DOCSLIB.ORG

Impact of Climate-Induced Dynamics on a Coastal Benthic Ecosystem from the West Antarctic Peninsula

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Impact of Climate-Induced Dynamics on a Coastal Benthic Ecosystem from the West Antarctic Peninsula Impact of Climate-induced dynamics on a Coastal Benthic Ecosystem from the West Antarctic Peninsula Francesca Pasotti 2015 Impact of Climate-induced dynamics on a Coastal Benthic Ecosystem from the West Antarctic Peninsula By Francesca Pasotti Promotor: Prof. Dr. Ann Vanreusel Academic year 2014-2015 This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Science (Marine Sciences) Committee members Reading Committee Prof. Bruno Danis (Marine Biology Laboratory, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium) Prof. Wim Vyverman (Phycology and Aquatic Ecology Laboratory, Ghent University, Belgium) Dr. Marleen De Troch (Marine Biology Laboratory, Ghent University, Belgium) Examination Comittee Dr. Elie Verleyen (Phycology and Aquatic Ecology Laboratory, Ghent University, Belgium) Dr. Ulrike Braeckman (Marine Biology Laboratory, Ghent University, Belgium) Prof. Dr. Tom Moens (Marine Biology Laboratory, Ghent University, Belgium) Prof. Dr. Magda Vincx (Marine Biology Laboratory, Ghent University, Belgium) Prof. Dr. Doris Abele (Dept. of Functional Ecology, Alfred Wegener Institute, Germany) Prof. Wim Vyverman (Phycology and Aquatic Ecology Laboratory, Ghent University Belgium) Dr. Marleen De Troch (Marine Biology Laboratory, Ghent University, Belgium) Prof. Dr. Ann Vanreusel (promoter, Marine Biology Laboratory, Ghent University, Belgium) Prof. Dr. Dominique Adriaens (chairman, Dept. of Evolutionary Morphology of Vertebrates, Ghent University, Belgium) Aknowledgments The last lines I find myself writing are actually the first in importance for my heart. This PhD thesis would have never been possible without many and several causes and conditions (hence, wonderful people) which shaped my life. First of all, I need to thank my parents and family, who gave me this life, nurtured me when I was little and transmitted me those basic human values which made me go through life in a lighter, yet stronger way. Grazie mille, vi amo. Secondly, I want to thank my partner Inge, who has been supporting me in this last 1.5 years of my life, a time period which has been the hardest from all the possible points of view, yet the best ever. She never lost the patience and gentle touch that characterise her and she gave me an amazing sense of stability and care. Thank you, I really appreciate it. Since we are yet at the family level, let me thank my amazing dog Blu, for all the relaxing walks during the hard times of writing, for the tenderness in the harsh “early wake-up” mornings, and for the loyalty that only a non-human being can show to such a “difficult one” like me. Thank you Bluchie, I love you. Of course I can’t forget to thank my mentor, boss and friend Ann. Thank you for the possibility to carry out marine biology research in one of the most amazing ecosystems in the World, the Antarctic. Thank you for never stop believing in me, also when I was ready to quit. Thank you for understanding my nature, and find “alternative ways” to get the best out of me, without braking me down. Thank you. I wish to thank all my colleagues-friends, those in Belgium and those all around the World (the most “famous” Marleen, Rasha, Jan, Renata, AnnaMaria, Annelies, Isolde, Uli, Peter C., Alain, Ricardo, Leonardo, Doris, Gaby, Lili, Dolo, Susi) for their know-how sharing, their patience, availability, humorism and charisma. I have learnt a lot from all of you, I hope we will keep on learning from one another. A special thank you goes to all my friends (Simo, Michy, Tim, Gloria, Laura, Karel, Benny, Ilias, Peter C., Peter A.) for taking care of my moods, sharing my days and listening/sharing to my “nerd chats”. I care for each and everyone of you, very much. Last but not least, I want to thank all the members of the jury, for improving and ameliorating this thesis work by the many interesting and detailed comments I received during the review, I have found them all very stimulating. Thank you for the work. I wanted to keep these aknowledgments short, just because I am more a person of facts than a person of words. I will certainly show to each and everyone of you the appreciation, gratitude and love I feel towards you, wonderful people of my life, who made this work possible just because life and work are simply one thing, they support and stimulate one another through their constant interactions. <°(((<>< So thank you to all of you who know that I am thanking you ><>)))°> Table of Contents Homo immergunt "A lot of people attack the sea, I make love to it." — Jacques Yves Cousteau Sea explorer (1910 – 1997) Table of contents Summary .......................................................................................... i Samenvatting ............................................................................... viii Chapter I. General introduction 1. Prologue: Anthropogenic climate change .............................. 1 2. The Antarctic and climate change .......................................... 4 2.1. The ecosystem ...................................................................... 4 2.1. Recent environmental changes ............................................ 5 2.2. Biological responses to climate change in Antarctic coastal systems ......................................................................................... 9 3. International context ............................................................ 27 4. Thesis background and scientific approach .......................... 29 4.1. West Antarctic coastal ecosystems: a case study............... 29 4.2. Potter Cove, King George Island, West Antarctic Peninsula30 4.3. Trophic structure at the community level: a stable isotope approach ..................................................................................... 37 4.4. Stable isotopes addition to trace carbon fluxes ................. 45 5. Thesis outline ........................................................................ 45 Chapter II. Spatial analysis Abstract ........................................................................................ 49 1. Introduction .............................................................................. 49 2. Material and Methods .......................................................... 51 2.1. Study sites............................................................................ 51 2.2. Environmental variables ...................................................... 52 Table of contents 2.3. Biota .................................................................................... 54 2.4. Statistical analysis ................................................................ 57 3. Results .................................................................................. 59 3.1. Environmental variables ...................................................... 59 3.2. Biota .................................................................................... 61 4. Discussion ............................................................................. 71 4.1. Faro ...................................................................................... 71 4.2. Isla D .................................................................................... 73 4.3. Creek .................................................................................... 75 5. Conclusions ........................................................................... 77 6. Acknowledgments ................................................................ 77 Chapter III. Trophic interactions Abstract ........................................................................................ 79 1. Introduction .......................................................................... 80 2. Material and Methods .......................................................... 82 2.1. Study site ............................................................................. 82 2.2. Sampling and stable isotope analyses ................................. 83 2.3. Data analysis ........................................................................ 87 3. Results .................................................................................. 90 4. Discussion ........................................................................... 100 4.1. Temporal and spatial glacier retreat effects on benthic trophic interactions .................................................................. 100 Table of contents 4.2. General considerations: functional traits in Potter Cove benthic food web ..................................................................... 106 5. Acknowledgments .............................................................. 109 Chapter IV. Temporal analysis Abstract ...................................................................................... 113 1. Introduction ........................................................................ 113 2. Materials and methods ...................................................... 115 2.1. Study site and sampling strategy....................................... 115 2.2. Environmental variables .................................................... 116 2.3. Meiofaunal abundance and biomass ................................ 117 2.4. Statistical analysis .............................................................. 118 3. Results ................................................................................ 120 3.1. Environmental description ................................................ 120 3.2. Grain size ..........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ilha Rei George, Antártica Marítima) Entre 1986 E 2011
    Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia, v.29, n.3, 379 - 388, 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-778620120439 VARIAÇÕES DA FRENTE DA GELEIRA POLAR CLUB, PENÍNSULA POTTER (ILHA REI GEORGE, ANTÁRTICA MARÍTIMA) ENTRE 1986 E 2011 EVERTON LUÍS POELKING1, ANDRÉ MEDEIROS DE ANDRADE2, GONÇALO BRITO T. G. VIEIRA3, CARLOS ERNESTO G. R. SCHAEFER4, ELPÍDIO INÁCIO FERNANDES FILHO4 1Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia (UFRB), Cruz das Almas, BA, Brasil 2Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil 3Universidade de Lisboa (UL), Lisboa, Portugal 4Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV), Viçosa, MG, Brasil [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], elpidio@ufv. br Recebido Fevereiro de 2012 - Aceito Novembro de 2013 RESUMO As mudanças ambientais, especialmente na criosfera, podem resultar em amplas consequências globais, sendo o estudo de geleiras das regiões polares estratégicos para analisar áreas sensíveis às mudanças climáticas. Neste trabalho foram analisadas as taxas de mudança da frente da geleira Polar Club e comparadas com a variabilidade interanual da temperatura do ar, na Península Potter, ilha Rei George, a fim de compreender o impacto direto das alterações do clima local na dinâmica das áreas livres de gelo. Foi utilizada uma série de dez cenas de imagens do satélite Landsat e dados de temperatura do ar superficial entre 1986 e 2011. Os resultados evidenciam uma tendência no aumento na temperatura do ar de 0,04 ºC por ano, o que resultou no incremento de 1,03 ºC nas temperaturas médias do ar para o período de 26 anos analisados.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan Anual Antártico Del Programa Antártico Argentino 2018-2019
    Programa Antártico Argentino Plan Anual Antártico 2018-2019 INTRODUCCIÓN La Argentina reivindica soberanía sobre el Sector Antártico Argentino, comprendido entre los meridianos 25° y 74° de longitud Oeste al sur del paralelo de 60° de latitud Sur, con fundamento en títulos históricos, geográficos, geológicos y jurídicos. La Argentina tiene presencia permanente e ininterrumpida en la Antártida desde el 22 de febrero de 1904, en que se estableciera la primera estación científica (Base Orcadas) en la Isla Laurie, Archipiélago de las Islas Orcadas del Sur. La Argentina, por tanto, tiene la presencia continua más antigua en la Antártida. La Argentina tiene seis bases permanentes (Carlini, Orcadas, Esperanza, Marambio, San Martín y Belgrano II) y siete bases temporarias (Brown, Primavera, Decepción, Melchior, Matienzo, Cámara y Petrel). Todas están situadas en el Sector Antártico Argentino. La Dirección Nacional del Antártico administra dos de ellas (las Bases Carlini y Brown) y el Ministerio de Defensa, a través del Comando Conjunto Antártico, administra las otras once. La Argentina es uno de los doce países que participaron en la Conferencia de Washington sobre la Antártida de 1959, y eso la llevó a ser uno de los doce signatarios originarios del Tratado Antártico. El Tratado establece que la Antártida se utilizará exclusivamente para fines pacíficos y erige a la ciencia en el centro de la actividad antártica. El artículo IV del Tratado resguarda adecuadamente las reivindicaciones de soberanía en la Antártida. Por tanto, uno de los ejes de la política exterior argentina es continuo fortalecimiento del conjunto de normas surgidas a partir del Tratado Antártico. Los lineamientos de la Política Antártica Nacional (PAN) están definidos por el Decreto 2316/90, cuyo objetivo principal es el P á g i n a 2 | 265 Programa Antártico Argentino Plan Anual Antártico 2018-2019 afianzamiento de los derechos argentinos de soberanía en la Antártida.
    [Show full text]
  • The Antarctic Treaty Cm 8841
    The Antarctic Treaty Measures adopted at the Thirty-sixth Consultative Meeting held at Brussels, 20 – 29 May 2013 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty March 2014 Cm 8841 © Crown copyright 2014 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v.2. To view this licence visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/2/ or email [email protected] This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at Treaty Section, Foreign and Commo nwealth Office, King Charles Street, London, SW1A 2AH Print ISBN 9781474101134 Web ISBN 9781474101141 Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID P002631486 03/14 Printed on paper containing 30% recycled fibre content minimum MEASURES ADOPTED AT THE THIRTY-SIXTH ANTARCTIC TREATY CONSULTATIVE MEETING Brussels, Belgium, 20-29 May 2013 The Measures1 adopted at the Thirty-sixth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting are reproduced below from the Final Report of the Meeting. In accordance with Article IX, paragraph 4, of the Antarctic Treaty, the Measures adopted at Consultative Meetings become effective upon approval by all Contracting Parties whose representatives were entitled to participate in the meeting at which they were adopted (i.e. all the Consultative Parties). The full text of the Final Report of the Meeting, including the Decisions and Resolutions adopted at that Meeting and colour copies of the maps found in this command paper, is available on the website of the Antarctic Treaty Secretariat at www.ats.aq/documents.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Inhabiting the Antarctic Jessica O'reilly & Juan Francisco Salazar
    Inhabiting the Antarctic Jessica O’Reilly & Juan Francisco Salazar Introduction The Polar Regions are places that are part fantasy and part reality.1 Antarctica was the last continent to be discovered (1819–1820) and the only landmass never inhabited by indigenous people.2 While today thousands of people live and work there at dozens of national bases, Antarctica has eluded the anthropological imagination. In recent years, however, as anthropology has turned its attention to extreme environments, scientific field practices, and ethnographies of global connection and situated globalities, Antarctica has become a fitting space for anthropological analysis and ethnographic research.3 The idea propounded in the Antarctic Treaty System—that Antarctica is a place of science, peace, environmental protection, and international cooperation—is prevalent in contemporary representations of the continent. Today Antarctic images are negotiated within a culture of global environmentalism and international science. Historians, visual artists, and journalists who have spent time in the Antarctic have provided rich accounts of how these principles of global environmentalism and 1 See for instance Adrian Howkins, The Polar Regions: An Environmental History (Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2016). 2 Archaeological records have shown evidence of human occupation of Patagonia and the South American sub-Antarctic region (42˚S to Cape Horn 56˚S) dating back to the Pleistocene–Holocene transition (13,000–8,000 years before present). The first human inhabitants south of 60˚S were British, United States, and Norwegian whalers and sealers who originally settled in Antarctic and sub-Antarctic islands during the early 1800s, often for relatively extended periods of time, though never permanently 3 See for instance Jessica O’Reilly, The Technocratic Antarctic: An Ethnography of Scientific Expertise and Environmental Governance (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2017); Juan Francisco Salazar, “Geographies of Place-making in Antarctica: An Ethnographic Approach,” The Polar Journal 3, no.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Year Analysis of Distributed Glacier Mass Balance Modelling and Equilibrium Line Altitude on King George Island, Antarctic Peninsula
    The Cryosphere, 12, 1211–1232, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1211-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Multi-year analysis of distributed glacier mass balance modelling and equilibrium line altitude on King George Island, Antarctic Peninsula Ulrike Falk1,2, Damián A. López2,3, and Adrián Silva-Busso4,5 1Climate Lab, Institute for Geography, Bremen University, Bremen, Germany 2Center for Remote Sensing of Land Surfaces (ZFL), Bonn University, Bonn, Germany 3Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, University Cologne, Cologne, Germany 4Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, University Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina 5Instituto Nacional de Agua (INA), Ezeiza, Buenos Aires, Argentina Correspondence: Ulrike Falk ([email protected]) Received: 12 October 2017 – Discussion started: 1 December 2017 Revised: 15 March 2018 – Accepted: 19 March 2018 – Published: 10 April 2018 Abstract. The South Shetland Islands are located at the seen over the course of the 5-year model run period. The win- northern tip of the Antarctic Peninsula (AP). This region ter accumulation does not suffice to compensate for the high was subject to strong warming trends in the atmospheric sur- variability in summer ablation. The results are analysed to as- face layer. Surface air temperature increased about 3K in sess changes in meltwater input to the coastal waters, specific 50 years, concurrent with retreating glacier fronts, an in- glacier mass balance and the equilibrium line altitude (ELA). crease in melt areas, ice surface lowering and rapid break- The Fourcade Glacier catchment drains into Potter cove, has up and disintegration of ice shelves.
    [Show full text]
  • And Peracarida
    Contributions to Zoology, 75 (1/2) 1-21 (2006) The urosome of the Pan- and Peracarida Franziska Knopf1, Stefan Koenemann2, Frederick R. Schram3, Carsten Wolff1 (authors in alphabetical order) 1Institute of Biology, Section Comparative Zoology, Humboldt University, Philippstrasse 13, 10115 Berlin, Germany, e-mail: [email protected]; 2Institute for Animal Ecology and Cell Biology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Buenteweg 17d, D-30559 Hannover, Germany; 3Dept. of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195, USA. Key words: anus, Pancarida, Peracarida, pleomeres, proctodaeum, teloblasts, telson, urosome Abstract Introduction We have examined the caudal regions of diverse peracarid and The variation encountered in the caudal tagma, or pancarid malacostracans using light and scanning electronic posterior-most body region, within crustaceans is microscopy. The traditional view of malacostracan posterior striking such that Makarov (1978), so taken by it, anatomy is not sustainable, viz., that the free telson, when present, bears the anus near the base. The anus either can oc- suggested that this region be given its own descrip- cupy a terminal, sub-terminal, or mid-ventral position on the tor, the urosome. In the classic interpretation, the telson; or can be located on the sixth pleomere – even when a so-called telson of arthropods is homologized with free telson is present. Furthermore, there is information that the last body unit in Annelida, the pygidium (West- might be interpreted to suggest that in some cases a telson can heide and Rieger, 1996; Grüner, 1993; Hennig, 1986). be absent. Embryologic data indicates that the condition of the body terminus in amphipods cannot be easily characterized, Within that view, the telson and pygidium are said though there does appear to be at least a transient seventh seg- to not be true segments because both structures sup- ment that seems to fuse with the sixth segment.
    [Show full text]
  • Anta272.Txt F*************************************************************************** * W.A.P
    anta272.txt f*************************************************************************** * W.A.P. Worldwide Antarctic Program * * Antarctic, Sub-Antarctic and Peri-Antarctic News * * SINCE 1979 * * * * Bases, Activities and Informations for * * Amateur Radio Stations and Antarctic Enthusiasts * * Bulletin nr.272 (24 February 2017) * * * * WAP Antarctic Bulletin is a free of charge information sheet * * edited by Max IK1GPG, Gianni I1HYW and Betty IK1QFM @ WAP Staff * * * * WEB Page : http://www.waponline.it/ * * * * * * Others Antarctic WEB Pages with our WAP Bulletin * * http://www.qsl.net/f5nod/antarctica.html * * * * Antarctica Mailing List * * http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antarctica_list/ * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- * W.A.P. Special Edition * * 22 issues are available at WAP web site !! * * We are waiting volounteers to continue the Monthly Issues pubblication * * Those interested to do this work for free, PSE contact IK1GPG or I1HYW * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- * W.A.P. - W.A.D.A. (Worked Antarctic Directory Award) * * Antarctic, Sub-Antarctic and Peri-Antarctic Directory * * (16th Edition - Release 1.29 - 04 January 2017) * * List of more than 873 Bases, Camp, Hut, Refuge and Station used in * * Antarctica since 1945. * * * * W.A.P. - W.A.C.A. (Worked Antarctic Callsigns Award) * * Antarctic, Sub-Antarctic and Peri-Antarctic Directory * * (16th Edition - Release 1.29 - 04 January 2017) * * List of more than 4.076 Callsigns used
    [Show full text]
  • National Report, Argentina V2
    IHO Hydrographic Committee on Antarctica (HCA) th 16 Meeting, Prague, Czech Republic. 3 -5 July 2019. REPORT BY THE NAVAL HYDROGRAPHIC SERVICE MINISTERIO DE DEFENSA SERVICIO DE HIDROGRAFIA NAVAL Tel.: (54-11) 4301-0061/67 Fax.: (54-11) 4301-3883 Av. Montes de Oca 2124 www.hidro.gob.ar (C1270ABV) Buenos Aires REPUBLICA ARGENTINA 1- HYDROGRAPHIC OFFICE MINISTERIO DE DEFENSA SERVICIO DE HIDROGRAFÍA NAVAL www.hidro.gob.ar 2- SURVEYS 2.1 INT 9101 / H-757– Península Trinidad – Base Esperanza. 6 (six) WGS84 points and coast line were measured in Esperanza Bay for the realization of INT 9101. 2.2 H-711 – Potter Cove – Carlini Base. 8 (eight) WGS84 points and coast line were measured in Potter Cove for future actualization of H-711. 3- NEW CHARTS & UPDATES 3.1 New Charts 3.1.1 AR-GB INT 9153 / H-734 “Church Point a Cabo Longing”, Published in September 2018. INT9153/H-734 Boundaries Scale North Latitude 63° 39’S “Church Point a Cabo South Latitude 64° 36.4’S 1:50.000 Longing” West Longitude 59° 00’W East Longitude 55° 17.6’W 3.1.2 AR-GB INT 9154 / H-733 “Isla Joinville a Cabo Ducorps”. Published in September, 2018. INT 9154 / H-733 Boundaries Scale North Latitude 62° 50’S “Isla Joinville a Cabo South Latitude 63° 49.1’S 1:50.000 Ducorps” West Longitude 58° 12.5’W East Longitude 54° 30’W 3.2 New Updates 3.2.1 H-7 “Provincia de Tierra del Fuego, Antártida e Islas del Atlántico Sur, Península Antártica”.
    [Show full text]
  • Eleven New Species and a New Genus of Diastylidae (Crustacea: Cumacea) from Australia and One New Species from Canada
    AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Gerken, Sarah, 2013. Eleven new species and a new genus of Diastylidae (Crustacea: Cumacea) from Australia and one new species from Canada. Records of the Australian Museum 66(1): 1–62. [Published 26 February 2014]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3853/j.2201-4349.66.2014.1601 ISSN 0067-1975 (print), ISSN 2201-4349 (online) Published by the Australian Museum, Sydney nature culture discover Australian Museum science is freely accessible online at http://australianmuseum.net.au/Scientific-Publications 6 College Street, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia © The Author, 2014. Journal compilation © Australian Museum, Sydney, 2014 Records of the Australian Museum (2014) Vol. 66, issue number 1, pp. 1–62. ISSN 0067-1975 (print), ISSN 2201-4349 (online) http://dx.doi.org/10.3853/j.2201-4349.66.2014.1601 Eleven New Species and a New Genus of Diastylidae (Crustacea: Cumacea) from Australia and One New Species from Canada Sarah Gerken Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alaska, Anchorage, 3211 Providence Drive, Anchorage, Alaska 99508 United States of America [email protected] Abstract. The shallow water cumacean fauna of Australia is relatively well known, particularly from the southern coasts. However, recent investigations in the collections of the Australian Museum and Museum Victoria have yielded 12 new species and one new genus of diastylid cumaceans, most from continental shelf and slope depths of Australia; one new species in Museum Victoria is from Canadian waters. The new genus Austroleptostylis is described, and the species Leptostylis recalvastra Hale, 1945 is transferred to it, creating the new combination Austroleptostylis recalvastra (Hale, 1945).
    [Show full text]
  • Brazil in Antarctica: the Scientific and Geopolitical Importance of Proantar in the Brazilian Strategic Surrounding Area
    251 BRAZIL IN ANTARCTICA: THE SCIENTIFIC AND GEOPOLITICAL IMPORTANCE OF PROANTAR IN THE BRAZILIAN STRATEGIC SURROUNDING AREA Israel de Oliveira Andrade Leonardo Faria de Mattos Andrea Cancela da Cruz-Kaled Giovanni Roriz Lyra Hillebrand 251 DISCUSSION PAPER Brasilia, September 2020 BRAZIL IN ANTARCTICA: THE SCIENTIFIC AND GEOPOLITICAL IMPORTANCE OF PROANTAR IN THE BRAZILIAN STRATEGIC SURROUNDING AREA1,2 Israel de Oliveira Andrade3 Leonardo Faria de Mattos4 Andrea Cancela da Cruz-Kaled5 Giovanni Roriz Lyra Hillebrand6 1. This text corresponds to the translation of the research, published originally in Portuguese: O Brasil na Antártica: a importân- cia científica e geopolítica do PROANTAR no entorno estratégico brasileiro. Texto para Discussão n. 2425, Brasília, Ipea, 2018. 2. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Admirals Eduardo Bacellar Leal Ferreira and Marcos Silva Rodrigues, and Rear Admirals Sérgio Gago Guida and Paulo Roberto da Silva Xavier. We also thank the staff of the Secretariat of the Inter- ministerial Commission for Sea Resources (SECIRM), the PhD professors Alvaro Toubes Prata – State Secretary of Research and Development Policies and Programs of the Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation, and Communications (MCTIC) –, Ana Flávia Barros-Platiau and Paulo Eduardo Aguiar Saraiva Câmara – coordinators of graduate programs at the University of Brasilia (UnB) –, and Daniela Portella Sampaio (University of Leeds), as well as the researchers Luiz Gustavo de Aversa Franco, Maurício Kenyatta and Matheus Augusto Soares, of the Research Program for National Development (PNPD) at Ipea, exempt- ing them of any errors or omissions. Any remaining imperfections in the text are sole responsibility of the authors. 3. Researcher at Ipea.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumacea of the NEP: Equator to Aleutians and Intertidal to the Abyss Part 1
    Cumacea of the NEP: equator to Aleutians and intertidal to the abyss Part 1. Introduction and General Comments dbcadien 15 October 2006 (revised 21 November 2011) Introduction The Order Cumacea is a relatively small one, much smaller than either the Order Amphipoda, or the Order Isopoda. Even so, over 1032 described species were listed in the order up to 1992 (Bacescu 1988, 1992), and that number has continued to swell. Most areas of the globe probably contain many undescribed species. If we use a multiplier based on the percentage of undescribed taxa known from the NEP, the world cumacean fauna would be expected to reach well above 1800 eventually. It's members are relatively uniform in size and external form, all looking like small balls or tubes on a stick. This structure results from the presence of a more or less globose carapace (which can become considerably flattened) combined with a tapering thoracic region, and a long narrow abdomen terminating in the two uropods. The flavor of the group is well presented by Stebbing (1893), which while rich in detail, is very readable. Cumaceans are relatively important members of the benthic community, being the second most abundant group of crustaceans retained on a 1mm screen (Barnard and Given 1961). Definition The definition of the order from Schram (1986) is: "Carapace short, fused to at least first three thoracomeres, can fuse with up to six, laterally enclosing a branchial cavity, with lateral lappets that extend anteriad and mediad to form a pseudorostrum; eyes generally fused, located
    [Show full text]
  • Comments on Cumacea for LH - Part 3
    Comments on Cumacea for LH - Part 3. The Family Diastylidae dbcadien 5 November 2006 The Diastylidae is a relatively large family (17 genera and over two hundred species, Bacescu 1992; now grown to 21 genera, Milhlenhardt-Siegel 2003) which is quite common in the NEP, especially in its Arctic and Boreal areas. Eight of these genera occur in the NEP, and are discussed below.. A key to the genera in the family is provided by Jones (1969), but genera from couplet 16 on in that key are now considered to belong in the family Gynodiastylidae (see Day 1980). As one of three families bearing articulated telsons, its members are most often confused with members of the other two, Gynodiastylidae and Lampropidae. This confusion extends to even knowledgeable workers, with some describing lampropids as diastylids (see Gladfelter 1975). The family key provided in the first part of this series should allow appropriate allocation of specimens to families. More of NEP diastylid species are described than was the case with the last family, the bodotriids. Of the 38 diastylids reported from the NEP, only 7 belong to provisional taxa. This is perhaps due to the relatively shallow distribution of bodotriids, into habitats frequently unsampled, while diastylids are commonly found further offshore where they can be easily taken by dredge, core, and trawl. The family also has more affinity for cold waters than does the Bodotriidae, with many of the NEP forms of only Arctic or boreal distribution. Lastly, diastylids tend to be larger than bodotriids, with some of the largest species of cumaceans in the family.
    [Show full text]