DOCSLIB.ORG

A Legal Analysis of Kurdish Revolts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Legal Analysis of Kurdish Revolts Faculty of Law Academic year 2011-2012 International Law and Non-State Armed Groups: A legal Analysis of Kurdish Revolts PhD dissertation presented to the Faculty of Law of Ghent University in order to obtain the degree Doctor of Law Joseph Zand Promoter: Prof. Dr. Frank Maes Doctoral Guidance Committee: Prof. Dr. Dirk Heirbaut and Prof. Dr. Gert Vermeulen 1 “… there are no authentic nations: nationhood is a consequence of political and ideological struggle”.1 1 M. Koskenniemi, ‘National Self-Determination Today: Problems of Legal Theory and Practice’ (1994) 43 ICLQ, p. 241. 2 Acknowledgements Completing a PhD thesis is the most arduous but rewarding task I have ever undertaken in my life. Writing a thesis can be a lonely experience. It has to be said that spending hours on end researching in different libraries is hardly conducive to a healthy social and family life. However, I have been extremely fortunate to be the recipient of so much assistance and encouragement in this process. Above all, I would like express my gratitude to my promoter Professor Dr. Frank Maes, without whose support this task would have been practically impossible. He has supported me through some of my darkest hours and now I hope he enjoys the fresh new dawn with me. I would like to thank sincerely my co-promoter Professor Dr. Dirk Heirbaut and Professor Dr. Gert Vermeulen for their valued guidance. Professor Dr. Eduard Sommers and Professor Dr. Kemal Baslar from the National Police Academy, Turkey deserve a special mention for their kindness and unrelenting support. I would like to thank my family and friends for giving me their undying love and belief in me. There are three very special ladies I would like to thank, our brilliant secretaries Peggy De Smet, Karin Pensaert, and Kristien Ballengeer for helping me throughout my stay in Gent. I would also like to express my sincere gratitude to Betty Queffelec and Eric Boone for their invaluable computer assistance. Last, but by no means least, I would like to thank all my colleagues at the Department of Public International Law and the Department of Legal Theory and Legal History at the Law Faculty of Ghent University for their support and encouragement throughout this process. 3 Table of contents International Law and Non-State Armed Groups: A legal Analysis of Kurdish Revolts . 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................... 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................. 10 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 13 1.1 Non-State Armed Groups: a working definition ........................................................ 14 1.2 The three Kurdish entities of Iran, Iraq and Turkey ................................................... 20 1.3 Methodology of the thesis .......................................................................................... 21 1.4 Classification of armed conflict in Kurdistan ........................................................ 22 1.4.1 International armed conflict ................................................................................. 22 1.4.2 Internal armed conflict ................................................................................... 24 1.4.3 Internationalized armed conflict..................................................................... 27 CHAPTER 2. THE KURDS: AN HISTORICAL BACKGROUND .................................. 29 2.1 The land of the Kurds ................................................................................................. 29 2.1.1 The Kurds: a divided people ................................................................................ 29 2.1.2 Division of Kurdistan ..................................................................................... 33 2.1.3 The roots of Kurdish nationalism ................................................................... 34 2.2 The Kurds, international law and the formation of the modern Middle East ............. 40 2.2.1 A struggle for dominance: the Treaty of Sèvres ............................................. 40 2.2.2 Treaty of Lausanne (1923): Creation of modern Turkey and Iraq ................. 42 2.2.3 The Permanent Court of International Justice and the Vilayet of Mosul ....... 45 2.3 The Kurds in Turkey: 1923-1945 .......................................................................... 47 2.3.1 Living under the Kemalist regime ....................................................................... 47 2.3.2 Legal measures against the Kurds in Turkey ................................................. 49 2.3.3 The major Kurdish revolts in Turkey ............................................................. 52 2.3.3.1 SHEIKH SAID REVOLT, 1925 ........................................................................ 53 4 2.3.3.2 ARARAT REVOLT, 1927-1930 ...................................................................... 55 2.3.3.3 THE DERSIM REVOLT OF 1937 ..................................................................... 58 2.4 The Kurds in Iraq: 1923-1945 ............................................................................... 60 2.4.1 Iraq: a British creation ......................................................................................... 60 2.4.2 The false promise of self-rule......................................................................... 62 2.4.3 The establishment of monarchy: the nascent Arab state ................................ 63 2.4.3.1 KURDISH REVOLTS IN IRAQ .......................................................................... 66 2.4.3.2 SHEIKH MAHMUD’S REVOLTS ...................................................................... 67 2.4.3.3 THE EMERGENCE OF MULLAH MUSTAFA BARZANI ..................................... 69 2.5 The Kurds in Iran ................................................................................................... 70 2.5.1 The end of the Qajar Dynasty .............................................................................. 70 2.5.2 Reza Shah and Iranian nationalism ................................................................ 72 2.5.3 Simko’s revolts ............................................................................................... 73 2.6 The Kurdish Mahabad Republic of 1946 ................................................................... 75 2.7 A United front against the Kurds: Treaty of Saadabad of 1937 ................................ 78 2.8 Kurdistan 1946-1991 ............................................................................................. 79 2.8.1 After the Mahabad Republic and emergence of Kurdish political parties ........... 79 2.8.2 The Kurds in Iran: the post 1946 era .............................................................. 80 2.8.3 Armed revolts against the Shah’s regime ....................................................... 82 2.8.4 The establishment of the Islamic Republic: a false dawn .............................. 84 2.8.5 State terrorism: assassinations of Kurdish leaders in Europe ........................ 89 2.9 The Kurds in Iraq: the Post-1946 Era .................................................................... 91 2.9.1 The End of monarchy and the war of 1961.......................................................... 91 2.9.2 First Barzani revolt 1961-70 .......................................................................... 92 2.9.3 The Second Barzani revolt of 1974-75 .......................................................... 96 2.9.4 The Algiers agreement of 1975 ...................................................................... 98 2.9.5 The emergence of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) ........................... 99 5 2.9.6 The Anfal campaign: the genocide of the Kurds.......................................... 101 2.9.7 The Gulf War 1990-91: the establishment of a safe haven .......................... 103 2.10 The Kurds in Turkey: the Post-1946 Era ............................................................. 109 2.10.1 Repression of the Kurdish population in 1950s & 1960s ................................ 109 2.10.2 The 1980 military Coup d’état in Turkey..................................................... 112 2.10.3 The emergence of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) ............................. 113 2.10.3.1 POLITICAL AND MILITARY STRUCTURE OF THE PKK ................................ 116 2.10.3.2 PKK’S REVOLT OF 1984 .......................................................................... 118 2.10.3.3 THE CAPTURE OF ABDULLAH OCALAN .................................................... 123 2.10.3.4 THE UNION OF COMMUNITIES IN KURDISTAN (KCK) .............................. 126 2.11 Party for a Free Life of Kurdistan (PJAK) ............................................................. 128 CHAPTER 3 MODERN INTERNATIONAL LAW, THE KURDS AND SELF- DETERMINATION ........................................................................................................... 131 3.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 131 3.2 The rise of non-state actors in the post-1945 era ...................................................... 136 3.3 The rise of NSAGs globally, guerrilla warfare and international
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Turkish Foreign Policy: New Concepts and Reflections
    TURKISH FOREIGN POLICY: NEW CONCEPTS AND REFLECTIONS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY GÜLBAHAR YELKEN AKTAŞ IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATION DECEMBER 2010 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences ________________ Prof. Dr. Meliha Benli Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. ________________ Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Bağcı Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. ________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayşegül Kibaroğlu Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayşegül Kibaroğlu (METU, IR) ________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Zana Çıtak Aytürk (METU, IR) ________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Mehmet Şahin (GAZİ U. , IR ) ________________ ii I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this works Name, Last Name: Gülbahar Yelken Aktaş Signature : iii ABSTRACT TURKISH FOREIGN POLICY: NEW CONCEPTS AND REFLECTIONS Aktaş, Gülbahar Yelken M. Sc., Department of International Relations Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayşegül Kibaroğlu December 2010, 101 Pages Turkey has been in the process of taking its foreign policy position in the post-Cold War international schema.
    [Show full text]
  • Centre for Kurdish Studies
    Centre for Kurdish Studies Centre for Kurdish Studies anks to Professor Michael M Gunter of Tennessee Technological University for permission to use this image. Living over a territory divided between Turkey, Iraq, Iran, Syria and the former Soviet Union, and with an active international diaspora, the Kurds are the largest stateless nation in the world, and the fourth largest ethnic group in the Middle East. They inhabit a strategic area, once a region of contact between the Ottoman, Persian and Russian empires, and later a contested border zone between modern nation-states. Although they are ethnically, linguistically, and culturally distinct from the majority populations of the nation-states where they live, they are often consigned to a peripheral role in Turkish, Arab or Iranian studies. Our focus on Kurdish Studies places the Kurds at the centre of our research and offers a chance to consider Kurdish society, culture and politics holistically in all its complexity and variation, across and within established nation- states and the global diaspora community. Exeter is the only British university to have developed a strong research focus in the field of Kurdish Studies. As such, we are the leading centre of research in the field in the UK, and one of the global centres of excellence. The Centre for Kurdish Studies has recently benefited from generous donations from the Ibrahim Ahmed Foundation, the Prime Minister’s Office of the Kurdistan Regional Government, and the President’s Office of Iraq. These gifts have enabled us to expand our staff base and our research and teaching activities. We now offer the following degrees: • PhD in Kurdish Studies A multi-discplinary programme covering Social Science, Political Science, and Humanities and Arts disciplines.
    [Show full text]
  • Lament of Ahmad Khani: a Study of the Historical Struggle of the Kurds for an Independent Kurdistan
    Lament of Ahmad Khani: A Study of the Historical Struggle of the Kurds for an Independent Kurdistan Erik Novak Department of Political Science Villanova University The Kurdish poet Sheikmous Hasan, better known as Cigerxwin, wrote these words as part of his much larger work, Who Am I? while living in exile in Sweden. “I am the proud Kurd, the enemies’ enemy, the friend of peace-loving ones. I am of noble race, not wild as they claim. My mighty ancestors were free people. Like them I want to be free and that is why I fight, for the enemy won’t leave in peace and I don’t want to be forever oppressed.”1 Although Hasan, who died in 1984, was a modern voice for Kurdish nationalism, he is merely one of a chorus of Kurds reaching back centuries crying out for a free and independent Kurdish state, unofficially named Kurdistan. Although the concept of nationalism is common today, the cries of the Kurds for their own state reach back centuries, the first written example coming from the Kurdish poet Ahmad Khani in his national epic Mem-o-Zin in 1695. Mem-o-Zin actually predates the French Revolution of 1789, which is often thought to be the true beginning of the concept of a national state. Despite having conceived of nationalism for the Kurds nearly a century ahead of France and the rest of Western Europe, the Kurds lack a state of their own. What are the origins of Kurdish nationalist thought and how has it evolved over the years? To answer this question, we will track the evolution of Kurdish nationalist thought from its origins during the Ottoman Empire, 1 through World War I and up to the present by looking at the three successor states of the Ottoman Empire that contain the largest Kurdish populations: Turkey, Iran, and Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • THE KURDS ASCENDING This Page Intentionally Left Blank the KURDS ASCENDING
    THE KURDS ASCENDING This page intentionally left blank THE KURDS ASCENDING THE EVOLVING SOLUTION TO THE KURDISH PROBLEM IN IRAQ AND TURKEY MICHAEL M. GUNTER THE KURDS ASCENDING Copyright © Michael M. Gunter, 2008. Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2008 978-0-230-60370-7 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews. First published in 2008 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN™ 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 and Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England RG21 6XS Companies and representatives throughout the world. PALGRAVE MACMILLAN is the global academic imprint of the Palgrave Macmillan division of St. Martin’s Press, LLC and of Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. Macmillan® is a registered trademark in the United States, United Kingdom and other countries. Palgrave is a registered trademark in the European Union and other countries. ISBN 978-0-230-11287-2 ISBN 978-0-230-33894-4 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/9780230338944 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Gunter, Michael M. The Kurds ascending : the evolving solution to the Kurdish problem in Iraq and Turkey / Michael M. Gunter. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Kurds—Iraq—Politics and government—21st century. 2. Kurds— Turkey—Politics and government—21st century. I. Title. DS70.8.K8G858 2007 323.1191Ј5970561—dc22 2007015282 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Design by Newgen
    [Show full text]
  • Kurdistan Rising? Considerations for Kurds, Their Neighbors, and the Region
    KURDISTAN RISING? CONSIDERATIONS FOR KURDS, THEIR NEIGHBORS, AND THE REGION Michael Rubin AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE Kurdistan Rising? Considerations for Kurds, Their Neighbors, and the Region Michael Rubin June 2016 American Enterprise Institute © 2016 by the American Enterprise Institute. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or reproduced in any man- ner whatsoever without permission in writing from the American Enterprise Institute except in the case of brief quotations embodied in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. The views expressed in the publications of the American Enterprise Institute are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, advisory panels, officers, or trustees of AEI. American Enterprise Institute 1150 17th St. NW Washington, DC 20036 www.aei.org. Cover image: Grand Millennium Sualimani Hotel in Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan, by Diyar Muhammed, Wikimedia Commons, Creative Commons. Contents Executive Summary 1 1. Who Are the Kurds? 5 2. Is This Kurdistan’s Moment? 19 3. What Do the Kurds Want? 27 4. What Form of Government Will Kurdistan Embrace? 56 5. Would Kurdistan Have a Viable Economy? 64 6. Would Kurdistan Be a State of Law? 91 7. What Services Would Kurdistan Provide Its Citizens? 101 8. Could Kurdistan Defend Itself Militarily and Diplomatically? 107 9. Does the United States Have a Coherent Kurdistan Policy? 119 Notes 125 Acknowledgments 137 About the Author 139 iii Executive Summary wo decades ago, most US officials would have been hard-pressed Tto place Kurdistan on a map, let alone consider Kurds as allies. Today, Kurds have largely won over Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 25
    THE BRITISH INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF IRAQ المعھد البريطاني لدراسة العراق NEWSLETTER NO. 25 May 2010 THE BRITISH INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF IRAQ (GERTRUDE BELL MEMORIAL) REGISTERED CHARITY NO. 1135395 & NO. 219948 A company limited by guarantee registered in England and Wales No. 6966984 THE BRITISH INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF IRAQ at the British Academy 10, CARLTON HOUSE TERRACE LONDON SW1Y 5AH, UK E-mail: [email protected] Tel. + 44 (0) 20 7969 5274 Fax + 44 (0) 20 7969 5401 Web-site: http://www.bisi.ac.uk The next BISI Newsletter will be published in November 2010. Brief contributions are welcomed on recent research, publications, members’ news and events. They should be sent to BISI by post or e-mail (preferred) to arrive by 15 October 2010. The BISI Administrator Joan Porter MacIver edits the Newsletter. Cover: An etching of a Sumerian cylinder seal impression by Tessa Rickards, which is the cover image of the forthcoming BISI publication, Your Praise is Sweet – A Memorial Volume for Jeremy Black from students, colleagues and friends edited by Heather D. Baker, Eleanor Robson and Gábor Zólyomi (further details p. 32). THE BRITISH INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF IRAQ THE BRITISH(GERTRUDE INSTITUTE BELL FOR MEMORIAL) THE STUDY OF IRAQ STATEMENT(GERTRUDE OF BELL PUBLIC MEMORIAL) BENEFIT STATEMENT OF PUBLIC BENEFIT ‘To advance research and public education relating to Iraq and the neighbouring‘To advance countriesresearch inand anthropology, public education archaeology, relating geography,to Iraq and history, the languageneighbouring and countriesrelated disciplines in anthropology, within archaeology,the arts, humanities geography, and history, social sciences.’language and related disciplines within the arts, humanities and social sciences.’ • BISI supports high-quality research across its academic remit by • makingBISI supports grants and high-quality providing expertresearch advice across and itsinput.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy and Monarchy As Antithetical Terms?: Iraq's Elections of September 1954 Bishop, Elizabeth
    www.ssoar.info Democracy and monarchy as antithetical terms?: Iraq's elections of September 1954 Bishop, Elizabeth Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Bishop, E. (2013). Democracy and monarchy as antithetical terms?: Iraq's elections of September 1954. Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review, 13(2), 313-326. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-447205 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de Democracy and Monarchy as Antithetical Terms? 313 Democracy and Monarchy as Antithetical Terms? Iraq’s Elections of September 1954 ELIZABETH BISHOP Historian Bernard Lewis observes: ”Americans tend to see democracy and monarchy in antithetical terms; in Europe, however, democracy has fared better in constitutional monarchies than in republics”1. Let us take this opportunity to consider elections held in the Hashemite Kingdom of Iraq during the Cold War, in order to assess how”democracy” fared during the years that country was a constitutional monarchy. As we do so, let’s keep Saad Eskander’s words in mind: ”You cannot have democracy in Iraq by just holding elections... You need to enable Iraq’s core of citizens to have free access to information, absolutely all, all of legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lawyers' Committee for Cultural Heritage Preservation 9 Annual
    The Lawyers' Committee for Cultural Heritage Preservation 9th Annual Conference Friday, April 13, 2018 8:00am-6:30pm Georgetown University Law Center McDonough Hall, Hart Auditorium 600 New Jersey Ave NW, Washington, DC 20001 TABLE OF CONTENTS: Panel 1: Claiming and Disclaiming Ownership: Russian, Ukrainian, both or neither? Panel 2: Whose Property? National Claims versus the Rights of Religious and Ethnic Minorities in the Middle East Panel 3: Protecting Native American Cultural Heritage Panel 4: Best Practices in Acquiring and Collecting Cultural Property Speaker Biographies CLE MATERIALS FOR PANEL 1 Laws/ Regulations Washington Conference Principles on Nazi-confiscated Art (1998) https://www.state.gov/p/eur/rt/hlcst/270431.htm Articles/ Book Chapters/ White Papers Quentin Byrne-Sutton, Arbitration and Mediation in Art-Related Disputes, ARBITRATION INT’L 447 (1998). F. Shyllon, ‘The Rise of Negotiation (ADR) in Restitution, Return and Repatriation of Cultural Property: Moral Pressure and Power Pressure’ (2017) XXII Art Antiquity and Law pp. 130-142. Bandle, Anne Laure, and Theurich, Sarah. “Alternative Dispute Resolution and Art-Law – A New Research Project of the Geneva Art-Law Centre.” Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, Vol. 6, No. 1 (2011): 28 – 41 http://www.jiclt.com/index.php/jiclt/article/view/124/122 E. Campfens “Whose cultural heritage? Crimean treasures at the crossroads of politics, law and ethics”, AAL, Vol. XXII, issue 3, (Oct. 2017) http://www.iuscommune.eu/html/activities/2017/2017-11-23/workshop_3_Campfens.pdf Anne Laure Bandle, Raphael Contel, Marc-André Renold, “Case Ancient Manuscripts and Globe – Saint-Gall and Zurich,” Platform ArThemis (http://unige.ch/art-adr), Art-Law Centre, University of Geneva.
    [Show full text]
  • The University at War1
    The University at War1 By Hugh Gusterson (George Mason University) The political scientist Mark Duffield has observed that the effect of Western intervention in Iraq has actually been to “demodernize” that country.2 This is ironic given that the military campaigns against Iraq and Afghanistan have been accompanied by narratives of the West’s obligation to modernize backward nations. Nowhere is the truth of Duffield’s observation clearer than in the story of what has happened to Iraq’s education system, especially its higher education system. Western intervention has ended up destroying Iraq’s universities, formerly among the best in the region, as functional institutions. “Up to the Early 1980s, Iraq’s educational system was considered one of the best in the Middle East. As a result of its drastic and prolonged decline since then, it is now one of the weakest,” concludes a 2008 official report.3 Iraq has a long and venerable tradition as a center of higher learning. As Eric Herring observes, “Iraqis tend to see themselves proudly as coming from a society that was the cradle of civilization in its ancient contributions to the development of writing, legal systems, libraries, mathematics, astronomy, medicine, technology and so on.”4 Mosul houses the world’s oldest known library, which dates to the seventh century. And In 832 the construction of the Byat al Hikma (house of Wisdom) established the new capital [Baghdad] as an unrivaled center of scholarship and intellectual exchange. The tradition of research there brought advances in astronomy, optics, physics and mathematics. The father of algebra, Al Khawarizmii, labored among its scrolls.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Title of Dissertation: NEGOTIATING the PLACE OF
    Abstract Title of Dissertation: NEGOTIATING THE PLACE OF ASSYRIANS IN MODERN IRAQ, 1960–1988 Alda Benjamen, Doctor of Philosophy, 2015 Dissertation Directed by: Professor Peter Wien Department of History This dissertation deals with the social, intellectual, cultural, and political history of the Assyrians under changing regimes from the 1960s to the 1980s. It examines the place of Assyrians in relation to a state that was increasing in strength and influence, and locates their interactions within socio-political movements that were generally associated with the Iraqi opposition. It analyzes the ways in which Assyrians contextualized themselves in their society and negotiated for social, cultural, and political rights both from the state and from the movements with which they were affiliated. Assyrians began migrating to urban Iraqi centers in the second half of the twentieth century, and in the process became more integrated into their societies. But their native towns and villages in northern Iraq continued to occupy an important place in their communal identity, while interactions between rural and urban Assyrians were ongoing. Although substantially integrated in Iraqi society, Assyrians continued to retain aspects of the transnational character of their community. Transnational interactions between Iraqi Assyrians and Assyrians in neighboring countries and the diaspora are therefore another important phenomenon examined in this dissertation. Finally, the role of Assyrian women in these movements, and their portrayal by intellectuals,
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT SARAH MARIE CARUANA the Legacy of Mullah Mustafa Barzani
    ABSTRACT SARAH MARIE CARUANA The Legacy of Mullah Mustafa Barzani (Under the Direction of DR. ADAM SABRA) This paper attempts to answer the question of the quality of Kurdish leaders’ discernment in predicting, interpreting, and responding to American foreign policy from the end of World War II until the collapse of the Barzani-led revolt in 1975. The goal of this paper is to establish the geopolitical and personal reasons for Kurdish misinterpretations of U.S. Foreign policy from 1945 to 1975. Specifically, the decision-making of long-time Kurdish leader Mullah Mustafa Barzani will be examined to reveal how both personal and wider socio-political interpretations of U.S. foreign policy led Barzani to make decisions that compromised the livelihoods of Iraqi Kurds. What were Barzani’s options? Were his mistakes avoidable? INDEX WORDS: Kurds, Iraqi Kurdistan, Mullah Mustafa Barzani, U.S. Foreign Policy, Cold War, Iran, Mahabad Republic THE LEGACY OF MULLAH MUSTAFA BARZANI by SARAH MARIE CARUANA A Thesis Submitted to the Honors Council of the University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree BACHELOR OF ARTS in HISTORY with HIGHEST HONORS Athens, Georgia 2010 © 2010 Sarah Marie Caruana All Rights Reserved THE LEGACY OF MULLAH MUSTAFA BARZANI by SARAH MARIE CARUANA Approved: Dr. Adam Sabra________ __April 30, 2010____ Dr. Adam Sabra Date Faculty Research Mentor Approved: Dr. Timothy Cleaveland __ __April 30, 2010____ Dr. Timothy Cleaveland Date Reader Approved: Dr. David S. Williams ____ _ May 7, 2010____ Dr. David S. Williams Date Director, Honors Program Approved: Dr. Pamela B. Kleiber ____ _ May 7, 2010____ Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 1 Mustafa Kemal Atatürk
    Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 1 Mustafa Kemal Atatürk Mustafa Kemal Atatürk [[file:MustafaKemalAtaturk.jpg alt=]] President Atatürk 1st President of Turkey In office 29 October 1923 – 10 November 1938 (15 years, 12 days) Prime Minister Ali Fethi Okyar İsmet İnönü Celâl Bayar Succeeded by İsmet İnönü 1st Prime Minister of Turkey In office 3 May 1920 – 24 January 1921 (0 years, 266 days) Succeeded by Fevzi Çakmak 1st Speaker of the Parliament of Turkey In office 24 April 1920 – 29 October 1923 (3 years, 219 days) Succeeded by Ali Fethi Okyar 1st Leader of the Republican People's Party In office 9 September 1923 – 10 November 1938 (15 years, 62 days) Succeeded by İsmet İnönü Personal details Born 19 May 1881 (Conventional. This date was adopted by the president himself for official purposes in the absence of precise knowledge concerning the real date.)Salonica, Ottoman Empire (present-day Thessaloniki, Greece) Died 10 November 1938 (aged 57)Dolmabahçe Palace Istanbul, Turkey Resting place Anıtkabir Ankara, Turkey Nationality Turkish Political party Committee of Union and Progress, Republican People's Party Spouse(s) Lâtife Uşaklıgil (1923–25) Religion See Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's religious views. Signature Military service Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 2 Allegiance Ottoman Empire (1893 – 8 July 1919) Republic of Turkey (9 July 1919 – 30 June 1927) Army Service/branch Rank Ottoman Empire: General (Pasha) Republic of Turkey: Mareşal (Marshal) Commands 19th Division – 16th Corps – 2nd Army – 7th Army – Yildirim Army Group – commander-in-chief of Army of the
    [Show full text]