DOCSLIB.ORG

Mid-Atlantic Ocean Action Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mid-Atlantic Ocean Action Plan MID-ATLANTIC REGIONAL OCEAN ACTION PLAN Mid-Atlantic Regional Ocean Action Plan Released November 2016 To access the Plan online, visit this site: boem.gov/Ocean-Action-Plan/ [ Foreword ] As the Federal, Tribal, and State Co-leads of this historic effort and on behalf of the Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Body (RPB), we are proud to present the Mid-Atlantic Regional Ocean Action Plan (Plan). This Plan is the result of over three years of collaborative effort by many RPB contributors, partners, and stakeholders and is the first of its kind in our region. It charts the course toward a more integrated approach to managing our shared ocean resources that is grounded in stakeholder engagement. The Plan guides and informs the decisions and practices of RPB member entities and fosters transparent ocean data and information sharing, improved coordination in decision making, and collaboration around specific actions that support ocean ecosystem health and sustainable ocean uses. The planning process will evolve over time, and we look forward to continuing to work with the people of the Mid-Atlantic in advancing this effort. Ultimately, we bear a shared responsibility for the treasured ocean resources upon which our region’s communities, economies, and ecosystems depend. Together, we can seize this opportunity. With appreciation, Robert LaBelle (Federal Co-Lead) Senior Advisor to the Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Kelsey Leonard (Tribal Co-Lead) Shinnecock Indian Nation Gwynne Schultz (State Co-Lead) Director, Office of Coastal and Ocean Management Maryland Department of Natural Resources [ Acknowledgements ] An effort of this magnitude, spanning several years and many jurisdictions, RPB member entity contributors (current and former): Debra could not be successful without the help of many dedicated people. The Abercrombie, Edward Ambrogio, Kristie Bailey, Joan Barminski, Mary Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Body (RPB) is deeply grateful to the Boatman, Stephen Bowler, Sarah Bowman, Charles Chesnutt, Peter many individuals who provided input, technical assistance, production Clouse, Chris Darnell, Michele DesAutels, Amardeep Dhanju, Patty Engler, assistance, and many other forms of support and advice in helping us to Lori Fenstermacher, Marc Fersman, John Forren, Mary Gerbauckas, Sara develop the Mid-Atlantic Regional Ocean Action Plan (Plan). In particular, Guiltinan, James Haggerty, Sean Hart, Kevin Hassell, Roselle Henn, Kim the RPB wishes to thank the countless dedicated members of the public Hernandez, Susan Holmes, Molly Holt, George Jackson, Liza Johnson, that have participated in the regional ocean planning process thus far. Tiffany Johnson, Joshua Kaplowitz, Chris Kinkade, Timothy Konnert, Your input and advice over the past three and a half years has brought us Mary Krueger, John Kuriawa, Cliff McCreedy, Lori Mohr, Peter Murdoch, to this important milestone for the region. We hope you will continue to Casey Reeves, Jeffrey Reidenauer, Nicole Rodi, Salvatore Ruggiero, engage with us during implementation of the Plan and in the long term as Susan Russell-Robinson, Sue Samonski, Renee Searfoss, Stephen we work to update and improve our collaborative effort over time. Simpson, Caleb Spiegel, Philip Stafford, Pamela Toschik, Megan Treml, and Patrick Wycko. In addition, the RPB wishes to thank the leaders and staff at their respective RPB facilitators and plan drafting team (Meridian Institute): Laura Cantral, entities for supporting these important efforts, and those who actively Jeana Connaughton, Selena Elmer, Ingrid Irigoyen, Meghan Massaua, contributed to this work, including: Orion McCarthy, Kara Runsten, Lucas Smith, and Danielle Youngblood. Current Co-leads: Robert LaBelle (Federal Co-Lead), Kelsey Leonard MARCO staff partners (current and former): Kim Barber, Ed Camp, (Tribal Co-Lead), and Gwynne Schultz (State Co-Lead). Kaity Goldsmith, Arlo Hemphill, Michelle Lennox, Kate Morrison, Kris Former Co-leads: Maureen Bornholdt (Federal Co-Lead), Sarah Cooksey Ohleth, and Judy Tucker. (State Co-Lead), and Gerrod Smith (Tribal Co-Lead). Data Portal team: John Bognar, Chris Bruce, Matt Campo, Gwynn Current RPB Members and Alternates: Sandra Allen, Joe Atangan, Hoyt Crichton, Rick Lathrop, Tony MacDonald, Jay Odell, Drew Seminara, Battey, John Bull, Leann Bullin, Greg Capobianco, Kevin Chu, Karen Chytalo, Jim Trimble, and Karl Vilacoba. John Clark, Darlene Finch, Jeffrey Flumignan, Simon Gore, Robert Gray, Additional project partners who supported graphic design, data Kelly Heffner, Terron Hillsman, Michael Jones, John Kennedy, Ginger Kopkash, product development, information gathering, and outreach activities: Sherilyn Lau, Charles (Buddy) LoBue, Michael Luisi, Kathryn MacCormick, Earvin Balderama, Jesse Cleary, Corrie Curtice, Michael Fogarty, Katie Catherine McCall, Laura McKay, Christine Mintz, Kathy Moser, Kristen Guttenplan, Pat Halpin, Brian Kinlan, Ian Mogavero, Stephanie Moura, Regan, Rossana Rosado, Chris Scraba, Basil Seggos, Elizabeth Semple, Betsy Moyer, Charles Perretti, Jason Roberts, Melanie Schroeder Gearon, Joseph Sieber, Douglas Simpson, Michael Snyder, and Brian Thompson. Rachel Shmookler, Emily Shumchenia, Zachary Singer-Leavitt, Miya Su Former RPB Members and Alternates: Kate Anderson, Jerry Barnes, Rowe, Peter Taylor, Bob Whitener, Jennifer Whitener Ulrich, Arliss Thomas Bigford, Amy Cradic, Lucas Feinberg, Patrick Gilman, Jon Hall, Winship, and Peter Zaykoski. Taura Huxley-Nelson, Marilyn Lennon, L. Frank Mach, Joseph Martens, National Ocean Council Office Directors and staff who provided Matthew Millea, Thomas Morgart, Elizabeth Nashold, W. David Noble, guidance throughout the process: Deerin Babb-Brott, Beth Kerttula, Douglas Pabst, Cesar Perales, Pedro Ramos, Martin Rosen, George Jonathan Andrechik, Steve Baldovsky, Linda Bunn, Christopher Corvo, Stafford, Jack Travelstead, Lorraine Wakeman, John Walters, Richard Margaret (Meg) Larrea, Matthew Lurie, and Jerry Smith, Jr. Weeks, and Andrew Zemba. 2 | Mid-Atlantic Regional Ocean Action Plan [ Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Body Member Entities ] STATES Delaware | Maryland | New Jersey | New York | Pennsylvania | Virginia FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED TRIBES Shinnecock Indian Nation | Pamunkey Indian Tribe FEDERAL AGENCIES Department of Agriculture (represented by the Natural Resources Conservation Service) Department of Commerce (represented by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) Department of Defense (represented by the U.S. Navy and the Joint Chiefs of Staff) Department of Energy (represented by Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy) Department of Homeland Security (represented by the U.S. Coast Guard) Department of the Interior (represented by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management) Department of Transportation (represented by the Maritime Administration) Environmental Protection Agency MID-ATLANTIC FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL Mid-Atlantic Regional Ocean Action Plan | 3 [ Contents ] List of Acronyms and Shorthand ........................................... 7 Chapter One: Ocean Planning in the Mid-Atlantic ........................... 9 1.1 About this Document .................................................. 14 1.2 The Planning Process .................................................. 15 1.2.1 The Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Body ........................... 15 1.2.2 Key Partners in the Regional Planning Process ...................... 17 1.2.3 Stakeholders in the Regional Planning Process ...................... 19 1.2.4 Tribal Engagement in the Regional Planning Process ................ 22 1.3 Regional Ocean Assessment ............................................ 22 1.4 Mid-Atlantic Regional Ocean Planning Framework ........................ 23 1.4.1 Vision ........................................................... 23 1.4.2 Geographic Focus ................................................ 24 1.4.3 Principles ........................................................ 24 1.4.4 Goals and Objectives ............................................. 26 1.5 Approach to the Mid-Atlantic Ocean Action Plan ......................... 26 1.6 Moving Ahead Under Existing Authorities ................................ 27 Chapter Two: Actions to Promote Interjurisdictional Coordination in Support of Regional Ocean Planning Goals ................................ 29 2.1 Best Practices for Enhanced Coordination ............................... 31 2.1.1 Enhance the Use of Data and Information in Agency Coordination . 32 2.1.2 Enhance Participation in Agency Coordination ...................... 34 2.1.3 Enhance Coordination with Stakeholders . 35 2.1.4 Enhance Federal-State Coordination ............................... 35 2.1.5 Enhance Federal-Tribal Coordination ............................... 36 2.2 Continuation of the Regional Planning Body .............................. 37 2.3 Actions to Promote a Healthy Ocean Ecosystem .......................... 38 2.4 Actions to Foster Sustainable Ocean Uses ............................... 45 2.4.1 National Security ................................................ 46 2.4.2 Ocean Energy .................................................. 49 2.4.3 Commercial and Recreational Fishing .............................. 56 2.4.4 Ocean Aquaculture ............................................... 59 2.4.5 Maritime Commerce and Navigation .............................. 60 2.4.6 Sand Management ......................................................... 63 2.4.7 Non-Consumptive Recreation ..............................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • North America Other Continents
    Arctic Ocean Europe North Asia America Atlantic Ocean Pacific Ocean Africa Pacific Ocean South Indian America Ocean Oceania Southern Ocean Antarctica LAND & WATER • The surface of the Earth is covered by approximately 71% water and 29% land. • It contains 7 continents and 5 oceans. Land Water EARTH’S HEMISPHERES • The planet Earth can be divided into four different sections or hemispheres. The Equator is an imaginary horizontal line (latitude) that divides the earth into the Northern and Southern hemispheres, while the Prime Meridian is the imaginary vertical line (longitude) that divides the earth into the Eastern and Western hemispheres. • North America, Earth’s 3rd largest continent, includes 23 countries. It contains Bermuda, Canada, Mexico, the United States of America, all Caribbean and Central America countries, as well as Greenland, which is the world’s largest island. North West East LOCATION South • The continent of North America is located in both the Northern and Western hemispheres. It is surrounded by the Arctic Ocean in the north, by the Atlantic Ocean in the east, and by the Pacific Ocean in the west. • It measures 24,256,000 sq. km and takes up a little more than 16% of the land on Earth. North America 16% Other Continents 84% • North America has an approximate population of almost 529 million people, which is about 8% of the World’s total population. 92% 8% North America Other Continents • The Atlantic Ocean is the second largest of Earth’s Oceans. It covers about 15% of the Earth’s total surface area and approximately 21% of its water surface area.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoregions of New England Forested Land Cover, Nutrient-Poor Frigid and Cryic Soils (Mostly Spodosols), and Numerous High-Gradient Streams and Glacial Lakes
    58. Northeastern Highlands The Northeastern Highlands ecoregion covers most of the northern and mountainous parts of New England as well as the Adirondacks in New York. It is a relatively sparsely populated region compared to adjacent regions, and is characterized by hills and mountains, a mostly Ecoregions of New England forested land cover, nutrient-poor frigid and cryic soils (mostly Spodosols), and numerous high-gradient streams and glacial lakes. Forest vegetation is somewhat transitional between the boreal regions to the north in Canada and the broadleaf deciduous forests to the south. Typical forest types include northern hardwoods (maple-beech-birch), northern hardwoods/spruce, and northeastern spruce-fir forests. Recreation, tourism, and forestry are primary land uses. Farm-to-forest conversion began in the 19th century and continues today. In spite of this trend, Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and 5 level III ecoregions and 40 level IV ecoregions in the New England states and many Commission for Environmental Cooperation Working Group, 1997, Ecological regions of North America – toward a common perspective: Montreal, Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 71 p. alluvial valleys, glacial lake basins, and areas of limestone-derived soils are still farmed for dairy products, forage crops, apples, and potatoes. In addition to the timber industry, recreational homes and associated lodging and services sustain the forested regions economically, but quantity of environmental resources; they are designed to serve as a spatial framework for continue into ecologically similar parts of adjacent states or provinces. they also create development pressure that threatens to change the pastoral character of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Geography Notes.Pdf
    THE GLOBE What is a globe? a small model of the Earth Parts of a globe: equator - the line on the globe halfway between the North Pole and the South Pole poles - the northern-most and southern-most points on the Earth 1. North Pole 2. South Pole hemispheres - half of the earth, divided by the equator (North & South) and the prime meridian (East and West) 1. Northern Hemisphere 2. Southern Hemisphere 3. Eastern Hemisphere 4. Western Hemisphere continents - the largest land areas on Earth 1. North America 2. South America 3. Europe 4. Asia 5. Africa 6. Australia 7. Antarctica oceans - the largest water areas on Earth 1. Atlantic Ocean 2. Pacific Ocean 3. Indian Ocean 4. Arctic Ocean 5. Antarctic Ocean WORLD MAP ** NOTE: Our textbooks call the “Southern Ocean” the “Antarctic Ocean” ** North America The three major countries of North America are: 1. Canada 2. United States 3. Mexico Where Do We Live? We live in the Western & Northern Hemispheres. We live on the continent of North America. The other 2 large countries on this continent are Canada and Mexico. The name of our country is the United States. There are 50 states in it, but when it first became a country, there were only 13 states. The name of our state is New York. Its capital city is Albany. GEOGRAPHY STUDY GUIDE You will need to know: VOCABULARY: equator globe hemisphere continent ocean compass WORLD MAP - be able to label 7 continents and 5 oceans 3 Large Countries of North America 1. United States 2. Canada 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicare Centers for Medicare & Provider Reimbursement Manual - Part 1, Medicaid Services (CMS) Chapter 22, Determination of Cost of Services to Beneficiaries
    Department of Health & Human Services (DHHS) Medicare Centers for Medicare & Provider Reimbursement Manual - Part 1, Medicaid Services (CMS) Chapter 22, Determination of Cost of Services to Beneficiaries Transmittal 473 Date: December 16, 2016 HEADER SECTION NUMBERS PAGES TO INSERT PAGES TO DELETE 2231 – 2231 (Cont.) 22-71 – 22-72 (2 pp.) 22-71 – 22-72 (2 pp.) CLARIFIED/UPDATED MATERIAL--EFFECTIVE DATE: N/A Section 2231, Regional Medicare Swing-Bed SNF Rates, adds a crosswalk to clarify the numbering of regions referenced in this chapter with the numbering of divisions identified by the Bureau of the Census. The names of each division and the states that are included in each division are provided for further clarification. DISCLAIMER: The revision date and transmittal number apply to the red italicized material only. Any other material was previously published and remains unchanged. CMS-Pub. 15-1-22 DETERMINATION OF COST OF SERVICES 12-16 TO BENEFICIARIES 2231 2231. REGIONAL MEDICARE SWING-BED SNF RATES Effective for services furnished on or after October 1, 1990, Medicare payment to swing-bed hospitals for routine SNF-type services is based on the average rate per patient day paid by Medicare during the calendar year for routine services provided in freestanding skilled nursing facilities in the region where the hospital is located. The rates are calculated based on the most recent year for which cost reporting data are available trended forward in the same manner as the limits applicable to skilled nursing facilities. The rates are calculated using the regions as defined in §1886 (d)(2)(D) of the Act (that is, one of the nine census divisions established by the Bureau of the Census).
    [Show full text]
  • State Abbreviations
    State Abbreviations Postal Abbreviations for States/Territories On July 1, 1963, the Post Office Department introduced the five-digit ZIP Code. At the time, 10/1963– 1831 1874 1943 6/1963 present most addressing equipment could accommodate only 23 characters (including spaces) in the Alabama Al. Ala. Ala. ALA AL Alaska -- Alaska Alaska ALSK AK bottom line of the address. To make room for Arizona -- Ariz. Ariz. ARIZ AZ the ZIP Code, state names needed to be Arkansas Ar. T. Ark. Ark. ARK AR abbreviated. The Department provided an initial California -- Cal. Calif. CALIF CA list of abbreviations in June 1963, but many had Colorado -- Colo. Colo. COL CO three or four letters, which was still too long. In Connecticut Ct. Conn. Conn. CONN CT Delaware De. Del. Del. DEL DE October 1963, the Department settled on the District of D. C. D. C. D. C. DC DC current two-letter abbreviations. Since that time, Columbia only one change has been made: in 1969, at the Florida Fl. T. Fla. Fla. FLA FL request of the Canadian postal administration, Georgia Ga. Ga. Ga. GA GA Hawaii -- -- Hawaii HAW HI the abbreviation for Nebraska, originally NB, Idaho -- Idaho Idaho IDA ID was changed to NE, to avoid confusion with Illinois Il. Ill. Ill. ILL IL New Brunswick in Canada. Indiana Ia. Ind. Ind. IND IN Iowa -- Iowa Iowa IOWA IA Kansas -- Kans. Kans. KANS KS A list of state abbreviations since 1831 is Kentucky Ky. Ky. Ky. KY KY provided at right. A more complete list of current Louisiana La. La.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantos D9.5. European Strategy for All Atlantic Ocean Observing System
    European Strategy for All-Atlantic Ocean Observing System This report is a European contribution to the implementation of the All-Atlantic Ocean Observing System (AtlantOS). This report presents a forward look at the European capability in the Atlantic ocean observing and proposes goals and actions to be achieved by 2025 and 2030. Editors: Erik Buch, Sandra Ketelhake, Kate Larkin and Michael Ott Contributors: Michele Barbier, Angelika Brandt, Peter Brandt, Brad DeYoung, Dina Eparkhina, Vicente Fernandez, Rafael González-Quirós, Jose Joaquin Hernandez Brito, Pierre-Yves Le Traon, Glenn Nolan, Artur Palacz, Nadia Pinardi, Sylvie Pouliquen, Isabel Sousa Pinto, Toste Tanhua, Victor Turpin, Martin Visbeck, Anne-Cathrin Wölfl Design coordination: Dina Eparkhina The AtlantOS project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 633211. This out- put reflects the views only of the authors, and the European Union cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of this information contained therein. 2 3 Contents Executive Summary 4 1. European strategy for the All-Atlantic Ocean Observing System (AtlantOS) 6 1.1 Why do we need a European strategy for Atlantic ocean observing? 7 1.2 Structure of this strategy 8 2. Meeting user needs: from requirement setting to product delivery 9 2.1 Recurring process of multi-stakeholder consultation for user requirements and co-design 9 2.2 The ‘blue’ value chain – products driven by user needs 10 2.3 European policy drivers 12 3. Existing and evolving observing networks and systems 13 3.1 Present capabilities and future targets 13 3.2 Role of observing networks and observing systems in the blue value chain 15 3.3 Advancing the observing system through new technology 17 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Life in the New England Colonies
    Life in the New England Colonies The New England colonies include Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Rhode Island. The lifestyle of New England’s people was greatly impacted by both its geography and climate. New England’s economy depended on the environment. Its location near the Atlantic Ocean along a jagged coastline determined how people made a living. People in New England made money through fishing, whaling, shipbuilding, trading in its port cities and providing naval supplies. One of the busiest port cities was Boston. People in New England could not make a living from farming because most of the land was not suited to farming due to the hilly terrain and rocky soil. The nature of the soil was partially caused by the Appalachian Mountains. Another factor that made farming for profit difficult was climate; New England experienced moderate summers and cold winters. The growing season was simply too short to make farming profitable and most farms were small family ones. So rather than farming, many people not involved in industries involving the water were either skilled craftsman or shopkeepers. Towns and villages were very important in the daily lives of New Englanders. Their social lives revolved around village events and attending church. The Sabbath or Sunday was a high point of the week. Work was not allowed and it provided an opportunity to visit one another. Many of the New England colonies were founded by religious reformers and separatists searching for religious freedom. Civic events were also central to New England life. Town meetings determined answers to important questions about running the colony.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine ENERGY SECTOR RISK PROFILE
    State of Maine ENERGY SECTOR RISK PROFILE This State Energy Risk Profile examines the relative magnitude of the risks that the State of Maine’s energy infrastructure routinely encounters in comparison with the probable impacts. Natural and man-made hazards with the potential to cause disruption of the energy infrastructure are identified. The Risk Profile highlights risk considerations relating to the electric, petroleum and natural gas infrastructures to become more aware of risks to these energy systems and assets. MAINE STATE FACTS State Overview Annual Energy Production Population: 1.33 million (<1% total U.S.) Electric Power Generation: 14.4 TWh (<1% total U.S.) Housing Units: 0.72 million (1% total U.S.) Coal: 0 TWh, <1% [0.1 GW total capacity] Business Establishments: 0.04 million (1% total U.S.) Petroleum: 0.1 TWh, <1% [1 GW total capacity] Natural Gas: 6 TWh, 42% [1.9 GW total capacity] Nuclear: 0 TWh, 0% [0 GW total capacity] Annual Energy Consumption Hydro: 3.7 TWh, 26% [0.7 GW total capacity] Electric Power: 11.6 TWh (<1% total U.S.) Other Renewable: 0.9 TWh, 6% [1 GW total capacity] Coal: 0 MSTN (0% total U.S.) Natural Gas: 413 Bcf (2% total U.S.) Coal: 0 MSTN (0% total U.S.) Motor Gasoline: 16,100 Mbarrels (1% total U.S.) Natural Gas: 0 Bcf (0% total U.S.) Distillate Fuel: 10,800 Mbarrels (1% total U.S.) Crude Oil: 0 Mbarrels (0% total U.S.) Ethanol: 0 Mbarrels (0% total U.S.) NATURAL HAZARDS OVERVIEW Annual Frequency of Occurrence of Natural Hazards in Maine Annualized Property Loss due to Natural Hazards in Maine (1996–2014) (1996–2014) ❱ According to NOAA, the most common natural hazard in Maine ❱ As reported by NOAA, the natural hazard in Maine that caused the is Thunderstorm & Lightning, which occurs once every 9.5 days greatest overall property loss during 1996 to 2014 is Winter Storm & on the average during the months of March to October.
    [Show full text]
  • Liminal Encounters and the Missionary Position: New England's Sexual Colonization of the Hawaiian Islands, 1778-1840
    University of Southern Maine USM Digital Commons All Theses & Dissertations Student Scholarship 2014 Liminal Encounters and the Missionary Position: New England's Sexual Colonization of the Hawaiian Islands, 1778-1840 Anatole Brown MA University of Southern Maine Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/etd Part of the Other American Studies Commons Recommended Citation Brown, Anatole MA, "Liminal Encounters and the Missionary Position: New England's Sexual Colonization of the Hawaiian Islands, 1778-1840" (2014). All Theses & Dissertations. 62. https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/etd/62 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at USM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of USM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LIMINAL ENCOUNTERS AND THE MISSIONARY POSITION: NEW ENGLAND’S SEXUAL COLONIZATION OF THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS, 1778–1840 ________________________ A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTERS OF THE ARTS THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE AMERICAN AND NEW ENGLAND STUDIES BY ANATOLE BROWN _____________ 2014 FINAL APPROVAL FORM THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE AMERICAN AND NEW ENGLAND STUDIES June 20, 2014 We hereby recommend the thesis of Anatole Brown entitled “Liminal Encounters and the Missionary Position: New England’s Sexual Colonization of the Hawaiian Islands, 1778 – 1840” Be accepted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Professor Ardis Cameron (Advisor) Professor Kent Ryden (Reader) Accepted Dean, College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis has been churning in my head in various forms since I started the American and New England Studies Masters program at The University of Southern Maine.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents for Strategic Planning Managers Implementation Tools Handbook
    STRATEGIC PLANNING HANDBOOK AND MANAGERS IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY AT NEW ORLEANS Academic Years 2006-2011 Strategic Implementation Plan Academic Years 2006 to 2011 Southern University at New Orleans Revised December 2, 2010 ii FORWARD The State of Louisiana requires higher education institutions to provide a strategic plan for intended operations. Southern University at New Orleans (SUNO) has prepared and implemented strategic initiatives for academic years 2006 to 2011. The SUNO strategic plan includes the Louisiana Board of Regents and the Southern University System strategic goals for higher education institutions including student access and success, academic and operational quality and accountability, and service and research. These goals are complemented by an institutional vision of community linkages, academic excellence, illiteracy and poverty reduction, transparency, and technological excellence. These SUNO strategic directions are paramount for higher education eminence and for rebuilding our community and the Gulf Coast after the Hurricanes of 2005. The strategic plan was facilitated by a strategic planning committee made up of representatives of every campus unit and was developed with input from the entire University family including community representatives. The implementation of the strategic plan will ensure that SUNO will continue to provide quality education, service to our communities, and contributions to the economic development of the State of Louisiana. Victor Ukpolo Chancellor Southern University at New Orleans iii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANCELLOR’S LETTER ………………………………………………………… vi UNIVERSITY STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE ………………….…….. vii I. STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS BACKGROUND INFORMATION …. 1 A. A Definition of Strategic Planning ………………………………………….... 1 B. Purpose of Strategic Planning ………………………………………………... 1 C. Steps in a Strategic Planning Process (Example 1) ………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Ed Muskie, Political Parties, and the Art of Governance
    Maine Policy Review Volume 29 Issue 2 Maine's Bicentennial 2020 Ed Muskie, Political Parties, and the Art of Governance Don Nicoll [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mpr Part of the American Politics Commons Recommended Citation Nicoll, Don. "Ed Muskie, Political Parties, and the Art of Governance." Maine Policy Review 29.2 (2020) : 34 -38, https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mpr/vol29/iss2/5. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. ART OF GOVERNANCE Ed Muskie, Political Parties, and the Art of Governance by Don Nicoll creating parties, recreating them, dumping Abstract some and building others, and struggling In its 200-year history as a state, Maine has gone through three major political for power continues today, with credible realignments and is now in the midst of a fourth. The Jefferson Democratic Re- fears about the viability of our representa- publicans supplanted the Federalists to achieve statehood. The Republican Par- tive democracy. ty dominated state politics from the eve of the Civil War until 1954. The Maine The year 2020, the bicentennial of Democratic Party, under the leadership of Edmund S. Muskie and Frank Coffin, the creation of the state of Maine, may be transformed it into a competitive two-party state. Now the goals of open, re- another seminal year in the political life of sponsive, and responsible governance that Muskie and Coffin sought through the United States and the survival of healthy competition and civil discourse are threatened by bitter, dysfunctional representative democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • December 16, 2019 Secretary Michael R. Pompeo Unites States
    STATE OF MAINE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR 1 STATE HOUSE STATION AUGUSTA, MAINE Janet T. Mills 04333-0001 GOVERNOR December 16, 2019 Secretary Michael R. Pompeo Unites States Department of State 2201 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20520 Dear Secretary Pompeo, In response to President Trump's "Executive Order on Enhancing State and Local Involvement in Refugee Resettlement" issued on September 26, 2019, I am writing to affirm the State of Maine's support for refugee resettlement in our state. For more than forty years, and under the leadership of seven Democratic, Republican and Independent governors, Maine has participated in the federal refugee resettlement program. Over the course of those decades we have welcomed nearly 10,000 people from more than 30 countries - people who have resettled in Maine with the hope of finding peace, safety and work for themselves and their families. Maine has a workforce shortage, projected to grow worse over the next decade, creating serious challenges for businesses seeking to hire qualified workers in every industry and in every sector of our economy. Our state welcomes refugees who have skills, education and ability, a proven work ethic and tremendous drive. It is the right thing to do, and it is critical to the strength of our economy and our future success as a state. For the reasons I list above, the State of Maine fully consents to resettle refugees through the United States Refugee Admissions Program. Sincerely, Governor cc: Carol T. O'Connell, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration, U.S. Department of State Catholic Charites Maine Refugee and Immigration Services PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER PHONE: (207) 287-3531 (VOICE) TTY USE RS CA LL 7 11 FAX: (207) 287 - 1034 www.maine.gov .
    [Show full text]