Spectacular Spiders
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Dna Sequence Data Indicates the Polyphyl Y of the Family Ctenidae (Araneae )
1993. The Journal of Arachnology 21 :194–201 DNA SEQUENCE DATA INDICATES THE POLYPHYL Y OF THE FAMILY CTENIDAE (ARANEAE ) Kathrin C . Huber', Thomas S . Haider2, Manfred W . Miiller2, Bernhard A . Huber' , Rudolf J. Schweyen2, and Friedrich G . Barth' : 'Institut fair Zoologie, Althanstr . 14; 1090 Wien; and 2lnstitut fur Mikrobiologie and Genetik; Dr. Bohrgasse 9 ; 1030 Wien (Vienna), Austria . ABSTRACT. Mitochondrial DNA fragments comprising more than 400 bases of the 16S rDNA from nine spider species have been sequenced: Cupiennius salei, C. getazi, C. coccineus and Phoneutria boliviensis (Ctenidae), Pisaura mirabilis, Dolomedes fimbriatus (Pisauridae), Pardosa agrestis (Lycosidae), Clubiona pallidula (Clubi- onidae) and Ryuthela nishihirai (syn. Heptathela nishihirai; Heptathelidae: Mesothelae). Sequence divergence ranges from 3–4% among Cupiennius species and up to 36% in pairwise comparisons of the more distantly related spider DNAs. Maximally parsimonious gene trees based on these sequences indicate that Phoneutri a and Cupiennius are the most distantly related species of the examined Lycosoidea . The monophyly of the family Ctenidae is therefore doubted ; and a revision of the family, which should include DNA-data, is needed . Cupiennius salei (Ctenidae) is one of the most get a high copy number of the DNA segment of extensively studied species of spiders (see Lach - interest. The PCR depends on the availability of muth et al. 1985). The phylogeny of the Ctenidae , oligonucleotides that specifically bind to the a mainly South and Central American family, i s flanking sequences of this DNA segment. These poorly understood ; and systematists propose oligonucleotides serve as primers for a polymer- highly contradicting views on its classification ization reaction that copies the segment in vitro. -
Sexual Selection Research on Spiders: Progress and Biases
Biol. Rev. (2005), 80, pp. 363–385. f Cambridge Philosophical Society 363 doi:10.1017/S1464793104006700 Printed in the United Kingdom Sexual selection research on spiders: progress and biases Bernhard A. Huber* Zoological Research Institute and Museum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany (Received 7 June 2004; revised 25 November 2004; accepted 29 November 2004) ABSTRACT The renaissance of interest in sexual selection during the last decades has fuelled an extraordinary increase of scientific papers on the subject in spiders. Research has focused both on the process of sexual selection itself, for example on the signals and various modalities involved, and on the patterns, that is the outcome of mate choice and competition depending on certain parameters. Sexual selection has most clearly been demonstrated in cases involving visual and acoustical signals but most spiders are myopic and mute, relying rather on vibrations, chemical and tactile stimuli. This review argues that research has been biased towards modalities that are relatively easily accessible to the human observer. Circumstantial and comparative evidence indicates that sexual selection working via substrate-borne vibrations and tactile as well as chemical stimuli may be common and widespread in spiders. Pattern-oriented research has focused on several phenomena for which spiders offer excellent model objects, like sexual size dimorphism, nuptial feeding, sexual cannibalism, and sperm competition. The accumulating evidence argues for a highly complex set of explanations for seemingly uniform patterns like size dimorphism and sexual cannibalism. Sexual selection appears involved as well as natural selection and mechanisms that are adaptive in other contexts only. Sperm competition has resulted in a plethora of morpho- logical and behavioural adaptations, and simplistic models like those linking reproductive morphology with behaviour and sperm priority patterns in a straightforward way are being replaced by complex models involving an array of parameters. -
Hundreds of Species of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Live in Illinois In
Illinois A B aquatic sowbug Asellus sp. Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella AAqquuaattiicc mayfly A. adult Hexagenia sp.; B. nymph Isonychia sp. MMaaccrrooiinnvveerrtteebbrraatteess Photographs © Michael R. Jeffords northern clearwater crayfish Orconectes propinquus Photograph © Michael R. Jeffords ruby spot damselfly Hetaerina americana Photograph © Michael R. Jeffords aquatic snail Pleurocera acutum Photograph © Jochen Gerber,The Field Museum of Natural History predaceous diving beetle Dytiscus circumcinctus Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella monkeyface mussel Quadrula metanevra common skimmer dragonfly - nymph Libellula sp. Photograph © Kevin S. Cummings Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella water scavenger beetle Hydrochara sp. Photograph © Steve J.Taylor devil crayfish Cambarus diogenes A B Photograph © ChristopherTaylor dobsonfly Corydalus sp. A. larva; B. adult Photographs © Michael R. Jeffords common darner dragonfly - nymph Aeshna sp. Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella giant water bug Belostoma lutarium Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella aquatic worm Slavina appendiculata Photograph © Mark J. Wetzel water boatman Trichocorixa calva Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella aquatic mite Order Prostigmata Photograph © Michael R. Jeffords backswimmer Notonecta irrorata Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella leech - adult and young Class Hirudinea pygmy backswimmer Neoplea striola mosquito - larva Toxorhynchites sp. fishing spider Dolomedes sp. Photograph © William N. Roston Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella Photograph © Michael R. Jeffords Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella Species List Species are not shown in proportion to actual size. undreds of species of aquatic macroinvertebrates live in Illinois in a Kingdom Animalia Hvariety of habitats. Some of the habitats have flowing water while Phylum Annelida Class Clitellata Family Naididae aquatic worm Slavina appendiculata This poster was made possible by: others contain still water. In order to survive in water, these organisms Class Hirudinea leech must be able to breathe, find food, protect themselves, move and reproduce. -
Checklist of Non-Insect Invertebrates of Steele Creek Park
Checklist of Non-Insect Invertebrates of Steele Creek Park Harvestmen (Order Opiliones) __ Leiobunum aldrichi __ Leiobunum vittatum (Eastern Harvestman) __ Odiellus nubivagus __ Odiellus pictus __ Vonones sayi (Ornate Harvestman) Centipedes (Class Chilopoda) __ Geophilus vittatus (Diamondback Soil Centipede) __ Hemiscolopendra marginata (Florida Blue Centipede, Eastern Bark Centipede) __ Scolopocryptops nigridius __ Scolopocryptops sexspinosus (Eastern Fire Centipede) __ Strigamia bothriopus __ Theatops posticus (Smooth-tailed Forceps Centipede) __ Cryptops leucopodus Millipedes (Class Diplopoda) __ Apheloria montana (Cherry Millipede) __ Brachycybe lecontii (Feather Millipede) __ Cambala annulata __ Oxidus gracilis (Greenhouse Millipede)* __ Pseudopolydesmus canadensis __ Abacion magnum __ Abacion tesselatum __ Euryurus leachii __ Andrognathus corticarius (Cope’s Noodle Millipede) __ Narceus americanus-annularis (American Giant Millipede) Spiders (Order Araneae) __ Agelenopsis sp. (Grass Spider) __ Araneus marmoreus (Marbled Orbweaver) __ Araniella displicata (Six-spotted Orbweaver) __ Dolomedes albineus (White-striped Fishing Spider) __ Dolomedes tenebrosus (Dark Fishing Spider) __ Dolomedes triton (Six-spotted Fishing Spider) __ Dolomedes vittatus (Banded Fishing Spider) __ Larinioides cornutus (Furrow Orbweaver) __ Leucage venusta (Orchard Orbweaver) __ Micrathena gracilis (Spiny Micrathena) __ Micrathena mitrata (White Micrathena) __ Micrathena sagitatta (Arrow-shaped Micrathena) __ Misumenoides formosipes (White-banded Crab Spider) __ Neoscona crucifera (Spotted Orbweaver) __ Phidippus audax (Bold Jumping Spider) __ Phidippus otiosus (Canopy Jumping Spider) __ Phidippus putnami (Putnam’s Jumping Spider) __ Platycryptus undatus (Tan Jumping Spider) __ Pardosa sp. (Thin-legged Wolf Spider) __ Pirata sp. (Pirate Wolf Spider) __ Rabidosa rabida (Rabid Wolf Spider) __ Schizocosa crassipes (Brush-footed Wolf Spider) __ Synema parvulum (Black-banded Crab Spider) __ Tetragnatha sp. -
Common Kansas Spiders
A Pocket Guide to Common Kansas Spiders By Hank Guarisco Photos by Hank Guarisco Funded by Westar Energy Green Team, American Arachnological Society and the Chickadee Checkoff Published by the Friends of the Great Plains Nature Center i Table of Contents Introduction • 2 Arachnophobia • 3 Spider Anatomy • 4 House Spiders • 5 Hunting Spiders • 5 Venomous Spiders • 6-7 Spider Webs • 8-9 Other Arachnids • 9-12 Species accounts • 13 Texas Brown Tarantula • 14 Brown Recluse • 15 Northern Black Widow • 16 Southern & Western Black Widows • 17-18 Woodlouse Spider • 19 Truncated Cellar Spider • 20 Elongated Cellar Spider • 21 Common Cellar Spider • 22 Checkered Cobweb Weaver • 23 Quasi-social Cobweb Spider • 24 Carolina Wolf Spider • 25 Striped Wolf Spider • 26 Dotted Wolf Spider • 27 Western Lance Spider • 28 Common Nurseryweb Spider • 29 Tufted Nurseryweb Spider • 30 Giant Fishing Spider • 31 Six-spotted Fishing Spider • 32 Garden Ghost Spider Cover Photo: Cherokee Star-bellied Orbweaver ii Eastern Funnelweb Spider • 33 Eastern and Western Parson Spiders • 34 Garden Ghost Spider • 35 Bark Crab Spider • 36 Prairie Crab Spider • 37 Texas Crab Spider • 38 Black-banded Crab Spider • 39 Ridge-faced Flower Spider • 40 Striped Lynx Spider • 41 Black-banded Common and Convict Zebra Spiders • 42 Crab Spider Dimorphic Jumping Spider • 43 Bold Jumping Spider • 44 Apache Jumping Spider • 45 Prairie Jumping Spider • 46 Emerald Jumping Spider • 47 Bark Jumping Spider • 48 Puritan Pirate Spider • 49 Eastern and Four-lined Pirate Spiders • 50 Orchard Spider • 51 Castleback Orbweaver • 52 Triangulate Orbweaver • 53 Common & Cherokee Star-bellied Orbweavers • 54 Black & Yellow Garden Spider • 55 Banded Garden Spider • 56 Marbled Orbweaver • 57 Eastern Arboreal Orbweaver • 58 Western Arboreal Orbweaver • 59 Furrow Orbweaver • 60 Eastern Labyrinth Orbweaver • 61 Giant Long-jawed Orbweaver • 62 Silver Long-jawed Orbweaver • 63 Bowl and Doily Spider • 64 Filmy Dome Spider • 66 References • 67 Pocket Guides • 68-69 1 Introduction This is a guide to the most common spiders found in Kansas. -
Wetland Wildlife Cards
Wetland wildlife cards • To make the cards, cut the line across the width of your paper then fold each half in half again so you end up with a picture on one side and the information on the other. Stick the two sides together with glue. Cut Fold Fold Stickleback Diet: Insects, crustaceans, tadpoles and smaller fish Wetland adaptations: Some sticklebacks have adapted to be able to cope with both fresh and saltwater meaning they can live in both rivers and the sea Classification: Vertebrate - Fish Habitat: Ponds, lakes, ditches and rivers Did you know? The male develops a bright red throat and belly and performs a courtship dance to attract a mate. The male also builds and protects the nest Cut Cut Eel Diet: Plants, dead animals, fish eggs, invertebrates and other fish Wetland adaptations: Long, narrow body enables it to get into crevices Classification: Vertebrate - Fish Habitat: Rivers and ditches Did you know? Adult eels migrate 3,000 miles (4,800 km) to the Sargasso Sea to spawn. It then takes the young eels two or three years to drift back to their homes here in the UK Fold Fold Smooth newt Diet: Insects, caterpillars, worms and slugs while on land; crustaceans, molluscs and tadpoles when in the water Wetland adaptations: Can breathe through their skin Classification: Vertebrate - Amphibian Habitat: Ponds in spring; woodland, grassland, hedgerows and marshes in summer and autumn; hibernates underground, among tree roots and under rocks and logs over winter Did you know? Their body gives out a poisonous fluid when they feel threatened -
Nature Conservation on a Shoestring
Bulletin of the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management Issue 98 | December 2017 Nature Conservation on a Shoestring In this issue Conservation on a Shoestring: Working for Wildlife – Pantheon: A New Resource The Mutualistic Benefits of Environmental Partnerships for Invertebrate Survey University – Nature Reserve between Water Companies Standards and Analysis Collaborations and Wildlife Trusts Welcome Information Nature Conservation on a Shoestring In Practice No. 98 December 2017 Most CIEEM members will agree that a healthy, wildlife-rich natural world is valuable ISSN 1754-4882 in its own right as well as being the foundation of our wellbeing and prosperity; Editor we depend on it and it depends on us. Yet too many forces in the world are pulling Dr Gillian Kerby ([email protected]) wildlife and people apart, unnecessarily damaging natural systems, disrupting Internal contributions ecological processes and reducing biodiversity. The turbulence of the political climate coordinator opens up major risks but also presents new opportunities for nature conservation. Mr Jason Reeves ([email protected]) We have our work cut out to turn this chaos to the advantage of the natural world. Editorial Board Mr Jonathan Barnes, Dr Kate Bayley, The Wildlife Trusts believe that everyone deserves to live in a healthy environment, Dr Andrew Cherrill, Mr Dominic Coath, rich in wildlife and full of opportunities to enjoy the natural world. By working Mr Neil Harwood, Dr Caroline McParland, together, in the places that are closest and most important to us, people can change Mrs Kate Morris, Mr Paul Rooney, the natural world for the better – whoever and wherever we are – for ourselves and Mr Paul Scott, Miss Katrena Stanhope, Mr Darren Towers for future generations. -
Observations of a Semi-Aquatic Spider Attack: an Overlooked Fish Predator in A
Observations of a Semi-Aquatic Spider Attack: An Overlooked Fish Predator in a Well Studied Ecosystem? Amy E. Deacon, Aidan D. Farrell and Douglas F. Fraser Deacon, A. E., Farrell, A. D., and Fraser, D. F. 2015. Observations of a Semi-Aquatic Spider Attack: An Overlooked Fish Predator in a Well Studied Ecosystem? Living World, Journal of The Trinidad and Tobago Field Naturalists’ Club , 2015, 57-59. NATURE NOTES OEVHUYDWLRQ RI D SHPLATXDWLF SSLGHU AWWDFN AQ OYHUORRNHG )LVK 3UHGDWRU LQ D Well-Studied Ecosystem? We describe here a noteworthy spider encounter that Nyffeler and Pusey (2014) reviewed accounts of took place on the bank of the Ramdeen Stream in Trin- VSLGHU SUHGDWLRQ RQ ¿VK ZRUOGZLGH E\ FROODWLQJ SXE- LGDG¶V $ULPD 9DOOH\ ¶´1 ¶´: RQ lished and anecdotal reports. According to this paper, the August, 2014. This stream forms part of one of the most VLJKWLQJ GHVFULEHG KHUH LV WKH ¿UVW UHFRUGHG LQFLGHQFH RI intensively-studied freshwater ecosystems in the tropics; ¿VK SUHGDWLRQ E\ D VSLGHU LQ 7ULQLGDG 7KLV LV PRVW OLNHO\ for more than four decades international researchers have because few people have witnessed the event, and/or that been visiting this valley to discover more about the ecology previous descriptions have remained unpublished rather DQG HYROXWLRQ RI WKH ¿VKHV WKDW LW VXSSRUWV ± SULPDULO\ WKH WKDQ UHÀHFWLQJ WKH DFWXDO UDULW\ RI ¿VK SUHGDWLRQ E\ VSLGHUV Trinidadian guppy Poecilia reticulata DQG WKH NLOOL¿VK The pools in this case are manmade, but mimic pools Rivulus hartii (recently revised as Anablepsoides hartii). that are often found in such habitats and are naturally col- This unrivalled body of research has greatly expanded our RQLVHG E\ ULYXOXV 2YHU WKH FRXUVH RI SRRO YLVLWV E\ WKH understanding of natural selection, evolution and commu- DXWKRUV RYHU WZR \HDUV ¿VKLQJ VSLGHUV ZHUH REVHUYHG LQ nity ecology (Magurran 2005). -
Scottish Spiders - Oonopspulcher 15Mm
Scottish Spiders BeesIntroduction and wasps to spider families There are approximately 670 species of spider in 38 different families in the UK. This guide introduces 17 families of spiders, providing an example of a species or genus to look for in each. Please Note: The vast majority of spiders in the UK need examination under a microscope of mature adults to confirm species. Immature specimens may be identified to family or to genus level and often only by an expert. This guide has been designed to introduce several families with information on key features in each and is not an identification guide. Woodlouse spiders (Family Dysderidae) 4 species in 2 genera Rather elongate looking spiders with no clear markings or Woodlouse spider (female) pattern on their cylindrical abdomen. They have six eyes that are clustered together in a circular formation. Often found under stones, logs, tree bark and other debris. Typical body length in family ranges from 6-15mm. Species to look out for - Woodlouse spider (Dysdera crocata) A distinctive species with a red cephalothorax and legs and forward projecting chelicerae. This species feeds on woodlice and can be found under stones and debris in warm (and sometimes) slightly damp situations. Generally nocturnal - look for them in gardens and on walls where they may be found sheltering in silken retreats. This species is common in England but less so in Scotland, being absent from the very north. Look out for Harpactea hombergi which although similar in Male: 9—10mm Female: 11—15mm appearance has a narrower cephalothorax and with less Falk © Steven prominent chelicerae. -
SRS News 66.Pub
www.britishspiders.org.uk S.R.S. News. No. 66 In Newsl. Br. arachnol. Soc. 117 Spider Recording Scheme News March 2010, No. 66 Editor: Peter Harvey; [email protected]@britishspiders.org.uk My thanks to those who have contributed to this issue. S.R.S. News No. 67 will be published in July 2010. Please send contributions by the end of May at the latest to Peter Harvey, 32 Lodge Lane, GRAYS, Essex, RM16 2YP; e-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] Editorial Hillyard noted that it had been recorded at Edinburgh. This was not mapped, but probably refers to a record from As usual I am very grateful to all the contributors who have provided articles for this issue. Please keep the Lothian Wildlife Information Centre ‘Secret Garden providing articles. Survey’. The species was found in Haddington, to the Work on a Spider Recording Scheme website was east of Edinburgh and south of the Firth of Forth in delayed by hiccups in the OPAL grant process and the October 1995 (pers. comm. Bob Saville). These records timeslot originally set aside for the work has had to be appear on the National Biodiversity Network Gateway. reorganised. Work should now be completed by the end of D. ramosus is generally synanthropic and is common May this year. in gardens where it can be beaten from hedges and trees, As always many thanks are due to those Area especially conifers. However many peoples’ first Organisers, MapMate users and other recorders who have experience of this species will be of seeing it spread- provided their records to the scheme during 2009 and eagled on a wall (especially if the wall is whitewashed – early this year. -
Pompilidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera). Fauna of New Zealand 12, 160 Pp. Harris, A. C. 1987
Fauna of New Zealand Eioia Aisoy Gou Memes a Eomoogy iisio eame o Scieiic a Iusia eseac Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag Aucka ew eaa E oicio ieco - M ogwo Gou eae Sysemaics Secio - G W amsay Co-opted from within Systematics Section K Cosy A ooway Uiesiies eeseaie G W Gis ooogy eame icoia Uiesiy o Weigo iae ag Weigo ew eaa Museums eeseaie C Yawy ieco aioa Museum o ew eaa iae ag Weigo ew eaa Oeseas eeseaie awece CSIO iisio o Eomoogy O o 17 Caea Ciy AC 1 Ausaia o a oaioa asis —s— Seies Eio M C ua Sysemaics Secio Eomoogy iisio eame o Scieiic a Iusia eseac Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag Aucka ew eaa aua o ew eaa ume 1 omiiae (Iseca ymeoea Α C ais Oago Museum Gea Kig See uei ew eaa Cataloguing-in-publication citation AIS A C omiiae (Iseca ymeoea / A C ais - Weigo SI Sciece Iomaio uisig Cee 197 (aua o ew eaa ISS 111-533; o 1 IS -77-51-3 I ie Η Seies UC 595793 Date of publication: see back cover of subsequent numbers Suggested form of citation ais A C 197 omiiae (Iseca ymeoea Fauna of New Zealand [no.] 12. is uicaio was ouce y ose iogay e auos ye- sci was ascie y OC scaig o o e ocesso iskee a ae eiig a sye coig was ooyese a e ΝΖ Goe- me iig Oice imes ew oma ye is use o mos o e e; mao eaigs a igue aes ae se i Uies; Gaamo a Geea ae use i e ies e Eioia Aisoy Gou a e Seies Eio ackowege e oowig co-oeaio DSIR Research Orchard, Havelock North: Ms Cocko - assisace wi wo ocesso iu Mount Albert Research Centre, DSIR: Ms aig - asciio o e M W emoe - assisace wi awok M ΜΒ Iwi - ooeucio ο ie igues Ms ΗΑ Wea - comue ie maageme Science Information Publishing Centre, DSIR: awco - sueisio o oucio a isiuio M C Maews - assisace wi oucio a uiciy Science Mapping Unit, DSIR: M Saage - assisace wi awok Front cover: e isec eice is Sphictostethus nitidus (aicius [] aggig a ey sie Miturga frenata Koc © Cow Coyig uise y Sciece Iomaio uisig Cee SI O o 971 Weigo ew eaa : Φ I 4 Φ • $4 Φ • • 4 oisiece Priocnemis (Τ monachus i-isa aa o is os Cantuaria allani. -
Araneae (Spider) Photos
Araneae (Spider) Photos Araneae (Spiders) About Information on: Spider Photos of Links to WWW Spiders Spiders of North America Relationships Spider Groups Spider Resources -- An Identification Manual About Spiders As in the other arachnid orders, appendage specialization is very important in the evolution of spiders. In spiders the five pairs of appendages of the prosoma (one of the two main body sections) that follow the chelicerae are the pedipalps followed by four pairs of walking legs. The pedipalps are modified to serve as mating organs by mature male spiders. These modifications are often very complicated and differences in their structure are important characteristics used by araneologists in the classification of spiders. Pedipalps in female spiders are structurally much simpler and are used for sensing, manipulating food and sometimes in locomotion. It is relatively easy to tell mature or nearly mature males from female spiders (at least in most groups) by looking at the pedipalps -- in females they look like functional but small legs while in males the ends tend to be enlarged, often greatly so. In young spiders these differences are not evident. There are also appendages on the opisthosoma (the rear body section, the one with no walking legs) the best known being the spinnerets. In the first spiders there were four pairs of spinnerets. Living spiders may have four e.g., (liphistiomorph spiders) or three pairs (e.g., mygalomorph and ecribellate araneomorphs) or three paris of spinnerets and a silk spinning plate called a cribellum (the earliest and many extant araneomorph spiders). Spinnerets' history as appendages is suggested in part by their being projections away from the opisthosoma and the fact that they may retain muscles for movement Much of the success of spiders traces directly to their extensive use of silk and poison.