POSC 370D Syllabus: the Politics of China
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Contemporary China: a Book List
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: Woodrow Wilson School, Politics Department, East Asian Studies Program CONTEMPORARY CHINA: A BOOK LIST by Lubna Malik and Lynn White Winter 2007-2008 Edition This list is available on the web at: http://www.princeton.edu/~lynn/chinabib.pdf which can be viewed and printed with an Adobe Acrobat Reader. Variation of font sizes may cause pagination to differ slightly in the web and paper editions. No list of books can be totally up-to-date. Please surf to find further items. Also consult http://www.princeton.edu/~lynn/chinawebs.doc for clicable URLs. This list of items in English has several purposes: --to help advise students' course essays, junior papers, policy workshops, and senior theses about contemporary China; --to supplement the required reading lists of courses on "Chinese Development" and "Chinese Politics," for which students may find books to review in this list; --to provide graduate students with a list that may suggest books for paper topics and may slightly help their study for exams in Chinese politics; a few of the compiler's favorite books are starred on the list, but not much should be made of this because such books may be old or the subjects may not meet present interests; --to supplement a bibliography of all Asian serials in the Princeton Libraries that was compiled long ago by Frances Chen and Maureen Donovan; many of these are now available on the web,e.g., from “J-Stor”; --to suggest to book selectors in the Princeton libraries items that are suitable for acquisition; to provide a computerized list on which researchers can search for keywords of interests; and to provide a resource that many teachers at various other universities have also used. -
Understanding China's Future
PALACKÝ UNIVERSITY OLOMOUC PHILOSOPHICAL FACULTY Department of Politics and European Studies UNDERSTANDING CHINA’S FUTURE: A CRITICAL EXPLORATION OF FUTURE- ORIENTATED APPROACHES TO ANALYSING SOCIO-POLITICAL PHENOMENA Doctoral Thesis Jeremy Garlick, M.A. Supervisor: Gaudenz Assenza, D.Phil. (Oxon), M.P.A. (Harvard) Olomouc, 2014 Declaration: I hereby declare that this thesis is entirely my own work and I have faithfully and accurately cited all sources used to the utmost of my ability. ………………………………………………. Jeremy Garlick, M.A. 2 Abstract This thesis has two main aims. The first of these is to study available methodologies for researching the future in the social sciences, and particularly in political science and international relations (IR). To be more specific, it attempts to determine whether it is possible to establish, given the present state of scientific knowledge, a relatively rigorous method for examining the futures of socio-political phenomena. The second aim is to set out to use the methodological approach(es) established in the first part of the study to examine the future of China, both as an applied example of the use of the methodology as well as an end in itself within IR’s sub-field of China studies. Thus, the thesis fits within the areas of future studies and China studies, but with a particular focus on the implications of the research for political science and IR within the broader social sciences. The research reveals that the most suitable candidate for researching socio-political futures, at least until computer modelling and complexity theory are refined enough to examine the future with greater accuracy (if this is possible), is scenario construction, given that it deals not with prediction of definite outcomes, but with future possibilities. -
Xi Jinping's Inner Circle
Xi Jinping’s Inner Circle (Part 1: The Shaanxi Gang) Cheng Li Like successful politicians elsewhere, President Xi Jinping assumed China’s top leadership role with the support of an inner circle. This group has been crucial to Xi’s efforts to consolidate power during his first year in office. Xi’s inner circle of confidants has smoothed the way for him to undertake a bold anti-corruption campaign, manage the Bo Xilai trial, and begin the process of crafting ambitious economic reforms. This series examines various power bases that make up Xi’s inner circle—individuals who serve as his hands, ears, mouth, and brain. This first article focuses on native-place associations, namely the so-called Shaanxi Gang, which includes the “Iron Triangle” grouping in the Politburo Standing Committee. Such discussion can help reveal the future trajectory of politics and policy-making during the Xi administration. The analysis of the positioning and promotion of some of Xi’s longtime friends provides an invaluable assessment of both Xi’s current power and the potential for effective policy implementation. Much of the current discussion about the consolidation of Xi Jinping’s power centers on the top leadership positions that he holds concurrently.1 Xi not only took control of all the supreme institutions in the party, state, and military during the latest political succession, but he also now chairs the newly established National Security Committee and the Central Leading Group on Comprehensive Deepening of Economic Reform—two crucial decision-making bodies in Zhongnanhai. There is now widespread recognition that the party leadership enthusiastically endorsed Xi’s comprehensive market reform agenda at the Third Plenum of the 18th Central Committee held in November 2013.2 These big, bold, and broad policy initiatives ostensibly reflect Xi’s growing power and influence.3 Less noticed, but equally important, is Xi’s substantial reliance on an inner circle of confidants, especially his quick moves to promote longtime associates to key leadership positions. -
China Policy Institute
China Policy Institute Discussion Paper 8 DE FACTO FEDERALISM AND DYNAMICS OF CENTRALLOCAL RELATIONS IN CHINA by Professor Yongnian ZHENG © Copyright China Policy Institute June 2006 China House University of Nottingham University Park Nottingham NG7 2RD United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)115 846 7769 Fax: +44 (0)115 846 7900 Email: [email protected] Website: www.nottingham.ac.uk/chinapolicyinstitute The China Policy Institute was set up to analyse critical policy challenges faced by China in its rapid development. Its goals are to help expand the knowledge and understanding of contemporary China in Britain, to help build a more informed dialogue between China and the UK and to contribute to government and business strategies. 1 De Facto Federalism and Dynamics of CentralLocal Relations in China By Yongnian Zheng Abstract China does not have a federalist system of government. Nevertheless, with deepening reform and openness, China’s political system in terms of centrallocal relations is functioning more and more on federalist principles. Federalism as a functioning system in China has been understudied. This paper defines the political system existing in China as de facto federalism, and attempts to explore the sources and dynamics of this federalism. China’s de facto federalism has mainly been driven by two related factors—decentralization and globalization. This paper argues that while economic decentralization in the 1980s led to the formation of de facto federalism, globalization since the 1990s has accelerated this process and generated increasingly high pressure on the Chinese leadership to institutionalize de facto federalism. 2 De Facto Federalism and Dynamics of CentralLocal Relations in China By Yongnian Zheng * China does not have a federalist system of government—it has neither constitutional division of power between the different levels of government nor separation of power within the branches of government. -
The Politics of China
POSC 370D Spring 2020 Syllabus: The Politics of China POSC 370D The Politics of China Spring 2020 Paul E. Schroeder [email protected] Main Idea: How China Works Questions: China is not rising. It has risen. Though it has problems, its economy is robust and its activities in the world are equally so. This poses a question raised by Frederick Engels: Has political reform become an economic necessity? Put another way, does politics yield to the dictates of economic development? Chinese politics remains much as it always has. The country has wrestled with Weber’s three types of legitimacy: traditional, in which people go along because that is all they know; charismatic, in which they go along with a great leader such as Mao Zedong; and rational-legal, which China has tried since the death of Deng Xiaoping but is often overshadowed by the rise of a new great leader, e.g. Xi Jinping. The basic three questions China has and continues to ask are what is the best form of government, how to achieve that form, and how to maintain legitimacy. China has wrestled with each in 1895, 1905, 1911, 1915, 1919, 1921, 1927, 1949, 1979, and 2013. Questions of the best form of government and whether it can foster legitimacy abide. These basic questions are the core of this course. The course take-away is an understanding of China’s political culture, how the government is organized, the ideology – or lack thereof – that stands behind its organization, China’s policy process, the social changes brought on by economic reforms and generational change, political contention, government fragility or adaptation, and whether these last two issues will prompt change in the regime. -
Avoiding Three Traps in Confronting China's Party-State
AVOIDING THREE TRAPS IN CONFRONTING CHINA’S PARTY-STATE CHENG LI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY foundation for decoupling. Some components of the initiatives have received bipartisan support. To navigate the current perilous and complicated Although American decision-makers and analysts situation in U.S.-China relations, the new have by no means reached consensus that the administration will need to move beyond disputes United States should end engagement with the over COVID-19 and partisan politics with the People’s Republic of China (PRC), the prevailing objective of establishing a long-term, well-grounded view in Washington is that a new and more resolute strategy toward China, rather than adopting short- strategy is needed. sighted and sensational tactics spawned by an unbalanced and fatalistic outlook. This paper Proponents of decoupling in Washington have argues that the three prevailing policy objectives raised legitimate concerns about — and valid of the Trump administration — 1) the rhetorical criticism of — the CCP leadership’s merciless separation of the PRC from the CCP, 2) calls for crackdown on Uighur Muslims and political overthrowing the Communist regime, and 3) dissidents, unfair practices in the economic and containment of China’s “whole-of-society threat” technological domains, and aggressive behavior in — are conceptually contradictory, empirically the Asia-Pacific region. China has taken advantage misguided, and strategically self-deceiving and of the openness of America’s economy, universities, dangerous. The new administration should avoid and research institutions, especially in terms of these traps. Instead, Washington should prudently entrepreneurial and technological innovation. reassess the capacity and constraints of both Some recent U.S. -
China's Labor Question
Christoph Scherrer (Ed.) China’s Labor Question Rainer Hampp Verlag München, Mering 2011 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de. ISBN 978-3-86618-387-2 Picture on cover: Workers are seen inside a Foxconn factory in the township of Longhua in the southern Guangdong province May 26, 2010 (reproduced by permission of REUTERS/Bobby Yip) First published in 2011 © 2011 Rainer Hampp Verlag München, Mering Marktplatz 5 86415 Mering, Germany www.Hampp-Verlag.de All rights preserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted or reproduced or util- ized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereaf- ter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or re- trieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. In case of complaints please contact Rainer Hampp Verlag. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements............................................................................................................. vi Notes on Contributors........................................................................................................ vii Introduction: The many Challenges of Chinese Labor Relations..................................1 Christoph Scherrer Part I: The Basic Setting 1. Perspectives on High Growth and Rising Inequality .......................................................7 -
Curriculum Vitae CHENG LI EDUCATION 1992 Ph.D. (Political
Curriculum Vitae CHENG LI EDUCATION 1992 Ph.D. (Political Science) Princeton University 1989 M.A. (Political Science) Princeton University 1987 M.A. (Asian Studies) University of California, Berkeley 1985 B.A. (English Literature) East China Normal University, Shanghai CURRENT POSITIONS 2014-present Director, John L. Thornton China Center, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. 2009-2014 Director of Research, John L. Thornton China Center, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. 2007-present Senior Fellow, Foreign Policy Studies, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. WORK EXPERIENCE 2003-2009 William R. Kenan Professor of Government, Hamilton College, Clinton NY 2006-2007 Visiting Fellow, John L. Thornton China Center, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. 2005-2006 Nonresident Senior Fellow, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. 2004-2006 Chair, Asian Studies Program, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY 2002-2003 Fellow, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC 2001-2002 Acting Chair, Department of Government, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY 1999-2003 Professor, Department of Government, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY 1997-1999 Associate Professor, Dept. of Government, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY 1992-1997 Assistant Professor, Dept. of Government, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY 1993-1995 Fellow, Institute of Current World Affairs, Hanover, NH 1991-1992 Instructor, Department of Government, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY BOARD MEMBERSHIPS 2016-present Adviser, SupChina Advisory Board (A New York-based media company dedicated to covering all the news about China) 2013-present Editorial Board Member, The China Report (India) 2012-present Director, the Board of Directors of the National Committee on U.S.-China Relations 2012-present Member, the Executive Committee and the Nomination Committee of National Committee on U.S.-China Relations 2014-present Co-Chair, the Issues Committee, Committee of 100 2012-2015 Trustee, Institute of Current World Affairs, Washington D.C. -
College of Charleston
College of Charleston POLI 345.01 Politics of China Dr. Guoli Liu Fall 2021 Express II Maybank Hall 111, Monday and Wednesday 4:00-6:45 pm Office: J. C. Long Building, Room 229, 9 Liberty Street Office Hours: Please email me to make appointment for ZOOM meeting Telephone: 843-953-5883; E-mail: [email protected] COURSE OBJECTIVES This course examines contemporary Chinese politics (1949-present) with an emphasis on the era of reform and opening since 1978. What are the crucial problems in Chinese politics? How have the Chinese people and political leaders confronted them? We begin with an introduction of China’s tradition and revolutionary transformation. The main focus of the course is on political reform and socioeconomic change in the post-Mao era. China’s politics from Deng Xiaoping’s “four modernizations” and xiaokang shihui (well to do society) to Hu Jintao’s harmonious society, and now Xi Jinping’s “Chinese dream” has been focusing on achieving modernity. After four decades of hard work and rapid growth, China is approaching modernity. In addition to having a rapidly growing economy, China is experiencing profound sociopolitical changes. We shall examine whether the Chinese can build a dynamic market economy in an increasingly globalized world economy, create social harmony in a society with growing tensions, and maintain political stability while avoiding stagnation and decay. What we face is a most challenging prospect that will affect not only the fate of 1.4 billion Chinese people but also the future of world politics. We are going to study China in comparative perspectives. -
Agenda and Speaker Bios
Informing and Strengthening Policy ENGAGING ASIA 2010: Th e Future of U.S. Leadership Friday, September 17 | Th e Phoenix Park Hotel | 8:45 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. 8:00 a.m. Registration and breakfast FEATURED PUBLICATION 8:45 a.m. Welcome and Introductions Power Constrained: Sources of Meredith Miller, Th e National Bureau of Asian Research Mutual Strategic Suspicion in U.S.-China Relations, by David 9:00 a.m. MANAGING STRATEGIC SUSPICION IN U.S.-CHINA RELATIONS M. Lampton Moderator: Michael Wills, Th e National Bureau of Asian Research Th e U.S.-China relationship is fun- Speakers: David M. Lampton, Th e Paul H. Nitze School of damentally stable and will remain Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University so for the foreseeable future. Hav- ing said this, however, the essay Cheng Li, Th e Brookings Institution highlights four sources of mutual strategic mistrust that, if insuffi - 10:00 a.m. Coff ee Break ciently attended to by Washington 10:15 a.m. THE FUTURE OF U.S. LEADERSHIP and Beijing, will metastasize. 10:15 a.m. U.S. Security Policy in Asia Th ese sources are: (1) defi ning the Speaker: Michèle Flournoy, Under Secretary of Defense for Policy challenge of U.S.-China relations in such a manner that there is no 11:15 a.m. U.S. Economic Policy in Asia “win-win” solution, (2) miscal- Speaker: Robert D. Hormats, Under Secretary of State for culating U.S. and Chinese power, Economic, Energy and Agricultural Aff airs (3) desires in China to “change the game,” and (4) challenge and 12:15 p.m. -
China's Political Trajectory: Internal Contradictions and Inner-Party
China’s Political Trajectory: Internal Contradictions and Inner-Party Democracy Cheng Li Brookings Institution and Hamilton College Draft paper prepared for the conference “The Rise of China” Mount Holyoke College March 7-8, 2008 1 Introduction This year marks the 30th anniversary of China’s policy of “reform and opening,” which was initiated by Deng Xiaoping in 1978. During the past 30 years, China’s meteoric economic growth, profound societal transformations, and multi-faceted integration with the outside world have been widely recognized by both policymakers and the general public in the United States. Yet, the American China studies community seems to have been struck by a prolonged and peculiar sort of political blindness. The early signs of Chinese political experiments, such as genuine local elections and regional representations at the national leadership, have largely been overlooked.1 Some important socio-political forces unleashed by the country’s transition toward a market economy, including the emergence of an entrepreneurial class and a middle class, are commonly perceived as factors that are more likely to consolidate the existing authoritarian political system than to challenge it.2 The prevailing view in the United States is that, despite the economic dynamism exhibited by present-day China, the Chinese regime is still essentially a Communist system resistant to significant political change.3 Of course, China’s political development in the reform era, though intriguing and potentially consequential, has been far less fundamental or systemic than changes in the economic realm. Yet, it is too simplistic to think that the earthshaking socio-economic changes that have transformed China over the past three decades have taken place within a political vacuum, with no corresponding changes in the Chinese political system. -
Curriculum Vitae CHENG LI Citizenship: U.S.A. EDUCATION
Curriculum Vitae CHENG LI Citizenship: U.S.A. EDUCATION 1992 Ph.D. (Political Science) Princeton University 1989 M.A. (Political Science) Princeton University 1987 M.A. (Asian Studies) University of California, Berkeley 1985 B.A. (English Literature) East China Normal University, Shanghai CURRENT POSITIONS 2014-present Director, John L. Thornton China Center, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. 2007-present Senior Fellow, Foreign Policy Studies, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. WORK EXPERIENCE 2009-2014 Director of Research, John L. Thornton China Center, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. 2003-2009 William R. Kenan Professor of Government, Hamilton College, Clinton NY 2006-2007 Visiting Fellow, John L. Thornton China Center, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. 2005-2006 Nonresident Senior Fellow, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. 2004-2006 Chair, Asian Studies Program, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY 2002-2003 Fellow, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC 2001-2002 Acting Chair, Department of Government, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY 1999-2003 Professor, Department of Government, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY 1997-1999 Associate Professor, Dept. of Government, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY 1992-1997 Assistant Professor, Dept. of Government, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY 1993-1995 Fellow, Institute of Current World Affairs, Hanover, NH 1991-1992 Instructor, Department of Government, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY BOARD MEMBERSHIPS AND OTHER AFFLIATIONS 2019-present