DOCSLIB.ORG

CIRCUIT COURT of APPEALS Criminal Justice Section Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CIRCUIT COURT of APPEALS Criminal Justice Section Program SIGNIFICANT DECISIONS OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT & THE 5TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS Criminal Justice Section Program Buck Files Bain, Files, Jarrett, Bain & Harrison, P.C. 109 West Ferguson Street Tyler, Texas 75702-7203 (903) 595-3573 Friday, June 11, 2010 3:30 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. F. R. (Buck) Files, Jr. is a shareholder in the firm of Bain, Files, Jarrett, Bain and Harrison, P.C., in Tyler, Texas. He holds board certifications in criminal law from the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and in criminal trial advocacy from the National Board of Trial Advocacy. Buck is a charter member and former director of the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association. In 2007, he was honored by a resolution of TCDLA’s board of directors for having had more than 100 of his columns – “The Federal Corner” – published in the VOICE for the Defense. Buck is currently serving as a member of the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and as Chair of the State Bar’s Continuing Legal Education Committee. He is a former member of the State Bar’s board of directors and was named “Outstanding Third Year Director” in 2007. He also received a State Bar Presidential Citation for his work as Co-Chair of the State Bar’s Task Force on the Qualifications of Habeas Counsel in Capital Cases. In 2004, he was named the Defense Lawyer of the Year by the Criminal Justice Section of the State Bar. Buck received his B.A. degree from Austin College (1960) and his M.L.A. and J.D. degrees from S.M.U. (1974 and 1963). Before entering private practice in 1970, he served in the United States Marine Corps (1963-1967) and was an assistant and first assistant in the Smith County Criminal District Attorney’s office (1967-1970). Buck has been a frequent speaker at TCDLA, CDLP and State Bar seminars. “SIGNIFICANT DECISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT” [The First 13 Cases of the 2009 – 2010 Term] F. R. (BUCK) FILES, JR. Bain, Files, Jarrett, Bain & Harrison, P.C. 109 West Ferguson Tyler, Texas 75702 903-595-3573 Fax 903-597-7322 E-mail: [email protected] STATE BAR OF TEXAS ANNUAL MEETING June 10 - 11, 2010 Fort Worth, Texas Table of Contents I. Introduction............................................................................................................................................ 1 A. The Challenge of Preparing this Paper........................................................................................ 1 B. Beware Of....................................................................................................................................... 1 C. The Big Ticket Cases ..................................................................................................................... 1 D. The Rest of the Cases..................................................................................................................... 1 E. What’s Still Pending Before the Court? ...................................................................................... 1 II. The Cases ................................................................................................................................................ 1 A. Double Jeopardy ............................................................................................................................ 1 1. Renico v. Lett, 559 U.S. ___ (2010) [Slip Opinion May 3, 2010]......................................... 1 B. The Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 48........................................................................................ 2 1. United States v. Stevens, ___ S.Ct. ___, 2010 WL 1540082 (April 20, 2010)...................... 2 C. Confessions ..................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Maryland v. Shatzer, 130 S.Ct. 1213 (February 24, 2010) .................................................... 3 2. Florida v. Powell, 130 S.Ct. 1195 (February 23, 2010) ......................................................... 4 D. The Right to a Public Trial ........................................................................................................... 6 1. Presley v. Georgia, 130 S.Ct. 721 (January 19, 2010)........................................................... 6 E. The Speedy Trial Act..................................................................................................................... 8 1. Bloate v. United States, 130 S.Ct. 1345 (March 8, 2010)...................................................... 8 F. Resolution of a Jackson v. Virginia Issue ..................................................................................... 9 1. McDaniel v. Brown, 130 S.Ct. 665 (February 25, 2010)....................................................... 9 G. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel.................................................................................................. 10 1. Padilla v. Kentucky, 130 S.Ct. 1473 (March 31, 2010) ......................................................... 10 2. Bobby v. Van Hook, 130 S.Ct. 13 (November 30, 2009)...................................................... 12 3. Johnson v. United States, 130 S.Ct. 1265 (March 2, 2010) ................................................... 13 4. Porter v. McCollum, 130 S.Ct. 447 (November 30, 2009) .................................................... 14 5. Smith v. Spisak, 130 S.Ct. 676 (January 12, 2010) ............................................................... 16 6. Wong v. Belmontes, 130 S.Ct. 383 (November 16, 2009) .................................................... 18 III. Conclusion............................................................................................................................................... 20 i NOTES ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ NOTES ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATORS City College
    College of Music.........................................................Edward J. Kvet, D.M.E., Dean Associate Dean...................................................................Anthony DeCuir, Ph.D. UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATORS City College................................................................Marcel Dumestre, Ed.D., Dean Associate Dean................................................................Richard A. Lucore, Ed.D. Loyola Institute for Ministry ..................................Mark Markuly, Ph.D., Director BOARD OF TRUSTEES 2003 – 2004 School of Law ..........................................................Brian Bromberger, LL.M., Dean Chair .......................................................................................Donna D. Fraiche, L’75 Associate Dean of Academic Affairs......................Lawrence W. Moore, S.J., J.D. Vice Chair.......................................................................Jerome J. Reso, Jr., B’58, L’61 Associate Dean of Students.........................Stephanie W. Jumonville, M.Ed., J.D. President ...................................................................Rev. Bernard P. Knoth, S.J., Ph.D. Assistant Dean of Admissions................................K. Michele Allison-Davis, J.D. Secretary and Treasurer......................................Rev. Lawrence W. Moore, S.J., LL.M. University Library.....................................Mary Lee Sweat, M.S.L.S., M.B.A., Dean Admissions and Enrollment Management.....................Deborah Stieffel, M.S., Dean B.A. “Red” Adams,
    [Show full text]
  • Fourth Amendment Motion to Suppress
    NO. 10-20132 In the In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit __________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff–Appellee , v. WASHINGTON MONTANYA Defendant–Appellant . ____________________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division No. 4:09-CR-368(2), Hon. Sim Lake, Judge Presiding ___________________________________________________ BRIEF OF APPELLANT WASHINGTON MONTANYA ___________________________________________________ Seth H. Kretzer LAW OFFICES OF SETH KRETZER Galleria Tower II 5051 Westheimer, Suite 1850 Houston, Texas 77056 [Tel.] (713) 775-3050 [Fax.] (713) 625-0329 COURT -APPOINTED ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT WASHINGTON MONTANYA CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES NO. 10-20132 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff–Appellee , v. WASHINGTON MONTANYA Defendant–Appellant . The undersigned counsel of record certifies the following listed persons have an interest in the outcome of this case. These representations are made in order that the judges of this court may evaluate their possible recusal or disqualification. 1. United States of America – Appellee. It is represented in the Fifth Circuit by: James Lee Turner Jose´ Moreno Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney Chief, Appellate Division P.O. Box 61129 P.O. Box 61129 Houston, Texas 77208 Houston, Texas 77208 The United States was represented in the district-court proceedings by: Robert Johnson Assistant U.S. Attorney 919 Milam Street Houston, TX 77002 i 2. Washington Montanya – Appellant. Montanya is represented in the Fifth Circuit by: Seth H. Kretzer LAW OFFICES OF SETH KRETZER 5051 Westheimer Suite 1850 Houston, Texas 77056 Additional counsel who represented Montanya in the district court proceedings are: Gilbert Villarreal ATTORNEY AT LAW 1419 Franklin; Suite 5 Houston, TX 77002 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Barack Obama, 2011 Nominations Submitted to The
    Administration of Barack Obama, 2011 Nominations Submitted to the Senate December 16, 2011 The following list does not include promotions of members of the Uniformed Services, nominations to the Service Academies, or nominations of Foreign Service Officers. Submitted January 5 Arenda L. Wright Allen, of Virginia, to be U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, vice Jerome B. Friedman, retired. Anthony J. Battaglia, of California, to be U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of California, vice M. James Lorenz, retired. Cathy Bissoon, of Pennsylvania, to be U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Pennsylvania, vice Thomas M. Hardiman, elevated. James Emanuel Boasberg, of the District of Columbia, to be U.S. District Judge for the District of Columbia, vice Thomas F. Hogan, retired. Vincent L. Briccetti, of New York, to be U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of New York, vice Kimba M. Wood, retired. Louis B. Butler, Jr., of Wisconsin, to be U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Wisconsin, vice John C. Shabaz, retired. Susan L. Carney, of Connecticut, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Second Circuit, vice Barrington D. Parker, retired. Claire C. Cecchi, of New Jersey, to be U.S. District Judge for the District of New Jersey, vice Joseph A. Greenaway, elevated. Edward Milton Chen, of California, to be U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of California, vice Martin J. Jenkins, resigned. Max Oliver Cogburn, Jr., of North Carolina, to be U.S. District Judge for the Western District of North Carolina, vice Lacy H.
    [Show full text]
  • Complaint of Judicial Misconduct
    Complaint of Judicial Misconduct Complainant arl Bernofsky The Hon. Ginger Berrigan. Ju 6478 General Diaz treet United tates District Court for the New Orleans LA 70124 Eastern District of Louisiana (504) 486-46"9 (504) 589-7515 I. Introduction The complainant was plaintiff in a serie of four lawsuits against Tulane Universit in which th Hon. Ginger Berrigan was Pr siding Judge. Relatively recent) , he learned that Judge Berrigan has had a material and continuing relationship with the defendant. Under Canon 3 of the ode of Judicial onduct, Judge Berrigan had a duty to disclose her as ociation with Tulane before sitting in any cas in which Tulane was a defendant. From Januar , 1995 onward Judge Berrigan continuously violated this Code in all of the complainant's lawsuits where she presided and failed to make any disclo ure. II. Statement of Facts A. Professorship Federal District ourt Judge Ginger Berrigan i Adjunct Associate Professor of Law at Tulane University and taught the cours Trial Advocacy during the 1995-96 academic year [1 2]. Since then, Judge Berrigan has maintained a professional association with Tulane through her continued participation in the Law School's Judicial Externship Program [3-5] and as a substitute instructor for the course, Federal Practice & Procedure: Trials [6], taught by the 76-year-old Adjunct Professor Federal District Court Judge Charles Schwartz Jr. [7]. B. Board Membership In 1990, Judge Berrigan then an attorney was appointed to the Board of Directors of Tulane University's Amistad Research Center, a position she occupied until 1997 [8]. 13 ERRIGAN.Q9C - I - The Amistad Research Center occupies a wing of Tilton Memorial Hall on the campus of Tulane University [9].
    [Show full text]
  • PATTERN JURY INSTRUCTIONS (Civil Cases)
    PATTERN JURY INSTRUCTIONS (Civil Cases) Prepared by the Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions District Judges Association Fifth Circuit 2014 with revisions through October 2016 For Customer Assistance Call 1-800-328-4880 Mat #41663410 COMMITTEE ON PATTERN JURY INSTRUCTIONS DISTRICT JUDGES ASSOCIATION FIFTH CIRCUIT Judge Daniel P. Jordan III, Chairman Judge Ron Clark Judge Elizabeth Erny Foote Judge Melinda Harmon Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon Judge Michael P. Mills Judge Sul Ozerden Judge Sarah Vance Judge Stanwood R. Duval, Jr. Judge Lee H. Rosenthal iii FOREWORD In July 2011, the Fifth Circuit District Judges Associa- tion formed the Pattern Jury Instruction Committee (Civil) including Judges Lee Rosenthal, Ron Clark, Elizabeth Foote, Sul Ozerden, Michael P. Mills, Stanwood Duval, Mary Ann Lemmon, Sarah Vance, Melinda Harmon and Dan Jordan. The Committee was charged with reviewing the existing pattern instructions and updating them where necessary. After an initial review, the Committee determined that the time had come for a top-to-bottom examination for substantive accuracy. While many of the existing instruc- tions remained valid, a significant number no longer reflected current law. This is no reflection on prior commit- tees, which did an excellent job drafting prior patterns. The law is not stagnant; it was time to update. Accordingly, the 2014 edition of the Fifth Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions (Civil) will represent a substantial overhaul. The Committee approached this project with a consistent mantra: present instructions that are as balanced, accurate, and user friendly as possible. Given the breadth of that undertaking, outside assistance was essential. And in the end, nearly one hundred judges, attorneys, law professors, and law students helped draft, vet, edit, and proofread the final product.
    [Show full text]
  • Members by Circuit (As of January 3, 2017)
    Federal Judges Association - Members by Circuit (as of January 3, 2017) 1st Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Bruce M. Selya Jeffrey R. Howard Kermit Victor Lipez Ojetta Rogeriee Thompson Sandra L. Lynch United States District Court District of Maine D. Brock Hornby George Z. Singal John A. Woodcock, Jr. Jon David LeVy Nancy Torresen United States District Court District of Massachusetts Allison Dale Burroughs Denise Jefferson Casper Douglas P. Woodlock F. Dennis Saylor George A. O'Toole, Jr. Indira Talwani Leo T. Sorokin Mark G. Mastroianni Mark L. Wolf Michael A. Ponsor Patti B. Saris Richard G. Stearns Timothy S. Hillman William G. Young United States District Court District of New Hampshire Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. Joseph N. LaPlante Landya B. McCafferty Paul J. Barbadoro SteVen J. McAuliffe United States District Court District of Puerto Rico Daniel R. Dominguez Francisco Augusto Besosa Gustavo A. Gelpi, Jr. Jay A. Garcia-Gregory Juan M. Perez-Gimenez Pedro A. Delgado Hernandez United States District Court District of Rhode Island Ernest C. Torres John J. McConnell, Jr. Mary M. Lisi William E. Smith 2nd Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Barrington D. Parker, Jr. Christopher F. Droney Dennis Jacobs Denny Chin Gerard E. Lynch Guido Calabresi John Walker, Jr. Jon O. Newman Jose A. Cabranes Peter W. Hall Pierre N. LeVal Raymond J. Lohier, Jr. Reena Raggi Robert A. Katzmann Robert D. Sack United States District Court District of Connecticut Alan H. NeVas, Sr. Alfred V. Covello Alvin W. Thompson Dominic J. Squatrito Ellen B.
    [Show full text]
  • Durrenberger V. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
    Case 4:09-cv-00786 Document 51 Filed in TXSD on 01/04/11 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION JEREMY JOSEPH DURRENBERGER, § Plaintiff, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:09-CV-00786 § TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF § CRIMINAL JUSTICE, § Defendant. § TDCJ’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT’S ORDER GRANTING DURRENBERGER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIM LAKE: Pursuant to Rule 60 of the FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, TDCJ, by counsel, the Texas Attorney General, submits this Motion requesting the Court reconsider Its Order granting Durrenberger’s Motion for Summary Judgment. NATURE AND STAGE OF PROCEEDINGS Durrenberger filed suit claiming disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act. Durrenberger complained his hearing loss prevented him from participation in visitation with an inmate. The Court has determined Durrenberger is hearing impaired and that TDCJ discriminated against Durrenberger by failing to accommodate Durrenberger’s disability with an auxiliary hearing device or an attorney-client booth visit. TDCJ seeks reconsideration of the Court’s ruling because: 1) Durrenberger’s admission that he has not used or carried an auxiliary device set against his claim he is entitled to an auxiliary aid at TDCJ presents a factual issue for the jury as to whether he has a disability and whether TDCJ reasonably accommodated any disability and 2) a factual dispute remains regarding the Rehabilitation Act Case 4:09-cv-00786 Document 51 Filed in TXSD on 01/04/11 Page 2 of 5 causation factor necessary to a determination of intentional discrimination.
    [Show full text]
  • Editor's Note
    Published by the Bolch Judicial Institute at Duke Law. Reprinted with permission. © 2021 Duke University School of Law. All rights reserved. JUDICATURE.DUKE.EDU 2 JUDICATURE VOL. 101 NO. 1 EDITOR IN CHIEF CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS CREATED A STIR IN 2011 FOR SUGGESTING THAT MUCH LEGAL “Pick up a copy of any law review,” ribbed DON WILLETT SCHOLARSHIP OFFERS SCANT PRACTICAL INSIGHT. Justice, Supreme Court of Texas the Chief Justice, “and the first article is likely to be . the influence of Immanuel Kant on evidentiary approaches in 18th Century Bulgaria.” BOARD OF EDITORS The Chief Justice, who frequently cites relevant scholarship, was lightheartedly noting DINAH ARCHAMBEAULT what others have long lamented: the disjunction between legal academia and the bread-and- Judge, Twelfth Judicial Circuit Court, Illinois butter work of lawyers and judges. FREDERIC BLOCKX Judicature, for its part, need never fret over its usefulness. Our BRIEFS Judge, Commerical Court, Belgium unfussy aim — to be relentlessly relevant — rarely misses the bull’s-eye. MARK DAVIS This edition’s “cover story” showcases a hot-off-the-press report from Judge, North Carolina Court of Appeals the Conference of Chief Justices, an urgent call for civil justice improve- ments to ensure that state courts remain “affordable for all, efficient MEMBERS OF THE BOARD for all, and fair for all.” The article, co-authored by Oregon Chief JENNIFER BAILEY Justice Thomas Balmer and Judge Gregory Mize, discusses the CCJ’s Judge, 11th Judicial Circuit Court, Florida far-reaching reform proposals to meet 21st-century needs. These are CHERI BEASLEY concrete reforms, not rhetorical meringue, and rooted in a simple, yet Justice, Supreme Court often overlooked, truth: Courts exist to serve real people facing real of North Carolina challenges in the real world.
    [Show full text]
  • Elements of a Finding
    Judge Helen “Ginger” Berrigan Papers LLA0005 Inventory Compiled by Travis H. Williams Paul M. Hebert Law Center Archival Collections Paul M. Hebert Law Center Library Baton Rouge, Louisiana State University 2017 JUDGE BERRIGAN PAPERS LLA0005 1973-2016 PAUL M. HEBERT LAW CENTER LIBRARY CONTENTS OF INVENTORY SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 3 BIOGRAPHICAL/HISTORICAL NOTE .......................................................................... 5 SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE ....................................................................................... 6 PROCESSING NOTE ........................................................................................................ 6 SERIES DESCRIPTIONS .................................................................................................. 7 INDEX TERMS .................................................................................................................. 8 CONTAINER LIST ............................................................................................................ 8 Use of archival materials. If you wish to examine materials in this collection, consult the container list and make note of which items you wish to see. Then inquire at the circulation desk about making an appointment to view those materials. Photocopying. Should you wish to request photocopies, please consult a staff member. Do not remove items to be photocopied. The existing order and arrangement of
    [Show full text]
  • View Procedures
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION JUDGE KENNETH M. HOYT THE ATTACHED COVER PAGE MUST BE SERVED WITH THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT OR NOTICE OF REMOVAL Presented are Court Procedures and attachments that are applicable to cases assigned to Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt. The plaintiff must serve this cover page and the Order for Conference along with the summons and complaint on all defendants. A party removing a case to this Court has the same obligation as a plaintiff filing an Original Complaint. Proof of service of these materials must be filed with the Clerk. A form certificate for use in removed cases is attached to these materials. Additionally, the parties may, at their election, proceed with their case before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. A consent form and related instructions may be obtained on the District Court’s website at www.txs.uscourts.gov. The accompanying procedures are to be used in conjunction with the Local Rules for the Southern District of Texas and not as a substitute for them. The Local Rules as well as this Court’s procedures may also be obtained at www.txs.uscourts.gov. The Court requires strict compliance with the Local Rules and its procedures. Revised: March 2013 THE HONORABLE KENNETH M. HOYT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States Courthouse Courtroom No. 11A 515 Rusk, 11th Floor, Room 11-144 Telephone: (713) 250 - 5613 Facsimile: (713) 250 - 5368 CYNTHIA HORACE Case Manager for Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt P. O. Box 61010 Houston, Texas 77208 Telephone: (713) 250 - 5515 Email: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Contact with Court Personnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Friday, March 20, 2020
    Friday, March 20, 2020 View on the Campaign Judge Lance M. Africk Lance M. Africk received a Bachelor of Arts and Laws degree from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1973, and his Jurist Doctorate degree from the University of North Carolina Law School at Chapel Hill in 1975. Following a judicial clerkship, and several years in private practice, Judge Africk served as the Chief of the Career Criminal Bureau for the Orleans Parish District Attorney’s office and the Chief of the Criminal Division for the United States Attorney’s office in New Orleans. In 1990, he was appointed a United States Magistrate Judge. On April 17, 2002, he was confirmed as a United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Judge Africk is an adjunct professor of law at Tulane University Law School and former president of the Allstate Sugar Bowl. He currently serves on the 5th Circuit Committee on Criminal Pattern Jury Instructions. Judge Africk was also a reviewing author for Moore's Federal Practice/Criminal Procedure Chapters, Third Edition. Judge Africk was appointed by Chief Justice Rehnquist to the Judicial Conference Committee on Criminal Law and he was reappointed to that committee by Chief Justice Roberts, his term ended on October 1, 2011. He was inducted into the Louisiana Justice Hall of Fame in July, 2011. Judge Jane Triche Milazzo Jane Triche Milazzo was sworn in as a United States District Court Judge for the Eastern District of Louisiana on October 12, 2011. Judge Milazzo was nominated by President Obama on March 13, 2011 and was unanimously confirmed by the United States Senate on October 11, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • (“ERISA”) Decisions As They Were Reported on Westlaw Between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016
    DRAFT * This document is a case summary compilation of select Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) decisions as they were reported on Westlaw between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016. Nothing in this document constitutes legal advice. Case summaries prepared by Michelle L. Roberts, Partner, Roberts Bartolic LLP, 1050 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 105, Alameda, CA 94501. © Roberts Bartolic LLP I. Attorneys’ Fees .................................................................................................................. 11 A. First Circuit ..................................................................................................................................... 11 B. Second Circuit ................................................................................................................................. 11 C. Third Circuit .................................................................................................................................... 14 D. Fourth Circuit .................................................................................................................................. 14 E. Fifth Circuit ..................................................................................................................................... 15 F. Sixth Circuit .................................................................................................................................... 16 G. Seventh Circuit ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]