DOCSLIB.ORG

Small Ancestral Pueblo Sites in the Mesa Verde

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Small Ancestral Pueblo Sites in the Mesa Verde The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts SMALL ANCESTRAL PUEBLO SITES IN THE MESA VERDE REGION: LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION A Dissertation in Anthropology by A’ndrea Elyse Messer ©2009 A’ndrea Elyse Messer Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2009 This dissertation of A’ndrea Elyse Messer was reviewed and approved* by the following: George Milner Professor of Anthropology Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee David Webster Professor of Anthropology Dean Snow Professor of Anthropology Christopher Duffy Professor of Civil Engineering Nina Jablonski Professor and Head, Department of Anthropology *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ii ABSTRACT A basic theoretical issue in settlement archaeology is the effect that environment on the one hand, or large centers on the other, have on the placement of small habitations. A key methodological issue is whether old survey data, collected at a time when today’s questions had not yet been formed, can still prove useful. This dissertation investigates the viability of old survey data, some of the environmental influences – landform, elevation, temperature, precipitation – and settlement population density, on site location choice in the Mesa Verde Southwest. I also investigated the effects of large sites on small site location and looked at all these factors with respect to reinhabited sites versus pristine sites. My results suggest a method to determine which old surveys can be used, and which cannot. The site populations in the mesa surveys are similar but differ from the site populations of the non-mesa surveys, indicating a possible difference in settlement pattern between mesas and other areas. Site population in general increased through time. Wetherill Mesa is the only location where Late Pueblo III site population dipped dramatically, probably due to movement into aggregated cliff locations. Mesa-top sites remained the majority through time, but population pressure caused people to move sites to the talus slopes. No large site influence pushes sites up or down in elevation, but population pressure does expand the range of elevations inhabited. Distances to large sites from small sites do not change the appearance of large sites. Small sites move away from or toward large sites without pattern. The environment appears to influence small site locations far more than proximity to large sites. While large sites might have influenced the myriad small-site inhabitants by altering their social and political life, they did not seem to alter the locations people chose for their homes. Population pressure seems to be the largest influence on the settlement patterns in the Mesa Verde area. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ......................................................... vi LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................. xiii Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................1 Variables ..................................................................8 Rehabitation of Sites ........................................................10 Old Data .................................................................13 Study Area ...............................................................15 Ancestral Puebloan World – Mesa Verde .........................................18 Mesa Verde Archaeology ....................................................22 Organization of Chapters .....................................................28 Chapter 2. THE SURVEYS ..................................................31 Approach to Survey Data ....................................................32 Chapin Mesa Survey ........................................................34 Wetherill Mesa Survey .......................................................37 Mockingbird Mesa Survey ....................................................41 Sand Canyon/Goodman Point Survey ...........................................42 Mesa Verde Area Study 2000 Survey ...........................................44 Database Structure .........................................................45 Chronology and Its Problems ..................................................50 Normalization of Cultural Phase Lengths ........................................56 Chapter 3. SITE POPULATIONS ..............................................58 Broad Time Scales – BM, PI, PII, PIII. .62 Narrow Time Scales – BM, PI, EPII, MPII, LPII, EPIII, LPIII ........................68 The Chapin Mesa Problem ....................................................71 Chapter 4. LANDFORMS ....................................................73 Broad Time Scales ..........................................................76 Narrow Time Scales ........................................................80 Comparison of Landforms ....................................................84 The Chapin Mesa Problem ....................................................87 Chapter 5. ELEVATION AND CLIMATE .......................................91 Broad Time Scales ..........................................................95 Narrow Time Scales ........................................................99 Temperature and Elevation ..................................................105 iv Temperature Analysis ......................................................108 Broad Time Scales .............................................108 Narrow Time Scales. ...........................................114 Precipitation Analysis ......................................................119 Broad Time Scales. .............................................119 Narrow Time Scales. ...........................................124 Chapter 6. DISTANCE TO LARGE SITES .....................................129 Large Sites ..............................................................130 Wetherill Mesa Survey ......................................................137 Sand Canyon/Goodman Point Survey ..........................................145 Mockingbird Mesa Survey ...................................................154 Chapter 7. REINHABITED SITES ............................................163 Population ...............................................................163 Landforms ...............................................................169 Elevations ...............................................................175 Distance to Large Sites .....................................................181 Chapter 8. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ..................................186 Ancestral Puebloan World – Mesa Verde ........................................187 Site Populations ...........................................................188 Landforms ...............................................................189 Elevation ................................................................190 Distance to Large Sites .....................................................191 Reinhabited Sites ..........................................................192 Old Surveys ..............................................................194 Future Work .............................................................196 Conclusions ..............................................................198 BIBLIOGRAPHY .........................................................200 Appendix A. MODIFIED DATABASE OF MOCKINGBIRD MESA SURVEY, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT – HABITATION SITES ONLY ....................214 Appendix B. MODIFIED DATABASE OF SAND CANYON STUDY AREA SURVEYED SITES – HABITATION SITES ONLY .............................219 Appendix C. MODIFIED DATABASE OF PENN STATE MESA VERDE AREA SURVEY – HABITATION SITES ONLY ..........................................227 v LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Phases and dates in the Mesa Verde Southwestern U.S. ...................7 Table 2 General survey information ........................................32 Table 3 Site counts of surveys used ........................................38 Table 4 Distribution of sites by site type ....................................41 Table 5 Variables Used in Survey Databases .................................47 Table 6 Pecos classifications ............................................51 Table 7 Dates and phases used in the Wetherill Mesa Survey .....................53 Table 8 Phases and Dates Currently in Use in the Mesa Verde Southwestern U.S. .....54 Table 9 Comparison of dates across surveys .................................55 Table 10 Phase lengths and multipliers for normalization of data ...................56 Table 11 Landform categories by survey. ....................................73 Table 12 Student T test of Pueblo I elevations vs. Pueblo II elevations .............103 Table 13 Student T test of Pueblo II elevations vs. Pueblo III elevations ............103 Table 14 Student T Test of Early Pueblo III Elevations vs. Late Pueblo III Elevations . 104 Table 15 Sites with 50 or more rooms in survey areas. .........................131 Table 16 Numbers of pristine and reinhabited sites in Pueblo III ..................163 Table 17 Distribution of Pueblo III sites between pristine and reinhabited sites, percentages. ..................................................164 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Map of the Four Corners area. Enclosed area approximately encloses the range of surveys discussed (MapSource 1999) .........................14 Figure 2 Major
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Student Worksheet (Grades 6–8)
    Name ______________________ Pueblo Indian History for Kids Student Worksheet (Grades 6–8) Overview Pueblo Indian History for Kids is an online timeline that tells the history of the Pueblo Indian people of the American Southwest. The timeline covers more than 15,000 years of history! Use this worksheet to guide your exploration of the timeline. As you move through the timeline, answer the questions below. Keep a list of questions you have as you explore. Go to: www.crowcanyon.org/pueblohistorykids Introduction 1. Who are the Pueblo Indians? 2. What other names are used to describe this group of people? 3. Where is the Mesa Verde region? 4. What does “Mesa Verde” mean, and what is the region’s environment like? 5. How is the environment of the Mesa Verde region similar to the environment where you live? How is it different? 6. What are two ways we can learn about Pueblo history? Can you think of others? 1 Pueblo Indian History for Kids―Student Worksheet (6–8) Paleoindian 1. What does the term “hunter-gatherer” mean? 2. How would you describe how people in your culture acquire food? Where do you get your food? 3. Identify two similarities and two differences between your life and that of Paleoindian people. Archaic 1. There were several major differences between the Paleoindian and Archaic periods. What were they and what is the evidence for these differences? 2. What important tools were used during the Archaic period? How did they change ways of life for people in the Mesa Verde region? 3. Why do you think there is not as much evidence for how people lived during the Paleoindian and Archaic periods as there is for later time periods? 2 Pueblo Indian History for Kids―Student Worksheet (6–8) Basketmaker 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Physalis Longifolia in the U.S
    The Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology of Wild Tomatillos, Physalis longifolia Nutt., and Related Physalis Species: A Review1 ,2 3 2 2 KELLY KINDSCHER* ,QUINN LONG ,STEVE CORBETT ,KIRSTEN BOSNAK , 2 4 5 HILLARY LORING ,MARK COHEN , AND BARBARA N. TIMMERMANN 2Kansas Biological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA 3Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO, USA 4Department of Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA 5Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA *Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected] The Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology of Wild Tomatillos, Physalis longifolia Nutt., and Related Physalis Species: A Review. The wild tomatillo, Physalis longifolia Nutt., and related species have been important wild-harvested foods and medicinal plants. This paper reviews their traditional use as food and medicine; it also discusses taxonomic difficulties and provides information on recent medicinal chemistry discoveries within this and related species. Subtle morphological differences recognized by taxonomists to distinguish this species from closely related taxa can be confusing to botanists and ethnobotanists, and many of these differences are not considered to be important by indigenous people. Therefore, the food and medicinal uses reported here include information for P. longifolia, as well as uses for several related taxa found north of Mexico. The importance of wild Physalis species as food is reported by many tribes, and its long history of use is evidenced by frequent discovery in archaeological sites. These plants may have been cultivated, or “tended,” by Pueblo farmers and other tribes. The importance of this plant as medicine is made evident through its historical ethnobotanical use, information in recent literature on Physalis species pharmacology, and our Native Medicinal Plant Research Program’s recent discovery of 14 new natural products, some of which have potent anti-cancer activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Pueblo Indian History for Kids Student Worksheet (Grades 4–6)
    Name ______________________ Pueblo Indian History for Kids Student Worksheet (Grades 4–6) Overview Pueblo Indian History for Kids is an online timeline that tells the history of the Pueblo Indian people of the American Southwest. The timeline covers more than 15,000 years of history! Use this worksheet to guide your exploration of the timeline. As you move through the timeline, answer the questions below. Keep a list of questions you have as you explore. Go to: www.crowcanyon.org/pueblohistorykids Introduction 1. Who are the Pueblo Indians? 2. What other names are used to describe this group of people? 3. Where is the Mesa Verde region? What is the environment like there? 4. How is the environment of the Mesa Verde region similar to the environment where you live? How is it different? 5. What are some of the different ways we can learn about the Pueblo past? 1 Pueblo Indian History for Kids―Student Worksheet (4–6) Paleoindian 1. What does the term “hunter-gatherer” mean? 2. How do you get your food? Where does it come from? Archaic 1. How is the Archaic period different than the Paleoindian period? 2. What two important tools were used during the Archaic time period? How were they used? Basketmaker 1. What made the Basketmaker time period different than the Archaic period? 2. Describe the diet of the Pueblo people during the Basketmaker time period. 3. What important structures were used during the Basketmaker period? How were they used? What structures do people use today with similar purposes? 2 Pueblo Indian History for Kids―Student Worksheet (4–6) Pueblo I 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Cultural Response in the Prehistoric American Southwest
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Staff -- Published Research US Geological Survey Fall 2009 Climate Change and Cultural Response In The Prehistoric American Southwest Larry Benson U.S. Geological Survey, [email protected] Michael S. Berry Bureau of Reclamation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub Benson, Larry and Berry, Michael S., "Climate Change and Cultural Response In The Prehistoric American Southwest" (2009). USGS Staff -- Published Research. 725. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/725 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Staff -- Published Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. CLIMATE CHANGE AND CULTURAL RESPONSE IN THE PREHISTORIC AMERICAN SOUTHWEST Larry V. Benson and Michael S. Berry ABSTRACT Comparison of regional tree-ring cutting-date distributions from the southern Col- orado Plateau and the Rio Grande region with tree-ring-based reconstructions of the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) and with the timing of archaeological stage transitions indicates that Southwestern Native American cultures were peri- odically impacted by major climatic oscillations between A.D. 860 and 1600. Site- specifi c information indicates that aggregation, abandonment, and out-migration from many archaeological regions occurred during several widespread mega- droughts, including the well-documented middle-twelfth- and late-thirteenth- century droughts. We suggest that the demographic response of southwestern Native Americans to climate variability primarily refl ects their dependence on an inordinately maize-based subsistence regimen within a region in which agricul- ture was highly sensitive to climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Collaborative Approaches to Archaeological Site Preservation
    University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 1-1-2013 Hearts and Minds: Collaborative Approaches to Archaeological Site Preservation Mark Russell Sanders University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Sanders, Mark Russell, "Hearts and Minds: Collaborative Approaches to Archaeological Site Preservation" (2013). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 572. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/572 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. HEARTS AND MINDS: COLLABORATIVE APPROACHES TO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE PRESERVATION ______________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Arts and Humanities University of Denver ______________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts ______________ By Mark Russell Sanders June 2013 Advisor: Bonnie Clark i Author: Mark Russell Sanders Title: HEARTS & MINDS: COLLABORATIVE APPROACHES TO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE PRESERVATION Advisor: Dr. Bonnie Clark Degree Date: June 2012 Abstract Archaeological relic hunting on public lands in the southwestern United States accelerated with 19th century westward expansion and it continues today. Efforts to curb looting through the passage and enforcement of laws has been only moderately successful. Americans’ misunderstandings of archaeology’s ethical responsibilities, particularly with regard to Native Americans and other descendant communities, have further undermined historic preservation initiatives. My thesis addresses the usefulness of public, private, and nonprofit site protection efforts in changing the beliefs and behaviors associated with site looting, focusing particularly on the need for collaboration outside the heritage management profession.
    [Show full text]
  • Pueblo III Towers in the Northern San Juan. Kiva 75(3)
    CONNECTING WORLDS: PUEBLO III TOWERS IN THE NORTHERN SAN JUAN Ruth M. Van Dyke and Anthony G. King ABSTRACT The towers of the northern San Juan, including those on Mesa Verde, Hovenweep, and Canyons of the Ancients National Monument, were constructed on mesa tops, in cliff dwellings, along canyon rims, and in canyon bottoms during the Pueblo III period (A.D. 1150–1300)—a time of social and environmental upheaval. Archaeologists have interpreted the towers as defensive strongholds, lookouts, sig- naling stations, astronomical observatories, storehouses, and ceremonial facilities. Explanations that relate to towers’ visibility are most convincing. As highly visible, public buildings, towers had abstract, symbolic meanings as well as concrete, func- tional uses. We ask not just, “What were towers for?” but “What did towers mean?” One possibility is that towers were meant to encourage social cohesiveness by invoking an imagined, shared Chacoan past. The towers reference some of the same ideas found in Chacoan monumental buildings, including McElmo-style masonry, the concept of verticality, and intervisibility with iconic landforms. Another possibility is that towers symbolized a conduit out of the social and envi- ronmental turmoil of the Pueblo III period and into a higher level of the layered universe. We base this interpretation on two lines of evidence. Pueblo oral tradi- tions provide precedent for climbing upwards to higher layers of the world to escape hard times. Towers are always associated with kivas, water, subterranean concavities, or earlier sites—all places that, in Pueblo cosmologies, open to the world below our current plane. RESUMEN Las torres del norte del San Juan, inclusive ésos en Mesa Verde, en Hovenweep, y en el monumento nacional de Canyons of the Ancients, fueron construidos en cimas de mesa, en casas en acantilado, por los bordes de cañones, y en fondos de cañones durante Pueblo III (dC.
    [Show full text]
  • Archeology of the Funeral Mound, Ocmulgee National Monument, Georgia
    1.2.^5^-3 rK 'rm ' ^ -*m *~ ^-mt\^ -» V-* ^JT T ^T A . ESEARCH SERIES NUMBER THREE Clemson Universii akCHEOLOGY of the FUNERAL MOUND OCMULGEE NATIONAL MONUMENT, GEORGIA TIONAL PARK SERVICE • U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 3ERAL JCATK5N r -v-^tfS i> &, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fred A. Seaton, Secretary National Park Service Conrad L. Wirth, Director Ihis publication is one of a series of research studies devoted to specialized topics which have been explored in con- nection with the various areas in the National Park System. It is printed at the Government Printing Office and may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D. C. Price $1 (paper cover) ARCHEOLOGY OF THE FUNERAL MOUND OCMULGEE National Monument, Georgia By Charles H. Fairbanks with introduction by Frank M. Settler ARCHEOLOGICAL RESEARCH SERIES NUMBER THREE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR • WASHINGTON 1956 THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM, of which Ocmulgee National Monument is a unit, is dedi- cated to conserving the scenic, scientific, and his- toric heritage of the United States for the benefit and enjoyment of its people. Foreword Ocmulgee National Monument stands as a memorial to a way of life practiced in the Southeast over a span of 10,000 years, beginning with the Paleo-Indian hunters and ending with the modern Creeks of the 19th century. Here modern exhibits in the monument museum will enable you to view the panorama of aboriginal development, and here you can enter the restoration of an actual earth lodge and stand where forgotten ceremonies of a great tribe were held.
    [Show full text]
  • THE Mckern “TAXONOMIC” SYSTEM and ARCHAEOLOGICAL CULTURE CLASSIFICATION in the MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES: a HISTORY and EVALUATION
    Published in Bulletin of the History of Archaeology, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 3-9 (1996). Excepting some very minor revisions and McKern's quote describing the structure and detail of his classification this was the paper read at the IInd Indianapolis Archaeological Conference, Sheraton Meridian Hotel, November 15, 1986, organized by Neal L. Trubowitz. Since the reader of this article does not have the contributions of the other participants that describe the system it was thought advisable that it be included. The proceedings of this event were to be published as a commemorative volume of the first conference, but this never occurred. THE McKERN “TAXONOMIC” SYSTEM AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL CULTURE CLASSIFICATION IN THE MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES: A HISTORY AND EVALUATION By B. K. Swartz, Jr. from Selected Writings ABSTRACT In the first half of the 20th century three major archaeological culture unit classifications were formulated in the United States. The most curious one was the Midwestern "Taxonomic" System, a scheme that ignored time and space. Alton K. Fisher suggested to W. C. McKern in the late 1920's that the Linnean model of morphological classification, which was employed in biology at a time of pre-evolutionary thinking, might be adapted to archaeological culture classification (Fisher 1986). On the basis of this idea McKern conceived the Midwestern Taxonomic System and planned to present his concept in a paper at the Central Section of the American Anthropological Association at Ann Arbor, Michigan, in April 1932. Illness prevented him from making the presentation. The first public statement was before a small group of archaeologists at the time of an archaeological symposium, Illinois Academy of Science, May 1932 (Griffin 1943:327).
    [Show full text]
  • Pinworm Infection at Salmon Ruins and Aztec Ruins: Relation to Pueblo III Regional Violence
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Karl Reinhard Papers/Publications Natural Resources, School of 12-2019 Pinworm Infection at Salmon Ruins and Aztec Ruins: Relation to Pueblo III Regional Violence Karl Reinhard Morgana Camacho Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natresreinhard Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Environmental Public Health Commons, Other Public Health Commons, and the Parasitology Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural Resources, School of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Karl Reinhard Papers/ Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. ISSN (Print) 0023-4001 ISSN (Online) 1738-0006 Korean J Parasitol Vol. 57, No. 6: 627-633, December 2019 ▣ BRIEF COMMUNICATION https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2019.57.6.627 Pinworm Infection at Salmon Ruins and Aztec Ruins: Relation to Pueblo III Regional Violence 1 2, Karl J Reinhard , Morgana Camacho * 1School of Natural Resource Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, USA; 2Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Abstract: The study of coprolites has been a theme of archaeology in the American Southwest. A feature of archaeopar- asitology on the Colorado Plateau is the ubiquity of pinworm infection. As a crowd parasite, this ubiquity signals varying concentrations of populations. Our recent analysis of coprolite deposits from 2 sites revealed the highest prevalence of infection ever recorded for the region. For Salmon Ruins, the deposits date from AD 1140 to 1280.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    Great kivas as integrative architecture in the Silver Creek community, Arizona Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Herr, Sarah Alice, 1970- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 02/10/2021 15:30:52 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/278407 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, soms thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy.
    [Show full text]
  • Chacoan Tower Kiva Sites of Kin Klizhin and Kin Ya'a
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type o f computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand com er and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with with permission permission ofof the the copyrightcopyright owner.owner. Further reproductionreproduction prohibitedprohibited without without permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum of New Mexico
    MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES A DATA RECOVERY PLAN FOR LA 9075, ALONG NM 53, CIBOLA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO Stephen C. Lentz Submitted by Yvonne R. Oakes Principal Investigator ARCHAEOLOGY NOTES 270 SANTA FE 2000 NEW MEXICO ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY The Archaeological Site Stabilization and Preservation Project (ASSAPP), Office of Archaeological Studies, Museum of New Mexico, conducted a site evaluation of LA 9075 (the La Vega site), a large multicomponent site along NM 53 in Cibola County, New Mexico, on private lands and highway right-of-way. The New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department (NMSHTD) proposes to stabilize areas within the boundaries of the site and within the NMSHTD right-of-way that have been or may be affected by erosion. The Office of Archaeological Studies has been working under contract with the NMSHTD to identify endangered archaeological sites within highway rights-of-way. Subsequent to shoulder construction and improvement by the NMSHTD, additional cultural resources were exposed within the Museum’s project area. The OAS/ASSAPP program identified five major areas within the highway right-of-way at LA 9075 where cultural resources are threatened by erosion. These areas have been targeted for stabilization. In conjunction with the NMSHTD, District 6, the OAS proposes to conduct a data recovery program on the affected areas prior to stabilization efforts. NMSHTD Project No. TPE-7700 (14), CN 9163 MNM Project No. 41.596 (Archaeological Site Stabilization and Protection Project) Submitted in fulfillment of Joint Powers Agreement J0089-95 between the New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department and the Office of Archaeological Studies, Museum of New Mexico.
    [Show full text]