Following This Cover Page Are Scanned Images of No-Opposition Summary Judgment Motions and Orders Filed on the Selected Date

Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the selected date. The documents are displayed in no particular order. However, all of these documents are searchable.

To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer.

1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f (Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);

2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the form field provided and press Enter or Return.

In most applications, the first appearance of the index number, the word, or the phrase in the document will be highlighted.

Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications, including browsers and PDF viewers. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ;©iii¥ED) INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION MAY 0S 2015 -x This Document Relates To: PART 50 NYi SUPREME COURT - CIVIL WALLACE S. HANKIN and HELEN NYCAL HANKIN I.A.S. Part 30'Sh (Hon. Peter H. Moulton) Plaintiff(s), Index No.: 190054/2015 -against- NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: NewbAZ/'SYork, New York

AAI. "khuu4 Suzanne Ratcliffe, Esq. Kirsfen Alford Kneis, Esq. WElir/ & LUXENBERG, P.C. KSLL GATES LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) (ttorneys for Defendant 700 Broadway CRANE CO. New York, NY 10003 599 Lexington Avenue (212) 558-5500 New York, NY (212) 536-390'

MAY 19 W5 SO ORDERED duj/5 ' ' Hon.UJ~ Peter H. Moulton COUHÿr,CE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION - > This Document Relates To:

STEPHEN ANZALONE JR. and LORETTA NYCAL ANZALONE, I.A.S. Part yS SO (Hon. Peter H. Moulton) Plaintiff(s), Index No.: 190090/2015 -against- NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO., with respect to named defendants CRANE CO. and

CRANE CO. individually and as successor to PACIFIC VALVES (an unincorporated product line of

MCC Holdings, Inc. identified incorrectly as a subsidiary of Crane Co.)("CRANE CO.") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: ÿY,Lo/S New York, New York jM

Mfcnaef'MÿJaeTiÿoberts,"Roberts, Esq. Kirsten Alford Kneis, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. K&KGATES LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) torneys for Defendant 700 Broadway CRANE CO. New York, NY 10003 599 Lexington Avenue (212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022-6030 (212) 536-3900 SO ORDERED s? filed Hon. Peter H. MouTton fa/is MM \9 ZOfi I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK , COUNTY OF NEW YORK -x INRE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION ---x This Document Relates To: -

ANN MARIE SEDITA, Plairitiff(sj, NYCAL I.A.S. PartÿKf 5~0 (Hon. Sheny KleinIleitlciT"" ÿagainsL, MGN.PETERH.MOULTON IndexjNcf(S).: :ii6£i;6-p . / AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, : NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY eiat, : JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

Defendants.

..s— „ ——-—•—... x. ------WHEREFORE,------defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules ÿSection 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against, defendant CRANE CO. with, prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, th'at upon notice to all co-defendants,, all claimsandcross claims against ' ' I defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated New York, New York

Erik Karst, Esq. KimenAlford Kneis, Esq. KARST & VON OlSTE LLP "" cL-GATES;LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) attorneys for Defendant 19500 State Hwy 249 CRANE CO. Suite.420 599 LexingtonAvenue Houston, TX 77070 New York, NY 10022-6030 (281-970-9988) (212) 536-3900 F is SO ORDERED, . 5fl3ps m cueBK'SOFFKe liiN.petjerh.moulton---- HGT.JUOM.H SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -x m INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION May D x THOMAS H. DAVIS, NYCAL I.A.S. Plaintiffs, Parted S"0 (Hon. Peter H. Moulton) -against- Index No.: 190525-2012 3M CO. (f/k/a MinnesotaMining & Manufacturing NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY Co.), et al., JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

Plaintiffs complaint against ''defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all .claims and cross claims against defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: //I / 15"

. N. Cotilletta, Esq. Kirsten Alford Kneis, Esq. THE LANIER LAW FIRM, PLLC K&£ GATES LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) torneys for Defendant 126 East 56th Street, 6th Floor :raneCO. New York, NY 10022 599 Lexington Avenue (212) 421-2878 New York, NY 10022-6030 (212) 536-3900 r SO ORDERED, Sl's/l6" Hon.Peter H.-Moulton OFFICE ••••*• cTÿv • . U' -Vy *-**"" ÿ -v .••'• \*» -' t:'-' *

;\ i? %> .

*», til r,' ÿ ÿ i. f /F'i f **4. j) ÿ 2p ÿm 2 0 2015-

lif'lK' t * */ YAM a ÿTiQ (;'w,3 , "«oYwiÿoa SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK may m INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION -.....- — > This Document Relates To:

CLIVE K. TAYLOR and CLARICE TAYLOR, NYCAL I.A.S, Partner 50 Plaintiff(s), (Hon. Peter H. Moulton)

Index No.: 190113/2015 -against- NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„ ORDER

Defendants.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: /T W New York, New York

7M/L* Tarmen St. Gforge, Esq. Kirstei/Alford Kneis, Esq, WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C KM/GATES LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys for Defendant 700 Broadway IRANE CO. New York, NY 10003 599 LexingtonAvenue (212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022-6030 (212) 536-3900

SO ORDERED, j'3)/s 0 ffonfPetÿPeter H. Moulton p \ LE m 2015 <

. couÿcÿorncE ÿ r; r.

f*'-»u I J ÿ w • vÿ,'y - fU;or*ÿ ÿOYWyÿ ..«* " SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ' ' COUNTY OF NEW YORK „. V *

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION m n - .!•_ ;-i—-...... -1 ------X This------Document------Relates To: ÿ ------MINARD S. FOSTER and THALIA FOSTER, • T. NYCAL Plaintiff(s), I.A.S. PartjerS"- <> (Hun. 3hcuy Klein HcMse.) PBTERH.MOULTON -against- , Index No.:T90308/14

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, JUDGMENT MOTIONAND as successor-by-merger to BUFFALO'PUMPS, ORDER INC., et'al., " .i

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby.. requests' summary judgment in the above-entitled case, .pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint 'against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no--

. opposition thereto, t.

' s> •> ' i- .- • : ORDERED, that upon notice to all' co-defendants, ; all -claims and cross claims against defendant CRANBCO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with-prejudice ahd without costs.

ÿ Dated: IV I •• W New YorkÿNew York •

Patti Bur'shtyn,:Esq. , ' • • . -: Kirsten Alforti Kneis, Esq: WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PiC. K&IVGATES LLP ? Attorneys for Plaintiff(s), Attorneys for Defendant " : 700;Broadway ÿ V NE CO, " New Yorkÿ NY 10003 ; Y 599 Lexington;Avenue (212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022-6030p, ; (2.12) 536-3900 SO ORDERED, ~ W3/ ----OFFICE PETERH.MOULTON , . ÿ - -,4. ÿ ,

w -'A 4- ÿyH. : 0 ÿ';ÿ•>' -ÿr' '•% "• : .3 • '<) 4

' .'' ' <, *ÿ •" • ' ° ÿ c..-,-> ; v \ ÿ••; -• ÿ i- ;:v4,;4 ÿ '4 4 4 -, : ti ' =' - V; . >• C ÿ- '& .. . V ' . ÿ ' ; 0 • -S. .ÿ.,- *' . & v 'ÿ ÿ ' l?.f. '40 '.< 4 .•ÿ ' 44 ,i . - f 0 * ,00:0,.:0:

*ÿ, • 'i v ÿ? / 4 . 0 • ÿ ÿ ÿ 40 Y. ÿ . % 4 > 0ÿ

4 ÿ ÿ000'''' 0 -• 0: Ft '• ,,,-• WÿIOÿiWWLMail- f c. 00 V

4 ' 4 - . .? 0 &

.* 'f c>.0 .40

£0 . - 0 0,

A \ *0

ÿ 0. . ( v: v/v 4 0 'rv. ÿ 0;4 0 00 ..r*. *"ÿ /: V0 0' -0 . -sj 0-'- .0

ÿ•ÿ' 7 ÿ/ÿ • * & 0 •<ÿ ' a 00 ÿ- ?.'. ÿ'> - 0000 0/* 4 ' :0 * -4'. f- 00X 0 0 % 4 4 V ' '"' 0 . 0.0~?"/ 4 v 4 ' ;4..4' -V '\ "'4'!ÿ' 'ÿ'. . ..-v 0V 4. ' -'-ÿÿÿ• • •ÿÿ *ÿ ÿ ; „ . Af ÿ ÿ ...... ÿi .-j; . _,:r-y , * ~ 000- >4 4 *y ÿ : ÿ

0 4 ÿ •

' ÿ4 V> ' 0

• ÿ 0'..4 ÿ', '• ÿ» *ÿ{-'•- .'• •;V :t.. v . I- v •- i. e . •..*: • .. 1 -• • • • ®-' ' 0 4 ; •* 4; 'V . <ÿ0 -i ...V • ÿ ÿ ' • 4-V 'ÿ 'ÿ ÿ " ' ' ÿ0.':ÿ'••••ÿ- •ÿ:•ÿÿ ;..ÿ<4 , - 0"s-- - .. ... 4 . MftY-08-2015 16:0? P.04'

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW/YORK '

SALVATOR MURABITO and'GIOVANNA MURABITO, .v. .Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION vs; SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER AERCO INTERNATIONAL, et al., Index No. 190081-13 Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant AWMCO, INC. hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, rs ' ÿ . dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant AWMCO, INC. with prejudice and

without costs, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that , upon notice to all co-defendants* all claims and cross-claims

against defendant AWMCO, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without oosts.

DATED: Buffalo,New York December S .2014

jh P. wifiiams, ''Ryan L. Gellman, Esq. )SEPH P. WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES, P.C. , COLUCCI 8c GALLAHER, P.C. Lttorneys for Plaintiffs " Attorneys for Defendant 245 Park Avenue - AWMCO, Inc. New York, New York 10167 2000 Liberty Building (212) 668-1122 424 Main Street Buffalo, New York 14202-3695

(716) 853-4080 ; SO ORDERED:

X HON. PETER H. MOULTON ' J.S.C,

TOTAL P.04- KQTJUOM. H R3T31MOH °rÿu0Q 1 r- j'

SUPREME COURT OFTHE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK J

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION -X may © This Document Relates To: SUpXgtoi*lS0 RICHARD A. HIDDIE and SHIRLEY HIDDIE, NYCAL I.A.S. Partÿtf 5"0 Plaintiffs), (Hon. Qliuriy Klein Ilittler) peterh.moulton Index No.: 119850-1998 -against- NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND A. C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG ORDER CONTRACTING AND SUPPLY), et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC., formerly known as Square

D Company, (hereinafter "SQUARE D"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, . pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant

SQUARE D. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant SQUARE D. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated; New York, New York

Frank Ortiz, Esq. KirsteiflAlfordKneis, Esq: WEITZ & LUXENBI K&I/GATES LLP .. Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys for Defendant 700 Broadway . .HNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC. New York, NY 10003 (f/k/a SQUARE D COMPANY) (212) 558-5500 599 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10022-6030 (21.2) 536-3900 r SO ORDERED, m 19 dein ffertle*- S/l3/lS .PEfERH.MOULTON cwssr" I

' J

: v

mokioom,hmim.wan

S''.

ÿ7? rxi; . /? 'ÿ

' ' "1 .. vjj ÿ ' 'ÿ$

i! :*' i/i, "SV\ ~V

'-0ÿ 2'ÿriye;; - 5 MBr-y W'3M £.OT SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE:'NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION m - 1 This Document Relates To:

WILFRED L. HINES JR. and NOREENANN NYCAL HINES, I.A.S. Partyt go (Hon. Sherey-Kfciii Heitler)- Plaintiff(s), •PETERH.MOULTON Index No.: 116038-2006 -against- NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants. .... x WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

Frank Ortiz, Esq. Kirsten Alford Kneis, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. K&L GfATES LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys for Defendant 700 Broadway CRANE CO. New York, NY 10003 599 LexingtonAvenue (212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022-6030 (212) 536-3900

SO ORDERED, FILED MAY 19 2015 MOULTON COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK MK/Vi • ( ';ÿ/ -Xfl'/UA C'.' 'fchK'y ys§onrxoM Oi-i'lCh •WA JS ijÿ '**• 4:::, - 3 j:> •ÿ>. H ÿ

<4* V, c v; 'ÿ * cSrÿ si r~

S@£4*b£ilB& fi' HOnriOW

vfy1AY *04 2015 • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK , COUNTY OF NEW YORK m

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION ...... * X This Document Relates To:

MICHELANGELO SCIMECA and LAURA NYCAL SCIMECA, I.A.S. Part>efS"0 (Hon. Sherry ÿKlcinTIcitlor) Plaintiff(s), Index No.: 1022 -against- NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY A.C. and S., INC., (ARMSTRONG JUDGMENT MOTIONAND CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), et al., ORDER

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to vCivil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, ORDERED, that upon...... notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Dated: \\ NevÿYork t

ÿ O* Frank Ortiz, Esq. KirsteiyAlford Kneis, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. K&L/jATESLLP Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys for Defend; 700 Broadway CEANE CO. New York, NY 10003 599 LexingtonAvenue (212) 558-5500 New York, NY'10022-6030 (212) 536-3900

SO ORDERED, 5 F ÿHenÿhmiy KleinHcitlor ÿ //?/«"

yiOU'ÿOM.HJfcfW V

MWSSSt f <0ÿ1

ÿ< ÿ « 1 / » -A A

ÿ's

-•VI i'iOM -, y».- jJq y-( ÿ/«. yp. yiOi » a<1(ÿW3H' Q-'f

l SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK m m INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

JEAN AMBROSINO, NYCAL I.A.S. Part Plaintiff(s), .fflon. Sherry Kfem Ilcitler)- K©N.PETERH.MOULTON Index No.: 112729-2001 -against- NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND A.C. and S. INC. (ARMSTRONG MOTION ORDER CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), et al„

• Defendants.

' 1 opposition thereto, ÿ I ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Dated: "(VvM I\ Q ÿ ÿ0 \ 3 New York, New York.

Frank Ortiz, Esq. KirstenrAlford Kneis, Esqy WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P C. K&L/GATES LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) Atjdrneys for Defendant 700 Broadway WE CO. New York, NY 10003 599 Lexington Avenue (212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022-6030 (212) 536-3900

SO ORDERED, F IL orh-Shcrry-KlciirlIcitlci' * PETERH;MOULTON cooÿrlcE ,v< Atj; :j/

MAY © 4 2015

_v _ SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK m INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION MAY - --> This Document Relates To:

JOSEPH MUNNELLY; nYcal I.A.S. ParÿKj'S"ÿ Plaintiff(s), (Lion. Shcrry-Klci h®n.pbti N -against- index No.: 190415-2011

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND Defendants. ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendants CRANE CO. and PACIFIC VALVES, improperly sued as

"PACIFIC VALVES, Individually and as subsidiary of CRANE CO." (hereinafter "CRANE

CO.") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. y y with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York#New York

Frank Ortiz, Esq. Kirstea Alford Kneis, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. K&L/GATES LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys for Defenda: 700 Broadway IE CO. New York, NY 10003 599 LexingtonAvenue (212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022-6030 (212) 536-3900 F !LE SO ORDERED, 2015 Han Shprry K-tein Hp.itlp.r_ sjnj/s m 19 OFFICE COUNTY CLEBK| moulton NEW YORK j. ÿ i .Jf.O'iiuOM,HXSltW? ..kotl

is« ' ' . * i-

S''7"'° ':'>'<''ÿ',0. -W ** v !•/}' ;-J0 MOTJUOf SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK m D INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION - > This Document Relates To:

ROSE ANGELA KALACHMAN, as Administratrix for the Estate of MELVIN KALACHMAN, and ROSE.ANGELA NYCAL KALACHMAN,"Individually, I.A.S. PartÿS"0 -fllou. Qlieiiy Kiel Plaintiff(s); H0N.PBT1 Index No.: 108198-1999

-against- NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER A.C. and S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), et al.,

Defendants. ( x WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED,,that upon notice to all co-defendants, all/claims and cross claims against defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

ÿÿNavvTor Nev

Frank Ortiz, Esq. , Alford Kneis, Es$ WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. L&L GATES LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys for Defendant 700 Broadway CRANE CO. New York, NY 10003 ÿ . 599 Lexington Avenue (212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022-6030 (212)536-3900 F SO ORDERED, NLftf 19 m-Hÿitler., -rvrLEBK'SOFBCE tPETERH.MOULTON toOWl&LEK HT WOnriOW!

MAY'® 4 2015 ( : • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK m o INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION ------—- -> This Document Relates------To: ROSE ANGELA KALACHMAN, as Administratrix for the Estate of MELVIN NYCAL KALACHMAN, and ROSE ANGELA I.A.S. 0 KALACHMAN,Individually, Parted -S (Hon. Sherry KleinHeftier)— Plaintiff(s), HON.PETERH.moulton Index No.: 190240-2009

-against- NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., J ' Defendants. —- -—x WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO- with . prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs. ' T-UOO! Dated:

Frank Ortiz, Esq. \ Kirstej/Alford Kneis, Esq, WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. AGATES LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs) fbrneys for Defendant 700 Broadway CRANE CO. New York, NY 10003 599 LexingtonAvenue (212)558-5500 New York, NY 10022-6030 (212) 536-3900 SO ORDERED, LED Ion. Shorry KlemTTcitlcr ÿ ÿJl3 f I 2015 I.PETERH.MOULTON MM .19 COUNTY CLERKÿ OFFICE NEW YORK ÿX

% rr> • Sv ' » o

um ,f»£ >** \ÿ£fs m k SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -x m IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION © - ...... > This Document Relates To:

WILFRED L. HINES JR. and NOREENANN NYCAL HINES, I.A.S. Part 41Ion. ShcrryK:lcin Ilcitfer)-— Plaintiff(s), HON.PETERH.MOULTON Index No.: 119847-1998 -against- NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER A.C. AND S. INC., (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING AND SUPPLY), et ah, Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO; with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissedwith prejudice and without costs. Dated: 'ÿ0ÿ yddbid Frank Ortiz, Esq. KirstenAlford Kneis, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. K&IyGATES LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys' for Defendan 700 Broadway CRANE CO. 1 New York, NY 10003 599 Lexington Avenue (212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022-6030 (212) 536-3900

SO ORDERED, FILED may 19 2015 PETERH.M0U170N COUNTS CLERKS OFFICE NEW YORK

ÿ( sioz yo xwi

WQTJUOM ,M SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION m $20 This Document Relates To:

JOSEPH C. MCKENDRY, NYCAL I.A.S. PartyfSO Plaintiff(s), (Hon. Peter H. Moulton)

Index No.: 113335/2001 -against- NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., ORDER

Defendants. -...... — — — - x WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, IS ew York

Erik Jacobs, Esq. Kirsten/Alford Kneis, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERO, P.C. K&KGATES LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys for Defendant 700 Broadway JRANE CO. New York, NY 10003 99 Lexington Avenue (212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022-6030 (212) 536-3900 PILED SO ORDERED, ÿhTrmHon. PeterPp H. Moulton SMIS wi.ZM- COUNTY CLERK'SÿOFFICE ...... NEW YORK *n0Y W3M, *)

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK NYCAL INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Heilltu, J.}~ Index No: 190082/ This Document Relates to:

NO OPPOSITION 3uiviivi/\i\i IRWINMORRISand SANDRA MORRIS JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York 5 |II .2015

Frank Ortiz, Esq. (v/v< Judith A. Yavf/z, Esq, WEITZ & LUXENBERG, F.C. DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Union Carbide Corporation 700 Broadway 116 East 27th Street, 12th Floor New York, NY 10038 New York, NY 10016 (212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, on.wierry K" Heitlpr. 19 [email protected] mm ofBCE ,TV clerks

.-t " • v 'ÿ -i

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITY NYCAL , _ m.Q.S A ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Heitler, ÿlUN.Dr_„ÿ PETERH.MOULTONL1UN This Doeument Relates to: Index No:i: 117884-00

RONALD RESUA ancLSUSAN RESUA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Amchem Products, Inc., with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon noticeto all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem:Prbductsiÿ.Ihb';j be;and the same are hereby dismissed.with prejudice and

without costs. - : .

Dated: New York, New York yj?; ,20i£6 ' (jicQsÿ Franlc Ortiz, Judith A.|Yayitz,;Esq;/Graig Blau,- Esq. Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. " DARGeI ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, " ' Attorneys for Plairitiff LLP -'u ÿ 700 Broadway . : Attorneys for Amchem Products, Inc. New York, NY 10003 116 Ea:st 27th'Street, .12th Floor " (212) 558-5500 . . New York, NY 10016 (212) 452-5300

• A' v

SO. ORDERED, ..ÿIdif.-Shcfry K. Hoitlor lidkpfiTERH. MOULTON MM W

/- -v /" • :*ÿ ÿ .

.. | '

ÿ !. ; ..

5 . | 'JOUI.YM* .. ; /' 'I " . \ 1-V-- WOTJUOiM[.t

v ;3 -**¥3 ;? "V mgi- •!%; ; tycnuuoMjuBrnn

-'::Jri"lO <ÿ;'>/ ti.Ij.'J

vV3 !.*:•ÿ v-, v.',u .J.:, .:v TMc:CC(jpk) 11/20/14 m SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK NYCAL INRE:NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 3, ASBESTOS LITIGATION,

IDEXNO. THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 105718/02 and 112292/02

BoydWeller NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company ofNew York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company ofNew York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company ofNew York, Inc.,be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York *7.* . Peter Tambini, Esq. Timothy 1ÿ/McCann,Esq. - WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. DAVID M. SANTORO, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant 700 Broadway Consolidated Edison Company of New New York, NY 10003 York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598

SO ORDERED: Hon. Sliejuy Klein HeiCfer r//r//r Our File No S-6060-02 F 1i-E HON.PETERH.MOULTON MM 1» 2015 o°ÿrHCE - --•js:fÿ~y "v.f-; * • 'ÿ»: :

\l;-A;";'v - ••• . •' -\ ,J . V " - V : \ *. • :••' \ •; j 15

-'A.-' .>• sV\ ~\ ÿ'ÿ • Vv>;ÿ. j '

Ii! A ' ÿ HOXJUOM-H&3T'.H MOM. :A\i

ÿ' ; J ' ÿ•/O; vv-iiH TMc:CC(jpk) 7/17/14 M/\y m SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK n COUNTY OF NEW YORK NYCAL INRE:NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part ASBESTOS LITIGATION, (Hoitlop,1J.'

DEaNO. THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 106973/08

Austin Joerger NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company ofNew York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: ew York 7, 3ÿ/j

Peter T&Qibini, Esq. Timothy Jÿ/McCann, Esq. WEITZ &LUXENBERG, P.C. DAVID M. SANTORO, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant 700 Broadway Consolidated Edison Company ofNew New York, NY 10003 York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598

SO ORDERED: ÿ6on. SMSrry KloinHeitler Our File No S-4075-08

HON.PETERH.MOULTON MAX 19 hotjuom.hmim.mom

ÿ ' : /.J- •• . 0'-t\ 7* ' ' d

TMc:CC(jpk) 3/13/15

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ; COUNTY OF NEW YORK ... . i m NYCAL INRE:NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S.Part ASBESTOS-LITIGATION, •(Hrillei, J.) :

INDEX NO. THIS DOCUMENT'RELATES TO: 106972/08

Thomas Franzone NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

. WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing,plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company ofNew York, Inc.,be and the same are hereby

dismissed'with prejudice apd,without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

David J.'Dai'ij", Esq. Timothy IÿMcCann, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P:C. DAVID.M.:SANTORO, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff' , Attorney for Defendant 700 Broadway Consolidated Edison Company of New New York, NY 10003 .: York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598

SOORDERED: s/'t/is Hon.gjferry EleinTIoitlof . Our File"No HON.PETERH.MOULTON S-4077-08 »<<

7? » •

, 'V' c-T ÿ ,t •

. .v. .- v...

•! '. •ÿ•• nr.- :-.:ÿ•ÿÿ • - -k - :'ÿ SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -X NYCAL m InRe NEW YORK-COUNTY I.A.S. Part M/\y ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Hoittor, Jr). -X This document relates to: Index No.: 190355/10

MARC ROSE, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY Plaintiff, JUDGMENT MOTIONAND -against- ORDER AS TO DEFENDANT KEELER-DORR OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al. KEELER/DORR- OLIVER BOILER Defendant. COMPANY -X

WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Da«=d:±ÿS Harrison,New York Q Joanna 1 WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 3 HUN < Attorneysfor Plaintiff Attorneys 700 Broadway ZELER/UORR-t R BOILER New York, New York 10003 COMPANY (212)558-55,00' 500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501 Harrison,New York 10528 (212) 661-1151 SO ORDERED. p LEÿ T

ft /

woTJ'JOM-HaardH.ww

ÿ i , 'i. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK Index No.: InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

ROY W. McELMOYL,

Plaintiff(s), NO OPP< SUMMARY - against - MO!iUJ>

AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the.same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.

Dated: KqrcVl •3VV",2015 New York, New York

3. vocih Jordan D. Beltz, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE Attorneys for Plaintiff SINGER & MAHONEY,LTD. 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant New York, NY 10003 Aurora Pump Company (212) 558-5500 ; 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100 New York, NY 10022 (212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED, ÿHon: Sherry Klcin-IIeiilei HON.PETERH.MOULTON r • -v

V/ ' E C II W IR\ / ,, APR 1 7 2015 K: Segal IVicCambridge Singer & Mahoney, Ltd New York NY KiOTiUOi/i-H$31 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK . '• -X InRe; NEW. YORK CITY NYCAL % ASBESTOS LITIGATION c I.A, S. Part 5 (Moulton,f.) -X This document relates to: Index No.: 107446/07

JAMES WOODS NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER -X

WHEREAS, Defendant EXTECO, f/k/a THERMO ELECTRIC ("EXTECO") requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against EXTECO, without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

EXTECO, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York April 30 ,2015

Jamÿs M. Kramer, Esq. Jason Riemer, Esq. LEVY KONIGSBERG LLP HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN, 800 Third Avenue, 11th Floor DUNST & DOUKAS, LLP New York, NY 10022 1345 Avenue of the Americas Counselfor Plaintiff New York, NY 10105 Counselfor Exteco

SO ORDERED, Honfreter H. Moulton F

{00360128.DOCX}. '* \

.t. V . - > ÿ** \ ' >V">ÿ x

x *•

ÿ ( 'ji ' ' -* *1 J: t ; v. " f i . i

ÿ W, minor '-f "V7f SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 112729/01 JEAN AMBROSINO 12136/99

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, BMCE Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant BMCE Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: moo -23

At No Maria Attorneys for Defendant 700 Broadway - 7th floor BMCE Inc. New York, NY 10003 Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED, 'eter H. Moulton

OCUKNgSS* «<,,UAr SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK © COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION SUPREME court

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 115177/05 RANDI ALBERTELLI, as Executrix for the Estate of HOWARD ROTHMAN NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant BMCE Inc:, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. DATED: iMlCk 22*. ,2015

Attorneys for Plaintiff Jennifer M. Roberts Weitz & Luxenberg Attorneys for Defendant 700 Broadway - 7th floor BMCE Inc. New York, NY 10003 Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED, ion. Peter H. Moulton

MAY 19 2015 OFFICE COUNTYC° CLERK'S NEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK m COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION ÿ*a5K*>

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 102246/00 MICHELANGELO SCIMECA and LAURA SCIMECA

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant BMCE Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: ,2015

Attorneys fqrPlaintiff Jennifer M. Roberts Weitz & Luxenberg Attorneys for Defendant 700 Broadway - 7th floor BMCE Inc. New York, NY 10003 Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED, S7/97/S Hon; Peter H. Moulton

m 19 2015 OFFICE COUNTVC CLERKS NEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK m d COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 108701/00 LINDA YORK as Administratrix for the Estate of ALFRED H. RAINER NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant BMCE Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: ,2015

A- Attorneys for Plaintiff -pf Jennifer M. Roberts Weitz & Luxenberg Attorneys for Defendant 700 Broadway - 7th floor BMCE Inc. New York, NY 10003 Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 a Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED, Hon. Peter H. Moulton

: ÿ • &»=. A f ""

""M I; W 4?''

:V D SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK May COUNTY OF NEW YORK ÿ1SUp*£MERLS0 IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 122138/01 ELISE YARCZOWER, as Administratrix for the Estate of 102724/02 ARNOLD YARCZOWER, and ELISE YARCZOWER, Individually NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in i the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, BMCE Inc.-, with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant BMCE Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

I*"" DATED: ,2015

!I. AttomeyjRolÿFtaibtiff Noriel Sta. Maria Weitz & Luxenf Attorneys for Defendant 700 Broadway - 7th floor BMCE Inc. New York, NY 10003 Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED, 'HdmÿPeti Peter Moulton FILE lilSN.PETERH.MOMLTON m 19 "•BfS"™ ÿ • •» V .A .v ÿ ' Ss, p r PPr HV. >J': i 4 • -V ' /

••"> 't irtiKr! 'JkHOfc

r/J J $ Xl$~ " ' kp: k It*iff?:]. •if.. . : P&t . /ÿ

ÿ ; • -i

• '•r-

-y

' - i> .">! • I? ':pr. ÿ '*>' ,k

ÿJ-i ' .

v: 'i ' '

7- ÿ ÿ

' ' ÿ "' :r-£- • * X 4 . s '& * i 4-:

ÿ : ;vrn ÿ- y.:u v. - i -r/ ..• .;• •:•• ' " - r' ' ' '• • yy ÿ V- ÿ """ \ . i. Xpp .. ' . A rP$' ;» :: 1 A''-;- «ÿ••-. ÿ;<. i-r :: v-* I •/' ' ' ' ÿÿÿ' ' 'ÿÿ ÿ " ÿ ' ' - a : •>'•• ' ..v . .. . • •'ÿÿ} ' : ÿ ÿ ' V, 1«V ? . V- r\f(i : ,T; -. y' '-i, .. i " • ÿ/* ' . ». fi'

V\ V X /* / ÿ

. .:?ÿ

,'A ÿ

y-v'-V.-'-.s y , . . ,-)

: • :

. i' . • 4 ÿ

r , «/ ' .* : ic,W\ -rx'* f',j ..Ss-X \ '• - i-.' >- . • • iV -4 - •jrÿ; • V4ri"!' '' •'-.-ÿv -.v' - f.v'.; .ifl.

ii ÿ • 'f ' %: mp'ÿ ÿ •: , 'f- \xxxx X'pX/OP; p/xx- vx/'- c '-v v . ' ';-

\ / ÿ

: ; &ÿÿÿ v'-" '

-O

••ÿ ÿvv'- ' y...; > -'AA ÿ ÿ ;ÿ r- • • ; • . ÿ: £ d' 'ÿ :y .v -.A v. :.yv 'W.Vy-: .. ;,. .. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION supreme

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 113335/01 JOSEPH C. MC KENDRY

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant BMCE Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DAT 2015

AttPl iV JA

SO ORDERED, Hon. Peter H. Moulton iw'ii*

itv clews OFFICE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 124229/02 SALVATORE MALTA, as Personal Representative for the Estate of THOMAS MALTA and SALVATORE MALTA, as Personal Representative for the Estate of NO OPPOSITION LOUISE MALTA SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant BMCE Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. DATED: ffl fllT Ia *23 ,2015

Attorneys for PlaintiffÿJÿjÿ Jennifer M. Roberts Weitz & Luxenberg Attorneys for Defendant 700 Broadway - 7th floor BMCE Inc. New York, NY 10003 Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED Hon. Peter H, Moulton

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK m COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 122549/01 PATRICIA ANN HUTNICK PASTORE, as Executrix for the Estate of PAUL M. HUTNICK JR. NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant BMCE Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: ÿ ,2015 Si Attorneys for Plaintiff Noriel Sta. Maria Weitz & Luxenberg Attorneys for Defendant 700 Broadway - 7th floor BMCE Inc. New York, NY 10003 Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED, €j/#//ÿ Hon. Peter H. Moultdri

19 CLERK'S OFFICE

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK m

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 119847/98 WILFRED L. HINES JR. and NOREEN ANN HINES 116038/06

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant BMCE Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: (\V)((> *>3 ,2015

Attorneys for Plaintiff Norief sta. Maria \A/eitz & Luxenberg Attorneys for Defendant 700 Broadway - 7th floor BMCE Inc. New York, NY 10003 Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED, Hon. Peter H. Moulton

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION supreme THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 115544/04 CATHY G. CRUSE, as Executrix for the Estate RICHARD A. GEORGE NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, BorgWarner Morse TEC, Inc., as successor-byÿ merger to Borg-Warner Corporation ("Morse TEC"), hereby requests summary ' judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Morse TEC, with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

, r ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Morse TEC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. DATED: HJ4 ,2015

Attorneys for Plaintiff NorierSta.*Maria Weitz M-uxenberg Attorneys for DefendantDef 700 Broadway - 7th floor BorgWarner Morse TEC, Inc., as New York, NY 10003 suceessor-by-merger to Borg-Warner Corporation Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED ran. Peter H. Moulton

OFFICE m SUPREME COURT Op THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 115544/04 CATHY G. CRUSE, as Executrix for the Estate RICHARD A. GEORGE NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant BMCE Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: ,2015

Attorneys for Plaintifhÿ=f fÿVS Noriel sta. Maria Weitz & Luxenberg Attorneys for Defendant 700 Broadway - 7th floor BMCE Inc. New York, NY 10003 Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED, THon. Peter H. Moulton I) SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK m COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 110942/02 BRUCE DUSHARM & SANDRA DUSHARM

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant BMCE Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: JINnrfk ,2015

A Attorneys for Plaintiff fl Noriel Sta. Maria Weitz & Luxenberg Attorneys for Defendant 700 Broadway - 7th floor BMCE Inc. New York, NY 10003 Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED, Ion. Peter H. Moulton sjnjis

W V® m office

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK m © COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 111360/99 JOSEPH RONALD SHANLEY

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant BMCE Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: ftVUf Id 7.3 ,2015 fl- Attorneys for Plaintiff |

SO ORDERED, Hon. Peter H. Moulton rjif/is-

19 ZQft

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 102916/00 MICHAEL SOLOMON and GERTRUDE SOLOMON

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, BorgWarner Morse TEC Inc. as successor-by-merger to Borg-Warner Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "BorgWarner"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, BorgWarner, with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant BorgWarner, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without .costs.

DATED:

/ Anna M. DiLonardo \ Attorneys for Defendant 700 Broadway - 7th floor BorgWarner Morse TEC Inc. as New York, NY 10003 successor-by-merger to Borg-Warner Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "BorgWarner") Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED Hon. Peter H. Moulton

*©Si may SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK i3J015 COUNTY OF NEW YORK nys so COURT - CIVIL IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 190520/11 EVA TOY, Individually and as Personal Representative for the Estate of CHARLES H. TOY NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant,ÿBorgWarner Morse TEC Inc. as successor-by-merger to Borg-Warner Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Morse TEC"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Lavy-and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Morse TEC, with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Morse TEC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. DATED: 4 ,2015

Attorneys for Plaintiff nAftC&'HfCJennifer M. Roberts Weitz & Luxenberg ' Attorneys for Defendant 700 Broadway 7th floor BorgWarner Morse TEC Inc. as New York, NY 10003 successor-by-merger to Borg-Warner Corporation Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED, Hon. Peter H. Moulton

19 Off*06 TMc:CC(jpk) J.1/20/14 ÿ / i

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE-OF NEW YORK ...... COUNTY OF NEW YORK . ÿ - - -- .....- - " " " " n;ÿ ÿ — "

INDEX NO. THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 190355/10

Marc Rose NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment inthe above-entitledcase, pursuant to'Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff s complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company ofNew York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED,.that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company ofNew York, Inc.,be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Frank Ortiz,Esqr 'Timothy McCann, Esq. . WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. DAVID M.SANTORO, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff , ' Attorney for Defendant 700 Broadway Consolidated Edison Company of New New York, NY 10003 . York, Inc. j-

, 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598

SO ORDERED: Tfon Sherry Klein Heitlerÿ Our File No S-4151-10 PETERH.MOULTOl/ /> T .....'-'.i. -Jÿÿ&ÿ;; ip;. v QC: A.Vl" Ov £f#'[

* v:ÿ.:(v:;K:ÿs."V:;vCiX am;-;JK;hx;:ÿ gj?q- >*• Oi;'X. ;x t it-'™.' •&ÿ•> v-;:-;V"-'0 jy:vc;jpÿrrir.oÿr

conÿj ok: ?:..' i/v i/i-:' /.- ; ÿ<•ÿ*•;/',>* t-r.HrA.v !:x>K

K:0/K.KG0 ; SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY1OF NEW YORK —x INRE NEW YORK CITY. NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.$. Part 50/ (Moulton,|f)

MILES R. PEDERSEN and JOSEPHINE PEDERSEN, Index No. 115822/01 111222/01 Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT . A.C. and S., INC., including, MORSE-DIESEL MOTIONAND ORDER ' . INTERNATIONAL;INC.'; ,

Defendants,

WHEREFORE, Defendant-Morse Diesel, Inc. (incorrectly riamed'herein as "Morse-Diesel International, Inc."),hereby requests summary judgment inthe above-rentitled ease, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules S.ection-3212,"dismissing.plaintiffs'''complaint against defendant' Morse Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., be and thesame are hereby dismissed with.prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New YorlcNew York 5jK .2015

Suzanne Matchffe, Esq. ''ff-' Erika.L. Eraenkel,Esq! . /WEITÿ& LUXENBERG, PC. ' MALABY & BRADLEY,LLC Attorneysfor Plaintiffs Attorneysfor Defendant Miles R. Pedersen andJosephine Pedersen Morse Diesel, Inc. 700 Broadway ; 150 Broadway, Suite 600 New York, New York. 10003 NewYork, New York 10038

(212) 558-5500 (212)791-0285 <ÿ .

SO ORDERED, •Dated: 5 /ÿS" Hortÿeter H.' Mouiton: .' )?f.- p ,-&5

INRE NEW YORK CITY. NYCAL ÿ ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. PartMlÿO \ (4fcitler, J..) HON.PETERH.MOULTON MARC ROSE and MARILYN ROSE, Index No. 190355/10

Plaintiffs, . ÿISO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., including, MORSE DIESEL, INC.

v Defendants,

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled case:, pursuant to.Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,-dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendanfMorse,Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being-no opposition thereto, ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against-defendant Morse Diesel, Inc.", be and the same,are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, Ne\y York " ft '2015 .

Matthew Maclntyre; Esq. d L. Mendelsohn, Esq.. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC. & BRADLEY, LLC Attorneysfor Plaintiffs • Attorneysfor Defendant Marc Rose andMarilyn,Rose Morse Diesel, Inc. ' 700 Broadway 150 Broadway, Suite 600 New York, New York- 10003 New York, New York 10038 (212) 558-5500 ÿ (212) 791-0285

SO ORDERED Dated: IL o

PETERH.MOULTON \

K * -

ÿ A' S>" *> " \*oTAun\£Aim:m<\MQti y \ *

t *

.->ÿ ,ÿ' cv '• "\/ >A ÿ*J/cr.v i tf0vji30i/..HflHW.K0H ÿrh/<) w. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY .: NYCAL ' ASBESTOS LITIGATION .

This .Document relates to: ! Index No. 112522/06 GERARD E. SCIIIAVO, m ... Plaintiffs, m i NO OPPOSITION

, -against- •| SUMMARY paRt JUDGMliWsSo Smp~- 1 MOTION AND ORDER A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc.,hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc.,with prejudice inthis action, and there being no opposition thereto, • .

ORDERED, that upon notice to . all co-defendants,' all claims and cross claims against defendant Peerless Industries,Inc.,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.

Dated: New York, New York l- 4

Philip JAO'Rourke, Esq. Charles Ferguson; Esq. Y vnVV Q Attorney for Defendant Attorney for Plaintiff(s) Peerless Industries, Inc. Gerard E. Schiavo Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard.& Smith LLP Weitz & LuxEnberg,P.C. 77 Water Street, 21st Floor 700 Broadway New York, New York 10005 New York, NY 10003 212.232.1300 212.558.5800 File No. 1863.11913

SO ORDERED, SÿIII •Hon.;Peter H; Moulton

V'L 00ÿ ÿ

4851-8266-3969.1 ÿ ; •:V: • V "> • - -t; ,-ÿ .vVV.; ; ;-V" -..

•? « ..

: .. ÿ v'

ÿ•' ' r '" '" ' '&• ÿ->«- ' fi;': - r\ .•;ÿ••'-

7. ÿ 1 w' . . *£&. r;J

i: \ ' \ \-; Vj<- ÿ' ' • ÿ'ÿÿ••y>9'1-Q ° x ' '

• ,• t'V~ . \ ... -1--S W -

' *k«v < / ,, % By ÿ 'RECEIVED LEWISBRISBOfS ' LEWIS8RI5BOIS*' '--,r MAY 1 1 BISGAARD &'SMITH LLP SiSGM/?0& SMITH LLP ivÿ% 2015 APR 212015 itOi.

ÿ ÿÿVi.SS:. aw*.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ÿ COUNTY OF NEW YORK - ÿ INRE: NEW YORK CITY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Partÿerÿi (Heitler,ÿ.) © JAMES R. REYNOLDS and JEAN REYNOLDS, Index No. 113781/2 Plaintiffs,

-against- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & AS TO DEFENDANT SUPPLY), et al„ PEERLESS INDUSTRIES.INC.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law;and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES!INC.,with prejudice inthis action, and there being no Opposition thereto,

ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all Claims and cross claims against defendant PEERLESSINDUSTRIES,INC.,be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York K ÿ I

RebekanLee, EsqT y, Esq. Attorney for Defendant ey/for Plaintiffs Peerless Industries,Inc. .Reynolds and Jean Reynolds Lewis BrisboisBisgaard& Smith LLP Weitz & Luxenberg,P.C. 77 Water Street, 21st FloOr 700 Broadway New York, New York 10005 New York, New York 10003 (212) 232-1300 (212) 558-5500 Filefto..39510.taagyaH

SO ORDERED lff\c£ 4f&Hr. fjhiii.yKlein Ileltlei— coÿeÿCLSS*®? 4828-6856-9378.1 MOULTOH fc ÿ r*T s ' 4:1; i: mmuTi®WQt$mmT • ,, j -' ' T '/W w 12016 BISGAARD & SMITH LLP APR 06 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK INRE: NEW YORK CITY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Partÿ0S"O (Heitler, J.; SHARY LICHTENSTEIN, as Administratrix for the Estate of STUART MOSS, Index No. 106979/2008 Plaintiffs,

-against- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., AS TO DEFENDANT PEERLESS INDUSTRIES.INC. Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES,INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC.,with prejudice in this action, and;there being no opppsition thereto,

ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant PEERLESSINDUSTRIES,INC.,be andthe same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Q—aut-JL- Heather Janis Gaw, Esq. . David J. Dairy, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Attorney for Plaintiffs Peerless Industries,Inc. , Sharry Lichtenstein, as Administratrix for the LewisBrisbois BisgAard&:Smith LLP Estate of Stuart Moss 77 Water Street, 21st Floor Weitz & Luxenberg,P.C. New York, New York 10005 700 Broadway (212)232-1300 New York, New.York 10003 File No. 1863.12051 (212) 558-5500..

SO ORDERED ÿHuii. Sheiiy, Hcitlcc Kidli —s

: . -I UJVhOriQ ' F ujHnMi A iAA£>2!6 WWl**®6 Cl£BKSOFHCe 48 15-4848-13 13.1 I ~ >(S

' .'7 I ! • :; '

CS&-, W/ 'ÿ WOTJUOM.w 8 RECEIVED Br MAY 112015 . ÿ LEWIS BRISBOIS J? f vau BISGAARD & SMffH LLP

APk b ~ SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ; m

INRE NEW YORK CITY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION \ , I.A.S. Part38*0 (Hoitlor, J.) .

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 120902/02, 113279/02

NO OPPOSITION THADDEUS M. KOZLOWSKI SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

-x -V

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment inthe . above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc.,with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto, ; ( ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant Morse Diesel,.Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

COStS. • ÿ

Dated:i: New YorkÿNewYorker York :

Adam RaffojlEsq; Rosario Chetta, Esq. . WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC. MALADY & BRADLEY,LLC Attorneysfor Plaintiff(s) Attorneysfor Defendant ' Ttoddeus M. Kozlowski Morse Diesel, Inc. 700 Broadway 150 Broadway, Suite 600 New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10038 (212) 558-5500 (212)791-0285 "

SO ORDERE Dated: S//ÿ9 //S~ Hon. Sherry KleinIIcrtfeT j-far) : M&r UMou PETERH.MOULTON ÿ ...

o--h ÿ •:• - \ iDR-ln o ' V ' ' 'ÿ :' V ÿ'.•ÿ" "•''. 'ÿÿ ''O'pU:. •' ." • • " '.'lW ÿ : " kvx*& ÿ'

.ÿ4.. -? SUPREME COURT OF THESTATE OF NEW YORK" COUNTY OF NEW YORK : / ' may m 'ÿ •' _:_ :_1_ ÿ _:___ ' 1 . • : ; INRE YORK CITY NYCAL NEW , r ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. PartfCPÿ <(Hciller,.J.). " —X THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 120904/02, 113279/02

NO OPPOSITION CHARLES MAHFOUD and JUNE MAHFOUD SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant.to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs "complaint against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition

' thereto, V ÿ ORDERED!, that upon,notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant Morse-Diesel,'ÿ Inc.',"be.and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs. " ÿ •

Dated: New York,New York G ,20lg

Adam Raffo, Rosario Chetta, Esq. WEITZ & LUJ NBERG,PC. MALABY & BRADLEY,LLC Attorneysfor Plaintiff(s) .. Attorneysfor Defendant \ Charles MahfoudandJune Mahfoud Morse Diesel, Inc. 700 Broadway . ; 150 Broadway,"Suite,600 New York, New York 10003 New-York, New York 10038 (212) 558-5500 (212)791-0285

SO ORDERED, Dated: €)"/'s Honr Sherry Klein IIohlor p\\*

HON.PETERH.MOULTON

'.U" ,.L. f.r

-r SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ÿ> COUNTY OF NEW YORK- ; C m -x MAY INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION .... ----- — ---77—— ---- > This Document------Relates------To: ------THOMAS GEORGE TRAVERS, NYCAL < I,A:S: ParÿSÿ Plaintiff(s), JjjLon: Sherry Klein Heillei) •

- -against- - Index No,: 1 1 1226-01

A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY " CONTRAC TING & SUPPLY), et al:, . " JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER Defendants. :

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, -pursuant; to Civil Practice .Law and Ruies Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against ,defendant CRANE..CO/ .with .prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, .. V . . .. .

ORDERED, thaLupon notice to all co-defendants, all claims.and cross claims against defendant CRANE CO* be, andthe same are hereby, dismissed,with prejudice and without costs.

Dated-

NewYork, New York) V , A

Frank Ortiz, Esq: Alford Kneis, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, B.C. K&/:GATES ELP Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) orneys for Defendant 700 Broadway CRANE CO. ' New York, NY 10003v - . =" - T.Y . , 599 Lexington Avenue ' (212) 558-5500 , T- 'A ÿ New York, NY 10022-6030 (212) 536-3900

SO ORDERED, : 7AS" len'y R-lein Heillei . ,. 4 -i -,r - ÿ - A-S HON.PETERH.MOULTOfo 'i'- if'* •RECEIVED.

MAY IS 2015 > , V miGATES j- tfQTJUOM.H533T3,l jtoff SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ÿÿZlUpR£MsRLSo NYCAL C°UftT - x - CIVil IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 50 - x (Moulton, ) THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

EDWARD BENDERSKI, Index No.: 99/106277 00/121394 Plaintiff (s) , -against- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a MOTION AND ORDER NATIONAL GRID, et al.,

Defendants . -x

WHEREFORE,, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL

GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), named herein as LONG ISLAND LIGHTING

COMPANY, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York .r 7 i 3 2015

John J. Fanning, Efeq. Frank: -0Ll-L =Esq-. Cullen and iDykman/LLP WEITZ Sc LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorney far Defendant Attorneys for Plaintiffs NATIONAL GRIDU3BNERATION LLC 700 Broadway 44 Wall Street New York, . NY 10003 New York, NY 10005 (212) 558-5500 (212)732-2000

SO ORDERED, /Son. Peter H. Moulton r/'r//6 P \ 10ft cv-6ÿ® OFFICE v.-,"? TV" " \

i U\V

-*i

8 'ÿ3 <~*i |; .**$

ifi

ÿ!':nn ÿ SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - x IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION x THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

FRANCIS ZELL Index No. : 01/120304 98/111030 Plaintiff (s) 95/115994 95/102529 -against- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a MOTION AND ORDER NATIONAL GRID, et al.,

Defendants . x

WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL GRID ("NATIONAL GRID") , sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a

LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled" case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

John J. Farming, /Esq. Pr-f -i -7 Esq. jf Cullen and Iwkman LLP WEITUZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorney foixb&fendantfof\D&fendant Attorneys for Plaintiffs NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC 700 Broadway 44 Wall Street New York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10005 (212) 558-5500 (212)732-2000

SO ORDERED Hon. Peter H. Moulton

COUKWgf®* v

if'" ' 0 ' •' ÿ • • II - . .. kf k • *»w (V "Jf

U;9 \ ÿ•• $ f Vv •• ÿ< ••• 1/ aoraoawojo ~ap,orwmytwoc- m D SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY -X IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION -X This Document Relates to: HARRY W. GUY and EVA NIECZAJ-GUY Index No.: 190496/11

Plaintiff (s) , NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT - against - MOTION AND ORDER

AMERICAN BILTRITE INC. , et al.,

Defendants. ----... -X WHEREFORE, defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO. , INC. , with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING

CO., INC., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Dated: New York, New York 015

M. Ratcliffe, Es Austin D. O'MaHe'y, Esq. Luxeriberg, P .C . Cullen and Dykman LLP ;ys for Plaintiff (s) Attorneys for Defendant HARRY W. GUY and EVA NIECZAJ- MARIO &.DIBONO PLASTERING CO., GUY INC. 700 Broadway 44 Wall Street New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10005 212-558-5500 212-732-2000 Our File No.: 10924-6609 So Ordered: Hon.. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

ViM 19 V® ------0ff\c£ may 14.2015 SUPREME. COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY ÿÿoÿ.C[vlL -X IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION -X This Document Relates to: LOUISE SIMS, as Administratrix for Index No. 190257/11 the Estate of EDDIE SIMS, and LOUISE SIMS, Individually,

Plaintiff (s) , NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT - against MOTION AND ORDER

AIR Sc LIQUID SYSTEMPS CORP., et al.,

Defendants. -X WHEREFORE, defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING

CO., INC., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Dated: New York, New York 2015 Jli-fk' '

McJdmiUl T.ManlAkfrfÿEsq. Austin D. 0'Ma11eyfl Esq. Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. Cullen and Dykman LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff (s) Attorneys for Defendant LOUISE SIMS MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO. 700 Broadway INC. New York, New York 10003 44 Wall Street 212-558-5500 New York, New York 10005 212-732-2000 Our File No.: 10924-6527 So Ordered: ffen . Peter H. Moulton, J.S .C

MM 19 20fi OFFICE COUNTY CLERK'S NEW YORK m SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK © ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY -X IN RE: NEW YORK CITY supreme ASBESTOS LITIGATION -X This Document Relates to: DOLORES RHODES, as Executrix for the Index No.: 101534/05 Estate of RONALD RHODES, and DOLORES RHODES, Individually,

Plaintiff (s) , NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT - against MOTION AND ORDER

A .0 . SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants. ------~ ~ -X WHEREFORE, defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO .., INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Dated: New York, New York y/\\ . 2015

Matthew T. Maclntyrÿ Esq. AOrStin D. O'MalleyÿEsq. Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. Culleh and Dykman LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff (s) Attorneys for Defendant DOLORES RHODES MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO. , 700 Broadway INC. New York, New York 10003 44 Wall Street 212-558-5500 New York, New York 10005 212-732-2000 Our File No.: 10924-4946 So Ordered: Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C

WAY 19® OFBCE COUNTYc CLERKS NEW YORK pi©Iffiii" SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK MAY 14,2015 ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY -X JÿIifUPREMAERC0URT- IN RE: NEW YORK CITY crviL ASBESTOS LITIGATION -X This Document Relates to:. LUCILLE JACOBSEN, Individually and as Index No.: 100977/01 Executrix for the Estate of ROY N. JACOBSEN,

Plaintiff (s) , NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT against - MOTION AND ORDER

A.C. and S., INC., et al.,

Defendants. . ------X WHEREFORE, defendant-----MARIO----& DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against

defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims

and cross claims against defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING

CO., INC., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York,Yo:pk, New] York y/n , 2015

(U.CAJ4WLM3 MciUffiVKttTPff Esq. Austin D. 0'Mailey-/ Esq. We it z & Luxenbe/rg, P.C. Cullen and Dykman LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff (s) Attorneys for Defendant LUCILLE JACOBSEN MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO. , 700 Broadway INC. New York, New York 10003 44 Wall Street 212-558-5500 New York, New York 10005 212-732-2000 Our File No.: 10924-978 So Ordered: s Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C. /itllS

MAY 19 2015

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE ---NEW YORK m © SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ' ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY supremf IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION -X This Document Relates to: MARIE MANCUSO-BERG, as Administratrix Index No.: 102336/06 for the Estate of ROBERT BERG, and MARIE MANCUSO-BERG, Individually

Plaintiff (s) , NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT against - MOTION AND ORDER

A .O . SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants -X WHEREFORE, defendant MARIO & DIBONO. PLASTERING CO., INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING

CO., INC., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York try q , 2015

Matthew T. Maclntyÿjej Esq. Austin D. O'Malleÿÿ Esq. Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. Cullen and Dykman LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff (s) Attorneys for Defendant MARIE MANCUSO-BERG MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO. , 700 Broadway INC. New York, New York 10003 44 Wall Street 212-558-5500 New York, New York 10005 212-732-2000 Our File No. : 10924-5200 - So Ordered: --—r___ /fion. Peter H. Moulton, J.S .C . s/nlis

MM 19 OFFICE COUNTY OURKS ÿ NEW YORK m d SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY -X IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION ÿX This Document Relates to: BRIAN M. CURRY, as Personal Index No. : 115799/01 Representative for the Estates of RICHARD H. CURRY and BEATRICE MARY CURRY Plaintiff (s) , NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT - against - MOTION AND ORDER

A.C. and S., INC., et al.,

Defendants. -X WHEREFORE, defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'. Complaint against defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Dated: New York, New York

PlaCLA f\(KlOM)UlJO , Esq. Austin D. O'Malÿjeÿ, Esq. Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. Cullen and Dykman LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff (s) Attorneys for Defendant BRIAN M. CURRY MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., 700 Broadway INC. New York, New York 10003 44 Wall Street 212-558-5500 New York, New York 10005 212-732-2000 Our File No.: 10924-1041 So Ordered: |S7 "lion. Peter H. Moulton, J. S

MAY 19 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK m o SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION -X This Document Relates to: MICHAEL J. PARLE as Executor for the Index No. 106187/01 Estate of PETER J. PARLE,

Plaintiff (s) , NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT - against - MOTION AND ORDER

A.C. and S., INC., et al.,

CO., INC., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs. . Dated: New York, New York A prvA 3-3) , 2015

kupmjdo, Esq. Austin D. O'Malleÿ Esq. Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. Cullen and Dykman LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff (s) Attorneys for Defendant MICHAEL J. PARLE MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., 700 Broadway INC. New York, New York 10003 44 Wall Street 212-558-5500 New York, New York 10005 212-732-2000 Our File No.: 10924-637 So Ordered: _ Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C S/W//S

MAY 19 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK m

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY ART so -X court . IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to: JOSEPH MCKENDRY, Index No. : 113335/01

Plaintiff (s) , NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT - against - MOTION AND ORDER

A .0 . SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al

Defendants . -X WHEREFORE, defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, ORDERED, that upon notice to. all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Datedÿv r/ ) Yprk,,York, New YorkY< 2015

Erik Jacobs,] Esq. effery Fegan, Esq. Weitz & NlLpsenberg, P.C. Cullen and Dykman LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff (si orneys for Defendant Joseph McKendry MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO. , 700 Broadway INC. New York, New York 10003 44 Wall Street 212-558-5500 New York, New York 10005 212-732-2000. Our File No. : 10924-1 So Ordered: Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C. F 1 MAY 19 2015 COUNTY CIERKS.OFFICE NEW YORK ÿrzc <*>7gv

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -X HELENNASH, individually and as Executrix Of the Estate of MICHAEL J. NASH, Index No.: 109039/0

Plaintiff, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND -against- ORDER

A.W. CHESTERTON CO: INC., et al„

Defendants. . -x WHEREFORE, defendant BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, hereby

requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case pursuant to Civil Practice Laws and

Rules §3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant BMW OF NORTH AMERICA,

LLC, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto;

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, Nfew York 2013

ips & KonigshCFg, LLP Biedermannljoenig Semprevivo, A Professional Corpora

Carmen St. Georgqf|)sq. Peter W. Beadle, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for BMW ofNorth America, LLC 800 Third Avenue One Grand Central Place New York, NY 10022 60 East 42nd Street, Suite 660 (212) 605-6200 New York, New York 10165 Telephone: 1.212.697.6555 SO ORDERED: F m 20,5 /> TTfflST VTTTTPPV TÿT FTM TATTLER- tfirj

PETERH.MOULTON ::i l.; A ;i i :if i //A~- l.go i .v.i-'i L : ..ifi on 3:5iT-iO >;:!iic;oD oqro-v.c-h (s i5} some vscsnjt w:iM :;vitu."!3x;i vi a fiOJ.'.vf.iH-;:!?';'.:!.;! I iiDOixnnrixAUQ f.SGO I xyiOY v.';;:-! i:?.r.O r-iÿvo;;;) ;o ! <--:;.v;VO ss-.v/aJ

' *1, i i* - " SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW.YORK ; IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL / ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Pairt 50 : / ÿ . 1 (Moulton,C) THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: ! > ÿ5ÿ5% : Index No.: 107845/06

EDWIN H. FLAHERTY : NO OPPOSITION i SUMMARY JUDGMENT I MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Pecora Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Pecora Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claiims against defendant, Pecora Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

' ÿ 'costs.; . . ÿ

Dated: New Ybrk,New York 6Pÿj ,2015

> ' •

Carol Tempesta, Esq. & c<~

~~ SO ORDERED. fl/S'l/S _ ÿ ~~ Hon. Peter H.Moulton ' ÿ \ \gp cooÿr,CE

SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OF NEW YORK . COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL • ASBESTOS LITIGATION. I.A.St Part 50 (Moultori,-ÿ.) This Document Relates to: Index No.: 190355/10, MARC ROSE AND MARILYN ROSE NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuantjo Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporatidh, ÿ with, prejudice in..this action, arid there being no opposition theretoV , - :

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, -all claims and cross claims against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, 'be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

'' ' " ' ' ' without costs. . ; .

Dated: New Yqfky&eiw York, Y ' ' ' 2015 / ,VY-

TV Attorney for Plaintiffs Attorney for Defendant f Marc Rose and Marilyn Rose Treadwell Corporation WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC. McGivney& Kjl-uqer',P.C. 700 Broadway ' 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10004 (212) 558-5500 (212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, Hon..Peter'H. Moulton

Y 1235-23474 A ,,

- !,ÿ&- w ; v*'* v\ .* ' * - , :< x/#4 ' f AY" • .,«<-' " \T-* vY * ,\ - '*>•'

3 • fJ -fi **r> -. M

£ ' ÿ : fWS 3 f i

'B=?0 (; >»HQy J ÿ SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK \ COUNTY OF NEW YORK ÿ ).. _ j INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY . NYCAL .... •; ' ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part .50 , (Moulton, if)'. ' This Document Relates to: Index No.: 190520/11,

CHARLES H. TOY NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc., Hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Atwood &Morrill Gaylne, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto, . - U:, ' ' ,

, ORDERED, that upon, notice to alTco-defendants, .all. Claims, and cross claims against

defendant, Atwood.& ;Morrill Co.,;Inc:, be and the same are.hereby,dismissed,with prejudice and

' without costs. ' .T. '

Dated: New Yon&, Neÿv York INI\ 2015

Nicole Wesselmann, Esq. . ' Attorney for Plaintiffs : Attorney for Defendant Charles H. Toy ' Atwood &Morrill CoV, Inc. ÿ Weitz & LUXENBERG, P.C. McGivney & Klu.ger,P.C. 700 Broadway 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York !0003 New York, New York 10004 V : (212) 558-5500 (212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, er H. Moulton F CGPr urÿA0U,

to '•< y SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 50 (Moulton,ÿ.) THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: Index No.: 190087/1 STANLEY CORNELIUS LARSEN AND MARGARET C. LARSEN NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, George A. Fuller Company, hereby requests summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, George A. Fuller Company, with prejudice inthis action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant, George A. Fuller Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated:

ErinMiter, Esq. Attorne Attorney for Defendant Larsein George A. Fuller Company Belluc McGivney &Kluger,P.C. 546 FifthAvenue, 4th Floor 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10036 New York, New York 10004 (212) 681-1575 (212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, rlon.!on. Peter H. Moulton SUPREME COURT OFTHE STATE OF NEW YORK • COUNTY OF NEW YORK INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL ÿ % % • ASBESTOS LITIGATION- ; IA.S. Part'50 . (Moultbn,ÿ.)r£ v THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: Index No.: 115822/01, 111222/01

MILES R.PEDERSEN AND JOSEPHINE PEDERSEN . NO OPPOSITION ! SUMMARY JUDGMENT ! MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Safeguÿd Industrial Equipment Company with

' 1 prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, . L

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant,

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice . and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York S j K .2015

KerryaniÿodkÿEj /EITZ/&/LUXENBERG, P. McGivnÿPS'KeuGer,p.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys forDefendants Miles R. Pedersen and Josephine Pedersen Safeguard Industfiai Equipment Company 700 Broadway " : 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10003 New York, New York v ' ' ; 10004 (212) 558-5500 (212)509-3456

SO ORDERED, on. Peter H. Moulton

89AM SOFBCE- {N0404045-1} ,, XBqy ÿ • -'if : ty -f.. v

SUPREME COURT.0F THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCALv"- ASBESTOS LITIGATION i'a.S.Part 5:6' (Moultori,$,) This Document Relates to: Index No.: 110353/00, 108355/00

JANICE E. POTTER, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF GLENN L. BURROWS NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice 'and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York wcV £3 .2015

' . f\i\iCUrcL6ÿ0 r KeraySnn MAlqok, Esq. Weitz & LuxeNberg, P:C. KLUGER, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff : , Attorneys for Defendants Estate of Glenn L. Burrows Courter & Company,.Inc. 700-Broadway 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10003 New York, New York.10004 (212)558-5500 ÿ (212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, Hon. Pfeter HnVTouiton

1122-9790

0FFlCE f CLERKS {N04009.82-1.} nennvork (ft p p — ' . v; V

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 50 (Moulton, f.) This Document Relates to: Index No.: 110353/00, 108355/00

JANICE E. POTTER, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF GLENN L. BURROWS NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, with prejudice and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without;costs.

Dated: New York, New York A?r\\ 3-3 ,2015 :

/ÿ/xyCLrcL-dÿo Kerfy$ffn MDfek, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C, McGiwETTSTkluger,PC. Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendants Estate of Glenn L.:Burrows Tishman Liquidating Corporation 700 Broadway 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 10003 ' (212) 558-5500 (212)509-3456

SO ORDERED, JS~ Ion. H. Moulton Befefÿÿ . / P 2383-2900L

MAY 19 C- COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE {N0400990-1} .. NEWYORK ,(£\ VA. llU A'V* *>.

,VN V? ' • ,.<\K

' f*Z, »ÿ; ÿ ÿ '£? ?J ji "ii

. Ct'/i ;? i.-y/i?4

:, A'TiG %'WJO YTi;un: XRQY WBÿ SUPREME COURT OF THE:STATE OF NEW YORK - COUNTY OF NEWYORK. Y' INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY • NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part -(Ilcitlcf, j.) This Document Relates to: Index No.: 190159/14, ) ROLAND QUASHIE ; AND • SABIE QUASHIE NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint •.'against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Company, with prejudice in this action, and there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, allclaims and cross claims against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Ne k, New York

KerryanmMpCook, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs Attorney for Defendant Roland Quashie'and'S.abie Quashie Atwood & Morrill Company The WilliamsLaxv Firm;PC? - McGivney &Kluger,P.C. 245 Park Avenue,"39ÿ Floor • ' 80 Broad StreetÿShite 2300 New York, New York 10167 New York, New York 10004 (212)668-1122 (212)509-3456.

SO ORDERED, Hon. Shorry KlbiriHeitler J/r//s ÿ®SÿÿrÿKMOUIIIpN 963-1982

.. MAY 19 2015 COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK MOTOlfOMM

if3? «'? ft-' a'-- 5ÿ ' Wvt? ijsgi'j _

BCiFRO eMR'JJO YWUOO XflO-.'.Wvltf SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Wg© COUNTY OF NEW YORK -X InRe: NEW YORK CITY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION •I. A. S. Part ÿe'couV . (Moulton,f.) -X This document relates to: Index No.: 107446/07

JAMES WOODS NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY - JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER -X

WHEREAS, Defendant JOHNSTON BOILER requests' summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

Plaintiffs complaint against JOHNSTON BOILER, without prejudice, and there being no

: opposition thereto, it is hereby -i

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,"all claims and cross claims against

JOHNSTON BOILER, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs. FIL E Dated: New York, New York D April 3V ,2015 MAY 19 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK

James MÿKramer, Esq. Jason Riemer, Esq. LEVYXONIGSBERG LLP HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN, 800 Third Av.enue, 11th Floor DUNST & DOUKAS, LLP New York, NY 10022 1345 Avenue of the Americas Counselfor Plaintiff New York, NY 10105 Counselfor, Johnston Boiler

SO ORDERED, is- «-Flon. Peter H. Moulton #/'

{00360128.DOCX}

ÿ ' ÿ ' ÿ , . I , * , * . f t; *

* e

< |> (i j n»i U ÿÿSSL'ji CSÿU iS*'1 ra e iyam

301ÿ0 R'/fl3J0Y WUOO anny ma TMc:CC(jpk) 3/13/15

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK m CUlÿYQ]?NEWYORK _ J" NYCAL > INRE:NEW YORK COUNTY iXs:part>er

ÿ ASBESTOS LITIGATION, ÿfflkillu, J.)

•INDEX NO. THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 100081/08

' GabrielCintorino NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edispri;Company;ofNew York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled ease,-pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company ofNew York, Inc.'with prejudice, and there being/no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims arid cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison'Company ofNew York. Inc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice'and'without costs. •; /Mcmv ÿolO/r ' ' ' Dated: New York, New York - ÿ< '

Adam- Raffd, Esq. N Timothy... Iÿl/McCann, Esq. ÿ &• P.C. WEITZ LUXEN&EkG,' DAVID M. SANTORO, " i x ESQ. ''V' • •' Attorneys for Plaintiff-. • Attorney for Defendant 7.00 Broadway :V Consolidated Edison Company ofNew New York, NY 10003; : ÿ •• v York;- Inc...... - 4 IrvingPlace , New York, NY 10003-3598 ., ' .

SO ORDERED: luii. Gliuny Klein-HeiEer Our File No ?/ : S-4020-08 ÿhBn moultot* Fit MAY 19 2015 OFFICE; COUNTY CLERK'S NEW YORK • cM-mj?) v. MoywiW " "•ÿ ; a f \ie\i? v 7-ÿ'X* -r .-• • **• ' " ' . • •" .V . . '* • . ÿ ÿ••• ' Y' *• ' ' - >' • ; * '?•

ÿ "J* '-'Y;

' : ÿ ' TMc:CC(jpk).. 'ÿ ; >?' .« 3/13/15 V': S.

SUPREME COURT. OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. : ;•"ÿ . ' ' COUNTY OF NEW YORK . . .. VU -V NYCAL. m m INRE:NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S.1 ASBESTOS1LITIGATION, (Ilcillu, J.) »<*£&• INDEXNO. THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 106691/02 and 114.787/02

.. Arthur'C. Clark,Jr. NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

. WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company ofNew York, Inc.

hereby requests,summary judgment in the above-entitled case,.pursuant to Civil Practice Law,

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant ConsolidatedEdison

Company ofNew York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no'opposition thereto,

ORDERED,'that uponnotice to all Co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company ofNew York, Inc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs. /lÿcty &0/£~ Dated: New.York, New York

'"X • Adain Raffo,I /Timothy MyMcCann, Esq. . WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Davidm. santoro,esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant 700 Broadway" Consolidated Edison Company ofNew New-York, NY 10003 York,' Inc; 4 IrvingPlace New York, NY 10003-3598

SO ORDERED: ÿSjli/lS '' -UnfL Sherry KfcinIIoitlor Our File No S'6g00-02 HON.PETERH.MOULTON F MAY 19 2015 COUNTY CLERKSOFFICE NEW YORK "

T. ,3. ; ' . . 1 4 , ÿOT4UOM.«.g3t3

;« / 1 >„ ' ' i 'ÿ;?.ÿ»

v'T/t'JQS

ÿC-V i ... , j TMc:CC(jpk) 8/14/14 m SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK o COUNTY OF NEW YORK NYCAL INRE:NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 3Jo ASBESTOS LITIGATION, hotk ' INDEXNO. THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 105974/00 and 121985/99

Crescenzo Galano NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company ofNew York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company ofNew York, Inc. with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company ofNew York, Inc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New Yorkÿ

ÿIPetSrTambini, Timothy Iÿ/McCann, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. DAVID M. SANTORO, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant 700 Broadway Consolidated Edison Company of New New York, NY 10003 York, Inc. 4 IrvingPlace New York, NY 10003-3598

SO ORDERED: Hon. Slurry jn Heitler Our File No S-5974-00

PETERH.MOULTON F MAY 19 2015 COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE NEW YORK ÿ?\\Y

VlOTJUOfvl .HH3TSM.WOK ri't" rti • «•>/

Ji * i . '-f »•>> . . " * # ' '---J-./ .< "•••'' 7 Wjt/' I m SUPREME CO0RT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK MAY © COUNTY OF NEW YORK' - .. . NYCAL IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY . . LA.S. Part 50 ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Moulton, ÿ.)

This Document Relates to: Index No: 190070/2015 ÿ . ' ÿ :/ÿ , V ELIZABETH RENO, NO OPPOSITIOIÿpMlyUpYÿ ) • JUDGMENT Plaintiff, MOÿFMÿ3RDEÿ|;j vs.

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP., as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., ET al.,

• . Defendants..

WHEREFORE, defendant Grinnell LLC ..hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and' 'Rules .Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Gririnell LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, "

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all .claims.and cross claims against defendant Grinnell LLC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

ÿ Dated: New York, New York 0 . '• ÿ 2015

JosephJC AyOTiams, Beth L.Hughes, Esq. TheÿVilHams Law Firm RC. Brady;S. Edwards, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs . Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP .245 Park Avenue,' 39th Floor Attorneys fof'Grinnell LLC New York, NYÿ10167 . 101 Park Avenue ; Phone:(212)668-1122 New York, NY 10178-0060 Phone: (212) 309-6000 , Fax:(212)309-6001 FILED SO ORDERED, f/ltj/S MAY 19 2015 HON.PETERH.MOULTOM COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK ÿ 'd

"VV ÿVF-

' * "* ÿ ' "*' • v. • '; '

' ÿ• ÿ- • .. >. - ÿ ÿ ' wj'x: '&*ÿ- v • 11. ':-i: -I'l ii. ~>j 3 ÿ.'4- *w/4 •' •

fMf " .sdOTJUOMvH83134.M©h. 'jlQR-iO B'Jim C- V fHUV ..-iHOV-wan • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK NYCAL INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 50 ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Moulton, £) This Document Relates to: Index No: 190500/2012

JOSEPH C. FERRARO AND DORINNE M. NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY KOPFENSTEINER AS CO-EXECUTORS OF JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER THE ESTATE OF DORIS FERRARO,

Plaintiffs, vs.

ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY, ET al., Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant Anvil International Inc., individually and as successor to Grinnell Corp., and/or ITT-Grinnell, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Anvil International Inc., individually and as successor to Grinnell Corp., and/or ITT-Grinnellwith prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Anvil International Inc., individually and as successor to Grinnell Corp., and/or ITT- Grinnell, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York fhdjj "7 .2015 A. Jpfcn Guinan, Esq. Beth L. Hughes, Esq. Q Levy Konigsberg LLP Brady S. Edwards, Esq. Attorneys for the Plaintiffs Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP 800 Third Avenue, 11thFloor Attorneys for Anvil International Inc. New York, New York 10022 101 Park Avenue Phone: (212) 605-6212 New York, NY.l0178-0060 Fax: (212) 605-6290 Phone: (212) 309-6000 Fax: (212) 309-6001 F ILED SO ORDERED, MAY 19 2015 erH.TvToulton COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK t/iEMAOBK CORS/11A CfEBK.3 OkUCE

ÿ WVA/SM

ÿ>i Vv ; . '

V-'" , ÿ '.-r.v'0X- Q SUPREME COURT OF THE, STATE OF NEW YORK m COUNTY OF NEW YORK MAY D NYCAL INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY . ÿ ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 50 (Moulton, 3|) This Document Relates to: Index No: 190207/2014

FREDERICKrJOSEPH CICIO and NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JACQUELINE A. CICIO JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Uhion Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York & 11\ .2015

Brian F. Early, Esq.' athan B. Kromberg, Esq. EARLY LUCARELLI SWEENEY & DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLP MEISENKOTHEN,LLC Attorneys for Union Carbide Corporation Attorneys for Plaintiffs 116 East 271' Street, 12th Floor 360 Lexington Avenue, 20th Floor New York, NY 10016 New York, NY 10017 (212) 452-5300 (212)986-2233 FILED SO ORDERED, SlijJiS MAY 19 2015

AOtiK -CGOW.A CfEBKS QfcfciCE

"A1i :t w. 4 5",» a • -i*

vu*- SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK may i COUNTY OF NEW YORK _ INRE:NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 50 ÿ COURT CIVIL (Moulton, -Jt) This Document Relates to: Index No: 190377/2014

WALTER HAZARD and SUSAN HAZARD NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Hopeman Brothers, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Hopeman Brothers, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Hopeman Brothers, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York \V„ ,2015

Jordan Fox, Esq. sq. BELLUCK & F TE YAVITZ & BI Attorneys for Pla "ttorneys for Hopeman Brothers, Inc. 546 Fifth Avenue]ÿ1" FL 116 East 27th Street, 12th Floor New York, NY 10036 New York, NY 10016 (212)681-1575 (212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, ÿJt§f*5 Hon. Peter H. Moulton F MAY 19 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK \

MfiOY WIJi/5

/ SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK NYCAL INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY. ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 50 (Mouiton, $.) This Document Relates to: Index No: 190207/2014

FREDERICK JOSEPH CICIO and NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JACQUELINE A. CICIO JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Hopeman Brothers, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules, Section 32-12, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Hopeman Brothers, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that' upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Hopeman Brothers, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. >

Dated: New York, New York ÿ

" j l£X .2015

,e ss sr, Esq. CARLY LUCARELLI SWEENEY & 1TE YAVITZ & BEAULLP MEISENKOTHEN,LLC (ttorneys for Hopeman Brothers, Inc. Attorneys for Plaintiffs , * .116 East'27th Street, I2'h Floor 360 Lexington Avenue, 20th Floor New York, NY 10016 New York, NY 10017 (212) 452-5300 (212)986-2233

ED SO ORDERED, It:IS Hon. Peter H. Mouiton COUNTY CLEfl/cj; '*»YonKopcippRCE v ft*,* I' il •.• vv ,'T-v ] £Jfc4Uv&Pi'f«; ' 1 ' ; 0 PP'P.'-'- :aM i) -

ÿ ÿ " ÿ07 v-" .;?ÿ ÿÿ ' '.v ÿ

'-P r**n . *5$

ay yii4»;oq 3Ciiio"ÿRCYvVnÿ • *B0 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK May COUNTY OF NEW YORK ÿrs suPR So IN NEW YORK CITY NYCAL. RE C°Uf?T .c ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 5© rviL (Moulton)

This Document Relates To: Index No: 190034-15

Walter Andrews and Geraldine Andrews NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated:

Benjaminr Darche, Esq. Virginia Squitieri, Esq. Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C'. WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, Attorney for Plaintiff EDELMAN & DICKER LLP Attorney for Defendantÿ 700 Broadway / New York, NY 10003 CARRIER CORPORATION 150 East 42nd Street New York, New York 10017 File No. 10557.01746

SO ORDERED, Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C. FILED MAY 19 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK

6725970v. 1 WEAA ''(jiÿ!< COHH.I A Of hi it ;

V 1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE NEW YORK CITY NYCA] ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 0 f°Oi'*r. (Moulton) c%/ X This Document Relates To: Index No: 190037/2015

GEORGE E. WALSH NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER X

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, Ne\y York v/ r/ts_

Patti Burshtyn, Esq. Virginia Squitieri, Esq. Weitz & Luxenberg,.P.C. WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, Attorneys for Plaintiff EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 700 Broadway Attorney for Defendant New York, NY 10003 CARRIER CORPORATION 150 East 42nd Street New York, New York 10017 Our File No. 10557.01747 FILE SO ORDERED, on;1Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C. MAY 19 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK 6681506v. 1 ' n p «b

301-1ÿ0 3'XR3JO YTHUOO ÿiflOY W3H '"J" ",ÿ v ' ."v3 *ÿv

' ' :;" ' :' -. ' l " ' ÿ'ÿ<:ÿ& *f\> V 0' ÿ'

• -'ÿ . -•. •ÿ - •.'. h'"

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ' COUNTY OE NEW YORK '

INRE NEW YORK CITY NYCAL \ ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 50 (MoultonÿJ.)

This Document Relates To: Index No: 190087/14

NO OPPOSITION Walter Miller SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE,, defendant CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., incorrectly s/h/a "CHEVRON TEXACO CORPORATION" (hereinafter "CHEVRON U.S.A. INC."), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint "against . defendant CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, 0

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant CHEVRON. U;S.A. INC., be and the;same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Dated: y/W/r

David Chandler, Esq. Armand'Kalfayan, Esq. KARST& VON OISTE LLP WILSON,ElSER,'MOSKOW1TZ, Attorney for Plaintiff EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 576 Fifth Avenue, Ste. 401 Attorney for Defendant New York, NY 10036 " CHEVRON U>S A. INC. 150 East 42nd; Street New York, NY;1001/7 '.. File No. 01.042.00340

SO ORDERED, ÿ HbitfPeter H. Moulton v.> •;

6639694V.I,

'.ft ,>L'. 'i' ÿ . ... •• ÿ-

P' va :

Cr-.'

M/\y SUPREME CQURT OF THE STATE.OF NEW YORK ' ' ; ' : COUNTY OF NEW YORK v . . „ A ------x INRE NEW YORK COUNTY . 'ÿ .' NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION =. I.A.S. Part 50 (Moulton) x This Document Relates To: Index No: 190037/15

NO OPPOSITION George E. Walsh and/Eileen Walsh SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE,'.defendant CLYDE UNION, INC; hereby requests summary-judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuaht to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLYDE UNION, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendants CLYDE UNION, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. "

Dated: T/U/A

Patti Burshtyn, Esq. Virginia Squitieri, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, Attorney for Plaintiff EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 700 Broadway . . Attorney for Defendant . . New York, NY 10003 CLYDE UNION,INC. 1.50 East 42nd Street ' - .New York,'New York 10017 File No. 07723.00149 . -

SO ORDERED, . J$6n. P'eter.H; Moulton • F MAY 19 2015 COUNTY OLEBKS OFFICE NEW YORK 6673485V. 1

.ÿ4 >

' ÿ s e SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE,OF NEW YORK * ' M/\y COUNTY OF NEW YORK, U . - x IN RE NEW YORK CQUNTY nycal; ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 50 (Moulton)

This Document Relates to: Index No: 190054/15

NO OPPOSITION Wallace S. Hankin arid Helen Hankin SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER x

WHEREFORE, defendant CLYDE UNION,.INC. hereby requests sumrnary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules* Section '3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CLYDE UNION, IÿifC. with prejudice, and there being ; no opposition thereto, \

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant CLYDE UNION, INC., be .and the-* same - are'-hereby- .'dismissed with prejudice and without costs. 3

Dated: f/ri New York; NY

IAML Suzanne Raacliffe, Esq . ,< Wirgiwrioquitieri, Esq. /WEITZ &/LUXENBERG P.C WILSON, ELSER, M.OSKOWITZ, ' ' Attorneys for Plaintiff • .;ED'eLMAN & DICKER LLP - ' 700 Broadway • Attorney for-Defendant New York, NY 10003 CLYDE UNION, INC. '.150 East 42nd Street New York, NY 10017 File No.: 07723.00152

SO ORDERED,

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK 6732470v. 1 am.8 1YAM aomo'8'>!H3J0yiMUOD ' , >iROY W3M : Y-sy

SUPREME .COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK 1 •x IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY .NYCA ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A S. Part 50 (Moulton)

This Document Relates To: Index No: 190129/14

NO OPPOSITION Marc Vital-Herne SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

' WHEREFORE, defendant NORCA CORPORATION. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff s? complaint against defendant NORCA CORPORATION with prejudice,, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross, claims against defendant NORCA CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby'dismissed with prejudice and without costs. ÿ T

Dated: S7/7/A New Yorlcj' NY

rey P. Raphael,;Esq. Carl L. Steccato, Esq. LEVY KONIGSBERC WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, Attorney for Plaintiff . . :• EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 800 Third Avenue, 1 llh Floor Attorney for Defendant New York, NY 10022 . , NORCA CORPORATION PVte*, ÿ-5ÿ' .150 East 42nd Street • New York, New York 10017 : . 212-490-3000 File No. 10955.00009 -

SO ORDERED, Y S7/f//S Hon. Peter H. Moulton F IL MAY 19 2015

6707794v.I • • ;Y Y' 'YY/ COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK

• . > 2 '-*v: .. WEMAOlIK cor»;ucrcH!',} ot-::.rr

• • • ••*"«¥* -• • .....ÿ Wl: * -J ' • V (.?!.' 'O . ÿ 1 1 '"ÿ> v 1 eyj* c;"vf ' i'ioa t-/"'-vhj iix.c

ÿ ÿ li.t. el KS-U *- ÿ 1 ÿ '» ' ' ' 4»r»'sl &u.iin > t I: ÿ -.-Oÿ <' ' s.

\ v . \ 'i ÿ SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK % COUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRENEW YORK CITY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. ÿ(Heitler, J.) X HON.PETERH.MOULTOF This Document Relates To: Index No: 190377/14

WALTER HAZARD and SUSAN HAZARD, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER X

WHEREFORE, defendant HYDE MARINE,INC.,hereby requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant HYDEMARINE,INC.,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that uponnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant HYDE MARINE,INC.,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: irk.New York.

Jordan Fo> ErikgiMÿco,Esq. BELLUCMSfWXLLP WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, Attorneys rorPlaintiff EDELMAN& DICKER LLP 546 FifthAvenue, 4th Floor Attorney for Defendant New York, NY 10036 HYDEMARINE,INC. 150 East 42nd Street New York, New York 10017 Our FileNo. 12606.00013 FILED SO ORDERED, _ ~M'S Jfon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C. MAY 19 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK 6499135v.l s vv * V:.

- \ \ --'

y--* HOTJUOM.H51313'! Mm.

«£

r>.i\ *

TI'iH-n jjj:; v 'ÿ ujix; sip ?Y W3/j r.: ' -; ra •/A/- ,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ; • M/\y m INRE NEW YORK COUNTY \ NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION IAS.P (Moulton)

This Document Relates To: Index No: 190531/12

NO OPPOSITION Edmund Lehanka and Nellie Lehanka SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER x

WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, hereby requests summary judgment in the above.-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, with prejudice, and there-being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED,' that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims,against defendant CARRIER-CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.. . .

Dated: April

Phah Alvarado, Esq'. V ÿirginiaÿSquitieri, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. WILSON, EL'SER, MOSKOWITZ, Attorney for Plaintiff EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 700 Broadway Attorney for Defendant New York, NY' 10003 CARRIER CORPORATION 150 East 42nd Street New-York, New York 10017 Our File No. 10557.01303

SO ORDERED, _s'/jifis FJdn. Petÿ H. lyioulton, J.S.C.

MAY 19-2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK 7. I Y. " 5305535v. 1

•'U ÿ ' ÿ?*V A V • r '• {<"' \ * A A' °'

-K'. >•- V , .,;rP ;..

•"•ÿy n j , -Jt;! 0]' a- J i: **ÿ mc.?,m

301-RC *%BJO YTÿl'OO , /IHOY WBM ÿK?

,!ÿ

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK Index No.: 190454/2014 INRE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION. % THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: (Hon. Peter H. Moul

STEVEN A. MORENO and VIRGINIA MORENO, his wife NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY Plaintiffs), JUDGMENT -against- MOTIONAND ORDER AS TO Keeler/Dorr-Oliver Boiler Company, et al., DEFENDANT KEELER-DORR OLIVER Defendants. BOILER COMPANY

WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby

" ' ' ' ' " * ' * \ - . - " . requests summary judgment in the "above-entitled case, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER

BOILER COMPANY, with prejudice; and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED; that upon notice to all co-defendants, ail. claim?' and cross-claims against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER ElOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated; April 27, 20 15 Harrison,New York

STE.LLP MARINGOODMAN,LLP

David A. Chandler, Esq. IrinaH6yhannisyan,.Esq. Attorneysfor Plaintiff Attorneysfor Defendant 576 FifthAvenue, Suite 401 500 Matnaroneck Ave., Suite 501 New York, New York 10036 Harrison,New York 10528 ,ÿ . (212) 764-3900 (914)412-7300

SO ORDERED - 'cJlfjiS

" ÿ ÿ llolforable Peter H. MoiiltOii ' ÿ ." . rf ' 19 2015 ;r- D MAY COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK.

rv.iv-'-n: . ;r, •30rR0 SÿR3JOrmUOOl. ÿ XflOY VV3H May. 1. 2015 3:51PM MARIN GOODMAN LLP No. 8722 P, 2

Supreme courtof thestateof newyork COUNTY OF NEW YORK -X NYCAL INRE: NEWYORK COUNTY (Hon. Peter H.Moulton) ASBESTOS LITIGATION -X iÿodWis This document relates to: IndexNo.No.;i3e3S3*T5ri

MARTINKOCH,

Plaintiffs), -against-

KEELER-DORROLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al. Defendants. •X

WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissingplaintiffs' complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY, with

prejudice, andthere beingno opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

Harrison,NewYork

Adam Dreksler,Esq. ffina Hovhannisyan,Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C. MARINGOODMAN, LLP. Attorneysfor Plaintiff' Attorneysfor Defendant 700 Broadway KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER NewYork, New York 10003 COMPANY (212)558-5500 500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501 Harrison,New York 10528 (212) 661-1151 SO ORDERED-

IJdnotablePeter H. Moulton

MAY 19 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORK« - - x IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS.LITIGATION - x Index No.: 190038/13 DENNIS CALLANAN, as Administrator for the Estate of THOMAS P. CALLANAN, m

Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITION -against- SUMMARY JUDGME MOTION AND ORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

Hon. Peter H. Moulton Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant BW/IP, Inc., hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above- entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant BW/IP, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,

BW/IP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.

Dated: New York, New York A/tojl&

rmanelli, Esq. Michael F. Gorman, Esq. rz & LUXENBERG, P.C. SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER & Attorneys for Plaintiff MAHONEY, LTD. 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant New York, NY 10003 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1 100 New York, New York 10022

SO ORDERED, _ on/'Peter I-I. Moulton F ILED mis k»5 office [

\ \ .

i ICE w T\ 1MAY - 6 2015

SEGAL MCCAMBRIDGE SINGER & MAHONEY a

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK Index No.: InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

SOL RASKIN

. ÿ ,J CJW-s p i Plaintiff(s), no oppoSram/vÿTso SUMMARY JUDGMl&fiÿ - against - MOTION

AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et al„

Defendants.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.

New York, New York

Patti Burshtyn, Esq. Jordan Dj/Beltz, E&p WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. SEGAL/McCAMBRIDGE Attorneys for Plaintiff SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD. 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant New York, NY 10003 Aurora Pump Company (212) 558-5500 . 850 Third Avenue, Suite llOO New York, NY 10022 (212) 651-7500 fsled SO ORDERED 19 2015 ÿ MAY TUn inry r inin nÿirifr COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE IMNPETERH.MO(JLTON new YORK I

\ "• \ \ s

Cr 1 £ 'I f I- » -¥ rÿ\ mf / 30l-j:i, _ j p \.f APR 1 0 2015 iH/ MOYwVHmÿ KOTJUOM.HS;rnnnow SEGAL MCCAMBRIOGE SINGER & MAHONEY SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK Index No. InRe: NEW YORK ClfYASBESTOS LITIGATION

ANTHONY PALLINI

Plaintiff(s), NO OPJ SUMMAR\ - against - MC

WEIL-MCLAIN; et-al.

Defendants;

WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules . Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, , ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are' hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.

Dated: M IW ,2015 New York,— New York

DanaNorthcraft, Esq. Jordan D. Bÿtz,Esq."ÿ WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C Attorney for the Plaintiffs SINGER & MAHONEY,LTD. 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant New York, NY 10003 Weil-McLain (212) 558-5500 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100 New York, NY 10022 (212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED, ~ . HQÿv-ShcrfyTClcintietrrffCTtterIlcillu MAY 19 2015 HON.PETERH.MOULTON COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IndexNo.: 190161/ InRe: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION ___ O

ALLEN E. WATTS and LOLA ESTELLE WATTS, NO OPPOSITIO SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, MOTION - against -

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et al.,

' _ Defendants. .

WHEREFORE, Defendant Cla-Val Co., requests Summary Judgment inthe above- entitled case pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212ÿ dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Cla-Val Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

Cla-Val Co. be an

Dated: Nhw

Jordan O. Fox Htisq.l W. Simone Nicholson, Esq. BELLUCK &VOX.LLP SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE Attorneys forjPlaintiffs ] SINGER & MAHONEYj LTD. 546 Fiftinÿydnue, 4th Floor Attorneys for Defendant Cla-Val Co. New York, New York 10036 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100 (212)681-1575 New York, New York 10022 (212)651-7500 SO ORDERED: SJ fuii. Sherry K.Heillei i:PETERH.MOULTON F S LE D MAY 19 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK '/ir-AA' -m conv?.!abrkmizoi-.ticn i'tfk Jv',ÿ3

}' pÿ. («] y is; iuj

V S ÿ•'V •I ; •A v.. r;i> • ' ÿ : -vL' Y1

m SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK o

COUNTY OF NEW YORK ÿ --X IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION N.YCAL -X ROBERT WALSH and JOAN WALSH, Index No.: 190501/2013 Plaintiff, NO.OPPOSITION - against SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION 3M COMPANY, et al;,

Defendants. X . WHEREFORE, Defendant FLOWSERVE U.S. INC;; as successor-in-interest to

DURAMETALLIC , CORPORATION incorrectly sued - herein • as FLOWSERVE CORPORATION, as .'successor in interest to DURAMETALLIC.CORPORATION, (hereinafter "DURAMETALLIC") hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law 'and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint' against Defendant DURAMETALLIC,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon' notice to all co-defendants,'-all"claims' and cross, claims against Defendant, DURAMETALLIC, be and the same are hereby -dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either.'party.

Dated: N ork,/New York " hLWlri015 LEVY PHILLIPS & SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE KONIGSBERG,'.LLP- SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD. /// : Amber Long, Esq. Madina Axelrod, Esq. Levy Konigsberg, LLC. Attorneys for Defendant Attorney for Plaintiff Durametallic Corporation 800 ThirdAvenue, 13 th- Floor 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1 100 ' ' New York, NY 10022' '. . New York, NY 10022'

SO ORDERED, & iF/lS

, • peteiÿh.moulton MAY 19 2015 \

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK

ML..o-.vv 5!DS$I*A&

30l¥i0 g'>iH3J&feuQ0 ' '"<ÿ . . /iROYW31A. ÿ>. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OFNEW YORK May Wn STEVENA. MORENO and VIRGINIA MORENO,HIS WIFE, INDEXNO. 190454/2014/ PlaintifF(s), c°urt . Qv/i -against- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT A.O. SMITHCORPORATION, et al, MOTION(WITHPREJUDICE)

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Honeywell Inc.,hereby requests summary judgment inthe above-titled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against defendant Honeywell hie.with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto.

ORDERED,that uponnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant HoneywellInc. be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: / .

KARST & VON OISTE LLP O'TOQM FERNANDEZ WEINER LLC

DavidChandler, Esq. Steven AWeiner, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant, Karst & von Oiste LLP Honeywell Inc. 19500 State Hwy 249 60 PomptonAvenue Houston,TX 77070 Verona, New Jersey 07044

SO ORDERED

sjirjis HONOgÿBLEPETER MOULTOiOÿC- FILED MAY 19 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK • M'A P f " \ule

S> !j /P3' ÿ ÿJ..h S M

I MAY 0 8 2015

• |

ÿ 3 k 'I { SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

1 ÿPR ( THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 190034/15 WALTER ANDREWS and GERALDINE ANDREWS,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, BorgWarner Morse TEC LLC as successor-by-merger to Borg-Warner Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Morse TEC"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Morse TEC, with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Morse TEC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: ,2015

Attorneysffor Plaintiff Andrew M. Warshauer Weitz & Luxenberg Attorneys for Defendant 700 Broadway - 7th floor BorgWarner Morse TEC LLC as New York,. NY 10003 successor-by-merger to Borg-Warner Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Morse TEC") Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED, s Hon. Peter H. Moulton f/ir/i

m 19 2015 COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE NEW YORK SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK DJ COUNTY OF NEW YORK IflVED MAY .13 .2015

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION 'PART nys supreme 50 COURT - CIVIL

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 190248/13 RAYMOND J. BALCERZAK

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, BorgWarner Morse TEC, Inc. as successor-by- merger to Borg-Warner Corporation ("Morse TEC"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above:entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Morse TEC, with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Morse TEC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: "ho ,2015

Attorneys for Plaintiff Vria M. DiLohardo Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik NY Attorneys for Defendant Empire State Building BorgWarner Morse TEC, Inc. as 350 Fifth Avenue successor-by-merger to Borg-Warner Suite 7413r Corporation ("Morse TEC") New York, NY 10118 Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED, w Hon. Peter H. Moulton may 19 :

COUNTY CLEBH'S OFF NEW YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK MAY'320I5

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION COURT - CIVIL

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 190535/12 JOHN SWANSON and PATRICIA SWANSON,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant BMCE Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED s ,2015

SO ORDERED, -ÿTlon. Peter H. Moulton

MAY 19 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFF CE NEW YORK V Xj > -••Vi/'V';.. "r,,.tf- '- <*. * ' . • ;k •>'. ,

" v J , • ÿ ,. • T fV i'- . «. •' :W.' >a*\

'• . 'fit ' „ "i. . 'V:- © COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Index No. 190084/13 JOLANTA KIELAR, asiadnhiriistratrix for the estate of <<-ÿ JANiNA CHLEBOWSKA V ' NO OPPOSITION .SUMMARY JUDGMENT • MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Southern talc, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant* Southern Talc, with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto, ' ' V '

ORDERED; that upon notice to all cO¥ddPendaints, .allclaims and cross claims against defepdantSputhernTalc.beandthesameareJherebydismissed with prejudice arid witodut costs:7

DATED:: ,2015

Aftorneys for Plaintiff: ; Colleen M. Levy konigdbdrg LLP Attorneystor Defendant 800 third Avd- , 13th Floor . SouthernTalc; ' ' New York, NY 10022 ; Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, ÿColeman & GoQgin 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 . . Melville, NY 11747

SOORDERED, Hon. Pfeter Moulted.

ttM 19 rr:9 Wli! i:i:*;'XMSsgS s**'~

V !':.r

Gi ' 3JI3 ...... v : ; "ÿÿÿ 1 : v. ' ÿ' / aOHHO ST-Hajo • ÿ r -•••'< YTiiuOD" - • ySPOYWWi ' ÿÿÿ' V .. ' -/ . V: . U . - ' '' :\ " : SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK m COUNTY OF NEW YORK \ " o

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 190084/13 JOLANTA KIELAR, as administratrix for the estate of JANINA CHLEBOWSKA = NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Thyssen Krupp Elevator Corp, hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffsÿcomplaint against defendant, Thyssen Krupp Elevator Corp, with prejudice in this' action,,and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Thyssen Krupp Elevator Corp, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: ,2015

forneys for Plaintiff Colleeh M: Gronin Levy Konigsberg LLP Attorneys for Defendant 800 Third Ave., 13th Floor Thyssen Krupp Elevator Corp New York, NY -10022 Marshall, Depnehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED, ?M is <*JHon. Peter Moulton ; ; HON.PETERH.MOULXON , WAY 19Z015 CLERK'S OFFlC cCOUNTYnennyork • 'V .

.1 - •

a ;iVv -wÿy

•ÿ ' :: ' ÿ '' .. V'.ieriviL . '..\f ; '.o.iz"!»y'Si}S!i:!'i'l/i.-i • ,> ÿ 3IK20 ::.'i.' v#w ? , ''ÿ *i .. .v.; /._lv v*j„i. v.'?- ;" s«si'M l*!iw;r: 'i t" ÿ0i30OMJi5iirfa«?.M

•o»>fti0vmjfri XflOY W.314 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW;YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION HiÿCOURT THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 190443/13 CHARLES DIONYSIUS

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, BorgWarner Morse TEC, Inc. as successor-by- merger to Borg-Warner Corporation ("Morse TEC"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant/Morse TEC, with prejudice in this action, andThere being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Morse TEC, be and the same afd hereby dismissed with prejudice and Without costs. 1

DATED: 4(l5® 2015

Attc . ntiff / Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik NY Attorneys tor Defendant Empire State Building BorgWarner Morse TEC, Inc. as 350 Fifth Avenue successor-by-merger to Borg-Warner Suite 7413 Corporation ("Morse TEC") New York, NY 10118 Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin : 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 Melville, NY 11747. ,

SOORDERED, Hon. Peter H. Moulton

MAY 19 Z015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIC E NEW YORK '•*. ..o , v-:' 'ÿ y iv\- r «c:! % &ÿÿÿ". i

• »; r-.v>, , ••ÿw ; ÿ .*•: •< %- - .- •'•cvv--. v ••• ,

• •)- v •: uW/v ." ' •<••' j •

•• ..•>. ÿÿ V .ÿ.

*•ÿ " .'•ri.v s-::v

V SUPREMECOURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 'JWIEB COUNTY OF NEW YORK a' /*"ÿ'.. ÿMAYl3J015 wÿSRT-crviL- IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LlTlGATiON

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 190213/13 WILLIAM FOX JR. and DOROTHY FOX

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, BorgWarner Morse TEC, Inc. as successor-by- merger to Borg-Warner Corporation ("Morse TEC"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Morse TEC, with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Morse TEC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. <. - ÿ

DATED: ,2015

Attorneys for Plaintiff Anna M. DiLonardo Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik NY Attorneys for Defendant Empire State Building BorgWarner Morse TEC, Inc. as 350 Fifth Avenue successor-by-merger to Borg-Warner Suite 7413 Corporation ("Morse TEC") New York, NY 10118 ÿ Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Gqggin • .q\Jcÿqvÿ 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 CQÿ ÿ Melville; NY 11747

SO ORDERED, y)j?/A'S Won. Peter H. Moulton

A..

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYS SUPREME COURT IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 190437/13 DOLORES GOKEY

' NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, BorgWarner Morse TEC Inc. as successor-by- merger to Borg-Warner Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "BorgWarner"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,.dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Borg-Warner Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Borg-Warner Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: jft0 __ ,2015

Attorneys for Plaintiff M. DiLonardo Napoli BernRipkaShkolnikNY Attorneys for Defendant Empire State Building l** - Borg-Warner Corporation 350 Fifth Avenue Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Suite 7413 . VW*1 Cÿefcian & Goggin New York, NY 10118 9,0.5 Maxess Road, Suite 303 sOÿMelville, NY 11747

• sj/ SOÿ ORDERED.1 • . ; \ ri a i .. ctot '

. . : ' ÿJ\- APR 2Q15 - Tli-v '•Y: c-

.U'f-ÿ OF NEW YORK COUNTY . , . PART 50 NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL "a- , * IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THISDOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 190235/13 BRYAN HOCKLER

NO OPPOSITION . SUMMARY JUDGMENT ;MÿT!ONÿNDÿDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Sur-Seal Gasket & Packing, hereby requests

Rules § 32;12, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint-againsCdefendarit, Sur-Seal Gasket & Packing; with prejudice inthis action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Sur-Seal Gasket & Packing, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice;and without costs.

ÿ' : DATED: W /O , ,2015 ,

Attorrleys fpr Plaintiff Colleen Mr Cronin Levy, Phillips & kbhigsber Attorneys for Defendant •800 Third:Ave., 13th Flo Sur-Seal Gasket & Packing New York, NY 10022 Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, t Ccfernan & Goggin Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788

ÿfekfh. Peter Fl.,Mqulton

> (?'•

1 1 r 1 .. %-:ÿ ÿ , oI-I3O A Tif,A Jr.A .Wn .Tt»333MTi-!DA:i

PART 50 IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION ÿ.NYS SUPREME COURT

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 190456/13 DAVID V. NABLO and CLAIRE A. NABLO

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, BorgWarner Morse TEC, Inc. as successor-by- merger to Borg-Warner Corporation ("Morse-TEC"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant,iMorse TEC, with prejudice in this j action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Morse TEC, be and the same are hereby dismissed wjth prejudice and without costs.

DATED: _ ,2015

Attorneys for Plaintiff Anna M. DiLonardo Napoli Bern Ripka ShkolnikN Attorneys for Defendant Empire State Building \ Borg-Warner Corporation Tt "'"shall; Dennehey, Warner, smart & Goggin ÿ05 Maxess Road, Suite 303 Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED, Hÿn. Peter H. Moulton ?**' i{' . ÿ " Y* . : V--

A.y --A v; :> *

' ' -i SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK iiWE" COUNTY OF NEWYORK WAY 13 2015

PART 50 S SUPREME IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION . COURT - CI\/IL

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 190444/13 ROY NICHOLS and BARBARA NICHOLS,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, BorgWarner Morse TEC, Inc. as successor-by- merger to BorgTWamer Corporation ("Morse TEC"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Morse TEC, with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED,.that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Morse TEC, be and.the same areÿ hereby dismissed with prejudice and withbut.costs. . «

DATED:

AttornÿysTerRtSintiff CollediiIVf. Cronin' Napoli Bern Ripka'Shkolnik Attorneys for Defendant Empire Statepuiiding BorgWarner Morse TEC, Inc. as " 3I50 Fifth Avenue V a successor-by-merger to Borg-Warner Suite 7413 Y" Cmnoration New York,. NY. 10118 ,/iCL Oÿlvlarshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin ' 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 Melville, NY 11747 it * \ SO ORDERED, -Hon. Peter H. Moulton • n

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ©

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION SUPREME court

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 190039/15 RALPH W. NUNEVILLE

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Aerco International, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Aerco International, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Aerco International, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. DATED: u ,2015

Attorn Colleen M. Cronin The Attorneys for Defendant 245 Park Avenue Aerco International, Inc. 39th Floor Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, New York, NY 10167 ÿ Qÿ3fefeman & Goggin 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 C0ÿ>S° Melville, NY 11?47

SO ORDERED, ÿTton. Peter Moulton 7/ir/is laSN.PETERH.MOULTOFI u&lfkH"wt»nr.iO'/ SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 190039/15 RALPH W. NUNEVILLE

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, BorgWarner Morse TEC Inc. as successor-by-merger to Borg-Warner Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Morse TEC"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Morse TEC, with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Morse TEC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED ,2015

Attorneys Colleen M. Cronin The Willia Attorneys for Defendant 245 Park Avenue BorgWarner Morse TEC Inc. as 39th Floor successor-by-merger to Borg-Warner New York, NY Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 10167ÿ "Morse TEC"), Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & 0* Goggin .w 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED, rjisfAs' 'flon. Peter Moulton

m®.PETERH.MOULTON « t • 1

' '" •''/ T

MOTIUCM.HHH.tfQH - ; r.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

supreme IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No: 190002/15 JOHN PARKE O'CONNOR and PATRICIA O'CONNOR, HIS WIFE NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kamco Supply Corp., hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Kamco Supply Corp., with prejudice in thisaction.and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Kamco Supply Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: H \

Attorneys for Plaintiff i.Maria Karst & Von Oiste, LLP Attorneys for Defendant 19500 State Highwa Kamco Supply Corp. Suite 420 Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin Houston, TX 77070 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED, sjnfis ÿHon. Peter H. Moulton _ '*ÿ a j &uKviSefrtsUV ,1

• -r, :,y; 3v.4.?'ÿ/'i"jSrt'*, f <;"•-• '# **?«&£ ÿ'.' " I> y-' >•/' W>'' JJ- r- '*. ÿ

; ' ;,

H*,.

• ?' ÿ * ÿ'- ' ;

ÿ • ÿ v -• •• ••* ÿ \ -- vy._., . \. ... v

ÿ ÿ - t. •-1'

ÿ' . y r.:„ • '. >ÿ , i ."->*•

— ' .«ÿ• ÿ'•ÿ'ÿ'• *t; ÿ'ÿ ' -.,'ÿ•ÿÿ,';*ÿÿÿ. ÿ i'i- ' : ÿ•: . ÿ„ \ *

' V ' >*" " " :cÿ';v - . i . •• '' YY" V' ; ÿ' ' ; ; ÿ ."p. '' V"" . ? \ ;-*v r Y - *

- r, •• - •> SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 190384/14 ARDESHIR OMMANI and ELEANOR OMMANI

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Carboline Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Carboline Company, with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, ali claims and cross claims against defendant Carboline Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: 2015

At Be 54o rum Mvenue - him riÿui oC\Yi oaiuuiuie ouinpany New York, NY 10036 Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, lC,0?ÿeman & Qog'gin

ÿ 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 CO° Melville, NY 11747

Hon. Peter H. Moulton

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 190384/14 ARDESHIR OMMANI and ELEANOR OMMANI

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Fluor Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Fluor Corporation, with prejudice in this action,-and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Fluor Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and Without costs. DATED: i/z-iK—_ ,2015

Attorney/ forPlaintiff Anna M. DiLonardo Bellu/k/& Fox LLP Attorneys for Defendant 546 rfrth Avenue - 4th Fluor Corporation New York, NY 10036 Marshall, Dennehey, Warner Coleman & Goggin

:vn£ÿS,/° Melville, NY 11747

SO ORDERED, •Hon. Peter H. Moulton sllr/lS

may !•2015 OFFICE COUNTY CLERK'S NEW YORK •V H '• ' ÿ

v . r--v\ -':0 vi's'U.;oo

• • * • user- • •• T. s >- . .;-xt**.. w ÿ.

• • . v - ?.i ÿ • ÿ' ' ... .'V ÿ•

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK WED » COUNTY OF NEW YORK ÿ > ÿi ,1 . -'MAY:; 3-2015

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION JÿkmTcoL- avu

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 190175/12 LESTER G. SCOTT and CAROL SCOTT

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, BorgWarner Morse TEC Inc. as successor-by-mergef to Borg-Warner Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Morse TEC"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Morse TEC, vyith prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Morse TEC, be'and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: ,2015

Attorneys for Plaintiff OfsVS Jennifer M. Roberts Weitz & Luxenberg 0/ Attorneys for Defendant 700 Broadway - 7th floor BorgWarner Morse TEC Inc. as New York, NY 10003 successor-by-merger to Borg-Wamer Corporation Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 Melville, NY 11747 \ I

SO ORDERED, m/S Hon. Peter H. Moulton SOff1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ™&0WED~l May. COUNTY OF NEW YORK 13.2015' j

JZlÿÿfcOURT. CIVIL IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 190219/12 DONNA GILBERT, as Executrix for the Estate of RICHARD F. SEXAUER NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, BorgWarner Morse TEC Inc. as successor-by-merger to Borg-Wamer Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Morse TEC"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Morse TEC, with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Morse TEC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: ,2015 A Attorneys for Plaintiff ~pfacLA Jennifer M. Roberts Weitz & Luxenberg Attorneys for Defendant 700 Broadway - 7th floor BorgWarner Morse TEC Inc. as New York, NY 10003 successor-by-merger to Borg-Wamer Corporation Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin 105 Maxess Road, Suite 303 _ Melville, NY 11747 CI

SO ORDERED, WW ÿ Hon. Peter H. Moulton couÿr10 ÿ";i ÿ M , •!' ÿÿ' v",-:-1;

' **"• TMc:CC(jpk) 4/27/15

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK m .COmTYÿINEÿ : ..'.7.'.iLL NYCAL INRE:NEW YORK COUNTY...... I.A.S.Part . ASBESTOS LITIGATION, (Mouton, 5ÿ)

INDEXNO. THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 190042/14 '

DONALDROCOVICHAND PATRICIA ROCOVICH NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated EdisonCompany ofNew York, Inc.

hereby.Requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law.

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company ofNewYork, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that uponnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendantÿConsolidated Edison Company ofNew York, Inc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: NewYork, New York ij- &>/S

Mark Bibro, Esq. "Timothy IÿyMcCann, Esq. THE EARLY FIRM ' / DAVID.M. SANTORO, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant 360 LexingtonAvenue. Consolidated Edison Company of New New York, NY:.10017 York, Inc. Irving Place ' .4 NewYork, NY 10003-3598

SO ORDERED: 7/5 Hon. Peter ffMouton Our File No 7: U3.rr ;v f V S-4002-14 -ÿjSfifSOf&Z ."I'Ctf y.yty:- y/ ' VvHT ÿÿy.y.v.c--r Wr: ':

ÿ . VTAl/CO 7, • '.• X y j j:\-J \ .r > /: ' •'- ;i.ÿ[ A:A.;.! ÿ r:?;Uo:, gaga ggbggg vij; :',l .noli/oM) ' /GGGVGGGG t. • .ga XcCJw? i :-•: V/. gg* '. /r f vrr-o A - rr--

'•V-

!ÿ G;r , G \ iÿri::';i/:.. ;.;,oi'G 0 ii> :v -I : :: GG , G. G:Gi.

.. :.T': ,2';;!AAr::no.:;%Aÿ

g.ggog GGfr/-i.G;G>oG 'GAGg-tgÿ -g. ggs

v '.

h fs ÿ ÿ ÿ I . ;v Wl"

:'vj G. ; V < ÿ' C : G i - j j \.J* V- -1.-' i r.L': J- V-. .ÿUG-GG'} i £ 1 ;j O, • ÿ \rr"- •• ; ÿ >V-VS?P Vs';1 *ÿ«?"•" '> ÿ£'* -" ÿ ™:0>- ÿ'ÿ'ÿÿÿ """ ' '

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ; > ÿSUpREtoiRlS0 . NYCAL ; IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 50 ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Moulton,|.) This Document Relates to: Index No: 190263/2014

JEREMIAH SULLIVAN, JR., as Administrator NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY for the Estate of Jeremiah' P. Sullivan, JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Plaintiff, vs.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ETAL., Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant Crosby Valve, LLC, identified in the complaint as FMC Corporation on behalf of its former subsidiary, Crosby Valve, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice/Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant "Crosby Valve,; LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,':all claims and cross claims against defendant Crosby Valve, LLC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. .

Dated: New Yprk,.New York : ,

' :'. •', 2015. •/

Benjamin Darche, Esq. Beth L. Hughes,Esq. Weitz & Luxenberg PC Brady S. Edwards, Esq. Attorney for the Plaintiff Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP 700 Broadway Attorneys for Crosby Valve, LLC New York, New York 1,0003 . 101 Park Avenue Phone: (212) 558-5500; New York, NY 10178-0060 ' 7 v- J : ' Fax: (212) 344-5461': ;r • -Phone;: ,(2;12) 3.09-6000 - Fax: (212) 309-6001

SO ORDERED, ". Hon. Peter.Moulton H®N.PK'ERH.MOULTON

•/(> . !40T.KK)M.H?s3' 1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK May '

NYCAL • 75 IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY Nys Part 50 . ASBESTOS' LITIGATION LA S. sÿfrSo (Moulton, t) ÿOUf(T

This Document Relates to: Index No:.190365/2014

VINCENT MARSI and JOSEPHINE MARSI, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiff, vs.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET al„ Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant Crosby Valve, LLC, identified in the complaint as FMC Corporation on behalf of its former subsidiary, Crosby Valve, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Crosby Valve, LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Crosby Valve, LLC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. '

Dated: New York, New York

Benjamin Darche, Esq. Beth L. Hughes, Esq. Weitz & Luxenberg PC .Brady S. Edwards, Esq.. Attorney for the Plaintiff Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP 700 Broadway Attorneys for Crosby Valve, LLC New York, New York 10003 101 Park Avenue Phone:(212) 558-5500 New York," NY 10178-0060 Fax: (212) 344-5461 Phone: (212) 309-6000 Fax: (212)309-6001 19 SO ORDERED, cjnjis ifpce Hon/Peter Moulton .RVCSO

HON;PETERH.MOULTON ÿkt v-\ i'- r \ K\

ii *$/• . f

f.i'i4 # s. ' - J if ' ÿ Vÿ7/.• - * r '?»>•. so/"--,'• 7f vu../Q-*>O yy» % wfjuom.»aa;mi.mom SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK May m NYCAL INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY Part 50 ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. (Moulton, £) This Document Relates to: Index No: 190108/2014

GERALDINE STRASSER, INDIVIDUALLY NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER ESTATE OF CLARENCE STRASSER,

Plaintiff, vs.

ADEL WIGGINS GROUP, A DIVISION OF TRANSDIGM, INC., ET AL., Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant Anvil International Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Anvil International Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Anvil International Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York ~7 ,2015 'utfh A. John Gtnnan, Esq. Bethleth L. Hughes, Esq. J Levy Konigsberg LLP Brady S. Edwards, Esq. Attorneys for the Plaintiffs Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP 800 Third Avenue, 11th Floor Attorneys for Anvil International Inc. New York, New York 10022 101 Park Avenue Phone: (212) 605-6212 New York, NY 10178-0060 Fax: (212) 605-6290 Phone: (212)309-6000 Fax: (212)309-6001 ft SO ORDERED, ÿFfbn. Peter H. Moulton >'-ÿ

<\\ "fc-x"

A'ÿ ' ' • -. I T; .'\S- .* 'xX

wvffi

f\ .s,: • V'. '{'v\\"* $ XÿJ.VX-X -ÿC -'. 1 ' X

pX? <**, W Bi 0 n « <1 » ÿ C« '> '.''/>ÿ

30lÿ> ÿ. ' ' ... **88P*«to SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 50 (Moulton, ÿ.) This Document Relates to: Index No: 190235/2013

BRYANHOCKLER, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER Plaintiff,

vs.

3M COMPANY, F/K/A MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ETAL.,

Defendants.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,, all claims and cross claims against defendant Anvil International Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York 2015 EM, "Tohnohn Guinan, EsqEsq. Bfeth L. Hughes, Esq. Levy Konigsberg LLP Brady S. Edwards, Esq. Attorneys for the Plaintiffs Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP 800 Third Avenue, 11thFloor Attorneys for Anvil International Inc. New York, New York 10022 101 Park Avenue Phone: (212) 605-6212 New York, NY 10178-0060 Fax: (212) 605-6290 Phone: (212)309-6000 Fax: (212)309-6001

SO ORDERED, *Ffon. Peter H. Moulton "ÿw

'ÿ) o->- iv 'j r} \\ < rÿ'A-

i a \ -* \ i K-V-. ; \\

\ i\ i r\ !ÿ» ,M~V ÿ-. >V " ' -s,f •"' ~-U». -*"" <ÿÿ v >'\ —

•«-1 r- ;V ; •ÿ. £r £*ÿy "t, , £ tl./',' /) p. .

•ÿr /-I SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL Part ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. 50 (Moulton,If.) This Document Relates to: Index No: 190390/2012

THOMAS J. BRIGANTINO AND PHYLLIS NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY BRIGANTINO, JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

Plaintiffs. vs.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY, ET al.,

_ Defendants._

WHEREFORE, defendant Anvil International Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs',complaint against defendant Anvil International Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Anvil International Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Beth L. Hughes, Esq. " Levy Konigsberg LLP Brady S. Edwards, Esq. Attorneys for the Plaintiffs Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP 800 Third Avenue, 11th Floor Attorneys for Anvil International Inc. New York, New York 10022 101Park Ave""0 Phone: (212) 605-6212 New York, N Fax:(212)605-6290 < Phone: (212; Fax: (212)3

SO ORDERED, fibn. Peter H. Moulton V

I r- J v„ 'ÿr • .

i! r?V ' /? Jg,i1r •BOi-n-lO8'>'feJ0 >IROYwmYTMUOO " ) • '' -

.'.j ;

V SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK . f

' ' M/\y COUNTY OR)F NEW/YORK . . / F ' NYCAL v,;;. IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY , I.A.S. 50" LITIGATION Part. ASBESTOS (Moulton, £) This Document Relates to': :- Index No: 190191/2013

RITA E. LEWIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF GEORGE JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER P.LEWIS, /V'

Plaintiff, vs:

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BUFFALO ' PUMPS, INC.,.ETAL., _ • Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant Anvil International Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled:?case; pursuant to Civil Practice Law .and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint .against defendant Anvil International.Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,> ;

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Anvil International 'Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and , without costs. ÿ

Dated: New York, New.York . . 1: ',2015 4- tyktMwL. John Guinan, Esq. Beth L. Hughes, EsqT Levy Konigsberg LLP Brady S. Edwards, Esq. Attorneys for the Plaintiffs, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP 800 Third Avenue, 11th Floor Attorneys for Anvil International Inc. New York, New York 10022 101 Park Avenue Phone: (212) 605-6212 • New York, NY 10178-0060 Fax: (212)605-6290 . ,. Phone: (212) 309-6000 Fax: (212) 309-6001 SO ORDERED, s/'f Peter.H. Moulton /is

,:v;

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK NYCAL INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 50 ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Moulton, J') This Document Relates to: Index No: 190392/2012

JOHN W. ADLER AND ELAINE ADLER. NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER Plaintiffs, vs.

3M COMPANY, F/K/A MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant Griimell LLC, f/k/a Grinnell Corporation, hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Grinned LLC, f/k/a Grinned Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Grinned LLC, f/k/a Grinned Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York ftlGyj'7 .2015

SO ORDERED, Hon. Peter H.Moulton /.

I : A; ÿ , V -' .• / ... i-f, VI y -'< I f

f • -

'ÿ -• \

£ . &*- '

'.J , t?\r~ '£5*° Q ÿ

t v,"; '*• &ÿ ;77 s Sÿ>» a:' 7- C,VT> X'7 C i<7/ CD ?$ 'V fr (O/ IV \ÿT}} O m SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL Part ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. 50 (Moulton, J.) This Document Relates to: Index No: 190013/20u

MICHAEL LEOGRANDE, SR. AND NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY DOROTHY LEOGRANDE, JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

Plaintiffs, vs.

BURNHAM LLC, ET AL., Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant Griimell LLC hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Grinnell LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Grinnell LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York rn

SO ORDERED, !er*H. Moulton

19 ,F«csoff,c£ Mc- * ,.0-'Y *. •<>. . s( i,wv- \V ( ' V *' \ \ 7?:- \ , - >'v"

• - ;

•,M . % W* * •ÿ•' "ÿv:'\'v-iY>\3V , * SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK W COUNTY OF NEW YORK NYCAL INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 50 (Moulton, ÿ.) This Document Relates to: Index No: 190398/2014

GAETANO BARTOLONE AND MARIE NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY BARTOLONE, JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

Plaintiffs, vs.

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., ET AL., Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant Grinnell LLC, f/k/a Grinnell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs' ' complaint against defendant Grinnell LLC, f/k/a Grinnell Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Grinnell LLC, f/k/a Grinnell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York ,2015

Guinan, Esq. iughes, Esq. Levy Konigsberg LLP Brady S. Edwards, Esq. Attorneys for the Plaintiffs Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP 800 Third Avenue, 11th Floor Attorneys for Grinnell LLC New York, New York 10022 101Park Avenue Phone: (212) 605-6212 New York, NY 10178-0060 Fax: (212) 605-6290 Phone: (212)309-6000 \L.E° Fax: (212)309-6001 F SO ORDERED, ~S)ll)lS eter H. Moulton CLEFT'S office n v1, . :-\\<-*lJ c ; \ 0ÿ' \'< "?ÿV

... 3- ,

(- ,\ ir.rvA

,-fv I ÿA •. '• '.S--. a; ; ' .. .i- ' .ÿ•|ÿuy -,j:\ 1 ....a / .. '.i-V :v». 1

. ÿ -

/•'T j/' sj 'H.-3 Ia ' Mt'exm 3oÿoe>n;pkw ÿ:V7,,.ÿm ÿ/fly J: SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW,YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION

WILLIAM D. EBANKS, Index No. 190040-2015

Plaintiff, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS AGAINST -againstÿ ropeR pump Company

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al. including ROPER PUMP COMPANY, '

Defendants.

V; . -C-

. . , WHEREF0RE,'defendarit RQPER:RUMP COMPANY hereby.requestS:Summaryjudgment inthe above- entitled caseÿpufsja.9n't'td;(C;i$jfePratficie Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against ROPER PUMP COMPANY, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, ORDERED, thatiupon notice to all co-defendants, aH 'claims and cross claims against defendant

ROPER PUMP COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Dated: New York.Jÿyil'tork S/a

Patti Burshtyn,-Esq. •> f. Stephen IxtavaJdois; Esq"'' . . Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. Malaby & Bradley, LLC Attorneysfor Plaintiffs Attorneysfor Roper Pump Company 700 Broadway 150 Broadway, Suite 600 . New York, New York 10003 New York, NY 10038 F Ik SO ORDERED, ' Dated: /1$//ÿ ; ."Hon.'Peier H'. Moult'on CLgBKS OFFICE

ÿ '/v > i.--v" ••'V '• 'rV-V.V

:ÿ .V':. » - rrvt,- ? «ÿ! c.-sÿÿ ": V:v:-;v.:' ".-:V 0 L'o.'iiP f fi :-o y-vsu-..:: rm : :'"'ÿ >:Cft* -ft' '*•• ' ÿ''' ftft..

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITY NYCAL Asbestos litigation

\ ADOLPH H. WRIGHT and NANCY WRIGHT, Index No: 190137-2014 ft. \ Plaintiffs, -against- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT ft AERCO INTERNATIONALet al. including CROWN BOILER CO. f/k/a CROWN INDUSTRIES INC.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant CROWN BOILER CO., F/K/A CROWN INDUSTRIES, INC. ("CROWN BOILER"), hereby,requests-summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

Law and Rules Section 32i2, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against CROWN,BOILER, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, ' - ORDERED; that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant CROWN BOILER, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Dated: NewYor

Michael Fanelli> Esqv-:' Evas. Wayne, Esq. The Williams'Law Firm, P.C. Malaby & Bradley, LLC Attorneysfor Plaintiffs "" Attorneysfor Crowri Boiler Co. 245 Park Avenueÿ 39th Floor 150 Broadway; Suite 600 New York, New York 10167; New York, NY 10038 may i9.zo'fi .OFFICE ; SO ORDERED;./I Dated: fC//?//<." 00rOUNTY OUEBKS Hon: Peter H. Moulton NEW YORK ÿI -T

ÿ •" ft ' , t ij 5/ ft '1; 8 • J- ;,j ÿ $?m '

30mce*fl3i0 a ÿ'OY w3l/}

i V '

£ . A/. U'sY

ÿ i''

SUPREME COURT ORlfHE STATE OF NEW YORK ' COUNTY OF NEW YbRK - x IN RE NEW YORK CITY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION

GEORGE E. WALSH and EILEEN WALSH, Index No. 190037-2015

Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY V JUDGMENT -against-ÿ

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO;, et al. including ROPER PUMP COMPANY,

V Defendants.

ÿ s . 'i

WHEREFORE, defendant ROPEFl PUMPCOMPANY hereby'requests summaryjiidgment inthe above- entitled case, pursuant to Civif Practice Law and Rules.Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against ROPER PUMP COMPANY, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, ORDERED, that' upon notide to all co-defendants, airclaims andvcrosSiXlaims against defendant ROPER PUMPCOMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Dated: NewYork„ York >*V-'

Patti Burshtyh;.Esq.. .Stephen Novdlpdis; Esq: • , Weitz & Luxenberg, R.C.' Malaby & Bradley LLC :" Attorneysfor Plaintiffs Attorneysfor Roper Pump Company 700 Broadway 150 Broadway, Suite 600/ . New York, New York 10003 New:York, NY 10038;' MAY 19 Z015 OFFICE COUNTVGLERKSÿEWVORK SO ORDERED, Dated: 'Qll % /5 ÿÿ-Hbhr Pelen.H. Moulton

'yÿr ... 3C)m'-70 e'X'f?3iO yfro'SivsM '? "" SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK : : INRE: NEW YORK CITY ,. : -. | NYCAL ;• ASBESTOS LITIGATION i l.A.S. Part 50 : (Moulton,*$.)

ADOLPH H. WRIGHT and NANCY WRIGHT, . Ilndex No. 190137/ÿ Plaintiffs,

-against- ! NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER AERCO INTERNATIONAL, et al„ I AS TO DEFENDANT : PEERLESS INDUSTRIES.INC. Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES,INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES,INC.* with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant PEERLESSINDUSTRIES,INC.,be andthe same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Bern Barseghian, Esq! Michael Fanelli, Esq. ÿ Attorney for Defendant Attorney for Plaintiffs Peerless Industries,Inc. Adolph Wright and Nancy Wright Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard& Smith LLP The Williams Law Firm,P.C. 11Water Street, 21st Floor ; 245 Park Avenue, 39-h Floor New York, New York 10005 New York, New York 10167 FILED (2.12) 232-1300 •' (212)668-1122 FileNol'l86S-29494 V9 Z015

SO ORDEI conÿrF,CE Hon. Peter H. Moulton

4837-4781-0595/1 X3J0 y.Tf/!| «->, '* V/%* A /'C. . . SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK y INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY v : NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. : 0 j (Ileillei, J.) This Document relates to: i Index No. 190034/1\_nys supremeÿcourt WALTER ANDREWS AND GERALDINE - ANDREWS, NO OPPOSITION Plaintiff, SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER ragainst- .

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law. and Rules § 3212,' dismissing plaintiff s complaint against defendant, Peerless Industries,Inc.,with prejudice inthis action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Peerless Industries,Inc.,be andthe same are hereby dismissedwith prejudice andwithout costs. '' fil Dated: New York, -New York : m, MAY 19 2015 CLERKS OFFICE , COUNTY YORK mart, NEW anda J. Fachlir, Esq. . : BenjamfrMJarche, Esq. ttorney for Defendant Attorney for Plaintiffs Peerless Industries, Inc. ' . V. : Walter Andrews and Geraldine Andrews Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard<& Smith LLP Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. 77 Water Street, 21st Floor , 700 Broadway : FlewYorkj-New York 10005' New York, NY 10003 ; 212.232.-1300; ' V 212.558.5500 " : 1LE .,1863.29927,;. F ,. "jjl >. ;"AC & : MAY 19 *015 p t SO'ORDERED,w -*r Hon. Peter H. Moulton COUNTY

4850-4338-0002.1 . oeÿw4-

n , r3"?! • H

ill' YAM'- -U i

•-. d0!ÿ0 8'>lH3J0 Yrtfutir

" ••ÿ /IHOY , .- . t s.v,% VVdH • /ÿV.v -••'£ •- : ;« ÿ

ÿ"13 'ÿ5 "•. ÿ ' • §-#' SJ RECEIVED BY . carl ÿ • W.J 3 INIYMekSfiWÿiWPW, LEWIS 8RISB0IS . '* • •'.'• . "•• •---.. • <• BISGAARD& SMITHLLP *W'ff ft*wiw •; APR 13 2015 ÿ»aoW':: ÿROYtySl/. -v.,;' ÿ t '> ÿ ,-T

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK % COUNTY OF NEW YORK • -x INRE NEW YORK CITY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION -x v. CARLETON JOHNSON and DORIS JOHNSON, . ; Index No. 190125/2014

Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION . -v.- SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER .AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, as Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., et al., . including KINNEY VACUUM COMPANY,

Defendants.-

WHEREFORE, defendant Kinney Vacuum Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case;.pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Ruies.Section.3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Kinney Vacuum Company with prejudice, and there being ho opposition thereto, .• . . *.

ORDERED, that Upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant .

Kinney Vacuum Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New 1 F ILE D MAY 19 2015 BELLUCK & F,0 MALABY & BRADLEY,LLC COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK

David PTSchaffer, Esq. Attorneysfor Plaintiffs Attorneysfor Defendant Carleton Johnson, et al. Kinney Vacuum Company 546 Fifth Avenue, 4.th Floor 150 Broadway, Suite 600 New York, New York 10036 New York,New York 10038 (212)681-1575 (212) 791-028.5 ,

SO ORDERED, Dated: L5L Hon: Peter H.' Moulton' Mc:M' AOU!' 'CHMlA' CTEWS-e ' t ÿ f . )•.,..«4T .•: ?,r

ÿ..j.-.-i, 'i.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK - COUNTY OF NEW YORK "

INRE NEW YORK CITY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION —* Qiu CARLETON JOHNSON and DORIS JOHNSON, IndexNo, 190125/2014

Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT -v.- MOTIONAND ORDER

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et al., including J.A. ,SEXAUER, INC., - Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, J.A. Sexauer, Inc. (hereinafter "J.A. Sexauer"), hereby requests summary judgment in the ÿÿ above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212," dismissing plaintiff's compiairit against defendant J.A. Sexauer with prejudice, and there being no

~ opposition thereto, . , ' * ORDERED, that upon notice to,allco-defendants,\all claims and cross claims against defendant J.A. Sexauer be and the saxne are hereby dismissed with prejudice arid without costs.

Dated: NewiYiyJcÿNew York 2015 .

BELLUCK OX.LLP MALADY & BRADLEY,LLC

DavidP. Schafter, Jbsq. Attorneysfor PMritijfsyj : Attorneysfor Defendant Carleton Joiytsonfet oil. .j J.A. Sexauer, Ina - .546 Fifth Avenue, 4-h Floor 150 Broadway, Suite 600 " FILED New York, NY 10036 ÿ New York, New York 10038 (212) 681-1575 (212)791-0285 . may 19 OFFICE C°COUNTY CLERK'S NEW YORK

" * SO ORDERED,ÿ -Dated: m. : - Hon Peter H: Moulton. W4

J ÿ \ ' 'ÿ " ' " ' ÿ>'ÿ ÿ '' • \ ÿ v.? 3"

- • i'V" ' • .,-Ji ' ' ÿ ÿ 3 ; - ; . ; 3",.

' • f ,v3 • \3 : % . v ÿ .J J /ÿ v;ÿ\V vv . :r /.

* v' . - V

' ;Vv ;:3vtT'' . ' , -i

j ' ÿ • " 0 3 | • • ÿ V , • •* . -V ÿ' " :ÿ ÿ ' . - - V - ' • ÿ : 'ÿ . -v v , . > A

• ' ::aomo' jjo "* ' >}fK rcnÿuo »Y W3h .

•• 3,V 'ÿ 3 :IF®® SrfATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORR —x INRE NEW'YORKlOITy NYOAL ®WIÿ™SATiON

MARTIN'KOCH; Index-No, 190044/2015

Plaintiff, NOfOPPOSITION SUMMARY;JUDGMENT .-V:- liÿONAND'OrdeR'

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS:00., ET AL ,including, SUPERIOR BOIEER WORKS, INC.,

Defendants:

WilEREFORE, defendant SUPERIOR BOILER WORKS, INC. ("Superior")"hereby.request

summaryjudgment: iii the-above-entitled case; pursuant to Civil Practice Law an'd Rules'Section 3212,

disinissiirg:plaintiff's:'iQp;mplaint against defendant S.iiperibr \yitliout:ilfeju.dice,,and there being no

opposition.thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to a 11 co-defendants, alI claims arid cross claims against defendant

Superior be and the same are hereby dismissed \yithout preju.dice aitd without costs.

Dated: NewYbrkvNeÿv York J2._ 20X5

.Adanr Dreksjer; Esqv Eva-S. Wayne];Esq: \yElT»& EUXENBERiG MALABY& BRADLEY,LLC 700 Broadway 150 Broadway}vSuite,600' New York,.New Yprÿ New York;.NewfYo Attorneysfor Plaintiff Attorkeys.fok Defendant MartinKoch Superior Boiler Works, Inc. (212)558-5500 (2 12)i791-0285 ED SQORDEREDr Dated:ed: ' Slml/S MAY 19 Z015 Hon,Peter.H.!Mou1ton ...... CLERK'S OFFICE COUNTY NEW YORK SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -x INRE NEW YORK CITY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION -x MARTIN KOCH, Index No. 190044,

Plaintiff, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT -v.- MOTION AND ORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO, ET AL, including, CROWN BOILER CO,

Defendants.

ÿx WHEREFORE, defendant CROWN BOILER CO, F/K/A CROWN INDUSTRIES, INC.

("Crown Boiler") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Crown

Boiler without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to'all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Crown Boiler be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York. New York

Adam D'rekslef, Esq. Eva S. Wayne, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC MALABY & BRADLEY,LLC 700 Broadway 150 Broadway, Suite 600 New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10038 Attorneysfor Plaintiff Attorneysfor Defendant Fred C. Boddy Crown Boiler Co. (212) 558-5500 (212) 791-0285

MAY 19 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE SO ORDERED, Dated: NEW YORK Hon. Peter H. Moulton / ÿ .... . I • . • ' -iy* SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE NEW YORK CITY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 50 (Moulton, ' J- J.)

MARTIN KOCH, Index No. 190044/15

Plaintiff, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER A.O. SMITH:WATER PRODUCTS CO., including, ' MORSE DIESEL, INC. ,

.. Defendants,

-x •

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled case* pursuant to Civil Practice Law'and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff s complaint against.defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., with prejudice,.and there being no opposition thereto, ORDERED, that'upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New YorWNew York . ' 7 ,2015 '

Adam Dreksler, Esq.; . . Erika L, Fraenkel, Esq. WEITZ &luxenberg;PC. MALABY & BRADLEY,LLC Attorneysfor Plaintiff v Attorneysfor Defendant MartinKoch - - : . Morse Diesel; Inc. 700 Broadway 150 Broadway, Suite 600 New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10038 (212) 558-5500 (212)791-0285 file SO ORDERED?; Dated: £7/ MAY l . Hon. Peter H. Moulton a 2015 COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK

ÿw •. w-v'- fj'.y ÿ. • ÿ•>••• ÿc.y •. . ÿ - at . ÿ • «• ' ' ' ÿ • ÿ v- . 'Ti '7v.:..v ••

J .1«ÿ *. v»

' • . • ; T\ 7 - • lv7 SUPREME COURT GF THE STATE OF NEW YC COUNTY OF NEW YORK ' U.a'\ v"; "S- . .

INRE NEW YORK CITY NYCAL ÿ ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S: Part 50 . (Moultpn,$0

JOHN CUZZOLlNO and CONCETTA CUZZOLlNO, Index No. 190270/14

Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER A.O. SMiTH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.j including, MOkSE DIESEL, INC.

Defendants,

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant-to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendantMorse'Diesel, Inc., with prejudice/and there being no opposition thereto, ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New YcjrjI, Vork ,201:

Bryan Belasky, David-Pl";Senaitef;-iisq,".ÿ BELLUCK &Fi MALABY & BRADLEY,LLC Attorneysfor Pic Attorneysfor Defendant , John Cuzzolino Cuzzolino Morse Diesel, Inc. a\d0oncetta ÿ j.Ta 546 FifthAvenue, 4th Floor 150 Broadway, Suite 600 New York, New York 10036 New Yÿrk,New-York 10038 ' (212) 558-5500 J (212) 791-0285

FIL P B SO ORDERED, Dated:: . ft!ftp. ÿfion. Peter H. Moulton MAY 19 2015 .

COUNTY CLERK'S.CVF newYork

' . • y"i* ft -j«a.: ? /TIAUOO i - '- ' ÿL.Pwh' "iv--' •<ÿÿ ÿ ÿÿÿ. .

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK K .. COUNTY OF NEW YORK '

INRE NEW YORK CITY' NYCAL ' ASBESTOS LITIGATION —x JOHN NEGRI, .Index No. 190428/20lty

Plaintiff, NO OPPOSITION -against- SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, LLC et a),

Defendants. -x

WHEREFORE, defendant ADVANCE AUtO PARTS, INC. (incorrectly sued herein as

"ADVANCE AUTO SUPPLY") ( Hereinafter "ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INC.") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, ; dismissing Plaintiffs':complaint against defendant ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INC.with prejudice, and there being.no oppositionThereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against.defendant

ADVANCE AUTO PARTS,' INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without 7 costs.

Dated: New h

David P. Schaffer, Esq-. BELLUCK & FOX,LLC MALABY & BRADLEY,LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant John Negri Advance Auto Parts, Inc. F IL 546 Fifth Avenue . 150 Broadway, Suite 600 MAY 19 2015 New York, NY 10036 New York, New York 10038 (212) 681-1575 (212)791-0285' > COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK SO ORDERED,ÿ Dated: & ft I Hon. Peter H. Moulton -iC 8>!fejaYlW.IQ0

ÿ- >lciaY W3M .. • SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF.NEW YORK ' " • ' 'ÿ COUNTY OF NEW YORK . ÿ —x INRE NEW YORK CITY , - NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION -x = JOHN NEGRI, Index No. 190428/201ÿ , Plaintiff,

-against- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT ADVANCE AUTO SUPPLY, et al, including MOTIONAND ORDER WESTERN AUTO' SUPPLY COMPANY,

, Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant Western Auto Supply Company ("Western Auto") hereby requests summary judgment inthe aboye-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiff's complaint against defendant Western Auto withJprfcjudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, , ' ..•ÿ

ORDERED, that upon notice/to'all co-defendants, all claims and;ctoss claims against defendant

Western Auto be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andWithout costs.. ÿ; ;

Dated: ,'NeV Yof 2015 .

Jordan Fpx, Esj EiiluL. BELLUCK&feOJ MALABY & BRADLEY, LLC 546 Fifthÿvepue;4th.Floor 150 Broadway, Suite 600 7 New York, New York 10036 NewYork, New"York 10038 Attorneysfor Plaintiff Attorneysfor*Defendant John Negri, . ,.ÿ•?;ÿÿÿ • Western Aiito Supply.Company (212) 681-1575 (212) 791-0285 -

SO ORDERED, Dated: 5" F ILE D ÿffon. Peter H. Moulton MAY 19 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S.OFFICE NEWYOB&' '( ÿ p ÿ .J oi! (i res ? r -.-am

:K >H;K ' •/.'> ;BJO YTHUOO >iHOY W !l/i ' SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

-ÿX' INRE NEW YORK CITY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION -x RICHARD R. LEFRAK, l /Index No. 190033/2014

Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION -a SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER AERCO INTERNATIONAL,INC., et al., including ANIXTER INTERNATIONAL INC., a/k/a ' ANIXTER INC.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Anixter Inc. (sued herein as "ANIXTER INTERNATIONAL, INC., a/k/a ANIXTER INC.,"hereinafter "Anixter"), hereby requests:summaryjudgment inthe above-entitled case,pursuanttaCiyil PracticeLaw andRules Section3212,dismissingplaintiffscomplaint against defendant Anixter with prejudice, and there being .no opposition thereto, ORDERED/that -upon .notice to all co-defendants,- all/claims and cross-claims against defendant Anixter, be and'the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, NÿwYork r/l3 2015

Christopher AvRoinanelliv Esq. Matthew E. Endlich, Esq. ; WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P C. MALABY & BRADLEY,LLC 700 Broadway 150;Broadway, Suite 600 New York, NewYqrk 10003. New York, New York 10038 Attorneysfor Plaintiff .r

SO ORDE "Dated:__£ JAY 19 2015 •ÿHoriv Peter H. Moulton COUNTY CLERk'SOFFICE aNEW YORK K,<- it v " > ; „ >130'.' vO'ii/i ÿ' ÿ " ÿ ' ÿ . ..v.-- [y--p.- S:ÿ:' ::' " 1, • ..."

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ..

ÿ "'•ÿÿ ' m ,_ v A-.. ÿ' INRE NEW YORK CITY NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part:50 , —x ÿ A - This Document Relates to: Index No. 190454/1ÿ

STEVEN A. MORENO.and VIRGINIA MORENO NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER -X WHEREFORE,' Defendant Alcoa Inc., incorrectly.sued herein as "Alcoa, Inc., individually and as.successor in interest to Reynolds Metals, as.successor ininterest to Triple

AAA Roofing," hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs';complaint against Defendant Alcoa . • v Inc., with prejudice, and there.being no opposition thereto; it is '

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,.allclaims and cross claims against defendant, Alcoa InC,be and the1same are hereby dismissed.wi|h;prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York7 1, 2015

David A. Ghandle MichaeljTCurtiSj'Esq. ' KARST & VON OISTE, LLP MALABY & BRADLEY, LLC

576 Fifthÿ AveriueFSuite'40.1 150;Broadway, Suite 600 New York, New York 10036 NewYdrk, New York 10038 Attorneysfor Plaintiff(s)"'' A ttorneysforDefendant ÿ Steven A. Moreno andVirginia Moreno Alcoa Inc. ' (212)764-3900 • ''"V (212)791-0285 7 F IL E 19 2015 SO ORDERED, Dated: SjttjlS MAY Hon. Peter H. Moulton COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK

.7 ,ÿ ; : ...' Vh ' :ÿ -

' ' ; ;

-ÿiflÿjO YTMUOO ..XWVyÿt- SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK * - m -ÿx INRE ' -Y NEWYORK CITY' NYCAU . ASBESTOS LITIGATION LA.S. Part 50 .(Moulton,

STEVEN A. MORENO and VIRGINIA MORENO; his Index No. 190454/14 wife, '

Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER A.O: SMITH CORPORATION, including, MORSE- DIESEL INTERNATIONAL, INC. .

v' T *. Defendants, ÿÿ

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc. (incorrectly named herein as "Morse-Diesel • Construction Co."), herebyrequests.summaryjudgment inthe/above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law.and Rules.Section 321-2, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and thefeibeing no' Oppositionthereto, ' ; ORDERED, that uponnotice to all eo-defendants, all'claims and cross-claims against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs;

' Dated: New York, New York ÿ . . ... s-,„' _v20.15 . . ..."

David Chandler, Esq. * ' David H. Jones', tsq. KARST & VON OlSTE, LLP MALABY & BRADLEY,LLC • Attorneysfor Plaintiffs . ; Attorneysfor Defendant 5 Steven A. Moreno and Virginia Moreno, his wife Morse Diesel, Inc. f . 576 Fifth Ave., Suite 401 *:• 150 Broadway, Suite 600 New York, New York 10036 New York, NewYork 10038 F iLE ' (212) 764-3900 . T \ , (212) 791-0285. ." MAY 19 2015

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE SO ORDERED, Dated: , Sjl$I/S NEW YORK Hon. Peter H.-Moulton 1 » '1' . I'M «!.' - V.. ) \ ' ,AI1*'

' ÿ'** ' - .iK«ÿ ItI- • \ ti' -V *' *

t]; «jf r 1 ÿ V> * rw'I f1 mr iya.v

• ;;w < 8'Mfiuo vrnuoo >IHU 'W3K 1 ÿÿÿ ! \ ,/.f, '. ; ' .-.-'V 1 An-.'/wc ÿ •ÿ• - • - -ÿ iKf-.'i • -» ' ÿ ..«!- - - ÿ *.r.- . « .

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK V ÿ?' :V' V- A.- ,Y- -x '• INRE NEW YORK CITY •NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION _ J_ - _ WALLACE S. HANKMarid HELEN HANKIN, Index No. 190054/2015

Plaintiff, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT -v.- . .. MOTIONAND ORDER

A.O. SMITHWATER PRODUCTS CO., et al:, including VIKING PUMP, INC., v

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant Viking Pump, Inc. ("Viking") hereby requests summary judgment inthe abover'entitled;case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' compiairifagairist defendant Vikifig with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, , ,

ORDERED, that upon notice,to all co-defendarits, all claims and cross claims against defendant Viking be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York . . ' 2015 :

/Suzanne Katcliffe, Esq. David P."ÿchaffer, Esq. !WEITZ/& LUXENBERG, PC MALABY & BRADLEY, LLC 700 Broadway . 150 Broadway, Suite 600 New York, New York 10003 New York, New- York 10038 Attorneysfor Plaintiff- Attorneysfor Defendant p |ÿ Carlos Muszak Viking Pump Inc. (212) 558-5500 (212)791-0285 MAY 19 2015 SO ORDERED, Dated: kjitlis COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE Hon. Peter H. Moulton NEW YORK / aomo sw:bjo mvJoo • ÿ Xfi< -V \A/3i-i SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION

X: GEORGE BENSON and SUSAN BENSON, i; "Index No. 190i50-2014

' Plaintiffs, vv • /•;/ -against- nO Opposition summary

ÿ : " JUDGMENT

A.O. SMITH WATER PRppCTS CO. et al. including SUPERIOR BOILER WORKS, INC.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant SUPERIOR BOILER WORKS, INC hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against SUPERIOR BOILER.WORKS, INC., with prejudice andÿthere being no opposition ÿ" thereto, . . ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims;and cross claims against defendant SUPERIOR BOILER WORKS, INC., costs.

Dated: New York, New York . S S.JJ5

FrankT)rinz,Esq. Eva S! Wayne, Esqÿ':;;.-- Weitz(jÿ/Luxenberg, P.C. Malaby.& Bradley, LLC Attorneysfor Plaintiffs s, Inc. 700 Broadway 150Broadway,~ Suite600; New York, New York 10003 New York, 'NY 10038:ÿ.

MAY 19 2015 SO ORDERED, Dated: Hon. Peter H. Moulton COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEW YORK s;Z

ÿrj\

;;

« ÿ • i* t, 3O!P&2'M3j$Yp%O0$ SUPREME COURT OFTHE STATE OFNEWYORK. COUNTY OFNEWYORK ...— -— X RiCHARD—R.LEFRAK IndexNo.: 190033/2014

Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT -against- MOTIONAND ORDER

AERCO INTERNATIONALINC.,ET.AJL. Defendants. -X

. WHEREFORE; defendant,. BELDEN WIRE & CABLE COMPANY, LLC, sued incorrectly as

"BELDENINC.,"hereby requests summary-judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuantto CivilPractice

Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiff's Complaint againstthe-above defendant, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

BELDEN WIRE & CABLE COMPANY, LLC, be and the same, are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs;' • Dated; NewYork,NewYork May A 2015

WE1T#& ERG, P.C. COSTELLC1 SHEA & GAFENEY LL,

BY: £ sECLl •' ' RACHELL. GOLDBERG. fomeys for Plaintiff , . Attorneys for Defendants RICHARDR. LEFRAK • BELDENWIRE & CABLE COMPANY, LLC 700 Broadway 44 Wall Street - New York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10005 212-558-5500 212-483-9600 .

SO ORDERED, able Peter H. Moulton f 1LEÿ Costbuo,Shea & Oafpney up attornkys-at-uvw ;- KAY 19 <4 WAIL STREET NEW YORK, NY 10035 . - « ,}

' . T

.. /

ÿV CC3r> -Fÿii $ Vj ÿ /--- I"~fV' 6U;

ÿ0:Siv/ii,int VM" SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION

MICHAEL KOULERMOS and MARIAN KOULERMOS, Index No: 190406/2014

Plaintiffs, -v.- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al, MOTION AND ORDER including BASIC, INC.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant BASIC, INC. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled

case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against

defendant BASIC, INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED,4hat Upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

BASIC, INC. be and thasame are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: rork VJ 2014 -ft

Bonnie mr Esqr C. £s94 RichÿLÿMendUlsohn, Esq. BELLUICK t FOX,LLP ' MALABY & BRADLEY,LLC 4,h 546 Fift i Avenue, Floor 150 Broadway, Suite 600 New Yoiÿk, New York 10036 New York, New York 10038 Atlorneysjor Plaintiffs Attorneysfor Defendant MichaelKoulermos, et al. BASIC, INC. (212) 681-1575 (212)791-0285

SO ORDEREDÿ, DATED: <$Tjitj0 Hon. Peter H. Moulton 20,5 if"1;; ÿ; *jty mt« . ~ s~~-- '"'-'.A ' ÿ ÿ a- \ir "" Ya i> "

•rI'iT :;0'i>!.' .jtJ/tS.WJJi .;:.0V V. •M'lO.YTWU'OO

J.'Y.)Y>. yti:.y>D7(;- ; Ay '.A'.

r 'f'. :" -fV "i'f- VSf.

'V-i'i "... *vÿ > ÿ

ÿ.. jf

'"•Vv £<*•

SUPREME GOURT OEpHE STATElOF NEW YORK ÿ' ; ":"'- COUNTY OF NEW YORK WAY

IN RE NEW YpRK CITY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION J.A. S:?Part 5.0 . ; (Moulton, P.)

'V '. ÿÿ FRED C. BODDY, ;vp Index No. .190137-2015

Plaintiff, -against- NQ OPPOSITION SUMMARY v': JUDGMENT

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. et al.,

Defendants. . x,

WHEREFORE;def . J.. in the above-entitled case, ' cdmpiaint against BLACKMER, without prejudice,:andtherebeing np opposition.thereto, ORDERED, that UjDOirnoticeicrall co-defendants, acclaims and cross claims against defendant ÿÿ4," ""P'JMP,/Pi BLACKMER, be,and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: ' New:Yo.rk;..New York :-V . nSf y: ÿ

Michael RobertsÿEsqU ; /Connor, Esq. Weitz & Luxenberg, P C. *.:>• : Bradley, LLC AttorneysfbfPlaintiffs \ AttorneysfonBlackmef 700 Broadway v . . ÿv.'- ' 150Brbadway,Suite:600 New York, NewYork 10003 New York, NY 10038

SO ORDERED' Dated: J[S on/ Peter ÿ/Mo.uIton &JlK H MAY 19:2015 ... - 3. " county ornoe '• ,-V- NEW YORK

.--U : (',\i ' • ?! ' - *v'. , 1

yf'. ... - . ' worm# W ; • • = ÿ - ÿ:

' • ÿ ÿ " • ' • ... o>' ••• .'ÿ = : :. v"..-.. ÿ. • '• • .. ÿ' ' ÿ . v ÿ ' '' ' '' ' ' / >ÿ 'ÿ .' ÿ • K „ v

SUPREME COURt OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ,nn « ,ffttK. county of new york RECEIVED APR ______;______x / /£S) IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL I.A.S.Partÿifd/ ------.------...... ------...... - ...x (Ilcitlcr,L)--/ ÿm This Document Relates to: 1 '' 13? IndexNo. '' DONALD ROCOVICH AND PATRICIA------ROCOVICH,------190042/14 NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER - - - :—x OCTOBER 2014 IN EXTREMIS ------WHEREFORE,------defendant,------TiSHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k,'a TT¥

REALTY HOLDINGS', INC., hereby requests summary judgment.in the.above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and ;Rules Section 3212, dismissing ÿplaintiff's- complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN"REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. with prejudice, and there being no;opposition thereto, ÿ

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. \

Dated: New York, New York . ,2015

MARK BIBRO / / 4 YARDS , : THE EARLY LAW FIRM • ÿ DEMERS & McMANUS Attorneys for Plaintiffs • • eys for Defendant 360 Lexington Avenue, 20th Floor REALTY & CONSTRUCTION . New York, NY 10017 .n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, (212) 986-2255 INC. ÿ" " = ' 199 Water Street New York, N&w.York 10038 (212)513-7788

SO ORDERED, • H6n:PeterH.M6ulton 19 2015 ' V" MAY

" ' . •* Y ---'r ÿ. , t, ÿ ÿ ~ >.-•• COUNTYC CL6BKSpFBCE

ÿ YORK. • . .-Y 'Y- . - - • - NEW : i'-V .....

. :J.. :•-? L-. ÿ ay: : 03VJ303H

r.xi " '

xO*ÿ 03.'-ÿ''**" #

V. ' *

TT- v p ftÿ„J "~ ÿ ii t: jrs --radsf ' fei ~*fi

\ t! i- YAM aomo 8'>iR3Jb ytwuod 3ROYW3M i. > ÿ' •«>> ÿ v;;::*

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK May mr® IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S.PartjX) 4HeitkwtJ.) So : C°Uf?T _ THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO; HON.PETERH.MOULTON CI\/IL Index No.: 190125/2014 CARLETON JOHNSON AND DORIS JOHNSON,

NO OPPOSITION . Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER -against-

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP., et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant Oakfabco, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law: and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant Oakfabco, Inc.with prejudice, and there beipg no opposition thereto,

ÿ ORDERED, that upon ; notice to all co-defendants, all chums and cross claims against

defendant Oakfabco, Inc, be and the same are hereby dismissed/vith prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York May ÿ J2015

Mark K. Hsu Joseph leiiuck Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLP Belluck 7oxl LLP Attorneys for Defendant Attorne:ÿs/fbr PTaintiffs Oakfabco, Inc. Carleto Johnson and Doris Johnson 600 Lexington Avenue, 8th Floor 546 Fifth Avenue, 4th Floor New York, New York 10022 New York, NY 10036 (212) 897-9655 (212) 681-1575

SO ORDERED,. i'.Peterh.moulton pil&P KM 19 CLERK'SÿOFFICE rOUNTVc0 newvobk 4 t

z-> fi.w urn.ha*rra

motjugm.H*mv:W j/im . ÿ J?' ;;K7?Pÿ " .*;• « -:/.W //-'

-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ' COUNTY OF NEW YORK ÿ m

' 1 INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCAL . ASBESTOS LITIGATION :•? I.A.S- Parted (Moulton,-ÿ)' X' , This Document Relates to: . . : Index No.: 19020,7/14

• • ÿ FREDERICK JOSEPH CICIO and JACQUELINE : NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY CICIO : JUDGMENT MOTION AND : ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. as successor-ih- interest to Wilputte Coke OVen Division of Allied Chemical Corporation ("Honeywell/Wilputte") by its attorneys Harris Beach'PLLC, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Ciyil/Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingÿplaintiffs complaint against defendant HONEYWELL/WILPUTTEwith prejudice only (this Order does not apply to Honeywell Int'l Inc. s/h/a successor to Allied Signal/Bendix Corp.), and, there being.no

1 opposition thereto,. : , ORDERED,/that upon notice to all 'co-defendahts, all claims and cross claims against defendant Honeywell/Wilputte- and the same'are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and-without

' ' costs. - ' Dated: New York, New York u ,2015 v

Matthew Park,-Esq. 0Air V Robert A. Schaefer, Jr., I THE EARLY LAW FIRM,LLC HARRIS BEACH PLLC Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Defendant 360 Lexington/Avenue, 20lh Floor HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. New York, NY 10017 as successor-in-interest tOfWilputte Coke Oven (212)986-2233. • Division of Allied Chemical Corporation - TOO Wall Street, 23rd Floor ' / New York, NY 10005 (212)687-0100

SO ORDERED, 19 ' Hon. Peter H. Moiilton.TSrC. ' MAY CLERK'S OFFICE COUNTYc- newyork

%ÿ

"ÿ ' /•'• T.' V' 4 , . • v" ÿ"'TOvVfej; SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK m x! . may B IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION : I.A.S. Part 50 : (Moulton, £) x < This Document Relates to: : Index No.: 190045/14

JAMES M: SUDIMACK and JAMIE K. SUDIMACK NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

x WHEREFORE,; Defendant; HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. (f/k/a Allied Chemical Corporation), s/h/a as successor in interest to Allied Chemical Corporation, Wilputte Coke Division by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. (f/k/a Allied Chemical Corporation) with prejudice only (this Order does not apply to Honeywell Int'l Inc. s/h/a as successor to Allied Signal/Bendix Corp.), and there being no opposition thereto, ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims arid cross claims against defendant Honeywell Int'l Inc. (f/k/a Allied Chemical Corporation) be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Dated: Neww York, 1New York r |K _,2015 ':ÿÿÿÿ;

Matthew Park, E 0o'ciA Robert A. Schaefer,Urÿ Esq, THE EARLY LAW FIRM,LLC HARRIS BEACHPLLC Attorneys for Plaintiffs HoneywellTnternatiorial Inc. (f/k/a Allied th 360 Lexington Avenue, 20 Floor Cheriiical Corp.) s/h/a successor in interest to New York, NY 10017 Allied Chemical Corp., Wilputte Coke Division (212)986-2233 100 Wall Street, 23rd Floor New York, NY 10005 (212)687-0100 FSL ED SO ORDERED, may 2015 Hon. Peter H. MoultorT>J.S.C. 19 COUNTY CUERK'SWFICE NEW YORK

'ÿÿ•> " ÿEGEIVEO*uu MAY 117 ' ' L SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK , COUNTY OF NEWLyORK- r- ...... -~X"- . • '' /,/&> IN RE NEW YORK.CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION...... , NYCAL s ÿ .. . ; ; . ; . / This Document Relates to.:.' ' ÿ ( . Index No.: /. -

REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests' summary judgment ,in the aboveÿentitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and .Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, . . .

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against - defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,

INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice, and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York Yjb 2015 /f/— BENJAMIN DARCHE •; . /. . TAMES.EpWARDS , WXITZ&- LUXENB'ERG PC ÿ /ÿAHVlbT/Y; DEMERS & McMANUS ' ' Attorneys for Plaintiffs , V. Attorheÿfor 'Defendant 700 Broadway . TTSJiMAÿ REALTY.& CONSTRUCTION . New York, NY 10003 CO INC! n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, / ' INC. ; 199 Water;Street > New York," New York 10038 (212) 513-7788

SO ORDERED. ÿ ÿ ' ' HonYPe'tfer H.oMou1ton / . - ' • ÿ 'Vs- - MAY 19 2015

' ' ' . v- . COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE ' NEW YORK • • V • ,• - •. V.v- ' • ,l.;r ÿ • « v ,«*•;) . - . •• : ÿ .

'4EM AOBK CODi/LlA CfEWK.3 OEEiCE mhnsn.- . ''V -n» J K~s v . tS 2- Tf >CM .p?i ;C l\ k:..fe

> ( SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF;NEW YORK ÿR£CBV£0 ttJtf ------—-—- -"""""""i—: - IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL. (Moulton,"5p

This Document Relates to: , Index No.: L 190263/14 JEREMIAH SULLIVAN NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER -X APRIL 2015 INEXTREMIS

WHEREFORE, defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV

REALTY HOLDINGS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff s> complaint against defendant,

TISHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS,' INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all. claims and cross-claims against defendant, TISHMAN REALTY & CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, / CONSTRUCTION

INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New jYork, New York , 2015 "

BENJAMIN DARCHE JWARDS / ,V. • WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Y, OeMERS & McM us Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 .Attorneys for.Defendant 700 Broadway lN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION New York, NY 10003 / CO., INC. n/k/a TTV REALTY HOLDINGS, JNC.. • ; / '199 Water Street NewYork, New York 10038 (212) 513-7788

SO ORDERED,- ÿ 8 .PILE® Hon..Peter H. Moulton C// ... 7:. cou-»rF'CE

A ' y Xt' /

I '

* 'l

f ;j

¥ - ' *s=q #=Pl,( ÿ -h' r-~>-r - I fJ H r— 1. 1 *2f ju h ÿli

30m0g'XREIJoVrtiUOO >lflOY • W3M =ÿ

V . E;STATE QF EW YQRK ' Ri!V|ÿgQÿRTÿGFTH N . '• LÿssupR£ÿtÿ COUNTY OF NEW-YORK CIVIL

ALTON C. Index No.: 190293/14

Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION - against- SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC., Individually an, et-al.

Defendants. WHEREFORE, Defendant, ELECJROLUX HQME PRODUCTS, INC., Individually and as successor to Tappan and Gopes-Vuican (hereinafter "ELECTROLUX") hereby requests summary judgment in the .above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil -Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint .against Defendant, ELECTROLUX, with prejudice, and there being no oppbsitibh thereto. ORDERED, that; uponnotice to all co-defendants, ajl claims and cross claims against defendaht, ELECTROLUX, be and the same are hereby

Dated: ... . .White Plains, New York ,2015

Frank-OrtizrEsq- CYNTHIA#/ MESSEMER, ESQ. Weitz & Luxenbdrg,' HodgeS-Walsh & Messemer; Li-P Attorneys fprPlaintiff Attorneys for- Defendant . 700; Broadway < ELECTROLUX:HOME PR'aD.UGTS, INC., New York; New York 10003 Individualjy.;and as SUccessor fo Tappan (212) 558-5500 ÿ and Copes-Vulcan 55 Church Street, Suite 211 White Plaihs,;NY 10601 Tel: 914-385ÿ60019

' " -v. So Ordered:. J,SC. S'j f\CE H0N;PETtRH.MOULTON

% ' MOTJUQM,W :H3'WS .$0M' i ÿAY SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK „ . ./ 1ÿQ/r COUNTY OF NEW YORK . ' - / / -- ; V-V INRE:NEW YORK COUNTY 1 "* NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION 4 ÿ I.A.S.PART 50 ...- x] (Moulton,J.) EDWARD O. SCOTT and LENDELL SCOTT, ' : ...... INDEXNO. 190082/2015 Plaintiff(s), ------NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY -against- JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants. , - X

WHEREFORE, defendant Sulzer Turbo Services Houston Inc. hereby requests summary

judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law arid-Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Sulzer Turbo Services Houston Inc. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto;

ORDERED, that uponriotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

Sulzer Turbo Services Houston Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

. costs. v W.-. v L

' • '* Dated: New York, New York . : . April 15, 2015' . *'ÿ>/, ; - > \ f. Patti'Burshtyn, Esq. ; ÿ v '' *" Richard;P; O'Leary; Esq. - q Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. • Troutmari Sanders, LLP 700 Broadway - . The Chrysler Building New York, NY 10003 405 LexingtonAvenue 212-558-5500 .-V ' New York, NY 10174-0700 ' T!. : Attorneys for Plaintiffs' L 212-704-6000 ÿ . EdwardO. Scott andLendellScott Attorneys for Defendant ------Sulzer Turbo Services HoustonInc. i __G.ljtJÿ SO ORDERED. ÿ Hon. Peter H.Moulton, J.S.C. '

, CRVCS OFP*cE c°UNTNeIiooÿ . 25436I38vl " \ ...... - A °3.i|%

. ftlis. $ • i-Ahi

„ÿ r S ~.. - '"e'W3j:yx*- HP'-.'. ÿÿ • AUrv "-J,:.yvri!/- SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK beoebve© INRE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION MAY 14: 2015

PART 50 Relates NYS This Document To: SUPREME COURT - CIVIL ELIPETROVITCHand ANTOINETTE PETROVITCH, NYCAL I.A.S. Part}6 Plaintiff(s), 4HonÿSherry-K4©i«JHeitler)— IndexNo.: 190402/2014 -against- NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARY / JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated NewY

Jordan C. Fo: . Alford Kneis, Esq BELLUCK & . GATES LLP Attorneys for Phrintiff(s) Attorneys for Defend 546 FifthAvenue, 4th Floor CRANE CO. New York, NY 10036 599 LexingtonAvenue (212)681-1575 New York, NY 10022-6030 (212) 536-3900

SO S 19 ORDERED, . -J/sf/S OfF«E Hon.Peterh.moulton ... -;3

f r,r-3? />' >N *;5i (rli I 'CJJ : :5 aos K i ?

Z y,} ',J •' - < I 4,_ .."J -. ?-r.'*-ÿ< ÿ A'>" £ÿ . ÿ 'V-Sÿw—-- —

ÿ ÿ % W A V ,

SSs# ÿ ÿ T

• <ÿ MAY YAh* 12 2015 >7t ' mLj@AtES_

''7, 1 • l'"y ''v. motjwom.imnwi:mti SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK m © INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION supreme This Document Relates To:

CHRISTIAN P. PLATT, SR., NYCAL I.A.S. Part PlaintifF(s), KleinHoitlor)

IndexNo.: 190239/2014 -against- NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., ORDER

Defendants. - x WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant CRANE GO. be, andjbÿsame are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Dated: I-

Jordan KirstalAlford Kneis,Esq BELLLCKJ® ,LLP K&I/GATES LLP Attorne; tiff(s) Attorneys for Defendant 546 FifllivAyÿ h ,4th Floor CRANE CO. New York, NY 10036 599 LexingtonAvenue (212) 681-1575 New York, NY 10022-6030 (212) 536-3900

SO ORDERED, _ sp/i? ÿHHFfw-Sbaay Klp.in Heitler CL£BK.'S office HON.PBTerHMOULTON qOUM"ÿ ÿ !irv,

'VVil

,uow.hÿÿ-woH 1 - #1? SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK "i" COUNTY OF NEW YORK may m INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION j This Document Relates To:

JOHN CUZZOLINO and CONCETTA NYCAL CUZZOLINO, I.A.S. Part ÿ (Hon. Sherry Klein° Ilcitlor)- Plaintiff(s), IndexNo.: 190270/2014 -against- NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al,

Defendants. - x WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Dated:/__ J2 "kkiA JordpinCIFoj KirsfenAlford Kneis, Esq. BEI KML GATES LLP Attoÿ Attorneys for Defenÿit 546 FlfttpAvenue,ÿth Floor CRANE CO. New York, NY 10036 599 Lexington Avenue (212) 681-1575 New York, NY 10022-6030 (212) 536-3900 ,sofP°£ SO ORDERED, Sj/r/is *Hbn. Sherry K3eiTrffeitter~ coÿ1' monpeterh.moulton I SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CMTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION may m B : - x This Document Relates To:

ROBERT FRIEDLANDER and ROSE FRIEDLANDER, NYCAL I.A.S. Part 50 Plaintiff(s), (Hon. Peter Moulton)

Index No(s).: 190283/14 -against- NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO!, et al„

Defendants.IW

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: NewAork CljQ-— l, Escÿ, David Oxamendi, Esq. ?erg P.C. K&L GATES LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys for Defendant 700 Broadway ÿ ... CRANE CO. New York, NY 1000ÿÿ: 599 Lexington Avenue (212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022-6030 .;!! '• i (212) 536-3900

SO ORDERED, s Hon. Peter Moulton Y% HON.PETERH.MOULTON co I

HOTJUOM.HticWW MOB SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK m © INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION x This Document Relates To:

MYRON MILHISER AND BETTY CROVO, NYCAL I.A.S.Part>ef ££> Plaintiff(s), (Hon. Peter H.-Moulton) -against- Index No.: 190120-15 ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY (Individually and as successor to ROCKWELL NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT AUTOMATION), et al., MOTION AND ORDER Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. (improperly and allegedly sued herein as Crane

Company, Individually and as successor to Deming Pump, Weinman Pump Manufacturing Company,

Pacific Steel Boiler Corporation and Thatcher Boiler) ("CRANE CO.") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and-Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and. there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that Upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: S New York, New York

Brian Early, Esq. KirstenAlford Kneis, Esq. The Early Law Fiirn;vLEC k&i/6atesYlp Attorneys forPlaintiff(s) ' » Attorneys for. Defendant " 360 Lexington ÿ.venueÿ;20th Floor UME CO. New YorkvNY4'0,Q17ÿM . ,v,. 599 Lexington Avenue, , (212)986-2233'" New York, NY i0022 && *1 (212)536-3900 : .

SO ORDERED, Hon. Peter H. Moulton £//t//s

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK m MAY INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION j, This Document Relates To:

MICHAEL KOURLERMOS and MARIAN KOULERMOS, NYCAL I.A.S. Partÿ'Sÿ (Hon. Peter H. Moulton) Plaintiff(s), Index No.: 190406/2014 -against- NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,

Defendants. —x WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant CRwNEI CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: ork, Ne

Bonnie Stein f#ci)le M. Kozin, Esq. BELLUCK &TO: ,LLP K&UGATES LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys for Defendant 546 FifthAvenue, 4th Floor CRANE CO. New York, NY 10036 599 Lexington Avenue (212)681-1575 New York, NY 10022-60 (212) 536-3900 oÿ°e SO ORDERED, bjir/is Hon. Peter H. Moulton MAY 12 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY NYCAL IN RE: NEW,YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part >0'S~0 ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Judge Moulton) -X This Document Relates to: ELIZABETH RENO, Index No.: 190070/15

| t Plaintiff, NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATIO: as successor by merger to BUFFA: m PUMPS ,INC ., ©

Defendants

WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs. ! - Dated: New AVo&CTNevh York 2015

Joseph P. Williams,___Sfeq. Kristen L. Morrissy, Esq. THE WILLIAMS LAW FIRM, P.C. Cullen and Dykman LLP Attorneys for Plaij/tiff Attorneys for Defendant ELIZABETH RENO Goulds Pumps, Inc. 245 Park Avenue - 39th Fl 44 Wall Street, 15th Floor New York, New York 10167 New York, New York 10005 (212) 668-1122 (212) 732-2000 Our File No. :6754-13ÿ3' SO ORDERED: Sjltfjl: * M&&-.—Peter Moul-fcon— |}0M.peterh.moulton h

*0T-i00M .H .won ORIGIN SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW._Y.ORK . COUNTY OF NEW YORK x NYCAL

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION J. Peter H.Moulton

x Index No.: 190276/14 This Document Relates to: NO OPPOSITION DAVID HARRISON SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER x

No evidence has been adduced in the course of product identification discovery that plaintiff

David Harrison was exposed to an asbestos-containing product manufactured by Honeywell International

Inc.,formerly known as AlliedSignal Inc., successor-in-interest to the Bendix Corporation ("Honeywell").

WHEREFORE, Defendant Honeywell hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against

Defendant Honeywell with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against Defendant

Honeywell, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. )

Dated: New York, New York

,2015

McDermott Will & Emery LLP Karst & von Oiste, LLP

By: DÿldlLPugliDonald RvPugliebfiÿEsq.eSeÿE'sqMSr\\ David AfCfiahdler, Esq. 340IdO MnHicnnMadison AvenueAvpnnp ÿ 576 Fifth Ave, Suite 401 New York, New York 10173 New York, New York 10036 Attorneysfor HoneywellInternationalInc. Attorneysfor Plaintiffs ffk/a AlliedSignal, Inc., successor-in-interest to The Bendix Corporation SO ORDERED

Honorable Peter H. Moulton s-J/tf/S <•#*** ce rv£ÿS°f

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 50 (Moulton,"ÿ) THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: Index No.: 190389/12 ROBERT H. BODENSTEIN AND ASUNTA BODENSTEIN NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler Company of Pottstown, hereby requests

summary judgment in fee above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler Company of Pottstown, with

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Columbia Boiler Company of Pottstown, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs. * Dated: New York, New York May ft7 ,2015

£ . . Kerry Attorney for Plaintiffs Attorney for Defendant Bodenstein, Robert H. Columbia Boiler Company of Pottstown Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. McGivney & Kluger,P.C. 700 Broadway 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10004 (212) 558-5500 (212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, ÿTlon. Peter H. Moulton i 4

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 50 (Moulton,J.) This Document Relates to: 't$ Index No.: 190066/14 ROBERT G. FITZPATRICK AND :cÿ, MILDRED A. FITZPATRICK NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Parr Lumber Company, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

9 plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Parr Lumber Company, with prejudice in this action, and

there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Parr Lumber Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York 37 / 3 .2015

Kardon Stc ErinMiter,Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs Attorney for Defendant Robert G. Fitzpatrick and Mildred A. Fitzpatrick Parr Lumber Company Napoli,Bern,Rjpka,Shkolnik &Associates, LLP McGivney&Kluger,P.C. Empire State Building, .80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 350 FifthAvenue, Suite 7413 New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 10118 (212) 509-3456 (212) 267-3700

SO ORDERED, -ÿTlon. Peter H.Moulton 'S/if/iS

3605-0009 19 OFFICE #ÿ1 e*x , %Jf **£ i,

IP •• »'w ;P-i'o-- Vb . -1&OY ''!'K lAf'S.i/ir:' SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK : IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 50 (Moulton,ÿ.) This Document Relates to: Index No.: 190315/14, charles Anthony matuk : . - 'AND. ÿ . ELIZABETH B. MATUK NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporationÿ hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New Ycfrk, Nlew York 3/Hi v2015

.3r;

SO ORDERED, . ÿHon. Peter H. Mouiton

OFFICE

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 50 (Moulton, £.) % This Document Relates to: Index No.: 190456/13 DAVID V.NABLO AND CLAIRE A. NABLO NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Parr Lumber Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Parr Lumber Company, with prejudice inthis action, and e there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Parr Lumber Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York V/jq, ,2015

Kardon Stolzman, Esq. ErinMiter, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs Attorney for Defendant DavidV. Nablo and Claire A. Nablo Parr Lumber Company Napoli,Bern,Ripka,Shkolnik&Associates, LLP McGivney & Kluger,P.C. Empire State Building 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 350 FifthAvenue, Suite 7413 New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 10118 (212) 509-3456 (212) 267-3700 file SO ORDERED,. 19m ilon. Peter H.Moulton WW coutJ[»KCL£BK's 36(15-0007 ÿ ÿ ,r •% V '

ÿ '-1 ei. ,K \\ * OV

.Tÿ " i; w *"*:ÿ

'ÿ 1 !l--< V I'

' '"'--Jj > Vv , -ÿvÿ;

WHEREFORE, defendant, Parr Lumber Company, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Parr Lumber Company, with prejudice inthis action, and

there being no opposition thereto,

t ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Parr Lumber Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New

Kardon Sfolzman,itolzman. Esq. ErinMiter,Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs Attorney for Defendant Stanley Sadauskas and Geraldine Sadauskas Parr Lumber Company Napoli,Bern,Ripka,Shkolnik &Associates, LLP McGivney & Kluger,P.C. Empire State Building 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 350 FifthAvenue, Suite 7413 New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 10118 (212)509-3456 (212)267-3700 MAY 19 2015 SO ORDERED, ÿ v ffon. Peter H.Moulton COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE NEWYORK

I 3605-0006 iTV %ii ;y' A 5 '.'Vy

ÿ: a 4;

ÿ- n?

i.Q, - . V- 'ÿÿÿji.. ÿÿÿ SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK rN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 50 (Moulton,£) This Document Relates to: Index No.: 190501/13 ROBERT WALSH AND JOAN WALSH NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Rust Engineering and Construction Inc., as Successor to Rust

Engineering Company improperly plead as Treco Construction Services, Inc. f/k/a Rust

Engineering Company hereinafter as Rust Engineering and Construction Inc., as Successor to

Rust Engineering Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Rust Engineering and Construction Inc., as Successor to Rust Engineering Company, with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant, Rust Engineering and Construction Inc., as Successor to Rust Engineering Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

CaitlirfE. Bell, Esq. Attorney ior riaintirrtsj Attorney for Defendant Robert Walsh and Joan Walsh Rust Engineering and Construction Inc., as Levy Konigsberg,LLP Successor to Rust Engineering Company 800 Third Avenue, 13th F1 McGivney&Kjluger,P.C. New York, New York 10022 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 (212) 605-6200 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456 FILED SO ORDERED. Hon. Peter H. Moulton MM OFFICE c°UNTSyobkity&BWS v t. , \ \\ \ -X V

ÿ .--;v *-

ÿ ÿ•• ÿ ,- .,'•, 'jl'A..'.- .. ...: .'i ;.i

I1? &0:, § d' vauvt

-'ÿ-ÿprnjonmm; At .f/V \Aj-~ll..

-si 'a < p-

si,fPKi:mi-: co.tik-i or i-i ir s i atb ( >1 ni-;\vtokk . COUNTYOT Nl/W Yi)|<|< ÿ" ÿ"""'. Y • O '-ÿ'.•

Ci/MI . BUCK! IKI•]'..:>•> lew.can i,\ of ihc Iislj-i ic; ojf lM.lc,viVo; lt|.l665/20()6 pi: ri-:i< faci i:k i). ijHAui-orÿn wiiii i- corporation1s I'fninliiV NO OIM'VjsiTlON SUMMARY J:uj>,<=sijVI-- :. iÿQvr:iD.3N-" ani> pi vs.

AO. SMITH.W A! |. U;i'ROOi:!t.".l"S. el ;il.

I.Vieml.'MUS

Wi Il-'.lv I!1 A. J Iv I .. .I-. U'u.ls.iul Bradford While Corporalion hereby requests siinirtiary judgment in ihc above-cniftled case, pursuant tcy Civil 1h:ac:tiee Law and Rules;Secpon Bi2 V 2,

()i;sniissin»;:plain,|i1'rs i,vnnpl.;uni,againsi defendant Bradford Wdritcÿ with prejudice, there being lio njipusilinn.iliv.iy.

OR'PKR'P.I ), iiv: 1 1 tipon notice in aU cb-delendaiifs,All claims and ci;6ss: clairns againsl defendant -Bmdlnid \N" Ivi iv C >< > i:£i( i011, be and iIvc ÿ same.Are. hereby chSrriissed with prejudice and vvidu:aif costs'.

.Datedd: New rYiilv./Ni.'M' Vnrk I\i L / ?.0 12 I/

Bonnie M, SlcuBvK> ij. jtsquire Lathy A./fÿ'iN-Ct'll,; fequire ,U Iklkick

Rh: ÿ 212-6.SI-I.575 (2 12) 244-9500 v : I'ax: 212-6.S I • i 574 . Attorney for I'laiwi/js.. . Brac/JiiriJ White. Co'r/iorution Gail Bucklieii. as Pxet ufrixopha Estate oj Peter Pacifies)

' i','" sookoiiRiij:). lion. jt0N.PETERH.MOULTON

';i753x:w,i tftaiiQfa =NOTICE OF RESULTS= PLEASE take notice that the within is a (certified) true INDEX NO. 101665/2006 copy of a duly entered in the office of the clerk SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK of the within named court on COUNTY OF NEW YORK _ Dated, GAIL BUCKHEIT, as Executrix of the Estate of Yours, etc. PETER PACIFICO, LAWOFFICE OF Plaintiff, WHITE AND WILLIAMS LLP -against- Attorneys for A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al Office andPost Office Address Defendants ONE PENNPLAZA FORTY-FIRSTFLOOR, SUITE 4110 BRADFORD WHITE CORPORATION'S NO NEW YORK, NEW YORK 101197 OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION TO: AND ORDER Attorney(s) for Signature (Rule 130-lTÿ) =NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT= PLEASE take notice that an order of which the within is a true copy will be presented for Print name beneath settlement to the Hon. one of the judges of the Ingrid He, Esq. within named Court, Yours, etc. LAW OFFICE OF at WHITE AND WILLIAMS LLP Attorneysfor Defendant

at .M. Office andPost Office Address ONE PENNPLAZA Dated, FORTY-FIRSTFLOOR, SUITE 4110 Yours, etc. NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10119 LAW OFFICE OF (212) 244 - 9500 WHITE AND WILLIAMS LLP To: erÿa Attorneys for Attorney(s) for Plaintiff Office andPost Office Address Service of a copy of the within is hereby admitted ONEPENN Dated: FORTY-FIRSTFLOOR, SUITE 4110 NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10119 Attorneys for Plaintiff TO: I us/'

12967944v. 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -— - -x NYCAL B INRE:NEW YORK CITY----I.A.S. Part 50 ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Moulton) — x This Document Relates to: Index No.: 110130/1998 SULLIVAN, JOHN,

Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION v. AND ORDER AS TO DEFENDANT WHITING CORPORATION, et al. WHITING CORPORATION

Defendants. -X

WHEREFORE, defendant Whiting Corporation hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Whiting Corporation with prejudice, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against defendant Whiting Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

New York, New York

Dated:

izTEsq. Marissa C. Nardi, Esq. LUXENBERG WINSTON & STRAWN LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant Whiting Corporation 700 Broadway 200 Park Avenue New York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10166 (212) 558-5500 D: (212)294-3527 F: (212)294-4700 F SO ORDERED _ 19 ZM5 4>Hon. Peter H. Moulton CORK'S OFFICE 'ÿ r't,-v, ÿ••.•; J-V. :iV- J*:.

; affirmationof service

I, Marissa C. Nardi, state: that Iam an attorney ;in good standing and admitted to practice in,the courts of the State of New York, and that on May 13, 2015, 1served a copy of the

Suzanne Ratcliffe, Esq. Weitz.& Luxenberg 700 Broadway New York,- NY 10003 Attorneyfor Plaintiff

2. All Defense Counsel inthe New York City Asbestos Litigation

Dated: May 13, 2015- .Marissa C. Nardi, Esq. "V ?' > :• WINSTON & STRAWN LLP AttorneysforÿDefendant Whiting Corp. 200 Park A.venue '

ÿ New York, NY 10166 ÿ = [email protected] ' D:. (212) 294-3527 F: (212) 294-4700 .

V J. ..

>, '' ' ,v MAY 19 W,5 0FFlCE » , • vv/'.-y- r-,' COUNTY CLERK'S CQ YORK .. •" ''' ' ÿ' NEW

• h.

'V.. •». ÿ -.2. r>\ yyan ' SUPREME COURT;OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK , ' COUNTYOF NEW YORK : , -—— x; .NYOAL V, rN RE:'NEW YORK CITY ------" I.A.Si Part 50 ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Moulton). - r-?;---!------*?— ~— — — - - x • This...... Document...... Relates to: : . Index No.: 110130/1998 SULLIVAN, JOHN, . NOTICE OF NO OPPOSITION Piaintiff(s), Summary judgment motion AND ORDER v. as to Defendant whiting corporation WHITING CORPORATION, et ah

Defendant: -x

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the within is a true copy of a No Opposition

Summary Judgment Motion as to defendant, Whiting Corporationÿ' which is served in accordance with the Case Management Order. . '

New York, New York

Dated: ~fW-tlU/i

Marissa G:TJardi, Esq. WINSTON & STRAWN LLP

j 200 ParleAvenue , New York, New York 10166 [email protected] ' D: (212) 294-3527 F: (212) 294-4700

avCSOÿ0

Mew York Counsel Service List Genevieve MacSteel, Esq. Carol M.Teiripesta,Esq. Cynthia Antonucci,.Esq. £> McGuireWoods ÿ . Marks,6'Neiil, O'Brien & ! LLP . HariisjBeach, 1345 Avenue of the Americas . Courtney* P.C. 100 Wall 23rdFlodr Sjtreeti 7th Floor ÿ 530 Saw MiliRiver Road i New N,Y 10005 Yojrk, . New York, NY 10i05-0005 Elmsford,NY 10523

Robert Brooks-Rigolosi; Esq. William Bradley,Esq. MichaelCerussi/ Thomas Crispi McGuirewoods ; Malaby & Bradley LLC Cerussi &'Spring 1345 Avenue of the Americas ' i50 Broadway* Suite 600 One North Lexington Avenue 7th Floor : New York, NY 10038 White Plains, NY 10601 New York, NY 10105-0005

Elisa M.Pugliese, Esq. Frank A. Cecere, Esq. Mary Ellen Connor, Esq. Keyspan ;• j Ahmuty, Demers & McManus Malaby & Bradley,LLC Legal Department 1 | 200 l.U. WiUets Road ' 150 Broadway 175'East Old Co'untry Road Albertson, NY 11507 New York, NY 10038 . Hicksville, N;Y 11801

Jennifer Darger,Esq. David Goodearl, Esq. Kerryann Cook, Esq. DargerA Errinte,LLP Leader & Berkon ' McGivney Kluger & Gannon, P.C. 116Eait 27? Street ' ' 630 Third Avenue, 17th Floor 80 Broad Street, 23- Floor New York, 1N|Y 10016 New York, NY 10017 ' New York, NY 10004

Patrick j. Dwiyer,Esq. Anna DiLeonardo,Esq. I T Julie Evans,Esq. Smith, Stratton, Wise, Heher-& Brennan, Marshall,Dennehey, Warner, Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman i llp! . v i & Coleman .... 150 East 42nd Street : 2 Research Way 105 Maxess Road,Suite 303 New York, NY 10017-5639 Princeton,NJ 08540-6628 Melville,NY 11747

John J. Fanning, Esq. David L..Ferstendig, Esq. Steve Gary, Esq. Cullen:& Dykman Law,Offices of David L. Ferstendig, LLC Costello Shea & Gaffney 44 Wall Street 280 Madison Avenue, Suite 300 44 Wall Street INew York, NY 10005 New York, NY 10016 New York, NY 10005

Marc S. Gaffney, Esq: Diane Miller,Esq. Heidi Chang, Esq. Hoagland Longo Marin Goodman, LLP McMahon,Martine&Gallagher . 40 Pat!ersoi i-Street 500 Mamaroiieck Avenue 55 Washington Street, !7,h Floor. P.O Box •480 ÿ( Suite 501 Brooklyn, NY 11201 " ' , ew Brunswick,NJ08903 .. fi 1 : V Harrison,NY 10528

ILicbard f O'lleary,Esq. LoriElliot Guzman,Esq: Nicole Wesselmann, Esq. rroutmap Sanders LLP Hutton & Williams Price McMahon, Martine & Gallagher The 'sler Building . Riverfront Plaza East Tower ' 55 Washington Street, 7th Floor <105 Ldxington Ave 951East Bryd Street . Brooklyn,NY 11201 New York, NY 10174ÿ0700: Richmond,VA 23219

Anna DifiOnaÿdo,Esq. Ross & Hardies John P. Hooper,Esq. ;Weiner Lesniak LLP 1345 Avenue of the Americas Reed Smith LLP 629 Pansippany.Road 7th Floor 599 Lexington Avenue Parsippahy,NJ 07054 New York, NY 10105-0005 New York, NY 10022-7650

; Marissa C. Nardi, Esq. y George S. Hodges,Esq. Rosa Lee, Esq. Winston & Strawn LLP Hodges Walsh & Slater; LLP Cullen and Dykman 200 Park Avenue 55 Church Street, Suite 211. 44 Wall Street New York, NY 10166 White Plains,NY 10601 New York, NY 10005 '"HH I ! I New York Counsel Service List

Dwight Kern, Esq. Ann Hult,Esq. Francis Leonard, Esq. McGivney Kluger & Gannon, P.C. Brody,Fabiani & Cohen - Consolidated Edison Co. of NY P 80 Broad 5 treet 570 Lexington Avenue 4 IrvingPlace, Rm 1820 'I: New York, NiY 10004 New York, NY 10022 New York, NY 10003

Mark S. Landman, Esq; Timothy J. Mcliugh, Esq. Landman & Steven L.Keats Lavin, Coleman, O'Neil,Ricci,Finarelli CofsijBallaine' Ford,pj.C.' 131Mineola Boulevard • & Gray 120-Broadway,:27th Floor Mineola,NY 11501 420 Lexington, Suite 2900 ; New York, NY 10271 New York, NY 10170

. • . John S. Howarth, Esq.' Daniel J. McNamara, Esq. Salvatore G. Gangemi, Esq. WILBRAHAM, LAWLER & BDBA DeCicco Gibbons & Gangemi Law Firm,P.C. 140 Broadway, 46th Floor McNamara,P.C. 82 Wall Street; Suite 300 New York, New York 10005 232 Madison Ave., Suite 1409 New York, NY 10005 New York, NY 10016

Genevieve MacSteel, Esq. William Ivialaby,Esq. DanielMoretti, Esq. McGuirewoods Vlalaby ÿ Bradley LLC Landman Ballaine & Ford 1345 Avenue of the Americas Corsi | 150 Iroaqway 120 Broadway, 27th Floor 7th Floor New York, NY 10038 New York, NY 10271 New York, NY 10105

Anthony J. Marino;Esq.: Nancy McDoi aid, , Michelle Regan, Esq. Ejsq. Garrity,Graham, Murphy, McElroy,D( utch & Mulvaney Lavin, Coleman, Q'Neil, Ricci,Finarelli ÿ•i Garofalo & Flinn Moun : Keinbel Avenue 420 Lexington,Suite 2900 13pO 72 Eagle Rock Avenue, 3rd Floor Morristown,NJ07962-2075 New York, NY 10170 EastHanover,NJ 07936

Richard Fama, Esq. William Mendrzycki, Esq. David P. Schaffer, Esq. - Cozen O'Connor Drinker Biddle & Shanley Malaby & Bradley,L.L.C 45 Broadway Drive 600 Campus 150 Broadway, Suite 600 16th Floor Florham Park,NJ07962-1047 New York, NY 10038 New York, NY 10006-3792

John S; Rand,Esq. .Thomas Rhatigan,Esq. PaulA. Scrudato, Esq. Clark, Gagliardi & Miller, P.C. Costello, Shea & Gaffney, LLP Schiff- Hardin LLP Inns of CourtjBiiiiding / ÿ v 44 Wall Street . 666 Avenue, 17u> Floor 99 Court Street . Fifth V L New York, NY 10005 New York, NY 10103 White Plaines;|SrY 10601 Giovannji ReJina, Esq. David P. Schaffer, Esq. Christian H.Gannon, Esq. Waters,,McEherson,McNeill Malaby & Bradley,LLC Segal McCambridge Singer & Mahdney Building Woolwarth 150Broadway, Suite 600 850 Third.Avenue, Suite 1100 33- Broadway,Suite 2220 New York, NY 10038 New York, NY 10022 bjew York, NY 10279

M. ella, Esq, Christopher P. Hannan, Esq. Lisa ija'sca Norman Senior,Esq, Pascarella, Diyita, Jndenbaum & . Kelley Jasohs McGowan Greenfield Stein & Senior ÿ"! i Toniaszewski , Spinelli & Hanna,LLP • 600 Third Avenue Route 35 Suite 290 ;: A 120 Wall Street, 30th Floor ?137 :: New York, NY 10016 I Holmdjel, NJ 07733 •' New York, NY 10005 Jeffrey M:Thomen, Esq. Catherine A. Mohan,Esq. LindaYassky,Esq. Brown Gavalas & Fromm LLP • McCarter & SNR Denton LLP US 355 Lexington Avenue CityPlacel 1221Ayenue of the Americas New York, NV 10017 185 Asylum Street, 36th Floor. New York,XNY 100210 Hartford,CT 06103-3495

New York Counsel Service List Graig R.Avind, Esq; Francis!Wuihny Esq.. Timothy E.Corriston,Esq. Borowsky & Borowsky,LLC Laviri, Coleman Connell Foley LLP 59 Avenue at the Common 420 Lexington,Suite 2900 85 Livingston Avenue - Suites 101& 102 New York, NY 10170 Roseland,NJ07068-1765 Shrewsbury; NJ 07702

Russell |A. Pepe, Esq. Pepper Hamilton LLP Swartz & Campbell, LLC HarwooidLlo'yd, LLC 620 Eighth Avenue 1300 Route 73 130 Street 37,h Floor l\jlain Mount Laurel, NJ080854-2218 Hackensack, NJ 07601 New York, NY 10018

Stephanie Robbins, Esq. . Lavin,O'Neil, Ricci, Cedrone & DiSipio MichaelA; Tanenbaum, Esq.. CColeman,, Riccij Finarelli Lavin, p'Neil, 420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 2900 Sedgwick, LLP ÿiGrdy * Graybar Building 3 Gateway Center-12,h Floor 420 Lexin ;ton, 2900 jsuite New York, NY 10170 Newark,NJ07102 New Yoirk,NY 10170

Anna V. Aroniadis, Esq. Samuel Goldblatt, Esq. Greg Borri,Esq. LLP MorrisonjMahoney Nixon Peabody LLP Borri Law Office State Street .17 40 Fountain Plaza, Suite 500 61 Broadway, Suite 2820 Suite 1110 Buffalo,NY 14202 New York, New York 10006 New York, NY 10004

Zachary W. Carter, Esq. Shehzad Hasan, Esq. Stephen Donahue, Esq. James V. Parravani Steptoe & Johnson LLP Hardin,Kundla,McKeon & Poletto,P.A. Dorsey & Whitney 1114 Avenue of the Americas LLP 110 William Street, 25,h Floor 51West 52nd Street , New York, NY 10036 New York, NYT0038 i New York, NY 10019-6119 I i Cristina Sinclair, Esq. S. Yudelson, Esq. ScottEmery, Esq. David McElroy,Deutsch & Mulvaney, LLP Sive,,Paget & Iiesel, P.C. Lynch,-.Daskal,Emery 1300 Mt.Kemble Avenue 460 Park A venu ;, 10r Floor 264 West 40th Street P.O. Box 2075 New, Yt rk,NY 10022 New York, NY 10018 Morristown,NJ 07962

Angela DiGiglio, Esq: James S. Montano,Esq. Day 1'itneyLLP K&L GATES McCullough Ginsberg Montano & ; 7 Times Square ! 599 Lexington.Avenue ... Partners LLP New York, NY 10036-7311 New York, NY 10022 » , 122 East 42nd Street, Suite.3505 j '

ÿ New York, 10068 ÿ I NY I ! S ! .. Philip O'Rourke & David'Pollack , Michae Waller, Esq. ~ Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard Bradley J. Levien, Esq. Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston & SmithjLLP Mintzer.Sarwitz Zeris Ledva & Meyers Gates Ellis LLP 77 Water St,2l!t Floor LLP One Newark Center, Tenth Floor New York, NY 10005 39 Broadway,Suite 950 Newark,NJ07102. New York, NY 10006

William Bell, Esq. Leonard F. Lesser, Esq. William_F. Mueller,Esq. Jones Hirsch Connors ;& Bull P.C. Simon Lesser PC . Clemente, Mueller & Tobia, PA One Battery Park Plaza 355 Lexington Ave., 10th Floor 218 Ridgedale Ave., New York, NY 10004 . .: New York, NY 10017 Cedar Knolls,NJ 07927

Nancy L.Pehnie, Esq. Michael Masino, Esq. Yasmit eTa yab, Esq. AARONSON RAPPAPORT : J. HARRIS, BEACH, LLP Morg */-. " I FEINSTE1N & DEUTSCH, LLP ; ;an,rLewis;;ÿ/''; 99 Garnsey Road 77 West Wacker Drive . ' 600 Third Avenue Pittsford,NY 14534 Chicago, IL66601-5094 New York, New York 10016 -

"New York CounselService List Dale E. Hibbard, Esq.- Williaija A. Coohey ' David.Richman, Esq. BARRETT LAZAR, LLC Barrÿ, & Moore, LLC Rivkin,.Radler McTieijnan 109-01 72nd Road 2 Rector Street , 926 EAB Plaza Forest Hills, New York 11375' New York, NjY 10006 Uniondaie, NY 11556 i

Er ic Co tie Lisa Massimi, Esq. Thomas M.Berieventano, Esq. K&LG: tes CARUSO SMITHPIC1NIPC. . LaSorsa & Beneventano OhleNewarlk Ctr. 10th Floor , 60 US 46 EAST 3 Barker Ave., 2nd Floor Newaik,NJ 07102 Fairfield,New Jersey 07004 White Plains,NY 10601

; MarkK. Elizabeth A. Weill, Esq. Hsu. James B. Daniels,Esq. Hawkins Parnel Thackston ECKERT SEAMANS CHEBIN & BUDD LARNER, P.C. , & Young LLP MELLOTT.LLC 150John F. Kennedy Parkway 600 Lexington Ave., 8" Floor Two Liberty Place Short Hills,New Jersey 07078 New York, NY 10002-7678 , 50 South 16th Street, 22nd Floor Philadelphia* Pennsylvania 19102. Marshall S. Turner, Esq. MichaelB. Sena, Esq; Timothy M. McCann, Esq. CONDON & FORSYTH HERZFELD & RUBIN,P.C. LLP CAROLE A. BORSTEIN Times Square Tower 125 Broad Street, 12th Floor 4 IrvingPlace . 7 Times Square New York, New York l0OO4 Niw YOrk, New York 10003 New York, New York 10036

David Katzenstein, Esq. Bradley R. Lawrence,Esq. Claude N. Grammatico ECKE IT SEAMANS CHER1N & KENT & MCBRIDE,P C. LAW OFFICE OF EPSTEIN, MELLOT.T,|LLC 420 Lexington Avenue GIALLEONARDO & FRANKINI 10;Bank Street, Suite 700 Room;335 .. 330 Old Country Rd,Suite 200 Whit'e Plains, New York 10606 New York, New York 10170 . Mineola,NY 11501

Kennet lJ. Kelly, Esq. Thomas J. Maimone, Esq, Russell A. Pepe, Darren Luft, Esq. Esq. MA1MONE HARWOODLLOYDLLC EPST EljS BECKEK& GREEN, P.C. &;ASSOCIATES,PELC 150Haven Avenue 350 Fifth Avenue, 59th ; 250 tfark Avenue Floor Port Washington, New York 11050 New York, New York 10118 New York, N:w York 10177-1211

Michael Garcia, Esq. MaximeA. Guindo, Esq. Richard L.Mendelsohn, O'TOOLE FERNANDEZ WEINER Esq. JONES DAY LONDONFISCHER LLP VAN LIEULLC 222 East 41st Street 59 Maiden Lane ' 60 Ponipton Avenue- New York, NewYork 10017 New York, New York 10038 . Verona, New Jersey 67044

Kevin J. Dooley, Esq. McMAHON,MARTINE & t DonaldR.Pugliese, Esq. KASOWITZ,BENSON, TORRES & GALLAGHER LLP McDERMOTT WILL & ' LLP EMERY LLP FRIEDMAN 55 Washington Street, Suite 720 340 Madison Avenue 1633 Broadway Brooklyn,New YorkTliOl New York, New York 10173 NeW York, New Y ark 10019

Matthew S. Tamasco, Esq. Thomas M.Grove, Esq. Andrew Sapoh..Esq,.,; ; SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT B. LItCHFIEL,DCAVO LLC LEWIS LLP MARCUS P.C. 420 Lexington venie,Suite 2104 140 Broadway* Suite 3100 One North Broadway,Suite 412 . York, ISewYorkl0170. • • Nevy New York, New York 10005 White Plains,New York 10601

ÿ Jhmes S. JVC_ ontano, Esq. ' Stephen A. Manuele, Esq. Thomas M.Canevari, Esq. McOULLOUGH (INSBERG FELDMANlaEFFER, FREEH1LL HOGAN & MAHAR & PARTNERS LLP LLP LLP MONJANO 110 Street, Suite.400 80 Pine Street 320 East 53rd Stre< t, Suite 100 Pearl Buffalo,New York 14202 New York, NY 10005 Nevj' York,ÿ ew York 10022 , 1 •' < " ,1 >> " ÿ / ' \ ÿÿÿ •ÿ ; : . - . - V." r...... VZ&-- -;.A ÿ>>. ::ÿ ÿÿ' ;ÿ V>

ÿ • i

New York CouriseliS€iÿiceiiMst ;i Joseph Koczko,Esq. *. Jason Sultzer, Esq. ! ÿ' , . Richard C. Milazzo,Esq. RutheNepf ,Esq. * Joseph LiparijEsq.;;: ., - . iviMpEs THOMPSON H1NE LLP THE SULTZER LAW GROlJE, P;C A MOUNT,LLP 750 Seventh 335 Madison Aye. 12-h Floor ' 77 Water Street, 8th Floor . Avenue l New ew York: New York 10017 New York, New York;10005 York, New York 10019.

i: • •r

' ' 'V ' '"V' :: A-'.A . A

j 'MV V"

•;y y •,'A : • '• ' \'M' ÿ ' 0 ' *ÿ'- y - -ÿ -. ; j. - -'.A •- i A

ÿ J "v'.'>k'CcA--' t -7' •. .. . , i' A-jK.'.YAA :A ik,

Index No : 1 10130/1998 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK_ INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

SULLIVAN, JOHN, Plaintiff(s),

-against-

WHITING CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER AS TO DEFENDANT WHITING CORPORATION

Winston & Strawnllp

MAR1SSA C. NARDI,ESQ.

Attorneysfor 'Defendant Whiting Corporation

Office and Post Office Address, Telephone 200 PARK AVENUE. NEW YORK, NY 10166-4193 (212) 294-6700