Enrichment, Isolation and Characterization of Alachlor, Carbofuran, and Dicamba-Degrading Bacteria Obtained from Soil

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Enrichment, Isolation and Characterization of Alachlor, Carbofuran, and Dicamba-Degrading Bacteria Obtained from Soil South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Electronic Theses and Dissertations 1986 Enrichment, Isolation and Characterization of Alachlor, Carbofuran, and Dicamba-degrading Bacteria Obtained from Soil Neal R. Adrian Follow this and additional works at: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd Recommended Citation Adrian, Neal R., "Enrichment, Isolation and Characterization of Alachlor, Carbofuran, and Dicamba- degrading Bacteria Obtained from Soil" (1986). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 4342. https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/4342 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EN RICHMENT , ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF ALACHLOR, CARBOFURAN, AND DICAMBA -DEGRAD ING BACTER IA OBTAINED FROM SOIL BY NEAL R. ADRIAN A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Mas ter of Science Maj or in Microbiology South Dakota State Univers ity 1986 ENRICHMENT, ISOLATION AND CHARACTERI ZATION OF ALACHLOR, CARBOFURAN, AND DICAMBA-DEGRAD ING BACTERIA OB TAINED FROM SOIL Th is thesis is approved as a creditable and independent inv est igation by a candidate for the degree, Master of Sc i- ence, and is acceptable for meeting the thesis requi rements for this deg_ree . Acceptance of this thesis does not imply that the conclusions reached by the candidate are neces- sarily the · conclus ions of the maj or department. Dr. W. Kennedy Gauger Date Thesis Advisor .VI. • L\.UUt:::L" l.. .1.000 Date Hea d, Microbiology Dept. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express thanks and appreciation to Dr. W. Ken nedy Gauge r for his guidance, support and con­ struc tive crit icism in the preparation and editing of this manuscript . A special thanks to Dr. Duane Matthees for his support , expert ise, and laboratory facilities throughout this stud y. My time spent at South Dako ta St ate University's Mic ro­ biology Departme nt was an enj oyable and enlightening period that clarified my career go�ls . i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMEN TS . i TABLE OF CONTENTS .... ... ............... ...... ; . ii LIST OF FIGURES . 1v LIST OF TAB LES . v i INTRODUCTION . 1 Chapter 1 . • . • • . 3 LITERATURE REV IEW . 3 CHAPTER 2 ....... .......... ...... ... ..· .. 34 SCREENI NG FIELD ISO LATES FOR INCIDENTAL AND CATABOLIC PESTICIDE METABOLISM . 34 MATERIALS AND METHODS . 34 RES ULTS AND DI SCUSSION . 53 CHAPTER 3 ....· ..................................... 85 PESTIC IDE DEG RADATION BY BACTERIA ISOLATED FROM AN AGRICULTURE CHEMICAL SPILL 85 MATERIALS AND METHODS . ... .. 85 RES ULTS AND DI SCUSS ION . .. .. 93 ii CHAPTER 4 ............•....•.......•........•...... 101 ENRICHMENTS FOR MIC ROORG ANIS MS UTILIZI NG PES TICIDE S FOR CARBON, NITROGEN , OR PHOSP HORU S SOURC ES ..... ........ 101 MATERIALS AND METHODS ................. ... 101 RE S ULTS AND DI SCUSS ION .... ..... ...... 10� CONCLUSIONS . 111 LITERATURE CITED . 114 iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1 a. Screening for pesticide degradat ion by bac- teria after four weeks incubat ion ..• ....•......... 59 lb . Screening for pest icide degradation by bac- teria after four weeks incubation ............... 60 1 c. Screening for pest icide degrada tion by bac- teria after four weeks incubat ion ............... 61 2 . Deg radat ion of alachlor in complex (tryp tone­ yeast extract) , defined + yeast extract (Hutner's basal + 0.05% yeast ext ract), and def ined· (Hutne r's basal ) media .................. 64 3 • Degradat ion of ala chlor in complex (tryp tone­ yeast �xt rac t ), defined + yeast extract (Hutner's basal + 0.05% ye ast ext r act), and defined (Hutner's basal) media by St rept omyces pilosu s ............................ 65 Deg radat ion of ·al a chlo r in complex (tryp tone­ yeast extract) , defined + YE (Hutner's basal + 0.05% yeast ext ract) , and def ined (Hutner's basal) media by St reptomycete · Isolate 5 ......... 67 s: Degradat ion of ala chlo r in comple x (tryp tone­ yeast extract), defined + YE (Hutne r's basal + 0.05% yeast extract), and def ined (Hutner's basal ) media by St rept omycete Isolate 26 ........ 68 6 . Rap id plasm id DNA sc reening of Isolates using either an alkaline or polye t hylene glycol (PEG) procedure .......................... 70 7a. Alachlor degradat ion by Isolate 5 in a soil ·slu rry supplemented with ala chlor . 75 7b . Alachlor degradati�n by Isolat� 5 in a soil slu rry supplemented with ala chlor 76 iv 8a . Alachlor degradation by Isola te 5 in a soil slurry from an agricultural chemical spill 77 8b . Alachlor degradat ion by Isolate 5 in a soil slurry from an agricultural chemical spill 78 9a. Alachlor degradat ion by Isolate 5 in a soil slurry supplemented with alachlor 7 9 9b. Alachlor degradat ion by Isolate 5 in a soil slurry supplemented with alachlor 80 1 0 • Growth of two isolates obtained from Brook ings chemical spill in a basal med ium with alachlor as sole source of carbon and energy ............ 94 1 1 . Growth of two isola t es obtained from Brookings chemical spill in bas al medium with tri flu ralin as sole source of carbon and ene rgy ............. 95 1 2 • Growth-of two isola tes obtained from Brookings chemical spill in basal medium not containing an addit ional source of carb�n and ene rgy ........ 96 1 3 . Ala chlor degradat ion by two isola tes obtained from Brookings chemical sp ill ........... ......... 97 v LIST OF TABLES Tab le Page 1 . Growth of isolates on 2% unwashed and washed agar in HB broth supplement ed with various carbon and ene rgy sources .................•.. 54 2. Growth of isola tes in broth media containing various carbon and ene rgy sources 57 3 . Milligrams of mycelial biomass harvested from each culture flask following degradat ion of alachlor in three types of culture media ...... 63 4. Summary of taxonomic characteristics for alachlor-degrading bacteria ............ 84 5 . Ala chlor degradation after four weeks by eight bacteria isolated from an agricul- tural chemical spill ................... 99 6 . Enrichments performed with various pesticides added as either carbon and ene rgy, nitrogen, or phosphorus sources ....................... 105 vi INTRODUCTION The prod uction and use o � synthetic chemicals fpr pest icide control increase d dram atically after World Wa r II. Th ey were found to be highly effective , cheap to pro- duce and easy to apply. Development of these chemic als has been one of the major developments for agricul ture . In the 1970's public health risks and environme ntal damage caused by agricultural chemic als was recog nized . Problems of chronic exposure� improper waste disposal and environmental dam age developed wh ich led to the federal gov- ernment regul ating their use and manufacture . Pest icide manu facturers have a variety of physical / · and chemical disposal methods for pest icide wast es. Dis- posal or detoxification me thods for pesticides that have become enviro nmental pollutants through sp ills or accumu- la tion in · high use areas are limited or nonexistent . Th ere 1s a �otential for biodegradation to help decontaminate these environmental pollutants, since the degradation of organic compounds in the environment is predominantly micro- biologic ally mediated . Further research on microbial metabolism of xenobioti�s and their ability to degrade these comp ound s under different growth condit ions is needed. 2 Four objectives for this thesis research were to: 1. Screen lab oratory field isolates for their· capability to degrade the pesticides alachl or, carbof uran, and dicamba. 2a . Take key isolates obtained from objective 1 and determine in vitro broth degradat ion in three types of culture media. 2b . With these same isolates determine thei� in vitro soil slurry degradation capability . 3. Determine alachlor degradation by eight isolates obt ained from an agricultural chemical spill. 4. Determine if any observed pest icide degradation was mediated . by plasmid or chromoso mal DNA . 3 CHAPTER 1 LITERATURE REV IEW Pesticide degradat ion occurs thr ough chemical and _ biological metabolic processes wh ich are char acteri zed as either abiotic or biotic, respectively (8, 48). Abiotic degradat ion is not dependent on specific soil enzymes, and involves chemical reactions with other organic mole cule s. A me tabolic reaction is one wh ere alterat ions in the pesti­ cide are mediated by an enzyme . ABIOTIC DEGRADATION EFFECTS MED IATED BY HUMUS FORMA TION: Ab iotic degradation of pesticides may occur · during humus form ation in the soil. The organic fraction of soil may contain carboxyl, phenolic, aliphatic , hydroxyl, carbon yl, as well as le ss frequently found functional groups such as amino, imino , and sulfhydryl groups (1, 8). These highly react ive functional groups link together chemically with polysacchar­ ides , am ino acids , peptides and proteins , and other organic matter. This results iri a complex �ixture of polymerized material called humus and pesticid� molecule s or their me t abol ites may become incorporated during " its form ation ( 8 ) . 4 Mic roorganisms may produce enzymes that gen erate highly reactive pesticid e molecule s that are otherwis e unreactive . Th ese then combine with functional groups present in the soil organic ma tter. For example phenoli c pesticides can be transf ormed in to active phenolic radic als by the action of phenoloxidases (8) . Th ese radicals then stabil ize by linkin g together or by further oxid ation to quinones. EFFECTS MED I ATED BY. CHANGE OF pH : The hydrogen ion concentration has a maj or effect on the reactivit y of the pest icid� mo lecule by ionizing func tional groups of pesticid es or functio nal groups present in soil organic mat ter (8, 64 ).
Recommended publications
  • Relative Tolerance of Peanuts to Alachlor and Metolachlor' Materials
    Relative Tolerance of Peanuts to Alachlor and Metolachlor' Glenn Wehtje*, John W. Wilcut, T. Vint Hicks2. and John McGuire3 ABSTRACT vealed that peas were most sensitive across all the sub- Field studies were conducted during 1984, 1985, and 1987 to evaluate weed control and the relative tolerance of peanuts stituted amide herbicides when the application was (Arachis hypogaea) to alachlor and metolachlor when applied at made 2 days after planting. This time of application cor- rates from 2.2 to 13.4 kg adha. Both single and split responded to shoot emergence, which is considered to preemergence, and postemergence applications were in- be the most sensitive portion of the seedling, through cluded. In 1984 and 1985, neither herbicide adversely affected the surface of the treated soil. Later applications re- yields compared to a hand-weeded control. In 1987, metolachlor at a rate of 9.0 kgha and alachlor at 13.4 k&a re- sulted in progressively less injury, indicating that the duced yields. Across all years, at least a two-fold safety factor foliar portion of the developing pea was relatively toler- existed between the maximum registered rate and the rate ant once emerged. Field studies indicated injury was necessary for peanut injury. Occurrence of injury appears to be markedly influenced by rainfall soon after planting. related to rainfall. Metolachlor was slightly more mobile than alachlor in soil chromatography trials, which may be a factor in Putnam and Rice (7) evaluated the factors associated its slightly greater propensity to be injurious under certain with alachlor injury on snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris conditions of extensive leaching and/or slow peanut L.).
    [Show full text]
  • 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
    2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid IUPAC (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid name 2,4-D Other hedonal names trinoxol Identifiers CAS [94-75-7] number SMILES OC(COC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1Cl)=O ChemSpider 1441 ID Properties Molecular C H Cl O formula 8 6 2 3 Molar mass 221.04 g mol−1 Appearance white to yellow powder Melting point 140.5 °C (413.5 K) Boiling 160 °C (0.4 mm Hg) point Solubility in 900 mg/L (25 °C) water Related compounds Related 2,4,5-T, Dichlorprop compounds Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C, 100 kPa) 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is a common systemic herbicide used in the control of broadleaf weeds. It is the most widely used herbicide in the world, and the third most commonly used in North America.[1] 2,4-D is also an important synthetic auxin, often used in laboratories for plant research and as a supplement in plant cell culture media such as MS medium. History 2,4-D was developed during World War II by a British team at Rothamsted Experimental Station, under the leadership of Judah Hirsch Quastel, aiming to increase crop yields for a nation at war.[citation needed] When it was commercially released in 1946, it became the first successful selective herbicide and allowed for greatly enhanced weed control in wheat, maize (corn), rice, and similar cereal grass crop, because it only kills dicots, leaving behind monocots. Mechanism of herbicide action 2,4-D is a synthetic auxin, which is a class of plant growth regulators.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenhouse and Field Evaluation of Isoxaflutole for Weed Control In
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Greenhouse and field evaluation of isoxaflutole for weed control in maize in China Received: 27 June 2017 Ning Zhao, Lan Zuo, Wei Li, Wenlei Guo, Weitang Liu & Jinxin Wang Accepted: 18 September 2017 Greenhouse and field studies were conducted to provide a reference for pre-emergence (PRE) Published: xx xx xxxx application of isoxaflutole on maize in China. In greenhouse study, the isoxaflutole PRE application at 30 g active ingredient (a.i.) ha−1 could effectively control large numbers of weeds, especially some large-seeded broadleaves, tested in this study. The tolerance results indicated 21 maize hybrids showed different responses to isoxaflutole under greenhouse conditions. In 2015 and 2016, field experiments were conducted to determine and compare the weed control efficacy and safety to Zhengdan 958 maize with 6 herbicide treatments. In both years, isoxaflutole PRE at 100 to 250 g a.i. ha−1 was sufficient to provide satisfactory full-season control of the dominant common broadleaf and grass weeds in the field. Temporary injury to maize was observed with isoxaflutole treatments of 125, 150, and 250 g a.i. ha−1 in both years, but plants recovered within 4 to 6 wk. To maximize maize yield and provide satisfactory weed control, a range of 100 to 150 g a.i. ha−1 of isoxaflutole is recommended, depending on the soil characteristics, weather, and weed species present at the experimental site. Based on the results, isoxaflutole PRE has good potential for weed control in maize in China. Maize was planted on more hectares than any other crops in China from 2010 to 2014, with an average of 35 million ha planted per year and yield averaging 5,779 kg per ha per year1.
    [Show full text]
  • Exposure to Herbicides in House Dust and Risk of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
    Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2013) 23, 363–370 & 2013 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved 1559-0631/13 www.nature.com/jes ORIGINAL ARTICLE Exposure to herbicides in house dust and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia Catherine Metayer1, Joanne S. Colt2, Patricia A. Buffler1, Helen D. Reed3, Steve Selvin1, Vonda Crouse4 and Mary H. Ward2 We examine the association between exposure to herbicides and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Dust samples were collected from homes of 269 ALL cases and 333 healthy controls (o8 years of age at diagnosis/reference date and residing in same home since diagnosis/reference date) in California, using a high-volume surface sampler or household vacuum bags. Amounts of agricultural or professional herbicides (alachlor, metolachlor, bromoxynil, bromoxynil octanoate, pebulate, butylate, prometryn, simazine, ethalfluralin, and pendimethalin) and residential herbicides (cyanazine, trifluralin, 2-methyl-4- chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA), mecoprop, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), chlorthal, and dicamba) were measured. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by logistic regression. Models included the herbicide of interest, age, sex, race/ethnicity, household income, year and season of dust sampling, neighborhood type, and residence type. The risk of childhood ALL was associated with dust levels of chlorthal; compared to homes with no detections, ORs for the first, second, and third tertiles were 1.49 (95% CI: 0.82–2.72), 1.49 (95% CI: 0.83–2.67), and 1.57 (95% CI: 0.90–2.73), respectively (P-value for linear trend ¼ 0.05). The magnitude of this association appeared to be higher in the presence of alachlor.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Herbicide Use and Risk of Lymphoma and Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Shelia K
    Agricultural Herbicide Use and Risk of Lymphoma and Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Shelia K. Hoar, ScD; Aaron Blair, PhD; Frederick F. Holmes, MD; Cathy D. Boysen; Robert J. Robel, PhD; Robert Hoover, MD; Joseph F. Fraumeni, Jr, MD A population-based case-control study of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS), Hodgkin's agents for leather and textiles, and disease (HD), and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) in Kansas found farm medications.1 For these reasons, a pop¬ herbicide use to be associated with NHL (odds ratio [OR], 1.6; 95% confidence ulation-based case-control study was interval [CI], 0.9, 2.6). Relative risk of NHL increased significantly with number conducted to clarify whether agricul¬ of of herbicide and Men to herbicides tural use of herbicides and insecticides days exposure per year latency. exposed and NHL in than 20 had sixfold increased risk of NHL 95% affects risk of STS, HD, more days per year a (OR, 6.0; the United States. CI, 1.9, 19.5) relative to nonfarmers. Frequent users who mixed or applied the herbicides themselves had an OR of 8.0 (95% CI, 2.3, 27.9) for NHL. Excesses METHODS were associated with use of phenoxyacetic acid herbicides, specifically Kansas, a major wheat-producing acid. Neither STS nor HD was associated with 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic state, was chosen as the location for pesticide exposure. This study confirms the reports from Sweden and several the study, since herbicides have been US NHL states that is associated with farm herbicide use, especially used more frequently than other pesti¬ phenoxyacetic acids.
    [Show full text]
  • INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES
    US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES Note: Pesticide tolerance information is updated in the Code of Federal Regulations on a weekly basis. EPA plans to update these indexes biannually. These indexes are current as of the date indicated in the pdf file. For the latest information on pesticide tolerances, please check the electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_07/40cfrv23_07.html 1 40 CFR Type Family Common name CAS Number PC code 180.163 Acaricide bridged diphenyl Dicofol (1,1-Bis(chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethanol) 115-32-2 10501 180.198 Acaricide phosphonate Trichlorfon 52-68-6 57901 180.259 Acaricide sulfite ester Propargite 2312-35-8 97601 180.446 Acaricide tetrazine Clofentezine 74115-24-5 125501 180.448 Acaricide thiazolidine Hexythiazox 78587-05-0 128849 180.517 Acaricide phenylpyrazole Fipronil 120068-37-3 129121 180.566 Acaricide pyrazole Fenpyroximate 134098-61-6 129131 180.572 Acaricide carbazate Bifenazate 149877-41-8 586 180.593 Acaricide unclassified Etoxazole 153233-91-1 107091 180.599 Acaricide unclassified Acequinocyl 57960-19-7 6329 180.341 Acaricide, fungicide dinitrophenol Dinocap (2, 4-Dinitro-6-octylphenyl crotonate and 2,6-dinitro-4- 39300-45-3 36001 octylphenyl crotonate} 180.111 Acaricide, insecticide organophosphorus Malathion 121-75-5 57701 180.182 Acaricide, insecticide cyclodiene Endosulfan 115-29-7 79401
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicological Profile for Glyphosate Were
    A f Toxicological Profile for Glyphosate August 2020 GLYPHOSATE II DISCLAIMER Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, the Public Health Service, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. GLYPHOSATE III FOREWORD This toxicological profile is prepared in accordance with guidelines developed by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The original guidelines were published in the Federal Register on April 17, 1987. Each profile will be revised and republished as necessary. The ATSDR toxicological profile succinctly characterizes the toxicologic and adverse health effects information for these toxic substances described therein. Each peer-reviewed profile identifies and reviews the key literature that describes a substance's toxicologic properties. Other pertinent literature is also presented, but is described in less detail than the key studies. The profile is not intended to be an exhaustive document; however, more comprehensive sources of specialty information are referenced. The focus of the profiles is on health and toxicologic information; therefore, each toxicological profile begins with a relevance to public health discussion which would allow a public health professional to make a real-time determination of whether the presence of a particular substance in the environment poses a potential threat to human health. The adequacy of information to determine a substance's
    [Show full text]
  • Alachlor in Drinking-Water
    WHO/SDE/WSH/03.04/31 English only Alachlor in Drinking-water Background document for development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality ______________________________ Originally published in Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 2nd ed. Vol.2. Health criteria and other supporting information. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1996. © World Health Organization 2003 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from Marketing and Dissemination, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel: +41 22 791 2476; fax: +41 22 791 4857; email: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to Publications, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; email: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. The World Health Organization does not warrant that the information contained in this publication is complete and correct and shall not be liable for any damages incurred as a result of its use.
    [Show full text]
  • Pesticide Trends in Major Rivers of the United States, 1992–2010
    National Water-Quality Assessment Program Pesticide Trends in Major Rivers of the United States, 1992–2010 Scientific Investigations Report 2014–5135 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. View of Missouri River from Double Ditch Indian Village Historic Site, north of Bismarck, North Dakota, September 26, 2006 (photograph by Kathleen Macek-Rowland). Pesticide Trends in Major Rivers of the United States, 1992–2010 By Karen R. Ryberg, Aldo V. Vecchia, Robert J. Gilliom, and Jeffrey D. Martin National Water-Quality Assessment Program Scientific Investigations Report 2014–5135 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2014 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Ryberg, K.R., Vecchia, A.V., Gilliom, R.J., and Martin, J.D., 2014, Pesticide trends in major rivers of the United States, 1992–2010: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • AP-42, CH 9.2.2: Pesticide Application
    9.2.2PesticideApplication 9.2.2.1General1-2 Pesticidesaresubstancesormixturesusedtocontrolplantandanimallifeforthepurposesof increasingandimprovingagriculturalproduction,protectingpublichealthfrompest-bornediseaseand discomfort,reducingpropertydamagecausedbypests,andimprovingtheaestheticqualityofoutdoor orindoorsurroundings.Pesticidesareusedwidelyinagriculture,byhomeowners,byindustry,andby governmentagencies.Thelargestusageofchemicalswithpesticidalactivity,byweightof"active ingredient"(AI),isinagriculture.Agriculturalpesticidesareusedforcost-effectivecontrolofweeds, insects,mites,fungi,nematodes,andotherthreatstotheyield,quality,orsafetyoffood.Theannual U.S.usageofpesticideAIs(i.e.,insecticides,herbicides,andfungicides)isover800millionpounds. AiremissionsfrompesticideusearisebecauseofthevolatilenatureofmanyAIs,solvents, andotheradditivesusedinformulations,andofthedustynatureofsomeformulations.Mostmodern pesticidesareorganiccompounds.EmissionscanresultdirectlyduringapplicationorastheAIor solventvolatilizesovertimefromsoilandvegetation.Thisdiscussionwillfocusonemissionfactors forvolatilization.Thereareinsufficientdataavailableonparticulateemissionstopermitemission factordevelopment. 9.2.2.2ProcessDescription3-6 ApplicationMethods- Pesticideapplicationmethodsvaryaccordingtothetargetpestandtothecroporothervalue tobeprotected.Insomecases,thepesticideisapplieddirectlytothepest,andinotherstothehost plant.Instillothers,itisusedonthesoilorinanenclosedairspace.Pesticidemanufacturershave developedvariousformulationsofAIstomeetboththepestcontrolneedsandthepreferred
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Chemical Fact Sheets
    1212 ChemicalChemical factfact sheetssheets A conceptual framework for Introduction implementing the Guidelines (Chapter 1) (Chapter 2) he background docudocu-- ments referred to in FRAMEWORK FOR SAFE DRINKING-WATER SUPPORTING Tments referred to in INFORMATION thisthis chapterchapter (as the princi-princi- Health-based targets Public health context Microbial aspects pal reference for each fact (Chapter 3) and health outcome (Chapters 7 and 11) sheet) may be found on Water safety plans Chemical aspects (Chapter 4) (Chapters 8 and 12) thethe Water, Sanitation, HyHy-- System Management and Radiological Monitoring giene and Health web site assessment communication aspects at http://www.who.int/ (Chapter 9) Acceptability Surveillance water_sanitation_health/ aspects (Chapter 5) dwq/chemicals/en/indewater-quality/guidelines/x. (Chapter 10) htmlchemicals/en/. A complete. A complete list of rlist eferences of references cited citedin this in Application of the Guidelines in specic circumstances chapter,this chapter, including including the (Chapter 6) background documents Climate change, Emergencies, Rainwater harvesting, Desalination forfor each cchemical, hemical, is pro-pro- systems, Travellers, Planes and vided in Annex 22.. ships, etc. 12.1 Chemical contaminants in drinking-water Acrylamide Residual acrylamideacrylamide monomermonomer occursoccurs inin polyacrylamidepolyacrylamide coagulantscoagulants used used in in thethe treattreat-- ment of drinking-water. In general, thethe maximummaximum authorizedauthorized dosedose ofof polymerpolymer isis 11 mg/l. mg/l. At a monomer content of 0.05%, this corresponds to a maximum theoretical concen-- trationtration ofof 0.5 µg/l of the monomer in water.water. Practical concentrations maymay bebe lowerlower byby aa factor factor of 2–3. This applies applies to to thethe anionic anionic and and non-ionic non-ionic polyacrylamides, polyacrylamides, but but residual residual levelslevels fromfrom cationic polyacrylamides maymay bebe higher.higher.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Herbicide Groups
    List of herbicides Group Scientific name Trade name clodinafop (Topik®), cyhalofop (Barnstorm®), diclofop (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*, Hoegrass®), fenoxaprop (Cheetah® Gold* , Wildcat®), A Aryloxyphenoxypropionates fluazifop (Fusilade®, Fusion®*), haloxyfop (Verdict®), propaquizafop (Shogun®), quizalofop (Targa®) butroxydim (Falcon®, Fusion®*), clethodim (Select®), profoxydim A Cyclohexanediones (Aura®), sethoxydim (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*), tralkoxydim (Achieve®) A Phenylpyrazoles pinoxaden (Axial®) azimsulfuron (Gulliver®), bensulfuron (Londax®), chlorsulfuron (Glean®), ethoxysulfuron (Hero®), foramsulfuron (Tribute®), halosulfuron (Sempra®), iodosulfuron (Hussar®), mesosulfuron (Atlantis®), metsulfuron (Ally®, Harmony®* M, Stinger®*, Trounce®*, B Sulfonylureas Ultimate Brushweed®* Herbicide), prosulfuron (Casper®*), rimsulfuron (Titus®), sulfometuron (Oust®, Eucmix Pre Plant®*), sulfosulfuron (Monza®), thifensulfuron (Harmony®* M), triasulfuron, (Logran®, Logran® B Power®*), tribenuron (Express®), trifloxysulfuron (Envoke®, Krismat®*) florasulam (Paradigm®*, Vortex®*, X-Pand®*), flumetsulam B Triazolopyrimidines (Broadstrike®), metosulam (Eclipse®), pyroxsulam (Crusader®Rexade®*) imazamox (Intervix®*, Raptor®,), imazapic (Bobcat I-Maxx®*, Flame®, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazapyr (Arsenal Xpress®*, Intervix®*, B Imidazolinones Lightning®*, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazethapyr (Lightning®*, Spinnaker®) B Pyrimidinylthiobenzoates bispyribac (Nominee®), pyrithiobac (Staple®) C Amides: propanil (Stam®) C Benzothiadiazinones: bentazone (Basagran®,
    [Show full text]