by A n n a E . Wa r d Porn, Pedagogy, and the Passing of an Icon

Three days after my students and as a teacher, about where has I discussed the hardcore pornographic been, where it is, and where it’s going. Given film Behind the Green Door (Mitchell and that I was teaching a course on pornography, Mitchell, 1972), its enigmatic star, Marilyn this summons could not have been timelier. Chambers, passed away. Chambers’ The course, “Pornography in Contemporary passing garnered brief nods from news U.S. Culture,” was offered as a senior capstone media, but for the most part, her death seminar by the Department of Women’s faded quickly from national attention. For Studies. As the instructor, I approached the me, however, Chambers’ death seemed course with the explicit purpose of offering to linger, and in some ways, still does. Her Women’s Studies students a perspective on death served as a summons for me to pornography that they rarely encounter in think anew, as a scholar whose work often our curriculum at UCLA, a perspective firmly overlaps with the field of porn studies and rooted in both media studies and sexuality

FEB10 7 CSupdateW studies, but also contextualized within the field On one hand, pornography is discussed as of Women’s Studies itself. if it were an unstoppable behemoth, always If pornography Pornography in the classroom is nothing threatening to take over the cultural landscape, is as ubiquitous new—it has been taught by instructors across described as unavoidable and overwhelming. a wide range of fields, including Women’s Print and television news media paint a as many make Studies, and within a variety of universities for grim picture—our inboxes are overflowing quite some time. Despite this, there is still a with porn spam, the Internet is a veritable it out to be, then great deal of concern surrounding discussing minefield of sexually explicit content, Cable undergraduates pornography in the classroom, particularly programming is increasingly more salacious, if those discussions involve actually viewing and compamies such as , Wicked, and are already pornographic images. As a graduate student Vivid have made porn actors into household instructor, I was cautioned by quite a few of names. On the other hand, when it comes to handling it; it is my colleagues against treading this path. students viewing pornographic images in the already part of the “Not until you have a job and tenure,” I heard classroom, the general consensus seems to be on several occasions, a warning also quite that they can’t handle it—undergraduates are fabric of their lives common within the field of porn studies itself. simply not emotionally and intellectually ready This is probably good advice to heed but, then to encounter such images. These two notions, in some way or again, Women’s Studies graduate students often simultaneously held, seem to me wholly another. aren’t exactly known for following the path of incompatible. least resistance. Nonetheless, these cautions If pornography is as ubiquitous as many prompted me to think carefully about the make it out to be, then undergraduates are If porn’s takeover has been greatly design and content of the course. How will already handling it; it is already part of the exaggerated, then students may be forming undergraduate students respond to explicit fabric of their lives in some way or another. opinions regarding a mode of representation, images? Do the potential pedagogical benefits The argument that undergraduates are not one with significant legal, political, and cultural of showing pornographic images in a class emotionally or intellectually ready to view stakes, without direct engagement with the about pornography outweigh the risks? Is it these images seems more an argument for media in question. This may be especially true worth it? pornography in the classroom than against it. for Women’s Studies students, many of whom

FEB10 8 CSupdateW are presented with arguments regarding The “porno-chic” era of Behind the Green Classroom viewership, while certainly pornography in their coursework, with little Door, as well as Boys in the Sand (Poole, 1971), markedly different from a public theater, to no direct engagement with examples Deep Throat (Damiano, 1972), The Devil in Miss is a form of “be[ing] seen screening it.” of the representations discussed. Students Jones (Damiano, 1973), and The Opening of Misty Viewing pornography in the classroom typically have to rely on descriptions of images Beethoven (Metzger, 1976), was notable for the requires each participant to think about and these descriptions tend to vary widely “assertive publicness of its exhibition.”1 Deep themselves in relation to the other people according to the viewpoints of the authors. Throat, in particular, remains one of the most sitting next to them, to think about Engaging directly with porn representations successful independent films of all time— themselves as part of a larger audience, allows students to form their own people of all stripes went to see it, and they and to own their presence in that audience. interpretations and do so from the perspective went to see it with partners, friends, and It requires a taking of responsibility, unlike of a viewer. The students’ responses to the family. As Linda Williams suggests, what was the private viewership engaged in by media presented in my class ran the gamut so important about Deep Throat had less to so many people and shared with so few. of reactions, including amusement, disgust, do with what was going on on-screen, and Most importantly, shared spectatorship excitement, and boredom. While each student more to do with the viewing experience provokes conversation. As much as I hope in the class took the course seriously, thinking itself and the conversations it engendered. my students found what I had to say and carefully about the representations and issues She argues, “The most significant show what the authors we read had to say about under discussion, and producing solid written offered up by Deep Throat…was taking the issue of pornography compelling work, they were not dispassionate observers place in the audience: our social presence to and instructive, I would speculate that and didn’t pretend to be. Their reactions one another at a public screening of graphic, the most significant work this course reflected not only their individual, honest unsimulated sex; our willingness not only did was invite dialogue amongst the responses, but also reflected the experience of to screen sex but to be seen screening students themselves, and with the people viewing these images in a group setting. it.”2 With the rise of video and web-based in their life. As astute as many students’ The group dynamic is perhaps the most pornography, however, viewership has, in comments in class were, I found myself, important and underappreciated aspect of large part, retreated back to the domain of as an instructor, more intrigued by the pornography in the classroom. It provides the private. conversations I witnessed spilling into the an opportunity to engage in a viewing hallway after class. Students also recounted experience that has largely come and gone. 1. Linda Williams, Screening Sex (Durham, NC: Duke UP, 2008), 127. a multitude of discussions they had with 2 Screening Sex, 142. FEB10 9 CSupdateW roommates, friends, and partners about part of the shared space of the classroom. Watching these what we were watching in class. I suspect One person’s laughter inevitably led to there is a certain safety in engaging others others. It would be easy to dismiss this images as part in conversation about something you as simply a by-product of a group-think of a community viewed for a class, rather than having mentality, but I think it’s altogether to fess up to watching something on something different. Yes, pornography is encourages people your own. These discussions often led to meant to be, and sometimes actually is, broader issues that extended beyond just arousing. But, it can also be quite funny; to experience and the topic of sexual representation itself. sometimes intentionally, sometimes not. express a broad The conversation that emerged during Intentional humor and unintentional, the 1970s around pornography, an era laughter-inducing bad dialogue aside, range of emotions in which and Behind there is something about sex that is… the Green Door were such an important well…funny. Rather than dismissing the and have them part, may have come and gone, but the giggles that undergraduates occasionally validated. experience of viewing pornographic emit when the subject of sex arises in the images in a collective space may be worth classroom, we might have to confront the reinvigorating. Watching these images as fact that they may know something we’ve part of a community encourages people long since forgotten—that while sex can, to experience and express a broad range at times, be profound, or dangerous, or of emotions and have them validated. even spiritual, for the most part, it’s just Students did not hesitate to laugh when not worth taking so seriously. We can they found something funny, to utter recognize the violence, loss, heartbreak, sounds of displeasure or rear back in terror, confusion, sadness, and pain that their chairs when they found something can accompany sex, and still not lose sight disgusting or shocking, or yawn or sigh of this. when the images failed to hold their Approaching pornography with a bit attention. These vocalizations became a more levity, even while recognizing

FEB10 10 CSupdateW its potential dangers and limitations, statements, and teaching philosophies on is particularly important in a Women’s some level. In a Women’s Studies teaching A startling Studies context. It is common to hear context then, it seems crucial to me that in scholars in porn studies bemoan any order to “move on” from these debates, we number of the rehashing of the feminist “sex wars” must ultimately pass through them. graduating around the issue of pornography; this is Perhaps the reason why this issue has particularly true for scholars trained in dropped out of our classrooms is because seniors in my film and media studies.3 The field is urged the debates were often so ugly, so divisive. to “move on” and it largely has. The need Indeed, many Women’s Studies and class had never to “move on” is one I wholeheartedly related programs have avoided the issue heard of the support, and even invoke in the course altogether, resulting in the graduation of description for my class—where I disagree undergraduate majors and minors who “sex wars,” the is in regards to how to go about this. In are unfamiliar with this critical moment in the context of Women’s Studies, as well as feminist scholarly and political history. A 1982 Barnard Gender Studies, Sexuality Studies, Feminist startling number of the graduating seniors Conference, Studies, and their various combinations, in my class had never heard of the “sex the "sex wars" are part and parcel of the wars,” the 1982 Barnard Conference, or or Catherine formation of our field. The development Catherine MacKinnon. “ceasefire” and consolidation of many Women’s was called, one of the stipulations seems MacKinnon. Studies courses and programs in the US to have been a tacit agreement to just not occurred in the 1970s and 1980s, during the talk about it anymore. height of these battles; it is unreasonable Why the silence? Have the debates that to think that these debates are not woven emerged around sex and sexuality during into the fabric of our curriculums, mission this era been settled? Are these debates

3. For an excellent discussion of the “sex wars” and this era of no longer interesting? Have we moved US. feminist theorizing and activism, see Jane F. Gerhard’s beyond “pleasure and danger” once and Desiring Revolution: Second-wave Feminism and the Rewriting of American Sexual Thought, 1920 to 1982 (: Columbia University Press, 2001).

FEB10 11 CSupdateW for all?4 Or, have we just ceded this ground circulates amongst Women’s Studies issue of sex in our curriculums. I certainly to other fields, hoping that they will take students; they view passing judgement don’t have it figured out, but this teaching care of this messy issue of sex and its as antithetical to gender scholarship experience has taught me that this representation? Women’s Studies courses and activism, particularly in the realm of conversation is one that students want to talk a lot about “sexuality” but, strangely, sex and sexuality. Behind that mantra, be having. If the eighteen students I had rarely talk about sex. I am always intrigued however, often lies a different reality, in my class last Spring Quarter are any that entire weeks devoted to discussing one that needs to be interrogated in the indication, our undergraduates are not sexuality in classrooms manage to avoid rigorous manner that our curriculum only capable of having this conversation talking about sex altogether. One of engages other issues in. but have much to offer it. I hope Women’s the reasons why feminist discussions of The pro-porn/anti-porn dichotomy is a Studies as a field continues to reinvigorate pornography in the 1970s and 1980s were false one—it always was. In that sense, yes, our commitment to discussions around so divisive is because they forced frank we absolutely must move on and largely sex and sexuality, including pornography; conversations regarding sexual desires have. The issue of sexual representation, otherwise, we will only ensure that the and practices, and these conversations however, remains a critical one and needs conversation will go on without us. revealed some startling assumptions to be engaged in directly. The belief and viewpoints that drove a wedge in that students are not ready to confront Anna E. Ward is a PhD candidate in the Department of Women's Studies. between individuals and communities. pornography in the classroom says more Her dissertation project is entitled "The Discussing pornography in the classroom about those making the argument than it Uncertainty of Pleasure/The Pleasure of provides a space for students and does about the students themselves. This Uncertainty: and the History of Ecstatic Expression," instructors to articulate these assumptions argument may be merely a guise for the and viewpoints—and, again, to take discomfort of faculty and administrators. responsibility for them. There is a strange Within Women’s Studies, it may be a guise Seinfeldian “not that there’s anything for the fear that if we reopen the door to wrong with that” mantra that sometimes pornography, the old disagreements and 4. The anthology arising from presentations at the controversial 1982 divisions will inevitably slink in along with The Scholar and the Feminist IX Conference, “Towards a Politics of Sexuality,” held at Barnard College, is titled Pleasure and Danger: it. It may also signal that we still haven’t Exploring Female Sexuality (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984), edited by Carole S. Vance. quite figured out how to address the

FEB10 12 CSupdateW