DOCSLIB.ORG

Programming Document 2019–2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Programming Document 2019–2021 Programming Document 2019–2021 Warsaw, 18 October 2018 Reg. No 15891 Frontex – European Border and Coast Guard Agency Plac Europejski 6, 00-184 Warsaw, Poland | Tel. +48 22 205 9500 | Fax +48 22 205 9501 | email: [email protected] | www.frontex.europa.eu Programming Document 2019–2021 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 7 1. Foreword 7 2. List of Acronyms 8 3. Mission Statement 10 3.1. Mission 10 3.2. Vision 10 3.3. Values 10 3.4. Mandate 10 3.5. Tasks 11 SECTION I – GENERAL CONTEXT 12 1. Influencing Factors 12 1.1. Legal Framework 12 1.2. Political Framework 12 1.3. Economic/Financial Framework 13 SECTION II – MULTI-ANNUAL PROGRAMMING 2019 – 2021 14 1. INPUTS (Resources) 14 1.1. Resourcing (Stability) Index 14 1.2. Compliance Index 15 2. ACTIVITIES 16 2.1. Pooling (Availability and Utilisation) Index 16 2.2. Flexibility Index 16 3. OUTPUTS and INTERMEDIATE/DIRECT OUTCOMES 17 3.1. Operational Results 17 3.2. Satisfaction Level (needs vs product) 17 3.3. Quality Level (features of P/S) 17 3.4. Usage Level 17 4. Multi-Annual Objectives 18 5. Strategic Direction 20 6. Strategic Action Areas 22 6.1. EUROPEAN INTEGRATED BORDER MANAGEMENT 22 6.2. EUROPEAN COOPERATION ON COAST GUARD FUNCTIONS 24 6.3. OPERATIONAL RESPONSE 26 6.4. RETURN ACTIVITIES 28 6.5. ANALYSIS 33 6.6. A. CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATIONAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 41 6.6. B. EQUIPMENT, SUPPORT AND LOGISTICS 44 6.7. TRAINING 45 6.8. RESEARCH AND INNOVATION 48 6.9. SITUATION MONITORING 50 6.10. INTERNATIONAL AND EUROPEAN COOPERATION 54 Page 2 of 212 Programming Document 2019–2021 6.11. MEDIA AND PUBLIC RELATIONS 57 6.12. FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 60 6.13. GOVERNANCE 63 6.14. INSPECTION AND CONTROL 67 6.15. FRONTEX PROJECTS 68 7. Human and Financial Resources Outlook for years N+1 – N+3 70 Highlights and main aspects of the past and current situation 70 7.1. Overview of the past and current situation 70 7.2. Resource programming for the years N+1 – N+3 71 SECTION III ANNUAL WORK PROGRAMME 2019 73 1. Executive Summary 73 2. Strategic Action Areas in the Annual Work Programme 2019 74 2.1. European Integrated Border Management 77 2.2. European cooperation on Coast Guard Functions 77 2.3. Operational Response 79 2.4. Return Activities 86 2.5. Analysis 91 2.6. A. Capability Development and Operational Resource Management 100 2.6. B. Equipment, Support and Logistics 102 2.7. Training 103 2.8. Research and Innovation 104 2.9. Situation Monitoring 107 2.10. International and European Cooperation 110 2.11. Media and Public Relations 114 2.12. Fundamental Rights 117 2.13. Governance 119 2.14. Inspection and Control 126 2.15. Frontex Projects 128 SECTION IV – BUDGET 2019 129 Revenue 129 Expenditure 130 Section V – Annexes 134 Annex II: – Human and Financial Resources (Tables) N+1 – N+3 134 Annex III 137 Annex IV: A. Recruitment policy 139 Officials 139 Temporary agents 139 Contract agents 140 Seconded national experts (SNEs) 140 Structural service providers 140 Page 3 of 212 Programming Document 2019–2021 Annex IV: B. Appraisal of performance and reclassification/promotion 142 The Agency's policy on performance appraisal and promotion/reclassification – brief description 143 Annex IV: C. Mobility Policy 144 1. Mobility within the Agency 144 2. Mobility among agencies (Inter-Agency Job Market) 144 3. Mobility between the agencies and the institutions 144 Annex IV: D. Gender and geographical balance – 1 October 2018 145 146 Annex IV: E. Schooling and social measures (adopted in line with Article 1e of the Staff Regulations) 147 Annex IV: F. Other elements of social measures for Frontex staff: 148 Annex V: Buildings 149 New Headquarters 2024 150 Annex VI: Privileges and Immunities 151 Annex VII: Evaluations 152 Annex VIII: Risks 2019 (Limited) 154 Annex IX: Procurement Plan 2019 155 Annex X: Organisation Chart 2019 161 Annex XI: Training Plan 2019 162 Scope of work 162 New demands for training 162 Objectives, Approach and Priorities 164 Revised Multi-Annual Plan 167 Annex 1: Courses planned for 2019 170 Annex XII: Plan of Operational Response 2019 – Core Elements 177 Background information 177 Operational activities at the external EU borders and in third countries 178 Coast guard function-related activities 180 Law Enforcement related activities 181 Activities related to combating document fraud 182 Page 4 of 212 Programming Document 2019–2021 Operational activities in returns matters 183 Operational contingency 186 Annex XIII: International Cooperation Strategy 2018–2020 187 1. Foreword 187 1.1. Setting a strategic direction for international cooperation 187 2. Overall Direction 188 2.1. Vision 188 2.2. Strategic objectives 188 2.3. Guiding principles 189 3. Cooperation framework 190 3.1. Cooperation instruments 190 3.2. Cooperation areas 192 4. Cooperation partners and priority direction 196 4.1. Third countries 196 4.2. International organisations 199 5. Synergies with EU actors in the external dimension 200 5.1. EU institutions, bodies and agencies 200 5.2. EU Member States 203 6. Annual planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation 204 6.1. Teamwork 204 6.2. Facilitating structured cooperation 204 6.3. Stakeholder dialogue 204 6.4. Transparency and accountability 204 6.5. Multi-annual programming 204 6.6. Annual planning 204 6.7. Evaluation and review 205 Annex XIV: Schengen Associated Countries’ Contributions to ABN 2019 206 1. SWITZERLAND 206 1.1. ABN 2019 Targeted Call 1 (deployment periods 1-7) 206 1.2. Generic Contribution for second operational period (deployment periods 8-13) 207 2. NORWAY 208 2.1. ABN 2019 Targeted Call 1 (DP 1-7) 208 2.2. Generic Contribution for second operational period (DP 8-13) 209 3. ICELAND 210 3.1. ABN 2019 Targeted Call 1 (DP 1-7) 210 3.2. Generic Contribution for second operational period (DP 8-13) 210 Annex XV: Annual Strategic Plan 2019 as part of the Tripartite Working Arrangement EFCA – EMSA - Frontex 211 Annual Strategic Plan 2019 211 Introduction 211 Page 5 of 212 Programming Document 2019–2021 Priorities for 2019 (outline) 211 Strategic / Crosscutting 211 Information sharing 212 Surveillance and communication services 212 Capacity building 212 Risk Analysis 212 3.3. Capacity sharing 212 Page 6 of 212 Programming Document 2019–2021 INTRODUCTION 1. Foreword This Frontex Programming Document 2019 – 2021 (PD 2019 - 2021) sets the framework for all strategic planning documents as outlined in the European Border and Coast Guard Regulation 1 (the EBCG Regulation). As a strategic planning document the PD 2019 – 2021 comprises the Frontex Multiannual Programming 2019 – 2021 (MAP 2019 – 2021), representing the Agency’s mid-term strategic business plan. The structure of the MAP 2019 – 2021 is in line with the joint statement of the European Parliament, the Council of the EU and the European Commission on decentralised agencies, adopted on 19 July 2012, and follows the guidelines of the Commission as communicated on 16 December 2014, C(2014) 9641 final. Together with the Annual Work Programme 2019, they form Section II and Section III of the PD 2019 – 2021. The 2019 budget is elaborated and presented in Section IV of the document. Frontex will continue to be more present in the field and more operational than in years before. Utilising the shared responsibility for the management of the external borders, the Agency will continue in 2019 to act as the technical and operational arm of the EU and as a partner for the Member States. To prepare Europe for future challenges, the further implementation and utilisation of ‘ vulnerability assessment’ as a tool will be crucial. Further steps in the area of return moving towards becoming an essential actor in illegal immigration management on the European level will be made. This will also include connecting EU funded networks in the field of return within the framework of the Integrated Return Management Systems, in close cooperation with the European Commission and European Migration Network. The shift from utilising resources provided by other Member States and Schengen Associated Countries to provision of own equipment and staff will be further pursued. The PD 2019 – 2021 further shows how the Frontex Mission Statement is translated into multiannual objectives and linked with strategic action areas. As a strategic document, the PD 2019 - 2021 also aims at outlining the mid-term strategy and the related activities of the Agency 2. The purpose of the PD 2019 – 2021 can be described as: • ensuring transparency, accountability and efficiency regarding the activities of Frontex; • providing the Management Board with a commonly agreed framework for its undertakings; • serving as a reference for the development of the annual work programme; • enabling the Executive Director to perform their duties within the key objectives and strategic action areas as established by the Management Board. The tables and figures contained in the document reflect the status as of 1 December 2017 and will need further validation and adjustment before the final adoption of the document. 1 Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 of 14 September 2016 on the European Border and Coast Guard (OJ L 251, 16.9.2016, p. 1 2 Article 64 of the European Border and Coast Guard Regulation. Page 7 of 212 Programming Document 2019–2021 2. List of Acronyms ABB Activity Based Budgeting ABM Activity Based Management AFIC Africa/Frontex Intelligence Community AOD Assessment of Operational Deployment ARA Annual Risk Assessment BCM Business Continuity Management BCP Border Crossing Point CCC Common Core Curriculum CCG Core Country Group CCWP Customs Cooperation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sc Annex 7 Cover
    ANNEX 7 REPORT OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE WORKING GROUP ON KRILL AND THE WORKING GROUP FOR THE CCAMLR ECOSYSTEM MONITORING PROGRAM (Cape Town, South Africa, 27 July to 2 August 1994) TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION MEETING OBJECTIVES PREY MONITORING Data Collection Procedures Review of Available Data Krill Biomass Estimates in the Integrated Study Regions (ISRs) Fine-scale Catch Data Fine-scale Surveys PREDATOR MONITORING ECOSYSTEM INTERACTIONS Distribution of Krill Fishing and Predators Potential Effect of Precautionary Measures Krill/Predator Functional Relationships ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT Development of Prey, Fishery and Environmental Indices Integrating Predator, Prey, Environmental and Fishery Indices into Ecosystem Assessments CEMP Experimental Approaches (Experimental Fishing Regimes) Incorporating Ecosystem Assessments into Management Advice ORGANISATION OF FUTURE WORK Advice on the Re-organisation of the Scientific Committee’s Working Groups List of Priority Activities Terms of Reference of a New Working Group on Ecosystem Monitoring and Management (WG-EMM) OTHER BUSINESS Future Cooperative Research ADOPTION OF THE REPORT CLOSE OF THE MEETING TABLES APPENDIX A: Agenda APPENDIX B: List of Participants APPENDIX C: List of Documents 1 REPORT OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE WORKING GROUP ON KRILL AND THE WORKING GROUP FOR THE CCAMLR ECOSYSTEM MONITORING PROGRAM (Cape Town, South Africa, 27 July to 2 August 1994) INTRODUCTION 1.1 The second Joint Meeting of the Working Group on Krill (WG-Krill) and the Working Group for the CCAMLR Ecosystem Monitoring Program (WG-CEMP) was held at the Breakwater Lodge, Cape Town, South Africa, between 27 July and 2 August 1994, and was chaired by the Chairman of the Scientific Committee, Dr K.-H.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Structure
    Data structure – Water The aim of this document is to provide a short and clear description of parameters (data items) that are to be reported in the data collection forms of the Global Monitoring Plan (GMP) data collection campaigns 2013–2014. The data itself should be reported by means of MS Excel sheets as suggested in the document UNEP/POPS/COP.6/INF/31, chapter 2.3, p. 22. Aggregated data can also be reported via on-line forms available in the GMP data warehouse (GMP DWH). Structure of the database and associated code lists are based on following documents, recommendations and expert opinions as adopted by the Stockholm Convention COP6 in 2013: · Guidance on the Global Monitoring Plan for Persistent Organic Pollutants UNEP/POPS/COP.6/INF/31 (version January 2013) · Conclusions of the Meeting of the Global Coordination Group and Regional Organization Groups for the Global Monitoring Plan for POPs, held in Geneva, 10–12 October 2012 · Conclusions of the Meeting of the expert group on data handling under the global monitoring plan for persistent organic pollutants, held in Brno, Czech Republic, 13-15 June 2012 The individual reported data component is inserted as: · free text or number (e.g. Site name, Monitoring programme, Value) · a defined item selected from a particular code list (e.g., Country, Chemical – group, Sampling). All code lists (i.e., allowed values for individual parameters) are enclosed in this document, either in a particular section (e.g., Region, Method) or listed separately in the annexes below (Country, Chemical – group, Parameter) for your reference.
    [Show full text]
  • Author's Response Reviewer 1 We Thank the Reviewer for Their
    Author’s Response Reviewer 1 We thank the Reviewer for their constructive comments regarding our manuscript. Our responses to specific comments are shown below in blue. This manuscript analyzed published transient simulations of the last deglaciation with a focus on regional conditions in Antarctic and Southern Ocean. The authors compared modeled temperature, accumulation rate and sea ice with available proxy estimates. Using model simulations, the authors also explored changes in variables and relationships that could impact ice-sheet mass balance. The manuscript is well-written. The topic may interest readers of Climate of the Past. But, I hope the following questions and comments will be addressed. Major comments: 1. In general, I feel the authors largely overlooked potential biases and uncertainty in proxy records, including the ice-core temperature and Alkenone- and Mg/Ca-based SSTs. Stable isotopes in ice cores reflect complicated signals in climate system, such as changes in seasonality (Jouzel et al., 2003; Erb et al., 2018), sea-ice content and changes in moisture source regions (Noone and Simmonds, 2004; Holloway et al., 2016), etc. Similarly, marine SST records are also subject to substantial uncertainties (for example, see Tierney and Tingley, (2018) for a discussion of alkenone-based SSTs). The authors should better consider and incorporate these biases and uncertainties in their model-data comparison and related discussion. I suggest the authors further explore possible seasonality biases in ice-core and marine sediment records by comparing modeled seasonal temperatures, in addition to annual mean, with proxy records. They can also test whether water isotopes in ice cores more reflect temperature at condensation level or surface air temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Vacancy Seconded National Experts to The
    Form DG.1 (EN) NOTICE OF VACANCY SECONDED NATIONAL EXPERTS TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION Post identification: MARE-A-3 (DG-DIR-UNIT) Head of Unit: Christos Economou Email address: [email protected] Telephone: +32 2 29 66 310 Number of available posts: 1 Suggested taking up duty: 1st quarter 2020 1 Suggested initial duration: 1 year1 Place of secondment: Brussels Luxembourg Other: …………………... With allowances Cost-free This vacancy notice is also open to the following EFTA countries : Iceland Liechtenstein Norway Switzerland EFTA-EEA In-Kind agreement (Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway) the following third countries: the following intergovernmental organisations: 1 Nature of the tasks: DG Maritime Affairs and Fisheries (DG MARE) aims to develop the potential of the European maritime economy and to secure sustainable fisheries, a stable supply of seafood, healthy seas and prosperous coastal communities – for today's Europeans and for future generations. This involves formulating, developing and implementing the Common Fisheries Policy – the cornerstone of our actions for a sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources; and promoting an integrated approach to all maritime policies. The DG has around 370 staff, distributed over 5 Directorates and 20 Units. The wide variety of responsibilities creates an interesting and challenging working environment. Hierarchical circuits are short, and working efforts translate into tangible results with a direct impact on the ground and on stakeholders. Unit A3 drives forward the maritime policy of the EU by fostering dialogue and cooperation on maritime issues and by developing initiatives in the European sea basins to help coastal communities and regions diversify and expand their economies.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Short Term Assignment DFID Contract Number: ESD/14 Comparative Analysis of OECD/DAC Guidance and Other Internationally
    Report of Short Term Assignment DFID Contract Number: ESD/14 Comparative analysis of OECD/DAC Guidance and other internationally important SEA regimes August 30 2006 Purpose The purpose of this briefing note is to provide a short, factual comparison of the differences and similarities among SEA approaches promoted and adopted internationally with particular reference to the implications for the donor community. Introduction In June 2006, the OECD/ DAC published the Good Practice Guidance on Applying SEA in Development Cooperation for use by its members and partner countries. This guidance now serves as a commonly agreed framework for strengthening and harmonising the use of SEA in support of international development policies, plans and programmes, as called for in the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness 2005. Currently, the guidance is being pilot tested by a number of multilateral and bilateral aid agencies as part of their ongoing activities. This process is designed to assist donor agencies to come to a better understanding of the ways that the Guidance can improve SEA application across a broad scope of development assistance activities. It also is expected to identify opportunities for coordination of their SEA procedures within partner countries, helping to implement a more coherent approach consistent with the harmonisation agenda agreed by the donor community. At the same time, the Guidance calls for donor agencies to take a flexible approach to SEA, adapting processes and tools to the particular context and issues encountered. This is a difficult challenge within the harmonisation agenda but not a contradictory one, since adaptation to purpose provides a convergence point for different processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Protection Efforts and the Threat of Climate Change in the Arctic
    Resumen: El cambio climático es un problema mundial polifacético, y la región ártica es una de las áreas más vulnerables actualmente en riesgo debido a sus efectos perjudiciales. El Ártico regula el clima de la Tierra y, por lo tanto, la protec- ción ambiental del Ártico es un diálogo necesario que debe explorarse en las relaciones internacionales. Es un problema global de máxima importancia. Esta tesis destaca el papel de los diferentes protagonistas del Ártico, incluido el Consejo Ártico, el principal foro internacional en las relaciones diplomáticas árticas. Esto nos lleva a un examen del trabajo que las Naciones Unidas han llevado a cabo con respecto al cambio climático y, finalmente, a comparar la política ártica de dos Instituto Universitario fuerzas (o potencias)globales clave, la Unión Europea y los Estados Unidos. Sus perspectivas divergentes son claras; la UE es una unión política y económica colectiva sin un estado propio del Ártico, mientras que los EE. UU. es una nación in- de Estudios Europeos dependiente del Ártico con más intereses geopolíticos y territoriales en la región. Se explorarán las políticas, los intereses, la cooperación y los desafíos de la UE y los EE. UU. en el Ártico. Se discutirán puntos clave como la Política ártica de 2016 de la UE, la presidencia finlandesa del Consejo Ártico, la política divisoria de los EE. UU respecto al cambio climático y las fuentes energéticas, y la tendencia de EEUU a rechazar los acuerdos colectivos internacionales. Al final, sus posturas sobre el medio ambiente son lo verdaderamente importante. El cambio climático y el Ártico están relacionados científica- mente y, por lo tanto, la protección ambiental del Ártico es crucial en el debate sobre el cambio climático.
    [Show full text]
  • IHB File No. S3/7020 CIRCULAR LETTER 55/2001 7 November
    IHB File No. S3/7020 CIRCULAR LETTER 55/2001 7 November 2001 FOURTH EDITION OF S-23 “LIMITS OF OCEANS AND SEAS” (Draft) References: 1) Decision No.17 of the XIth I.H. Conference, 1977 2) Circular Letter 27/1998, dated 8 June 1998 3) Circular Letter 26/1999, dated 1 June 1999 4) Circular Letter 45/1999, dated 17 September 1999 Dear Sir, Enclosed is a CD-Rom containing a draft of the Fourth Edition of IHO Publication S-23 “Limits of Oceans and Seas” (English version). There has been considerable interest in the availability of an updated version of this publication. As long ago as the XIth I.H. Conference in 1977, the Organization requested the Bureau, by Decision No.17 of that Conference, to undertake a revision of S-23. As you are aware, the draft presented to Member States in 1986 was not approved. Various attempts have been made to prepare another edition since that date, and since the last Conference we have engaged the services of Mr. Adam J. Kerr, former IHB Director (1987-1997), to progress the work. Some of you will have been in direct contact with him in the course of his work and the help that you have given is much appreciated. Some limited distribution was given to specific chapters to obtain regional comments and these have now been considered and included in the text. The purpose of this publication is to provide guidance to Government-authorized Hydrographic Offices, when compiling their charts and preparing their nautical publications, in order to ensure the greatest possible uniformity in the use of geographical names of oceans and seas.
    [Show full text]
  • Hari Singh and Colin Dürkop
    EDITED BY Hari Singh and Colin Dürkop CONTENTS NOTES ON THE CONTRIBUTORS / ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS / xvi PREFACE / xviii PART ONE INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1 / 03 COMPREHENSIVE SECURITY IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION: CONCEPTUALIZATION AND OVERVIEW Hari Singh ｜ PART TWO COMPREHENSIVE SECURITY: METAPHOR OR THEORY? CHAPTER 2 / 15 COMPREHENSIVE SECURITY, THE POST COLD WAR AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE STATE Kanishka Jayasuriya ｜ PART THREE THE STATE: SECURITY PROVIDER OR USURPER CHAPTER 3 / 37 HUMAN SECURITY: A RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT AND A RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE? Brendan Howe ｜ CONTENTS iii CHAPTER 4 / 60 COMPREHENSIVE SECURITY AND CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS IN SOUTHEAST ASIA: A COMPARATIVE SURVEY N. Ganesan ｜ CHAPTER 5 / 82 CIVIL SOCIETY IN A RE-CONCEPTUALIZED SOUTHEAST ASIAN SECURITY ENVIRONMENT Meredith L. Weiss ｜ PART FOUR GREY AREA PHENOMENON CHAPTER 6 / 105 THREATS FROM RELIGIOUS-BASED TERRORISM IN SOUTHEAST ASIA Bilveer Singh ｜ CHAPTER 7 / 141 MARITIME TERRORISM: A THREAT TO WORLD TRADE? Peter Roell ｜ CHAPTER 8 / 149 CHINA AND MARITIME COOPERATION: PIRACY IN THE GULF OF ADEN Gaye Christoffersen ｜ PART FIVE BIOSPHERE AND RESOURCES CHAPTER 9 / 187 SECURITY, CLIMATE CHANGE, AND DISASTER VULNERABILITIES IN ASIA Francisco A. Magno ｜ CHAPTER 10 / 205 WATER, SECURITY, CONFLICT, AND COOPERATION: THE CONSTRUCTION OF TIPAIMUKH DAM Ishtiaq Hossain ｜ iv COMPREHENSIVE SECURITY IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION PART SIX GLOBAL AND REGIONAL POWER STRUCTURES CHAPTER 11 / 245 SOUTHEAST ASIAN STATES AMIDST THE SINO-JAPANESE STRATEGIC RIVALRY Renato Cruz De Castro
    [Show full text]
  • Salp/Krill Interactions in the Southern Ocean:Spatial Segregation and Implications for the Carbon flux
    Deep-Sea Research II 49 (2002) 1881–1907 Salp/krill interactions in the Southern Ocean:spatial segregation and implications for the carbon flux E.A. Pakhomova,*, P.W. Fronemanb, R. Perissinottoc a Department of Zoology, University of Fort Hare, P/Bag X1314, Alice 5700, South Africa b Southern Ocean Group, Department of Zoology and Entomology, Rhodes University, P.O. Box 94, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa c School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa Abstract Available data on the spatial distribution and feeding ecophysiology of Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba, and the tunicate, Salpa thompsoni, in the Southern Ocean are summarized in this study. Antarctic krill and salps generally display pronounced spatial segregation at all spatial scales. This appears to be the result of a clear biotopical separation of these key species in the Antarctic pelagic food web. Krill and salps are found in different water masses or water mass modifications, which are separated by primary or secondary frontal features. On the small-scale (o100 km), Antarctic krill and salps are usually restricted to the specific water parcels, or are well segregated vertically. Krill and salp grazing rates estimated using the in situ gut fluorescence technique are among the highest recorded in the Antarctic pelagic food web. Although krill and salps at times may remove the entire daily primary production, generally their grazing impact is moderate (p50% of primary production). The regional ecological consequences of years of high salp densities may be dramatic. If the warming trend, which is observed around the Antarctic Peninsula and in the Southern Ocean, continues, salps may become a more prominent player in the trophic structure of the Antarctic marine ecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Compounds and Suspended Particulate Matter in Snow of High Latitude Areas (Arctic and Antarctic)
    atmosphere Article Organic Compounds and Suspended Particulate Matter in Snow of High Latitude Areas (Arctic and Antarctic) Inna A. Nemirovskaya and Vladimir P. Shevchenko * Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences (IO RAS), Moscow 117997, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 17 July 2020; Accepted: 24 August 2020; Published: 30 August 2020 Abstract: Long-term studies of suspended particulate matter (SPM) and organic compounds (OCs)—Corg, lipids, hydrocarbons (aliphatic—AHCs and polycyclic aromatic—PAHs), and chlorophyll a in the snow cover of the Arctic (Franz Victoria Trough, Mendeleev Rise, White Sea) and Antarctica (in the coastal waters on fast ice and on the mainland near Russian stations) were generalized. It was shown that in the Arctic, the influence of continental air masses leads to an increase in OCs in snow. Therefore, despite the fact that the Franz Victoria Trough and the Mendeleev Rise are at the same latitude (82◦ N), the OCs content in the snow in the region of the Mendeleev Rise was lower for aliphatic hydrocarbons 5 and 14–18 µg/L. In the White Sea, the AHC content in the snow and the upper layers of the ice in the mouth of the Severnaya Dvina River and in the Kandalaksha Bay was higher than that in the lower layers of the ice and sharply decreased with distance from the emission sources. As a result, the snow was supplied mainly by pyrogenic PAHs. In the Antarctica, the lowest OCs levels in atmosphere were found in areas where coastal hills are covered with snow. The maximum SPM and AHCs concentration was found in the sludge (SPM—to 4.37 mg/L, AHC—to 33 µg/L).
    [Show full text]
  • National Report Russia
    HCA9-07.4Al IHO Hydrographic Commission on Antarctica (HCA) 9th Meeting, Simon’s Town, Cape Town, South Africa, 12-14 October 2009 NATIONAL REPORT OF THE HYDROGRAPHIC SERVICE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION NAVY St Petersburg 2009 THE HYDROGRAPHIC SERVICE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION NAVY The Hydrographic Service is one of the important national bodies responsible for the safety of navigation. Although the Hydrographic Service forms a part of the Navy, it also meets the requirement of merchant and fishing fleets and vessels of other ministries and agencies. The Hydrographic Service is under the direction of the Department of Navigation and Oceanography of the RF MD (DNO of the RF MD), which is traditionally located in St. Petersburg. The principle functions of the Department of Navigation and Oceanography are: – to carry out hydrographic works and geophysical and oceanographical investigations of the World Ocean – to compile and produce Nautical Charts, Publications and Guides to Navigation – to develop and produce Guides, Instructions, Regulations and Methodical Directions on carrying out the World Ocean investigations and processing of its results – to equip the coast of the Russian Federation by aids to navigation – to organize mariner notification about changes in navigational conditions and regime – to develop navigational instruments and complexes. To carry out oceanographic surveys some special units have been created as a part of the Hydrographic Service of the Navy, such as expeditions and parties. The investigations are effected by special ships of up to 9000 tons displacement equipped with modern navigational and oceanographic facilities. The results of the oceanographic surveys are submitted to the Navy Charts Division where they are used for compilation and updating of Nautical Charts and Sailing Directions.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Squid and Fish in the Pelagic Zone of the Cosmonaut Sea and Prydz Bay Region During the BROKE-West Campaign
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Deep-Sea Research II 57 (2010) 956–967 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Deep-Sea Research II journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/dsr2 Distribution of squid and fish in the pelagic zone of the Cosmonaut Sea and Prydz Bay region during the BROKE-West campaign Anton P. Van de Putte a,n, George D. Jackson b, Evgeny Pakhomov c,d, Hauke Flores e,f, Filip A.M. Volckaert a a Laboratory of Animal Diversity and Systematics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Ch. Deberiotstraat 32, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium b Institute of Antarctic and Southern Ocean Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 77, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia c Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of British Columbia, 6339 Stores Road, Vancouver, BC, V6 T 1Z4, Canada d Department of Zoology, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice, 5700, South Africa e Wageningen IMARES, PO Box 167, NL-1790 AD Den Burg (Texel), The Netherlands f University of Groningen, Center for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, PO Box 14, NL-9700 AA Haren, The Netherlands article info abstract Article history: The composition and distribution of squid and fish collected by Rectangular Midwater Trawls in the upper Received 5 February 2008 200 m were investigated during the BROKE-West (Baseline Research on Oceanography, Krill and the Accepted 5 February 2008 Environment-West) survey (January-March 2006) in CCAMLR Subdivision 58.4.2 of the Southern Ocean. A Available online 1 December 2009 total of 332 individuals were collected, with the most abundant fish species being Pleuragramma antarcticum (34%), Notolepis coatsi (27%) and Electrona antarctica (26%); and the most abundant squid being Galiteuthis glacialis (64%).
    [Show full text]