HABITAT USE by the FISHING SPIDER DOLOMEDES TRITON in a NORTHERN Arthropods, Fishes, and Anurans (Gudger 1925, Williams 1979, Zimmerman and Spence 1989)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

HABITAT USE by the FISHING SPIDER DOLOMEDES TRITON in a NORTHERN Arthropods, Fishes, and Anurans (Gudger 1925, Williams 1979, Zimmerman and Spence 1989) Published in Wetlands, Volume 14:239-242. INTRODUCTION The vast freshwater wetlands of the Florida Everglades support a diverse aquatic and semi-aquatic arthropod fauna (Serrao 1980, Gunderson and Loftus 1992). One of the most NOTE conspicuous members of this arthropod fauna is the pisaurid fishing spider Dolomedes triton (Walckenaer). These semi-aquatic, hunting arachnids are voracious predators of other HABITAT USE BY THE FISHING SPIDER DOLOMEDES TRITON IN A NORTHERN arthropods, fishes, and anurans (Gudger 1925, Williams 1979, Zimmerman and Spence 1989). It EVERGLADES WETLAND is plausible that fishing spiders are keystone predators, although there is little agreement concerning the general role that spiders play in structuring either aquatic or terrestrial prey Frank Jordan1,3, Howard L. Jelks2,3, and Wiley M. Kitchens2,3 communities (Turnbull 1973, Foelix 1982, Nyffeler and Benz 1987, Oraze and Grigarick 1989). 1-Department of Zoology Indeed, there are few published studies dealing with any aspect of the biology of spiders living in 2-Department of Wildlife & Range Sciences 3-National Biological Survey natural wetland systems. Clearly, quantitative abundance and distribution data are needed to Florida Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit University of Florida increase our understanding of the ecology of fishing spiders in freshwater wetlands. 117 Newins-Ziegler Hall Gainesville, FL 32611 In this paper, we provide basic habitat use information about the fishing spider D. triton in the Arthur R. Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, a northern Everglades wetland system. Specifically, patterns of differential habitat use and seasonal variation in abundance Abstract: We investigated patterns of habitat use by adult fishing spiders Dolomedes triton in a were examined during an 18-month period. seasonally dynamic freshwater wetland of the northern Everglades. Spiders were collected STUDY AREA AND METHODS monthly (July 1990-January 1992) in adjacent wet prairie, alligator hole, and sawgrass habitats. Study Area Overall density of adult fishing spiders during the study period was 0.1 spiders per m2, although Research was carried out in the northern Everglades (Palm Beach County, Florida) at the there was extensive seasonal variation in abundance of these semi-aquatic arthropod predators. Arthur R. Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge (hereafter the Refuge). The Refuge is Densities were significantly higher in sawgrass stands than in wet prairies or alligator holes, a 57,234 hectare impounded marsh system historically comprised of emergent wet prairies, which did not differ from one another. Sawgrass sites were characterized by shallower water sawgrass stands, alligator holes, and elongate tree islands (Loveless 1959). More detailed habitat depths, taller and denser canopy structure, more extensive litter deposits, and fewer potential descriptions are provided by Richardson et al. (1990). avian and piscine predators. Overall, these data suggest that structural complexity and habitat The Refuge is the northern remnant of the Everglades, which historically stretched from heterogeneity influence the demographics of the fishing spider in this Everglades marsh system. the southern shores of Lake Okeechobee to the mangrove forests of northern Florida Bay. Currently, it is part of the vast south Florida water routing system and is operated as Water Conservation Area 1 by the South Florida Water Management District. The entire marsh is in as close proximity to one another as possible. Within each of these habitats, three traps encircled by a deep-water canal and dike system that drains an approximately equal area of the (subsamples) were randomly collected. Sampling was carried out monthly (except December Everglades Agricultural Area. The altered hydrologic regime, coupled with agriculturally 1991) from August 1990 through January 1992. Each month, six areas were randomly selected derived nutrient effluents, has led to extensive habitat conversion in the Refuge (Richardson et for sampling using a grid map of the Refuge and a random number table. Therefore, 54 trap al. 1990). For example, approximately 2,400 ha of sawgrass-dominated habitat has been samples (6 areas x 3 habitats x 3 subsamples) were collected during each of the 17 months (total replaced by a virtual monoculture of cattail (Typha domingensis Pers.). Concern over the impact n=918). This design was used to minimize airboat damage to vegetation associated with of habitat degradation on wildlife resources provided the primary impetus for this research. This repetitive sampling of fixed positions. study was carried out as part of a larger ecological characterization of the Refuge and its aquatic Due to the large number of empty traps, we converted spider densities to macrofaunal assemblages. presence/absence data and used multiple logistic regression (loglikelihood analysis) to examine the relationship between spider presence and the independent variables of habitat type, area, and Sampling Methods month. This loglikelihood approach is analagous to the analysis of variance method used for Aquatic macrofauna were collected by throwing an aluminum throw trap (100 x 100 x 75 continuous, interval data. cm) into the desired habitat and pressing firmly into the substrate. This technique has been shown to provide quantitative estimates of macrofaunal abundance (e.g., Kushlan 1981, Freeman RESULTS et al. 1984, Chick et al. 1992). Above-ground vegetation was identified and counted (relative Sawgrass, wet prairie, and alligator hole sites were physically distinct from one another. coverage), uprooted, and shaken to dislodge any macrofauna. A bar seine with 3.0-mm stretch Sawgrass sites were virtually monotypic, with Cladium jamaicense Crantz comprising 94% of mesh was then passed through the trap until three consecutive empty sweeps were obtained. the plant cover at these sites. The wet prairie sites were dominated by the emergents Eleocharis Traps were visually inspected for spiders following the clearing procedure. Fishing spiders were spp. and Rhynchospora spp. Alligator holes were comprised primarily of Utricularia spp. and identified, counted, and released back into the surrounding habitat. Nymphaea odorata Aiton. Wet prairies and alligator holes were generally deeper and more Several habitat variables were measured in addition to vegetation composition. Water open, whereas sawgrass sites were relatively shallow (average depth = 22 cm) and had well depth and canopy height were measured to the nearest centimeter inside each trap prior to developed canopies (average height = 145 cm) that provided significant shading and cover. removal of plants. Percentage dead sawgrass within each trap was visually estimated at the Above-ground plant biomass (dry weight) ranged from a low of 125 g/m2 in alligator holes to a sawgrass sites. Combined (live and dead) above-ground vegetation was dried and weighed to the high of 757 g/m2 in sawgrass, with wet prairie sites being intermediate at 284 g/m2. Dead plant nearest gram to obtain plant biomass estimates. material on average comprised 44% of the total Cladium coverage in sawgrass sites. The other The study involved a stratified random design with blocking. Areas (blocks) were two habitats did not have well developed litter deposits. random coordinates located throughout the Refuge. Within an area, one site each of sawgrass, Fishing spiders were distributed non-randomly with respect to habitat type (loglikelihood wet prairie, and alligator hole habitat were visited. These sites were sampled as encountered, and analysis, p<0.05; see Figure 1). Iterative removal of the different habitat types from the multiple regression model indicated that fishing spiders were significantly more abundant in sawgrass 1986, Uetz 1991). In this study, we found that the complex wetland mosaic comprising the than in either wet prairies or alligator holes, which did not differ from each other. The blocking northern Everglades affected the distribution of the fishing spider. The finding of higher effect was not significant (loglikelihood analysis, p>0.05). Therefore, the observed patterns of densities of fishing spiders in sawgrass is concordant with previous work by Bleckmann and differential habitat use were consistent across the wetland landscape. Rovner (1984). They found that the number of fishing spiders was highest in cattail habitat and A total of 918 1-m2 throw trap samples were collected during the study, yielding only 85 decreased as a function of decreasing plant cover and complexity. Relative to emergent fishing spiders. Individual traps contained between 0 and 5 spiders. Overall density was 0.1 vegetation of lesser stature, cattail and sawgrass provide similar habitat structure for fishing fishing spiders per meter square. However, there was considerable temporal variation in spiders: tall plant canopies with elevated levels of shading, enhanced protection from avian and abundance estimates. Monthly densities ranged from 0.3 spiders per m2 in May 1991, to no piscine predators, and reduced wind stimulii. spiders during the months of February, March, and April of 1991. The month effect was not Fishing spiders are not web builders but rather rely on mechanoreception to detect prey significant (loglikelihood analysis, p>0.05). There were no clear seasonal trends in spider that have become trapped on the water's surface or that are swimming just beneath it (Williams abundance, and interannual variation was great. 1979, Bleckmann and Barth
Recommended publications
  • Dna Sequence Data Indicates the Polyphyl Y of the Family Ctenidae (Araneae )
    1993. The Journal of Arachnology 21 :194–201 DNA SEQUENCE DATA INDICATES THE POLYPHYL Y OF THE FAMILY CTENIDAE (ARANEAE ) Kathrin C . Huber', Thomas S . Haider2, Manfred W . Miiller2, Bernhard A . Huber' , Rudolf J. Schweyen2, and Friedrich G . Barth' : 'Institut fair Zoologie, Althanstr . 14; 1090 Wien; and 2lnstitut fur Mikrobiologie and Genetik; Dr. Bohrgasse 9 ; 1030 Wien (Vienna), Austria . ABSTRACT. Mitochondrial DNA fragments comprising more than 400 bases of the 16S rDNA from nine spider species have been sequenced: Cupiennius salei, C. getazi, C. coccineus and Phoneutria boliviensis (Ctenidae), Pisaura mirabilis, Dolomedes fimbriatus (Pisauridae), Pardosa agrestis (Lycosidae), Clubiona pallidula (Clubi- onidae) and Ryuthela nishihirai (syn. Heptathela nishihirai; Heptathelidae: Mesothelae). Sequence divergence ranges from 3–4% among Cupiennius species and up to 36% in pairwise comparisons of the more distantly related spider DNAs. Maximally parsimonious gene trees based on these sequences indicate that Phoneutri a and Cupiennius are the most distantly related species of the examined Lycosoidea . The monophyly of the family Ctenidae is therefore doubted ; and a revision of the family, which should include DNA-data, is needed . Cupiennius salei (Ctenidae) is one of the most get a high copy number of the DNA segment of extensively studied species of spiders (see Lach - interest. The PCR depends on the availability of muth et al. 1985). The phylogeny of the Ctenidae , oligonucleotides that specifically bind to the a mainly South and Central American family, i s flanking sequences of this DNA segment. These poorly understood ; and systematists propose oligonucleotides serve as primers for a polymer- highly contradicting views on its classification ization reaction that copies the segment in vitro.
    [Show full text]
  • Hundreds of Species of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Live in Illinois In
    Illinois A B aquatic sowbug Asellus sp. Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella AAqquuaattiicc mayfly A. adult Hexagenia sp.; B. nymph Isonychia sp. MMaaccrrooiinnvveerrtteebbrraatteess Photographs © Michael R. Jeffords northern clearwater crayfish Orconectes propinquus Photograph © Michael R. Jeffords ruby spot damselfly Hetaerina americana Photograph © Michael R. Jeffords aquatic snail Pleurocera acutum Photograph © Jochen Gerber,The Field Museum of Natural History predaceous diving beetle Dytiscus circumcinctus Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella monkeyface mussel Quadrula metanevra common skimmer dragonfly - nymph Libellula sp. Photograph © Kevin S. Cummings Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella water scavenger beetle Hydrochara sp. Photograph © Steve J.Taylor devil crayfish Cambarus diogenes A B Photograph © ChristopherTaylor dobsonfly Corydalus sp. A. larva; B. adult Photographs © Michael R. Jeffords common darner dragonfly - nymph Aeshna sp. Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella giant water bug Belostoma lutarium Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella aquatic worm Slavina appendiculata Photograph © Mark J. Wetzel water boatman Trichocorixa calva Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella aquatic mite Order Prostigmata Photograph © Michael R. Jeffords backswimmer Notonecta irrorata Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella leech - adult and young Class Hirudinea pygmy backswimmer Neoplea striola mosquito - larva Toxorhynchites sp. fishing spider Dolomedes sp. Photograph © William N. Roston Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella Photograph © Michael R. Jeffords Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella Species List Species are not shown in proportion to actual size. undreds of species of aquatic macroinvertebrates live in Illinois in a Kingdom Animalia Hvariety of habitats. Some of the habitats have flowing water while Phylum Annelida Class Clitellata Family Naididae aquatic worm Slavina appendiculata This poster was made possible by: others contain still water. In order to survive in water, these organisms Class Hirudinea leech must be able to breathe, find food, protect themselves, move and reproduce.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Non-Insect Invertebrates of Steele Creek Park
    Checklist of Non-Insect Invertebrates of Steele Creek Park Harvestmen (Order Opiliones) __ Leiobunum aldrichi __ Leiobunum vittatum (Eastern Harvestman) __ Odiellus nubivagus __ Odiellus pictus __ Vonones sayi (Ornate Harvestman) Centipedes (Class Chilopoda) __ Geophilus vittatus (Diamondback Soil Centipede) __ Hemiscolopendra marginata (Florida Blue Centipede, Eastern Bark Centipede) __ Scolopocryptops nigridius __ Scolopocryptops sexspinosus (Eastern Fire Centipede) __ Strigamia bothriopus __ Theatops posticus (Smooth-tailed Forceps Centipede) __ Cryptops leucopodus Millipedes (Class Diplopoda) __ Apheloria montana (Cherry Millipede) __ Brachycybe lecontii (Feather Millipede) __ Cambala annulata __ Oxidus gracilis (Greenhouse Millipede)* __ Pseudopolydesmus canadensis __ Abacion magnum __ Abacion tesselatum __ Euryurus leachii __ Andrognathus corticarius (Cope’s Noodle Millipede) __ Narceus americanus-annularis (American Giant Millipede) Spiders (Order Araneae) __ Agelenopsis sp. (Grass Spider) __ Araneus marmoreus (Marbled Orbweaver) __ Araniella displicata (Six-spotted Orbweaver) __ Dolomedes albineus (White-striped Fishing Spider) __ Dolomedes tenebrosus (Dark Fishing Spider) __ Dolomedes triton (Six-spotted Fishing Spider) __ Dolomedes vittatus (Banded Fishing Spider) __ Larinioides cornutus (Furrow Orbweaver) __ Leucage venusta (Orchard Orbweaver) __ Micrathena gracilis (Spiny Micrathena) __ Micrathena mitrata (White Micrathena) __ Micrathena sagitatta (Arrow-shaped Micrathena) __ Misumenoides formosipes (White-banded Crab Spider) __ Neoscona crucifera (Spotted Orbweaver) __ Phidippus audax (Bold Jumping Spider) __ Phidippus otiosus (Canopy Jumping Spider) __ Phidippus putnami (Putnam’s Jumping Spider) __ Platycryptus undatus (Tan Jumping Spider) __ Pardosa sp. (Thin-legged Wolf Spider) __ Pirata sp. (Pirate Wolf Spider) __ Rabidosa rabida (Rabid Wolf Spider) __ Schizocosa crassipes (Brush-footed Wolf Spider) __ Synema parvulum (Black-banded Crab Spider) __ Tetragnatha sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Kansas Spiders
    A Pocket Guide to Common Kansas Spiders By Hank Guarisco Photos by Hank Guarisco Funded by Westar Energy Green Team, American Arachnological Society and the Chickadee Checkoff Published by the Friends of the Great Plains Nature Center i Table of Contents Introduction • 2 Arachnophobia • 3 Spider Anatomy • 4 House Spiders • 5 Hunting Spiders • 5 Venomous Spiders • 6-7 Spider Webs • 8-9 Other Arachnids • 9-12 Species accounts • 13 Texas Brown Tarantula • 14 Brown Recluse • 15 Northern Black Widow • 16 Southern & Western Black Widows • 17-18 Woodlouse Spider • 19 Truncated Cellar Spider • 20 Elongated Cellar Spider • 21 Common Cellar Spider • 22 Checkered Cobweb Weaver • 23 Quasi-social Cobweb Spider • 24 Carolina Wolf Spider • 25 Striped Wolf Spider • 26 Dotted Wolf Spider • 27 Western Lance Spider • 28 Common Nurseryweb Spider • 29 Tufted Nurseryweb Spider • 30 Giant Fishing Spider • 31 Six-spotted Fishing Spider • 32 Garden Ghost Spider Cover Photo: Cherokee Star-bellied Orbweaver ii Eastern Funnelweb Spider • 33 Eastern and Western Parson Spiders • 34 Garden Ghost Spider • 35 Bark Crab Spider • 36 Prairie Crab Spider • 37 Texas Crab Spider • 38 Black-banded Crab Spider • 39 Ridge-faced Flower Spider • 40 Striped Lynx Spider • 41 Black-banded Common and Convict Zebra Spiders • 42 Crab Spider Dimorphic Jumping Spider • 43 Bold Jumping Spider • 44 Apache Jumping Spider • 45 Prairie Jumping Spider • 46 Emerald Jumping Spider • 47 Bark Jumping Spider • 48 Puritan Pirate Spider • 49 Eastern and Four-lined Pirate Spiders • 50 Orchard Spider • 51 Castleback Orbweaver • 52 Triangulate Orbweaver • 53 Common & Cherokee Star-bellied Orbweavers • 54 Black & Yellow Garden Spider • 55 Banded Garden Spider • 56 Marbled Orbweaver • 57 Eastern Arboreal Orbweaver • 58 Western Arboreal Orbweaver • 59 Furrow Orbweaver • 60 Eastern Labyrinth Orbweaver • 61 Giant Long-jawed Orbweaver • 62 Silver Long-jawed Orbweaver • 63 Bowl and Doily Spider • 64 Filmy Dome Spider • 66 References • 67 Pocket Guides • 68-69 1 Introduction This is a guide to the most common spiders found in Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations of a Semi-Aquatic Spider Attack: an Overlooked Fish Predator in A
    Observations of a Semi-Aquatic Spider Attack: An Overlooked Fish Predator in a Well Studied Ecosystem? Amy E. Deacon, Aidan D. Farrell and Douglas F. Fraser Deacon, A. E., Farrell, A. D., and Fraser, D. F. 2015. Observations of a Semi-Aquatic Spider Attack: An Overlooked Fish Predator in a Well Studied Ecosystem? Living World, Journal of The Trinidad and Tobago Field Naturalists’ Club , 2015, 57-59. NATURE NOTES OEVHUYDWLRQ RI D SHPLATXDWLF SSLGHU AWWDFN AQ OYHUORRNHG )LVK 3UHGDWRU LQ D Well-Studied Ecosystem? We describe here a noteworthy spider encounter that Nyffeler and Pusey (2014) reviewed accounts of took place on the bank of the Ramdeen Stream in Trin- VSLGHU SUHGDWLRQ RQ ¿VK ZRUOGZLGH E\ FROODWLQJ SXE- LGDG¶V $ULPD 9DOOH\ ¶´1 ¶´: RQ lished and anecdotal reports. According to this paper, the August, 2014. This stream forms part of one of the most VLJKWLQJ GHVFULEHG KHUH LV WKH ¿UVW UHFRUGHG LQFLGHQFH RI intensively-studied freshwater ecosystems in the tropics; ¿VK SUHGDWLRQ E\ D VSLGHU LQ 7ULQLGDG 7KLV LV PRVW OLNHO\ for more than four decades international researchers have because few people have witnessed the event, and/or that been visiting this valley to discover more about the ecology previous descriptions have remained unpublished rather DQG HYROXWLRQ RI WKH ¿VKHV WKDW LW VXSSRUWV ± SULPDULO\ WKH WKDQ UHÀHFWLQJ WKH DFWXDO UDULW\ RI ¿VK SUHGDWLRQ E\ VSLGHUV Trinidadian guppy Poecilia reticulata DQG WKH NLOOL¿VK The pools in this case are manmade, but mimic pools Rivulus hartii (recently revised as Anablepsoides hartii). that are often found in such habitats and are naturally col- This unrivalled body of research has greatly expanded our RQLVHG E\ ULYXOXV 2YHU WKH FRXUVH RI SRRO YLVLWV E\ WKH understanding of natural selection, evolution and commu- DXWKRUV RYHU WZR \HDUV ¿VKLQJ VSLGHUV ZHUH REVHUYHG LQ nity ecology (Magurran 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Pókok Szünbiológiai Kutatása Az Ember Által Befolyásolt Tájban
    AKADÉMIAI DOKTORI ÉRTEKEZÉS Pókok szünbiológiai kutatása az ember által befolyásolt tájban Samu Ferenc, Ph.D. MTA Növényvédelmi Kutatóintézet Budapest 2007 TARTALOM 1 Előszó................................................................................................................... 4 2 Bevezetés ............................................................................................................. 6 2.1 Melyek a pókok ökológiai szerepét meghatározó fő biológiai tulajdonságok? .. 6 2.1.1 Táplálkozás........................................................................................................... 6 2.1.2 A pókfonál használata .......................................................................................... 7 2.1.3 Egyéb fiziológiai tulajdonságok......................................................................... 10 2.1.4 A pókok klasszikus ’sit-and-wait’ ragadozók .................................................... 11 2.2 Pókok a mezőgazdaságban................................................................................. 12 2.2.1 Pókok felhasználása a biológiai védekezésben .................................................. 12 2.2.2 Hazai előzmények a pókok kutatásában............................................................. 16 2.3 Kérdésfelvetés – a kutatások vázlata.................................................................. 18 3 A kutatás módszerei – metodológiai eredmények ......................................... 21 3.1 A kutatás módszerei ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Diversidad De Arañas (Arachnida: Araneae) Asociadas Con Viviendas De La Ciudad De México (Zona Metropolitana)
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 80: 55-69, 2009 Diversidad de arañas (Arachnida: Araneae) asociadas con viviendas de la ciudad de México (Zona Metropolitana) Spider diversity (Arachnida: Araneae) associated with houses in México city (Metropolitan area) César Gabriel Durán-Barrón*, Oscar F. Francke y Tila Ma. Pérez-Ortiz Colección Nacional de Arácnidos (CNAN), Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Ciudad Universitaria, Apartado postal 70-153, 04510 México, D. F., México. *Correspondencia: [email protected] Resumen. La ecología urbana es un área de investigación relativamente reciente. Los ecosistemas urbanos son aquellos defi nidos como ambientes dominados por el hombre. Con el proceso de urbanización, insectos y arácnidos silvestres aprovechan los nuevos microhábitats que las viviendas humanas ofrecen. Se revisaron arañas recolectadas dentro de 109 viviendas durante los años de 1985 a 1986, 1996 a 2001 y 2002 a 2003. Se cuantifi caron 1 196 organismos , los cuales se determinaron hasta especie. Se obtuvo una lista de 25 familias, 52 géneros y 63 especies de arañas sinantrópicas. Se utilizaron 3 índices (ocupación, densidad y estacionalidad) y un análisis de intervalos para sustentar la siguiente clasifi cación: accidentales (índice de densidad de 0-0.9), ocasionales (1-2.9), frecuentes (3.0-9.9) y comunes (10 en adelante). Se comparan las faunas de arañas sinantrópicas de 5 países del Nuevo Mundo. Palabras clave: sinantropismo, ecología, urbanización, microhábitats. Abstract. Urban ecology is a relatively new area of research, with urban ecosystems being defi ned as environments dominated by humans. Insects and arachnids are 2 groups that successfully exploit the habitats offered by human habitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Pompilidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera). Fauna of New Zealand 12, 160 Pp. Harris, A. C. 1987
    Fauna of New Zealand Eioia Aisoy Gou Memes a Eomoogy iisio eame o Scieiic a Iusia eseac Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag Aucka ew eaa E oicio ieco - M ogwo Gou eae Sysemaics Secio - G W amsay Co-opted from within Systematics Section K Cosy A ooway Uiesiies eeseaie G W Gis ooogy eame icoia Uiesiy o Weigo iae ag Weigo ew eaa Museums eeseaie C Yawy ieco aioa Museum o ew eaa iae ag Weigo ew eaa Oeseas eeseaie awece CSIO iisio o Eomoogy O o 17 Caea Ciy AC 1 Ausaia o a oaioa asis —s— Seies Eio M C ua Sysemaics Secio Eomoogy iisio eame o Scieiic a Iusia eseac Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag Aucka ew eaa aua o ew eaa ume 1 omiiae (Iseca ymeoea Α C ais Oago Museum Gea Kig See uei ew eaa Cataloguing-in-publication citation AIS A C omiiae (Iseca ymeoea / A C ais - Weigo SI Sciece Iomaio uisig Cee 197 (aua o ew eaa ISS 111-533; o 1 IS -77-51-3 I ie Η Seies UC 595793 Date of publication: see back cover of subsequent numbers Suggested form of citation ais A C 197 omiiae (Iseca ymeoea Fauna of New Zealand [no.] 12. is uicaio was ouce y ose iogay e auos ye- sci was ascie y OC scaig o o e ocesso iskee a ae eiig a sye coig was ooyese a e ΝΖ Goe- me iig Oice imes ew oma ye is use o mos o e e; mao eaigs a igue aes ae se i Uies; Gaamo a Geea ae use i e ies e Eioia Aisoy Gou a e Seies Eio ackowege e oowig co-oeaio DSIR Research Orchard, Havelock North: Ms Cocko - assisace wi wo ocesso iu Mount Albert Research Centre, DSIR: Ms aig - asciio o e M W emoe - assisace wi awok M ΜΒ Iwi - ooeucio ο ie igues Ms ΗΑ Wea - comue ie maageme Science Information Publishing Centre, DSIR: awco - sueisio o oucio a isiuio M C Maews - assisace wi oucio a uiciy Science Mapping Unit, DSIR: M Saage - assisace wi awok Front cover: e isec eice is Sphictostethus nitidus (aicius [] aggig a ey sie Miturga frenata Koc © Cow Coyig uise y Sciece Iomaio uisig Cee SI O o 971 Weigo ew eaa : Φ I 4 Φ • $4 Φ • • 4 oisiece Priocnemis (Τ monachus i-isa aa o is os Cantuaria allani.
    [Show full text]
  • Araneae (Spider) Photos
    Araneae (Spider) Photos Araneae (Spiders) About Information on: Spider Photos of Links to WWW Spiders Spiders of North America Relationships Spider Groups Spider Resources -- An Identification Manual About Spiders As in the other arachnid orders, appendage specialization is very important in the evolution of spiders. In spiders the five pairs of appendages of the prosoma (one of the two main body sections) that follow the chelicerae are the pedipalps followed by four pairs of walking legs. The pedipalps are modified to serve as mating organs by mature male spiders. These modifications are often very complicated and differences in their structure are important characteristics used by araneologists in the classification of spiders. Pedipalps in female spiders are structurally much simpler and are used for sensing, manipulating food and sometimes in locomotion. It is relatively easy to tell mature or nearly mature males from female spiders (at least in most groups) by looking at the pedipalps -- in females they look like functional but small legs while in males the ends tend to be enlarged, often greatly so. In young spiders these differences are not evident. There are also appendages on the opisthosoma (the rear body section, the one with no walking legs) the best known being the spinnerets. In the first spiders there were four pairs of spinnerets. Living spiders may have four e.g., (liphistiomorph spiders) or three pairs (e.g., mygalomorph and ecribellate araneomorphs) or three paris of spinnerets and a silk spinning plate called a cribellum (the earliest and many extant araneomorph spiders). Spinnerets' history as appendages is suggested in part by their being projections away from the opisthosoma and the fact that they may retain muscles for movement Much of the success of spiders traces directly to their extensive use of silk and poison.
    [Show full text]
  • Schwartz Et Al. 2016
    Report Males Can Benefit from Sexual Cannibalism Facilitated by Self-Sacrifice Highlights Authors d Male self-sacrifice behavior is adaptive in the dark fishing Steven K. Schwartz, spider William E. Wagner, Jr., Eileen A. Hebets d Postcopulatory sexual cannibalism results in fecundity Correspondence benefits for both sexes [email protected] d Cannibalized males benefit via increased offspring number, size, and survivorship In Brief Schwartz et al. show that obligate male d Benefits result from the consumption of the male, not from an death and subsequent sexual alternative prey item cannibalism in the dark fishing spider, Dolomedes tenebrosus, result in large and significant increases in the number, size, and survivorship of offspring. This empirical study provides support for the hypothesis that self-sacrifice behavior is adaptive via paternal effort. Schwartz et al., 2016, Current Biology 26, 2794–2799 October 24, 2016 ª 2016 Elsevier Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.010 Current Biology Report Males Can Benefit from Sexual Cannibalism Facilitated by Self-Sacrifice Steven K. Schwartz,1,2,3,* William E. Wagner, Jr.,1 and Eileen A. Hebets1 1School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA 2Department of Biology, Gonzaga University, Spokane, WA 99258, USA 3Lead Contact *Correspondence: [email protected] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.010 SUMMARY gate these costs [6]. While less commonly studied, female reproductive traits can impose costs on males, like the killing In a number of species, males are cannibalized by and consumption of males during reproductive interactions. females after mating (reviewed in [1, 2]), and some Such sexual cannibalism, which can occur prior to or following males actually appear to facilitate their own canni- copulation, is rare within most animal groups, but in some balism (reviewed in [3]).
    [Show full text]
  • Huron River Report – Winter 2004
    Huron River Report The Newsletter of the Huron River Watershed Council Winter 2004 Argo Dam Removal p 5 Streamside Hunters Natural Areas Map p 10 Fishing spiders stalk, skate, and dive for prey Site Design Fact Sheets p 9 Perhaps you’ve noticed one lying in wait guished by the arrangement of their eyes. along the bank of your local creek, on rocks Fishing spiders have eight eyes arranged in or vegetation, or maybe you’ve been lucky two rows of four each, while wolf spiders’ enough to watch one dancing across the eight eyes are arranged in three rows, with water’s surface. But most likely you’ve the two in the middle row being much never really noticed them at all. larger. Fishing spiders also frequent aquatic and riparian habitats, while wolf spiders are Fishing spiders are found throughout the more typically found in uplands. Huron River watershed. At least three species, all of the genus Dolomedes, have Fishing spiders, like wolf spiders, are been collected here. Members of this genus effective daytime predators that do not can be found throughout the continental spin webs to catch prey. They rely on United States and southern Canada. Fishing camouflage and excellent eyesight, waiting The six-spotted fishing spider, Dolomedes spiders can be large (females have a leg patiently for prey to pass their way and triton, sits in wait for aquatic prey. span of up to 3 inches), and therefore a bit swiftly springing upon unsuspecting victims. —photo: Giff Beaton intimidating, but they are harmless. These However, fishing spiders do not limit brown and gray, well-camouflaged spiders themselves to land-based prey.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Spider Community Resilience to Invasion by Non-Native Spiders
    Biological Conservation 98 (2001) 241±249 www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Evidence for spider community resilience to invasion by non-native spiders Jutta C. Burger a,*, Michael A. Patten b, Thomas R. Prentice a, Richard A. Redak c aDepartment of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA bDepartment of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA cDepartment of Entomology and Center for Conservation Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA Received 14 June 2000; received in revised form 20 June 2000; accepted 17 August 2000 Abstract The negative impacts of non-native species are well documented; however, the ecological outcomes of invasions can vary widely. In order to determine the resilience of local communities to invasion by non-native spiders, we compared spider assemblages from areas with varying numbers of non-native spiders in California coastal sage scrub. Spiders were collected from pitfall traps over 2 years. Productive lowland coastal sites contained both the highest proportion of non-natives and the greatest number of spiders overall. We detected no negative associations between native and non-native spiders and therefore suggest that non-native spiders are not presently impacting local ground-dwelling spiders. Strong positive correlations between abundances of some natives and non-natives may be the result of similar habitat preferences or of facilitation between species. We propose that the eects of non- native species depend on resource availability and site productivity, which, in turn, aect community resilience. Our results support the contention that both invasibility and resilience are higher in diverse, highly linked communities with high resource availability rather than the classical view that species poor communities are more invasible.
    [Show full text]