NYC's Zeckendorfs Embrace Global Buyers with UN Condos
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chapter 2 Economic Model of a Professional Football Club in France
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Stirling Online Research Repository Chapter 2 Economic model of a professional football club in France Nicolas Scelles and Wladimir Andreff The economic model of football clubs is a revenue model but also a cost model in relation to their objective. It can be defined as the search for balance between revenues, costs and objective, and the latter can vary: profit maximization, sporting maximization under strict constraint (“hard” constraint), or “soft” budget constraint (Andreff, 2009). In France, the revenue model of football clubs has evolved with time. This mutation fits in the switch from an SSSL (Spectators-Subventions-Sponsors- Local) model to an MMMMG (Media-Magnats-Merchandising-Markets-Global) model at the European level (Andreff & Staudohar, 2000). Before 1914, sport financing came mainly from practitioners (Bourg et Gouguet, 2001, p. 19). Thereafter, with competitions as spectacle, spectators have become the primary source of revenue, ahead of the subsidies granted by the local authorities and industry patrons. Advertising revenues have gradually become more and more important and, in the 1960s and 1970s, sponsorship increased significantly as firms were seeking more direct identification in terms of audience, image, reputation and sales (Andreff et Staudohar, 2000, p. 259) . In France, during the 1970s, operating revenues of first division football clubs came mainly from the spectators, supplemented by subsidies and sponsorship. The SSSL model was at its peak, with its “L” finding its justification in the fact that the revenues were generated from local or national residents. The 1980s is the starting point of a continuous increase in the share of TV rights income for French clubs. -
First Avenue Properties Rezoning Final Scope of Work for a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement
First Avenue Properties Rezoning Final Scope of Work for a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement A. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION INTRODUCTION East River Realty Company, LLC (ERRC) proposes to rezone and obtain other land use approvals, including special permits, for four parcels along First Avenue in midtown Manhattan for predominantly residential and commercial mixed-use redevelopment. Owned by ERCC, the four parcels are located between East 35th Street and East 41st Street (see Figure 1). The specific addresses are 616 First Avenue, 685 First Avenue, 700 First Avenue, and 708 First Avenue. The proposed actions would permit development of the parcels with a mix of residential, commercial, retail, community facility, and open space uses. It is expected that development would be complete in 2014. Potential development resulting from Con Edison’s sale of the properties to ERRC was the subject of a Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement (FGEIS) completed by the New York State Public Service Commission (PSC) in January 2004. Because the development program under the proposed actions may result in significant adverse environmental impacts not identified in the FGEIS, a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) is being prepared. The SEIS will analyze the extent to which the development and zoning actions as currently proposed could potentially result in any significant adverse environmental impacts not previously identified in the FGEIS. Specifically, the SEIS will consider differences between the programs and site plans described in the FGEIS and the current proposed program, site plan, and zoning actions and will consider changes in background conditions in the study areas to reflect the current status of planned and proposed projects and the new anticipated year of completion for the current proposed development program. -
Russian Billionaire Rybolovlev Sues Sotheby's for $380M in Fraud
AiA Art News-service Russian billionaire Rybolovlev sues Sotheby’s for $380m in fraud damages The mega-collector’s latest lawsuit, filed in New York, escalates his three-year legal feud with Swiss dealer Yves Bouvier MARGARET CARRIGAN 3rd October 2018 20:38 GMT Rybolovlev served Sotheby's with a $380m suit in a New York federal court despite a similar pending case in Geneva Francknataf The ongoing and vitriolic battle between the Russian fertiliser billionaire turned art collector Dmitry Rybolovlev and Yves Bouvier, an entrepreneurial Swiss art dealer and freeport magnate, reached dramatic new heights on Tuesday (2 October) when Rybolovlev filed a $380m lawsuit against Sotheby’s in a Manhattan federal court. The charges are brought by two of Rybolovlev’s companies and claim that the auction house materially assisted what the collector refers to as the “largest art fraud in history”, as first reported by Bloomberg. It is the latest attempt by the Russian oligarch to recoup $1bn from Bouvier after first claiming in 2015 that he was overcharged by the dealer on 38 works of art purchased for a total of $2bn over the course of a decade, among them Leonardo’s Salvator Mundi. Sotheby’s was involved in the sale of 14 of the works in question. According to the court papers, Bouvier “masterminded” the fraud by acquiring the paintings at lower prices than he represented before selling them to Rybolovlev at unduly marked up rates, fraudulently pocketing millions for himself. Sotheby’s, the complaint contends, knowingly and intentionally bolstered the plaintiffs’ “trust and confidence in Bouvier and rendered the whole edifice of fraud plausible and credible” by brokering certain sales and inflated valuations. -
Two Penthouses Sell for $60 Million, and John Mellencamp Buys in Soho
BIG TICKET (/COLUMN/BIG-TICKET) Two Penthouses Sell for $60 Million, and John Mellencamp Buys in SoHo Two half-floor sponsor units on the 91st floor of 432 Park Avenue sold to an unknown buyer for $60 million. This was New York City’s most expensive closed sale in January, according to property records. Andrea Mohin/The New York Times By Vivian Marino (http://www.nytimes.com/by/vivian-marino) Feb. 2, 2018 The new year began almost the same way as 2017 ended: with outsize closings of combination-ready penthouses at 432 Park Avenue (https://www.432parkavenue.com/). Two half-floor sponsor units on the 91st floor of this super-tall building, on https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/02/02/realestate/two-penthous…mellencamp-buys-in-soho.html?referer=https://www.google.com/ 2/2/18, 916 AM Page 1 of 10 Midtown’s so-called Billionaires’ Row, between 56th and 57th Streets, sold to an unknown buyer for a combined $60,083,577 (https://a836- acris.nyc.gov/DS/DocumentSearch/DocumentDetail? doc_id=2018010400031001). Each apartment had been on the market for around $40 million. This was New York City’s most expensive closed sale in January, according to property records. Just a few weeks earlier, in mid-December, two half-floor units on the 92nd floor and one on the 93rd of 432 Park, also listed at nearly $40 million apiece, sold to another unnamed buyer for $91.13 million (https://a836- acris.nyc.gov/DS/DocumentSearch/DocumentDetail? doc_id=2017121900639001). It was the priciest sale for all of 2017, as well as the third highest ever for a residence in the city. -
F. Vehicular Traffic
Chapter 9: Transportation (Vehicular Traffic) F. VEHICULAR TRAFFIC EXISTING CONDITIONS STREET AND ROADWAY NETWORK Traffic conditions in the study area vary in relation to a number of factors—the nature of the street and roadway network, surrounding land uses and the presence of major traffic generators, and the intensity of interaction between autos, taxis, trucks, buses, deliveries, and pedestrians. The study area contains five subareas, or zones—Lower Manhattan, the Lower East Side, East Midtown, the Upper East Side, and East Harlem—and each has different street and roadway characteristics along its length. East Midtown, the Upper East Side, and East Harlem are characterized by a regular street grid, with avenues running north-south and streets running east- west. Each of the major north-south avenues—First, Second, Third, Lexington, Park, Madison, and Fifth Avenues—are major traffic carriers. There is just one limited-access roadway, the FDR Drive, which extends around the eastern edge of the study area from its northern end to its southern end. A general overview of the character of the street and roadway network in each of the five zones is presented below. Lower Manhattan is characterized by an irregular grid pattern south of Canal Street. Except for a few major arterials, most streets within the area are narrow with usually just one "moving" lane. Travel is time-consuming and slow along them. Pedestrian traffic often overflows into the street space, further impeding vehicular traffic flow. Water Street and Broadway are the two key north-south streets in this area, and carry two or more effective travel lanes, yet are often difficult to negotiate due to frequent double-parked truck traffic. -
Order Could Pave Way for Russian Billionaire to Launch High Court Case Against Swiss Dealer Yves Bouvier and Sotheby’S ANNY SHAW 9Th January 2018 11:34 GMT
AiA Art News-service New York court grants permission for Rybolovlev to use confidential documents in UK and Switzerland Order could pave way for Russian billionaire to launch High Court case against Swiss dealer Yves Bouvier and Sotheby’s ANNY SHAW 9th January 2018 11:34 GMT Dmitry Rybolovlev Francknataf A New York court has ruled that the Russian mining billionaire Dmitry Rybolovlev can use confidential Sotheby’s documents in an imminent lawsuit in the UK, as well as in ongoing legal proceedings in Switzerland. The order, filed on 22 December, could pave the way for Rybolovlev to launch a fresh case in London’s High Court against the Swiss dealer Yves Bouvier, whom he accuses of defrauding him by $1 billion in the purchase of 38 works of art, including that of the Salvator Mundi by Leonardo da Vinci. The UK lawsuit also threatens to pull in Sotheby’s and Samuel Valette, the auction house’s vice chairman of private sales worldwide, whom Rybolovlev says was partly complicit in the alleged scam. All parties deny any wrongdoing. It is not clear what information is contained in the cache of documents, which Sotheby’s produced in 2016 as part of legal proceedings in Monaco, Singapore and France. No one is at liberty to discuss or disclose them. But court papers refiled on 26 December by David Michael Edwards, Rybolovlev’s lawyer in London, set out how the documents are of “crucial importance” to the proposed UK action. According to Edwards, the documents expose how Valette–and Sotheby’s–were aware that Bouvier was buying works on behalf of a client and that Sotheby’s assisted the Swiss dealer by providing documents that encouraged Rybolovlev to purchase works at “grossly inflated” prices. -
UEFA Financial Fairplay Regulations and European Union Antitrust Law Complications
Emory International Law Review Volume 29 Issue 4 2015 UEFA Financial Fairplay Regulations and European Union Antitrust Law Complications Valerie Kaplan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/eilr Recommended Citation Valerie Kaplan, UEFA Financial Fairplay Regulations and European Union Antitrust Law Complications, 29 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 799 (2015). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/eilr/vol29/iss4/4 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Emory Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Emory International Law Review by an authorized editor of Emory Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. KAPLAN GALLEYSPROOFS2 3/17/2015 9:57 AM UEFA FINANCIAL FAIRPLAY REGULATIONS AND EUROPEAN UNION ANTITRUST LAW COMPLICATIONS INTRODUCTION European Football1 is not just a sport to the rest of the world. Each match is more than just a game. A match can and has represented old battles that never die completely. The Celtic–Rangers rivalry is more than a cross-town rivalry, but a representation of the unfinished political fight over the Protestant Reformation.2 The Barcelona–Real Madrid rivalry represents a long-running nationalist fight between Castilian and Catalonian Spaniards.3 Celtic’s long running rivalry with Rangers Football Club (FC) is just another part of the centuries-old rivalry between Northern Irish Catholics and Protestants.4 While one’s club is a representation of his or her nation and tribe, it is also a business, as shown by the globalization of the sport.5 And just like any business, occasionally there are financial issues. -
The Player Trading Game 2017
The Player Trading Game 2017 footballbenchmark.com What is KPMG Football Benchmark? Consolidated and verified database of football clubs' financial and operational performance. Business intelligence tool enabling relevant comparisons with competitors. An ever-growing platform that includes data from over 150 European football clubs. A tool offering insights into many aspects of football clubs' operations, including, but not limited to, revenue generators, expense categories, profitability indicators, balance sheet items and stadium statistics. footballbenchmark.com Credits: Paris Saint-Germain FC © 2017 KPMG Advisory Ltd., a Hungarian limited liability company and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Table of contents Foreword 4 How we calculate player trading balance for the purposes of this report 7 The European Top 20 8 Where are the “big fish”? 13 Basis of preparation and limiting conditions 15 © 2017 KPMG Advisory Ltd., a Hungarian limited liability company and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 4 The Player Trading Game Foreword Only one year ago, the whole media and fans, it is noticeable that football world was stunned when the ratio between the fee paid for Manchester United FC broke record transfers and the operating the transfer record by signing revenues of the acquiring club has Frenchman Paul Pogba for EUR 105 remained stable at approximately million. Despite being considered 23% in the last 10 years. In view of by many as a disproportionate and that, Neymar’s acquisition by Paris unsustainable trend, this summer Saint-Germain FC (at 42%) could we have witnessed a further pull be considered as an exception, of the financial muscle exercised and more aligned to the ratio at the by clubs. -
Sales Slow at High-End Condos As Pricey Pads Grow Plentiful Around
NEW YORK NEWS POLITICS SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT OPINION LIVING EVENTS HEALTH HOMES FOOD AUTOS HOROSCOPES EDUCATION COMICS GAMES LIVING PICS FASHION PICS BLOGS BY KATHERINE Sales slow at high-end CLARKE condos as pricey pads grow plentiful around city Only 75 percent of the 94-unit One57 is occupied along Billionaire's Row in Midtown NEW YORK DAILY NEWS / Friday, June 13, 2014, 2:00 AM A A A SHARE THIS URL nydn.us/1lkOoDb Where did all the billionaires go? After a year of frenzied sales in 2013, high-end condo deals have slowed at several luxe buildings, including One57, the blue glass skyscraper that symbolizes the new Billionaire’s Row on W. 57th St. This time last year, the 94-unit LATEST STORIES building was 70% sold. Now, it’s just above 75%, said Jeff Dvorett Jane Fonda puts New Mexico ranch up for of Extell Development, meaning sale only a couple of apartments Jane Fonda has listed her have been bought over the last Forked Lightning Ranch just north of Santa Fe for $19.5 12 months. million. The remaining units are mostly Occupy W. 57th St. priced between $20 million and After a year of frenzied sales in 2013, high-end $40 million. And the 1% is condo deals have slowed at balking. several luxe buildings, including One57, the blue glass skyscraper that The uber rich are also slow to symbolizes the new Billionaire’s Row on W. 57th St. sign on the dotted line at 432 The penthouse market Park Ave., Harry Macklowe’s doesn't have to be top dollar high-end condo slated to The loftiest bragging rights become the tallest residential in town go to penthouse tower in the Western dwellers — but you don’t have to be Rupert Murdoch Hemisphere, and at a much- or Jon Bon Jovi to own lauded condo conversion at 737 trophy aeries. -
Condos for New on Billionaires'
September 5, 2019 https://therealdeal.com/2019/09/05/serial-buyers-trade-old-condos-for-new-on-billionaires-row/ Serial buyers trade “old” condos for new on Billionaires’ Row Sting, Daniel Och and Bob Diamond are just a few who’ve left 15 CPW for “newer” condos By E.B. Solomont For many, a move coincides with a huge life event — relocating when a marriage begins or ends, upsizing to make room for a new baby or downsizing when kids move out. But for an uber-rich set of buyers in Manhattan, it comes down to shininess. Over the past few months, serial buyers with deep pockets have swapped “older” condos for new ones. They’ve traded Central Park West for Park Avenue; limestone for a glass curtain wall; Christian de Portzamparc for Robert A.M. Stern. Take Sting and his wife, Trudie, who paid $65.7 million for a penthouse at 220 Central Park South after unloading their pad at 15 Central Park West for a cool $50 million. The couple paid $26.5 million at 15 CPW in 2008, records show. Or the rocker’s neighbor, Daniel Och, who is reportedly among the buyers at 220 CPS and recently listed his penthouse at 15 CPW for $57.5 million. Real estate developers are doing it, too. This summer, Related Companies boss Stephen Ross listed his Time Warner Center penthouse — which he received as a “distribution” — for $75 million. Now, Ross is moving west, to his company’s Hudson Yards megadevelopment. “There’s a certain personality that wants the new ‘It,’ whether it’s a handbag, car, vacation spot or home,” said Douglas Elliman’s Noble Black. -
Western Rail Yard
Chapter 10: Neighborhood Character A. INTRODUCTION Neighborhood character is an amalgam of several elements that give an area its distinctive personality and help distinguish it from other neighborhoods. These components include: land use; street layout; scale, type, and style of development; historic features; patterns and volumes of traffic; noise levels; and any other physical or social characteristics. However, not all of these elements affect neighborhood character in all cases; a neighborhood usually draws its character from a few determining elements. Using information presented in other technical chapters of this EIS, this chapter examines neighborhood character at the three project sites and the associated surrounding study areas, and analyzes the effects of the Proposed Actions on neighborhood character in these areas. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS The Proposed Actions would have a beneficial effect on neighborhood character on the project sites and in the surrounding study areas. Development of Western Rail Yard would fulfill a long- standing public policy to promote productive use of the site with a lively mix of uses, open spaces, and streets that would complement and support the development in the Hudson Yards area and West Chelsea. Construction of permanently affordable housing on the Tenth Avenue and Ninth Avenue Sites would support the Clinton neighborhood by emphasizing its residential character and the mixed-income character of its residents. DEVELOPMENT SITE The Proposed Actions would change the character of the Development Site, and this change would be, on balance, decidedly beneficial. The site, which presents a blank wall to the surrounding neighborhood on two sides and transportation/maintenance uses where it can be seen, would be transformed with a mix of residential and commercial uses and open spaces, clearly visible and accessible to the public. -
FINAL REPORT February, 2014
Safe Streets for Seniors Yorkville, Manhattan FINAL REPORT February, 2014 Polly Trottenberg, Commissioner Safe Streets for Seniors YORKVILLE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................... 4 2 BACKGROUND 2. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................. 5 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS ..................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 ABOUT THE STUDY AREA .........................................................................................................8 3.2 FIELD OBSERVATIONS AND PEDESTRIANS CONCERNS ...............................................................8 4 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS 4. TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 9 4.1 CRASH SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................9 4.2 TRAFFIC VOLUMES ................................................................................................................11 4.3 EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE .................................................................................................13 4.4 SIGNAL TIMING : PEDESTRIAN INTERVAL ..................................................................................14