PATTERN JURY INSTRUCTIONS (Civil Cases)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PATTERN JURY INSTRUCTIONS (Civil Cases) PATTERN JURY INSTRUCTIONS (Civil Cases) Prepared by the Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions District Judges Association Fifth Circuit 2014 with revisions through October 2016 For Customer Assistance Call 1-800-328-4880 Mat #41663410 COMMITTEE ON PATTERN JURY INSTRUCTIONS DISTRICT JUDGES ASSOCIATION FIFTH CIRCUIT Judge Daniel P. Jordan III, Chairman Judge Ron Clark Judge Elizabeth Erny Foote Judge Melinda Harmon Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon Judge Michael P. Mills Judge Sul Ozerden Judge Sarah Vance Judge Stanwood R. Duval, Jr. Judge Lee H. Rosenthal iii FOREWORD In July 2011, the Fifth Circuit District Judges Associa- tion formed the Pattern Jury Instruction Committee (Civil) including Judges Lee Rosenthal, Ron Clark, Elizabeth Foote, Sul Ozerden, Michael P. Mills, Stanwood Duval, Mary Ann Lemmon, Sarah Vance, Melinda Harmon and Dan Jordan. The Committee was charged with reviewing the existing pattern instructions and updating them where necessary. After an initial review, the Committee determined that the time had come for a top-to-bottom examination for substantive accuracy. While many of the existing instruc- tions remained valid, a significant number no longer reflected current law. This is no reflection on prior commit- tees, which did an excellent job drafting prior patterns. The law is not stagnant; it was time to update. Accordingly, the 2014 edition of the Fifth Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions (Civil) will represent a substantial overhaul. The Committee approached this project with a consistent mantra: present instructions that are as balanced, accurate, and user friendly as possible. Given the breadth of that undertaking, outside assistance was essential. And in the end, nearly one hundred judges, attorneys, law professors, and law students helped draft, vet, edit, and proofread the final product. In all, the instructions went through four rounds of review, each time by a different panel of reviewers. In every case, the volunteer reviewers were recruited for their expertise in the chapters they helped produce. In most cases, the volunteers presided, practiced, or taught within the Fifth Circuit and possessed hands-on experience apply- ing this circuit’s standards, though some experts beyond this circuit were consulted. Readers will note that the subject areas are not identical to previous editions. Chapter 6 on Antitrust and Chapter 8 on RICO have been deleted because the Committee concluded that the existing instructions were no longer trustworthy and that the issues arose too infrequently to justify revision. Chapter 9 on Patent Infringement has been deleted because the Committee learned that practitioners favored other pat- tern instructions for patent cases. Chapter 14 on statutes of v FOREWORD limitations was also deleted because such statutes generally involve state-law issues and Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas all have variations that were not reflected in the old pattern instructions. For some of these chapters, the Com- mittee has suggested other sources. The Committee also added instructions, including an instruction on electronic communications during trial and a new section on the Fair Labor Standards Act. Those using the new instructions will also observe that they are heavily footnoted. There is simply no way to draft an instruction that covers every possible factual case. The patterns therefore address the most common factual sce- narios, but the footnotes direct the reader to other potential issues and authorities. The notes also allow the reader to review the source to determine whether the instruction remains current. Along these same lines, the Committee received a fair number of suggested instructions from attorneys and profes- sors that represented novel legal theories. The Committee did not include these suggestions—though some were footnoted—concluding that pattern instructions are not the place to advance the law. Again, the patterns were designed to cover the most common issues. This major undertaking lasted more than three years, and there are many to thank. The Committee offers its heartfelt appreciation to all who helped produce the 2014 edition, including our law clerks and summer externs. Special thanks are extended to Professor Lonny Hoffman, who served as our reporter and devoted countless hours to the project. His guidance and input were invaluable. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Committee Members Page. iii Forward. ................ v Instruction 1. PRELIMINARY INSTRUCTIONS 1.1 Instructions for Beginning of Trial........................ 1 1.2 Preliminary Instructions to Jury.......................... 4 2. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS 2.1 First Recess ................................................ 8 2.2 Stipulated Testimony...................................... 9 2.3 Stipulations of Fact ....................................... 10 2.4 Judicial Notice ............................................. 11 2.5 Discontinuance as to Some Parties ...................... 12 2.6 Limiting Instruction....................................... 13 2.7 Charts and Summaries ................................... 14 2.8 Demonstrative Evidence .................................. 15 2.9 Witness Not Called ........................................ 16 2.10 Similar Acts ................................................ 17 2.11 Impeachment by Witness’s Inconsistent Statements .. 18 2.12 Impeachment by Witness’s Felony Conviction ......... 19 2.13 Deposition Testimony ..................................... 20 2.14 Transcript of Recorded Conversation.................... 21 2.15 Law-Enforcement Officer Testimony .................... 22 2.16 Bias—Corporate Party Involved ......................... 23 2.17 Clear and Convincing Evidence.......................... 24 2.18 Civil Allen Charge......................................... 25 3. JURY CHARGE 3.1 Jury Charge ................................................. 28 3.2 Burden of Proof: Preponderance of The Evidence ....... 30 3.3 Evidence ..................................................... 31 vii PATTERN JURY INSTRUCTIONS Instruction Page 3.4 Witnesses .................................................... 32 3.5 Expert Witnesses ........................................... 33 3.6 No Inference from Filing Suit ............................. 34 3.7 Duty to Deliberate; Notes.................................. 35 4. ADMIRALTY 4.1 Seaman Status............................................. 37 4.2 Vessels ...................................................... 41 4.3 Jones Act—Unseaworthiness—Maintenance and Cure (Seaman Status Not Contested) ................. 42 4.4 Jones Act—Negligence .................................... 43 4.5 Unseaworthiness .......................................... 45 4.6 Causation................................................... 47 4.7 Contributory Negligence .................................. 48 4.8 Damages.................................................... 50 4.9 Punitive Damages ......................................... 53 4.10 Maintenance and Cure Claims and Their Relationship to Jones Act and Unseaworthiness Claims—Punitive Damages for Willful Withholding of Maintenance and Cure ............................... 55 4.11 Section 905(b) Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act Claim................................ 60 5. RAILROAD EMPLOYEES 5.1 FELA, 45 U.S.C. §§ 51 and 53. ............................ 67 5.2 Federal Safety Appliance Act, 49 U.S.C. § 20301 et seq. (2006) (Recodifying 45 U.S.C. §§ 1–16 (1988)). ... 71 6. ANTITRUST (15 U.S.C. §§ 1, ET SEQ.) 7. SECURITIES ACT 7.1 Securities Act—(Rule 10b-5) ............................... 76 8. RICO 9. PATENT INFRINGEMENT (35 U.S.C. § 271, ET SEQ.) 10. CIVIL RIGHTS — 42 U.S.C. § 1983 10.1 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 (Unlawful Arrest—Unlawful Search—Excessive Force).............................. 83 10.2 Under Color of Law ...................................... 92 viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Instruction Page 10.3 Qualified Immunity ...................................... 93 10.4 Supervisory Liability..................................... 95 10.5 Municipal Liability....................................... 98 10.6 First Amendment Retaliation—Public Employees.... 100 10.7A Eighth Amendment (Excessive Force) ................. 105 10.7B Eighth Amendment (Excessive Force)—Pretrial Detainees ................................................ 108 10.8 Eighth Amendment (Inadequate Medical Care — Convicted Prisoner/Episodic Acts) .................... 111 10.9 Eighth Amendment (Conditions of Confinement — Convicted Prisoner) .................................... 114 10.10 Fourteenth Amendment (Inadequate Medical Care or Conditions of Confinement — Pretrial Detainee) ................................................ 117 10.11 Fourteenth Amendment (Medical Care — Pretrial Detainee/Episodic Acts) ................................ 120 10.12 Emotional Distress Damages ........................... 124 11. EMPLOYMENT CLAIMS 11.1 Title VII (42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2)—Discrimination Based on Race, Color, National Origin, Religion, or Sex (Disparate Treatment) ............................ 129 11.1 Pattern Jury Question, Title VII—Discrimination Based on Race, Color, National Origin, Religion or Sex (Disparate Treatment) ............................ 132 11.2 Title VII (42 U.S.C. § 2000E-2)—Supervisor Harassment Without Tangible Employment Action (Hostile Work Environment) .......................... 133 11.2 Pattern Jury Questions, Supervisor Sexual and Other Harassment without Tangible Employment Action (Hostile Work Environment) .................. 139 11.3 Title
Recommended publications
  • UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATORS City College
    College of Music.........................................................Edward J. Kvet, D.M.E., Dean Associate Dean...................................................................Anthony DeCuir, Ph.D. UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATORS City College................................................................Marcel Dumestre, Ed.D., Dean Associate Dean................................................................Richard A. Lucore, Ed.D. Loyola Institute for Ministry ..................................Mark Markuly, Ph.D., Director BOARD OF TRUSTEES 2003 – 2004 School of Law ..........................................................Brian Bromberger, LL.M., Dean Chair .......................................................................................Donna D. Fraiche, L’75 Associate Dean of Academic Affairs......................Lawrence W. Moore, S.J., J.D. Vice Chair.......................................................................Jerome J. Reso, Jr., B’58, L’61 Associate Dean of Students.........................Stephanie W. Jumonville, M.Ed., J.D. President ...................................................................Rev. Bernard P. Knoth, S.J., Ph.D. Assistant Dean of Admissions................................K. Michele Allison-Davis, J.D. Secretary and Treasurer......................................Rev. Lawrence W. Moore, S.J., LL.M. University Library.....................................Mary Lee Sweat, M.S.L.S., M.B.A., Dean Admissions and Enrollment Management.....................Deborah Stieffel, M.S., Dean B.A. “Red” Adams,
    [Show full text]
  • Recognition Report SEPTEMBER 1, 2018 THROUGH AUGUST 31, 2019
    FY 2019 Recognition Report SEPTEMBER 1, 2018 THROUGH AUGUST 31, 2019 The University of Texas School of Law FY 2019 Recognition Report CONTENTS 2 Giving Societies Letter from the Dean 9 A Year in Numbers We’ve just completed another remarkable annual giving drive 11 Participation by Class Year at the law school. Here you will find our roster of devoted 34 Longhorn Loyal supporters who participated in the 2018-19 campaign. They are 47 Sustaining Scholars our heroes. 48 100% Giving Challenge The distinctive mission and historical hallmark of our law school is to provide a top-tier education to our students without 49 Planned Giving top-tier debt. Historically, we have done it better than anyone. 50 Women of Texas Law You all know it well; I’ll bet most of you would agree that 51 Texas Law Reunion 2020 coming to the School of Law was one of the best decisions you ever made. The value and importance of our mission is shown in the lives you lead. This Recognition Report honors the This great mission depends on support from all of our alumni. alumni and friends who gave generously I hope that if you’re not on the report for the year just ended, to The University of Texas School of Law you’ll consider this an invitation to be one of the first to get on from September 1, 2018 to August 31, next year’s list! 2019. We sincerely thank the individuals and organizations listed herein. They help Please help us to keep your school great.
    [Show full text]
  • Scalise Shares Optimism & Lewis Shares Enthusiasm with SCIA
    20thAnniversary March 2017, ISSUE 1, VOLUME 21 Scalise shares optimism & Lewis shares New LUMCON director enthusiasm with SCIA membership highlights events By Jordon Legendre, Staff Writer, The Courier the changes that will come under his The No. 3 Republican in the U.S. House administration. of Representatives shared his optimism “The Department of the Interior is about the incoming presidential adminis- the federal agency that controls all the tration with local business leaders.. oil and gas activity,” Scalise said. “Every Rep. Steve Scalise, R-Metairie, said the year I bring members of Congress down change should have a positive impact on to south Louisiana, we go tour rigs in the Louisiana businesses. He made his remarks deep waters of the Gulf. One of the mem- during the monthly South Central Indus- bers who came last year was (Zinke). trial Association meeting in Houma. He spent some time out here, and he is “Things are getting ready to real busy in Wash- become the sec- LUMCON Director Craig McClain ington,” Scalise retary of the in- said. “The new Con- terior. I’m really By Jordon Legendre, Staff Writer, The Courier gress got sworn in excited.” The Louisiana Universities Marine many weeks ago, Scalise said re- Consortium is expanding its efforts but it seems like pealing the Af- to increase society’s awareness of months because fordable Care the environmental, economic and there’s been a lot Act, common- cultural value of Louisiana’s coastal that’s already been U.S. Rep. Steve Scalise Mark Lewis ly known as and marine environments, the done.” Obamacare, is organization’s executive director said With many of SCIA’s members involved another goal he expects Congress quickly Tuesday during the South Central in the oil and gas industry, Scalise, the Industrial Association’s monthly meeting in Houma.
    [Show full text]
  • Hon. Sarah S. Vance Chief Judge, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
    Judicial Profile MICHAEL L. DESHAZO Hon. Sarah S. Vance Chief Judge, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana PERHAPS THE BEST description of Judge Sarah S. Vance is the one that was offered by her friend and colleague, Judge Royal Furgeson of the Western District of Texas: “Some judges simply stand out because of their ability, their intellect, and their disposition. Judge Sarah Vance is one of those judges.” These sentiments are echoed by count- less others who have had the opportunity to work with Judge Vance during her time as a litigator and judge, and they accurately describe this in- sightful, disciplined, and compassionate jurist, who currently serves as the chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Judge Vance’s journey to the federal bench began contributed to Judge Vance’s academic success. After in the small town of Donaldsonville, La., which is ap- graduating first in her class from Ascension Catholic proximately 40 miles south of Baton Rouge. As Judge High School in Donaldsonville, Judge Vance spent the Vance describes it, Donaldsonville was a place where next four years at Louisiana State University, where “you knew everybody, and everyone knew you.” Her she again finished first in her graduating class, col- father, an Army veteran, had grown up there and, fol- lecting numerous honors and awards along the way. lowing his service in World War II, elected to return Although she initially considered a career in journal- home, having recently married. During the war, he ism, she found herself drawn to literature and political served as a captain, and suffered paralysis on his left philosophy, leading her to receive a bachelor’s degree side as a result of a head injury sustained during the in political science in 1971.
    [Show full text]
  • Members by Circuit (As of January 3, 2017)
    Federal Judges Association - Members by Circuit (as of January 3, 2017) 1st Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Bruce M. Selya Jeffrey R. Howard Kermit Victor Lipez Ojetta Rogeriee Thompson Sandra L. Lynch United States District Court District of Maine D. Brock Hornby George Z. Singal John A. Woodcock, Jr. Jon David LeVy Nancy Torresen United States District Court District of Massachusetts Allison Dale Burroughs Denise Jefferson Casper Douglas P. Woodlock F. Dennis Saylor George A. O'Toole, Jr. Indira Talwani Leo T. Sorokin Mark G. Mastroianni Mark L. Wolf Michael A. Ponsor Patti B. Saris Richard G. Stearns Timothy S. Hillman William G. Young United States District Court District of New Hampshire Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. Joseph N. LaPlante Landya B. McCafferty Paul J. Barbadoro SteVen J. McAuliffe United States District Court District of Puerto Rico Daniel R. Dominguez Francisco Augusto Besosa Gustavo A. Gelpi, Jr. Jay A. Garcia-Gregory Juan M. Perez-Gimenez Pedro A. Delgado Hernandez United States District Court District of Rhode Island Ernest C. Torres John J. McConnell, Jr. Mary M. Lisi William E. Smith 2nd Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Barrington D. Parker, Jr. Christopher F. Droney Dennis Jacobs Denny Chin Gerard E. Lynch Guido Calabresi John Walker, Jr. Jon O. Newman Jose A. Cabranes Peter W. Hall Pierre N. LeVal Raymond J. Lohier, Jr. Reena Raggi Robert A. Katzmann Robert D. Sack United States District Court District of Connecticut Alan H. NeVas, Sr. Alfred V. Covello Alvin W. Thompson Dominic J. Squatrito Ellen B.
    [Show full text]
  • Message from the President By: Hon
    SUMMER EDITION 2016 VOL. 25, NO. 4 MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT BY: HON. SARAH S. VANCE On July 31, 2016, the Eastern will be filled, but she will not be replaced. I am proud to District of Louisiana will say call her my friend.” goodbye to Magistrate Judge Sally Shushan. Magistrate Judge Shushan Chief Magistrate Judge Jay Wilkinson said of his has served the Eastern District colleague, “We’re really going to miss her around here, since February 1, 1999. Although not only because she is a work horse; but we’re also going our Advocate Editor contacted to miss her humor, her clear-eyed sensibility and her good Magistrate Judge Shushan for advice.” It is certainly true that Magistrate Judge Shushan a feature article, she did not want the attention. That is will be sorely missed, but I am sure we can count on seeing typical of Magistrate Shushan who never wanted to take her across the street at her beloved Lafayette Square – just credit or draw attention to herself. Small in stature, but look for the lady handing out doggie poop bags. large in presence, Magistrate Judge Shushan leaves a The Eastern District is pleased to announce the selection legacy of being one of the most effective magistrate of Janis van Meerveld as its newest Magistrate Judge. judges in the history of the Eastern District. As Judge Although Ms. van Meerveld has big shoes to fill, we are Stanwood Duval described her, “She is a rare combination confident that she is up for the challenge, and she will hit of intelligence, fairness, a super-human work ethic, and a the ground running.
    [Show full text]
  • (“ERISA”) Decisions As They Were Reported on Westlaw Between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016
    DRAFT * This document is a case summary compilation of select Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) decisions as they were reported on Westlaw between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016. Nothing in this document constitutes legal advice. Case summaries prepared by Michelle L. Roberts, Partner, Roberts Bartolic LLP, 1050 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 105, Alameda, CA 94501. © Roberts Bartolic LLP I. Attorneys’ Fees .................................................................................................................. 11 A. First Circuit ..................................................................................................................................... 11 B. Second Circuit ................................................................................................................................. 11 C. Third Circuit .................................................................................................................................... 14 D. Fourth Circuit .................................................................................................................................. 14 E. Fifth Circuit ..................................................................................................................................... 15 F. Sixth Circuit .................................................................................................................................... 16 G. Seventh Circuit ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of the United States
    No. _________ _______________________________________ In The Supreme Court of the United States _____________________ ∆ _____________________ SHANE M. GATES, ` Petitioner, v. WALTER P. REED, RODNEY J. STRAIN, JR., et al., Respondents, _____________________ ∆ _____________________ On Petition For Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Fifth Circuit _____________________ ∆ _____________________ PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI _____________________ ∆ _____________________ JOHN A. HOLLISTER Counsel of Record 613 BON TEMPS ROULÉ MANDEVILLE, LOUISIANA 70471 TELEPHONE: (985) 792-5353 [email protected] _______________________________________ i QUESTIONS PRESENTED: 1. Whether the Court of Appeals erred by failing to recognize that a District Attorney, who in his private law practice represented, and received hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees from, the liability insurer for the Parish (county) served by that District Attorney, both violated the Hobbs Act (18 U.S.C. § 1951, et seq.) and denied a criminal defendant substantive due process when that District Attorney used the authority of his public office to institute and maintain a misdemeanor criminal prosecution at the behest of that insurer and for the purpose of bolstering that insurer’s defense of a civil lawsuit for the tort of excessive force that was filed as a civil rights action by the misdemeanor defendant against the Sheriff of that Parish and others. 2. Whether the Court of Appeals erred in upholding the District Court’s dismissal of two civil rights suits against a District Attorney and a Sheriff, on the alleged ground that the plaintiff had failed to prosecute his civil suit when, in fact, that District Court had stayed the plaintiff’s suit on the defendants’ motion.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 17-205 In the Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 2017 In re CARL BERNOFSKY, Petitoner DR. CARL BERNOFSKY, Petitioner, v. JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, Respondent. APPENDIX for Petition for Writ of Mandamus CARL BERNOFSKY 109 Southfield Road, Apt. 51H Shreveport, Louisiana 71105 (318) 869-3871 Petitioner, Pro Se TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Petition of Nov. 2, 2016, “Grounds for 1 Impeaching Helen “Ginger” Berrigan, Judge, Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.” Submitted to all members of the Judicial Council of the Fifth Circuit. 2. Cover letter of Nov. 2, 2016 from petitioner 61 Carl Bernofsky to Hon. Carl E. Stewart, for the petition: “Grounds for Impeaching Helen “Ginger” Berrigan, Judge, Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.” Similar letters, together with the petition, were submitted to all members of the Judicial Council of the Fifth Circuit. 3. Order, signed Dec. 28. 2016 by Chief Judge 63 Carl E. Stewart, “IN RE: The Complaint of Carl Bernofsky Against United States Senior District Judge Helen G. Berrigan, Eastern District of Louisiana, Under the Judicial Improvements Act of 2002.” Filed Jan. 4, 2017 as “Complaint Number: 05-17-90013.” i TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.) 4. Cover letter of Jan. 4, 2017 from Fifth 70 Circuit Deputy Clerk, Shelley E. Saltzman, to Carl Bernofsky, informing him of Judge Stewart’s dismissal of “Judicial Misconduct Complaint No. 05-17-90013.” 5. Petition to the Judicial Council of the Fifth 72 Circuit for review of Judicial Misconduct Complaint No. 05-17-90013, submitted Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Judges Association Current Members by Circuit As of 4/28/2020
    Federal Judges Association Current Members by Circuit as of 4/28/2020 1st Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Jeffrey R. Howard 0 Kermit Victor Lipez (Snr) Sandra L. Lynch Ojetta Rogeriee Thompson United States District Court District of Maine D. Brock Hornby (Snr) 0 Jon David Levy George Z. Singal (Snr) Nancy Torresen John A. Woodcock, Jr. (Snr) United States District Court District of Massachusetts Allison Dale Burroughs 0 Denise Jefferson Casper Timothy S. Hillman Mark G. Mastroianni George A. O'Toole, Jr. (Snr) Michael A. Ponsor (Snr) Patti B. Saris F. Dennis Saylor Leo T. Sorokin Richard G. Stearns Indira Talwani Mark L. Wolf (Snr) Douglas P. Woodlock (Snr) William G. Young United States District Court District of New Hampshire Paul J. Barbadoro 0 Joseph N. Laplante Steven J. McAuliffe (Snr) Landya B. McCafferty Federal Judges Association Current Members by Circuit as of 4/28/2020 United States District Court District of Puerto Rico Francisco Augusto Besosa 0 Pedro A. Delgado Hernandez Daniel R. Dominguez (Snr) Jay A. Garcia-Gregory (Snr) Gustavo A. Gelpi, Jr. Juan M. Perez-Gimenez (Snr) United States District Court District of Rhode Island Mary M. Lisi (Snr) 0 John J. McConnell, Jr. William E. Smith 2nd Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Jose A. Cabranes 0 Guido Calabresi (Snr) Denny Chin Christopher F. Droney (Ret) Peter W. Hall Dennis Jacobs (Snr) Pierre N. Leval (Snr) Raymond J. Lohier, Jr. Gerard E. Lynch (Snr) Jon O. Newman (Snr) Barrington D. Parker, Jr. (Snr) Reena Raggi (Snr) Robert D.
    [Show full text]
  • Pages 126-153
    UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATORS BOARD OF TRUSTEES 2004 – 2005 Chair .......................................................................................Donna D. Fraiche, L’75 Vice Chair ................................................................................Theodore M. Frois, L’69 President.................................................................Rev. Kevin Wm. Wildes, S.J., Ph.D. Vice President ...........................................................Rev. James P. Bradley, S.J., Ph.D. Secretary and Treasurer......................................Rev. Lawrence W. Moore, S.J., LL.M. Stephen M. Barbas, L’79 George I. Shinn Rev. Gerald R. Blaszczak, S.J. Earnrolyn C. Smith, A’93 Janet S. Boles Frances S. Smith, B’62 A. Peyton Bush Rev. Thomas H. Stahel, S.J. Rev. John J. Callahan, S.J. Rose-Marie Toussaint, A’78 Karen J. Cooper, L’97 Rev. John B. Weling, S.J. Arthur Q. Davis Rev. Eric A. Zimmer, S.J. Alton F. Doody, Jr. David M. Ferris, L’96 Honorary Trustees Rev. Michael J. Graham, S.J. Adelaide W. Benjamin William J. Guste, III, A’70, L’73 B. Temple Brown, Jr. Mitchell J. Landrieu, L’85 David F. Dixon Rev. Mark S. Massa, S.J. Rita O. Huntsinger Suzanne T. Mestayer John B. Levert, Jr. Henry R. Muñoz, III Jerome J. Reso, Jr., L’61 Tina N. Owen Betty S. Sherrill Daniel F. Packer Moise S. Steeg J. Kevin Poorman Jeanne Wolf Pamela R. Ryan UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATORS President.................................................................Rev. Kevin Wm. Wildes, S.J., Ph.D. University Ministry ................Rev. Edwin Louis Gros, III, S.J., M.Div., M.A., Dean Executive Assistant to the President...................Sr. Anne M. Ramagos, C.S.J., M.A. Jesuit Center ......................................................Rev. Si Hendry, S.J., Ph.D., Director Lindy Boggs National Center for Community Literacy .........................................................Michael Cowan, Ph.D., Executive Director LUCAP Adviser ......................................................................Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • Suit up for the Future High School
    2014 Suit Up for the Future High School Summer Legal Institute and Intern Program Awarding Winning Diversity Pipeline Program 2013 ABA PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM AWARD RECIPIENT Strengthening diversity in the legal profession A partnership of the Louisiana State Bar Association, Just the Beginning Foundation, and Louisiana Bar Foundation A Diversity Pipeline Program New Orleans, Louisiana 2 | P a g e Suit Up for the Future - 2014 Table of Contents ABOUT Us ………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………….3 WHO IS THE LSBA? ..............................................................................................................................3 WHO IS THE JTBF? .....................................................................................................................4 WHO IS THE LBF? .................................................................................................................................5 2014 LEGAL SCHOLARS……………………………………………………………………………………..…….........6 WEEK ONE .....................................................................................................................................................7-8 Law School Summer School: Louisiana State Bar Center WEEK TWO....................................................................................................................................................9 Oral Argument Preparation: Field Placement Days WEEK THREE ............................................................................................................................................10-12
    [Show full text]