DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix I. Wild and Scenic River Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix I. Wild and Scenic River Review Appendix I Wild and Scenic River Review Appendix I: Wild and Scenic River Review I. Wild and Scenic River Review The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (Arctic Refuge, Refuge) is completing a wild and scenic river review as part of this revision of the Comprehensive Conservation Plan (Plan, Revised Plan). The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act requires that such a study be completed whenever Federal agencies revise their land use plans. The process consists of several steps, including inventory, eligibility evaluation, suitability study, and potential congressional designation. The first two steps are to inventory the Refuge’s rivers, and then determine which of the rivers meet the criteria for eligibility (i.e., that they are free-flowing and contain one or more outstanding river-related values (as defined in the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act). The third step, the suitability study, determines whether each eligible river or river segment would be a worthy addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. The findings of the eligibility and suitability studies are presented in this appendix, and preliminary suitability determinations are included for each river evaluated for suitability. The final decision on the suitability of a given river segment will be made in the record of decision for the Revised Plan. Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Revised Comprehensive Conservation Plan I-i Appendix I: Wild and Scenic River Review This page intentionally left blank. I-ii Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Revised Comprehensive Conservation Plan Prepared by: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Fairbanks, Alaska Appendix I: Wild and Scenic River Review Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. I-1 1.1 Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 .............................................................................................. I-1 1.2 Overview of the Wild and Scenic River Review Process ............................................................ I-2 1.3 Refuge Wild and Scenic Evaluation Team .................................................................................... I-3 1.4 Scope and Methodology of the Wild and Scenic River Review for the Revised Plan .................................................................................................................................................. I-3 1.5 Management and Protection of Rivers Included in this Review ................................................. I-7 1.6 Other Agency and Public Input ...................................................................................................... I-7 1.6.1 Eligibility Phase .............................................................................................................. I-7 1.6.2 Suitability Phase .............................................................................................................. I-7 2. Eligibility Criteria and Evaluation ........................................................................................................... I-9 2.1 Determination of Free-Flowing ...................................................................................................... I-9 2.2 Outstandingly Remarkable Values and Regions of Comparison ................................................. I-9 2.2.1 Defining Outstandingly Remarkable Values ................................................................ I-9 2.2.2 Defining Regions of Comparison ................................................................................. I-10 2.2.3 Outstandingly Remarkable Value Assessment Methodology .................................. I-10 2.3 Classifications .............................................................................................................................. I-13 2.4 Detailed Analyses for Each Outstandingly Remarkable Value .................................................. I-14 3. Eligibility Results ................................................................................................................................... I-15 4. Suitability Study ..................................................................................................................................... I-21 4.1 Suitability Analysis Process ........................................................................................................ I-21 4.2 Methodology and Suitability Criteria .......................................................................................... I-21 4.3 Data Sources ................................................................................................................................ I-22 4.4 Interim Management of Suitable/Recommended Rivers ........................................................... I-22 4.5 Management of Designated Wild and Scenic Rivers ................................................................ I-25 4.5.1 Purposes ......................................................................................................................... I-25 4.5.2 Classification .................................................................................................................. I-25 4.5.3 Establishment of Boundaries and Classification ....................................................... I-26 4.5.4 Comprehensive River Management Plan ................................................................... I-26 4.5.5 Acquisition Procedures and Limitations ..................................................................... I-27 4.5.6 Restrictions on Hydroelectric and Water Resources Projects ................................ I-27 4.5.7 Limitations on Entry on Public Lands ........................................................................ I-28 4.5.8 Limitations on Mineral Entry ...................................................................................... I-28 4.5.9 Management Direction ................................................................................................. I-28 Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Revised Comprehensive Conservation Plan I-v Appendix I: Wild and Scenic River Review 4.5.10 Management of Wild and Scenic Rivers in Wilderness .............................................I-29 4.5.11 Cooperative Agreements ..............................................................................................I-29 4.5.12 Federal Assistance to Others .......................................................................................I-29 4.5.13 Management Policies ....................................................................................................I-30 4.5.14 Existing Rights ..............................................................................................................I-30 4.5.15 Water Pollution ..............................................................................................................I-30 4.5.16 Jurisdiction and Responsibilities of State with Respect to Fish and Wildlife ...........................................................................................................................I-31 4.5.17 Federal Reservation of Water .....................................................................................I-31 4.5.18 Navigable Rivers ...........................................................................................................I-32 4.5.19 Easements and Rights-of-Way ....................................................................................I-32 4.6 Factors Common to Rivers in the Suitability Study .................................................................... I-33 4.6.1 Common Factors for Criterion 2 .................................................................................I-33 4.6.2 Common Factors for Criterion 3 .................................................................................I-34 4.6.3 Common Factors for Criterion 4 .................................................................................I-34 4.6.4 Common Factors for Criterion 6 .................................................................................I-34 4.6.5 Common Factors for Criterion 9 .................................................................................I-36 4.6.6 Common Factors for Criterion 10 ...............................................................................I-37 4.6.7 Common Factors for Criterion 12 ...............................................................................I-38 5. River Specific Suitability Analysis ........................................................................................................ I-42 5.1 Atigun River ................................................................................................................................... I-42 5.1.1 Description/Overview ....................................................................................................I-42 5.1.2 Suitability Factor Assessment .....................................................................................I-42 5.1.3 Preliminary Suitability Determination .......................................................................I-47 5.2 Canning River ................................................................................................................................ I-49 5.2.1 Description/Overview ....................................................................................................I-49
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fort Yukon Hunting / Unit 25
    Fort Yukon Hunting / Unit 25 $UFWLF9LOODJH &KDQGDODU :LVHPDQ &KULVWLDQ &ROGIRRW 9HQHWLH &KDON\LWVLN )RUW<XNRQ %HDYHU %LUFK&UHHN 6WHYHQV9LOODJH )RUW+DPOLQ &LUFOH &HQWUDO 5DPSDUW /LYHQJRRG &LUFOH+RW6SULQJV (XUHND 0LQWR )R[ &KHQD )$,5%$1.6 +RW (DJOH 6SULQJV Federal Public Lands Open to Subsistence Use 2014/2016 Federal Subsistence Wildlife Regulations 115 Unit 25 / Hunting (See Unit 25 Fort Yukon map) Unit 25 consists of the Yukon River drainage upstream from (but excluding) the Hamlin Creek drainage; and excluding drainages into the south bank of the Yukon River upstream from the Charley River. Unit 25A consists of the Hodzana River drainage rivers; and drainages into the north bank of the Yukon River upstream from the Narrows; the Chandalar River drainage upstream from Circle, including the islands in the Yukon upstream from (and including) the East Fork drainage; River. the Christian River drainage upstream from Christian; the Unit 25C consists of drainages into the south bank of Sheenjek River drainage upstream from (and including) the the Yukon River upstream from Circle to the Unit 20E Thluichohnjik Creek; the Coleen River drainage; and the boundary; the Birch Creek drainage upstream from the Old Crow River drainage. Steese Highway bridge (milepost 147); the Preacher Creek Unit 25B consists of the Little Black River drainage drainage upstream from (and including) the Rock Creek upstream from (but excluding) the Big Creek drainage; drainage; and the Beaver Creek drainage upstream from the Black River drainage upstream from (and including) (and including) the Moose Creek drainage. the Salmon Fork drainage; the Porcupine River drainage Unit 25D consists of the remainder of Unit 25.
    [Show full text]
  • West Copper River Delta Landscape Assessment Cordova Ranger District Chugach National Forest 03/18/2003 Updated 04/19/2007
    West Copper River Delta Landscape Assessment Cordova Ranger District Chugach National Forest 03/18/2003 updated 04/19/2007 Copper River Delta – circa 1932 – photo courtesy of Perry Davis Team: Susan Kesti - Team Leader, writer-editor, vegetation Milo Burcham – Wildlife resources, Subsistence Bruce Campbell – Lands, Special Uses Dean Davidson – Soils, Geology Rob DeVelice – Succession, Ecology Carol Huber – Minerals, Geology, Mining Tim Joyce – Fish subsistence Dirk Lang – Fisheries Bill MacFarlane – Hydrology, Water Quality Dixon Sherman – Recreation Linda Yarborough – Heritage Resources Table of Contents Executive Summary...........................................................................................vi Chapter 1 – Introduction ....................................................................................1 Purpose.............................................................................................................1 The Analysis Area .............................................................................................1 Legislative History .............................................................................................3 Relationship to the revised Chugach Land and Resource Management Plan...4 Chapter 2 – Analysis Area Description .............................................................7 Physical Characteristics ....................................................................................7 Location .........................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • The American Purchase of Alaska and Canadian Expansion to the Pacific
    THE AMERICAN PURCHASE OF ALASKA AND CANADIAN EXPANSION TO THE PACIFIC David Joseph Mitchell B.A., Simon Fraser University, 1975 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of History @ DAVID JOSEPH MITCHELL 1076 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY April 1976 All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name : David Joseph Mitchell Degree: Master of Arts Title of Thesis: The American Purchase of Alaska and Canadian Expansion to the Pacific Examining Committee: Chairman: J.M. Kitchen --A. Aberbach Senior Supervisor 1\ - R.KI Debo ~xtehal-~xaminer Assistant Professor University of British Columbia Date Approved: 2.1476 PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICEh SE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis or dissertation (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Title of Thesis I~issertation: Author : (signature) (date) ABSTRACT In the national histories of both Canada and the United States the purchase of Alaska is most commonly represented as an interesting footnote to nineteenth century American expansion.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Cultural Overview of the Yukon Flats Region Prepared By: Kevin Bailey, USFWS Archaeologist Date: 2/12/2015 In
    Environmental and Cultural Overview of the Yukon Flats Region Prepared by: Kevin Bailey, USFWS Archaeologist Date: 2/12/2015 Introduction With a substantial population of Native people residing in their traditional homeland and living a modern traditional lifestyle, the Yukon Flats Refuge and all of the Alaskan Interior is a dynamic and living cultural landscape. The land, people, and wildlife form a tight, interrelated web of relationships extending thousands of years into the past. Natural features and human created “sites” form a landscape of meaning to the modern residents. The places and their meanings are highly relevant to modern residents, not just for people and culture but for the land. To many Gwich’in people culture is not distinct from their homeland. Although only minimally discussed in this overview, this dynamic living cultural landscape should be considered and discussed when writing about this area. Environmental Setting Containing the largest interior basin in Alaska, the Yukon Flats Refuge encompasses over 11 million acres of land in east central Alaska. Extending roughly 220 miles east-west along the Arctic Circle, the refuge lies between the Brooks Range to the north, and the White-Crazy Mountains to the south. The pipeline corridor runs along the refuge’s western boundary while the eastern boundary extends within 30 miles of the Canadian border. The Yukon River bisects the refuge, creating the dominant terrain. As many as 40,000 lakes, ponds, and streams may occur on the refuge, most concentrated in the flood plain along the Yukon and other rivers. Upland terrain, where lakes are less abundant, is the source of important drainage systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Combined Power and Biomass Heating System Fort Yukon, Alaska
    FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR A COMBINED POWER AND BIOMASS HEATING SYSTEM FORT YUKON, ALASKA U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy GOLDEN FIELD OFFICE In Cooperation with USDA RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE DENALI COMMISSION APRIL 2013 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADEC Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation NEPA National Environmental Policy Act AFRPA Alaska Forest Resources Practices NFS Act Non‐Frost Susceptible BFE Base Flood Elevation NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service BMP best management practice NO2 nitrogen dioxide BTU British Thermal Unit NOX nitrogen oxide CATG Council of Athabascan Tribal Governments NPDES National Pollutant Discharge CEQ Council on Environmental Quality Elimination System CFR Code of Federal Regulations O3 Ozone CHP Combined Heat and Power OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration CO carbon monoxide Pb Lead CO2 carbon dioxide PM2.5 particulate Matter equal to or less CWA Clean Water Act than 2.5 microns in diameter dBA A-weighted decibel PM10 particulate Matter equal to or less than 10 microns in diameter DBH diameter at breast height ppb parts per billion DOE U.S. Department of Energy ppm parts per million EA Environmental Assessment PSD Prevention of Significant EFH Essential Fish Habitat Deterioration EO Executive Order RCA Regulatory Commission of Alaska Degrees Fahrenheit °F SO2 sulfur dioxide FEMA Federal Emergency Management SPCC Spill Prevention, Control, and Agency Countermeasure FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan GHG greenhouse gas TCC Tanana Chiefs Conference GZC Gwitchyaa Zhee Corporation U.S.C. United States Code GZGTG Gwitchyaa Zhee Gwich’in Tribal Government USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers GZU Gwitchyaa Zhee Utility Company USDA U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Observations on Climate Change – Arctic Village, Fort Yukon and Venetie, Alaska
    Community Observations on Climate Change Arctic Village, Fort Yukon and Venetie, Alaska 1 Table of Contents Introduction 4 Background 8 Region 10 The New Climate 12 Communities 16 • Fort Yukon 18 • Arctic Village 24 Above: Climate change was the topic at a community meeting in Venetie. Right: Sunset over • Venetie 40 the Yukon. Environment Impacts 56 Primary funding provided by the U.S. Geological Survey. Supplemental funding by the U.S. Health Impacts 57 Environmental Protection Agency. In-kind provided by our partners. Thank you all for your support. Findings 59 Recommendations 61 Conclusion 62 Note: All photos by Mike Brubaker unless otherwise indicated. 2 “We have lived here all our lives. We know the changes that are occurring.” Jerry Frank, First Chief, Venetie Field Survey Participants Brian Berube – Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium Mike Brubaker – Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium Brandon Garnett – Arctic Village Traditional Council Albert Gilbert Jr. - Arctic Village Traditional Council Rocky James – Gwichyaa Zhee Gwich’in Tribal Council James Kelly – Council of Athabascan Tribal Governments Racheal Lee – Tanana Chiefs Conference Antonio Sisto - Venetie Village Council Danielle Stickman – Yukon River Inter-Tribal Watershed Council Ryan Toohey – United State Geologic Survey Lance Whitewell – Venetie Tribal Council We appreciate the participation and support of all of our localCover: and Yukon regional River. tribal Above: partners! Chandlar River 3 Spruce bark beetle infestation near White Mountain. Introduction “I haul wood for a living. The low snow years are For the Upper Yukon area, climate change tough on snow machines. People sometimes hit has become a daily fact of life, causing a tree stumps.
    [Show full text]
  • Yukon Flats School District Superintendent Vacancy Fort Yukon, Alaska
    Superintendent Search Service Yukon Flats School District Superintendent Vacancy Fort Yukon, Alaska The Association of Alaska School Boards (AASB) is facilitating a superintendent search for the Board of Education of the Yukon Flats School District. The school district is spread across the vast northeastern region of Alaska known as the Yukon Flats, with the District Office residing in the community of Fort Yukon. The northernmost community, Arctic Village, sits at the base of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in the foothills of the Brooks Range. Other communities are either along the Yukon River or navigable tributaries of the Yukon. The student population is primarily Gwich’in Athabascan, and communities still practice a subsistence lifestyle. This unique Alaskan district is looking for a Superintendent who is eager to become an active member of not only the district, but the community. Applications are sought from those candidates with successful experience as a superintendent or principal. The Board is seeking a candidate dedicated to providing an enriching and excellent education, that actively engaging students, families, and communities, for the success of all students. The new superintendent is expected to start employment on July 1, 2021. The Board is interested in offering a multi-year contract for the successful candidate with a minimum starting salary of $150,000 or more depending on experience for a 260-day work year, with an attractive benefits package to the successful candidate. Timetable Open Recruitment: ........................... February 15, 2021 Application deadline: ....................... March 15, 2021 Selection of finalists: ....................... March 24, 2021 Interviews with Board: .................... April 3, 2021 Employment begins: ........................ July 1, 2021 The Association of Alaska School Boards uses an online application system.
    [Show full text]
  • Yukon and Kuskokwim Whitefish Strategic Plan
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Whitefish Biology, Distribution, and Fisheries in the Yukon and Kuskokwim River Drainages in Alaska: a Synthesis of Available Information Alaska Fisheries Data Series Number 2012-4 Fairbanks Fish and Wildlife Field Office Fairbanks, Alaska May 2012 The Alaska Region Fisheries Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service conducts fisheries monitoring and population assessment studies throughout many areas of Alaska. Dedicated professional staff located in Anchorage, Fairbanks, and Kenai Fish and Wildlife Offices and the Anchorage Conservation Genetics Laboratory serve as the core of the Program’s fisheries management study efforts. Administrative and technical support is provided by staff in the Anchorage Regional Office. Our program works closely with the Alaska Department of Fish and Game and other partners to conserve and restore Alaska’s fish populations and aquatic habitats. Our fisheries studies occur throughout the 16 National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska as well as off- Refuges to address issues of interjurisdictional fisheries and aquatic habitat conservation. Additional information about the Fisheries Program and work conducted by our field offices can be obtained at: http://alaska.fws.gov/fisheries/index.htm The Alaska Region Fisheries Program reports its study findings through the Alaska Fisheries Data Series (AFDS) or in recognized peer-reviewed journals. The AFDS was established to provide timely dissemination of data to fishery managers and other technically oriented professionals, for inclusion in agency databases, and to archive detailed study designs and results for the benefit of future investigations. Publication in the AFDS does not preclude further reporting of study results through recognized peer-reviewed journals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dalton Highway
    Te DaDallHtt ooi g nnh w a y Visitor Guide Road Conditions . pages 6-7 Points of Interest . .page 8 Bear Safety . .page 16 Contents Ultimate Road Adventure Trip Planning The Dalton Highway is a rough, industrial road that begins 84 miles/134 km north of Fairbanks and ends 414 miles/662 km later in 4 Preparing and Safety Deadhorse, the industrial camp at Prudhoe Bay. It provides a rare 6 Mileage Chart opportunity to traverse a remote, unpopulated part of Alaska to the 11-14 Maps very top of the continent. Traveling this farthest-north road involves real risks and challenges. This publication will help you decide 23 Planning Your Trip whether to make the journey, how to prepare, and how to enjoy your experience. Please read this information carefully. Exploring Know Before You Go 8-11 Points of Interest • There is no public access to the Arctic Ocean from Deadhorse. 15 An Icebound Land You must be on an authorized tour. Call toll-free 1-877-474-3565; 17 Watching Wildlife in Fairbanks, 474-3565. 18 Recreation • There are no medical facilities between Fairbanks and Deadhorse, a distance of 500 miles/800 km. For emergency information, see the back page. Facilities and Services • Food, gas, and vehicle repair service are extremely limited. 5 Visitor Centers See page 5. 18 Campgrounds • There is limited cell phone service and public Internet connection between Fairbanks and Deadhorse. The Dalton Highway BLM Coordinator: Kelly Egger Contributors: Eugene Ervine, Lenore Heppler, Lisa Shon Jodwalis, Craig McCaa, Pam Rice. John Rapphahn, Crystal Glassburn, Jason Oles, Jason Post Produced and Designed by All photos courtesy of the BLM unless otherwise noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Water and Sediment Quality of the Yukon River and Its Tributaries, from Eagle to St
    Water and Sediment Quality of the Yukon River and its Tributaries, from Eagle to St. Marys, Alaska, 2002–2003 Edited By Mark M. Dornblaser and Douglas R. Halm Open-File Report 2006–1228 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2006 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Dornblaser, Mark M., and Halm, Douglas R., eds., 2006, Water and Sediment Quality of the Yukon River and its Tributaries, from Eagle to St. Marys, Alaska, 2002–2003, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1228, 202 p. Cover photo: Yukon River, between Eagle and Circle, by Mark Dornblaser, U.S. Geological Survey Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. ii Contents Conversion Factors ............................................................................................................................. x Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................x
    [Show full text]
  • Dalton Highway Scenic Byway Corridor Partnership Plan
    Dalton Highway Scenic Byway Corridor Partnership Plan March 2010 Prepared for: Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, State Scenic Byways Program Prepared by: Alaska Department of Natural Resources, U.S.Department Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation, of Transportation Federal Highway Interpretation and Education Unit Administration This project was funded in part with a grant from the Federal Highway Administration, the Bureau of Land Management, and the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities. This publication was released by the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, produced at a cost of $18.00 per copy to benefit the Dalton Highway State Scenic Byway, and printed in Anchorage, AK. The views expressed herein are those of the Dalton Highway State Scenic Byway stakeholders and do not necessarily reflect the view of the AKDOT&PF. Title page photo courtesy of John Will Dalton Highway Scenic Byway Corridor Partnership Plan U.S.Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Sukakpak Mountain. NPS photo by volunteer Whitney Root Contents 1. Executive Summary . 1 2. Acknowledgments . 3 3. Planning Process and Public involvement . 4 4. Background on Byways . 6 5. Corridor Issues and Concerns . 9 6. Vision, Goals, and Objectives . 19 7. route description . 24 8. Intrinsic Quality Assessment . 30 9. road and transportation system . 53 10. Byway Visitation . 66 11. Signage And Interpretation . 75 12. Recommendations and Implementation . 81 13. Conclusion . 82 14. Bibliography . 84 Figure 1. Overview map showing location of Dalton Highway vi 1. Executive Summary The Dalton Highway Scenic Byway Corridor Partnership Plan (CPP) is a comprehensive evaluation of the byway’s intrinsic qualities and serves as a guide for the management, protection, and enhancement of those qualities over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Dalton Highway Field Trip Guide for the Ninth International Conference on Permafrost
    DALTON HIGHWAY FIELD TRIP GUIDE FOR THE NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PERMAFROST A supplement to Guidebook 4, “Guidebook to permafrost and related features along the Elliott and Dalton Highways, Fox to Prudhoe Bay, Alaska,” 1983, by Jerry Brown and R.A. Kreig, editors, published by the Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys for the Fourth International Conference on Perma- frost. by D.A. Walker, T.D. Hamilton, C.L. Ping, R.P. Daanen, and W.W. Streever With contributions by M.S. Bret-Harte, R.R. Gieck, T.N. Hollingsworth, L.S. Jodwallis, D.L. Kane, G.J. Michaelson, F.E. Nelson, C.A. Munger, M.K. Raynolds, V.E. Romanovsky, G.R. Shaver, E.M. Barbour, C.A. Stiles Guidebook 9 Published by STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL & GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS 2009 DALTON HIGHWAY FIELD TRIP GUIDE FOR THE NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PERMAFROST A supplement to Guidebook 4, “Guidebook to permafrost and related features along the Elliott and Dalton Highways, Fox to Prudhoe Bay, Alaska,” 1983, by Jerry Brown and R.A. Kreig, editors, published by the Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys for the Fourth International Conference on Permafrost. by D.A. Walker, T.D. Hamilton, C.L. Ping, R.P. Daanen, and W.W. Streever With contributions by M.S. Bret-Harte, University of Alaska Fairbanks; R.R. Gieck, University of Alaska Fairbanks; T.N. Hollingsworth, U.S. Forest Service, Bonanza Creek Research Unit; L.S. Jodwallis, Bureau of Land Management; D.L. Kane, University of Alaska Fairbanks; G.J. Michaelson, University of Alaska Fairbanks; F.E.
    [Show full text]