DOCSLIB.ORG

Download the Free QR Code Reader App

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download the Free QR Code Reader App FALL 2018 “You’re gay? ” Fighting back after a rescinded job offer Taxpayer funds can’t be used to discriminate ONE COUPLE’S FIGHT BEYOND K AVANAUGH Why all federal court seats are crucial THE FACES We N LGBT seniors: Lambda Legal and AARP OF NIKKO working together TAKING DOWN HIV STIGMA PAGE 8 One Nation. One Set of Laws for All. Sheppard Mullin is proud to support its LGBTQ professionals and salutes Lambda Legal’s efforts to secure equality for all. Beijing | Brussels | Century City | Chicago | Dallas | London | Los Angeles | New York | Orange County Palo Alto | San Diego (Downtown) | San Diego (Del Mar) | San Francisco | Seoul | Shanghai | Washington, D.C. www.sheppardmullin.com Stand Out. Be Proud. Sidley is honored to continue our support of Lambda Legal and applauds its tireless dedication to achieving equality for the LGBTQ community. Find out how we are standing up for equality at sidley.com/diversity Sally Olson Chief Diversity Officer One South Dearborn Chicago, IL 60603 Attorney Advertising - Sidley Austin LLP, One South Dearborn, Chicago, IL 60603. AMERICA • ASIA PACIFIC • EUROPE | +1 3122 853 7000.LAMBDA Prior results LEGAL do IMPACT not guarantee Summer a similar 2018 outcome. MN-8919 sidley.com THANK YOU FOR BELIEVING Dear Lambda Legal family, As we wish our outgoing CEO Rachel B. Tiven well on community to fight for the kind of country that we want her new endeavors, our eyes are focused on the future. The ours to be. threats we currently face are meant to strike fear in the hearts We approach this task with resolve but also with humil- of the LGBTQ community and everyone living with HIV. ity, as we know that we cannot succeed without the support Forces opposed to our equality unabashedly seek to drive us and assistance of all of you. As Lambda Legal writes this next back into the shadows. But we draw strength from the fact chapter of our history, we thank you for believing in this that we have lived through dark times before, and we have organization as much as we do. never given up. Remember, Lambda Legal had to fight for our very existence in 1973—and we have not stopped fight- ing for our community since. While the forces of bigotry and hatred that have been unleashed by this administration may feel unprecedented and horrifying, the challenges and obstacles we face now are not really all that new. The team here at Lambda Legal knows what to do. We will keep bringing cases to move the CHARLES FIELDS law forward. We will keep fighting harmful policies wherever Co-Interim CEO and Chief Operating Officer they are proposed and working with allies to advance the ball SHARON MCGOWAN wherever we can. We will lift up the beauty of our stories and Co-Interim CEO, Chief Strategy Officer and stand shoulder to shoulder with the broader civil rights Legal Director, Eden/Rushing Chair Los Angeles; Lawrence Trachtenberg, Scottsdale, AZ; David T. May, Saugatuck, MI; Gregory S. McCurdy, San Francisco; Tsai, San Francisco; Michelle Waites*, Mount Vernon, NY; John McGowan, Chicago; Beau Miller, Houston; Lauren Kenneth Weissenberg, Bedford Corners, NY (*denotes Mutti, Dallas; Thao Ngo, San Francisco; Robert W. Ollis, Executive Committee member) Chicago; James Owens, Los Angeles; Andrew Parlen, New York; Michelle Peak, Grand Prairie, TX; Mike Ponto, Minneapolis; FALL 2018 | VOL. 35, NO. 3 NATIONAL LEADERSHIP COUNCIL Jason Pucci, Summit, NJ; Peter Reichertz, Washington, CHAIR Jamie Pedersen, Seattle DC; Jennifer L. Rexford, Princeton, NJ; Laura Ricketts, Charles Fields, Co-Interim CEO and Chief MEMBERS G. Ross Allen, San Francisco; Neil Bagadiong, Chicago; Edward H. Sadtler, New York; P. Watson Seaman, Operating Officer Indianapolis; Debra R. Bernard, Chicago; Marcus Boggs, Richmond, VA; Richard M. Segal, San Diego; Brad Seiling, Sharon McGowan, Co-Interim CEO, Chief Strategy Chicago; Daniel H. Bowers, New York; Susan Bozorgi, Los Angeles; Beverlee E. Silva, Atlanta; Norman C. Simon, Officer and Legal Director, Eden/Rushing Chair Miami; Mark R. Braun, Chicago; Laura Brill, Los Angeles; New York; Paul Smith, Washington, DC; Michael D. Soileau, Eric Brinker, New York; Jeff Brodin, Phoenix; William Philadelphia; Charles M. Spiegel, San Francisco; Christopher LAMBDA LEGAL BOARD OF DIRECTORS Candelaria, New York; Samuel R. Castic, Seattle; Martin W. Stuart, San Francisco; Tony Timiraos, Ft. Lauderdale; CHAIR Anne Krook*, Seattle S. Checov, San Francisco; Daniel C. Cochran, New York; George D. Tuttle, Sebastopol, CA; Lauren Verdich, Chicago; VICE-CHAIRS David de Figueiredo*, Berkeley, CA Benson R. Cohen, New York; Paul H. Coluzzi, M.D., Laguna Roy Wesley, Chicago; Marcy Wilder, Washington, DC; John Strafstrom*, Bridgeport, CT Beach, CA; R. Sue Connolly, Chicago; MaryKay Czerwiec, Peter S. Wilson, New York; Alan York, Houston; George IMMEDIATE PAST CHAIR Tracey Guyot-Wallace*, Chicago; Beth Davis, Atlanta; Bruce Deming, San Francisco; R. Zuber, Ft. Lauderdale; Mark Zumwalt, New York Dallas David Draigh, Miami; Mitchell Draizin, New York; Melinda (Last updated September 21, 2018) TREASURER Rachel Goldberg, Stamford, CT Dunker, Chicago; Daniel S. Ebner, Chicago; Ruth Eisenberg, SECRETARY Vadim Schick*, Washington, DC Washington, DC; C. Douglas Ferguson, Chicago; William P. IMPACT MAGAZINE STAFF MEMBERS Yemi Adegbonmire, Los Angeles; Sheri Bonstelle, Flanagan, Washington, DC; Michael Foncannon, Summit, Angelo Ragaza, Director, Marketing and Editorial Los Angeles; Annette Cerbone, New York; Wendy Chang, NJ; Kendall E. French, San Diego; Michael H. Gluck, Alberto Galindo, Manager, Marketing and Editorial Los Angeles; Roberta A. Conroy, Los Angeles; Trayton M. Skillman, NJ; Michael I. Gottfried, Los Angeles; Kathryn G. Natalie Pryor, Consulting Designer Davis, Montclair, NJ; Roderick Hawkins*, Chicago; Jordan Graham, New York; Natasha F. Haase, Princeton, NJ; Joseph Jesse Oxfeld, Consulting Editor Heinz, Chicago; Eric Johnson, Dallas; Laura Maechtlen*, Hall, New York; Laurie Hasencamp, Los Angeles; Donald San Francisco; Patrick S. Menasco, Washington, DC; Carol J. Hayden, Miami; Cynthia Homan, Chicago; Dennis News by Tim Murphy Meyer, Dallas; Andrew T. Mitchell-Namdar, Stamford, CT; Hranitzky, New York; F. Curt Kirschner, San Francisco; Kate Donor profile by Ishmam Rahman Lauren Mutti, Dallas; Danielle Piergallini, Dallas; Katrina Kleba, Philadelphia; B. Birgit Koebke, San Diego; William Quicker, Atlanta; John R. Richards, Atlanta; Todd G. Sears, M. Libit, Chicago; Lisa Linsky, Sleepy Hollow, NY; Charles For advertising, contact Allen Clutter, New York; Dan Slaughter, San Francisco; Holly Thomas, V. Loring, Ft. Lauderdale, FL; Yery Marrero, Miami; Brian [email protected] lambdalegal.org 1 NEWS FEATURE hese days, Mark Horton and his husband, Alton Greenough, are finding themselves forced to sell— even give away, because they’re expensive to keep—more Tand more of the beloved miniature horses that graze on their farm in Edwardsville, Illinois, just north of St. Louis. “They’re more like our children,” says Horton. But the couple is in rough times financially. It all goes back to an email Horton sent to his employer-to- be in 2016 casually outing himself as gay by mentioning Greenough. Before that fateful email, Horton, 62, was employed as vice president of sales for a home health and hospice company based in Pittsburgh. But he had to travel extensively for that job and wanted to be closer to home to care for both his mother, who was suffer- ing from pancreatic cancer (and has since died), and Greenough, who had sustained serious injuries in a riding accident. So when a headhunter contacted him to let him know that a local eldercare company, Midwest Geriatric Management (MGM), was looking for a new VP, Horton applied. Thus began Mark Horton lost a three-month process during which he says he met everyone at MGM a great job offer and ultimately was given a written job after he revealed offer by MGM CEO Judah Bienstock he was gay. NOTNOT With Lambda Legal’s help, he’s fighting back. HORSINGHORSING BY TIM MURPHY AROUNDAROUND 2 LAMBDA LEGAL IMPACT | Summer 2018 and his wife, Faye. Once Horton He suspects that’s because many accepted, Faye emailed, “Wonderful! employers consider him overqualified Congratulations! We are so excited!” for some of the positions and because Horton gave notice to his employer a simple Google search reveals the in Pittsburgh. All that was pending was lawsuit is still pending. confirmation of Horton’s educational “This was going to be a final career background, which Horton said would move for Mark that he was very excited take a few weeks because of adminis- about, but it all went south after he trative changes at one of his schools. Mark Horton and Alton Greenough casually mentioned his husband,” The Bienstocks did not indicate that with two of their many pets. says Lambda Legal counsel and this was a problem. In a casual email Employment Fairness Project Director conversation about the degree, Horton This was going to be a Greg Nevins, who is on Horton’s wrote, “My partner has been on me final career move for legal team. “The paper trail strongly about [my MBA] since he completed Mark that he was very excited suggests that this is discrimination, his Ph.D. a while back.” so Mark’s becomes yet another case Three days later, Faye Bienstock “about, but it all went south demonstrating the urgency of under- wrote to Horton. “Are you able to after he casually mentioned standing sex discrimination under Title come this afternoon?,” she asked. “We his husband.” VII to encompass sexual-orientation would like to discuss the status of your discrimination.” (Lambda has also employment.” Horton wrote that he —Greg Nevins, Lambda Legal counsel and successfully argued that Title VII Employment Fairness Project director was out of town that day but could covers gender identity as a form of sex come on a different date. Two days discrimination.) later, Bienstock wrote again: “Mark— Now Lambda Legal, which has Meanwhile, says Horton, staying I regret to inform you that due to the since joined the case, is appealing that home and taking care of his and incompletion of the background check dismissal to the U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A New Paradigm for Fairness: the First National Conference on Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Bias in the Courts
    1.-.- 3 -4185 00322265-I 9 J A New Paradigm for Fairness: The First National Conference on Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Bias in the Courts , P A New Paradigm for Fairness: The First National Conference on Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Bias in the Courts H. Clifton Grandy, J.D Edited by Dawn Spinozza I Chuck Campbell National Center for State Courts State Justice Institute t Q 1995 National Center for State Courts ISBN 0-89656- 160-7 National Center Publication Number 'R- 180 These proceedings were prepared and reproduced with finds fiom the State Justice Insti- tute, Grant Number SJI-93- 12A-C-B- 198-P94-( l -3), for the First NationaZ Conference on Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Bias in the Courts. The points of view expressed are those of the presenters and author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Center for State Courts or the State Justice Institute. Planning Committee Honorable Veronica Simmons McBeth Chair, Planning Committee Los Angeles Municipal Court, California Honorable Benjamin Aranda 111 Dr. Yolande P. Marlow South Bay Municipal Court Project Director, Task Force on Minority California Concerns, New Jersey Marilyn Callaway Honorable Jon J. Mayeda Director, Juvenile Court Services Los Angeles Municipal Court, California San Diego, California Honorable Carl J. Character Joseph A. Myers, Esq. Court of Common Pleas, Cleveland, Ohio Executive Director National Indian Justice Center Honorable Charles R Cloud Rose M. Ochi, Esq. Norfolk General District Court, Virginia Associate Director Office of National Drug Control Policy Honorable Lewis L. Douglass Honorable Charles 2.Smith King’s County Supreme Court, New York Justice, Supreme Court of Washington Dolly M.
    [Show full text]
  • Aclu Ar Covers R.Qxd
    The Annual Update of the ACLU’s Nationwide Work on LGBT Rights and HIV/AIDS WhoWho We We Are Are 2005 2005 The Annual Update of the ACLU’s Nationwide Work on LGBT Rights and HIV/AIDS WHO WE ARE 2005 PARADOX, PROGRESS & SO ON . .1 FREEDOM RIDE: THE STORY OF TAKIA AND JO . .5 RELATIONSHIPS DOCKET . .7 WHAT MAKES A PARENT . .19 PARENTING DOCKET . .21 THE QUEER GUY AT HUNT HIGH . .25 YOUTH & SCHOOLS DOCKET . .27 LIFE’S CRUEL CHALLENGES . .31 DISCRIMINATION DOCKET . .33 TRANSLATINAS AND THE FIGHT FOR DERECHOS CIVILES . .37 TRANSGENDER DOCKET . .41 THE HARD TRUTH ABOUT SMALL TOWN PREJUDICE . .43 HIV/AIDS DOCKET . .45 HOW THE ACLU WORKS . .47 PROJECT STAFF . .49 COOPERATING ATTORNEYS . .51 CONTRIBUTORS . .53 Design: Carol Grobe Design 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004-2400 212.549.2627 [email protected] www.aclu.org Paradox, Progress & So On BY MATT COLES, PROJECT DIRECTOR The LGBT movement is at a pivotal moment in its sexual orientation. But just after the year ended, the a remarkable pace, none history. 2004 was a year of both remarkable progress U.S. Supreme Court let stand a lower court ruling of our recent gains is and stunning setbacks. For the first time, same-sex upholding Florida’s ban on adoption. And legislators in secure and continued couples were married in the United States – in Arkansas are already trying to undo the Little Rock progress is not assured. Massachusetts, San Francisco, Portland, Oregon, and judge’s decision. There are two forces at New Paltz, New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Idahoans to Decide on Medicaid Expansion
    MMMRs- 2018 11 06 (Midterms Edition) Notebook: Curator: MMMRs Created: 11/6/2018 5:17 AM Updated: 11/6/2018 5:39 AM URL: https://www.bradenton.com/news/local/health-care/article221187925.html SourceURL: https://www.bradenton.com/news/local/health-care/article221187925.html Idahoans to decide on Medicaid expansion FILE--In this July 6, 2018, file photo, Dr. Kathleen Romito, M.D. hands a box full of signatures from Ada County to Kelly Goughnour, both of Boise, Idaho, at the Idaho Statehouse in Boise, Idaho. In a bucket-brigade-style delivery of more than 70,000 voter petitions from 44 counties, Idahoans For Healthcare volunteers delivered signatures to the Idaho Secretary of State calling for placement of a Medicaid expansion initiative the ballot. Voters will decide Proposition 2’s fate Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2018. Idaho Statesman via AP, file Darin Oswald Health News Idahoans to decide on Medicaid expansion By REBECCA BOONE Associated Press November 06, 2018 01:37 AM Updated 4 hours 36 minutes ago BOISE, Idaho Of all the decisions Idaho voters are making on election day, the decision on whether to expand Medicaid to more low-income Idahoans might be the one that hits closest to home for many. The citizen initiative called Proposition 2 would expand Medicaid coverage to potentially more than 60,000 low-income adults across the state. Those residents are dubbed the "gap population," people who make too much to qualify for Medicaid in its current form but don't earn enough to get subsidized health insurance coverage under the state health insurance exchange.
    [Show full text]
  • Transgender Movement
    New Trump Administration Memo on Obama Order Alarms LGBT Advocates Community Bonds Over Scoring Goals in the Detroit Drive Soccer League TRANS SINGER MOVED FELLOW MICHIGAN INMATES. NOW? AN ALBUM. WWW.PRIDESOURCE.COM AUGUST 23, 2018 | VOL. 2634 | FREE Join The Conversation @ Pridesource.com SAVE THE DATE PROFILE WAYNE’S WORLD A Local Designer’s Breathable, Butt- Hugging Underwear Line for Men Who Want to Feel COVER Comfortable While 16 Trans Singer Moved Fellow Michigan Inmates. Feeling Sexy Now? An Album. CONFERENCE NEWS Queering Racial Justice Heads to Detroit 6 Sue Carter Runs for WSU Board of Governors 6 Wade Rakes Runs for U of M Board of Regents See Page 22 See Page 14 7 Trump Administration Memo on Obama Order Alarms LGBT Advocates 12 Promoting Pride 12 Team-WERK HAPPENINGS NATIONAL NEWS ELECTION 2018 OPINION 8 Parting Glances 8 Viewpoint 9 Creep of the Week LIFE 14 Wayne’s World 18 Happenings 21 Puzzle and Crossword 20 The Frivolist: 7 Gay Tips for Throwing the Perfect Labor Day Party 26 Deep Inside Hollywood COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS 22 Detroit Repertory Theatre Hosts Second Arts & IN CONCERT JOE BIDEN VERMONT Culture Festival Sarah Shook & the Disarmers at OTUS Foundation Launches Campaign In First, Trans Candidate Wins Major Party 22 Affirmations Hosts Golden Girls Trivia Party Supply in Ferndale Promoting LGBTQ Acceptance Nomination for Governor’s Race 22 Queering Racial Justice Heads to Detroit See Page 18 24 Third Annual Strand with Trans Family Picnic See Page 11 See Page 10 Draws Record Crowd 22 Mom to Mom Sale in Ferndale on Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Incarceration's Front Door: the Misuse of Jails in America
    Incarceration’s Front Door: The Misuse of Jails in America FEBRUARY 2015 (UPDATED 7/29/15) CENTER ON SENTENCING AND CORRECTIONS Ram Subramanian • Ruth Delaney • Stephen Roberts • Nancy Fishman • Peggy McGarry FROM THE PRESIDENT Incarceration’s Front Door addresses what is arguably one of the chief drivers of difficulty in our troubled criminal justice system: jails. The report’s encyclopedic examination of jail use—who’s in jail and the myriad paths lead- ing there—is meant to inform. But it should also unnerve and incite us to action. As Vera’s president, I observe injustice routinely. Nonetheless even I—as this report came together— was jolted by the extent to which unconvicted people in this country are held in jail simply because they are too poor to pay what it costs to get out. I was startled by the numbers of people detained for behavior that stems primarily from mental illness, homelessness, or addiction. I was dismayed by how even a brief stay in jail can be destructive to individuals, their families, and entire communities. And I’ve been at this work for a while now. I suspect that many readers will come to this report thinking that jail is reserved only for those too dangerous to be released while awaiting trial or those deemed likely to flee rather than face prosecution. Indeed, jails are necessary for some people. Yet too often we see ordinary people, some even our neighbors, held for minor violations such as driving with a suspended license, public intoxication, or shoplifting because they cannot afford bail as low as $500.
    [Show full text]
  • Ballot Guide As You Look Through the Bell Policy Center’S 2020 Ballot Guide, You’Ll Notice It Looks Different from Previous Years
    1 A Note About This Ballot Guide As you look through the Bell Policy Center’s 2020 Ballot Guide, you’ll notice it looks different from previous years. In order to provide clear and accurate analysis about how the 11 statewide measures will affect Coloradans, we adopted new criteria to inform our recommendations. For each measure, you’ll see there are three values every proposal is scored on: tax fair- ness, racial equity, and economic mobility. We chose these three as all are closely aligned to the Bell’s work and our organizational mission. Each value receives a rating (very bad, bad, slightly bad, neutral, slightly good, good, very good) based on how the ballot measure in question will affect these values. Based on our research and analysis, some proposals have more serious implications for tax fairness, racial equity, and economic mobility in Colorado. For that reason, we encourage you to pay close attention to the following measures: • Amendment B: Repeal the Gallagher Amendment (Support) • Proposition EE: Taxes on Nicotine Products (Support) • Proposition 116: State Income Tax Rate Reduction (Oppose) • Proposition 117: Voter Approval for Certain New State Enterprises (Oppose) • Proposition 118: Paid Family & Medical Leave Insurance Program (Support) 2 Repeal the Gallagher Amendment Amendment B repeals the section of the Colorado Constitution commonly known as the “Gallagher Amendment.” Passed in 1982, the Gallagher Amendment is a restriction on property taxes that limits Good. While property taxes are not necessarily progressive nor regressive, the total amount of property taxes that the reduced ability of local communities can be generated from residential prop- in Colorado to use property taxes has erty taxes, as opposed to non-residential required them to use the sales tax to a larger degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Top DOJ Lawyer Joins Lambda Legal Staffing up to Fight the Trump Administration, Lambda Legal Brings on Sharon Mcgowan As Director of Strategy
    Top DOJ Lawyer Joins Lambda Legal Staffing up to fight the Trump Administration, Lambda Legal brings on Sharon McGowan as Director of Strategy (New York, February 1, 2017) — Today, Lambda Legal announced the hiring of Sharon McGowan, a top attorney in the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice, as the organization’s new Director of Strategy. “Sharon McGowan is one of the most influential and effective LGBT rights lawyers in the country,” said Rachel B. Tiven, CEO of Lambda Legal. “At the Department of Justice, Sharon has been a forceful voice for our community, helping usher in an unprecedented era of progress for LGBT rights. She has had a hand in virtually every major achievement on LGBT rights to come out of President Obama’s administration, from the department’s decision to stop defending DOMA to its position that discrimination on the basis of sex encompasses discrimination on the basis of gender identity. She is a brilliant legal thinker and formidable advocate. As Lambda Legal prepares to vigorously defend LGBT rights during the Trump presidency, Sharon will be an indispensable part of our team.” “Our community has made tremendous strides since I first worked with Lambda Legal almost fifteen years ago as part of the litigation team on Lawrence v. Texas,” said Sharon McGowan, Lambda Legal’s new Director of Strategy. “From that landmark decision to securing nationwide marriage equality in Obergefell v. Hodges, Lambda Legal has played an unparalleled role in extending our country’s promise of equality to the LGBT community. I’m honored to join this historic organization and to continue fighting for our community in this new role.” More on Lambda Legal and the organization’s fight back against discrimination at www.lambdalegal.org.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Testimony of Sharon M. Mcgowan Chief Strategy Officer and Legal
    Testimony of Sharon M. McGowan Chief Strategy Officer and Legal Director, Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, Inc. Former Principal Deputy Chief, Appellate Section, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division Testimony before the United States House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Hearing on “Oversight of the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice” September 24, 2020 Good morning, and let me begin by thanking Chairman Cohen, Ranking Member Johnson, Chairman Nadler, and the other distinguished members of the Committee for the invitation to testify today as part of this incredibly important oversight hearing regarding the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. My name is Sharon McGowan, and I currently serve as the Chief Strategy Officer and Legal Director of Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, Inc. (“Lambda Legal”), the oldest and largest national legal organization dedicated to achieving full recognition of the civil rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (“LGBTQ”) people and everyone living with HIV through impact litigation, education and public policy work. Immediately prior to joining Lambda Legal, I was proud to serve as the Principal Deputy Chief of the Appellate Section of the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. I first joined the Civil Rights Division as a line lawyer in the Appellate Section in February 2010. I served in that role for approximately three years. After a stint at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, I returned to the Justice Department in September 2014, when I was selected for an open Deputy Chief position in the Appellate Section.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Fairness Project Changed the Lives of Over 17 Million Americans in Our First 5 Years
    BREAKING THROUGH AT THE BALLOT BOX How The Fairness Project Changed the Lives of Over 17 Million Americans in Our First 5 years BREAKING THROUGH AT THE BALLOT BOX How The Fairness Project Changed the Lives of Over 17 Million Americans in Our First 5 years Building a Movement to Support Working Families at the Ballot Box 3 TFP 2020 Campaigns Inspired Activism 4 Empowering Voters to Expand Health Care 4 Shifting the Political Math on Health Care 5 Making Health Care a Constitutional Right During a Pandemic 5 Guaranteeing Paid Leave 7 Ending Poverty Wages 7 Combating Systemic Racism 8 Winning Leave Policies that Support American Families 8 Responding to the COVID Pandemic 9 TFP’s Impact Record: Over 17 Million Lives Changed 10 TFP’s Ballot Initiatives Helped Define the 2020 Election— And Redefine What’s Possible 11 The Best Investment in Politics Is Also the Fastest Path for Change 13 Ballot Initiative Campaigns Bring Huge Results 14 The Fairness Project Builds and Supports Campaigns 15 Missouri Case Study: From Concept to Victory 16 www.thefairnessproject.org TWITTER fairnessproject• FACEBOOK-F projectfairness• instagram thefairnessproject Hundreds of volunteers in Oklahoma helped put Medicaid expansion on the ballot BUILDING A MOVEMENT TO SUPPORT WORKING FAMILIES AT THE BALLOT BOX Since its founding in 2015, no organization has a better track record of winning progressive issues at the ballot box The Fairness Project is now 20–1, winning 95 percent of its ballot initiative campaigns at a time when partisan gridlock and special interests
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Campaign
    No. 16-1466 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ____________________ MARK JANUS, Petitioner, v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, COUNCIL 31 ET AL., Respondents. ____________________ On Writ of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Seventh Circuit ____________________ BRIEF OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN, LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND, INC., THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS, THE NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE, AND PFLAG AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS ____________________ LAURA B. HEIMAN STEVEN E. FINEMAN Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Counsel of Record Bernstein, LLP JASON L. LICHTMAN 222 2nd Ave S, Suite 1640 KATHERINE I. MCBRIDE Nashville, TN 37201 Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP 250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor New York, NY 10013 [email protected] (212) 355-9500 Counsel for Amici Curiae (Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page) i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page STATEMENT OF INTEREST ........................................... 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT....................................................................... 3 ARGUMENT....................................................................... 4 I. LGBT WORKERS FACE WORKPLACE DISCRIMINATION THAT DIMINISHES THEIR PERSONHOOD ......................................... 4 II. UNIONS DEPEND ON FAIR-SHARE FEES TO HELP COMBAT AND ADDRESS DISCRIMINATION AND PROVIDE IMPORTANT BENEFITS .................. 10 A. Unions Collectively Bargain For Antidiscrimination Provisions And Accompanying Grievance Procedures
    [Show full text]
  • Cause Lawyers Inside the State
    CAUSE LAWYERS INSIDE THE STATE Douglas NeJaime* Scholarship on the legal profession tends to situate cause lawyers in a state of adversarial tension with government lawyers. In this traditional paradigm, cause lawyers challenge the agenda of government attorneys, who represent institutional interests and the status quo. From this oppositional perspective, socio-legal scholars explore the activity of lawyers working at public interest law firms, for general social movement organizations, and in private practice. For some time, however, cause lawyers have moved in and out of government, thus complicating the conventional picture of lawyer-state opposition. This Article aims to identify and understand the significant role that cause lawyers play inside the state. It does so by drawing on recent social movement scholarship exploring the overlapping and interdependent relationship between movements and the state. Ultimately, this Article identifies four key impacts that cause lawyers within the state may produce: (1) reforming the state itself; (2) shaping state personnel and priorities; (3) harnessing state power to advance shared movement-state goals; and (4) facilitating and mediating relationships between the movement and the state. These productive functions, however, also come with significant limitations. By appealing to governmental authority and involving the state as a pro-movement force, cause lawyers in government positions may channel movement activity toward moderate goals and into institutional, state-centered tactics. Accordingly, this Article explores not only the benefits but also the costs of cause lawyer movement in and out of the state. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 650 I. LAWYER-STATE RELATIONSHIPS IN CAUSE LAWYERING SCHOLARSHIP ................................................................................. 656 * Associate Professor of Law, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles (Loyola Marymount University).
    [Show full text]
  • Studies of Voting Behavior and Felony Disenfranchisement Among Individuals in the Criminal Justice System in New York, Connecticut, and Ohio
    514 10TH S TREET NW, S UITE 1000 WASHINGTON, DC 20004 TEL: 202.628.0871 • FAX: 202.628.1091 S TAFF@S ENTENCINGPROJECT.ORG WWW.SENTENCINGPROJECT.ORG STUDIES OF VOTING BEHAVIOR AND FELONY DISENFRANCHISEMENT AMONG INDIVIDUALS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN NEW YORK, CONNECTICUT, AND OHIO ERNEST DRUCKER AND RICARDO BARRERAS MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER/ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE September 2005 This report was written by Ernest Drucker and Ricardo Barreras, both of Montefiore Medical Center. The Sentencing Project is a national non-profit organization engaged in research and advocacy on criminal justice policy issues. Funding for this project was made possible by support from the Ford Foundation. The Sentencing Project is a partner in the Right to Vote Campaign, a national campaign to remove barriers to voting faced by people with felony convictions. Further information can be found at www.righttovote.org The authors would like to acknowledge support from the JEHT Foundation and the Open Society Institute, along with the following organizations and individuals who collaborated in the work and provided invaluable resources: JoAnne Page, David Rothenberg, and Barry Campbell (The Fortune Society); Joyce Hamilton Henry and Kathleen Miller (DemocracyWorks); Maureen Price-Boreland (Community Partners in Action); and Molly Weiser (the Racial Fairness Project). Ricardo Barreras was supported as a postdoctoral fellow in the Behavioral Sciences Training in Drug Abuse Research program sponsored by Medical and Health Research Association of New York City, Inc. (MHRA) and the National Development and Research Institutes (NDRI) with funding from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (5T32 DA07233). Points of view, opinions, and conclusions in this paper do not necessarily represent the official position of the U.S.
    [Show full text]