Formation of a Parish Council for Pannal and Burn Bridge
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Community Governance Review – Formation of a Parish Council for Pannal and Burn Bridge Consultation Results Legal and Governance Harrogate Borough Council Council Offices Crescent Gardens Harrogate HG1 2SG August 2015 1 Dates of consultation: 12 May – 28 July 2015 A copy of the survey is available at Appendix A Equalities statistics are included at Appendix C Number of surveys posted out: Households (on electoral register) 941 Businesses / Community groups 66 Total 1007 (additional copies of the survey were available on request or were available to download from the website) Total population aged 18+ (eligible to respond): 2012 (source: 2011 census) Responses received: 358 surveys 2 written responses Response rates: As a proportion of paper copies sent to households/businesses/community groups: 35.6% As a proportion of population eligible to complete the survey: 17.8% Notes on response rates These response rates are only indicative for the following reasons: Whilst primarily surveying residents and other local stakeholders, anyone from outside the locality was welcome to complete the survey. The only criteria was respondents should be aged over 18. One form was sent per household, but residents were invited to request additional copies should all adults in a household wish to complete their own form There was nothing to stop people responding multiple times, additional forms could be requested, downloaded from the website or photocopied Some responses are clearly on behalf of a household (eg “my wife and I think…”) 2 1. How are you responding to this consultation? No reply 82 22.9% As a resident of the area 268 74.9% As a representative of a voluntary or 0.8% community group 3 As a business 5 1.4% As a Harrogate Borough Councillor - As a North Yorkshire County Councillor - As a public service provider - other (please specify) 4 1.10% Chairman, Harrogate & District Royal Naval Association Pannal Village Hall Pannal Methodist Church Pannal Primary Governors Of the 82 “no replies” only two did not give a postcode. Analysis of all the postcodes given showed that only one response was received from outside the proposed area – a former Pannal resident who now lives in Birstwith. 2. Do you agree with this proposal? Number Percentage Percentage of of responses population Yes 246 68.7% 12.2% No 94 26.3% 4.7% No opinion 14 3.9% 0.7% Blank 4 1.1% 0.05% 358 100% Cross-analysis: How are you responding? by Do you agree with the proposal? No Yes No opinion Blank Total As a resident of the area 187 70 8 3 268 As a representative of a voluntary or community group 3 - - - 3 As a business 3 1 1 - 5 As a Harrogate Borough Councillor - - - - - As a North Yorkshire County Councillor - - - - - As a public service provider - - - - - other (please specify) 4 - - - 4 Blank 53 23 5 1 82 Total 246 94 14 4 358 3 3. Do you have any comments or concerns regarding the proposal? Comments in full are included at Appendix B Comments in support 23 Comments not in support 74 General comments 28 Total comments made 125 Comments not in support Number of comments increase in Council Tax / cost of Parish Council 39 More bureaucracy / another tier of government 33 not needed 23 already well served by HBC and district Councillors 10 waste of resources / money 8 Driven by Pannal Village Society who don’t reflect whole community 3 concern that HBC will withdraw funding and expect new PC to pay 3 too much local power 2 enough Councillors already with NYCC and HBC 2 PC won’t have enough power to deal with issues 1 concerns over allowances paid to Parish Councillors 1 review taken too long 1 not clear why needed 1 Comments in support Number of comments local decisions process and governance improved 3 will help with secondary school admissions 2 Pannal and Burn Bridge have different issues to Harrogate 1 Will help preserve green belt 1 need two PCs - Pannal & Burn Bridge 1 more influence than village society 1 Parish Councils more appropriate for rural areas 1 improve viability of village hall 1 Opportunity for views to be heard in Planning consultation 1 Positive development for Pannal Village Society 1 allow residents more say 1 look after the village 1 4 4. Do you agree that, if created, the name of the council should be Pannal and Burn Bridge Parish Council? Number Percentage of responses Yes 275 76.8% No 19 5.3% No opinion 48 13.4% Blank 16 4.5% 358 100% 5. If you disagree with the proposed name please state why / suggest an alternative Burn Bridge and Pannal – 4 comments Pannal – 1 comment Pannal, Burn Bridge and Walton Park – 1 comment Pannal Burn Bridge Community Council – 1 comment Comments I don't disagree, but feel it would be more inclusive if a historic area name could be found, that does not explicitly name Pannal or Burn Bridge or Walton Park. A significant area is Spacey Houses. Historically Pannal and Spacey Houses were 2 distinct and separate villages with the railway station built between them. It was in the 1930's onwards that built up areas merged. 6. Do you have any further comments on the proposed name of Pannal and Burn Bridge Parish Council? Unfortunately it is too long for comfort and easy use but any abbreviation would lose the precision of the name The people in Walton Park may be upset. Burn Bridge and Pannal Parish Council works equally well. Should Spacey Houses be included in the name? Describes the community very well. If proposed Pannal and Burn Bridge then Spacey Houses area (which includes Walton Park estate) should remain separate. Why not "Burn Bridge and Pannal PC" alphabetically 5 7. Do you agree with the proposed boundaries? Number Percentage of responses Yes 268 74.9% No 18 5.0% No opinion 54 15.1% Blank 18 5.0% 358 100% 8. Do you have any comments on the area to be covered by the council? Agree It can be said that the new boundaries better reflect the areas of Pannal and Burn Bridge. This is a natural boundary for the Parish. Distinction between Harrogate and Pannal/Burn Bridge is desperately needed as if we don't have autonomy we won't exist in a few years as Harrogate will have merged into us without our say!! (Burn Bridge is constantly used as go between now for Harrogate and traffic) Boundaries make sense. Spot on! Looks entirely appropriate. Would like to see additional areas included Suggest new Police College site and Rossett Green Lane could be included. We think that the boundary should be to the roundabout and should continue up bypass to new point (includes Burn Bridge side to roundabout (see illustration) It should include the whole of the road from the Black Swan to the main Leeds/Harrogate Road The proposed boundaries should include the whole of Pannal Ward. Would like to see certain areas excluded Exclude me at top of Yew Tree Lane/Rossett Green Lane - don't know if I am in or out. Don't see why it includes Rossett Manor and the nearby houses - surely should be in Pannal Ash? The land extending to Crimple Viaduct looks odd and could be omitted to be more compact The houses on the southern side of Rossett Green Lane & Leadhall Lane and at the top of Church Lane are part of the Rossett Green / Pannal ash area rather than Pannal village It should include the whole of the Pannal ward or just Pannal and Burn Bridge only. The physical boundary should then run along the railway line and along A61 Road to Almsford bank for just village. I wouldn't include Walton Park 6 Comments Boundaries do not reflect gaps between communities boundary too close to Harrogate to the north. From the map Walton Park appears to be the largest area but is not mentioned in the name. The larger part of the Pannal Ward has been excluded. Keep the green belt/separation from Harrogate. The area should mean common interests can be found although either side of the A61 might result in conflicting views It might help to deter over-development of unwanted kinds Happy to be excluded from possible parish council. To include Church Lane? Could not read map provided. How do boundaries coincide with adjacent or near adjacent Parishes? Seems odd to exclude Walton Head Water Tower which is now a residence and Walton Head Farm Just increase the size of the existing Pannal District Ward. The 3 areas of Burn Bridge Pannal and Walton Park are separate at present. It will be of benefit if all can be represented together. The degree of geographical separation currently may be an obstacle at least initially. 7 9. Do you agree with the years in which elections will be held? Number Percentage of responses Yes 250 69.8% No 18 5.0% No opinion 62 17.3% Blank 28 7.8% 358 100% 10. Do you have any comments on the years in which elections will be held? Agree Good plan to have reduced initial period to enable personnel changes to be made to cater for perhaps early mistakes Disagree Every 5 years. Wait until 2019 to start with full term Three years maximum Bi-annual Comments As stated before, the first election should have been this year. Is there a mechanism to allow things to start running in 'practice mode' to get things established A provisional parish precept should be included for in the 2016/17 Council Tax calculation in order that the new Parish Council has funds to undertake its services from May 2016 8 11.