DOCSLIB.ORG

Building Statistics, 2003

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Building statistics, 2003 Report No. 50-11-01 (2003) Building statistics, Report No. 50-11-01 (2003) Published by Statistics South Africa, Private Bag X44, Pretoria 0001 © Statistics South Africa, 20006 Users may apply or process this data, provided Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) is acknowledged as the original source of the data; that it is specified that the application and/or analysis is the result of the user's independent processing of the data; and that neither the basic data nor any reprocessed version or application thereof may be sold or offered for sale in any form whatsoever without prior permission from Stats SA. Stats SA Library Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) Data Building statistics, 2003 / Statistics South Africa. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa, 2003 xi. 173 p. [Report No. 50-11-01 (2003)] ISBN 0-621-36453-3 1. Construction 2. Building I. Statistics South Africa II. Series III. (LCSH 16) A complete set of Stats SA publications is available at Stats SA Library and the following libraries: National Library of South Africa, Pretoria Division Eastern Cape Library Services, King William's Town National Library of South Africa, Cape Town Division Central Regional Library, Limpopo Library of Parliament, Cape Town Central Reference Library, Nelspruit Bloemfontein Public Library Central Reference Collection, Kimberley Natal Society Library, Pietermaritzburg Central Reference Library, Mmabatho Johannesburg Public Library This report is available on the Stats SA website: www.statssa.gov.za Copies are available from: Printing and Distribution, Statistics South Africa Tel: (012) 310 8619 or 3108161 Fax: (012) 321 7381 Email: [email protected] Building statistics, Report No. 50-11-01 (2003) Statistics South Africa i Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................ii Key findings ...........................................................................................................................................................iv List of detailed tables............................................................................................................................................. vi List of municipalities covered in the monthly and annual surveys ........................................................................xi Explanatory notes ................................................................................................................................................169 Glossary...............................................................................................................................................................172 Building statistics, Report No. 50-11-01 (2003) Statistics South Africa ii Introduction Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) conducts a monthly survey of metropolitan Table B - Subsidised low-cost dwelling-houses completed or under construction municipalities and large local municipalities on building plans passed and by province buildings completed for the private sector. An annual survey of the remaining municipalities is conducted regarding buildings completed. In Part 1 of this report Value Province Year Number 1 Square metres 2 information on provincial level is published for the monthly survey on buildings R’0002 completed by type of building for 2001, 2002 and 2003. Provincial data for the Western Cape 2001 16 908 459 729 146 157 monthly and annual surveys on buildings completed are published in Part 2 (2001, 2002 19 534 531 116 168 852 2002 and 2003). Detailed information on buildings completed for both surveys is 2003 16 926 507 780 247 187 published by province, municipality and type of building for 2003 in Part 3. Data for 2003 regarding building plans passed and buildings completed of the monthly Eastern Cape 2001 16 617 560 666 168 592 survey, were published in the annual statistical release P5041.3 – Selected 2002 46 700 1 575 675 473 806 building statistics of the private sector as reported by local government 2003 35 005 1 050 150 511 213 institutions, 2003 and can be accessed on Stats SA’s website, www.statssa.gov.za Northern Cape 2001 2 978 94 641 39 071 Table A – Value of buildings reported as completed to municipalities 2002 5 189 164 906 68 078 2003 4 354 130 620 63 586 Year Monthly survey Monthly and Percentage Free State 2001 9 276 375 111 165 893 annual surveys contribution 2002 8 617 348 492 154 121 of monthly survey 2003 14 848 445 440 216 840 to total of monthly KwaZulu-Natal 2001 17 921 678 489 191 008 and annual surveys 2002 21 958 831 349 234 041 R'000 R'000 2003 31 372 941 160 458 157 North West 2001 13 941 412 235 137 674 2001 12 590 750 14 105 710 89,3 2002 21 309 630 115 210 439 2002 14 034 387 15 265 056 91,9 2003 13 809 414 270 201 667 2003 16 616 738 18 491 574 89,9 Gauteng 2001 44 679 1 479 768 480 451 2002 29 939 991 571 321 943 As indicated in Table A, the value of buildings reported as completed to 2003 42 862 1 285 860 625 957 municipalities in the monthly survey, represents approximately 90 percent of the Mpumalanga 2001 15 053 500 036 192 239 total value of buildings completed in South Africa. 2002 19 883 660 505 253 931 2003 21 336 640 080 246 079 Purpose of the surveys Limpopo 2001 17 749 699 143 212 057 The results of these surveys are used in monitoring the state of economy and 2002 15 382 605 877 183 769 formulation of economic policy. Furthermore, the results are important inputs to 2003 15 596 467 880 227 764 estimation of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and are extensively used by the private sector. South Africa 2001 155 122 5 259 818 1 733 142 2002 188 511 6 339 606 2 068 980 Sudsidised low-cost dwelling-houses 2003 196 108 5 883 240 2 798 450 Source: Provincial Governments co-ordinated by the National Department of Housing The figures obtained from these surveys do not include the bulk of subsidised 1 As soon as building commences, dwelling-houses are recorded as completed or under construction. low-cost dwelling-houses. Data regarding subsidised low-cost dwelling-houses, 2 Estimates by the National Department of Housing. supplied by provincial governments and co-ordinated by the National Department of Housing, are shown in Table B. Building statistics, Report No. 50-11-01 (2003) Statistics South Africa iii Name and boundary changes Table C – Cross-border municipalities The boundaries and the names of local government institutions have changed as Municipalities overlapping Province in which municipality described in the Local Government: Municipal Structures Act, 1998 (Act No. 117 of provincial boundaries is included in this report 1998) and the Local Government Municipal Demarcation Bill (B36B-98). Further information may be found on the website of the South African Government, Mpumalanga/Limpopo www.gov.za, see section GOVZA: Government System; and the website of the Greater Marble Hall Municipality Mpumalanga Municipal Demarcation Board, www.demarcation.org.za. Greater Groblersdal Municipality Mpumalanga Stats SA used the following publications to update the names of municipalities: Greater Tubatse Municipality Limpopo • Local Government in South Africa, 2001/2002 (Official yearbook); Bushbuckridge Municipality Limpopo • Municipalities of the Republic of South Africa compiled by the Department of Provincial and Local Government; Gauteng/North West • Key municipal data – Statistics South Africa Census 2001; and Merafong City Municipality Gauteng • Municipal Demarcation Board. City of Tshwane Gauteng • Furthermore, municipalities also informed Stats SA of name changes. Gauteng/Mpumalanga Cross-border municipalities Kungwini Local Municipality Gauteng In some cases borders of municipalities extend over two provinces. Table C lists the Northern Cape/North West cross-border municipalities and the provinces in which the municipalities are included Ga-Segonyana Municipality Northern Cape in this report. Phokwane Municipality Northern Cape Moshaweng Municipality Northern Cape Building statistics, Report No. 50-11-01 (2003) Statistics South Africa iv Key findings Table D – Selected key figures regarding buildings reported as completed to Figure 1 – Value of buildings reported as completed to municipalities in the municipalities in the monthly and annual surveys at current prices for 2002 and 2003 monthly and annual surveys for 2003 by province Percentage Difference R'000 change in the value 8 000 000 7 433 994 Estimates at 2002 2003 in the value of buildings current prices of buildings completed 7 000 000 completed between 6 000 000 4 922 129 between 2002 5 000 000 2002 and and 2003 4 000 000 2003 R'000 R'000 R'000 3 000 000 2 473 772 Residential buildings 9 273 325 11 481 842 + 23,8 +2 208 517 2 000 000 884 446 617 642 609 977 666 375 670 627 1 000 000 Dwelling-houses 6 746 482 7 996 416 + 18,5 +1 249 934 212 612 Flats and townhouses 1 966 075 2 622 004 + 33,4 +655 929 0 Other residential buildings 560 768 863 422 + 54,0 +302 654 Western Cape Eastern Cape Northern Cape Free State KwaZulu-Natal North West Gauteng Mpumalanga Limpopo Non-residential buildings 2 797 165 3 320 791 + 18,7 +523 626 Value of buildings reported as completed to municipalities in the monthly and annual surveys for 2003 by province Additions and alterations 3 194 566 3 688 941 + 15,5 +494 375 The major contributor to the value of buildings reported as completed, aggregated to Total 15 265 056 18 491 574 + 21,1 +3 226 518 provincial level, was recorded for Gauteng (contributing 40,2% of total of South Africa or R7 434,0 million), followed by Western Cape (26,6% or R4 922,1 million) and As indicated in Table D, the value of buildings reported as completed to municipalities in KwaZulu-Natal (13,4% or R2 473,8 million) (see Figure 1). Table E (page v) lists the the monthly and annual surveys increased by 21,1% from R15 265,1 million in 2002 to largest municipal contributors to the value of buildings reported as completed for 2003 R18 491,6 million in 2003. Large increases were reported for residential (+23,8% or by province. R2 208,5 million), non-residential buildings (+18,7% or R523,6 million) and additions and alterations (+15,5% or R494,4 million).
Recommended publications
  • A Revision of the 2004 Growth Potential of Towns in the Western Cape Study

    A Revision of the 2004 Growth Potential of Towns in the Western Cape Study

    A revision of the 2004 Growth Potential of Towns in the Western Cape study Discussion document A research study undertaken for the Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning of the Western Cape Provincial Government by Stellenbosch University & CSIR RESEARCH TEAM Dr Adriaan van Niekerk* (Project Manager) Prof Ronnie Donaldson* Mr Danie du Plessis† Mr Manfred Spocter‡ We are thankful to the following persons for their assistance: Ms I Boonzaaier*, Mr Nitesh Poona*, Ms T Smith*, Ms Lodene Willemse* * Centre for Geographical Analysis (CGA), Stellenbosch University † Centre for Regional and Urban Innovation and Statistical Exploration (CRUISE), Stellenbosch University ‡ Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) 17 January 2010 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY One of the objectives of the Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning (DEA&DP) is to undertake spatial planning that promotes and guides the sustainable future development of the Western Cape province and redresses spatial inequalities. This goal led to the development of the Provincial Spatial Development Framework (PSDF), which identifies the areas of growth in the province and the areas where, in terms of the sustainable development paradigm, growth should be emphasised in the future. It also addresses the form that this growth or development should take and further emphasises the restructuring of urban settlements to facilitate their sustainability. To provide guidance and support for implementing the PSDF, a thorough understanding and knowledge of the characteristics and performances of all the settlements in the province is needed. The aim of this study was to revise and update the Growth Potential Study of Towns in the Western Cape (Van der Merwe et al.
  • 9 Top South African Spiritual Retreats

    9 Top South African Spiritual Retreats

    9 top South African spiritual retreats Compared with the collective wisdom of these South African mellow centers, what you know about relaxation couldn't fit into an herbal tea cup. Get ready to humble. 1. Emoyeni Retreat Center, Magaliesberg Offering an austere but peaceful-sounding program, Emoyeni is set high on the northern slopes of the Magaliesberg Mountains, 100 kilometers from Johannesburg. Run on Buddhist principles, Emoyeni (place of spirit in Zulu) seeks to foster mindfulness and what it calls loving kindness among its guests. A typical day starts at 7.30 a.m. with a light breakfast followed by meditations and other mindful activities (cooking and gardening) throughout the day. Theres a light supper in the evening and then Noble Silence (no speaking) till the following morning. All meals are vegetarian, the accommodation is basic and there are no TV, games or swimming pool - - the lack of distractions meant encourage a spirit of introspection. The main building has beds for 14 guests, and tents are also available. From $40 per person, per night. Emoyeni Retreat Center, P.O. Box 190 Mooinooi; + 27 0 14 574 3662 2. Blue Butterfly Retreat, Welbedacht Nature Reserve A self-catering cottage at Blue Buttterfly ... chanting meditation, massage and yoga are part of the mix here.In the middle of the 400-acre Welbedacht Nature Reserve, Blue Butterfly adds chanting meditation, massage and yoga to the more conventional mix of hiking, swimming and wildlife tours. Theres a natural labyrinth to explore and youre advised to set aside time simply to sit on the porch and soak up the incredible views -- they're pretty meditative, too.
  • GTAC/CBPEP/ EU Project on Employment-Intensive Rural Land Reform in South Africa: Policies, Programmes and Capacities

    GTAC/CBPEP/ EU Project on Employment-Intensive Rural Land Reform in South Africa: Policies, Programmes and Capacities

    GTAC/CBPEP/ EU project on employment-intensive rural land reform in South Africa: policies, programmes and capacities Municipal case study Matzikama Local Municipality, Western Cape David Mayson, Rick de Satgé and Ivor Manuel with Bruno Losch Phuhlisani NPC March 2020 Abbreviations and acronyms BEE Black Economic Empowerment CASP Comprehensive Agricultural Support Programme CAWH Community Animal Health Worker CEO Chief Executive Officer CPA Communal Property of Association CPAC Commodity Project Allocation Committee DAAC District Agri-Park Advisory Committee DAPOTT District Agri Park Operational Task Team DoA Department of Agriculture DRDLR Department of Rural Development and Land Reform DWS Department of Water and Sanitation ECPA Ebenhaeser CPA FALA Financial Assistance Land FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation FPSU Farmer Production Support Unit FTE Full-Time Equivalent GGP Gross Geographic Product GDP Gross Domestic Product GVA Gross Value Added HDI Historically Disadvantaged Individual IDP Integrated Development Plan ILO International Labour Organisation LED Local economic development LORWUA Lower Olifants Water Users Association LSU Large stock units NDP National Development Plan PDOA Provincial Department of Agriculture PGWC Provincial Government of the Western Cape PLAS Proactive Land Acquisition Strategy SDF Spatial Development Framework SLAG Settlement and Land Acquisition Grant SSU Small stock unit SPP Surplus People Project TRANCRAA Transformation of Certain Rural Areas Act WUA Water Users Association ii Table of Contents
  • Heritage Impact Assessment

    Heritage Impact Assessment

    HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT (REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 38(8) OF THE NHRA (No. 25 OF 1999) FOR THE PROPOSED MOZAMBIQUE TILAPIA FARM PROJECT, ALBASINI DAM, ELIM, LOUIS TRICHARDT LIMPOPO PROVINCE Type of development: Agricultural Client: CSIR Client info: Karabo Mashabela E – mail: [email protected] Developer: Makwaria Trading . HCAC - Heritage Consultants Report Author: Private Bag X 1049 Mr. J. van der Walt Suite 34 Project Reference: Modimolle HCAC Project number 218403 0510 Report date: Tel: 082 373 8491 April 2018 Fax: 086 691 6461 E-Mail: [email protected] 1 HIA – Makwaria April 2018 APPROVAL PAGE Project Name Makwaria Fish Farm Report Title Heritage Impact Assessment Makwaria Fish Farm Authority Reference Number SAHRA Case 12199 Report Status Final Report Applicant Name Makwaria Trading Name Signature Qualifications and Date Certifications Document Compilation MA Archaeology Jaco van der Walt April 2018 ASAPA #159 BA Hons Marko Hutten April 2018 Archaeology Liesl Bester BHCS Honours April 2018 DOCUMENT PROGRESS Distribution List Date Report Reference Number Document Distribution Number of Copies 6 April 2018 2178403 CSIR Electronic Copy Amendments on Document Date Report Reference Number Description of Amendment HCAC 2 HIA – Makwaria April 2018 INDEMNITY AND CONDITIONS RELATING TO THIS REPORT The findings, results, observations, conclusions and recommendations given in this report are based on the author’s best scientific and professional knowledge as well as available information. The report is based on survey and assessment techniques which are limited by time and budgetary constraints relevant to the type and level of investigation undertaken and HCAC reserves the right to modify aspects of the report including the recommendations if and when new information becomes available from ongoing research or further work in this field, or pertaining to this investigation.
  • 6 the Environments Associated with the Proposed Alternative Sites

    6 the Environments Associated with the Proposed Alternative Sites

    6 THE ENVIRONMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE SITES The purpose of this section is to describe the environments associated with the proposed alternative sites. The information contained herein was extracted from the relevant specialist studies. Please refer to Section 3.5 for a list of all the relevant specialists and their fields of expertise and to Appendix E for the original specialist reports. 6.1 Brazil Site 6.1.1 Physical (a) Location The Brazil site is situated in the Kleinzee / Nolloth region of the Northern Cape, within the jurisdiction of the Nama-Khoi Municipality ( Figure 16). The site has the following co-ordinates: 29°48’51.40’’S and 17°4’42.21’’E. The Brazil site is situated approximately 500 km north of Cape Town and 100 km west-southwest of Springbok. Kleinzee is located 15 km north, Koiingnaas is 90 km south and Kamieskroon is located 90 km southeast of the Brazil site. Figure 16: Location of the proposed Brazil site in relation to the surrounding areas (Bulman, 2007) Nuclear 1 EIA: Final Scoping Report Eskom Holdings Limited 6-1 Issue 1.0 / July 2008 (b) Topography The topography in the Brazil region is largely flat, with only a gentle slope down to the coast. The coast is composed of both sandy and rocky shores. The topography is characterised by a small fore-dune complex immediately adjacent to the coast with the highest elevation of approximately nine mamsl. Further inland the general elevation depresses to about five mamsl in the middle of the study area and then gradually rises towards the east.
  • Campanulaceae) Based on ITS and Tranl-F Sequence Data: Implications for a Reclassification

    Campanulaceae) Based on ITS and Tranl-F Sequence Data: Implications for a Reclassification

    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of the Western Cape Research Repository Cupido, C. N. et al. (2013). Phylogeny of Southern African and Australasian Wahlenbergioids (Campanulaceae) based on ITS and tranL-F sequence data: implications for a reclassification. Systematic Botany, 38(2): 523 – 535 http:// doi.org/10.1600/036364413X666714 dx. Phylogeny of Southern African and Australasian Wahlenbergioids (Campanulaceae) based on ITS and trnL-F sequence data: implications for a reclassification Christopher N. Cupido , Jessica M. Prebble , and William M. M. Eddie Abstract The Campanulaceae: Wahlenbergioideae currently comprises 15 genera, one of which, Wahlenbergia, is widespread over the southern continents. Southern Africa is the region with maximum wahlenbergioid diversity with 12 genera and approximately 252 species. A second center is Australasia with 38 Wahlenbergia species. This study used a broad sample of wahlenbergioid diversity from South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand to reconstruct a phylogeny based on chloroplast trnL-F and nuclear ITS sequences. Data were analyzed separately and in combination using parsimony and Bayesian methods. The results suggest that for the wahlenbergioids to be monophyletic Wahlenbergia hederacea has to be excluded and that none of the South African, Australian or New Zealand lineages are strictly monophyletic. There are five species assemblages that are in some disagreement with current classification in the family. Wahlenbergia, Prismatocarpus and Roella are shown to be non-monophyletic and implications for a reclassification are presented. Careful consideration of morphological characters is suggested before the adjustment of generic circumscriptions can be accomplished. Recent family-wide molecular phylogenetic studies have supported the view that the Campanulaceae s.s.
  • Oriental Fruit Fly) in Several District Municipalities in the Northern Cape Province of South Africa

    Oriental Fruit Fly) in Several District Municipalities in the Northern Cape Province of South Africa

    International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) country report by the National Plant Protection Organization (NPPO) of South Africa: Notification on the detection of Bactrocera dorsalis (Oriental Fruit Fly) in several District Municipalities in the Northern Cape Province of South Africa Pest Bactrocera dorsalis (Oriental Fruit Fly) Status of pest Transient: actionable, under eradication Host or articles concerned Citrus spp., Grape (including Table-, Wine-, and Dry grape varieties); Plum, Pomegranate fruits produced or present in this area in South Africa are under threat. Geographic distribution Several male, Bactrocera dorsalis specimens, were detected in Methyl Eugenol-baited traps between Douglas and Prieska, situated approximately 300 km East of Upington as well as in Groblershoop, Karos, Upington, Kakamas and Augrabies, areas alongside or close to the Orange River, in the Northern Cape Province of South Africa. Other male detections occurred in Jan Kempsdorp, which is approximately 400km from North-West of Upington. Nature of immediate or Potential spread or establishment of B.dorsalis into other production potential danger areas where its presence may impede the export potential of the relevant host commodities affected. Summary Several male, Bactrocera dorsalis specimens, were detected in Methyl Eugenol-baited traps from Douglas to Kakamas, areas alongside or close to the Orange River, in the Northern Cape Province of South Africa. Four specimens were collected from Douglas and two specimens from Prieska, situated approximately 300 km West of Upington, where wine grapes are produced. In Groblershoop, also an area of wine and dry grapes production, approximately 110 km from Upington, two specimens were detected. Two specimens were detected in Karos, situated 50 km West of Groblershoop.
  • Namaqualand and Challenges to the Law Community Resource

    Namaqualand and Challenges to the Law Community Resource

    •' **• • v ^ WiKSHOr'IMPOLITICIALT ... , , AWD POLICY ANALYSi • ; ' st9K«onTHp^n»< '" •wJ^B^W-'EP.SrTY NAMAQUALAND AND CHALLENGES TO THE LAW: COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND LEGAL FRAMEWORKS Henk Smith Land reform in the arid Namaqualand region of South Africa offers unique challenges. Most of the land is owned by large mining companies and white commercial farmers. The government's restitution programme which addresses dispossession under post 1913 Apartheid land laws, will not be the major instrument for land reform in Namaqualand. Most dispossession of indigenous Nama people occurred during the previous century or the State was not directly involved. Redistribution and land acquisition for those in need of land based income opportunities and qualifying for State assistance will to some extent deal with unequal land distribution pattern. Surface use of mining land, and small mining compatible with large-scale mining may provide new opportunities for redistribution purposes. The most dramatic land reform measures in Namaqualand will be in the field of tenure reform, and specifically of communal tenure systems. Namaqualand features eight large reserves (1 200 OOOha covering 25% of the area) set aside for the local communities. These reserves have a history which is unique in South Africa. During the 1800's as the interior of South Africa was being colonised, the rights of Nama descendant communities were recognised through State issued "tickets of occupation". Subsequent legislation designed to administer these exclusively Coloured areas, confirmed that the communities' interests in land predating the legislation. A statutory trust of this sort creates obligations for the State in public law. Furthermore, the new constitution insists on appropriate respect for the fundamental principles of non-discrimination and freedom of movement.
  • 7. Water Quality

    7. Water Quality

    Western Cape IWRM Action Plan: Status Quo Report Final Draft 7. WATER QUALITY 7.1 INTRODUCTION 7.1.1 What is water quality? “Water quality” is a term used to express the suitability of water to sustain various uses, such as agricultural, domestic, recreational, and industrial, or aquatic ecosystem processes. A particular use or process will have certain requirements for the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of water; for example limits on the concentrations of toxic substances for drinking water use, or restrictions on temperature and pH ranges for water supporting invertebrate communities. Consequently, water quality can be defined by a range of variables which limit water use by comparing the physical and chemical characteristics of a water sample with water quality guidelines or standards. Although many uses have some common requirements for certain variables, each use will have its own demands and influences on water quality. Water quality is neither a static condition of a system, nor can it be defined by the measurement of only one parameter. Rather, it is variable in both time and space and requires routine monitoring to detect spatial patterns and changes over time. The composition of surface and groundwater is dependent on natural factors (geological, topographical, meteorological, hydrological, and biological) in the drainage basin and varies with seasonal differences in runoff volumes, weather conditions, and water levels. Large natural variations in water quality may, therefore, be observed even where only a single water resource is involved. Human intervention also has significant effects on water quality. Some of these effects are the result of hydrological changes, such as the building of dams, draining of wetlands, and diversion of flow.
  • Sea Level Rise and Flood Risk Assessment for a Select Disaster Prone Area Along the Western Cape Coast

    Sea Level Rise and Flood Risk Assessment for a Select Disaster Prone Area Along the Western Cape Coast

    Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning Sea Level Rise and Flood Risk Assessment for a Select Disaster Prone Area Along the Western Cape Coast Phase 2 Report: Eden District Municipality Sea Level Rise and Flood Risk Modelling Final May 2010 REPORT TITLE : Phase 2 Report: Eden District Municipality Sea Level Rise and Flood Risk Modelling CLIENT : Provincial Government of the Western Cape Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning: Strategic Environmental Management PROJECT : Sea Level Rise and Flood Risk Assessment for a Select Disaster Prone Area Along the Western Cape Coast AUTHORS : D. Blake N. Chimboza REPORT STATUS : Final REPORT NUMBER : 769/2/1/2010 DATE : May 2010 APPROVED FOR : S. Imrie D. Blake Project Manager Task Leader This report is to be referred to in bibliographies as: Umvoto Africa. (2010). Sea Level Rise and Flood Risk Assessment for a Select Disaster Prone Area Along the Western Cape Coast. Phase 2 Report: Eden District Municipality Sea Level Rise and Flood Risk Modelling. Prepared by Umvoto Africa (Pty) Ltd for the Provincial Government of the Western Cape Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning: Strategic Environmental Management (May 2010). Phase 2: Eden DM Sea Level Rise and Flood Risk Modelling 2010 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Umvoto Africa (Pty) Ltd was appointed by the Western Cape Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning (DEA&DP): Strategic Environmental Management division to undertake a sea level rise and flood risk assessment for a select disaster prone area along the Western Cape coast, namely the portion of coastline covered by the Eden District (DM) Municipality, from Witsand to Nature’s Valley.
  • Hlanganani Sub District of Makhado Magisterial District

    Hlanganani Sub District of Makhado Magisterial District

    # # C! # # # ## ^ C!# .!C!# # # # C! # # # # # # # # # # C!^ # # # # # ^ # # # # ^ C! # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C!# # # C!C! # # # # # # # # # #C! # # # # # C!# # # # # # C! # ^ # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # C! # # C! # #^ # # # # # # # ## # # #C! # # # # # # # C! # # # # # C! # # # # # # # #C! # C! # # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #C! # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## C! # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! # # # # # # # # C! # # # # # # # # # C! # # ^ # # # # # C! # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! # # # ##^ C! # C!# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #C! ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! C! # # # # # ## # # C!# # # # C! # ! # # # # # # # C# # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # ## ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ^ C! # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! C! # # # # # # # # C! # # #C! # # # # # # C!# ## # # # # # # # # # # C! # # # # # ## # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! # # # # # # # # # # # ### C! # # C! # # # # C! # ## ## ## C! ! # # C # .! # # # # # # # HHllaannggaannaannii SSuubb DDiissttrriicctt ooff MMaakkhhaaddoo MMaagg# iisstteerriiaall DDiissttrriicctt # # # # ## # # C! # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ROXONSTONE SANDFONTEIN Phiphidi # # # BEESTON ZWARTHOEK PUNCH BOWL CLIFFSIDE WATERVAL RIETBOK WATERFALL # COLERBRE # # 232 # GREYSTONE Nzhelele # ^ # # 795 799 812 Matshavhawe # M ### # # HIGHFIELD VLAKFONTEIN
  • Dissertation Masters in Development Studies Mds 794

    Dissertation Masters in Development Studies Mds 794

    RESILIENCE AND ADAPTABILITY OF RURAL COMMUNITIES A CASE STUDY OF EBENHAESER James Backhouse visit to Ebenezer, 1840 DISSERTATION MASTERS IN DEVELOPMENT STUDIES MDS 794 Ilma Brink Student number: 2005024092 Centre for Development Support University of the Free State Bloemfontein 2014 Resilience and Adaptability of Rural Communities. A Case Study of Ebenhaeser Ilma Brink Contents TABLE OF FIGURES, MAPS, TABLES AND TRAVEL DEPICTIONS ....................... 4 ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................... 6 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 7 CHAPTER 1: PROBLEM STATEMENT .................................................................. 10 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 10 1.1 Critical Questions ........................................................................................ 11 1.2 Objectives of the Study ............................................................................... 12 1.3 Significance of the Study ............................................................................. 12 CHAPTER 2: RESEARCH DESIGN ........................................................................ 13 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 13 2.1 Focus area of research ..............................................................................