Returning Grazing Land to Nature Helps More than Wolves PAGE 4 Wild Canids Among Us: Can We Coexist? PAGE 8 Pros and Cons: The 2017 Mexican Wolf Recovery Plan PAGE 12 Savana Brown Logo Wear T-Shirt Item:1099p Wolf $10.00 Den Store Your purchases help support the mission of the International Wolf Center.
Tall Camper Mugs $7.95 Gray Item: 2394 Cobalt Item: 2395 Wild Wolves We Have Green Item: 2393 White Item: 232 Known - 2nd Printing Item: 6668 $18.95
Highlights of the Ambassador Wolf Canvas Wolves 2018 DVD Shopper Bag Item: 9024 Item: 2097 $19.95 $7.95
Contigo Stainless Steel Travel Mug Item: 2400 2019 Ambassador $24.95 Nalgene Wide Mouth Bottle Wolves Calendar Item: 2398 Item: 2377 $14.95 $14.95
To Order, visit: or call 1-800-ELY-WOLF VOLUME 28, NO. 3 THE QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL WOLF CENTER FALL 2018
4 Ratner B Jonathan 8 Ilya Raskin 11 UWFWS Clark / Jim Returning Grazing Land Wild Canids Among Us: Pros and Cons: The 2017 to Nature Helps More Can We Coexist? Mexican Wolf Recovery Plan than Wolves More than three billion people now The 2017 Mexican wolf recovery Large carnivores and their prey need reside in cities around the world. As plan, an update of a plan devised in healthy, spacious habitat in order to we’re moving into town, canids are 1982, has evoked strong reactions thrive, but huge tracts of land have right behind us, and they’re subjects from biologists and environmentalists. been decimated by the grazing of of growing scientific interest—so Here, two experts present opposing domestic livestock. About 2,400 much interest that they have earned viewpoints on the validity and grazing authorizations are granted their own name: synanthropes. Here’s effectiveness of the plan—one to ranches across 12 western states what researchers are learning about questioning the science involved, each year. The author describes the this growing group of city-dwelling and the other declaring it solidly problems that can cause, along with carnivores. designed to assure the survival of current efforts to return grazing land this wolf subspecies. By Cheryl Lyn Dybas to a wild state. By Jim Heffelfinger By Tracy O’Connell and Mike Phillips
On the Cover Departments Mexican Wolf © Bob Jensen 3 From the Executive Director Did you know? 20 Tracking the Pack One easy way for you to help us conserve 24 Wild Kids natural resources is to make sure we have your email address. 26 Personal Encounter Simply email your address to 27 Wolves of the World [email protected]. 30 A Look Beyond 32 Book Review Inernational Wolf Center Wolf Inernational Popular “Wolves at Our Door” Programs, Presented to More Than 51,000 Minnesotans, Will Continue
Publications Director he International Wolf Center in June con- Chad Richardson cluded a unique, four-year program that Graphics Coordinator Ttaught unbiased lessons about wolves to more Carissa L. Winter than 51,000 people in the state. “Wolves at Our Door” presentations educated and entertained more than Consulting Editor Kristine Chapin 49,000 students and 2,000 state park and library visitors from September 2014 through June 2018. Technical Editor Funding for the project was provided by the Dr. L. David Mech Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Graphic Designer Fund as recommended by the Legislative-Citizen Tricia Austin Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCCMR). International Wolf (1089-683X) is published That funding ceased at the end of June, but based on research results, the quarterly and copyrighted, 2018, by the International Wolf Center has vowed to continue the program. International Wolf Center, 7100 Northland Circle N, Suite 205, Minneapolis, MN 55428, USA. Before and After email: [email protected]. All rights reserved. Follow-up research conducted by educators indicates that the statewide program was a smashing success. Publications agreement no. 1536338 Educators took before-and-after surveys to gauge how much children knew Membership in the International Wolf Center includes about wolves and what they learned from the presentations, also measuring a subscription to International Wolf magazine, free attitudes toward wolves held by young people before and after their exposure admission to the Center and discounts on programs to the program. The results were impressive. and merchandise. Using Clicker survey technology, students were surveyed pre-and post- Membership Levels: (in U.S. dollars) • Wolf Pup $25 (students • Wolf Associate $125 program to collect data on knowledge of, and attitudes toward, wolves and age 21 and under) • Wolf Tracker $250 wolf issues. The resulting data showed an increase ranging from 8 percent to • Lone Wolf $45 • Wolf Sponsor $500 34 percent, pre-program to post-program, in knowledge of wolf facts, positive (individual) • Alpha Wolf $1,000 attitudes, and understanding of current issues concerning wolves and humans. • Wolf Pack $75 (family at same address) “The clear success of the program prompted our board of directors to find Outside the United States, please add an additional a way to continue offering it to schools across the state,” said Rob Schultz, $15 to Wolf Pup, Lone Wolf, Wolf Pack and Wolf the Center’s executive director. “We’re thrilled that students will continue to Associate memberships. receive this educational programming in their classrooms.” Please mail membership payment to: International Using engaging video and photos, the PowerPoint-based “Wolves at our Wolf Center Administrative Office, Attn: Membership, Door” covers basic wolf biology, predator-prey dynamics, the role of wolves 7100 Northland Circle N, Suite 205, Minneapolis, in healthy ecosystems, myths and opinions about wolves, wolf management MN 55428, USA. Contact the membership department and the importance of wildland habitat. Students also learn by handling arti- with questions: 763-560-7374 ext. 230 or [email protected]. facts such as wolf, deer, and moose bones and pelts. International Wolf is a forum for airing perspectives, They Learned About Wolves (2014-2018) science-based information and personal experiences about wolves. Articles and materials printed in The total number of classrooms in grades 2-12 that had 1,981 International Wolf do not necessarily reflect the an hour-long classroom presentation. viewpoint of the International Wolf Center or its board of directors. 49,099 The total number of students who received the programming. International Wolf welcomes submissions of personal State parks in which programs were presented. adventures with wolves and wolf photographs. Prior 33 to submission of other types of manuscripts, address 32 Public libraries that had Wolves at Our Door programs. queries to Chad Richardson, publications director. PHOTOS: Unless otherwise noted, or obvious from the More than The number of Minnesota counties in which there was caption or article text, photos are of captive wolves. 52 at least one program. International Wolf is printed entirely with soy ink. Paper More than The number of school districts in which there was use is offset with a donation from the Center through 124 at least one program. Print Releaf. We encourage you to recycle this magazine.
2 Fall 2018 www.wolf.org From the Executive Director
INTERNATIONAL WOLF CENTER
It’s dynamic, fun and mega-fauna charismatic. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Nancy jo Tubbs And it’s coming in 2019! Chair n some respects, it was a museum exhibit that led to the creation of the International Wolf Dr. L. David Mech Vice Chair Center. In the early 1980s, the Science Museum of Minnesota developed a natural history Debbie Hinchcliffe Iexhibit featuring the social, biological, mythological and ethical relationships between Secretary wolves and humans. The 6,000-square-foot “Wolves and Humans” display won awards, Paul B. Anderson set attendance records and eventually went on tour in 18 cities around Treasurer the United States and Canada. One of the main biologists from whom the Cree Bradley material for that exhibit came was Dr. L. David Mech. Cindy Carvelli-Yu At the time, Dr. Mech was studying wolves in the Superior National Rick Duncan Forest near Ely, Minnesota. He and his team commonly fielded questions Fitz Fitzgerald Nancy Gibson from the public about wolves. The need for the exhibit to have a perma- Judy Hunter nent home along with the stream of public interest about wolves eventually Connie LaFond led to the 1993 opening of the International Wolf Center in Ely. Deborah Wold Lewis Rob Schultz Since the Center opened, the exhibit has helped educate more than a Aaron Morris million visitors from around the world. But scientific knowledge about wolves has increased Mike Phillips significantly since the exhibit was created, and the story of how this endangered species has Debbie Reynolds Jerry Sanders been recovering in the U.S. over the past few decades needs to be added. Paul Schurke Last winter, work began on a redesign of the entire exhibit. The new exhibit will be installed Keira Thrasher in May 2019, in time for our busy summer months in Ely. New features will include a howling room, interactive displays and even augmented reality. It’s a huge undertaking at the Center, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR but we’re ready for the challenge. Rob Schultz The new exhibit is funded, in large part, by a $1 million grant from the Legislative- MISSION Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources. The funding was secured when Minnesota The International Wolf Center Gov. Mark Dayton signed the budget bill on May 30. We deeply appreciate the efforts of advances the survival of wolf Rep. Rob Ecklund, Sen. Tom Bakk and the Ely City Council for their support of the funding. populations by teaching about We look forward to sharing this wolves, their relationship to wildlands and the human role new exhibit with you in 2019! n in their future.
Educational services and Sincerely, informational resources are available at: 1396 Highway 169 Ely, MN 55731-8129, USA 800-ELY-WOLF Rob Schultz 218-365-4695 Executive Director email address: [email protected] www.wolf.org The Wolves and Humans exhibit, which helped launch the International Wolf Center.
International Wolf Fall 2018 3 Returning Grazing Land to Nature Helps More than Wolves By TRACY O’CONNELL Laura Welp Adobe Sotck/ Carter
4 Fall 2018 www.wolf.org 90 he importance of preserving wild- for the use of both wildlife and livestock. lands to provide healthy, spacious The sheer scope of the grazing allot- Thabitat for large carnivores and ment program, together with the myriad their prey has long been realized by ecological concerns raised by grazing cat- environmentalists. The International tle and sheep on fragile mountain land, is Wolf Center mission, in support of that why the retiring of grazing allotments— idea, is to advance the survival of wolf such as the more than 50,000 acres populations by teaching about wolves, recently removed from the allotment their relationship to wildlands and the program in the Upper East Fork of the human role in their future. Salmon River in Idaho—was a big deal One prominent cause of wild eco- to supporters of system destruction is the grazing of wildland pres- domestic livestock such as sheep and ervation. One MONTANA cattle. Millions of acres of public land, such supporter Yellowstone National managed by branches of the federal gov- is Lynne Stone, Park ernment such as the U.S. Forest Service director of the Boise National and the Bureau of Land Management Ketchum, Idaho, Forest (BLM), are divided into allotments and based Boulder- 15 pastures for management purposes. White Clouds Boise There, the practice of domestic livestock Council, formed grazing coexists with the wildlife native in 1989 to pro- IDAHO to the region. tect, defend and The Forest Service, part of the U.S. enhance Idaho’s 86 Department of Agriculture, notes on its wildlands and 84 website that it “supports livestock graz- wildlife, accord- WYOMING
ing on National Forest System lands.” ing to its web Map data courtesy of Sagebrush Fund Such grazing, the site says, “if responsi- site. Stone notes The highlighted area includes recently retired allotments in the headwaters bly done, provides a valuable resource that more than of the East Fork of Idaho’s Salmon River, which will provide habitat for to the livestock owners as well as the 39,000 acres steelheadNEVADA trout, bull trout and Chinook salmon,UTAH three top carnivores American people.” of this retired (wolves, bears and mountain lions), and bighorn sheep, among others. In the U.S. Department of the Interior, allotment is in the BLM’s Rangeland Administration two new wilder- System handles about 18,000 applica- ness areas, the Jerry Peak and the adja- multi-million dollar fund the WPP has tions and issues 2,400 grazing authoriza- cent Hemingway-Boulders, both created dedicated to buying out allotments from tions (in the form of permits, leases, and by Congress in 2015 and now protecting willing sellers. That fund is managed by other agreements) with ranchers each nearly 185,000 total acres. a “semi-separate” organization with a year across 12 western states, noting Key to such an effort is the Western friendlier image—the Sagebrush Habitat online that it manages the public lands Watershed Project (WWP), whose exec- Conservation Fund—that exists to utive director, wildlife biologist Erik negotiate with ranchers, some of whom Molvar, explained his group’s work. might not meet willingly with WWP “It’s in the philosophical DNA of our because of its perceived anti-grazing organization to take on livestock graz- image. The group has worked to restore ing,” he says, adding that while fre- more than 250 million acres of public quently teaming with other conservation land in the west—places where an array groups to achieve a goal, WWP is seen of birds, fish, mammals, amphibians as a leader in the grazing issue—a topic and rare plants flourish. many don’t want to touch because the The monies used by the Sagebrush grazing industry is very well connected Habitat Conservation Fund resulted politically. “We’re a hardnosed organi- from a unique alliance between WWP zation,” he says of WWP. “Regardless and Ruby Pipeline LLC, a subsidiary of the politics, we are free to take on of El Paso Corporation. Under a legal problems and rock the boat.” settlement, WWP agreed not to oppose Molvar says his group, with offices in a 680-mile underground pipeline several western states, is armed with a project intended to bring natural gas Adobe Sotck/ Brett
International Wolf Fall 2018 5 produced in Wyoming and other Rocky with ranchers, it also brings multiple heavy grazing, cattle provide an open- Mountain states to Oregon for dis- benefits to the rest of the ecosystem. ing to the invasive cheatgrass (so called tribution to West Coast customers. Molvar ticks off examples of environ- because it sends out long roots to cheat In exchange, Ruby agreed to pay $15 mental degradation caused by grazing, other grass of water) to take over. million over 10 years to be used for and the improvements that occur as the “Livestock are rototilling the land and voluntary conservation projects. livestock leave. creating conditions for cheatgrass mono- When the Conservation Fund pur- “Ranching takes all the natural for- culture,” Molvar explains. Also called chases land to return it to wild habitat age away from the native herbivores,” drooping brome, cheatgrass is an annual and protect it from grazing, “It’s a win- he begins, noting that bighorn sheep, plant native to the Eurasian steppes, and win,” according to Molvar. The sellers bison and elk can be driven from an area because it seeds much more prolifically, typically want someone to take over used for livestock grazing by lack of it can eliminate competing native peren- the land, often because their children forage. Additional harm comes from the nials such as bunchgrass and sagebrush. choose to forego ranching, with its mar- trampling of vulnerable soil biocrusts Highly flammable when it dries out in ginal income, in favor of other careers, which contain microscopic communities the summer, it is blamed for some of the he explained. “We give them a golden that capture nitrogen from the air and severe fires in western states. saddle to ride off into the sunset.” hold moisture, among other functions. Damage to waterways is another det- While the return of grazing allotments One hoof print can destroy these crusts rimental effect of grazing allotments. to wildland provides much-needed space for 30 to 100 years, he says. Molvar explains that cattle evolved in for large carnivores to live free of conflict By destroying native grasses through a boggy, northern European landscape
No one alive today has ever seen the massive herds of wildlife that roamed the western range.
Destroyed natural spring Jonathan B Ratner B Jonathan Adobe Sotck/ PriceM
6 Fall 2018 www.wolf.org and spend a lot of time wallowing in streams. In addition to breaking down stream banks and eroding soil, they cre- ate a “serious to extreme” risk of e coli from their droppings, which pollute wild streams with bacteria to an extent often in violation of the Clean Water Act. Among its other work, WWP seeks to ensure that land management agencies such as the BLM and the Forest Service enforce environmental laws, including the Clean Water, Endangered Species, and National Environmental Policy acts. Domestic livestock can spread disease
to wild populations, as well. In the case Melissa Cain & Google Earth of cattle, brucellosis can be transmitted In northern New Mexico’s Carson National Forest, a sheep grazing allot- to bison and elk. Cattle ranchers some- ment is shown on the left. On the right, an ungrazed section of the same times want bison killed to eradicate the area. Sagebrush loss is apparent even from a Google Earth satellite. threat of transmission to cattle, Molvar says, when it was actually the cattle that the best places to see elk, which is also way or another so land that was consid- infected the wild herbivores. an excellent place to see wolves. Elk ered protected is re-opened to grazing. Domestic sheep can spread the are abundant where domestic livestock On still other occasions, the passage of bacterium, Mannheimia haemolycta, are not competing with them, he says, time and the natural destruction of fences which is harmless to them but can wipe noting that WPP looks to strategically lead to de-facto permanent preservation out a bighorn population with a serious create large tracts that, by being free of because it becomes too problematic to illness similar to pneumonia. Whole livestock, also provide an area for wolves restore the required fencing in order to wild herds have been eliminated by and bears free of conflicts with ranchers. reopen the allotment. this condition to which bighorn sheep While the areas removed from grazing As the Sagebrush Habitat Conser- develop no immunity. are large, often the protections achieved vation Fund project helps reduce live- “This region was an American are not permanent. “Most allotments are stock grazing, create de facto permanent Serengeti, as described by Lewis and only closed for the life of the 20-year preservation, and allow retiring ranchers Clark,” Molvar comments, adding, “No forest plan,” Molvar explains, after which to benefit wildlands and wildlife, this one alive today has ever seen the massive they can be reopened. Of the half million does seem like a win-win. n herds of wildlife that roamed the western acres WPP has restored from grazing, range.” “People say wolves kill the prey,” more than 400,000 acres are perma- Tracy O’Connell is professor emeritus at he continues, but points to Yellowstone nently closed to livestock. Other times the University of Wisconsin-River Falls in National Park as an example of one of the Forest Service changes its policies one marketing communications and serves on the Center’s communications and magazine committees. No one alive today has ever seen the massive herds of wildlife that roamed the western range. Gerry Goldner
International Wolf Fall 2018 7 By CHERYL LYN DYBAS
Golden jackal searching for a meal in Croatia. Can We Coexist? Miha Krofel / University of Ljubljana
8 Fall 2018 www.wolf.org Banff wolf pack hunting elk
The absence of large preda- tors such as wolves from cities has also given urban adapt- ers free rein. Infrequently, wolves have populated cit- ies, and when their numbers decrease, mesopredators such as red foxes and coyotes often increase. For example, “Europe is currently experiencing a dra-
Christopher MartinChristopher matic expansion of a new car- nivore across the continent,” says ecologist Miha Krofel of the University of Ljubljana in Slovenia. or the first time in history, a Life in the big city The golden jackal is a native European majority of humans live in Synanthropes demonstrate how species, but its range has been limited Furban areas—more than three quickly wild species can adapt to the to the southern fringes of Europe for billion people reside in cities around pressures of living in unnatural habi- millennia. Now it’s increasingly colo- the world. As we’re moving into town, tats, says wildlife biologist David Drake, nizing new areas, with reports of its canids are right behind us. Or we’re director of the Urban Canids Project at arrival in the Netherlands, Denmark and behind them, sometimes claiming turf the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Estonia. Two new studies have identi- they’ve already staked out. Beyond adapting, synanthropes are fied the likely reason: wolves. Or more In Moscow, feral dogs ride the sub- evolving; some researchers believe that precisely, states Krofel in the journals ways, while halfway around the globe urban living is accelerating the process. Nature Communications and Hystrix, a in Madison, Wisconsin, red foxes tun- Changes that would usually take centu- lack of wolves. nel under garage floors to dig dens. ries are happening in decades or years. Gray wolves once were—and in many Red foxes in Fairfax, Virginia go them For example, urban red foxes in Israel places, still are—persecuted by humans. one better, stealing newspapers from have higher survival rates and smaller At one time, wolves existed throughout suburban front porches to line their home ranges than their country cousins. North America and Eurasia, but were domiciles—or, as one homeowner Human presence may have shortened gradually eliminated until only those quipped, “…to read up on prime real the distance canids and other mammals in remote areas survived, opening the estate in the neighborhood.” roam by two-thirds, according to an way for European mesopredators like Urban canids not only provide end- analysis published in the January 26, golden jackals. less “Can you believe?” tales; they are 2018, issue of the journal Science. In the subjects growing scientific inter- areas with a large human “footprint,” Wolves once more at the door est, so much so that researchers have wild mammals’ maximum ranges aver- That situation may be changing again. Can We Coexist? coined a term for these city-dwelling aged 4.3 miles. In low-footprint areas, Protection of gray wolves is increas- carnivores: synanthropes. that estimate was 13.7 miles. ing their numbers in parts of Europe Some species fare better than others and elsewhere. Wolves now frequent in cities and suburbs. Medium-sized refuse dumps in Israel, Italy, Canada and canids such as coyotes and red foxes, Romania. In Canada, some follow dump also called mesopredators or mesocarni- trucks carrying trash to landfills, timing vores, are often “urban adapters.” Much their appearance to that of the trucks. of their success stems from their diets; In France, where wolves were eradi- they’re far from picky eaters. They trot cated by the 1930s, they’re creeping back, along carrying everything from discarded with some 360 now in the country. The fast-food wrappers to fishery bycatch French government recently announced that washes ashore. a plan to allow 500 wolves nationwide
International Wolf Fall 2018 9 by 2023. Farmers can apply for funding minutes from downtown Minneapolis. Fire Island, where canids (some- to protect their sheep and other livestock According to Mech, it’s the farthest south times) coexist with humans from predators like wolves, but compen- in the state a pack has been found in sation is contingent on measures like recent history. The wolves thrived on Wolves may be inching closer to installing electric fences. the area’s abundant deer. cities, but red foxes are already there. “Biologically, wolves can and will Isanti resident Larry Hogie digs soil Foxes are the most widespread, and live almost anywhere people will toler- from ponds on his property and forms possibly most abundant, urban canid ate them, and that will vary with local it into mounds of dirt for sale to gar- in Australia, Europe, Japan and North culture and politics,” writes Dave Mech deners and horticulture centers. One America, according to Carl Soulsbury of of the U.S. Geological Survey’s Northern day Hogie glanced at the edge of the the University of Bristol in the U.K. and Prairie Wildlife Research Center and the woods near his home…and a gray wolf co-authors of the book Urban Carnivores: University of Minnesota in a 2017 paper looked back. Since then, he’s spotted Ecology, Conflict, and Conservation. in the journal Biological Conservation. wolves four or five times. “But I don’t Sarah Karpanty of Virginia The founder of the International Wolf think many of the wolves are around Polytechnic Institute and State University Center in Ely, Minnesota, Mech wasn’t any longer,” Hogie says. in Blacksburg, Virginia is conducting a expecting wolves to stake out territory Mech believes there may be one or multi-year study of red fox population almost in the backyard of his University two left, and he and his University of density, spatial ecology and dietary ecol- of Minnesota-Twin Cities office. But that’s Minnesota colleagues hope to study ogy on Fire Island, New York. About 31 exactly what happened. them. “We’d like to find out if wolves miles long, Fire Island runs parallel to In the spring of 2015, gray wolves could exist on a long-term basis so close the south side of Long Island, northeast showed up near Isanti, Minnesota, 45 to the Twin Cities,” he says. Adds Hogie, of New York City. Karpanty’s research “For that to happen, we need to learn territory extends from Robert Moses how to live in peace with wolves and State Park at one end of the island to Fire other predators.” Island National Seashore on the other. Research reported in a 2014 paper in The area has one of the highest red Science shows that humans and predators fox densities in the world. How the can successfully share the landscape. In foxes got there, no one is sure, but they areas where wolves and other carnivores probably made their way across the prey on livestock, say the 76 co-authors 8-mile-long Robert Moses Causeway of the Science paper, attempts to reduce that connects the city of Islip, New York, the threat, such as installing electric with Fire Island. fences and obtaining livestock-guarding On a May morning, with a stiff ocean dogs, can facilitate coexistence. breeze flapping small-craft warning flags, Karpanty and I, along with Karpanty’s students Kat Miles and Claire Helmke, Photos: Ilya Raskin are at the Robert Moses State Park’s Field 5— which is, in fact, a park- ing lot. We cross the asphalt in Karpanty’s jeep and pull up near some dumpsters. Not far from the trash receptacles, at the base of a pitch pine tree rooted in a dune, is an open- ing in the sand where a fox family has taken up residence. Before long, one, two… seven small, orange-red kits poke out their faces. We’re well hidden in nearby shrubs, so the young foxes emerge and Fox kits and adult near their den in the middle of a busy golf course in Islip, New York. start to play, batting each other with small paws. From there, we head south to Field 2 and the nearby Pitch & Putt Golf Course.
10 Fall 2018 www.wolf.org International Wolf bow. The dead fox was a mature female State Parkwasfatallyshotwith across chased carsforfoodinRobert Moses trous results. In January, 2017, a fox that thing,” Karpantycomments. runs forit.“Obviouslythisisn’t agood and tossascraptowaitingfox,which The occupantsroll downthewindows As wewatch,acarstopsintheroad. by toseeifpeoplewilloffer handouts. Island, stoppingtolookatcarspassing main road runningupanddownFire dog,” saysKarpanty. Redfoxeshauntthe behavior likewhatyoumightseeinyour f beaches, where foxesmakeoff withthe fish. Thedeadskatesthenwashupon Local fishers often discard skates as trash feathers and fish scales at den “doors.” Karpanty says.Thefoxeshavealsoleft food wrappersandchipbagsatdens,” healthiest diets.“We’ve foundtake-out living high,althoughnotalwaysonthe Con and Conflict Ecology, Carnivores: in theU.S.,according toUrban Australia;andChicago U.K.; Melbourne, other fox-richlocales:Edinburgh inthe “a lotoffoxes.” of 6.25square miles. mile, in a total available area one-thirdevery of a square 2.37 adultsand3.51kitsin Karpanty hasfoundbetween 57 kits.Ontheentire island, end, there are 39adultsand and OldInletatitseastern at theisland’s end western that betweenFire IslandInlet survey, Karpanty estimates they doit?Basedonarecent on Fire Island,andhowdo often rolls intoafox’s den. nearby.” Sonear, infact,thatastrayball might accuratelyadd:“andwithwildlife and challengeofatruegolfcourse.”It taste oftheocean,withhighgreenery park’s adstatesthatthecourse“offers a thicket ofpoisonivyandgreenbrier. The beneath vegetation, this time in a dense Here, asatField5,afoxdenishidden ish parts. Accepting handoutscanhave disas- “These foxesare alsointobegging In suburbanIslip’s backyard, foxesare “In otherwords,” shesays, The numbers are similar to those of The numbersare similartothoseof How manyred foxesmakealiving
servation . - 13.2 million rodents that are crop pests. more than 3,700 tons of animal waste and alone, golden jackals annually remove trash collectors. golden jackalsare asunpaid serving Conservation a 2016paperinBiological front oftheireyes.Astheyreported in leagues discovered asolutionalmost in the UniversityofBelgradeandhiscol- less so in Europe. But Dusko Cirovic of on Fire Island andacross theU.S.,it’s no Symbiotic canids? urban the nearest trashcan—notontheroad.” they candoisplacetheirleftoversin “If peoplelikethefoxes,bestthing foxes, oranywildlife,”saysKarpanty. ing visitorstotheislandnotfeed and partofKarpanty’s study. “We’re ask and suburbs.Medium-sizedcanidssuchascoyotes The researchers estimatethatinSerbia If “wastemanagement”isachallenge Some speciesfarebetterthanothersincities Much oftheirsuccessstemsfromdiets; mesocarnivores, areoften“urbanadapters.” and redfoxes,alsocalledmesopredatorsor they’re farfrompickyeaters. - , Wildlife Geographic, as for Writers, writesonconservationbiology the InternationalLeagueofConservation ecologist Cheryl Lyn Dybas,aFellowof Award-winning sciencejournalist and are. Often, unbeknownst to us, wealready communities.” predators are ofgreat valuetohuman as scavengers,andtoshowthatthese providedservices by mesocarnivores to demonstratethevalueofecosystem greater thanahalf-millioneuros peryear. value of the jackals’ waste removal is The biologists found that the monetary
National Geographic,
The results, says Cirovic, “are thefirst Can we coexist with wild canids? wild with we coexist Can International W n
and manyotherpublications.
National Wildlife, BBC olf aswell
Photos: Arti Wulandari Wisconsin-Madison. of theUniversity Foxes onthecampus
Ocean Fall 2018
11 Pros and Cons:
he wild Mexican wolf population in the United States has been grow- Ting, on average, 14 percent annu- ally since 2009. This strong growth proves the inaccuracy of population models from the 2010-2013 recovery team on which I served (with individuals from Michigan Tech University, Turner Endangered Species Fund, the National Park Service and others) and suggests caution in basing conclusions on those models. The 2017 survey detected all-time, record minimum numbers of wolves (114), packs (22), potential breeding pairs (26) and adult Mexican wolves (88) in the wild. Widespread claims of agency mismanagement and genetic crisis—claims made by scientists, media, wildlife associations and members of the public—are being muted by the successful progress of recovery. The 2010-2013 attempt to revise the recov- ery plan was based on what is now decade-old information and has been eclipsed by more cur- rent data. The 2017 Mexican Wolf Recovery Plan is based on analyses led by an independent, inter- nationally known endangered species population- viability expert with a group that included some Recovering former recovery team members. This latest effort used a more advanced, customized viability model with access to an updated pedigree. For more than Mexican Wolves two years, scientists updated all available data to determine what is needed for recovery. The team used wild Mexican wolf data to update: on a Solid Scientific effects of inbreeding, mortality rates, catastrophe prob- ability, percent of females breeding, pup production Foundation and historical range. Previous models were based on wolf mortality rates from the northern Rockies, but the current plan uses mortality rates from wild Mexican By JIM HEFFELFINGER wolves in the recovery areas. Previous analyses lacked the 15-plus years of data on percent of females breed- ing in the wild, considered in the current plan. The last recovery team estimated the effects of inbreeding with data from only 39 litters, but the current plan is based on 89 wild Mexican wolf litters from 1998-2014 (50 more litters and eight more years of data). Importantly, overall inbreed- ing levels of wild-born pups are not increasing—data which conflicts with claims of a mounting genetic crisis.
Jacquelyn Fallon Jacquelyn continued on page 14
12 Fall 2018 www.wolf.org The 2017 Mexican Wolf Recovery Plan AdobeStock / RbbrDckyBK / AdobeStock
he 2017 Mexican wolf (Canis lupus baileyi) recovery plan is a long Toverdue update of the original 1982 plan. It calls for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to establish two genetically diverse populations in the subspecies’ core historical range. The southwestern United States is targeted for a population of ≥320 wolves and northern Mexico for a population of ≥200. FWS predicts that 25 to 35 years and $260 million will be required to establish 2017 Mexican Wolf those populations. Selection of habitat for the population in Recovery Plan: Mexico is not based on the best—or even good— science, but rather on political pressure. This was made clear in the following reaction by Utah to Really Good on an early draft of the plan, which indicated that, because suitable habitat in Mexico was lacking, Anti-Wolf Politics, the recovery region needed to be extended north to areas outside the subspecies’ historical range: Identification of areas outside the historic range of Really Bad on the sub-species as part of the recovery area…will be vigorously opposed (legally and politically) by the Utah Pro-Wolf Science Division of Wildlife Resources and the State of Utah. Notably, Utah did not indicate that opposition would be based on scientific grounds. Arizona, New Mexico BY MIKE PHILLIPS and Colorado adopted similar positions. The dogged press of political considerations by Arizona, New Mexico, Utah and Colorado ensured that the FWS would finalize the 2017 plan with undue reliance on continued on page 15
International Wolf Fall 2018 13 Heffelfinger recovery occur mostly outside Mexico. make unsuitable the historical range continued from page 12 Some advocates with little knowledge of the Mexican wolf in a relevant time- of Mexico contradict the best avail- frame. Quality wolf habitat exists north The newest plan also takes into able science and first-hand knowledge of the Arctic Circle, but we must decide account the gradual phase-out of feed- of Mexican experts. A state-of-the-art how to restore the historical, ecological ing wolves to divert them from livestock analysis by a binational team identified role of Mexican wolves. Scientists have and includes realistic estimates of con- 28,635 square miles of high quality wolf recently warned of the perils of pushing nectivity between populations. Genetic habitat in Mexico; clearly Mexico will recovery north of historical range because diversity retention is addressed with play a vital role in recovery. The same two of genetic swamping by large wolves of objective, measurable and achievable large recovery areas of suitable habitat in Canadian origin that disperse from the criteria—not ambiguous references to Mexico were independently identified Rocky Mountains. (A Yellowstone wolf measurements of genetic diversity that in a jaguar recovery plan. Discounting already visited Arizona). will only lead to endless litigation about that information would contradict the We have binational recovery plans delisting. To date, human intolerance Endangered Species Act requirement for ocelot, jaguar, Sonoran pronghorn, has been limiting Mexican wolf recov- to use best available data in recovery thick-billed parrot, condor, masked bob- ery, not inbreeding depression. planning. white, Kemps-Ridley sea turtle and more; Members of the last Mexican wolf This updated habitat analysis includes why shouldn’t the Mexican wolf also recovery team asserted that recovery two measures of human-caused mortal- benefit from expansion across borders? will require three populations of 250 ity (road density and towns). Adding This recovery plan, based on updated Mexican wolves, but this was based on information on livestock distribution analyses far more complex and realistic theoretical genetic principles, and on the and protected areas would stack four than all previous versions, provides for outdated, obsolete model from 2010- redundant layers representing the same successful Mexican wolf recovery in its 2013. Despite these shortcomings, it is issue. Large tracts of private land with historical range. often misrepresented as a threshold for restricted access in Mexico have the Efforts are now appropriately focused successful recovery. The plan’s founda- same function as official land designa- on returning this small wolf subspecies tion is an accurate depiction of historical tions in the U.S. No other carnivore to its ecological role in the American range based on detailed skull and body recovery plan has a better representa- Southwest and Mexico. n measurements, historical records, genetic tion of relative distribution of prey on differences and measures of ecological the landscape; past efforts simply used Supporting Literature differentiation. a satellite image of green vegetation as (with links to full manuscripts) Federal regulations require that a substitute. Criticism that the analysis Mexican wolves be recovered in their lacks a measure of livestock density is a Harding, L. E., J. Heffelfinger, D. historical range unless it is “unsuitably and red herring, as no accurate records exist Paetkau, E. Rubin, J. Dolphin, A. irreversibly altered or destroyed.” Earlier on either side of the border. Aoude. 2016. Genetic management teams chose to ignore tens of thou- Wolves have adapted to environments and setting recovery goals for Mexican sands of square miles of suitable habi- from the Arctic to Arabia, and climate wolves (Canis lupus baileyi) in the wild. Biological Conservation 203:151-159. tat in Mexico, inappropriately insisting change is not going to alter, destroy or https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0006320716304256
Heffelfinger, J. R., R.M. Nowak, and D. Paetkau. 2017. Clarifying historical range to aid recovery of the Mexican wolf. Journal of Wildlife Management 81:766-777. https://onlinelibrary.wiley. com/doi/full/10.1002/jwmg.21252
Odell, E.A. Heffelfinger, J.R. Rosenstock, S.S., Bishop C.J., Liley, S., González-Bernal, A., Velasco, J.A., Martínez-Meyer, E. 2018. Perils of recovering the Mexican wolf outside of its historical range. Biological Conservation 220:290-298. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.01.020
Jim Heffelfinger is the Wildlife Science At only 25–32 inches tall, the Mexican gray wolf is smaller than its Coordinator for the Arizona Game and cousin, the gray wolf, with a coat of buff, gray, rust and black. Fish Department. Larry Lamsa
14 Fall 2018 www.wolf.org Phillips continued from page 13 a woefully inadequate habitat-suit- ability model. The model relies on correlation between climatic and vegetative fac- tors, and locations where Mexican wolves were collected historically to identify suitable habitat for recovery. FWS and the states justify this reliance by opin- ing that Mexican wolves evolved to be precisely adapted to the narrow range of habitat present within the subspe- cies’ core historical range in Mexico. That opinion, however, is undermined by 1) good science which indicates that wolves are broadly adaptable to climatic and vegetative conditions, and 2) the FWS’s longstanding effort to restore the subspecies to Arizona and New Mexico where such conditions differ from those in Mexico. Fallon Jacquelyn More important, the model is woe- fully inadequate because of its disregard for aspects of wolf habitat that good sci- ence deems essential to recovery: limited and managing wolves across millions of failure of science-informed planning density of livestock, adequate density acres of private land necessary to sup- and leadership by FWS simply for the of wild prey, and large tracts of public port ≥200 animals. sake of political expediency. land where human-caused mortality is Although the U.S. public supports Much of the 2017 Mexican wolf typically low. wolf recovery, anti-wolf groups hold recovery plan is based on the state’s Based on the flawed habitat model, immense political influence in Colorado, desire to assign to Mexico as much of the 2017 plan targets 38 percent of Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah. These the burden of Mexican wolf recovery as recovery on an area in Mexico domi- groups were well served by the scien- possible—not the best available science. nated by small tracts of private property tific gloss the habitat model gives to the It is worse than a poor replacement for with abundant livestock and unknown recovery plan, and by the disastrous the 1982 plan. Deeply discounting the numbers of native prey, and where decision to exclude from it the high- cardinal role of wolf-livestock interac- wildlife protection laws are irregularly quality habitat of the Grand Canyon and tions and importance of land ownership enforced and access and safety for field Southern Rockies ecoregions of north- ensures that FWS will waste precious personnel are concerns. The FWS would ern Arizona/southern Utah and north- time and millions of dollars, all the while never target such an area in the U.S. for ern New Mexico/southern Colorado, failing to recover Canis lupus baileyi. n wolf recovery. respectively. Reliance on the model is already prov- If politics demanded that FWS Mike Phillips has served as the executive ing problematic. Free-ranging Mexican initially focus on marginal habitat in director of the Turner Endangered Species wolves in Mexico are routinely fed artifi- Mexico by adopting a habitat suitability Fund and senior advisor to the Turner cially to promote survival by minimizing model that discounts the importance Biodiversity Divisions since he co-founded conflicts with livestock. Such “diver- of livestock and land ownership, then both with Ted Turner in 1997. Before that Mike worked for the U.S. Fish and sionary feeding” is required because of the agency should at least have defined Wildlife Service and National Park abundant livestock and relatively scarce a recovery region that also included Service leading efforts to restore red wild prey, suggesting that the area is not these two ecoregions. Such an approach wolves to the southeastern U.S. and gray suitable despite being identified as such would have facilitated progress once wolves to the Yellowstone Park. Mike has by the habitat model. The shortcomings the inevitable shortcomings of habitat served in the Montana legislature since of the model will become even more in Mexico became undeniable to even 2006, and will hold his Senate seat apparent as biologists strive to expand the most ardent opponents to recovery. through 2020. recovery in Mexico, completing a record Failure to advance such a common- number of initial releases and monitoring sense approach to recovery represents a
International Wolf Fall 2018 15 WOLF EXPERTS FROM 19 COUNTRIES SHARING 100 PRESENTATIONS Concurrent, Poster, Plenary and Keynote
WOLVES IN A CHANGING WORLD OCTOBER 11–14, 2018 MINNEAPOLIS, MN USA THE LAST GREAT WOLF RESTORATION – COLORADO A presentation on the concept of reintroducing wolves to Colorado, BANQUET focusing on attributes and challenges. Attributes • Prey base KEYNOTE may include: • Amount of public land available MIKE PHILLIPS • Varying eco-regions (high deserts, mountains, etc.) Challenges include • Livestock grazing interests/public grazing allotments factors such as: • Conflicting positions among special-interest groups, politicians and USFWS • Legislatively sanctioned, nationwide delisting of wolves as endangered
PLENARY SESSIONS
PANELS Isle Royale Red Wolves, Eastern Wolves and A panel of four will present a other Canis Mixes in Eastern Wolves of the World summary of ups and downs, and North America: Taxonomic validity Speakers from regions around the changing conditions affecting wolves and challenges to recovery world, including Asia, Europe, and trophic systems over 56-plus A panel of five will discuss topics Canada, the Canadian Arctic and years of research on Isle Royale. related to eastern canids, including the United States and Mexico, will They will also address the ways in implications for the U.S. Fish and cover topics that include progress which reintroduction of wolves Wildlife Service if science reorganizes of recovery in each region, politics would benefit a future Isle Royale North American canid species and in place to ensure a viable popula- ecosystem, given the uncertainties of declares the red wolf synonymous tion, issues and problems that future contributions by ice bridges, with eastern wolves, or declares may need to be addressed. weather patterns, random population it a variant of gray wolves. events, herbivory and other factors Ellesmere that influence this island system. SPECIAL PRESENTATION A series of speakers will discuss the wolves inhabiting Ellesmere Island Wolf Depredation Control on Livestock 20-Plus Years of Wolves in Yellowstone and the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, A panel of experts representing Doug Smith, project leader for focusing on observations at dens various viewpoints will discuss wolf the Wolf Restoration Project in and other aspects of pack life, and depredation conflict management. Yellowstone and Emmy Award including a historical summary of Agencies, field agents, a wolf winning cinematographer Bob Landis Dr. L. David Mech’s two-decade study. advocate and a livestock producer will present the history of wolves will discuss key problems and in Yellowstone since their Michipicoten Island the latest news, and find areas of reintroduction in 1995. An overview of geography, species agreement and disagreement. history, human disturbances DEBATE and recent studies of caribou, Mexican Wolf Recovery Plan wolves and beaver. A debate between Mike Phillips, who will discuss and challenge the current Mexican Wolf Recovery Plan and Jim deVos, who will defend it. Gray wolves in Mongolia: changing Risk effects of wolves on free-ranging attitudes and current research livestock: Can prey-gut microbiome PRESENTER Uuganbayar Ganbold, predict stress response in biologist and anti-poaching protection predator–prey interactions? manager, Hustai Nuruu National Park, PRESENTER Azzurra Valerio, Mongolia Washington State University, Olympia, Washington Gray wolves in Estonia: an overview of population genetics and Adaptive use of nonlethal strategies for hybridization with domestic dogs minimizing wolf–livestock conflict PRESENTER Liivi Plumer, PRESENTER Suzanne Stone, Department of Zoology, Institute of Ecology Northwest Senior Field Representative, and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Defenders of Wildlife, Boise, Idaho Harjumaa, Estonia Challenges in wolf management SAMPLING OF Quantifying the diet of the Alexander in Croatia Archipelago wolf in southeast PRESENTATIONS PRESENTER Djuro Huber, Alaska using molecular methods Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, PRESENTER Aimee Massey, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon; Alaska Department of Fish and Game The future of wolf poisoning programs in Canada Through the eyes of a wolf: quantifying PRESENTER Hannah Barron, and classifying the complexities of Wolf Awareness, Inc., facial signaling in wolves Golder, British Columbia, Canada PRESENTER Elana Hobkirk, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom
AUSTRALIA BRA IL CROATIA ESTONIA A AN
AUSTRIA CANADA DENMAR INDIA MON OLIA
NORWA OLAND SLOVA IA SWEDEN UNITED IN DOM JOIN US at the MINNEAPOLIS MARRIOTT NORTHWEST 7025 Northland Dr N, Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 | www.marriott.com A ISTAN OTU AL S AIN SWIT ERLAND USA Comfort and convenience are right on target at Minneapolis Marriott Northwest. Providing easy access to The Shoppes at Arbor Lakes, this all-suite hotel in Brooklyn Park is the perfect place to stay during the symposium. Spread out in upscale accommodations with private sleeping areas, or wrap up work obligations using ergonomic workstations and high-speed Wi-Fi. Symposium registrants will receive a special conference rate of $119 plus tax (includes complimentary WiFi). To book your room, go to wolf.org, click on Programs/International Wolf Symposium/Lodging. If you prefer to reserve your room over the phone, call Dana Madich at: 763-536-3332. Functional response of wolves to human REGISTRATION development across boreal Canada Registration includes 3 breakfasts, 2 lunches, a PRESENTER Marco Musiani, reception, all daily break refreshments and materials. Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science and Faculty of Veterinary Rates go up Sept. 1 Medicine, University of Calgary, To register or for more information: Calgary, Alberta, Canada Registration fees Wolf tracks at the doorstep: International Wolf Center Member. . $424 A 1-year cycle of wolf behavior close to houses in Scandinavia After Sept. 1...... $450 PRESENTER Barbara Zimmermann, Non-member...... $474 > Not a member? Scandinavian Wolf Research Project, After Sept. 1...... $500 Join today at Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, www.wolf.org/support/ Koppang, Norway Student registration...... $299 membership/ An 18-year spatial and temporal analysis of colonizing gray wolves (Canis lupus) in disjunct population Dietary niche overlap between Winter predation patterns of wolves PRESENTER Theresa Simpson, wolves, coyotes, and hybrids in in northwestern Wyoming University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, a 3-species hybrid zone PRESENTER Susannah Woodruff, La Crosse, Wisconsin PRESENTER John Benson, Regional research coordinator, Alaska Department of Fish and Game Shooting wolves: photographs and University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska the reconfiguration of the wolf Humans and their role in shaping in nonfiction for children Ecology of the Indian gray wolf the ecological functions of wolves PRESENTER Debra Mitts-Smith, (Canis lupus pallipes) in the Suleman PRESENTER Thomas Newsome, School of Information Sciences faculty Range, South Waziristan, Pakistan University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia member at the University of Illinois PRESENTER Abdul Hamid, Department of Wildlife Management, Challenging the wildlife decision- Wolves at Our Door: results of 4-year Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, making infrastructure Minnesota education program initiative Rawalpindi, Pakistan PRESENTER Walter Medwid, PRESENTER Misi Stine, Vermont Wildlife Coalition, Newport, Vermont Project Coordinator, Wolves at our Door, Competition on two legs and four: International Wolf Center, Impacts of wolf-cougar co-occurrence on Minneapolis, Minnesota Scent-marking and biometeorology: resource selection and survival across An analysis of behavior across canid an anthropogenic gradient Are livestock-guarding dogs a viable tool species Gray Wolf (Canis lupus), for preventing damages in open-range PRESENTER Lauren Satterfield, Red Wolf (Canis rufus), and livestock? A case study from Portugal University of Washington, Seattle, Washington Coyote (Canis latrans) PRESENTER Hannah Jones, PRESENTER Francisco Petrucci-Fonseco, Individuality in habitat use of Hardin-Simmons University, Abilene, Texas Groupo Lobo, Lisbon, Portugal Scandinavian wolves in relation to anthropogenic infrastructure Patterns of niche partitioning and overlap Do novel scavenging opportunities PRESENTER David Carricondo-Sanches, between sympatric wolves and snow or risk of interspecific killing by AUSTRALIA BRA IL Inland CROATIANorway University of Applied Sciences,ESTONIA A AN leopards in the mountains of central Asia wolves influence occupancy and activity Koppang,Norway patterns of smaller carnivores? PRESENTER Shannon Kachel, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington PRESENTER David Keiter, AUSTRIA CANADA DENMAR INDIA University of Nebraska,MON OLIA School of Natural Resources
NORWA OLAND SLOVA IA SWEDEN UNITED IN DOM