CEPF | 2019 IMPACT REPORT

2000 to CEPF empowers nongovernmental organizations, indigenous groups, 30 June 2019 universities and private enterprises to protect the world’s biodiversity hotspots and help communities thrive. We do this through grants for conservation, organizational strengthening and sustainable development. 24 hotspot strategies implemented CEPF’S APPROACH • Donor partnership: CEPF is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Dével- oppement, Conservation International, the European Union, the Global 2,408 Environment Facility, the Government of Japan and the World Bank. grantees supported • Focused investment: On the basis of an assessment of opportunities and threats, CEPF donor partners choose which biodiversity hotspots to invest in as funding becomes available. US$242 million in grants • Participatory priority-setting: Grant making is guided by ecosystem committed profiles—analyses of the biodiversity and socio-economic conditions in each hotspot that are produced by, and in consultation with, local stakeholders. The result is a regional conservation strategy tailored to the most urgent needs, using practical solutions. US$376 million leveraged by • Local management: CEPF partners with a regional implementation team in those grants each biodiversity hotspot to help shepherd the investment and build local conservation leadership.

• Grants to civil society: Civil society entities—including nongovernmental 98 organizations, communities, indigenous peoples groups, universities and countries and territories benefited small businesses—apply for grants that are awarded on a competitive basis for projects that contribute to CEPF’s conservation strategy. • Enduring conservation: Projects funded by CEPF add up to a portfolio of 15.3 complementary conservation actions addressing critical priorities while million hectares of also building local conservation communities that will continue to lead protected areas created protection of the hotspots after CEPF funding is completed. • Achieving global goals: The results achieved by CEPF grantees comple- 8.2 ment governments’ efforts to meet targets related to the U.N.’s Convention million hectares of on Biological Diversity (the Aichi Biodiversity Targets), Framework Conven- production landscapes tion on Climate Change, and Sustainable Development Goals. with improved management

Cover image: (Alectroenas pulcherrimus). © O. Langrand 2 ElephantPlease photo: Africanvisit www.cepf.net elephant (Loxodonta for moreafricana), information. Uganda. © O. Langrand Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 3

Mediterranean Basin Caucasus Mountains of Central Asia US$10 million US$9.5 million US$8 million 2017–2022 2003–2013 November 2019-2024 US$10.7 million Mountains of 2012–2017 Southwest China Indo-Burma (Cumulative investment: US$7.9 million US$15.8 million US$20.7 million) 2002–2013 2013–2020 US$9.7 million 2008–2013 (Cumulative investment: Caribbean Islands US$25.5 million) US$6.9 million Eastern Afromontane 2010–2015 US$12 million 2012–2019 Himalaya Philippines Mesoamerica US$5 million US$7 million US$14.5 million 2005–2010 2002–2011 2002–2007 Western Ghats Guinean Forests of and Sri Lanka Tumbes-Chocó- Cerrado West Africa US$6 million Magdalena US$8 million US$10.1 million 2008–2015 US$6.95 million 2016–2021 2016–2022 2002–2013 US$8.3 million Coastal Forests and the Sundaland 2001–2012 of Eastern Africa Islands US$10 million Polynesia-Micronesia (Cumulative investment: US$8.75 million US$12.28 million 2001–2006 US$7 million US$18.4 million) 2004–2014 2015–2022 East Melanesian Islands 2008–2013 US$5.6 million Wallacea US$9 million 2001–2012 US$6.85 million 2013–2021 Succulent Karoo Tropical Andes (Cumulative investment: 2014–2019 US$10 million Atlantic Forest US$9.3 million US$17.88 million) 2015–2020 US$10.4 million 2003–2012 US$8.13 million 2002–2011 Maputaland-Pondoland-Albany 2001–2013 US$6.65 million (Cumulative investment: Cape Floristic Region 2010–2015 US$18.13 million) US$7.65 million PAST INVESTMENT 2001–2011 CURRENT INVESTMENT CEPF and the To qualify as a biodiversity hotspot, an area must There are 36 hotspots around the globe. CEPF meet two strict criteria: awards grants to civil society working on Biodiversity Hotspots • Contain at least 1,500 species of vascular conservation in developing countries within the plants found nowhere else on Earth (known as biodiversity hotspots. “endemic” species). Biodiversity Hotspots = Earth’s most biologically rich— As of 30 June 2019, CEPF had invested in 24 • Have lost at least 70 percent of its primary area yet threatened—terrestrial regions. biodiversity hotspots, and grants have benefited 98 of native vegetation. countries and territories.

4 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 5

I. INTRODUCTION

The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) CEPF and is supported by and linked to the other was established in 2000 to empower civil society in pillars. An empowered, knowledgeable and skilled developing countries and transitional economies to civil society is an essential foundation for sustainable protect the world’s biodiversity hotspots, which are biodiversity conservation. Human well-being is direct- some of Earth’s most biologically rich yet threatened ly linked to the success of biodiversity conservation terrestrial ecosystems. Since its inception in 2000, efforts because healthy ecosystems are essential for CEPF has awarded US$242 million in grants to 2,408 people’s lives and livelihoods, while ecosystems that civil society organizations. These grants have been are unhealthy or devoid of biodiversity cannot deliver implemented in 24 biodiversity hotspots, covering 98 the benefits that people need. Enabling conditions, countries and territories. The fund is a joint initiative such as sustainable financing and strong laws and of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conserva- policies are critical for successful conservation. CEPF tion International, the European Union, the Global measures progress in all four of these interlinked Environment Facility, the Government of Japan and pillars to gain a holistic understanding of the impact the World Bank. Additional donors support regional of the fund. components of the partnership. Each CEPF grant is assigned to one of the four pillars, CEPF’s aim, and its grantees’ achievements, have determined by identifying the major focus of the never been so important. With the biodiversity crisis grant. This allows CEPF to determine, broadly, the becoming more urgent every day, and climate change number of grants and amount allocated for each of exhibiting its devastating effects with increasing the pillars for the program as a whole. frequency, CEPF’s grantees are making solid prog- ress in protecting critical ecosystems, the species To date, CEPF has awarded 50 percent of its grants, and ecological processes that they support, and in just over US$117 million, under the biodiversity improving the lives of the people that depend on pillar, demonstrating the priority CEPF gives to this these ecosystems for their livelihoods and indeed, theme. Enabling conditions receives the second their very survival. largest allocation, noting that this amount includes funds to support the regional implementation teams Since its creation, CEPF has strived to articulate the (RITs), the on-the-ground institutions dedicated to achievements of its grantees and has employed sev- rolling out CEPF’s strategy and grant-making in the eral frameworks to measure its impact. These report- hotspots. RITs receive the first grant in each hotspot, ing practices have evolved over the years in an effort and perform a strategic and technical role in CEPF’s to be more accurate, precise, relevant and useful. grant-making throughout the investment period, in particular for the award of “small” grants (those The CEPF program contributes to four categories of under US$50,000), for which the RIT is fully respon- impact, known as the pillars of CEPF: biodiversity, sible. Civil society and human well-being receive 10% civil society, human well-being, and enabling condi- and 8% of the remaining funds, respectively. tions. The biodiversity pillar is the central focus of

New protected area Ulcinj Salina in Montenegro, part of the Mediterranean Basin Biodiversity Hotspot. © CZIP Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 7

Figure 1 shows the distribution of funds for each CEPF’s Global Monitoring Table 1 pillar. Framework Pillar and Indicators Target/ Goal Biodiversity What follows is a description of CEPF’s monitoring CEPF measures its global impact with 16 indicators, framework and the report of global impact from first adopted by CEPF’s Donor Council in June 2017. Each • Number of hectares of protected areas created and/or expanded. grant-making in January 2001 through 30 June 2019. indicator corresponds to one of CEPF’s four pillars, described above. CEPF has linked all 16 indicators • Number of hectares of Key Biodiversity Areas with improved management. to relevant United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and Convention on Biological Diversity Aichi • Number of hectares of production landscapes with strengthened management Biodiversity Targets (Table 1). Definitions for each of biodiversity. indicator are included in the results section of this • Number of protected areas with improved management (using the Management report. Effectiveness Tracking Tool).

Figure 1 • Number of globally threatened species benefiting from conservation action.

Distribution of Funds by Pillar Civil Society DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS BY PILLAR • Number of CEPF grantees with improved organizational capacity (using the Civil Society Tracking Tool). • Number of CEPF grantees with improved understanding of and commitment to gender issues (using the Gender Tracking Tool). • Number of networks and partnerships that have been created and/or strength- ened. Human Well-Being

• Number of people receiving structured training. Total: US$242 million • Number of people receiving non-cash benefits other than structured training. 50% Biodiversity 10% Civil Society • Number of people receiving cash benefits. 32% Enabling Conditions (17% – Regional • Number of projects promoting nature-based solutions to combat climate change. Implementation Teams)

8% Human Well-Being • Amount of CO2e sequestered in CEPF-supported natural habitats.

Enabling Conditions • Number of laws, regulations and policies with conservation provisions that have been enacted or amended.

• Number of companies that adopt biodiversity-friendly practices.

• Number of sustainable financing mechanisms that are delivering funds for conservation.

8 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 9

Achievement towards these global indicators is accomplishments at the end of the project. At this Data collection and reporting various aspects of protected area management. Upon measured only once for each grant, at the end of each time, grantees also report on their contribution to processes submission of monitoring reports and tracking tools, project. CEPF’s results are compiled annually for the portfolio indicators, as well as global indicators. All data are reviewed and validated by the respective program. For some indicators, where relevant, CEPF grantee reports are reviewed thoroughly by CEPF Each of CEPF’s grantees makes an important contri- regional implementation team and/or CEPF grant has reported on results by region. Several hotspots and/or regional implementation team staff, to ensure bution to CEPF’s global impact. CEPF’s monitoring director responsible for that grant. span regions; each region and what it includes, is accurate and valid reporting of achievements. system has evolved from a simplistic effort focused listed below. on rudimentary data collection and an emphasis on While CEPF has established procedures for data col- The second level is the hotspot level, for which each stories, to a complex framework applicable to grants lection and compilation, it is not without its challeng- • Africa: Cape Floristic Region; Eastern Afrom- portfolio has a logframe and targets associated with of all sizes and scope, capable of articulating global es. Below are some of the main challenges encoun- ontane (excluding Yemen); Coastal Forests of its specific investment strategy, made achievable be- impact and contributions to the U.N. Sustainable tered in preparing CEPF’s impact numbers. Eastern Africa; Guinean Forests of West Afri- cause of funding provided for the hotspot. Grantees, Development Goals and the Convention on Biological ca; Madagascar and the Indian Ocean Islands; at the end of their projects, are requested to record Diversity Aichi Biodiversity Targets in quantitative Interpretation Maputaland-Pondoland-Albany; Mediterranean their contributions to portfolio targets. Each hotspot and qualitative ways. • Misunderstanding about what an indicator Basin (North Africa only); Succulent Karoo. has a different set of portfolio indicators due to the means: Despite translation of CEPF’s reporting unique characteristics, challenges and opportunities CEPF’s monitoring framework allows for reporting formats into multiple languages, cultural differ- • Asia: Caucasus; Himalaya; Indo-Burma; Philip- present in the region. Since adoption of CEPF’s new on the program’s operational contribution as well ences can lead to varying interpretations of the pines; Mountains of Southwest China; Sundaland; monitoring framework in 2017, portfolio indicators as on impact. During the application process, prior indictors. Wallacea; Western Ghats and Sri Lanka. In FY20, are well correlated with CEPF’s global indicators. to project approval, each grant is assigned a pillar, this region will also include the Mountains of Progress towards achievement of hotspot targets is a project category (a subset of the pillar), a habitat, • Different interpretations of what an indicator Central Asia Biodiversity Hotspot, where a new assessed annually and reported in an annual portfo- one or more taxa if relevant, and applicable key means, irrespective of language: Each indicator investment is starting. lio overview. Assessment workshops are held at the words. These assignments allow the fund to ascer- has a definition, but even so, people’s under- mid-term and final stages of each portfolio invest- standing and experiences can lead to different • Caribbean: Caribbean Islands. tain amount of funds spent in certain categories and ment. for various themes, and facilitate analysis of data by interpretations. • Central America: Mesoamerica. hotspot and region. The ability to quantity how much The third level is the global level. In 2017 CEPF’s do- money has been spent on selected themes helps to Overreporting • Europe: Mediterranean Basin (excluding North nors approved a new monitoring framework with 16 frame results in terms of what CEPF grantees have Africa, Lebanon and Jordan). • This can occur when a grantee may have global indicators designed to yield clear and valuable been able to do with what they have been allocated. only achieved a partial result but reports it as • Middle East: Eastern Afromontane (Yemen only); data that articulates CEPF’s impact and will provide achieved. For example, a new protected area Mediterranean Basin (Lebanon and Jordan only). them with relevant results. Contributions to the Impact reporting is undertaken via comprehensive must be officially declared to be counted. A global indicators are recorded by grantees in their reporting tools and templates available in multiple • Pacific Islands: East Melanesian Islands; Polyne- grantee may report that an area has been de- final reports, as well as by regional implementation languages. Each grantee is responsible for completing sia-Micronesia. clared, because official declaration is imminent. teams who are able to report on collective portfo- selected monitoring tools, including regular program- However, such an accomplishment should not be • South America: Atlantic Forest; Cerrado; Tropical lio achievements that go beyond individual project matic progress reports, a final report, a final impact counted until it actually occurs. Andes; Tumbes-Chocó-Manabí. accomplishments. report, a gender tracking tool to measure change in understanding of and commitment to gender issues, Creative reporting and when applicable, a civil society tracking tool to CEPF grantees report on three levels. The first measure change in institutional capacity. Grantees • Grantees are proud of their accomplishments, level is project level, for which grantees report on that work on management of protected areas are as is CEPF. However, sometimes a grantee will project-specific targets and deliverables. Grantees also be asked to complete a Management Effec- alter or expand the results reported for a specific provide periodic updates via progress reports during tiveness Tracking Tool, which measures change in indicator, such that it is not possible to aggregate their project, followed by reporting on overall project the results with those from other projects.

10 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 11 Shoebill (Balaeniceps rex), Uganda. © O. Langrand

Maintaining a focus on reporting during Post-project contact to ensure comprehensive implementation reporting • Although grantees receive training at the start • CEPF’s grants are often awarded for initiatives of their project about reporting requirements that may require a significant amount of time and expectations, this focus can be lost in the to see a result, such as creation of a protected enthusiasm to implement the project. This means area. A grant may come to an end before a result that grantees may forget about portfolio and is achieved. In such instances, CEPF strives to global indicators, and may arrive at the end of maintain contact with grantees post-project so their project without collecting the necessary that when the result is achieved it can be record- data. For example, CEPF requires sex-disaggre- ed as part of CEPF’s impact. Grantees are usually gated data for some indicators. If grantees do not so enthusiastic about a result eventually being record such data, they may not be able to supply achieved that they communicate with CEPF. the required information. However, they are under no obligation to do so, and it may be that CEPF is under-reporting for Validation of grantee results some indicators as a consequence. • All grantee reports are thoroughly reviewed by a CEPF grant director or the regional implementa- These challenges are a constant focus for CEPF tion team, or both when relevant. These efforts MEOU, and its staff are dedicated to addressing these are supplemented by reviews of supporting doc- so that reporting procedures are better understood CEPF Pillar 1: umentation, correspondence with grantees, or and implemented, with the overall aim of ensuring site visits when possible. It is not possible to visit that CEPF’s results are as accurate and relevant as Biodiversity every grantee at the end their project, because possible. some are located in remote areas and funds are limited. Thus, while every effort is made to Indicator: Number of hectares of In FY19, CEPF saw the creation of numerous pro- understand what grantees are reporting, it is not protected areas created and/or tected areas, both large and small. To date, CEPF has supported the creation or expansion of 15,324,650 always feasible to physically see the results at expanded the project site. This means that the grant direc- hectares of new protected areas in 24 biodiversity hotspots. The figure of 15.3 million is a substantial tor and regional implementation team must strive Definition: To be counted, a new protected area must increase from the total at the end of fiscal year 2018, to maintain contact during the project. demonstrate formal legal declaration, and biodiversity growing by 480,000 hectares due to new achieve- conservation must be an official management goal. CEPF’s Monitoring, Evaluation and Outreach Unit ments in several hotspots where efforts came to If a protected area is expanded due to CEPF efforts, (MEOU) also reviews grantee reports when com- fruition this year, as is the case in the Tropical Andes. the area of expansion may be counted, but must also piling overall program results, thereby providing Additionally, some efforts undertaken by grantees in demonstrate formal legal declaration. New protected an additional avenue of communication with the years past are only now receiving formal legal rec- areas include national or local parks and reserves, grantee to verify and clarify results, as well as ognition, following continual focus after their CEPF private protected areas, marine parks and reserves, to gather additional qualitative information to grant ended, as is the case with the Ulcinj Salina pro- community protected areas such as fish conservation better present grantee results in CEPF’s various tected area in Montenegro. The charts below show zones and lands protected under stewardship and communications products. the number of hectares newly protected by hotspot, community agreements. Areas that do not have an and by region, since inception of the fund. official formal declaration may be included insofar as they are legally binding.

12 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 13

Figure 2

Protected Areas Created or Expanded, By Biodiversity Hotspot 15.3 MILLION HECTARES

Atlantic Forest 429,391 Cape Floristic Region 254,452.3 Caribbean Islands 116,604 Caucasus 16,9116 Cerrado 0 East Melanesian Islands 29,560 Eastern Afromontane 133,4151 Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests 200,471 Himalaya 0 Guinean Forests of West Africa 258,231.86 Indo-Burma 229,200.14 Madagascar and Indian Ocean Islands 158,7400 Maputaland-Pondoland-Albany 546,085 Mediterranean Basin 52,807 The Intag Toisán Municipal Conservation and Sustainable Use Area, located in northwest Ecuador. © Luis Calapi, Aves y Conservación Mesoamerica 457,417 Mountains of Southwest China 229,028 Intag Toisán: A new protected area in Ecuador Philippines 449,893 Polynesia-Micronesia 196,866.859 The Intag Toisán Municipal Conservation and Sustain- protection. Succulent Karoo 2,954,358 Sundaland 146,576 able Use Area (ACUS-MIT) lies in Cotacachi County in Tropical Andes 5,370,791.76 northwest Ecuador, an area of expansive cloud forest Fundación Prodeci worked to address the complex Tumbes-Chocó-Magdalena 124,185 also renowned for its mineral wealth. Rich in endemic challenges in the region by promoting sustainable Wallacea 1,076.63 species, rivers, watersheds and forests, this area has development of the territory, involving communi- Western Ghats and Sri Lanka 186,989 for many years experienced persistent threats from ties, NGOs and local governments. Prodeci garnered 0 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 agricultural expansion, encroachment, illegal logging strong support from local communities and munic-

Total and large-scale mining. Rampant deforestation and a ipal governments by emphasizing the area’s critical large gold mine have caused severe damage to water- importance for maintaining high quality and quantity Protected Areas Created sheds, which, when coupled with the consequences of water for downstream communities. The project or Expanded, By Region of climate change, have jeopardized the water supply included training activities, in particular for stake- South America 15.3 MILLION HECTARES for surrounding communities. holders to gain the necessary skills and tools for 39% public-community management of the area, such as Africa CEPF grantee Fundación Prodeci a Favor de los Dere- governance, leadership, management and monitoring. Pacific Islands Africa 47% chos Ciudadanos engaged with diverse stakeholders It also set up water-user associations to engage in Asia 1% including local communities and social and govern- community-driven management decision-making. Caribbean ment entities to participate actively in the creation of This new public-community management system Central America Middle East a new protected area, the ACUS-MIT. This protected will benefit the area’s abundant and diverse wildlife, Europe <1% area of 108,959 hectares was created in 2019, when forests and water reserves, and offers an exciting Middle East Central America Pacific Islands Europe the existing Toisán Municipal Protection Area (18,000 opportunity to bring community-led ecotourism to 3% Asia South America <1% Caribbean hectares) was recategorized and expanded with a the region. 1% 9% new status that includes sustainable use as well as

14 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 15

Ulcinj Salina, Montenegro, site of international importance for migratory . © Jovana Janjusevic New protection for Ulcinj Salina, Montenegro

For the past century, Ulcinj Salina in Montenegro has foraging to fall, and leaving the fragile ecosystems Children launching coral reef rehabilitation “building blocks” in the marine protected area near the village of Lamawolo on the western side of been one of Europe’s most important migratory in danger. The Center for Protection and Research Hadakewa Bay, Lembata Island, Nusa Tenggara Timur Province, Indonesia. © Barakat resting and breeding sites. Situated next to the small of Birds (CZIP) has been working with partners and coastal town of Ulcinj, the site was developed into a stakeholders to maintain and protect this site for Establishing marine sanctuaries in Lembata, Indonesia salt production complex in the 1920s, creating wealth more than 15 years (with CEPF support from 2013- for the town and a unique and bountiful ecosystem 2017), even launching a petition to save the site Lembata is one of several small islands lying between to address these threats and conserve the KBA by arising from the man-made salt pans. Over 250 spe- that was signed by more than 100,000 people and Flores and Timor in the Indonesian province of Nusa working with communities surrounding Hadakewa cies of birds visit it each year, including the greater presented to the Montenegrin government. Final- Tenggara Timur. The shallow seas surrounding Lem- Bay on the north side of the island. flamingo (Phoenicopterus roseus) and Dalmatian ly, in June 2019, the local parliament of the Ulcinj bata form a Key Biodiversity Area (KBA) that is home pelican (Pelecanus crispus). municipality voted to declare the salt pans a national to dugongs, turtles, whales, manta rays, dolphins and The key to Barakat’s work is to build upon the tradi- protected area in recognition of their distinct ecologi- numerous corals. The area suffers from destructive tional custom of muro, which means the temporary In 2003, the salt pans were privatized, and with lack cal and cultural value. fishing practices, like bombing, and from overfishing closure of an area, or a temporary ban on collection of maintenance and investments, salt production by trawlers. Its mangroves are being deforested and of resources from an area, to allow it to recover. slowed down, leading to bankruptcy a few years Although small, the 1,500-hectare new protected its coral reefs and seagrass are disappearing. Since Local people have long understood the concept of later. Plans were then prepared to transform the site area is of critical importance for migratory birds, June 2017, Lembaga Pengembangan Masyarakat letting farmland lie fallow or letting a fishery recover, into a luxury tourist resort. Meanwhile, salt produc- providing a site for hundreds of species to safely nest Lembata (the Lembata Community Development jointly agreeing on a period of muro. Barakat has tion ceased and the site’s water pumps were turned and rest during their migration through Europe. Association), known locally as Barakat, has strived been working with five communities surrounding off, causing the water levels essential for nesting and Continued on page 18.

16 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 17

Continued from page 17. Figure 3 Hadakewa Bay—Lamatokan, Lamawolo, Dikesare, hectares. The boundaries of each sanctuary were Key Biodiversity Areas with Improved Management, Tapobaran and Kolontobo—where muro is the basis demarcated in traditional ceremonies such that the by Biodiversity Hotspot for creation of a marine protected area (MPA). Each muro concept is locally “owned.” of the communities nominates people to an MPA 47.3 MILLION HECTARES management committee, called the Kapitan Sari Barakat is measuring “before” and “after” conditions. Atlantic Forest Lewa. The committee has both customary standing For example, in 2016, it was common for people to Cape Floristic Region (where traditional oaths performed by elders bind a net two to three sea turtles, on purpose or by acci- Caribbean Islands Caucasus community to protection of the bay) and modern ad- dent, every month. Since the delineation of the MPA Cerrado ministrative legal standing that allows the committee and the related awareness activities, only two turtles East Melanesian Islands to make rules about use and access and to prosecute have been caught in 24 months. Fishing communities Eastern Afromontane offenses. are noting the rebound of the fishery and enjoying Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests the ability to protect Hadakewa Bay from external Himalaya Guinean Forests of West Africa Due to Barakat’s work, the five communities have people using destructive fishing practices. Indo-Burma established six different nearshore sanctuaries that Madagascar and Indian Ocean Islands collectively form a protected area totaling 358.3 Maputaland-Pondoland-Albany Mediterranean Basin Mesoamerica Mountains of Southwest China Philippines Polynesia-Micronesia Succulent Karoo Indicator: Number of hectares Sundaland of Key Biodiversity Areas with Tropical Andes Tumbes-Chocó-Magdalena improved management Wallacea Western Ghats and Sri Lanka Definition: To be counted, an area must be a Key Key Biodiversity Areas are of paramount impor- Biodiversity Area, must benefit directly from CEPF tance to CEPF, and improving their management and 0 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000

funding, and there must be a substantive and mean- protection is a fundamental objective of CEPF. Key ingful positive change in the management/ protection Biodiversity Areas are sites contributing significantly Key Biodiversity of the Key Biodiversity Area. There must be a plausible to the global persistence of biodiversity, in terrestri- Areas with Improved attribution between CEPF grantee action and the al, freshwater and marine ecosystems. Sites qualify South America Management, by Africa strengthening of management in the Key Biodiversity as global Key Biodiversity Areas if they meet one 37% 29% Area. For an area to be considered as “strengthened,” or more of 11 criteria, clustered into five categories: Region it can benefit from a wide range of actions that con- threatened biodiversity, geographically restricted 47.3 MILLION HECTARES Pacific Islands tribute to improved management. Examples include: biodiversity, ecological integrity, biological processes, 1% increased patrolling, reduced intensity of snaring, and irreplaceability. Africa eradication, reduced incidence of fire Asia Middle East and introduction of sustainable agricultural/fisheries At the close of fiscal year 2019, CEPF had strength- Caribbean 2% Asia practices. ened the management and protection of 47,303,198 Central America Europe 20% Europe hectares of Key Biodiversity Areas in 24 hotspots. <1% Central America Middle East 10% Pacific Islands Caribbean South America 1%

18 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 19

Uganda’s Murchison Falls National Park, famous for its abundant wildlife and water resources. © O. Langrand

Adding a buffer zone for Murchison Falls National Park, Uganda

Murchison Falls National Park is a Key Biodiversity covers 40,000 hectares, all of which has been volun- Area and one of Uganda’s largest parks, covering tarily placed under protected status. Since creation of approximately 400,000 hectares and surrounding the conservancy in early 2019, AWF’s focus has been the confluence of the Victoria Nile and White Nile on improving the management of the area. Actions rivers. Like many East African grassland parks, it undertaken to improve its management include Critically Endangered mongoose lemur (Eulemur mongoz), from northwestern Madagascar. © Travis Steffens

is unfenced. Historically, elephants and other her- recruitment and training of 15 community members Community conservation in Ankarafantsika National Park, Madagascar bivores would have followed seasonal migration as MAFC community scouts, in collaboration with routes north toward present-day South Sudan. Today, the Uganda Wildlife Authority. These individuals farming communities surround the northern border have been trained in basic tactics, wildlife and related Ankarafantsika National Park contains one of the five The project has confronted the fire threat head on by of the park along the two-lane blacktop Gulu-Arua legislation, anti-poaching and patrolling techniques, largest blocks of western primary forest in Mada- creating firebreaks, patrolling, creating and distribut- Road. Without fences, the park suffers from poach- prevention of illegal activities, and community rela- gascar. The park is home to eight different species ing an educational film, holding stakeholder meetings ers who can easily enter to place snares—primarily tions. The scouts advise farmers on -friendly of lemur—five of which are Endangered or Critically and responsible fire days, conducting household for bushmeat—while the communities suffer from agriculture methods and how to ward off Endangered—and many other endemic and threat- surveys and building capacity. At project close, local animals that wander outside the park, particularly with nonlethal means. They have also been provided ened species. The park is under pressure from fire communities had cut and maintained 15 kilometers elephants, which can destroy farms, and buffaloes, with appropriate gear such as field boots and back caused by people to provoke regrowth of grass for of firebreaks, with the aim of stopping large, in- which are aggressive toward people. packs. Since receiving their training, the scouts have cattle grazing and charcoal production. To conserve tense fires from entering the management zone. The been conducting patrols as part of efforts to stem the park and its biodiversity, Planet Madagascar firebreaks were marked with educational signs and The African Wildlife Foundation (AWF) has worked to illegal activities (including wildlife poaching). The Association has taken a community-based conserva- periodically patrolled to prevent illegal activity and create a conservancy on the northern border of Mur- scouts also participate in ecological monitoring to tion approach, working hand in hand with the local fires within the management zone, and to monitor for chison Falls National Park, known as the Murchison protect wildlife, ensure that zoning schemes and by- communities living in and around the park. They have the presence of lemurs. Over the course of the proj- Aswa Falls Conservancy (MAFC). This conservancy laws under the conservancy’s management plan are implemented practical fire management solutions ect, 632 patrols were conducted. Efforts also entailed serves as a buffer zone for the park, and ensuring adhered to, and educate and engage with the local and promoted conservation education, working in preparation and screening of an educational film that it is well-managed is imperative for the wildlife population. an 8,000-hectare management zone, representing about the importance of lemurs to forests and people in the park. The conservancy has 128 members and approximately 6% of Ankarafantsika National Park. (lemurs are important seed dispersers), and the im- Continued on page 22.

20 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 21

Figure 4 Production Landscapes with Strengthened Management, by Biodiversity Hotspot 8.2 MILLION HECTARES Atlantic Forest Cape Floristic Region Caribbean Islands Caucasus Cerrado East Melanesian Islands Eastern Afromontane Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests Himalaya Guinean Forests of West Africa Indo-Burma Firebreak at Ankarafantsika National Park. © Mamy Razafitsalama Madagascar and Indian Ocean Islands Maputaland-Pondoland-Albany Continued from page 21. Mediterranean Basin pact of fire on lemurs, forests and people. Household from 2015 to 2018, which resulted in fires within the Mesoamerica surveys were also conducted to assist with making park’s management zone, Planet Madagascar As- Mountains of Southwest China decisions about how to best serve the communities sociation was still successful in protecting all 4,357 Philippines Polynesia-Micronesia and address the main conservation and community hectares of forest in the 8,000-hectare management Succulent Karoo development threats facing lemurs and people. zone via firebreaks and fighting fire. This success, Sundaland coupled with conservation education and communi- Tropical Andes Although the project was challenged by the drought ty engagement, has been good news for the lemurs Tumbes-Chocó-Magdalena that was affecting Madagascar and southern Africa living in Ankarafantsika National Park. Wallacea Western Ghats and Sri Lanka 0 400,000 800,000 1,200,000 1,600,000

Indicator: Number of hectares Production landscapes, areas where people con- Production Landscapes of production landscapes with duct agriculture, forestry, or extraction of natural with Strengthened products, can be very important for biodiversity. strengthened management of Management, by Region South America biodiversity CEPF supports grantees to integrate management of 23% biodiversity into these landscapes, and since 2001 8.2 MILLION HECTARES Definition: A production landscape is an area where has contributed to the strengthened management Africa Pacific Islands agriculture, forestry or natural product exploitation of biodiversity in 8,207,848 hectares. CEPF began Africa 41% occurs. For an area to be considered as “strength- to systematically record achievements in production Asia 3% ened,” it can benefit from a wide range of actions that landscapes in 2008, and therefore hotspots receiving Caribbean Middle East contribute to improved management. Examples of investment prior to this date are underrepresented in Central America Europe 12% interventions include: best practices and guidelines global figures. Europe <1% Middle East implemented, incentive schemes introduced, sites/ Caribbean Pacific Islands Central America Asia products certified and sustainable harvesting regula- <1% South America tions introduced. 1% 20%

22 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 23

reserves mandated to preserve traditional grass- Indicator: Number of land usage by local communities, on which the protected areas with improved poorest members of society still rely and without management which grassland would revert to scrub. The work undertaken by WCS and partners has focused on Definition: The purpose of this indicator is to track identifying biodiversity-friendly sustainable rice the management effectiveness of protected areas production practices that allow Bengal florican to that receive CEPF investment. persist and breed successfully in a farming envi- ronment. CEPF strives to track the management effective- ness of protected areas that have received CEPF CEPF’s current support to WCS entails catalyzing investment. The tool that CEPF uses to collect the uptake of biodiversity-friendly management this information is the Management Effectiveness practices in large-scale rice production landscapes Tracking Tool (METT). Changes in score are deter- in Stoung District, Kompong Thom Province, and mined by comparing a baseline scorecard to a final ensuring that biodiversity values are an integral scorecard completed at the end of investment in a part of the Sustainable Rice Platform (SRP), an targeted protected area. emerging global standard for environmentally and socially sustainable rice cultivation. In terms of To date, CEPF has received 363 METT score- cultivated area and number of farmers, the project cards from 215 protected areas in 17 biodiversity became the largest SRP pilot in Cambodia, which hotspots (Cape Floristic Region, Caribbean Islands, enabled WCS to have traction with both national Caucasus, Cerrado, Eastern Afromontane, Guinean policy and the global SRP standards and indicators, Forests of West Africa, Indo-Burma, Madagascar Staff of CEPF grantees Wildlife Conservation Society and Sansom Mlup Prey inspecting wildlife-friendly cover crops in Cambodia. which are being revised to incorporate new criteria and the Indian Ocean Islands, Maputaland-Pon- © CI/photo by A.W. Tordoff on land conversion and biodiversity. During the doland-Albany, Mediterranean Basin, Meso- project, more than 400 farmers were trained in Wildlife-friendly rice in Cambodia america, Mountains of Southwest China, Polyne- sustainable rice production practices and 2,000 sia-Micronesia, Succulent Karoo, Tropical Andes, hectares of production landscape benefited from Tumbes-Chocó-Magdalena and Wallacea). As of Indo-Burma’s Tonle Sap Lake and Inundation Zone is dry-season rice is causing a loss of grassland and the the adoption of management practices that are June 2019, 111 of the 215 protected areas had a an area of remarkable hydrology. Heavy rain in the increasing conversion of scrubland to more intensive friendly to wildlife species. Such practices include baseline and a subsequent METT scorecard. Out of headwaters of the Mekong causes an annual rever- agriculture. This is likely to have caused a decline field leveling to reduce dependence on chemical these 111 protected areas, 89 showed an improve- sal in the flow of the Tonle Sap, which increases the in fish populations, and loss of grassland is thought pesticides and use of legumes as cover crops, ment in their management effectiveness. For eight size of the lake from 250,000 hectares to 1.5 million to be the cause of the decline in the Bengal florican improving soil nutrition and providing cover for hotspots with a significant number of completed hectares. This annual flood pulse delivers water, population, now numbering less than 600. Bengal floricans. METT scorecards in fiscal year 2019, there was an fish and sediment to areas that are underwater for increase in management effectiveness of 12 points only a part of the year. The area has exceptional For nearly 20 years, Wildlife Conservation Society On the strength of the project, WCS was invited on average (+31 percent) (Figure 5). As such, CEPF biodiversity value, with its flagship species being the (WCS) has collaborated with government and non- to host the SRP plenary, which was held in Cam- has been contributing to Aichi Biodiversity Target Bengal florican (Houbaropsis bengalensis), a Critical- governmental partners to conserve the floodplain bodia in January 2019. This places WCS in a good 11 in helping countries increase the percent of cov- ly Endangered bird that is a CEPF priority species. and its rich biodiversity. This effort has been chal- position to influence the future development of this erage of protected area that has been assessed, as Bengal floricans breed in the floodplain between lenging and complex, as the lives of local people, initiative, which has attracted major purchasers of well as increasing their management effectiveness February/March and July, spending the flood season habitats and species are delicately interwoven in rice. over time. outside of the floodplain. Rapid expansion of irrigated this area. The work has entailed setting up grassland

24 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 25

Figure 5 coordinator from Fundação Pró Natureza–Funatura. while all the others remained stable. Most impor- Protected Areas Management “The METT was the tool used to update information tantly, the project was successful in receiving ap- Average and Percentage Change in Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool from protected areas. Due to its practicality and the proval for the updated DTBC for the entire mosaic, in directing of the questions to the topics of interest of identifying 30 priority areas and six priority corridors the project, it facilitated the participation of protect- important for zoning, and in identifying 19 agro-ex- 30.0 100% ed area managers in the Integrated Management tractive products that can be sustainably produced

88% 90% Working Group and qualified the information that and promoted as a source of income in the region. 25.0 later became actions and proposals within the DTBC 80% 24.3 plan.” 19.8 70% 20.0 60% At the end of the project, METT assessments were 14.9 conducted again to obtain final scores. Five protect- 15.0 47% 12.8 50% 11.9 ed areas (33%) showed an increase in their score 40% 9.4 10.0 34% 8.2 31% 28% 30% 24% 20% 4.2 20% 5.0 1.3 7% 10% 3% 0.0 0% Caribbean Cerrado Indo- Maputaland- Mediterranean Polynesia- Tropical Wallacea Total Islands Burma Pondoland- Basin Micronesia Andes Albany

Sertão Veredas-Peruaçu mosaic,

The Sertão Veredas-Peruaçu mosaic, located in Brazil mosaic through revision of the DTBC, elaboration of in the Cerrado Biodiversity Hotspot, is a collection of socio-environmental zoning and the implementation 25 protected areas (10 of which were created in 2018 of a mosaic fund. The team worked with the manage- with support from CEPF), private lands and indige- ment authorities of each of the 15 protected areas nous territories. The mosaic contains several endemic existing at project start within the mosaic to obtain and threatened species and significant water resourc- baseline Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool es. This area of 3 million hectares is being managed (METT) assessments. The work done on the DTBC in as a whole, guided by a Conservation-Based Terri- part benefited from the results of the METT assess- torial Development Plan (DTBC). Given the different ments. “One cannot fail to mention the opportunity categories of use, including fully protected areas and that this project provided to the managers of the sustainable-use units, varying conservation objec- Sertão Veredas-Peruaçu Mosaic Conservation Units, tives must be taken into consideration. to deepen and broaden the debate on the impor- tance of integrated management as a fundamental

For the past two years, Fundação Pró Natureza–Fu- instrument to guarantee the integrity of the protect- In the Cerrado’s Sertão Veredas-Peruaçu mosaic, protected area managers participate in the Integrated Management Working Group to prepare a natura worked to strengthen the management of the ed areas of the mosaic,” said Fernando Lima, project collaborative map and conduct a METT assessment. © Paulo Henrique Gonçalves de Souza

26 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 27

Indicator: Number of globally have benefited from conservation action, dating from threatened species benefiting the start of grant-making in 2001. At that time an from conservation action initial number was calculated by counting the num- ber of globally threatened species occurring in Key Definition: To be counted, a species must benefit from Biodiversity Areas where CEPF investments have an intervention that has direct conservation action. strengthened biodiversity conservation and deter- Examples include: preparation or implementation of a mined that 1,250 had benefited. In 2019, instead of conservation action plan, captive breeding programs, this overarching method, CEPF reviewed all project habitat protection, species monitoring, patrolling documentation to identify the species benefiting, to halt wildlife trafficking, and removal of invasive and the action taken in the project, and calculated species. that since inception of the fund, CEPF grants have benefited 882 species. Although a lower number, it In 2017, CEPF revised its species indicator to deter- is more precise and CEPF has documented the action mine the number of globally threatened species that taken by the grantee to benefit each species.

Figure 6

Number of Threatened Species Benefiting from Conservation Critically Action, 2001-2019 Endangered Vulnerable TOTAL: 882 250 383 A species survey underway. © L. Njoroge Endangered Conservation of the Kenya jewel 249

Figure 7 The Kenya jewel (Platycypha amboniensis) is a Crit- become important in identifying priority habitats for ically Endangered dragonfly found only in the Ab- conservation. Reptile Taxa Benefiting from Amphibian 8% erdare Mountains and Mt. Kenya in central Kenya. CEPF Conservation 13% Dragonflies may only be small creatures, but they Action contribute immensely to our well-being. They are ex- 2001-2019 Plant 13% perienced hunters feeding on disease-causing mos- quitoes, thereby reducing the disease burden and Bird the nuisance, and they are also extremely sensitive 23% to pollution. Since 2018, the National Museums of Kenya has received CEPF support to work with local Mammal communities to conduct surveys, produce distribu- 17% tion maps and checklists, and develop species action plans for red-listed dragonfly species occurring in Fish this area. They are also using a tool, the Dragonflies Invertebrate 3% Biotic Index (DBI), to assess the general health of 23% a habitat using dragonflies. This has increasingly The Kenya jewel dragonfly. © L. Njoroge

28 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 29

HIGHLIGHTS: SPECIES THAT HAVE BENEFITED FROM CEPF-FUNDED PROJECTS

Conserving the Banks flying fox by delivering knowledge to communities

East Melanesian Islands Biodiversity Hotspot Hatchlings. © Bou Vorsak © Ciro Albano © Endri Haxhiraj

The Banks flying fox (Pteropus fundatus), listed as Endangered on the IUCN Red List of Threat- Nest protection and hatchling release Working toward a resurgence of the Biodiversity survey yields new data ened Species, is endemic to a group of six small islands in the remote north of Vanuatu. The of the Endangered Asian giant blue-eyed ground dove on Albanian endemic Tulipa albanica scientific record of this small reddy-brown flying fox is scant, with only a handful of reported softshell turtle Cerrado Biodiversity Hotspot Mediterranean Basin occurrences and a few specimens in museums. The team from the Vanuatu Environmental Indo-Burma Biodiversity Hotspot Biodiversity Hotspot Science Society (VESS) is addressing this knowledge gap by conducting surveys to gather local The blue-eyed ground dove (Columbina knowledge as well as ecological and distribution data to identify important habitat for these bats. Conservation International and Wildlife cyanopis) is found only in the Cerrado re- The Critically Endangered Albanian tulip VESS is working with the local communities living in and close to Banks flying fox habitat to Conservation Society have been working gion of Brazil. Listed as Critically Endan- (Tulipa albanica) was first discovered ensure the survival of this species. Increasing awareness of the ecosystem services bats deliver to conserve the Asian giant softshell gered on the IUCN Red List of Threatened in 2013 with a population of only 250 to people has changed peoples’ minds about animals that they used to see as pests that raid the turtle (Pelochelys cantorii) in Cambodia Species, and with no recorded sightings individuals. Instituti i Politikave Mjedisore fruit in their gardens. In these cyclone-prone islands, the people now understand the vital role in two consecutive projects focusing in the past 75 years, the bird was thought (IEP) is working to ensure the survival of that bats play in dispersing seeds needed for regeneration of habitat after storms, not just for the © Vanuatu Environmental Science on nest protection, hatchling release, to be extinct in the wild. Remarkably, in this species by conserving its habitat and bats but for the people too. This has resulted in bats being protected from hunting in traditional Society / Image by Christina Shaw awareness and community patrolling. 2016, 12 individuals of the species were creating a generation of skilled botanists “Tabu” areas and bans on hunting in roosting trees. Since the initiative began in 2007, a total seen in a small area. Since this exciting and professionals to continue working 9,047 hatchlings from 402 protected discovery, SAVE Brasil has been working on the protection of endemic species nests have been released. Combined with to understand the natural history and in northeast Albania. IEP is increasing outreach, education and communication limiting factors for the conservation of knowledge and skills through surveys and activities, aimed at building support for the blue-eyed ground dove, implement a studies, using the information for conser- turtle conservation among local commu- conservation action plan, search for new vation planning, and strengthening the nities and the wider public, the project areas of occurrence, engage with local engagement of stakeholders in to support made a significant contribution to efforts communities, promote bird watching tour- species conservation. Recent survey work © IDEP Foundation/ Conservation through to restore the Asian giant softshell turtle ism and disseminate information about has already led to the discovery of a new Image by Gede Sugiarta pride: the sampiri population in the Mekong River and avert the species to the general public. population of this species, raising the Echo parakeets. © O. Langrand Wallacea Biodiversity Hotspot its . known number of individuals to over 750. birds make a comeback Madagascar and the Indian Ocean Islands The endangered red-and-blue lory (Eos histrio), known in Bahasa © Asociación Armonía - Márton Hardy © Vasco Pissarra Indonesia as a sampiri bird or as a Nuri Talaud, is one of at least Thanks to decades of dedicated 11 globally threatened bird species on the small island groups of effort by numerous conserva- Sangihe and Talaud, mid-way between Sulawesi (Indonesia) and tion organizations, including the Mindanao (the Philippines). The sampiri, with its bright colors, is Reforestation of mountain habitats Mauritian Wildlife Foundation, a magnet for the traders of illegally captured birds. At the same to conserve Captive breeding of two endemic birds, the echo time, it is a local icon–a species around which people can rally in Polylepis pepei the Obô snail . © O. Langrand parakeet (Psittacula eques) the name of protecting an entire set of Key Biodiversity Areas. and the pink pigeon (Nesoenas CEPF made a series of grants to Perkumpulan Sampiri working Tropical Andes Biodiversity Hotspot Guinean Forests of West Africa Biodiversity Hotspot mayeri) were downlisted by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Spe- on Sangihe Island and to Yayasan IDEP Selaras Alam and local cies in 2019 from Endangered to Vulnerable. Both species have partners on Talaud to conserve sampiri habitat and intervene in Asociación Armonía is working to conserve highly threatened The giant land snail, also known as the Obô snail (Archachatina suffered declines due to significant loss of forests on Mauritius; illegal trade. The grantees raised local awareness of the value of forests of Polylepis trees and other globally threatened species bicarinata), listed as Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List of Threat- predation by introduced cats, rats and monkeys; and competi- the bird species and the entire habitat that it occupies, worked that live in the Madidi and Cotapata national parks in Bolivia. In ened Species, is found only in the island nation of São Tomé tion with introduced invasive birds. A combination of captive with local authorities to monitor trade and stop hunting, and these high Andean Mountain habitats, Asociación Armonía has and Príncipe. It has suffered a rapid decline in the last several breeding, releases into the wild, nest improvement, artificial promoted the adoption of environmentally friendly agricultural implemented an integrated program to support reforestation decades due to habitat loss and indirect competition with the nest provision, supplementary feeding, eggs and chick rescue practices. Ultimately, the grants improved the management with Polylepis and other native trees. Provision of efficient introduced invasive West African giant snail. Grantee Alisei and manipulations, predator and competitor control, as well as of 2,157 hectares of protected forest on Sangihe and 6,720 cook stoves has reduced demand for fuelwood, and threatened ONG is creating an Obô snail conservation breeding center and introduction of birds onto private estates, has helped to secure hectares of agricultural buffer zone surrounding a protected species are benefiting from implementation of conservation raising awareness about conservation of Obô National Park, the future for these two species. area on Talaud. action plans. home to this threatened species.

30 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 31

Figure 8

CEPF Pillar 2: Capacities Improved NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS WITH INCREASED CAPACITIES Civil Society PER INVESTMENT STATUS AND ONGOING HOTSPOTS

80

of Southwest China, Mesoamerica, Polyne- 74 Indicator: Number of CEPF 81% 80% 72 69 grantees with improved sia-Micronesia, Western Ghats and Sri Lanka, 60 organizational capacity Tumbes-Chocó-Magdalena. 56 69% 59 68% 51 49 • More recently started investments for which 40 55% 47 44 Definition: CEPF measures change in organizational most final assessments are still pending:Cerra - 38 50% capacity with a self-assessment tool that aims to mon- do, Guinean Forests of West Africa, Madagascar 41% itor a civil society organization’s capacity to effectively 20 and the Indian Ocean Islands, East Melanesian 21 18 plan, implement and evaluate actions for biodiversity Islands. 12 6 conservation. This is determined by five major fac- 0 tors: (i) its available human resources; (ii) its financial • Ongoing investments: Eastern Afromontane, Closed More recent Eastern Indo-Burma Mediterranean Tropical Andes Wallacea resources; (iii) its management systems, which ensure Indo-Burma, Mediterranean Basin, Tropical hotspots hotspots Afromontane Basin that available resources are translated into effective Andes and Wallacea. # of CSOs with complete CSTT cycle # of CSO with increased capacities actions; (iv) its strategic planning, which ensures that % of CSOs with increased capacities these actions target conservation priorities; and (v) Out of the 368 organizations that completed their reporting cycles, 248 recorded an increase in organi- its delivery, which ensures that these actions effect Figure 9 change. The tool should be completed twice, at the zational capacity (67%). Figure 8 presents the results per investment status with the ongoing investments start of a project and at the end of the project. Local Average Change of Civil Society Organizations Capacities and national grantees are required to complete the presented by hotspot. PER INVESTMENT STATUS AND PER ONGOING HOTSPOTS Civil Society Tracking Tool. As per Figure 9, which presents the average baseline and final scores for each hotspot, there is CEPF measures change in civil society capacity 80 16% using the Civil Society Tracking Tool (CSTT), which an overall weighted average increase of 5.9 points was introduced as a pilot in 2009–2010 in two (+9%) in the capacities of civil society organiza- 60 hotspots, and rolled out to all active hotspots at tions. This weighted average is obtained by multi- 12% 10% the start of fiscal year 2013. plying the average of each hotspot by the number of civil society organizations with a complete cycle 40 At the close of fiscal year 2019, CEPF had received for this hotspot. 6% 368 complete assessment cycles (baseline plus 5% 5% Civil society organizations from Wallacea display 20 final) from recipients of large grants, small grants 2% (US$50,000 or less) and subgrants. The 368 orga- the lowest baseline average capacities, shortly fol- lowed by the Mediterranean Basin (score close to nizations that submitted a complete assessment 0 come from 16 hotspots: 60 points which is 5 points lower than the global Closed More recent Eastern Indo-Burma Mediterranean Tropical Andes Wallacea average baseline score). However, these organiza- hotspots hotspots Afromontane Basin • Completed investments: Caribbean Islands, tions have seen an increase in their capacities with Average baseline score Average final score % of change baseline to final Maputaland-Pondoland-Albany, Mountains

32 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 33

an average final score above 60 points (63 and hotspot, the percent changes in their CSTT scores, 67 points respectively). Yet hotspots still remain and by relating this to the total number of complet- below the global average final score of 71 points. ed CSTT cycles to understand the percentage of the hotspot’s contribution to change. For example, Figure 10 shows the contribution that each hotspot while 91 percent of Polynesia-Micronesia’s partic- makes to CEPF’s impact pertaining to change in ipating grantees showed an increase in capacity, civil society capacity. To date, the Mediterranean because the number of participating grantees was Basin Biodiversity Hotspot still contributes the only 11, this represents a smaller contribution than most to CEPF’s impact on capacity building of civil a hotspot such as Indo-Burma, where 59 grantees society organizations globally. These figures are participated and 80 percent of them increased derived by considering the number of civil soci- their capacities to date. ety organizations with complete cycles in each

Figure 10

Contribution of Each Hotspot to CEPF Global Impact on Civil Society Organizations’ Capacities

Caribbean Islands Western Ghats and Sri Lanka 5% Cerrado

Wallacea 9% 1% East Melanesian Islands Grantees in Wallacea receive training in conservation and natural resource management. Tumbes-Chocó- 7% 0% Magdalena © CI/photo by Aulia Erlangga 1% Eastern Afromontane Regional capacity building in Wallacea

Tropical Andes 15% 2% The story of civil society capacity building in Wal- NGOs. The result was that Wallacea had relatively Guinean Forests of West Africa lacea parallels the story of conservation action in weak civil society organizations, particularly those Polynesia Micronesia 0% the region, which parallels the story of economic working in the environmental sector. 8% development in the region. Wallacea, encompassing the central portion of Indonesia, and the whole of One CEPF goal was to remedy this situation, not only

Mountains of Timor-Leste, was historically lower on the list of strengthening individual organizations, but bringing Southwest China Indo -Burma Indonesian national development priorities. Without them into the larger national fold. CEPF engaged 3% 18% the huge population and economic might of Java and Yayasan Penabulu, a specialist in capacity building Bali, and without the natural resources of Sumatra, from the country’s democratization movement of Mesoamerica Kalimantan and West Papua, there was not the same the early 2000s, to work with the Wallacea region-

1% Madagascar and level of activity, education or civic engagement in al implementation team, Burung Indonesia, to run Indian Ocean Islands Sulawesi, Maluku and the Lesser Sundas. Similarly, trainings on organizational management. Also, as Mediterranean Basin 2% without the large forests, tigers or orangutans found many of the Wallacea civil society organizations had Maputaland- Pondoland-Albany on the more well-known islands, the region did not experience in livelihoods or political action, but not 26% 2% garner the same attention from major conservation conservation, trainings focused on methods for im- Continued on page 36.

34 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 35

Continued from page 35.

proving the management of Key Biodiversity Areas. Figure 11 Figure 12 Ultimately, Penabulu strengthened the capacity of 75 grantees and other partners, as measured by the Change in Average CSTT Gender Integration Scores in Wallacea Civil Society Tracking Tool at the beginning of Penab- AVERAGE SCORES AND PERCENTAGE ulu training and at the end of a CEPF-funded activity. CHANGE IN GENDER TRACKING TOOL Further, with their increased capacity, civil society 18.0 60% organizations from Wallacea were able to take part Baseline Endline in the Jakarta-based Forum on Community Forestry, Human Resources 16.0 15.3 50% the collection of NGOs formally invited by the gov- 20.00 50% 14.72 ernment to help revise the national biodiversity and 14.0 15.00 12.7 forestry law. 10.00 12.0 40% 7.20 Financial Delivery 14.76 14.80 26% 5.00 10.0 9.9 Figure 11 shows the increase in capacity for those 7.87 6.68 Resources 24%9.6 10.0 9.3 CEPF grantees and other, non-grantee partners that 0.00 22% 8.5 30% 7.9 7.9 7.8 that worked with Burung Indonesia and Yayasan 8.0 19% 7.3 7.5 7.79 8.03 6.8 6.7 Penabulu. 20% 6.0 5.7 6.0 17% 20% 15.40 13% Management Strategic 16.61 4.0 Planning Systems 10% 2.0

0.0 0% Cerrado Eastern Guinean Indo-Burma Madagascar Tropical Wallacea Total Afromontane Forests of II and Indian Andes II Since 2016, CEPF has worked to integrate gender West Africa Ocean Islands Indicator: Number of CEPF concerns into its program at all levels. CEPF has Average baseline score Average final score % Change grantees with improved developed a gender policy and a Gender Tracking understanding of and Tool, both of which were launched in 2017. commitment to gender issues *“II” after Indo-Burma and Tropical Andes indicates that these scores have been gathered from grantees participating in CEPF’s second As of June 2019, CEPF approved 407 assess- investment in these two hotspots; the first investments in these hotspots predated the Gender Tracking Tool. Definition: CEPF measures change in understanding of ments from recipients of large grants, small grants and commitment to gender issues with a tracking tool. (US$50,000 or less) and subgrants across nine It is a self-assessment tool that can be used by an or- hotspots: Cerrado, East Melanesian Islands, Eastern Of the organizations with a baseline and a final Analysis of the specific questions in the Gender ganization to understand if and to what extent gender Afromontane, Guinean Forests of West Africa, In- assessment, 84% are nongovernmental organizations, Tracking Tool reveals where grantees are making considerations have been integrated into its program do-Burma, Madagascar and the Indian Ocean Islands, 7% are academic/research institutions, 6% are private gains. The tracking tool contains eight questions: and operations. It consists of eight questions for a Mediterranean Basin, Tropical Andes and Wallacea. sector/cooperative and 2% are community groups. 1. Does your organization have a written policy total possible score of 20, with the last question being At present, 89 civil society organizations have sub- With still too few completed assessments for some that affirms a commitment to gender equali- a yes-no-maybe choice on whether the grantee would mitted a baseline and a final assessment. For these types of organization, no trend can be highlighted at ty? like to receive more information about gender. The tool organizations, the overall average baseline score this stage in terms of variance in gender integration 2. Are there people in your organization respon- should be completed twice, at the start of a project and was 7.8 points (39%) and the average final score is among different types of organizations. sible for gender issues? at the end of the project. All grantees are required to 9.6 (48%). This represents an increase of 24% over a complete the Gender Tracking Tool. period of about two years (2017–2019). 3. Have any staff in your organization ever

36 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 37

received training on gender issues? The highest increase of score is on whether organi- 4. Is gender analysis built into your program zations are collecting sex-disaggregated data about planning procedures? the people impacted by their projects. A contributing factor explaining this increase may be that CEPF 5. Do you collect sex-disaggregated data about grantees are requested to report back on the number the people impacted by your projects? of men and the number of women directly benefiting 6. Does your organization monitor and evaluate from their project as part of their standard end- how your projects and programs impact men of-project reporting requirements. Where gender and women differently? integration remains low is on the issue of designated 7. Does your organization allocate financial re- staff responsible for gender issues. However, most sources to incorporate gender into its work? respondents said that their staff had received more 8. Would your organization be interested in training on gender integration over the past two being contacted by the RIT to learn more or years. A contributing factor could be that grantees receive training about gender issues? are using CEPF’s Gender Toolkit, one of the most downloaded documents on the CEPF website.

Figure 13

Evolution of Gender Integration Among

Civil Society Organizations from Fiscal Baseline Final Women on Touguissoury, Guinée, being trained in solar salt production. © Guinee Écologie Year 2017 to Fiscal Year 2019 Addressing gender issues in Guinea

Written policy 2.00 While CEPF uses the Gender Tracking Tool to mea- taking gender into account,” said Executive Director sure change in understanding of and commitment to Mamadou Diawara. “Admittedly, it was the first time Financial resources for gender issues, the tool can be used for so much more. that our organization had assessed itself on the issue Sta dedicated to gender gender of gender. This evaluation aroused the interest of our 1.00 Guinée Écologie received a CEPF small grant to work organization to integrate the gender issue within the on the island of Touguissoury in southern Guinea organization’s bodies and beyond its planning.” to mobilize local communities to conserve their mangrove resources. Efforts focused on preparing a At project completion, a final GTT yielded a score of 0.00 participatory management plan and development of 12 (out of a maximum of 20). Guinée Écologie now Gender monitoring and Sta with appropriate biodiversity-friendly income-generating activities. has a gender policy, one staff person leading on evaluation training gender issues, other staff familiarized with gender Upon completing the baseline Gender Tracking Tool issues and integration needs, and a commitment to and reaching a score of only 2, the group realized collect sex-disaggregated data to help monitor how that they had much to learn. the organization’s projects impact men and women Sex-disaggregated data Gender analysis built into differently. collected programs “The CEPF Gender Tracking Tool allowed us to un- derstand our weaknesses and our needs in terms of

Baseline Final 38 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 39

Indicator: Number of networks CEPF was founded as a partnership, and partner- and partnerships that have been ships remain fundamental at all levels, including created and/or strengthened donor partners, the CEPF Secretariat, regional im- plementation teams and grantees. Partnerships/net- Definition: Networks/partnerships should have some works created or supported by grantees are especial- lasting benefit beyond immediate project implementa- ly important, as these can make a huge difference in tion. Informal networks/partnerships are acceptable assuring the sustainability of conservation outcomes. even if they do not have a memorandum of under- They can secure broad support for conservation ac- standing or other type of validation. Examples of net- tions, promote inclusion among diverse stakeholders, works/partnerships include: an alliance of fisherfolk to and increase the likelihood that conservation efforts promote sustainable fisheries practices, a network of and activities will be sustainable. In fiscal year 2019, Participants in the “Women of the Cerrado” meeting held in Brasilia. © Luana Campos ECOA environmental journalists, a partnership between one CEPF recorded a significant increase in the number or more nongovernmental organizations with one or of partnerships and networks supported, up from Mainstreaming gender in the Cerrado more private sector partners to improve biodiversity 249 in fiscal year 2018 to 407 partnerships in fiscal management on private lands, a working group focus- year 2019. Of these, CEPF has been involved in creat- In the Cerrado, grantees Action Aid and Ecologia e ences of resistance,” a meeting held during the IX ing on reptile conservation, etc. ing 319 of them. Ação (ECOA) have been working to address gender Meeting and Fair of the People of the Cerrado, in issues in the region. Both organizations are focused Brasília. Figure 14 on empowering local communities, indigenous and traditional people in the Cerrado, with Action Aid These meetings brought together more than 230 Networks and Partnerships Created and/or Supported working in the north and ECOA working in the south- women from different regions of Brazil and resulted TOTAL: 407 (319 CREATED) ern part of the hotspot. They have organized groups in the preparation of two national documents: the Networks created Networks supported of women in associations, cooperatives and networks letter of the first women’s meeting of the Cerrado to value their knowledge, share conservation practic- and the manifesto for resistance of women in the 160 es, and strengthen recognition of women as primary Cerrado and the Pantanal. In both documents women agents for a sustainable environment. articulate the need to preserve their territory and 140 21 their way of life. They condemn the destruction of Over the past year, with CEPF support, Action Aid the water of the Cerrado, the indiscriminate advances 120 and ECOA have orchestrated three critical meetings of agribusiness, and the social impact of these devel- 100 in the Cerrado to discuss environmental conserva- opments. The documents identify some of the factors 27 tion, climate change, gender, and the social relations that disrupt their communities, including sexual 80 and action strategies of women: exploitation, teenage pregnancy and violence. • The Meeting of the Women of the Cerrado, in 131 60 Luziânia, Goias, held as part of the National Cam- While this discussion is just the beginning, CEPF’s 17 paign in Defense of the Cerrado. grantees hope to bring it to the national assembly to 40 82 • The Meeting of the Cerrado and Pantanal Wom- be considered in the Feminist and Antiracist Parlia- 13 en Network - CerraPan, in Campo Grande, Mato mentary Group. The efforts of these grantees and 20 4 42 their partners are key in recognizing the contribu- 0 Grosso do Sul. 20 6 15 20 tion that women are making to conservation in the 5 40 • “Women from the Cerrado: Strengthening resil- 0 Cerrado. AFRICA ASIA CARIBBEAN CENTRAL EUROPE MIDDLE PACIFIC SOUTH ience, weaving knowledge and sharing experi- AMERICA EAST ISLANDS AMERICA

40 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 41

Table 2: A selection of CEPF’s most recently supported partnerships

Bolivia Inter-institutional Working Group on Responsible Gold Mining

Tropical Andes In Bolivia, Wildlife Conservation Society has worked with partners to build a space for Biodiversity Hotspot reflection, coordination, research and action on responsible gold mining. This working group seeks to promote responsible mining in government circles as well as within the mining industry, including artisanal and small-scale mining. The goal is to incorporate good technical, social and environmental practices in mining operations and thus reduce the negative impacts of the activity and optimize yields.

Brazil Alliance for the Cerrado

Cerrado Biodiversity Established in 2018 by the Instituto Terra em Desenvolvimento, the Alliance for the Hotspot Cerrado comprises six organizations and seeks to promote conservation throughout the Cerrado, especially within government entities and circles, via communication strategies, social networks and collaboration with the press. The alliance seeks to promote so- cio-economically responsible development, sustainable use, conservation of biodiversity, reduction of deforestation and restoration of native vegetation.

Vanuatu Partnership Agreement Between Wrecks to and the Mt. Tabwemasana Local The Santo Sunset Environment Network, convening at a capacity building workshop in Vanuatu’s Santo Mountain Chain. © Edenhope Foundation/Image by Billy Tavue Management Committee East Melanesian Islands Santo Sunset Environment Network, Vanuatu Biodiversity Hotspot The Nakau Programme, Ltd. facilitated a business partnership between a tour booking agent and a tour provider to establish a conservation levy to be used to support conser- vation of the Mt. Tabwemasana Key Biodiversity Area. In Vanuatu in the East Melanesian Islands Biodiver- promote protection of terrestrial biodiversity sites sity Hotspot, the Edenhope Foundation has been across the Santo Mountain Chain, on their customary China China Nature Watch Association working in the Santo Mountain Chain, an area rich lands. They also are working to formulate conserva- in natural and cultural diversity, to encourage the tion management plans relevant to the needs of each Indo-Burma Biodiversity In 2018, the Shan Shui Conservation Center established this partnership to address some emergence of local networks to address conserva- community. Hotspot of the gaps in biodiversity information in China and engage the public to contribute data and participate in helping to address conservation concerns. tion threats. With support from CEPF, Edenhope has convened workshops and events to build capacity, This effort has resulted in lasting cooperative part- Ghana Ghana Wildlife Society-Ghana Rubber Estates Limited (GREL) raise awareness and encourage conservation actions nerships among local communities, civil society and best practices. A key achievement is the creation groups, nongovernmental organizations and the Guinean Forests of West This partnership was formed in 2019 to facilitate the assistance of the Ghana Wildlife of the Santo Sunset Environment Network, launched government that will add momentum to future de- Africa Biodiversity Society to mainstream biodiversity into GREL’s business operations, for the purpose of in 2017 as part of the first capacity-building event velopment in the region. It has also been recognized Hotspot biodiversity conservation at Cape Three Points Forest Reserve, where GREL has produc- held during the project. The network has 44 mem- as a “matter of national interest” to the government tion units. bers representing 22 indigenous communities across of Vanuatu, meaning that protection of biodiversity the Santo Mountain Chain. Approximately 20% of the sites in the Santo Mountain Chain has its support. Colombia Conservation Alliance for the Bosque de San Antonio Key Biodiversity Area network members are female and at least 33% are Perhaps most relevant is that this network of local Tropical Andes Created in 2018 by Corporación para la Gestión Ambiental Biodiversa, this alliance of 27 youths aged 17 to 25. conservation champions is seeking ways to ensure Biodiversity Hotspot stakeholders participates in a range of actions that will contribute to the conservation of sustainable livelihoods that support conservation the Bosque de San Antonio Key Biodiversity Area. Representatives in the network collaborate to measures into the future.

42 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 43 Fisherman, Colombia. © O. Langrand

Figure 15

Number of Women 767 1,980 Trainees TOTAL: 26,431* 1,988 8,802 1,365 Africa Asia Europe Middle East Pacific Islands South America 11,529

*Collection of sex-disaggregated data started in 2017.

Figure 16

Number of Trainees by Region TOTAL: 137,325*

44,868 AFRICA 8,802 11,700

4,976 Women ASIA 11,529 Men 18,548 CEPF Pillar 3: 2,586 Human Well-Being CARIBBEAN CENTRAL 15,375 AMERICA

Indicator: Number of people This indicator captures the number of men and wom- 1,123 EUROPE 1,365 receiving structured training en who have participated in a structured training 1,808 opportunity. As with other indicators, sex-disaggre- 241 Definition: Structured training is defined as any gated data is only available since collection started in MIDDLE EAST 1,988 organized or formal training opportunity such as a 2017. To date, 137,325 people have received struc- 5,375 workshop, classroom activity, university program, tured training, including 26,431 women. Training top- 332 formal site visit or exchange program. Note that data ics are quite diverse and include species monitoring, PACIFIC ISLANDS 767 provided by the grantee will be sex-disaggregated. coastal zone management, ecology, botany, ranger 1,212 This number is not to be combined with the indicator training, biosafety, coconut oil production, organic 402 SOUTH 1,980 recording beneficiaries receiving non-cash benefits— farming, efficient post-harvest processing, commu- AMERICA this indicator is specific to training, a key element of nity leadership, mapping and a wide range of other 2,3482348 CEPF’s work. topics and skillsets. 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000

44 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 45

Indicator: Number of people grantees on the number of men and women receiv- receiving cash benefits ing cash benefits. These benefits are derived from employment opportunities, for example in projects Definition: Cash benefits include those derived from where grantees hire people to work in plant nurseries employment, and increased income due to livelihood or work as eco-guides, or from alternative livelihood programs. Grantees are requested to provide sex-dis- projects where beneficiaries develop products that aggregated data. generate income. To date, CEPF has recorded that 58,156 people have received cash benefits, of whom CEPF strives to ensure that people benefit from their 13,873 are women. natural resources in a sustainable manner. Since 2017, CEPF has systematically collected data from

Figure 17 Number of People Buriti tree, Brazil. © Michael Becker Receiving Cash Cerrado farmers reap benefits from buriti palm Benefits 14,849 AFRICA 4,272 TOTAL: 58,156 2,681 In Brazil, the buriti palm (Mauritia flexuosa) is known Since CEPF funding began in 2016, more than 400 as the “tree of life.” Its heart and fruit are edible, people have received training, including 189 women

6,692 its wood is used in construction and its leaves are and 87 youths. The number of families delivering ASIA 15,122 made into various handicrafts. More recently, the buriti shavings for oil production increased from 100

# of women 8,390 buriti fruit’s oil has caught the attention of interna- to 378 among 17 communities (up from 10). # of men tional skincare companies for its anti-aging qualities. # where sex not specified Traditionally harvested by local people, this species, Most important, however, is the increased income EUROPE 2,256 found in palm swamps known as Veredas, is vulnera- paid to farmers and extractivists for the delivery of 2,126 ble to overexploitation and unsustainable harvesting buriti shavings to CGS, which is estimated to be just practices, yet its multiple uses and growing popular- over R$200,000 (approximately US$51,000), consid- ity present an opportunity to bring revenue to local ering the buriti harvests from 2017 to 2018. MIDDLE - communities. EAST 2 2 Also notable is that with better planning and moni- In the northern part of the state of Minas Gerais, toring, the cooperative was able to achieve increased Brazil, in the Cerrado Biodiversity Hotspot, CEPF has and higher quality production, and consequently de- PACIFI C ISLANDS 520 supported efforts by the Cooperativa dos Agricul- veloped fruitful partnerships with at least six private 426 tores Familiares e Agroextrativistas Grande Sertão sector companies, all of which have linked with the (CGS) to train farmers in sustainable harvesting cooperative to support the responsible management

378 practices of the buriti palm as well as more efficient of natural resources. They are not only trading part- SOUTH AMERICA 192 processing techniques. The cooperative has targeted ners, but also financial supporters of a sustainable 248 women and young people in particular, as they are socio-productive chain. often the community members involved in these 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 activities.

46 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 47

Indicator: Number of people Figure 19 receiving non-cash benefits other Characteristics of Communities Benefiting* than structured training TOTAL # OF COMMUNITIES: 1,279 FISCAL YEARS 2017–2019 Definition: Non-cash benefits are stated as: increased CEPF has, since 2001, compiled data on the number access to clean water; increased food security; of communities benefiting from CEPF projects. In Small landowner 440 increased access to energy; increased access to public 2017 this effort expanded to include collection of in- services; increased resilience to climate change; im- formation about community characteristics, types of Indigenous/ethnic peoples 401 proved land tenure; improved recognition of traditional benefits received, and number of males and females Pastoralists/nomads 8 knowledge; improved decision-making and gover- in each community. Since 2001, a total of 3,526 Subsistence economy 565 nance; and improved access to ecosystem services. communities have benefited, and a total of 302,943 people (154,599 males and 148,344 females) have Recent migrants 51 been recorded as benefiting from the 1,279 commu- Urban community 47 nities counted since 2017. The charts below illustrate the characteristics of the communities CEPF has Other 72 supported, as well as the types of benefits received. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 *Communities can have more than one characteristic. Number of communities Figure 18 Figure 20 Communities Benefiting from CEPF Types of Benefits Received Projects, by Region by 1,279 Communities in 9 Hotspots TOTAL: 3,526 South America FISCAL YEAR 2017–2019

Pacific Islands 8% Increased food security 367

8% Increased access to energy 53 Middle East Africa Asia Increased access to public services 107 <1% Caribbean Increased resilience to climate 248 change Europe Central America Africa Europe Improved land tenure 151 1% 50% Middle East Improved recognition of traditional 375 Pacific Islands knowledge Central America South America 11% Increased access to clean water 124 Improved access to ecosystem 386 Caribbean services Improved decision-making and 527 2% Asia represention in governance 20% 0 100 200 300 400 500 600

48 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 49

Food Security on Mussau Island, Papua New Guinea

On the remote Island of Mussau in Papua New Guinea, Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS-PNG) has been working to increase protection for threat- ened species, and to improve food security for the Lolieng community. The island is situated in the Bismarck Sea, and its waters have an abundance of Endangered green turtles (Chelonia mydas), which are thought by some people to be competitors for an edible seaweed favored by the local community. The island is also home to feral . These pests are a constant threat to gardens and local community food supply. The local communities proposed a turtle cull in the belief that they would increase seaweed productivity, and also requested assistance to control Women discuss an environmental trend analysis during a training held in the feral pigs. Lolieng Village, Mussau Island, New Ireland Province, Papua New Guinea. © John Par Kagl/WCSPNG Signboard for gibbon protection at a community forest, Indawgyi, Myanmar. © O. Langrand During the project, WCS-PNG took a participatory Community benefits and gibbon conservation, Myanmar approach to prevent the turtle cull, improve gar- the use of nitrogen fixing legumes to improve soil dening and food security, and to build community nutrients. Efforts were also undertaken to reduce capacity to manage these and other natural resource incursion into gardens by building fences. In Myanmar, Northern Green Lights tested a commu- had been designated prior to the project; in the other management issues. Food security in particular is an nity-based conservation approach for forests adjoin- two, the Northern Green Lights assisted the com- urgent, immediate concern on the small island and is The local government of Mussau and provincial ing Indawgyi Wildlife Sanctuary. The site is import- munity to get the forest rights certificate from the threatened by increasingly severe weather events as government of New Ireland were informed of the ant for the conservation of eastern hoolock gibbon Forest Department for a period of 30 years. In this a consequence of climate change. project’s developments throughout the course of the (Hoolock leuconedys), which is listed as Vulnerable on way, the dynamic between local communities and the grant and a project close-out workshop was held to the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. The project Forest Department is changing: The communities are The project yielded significant results for marine life distribute reports on the activities and successes of assisted local communities in four villages to desig- starting to be seen as stewards of the environment as well as local communities. Through capacity build- the project to civil society and government represen- nate gibbon conservation areas, initiate patrolling and rather than threats to biodiversity. ing and awareness activities, the community’s com- tatives. This allowed the provincial and local gov- monitoring, and conduct awareness-raising activities mitment to and understanding of the need for turtle ernments to draw on the successes of this project. in surrounding villages. As a result, 1,332 hectares Looking ahead, the prospects for continuation of the and marine conservation was substantially improved, Indeed, the provincial government expressed interest of gibbon habitat was placed under community initiative look promising. Revolving funds were estab- and the turtle cull averted through a project study in supporting other Mussau communities to enact management, and incidence of hunting and forest lished in the project villages to finance the communi- that found that the turtles did not impact seaweed pig control methods demonstrated in this project. fire declined significantly. Although two years is not ty patrolling and outreach activities beyond the end productivity. Food security of the Lolieng community Furthermore, the Lolieng Sustainable Program has long enough to observe an increase in the gibbon of the CEPF grant, while the grantee is committed to was improved through a 50% increase in crops grown been registered as a community-based organization population size, anecdotal evidence suggests that remaining engaged in the landscape and building on in the community. This was achieved via the intro- and has submitted their first small grant application gibbons have changed their behavior in response to the success of the pilot project. It appears that other duction of new plant-derived pesticide techniques to to CEPF, which will allow them to continue monitor- the community-based conservation measures, with villages are interested in replicating the successful lessen pest damage to crops, improved mulching and ing and protecting turtles on Mussau and to continue gibbons being heard close to the villages for the first model, and, resources permitting, the opportunities building their capacity. time in years. In two villages, the community forest for replication are good.

50 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 51

Tree nursery in Anjouan, Comoros. © Dahari

Degraded mangrove habitat in Dubreka, Guinée. © Ibrahima Doumbouya/ Développement Pour Tous

Indicator: Number of projects feeling the impacts. CEPF’s grantees are addressing Solar salt production, Guinea promoting nature-based solutions the threat by promoting nature-based solutions such as ecosystem resilience, protected areas creation, to combat climate change In Guinea in the Guinean Forests of West Africa Tous has been working with local communities to reforestation and restoration, soil conservation and Biodiversity Hotspot, the Konkouré River estuary is reduce environmental degradation and improve watershed management, to name just a few of the Definition: Projects that have been tagged with one an important site for biodiversity. It is rich in wildlife traditional production systems, including that of salt. possible actions. From inception through fiscal year or more of the following key words: buffer zones, resources and flora, and provides local communities Traditional salt production has been practiced for 2019, CEPF has supported a total of 1,295 projects, carbon offsets, climate adaptation, climate mitiga- with their means of subsistence. An increase in peo- several generations in this region, and is an import- valued at US$127,460,097, that have contributed to tion, community-based conservation, conservation ple living in the area has come with a corresponding ant income-generating activity, mainly for women. reducing the impacts of climate change. planning, ecosystem resilience, habitat conservation increase in human-wildlife conflict, overharvest of Développement pour Tous has introduced new and management, land use planning, payment for wood, overgrazing and development of agro-pastoral technology to enable salt production using sunlight ecosystem services, private reserves, protected areas, activities. Of particular concern is the increase in and tarpaulins instead of fuelwood. The project reforestation, restoration, soil conservation and water traditional salt production, which relies on unsustain- has had significant impacts including reducing the management. 1,295 able mangrove harvest that reduces the ability of unsustainable mangrove harvest by 75%, improving PROJECTS PROMOTING NATURE- this coastal community to be resilient in the face of the livelihoods of local communities and women by With increasing frequency, the biodiversity hotspots BASED SOLUTIONS TO CLIMATE climate change. training 47 women in solar salt production, providing are experiencing changes in climate, and species, CHANGE equipment, and enhancing health and well-being ecosystems and the people that depend on them are With a small grant from CEPF, Développement pour through reduced workload.

52 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 53

Mauritius has one of the most threatened island ecosystem more resilient to disturbances. Forest restoration in Mauritius floras in the world, with 89% of its endemic plant spe- Achievements include weeding of 16 hectares of cies considered at risk of extinction, and only about forest, of which 1.4 hectares were high-quality native 2,600 hectares of reasonable-quality native forest forest weeded for the first time. Maintenance weed- remaining, representing less than 2% of the total area ing of all 16 hectares was done regularly to prevent of the island. Much of Mauritius’ , unique to the fast-growing, light-loving exotic vegetation from island, has disappeared along with the forest; 24 of suppressing the native vegetation. In the areas where the 52 native species of forest vertebrate that were there were few native trees remaining following the known to have occurred are now extinct. Remain- first weeding, 22,982 native plants grown in the ing fauna species are under pressure as the forest on-site plant nursery were planted to accelerate the becomes more and more degraded. native forest canopy recovery process. Planting was done by the conservation team, school children and Ebony Forest Ltd. has been working in the Ebony staff from corporations. The involvement of the pub- Forest Reserve since 2006 to address the many lic was instrumental in raising awareness and also threats to the fauna and flora, which include invasive increasing public engagement in nature conservation. alien plants, habitat fragmentation, loss of genetic Thirty staff received training during this project (in- diversity, lack of awareness of the importance of pro- cluding 17 women), in weeding, planting and nursery tecting natural ecosystems, and the effects of climate activities, conservation, tourism, communicating change. Their mission is to protect and restore the with the public and eco-guiding. Last but not least, in native forest, to develop low-impact tourism, and to 2018, 50 pink pigeons and 50 echo parakeets were educate the public about the importance of conserv- reintroduced to Ebony Forest, in partnership with the ing biodiversity. Mauritian Wildlife Foundation, an incredible develop- ment for two endemic species formerly on the brink With funding from CEPF, Ebony Forest has under- of extinction. taken intensive habitat restoration of the 50-hectare Ebony Forest Reserve with the aim of sustaining eco- Ebony Forest Ltd. is definitely leading the way with system functions and services, restoring plant diver- its comprehensive approach to conservation and sity, and ensuring resilience to small- or large-scale active engagement of the general public. Its project alterations such as those arising from climate change. serves as an excellent example for other organiza- They have also, in partnership with the Mauritian tions wishing to restore forests and ecosystems at Wildlife Foundation, reintroduced indigenous birds to scale in Mauritius and elsewhere in the hotspot. restore missing plant-animal interactions making the

Indicator: Amount of CO2e sequestered in CEPF-supported natural habitats.

Definition: This indicator will measure carbon stored Although adopted in 2017, CEPF continues to consid- at sites benefiting from restoration or maintenance of er the methodology to measure this indicator, and as Forest wardens battle invasive alien species in the Ebony Forest Reserve, Chamarel, Mauritius © N. Chunwan natural habitat. such, impact data is not yet available.

54 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 55 Espeletia, commonly known as “frailejones,” Colombia. © O. Langrand

Figure 21

Percent of Policies

Addressing Specific Wildlife trade Themes 2% Agriculture Transportation 3% 2% Climate Tourism 4% 4%

Ecosystem Species protection management 16% 20%

Education 1% Energy

Fisheries 2%

Protected areas 3% CEPF Pillar 4: 20% Forestry 4% Mining/quarrying Enabling Conditions 2% Pollution Planning/zoning for Conservation 1% 16% Figure 22

Indicator: Number of laws, tainability. For this reason, CEPF has prioritized the Scope of Policies, Laws Regional International mainstreaming of biodiversity into policy, and since regulations and policies with and Regulations 3% 1% conservation provisions that have inception has supported the enactment or amend- been enacted or amended ment of 306 laws, policies or regulations, categorized into 15 themes: agriculture, climate, ecosystem International management, education, energy, fisheries, forestry, National Definition: “Laws” and “regulations” pertain to official Local mining/quarrying, planning/zoning, pollution, protect- rules or orders, prescribed by authority. Any law, National 26% ed areas, species protection, tourism, transportation regulation, decree or order is eligible to be included. Regional “Policies” that are adopted or pursued by a govern- and wildlife trade. Protected areas is the most prev- Local ment, including a sector or faction of government, are alent theme with 90 policies addressing this issue, eligible. followed closely by ecosystem management with 89, 70% species protection with 71, and planning/zoning with An effective policy environment underpins conser- 70. Some policies address more than one theme. vation achievements and contributes to their sus-

56 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 57

Kenya’s wetlands, an integrated management plan, and resource users around the lake to deliberate on and a draft co-management agreement for Lake Ol’ how best to collaborate in their conservation efforts, Bolossat. The new conservation model for Lake Ol’ and helped to set the stage for sustainable manage- Bolossat puts the local community at the forefront. ment of this remarkable lake. EAWLS brought together local community groups

Figure 23

Laws, Policies and Regulations Lake Ol’ Bolossat, teaming with fauna and flora, is the highest altitude lake in central Kenya. © Fabian Haas TOTAL: 306 Policy support for Lake Ol’ Bolossat, Kenya Atlantic Forest 2 Cape Floristic Region 7 Lake Ol’ Bolossat is an important wetland with both ness, gain protective status for the lake and promote Caribbean Islands 5 salty and fresh water occurring in Nyandarua County sound management of the site. This engagement 3 in central Kenya. The lake lies at average altitude of involved government agencies, conservation organi- Caucasus 2,330 meters above sea level, making it the high- zations and representatives from the local communi- Cerrado 1 est-altitude lake in East Africa. It forms the headwa- ties—a challenge given competing objectives, a rising East Melanesian Islands 2 ters for the Ewaso Nyiro River, which supports the human population and the effects of climate change, Eastern Afromontane 29 livelihoods of communities, livestock and wildlife in all of which have exacerbated the degradation of Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests 1 the dry Laikipia and Samburu counties. Despite its Lake Ol’ Bolossat. Himalaya 9 small size (4,330 hectares), the lake is known for its Guinean Forests of West Africa 2 rich biodiversity that includes 370 plant species, 296 The EAWLS project has led to numerous policy species of bird (both residential and migrants), 134 achievements. First and foremost is the gazettement Indo-Burma 34 mammals and 96 invertebrates, as well as reptiles, of 4,304 hectares of Lake Ol’ Bolossat as a protected Madagascar and Indian Ocean Islands 7 amphibians, fish and 42 species of macrofungi. wetland under Kenya’s Environmental Management Maputaland-Pondoland-Albany 35 The lake supplies Nyahururu town with water and and Coordination Act (EMCA) effective 4 July 2018. Mediterranean Basin 15 supports the thriving wildlife tourism further north Under the legal notice, the county government of Mesoamerica 12 at Thomson’s Falls and the Buffalo Springs and Shaba Nyandarua has the lead role in the conservation and Mountains of Southwest China 2 national reserves. As an unprotected wetland, Lake management of the lake, as well as the mandate to Philippines 7 Ol’ Bolossat has faced myriad challenges and threats, collaborate with local communities and other stake- including deforestation of catchment areas, the holders in the joint management of the lake. This Polynesia-Micronesia 5 diversion of water from feeder streams and springs, enabled EAWLS to embark on an effort to promote Succulent Karoo 2 overgrazing, pollution, land-use changes, soil erosion collaborative management of Lake Ol’ Bolossat. Sundaland 6 and siltation. Tropical Andes 25 In support of this effort, EAWLS played an instru- Tumbes-Chocó-Magdalena 7 In 2016, the East African Wild Life Society (EAWLS), mental role in developing a policy brief on co-man- Wallacea 86 with support from CEPF and working with Crane agement and protection of wetlands in Kenya. It Western Ghats and Sri Lanka Conservation Volunteers and the National Museums provides recommendations to address the existing 2 of Kenya, engaged with stakeholders to raise aware- policy gaps in the management and protection of 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

58 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 59

Indicator: Number of sustainable financing mechanisms that are delivering funds for conservation

Definition: The purpose of this indicator is to track the Since 2001, CEPF has created and/or supported 31 number of functioning financing mechanisms created sustainable financing mechanisms that vary in size, by or receiving support from CEPF. Sustainable financ- scope and type, and include conservation trust funds, ing mechanisms are secured to help ensure long-term debt swaps, and credit or payment for ecosystem sustainable financing for project or program conserva- service schemes. A key factor in counting these tion objectives beyond the project’s or program’s lifes- mechanisms is that they must be functional; it is pan. Sustainable financing aims to generate sustaining not sufficient to simply set up a mechanism without financial resources over the longer term (five or more assuring its ability to operate. For some mechanisms, years). Sustainable finance goes beyond traditional this entails working with potential donors to secure government or donor funding by introducing innova- capital, as well as determining the administrative and tive market-based approaches such as debt-for-nature governance arrangements. swaps, environmental funds and payment for ecosys- tem services (PES). Financing conservation Footprints and discarded shells: Evidence of illegal poaching in an Albanian wetland. © Xhemal Xherri Figure 24 Extension of Albania’s hunting ban Sustainable Financing Mechanisms Supported Following concerted efforts by conservation orga- enforced, species hadn’t been given enough time to TOTAL: 31 nizations—including CEPF grantees Protection and recover and improved legislation for hunting hadn’t 10 Preservation of Natural Environment in Albania and been implemented. The government agreed; the ban the Association for Protection of Birds and Mam- was extended for five more years. 9 mals—the government of Albania declared a two-year 1 8 hunting ban in 2014. Populations of many terrestrial While the hunting ban has significantly reduced the 1 species in the country were in rapid decline—includ- intensity of poaching in Albania, it has not stopped 7 ing the Critically Endangered Balkan lynx (Lynx lynx it. In many remote areas of the country, where no Payment for ssp. balcanicus) and resident and migratory birds. The patrolling occurs, hunting is often reported, and traps ecosystem services 6 Incentives ban would give their populations an opportunity to kill species indiscriminately. Fund 5 recover. Debt swap 3 In the past year, the hunting community has lobbied 4 2 Credit scheme In the first year, the ban proved effective, but then the government to withdraw the ban but without 7 5 reported incidents of poaching increased. CEPF success. In the meantime, a new, improved hunting 3 dedicated a special grant for monitoring, and teams law is being prepared by the Ministry of Environment 2 2 of CEPF grantees patrolled selected protected areas for implementation following the ban’s end in 2021. 3 3 day and night. Encouragingly, civil society organizations have been 1 invited to take part in several consulations about the 1 1 1 1 0 Conservationists urged the government to extend new law. AFRICA ASIA CARIBBEAN CENTRAL EUROPE PACIFIC SOUTH the law, arguing that the ban had not been properly AMERICA ISLANDS AMERICA

60 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 61

Financing success: The Prespa Ohrid Nature Trust Indicator: Number of companies that adopt biodiversity-friendly practices In 2016, CEPF supported WWF Greece to establish a transboundary conservation trust fund in the Prespa Definition: A company is a legal entity made up of This indicator seeks to measure efforts to change water catchment basin and surrounding environment an association of people, be they natural, legal, or behavior within the private sector, with a specific located in Albania, Greece and the Republic of North a mixture of both, for carrying on a commercial or focus on recording progress in getting companies Macedonia, an area of exceptional ecological, cultural industrial enterprise. Company members share a com- to adopt biodiversity-friendly practices. While CEPF and historical value. While many projects had been mon purpose and unite in order to focus their various has worked with the private sector throughout its conducted over many years to address the conserva- talents and organize their collectively available skills existence, only since 2017 has CEPF attempted to tion needs of the region, much work remained to be or resources to achieve specific, declared goals. While quantify the results. To date, CEPF has documented done to ensure a sustainable and resilient supply of companies take various forms, for the purposes of 36 companies that have adopted practices favorable basic ecosystem services, and it was widely recog- CEPF, a company is defined as a for-profit business to biodiversity. nized that without a source of sustainable financing, entity. conservation goals would be beyond reach. Figure 25

In collaboration with key partners MAVA Foundation Nestled between Albania, Greece and the Republic of North Macedonia, and KfW, WWF Greece set out to implement three Prespa Lake is a site of exceptional biodiversity and beauty. © Prespa Ohrid Nature Trust Number of Companies Adopting Biodiversity- important work streams that built upon the prepara- Friendly Practices, by Biodiversity Hotspot tory activities already supported by MAVA Founda- TOTAL = 36 tion. The main components of the project were: In order to bring the trust to life, it was essential to secure funding to capitalize the trust. WWF Greece Wallacea Cerrado · The establishment and operationalization of the was successful in raising 20 million euros in col- Prespa Ohrid Nature Trust (PONT). laboration with MAVA Foundation and KfW. With 3 1 · Awareness raising among stakeholders, govern- funds secured, PONT was assured of delivering their Tropical Andes ments and the public in the targeted areas. conservation program. · Development of a comprehensive study to guide In 2019, PONT continues to operate and is delivering 5 PONT’s future operation and funding decisions. much-needed long-term funding for conservation Eastern in the region. The trust has active grant-making Afromontane By project close, PONT had been legally established, Madagascar and programs in the thematic areas of protected areas its statutes had been approved, and its essential Indian Ocean Islands and environmental actors, and most recently com- 14 operational policies were in place and implemented menced grant-making for non-timber forest products under the coordination of a set board of directors. and sustainable tourism. They have achieved much 4 WWF Greece also worked to set up a shared ser- already for the region through projects implemented vices mechanism with the Caucasus Nature Trust to by local organizations. In 2020, PONT is partnering supply necessary internal procedures and functions. with CEPF to hold a joint call for proposals for small Additionally, essential communication and branding Guinean Forests grants to bring in new actors on critical conservation tools were produced, a conservation strategy was Indo-Burma of West Africa issues, with the required co-financing being secured prepared, and the governments of all three countries through CEPF. provided letters endorsing the trust. 8 1

62 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 63

Working with the private sector on eco-friendly products, China

Tropical China is one of the areas with the highest biodiversity in China, but also one of the most threat- ened areas in the world. Various types of protected areas have been established to protect and manage natural resources and secure essential ecosystem services, but the overall management of these areas is poor, and illegal and unsustainable activities are common. While this is partly due to the absence of adequate supervision, it is also because community development has not been well coordinated with Brown sugar, or panela, from Peru’s private conservation areas and marketed by Shiwi, a company committed to sourcing locally produced products. @ Shiwi conservation. Partnership markets products from private protected areas, Peru The Institute of Zoology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences has worked to address this situation by Logo identifying Nanlang Protected Area-friendly products. The district of Amazonas in northeastern Peru is ity and biodiversity conservation and to effectively © Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences developing “protected-area friendly” agricultural renowned for its incredible biodiversity and high manage private lands. The financial sustainability products at three sites, branding them and working holds began to transition from sugar cane cultivation levels of endemism. The region has a protected-area part of the puzzle entailed a partnership with the with the private sector to sell them to more than to cultivation of traditional crops, while people from system, but it is not sufficiently large or connected to Shiwi social enterprise, which led a successful strat- 6,000 customers. At Nangunhe in both villages assisted nature reserve staff with mon- adequately protect the region’s biodiversity. Fortu- egy for marketing honey and brown sugar from the Yunnan Province, elephant-friendly tea and rice were itoring and anti-poaching patrols. Elements of the nately, the region has a significant amount of land network of private protected areas. This relationship produced, on 30 and 15 hectares of land, respective- plans, such as ecotourism activities, were incorporat- protected via private and community-based conser- resulted in development of a business plan for honey ly. Also in Yunnan, ecologically friendly Dendrobium ed into the development plans of local government. vation initiatives—there are currently 14 officially and brown sugar and a plan for product marketing, orchid production was adopted by 20 local people at Establishment of community patrol teams, support recognized private conservation areas, led by local leading to greater income to communities that prac- Malipo-Laoshan Provincial Nature Reserve. Finally, at with biodiversity monitoring and other forms of individuals, families or communities that together tice private conservation. Sales increased steadily Wuzhishan Nature Reserve on Hainan Island, frog tea assistance provided by the project contributed to an protect 107,173 hectares. An urgent problem faced by throughout the project period, despite setbacks such and Sanlan rice were produced on 10 and 7 hectares, improvement in the management of the three pro- private protected areas is that they have few sources as the flooding in early 2017 that halted the supply respectively. At least five companies collaborated tected areas, as evidenced by increases in their man- of income, thereby limiting their ability to implement chain and changes in rainy seasons that affected with the Institute of Zoology to help promote and sell agement effectiveness tracking tool (METT) scores. conservation strategies. The lack of financial incen- honey production in some private protected areas. In these products. tives for conservation also acts as a barrier to entry early 2018, a wildfire devastated the Milpuj-La Here- The project also made an important contribution to for potential new conservation stakeholders, such dad private protected area, which has led to the loss This grantee also made the link between protect- development of the Protected Area Friendly System, as campesino communities interested in creating of most of their beehives. Nevertheless, on average, ed-area-friendly production and community engage- and promoted it among different audiences, includ- conservation areas on their lands. there was a 99% increase in sales, and a 46% in- ment in protected area management. Landscape ing other conservation practitioners and the general crease in income to producers, based on the average ecological planning and implementation was conduct- public. Over the course of the project, the number To address the situation, the Peruvian Society for sales per semester after the project started in July ed for Nanlang village at Nangunhe Nature Reserve of protected-area-friendly products increased from Environmental Law (Sociedad Peruana de Derecho 2016. The involvement of the private enterprise Shiwi and Maona village at Wuzhishan Nature Reserve, and less than 10 to more than 20, and products worth Ambiental-SPDA) supported a network of private to purchase and market products from sustainably these were designated as “protected-area-friendly more than CNY 17 million (US$2.5 million) were sold, protected areas to use the legal framework for managed private protected areas is helping support villages.” In Nanlang village, at least 30% of house- mainly by the producers themselves. private conservation to achieve financial sustainabil- both conservation and local livelihoods.

64 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 65

Contributions to the U.N. Convention on Biological Diversity

Operational Aichi Biodiversity Target Contribution to Impact Target 11. By 2020, at least 17 per- CEPF has supported the creation or CEPF has supported 610 Contribution cent of terrestrial and inland water, expansion of 15,324,650 hectares of projects with primary em- Target 1. By 2020, at the latest, At least 137,325 people have ben- CEPF has supported a and 10 percent of coastal and marine new protected areas in 22 biodiversi- phases on protected areas people are aware of the values of bio- efited from training in biodiversity, total of 473 projects with areas, especially areas of particular ty hotspots. creation and improved diversity and the steps they can take conservation and related topics. a primary emphasis on importance for biodiversity and management, totaling CEPF has strengthened the manage- to conserve and use it sustainably. education, awareness and ecosystem services, are conserved US$67,948,146. ment and protection of 47,303,198 capacity building, valued through effectively and equitably hectares of Key Biodiversity Areas in at US$31,865,253. managed, ecologically representa- 23 hotspots. tive and well-connected systems of Target 2. By 2020, at the latest, bio- CEPF has influenced 306 policies, CEPF has supported a protected areas and other effective CEPF has contributed to improved diversity values have been integrated laws or regulations in 24 biodiversity total of 149 projects in 24 area‐based conservation measures biodiversity management of into national and local development hotspots. hotspots with a primary and integrated into the wider land- 8,207,848 hectares of production and poverty reduction strategies and focus on mainstreaming scapes and seascapes. landscapes in 21 hotspots. planning processes and are being biodiversity, valued at incorporated into national account- US$14,102,336. Target 12. By 2020 the extinction of At least 882 species have benefited CEPF has supported 466 ing, as appropriate, and reporting known threatened species has been from CEPF support. projects with a focus on systems. prevented and their conservation species conservation, status, particularly of those most totaling US$39,675,752. Target 7. By 2020 areas under CEPF has contributed to improved CEPF has supported 265 in decline, has been improved and agriculture, aquaculture and forestry biodiversity management of projects with a primary sustained. are managed sustainably, ensuring 8,207,848 hectares of production emphasis on strengthen- conservation of biodiversity. landscapes in 21 hotspots. ing management outside Target 20. By 2020, at the latest, the CEPF has supported 31 sustainable CEPF has supported 84 protected areas, totaling mobilization of financial resources for finance mechanisms that remain projects with a compo- US$24,787,270. effectively implementing the Strate- active, including five functioning nent focusing on conser- gic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-­2020 payment for ecosystem services vation finance, totaling Target 9. By 2020, invasive alien CEPF-funded projects have resulted CEPF has supported 95 from all sources, and in accordance schemes. US$13,737,949. species and pathways are identified in: projects with a component with the consolidated and agreed process in the Strategy for Resource and prioritized, priority species are • Biosecurity plans prepared. dedicated to addressing controlled or eradicated, and mea- invasive alien species, Mobilization, should increase sub- • Eradications undertaken. sures are in place to manage path- totaling US$7,223,077, in stantially from the current levels. • Invasive alien species training ways to prevent their introduction 13 biodiversity hotspots. This target will be subject to changes delivered. and establishment. contingent to resource needs assess- • Captive-bred and reintroduced ments to be developed and reported native species. by Parties. • Critical habitat restored.

66 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 67

Contributions to U.N. Sustainable Development Goals

Sustainable Development Goal Contribution to Impact Operational Contribution Goal 5 – Achieve Since CEPF started collecting sex-dis- Introduction in 2017 of collection of gender equality and aggregated data in 2017, a total of sex-disaggregated data from grant- Goal 2 – End hunger, CEPF grantee projects resulted in CEPF has supported 228 projects with empower all women 148,344 women and girls were record- ees. achieve food security 3,526 communities receiving non-cash a primary focus on human well-being, and girls ed as receiving non-cash benefits such and improved nutrition benefits such as improved access totaling US$19,565,875. Introduction in 2017 of new monitor- as increased access to water, increased ing tool to measure change in grantee and promote sustain- to water, improved land tenure and 149 projects totaling US$14,837,561 food security, and increased resilience understanding of and commitment to able agriculture increased representation in deci- with specific components on agrofor- to climate change. gender issues. sion-making and governance. Since estry and agriculture. collection of data about types of ben- Preparation and launch of a gender efits communities receive started in toolkit. 2017, 367 communities have reported increased food security. Goal 6 – Ensure avail- Since 2017, 124 communities receiving CEPF has supported 252 projects as- 137,325 people have benefited from ability and sustainable non-cash benefits report increased sociated with inland wetland habitats, structured training, including top- management of water access to clean water as a benefit. valued at US$17,591,431. ics that lead to improved nutrition, and sanitation for all 137 projects valued at US$11,998,734 increased income, and increased with a focus on freshvwater, covering production. Topics include coconut oil a range of topics such as research production, beekeeping, bookkeeping, and assessment, biodiversity invento- gardening, horticulture, organic prac- ries and development of best practic- tices, sustainable fisheries, and sus- es for management. tainable harvest of medicinal plants. 74 projects with an emphasis on wa- 8.2 million hectares of production ter management, located in various landscape have strengthened biodiver- habitats, valued at US$7,115,691. sity management through mechanisms Goal 8 – Promote sus- Since start of collection of the number Human well-being projects have such as organic agriculture, sustain- tained, inclusive and of people receiving cash benefits in taken place in 58 countries and able harvest and improved land use sustainable economic 2017, CEPF grantees report that 58,156 territories. practices. growth, full and pro- people have received cash benefits. ductive employment Goal 4 – Ensure 137,325 people received structured CEPF has supported 725 projects with and decent work for all inclusive and equita- training through CEPF-funded projects. a component/emphasis on capacity Goal 12 – Ensure 8.2 million hectares of production 39 projects totaling US$3,012,050 ble quality education Since start of collection of sex-disag- building, valued at US$90,278,469. sustainable consump- landscape have had biodiversity man- located in agricultural/artificial land- and promote lifelong gregated data in 2017, grantees report- CEPF has supported 637 projects tion and production agement strengthened through mech- scapes, focusing on topics such as learning opportunities ed that 26,431 women have received with a component/ emphasis on patterns anisms such as organic agriculture, agroforestry, sustainable production for all training. Training topics were diverse, education and awareness, valued at sustainable harvest and improved land and improved agricultural practices. such as beekeeping, sustainable US$55,332,640. use practices. tourism, medicinal plant production, environmental education, leadership, CEPF-funded projects have contributed financial management and field survey to enactment or amendment of 306 techniques. laws, regulations and policies with conservation provisions.

68 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 69

Goal 13 – Take urgent Grantees have taken multiple actions CEPF has supported 468 projects Goal 15 – Protect, CEPF has supported the creation or CEPF has supported 610 projects with action to combat across hundreds of projects involving: aimed at strengthening protection restore and promote expansion of 15.3 million hectares of primary emphases on protected area climate change and its • Restoration and management of areas within and sustainable use of new protected areas in 22 biodiversity creation and improved management, impacts • Tree planting outside of protected areas, thereby terrestrial ecosystems, hotspots. totaling US$67,948,146. promoting nature-based solutions sustainably manage • Training in forest carbon CEPF has strengthened the manage- 94 projects with a component ded- to address the negative impacts of forests, combat desert- technical work ment and protection of 47.3 million icated to addressing Invasive Alien climate change. These projects are ification, and halt and • Preparation of land use plans hectares of Key Biodiversity Areas in Species, totaling US$7,223,077, in 13 valued at US$49,525,232. reverse land degrada- containing climate change risk 23 hotspots. biodiversity hotspots. tion and halt biodiver- assessments Since 2017, 248 communities have CEPF has contributed to improved 468 projects totaling US$49,525,232 been reported as receiving the non- sity loss • Watershed management and biodiversity management of 8.2 million aimed at strengthening protection cash benefit of resilience to climate restoration hectares of production landscapes in and management of areas within and change. 21 hotspots. outside of protected areas. • Mangrove/coastal zone management At least 882 IUCN Red List species • Sustainable coastal tourism listed as CR, EN, and VU have benefited CEPF has supported 466 projects from CEPF support. • Climate change modeling with a focus on species conservation, • Development of strategies for 61 projects totaling US$6,348,339 totaling US$39,675,752. climate change adaptation and focused on reducing wildlife traffick- mitigation. ing, with targeted efforts to reduce demand for elephant ivory, rhino horn, Goal 14 – Conserve More than 60 coastal protected areas CEPF has supported 166 projects pangolins, turtles, tortoises and a and sustainably use have benefited from increased protec- associated with marine and coastal range of other species. the oceans, seas and tion and management. habitat, valued at US$12,507,188. marine resources for 32 Small Island Developing States Goal 16 – Promote 407 networks/partnerships supported, CEPF has supported 312 projects sustainable develop- have benefited from CEPF funds. peaceful and inclusive 319 of which CEPF helped to create. with an explicit focus on civil society ment societies for sustain- Of the 368 CEPF grantees for which capacity building and networking, able development, two Civil Society Organizational Capac- valued at US$24,678,582. provide access to ity Assessments have been completed, All local CEPF grantees self-assess justice for all and build 248 civil society organizations (67%) at start and end of grant to measure effective, accountable report an increase in their organiza- change in institutional capacity. and inclusive institu- tional capacity. tions at all levels

70 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 71

Conclusion

In 2019, CEPF’s grantees continued to make signifi- have much to show from five years of successful cant contributions to the conservation of biodiver- project implementation. Results are not only evident sity, the reinforcement of the civil society’s capac- locally on the ground, but also on a global scale, as ity, the improvement of human well-being and the we are able to document key contributions to the establishment of enabling conditions that are essen- U.N. Convention on Biological Diversity and the U.N. tial for ensuring the sustainability of conservation Sustainable Development Goals. In 2020, CEPF looks outcomes. Several new biodiversity hotspots have re- forward to showcasing contributions from nine active ported results as their first projects come to a close, hotspots and demonstrating the essential role that such as the Guinean Forests of West Africa, while civil society plays in securing a sustainable future for Oaxaca State, Mexico, center of endemism in the Mesoamerica Biodiversity Hotspot. © O. Langrand others, such as Eastern Afromontane and Wallacea, people and biodiversity.

72 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. Please visit www.cepf.net for more information. 73

The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a Offices located at: joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International Conservation International, the European Union, 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 600 the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan Arlington, VA 22202 USA and the World Bank. www.cepf.net

74 Please visit www.cepf.net for more information.