DOCSLIB.ORG

The Chandra Proposers' Observatory Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Chandra Proposers' Observatory Guide The Chandra Proposers’ Observatory Guide Prepared by: Chandra X-ray Center Chandra Project Science, MSFC Chandra IPI Teams Version 15.0 December 2012 2 Contents What’s New for Cycle 15? xv 1 Mission Overview 1 1.1 Program Organization . 1 1.2 Unique Capabilities . 1 1.3 Observatory Overview . 2 1.4 Pointing Control and Aspect Determination (PCAD) . 3 1.5 HRMA . 3 1.6 Science Instrument Module (SIM) . 3 1.6.1 Aimpoints . 4 1.7 Ground System . 4 1.8 Orbit . 4 1.9 Particle Detector . 5 1.10 ACIS . 5 1.11 HRC . 6 1.12 HETG . 6 1.13 LETG . 6 1.14 Effective Area Comparisons . 7 1.15 Allocation of observing time . 7 1.16 How to get information and help . 7 2 Spacecraft, Telescope, Operations, & Mission Planning 11 2.1 Introduction . 11 2.2 Spacecraft . 11 2.3 Telescope System . 13 2.4 Science Instrument Module (SIM) . 14 2.4.1 SIM Motions . 15 2.5 Electron Proton Helium Instrument (EPHIN) . 15 2.6 Operations . 16 2.6.1 Launch and On-orbit Verification . 16 2.6.2 The Ground System . 16 2.6.3 Commanding . 17 i ii CONTENTS 2.6.4 Telemetry . 17 2.6.5 SI Science Data . 18 2.6.6 Event Timing and the Spacecraft Clock . 18 2.7 Mission Planning . 18 2.7.1 The Long-Term Schedule . 18 2.7.2 Selecting Candidates for Short-Term Scheduling . 19 2.7.3 The Short Term Scheduling Process . 20 3 Offset Pointing, Visibility, and other Constraints 21 3.1 Introduction . 21 3.2 Offset Pointing . 21 3.3 Visibility . 21 3.3.1 Radiation Belt Passages . 21 3.3.2 Avoidances . 24 3.3.3 Pitch Angle Constraints . 24 3.4 Other Constraints and Considerations . 27 3.4.1 Instrument Constraints and Considerations . 27 3.4.2 User-Imposed Constraints . 28 4 High Resolution Mirror Assembly (HRMA) 29 4.1 Introduction . 29 4.1.1 Description and Physical Configuration . 29 4.1.2 Sub-assembly Calibration . 31 4.1.3 Operating Environment . 31 4.1.4 Heritage . 31 4.2 Calibration and Performance . 31 4.2.1 Calibration and Model . 31 4.2.2 HRMA Effective Area . 32 4.2.3 Point-Spread-Function and Encircled Energy Fraction . 34 4.3 Ghost Images . 43 4.4 Effects of Aspect and Instrument Uncertainties . 49 4.5 References . 54 5 Pointing Control and Aspect Determination System 57 5.1 Introduction . 57 5.2 Physical configuration . 57 5.2.1 ACA . 58 5.2.2 Fiducial lights and Fiducial Transfer System . 59 5.2.3 IRU . 60 5.2.4 Momentum control – RWA and MUPS . 60 5.3 Operating principles . 61 5.4 Performance . 61 5.4.1 Post-Facto and On-Orbit Aspect Determination . 61 CONTENTS iii 5.4.2 On-Board Acquisition and Tracking . 64 5.5 Heritage . 65 5.6 Calibration . 65 5.6.1 Pre-launch calibration . 65 5.6.2 Orbital activation and checkout calibration . 65 5.6.3 On-orbit calibrations . 66 5.7 Operations . 68 5.7.1 PCAD modes . 68 5.7.2 Operational constraints . 68 5.7.3 Output data . 70 5.8 Performing an Observation . 70 5.8.1 Star acquisition . 70 5.8.2 Science pointing scenarios . 70 5.8.3 PCAD capabilities (advanced) . 72 5.9 Ground Processing . 73 5.9.1 Data products . 73 5.9.2 Star catalog . 73 6 ACIS: Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer 75 6.1 Introduction & Layout . 75 6.2 Basic Principles . 78 6.3 Optical Blocking Filter & Optical Contamination . 80 6.4 Calibration . 80 6.5 Quantum Efficiency and Effective Area . 81 6.5.1 Molecular Contamination of the OBFs . 86 6.6 Spatial Resolution & Encircled Energy . 87 6.7 Energy Resolution . 87 6.7.1 Correcting the Energy Resolution of the CCDs . 88 6.8 Hot Pixels and Columns . 89 6.9 Cosmic Ray Afterglows . 89 6.10 Aimpoints . 89 6.11 Dither . 93 6.11.1 Gaps Between the CCDs . 93 6.12 Operating Modes . 95 6.12.1 Timed Exposure (TE) Mode . 95 6.12.2 Alternating Exposures . 97 6.12.3 Continuous Clocking (CC) Mode . 98 6.13 Bias Maps . 99 6.14 Event Grades and Telemetry Formats . 99 6.14.1 Event Grades . 99 6.14.2 Telemetry Formats . 101 6.15 Pileup . 102 iv CONTENTS 6.15.1 Other Consequences of Pileup . 104 6.15.2 Pileup Estimation . 106 6.15.3 Reducing Pileup . 107 6.16 On-Orbit Background . 109 6.16.1 The Non-X-ray Background . 109 6.16.2 The Total Background . 112 6.16.3 Background Variability.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • REVIEW ARTICLE the NASA Spitzer Space Telescope
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS 78, 011302 ͑2007͒ REVIEW ARTICLE The NASA Spitzer Space Telescope ͒ R. D. Gehrza Department of Astronomy, School of Physics and Astronomy, 116 Church Street, S.E., University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 ͒ T. L. Roelligb NASA Ames Research Center, MS 245-6, Moffett Field, California 94035-1000 ͒ M. W. Wernerc Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, MS 264-767, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California 91109 ͒ G. G. Faziod Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 ͒ J. R. Houcke Astronomy Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-6801 ͒ F. J. Lowf Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, Arizona 85721 ͒ G. H. Riekeg Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, Arizona 85721 ͒ ͒ B. T. Soiferh and D. A. Levinei Spitzer Science Center, MC 220-6, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, California 91125 ͒ E. A. Romanaj Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, MS 264-767, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California 91109 ͑Received 2 June 2006; accepted 17 September 2006; published online 30 January 2007͒ The National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Spitzer Space Telescope ͑formerly the Space Infrared Telescope Facility͒ is the fourth and final facility in the Great Observatories Program, joining Hubble Space Telescope ͑1990͒, the Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory ͑1991–2000͒, and the Chandra X-Ray Observatory ͑1999͒. Spitzer, with a sensitivity that is almost three orders of magnitude greater than that of any previous ground-based and space-based infrared observatory, is expected to revolutionize our understanding of the creation of the universe, the formation and evolution of primitive galaxies, the origin of stars and planets, and the chemical evolution of the universe.
    [Show full text]
  • Hubble Space Telescope Primer for Cycle 25
    January 2017 Hubble Space Telescope Primer for Cycle 25 An Introduction to the HST for Phase I Proposers 3700 San Martin Drive Baltimore, Maryland 21218 [email protected] Operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration How to Get Started For information about submitting a HST observing proposal, please begin at the Cycle 25 Announcement webpage at: http://www.stsci.edu/hst/proposing/docs/cycle25announce Procedures for submitting a Phase I proposal are available at: http://apst.stsci.edu/apt/external/help/roadmap1.html Technical documentation about the instruments are available in their respective handbooks, available at: http://www.stsci.edu/hst/HST_overview/documents Where to Get Help Contact the STScI Help Desk by sending a message to [email protected]. Voice mail may be left by calling 1-800-544-8125 (within the US only) or 410-338-1082. The HST Primer for Cycle 25 was edited by Susan Rose, Senior Technical Editor and contributions from many others at STScI, in particular John Debes, Ronald Downes, Linda Dressel, Andrew Fox, Norman Grogin, Katie Kaleida, Matt Lallo, Cristina Oliveira, Charles Proffitt, Tony Roman, Paule Sonnentrucker, Denise Taylor and Leonardo Ubeda. Send comments or corrections to: Hubble Space Telescope Division Space Telescope Science Institute 3700 San Martin Drive Baltimore, Maryland 21218 E-mail:[email protected] CHAPTER 1: Introduction In this chapter... 1.1 About this Document / 7 1.2 What’s New This Cycle / 7 1.3 Resources, Documentation and Tools / 8 1.4 STScI Help Desk / 12 1.1 About this Document The Hubble Space Telescope Primer for Cycle 25 is a companion document to the HST Call for Proposals1.
    [Show full text]
  • Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer Launch Press
    PRess KIT/DECEMBER 2009 Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer Launch Contents Media Services Information ................................................................................................................. 3 Quick Facts ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Mission Overview .................................................................................................................................. 5 Why Infrared? ....................................................................................................................................... 10 Science Goals and Objectives ......................................................................................................... 12 Spacecraft ............................................................................................................................................. 16 Science Instrument ............................................................................................................................. 19 Infrared Missions: Past and Present ............................................................................................... 23 NASA’s Explorer Program ................................................................................................................. 25 Program/Project Management .......................................................................................................... 27 Media Contacts J.D. Harrington
    [Show full text]
  • Concepts & Synthesis
    CONCEPTS & SYNTHESIS EMPHASIZING NEW IDEAS TO STIMULATE RESEARCH IN ECOLOGY Ecological Monographs, 81(3), 2011, pp. 349–405 Ó 2011 by the Ecological Society of America Regulation of animal size by eNPP, Bergmann’s rule, and related phenomena 1,3 2 MICHAEL A. HUSTON AND STEVE WOLVERTON 1Department of Biology, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas 78666 USA 2University of North Texas, Department of Geography, Denton, Texas 76203-5017 USA Abstract. Bergmann’s rule, which proposes a heat-balance explanation for the observed latitudinal gradient of increasing animal body size with increasing latitude, has dominated the study of geographic patterns in animal size since it was first proposed in 1847. Several critical reviews have determined that as many as half of the species examined do not fit the predictions of Bergmann’s rule. We have proposed an alternative hypothesis for geographic variation in body size based on food availability, as regulated by the net primary production (NPP) of plants, specifically NPP during the growing season, or eNPP (ecologically and evolutionarily relevant NPP). Our hypothesis, ‘‘the eNPP rule,’’ is independent of latitude and predicts both spatial and temporal variation in body size, as well as in total population biomass, population growth rates, individual health, and life history traits of animals, including humans, wherever eNPP varies across appropriate scales of space or time. In the context of a revised interpretation of the global patterns of NPP and eNPP, we predict contrasting latitudinal correlations with body size in three distinct latitudinal zones. The eNPP rule explains body- size patterns that are consistent with Bergmann’s rule, as well as two distinct types of contradictions of Bergmann’s rule: the lack of latitudinal patterns within the tropics, and the decline in body size above approximately 608 latitude.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cosmic X-Ray Background
    The Cosmic X-Ray Background Steven M. Kahn Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology Stanford University 1 Outline of Lectures Lecture I: * Historical Introduction and General Characteristics of the CXB. * Contributions from Discrete Source Classes * Spectral Paradoxes Lecture II: * The CXB and Large Scale Structure * The Galactic Contributions to the CXB * The CXB and the Cosmic Web 2 I. Historical Introduction and General Characteristics of the CXB. 3 Historical Introduction * The “birth” of the field of X-ray astronomy is usually associated with the flight of a particular rocket experiment in 1962 that yielded the detection of the first non-solar cosmic X-ray source: Scorpius X-1. (Giacconi et al. 1962) * That same rocket experiment also yielded the discovery of an apparent diffuse component of X-radiation, the Cosmic X-ray Background (CXB). (N.B. This was well in advance of the discovery of the Cosmic Microwave Background by Pensias and Wilson!) * In the ensuing 40 some odd years, our understanding of the X-ray Universe has progressed considerably. X-rays have now been detected from virtually all classes of astronomical systems, ranging from normal stars to the most distant galaxies. * Nevertheless, the precise origin of the CXB remains puzzling. This has been one of the great mysteries of high energy astrophysics! 4 Historical Introduction 5 Historical Introduction * “The diffuse character of the observed background radiation does not permit a positive determination of its nature and origin. However, the apparent absorption coefficient in mica and the altitude dependence is consistent with radiation of about the same wavelength responsible for the peak.
    [Show full text]
  • Chandra Was Launched Aboard Space Shuttle Columbia on July 23, 1999!!! Crew Lost During Re-Entry Modern X-Ray Telescopes and Detectors
    Chandra was launched aboard Space Shuttle Columbia on July 23, 1999!!! Crew Lost During Re-Entry Modern X-ray Telescopes and Detectors •X-ray Telescopes •X-ray Instruments •Some early highlights •Observations •Data characteristics •Calibration •Analysis X-ray Telescope: The advantages • Achieve 2-D imaging – Separate sources – Study morphology of extended sources – Simultaneously measure both source and local background • Reduce the background Æ increase the source 1/2 detection sensitivity: S/N ~ Fs t/(Fst+ ASbt) –t –exposure time –Fs – source count flux –A –source detection area –Sb – background surface brightness: Detector + sky background • Facilitate high-resolution dispersive spectrometers X-ray Telescope: Focusing mechanism External reflection at small grazing angles - an analogy of skipping stones on water •Snell’s law: sinφr=sinφi/n, where the index of refraction n=1-δ+iβ • External reflection occurs with sinφr > 1 Æ 1/2 The critical grazing angle θ = π/2- φi ~ (2δ) 1/2 (δ ∝ ne /E << 1) Focusing mechanism (cont.) • The critical angle (effective collecting area) decreases with increasing photon energy • High Z materials allow for reflecting high energy photon with the same grazing angle X-ray Telescope: Hans Wolter Configuraions • A Paraboloid gives a perfect image for on-axis rays. But it gives a coma blur of equivalent image size proportional to the off-axis angle. • Wolter showed that two reflections were needed to eliminate the coma. • A Paraboloid-Hyperboloid combination proves to be the most useful in X-ray astronomy. X-ray Telescopes • First used to observe the Solar corona • Then transferred to general astronomy with HEAO-2 (Einstein Observatory), launched in 1978: – imaged X-rays in 0.5-4.0 keV.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Wilderness Region Urban Forest Vulnerability Assessment
    United States Department of Agriculture CHICAGO WILDERNESS REGION URBAN FOREST VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND SYNTHESIS: A Report from the Urban Forestry Climate Change Response Framework Chicago Wilderness Pilot Project Forest Service Northern Research Station General Technical Report NRS-168 April 2017 ABSTRACT The urban forest of the Chicago Wilderness region, a 7-million-acre area covering portions of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin, will face direct and indirect impacts from a changing climate over the 21st century. This assessment evaluates the vulnerability of urban trees and natural and developed landscapes within the Chicago Wilderness region to a range of future climates. We synthesized and summarized information on the contemporary landscape, provided information on past climate trends, and illustrated a range of projected future climates. We used this information to inform models of habitat suitability for trees native to the area. Projected shifts in plant hardiness and heat zones were used to understand how nonnative species and cultivars may tolerate future conditions. We also assessed the adaptability of planted and naturally occurring trees to stressors that may not be accounted for in habitat suitability models such as drought, flooding, wind damage, and air pollution. The summary of the contemporary landscape identifies major stressors currently threatening the urban forest of the Chicago Wilderness region. Major current threats to the region’s urban forest include invasive species, pests and disease, land-use change, development, and fragmentation. Observed trends in climate over the historical record from 1901 through 2011 show a temperature increase of 1 °F in the Chicago Wilderness region. Precipitation increased as well, especially during the summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Grant Proposals, 1991-1999
    Grant Proposals, 1991-1999 Finding aid prepared by Smithsonian Institution Archives Smithsonian Institution Archives Washington, D.C. Contact us at [email protected] Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Descriptive Entry.............................................................................................................. 1 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 1 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 2 Grant Proposals https://siarchives.si.edu/collections/siris_arc_251859 Collection Overview Repository: Smithsonian Institution Archives, Washington, D.C., [email protected] Title: Grant Proposals Identifier: Accession 99-171 Date: 1991-1999 Extent: 17 cu. ft. (17 record storage boxes) Creator:: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory. Contracts and Procurement Office Language: English Administrative Information Prefered Citation Smithsonian Institution Archives, Accession 99-171, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Contracts and Procurement Office, Grant Proposals Descriptive Entry This accession consists of records documenting Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory projects and activities. Materials include proposals, correspondence, progress
    [Show full text]
  • Argops) Solution to the 2017 Astrodynamics Specialist Conference Student Competition
    AAS 17-621 THE ASTRODYNAMICS RESEARCH GROUP OF PENN STATE (ARGOPS) SOLUTION TO THE 2017 ASTRODYNAMICS SPECIALIST CONFERENCE STUDENT COMPETITION Jason A. Reiter,* Davide Conte,1 Andrew M. Goodyear,* Ghanghoon Paik,* Guanwei. He,* Peter C. Scarcella,* Mollik Nayyar,* Matthew J. Shaw* We present the methods and results of the Astrodynamics Research Group of Penn State (ARGoPS) team in the 2017 Astrodynamics Specialist Conference Student Competition. A mission (named Minerva) was designed to investigate Asteroid (469219) 2016 HO3 in order to determine its mass and volume and to map and characterize its surface. This data would prove useful in determining the necessity and usefulness of future missions to the asteroid. The mission was designed such that a balance between cost and maximizing objectives was found. INTRODUCTION Asteroid (469219) 2016 HO3 was discovered recently and has yet to be explored. It lies in a quasi-orbit about the Earth such that it will follow the Earth around the Sun for at least the next several hundred years providing many opportunities for relatively low-cost missions to the body. Not much is known about 2016 HO3 except a general size range, but its close proximity to Earth makes a scientific mission more feasible than other near-Earth objects. A Request For Proposal (RFP) was provided to university teams searching for cost-efficient mission design solutions to assist in the characterization of the asteroid and the assessment of its potential for future, more in-depth missions and possible resource utilization. The RFP provides constraints on launch mass, bus size as well as other mission architecture decisions, and sets goals for scientific mapping and characterization.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Contributions
    Mapping the X-ray Sky with SRG: First Results from eROSITA and ART-XC Report of Contributions https://events.mpe.mpg.de/e/SRG2020 Mapping the X- … / Report of Contributions eROSITA discovery of a new AGN … Contribution ID : 4 Type : Oral Presentation eROSITA discovery of a new AGN state in 1H0707-495 Tuesday, 17 March 2020 17:45 (15) One of the most prominent AGNs, the ultrasoft Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 Galaxy 1H0707-495, has been observed with eROSITA as one of the first CAL/PV observations on October 13, 2019 for about 60.000 seconds. 1H 0707-495 is a highly variable AGN, with a complex, steep X-ray spectrum, which has been the subject of intense study with XMM-Newton in the past. 1H0707-495 entered an historical low hard flux state, first detected with eROSITA, never seen before in the 20 years of XMM-Newton observations. In addition ultra-soft emission with a variability factor of about 100 has been detected for the first time in the eROSITA light curves. We discuss fast spectral transitions between the cool and a hot phase of the accretion flow in the very strong GR regime as a physical model for 1H0707-495, and provide tests on previously discussed models. Presenter status Senior eROSITA consortium member Primary author(s) : Prof. BOLLER, Thomas (MPE); Prof. NANDRA, Kirpal (MPE Garching); Dr LIU, Teng (MPE Garching); MERLONI, Andrea; Dr DAUSER, Thomas (FAU Nürnberg); Dr RAU, Arne (MPE Garching); Dr BUCHNER, Johannes (MPE); Dr FREYBERG, Michael (MPE) Presenter(s) : Prof. BOLLER, Thomas (MPE) Session Classification : AGN physics, variability, clustering October 3, 2021 Page 1 Mapping the X- … / Report of Contributions X-ray emission from warm-hot int … Contribution ID : 9 Type : Poster X-ray emission from warm-hot intergalactic medium: the role of resonantly scattered cosmic X-ray background We revisit calculations of the X-ray emission from warm-hot intergalactic medium (WHIM) with particular focus on contribution from the resonantly scattered cosmic X-ray background (CXB).
    [Show full text]
  • Hubble Space Telescope Primer for Cycle 18
    January 2010 Hubble Space Telescope Primer for Cycle 18 An Introduction to HST for Phase I Proposers Space Telescope Science Institute 3700 San Martin Drive Baltimore, Maryland 21218 [email protected] Operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration How to Get Started If you are interested in submitting an HST proposal, then proceed as follows: • Visit the Cycle 18 Announcement Web page: http://www.stsci.edu/hst/proposing/docs/cycle18announce Then continue by following the procedure outlined in the Phase I Roadmap available at: http://apst.stsci.edu/apt/external/help/roadmap1.html More technical documentation, such as that provided in the Instrument Handbooks, can be accessed from: http://www.stsci.edu/hst/HST_overview/documents Where to Get Help • Visit STScI’s Web site at: http://www.stsci.edu • Contact the STScI Help Desk. Either send e-mail to [email protected] or call 1-800-544-8125; from outside the United States and Canada, call [1] 410-338-1082. The HST Primer for Cycle 18 was edited by Francesca R. Boffi, with the technical assistance of Susan Rose and the contributions of many others from STScI, in particular Alessandra Aloisi, Daniel Apai, Todd Boroson, Brett Blacker, Stefano Casertano, Ron Downes, Rodger Doxsey, David Golimowski, Al Holm, Helmut Jenkner, Jason Kalirai, Tony Keyes, Anton Koekemoer, Jerry Kriss, Matt Lallo, Karen Levay, John MacKenty, Jennifer Mack, Aparna Maybhate, Ed Nelan, Sami-Matias Niemi, Cheryl Pavlovsky, Karla Peterson, Larry Petro, Charles Proffitt, Neill Reid, Merle Reinhart, Ken Sembach, Paula Sessa, Nancy Silbermann, Linda Smith, Dave Soderblom, Denise Taylor, Nolan Walborn, Alan Welty, Bill Workman and Jim Younger.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights and Discoveries from the Chandra X-Ray Observatory1
    Highlights and Discoveries from the Chandra X-ray Observatory1 H Tananbaum1, M C Weisskopf2, W Tucker1, B Wilkes1 and P Edmonds1 1Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138. 2 NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center, ZP12, 320 Sparkman Drive, Huntsville, AL 35805. Abstract. Within 40 years of the detection of the first extrasolar X-ray source in 1962, NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory has achieved an increase in sensitivity of 10 orders of magnitude, comparable to the gain in going from naked-eye observations to the most powerful optical telescopes over the past 400 years. Chandra is unique in its capabilities for producing sub-arcsecond X-ray images with 100-200 eV energy resolution for energies in the range 0.08<E<10 keV, locating X-ray sources to high precision, detecting extremely faint sources, and obtaining high resolution spectra of selected cosmic phenomena. The extended Chandra mission provides a long observing baseline with stable and well-calibrated instruments, enabling temporal studies over time-scales from milliseconds to years. In this report we present a selection of highlights that illustrate how observations using Chandra, sometimes alone, but often in conjunction with other telescopes, have deepened, and in some instances revolutionized, our understanding of topics as diverse as protoplanetary nebulae; massive stars; supernova explosions; pulsar wind nebulae; the superfluid interior of neutron stars; accretion flows around black holes; the growth of supermassive black holes and their role in the regulation of star formation and growth of galaxies; impacts of collisions, mergers, and feedback on growth and evolution of groups and clusters of galaxies; and properties of dark matter and dark energy.
    [Show full text]