DOCSLIB.ORG

Perek X Daf 110 Amud A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Perek X Daf 110 Amud A NOTES Rav Naĥman said that the verse said: “It was a night of watching ָא ַמר ַרב ַנ ְח ָמן: ָא ַמר ְקָרא: ֵ״ליל Some com- to the Lord” (Exodus :), which indicates that Passover night : ֵליל ַה ְמ ׁש ּו ָּמר ּו ָבא – A night that remains guarded ׁ ִש ּמוִרים״ – ֵליל ַה ְמ ׁש ּו ָּמר ּו ָבא ִמן mentaries explain that this night remains guarded throughout is a night that remains guardedN from demons and harmful H ַה ַּמִזּ ִיקין. history, as it is set aside as the time of redemption for the Jewish people. Therefore, there is no concern for danger on spirits of all kinds. Th erefore, there is no cause for concern about this night (see Rashi tractate Rosh HaShana 12b). Alternatively, this form of danger on this particular night. the verse states with regard to this night: “The night shines Rava said a diff erent answer: Th e cup of blessing for Grace aft er ָר ָבא ָא ַמר: ּכוֹס ׁ ֶשל ְּבָר ָכה ִמ ְצ ָטֵרף like the day” (Psalms 139:12), i.e., demons have no power at -Meals on Passover night is used in the performance of an addi ְל ָטוֹבה, ְו ֵאינוֹ ִמ ְצ ָטֵרף ְלָר ָﬠה. ָר ִב ָינא .(that time (Iyyun Ya’akov Because safety is guaranteed on this night, the custom in -tional mitzva and is not simply an expression of freedom. Th ere ָא ַמר: ַאְר ָּב ָﬠה ָּכ ֵסי ַּת ִּק ּינו ַר ָּב ַנן ֶ ּדֶר ְך many communities was to leave one’s doors unlocked as an fore, it combines with the other cups for the good, i.e., to fulfi ll ֵח ּירות, ָּכל ַחד ְו ַחד expression of trust in God, as the Jews were redeemed due the mitzva to drink four cups, and it does not combine for the to their faith (ge’onim). In addition, the blessing abridging the N seven blessings is not recited on Shabbat after the evening bad. With regard to the danger of drinking pairs of cups, it is as prayers because we are not afraid to walk home alone (Me’iri). though one drinks only three cups. Ravina said: Th e Sages insti- Other customs are based on similar considerations. tuted four separate cups, each of which is consumed in a manner that demonstrates freedom. Th erefore, each and every one ּכוֹס – The cup of blessing…does not combine for the bad Some commentaries explain that : ׁ ֶשל ְּבָר ָכה… ֵאינוֹ ִמ ְצ ָטֵרף ְלָר ָﬠה the cup of blessing used for the Grace after Meals does not combine with the other three cups because the three cups prior to the meal are either not part of the meal or are integral HALAKHA cern about danger, and therefore the blessing is unnecessary ֵליל – to the meal. However, the fourth cup following the Grace after A night that remains guarded from harmful spirits When Passover falls on Shabbat, the (Itur, citing the Ran; Kol Bo). This is the common practice (Beit : ַה ְמ ׁש ּו ָּמר ּו ָבא ִמן ַה ַּמִזּ ִיקין -Meals is no longer part of the meal and is therefore sepa rate from them (Me’iri). Other authorities state that the Sages blessing abridging seven blessings is not recited at the end of Yosef ). Similarly, when reciting Shema before going to bed, it is would drink four cups beside the cup used for Grace after the service. This blessing was instituted so that people would customary to recite only the paragraph of Shema itself but not Meals, so there were actually five cups in total (ge’onim; see remain in the synagogue a little longer to allow everyone to the other sections, which were instituted to provide protection Rabbeinu Yehonatan). leave at the same time. However, on Passover there is no con- from harmful spirits (Shulĥan Arukh, Oraĥ Ĥayyim 481:2). Perek X Daf 110 Amud a NOTES is a distinct mitzva in its own right. In other words, each cup is ִמ ְצָוה ְּב ַא ֵּפי ַנ ְפ ׁ ָש ּה ּהוא. .As the Gemara will later treated separately and one is not considered to be drinking in pairs : ִנ ְמ ַל ְך ּהוא – He has changed his mind explain, the danger of pairs applies only when one performs Th e baraita taught that one should not att end to his sexual needs ״לֹא ַי ֲﬠ ֶׂשה ְצָר ָכיו ְּתֵרי.״ ַא ַּמאי? ִנ ְמ ַל ְך -multiple actions on a single occasion. However, if one com pletes an activity and repeats it again later, the two actions do ;in pairs. Th e Gemara asks: Why should one be concerned for this ּהוא! ָא ַמר ַא ַּבֵיי, ָה ִכי ָק ָא ַמר: לֹא not combine (Rashash). N -he has changed his mind? One does not plan in advance to en יֹ ַאכל ְּתֵרי ְו ִי ׁ ְש ֶּתה ְּתֵרי, ְולֹא ַי ֲﬠ ֶׂשה In talmudic times, gage in marital relations twice, and therefore the two acts should : ּזוגוֹת ּו ַּמִזּ ִיקים – Pairs and harmful spirits ְצָר ָכיו ֲא ִפ ּיל ּו ַּפ ַﬠם ַא ַחת, ִ ּד ְיל ָמא most people were influenced by popular superstitions and not combine to form a dangerous pair. Abaye said: Th is is what ֲח ֵל ׁיש ּו ִמ ְּיתַרע. incantations. Provided that there was no concern for idolatry or prohibited gentile practices, the Sages did not attempt to the tanna is saying, i.e., the baraita should be understood in the uproot these customs. This was certainly true of practices following manner: One should not eat in pairs nor drink in pairs, that were so ingrained that people found them comforting and if he does so he should not att end to his sexual needs right and would have been distressed had they been prohibited aft erward even once, lest he is weakened by the act and will be from continuing them. For this reason, the Gemara subse- harmed for having eaten or drunk in pairs. quently says about pairs that one who is concerned about Th e Sages taught in another baraita: If one drinks in pairsN his ָּת ּנו ַר ָּב ַנן: ׁש ֶוֹתה ִּכ ְפ ַל ִים – ָ ּדמוֹ them should be careful not to perform actions in pairs, and one who is not concerned need not be careful (Me’iri). blood is upon his head, i.e., he bears responsibility for his own ְּברֹ ׁאשוֹ. ָא ַמר ַרב ְי ּהו ָדה: ֵא ָימ ַתי? ְו ִלישֹן – And to sleep is comparable to setting out on the road demise. Rav Yehuda said: When is that the case? When one did ִּבְז ַמן ׁ ֶש ּלֹא ָר ָאה ְּפ ֵני ַה ּׁש ּוק, ֲא ָבל .Apparently, Rabbeinu Ĥananel had a textual not leave the house and view the marketplace between cups : ְּכ ָל ֵצאת ַלֶ ּדֶר ְך ָ ּד ֵמי ָר ָאה ְּפ ֵני ַה ּׁש ּוק – ָהְר ׁש ּות ְּבָידוֹ. ָא ַמר variant, which he understood to mean that if one sleeps or However, if he saw the marketplace aft er the fi rst cup, he has ַרב ַא ׁ ִשי: ָחֵז ָינא ֵל ּיה ְלַרב ֲח ַנ ְנָיא ַּבר uses the lavatory between cups, they do not combine to form a dangerous pair. permission to drink another cup without concern. Likewise, :Rav Ashi said: I saw Rav Ĥananya bar Beivai follow this policy ֵּב ָיבי ְ ּד ַא ָּכל ָּכ ָסא ֲהָוה ָנ ֵפיק ְו ָחֵזי ַא ֵּפי Upon drinking each cup, he would leave the house and view the ׁש ּו ָקא. marketplace. And we said that there is concern for the safety of one who drinks ְו ָלא ֲא ַמַרן ֶא ָּלא ָל ֵצאת ַלֶ ּדֶר ְך ֲא ָבל ,in pairs only when he intends to set out on the road aft er drinking ְּב ֵביתוֹ לֹא. ָא ַמר ַר ִּבי ֵז ָירא: ְו ִלישֹן – -but if he intends to remain in his home there is no need for con ְּכ ָל ֵצאת ַל ֶ ּדֶר ְך ָ ּד ֵמי. ָא ַמר ַרב ַּפ ָּפא: cern. Rabbi Zeira said: And one who plans to sleep is compa- N ְו ָל ֵצאת ְל ֵבית ַה ִּכ ֵּסא – ְּכ ָל ֵצאת rable to one who is sett ing out on the road. He should be con- cerned that he might be harmed. Th e Gemara asks: And if one ַל ֶ ּדֶר ְך ָ ּד ֵמי. ּו ְב ֵביתוֹ לֹא? ְו ָהא ָר ָבא intends to remain in his home, is there no cause for concern? But ָמ ֵני ְּכ ׁש ּוֵרי. Rava would count the beams of the house to keep track of the number of cups he had drunk so as to ensure that he would not consume an even number. פרק י׳ דף קי. Perek X . 110a 246 BACKGROUND And likewise Abaye, when he would drink one cup, his mother ְו ַא ַּבֵיי ִּכי ׁ ָש ֵתי ַחד ָּכ ָסא ַמ ְנ ֵקיט ֵל ּיה These miniature silver : ִּבְר ַּכת ּכֹ ֲה ִנים – would immediately place two cups in his two hands so that he Priestly benediction scrolls, one of which contains an abbreviated version of the ִא ֵּימ ּיה ְּתֵרי ָכ ֵסי ִּב ְתֵרי ְיֵד ּיה, ְוַרב ַנ ְח ָמן would not inadvertently drink only one more cup and thereby priestly benediction, were found in Ketef Hinnom, southwest ַּבר ִי ְצ ָחק ִּכי ֲהָוה ׁ ָש ֵתי ְּתֵרי ָכ ֵסי ַמ ְנ ֵקיט expose himself to the danger of drinking in pairs. And similarly, of the Old City of Jerusalem. The scrolls are dated to the ֵל ּיה ׁ ַש ָּמ ֵﬠ ּיה ַחד ָּכ ָסא.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Mary Hytken Dumont University @ASBEE Presents.. from the Liturgical Department
    The Mary Hytken Dumont University @ASBEE presents.. From the liturgical department... Prayer Unlocked What we will look at today; What is a blessing? A look at the quintessential blessing, the Birkat Hamazon What does each blessing mean? What does this tell us about blessings? The only time it says to bless G-d... ְוַאָכְל ָ֖תְּוָשׂ ָ֑בְעָתֵּוּבַֽרְכ ָ֙תֶּאת־יְהָֹ֣וֱה א ֶ֔הַי עָל־ה ָ֥אֶרַץ הטּ ָֹ֖בֲה א ֶ֥שָׁר נַֽתָן־לֽ׃ You shall eat and be full, and you shall bless Hashem your God for the good land which He has given you. What does it mean to bless? Praise Bless We can bless G-d??? Berachot 7a Similarly, it was taught in a baraita that Rabbi Yishmael ben Elisha, the High Priest, said: Once, on Yom Kippur, I entered the innermost sanctum, the Holy of Holies, to offer incense, and in a vision I saw Akatriel Ya, the Lord of Hosts, one of the names of God expressing His ultimate authority, seated upon a high and exalted throne (see Isaiah 6). And He said to me: Yishmael, My son, bless Me. I said to Him the prayer that God prays: “May it be Your will that Your mercy overcome Your anger, and may Your mercy prevail over Your other attributes, and may You act toward Your children with the attribute of mercy, and may You enter before them beyond the letter of the law.” Rekanati, Taamei Hamitzvot pg. 11 What is the context? Remember the long way that the LORD your God has made you travel in the wilderness these past forty years, that He might test you by hardships to learn what was in your hearts: whether you would keep His commandments or not.
    [Show full text]
  • The Theological Problems with Our Sounding of the Shofar Rav Jared Anstandig
    The Theological Problems with our Sounding of the Shofar Rav Jared Anstandig Why 30? 1. Bemidbar 29:1 ּובַחֹדֶׁשהַשְּׁבִיעִי בְּׁאֶחָד לַחֹדֶ ׁשמִ קְּׁרָ א־קֹדֶ ׁש יִהְּׁ יֶה לָכֶם כָל־מְּׁ לֶאכֶת העֲבֹדָ לֹא תַ עֲׂשּו יֹום תְּׁ רּועָהיִהְּׁ יֶה לָכֶם׃ In the seventh month, on the first day of the month, you shall observe a sacred occasion: you shall not work at your occupations. You shall observe it as a day when the horn is sounded. 2. Rosh Hashana 34a אתקין רבי אבהו בקסרי תקיעה שלשה שברים תרועה תקיעה מה נפשך אי ילולי יליל לעביד תקיעה תרועה ותקיעה ואי גנוחי גנח לעביד תקיעה שלשה שברים ותקיעה Rabbi Abbahu instituted in Caesarea the following order of sounding of the shofar: First a tekia, a simple uninterrupted sound; next three shevarim, broken sounds; followed by a terua, a series of short blasts; and, finally, another tekia. The Gemara asks: Whichever way you look at it, this is difficult. If, according to the opinion of Rabbi Abbahu, the sound the Torah calls a terua is a whimpering, i.e., short, consecutive sounds, one should perform tekia-terua-tekia set. And if he holds that a terua is moaning, i.e., longer, broken sounds, he should sound a set as follows: Tekia, followed by three shevarim, and then another tekia. Why include both a terua and a shevarim? מספקא ליה אי גנוחי גנח אי ילולי יליל מתקיף לה רב עוירא ודלמא ילולי הוה וקא מפסיק שלשה שברים בין תרועה לתקיעה דהדר עביד תקיעה תרועה ותקיעה מתקיף לה רבינא ודלמא גנוחי הוה וקא מפסקא תרועה בין שברים לתקיעה דהדר עביד תש"ת The Gemara answers: Rabbi Abbahu was uncertain whether a terua means moaning or whimpering, and he therefore instituted that both types of sound should be included, to ensure that one fulfills his obligation.
    [Show full text]
  • Moshe Raphael Ben Yehoshua (Morris Stadtmauer) O”H Tzvi Gershon Ben Yoel (Harvey Felsen) O”H
    27 Menachem Av 5780 Eiruvin Daf 8 August 17, 2020 Daf Notes is currently being dedicated to the neshamot of Moshe Raphael ben Yehoshua (Morris Stadtmauer) o”h Tzvi Gershon ben Yoel (Harvey Felsen) o”h May the studying of the Daf Notes be a zechus for their neshamot and may their souls find peace in Gan Eden and be bound up in the Bond of life The dispute of Rav and Rav Yehudah owner may decide to build houses along one side (making the wall of the opening adjoin the wall of the storage area), and The Gemora explains what we thought the dispute was when the mavoi would thus be one that terminated at the sides of we thought that Rav and Rav Yehudah dispute whether or not a backyard [in which the movement of objects on the the residents of the mavoi – alleyway and the residents of the Shabbos] is forbidden. courtyard made an eruv. In the case where they didn’t make an eruv, their dispute is whether a lechi – pole which is visible The Gemora proves that we distinguish between privately outside but not inside is a valid lechi. [Since the courtyard is and publicly owned because of the concern about an wider than the mavoi, its walls along the entranceway are individual changing construction plans from a seeming effectively a lechi which they can see, but which the mavoi contradiction about the status of a dump. For Ravin bar Rav residents cannot. We thought that Rav considers such a lechi Adda quotes Rabbi Yitzchak who told a story of a mavoi which valid, and only prohibited the mavoi residents from carrying had one wall formed by the seawall and one formed by a because their dwelling is totally open to the street via the dump.
    [Show full text]
  • A Note on the Chronology of the Book of Joel
    zutot 14 (2017) 3-5 ZUTOT: Perspectives on Jewish Culture brill.com/zuto brill.com/zuto A Note on the Chronology of the Book of Joel Israel Netanel Rubin Jerusalem Abstract This short note points to a Talmudic source that supports modern research that locates the prophet Joel in the Second Temple period, contrary to the common orthodox tradi- tion that Joel prophesied in the First Temple period. Keywords Joel – chronology – Bible One of the books of the Bible that is chronologically problematic is the Book of Joel. The book itself does not provide any information on his lifetime, neither at the beginning of the book as is customary, nor elsewhere in the text. The rab- binic tradition tried to fill this gap and offered some suggestions, which Rashi and Radak cite at the start of their commentaries to the book: ‘Some say that this prophet prophesied in the days of Joram son of Ahab, as he states: he pre- dicted there would be famine in the land, as he said: for the Lord hath called for a famine (…) and Seder Olam said that he prophesied in the days of Manasseh, saying: Joel, Nahum and Habakkuk prophesied in the days of Manasseh, and because Manasseh was not honest they were not named after him.’1 Both sug- gestions position Joel in the First Temple period, and the first one even puts him ahead of the first writing prophets known to us. This convention was accepted also by Maimonides in his introduction to his Mishneh Torah, where he places Yoel in his tradition-chain after Isaiah, between Michah and Nahum: 1 Radak, Joel 1, 1 and similarly at Rashi, Joel 1, 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Moshe Raphael Ben Yehoshua (Morris Stadtmauer) O”H Tzvi Gershon Ben Yoel (Harvey Felsen) O”H
    21 Adar 5780 Shabbos Daf 11 March 17, 2020 Daf Notes is currently being dedicated to the neshamot of Moshe Raphael ben Yehoshua (Morris Stadtmauer) o”h Tzvi Gershon ben Yoel (Harvey Felsen) o”h May the studying of the Daf Notes be a zechus for their neshamot and may their souls find peace in Gan Eden and be bound up in the Bond of life And Rava bar Mechasya also said in the name of Rav Chama bar Rav Mesharshiya said: What verse teaches this? The heaven for Gurya in the name of Rav: Every city whose roofs are higher than its height, and the earth for depth, and the minds of kings are synagogue will ultimately be destroyed, as it is written: To raise up unsearchable. the house of our God, and to repair its ruins. And Rava bar Mechasya also said in the name of Rav Chama bar The Gemora notes that this refers only to houses, but as for forts Gurya in the name of Rav: Fasting is as potent against a dream as and towers, we have no objection. fire is against (flax) tow. Rav Ashi said: I accomplished that the town of Masa Mechasya was Rav Chisda said: Providing it (the fast) is on that very day (of the not destroyed (by not allowing the houses to be built higher than dream). the synagogues). Rav Yosef added: And even on Shabbos (for although it is forbidden The Gemora asks: But it was destroyed!? to fast on Shabbos, here it is permitted, in order to relieve his anxiety).
    [Show full text]
  • JCYF Text Collection
    Jewish Community Youth Foundation TEXTS: Draft Aug 24, 2007 Contents: 1. General Texts about Giving a. Not Teaching Your Children to Earn is to Teach them to Rob b. Tzedakah is Equivalent to all other Mitzvot c. Giving Will Not Make You Poor 2. We Don’t Really Own What We Give Away Anyway a. The Sabbatical Year b. Do Not Reap the Corners of your Land 3. Should the Poor Also Give? Two Perspectives a. Even Those Who Receive Tzedakah Should Give b. One’s Own Sustenance Comes First 4. Types of Giving a. Eight Categories of Giving Tzedakah, a.k.a Maimonides Ladder b. The Difference Between Tzedkah and Gemilut Hasadim c. Emergency Versus Ongoing Needs 5. Who Should We Give to? Texts about Allocating a. Allocating is Painful b. Give to Family First, then to the Neighbors c. Giving to Non-Jews d. How to Compare the Poor in your town to the Poor around the World 6. How Much Should We Give? a. Sufficient for his Needs (Day Machsoro) b. Defining ‘Sufficient for his Needs’ c. How Much to Give: 20%? 10%? 7. Tzedakah Midrash a. Midrash of the Sheep Crossing the River b. God Stands at the Right Side of a Poor Person 1. General Texts about Giving Not Teaching Your Children to Earn is to Teach them to Rob T. Kiddushin 29a Anyone who does not teach their child a skill or profession may be regarded as teaching their child to rob. Discussion: Do you think your parents have a responsibility to teach you a skill or profession? How does this teaching change your understanding of people who steal things? Tzedakah is Equivalent to all other Mitzvot B.
    [Show full text]
  • Daf Ditty Eruvin 17
    Daf Ditty: Eruvin 17: Salt 1 We learned in the mishna that in a military camp one is exempt from ritual washing of the hands. Abaye said: They taught this exemption only with regard to first waters, i.e., hand-washing before eating. However, final waters, i.e., hand-washing after eating and before reciting Grace after Meals, is an obligation even in a military camp. Rav Ḥiyya bar Ashi said: For what reason did the Sages say that the final waters are an obligation? It is due to the fact that there is the presence of Sodomite salt, which blinds the eyes even in a small amount. Since Sodomite salt could remain on one’s hands, one must wash them after eating. This obligation is binding even in a camp because soldiers are also obligated to maintain their health. Abaye said: And this type of dangerous salt is present in the proportion of a single grain [korta] in an entire kor of innocuous salt. Rav Aḥa, son of Rava, said to Rav Ashi: If one measured salt and came into contact with Sodomite salt not during mealtime, what is the halakha? Is there an obligation to wash his hands afterward? He said to him: It was unnecessary to say this, as he is certainly obligated to do so. RASHI 2 Tosafos DH MAYIM ACHARONIM CHOVAH תופסות ה"ד םימ ורחא נ םי הבוח םי נ ורחא םימ ה"ד תופסות Tosfos explains why we do not wash Mayim Acharonim. ישכע ו אל וגהנ םימב ורחא םינ ןיאד חלמ תימודס וצמ י ניניב וננב צ יוסחמ ידםנוח יב גנא ויכ Nowadays our custom is not to wash Mayim Acharonim, became Sodom salt is not found among us; יא ימנ יפל ןיאש נא ו גר םילי לבטל יתועבצא נ ו חלמב רחא הליכא רחא חלמב ו נ יתועבצא לבטל םילי גר ו נא ןיאש יפל ימנ יא Alternatively, it is because we do not normally dip our fingers in salt after eating.
    [Show full text]
  • Sota Book.Indb
    Perek I Daf 4 Amud a HALAKHA Th e baraita clarifi es: And what is the measure of seclusion,H ְו ַכ ָּמה ׁ ִש ּיעור ְס ִת ָירה? ְּכֵדי ּטו ְמ ָאה, ְּכֵדי The seclusion of a sota : ׁ ִש ּיעור ְס ִת ָירה – i.e., how is the seclusion of a sota defi ned? Th e measure of seclu- Measure of seclusion is defined as when witnesses see a woman secluded with ִּב ָיאה, ְּכֵדי ַה ֲﬠָר ָאה, sion is equivalent to the time needed for defi lement, which is a man with whom her husband had warned her not to be equivalent to the time needed to perform intercourse, which secluded. The duration of the seclusion is the time needed is equivalent to the time needed to perform the initial stage of for defilement, which is equivalent to the time required for intercourse.N roasting and swallowing an egg. This ruling is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Akiva, whose opinion is accepted Th e baraita quotes several practical examples of this period of time. when he is involved in a dispute with others (Rambam Sefer ְּכֵדי ַה ָּק ַפת ֶ ּד ֶקל, ִ ּד ְבֵרי ַר ִּבי ִי ׁ ְש ָמ ֵﬠאל; .(Th is is equivalent to the time needed for circling a palm tree; this Nashim, Hilkhot Sota 1:2; Shulĥan Arukh, Even HaEzer 178:4 ַר ִּבי ֱא ִל ֶיﬠֶזר ֵאוֹמר: ְּכֵדי ְמִז ַיגת ַה ּכוֹס; ַר ִּבי is the statement of Rabbi Yishmael. Rabbi Eliezer says: Th is is ְי ׁ ֻהוֹשﬠ ֵאוֹמר: ְּכֵדי ִל ׁ ְש ּתוֹתוֹ; equivalent to the time needed for mixing a cup of wine with water, NOTES with the total volume of a quarter-log.
    [Show full text]
  • Shabbos - Simanim ףד ב – Daf 2
    Shabbos - Simanim ףד ב – Daf 2 האצוה The melocho of .1 From the opening Mishna’s eight cases of passing an object between the ba’al habayis standing in his reshus hayachid (private domain) and the poor person standing in reshus harabim (public domain) we learn: a. One has only transgressed m’doraysa the melocho of hotza’ah (transferring) if he does the act of the object from its state of rest in one domain as well as the act of placing it down )הריע(ק lifting .in another domain ( החנה ) lest one come to do both החנה or קע י הר b. The Rabbis forbid one from doing one of the acts of elements of the transfer. (Bringing in) כה הסנ .2 כה נ הס taking out) also refers to) האצוה Rav Ashi teaches that the Mishna’s usage of the term . האצוה bringing in), since the Mishna includes cases of bringing in as examples of) The Gemara further clarifies that the Tanna refers to any removal of an object from its place as an act of “taking out.” 3. Domains transfers) in the Mishna he is referring to) תואיצי Rava said the when the Tanna uses the word domains. Therefore, the Mishna is understood to mean that there are two domains where one is prohibited to commit four acts of transferring. Siman – House The strange house, where the owner kept passing objects back and forth to a poor person standing outside, featured an exit sign over the entrance and a door mat that said Welcome to the Home of Two Domains.
    [Show full text]
  • Daf 110 March 11, 2021
    27 Adar 5781 Pesachim Daf 110 March 11, 2021 Daf Notes is currently being dedicated to the neshamah of Tzvi Gershon Ben Yoel (Harvey Felsen) o”h May the studying of the Daf Notes be a zechus for his neshamah and may his soul find peace in Gan Eden and be bound up in the Bond of life ‘He must not perform his requirements twice.’ Why? Has he not [newly] decided?1 - Said Abaye, This is what he [the Ulla said: Ten cups are not subject to [the danger of] pairs. Tanna] means: He must not eat in pairs and drink in pairs and Ulla is consistent with his view, for Ulla said, while others he must not perform his needs even once [after eating or maintain, it was taught in a Baraisa: The Sages instituted ten drinking in pairs], lest he be weakened2 and be affected.3 cups in a mourner's house. Now if you should think that ten cups are subject to [the danger of] pairs, how could our Our Rabbis taught: He who drinks in pairs, his blood is upon Rabbis arise and enact a regulation whereby one is led into his own head. Said Rav Yehudah: When is that? If he had not danger! But eight are subject to ‘pairs.’ Rav Chisda and seen the street;4 but if he has seen the street, he is at liberty Rabbah son of Rav Huna both maintained: ‘Shalom’ [peace] [to drink a second cup]. Rav Ashi said: I saw that Rav combines [with others] for good, but does not combine for Chananya bar Bibi used to go out and see the street at each evil;9 but six is subject to ‘pairs’.
    [Show full text]
  • Daf Ditty Pesachim 112
    Daf Ditty Pesachim 112: • Ownership: Is there a concept of “private property,” or does all property ultimately belong to God and/or the community? What can acquire the status of “property”? • The Moral Value of Wealth and Poverty: Is being wealthy a sign of divine favor? Is poverty ultimately a “better” state in which to live? • The Acquisition of Wealth: Are there better or worse ways to acquire wealth? Can one make money off the labor of others? How is the biblical prohibition against charging interest treated, and what are its ramifications? • Spending: What are good and bad ways of disposing of wealth? Do the poor have rights to the wealth of others? 1 The Sages taught: A person should not drink water from rivers or from ponds at night. And if he drank, his blood is upon his own head due to the danger. The Gemara explains: What is this danger? The danger of blindness. The Gemara asks: And if he is thirsty, what is his remedy? If there is another person with him, he should say to him: So-and-so, son of so-and- so, I thirst for water. And if there is no one else with him, he should say to himself: So-and-so, my mother said to me to beware of shavrirei, the demon of blindness. He should continue to say the following incantation, in the first part of which the demon’s name gradually disappears: Shavrirei berirei rirei yiri ri; I thirst for water in white earthenware cups. This is an incantation against those demons.
    [Show full text]
  • Daf 55 June 11, 2019
    8 Sivan 5779 Bechoros Daf 55 June 11, 2019 Daf Notes is currently being dedicated to the neshamot of Moshe Raphael ben Yehoshua (Morris Stadtmauer) o”h Tzvi Gershon ben Yoel (Harvey Felsen) o”h May the studying of the Daf Notes be a zechus for their neshamot and may their souls find peace in Gan Eden and be bound up in the Bond of life . Jordan River and the Euphrates The Gemora asks: But according to this reasoning, where it is also written (with reference to the boundaries between two Rabbi Meir had stated (in the Mishna): The Jordan River tribes): And the border curved, or, and the border went up, will separates two flocks, requiring a ma’aser for each. you also say that the Torah makes it a separate border on its own? [Can it be that the animals in the territory of one tribe and Rabbi Ammi said: This is the case only where there is no bridge, animals in that of another do not combine even within the but where there is a bridge, the bridge combines the animals sixteen mils? If so, then why does the braisa mention the case of (for the purpose of taking ma’aser from both of them together). outside Eretz Yisroel and inside of it as not combining, since this occurs even in Eretz Yisroel itself?] The Gemora notes that we see consequently that the reason (why the Jordan divides) is because they cannot contact each The Gemora answers: The case is different there (regarding other (since the water intervenes, the animals are not in touch tribal borders), because the Torah says: This shall be for you the with one another, nor with the shepherd).
    [Show full text]