Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 216 / Friday, November 6, 2020 / Notices 71049

Dated: November 2, 2020. Postponement of Final Determinations determination for these investigations Andrew McGilvray, Section 735(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of until no later than 135 days after the Executive Secretary. 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR date of the publication of the [FR Doc. 2020–24677 Filed 11–5–20; 8:45 am] 351.210(b)(2) provide that a final Preliminary Determination, and BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P determination may be postponed until extending the provisional measures not later than 135 days after the date of from a four-month period to a period of the publication of the preliminary not more than six months. Accordingly, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE determination if, in the event of an Commerce will issue its final affirmative preliminary determination, a determinations no later than March 1, International Trade Administration request for such postponement is made 2021. by the exporters or producers who [A–560–835, A–485–809] Notice to Interested Parties account for a significant proportion of This notice is issued and published Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From exports of the subject merchandise, or in pursuant to section 735(a)(2) of the Act Indonesia and Romania: the event of a negative preliminary and 19 CFR 351.210(g). Postponement of Final Determinations determination, a request for such of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations postponement is made by the petitioner. Dated: November 2, 2020. Further, 19 CFR 351.210(e)(2) requires Jeffrey I. Kessler, AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, that such postponement requests by Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and International Trade Administration, exporters be accompanied by a request Compliance. Department of Commerce. for extension of provisional measures [FR Doc. 2020–24700 Filed 11–5–20; 8:45 am] SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce from a four-month period to a period of BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P (Commerce) is postponing the deadline not more than six months, in for issuing the final determinations in accordance with section 733(d) of the the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) Act. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE investigations of imports of common On October 7, 2020, Pt. Alumindo alloy aluminum sheet (aluminum sheet) Light Metal Industry, Tbk. (Pt. International Trade Administration from Indonesia and Romania, until Alumindo), the sole mandatory March 1, 2021. Commerce is also respondent in the investigation of [A–570–831] extending the provisional measures aluminum sheet from Indonesia, from a four-month period to a period of requested that Commerce postpone the Fresh Garlic From the People’s not more than six months. deadline for the final determination Republic of China: Final Results and DATES: Applicable November 6, 2020. until no later than 135 days from the Partial Rescission, of the 24th publication of the Preliminary Antidumping Duty Administrative FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Determination, and extend the Review; 2017–2018 Glenn T. Bass Jr. and John K. Drury, AD/ application of the provisional measures CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement from a four-month period to a period of AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, and Compliance, International Trade not more than six months.3 International Trade Administration, Administration, U.S. Department of On October 8, 2020, Alro, SA and the Department of Commerce. Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue Vimetco Group (collectively, Alro), the SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: sole mandatory respondent in the (Commerce) published the Preliminary (202) 482–8338 and (202) 482–0195, investigation of aluminum sheet from Results of the 24th administrative respectively. Romania, requested that Commerce review of the antidumping duty order SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: postpone the deadline for the final on fresh garlic from the People’s determination until no later than 135 Background Republic of China (China) on January days from the publication of the 15, 2020. The period of review (POR) is On March 30, 2020, Commerce Preliminary Determination, and extend November 1, 2017 through October 31, initiated LTFV investigations of imports the application of the provisional 2018. The mandatory respondent in this of aluminum sheet from Indonesia and measures from a four-month period to a review is Shijiazhuang Goodman Romania.1 The period of investigation is period of not more than six months.4 Trading Co., Ltd. (Goodman). Commerce January 1, 2019 through December 31, In accordance with section is also rescinding its review of nineteen 2019. On October 15, 2020, Commerce 735(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR companies including the other selected published the Preliminary 351.210(b)(2)(ii), because: (1) The mandatory respondent Zhengzhou Determinations in these LTFV preliminary determination was Harmoni Spice Co., Ltd. (Harmoni). investigations.2 affirmative; (2) the request was made by Based upon our analysis of the the exporter and producer who accounts comments and information received, we 1 See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from for a significant proportion of exports of made no changes to the margin Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia, Egypt, Germany, Greece, the subject merchandise; and (3) no calculated for mandatory respondent India, Indonesia, Italy, Republic of Korea, Oman, compelling reasons for denial exist, Goodman. Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Commerce is postponing the final Taiwan, and the Republic of Turkey: Initiation of DATES: Applicable November 6, 2020. Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 85 FR 19444 (April 7, 2020). 3 See PT. Alumindo Light Metal Industry Tbk’s FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alex 2 See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from Letter, ‘‘Pt. Alumindo’s Request to Extend the Final Cipolla, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Indonesia: Preliminary Affirmative Determination Determination: Less Than Fair Value Investigation Enforcement and Compliance, of Sales at Less-Than-Fair-Value and Determination of Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from Indonesia of Critical Circumstances, 85 FR 65356 (October 15, (A–560–835),’’ dated October 7, 2020. International Trade Administration, 2020); and Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from 4 See Alro, SA and the Vimetco Group’s Letter, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Romania: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of ‘‘Alro’s Request to Extend the Final Determination: Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 85 FR 65358 Less Than Fair Value Investigation of Common DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4956. (October 15, 2020) (together, Preliminary Alloy Aluminum Sheet from Romania (A–485– Determinations). 809),’’ dated October 8, 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:00 Nov 05, 2020 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM 06NON1 71050 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 216 / Friday, November 6, 2020 / Notices

Background Scope of the Order ACCESS is available to registered users Commerce published the preliminary The products covered by the order are at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a results of this administrative review of all grades of garlic, whole or separated complete version of the Issues and fresh garlic from China on January 15, into constituent cloves, whether or not Decision Memorandum can be accessed 2020.1 We preliminarily found that the peeled, fresh, chilled, frozen, directly on the internet at http:// mandatory respondent Goodman sold provisionally preserved, or packed in trade.gov/enforcement/frn/index.html. subject merchandise to the United water or other neutral substance, but not The signed Issues and Decision States at less than normal value. We prepared or preserved by the addition of Memorandum and electronic versions of rescinded the review with respect to other ingredients or heat processing. the Issues and Decision Memorandum eight companies for which their sole The differences between grades are are identical in content. requests for review had been timely based on color, size, sheathing, and withdrawn.2 Furthermore, we level of decay. The scope of the order Separate Rates preliminarily determined that the does not include the following: (a) In the Preliminary Results, in review requests submitted by the Garlic that has been mechanically accordance with section 777A(c)(2)(B) Coalition for Fair Trade in Garlic harvested and that is primarily, but not (CFTG) and Roots Farm Inc. (Roots exclusively, destined for non-fresh use; of the Act, Commerce employed a Farm) were invalid and preliminarily or (b) garlic that has been specially limited examination methodology, as rescinded the review with respect to the prepared and cultivated prior to we determined that it would not be 19 companies solely requested by the planting and then harvested and practicable to examine individually all CFTG and Roots Farm. Additionally, we otherwise prepared for use as seed. The companies for which a review request found that three companies qualified for subject merchandise is used principally was made.10 There were three exporters separate rate status. as a food product and for seasoning. The of subject merchandise from China that On April 24, 2020, Commerce tolled subject garlic is currently classifiable have demonstrated their eligibility for a all deadlines in administrative reviews under subheadings: 0703.20.0000, separate rate but were not selected for by 50 days.3 On June 30, 2020, 0703.20.0005, 0703.20.0010, individual examination in this review. Commerce extended the deadline for 0703.20.0015, 0703.20.0020, These three exporters are listed in the these final results.4 On July 21, 2020, 0703.20.0090, 0710.80.7060, Final Results of Review section below. Commerce tolled all deadlines in 0710.80.9750, 0711.90.6000, Neither the Act nor Commerce’s administrative reviews by an additional 0711.90.6500, 2005.90.9500, regulations address the establishment of 60 days.5 The deadline for the final 2005.90.9700, and 2005.99.9700, of the results of this review is now November Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the the rate applied to individual 2, 2020. United States (HTSUS).8 companies not selected for examination The CFTG and Roots Farm each Although the HTSUS subheadings are where Commerce limited its timely submitted case briefs.6 Harmoni provided for convenience and customs examination in an administrative review and the petitioners each timely filed purposes, our written description of the pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the rebuttal briefs.7 scope of the order is dispositive. In Act. Commerce’s practice in cases order to be excluded from the order, involving limited selection based on 1 See Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic of garlic entered under the HTSUS exporters accounting for the largest China: Preliminary Results, Preliminary Rescission, subheadings listed above that is (1) volume of imports has been to look to and Final Rescission, In Part, of the 24th Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017– mechanically harvested and primarily, section 735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance, 2018, 85 FR 2400 (January 15, 2020) (Preliminary but not exclusively, destined for non- which provides instructions for Results) and accompanying Preliminary Decision fresh use or (2) specially prepared and calculating the all-others rate in an Memorandum (PDM). cultivated prior to planting and then 2 Those companies are: Chengwu County investigation. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Yuanxiang Industries; Jiang Hua Yao Autonomous harvested and otherwise prepared for Act instructs Commerce to use rates County Nikko Biotechnology Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu use as seed must be accompanied by established for individually investigated Lvhui Food Co., Ltd.; Jiangyong Foreign Trade declarations to U.S. Customs and Border producers and exporters, excluding any Corp.; Lianyungang Xiangjiang Food Co., Ltd.; Protection (CBP) to that effect. Qingdao Ritai Food Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Calgry Import rates that are zero, de minimis, or based Export; and Weifang Naike Food Co., Ltd. Analysis of Comments Received entirely on facts available in 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty All comments raised in the case and investigations. In these final results of Administrative Reviews in Response to Operational rebuttal briefs are addressed in the review, Goodman is the only reviewed Adjustments Due to COVID–19,’’ dated April 24, respondent that received a weighted- 2020. accompanying Issues and Decision 9 average dumping margin. Goodman’s 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Fresh Garlic from the Memorandum. The comments are People’s Republic of China—24th Administrative identified in Appendix I to this notice. margin is the only margin that is not Review: Extension of Deadline for the Final Results The Issues and Decision Memorandum either de minimis or based entirely on of the Review,’’ dated June 30, 2020. is a public document and is on file adverse facts available. Therefore, we 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for have assigned Goodman’s margin to the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty electronically via Enforcement and Administrative Reviews,’’ dated July 21, 2020. Compliance’s Antidumping and non-selected separate rate respondents. 6 See CFTG’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief,’’ dated April 10, Countervailing Duty Centralized Final Results of Review 2020; see also Roots Farm’s Letter, ‘‘Fresh Garlic Electronic Service System (ACCESS). From the People’s Republic of China Antidumping Administrative Review: Case Brief of Roots Farm,’’ Commerce finds that the following dated April 13, 2020. 8 See Antidumping Duty Order: Fresh Garlic from weighted-average dumping margins the People’s Republic of China, 59 FR 59209 7 See Harmoni’s Letter, ‘‘Harmoni Administrative exist for the POR: Reply Briefs: 24th Administrative Review of the (November 16, 1994). Antidumping Duty Order on Fresh Garlic from the 9 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision People’s Republic of China (A–570–831),’’ dated Memorandum for the Final Results and Final 10 See Memorandum, ‘‘Administrative Review of April 24, 2020 at Attachment 1 and Attachment 2; Rescission, in Part, of the 2017–2018 Antidumping the Antidumping Duty Order on Fresh Garlic from see also Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Fresh Garlic from the Duty Administrative Review: Fresh Garlic from the the People’s Republic of China: 2017–2018: People’s Republic of China: Petitioners’ Case People’s Republic of China,’’ dated November 2, Selection of Respondents for Individual Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated April 24, 2020 . 2020, and hereby adopted by this notice. Examination,’’ dated May 30, 2019.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:00 Nov 05, 2020 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM 06NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 216 / Friday, November 6, 2020 / Notices 71051

Weighted- Federal Register, as provided by section Dated: November 2, 2020. average 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the Jeffrey I. Kessler, dumping exporters listed above, the cash deposit Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Exporter margin (dollars per rate will be the weighted-average Compliance. kilogram) dumping margin established in the final Appendix 1 results of this review; (2) for previously Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading investigated or reviewed Chinese and List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Co., Ltd ...... 4.37 Decision Memorandum Jinxiang Feiteng Import & Export non-Chinese exporters not listed above I. Summary Co., Ltd ...... 4.37 that received a separate rate in a prior II. Background Chengwu Yuanxiang Industry & segment of this proceeding, the cash III. Scope of the Order Commerce Co., Ltd ...... 4.37 deposit rate will continue to be the IV. Final Rescission of Administrative Qingdao Sea-Line International exporter-specific rate published for the Review Trading Co., Ltd ...... 4.37 most recently completed segment of this China-Wide Entity ...... 4.71 V. Discussion of the Issues: proceeding; (3) for all Chinese exporters Issue 1: Whether the CFTG has Standing to of subject merchandise which have not Request a Review Assessment Rates been found to be entitled to a separate Issue 2: Whether 26 U.S.C. 6103 Is Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the rate, the cash deposit rate will be the Applicable Issue 3: Whether Sections 782(d) and Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), rate for the China-wide entity (i.e., 4.71 and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce has 782(e) of the Act Are Applicable dollars per kilogram); and (4) for all Issue 4: Whether Section 751 of the Act determined, and U.S. Customs and non-Chinese exporters of subject Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, Requires Country-Wide Reviews merchandise that have not received Issue 5: Whether Commerce May Rescind antidumping duties on all appropriate their own rate, the cash deposit rate will a Review for a Company that Has Not entries of subject merchandise in Demonstrated the Absence of De Jure accordance with the final results of this be the rate applicable to the Chinese exporter that supplied that non-Chinese and De Facto Government Control review. Commerce intends to direct CBP Issue 6: Whether Commerce Exceeded its to assess rates based on the per-unit (i.e., exporter. These deposit requirements, Authority to Combine Reviews per kilogram) amount on each entry of when imposed, shall remain in effect Issue 7: Whether the Petitioners and the subject merchandise during the until further notice. Harmoni’s Relationship Reveals Fraudulent Activity POR. Commerce also intends to issue Notification to Importers assessment instructions to CBP 15 days Issue 8: Whether Commerce Should Pursue after the publication date of the final This notice also serves as a reminder an 18 U.S.C.1001 Case Against Ms. Medina results of review. to importers of their responsibility Pursuant to Commerce’s assessment Issue 9: Whether Harmoni and the FGPA under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a Conspired to Defraud the United States practice in NME cases, for merchandise certificate regarding the reimbursement Issue 10: Whether Roots Farm has Standing that was not reported in the U.S. sales of antidumping duties prior to to Request an Administrative Review databases submitted by the exporter liquidation of the relevant entries Issue 11: Whether Commerce Should individually examined during this during this POR. Failure to comply with Calculate a Margin for Harmoni review, but that entered under the case this requirement could result in VI. Recommendation number of that exporter (i.e., at the individually-examined exporter’s cash Commerce’s presumption that Appendix 2 deposit rate), Commerce intends to reimbursement of antidumping duties List of Companies for Which Administrative instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at has occurred, and the subsequent Reviews Have Been Rescinded the NME-wide rate. In addition, if assessment of double antidumping 1. Hebei Golden Bird Trading Co., Ltd. Commerce determines that an exporter duties. 2. Jining Yongjia Trade Co., Ltd. under review had no shipments of the Notifications to Interested Parties 3. Jinxiang Changwei Agricultural Products subject merchandise, any suspended Co., Ltd. entries that entered under that This notice serves as the only 4. Jinxiang Dingyu Agricultural Products Co., exporter’s case number (i.e., at that reminder to parties subject to Ltd. 5. Jinxiang Fitow Trading Co., Ltd. exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the administrative protective order (APO) of China-wide rate.11 6. Jinxiang Guihua Food Co., Ltd. their responsibility concerning the 7. Jinxiang Hejia Co., Ltd. Cash Deposit Requirements return or destruction of proprietary 8. Jinxiang Honghua Foodstuff Co., Ltd. information disclosed under APO in 9. Jinxiang Infang Fruit & Vegetable Co., Ltd. Commerce intends to instruct CBP to accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 10. Jinxiang Kingkey Trade Co., Ltd. require a cash deposit for antidumping 11. Jinxiang Wanxing Garlic Products Co. duties equal to the weighted-average Timely written notification of return or destruction of APO materials, or Ltd. amount by which NV exceeds U.S. 12. Qingdao Doo Won Foods Co., Ltd. price. The following cash deposit conversion to judicial protective order, 13. Qingdao Joinseafoods Co. Ltd. requirements will be effective upon is hereby requested. Failure to comply 14. Shandong Chengwu Longxing Farm publication of these final results of this with the regulations and the terms of an Produce & By-Products Co., Ltd. administrative review for shipments of APO is a sanctionable violation. 15. Weifang Hongqiao International Logistics the subject merchandise from China We are issuing and publishing these Co., Ltd. entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 16. Xinjiang Longping Hongan Xiwannian results in accordance with sections Chili Products Co., Ltd. for consumption on or after the 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 17. Yantai Jinyan Trading, Inc. publication date of this notice in the CFR 351.221(b)(5). 18. Zhengzhou Harmoni Spice Co., Ltd. 19. Zhengzhou Yudishengjin Farm Products 11 For a full discussion of this practice, see Non- Co., Ltd. Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 [FR Doc. 2020–24701 Filed 11–5–20; 8:45 am] (October 24, 2011). BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:00 Nov 05, 2020 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM 06NON1