DOCSLIB.ORG

Amendments 16 - 63

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Amendments 16 - 63 European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on International Trade 2019/0273(COD) 5.6.2020 AMENDMENTS 16 - 63 Draft report Marie-Pierre Vedrenne (PE647.001v02-00) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 654/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the exercise of the Union’s rights for the application and enforcement of international trade rules Proposal for a regulation (COM(2019)0623 – C9-0197/2019 – 2019/0273(COD)) AM\1206492EN.docx PE652.575v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_LegReport PE652.575v01-00 2/27 AM\1206492EN.docx EN Amendment 16 Reinhard Bütikofer Draft legislative resolution Citation 4 a (new) Draft legislative resolution Amendment - having regard to its Resolution on the Crisis of the WTO Appellate Body of 28 November 2019 (2019/2918, RSP), Or. en Amendment 17 Bernd Lange, Agnes Jongerius, Joachim Schuster, Paolo De Castro, Kathleen Van Brempt, Inma Rodríguez-Piñero, Raphaël Glucksmann, Costas Mavrides Draft legislative resolution Citation 5 a (new) Draft legislative resolution Amendment - having regard to opinion 2/15 of the European Court of Justice, Or. en Amendment 18 Bernd Lange, Agnes Jongerius, Joachim Schuster, Paolo De Castro, Kathleen Van Brempt, Inma Rodríguez-Piñero, Raphaël Glucksmann, Costas Mavrides Proposal for a regulation Citation 1 a (new) Text proposed by the Commission Amendment - having regard to opinion 2/15 of the European Court of Justice, Or. en AM\1206492EN.docx 3/27 PE652.575v01-00 EN Amendment 19 Bernd Lange, Agnes Jongerius, Joachim Schuster, Paolo De Castro, Kathleen Van Brempt, Inma Rodríguez-Piñero, Raphaël Glucksmann, Costas Mavrides Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (1a) Opinion 2/15 of the Court of Justice of the European Union1а provided clarity regarding the question of competences covered by comprehensive trade agreements. That opinion clarifies, inter alia, that provisions covered by Trade and Sustainable Development chapters fall within the exclusive competence of the Union and that the goal of sustainable development forms an integral part of the common commercial policy. __________________ 1а ECLI:EU:C:2017:376. Or. en Amendment 20 Bernd Lange, Agnes Jongerius, Joachim Schuster, Paolo De Castro, Kathleen Van Brempt, Inma Rodríguez-Piñero, Raphaël Glucksmann, Costas Mavrides Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (2a) Dispute settlement provisions, including in regional and bilateral trade agreements, might lack the specificity necessary to adjudicate disputes effectively, necessitating a reliance on this Regulation. Or. en PE652.575v01-00 4/27 AM\1206492EN.docx EN Amendment 21 Reinhard Bütikofer Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 a (new) Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (4a) The Union insists on the primacy of international trade law, as administered by the WTO and enforced under Article 23 of the WTO Agreement, and will cooperate in all endeavours aiming to reform the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism in order to ensure the appropriate functioning of the WTO’s Appellate Body. Or. en Amendment 22 Reinhard Bütikofer Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 b (new) Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (4b) By ...[At the latest one year following the entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission should report to the European Parliament and to the Council about ongoing developments in the practice of international trade dispute settlements and its activities in reforming the Appellate Body of the WTO. Or. en Amendment 23 Helmut Scholz AM\1206492EN.docx 5/27 PE652.575v01-00 EN Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (5) In the same vein, a similar situation (5) In the same vein, a similar situation may arise under other international trade may arise under other international trade agreements, in particular regional or agreements, in particular regional or bilateral agreements, where a third country bilateral agreements, where a third country does not cooperate, as necessary, for the does not cooperate, as necessary, for the dispute settlement to function, for example dispute settlement to function, for example by failing to appoint an arbitrator and by failing to appoint an arbitrator, or by where there is no mechanism foreseen to failing to cooperate in the setting up of a secure the functioning of dispute settlement panel of experts with regard to the in this situation. settlement of disputes linked to labour and sustainability commitments, and where there is no mechanism foreseen to secure the functioning of dispute settlement in this situation. Or. en Amendment 24 Helmut Scholz Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 a (new) Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (5a) The Union considers the content and commitments in the Trade and Sustainable Development chapters of its trade agreements, and of its Association Agreements as binding. Or. en Amendment 25 Helmut Scholz Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 b (new) PE652.575v01-00 6/27 AM\1206492EN.docx EN Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (5b) The Union remains committed to a multilateral approach to international dispute settlement, rules-based trade, and international cooperation to achieve the United Nation‘s Sustainable Development Goals. Or. en Amendment 26 Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou, Christophe Hansen, Seán Kelly, Daniel Caspary, Danuta Maria Hübner, Massimiliano Salini, Iuliu Winkler Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (6) In the face of blockage of dispute (6) In the face of blockage of dispute settlement, the Union will be unable to settlement and in the absence of a enforce international trade agreements. definitive judicial ruling, the Union will be Therefore, it is appropriate to extend the unable to enforce international trade scope of Regulation (EU) No 654/2014 to agreements. Therefore, it is appropriate to such situations. extend the scope of Regulation (EU) No 654/2014 to such situations. Or. en Amendment 27 Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou, Christophe Hansen, Seán Kelly, Daniel Caspary, Danuta Maria Hübner, Massimiliano Salini, Iuliu Winkler Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (7) To this end, the Union should be (7) To this end, the Union should be able to expeditiously suspend obligations able to expeditiously suspend obligations under international trade agreements, under international trade agreements, including regional or bilateral agreements, including regional or bilateral agreements, when effective recourse to a binding when effective recourse to a binding AM\1206492EN.docx 7/27 PE652.575v01-00 EN dispute settlement mechanism is not dispute settlement mechanism is not possible because the third country has possible because the third country has rendered it impossible for the Union to do rendered it impossible for the Union to do so. so, provided the Union has appropriately challenged those measures in front of the relevant dispute settlement body. Or. en Amendment 28 Helmut Scholz Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (7) To this end, the Union should be (7) To this end, the Union should be able to expeditiously suspend obligations able to expeditiously suspend obligations under international trade agreements, under international trade agreements, including regional or bilateral agreements, including regional or bilateral agreements, when effective recourse to a binding when effective recourse to a binding dispute settlement mechanism is not dispute settlement mechanism, including possible because the third country has on commitments arising from the Trade rendered it impossible for the Union to do and Sustainable Development chapter of so. an agreement, is not possible because the third country has rendered it impossible for the Union to do so. Or. en Amendment 29 Tiziana Beghin Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (7) To this end, the Union should be (7) To this end, the Union should be able to expeditiously suspend obligations able to expeditiously suspend obligations under international trade agreements, relating to goods, services or in the sector including regional or bilateral agreements, of intellectual property rights under when effective recourse to a binding international trade agreements, including dispute settlement mechanism is not regional or bilateral agreements, when PE652.575v01-00 8/27 AM\1206492EN.docx EN possible because the third country has effective recourse to a binding dispute rendered it impossible for the Union to do settlement mechanism is not possible so. because the third country has rendered it impossible for the Union to do so. Or. en Amendment 30 Emmanuel Maurel Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (7a) In response to climate change and social dumping, the chapters on trade and sustainable development and the protection of workers’ rights should occupy a central place in international trade agreements and be binding. These chapters on trade and sustainable development and the protection of workers’ rights should be included within the scope of the commercial policy measures which the Union can take in the event of a manifest breach by a third country. This would strengthen the deterrent effect of the regulation and guarantee an immediate response by the EU designed to safeguard its interests and values. Or.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • European Parliament: 7Th February 2017 Redistribution of Political Balance
    POLICY PAPER European issues n°420 European Parliament: 7th February 2017 redistribution of political balance Charles de Marcilly François Frigot At the mid-term of the 8th legislature, the European Parliament, in office since the elections of May 2014, is implementing a traditional “distribution” of posts of responsibility. Article 19 of the internal regulation stipulates that the Chairs of the parliamentary committees, the Deputy-Chairs, as well as the questeurs, hold their mandates for a renewable 2 and a-half year period. Moreover, internal elections within the political groups have supported their Chairs, whilst we note that there has been some slight rebalancing in terms of the coordinators’ posts. Although Italian citizens draw specific attention with the two main candidates in the battle for the top post, we should note other appointments if we are to understand the careful balance between nationalities, political groups and individual experience of the European members of Parliament. A TUMULTUOUS PRESIDENTIAL provide collective impetus to potential hesitations on the part of the Member States. In spite of the victory of the European People’s Party (EPP) in the European elections, it supported Martin As a result the election of the new President of Schulz in July 2104 who stood for a second mandate as Parliament was a lively[1] affair: the EPP candidate – President of the Parliament. In all, with the support of the Antonio Tajani – and S&D Gianni Pittella were running Liberals (ADLE), Martin Schulz won 409 votes following neck and neck in the fourth round of the relative an agreement concluded by the “grand coalition” after majority of the votes cast[2].
    [Show full text]
  • Protokół Posiedzenia W Dniu 19 Września 2019 R. (2021/C 107/04)
    C 107/84 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej 26.3.2021 Czwartek, 19 września 2019 r. PROTOKÓŁ POSIEDZENIA W DNIU 19 WRZEŚNIA 2019 R. (2021/C 107/04) Spis treści Strona 1. Otwarcie posiedzenia . 87 2. Zdolność patentowa roślin i podstawowych procesów biologicznych (złożone projekty rezolucji) . 87 3. Składanie dokumentów . 87 4. Debata na temat przypadków naruszania praw człowieka, zasad demokracji i państwa prawa (debata) . 88 4.1. Sytuacja w Turcji, w szczególności odwołanie burmistrzów wyłonionych w wyborach . 88 4.2. Mjanma/Birma, w szczególności sytuacja Rohingjów . 89 4.3. Iran, w szczególności sytuacja obrońców praw kobiet i uwięzionych obywateli UE o podwójnym 89 obywatelstwie . 5. Wznowienie posiedzenia . 90 6. Skład komisji i delegacji . 90 7. Głosowanie . 90 7.1. Sytuacja w Turcji, w szczególności odwołanie burmistrzów wyłonionych w wyborach 90 (głosowanie) . 7.2. Mjanma/Birma, w szczególności sytuacja Rohingjów (głosowanie) . 91 7.3. Iran, w szczególności sytuacja obrońców praw kobiet i uwięzionych obywateli UE o podwójnym 92 obywatelstwie (głosowanie) . 7.4. Zdolność patentowa roślin i podstawowych procesów biologicznych (głosowanie) . 92 7.5. Znaczenie pamięci o przeszłości Europy dla jej przyszłości (głosowanie) . 93 7.6. Stan wdrażania przepisów dotyczących przeciwdziałania praniu pieniędzy (głosowanie) . 94 8. Wyjaśnienia dotyczące stanowiska zajętego w głosowaniu . 94 9. Korekty oddanych głosów i zgłoszenia zamiaru oddania głosu . 94 10. Wznowienie posiedzenia . 94 11. Zatwierdzenie protokołu poprzedniego posiedzenia . 95 26.3.2021 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej C 107/85 Czwartek, 19 września 2019 r. Spis treści Strona 12. Skład komisji i delegacji . 95 13. Zagrożenie statusu służb ochotniczej straży pożarnej w Unii Europejskiej (debata) .
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament 2019-2024
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Development DEVE_PV(2019)1106 MINUTES Meeting of 6 November 2019, 9.00-13.00 and 14.30-17.00, and 17.00-18.30 (coordinators’ meeting) and 7 November 2019, 9.00-12.30 BRUSSELS Jointly with the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the Committee on Foreign Affairs The meeting opened at 9.09 on Wednesday, 6 November 2019, with Juan Fernando López Aguilar (LIBE Chair), David McAllister (AFET Chair) and Tomas Tobé (DEVE Chair) presiding. 1. EU-Turkey facility and the situation of Syrian refugees in Turkey DEVE/9/01700 Exchange of views with the European Commission, the European External Action Service (EEAS) and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) Maceij Popowski (DG NEAR) and Michael Koehler (DG ECHO) made presentations. Speakers: Michael Gahler, Sophia in 't Veld, Tineke Strik, Thierry Mariani, Beata Kempa, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Birgit Sippel, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Costas Mavrides, Kostas Papadakis, Loucas Fourlas, Evin Incir, Nicola Procaccini, Mick Wallace, Željana Zovko, Bernhard Zimniok, Nicolas Bay. Maceij Popowski and Michael Koehler replied to questions raised. Tomas Tobé made some concluding remarks. The jointly meeting adjourned at 10.13 and the meeting of the Committee on Development resumed at 10.23. 2. Adoption of agenda The agenda was adopted as shown in these minutes. PV\1196027EN.docx PE643.148v02-00 EN United in diversityEN 3. Chair’s announcements None. 4. Approval of minutes of meetings 30 September 2019 PV – PE642.867v02-00 8 October 2019 PV – PE642.871v01-00 The minutes were approved. 5.
    [Show full text]
  • To the President of the European Commission Mrs. Ursula Von Der Leyen, Rue De La Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels
    To the President of the European Commission Mrs. Ursula von der Leyen, Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels To the Executive Vice-President of the European Commission Mr. Vladis Dombrovskis Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels Brussels, 22 October 2020, Subject: the EU must impose an import ban on Chinese companies using forced labour Dear President von der Leyen, Dear Vice-President Dombrovskis, For years, the Chinese regime has been detaining millions of human beings in camps, just because they were born Uyghurs. For years, Europe and the world have been witnessing a crime against humanity without opposing any resistance to it. In recent months, several studies have reported the use of Uyghur forced labour for the benefit of major European companies. Indeed, many Chinese factories, directly supplying EU brands exploit the Uyghurs and benefit from their forced labour. Facing this abjection, Europe must act to protect the lives and fundamental rights of Uyghurs. The EU should use its trade and market power to safeguards the founding principles enrichened in our Treaties and guiding our external policies. As the US did lately through an imports ban passed almost unanimously in the US House of Representatives, Europe urgently needs to establish a blacklist of Chinese companies implicated in Uyghur forced labour. We look forward to your response. Yours sincerely, 1. Raphaël Glucksmann, S&D 2. Dietmar Köster, S&D 3. Francisco Guerreiro, Greens 4. Sylvie Guillaume, S&D 5. Aurore Lalucq, S&D 6. Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Renew 7. Anna Cavazzini, Greens 8. Nora Mebarek, S&D 9.
    [Show full text]
  • 30.9.2020 A9-0160/35 Amendment 35 Agnes Jongerius, Paul Tang, Lara
    30.9.2020 A9-0160/35 Amendment 35 Agnes Jongerius, Paul Tang, Lara Wolters, Vera Tax, Aurore Lalucq, Andreas Schieder, Evelyn Regner, Joachim Schuster, Delara Burkhardt, Maria Noichl, Günther Sidl, Hannes Heide, Bettina Vollath, Tiemo Wölken, Dietmar Köster, Evelyne Gebhardt, Anna Cavazzini, Maria Arena, Bas Eickhout, Tineke Strik, Kim Van Sparrentak, Emmanuel Maurel, Leila Chaibi, Marc Tarabella, Udo Bullmann, Ismail Ertug, Marc Angel, Tanja Fajon, Klára Dobrev, Nora Mebarek, Mohammed Chahim, Eric Andrieu, Raphaël Glucksmann, Sylvie Guillaume, Pierre Larrouturou, Helmut Scholz, Cornelia Ernst, Martin Schirdewan, Gabriele Bischoff Report A9-0160/2020/REV Jörgen Warborn Implementation of the common commercial policy – annual report 2018 (2019/2197(INI)) Motion for a resolution Paragraph 49 Motion for a resolution Amendment 49. Recalls its position expressed in its 49. Recalls its position expressed in its previous report on the implementation of previous report on the implementation of the common commercial policy; underlines the common commercial policy; underlines that the 15-point action plan of 27 February that the 15-point action plan of 27 February 2018 set out by the Commission’s services 2018 set out by the Commission’s services represents a good basis for reflection in represents a good basis for reflection in order to improve TSD chapter order to improve TSD chapter implementation; points out that the new- implementation; points out that the new- generation agreements include human generation agreements include human rights clauses
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • To Read the Newsletter
    EPILEPSY ALLIANCE EUROPE NEWS FROM THE TASK FORCE CHAIRS under the auspices of: ® EA E International Bureau for APRIL 2018 Epilepsy Alliance Europe IBE Epilepsy Meet the members of the Task Force 2017-2021 Martin Brodie, Co-chair representing IBE Philippe Ryvlin, Co-chair representing ILAE Janet Mifsud, representing IBE Caroline Morton, representing IBE Francesca Sofia, representing IBE Lievan Lagae, representing ILAE Eugen Trinka, representing ILAE Kristl Vonck, representing ILAE FIND OUT MORE www.epilepsyallianceeurope.org/epilepsy-alliance-europe-task-force/ INTERNATIONAL EPILEPSY DAY IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Philippe Ryvlin and Martin Brodie, Co-chair, Epilepsy Alliance Europe Task Force A global alliance for epilepsy The European Advocates for Epilepsy MEP group in the European In opening the briefing, Brian Hayes MEP explained that the work- Parliament, organised a Breakfast Briefing in the parliament in Brus- shop focused on the need for a global alliance for epilepsy research sels on 31st January to mark International Epilepsy and was a follow up to an important workshop held Day. Hosted by its President, Brian Hayes MEP (Ire- in 2017 and which involved representatives from land), the event was attended by several MEPs, Epilepsy is a the national health agencies in the US and Canada. including Mrs Lieve Wierlinck (Belgium), Seán Kelly most complex Speaking at the event, Francesca Sofia, the mother (Ireland), Alojz Peterle (Slovenia), Roberta Metsola of an eight-year old girl with difficult refractory epi- (Malta), José Inácio Faria (Portugal), and Franc disease. lepsy, said: “My plea to you today is to work with us Bogovič (Slovenia). in a life-changing movement to save a community Also present were Stéphane Hogan, Head of Sec- Fighting of 6 million people (with epilepsy).
    [Show full text]
  • Hon. Mr President of the European Parliament, Dear David Sassoli
    Hon. Mr President of the European Parliament, Dear David Sassoli, Since March, when the outbreak of COVID-19 intensified in Europe, the functioning of the European Parliament (EP) has changed dramatically, due to the sanitary measures applied. We understand the inevitability of the contingency plan, taking into account the need to prevent infection and the spread of the virus and to protect the health and lives of people. Six months later, the functioning of the EP is gradually returning to normal. However, there are services whose unavailability seriously impairs parliamentary work, namely the interpretation service. The European Union (EU) has 24 official languages and all deserve the same respect and treatment. We recognize that the number of languages available in committee meeting rooms has been increasing, but even so, more than half of the languages still have no interpretation. Multilingualism is a right enshrined in the Treaties that allows Members to express themselves in their own language. Now, that is not happening and we are concerned that the situation will continue, even taking into account the expected workflow in the commissions after these atypical six months. In this sense, we appeal, once again, to you, the President of the EP for the application of the letter and the spirit of the principle of multilingualism, finding solutions that respect this principle and that allow the use of any of the 24 official languages of the EU. The expression of each deputy in her/his own language is a priority so that there can be conditions to fully exercise the mandate for which she/he was elected and a condition of respect for the citizens who elected her/him.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Recovery Call to Action & Signatories 121
    GREENRECOVERY REBOOT & REBOOST our economies for a sustainable future Call for mobilisation The coronavirus crisis is shaking the whole world, with devastating consequences across Europe. We are being put to the test. We are suffering and mourning our losses, and this crisis is testing the limits of our system. It is also a test of our great European solidarity and of our institutions, which acted fast at the start of the crisis to deploy measures to protect us. The crisis is still ongoing, but we will see the light at the end of the tunnel, and by fighting together, we will beat the virus. Never have we faced such a challenging situation in peacetime. The fight against the pandemic is our top priority and everything that is needed to stop it and eradicate the virus must be done. We welcome and strongly support all the actions developed by governments, EU institutions, local authorities, scientists, medical staff, volunteers, citizens and economic actors. In this tremendously difficult situation, we are also facing another crisis: a shock to our economy tougher than the 2008 crisis. The major shock to the economy and workers created by the pandemic calls for a strong coordinated economic response. We therefore welcome the declaration of European leaders stating that they will do “whatever it takes” to tackle the social and economic consequences of this crisis. However, what worked for the 2008 financial crisis may not be sufficient to overcome this one. The economic recovery will only come with massive investments to protect and create jobs and to support all the companies, regions and sectors that have suffered from the economy coming to a sudden halt.
    [Show full text]
  • European Alliance for a Green Recovery
    Launch of the European alliance for a Green Recovery Press Release Under embargo until 14/04 7:00am At the initiative of Pascal Canfin, Chair of the Environment Committee at the European Parliament, 180 political decision-makers, business leaders, trade unions, NGOs, and think tanks have come together to form a European alliance for a Green Recovery. In the face of the coronavirus crisis, the biggest challenge Europe has faced in peacetime, with devastating consequences and a shock to the economy tougher than the 2008 crisis, Ministers from 11 countries, 79 cross-party MEPs from 17 Member States, 37 CEOs, 28 business associations representing 10 different sectors, trade union confederation representing members from 90 national trade union organisations and 10 trade union federations, 7 NGOs and 6 think tanks, have committed to working together to create, support and implement solutions to prepare our economies for the world of tomorrow. This first pan-European call for mobilisation on post-crisis green investment packages will work to build the recovery and transformation plans which enshrine the fight against climate change and biodiversity as a key pillar of the economic strategy. Sharing the belief that the economic recovery will only come with massive investments to protect and create jobs and to support all companies, regions and sectors that have suffered from the economy coming to a sudden halt, the alliance commits to contribute to the post-crisis investment decisions needed to reboot and reboost our economy. Covid-19 will not make climate change and nature degradation go away. The fight against this crisis will not be won without a solid economic response.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear President of the European Parliament, Dear President of The
    Dear President of the European Parliament, Dear President of the European Council, Dear President of the European Commission and Dear President of the French Republic, We all have a responsibility for the shared future of Europe. In this time of crisis, it is high time to re-evaluate some of the rules we have upheld till now and focus on the most important aspects of the European project, which will help us move forward. An unprecedented health crisis is currently affecting millions of people in Europe and tragically taking thousands of lives. However, this is not the end. The economic crisis will crush the hopes and dreams of generations of Europeans. We sincerely hope that we will all do whatever is in our power not to leave anyone behind. We firmly believe that the European Parliament needs to take on its responsibility and share the burden since it is the highest European directly elected body. We need to be part of the solution, not part of the problem. If we want the people to have confidence and trust in the European project, we need to show them that we are also ready to make concessions. Therefore, we would like to ask you to do everything in your power to change the treaties in order to have just a single seat of the Parliament in Brussels. This call has again gained a large majority of support in the 2018 Parliament discharge resolution adopted on 13 May 2020 and shall now be taken into account and acted upon. The financial and environmental costs of moving the Parliament are, especially in these times of digitally connected Europe, extremely high and hard to justify.
    [Show full text]
  • Representative Democracy in the European Union»
    «Evolving dilemmas: representative democracy in the European Union» ****WORK IN PROGRESS – PLEASE DO NOT CITE OR SIRCULATE**** Guri Rosén1 Abstract In European Union (EU) studies, there has been what some call a ‘representative turn’ (cf. Kröger and Friedrich 2013). The particularities of the EU as a multilevel polity have spawned studies aiming to conceptualise and evaluate representation. Other analyses have revolved around the role of Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) and the extent to which their preferences and voting patterns are congruent with the EU electorate. Finally, there is work that seeks to appraise the responsiveness of EU parliamentarians, or the Union’s systemic responsiveness, by comparing public opinion to legislative output. The multilevel character of the EU presents distinct challenges to representation, however. We know for example that MEPs serve several principals, the party group they belong to at the EU-level, their national party (Hix 2002), their voters, perhaps even to the European integration project itself. What we know less about is how EU-parliamentarians adjudicate between these different commitments. Thus, the aim of this contribution is to analyse processes of representation within the EU, focusing on the interaction between the national and EU-levels. More specifically, it will gauge how MEPs’ representative roles are mediated by their national party, their EU-party group, their constituencies, as well as by their potential loyalty to the EU polity. It is argued that the European Parliament’s empowerment has made MEPs’ allegiances more unpredictable. As a result, representative practice becomes fragmented, putting further pressure on democracy both at the EU- and member state level.
    [Show full text]