Nutritional Basis of Butterflyfish Corallivory in the Red Sea a Thesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nutritional Basis of Butterflyfish Corallivory in the Red Sea a Thesis Nutritional Basis of Butterflyfish Corallivory in the Red Sea A Thesis by Jessica Masterman In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia December 2012 2 EXAMINATION COMMITTEE FORM The thesis of Jessica Masterman is approved by the examination committee. Committee Chairperson: Michael Berumen Committee Co-Chair: Randi Rotjan Committee Member: David Raubenheimer 3 ABSTRACT The overall goal of this study was to elucidate the relationship between coral nutrition and the observed prey preferences exhibited by corallivorous butterflyfishes. Fifteen species of coral (thirteen hard, two soft) and stomach/hindgut contents from six species of butterflyfish were analyzed in this study, all collected from the central Saudi Arabian Red Sea. All samples were analyzed for lipid, total-nitrogen (proxy for protein), and ash (proxy for minerals and when combined with lipid data, allows for calculation of carbohydrate). Unfortunately, substantial errors were encountered in the experimental lipid data, precluding the use of this data set. Using the value of (protein/ash) as a proxy for potential nutritional quality, it was determined that Pocillopora cf. verrucosa and P. damicornis have the highest nutritional quality, while Acropora hyacinthus and Stylophora pistillata have intermediate nutritional quality, and all remaining 11 species have low nutritional quality. This suggests that the high nutritional quality of Pocillopora damicornis and Acropora hyacinthus may be the cause of the well documented predator preferences for these two species. Fish gut content samples were, on average, twice as rich in protein and half as rich in minerals as the coral tissue samples, suggesting either selective consumption of especially rich parts of the coral colony, or consumption of other food sources (facultative corallivores). In all six butterflyfish species, stomach content samples were consistently richer in protein and poorer in mineral content than the hindgut content samples; this suggests significant and measureable uptake of protein in the butterflyfish digestion process. 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to first thank my MS thesis advisors Dr. Michael Berumen, Dr. Randi Rotjan, and Dr. David Raubenheimer. Without their support and guidance, I would never have been able to complete this work. Particularly, I would like to thank Mike and Randi for allowing me to utilize the parrotfish and butterflyfish samples that they had collected from the Red Sea in February 2011. Many thanks also go to Randi for the dedication and enthusiasm she has shown toward this project. Without Randi’s constant encouragement, I surely would not have gotten as far as I did in this work. Unfortunately, time constraints did not permit me to take advantage of David’s expertise as much as I would have liked in this project, although I hope to work with David much more in the future. I would also like to thank KAUST for providing all the resources and financial support for this project. Thanks also to the University of Wisconsin Soil and Plant Analysis Lab. Their work on the ash measurement of my samples was not only well planned, but also highly meticulous. I must also thank Mae Noble for acting as my dive buddy and helping me to collect all my coral fragments. I’d also like to thank Jessica Bouwmeester for her help in confirming my coral species identifications. Lastly, I’m very grateful to all of the amazing friends I’ve had during my stay at KAUST. Some of you have graduated already and some of you will continue attending KAUST, but I will never forget the time we’ve spent here and all the wonderful experiences we’ve shared together. Thank you all for joining me in this Saudi Arabian adventure! 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXAMINATION COMMITTEE FORM ................................................................................... 2 ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................... 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. 5 LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... 7 LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 11 1.1 Importance and Degradation of Coral Reefs ................................................................... 11 1.2 Corallivory .................................................................................................................................. 12 1.3 Corallivory in Butterflyfish (f: Chaetodontidae) ............................................................. 13 1.4 Butterflyfish Species Studied ................................................................................................ 14 1.4.1 Chaetodon auriga ............................................................................................................................... 14 1.4.2 Chaetodon austriacus ....................................................................................................................... 14 1.4.3 Chaetodon fasciatus .......................................................................................................................... 15 1.4.4 Chaetodon larvatus ........................................................................................................................... 15 1.4.5 Chaetodon paucifasciatus ............................................................................................................... 15 1.4.6 Chaetodon trifascialis ....................................................................................................................... 15 1.5 A New Approach ....................................................................................................................... 16 CHAPTER TWO: MATERIALS AND METHODS .............................................................. 17 2.1 Sample Collection and Preparation .................................................................................... 17 2.2 Lipid Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 19 2.2.1 Modified Folch method for lipid analysis ............................................................................... 20 2.2.2 Preliminary standardization tests ............................................................................................. 22 2.3 Protein Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 26 2.3.1 Preliminary standardization tests ............................................................................................. 27 2.4 Carbohydrate Analysis ........................................................................................................... 28 2.4.1 Preliminary attempts to measure ash content ..................................................................... 29 2.4.2 Successful measurement of ash content ................................................................................. 30 CHAPTER THREE: RESULTS ............................................................................................... 31 3.1 Prey: Coral Tissue Macronutrient Content ..................................................................... 31 3.1.1 Protein Results ................................................................................................................................... 31 3.1.2 Ash Content Results ......................................................................................................................... 35 3.1.3 Combination of Protein Content and Ash Content Results ............................................. 37 3.2 Predator: Stomach/Hindgut Macronutrient Content in Butterflyfishes .............. 44 3.2.1 Protein Content Results .................................................................................................................. 45 3.2.2 Ash Content Results ......................................................................................................................... 48 3.2.3 Combination of Protein and Ash Content Results ............................................................... 51 3.3 Predator vs. Prey ..................................................................................................................... 54 3.3.1 Chaetodon auriga: Stomach Content vs. Feeding Preferences ....................................... 55 3.3.2 Chaetodon austriacus: Stomach Content vs. Feeding Preferences ............................... 56 3.3.3 Chaetodon fasciatus: Stomach Content vs. Feeding Preferences .................................. 57 3.3.4 Chaetodon larvatus: Stomach Content vs. Feeding Preferences .................................... 58 6 3.3.5 Chaetodon trifascialis: Stomach Content vs. Feeding Preferences ............................... 59 3.4 Lipid Results: Issues and Errors ......................................................................................... 60 CHAPTER
Recommended publications
  • Chaetodon Larvatus Ordine Perciformes Cuvier, 1831 Famiglia Chaetodontidae
    Identificazione e distribuzione nei mari italiani di specie non indigene Classe Osteichthyes Chaetodon larvatus Ordine Perciformes Cuvier, 1831 Famiglia Chaetodontidae SINONIMI RILEVANTI Chaetodon karraf Cuvier, 1831 DESCRIZIONE COROLOGIA / AFFINITA’ Corpo fortemente appiattito e alto. Testa piccola Tropicale con bocca protrattile leggermente obliqua. Denti DISTRIBUZIONE ATTUALE lunghi e stretti sulla parte anteriore di entrambe le mascelle. Occhi relativamente grandi, interorbitale Oceano Indiano occidentale: Mar Rosso e Golfo di stretto. Pinna dorsale continua. Pinna caudale Aden. tronca. Piccole scaglie ctenoidi su tutto il corpo. Scaglia ascellare appuntita alla base della pinna PRIMA SEGNALAZIONE IN MEDITERRANEO pelvica. Bordo del preopercolo denticolato. Israele, gennaio 2011 (Salameh et al. 2011) COLORAZIONE PRIMA SEGNALAZIONE IN ITALIA Testa anteriormente marrone-arancione. Corpo - grigiastro con diverse linee giallastre verticali a V. Parte posteriore della pinna dorsale nera; pinna ORIGINE caudale nera con bordo posteriore bianco- Mar Rosso trasparente. Pinna anale grigia. Pinna pettorale trasparente. Pinna pelvica arancione. VIE DI DISPERSIONE PRIMARIE Migrazione lessepsiana. FORMULA MERISTICA D XI,27; A III,23; P 15; V I,5 Identificazione e distribuzione nei mari italiani di specie non indigene TAGLIA MASSIMA VIE DI DISPERSIONE SECONDARIE 120 mm STADI LARVALI STATO DELL ’INVASIONE Alieno. SPECIE SIMILI MOTIVI DEL SUCCESSO CARATTERI DISTINTIVI La tipica colorazione distingue questa specie dalle altre specie appartenenti alla
    [Show full text]
  • Growth of Chaetodon Larvatus (Chaetodontidae: Pisces) in the Southern Red Sea
    Marine Biology (2006) 148: 1113–1122 DOI 10.1007/s00227-005-0146-7 RESEARCH ARTICLE Z. A. Zekeria Æ S. Weertman Æ B. Samuel Æ T. Kale-ab J. J. Videler Growth of Chaetodon larvatus (Chaetodontidae: Pisces) in the southern Red Sea Received: 22 March 2004 / Accepted: 15 August 2005 / Published online: 15 November 2005 Ó Springer-Verlag 2005 Abstract Growth and age of Chaetodon larvatus were vertebrae to estimate age while the second is based on studied using growth bands in otoliths and length-fre- the length distribution of fish in a cohort and monitors quency analyses. Otoliths of 180 C. larvatus were ex- changes in the distribution with time. Both methods tracted and measured. Polished sections of sagittae have been widely employed for growth and ageing revealed alternating opaque and translucent bands cor- studies of temperate fishes and yielded good results. responding with a seasonal growth pattern. Both mass Until recently, the methods were not used for tropical and size of the otoliths continue to grow steadily fish growth studies for two reasons. First, tropical fish throughout life. Length-at-age data revealed very fast were assumed to lack seasonal growth patterns. This was growth during the first year. Growth proceeded at a thought to result in poorly developed growth marks in decreasing rate during the second and the third year; the hard parts (Brothers 1980). Second, tropical fishes fishes older than 3 years did not grow noticeably. No were believed to lack seasonality in recruitment. Pro- difference in growth patterns between males and females tracted recruitment would result in skewed and bimodal could be detected.
    [Show full text]
  • And Platycephalus Indicus (Teleostei: Platycephalidae) in the Mediterranean Sea
    BioInvasions Records (2012) Volume 1, Issue 1: 53–57 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/bir.2012.1.1.12 Open Access © 2012 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2012 REABIC Aquatic Invasions Records Recent evidence on the presence of Heniochus intermedius (Teleostei: Chaetodontidae) and Platycephalus indicus (Teleostei: Platycephalidae) in the Mediterranean Sea Michel Bariche Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, American University of Beirut, PO Box 11-0236, Beirut, Lebanon E-mail: [email protected] Received: 4 January 2012 / Accepted: 23 February 2012 / Published online: 7 March 2012 Handling editor: Ernesto Azzurro, ISPRA, Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, Italy Abstract A second specimen of the Red Sea bannerfish Heniochus intermedius Steindachner, 1893 and a specimen of the Bartail flathead Platycephalus indicus (Linnaeus, 1758) have been recently collected from Lebanon (eastern Mediterranean). The two alien species constitute very rare occurrences in the Mediterranean; the first record of H. intermedius dates back to 2002 and only a few P. indicus individuals were collected between the 1950s and 1970s. Their presence in the Mediterranean is discussed as well as possible future trends in light of recent environmental changes. Key words: Heniochus intermedius, Platycephalus indicus, alien species, Lessepsian migration, Lebanon, eastern Mediterranean Introduction associated to coral reefs (Randall 1983; CIESM 2009). Butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae) are marine Flatheads (Platycephalidae) are large bottom fishes that can be easily recognized by a deep dwelling fishes found mostly in the Indo-Pacific compressed body, small terminal and protractile area. They are characterized by an elongate mouth and bright coloration patterns (Randall body, a depressed head and a large mouth, with 1983; Nelson 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Trade in Marine Ornamental Species
    From Ocean to Aquarium The global trade in marine ornamental species Colette Wabnitz, Michelle Taylor, Edmund Green and Tries Razak From Ocean to Aquarium The global trade in marine ornamental species Colette Wabnitz, Michelle Taylor, Edmund Green and Tries Razak ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS UNEP World Conservation This report would not have been The authors would like to thank Helen Monitoring Centre possible without the participation of Corrigan for her help with the analyses 219 Huntingdon Road many colleagues from the Marine of CITES data, and Sarah Ferriss for Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK Aquarium Council, particularly assisting in assembling information Tel: +44 (0) 1223 277314 Aquilino A. Alvarez, Paul Holthus and and analysing Annex D and GMAD data Fax: +44 (0) 1223 277136 Peter Scott, and all trading companies on Hippocampus spp. We are grateful E-mail: [email protected] who made data available to us for to Neville Ash for reviewing and editing Website: www.unep-wcmc.org inclusion into GMAD. The kind earlier versions of the manuscript. Director: Mark Collins assistance of Akbar, John Brandt, Thanks also for additional John Caldwell, Lucy Conway, Emily comments to Katharina Fabricius, THE UNEP WORLD CONSERVATION Corcoran, Keith Davenport, John Daphné Fautin, Bert Hoeksema, Caroline MONITORING CENTRE is the biodiversity Dawes, MM Faugère et Gavand, Cédric Raymakers and Charles Veron; for assessment and policy implemen- Genevois, Thomas Jung, Peter Karn, providing reprints, to Alan Friedlander, tation arm of the United Nations Firoze Nathani, Manfred Menzel, Julie Hawkins, Sherry Larkin and Tom Environment Programme (UNEP), the Davide di Mohtarami, Edward Molou, Ogawa; and for providing the picture on world’s foremost intergovernmental environmental organization.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen Butterflyfishes of the Southern Red Sea Zekeria
    University of Groningen Butterflyfishes of the Southern Red Sea Zekeria, Zekeria Abdulkerim IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2003 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Zekeria, Z. A. (2003). Butterflyfishes of the Southern Red Sea: Ecology and population dynamics. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 26-09-2021 Butterflyfishes of the Southern Red Sea 31 Chapter 4 Resource Partitioning among Four Butterflyfish Species Z. A. Zekeria, Y. Dawit, S. Ghebremedhin, M. Naser and J. J. Videler Published in Marine and Freshwater Research. 2002,vol. 53, pp.1-6. 32 Chapter 4. Resource Partitioning Abstract Feeding habits and territorial behaviour of four sympatric Red Sea butterflyfishes were investigated in the Eritrean coastal waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Determinants of Chaetodon Butterflyfish and Fishery-Targeted Coral Reef Fish Assemblages in the Central Philippines
    ResearchOnline@JCU This file is part of the following reference: Leahy, Susannah Marie (2016) Habitat determinants of Chaetodon butterflyfish and fishery-targeted coral reef fish assemblages in the central Philippines. PhD thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: http://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/46299/ The author has certified to JCU that they have made a reasonable effort to gain permission and acknowledge the owner of any third party copyright material included in this document. If you believe that this is not the case, please contact [email protected] and quote http://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/46299/ Habitat determinants of Chaetodon butterflyfish and fishery-targeted coral reef fish assemblages in the central Philippines Thesis submitted by Susannah Marie Leahy (BSc, MAppSci) on 8 February 2016 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the College of Marine and Environmental Sciences, the Centre for Tropical and Environmental Sustainability Science, and the Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies James Cook University Cairns, Queensland, Australia This page is intentionally left blank. ii Acknowledgements I would first like to thank my supervisors: Garry Russ, Rene Abesamis, and Mike Kingsford. Garry, for his guidance and advice, and for his trust in me. Rene, for teaching me how to function in the Philippines. Mike, for being such a source of wisdom when I felt out of my depth. I would also like to thank the organisations who funded my work, including the Graduate Research School at James Cook University for a Postgraduate Research Scholarship and for two research grants, as well as the Australian Society for Fish Biology for the Michael Hall Student Innovation Award.
    [Show full text]
  • Centropomidae
    click for previous page CENTRP 1983 FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS FISHING AREA 51 (W. Indian Ocean) CENTROPOMIDAE Barramundis, sea perches Body elongate or oblong, compressed, dorsal profile concave at nape. Mouth large, jaws equal or with lower longer than upper; teeth small, in narrow or villiform bands on jaws and on vomer and palatines (roof of mouth), sometimes also on tongue; preopercle with a serrated posterior border or with 2 ridges; opercle with a single spine. Dorsal fin almost wholly separated into 2, with 7 or 8 stronq spines in front, followed by 1 spine and 10 to 15 soft rays; pelvic fins below pectoral fins, with a stronq spine and 5 soft rays; anal fin short, with 3 spines and 8 to 13 soft rays; caudal fin rounded. Scales usually large, ctenoid and adherent; lateral line continued onto caudal fin. Colour: usually dark grey or green above and silvery below. Medium- to large-sized bottom-living fishes occurring in coastal waters, estuaries and lagoons, in depths between about 10 and 30 m. Highly esteemed food and sport fishes taken mainly by artisanal fisheries. dorsal fins almost separate lateral line single spine continued onto tail concave - 2 - FAO Sheets CENTROPOMIDAE Fishing Area 51 SIMILAR FAMILIES OCCURRING IN THE AREA: Serranidae: spinous and soft parts of dorsal fin not as deeply notched; also, colour pattern distinctive and/or caudal fin truncate or weakly emarginate in some. Lethrinidae, Lutjanidae: dorsal fin not deeply notched, head profile not concave over eye and canine teeth present in some. Sciaenidae: lateral line also extends onto tail, but only 2 anal spines.
    [Show full text]
  • Portent Or Accident? Two New Records of Thermophilic Fish from the Central Mediterranean
    BioInvasions Records (2015) Volume 4, Issue 4: 299–304 Open Access doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/bir.2015.4.4.12 © 2015 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2015 REABIC Rapid Communication Portent or accident? Two new records of thermophilic fish from the central Mediterranean 1 2 1 Julian Evans *, Reno Tonna and Patrick J. Schembri 1Department of Biology, University of Malta, Msida MSD2080, Malta 2Namaste Flat 5, Triq il-Merzuq, Birzebbuga, Malta E-mail: [email protected] (JE), [email protected] (RT), [email protected] (PJS) *Corresponding author Received: 19 April 2015 / Accepted: 10 August 2015 / Published online: 14 September 2015 Handling editor: John Mark Hanson Abstract The blue tang Acanthurus coeruleus Bloch and Schneider, 1801 and the Red Sea bannerfish Heniochus intermedius Steindachner, 1893 are reported for the first time from the Maltese Islands, which also represents the first central Mediterranean record for both species. The new records are based on an individual of A. coeruleus observed in October 2013 and a specimen of H. intermedius caught in November 2014; no individuals of either species have been found since. The occurrence of these species in Malta may be due to a westwards range expansion in the Mediterranean, given that both species were previously recorded from the Levantine Sea, but they could also have been introduced directly in Maltese waters through the aquarium trade or by shipping, particularly since evidence for established populations in the eastern Mediterranean is lacking. The relevance of these new additions of thermophilic fishes to the central Mediterranean ichthyofauna is discussed in relation to ongoing biotic changes in this sea.
    [Show full text]
  • (2): 697^06 the Zoogeographical And
    J. mar. biot. Ass. India, ld72, 14 (2): 697^06 THE ZOOGEOGRAPHICAL AND PALEOGEOGRAPHICAL PROBLEM OF THE INDIAN OCEAN AND THE RID SEA ACCORDING TO THE ICHTHYOFAUNA OF THE LITTORAL* WOLFGANG KLAUSEWITZ Natur-Museum undForschungs-Institute Senckenberg, Frankfurt a.M., Germany ABSTRACT The Red Sea is generally considered zoogeographically as an appendix of the Indian Ocean. In reality this sea has its own paleogeographic history, beginning as a bay of the Mediterranean Tethys in early Tertiary and isolated for a rather, long time during the Pleistocene. The ichthyofauna, especially the coastal fishes there can be distinguished as three dififeient groups of immigrants to the Red Sea. Thus the Red Sea fauna is different in many aspects from the fishes of the Indian Qcean and has numerous endemic species. The ichthyofauna of the East African coast is influenced by the fishes of the Red Sea. The Indian Ocean is not a homogeneous unit with a imiform ichthyofauna. The eastern part till India and the Maldives is different from the western part. As the Indo-Australian Archipelago shows also different conditions the whole Indian Ocean region has to be divided into four subregions, including the Red Sea in the west and the Indo-Australian Archipelago in the east. iNTRODUCtlON WHILE Weber and Beaufort (1911-1962) as well as Fowler (1956) as ichthyologists considered the Indian Ocean with the Indo-Australian Archipelago in the East and the Red Sea in the West more or less as a unit without any greater differentiation, this zoogeographical province shows some distinctive characters from the geogra­ phical point of view.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of the Indian Ocean Anchovy Stolephorus Insularis Hardenberg, 1933 (Clupeiformes: Engraulidae) in the Mediterranean
    BioInvasions Records (2012) Volume 1, Issue 4: 303–306 Open Access doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/bir.2012.1.4.11 © 2012 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2012 REABIC Short Communication First record of the Indian Ocean anchovy Stolephorus insularis Hardenberg, 1933 (Clupeiformes: Engraulidae) in the Mediterranean Ronald Fricke1, Daniel Golani2* and Brenda Appelbaum-Golani3 1 Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany 2 National Natural History Collections and Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 91904 Jerusalem, Israel 3 Mt. Scopus Library, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 91905 Jerusalem, Israel E-mail: [email protected] (RF), [email protected] (DG), [email protected] (BA) *Corresponding author Received: 17 July 2012 / Accepted: 3 October 2012 / Published online: 11 October 2012 Handling editor: Ernesto Azzurro, ISPRA, Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, Italy Abstract The Golden anchovy Stolephorus insularis was recorded for the first time in the Mediterranean near Tel-Aviv, Israel on 7 August 2009. This northern Indian Ocean species evidently reached the Mediterranean by crossing the Suez Canal from the Red Sea. Since then, several specimens were collected over a period of time which indicates that this species has established a viable population in the Levant. Key words: Stolephorus insularis; Engraulidae; Indian Ocean; first record; Mediterranean; Lessepsian migration Introduction Hardenberg, 1933 from a nocturnal trawl catch in the port of Jaffa; these specimens were The opening of the Suez Canal in 1869 partially damaged and were therefore used only connected the Red Sea with the Mediterranean, for color description.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Movement in the Red Sea and Implications for Marine Protected Area Design
    Fish Movement in the Red Sea and Implications for Marine Protected Area Design Thesis by Irene Antonina Salinas Akhmadeeva In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia April, 2021 2 EXAMINATION COMMITTEE PAGE The thesis of Irene Antonina Salinas Akhmadeeva is approved by the examination committee. Committee Chairperson: Prof. Michael L. Berumen Committee Co-Chair: Dr. Alison Green Committee Members: Dr. Darren Coker, Prof. Rusty Brainard 3 COPYRIGHT © April 2021 Irene Antonina Salinas Akhmadeeva All Rights Reserved 4 ABSTRACT Fish Movement in the Red Sea and Implications for Marine Protected Area Design Irene Antonina Salinas Akhmadeeva The Red Sea is valued for its biodiversity and the livelihoods it provides for many. It now faces overfishing, habitat degradation, and anthropogenic induced climate-change. Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) became a powerful management tool to protect vulnerable species and ecosystems, re-establish their balance, and enhance marine populations. For this, they need to be well designed and managed. There are 15 designated MPAs in the Red Sea but their level of enforcement is unclear. To design an MPA it is necessary to know if it will protect species of interest by considering their movement needs. In this thesis I aim at understanding fish movement in the Red Sea, specifically home range (HR) to inform MPA size designation. With not much empirical data available on HR for Red Sea fish, I used a Machine Learning (ML) classification model, trained with empirical literature HR measurements with Maximum Total Length (L Max), Aspect Ratio (AR) of the caudal fin, and Trophic Level as predictor variables.
    [Show full text]
  • Saltwater Aquariums for Dummies‰
    01_068051 ffirs.qxp 11/21/06 12:02 AM Page iii Saltwater Aquariums FOR DUMmIES‰ 2ND EDITION by Gregory Skomal, PhD 01_068051 ffirs.qxp 11/21/06 12:02 AM Page ii 01_068051 ffirs.qxp 11/21/06 12:02 AM Page i Saltwater Aquariums FOR DUMmIES‰ 2ND EDITION 01_068051 ffirs.qxp 11/21/06 12:02 AM Page ii 01_068051 ffirs.qxp 11/21/06 12:02 AM Page iii Saltwater Aquariums FOR DUMmIES‰ 2ND EDITION by Gregory Skomal, PhD 01_068051 ffirs.qxp 11/21/06 12:02 AM Page iv Saltwater Aquariums For Dummies®, 2nd Edition Published by Wiley Publishing, Inc. 111 River St. Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774 www.wiley.com Copyright © 2007 by Wiley Publishing, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana Published by Wiley Publishing, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana Published simultaneously in Canada No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permit- ted under Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400, fax 978-646-8600. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Legal Department, Wiley Publishing, Inc., 10475 Crosspoint Blvd., Indianapolis, IN 46256, 317-572-3447, fax 317-572-4355, or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions. Trademarks: Wiley, the Wiley Publishing logo, For Dummies, the Dummies Man logo, A Reference for the Rest of Us!, The Dummies Way, Dummies Daily, The Fun and Easy Way, Dummies.com, and related trade dress are trademarks or registered trademarks of John Wiley & Sons, Inc., and/or its affiliates in the United States and other countries, and may not be used without written permission.
    [Show full text]