INFORMATION TO USERS
This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted.
The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction.
1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity.
2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame.
3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete.
4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation. Silver prints of "photographs" may be ordered at additional charge by writing the Order Department, giving the catalog number, title, author and specific pages you wish reproduced.
5. PLEASE NOTE: Some pages may have indistinct print. Filmed as received.
Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 76- 24,557 BERENTSEN, William Harry, 1947- REGIONAL POLICY AND REGIONAL INEQUALITIES IN AUSTRIA: THE IMPACT OF POLICY UPON THE ACHIEVEMENT OF PLANNING GOALS. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1976 Urban and Regional Planning
Xerox University M icrofilm s, Ann Arbor, Michigan48ioe REGIONAL POLICY AND REGIONAL INEQUALITIES IN AUSTRIA:
The Impact of Policy upon the Achievement of Planning Goals
DISSERTATION
Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for
The Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate
School of The Ohio State University
By
William Harry Berentsen, A.B., M.A.
* * * * *
The Ohio State University 1976
Reading Committee: Approved By:
Dr. George J. Demko, Adviser Dr. S.E. Brown Dr. Howard L. Gauthier ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The study resulting in this publication was made under a fellowship granted by the Social Science Research Council and the American Council of Learned Societies. How ever, the conclusion, opinions, and other statements in this publication are those of the aurhor and not necessarily those of the Councils.
I would also like to make a personal acknowledgement to the
Social Science Research Council and the American Council of Learned
Societies for their financial support and their efficient and
friendly administration of my fellowship. I would, further, like
to thank the Department of Geography at The Ohio State University, which gave me the opportunity to complete my dissertation by employing me as a teaching associate during 1975-1976.
My adviser, Dr. George Demko, has been extremely helpful to me throughout my education at Ohio State, and I very much appreciate his help on this dissertation. No student could ever hope to work with a more concerned adviser, and I am very grateful for his friendship and influence on my education and life.
I would also like to thank the other members of my committee,
Drs. S.E. Brown, Warren Eason, and Howard Gauthier, who have all contributed significantly to my graduate education. I especially
li appreciate their comments on this dissertation, and, in particular,
Dr. Gauthier’s help with developing a methodology for the study.
I am also indebted to Dr. Walter Stohr, Hochschule fUr Welthandel
in Vienna without whom X could not ha\ ; completed my work in Austria.
Dr. StOhr acted as an adviser for me in Vienna and helped me become
oriented in the city. I am very appreciative of his help and friendship.
I was also assisted and befriended by all of the members of Dr.
StUhr’s Institute — Ewald Brunner, Hildegard Kaufmann, Herwig Palme,
Uwe Schubert, and Anna Maria Skarke - and- I- want to thank them for
making our lives in Vienna so pleasant.
Two other special friends also helped me complete my work and
better introduce my wife and me to life in Vienna. I want to thank
Dr. Helmut Jeglitsch and Dr. Felix Jlilg for their assistance and
their part in our pleasant year in Vienna.
I would also like to thank Drs. Hansen, MacKinnon, and Swain
of the International Institute f°r Applied Systems Analysis (I.I.A.S.A.),
who all made helpful comments about my preliminary work. Several
other people in Austria were also very helpful in assisting and
guiding me, and I would particularly like to thank Drs. Kohlbacher
(OROK), Matzner (Technische Hochschule) , PrombiJk (Stadt Wien), and
Sauberer (Oesterreichische Institut flir Raumplanung). A great many
other people in Austria helped me; and although there is not space
to recognize them all, I want to acknowledge their assistance and
thank them for it.
My wife and I were also fortunate enough to receive considerable benefit from the excellent Fulbright Commission Program in Austria;
ill our special thanks to Dr. Porhansl and his fellow workers in Vienna.
We also benefitted from the experiences of Dr. Andrew Burghardt, who also completed his dissertation on an Austrian topic and who was helpful in providing a historical perspective on my work.
Finally, the completion of my degree would not have been possible without the help and encouragement of my wife, Mele, who willingly accompanied me to every corner of Central Europe and accepted all the long hours and inconveniences.
iv VITA
July 8 , 1947 .... Born - Wenatchee, Washington
1969 ...... A.B., Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
1970-1972...... Teaching Assistant, Department of Geography, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
1972 ...... M.A., The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
1972-1974...... Teaching Associate, Department of Geography, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
1974-197 5 ...... Dissertation grant from the Social Science Research Council and American Council of Learned Societies in Vienna, Austria
1975-197 6 ...... Teaching Associate, Department of Geography, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
FIELDS OF STUDY
"Major Field: Geography
Studies in Regional Economic Development. .Professors George Demko and Howard Gauthier
Studies In Transportation. Professor Howard Gauthier
Studies in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union. Professors S.E. Brown, George Demko, Warren Eason
v TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...... ±1
VITA ...... v
LIST OF TABLES ...... viil
LIST OF FIGURES AND M A P S ...... ix
Chapter
I. INTRODUCTION ...... 1
II. LITERATURE REVIEW ...... 4
Forces Affecting the Creation and Dissolution of Regional Inequalities ...... 5 The Need for Regional Planning...... 11 Two Regional Planning Strategies 14 • Regional Policy Experience...... 24
III. REGIONAL GOALS AND REGIONAL POLICY MEASURES IN AUSTRIA ...... 29
Introduction...... 2 9- . The Goals of Regional Planning...... 31 The Regional Planning Strategy ...... 33 Regional Policy Measures ...... 36 Conclusions ...... 61
IV. DATA AND METHODOLOGY...... 64
Regional Units ...... 64. Data Sources ...... 68 Methodology ...... 69
V. REGIONAL CHANGE AND REGIONAL INEQUALITY IN AUSTRIA ...... 78
Income Inequality ...... 81 Unemployment...... 91 Other Indications of Changing Regional Inequality...... 93 Net Migration ...... 100
VI. EVALUATION OF AUSTRIAN REGIONAL PLANNING.... 108
Introduction 10® ‘ Goal Conflicts in Austrian Regional Planning . 108 Policy Impact Analysis ...... Ill
vi TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page VII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS...... 158
LIST OF R E F E R E N C E S ...... 164
FOOTNOTES ...... 177 .
vii LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table 1 provincial Income 1971 (Austrian Shillings) . . . 88
Table 2 Provincial Income Inequality ...... 89
Table 3 District Income ...... 90
Table 4 Intra-Provincial Income Inequality ...... 91
Table 5 Average Annual Provincial Unemployment (Province of Residence ) ...... * ...... 92
Table 6 Factor Loadings ...... 99
Table 7 Oblique Factor Analysis: Factor Scores ...... 99
Table 8 Aid as a % of Total Provincial Industrial Investment, 1966-1970 ...... 120
Table 9 Aid/industrial worker ...... 122
Table 10 Gains from Redistributed Taxes as a Percentage of Municipal and Provincial Budgets, 1970 . . . 126
Table 11 Gains from Redistributed Taxes as a Percentage of Municipal and Provincial Investment in Construction ...... 127
Table 12 Simultaneous Equation Regression Results .... 134
Table 13 Direct and Indirect Effects upon Changes In Living Standards (DLIV) from Path Analysis. . . 136'
Table 14 Direct and Indirect Effects upon Changes in Living Standards (DLIV) from Path Analysis . . 137
Table 15 Regression Results of the District Analysis . . 146
Table 16 Effects of Independent Variables Upon Changing Relative Incomes ...... 153
viii LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Figure 1 A Hypothesized Temporal Evolution of Regional Inequalities ...... , 6
Figure 2 Summary Results of Regression Analysis . . . . , 140
LIST OF MAPS
Map 1 Austrian Trade with Central Europe ...... 82
Map 2 Sectoral Structure of the Economies of Austrian Districts ...... 83
Map 3 Net Domestic Product/Worker, 1971 ...... 85
Map 4 Change In Net Domestic Product/Worker, 1961-1971. 86
Map 5 Change in Industrial Employment, 1961-1971 . . . 87
Map 6 Unemployment, 1961...... 94
Map 7 Unemployment, 1971...... 95
Map 8 Infant Morality, 1970-1973 ...... 96
Map 9 Infant Morality Increases for 1970-1973 in Comparison to 1965-1969 ...... 98
Map 10 Population Decline in Austrian Districts . . . . 101
Map 11 Net Migration, 1951-1961 ...... 103
Map 12 Net Migration, 1961-1971 ...... 104
Map 13 "Wind" Vectors in Austria ...... 106
ix CHAPTER 1
\
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this research is to analyze the impact of Austrian regional development policy upon the achievement of two major planning goals, the lessening of regional income inequalities and the reduction of out-migration from rural regions in Austria. The research has been undertaken to fill a relative void in the regional policy literature, which, lacks studies.that investigate the impact of policy upon goal realization in the developed world. Such investigations are needed to evaluate programs that have been initiated in many nations of the developed world, in order to ascertain their effectiveness and to help planners in the selection of optimal policy measures. At a more general level the investigation of the effectiveness of regional development policies also provides a better understanding of the nature of complex regional economic relationships and the potential for policy to influence changes in these relationships.
Austria has been chosen as a case study; because regional policy has a relatively long history in Austria, and the nation also faces regional problems which are similar to problems in the rest of the industrialized world. Some of Austria's regional problems are also somewhat unique due to its geographical location in Europe. Still, i
2
Austria's attempts to resolve these particular problems should serve
as an instructive example for other nations which lie between antag
onistic political and economic systems (e.g. the German Federal Re
public) .
The methodology exployed to evaluate policy effectiveness must
necessarily be one that allows for the simultaneous consideration of
the numerous interlocking forces shaping a regional socio-economic
system. This study will employ a methodology which has not been used
extensively in geography but one which seems particularly well suited
for the investigation of problems with interrelated sets of variables,
which represent the aforementioned forces shaping regional socio
economic systems. These sets of variables can be handled in a simul
taneous equations and path analysis framework. A discussion of this
methodology will be presented in Chapter 4. The results from the
application of the techniques will be utilized 1 ) to evaluate the
success of Austrian regional policy in achieving the stated goals
and 2 ) to recommend potentially useful modifications in the present
planning strategy.
Chapter 2 will present a review of the literature relating to
the causes of regional inequalities and the Importance of regional
planning for identifying regional goals and implementing a planning
strategy to achieve the goals. Two types of policy alternatives are
considered at both the theoretical and empirical levels. One of these
planning strategies, decentralized concentration, has been adopted
in Austria. The policy goals and measures chosen to implement this
strategy will be outlined in Chapter 3. Much of that chapter will present a description of tax legislation and investment measures
which have been taken to attempt to achieve the planning goals.
In Chapter 5 there will be an Investigation of trends in Austrian
regional inequalities In an attempt to ascertain whether the planning
goals are, in fact, being achieved. The methodology applied includes
the use of factor analysis and information statistics in order to
assess changing levels of regional well-being. Chapter 6 will then
present the major analytical findings of the study, results of the
investigation of the importance of regional policy in the achievement
of the planning goals. These results derive from the application of
the simultaneous equation and path analysis methodologies and provide
insights into the Austrian policy experience at both the provincial
and district (county) scales.
The study will conclude in Chapter 7 with a summary of the
analytical results and an evaluation of the effectiveness of the
policy measures which have been adopted in Austria. This will
include a consideration of possible alterations in the Austrian planning strategy which might produce better results vis-a-vis the planning goals without alienating important political power groups
involved in the planning process. CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
The existence and persistence of regional Inequalities have long
been recognized as a fact common to all nations at all levels of
development (Williamson, 1965, p.3). A large number of regional
scientists have investigated the causes of these inequalities in
attempts to identify processes which affect the origins and solutions
of these regional problems. The following review outlines the processes which have been identified in these investigations. The review then outlines the arguments of regional scientists, who maintain that regional problems should be handled by the initiation of regional planning programs. The most important regional planning strategies are considered; first the theoretical underpinnings of each are outlined and second, there is a review of the small existing body of literature which deals with over-all assessments of regional policy programs in the developed world. The review will allow the reader to place Austrian problems within the context of more gen eralized problems encountered elsewhere and to compare the Austrian planning strategy and policy experience with those of other nations.
A Forces Affecting the Creation and Dissolution of Regional Inequalities
Myrdal contends that one cause of regional inequality, the
concentration of economic activities in a few regions, may result
from an original advantage (for example, accessibility to a resource)
but is, in any event, self-sustaining. Strong agglomeration forces
set into action and may prevent peripheral regions from overcoming
their original disadvantage (Myrdal, 1957). The agglomeration forces
may include economies of scale related to an ever self-propelling
local market, the continued creation of a more skilled labor pool,
the concentration of auxiliary business services resulting from
economies of scale, and the clustering of publicly financed social
overhead capital (Hansen, 1968, p.14).
Williamson argues that these and other forces will tend to
polarize the spatial incidence of growth and development during
the early stages of national development. This results in inc
reasing regional inequalities over some indefinite period, as sug-
' gested in Figure 1. Williamson believes that this period of in
creasing inequality will continue as long as a nation’s economy
is poorly integrated. This includes a poor Integration of regional
and' factor markets which works to the disadvantage of the peripheral
region (Williamson, 1965, p.7). 6
regional / X^
inequalities / X ^
time
Figure 1 A Hypothesized Temporal Evolution of Regional Inequalities
Friedmann and Hirschmann also maintain that there may be con
siderable persistence in levels of regional inequality. Friedmann
notes that marginal returns to scale may not diminish rapidly
enough in the established industrial areas to create important
alternative investment opportunities in lagging, or peripheral,
regions. He further argues that if fast growing industries are
located in the more economically advanced regions, capital will
tend to accumulate there, perpetuating existing agglomerative ad
vantages. The relatively low investment levels in the lagging
regions is also likely to remain low as long as investors, generally
inhabitants of the advanced region or "center," have a negative
perception of the periphery. This perception may unduly bias the
investor against properly assessing investment opportunities in
the periphery. Although the perception may be erroneous, its
existence means continued emphasis on Investment in the center
(Friedmann, 1966, pp.14-15). Hirschmann calls these factors forces
of polarization and adds that they may also include the beneficial
effects of selective in-migration and preferential trade legislation
originating from economic-political power concentration in the center (Hirschmann, 1958, p.188). Hilhorst is especially concerned with the effect of this con
centration of political and economic power, which has profound
effects upon the diffusion of information. He argues that the
"benefits of new innovations most often benefit the center and that
t h e center is further advantaged by being the domicile of decision
makers. These decision-makers are influenced not only by their
perception of the periphery vis-a-vis the center but by their
political affinity to the center. Hilhorst argues that primate
cities, like perhaps Vienna in the past, have developed as a result
o f this self-perpetuating process of growth, information avail
ability, and decision-making (Hilhorst, 1971, p.XII).
Hilhorstfs arguments actually refer to a special case of a more
general situation outlined by Allan Pred. Pred contends that many
important decisions are made by large business organizations and
t h a t the decisions' implementations result in the diffusion of
n e w business techniques or innovations through a complexly inter-
m e s h e d set of business and urban hierarchies. In keeping with the
arguments of Hilhorst, Pred maintains that "in a great many cir
cumstances there is coincidence between the metropolitan area where
organizational headquarters are located and the metropolitan area w h e r e implementation occurs" (Pred, 1975, p.256). Thus, in a highly polarized urban structure (i.e., the existence of something similar
t o a primate city), Pred's contentions suggest that growth may be spatially constrained, resulting in the creation and persistence o f regional inequalities (Pred, 1975, pp.252-268). Theoretical! notions exist, however, which suggest that economic variations between regions should stabilize or decline as factor flows in the direction of highest marginal returns reverse trends of factor and growth concentration. For example, "neoclassical general equilibrium theory predicts that in a situation characterized by inter-regional differentials in real wages, labor will migrate from the low-wage to the high-wage regions until real wages are equalized" (Richardson, 1969, p.295). In fact, though, the neo classical model does not necessarily imply that regional variations will decline. First, the original neo-classical model was postulated upon several rigorous assumptions including full employment, homo genous labor, constant returns to scale, perfect competition, and migration in response to wage differentials alone (Richardson, 1969, p.295). Clearly, these assumptions are not consistent with reality, and the previous arguments suggest that it is the existence of these factors which contribute to persistent regional inequalities. Sub sequent attempts to modify the limiting assumptions of the neo classical model have yet to develop an operational alternative to the earlier version. It must also be noted that neo-classicists themselves maintain that an application of their model to regions may not be appropriate, since the full employment assumption applies to the national economy and some regional unemployment levels may differ significantly from zero (Gauthier, 1976).
A second reason why the neo-classical model does not necessarily support a contention that regional inequalities will decline as the result of market forces is that the model only contends that an equilibrium will be attained. In fact, an equilibrium position may
be reached at which there are considerable variations in regional
living standards as the result of regional variations in the sectorial
structure of economic activities, thus, wages for peripheral regions
may climb to meet those of more developed regions in the industries
represented in the periphery. However, if the industry in the per
iphery is predominantly low-wage, as it quite likely, the periphery will have an income average below the national average (Gauthier,
1976).
Even if factor flows do begin to react to marginal returns in
the periphery, these flows may not produce growth impulses which are as powerful as the growth impulses created by factor flows to
the center and by agents of growth within the center itself. This implication can be supported by a logic derived from Hufbauer's ideas concerning the "international product cycle." Hufbauer suggests that highly developed nations are innovators which originally face little competition in the production of goods which they develop and place on the market. Later lesser developed nations "Imitate" the In novator1 s technology, but in the meantime the innovator has developed a new good and the cycle begins anew (Hufbauer, 1965).
Hufbauer applied his ideas within an international context, but they also seem readily applicable to the intra-national case.
In this case the center is the innovator and the periphery Is the eventual imitator. In fact, however, there is good reason to believe that "imitation" is an improper way to describe this process of the diffusion of production. More likely, the innovator develops 10 new products which compete for limited supplies of factor Inputs; and older products, which may require large inputs of factors of production which are relatively scarce in developed regions (labor, for example), may as a result be produced in lesser developed regions.
In this situation there is a factor flow of capital investment toward lesser developed regions in response to marginal returns. Note, however, that this investment may not have the expansive effects of investment elsewhere, since the product may itself be in a phase of declining marginal consumption and the productive activity may, therefore, not create a dynamic impulse in the economy of the lesser developed region. That is, although the activity may generate employment and income increases, there may be no or few inter industrial linkages fostered by the activity. This may be partic ularly true with regard to the local service sector, a potentially large source of new employment growth. New jobs in this sector may not materialize locally, since the service linkages for the industry may likely already be firmly established with suppliers from a dominant metropolis. This is probably all the more true when the new activity is a branch operation of an organization with headquarters elsewhere.
Further, due to the product’s demand structure, production may be quickly curtailed in times of economic distress. This latter effect may well characterize many productive activities in lesser developed or peripheral regions owing to corporate interests in first protecting its most valuable labor assets at main plants during recessions. These main plants are generally located in 11
the major metropolitan regions, where the recovery of labor talent would be most difficult during ensuing periods of economic expansion
(Mastalyer, 1976).
Thus, although industry and/or other economic activities may
decentralize, there is no guarantee that this alone will cause a reduction in regional inequalities. This is, further, not a con
tradiction of neo-classical equilibrium analysis but represents a situation in which an eventual economic equilibrium may be achieved without altering the basic disadvantageous position of the periphery.
The Need For Regional Planning
There are many regional planners who believe that a clearly defined regional policy is necessary in order to fundamentally change this uneven relationship between developed and lagging regions.
Thus, Friedmann emphasizes the focus on "the attainment of objectives for territorially organized—or spatia1-sub-systems of national societies" (Friedmann, 1972). He further argues this policy must tie together the national factor markets: "regional development must be designed to deal with the diverse problems of development regions as a comprehensive system of interdependencies" and that a
"failure to tie peripheral regions into a national system may even tually retard the rate of progress of which the country as a whole is capable" (Friedmann, 1966, pp.45-55). In other words, Friedmann believes that an era of divergence, caused by the forces outlined above, can be terminated by effective regional planning. He feels 12 that planning can help a nation enter a period of lessening regional inequalities, i.e. an era of convergence represented by the down ward sloping portion of Williamson1s regional inequalities curve
(see Figure 1).
Several Austrian researchers argue that regional policy is particularly important in national planning when social and pri vate costs are not the same. This may be true where continued growth in one region is responding to and resulting in private profit but where such development causes losses for society as a whole or neglects more socially profitable alternatives elsewhere.
The difference between social and private costs and benefits are the result of externalities (Scitovsky, 1954). For Austria and many other nations, for example, the concentration of the labor force in large metropolitan areas results in a negative externality.
Although this, perhaps, creates a profit for private enterprise,
Austrian officials contend that it is costly to society. Their argument is that it overloads urban infrastructure while under utilizing and jeopardizing the maintenance of rural infrastructure
(Nussbeumer, 1969, pp.9—10). Planners often, thus, recommend that government take actions to encourage a better assessment of the true costs and benefits of, for example, migration.
This may also mean that steps should be taken to encourage actions which create positive externalities for society as a whole.
Government investments in infrastructure and subsidies for the provision of some services in the private sector may, for example, produce important benefits which cannot be internalized in the
private sector. This is borne out by public investment in trans
portation networks which provide many benefits, some of which (i.e.
the externalities) cannot be redeemed by tolls or freight charges
(Nowotny, n.d. p.18). In this case, an improvement in regional,
and perhaps national, accessibility represents an important positive
externality of such an investment in transportation. Hirschmann and
others argue that investment in infrastructure (social overhead
capital) produces many such positive externalities which are im
portant permissive factors for the development of directly productive
activities (Hirschmann, 1968; Nowotny, n.d. pp.20—21; Mera, 1974,
p.7; Hansen, 1968, pp.252-253).
In general, then, regional planning may be necessary in order
to blunt the processes which contribute to increased regional in
equality and in order to provide an infrastructural base which will
permit the emergence of an era of inequality decline. Regional
planning efforts in the past have adopted various types of planning
strategies, two of which are of particular interest here. One of
these is a strategy which has a well-developed theoretical base and has attracted considerable attention in the recent literature - the
growth pole-growth center strategy. The other, decentralized con
centration, has a less well-developed basis in theory, but a strong appeal in nations vhere goals and/or political realities call for
"concentration" of regional policy at lower levels in the urban hierarchy. 14
Two Regional Planning Strategies
An Important type of regional policy designed to promote the efficient use of society's and a region's resources is the growth pole - growth center policy. This policy is one in which govern ments attempt to affect the sectorial-spatial structure of the economy in order to attain national social and economic goals.
Notably, the growth pole - growth center concept is based on the attempt to establish a basis for true economic expansion and evol ution and is not merely intended to concentrate existing growth into a few centers at the expense of others. This concept is derived from concepts originally proposed for pure economic space by Perroux but later related to geographic space by Boudeville.
Perroux's arguments emphasize "the set of relations which exist between the firm and, on the one hand, the suppliers of input
(raw materials, labor, power, capital) and, on the other hand, the buyers of the output (both intermediate and final)" and the pole as a place "from which centrifugal forces emanate and to which centripetal forces are attracted "(Perroux, 1950, pp.94-97). Boude ville identifies a growth center as a region, generally a city, where regional growth is concentrating owing to external and scale econ omies in production. Growth centers contain within them firms which are large and are characterized by high productivity and a growing share of the market. These firms come to dominate others in the sense that they are a large market for and/or a large supplier to other firms. In the former case, where a firm is a large market for another, a backward linkage exists. Where one firm is a major sup plier of another, a forward linkage exists. Perroux and Boudeville reason that it is these linkages which communicate growth impulses
throughout an economy. For example, increasing productivity may result in lower prices aiding firms tied to forward linkage firms, and larger output induced by such price reductions will move the economy toward even greater integration (Perroux, 1950, Perroux,
1955, pp.307-320; Boudeville, 1968). Thomas notes that "the spatial dimensions of interindustry linkages appears to be critically im portant if effective governmental economic planning is to be under taken when the goal is the maximization of regional or national per capita income" (Thomas, 1972, p.93) .
The firms promoting interlinkage, so-called leading or propul sive firms, create growth throughout the economic system, hastened by increased innovation and dynamism in the growth center, which becomes a magnet for labor, capital, and entrepreneurial talent.
However, it is also presumed that growth will diffuse from the growth center, thereby aiding general regional development. It is for this reason that regional development planners have often adopted policies which would aid in the creation of such a growth center. They count on so-called "trickle-down" or "spread" effects to improve the economic situation in lagging regions (Myrdal, 1957; Hirschmann,
1958). These effects include the expansion of the latter's market by greater contact with the "modem" techniques and innovations imported from the modem sector, and easing of population pressure in the lagging regions as migration streams develop. Hansen, Winnick, 16
and Berry emphasize the positive aspects of migration and commuting,
especially because they may result in a more rational use of resources
and they may be a more efficient way of realizing prosperity for people rather than just places (Berry, 1970; Hansen, 1972, p. 103;
Winnick, 1966, p.282). Lasuen emphasized the importance of the dif fusion of innovation and notes the positive role which large corpor ations can play in this regard. He is especially optimistic about the opportunities for the diffusion of growth impulses faster and to more places as the result of sub-contracting within the corpor ation (Lasuen, 1969, pp.146-147). These ideas are very consistent with the importance attached to interindustry linkage by. Perroux and Boudeville and potentially operational within a regional devel opment plan which embodies policy relating to business structures.
In fact, however, there is little evidence yet that a growth center will diffuse growth spatially. The evidence that has been found derives more from the interpretation of static patterns than from:the workings of the actual dynamic process. Berry has found evidence that technology will diffuse from a growth center, evidence which emerges from his study of the diffusion of television (Berry,
1972) and the investigations of the influences of U.S. urban areas upon surrounding regions. In the latter study, his urban "traverses"
Indicated that economic growth and well-being does generally decline with. distance from large urban centers (Berry, 1973, pp.122-148), but these results do not shed any light on the nature of the processes
Involved. And, Berry*s use of a consumer good, television, in another of his studies provides less insight into the diffusion 17
of technology than would a study of the diffusion of a new good
or process which embodies new industrial—commercial technology.
The latter is much more relevant to regional economic growth and
is, unfortunately, also more difficult to investigate. Malecki has
investigated the diffusion of innovations within banking systems
in Ohio with particular emphasis on behavioral parameters (Malecki,
1975) , but much work remains to be done in investigating the nature
of the actual processes of the diffusion of important technological
innovations.
Pred has suggested an interesting framework in which to study
these processes which influence the interregional diffusion of tech
nology. He contends, like Lasuen, that the structure of industry
is very important to the nature of the spatial pattern of the dif
fusion of innovations and growth impulses. He argues that there
exists a corporate hierarchy which co-exists within the urban hier archy and that the diffusion of growth impulses is influenced by
the interaction of biases from both hierarchies as well as by the effect of space (i.e. distance) (Pred, 1974, pp.62-64). Perhaps the best evidence supporting this contention comes from a study by
Jeffrey. His investigation of unemployment rate changes in U.S. cities found evidence of the temporal coincidence of unemployment cycles within both regional groups of cities and cities with sim ilar sectorial structures (Jeffrey, 1970), These results tend to ver ify pred’s assertions, but, again, considerably more research, is needed to illuminate the processes involved in regional growth., and specifically, the relationship of growth centers to the spatial-temporal diffusion of that growth. 18
In spite of the limited empirical investigation of growth cen
ters, there has already been considerable discussion about what
size a city must be to generate significant growth impulses. Many writers contend that growth cneter policies should emphasize medium-
size cities, since these cities avoid the diseconomies of scale of
large cities and yet staisfy the infrastructural requirements of most
industrial and commercial activities. Hansen points out that many big cities are beginning to show some diseconomies of scale, and that though money properly invested might alleviate their problems, medlum-size cities may present better, alternative investments. He believes many medium-size cities may have "sufficient" conditions for growth, Illu strated by "spurts" in population growth by many cities with populations of 150,000 to 200,000 (Hansen, 1971, pp. 77-84; Clark, 1945). Hope fully, these smaller cities also reach the threshold population at which the diffusion of innovations from larger centers becomes more frequent
(Pedersen, 1970, pp. 219-220).
Mera, however, Is not convinced that large cities have in fact encountered diseconomies of scale. He maintains that Japan has bene- fitted from industrial concentration and that a decentralization of industry and social overhead capital would be costly to future growth in Japan. Mera, thus, argues that policies favoring the dispersion of economic activities may aid the achievement of a goal to lessen reg ional inequalities but not the achievement of maximal growth of G.N.P.
(Mera, 1970, pp. 16-28). Thus, any growth center policy seeking to achieve both goals simultaneously miist emphasize the importance of the 19
parsimonious selection of growth centers and must be based on the exist
ence or non-existence of a truly propulsive industry within the econ
omies of the cities under consideration (Hermansen, 1972, p. 29).
The second type of regional planning strategy to be considered here,
decentralized concentration, proposed policy measures which do not sat
isfy the parsimonious selection criteria considered above and, yet, do
attempt to foster both regional growth and income convergence. This
type of strategy is not uncommon where there are a number of contradict
ory regional policy goals and where planning authority is highly frag mented. In such cases political realities often result in a much great er spatial dispersion of available regional development funds, so that
the benefits envisioned from growth pole policies cannot really be real ized (Klaasen and Drewe, 1973, p. 16). These funds, often direct monies from tax transfer payments or indirect monies from lessened tax burdens, are frequently used to improve local infrastructure in order to attempt to achieve goals of halting population losses in rural areas by attract ing industry. It is hoped that investment in local infrastructure will affect the locational choice of industry, causing new industry to set tle in areas other than the major population centers. In spite of the recognition of the dangers of over-dispersion, the size of centers con templated as investment centers are no where near the size of Hansen’s medium-sized cities; they are more often small towns or large villages
(Bundeskanzleramt, 1969, p. 137; Bylund, 1969, p. 200; Holzman, 1971, p. 125; Nowotny, n.d., p. 54; Mueller, 1965, p. 20; Niederoesterreichi- schen Landesregierung (N.O.), 1969, p. XIII; Oesterreichisches Institut fuer Raumplanung (OIR), 1968; Stummer, 1969, p. 19). 20
The arguments regarding this development strategy rely on theo
retical notions regarding the growth effects of concentration but
emphasize the importance of decentralization in order to avoid dis
economies of over-concentration (Organization for Economic Co-operat
ion and Development (OECD), 1974, pp. 37-38). This strategy also
emphasizes the need to organize unused local resources to spur growth
(MacKinnan and Robertson, 1969, pp. 40-41), which will be further in
tensified by multiplier effects. This strategy of development, how-
t ever, has very little in common with growth center strategies and im
plications to the contrary entirely disregard the importance of absolute
size inherent in the arguments of not,only growth pole - growth center
theorists but also those advocating the role of the medium-size city.
In fact, decentralized concentration has little-theoretical basis, and
the strategy is often used as a rationalization for political patronage
to rural areas and in lieu of greater central direction in planning.
Both of these factors, of course, result in disjointed policies bene-
fitting a large number of localities.
The industrial location policies of decentralized concentration do, though, seem to have close ties to export base theory (North, 1955), but that theory has also been beset with serious criticism. Attempts to spur local growth by establishing export oriented Industrial and commercial activities in lagging regions does not account for important considerations of national demand, which is assumed to be exogenous to the growth model and presumed to be no impediment t° development (Rich ardson, 1969, pp. 254, 337). This assumption, however, Is unrealistic, 21
particularly given the probable income elasticities of a lagging reg
ion's industrial products. Further, Blumenfeld points out that empha
sis of the export sector underplays the important role of the service
sector as a long-run determinant of economic expansion (Blumenfeld,
1955, p. 21).
In general, policies like decentralized concentration have been
questioned for their lack of a theoretical base and because of their
emphasis on "place" and not "people" prosperity (Winnick, 1966, pp. 280-
.281). That is, dispersed aid may help improve standards of living for
people at their current residence, but an alternative approach might be
more efficient in that it might encourage population mobility, some con
centration of economic activities, and greater improvements in living
standards. Decentralized concentration places a relatively high pri
ority on improving living standards within the context of existing
spatial distributions of the population, but there is no guarantee that
these population distributions should not or will not change.
Thus, a particularly interesting and important part of the decen
tralized concentration growth policy is the role of labor mobility,
both migration and commuting, which is especially relevant to the
Austrian case. A decentralized concentration strategy often attempts
to combat demographic and economic over-concentration by aiding smaller
cities in capturing commuters and migrants who might otherwise migrate
to the large metropolitan centers (Lentsch, 1973, p.11). The concern
is most generally with problems created by selective out-migration in
peripheral regions. The loss of young, talented people often results
from poor economic opportunity in peripheral regions owing to the 22
failure of adequate investment to provide jobs with wages competitive
to those in metropolitan regions. The investment may not be forth
coming due to incorrect perceptions of the periphery on the part of
investors (Friedmann, 1966), but the result is a selective migratory
flow of labor in the direction of more developed regions. Hirschmann
and Myrdal both believe that this migratory flow may, because of its
selective nature, worsen regional inequalities. The lesser developed
region is further disadvantaged by the impact of out-migration upon
firms providing goods and services for the local market. A popula
tion loss lessens market potential and, thus, threatens jobs based on
the local market (Parr, 1966, pp. 149-159).
Many researchers, however, argue that the best way to achieve
higher incomes, maintain some semblance of personal locational choice,
and still maintain consistency within a regional growth policy is to
allow or actually encourage labor mobility (Gober-Meyers, 1975, p. 149;
Groenman, 1969, p. 31; Winnick, 1966, p. 281). Such a policy, for ex
ample, would emphasize the potential of medium-sized cities located near peripheral regions, although, not necessarily located in these
regions (Hansen, 1968, p. 276).
This would seem to be consistent with empirical research which has indicated the spatial coincidence of fastest economic growth and
larger urban places (Berry, 1972, pp. 122-148). It is also consistent with. Alonso, Winnick, and HooverTs arguments which emphasize the impor
tance of creating prosperity for people and not attempting to achieve an
Illusory goal of prosperity for places (Alonso, 1971; Winnick, 1966;
Hoover, 1969). However, the results of empirical investigations of the 23
relationship between migration and economic growth are not conclusive.
Some studies find that income growth is fastest in net out-migration regions (Berry 1973, p. 155) and others find that regions benefittlng from selective in-migration experience most rapid growth (Gober-Meyers,
1975, pp. 110-115). This seeming incongruity is perhaps the result of the manifestations of geographical scale (Gober-Meyers, 1975, p. 150).
It should be noted, however, that apparent income increases in out migration regions may actually only represent an average increase in income per capita owing to out-migration of poorer people. This would tend to raise average incomes in origin regions and depress average in comes at destinations in spite of the fact that individuals have exper ienced no income change whatsoever. The real income changes that require investigation are the incomes of individuals, whose incomes are simul taneously influenced by any number of other variables besides migration.
It is recognition of this latter point that has prompted a more recent view that migration is both cause and effect of development
(Schwind, 1971, p. 7), within the context of a complex relationship between many interdependent variables. In fact, several researchers now believe that the impact of migration upon a region may vary depend ing upon the specific situation, that "Migration may act as a disequil ibrium force under certain conditions and as a factor contributing to greater income equality under other circumstances" (Gober-Meyers, 1975, p. 31; Okun and Richardson, 1961). Schwind feels that, in any event,
* * the impact of migration upon income conbergence is much less important than stronger equilibrating forces (Schwind, 1971, p. 116). Generally 24
the strongest such force is structural economic change In a region as
evidenced by sectorial employment shifts (Stein, 1964, pp. 19, 206-208).
These changes themselves often cause migration, especially rural to
urban movement during incipient stages of industrialization in a region.
At present, then, a composite view suggests that the effects of
migration upon regional changes must be assessed coincidently with other
forces contributing to and resulting from regional change. This approach
is both theoretically pleasing and methodologically feasible and has
received considerable attention in recent migration literature (Gober-
Meyers, 1975; Greenwood, 1973; Willis, 1974). Finally, this approach also
carries with it a strong policy implication. It suggests that levels of population and migration should be considered to be instrumental policy variables and not goals unto themselves (Willis, 1974, p. 46). If mi gration levels are chosen as policy goals, as they are in Austria, attempts
to achieve this particular goal will put very strict constraints upon the potential for change in the other instrumental variables which are important determinants of regional income growth. Thus, the array of potential policy actions available to achieve regional income convergence may be seriously limited, and the result may be a failure to achieve any meaningful regional change as the consequence of policy.
Regional Policy Experience
Unfortunately there has been little investigation of the successes or failures of the regional development policies which have been pursued in many parts of the world. The studies that have been carried out are 25
almost uniformly characterized by a qualitative evaluation of policy
and not by a more rigorous analysis of data. Of course, this is per haps largely due to data deficiencies and/or the short time spans of many regional policy actions.
There is especially little literature relating to policy exper ience with growth pole — growth center approaches to planning. This is due to the fact that most nations have not adopted policies which can be identified as growth center policies. However, there is evi dence from France that attempts to decentralize growth from the Paris region have been somewhat successful. This evaluation comes from an investigation of French policy prior to the selection of the metropoles d'equilibre but still refers to a situation where there was real con cern for the problems of over-dispersion of aid (Hansen, 1968, p. 69).
On the other hand, the construction of new industrial towns in the Ger man Democratic Republic has not proven to be entirely successful. Growth effects have been largely local in nature and there are serious problems with regard to efficiency (Sinnhuber, 1965), a problem which has also appeared at the large, new Slovakian steel mill in Kosice. The paucity of empirical research on growth center policies, however, does not allow any kind of general statement regarding the potential of this planning strategy.
More evidence is available on policy experiences with strategies which have been in reality, if not by plan, characterized by loosely co-ordinated programs dispersing aid to a wide range of localities.
Regional policies in the U.S. and Canada are, for example, policies 26 which, are akin, to decentralized concentration and the results have not been, promising. Hansen argues that the'.development effort in Appalachia has been hurt by too much dispersion of aid, which resulted from sev eral states’ attempts to block the adoption of a true growth center policy (Hansen, 1971, pp. 51-62). Similarly, Copes and Steed report that in Newfoundland a poorly devised industrial location strategy resulted in dispersed industrial growth and lost potential agglomera tion economies. "The results, not surprisingly, were discouraging"
(Copes and Steed, 1975, p. 99).
In Poland a policy for "equality in location of productive forces" quickly raised the problem of "co-ordination of the principle of equal ity with the principle of efficiency" (Winiarski, 1969, pp. 293-395).
This experience is consistent with experiences in several other cen trally planned economies like the German Democratic Republic and, again, emphasizes the need for planning authorities to consider the people versus place prosperity issue.
Rodgers has investigated industrial development, regional policy, and migration in Italy and found that although Industrial subsidies did help create some industrial employment, the planning goals were not achieved. The living standard gap between the North and the South actually widened during the 1950’s and 1960’s and migration patterns continued to respond to influences originating outside of the Mezzo- g i o m o development region. These disappointing results are apparently partly the result of the lack of an enforced "locational design" in the
Industrialization program (Rodgers, 1970). 27 Great Britain and Belguim have also not enjoyed much success in
their regional planning efforts. In Britain efforts to decentralize
business activities from London have hot led to an advantage for de
velopment regions, in spite of relatively strict building controls and
subsidies to development regions (European Free Trade Association, n.d.,
pp. 133-134; MacLennan and Robertson, 1969, pp. 42-44). In Belguim a
dispersed, poorly co-ordinated, poorly funded regional policy has not
lessened regional inequalities and, in fact, may have aided wealthier
regions more than poorer regions (Ruehmann, 1968, pp. 84-85; Davin,
1969, pp. 133-135).
Finally, in the German Federal Republic, where regional policy
efforts have been similar to Austrian efforts, Boeventer feels that the
lack of serious regional problems is due to the workings of the free
market and not due to successes of regional development planning (Boe—
venter, 1969, pp. 171, 195). This evaluation does, however, point out
the fact that the impact of regional policy may be beneficial to region
al development but that beneficial influences may also be overwhelmed
by stronger free market forces. Thus, policy can possibly retard forces which arepworking to increase regional inequalities without actually
resulting in inequality declines. This has possibly been the case in
Italy, for example. In the German case, Boeventer is arguing that
policy is only one relatively weak force among many stronger forces which, combined, have resulted in relatively few regional problems in
the Federal Republic. Clearly, then, regional policy must be evaluated within the context of policy1s potential for causing changes in regional 28 structures, given the prevailing set of free market forces and the absolute level of investment in regional development programs.
In conclusion, regional development policy experience suggests that decentralized concentration may or may not be beneficial to the reduction of regional inequalities and is probably, in any event, not a major influence upon changing regional socio-ecomomic structures.
However, this planning strategy is also not necessarily an expensive or high risk alternative for nations which are characterized by diverse economic and political power bases. The adoption of this strategy might, then, produce satisfactory results while minimizing political risks and dissensions, results which may be more important in reality than maxi mal declines in regional inequalities. The Austrian regional planning experience should be examined with these considerations in mind. Chapter 3
REGIONAL GOALS AND REGIONAL POLICY MEASURES IN AUSTRIA
Introduction
The selection of regional policy goals in Austria has taken place within the context of a prevailing philosophy which maintains that re gional policy should emphasize personal freedom of choice, equality in social and economic opportunities (Stoehr, 1964)., and personal economic security. This philosophy is also reflected in the Austrian political framework in which regional policy is implemented. This political framework is a federal system and the rights of independent action on the part of provinces (Laender) and municipalities are recognized and, indeed, exercized.
These rights are assured by legislation and by the national consti tution. Importantly, the authority of the national government, the
Bund, to enact regional policy is somewhat circumscribed by a 1954 court decision which argued that "regional planning . . . is not a special, separate administrative matter, but, from the point of view of constitu tional law, a complex concept comprising all activities serving the purposes of provident planning in the various spheres of administrat ion . . . Thus both the Federal Government and the Laender may engage in activities relevant to regional planning, but each of these author ities may do so only in those fields which, under the division of re sponsibilities provided for by the Federal Constitution, fall within
29 its cognisance" (OECD, 1974, p. 64).. The Bund is further constrained in its authority to make regional policy by the important and consis tent Impact that provincial political power bases have upon decisions made by the Bund within its sphere of potential action. The Bund's authority to act on regional policy is, thus, constrained by both legal and political factors. The provinces are, in turn, also checked in their actions by legal and political powers of the municipalities, which clamor for an equal voice in planning at the provincial and national levels. The municipalities emphasize the importance of co-ordinating their very extensive investment programs with provincial and national regional policy (Oesterreichische Raumordnungskonferenz, 1975, p. 428).
This co-ordination has only recently been legislatively required in most provinces and is beginning by way of a co-operative effort at the national level via OROK (the Austrian Regional Planning Commission), which will be discussed later (Rill, 1975, p. 80).
There is no question about the existence or problematical nature of this "high degree of dispersion of regional planning responsibili ties" (OECD, 1974, p. 65). The dispersion of planning authority has also spawned the creation of separate and often contradictory, regional planning goals by different regions and levels of government. The Bund has long had implicit goals, recently made more explicit by direct state ments from OROK and the Austrian Chancellor. However, the provinces and provincial interest groups have also explicitly defined goals which are often contradictory to both national goals and the planning goals of other provinces. 31
The Goals of Regional Planning
The Bund has shown consistent concern for attaining a goal of
lessening regional Income inequalities. This has been implicit in a
number of institutional and legislative acts taken by the Bund since
World War II and has been made more explicit in recent years. For ex
ample, in 1970 the Austrian Chancellor "emphasized the importance of an
active regional planning policy aimed at creating the spatial pre requisites for attaining equal earning and living conditions for the population in all the residential areas of the country" (OECD, 1974, p. 36). The ministries and 0R0K have also made frequent reference to
the Importance of the achievement of this goal (OIR, 1973a, p. 6 ; 0R0K,
1975, p. 11). The attainment of equal earning and living conditions, however, has generally been interpreted as an attempt to lessen region al Income inequalities and not an attempt to achieve actual equality.
A second major regional planning goal of the Bund is to reduce or halt-net out-migration from many rural regions in Austria (OROK, 1975, p. 165; Bundeskanzleramt, 1969, p. 17; OIR, 1973a, p. 6 ). This goal has gained more backing in recent years, particularly from provinces experiencing continued net out-migration. The main rationale for this goal has been to stop downward spirals in local economic conditions re sulting from massive, often selective, out-migration, which lessens the quality of the labor forces and the size of the local market. Proponents have also noted the importance to national defense of maintaining suit able population densities in border areas (Bundeskanzleramt, 1975a, p. 108; Bundeskanzleramt, 1973, p. 65) as well as the importance of
halting the de-population of many alpine regions in order to protect
agricultural cultivation and its benefits to tourism in alpine regions
(Bundeskanzleramt, 1973, p. 61). Alpine farms create visual contrast
and human interest in mountain regions. The demise of small mountain
communities and the alpine farms would detract considerably from the
character of the mountain regions and potentially cause a loss of tour
ism to nations where the mountain traditions have been maintained.
A third goal, regional full employment, is apparent from actions
of all governmental bodies and from social expectations concerning
economic security. This goal is consitent with a goal of regional
income convergence and, according to one Austrian source, is a goal
which is more lively, to be., fulfilled than that of actual income equal
ity (Trauner, 1969, p. 20).
Regional planning goals of the provinces generally emphasize in
creased industrialization and the reduction of out-migration and out-
commuting from many parts of the provinces. The latter goal is partic
ularly important to the provinces strongly affected by the attraction
of employment opportunities in the German Federal Republic, Switzerland, or Vienna itself. These latter regions have and do receive large num bers of in-migrants and commuters from adjacent Austrian provinces. The provinces are, again, concerned with the loss of labor, with the decline in local market potentials, and often with the threat of de-population in alpine regions.
Several of the provinces have also expressed the desire to lessen 33
intra-provincial income inequalities, which are in some cases quite
substantial. In fact, each province or group of provinces has its
particular problem for which unique goals are established. Notably,
Vienna has as its goal an increase in in-migration and in-commuting, in
direct opposition to the provinces which form its migrant and commuter
hinterland (mainly Lower Austria and Burgenland) (OIR, 1973b, p. 5-12).
Thus, although the provincial goals are generally similar to na tional goals, there are some real and potential conflicts. First, there
Is no guarantee that programs which could be devised to achieve the na tional goal would satisfy all of the provinces. ^h^-s due to the fact
that provincial goals relate to a subnational, i.e. smaller area, and national programs might not be consistent with goal achievement at the provincial scale. Second, there are also cases where the goals of various provinces are in direct conflict, as noted above. And, third, it may not be possible to achieve all three major national planning goals at once; they may be to some extent incompatible. A more de tailed examination of these issues will follow in a later section of the paper.
The Regional Planning Strategy
The planning strategy adopted in Austria is decentralized concen tration, a planning concept that some Austrians themselves admit .to having little or no theoretical underpinning (Seidl, 1969, p. 65;
Butschek, n.d., p. 44). The rationale for this strategy, noted in
Chapter 2, is that smaller central places should be aided in order to 34 intensify local multiplier effects and reduce a d v e r s e effects of over concentration (OECD, 1974, pp. 37-38). It h a s b e e n suggested by one
Austrian regional scientist that this strategy w a s adopted so that
Austrian regional policy might attempt tQ. lessen, urban-rural inequal ities by discouraging the development of " o n e - s i d e d " urban concentrat ions, which are considered by many to be un p r o d u c t i v e . These people also feel that urban concentration has a l r e a d y proce e d e d too far in
Austria, over-taxing existing urban infrastructures and under-utilizing infrastructure in rural and small urban c o m m u n i t i e s (Nussbaumer, 1969, p. 8; Seidl, 1969, p. 64; Seidl et. al. 1966) . T h i s conviction has grown in popularity in recent years, and a t t e m p t s at "discouraging in ternal migration, in order to counteract o v e r — concentration and to pre vent nationally undesireable de-population" h a v e b e e n initiated (OECD,
1974, p. 38). Decentralized concentration, a c c o r d i n g to some, is well suited to achieve this population goal by s t i m u l a t i n g rural centers which might act as catchments for migrants (Beirat f u e r Wirtschafts - und
Sozialfragen, 1972, p. 62). This, further, w o u l d m a k e use of the exist ent infrastructure in these centers in order t o a v o i d costly additional
Infrasturctural investments required by c o n t i n u e d i n —migration to large metropolitan regions. (Nussbaumer, 1969, pp. 9 — 10).
Xt should be noted, however, that there h a s n o t been universal agreement about stemming migratory flows i n A u s t r i a . There are several
Austrian regional scientists who believe t h a t t h e s e population movements are necessary to achieve the major economic p l a n n i n g goal, the lessen ing of regional income inequalities (Loederer a n d Nowotny, 1969, p. 59; 35
Stoehr, 1964, p. 125)'. However, the.theoretical arguments and, no doubt, political conviction of those particularly concerned with
stemming out-migration have prevailed.
Two other notable characteristics of the Austrian planning strat egy has been its emphasis on the importance of improved infrastructure and the conviction that industrial subsidies should be restricted to assistance at the founding of industrial enterprises and not to con tinued aid for an indefinite period thereafter. With regard to infra structure, it has been argued that such Investment is the most important regional industrial policy measure available (Holzmann, 1970, p. 125) and that it is, in general, of "eminent importance" (Pachucki n.d., p.9).
Infrastructural investments create" jobs in the short-term and, in the long-term, improve a region*s locational advantage by improving its attractiveness to industrial and commercial activities (Boekemann, 1975;
Matzner, 1969, pp. 15-16).
With regard to the duration of Industrial subsidies, it should be noted that although there have been many people who have aruged that this aid should not last indefinitely (Bundeskanzleramt, 1969, p. 137;
Stoehr, 1964, p. 125), there is no guarantee that this will not occur.
Finally, it can be argued that decentralized concentration as a planning strategy in Austria has to some extent been chosen by default.
That Is, the existence of a goal to reduce net out-migration from many regions has necessarily shaped the strategy employed to achieve the other goal, regional income convergence. The latter need not have been and, perhaps, should not have been pursued hy the dispersion of resources 36
to many small central places. However, the achievement of the popu
lation goal necessitated this strategy alternative and has had a very
great Influence on the creation of measures to implement regional
policy.
Regional Policy Measures
1. Identifying Problem Regions In Austria
In order to ascertain where regional policy measures should be
applied, the Austrians have defined what are to be considered problem
regions in need of assistance. They now identify six such types of regions. Two of the most important regional types are 1) the regions on the so-called "dead borders" (regions along the Czech, Hungarian, or
Yugoslav frontier) and 2) other agricultural regions lacking in Indus try. These regions, especially the former, have received attention from
Austrian regional planners since independence in 1955. More recently there has also been considerable attention given to regions with 3) structural problems in industry as well as to 4) depressed mining re gions. These areas are generally those with aging iron, steel, and related industries. Finally, 5) alpine agricultural regions and 6 ) urban areas have also been mentioned as problem or potential problem regions (Bundes kanzleramt, 1969, p. 15). Some urban areas are suffering from over-taxed infrastructure while the existing infrastructure of de-populating al pine regions is under—utilized. And, the continuation of public services in mountain areas is threatened by the decline of population below thresh— hold levels which are necessary to provide such services. Policy measures have been devised' to ameliorate the problems of
all of these regional types, and this is another major reason why there
has been such a geographic dispersal of Austrian regional planning ef
forts and monies. Any Austrian region can conceivably be included in
at least one of these six regional types. Attempts to delimit more
precisely or rank order the problem regions have been frustrated by the
lack of provincial co-operation (OIR, 1973b, p. 1). This reflects the
provinces' desires to have as many areas as possible designated as "prob
lem regions". It also reflects provincial reluctance to make the dif
ficult economic and political choices which are inherent in defining what is and what is not a problem region. Thus, for example, officials
in Vorarlberg, one of the wealthier provinces, have argued that much of
the populated region of that small province is in one way or another a
"problem" region (OIR, 1973, pp. 41-42).
Still, institutions and legislation enacting regional policy have, during certain time periods, more narrowly defined "development reg ions" for the purpose of that institution or legislation. These re - gions are most generally the rural, agricultural regions along Austria's eastern borders. However, there are exceptions to this general rule and
"problem" regions as defined by each respective policy measure will be identified below.
2. Regional Policy Measures Taken by the Bund
The Bund has instituted regional policy by way of regional in dustrial and infrastructural measures. The former is generally carried out via investment institutions and tax legislation causing the redis tribution of the tax burden. However, the Bund has also been involved 38
in some important co-operative programs with the provinces. All of
these regional planning efforts will be described below. A more care
ful analysis of the impact of regional policy upon goal achievement
will follow in a later chapter.
a. regional industrial policy measures
Perhaps the most explicit regional industrial policy measure
taken by the Bund was the establishment of the Kommunalkredit A.G.,
an industrial investment institution founded in 1958 by way of encourage
ment from the Bund and funded largely from the publicly owned banks and
federal investment institutions. This investment corporation is over
seen by an advisory board comprised of representatives from several
ministries and from the national leagues of cities and communities.
The purpose of the Kommunalkredit A.G. (hereafter K.K.A.G.) is to create
industrial employment in "development" regions (Oesterreichische Komm
unalkredit A.G. (OKKAG), n.d. , pp. 9-10). This was at one point en
couraged in order to lessen income inequalities within Austria so that
the nation could hopefully withstand expected pressures toward income
divergence upon Austria's entry into E.E.C. (OKKAG, 1962, p. 6 ). Al
though Austria was not allowed entry into the Common Market, the
K.K.A.G.'s goal to reduce income inequalities is, of course, still
in line with national planning goals. Investment funds are loaned at
low Interest for long terms to municipalities which in turn loan them
to industrial enterprises. It is estimated that the investment funds provide a benefit to the investor of approximately 5% of the loan size
* (Wiener Instltut fuer Standortberatung, 1975, p. 57). The investment funds are distributed for projects which will improve the economic 39
structure of regions and particularly if they attract migrants and
commuters to the employment site (Schramke, 1974). Application
must be made for these funds by municipalities, so their distribution
is not only dependent upon need but upon a municipality*s ability
to attract a prospective investor and upon local initiative. During
the period 1959-1966 most of these ''subsidized” investment funds
went to rural eastern Austria; thereafter, however, the aid was
distributed to regions with poorly diversified economies, so that
after 1967 all provinces received at least periodic investment
from the K.K.A.G. Still, the emphasis remains in eastern Austria,
where the poorest province, Burgenland, has been the largest rela
tive recipient. It received about 9% of all of its industrial invest
ment by way of the K.K.A.G. during the period 1966—1972 (OIR, 1973a,
p. 71).
Another public investment fund, the E.R.P. (European Recovery
Program) Fund, has been according to some people, however, the central instrument in the Bund's regional industrial policy (OIR,
1973a, p. 15). It provides more funds than the K.K.A.G., accounting for about 5% of all industrial investment in Austria during 1966-
1970. The E.R.P. Fund was established in 1948 and after 1955 was especially concerned with re-establishing investment incentives in eastern Austria, previously Soviet occupied territory. Though the fund's first explicit regional program began In fiscal year 1972/
1973, the E.R.P. has played a role in regional policy by way of its regional distribution of investment funds. The Fund's purpose has been to create Industrial jobs, especially in regions with structural 40
problems (notably mining regions) and where there were large labor
reserves, i.e., high unemployment. Investment funds are loaned at
a rate of 5% interest for 5-10 years and can comprise up to 70% of
a firmfs investment cost, though shortage of funds has recently
made this less likely. In 1966 a special program was instituted
for coal mining regions, resulting from large mine closures in
Burgenland and Carinthia. This program provides loans for up to
15 years to create alternative employment opportunities. The terms
of the loans are liberal; they include 5 years free of redemption
and 5 years at 1% interest (OECD, 1975, pp.53-54; John, 1974). It is
estimated that regular E.R.P. aid benefits firms to the extent of
about 5% of loan size, and for the coal region program that figure
Is about 20% (Wiener Institut fuer Standortberatung, 1975, p.72).
Legislative action has also been taken by the Bund to improve
\ the locational advantage of regions bordering on Czechoslovakia,
Hungary, and Yugoslavia. This has been in the form of an income
tax reduction, via Increased depreciation allowances for commer
cial and industrial enterprises. Between 1967 and 1974 firms in
these border regions were allowed a 20% (later 15%) higher depre
ciation rate on mobile assets than allowed in the rest of Austria.
After 1974 the rate for all of Austria was equalized when all re
gions were allowed the higher rate enjoyed by these border regions.
It is nearly impossible to adjudge the impact of this law, but it
certainly must have been felt by way of increased investment in the border regions. This was probably particularly true in Burgenland where the entire province benefitted from the income tax reduction 41
(R.ep. Oesterreich, 1967c, pp.1574,1616).
Another legislative measure favoring many poorer regions was a reduction in the transport tax levied on goods transported by motor vehicle over 65 kilometers. The exemption was in force during
1967-1972 and was extended to many poorer, rural regions for cargoes destined for the provincial capital and points directly enroute
(Rep. Oesterreich, 1967b). The measure’s purpose was to Improve the locational advantage of these less accessible regions. Though rela tively modest.in most cases, the savings in Burgenland can, for example, be estimated at a value equal to about 1-2% of total annual industrial investment . The exemption ended with this long distance transport tax was eliminated by the institution of a value added tax in 1973 (Berger, 1975; Foerster, 1975).
The Bund has also, of course, had a large influence on various sectors of the economy. In at least two cases this sectorial involve ment most strongly benefitted particular types of poorer regions.
A mining promotion act of 1967 provided special funds for investment and increased employment compensation for mining regions, particu larly hard pressed regions in Styria (OIR, 1973a, pp.49-52). Also, the Bund gave subsidies of from 1000 to 2000 schillings (about
$6Q to $120) to about 35,000 mountain farmers during the early 1970's
COROK, 1975, p.91). The purpose of the latter measure was to increase farmer's incomes and maintain settlement in alpine regions (Bundes- kanzleramt, 1975a).
The most important sectorial impact of the Bund upon the econ omy is, however, probably by way of the nationalized industries. These national concerns are concentrated in the heavy industrial sectors and have their regional concentrations in Upper Austria, especially at Linz, and in Styria. These enterprises account for something more than 20% of all national industrial employment and production and in Styria and Upper Austria employ about 10% of all employed persons (OECD, 1974, p.61). The nationalized industries affect regional policy and changes in the regional economic structure in several ways. Although the regional distribution of employment in the nationalized industries remains concentrated in a few areas, there have been some jobs created in peripheral regions as a result of production shifts away from metropolitan centers like Vienna.
Jobs have also been created in this manner on the Upper Austrian-
Bavarian border, where there have been attempts to lessen German influence on the Austrian labor market. The nationalized industries have also been involved in an important co-operative attempt to di versify the economic base in a stagnating industrial region in Styria
Aichfeld-Murboden. This project will be discussed in a later section
After independence in 1955, the nationalized industries also played an important role in revitalizing the economy of eastern
Austria by shifting internal investment funds from western (formerly
American-Britlsh occupied) to eastern (formerly Soviet occupied)
Austria. This aid was intended to ameliorate an east-west income differential that is still noticeable today (Fatscha, 1975, pp.126- 43
Finally, the nationalized industries have grown rapidly in
the Linz area contributing to the very rapid economic change there.
Employment, income, and migration changes in this region indicate
that Linz is perhaps the most rapidly growing center in Austria.
The successes of the nationalized industries in Linz have played
a very important role in this development, particularly in the
creation of inter-industrial linkages (Gatscha, 1975, pp.126-130).
Regions near Linz have shown spectacular declines in net out-migration,
apparently owing to increased commuting and new local employment
related to growth in Linz. Additionally, regional Income inequali
ties in Upper Austria have declined considerably since 1961. Thus,
there is reason to believe that the successes of nationalized indus
try in Upper Austria have had important effects upon the realization
of national and provincial planning goals in that province.
The Federal Ministry of Social Affairs (Bundesministerium fuer
soziale Verwaltung) has also played an important role in regional
policy. The Ministry has 1) provided potential industrial investors with Information regarding site selection and 2) made available
funds for the protection of endangered jobs and' retraining of
unemployed workers. The industrial information service was estab
lished in 1956 in response to high levels of unemployment in many Austrian regions. During its first 10 years it served over 200
firms, which created a total of 16,000 new jobs (Bundesministerium fuer soziale Verwaltung, 1966). The Ministry also financed training for thousands of workers in order to assure their employability; this aid was extended to nearly 73,000 workers in the period 1965- 44
1972. Aid to over 5,000 workers who were temporarily unemployed due to plant renovation was also extended during this period (Bundes- ministerium fuer soziale Verwaltung, 1966-1972). These types of aid increased sharply in the early 1970's under new labor legislation which also provided funds for 1) credits and subsidies to enterprises which created new jobs or which were threatened with closure and for 2) proper winter clothing for workers who might otherwise have been threatened with seasonal unemployment (OIR, 1973a, pp. 18-27).
During the period November 1969 to April 1972 these latter types of additional aid amounted to about $15 million and were largely con centrated in areas of high unemployment and/or high out-migration
(OECD, 1975, pp.43-44).
At this point it should’be clear, then, that the Bund has at- tampted to implement regional industrial policy measures which would encourage additional industrial employment, especially in regions f suffering from high levels of unemployment and resultant net out migration, The Bund's attempts to promote personal economic security have, of course, also implied attempts to raise income levels and, % thereby, reduce regional income inequalities.
b. regional infrastructural policy measures
The greatest influence that the Bund has had upon infrastruc tural development in the poorer provinces derives from the manner in which federally collected taxes are redistributed. These taxes are redistributed by way of the Finanzausgleichgesetz (Financial 45
Adjustment Law or simply F.A.G.), which has existed throughout the postwar period. Most taxes are not redistributed according to.re
gional revenue collection, but, rather, are dispersed according to population size. This clearly is a distinct advantage for regions with below average income.
Through 1972 the wine, wage, and sales taxes were distributed to provinces largely according to population. The distribution of petroleum tax revenues was somewhat more complicated. Seventy-five percent of this tax was distributed to provinces according to a formula incorporating population and areal size, extent of the highway network, and receipts from auto license and commercial taxes.
The remaining 25% was then allocated to Lower Austria, Styria, and
Burgenland according to their respective shares of the first 75%.
Further tax redistribution was achieved by dividing among provinces and municipalities all Vienna tax revenues exceeding 33% of re- distributed taxes. This was also done for one-half of the tax reven ues in cases when Vienna's share fell between 30.5% and 33%. (Those latter terms have been altered somewhat in favor of Vienna in the most recent F.A.G.)(Republik Oesterreich, 1972, 1967a, and 1959).
Finally, provinces with per capita tax incomes below the national average receive from federal funds the difference between the national average and their’ per capita tax revenues in accordance with the
Kppfquotenausgleich (per capita tax adjustment). In 1970 this amounted for example, to a benefit of $6 million for Lower Austria (Verbin- dungsstelle der Bundeslaender, 1972). Division of funds to the municipalities from federally collected taxes has been conducted essentially as described above with two important differences. First, the population of municipalities is weighted; municipalities with populations greater than 50,000 are weighted by 2 1/3 while those w i t h populations less than or equal to 1000 are weighted 11/6, wi t h several graduations in between.
This weighting system is designed to recognize the greater infra structural and service requirements of larger municipalities. Its
t institution resulted in a rapid decline in the number of municipal ities. This was caused by the consolidation of many, often small, municipalities into larger units w hich might potentially receive appreciably more tax revenues from the Bund. This process has resulted in the disappearance of some 2000 small municipalities and in sub sequent cost reductions In the provision of administrative and pub lic services. The second difference between provincial and munici pal tax revenues distribution is that municipalities which have tax revenues below the provincial average receive 30% of the difference between what Is then referred to as "financial need'* and "financial strength". This latter municipal tax feature has some similarities to the Kopfquotenausgleich, which applies to provinces (Foerster,
1975; Republic Oesterreich 1972 and 1967a).
This rather elaborate tax redistribution system has provided and continues to provide substantial benefit for poorer provinces and municipalities. The apparent benefits are, however, greater than the real benefits, since, for example, some taxes are collected at the company headquarters and not at the production site. In such, cases the tax 'redistribution only re-establishes equitable tax revenues per employee. Still, there is no question that many regions have benefitted from the redistributive effects of the tax system.
Burgenland, for example, receives more federal taxes back than are collected there, while the average return to Austrian provinces is less than 60%. In fact, in 1970 these "extra" federal tax returns to
Burgenland comprised more than 30% of total income for the provincial and municipal governments within that province. The absolute size of this redistributive tax benefit significantly exceeded the amount of all public construction investment in Burgenland in 1970 (Bundesminis terium fuer Finanzen; Verbindungsstelle der Bundeslaender,1972). The
F.A.G. has almost certainly helped increase investment in infrastruc ture in all poorer parts of Austria by increasing the fiscal base of the provinces and municipalities, which account for about 2/3 of all pub lic investment in Austria (Matzner, 1969).
Since 1959 the F.A.G. has also provided special subsidies for
"entwicklungsbeduerftige Gebiete", or regions in need of development.
The funds available have been modest in size but specifically intended for poorer regions. Originally the subsidies were given to regions which had municipal tax revenues 50% below the national average and/or regions with unemployment levels 25% above the national average (Repub- lik Oesterreich, 1959). The 1967 F.A.G., however, required only that % tax revenues, unemployment levels, and geographic location be taken into account Otepublik- Oesterreich, 1967a). And, the 1973 F.A.G. attempted to avoid continues political disagreement about subisdy 48
levels by providing about $300,000 to Burgenland and dividing another
$2 million among all provinces depending upon population and areal
size (Republik Oesterreich, 1972). At present, the provinces themselves
decide what constitutes a development region and do not always make it
easy to determine where the funds are spent (Stipschitsch, 1975). How
ever, information from provincial officials and accounts for Burgenland,
Styria, and Lower Austria, indicate that most funds have been used to
improve infrastructure and to promote industry, agriculture, and tour
ism (Land Niederoesterreich, 1961-1967; Land Steirmark, 1960-1968;
Stipschitsch, 1975).
The Bund, of course,- has also been directly involved in infrastruc tural investment itself. Unfortunately detailed data on the Bund's in-
frasturctural investments are not avlalable. However, there have been
some regional policy considerations in the Bund's highway and railroad
investment policies. Until the late 1960*s highways were built out of
dire necessity in response to existing traffic conditions. Exceptions
to this rule, though, did exist. The Vienna-Linz-Salzburg autobahn, begun by Hitler was completed after World. War IX in order to link
Austria to free Europe. A national highway was built the length of
Burgenland to improve accessibility within the province and to the national highway system. This road was meant as a substitute for a
rail line which served the same purpose in the old province of West
Hungary, now divided (along with the rail line) between Austria and
Hungary. And, in Carinthia provincial and national efforts have
succeeded, in providing a well integrated road network advantageous 49
to tourism (Jessl, 1975; Hadn, 1975).
Mora recently, due to increased funds for construction and elimi
nation of the backlog of repair and other necessary improvements, the
Bund has begun planning highways to improve regional accessibility.
The best examples include new highways improving accessibility to
Vienna, especially a new highway between the Vienna Basin and the Wald- viertel, a rural, low income region on the Czech-Lower Austrian border.
There are also several projects, newly completed, in construction or planning, to connect northern with southern Austria across and under the main ridge of the eastern Alps. These new roads will improve the accessibility of Carinthia and Styria, which are seriously disadvan taged by their poor access to E.E.C. markets. . Finally, it is notable that Vienna has received substantial subsidies from the Bund in order to help the city construct its subway system. This aid is in addition to large public transit aid provided the capital according to the 1973
F.A.G. (Jessl, 1975; Hadn, 1975).
Railroad operations have been less affected by regional policy than have highway construction activities. The national railroads form the vast majority of the network and must by law operate according to efficient, economic pronciples. However, in order to close a branch line the railway must submit an economic-demographic impact report, which could result in a federal subsidy to keep the line open. The subsidy would be intended to maintain a line which is deemed important to maintain economic and demographic vitality in the region. The other most notable regional policy action taken by the Austrian National
Railways in the postwar period was the construction of a line in the 50
1950's connecting Klagenfurt and Graz. These provincial captials had previously only been linked by a line traversing Yugoslav territory
(Petzmann, 1975).
Transport policy may begin to become more active in regional plan ning following the establishment of the Ministry of Transportation in
1973. It has been suggested that this ministry adopt as one of its goals an improvement in the accessibility of Austria to the E.E.C. and as another the integration of Austria's peripheral regions into the national transport network (Jaeger, 1973).
The Bund is also concerned with an expansion of the university system, especially in provinces other than Vienna. It is felt that * such expansion represents an important investment in human resources and can provide economic and demographic stimulii for growth in pro vincial centers (Kehlbacker, 1974). Vienna, however, had the fastest growth in the number of university students during the 1960's and remains the undisputed center of higher education in Austria. Linz and Salzburg also experienced relatively rapid growth in their uni versity enrollments during this period and a small college was recent ly founded in Klagenfurt. There will be growth during the 1970's in these and other provincial centers, but Vienna is presently scheduled to again receive the greatest investment in higher education (Bundes- mlnisterium fuer Wissenschaft und Forschung, 1972, and 1973).
3. Federal - Provincial Co-operative Programs for Regional Policy
There are several joint federal—provincial activities which have affected or implemented regional policy in Austria. An Important 51
body, the Austrian Conference on Regional Planning (hereafter OROK),
was recently created to co-ordinate regional planning at all govern
mental levels. OROK consists of the Chancellor, the Secretary of
State, the Provincial Governors and representatives from the munici
palities, the ministries, and the chambers of labor and business
(the latter non-voting members). It is supported by a permanent secre
tariat and subsidiary committees made up of regional planners (OECD,
1974, p. 65). Since decisions must be unanimous, progress has been
slow toward the goals of 1) establishing a regional planning concept
for all of Austria and 2) co-ordinating regional policy measures taken
by the Bund, the provinces, and the municipalities (Beirat fuer Wirt-
% schafts- und Sozialfragen, 1972, p. 38). However, the Conference has
agreed upon a list of national goals or priorities which more or less
embody the 3 major national planning goals discussed earlier. The
Conference has also begun to serve as an important publisher of books,
articles, proceedings, and legislative information relating to regional policy. OROK has also been involved in the co-operative investigation and consideration of policy alternatives for several types of prob lem regions. Among other things, it has undertaken or sponsored work related to the border regions, both the "dead” border regions in the east and the western border areas under strong influence from other nations. Notably, OROK has sponsored work through the Austrian Insti tute for Regional planning, a private research group which has been active in local and national planning in Austria since the mid—1950's.
This institute has been an Influential advisory body and has published relating to regional planning for more than 20 years.^ 52
The most publicized and ambitious co-operative regional planning
effort in Austria has been the Aichfeld-Murboden Program, a planning
project undertaken by the Bund, Styria, and local municipalities in a
declining mining and industrial region around Judenhurg, Styria. Na
tionalized Industry accounts for 55% of all jobs in this region and
existing high wages, especially in mining, have discouraged some in-
i dustrles from locating here despite available labor (OIR, 1969,
pp. II-III). All three levels of government have co-operated in what was intended as a showcase regional planning project, the purpose of which was to improve infrastructure, attract industry, and co-ordinate
financial assistance. New industry was to be attracted by way of ex-
\ panded credit from the E.R.P. as well as credit from provincial and local sources. Infrastructure was to be improved by the construction of 750 new apartments, funded largely by the Bund, by the establish ment of several new business and technical schools, and by the improve ment of roads and natural gas pipelines to the area (Wagner, 1975a, pp. 77-82). By June 1975 the area had benefitted from an increase in
1800 jobs, the construction of about 200 new apartments, and the im minent completion of more apartments, schools, and transport projects
(Vfagner, 1975b). Still, high unemployment persists in spite of heavy investment and the project has been labeled by one Viennese newspaper as the "problem child" rather than the "showplace" of Austrian region al planning (Die Fresse, 1975). However, the area's problems may well have been worse in the absence of the project?
A third co-operative program which involves the Bund is the E.R.P.
"Sofortprogramm" or Immediate Program for the Eastern Border Regions. The program began Initially in Lower Austria in 1970 with about $7 million annually scheduled for Industrial credit, the largest part
coming from the E.R.P. with smaller inputs from the Bund and the pro vincial government. The Bund and Lower Austria, however, also committed
themselves to increased infrastructural investment in the border regions, especially for schools, roads and water systems. There was also a commitment for increased aid to agriculture and tourism (OROK, 1975, pp. 21-24). The program has been extended to other provinces bordering on the socialist states of Eastern Europe. The goal of the entire border region program is to halt out-migration from these areas by creating the incentives and infrastructure needed to attract higher wage jobs in stable industries. The industrial credits are loaned at
1% interest, and, therefore, impjart a very large benefit on the invest or. Between 1973 and 1975 the program is credited with creating 2200 new jobs in diverse industries (Republik Oesterreich, 1967bl Bundes- kanzleramt, 1975a). Also, the program's priority has been such that it has not been subject to credit reductions which were instituted for other programs at the national level for a time in order to combat inflation (Kohlbacher, 1974).
4. Provincial Regional Planning Measures
Until recently there were few explicit provincial regional policy measures. Now all of the provinces have taken actions related to regional policy, but quite often the attempt is to implement regional policy by interpretation of existing economic legislation. Oily Lower
Austria has a large number of explicitly defined policy measures. 54
a . Lower Aus t r ia
Recent Lower Austrian regional planning efforts represent, without
question, the most active role a province has ever taken in regional
planning. Since 1969 Lower Austria has passed a series of legisla
tive measures designed to lessen regional income disparities and size
out-migration from many rural areas (OIR, 1973b, p. 6). The strategy
adopted has, again, been "decentralized concentration", with an empha
sis on increased industrialization and improved infrastructure.
The first action taken was in 1971 by the passage of a law for
creation, improvement, and security of specified locations for indust
rial and commercial enterprises producing goods for non-local markets.
The law affects all of Lower Austria but most benefits the eastern border regions. The measure*s purposes are to improve the economic situation in these border areas by creating jobs and to attain "opti mal" economic growth for Lower Austria as a whole. There are two fi nancial measures incorporated into the law. First, enterprises creat
ing 10 or more new jobs in the border regions can receive subsidies
to help pay for investment in equipment. For investment in any one
of the designated "development locales" (Ausbauorte) or in the lead
ing center of a lower level administration unit (Gerichtsbezirk), an
enterprise receives a subsidy of approximately $1150 per newly created job. For investment in other places with populations greater than
10Q0 the figure is about $800 and in all remaining places $575 per new job. These subsidies can also be made to firms investing outside of
the border regions. Decisions in these cases are made on an individual 55 basis by the province. The second financial measure makes available
interest subsidies for investment credits. This :subsidy amounts to between 2 % and 4% depending upon the central place rank and location of the community involved. In all, some 700 places are eligible for aid under the financial provisions of this law, about 200 of which are located in the more advantaged border areas (Land Niederoesterreich,
1971b).
Another legislative action taken in 1971 was the passage of a law for the improvement of municipal structures in Lower Austria. This law changed municipal boundaries, leading to the reduction in the number and an increase in the size of the provinceTs municipalities. The pur pose of the measure was to create units which were large enough to provide necessary administrative services. Another incentive for this I action was, of course, the potential tax benefits accruing to larger municipalities under the conditions of the F.A.G. (Land Niereroester- reich, 1971a).
In 1973 a law creating a Central Place Regional Planning Program was passed. The goals of this legislation are the improvement of central place services, improvement of accessibility to those ser vices, and the encouragement of non-agricultural employment. The leg islation particularly applies to border regions and to central places which, given their central place rank, are deficient in the provision of certain urban services. The legislation calls for the provision of central place services where they are lacking and assistance to public and private services where they are endangered. It also calls for home construction assistance to assure "minimum" central place population 56 levels and aid to improve accessibility to the central places, in cluding the provision of public transport where possible. Finally,
the law empowers the province to provide special credit assurances and interest subsidies for businesses in the border municipalities. The law affects all of Lower Austria but most benefits the border areas and a group of about 150 larger central places (Land Nlederoesterreich,
1974b).
A fourth legislative measure, the Border Region Planning Program passed in 1974, proposes to improve infrastructure in the regions along the Czech and Hungarian borders. It empowers the province to extend subsidies to municipalities in these regions for infrastructural in vestment. The province is to provide these funds according to a dis tribution system which favors municipalities with lower than average tax revenues and those larger central places designated in the Central
Place Regional Planning Program (Land Niederoesterreich, 1973).
The widely dispersed aid given by Lower Austria as a result of all of -these policy measures reflects the provincefs conviction that a more concentrated investment program would lead to continued de-pop- ulatlon of many regions (OIR, 1972, Lower Austrian section p. 8).
It is felt that the policy of decentralized concentration will help to maintain local population bases and assure threshold levels for many services, the provision of which will, in turn, further lessen the likelihood of out-migration. And, the strengthened central places are intended to serve as catchments for migrants who might otherwise go to large metropolitan areas within or outside of the province. This is 57
considered to be all the more important for the border regions which
In. many cases have been cut off from parts of their functional eco nomic regions across international borders. Consequently they have suffered considerable out-migration because of a re-orientation of their economic "relationships to larger, more dominant urban centers
(Land Niederoesterreich, 1974a).
b. Burgenland, Carinthia, and Styria
These lower income provinces are particularly concerned with less ening the impact of out-migration and often emphasize industrial job creation to provide improved economic opportunity for the unemployed who might otherwise out-migrate. Burgenland is also concerned with % heavy out-commuting (OIR, 1968, p. XXII) and has been aided in the search for industry by an Association for the Advancement of Industry in Burgenland, later renamed B.I.B.A.G. (Burgenlaendische Industrie- und Betriebsansiedlungs Ges. M.B.H.). B.I.B.A.G. has assumed that more industry would slow outward labor mobility and has been active in co-ordinating provincial and federal efforts to provide credits, subsidies, and information to prospective investors. Their efforts have been especially vigorous in areas of high unemployment. B.I.B.A.G. has been instrumental in the rapid increase in industrial employment, estimating that it has served firms which have eventually created
10,000 jobs In Burgenland (B.I.B.A.G., n.d.; Verein zur Foerderung der
Burgenlaendischen Wirtschaft, n.d.). 58
The provincial government in Burgenland has, like Lower Austria,
reacted to the population provision in the F.A.G. by encouraging
smaller municipalities to join together.• These efforts have bene—
fitted Burgenland*s municipalities with an estimated 15% increase in
redistributed taxes. The provincial government has also generally
emphasized the need to concentrate industrial growth and has attempted
to affect this by way of its sectorial industrial credit policies
(Szorger, 1975 and n.d.).
Carinthia and Styria have also implemented regional policies in
attempts to lessen out-migration. Styria offers some aid to poorer
municipalities for improving infrastructure (OROK, 1975, p. 332) and
has been active in the aforementioned Aichfeld-Murboden project.
Carinthia has attempted to direct aid to regions' with low rates of job
creation and with high rates of out-migration and out-commuting. The
aid is generally provided through existing legislation for economic
assistance to businesses. It is claimed that these efforts have created and helped maintain nearly 9000 jobs in some of the poorer parts of
Carinthia during the past several years (OROK, 1975, p. 236).
c. Upper Austria, Salzburg, Tirol, and Vorarlberg
These medium and higher income provinces all have at least one provincial goal in common, the reduction of influence from the Ger man Federal Republic and/or Switzerland on their labor markets. A particular problem has been rapidly' increased commuting from-border regions of these provinces across the international borders. The Bund 59
and the provinces became especially concerned with this problem
beginning with the construction boom in Munich prior to the 1972
Olympics, but the problem pre-dated the Olympics and has persisted
into the mid-1970fs. These mountainous provinces are also all con
cerned with alpine habitation and have in some cases taken overt
action to impede depopulation in the mountains.
Tirol, in fact, favors the erection of an "economic border wall"
to combat the attraction of Bavaria for Austrian labor. To achieve
this goal and the goal of halting depopulation in the mountains,
Tirol has been providing modest subsidies for certain development re
gions and areas threatened with depopulation. Tirol has been active
in the latter regard since at least 1962 and provides farmers differ
ential agricultural aid based on the difficulty of the farming con
ditions in each particular region (OROK, 1974, pp. 37-38; Land Tirol,
1975). This agricultural aid is intended to lessen out-migration from
alpine regions and to maintain cultivation in these regions, in part
to enhance scenic contrast for the benefit of tourism.
Vorarlberg and Salzburg have been particularly concerned with
infrastructure and its relationship to migration. Salzburg has been
attempting to improve housing and transport facilities in order to
produce a positive effect on the economic and social forces of de velopment in the border regions (OROK, 1974, p. 36). Vorarlberg has al
so provided extra aid to low income and mountain municipalities for
infrastructural investment in order to lessen out-migration from such
areas (for example, see: Land Vorarlberg, 1970). Mountain areas in
... / 60
Vorarlberg have additionally benefitted from.funds provided by the
Bund for regions in need of development and from aid provided by the
province for small businesses. The latter provincial program provides
a 4% interest subsidy on loans up to $60,000 for business construction
or expansion (Land Vorarlberg, 1975). Alpine farmers receive the
same "difficult conditions" aid received by farmers in Tirol and may also receive up to $20 per he’ad for stock kept in mountain pastures.
The aid is, again, intended to help agriculture and tourism.
Upper Austria is not only concerned with out-migration and out- commuting to Bavaria but with rather large intra-provincial income differentials (OIR, 1973b). The province wants to encourage a geo graphic dispersion of industrial employment via a strategy of de centralized concentration. Provincial officials feel that their economic and population goals will most likely be achieved by the growth of central places, which will serve as migrant and commuter centers (OIR, 1972, pp. 7-11). Relevant legislation in Upper Austria includes laws which provide modest, special aid to border regions and
Interest subsidies in. specified development regions-(OROK, 1974).
d . Vienna
Vienna is an entirely urban province and, as such, its internal spatial socio-economic variations fall below the scale considered here.
Vienna*s growth policies, however, do affect several neighboring pro vinces, particularly Lower Austria, which encircles it, and Burgenland.
Vienna*s population goals, for example, stand in direct opposition to 61
other provinces’ goals in eastern Austria (OIR, 1973b, p. 12). The
city’s rather old age structure has caused severe labor problems and
It actively encourages in-migration. The city has attempted to solve
migrants* biggest single problem upon entry into Vienna - locating
housing. There are programs to do this for Austrians and for the
substantial stream of foreign workers coming into the city. However,
the housing market is still somewhat tight in Vienna. This is also
true for the availability of industrial land, another shortage which
the city is attempting to ease. However, Vienna’s efforts to en
courage industry within the city meet considerable competition from
Lower Austria which welcomes industry to Vienna’s suburbs, which are
located in Lower Austria (Proniboek, 1975).
The economic and social goal conflicts existing between Vienna
and Lower Austria are but one example of a larger set of such conflicts i existing at the provincial and national levels. In this case, how
ever, hesitant co-operation is emerging, at least at one level - the mutual planning of public transport in the Vienna metropolitan area.
Conclusions
In general the provincial and national planning goals and strat egies are similar. The most apparent similarity in the choice of goals
is the desire of the national government and most of the provinces to lessen the mobility of Austrian labor. This is in response to depopu
lation and downward economic spirals in many Austrian regions. How ever, there are conflicts with regard to this and other goals, and 62
their resolution is not enhanced by the un-co-ordinated nature of national and provincial planning programs. OROK is attempting to encourage more co-operation in planning at all levels, but progress has been slow toward the adoption of a truly national planning strat egy.
The type of planning strategies now employed at the national and provincial levels is generally decentralized concentration. This strat egy is potentially compatible with the achievement of the three n a
tional and most important provincial planning goals. It: ls also po litically realistic, although the political process could endanger the success of the strategy's application by causing too much dispersion of available funds. Unfortunately, as evidenced by the preceding descriptions of policy measures, this is a real and pressing problem.
The policy measures applied in Austria at the national and pro vincial levels are also quite similar. Measures to aid industry gen erally provide incentives for investment by making industrial credits easier and less expensive to obtain. There are various types of meas ures which are designed to improve Infrastructure, the most Important of which are the various tax redistribution programs. These provide a much stronger fiscal base for the municipalities, which are the most important investors in public infrastructure in Austria. Other steps to improve the. infrastructure of lower income regions are often taken by utilizing existing legislation to channel extra funds to these areas.
The impact of these policy measures upon the socio-economic structure of Austrian regions is not easy to ascertain. Several of the provincial programs are quite new', and their Impact may not yet
be visible. It is also difficult to .get hard and fast data for many
programs. This is sometimes due to the fact that the programs have
only recently begun or sometimes because policy measures are inex
tricably tied up in more general, sectoral economic policy. In other
cases the data are simply not available for public scrutiny. However,
data>are available for some policy measures and these data will be used
in analyses to follow. The next chapter will outline some of the techniques" "to be used in these analyses, followed by a chapter outlin ing trends in regional inequalities in Austria. Then, in Chapter 6, an analysis of the impact of some of the policy measures described in this chapter will be presented. \
Chapter 4
DATA AND METHODOLOGY
The purpose of this chapter is to describe the methodological
techniques employed in the analyses and to comment on the data uti
lized in them. The chapter will make clear the reasons for the use
of particular data and techniques and there will be a discussion of
problems related to their usage. This should provide a fuller under
standing of the problem and avoids lengthy footnotes in the text of
the analysis chapters which follow.
Regional Units
The correct choice of the proper regional units for consideration
is an Important prerequisite to meaningful analysis. First, it is
important for a study of the type undertaken here that functional
socio-economic regional units be chosen in order to successfully iden
tify economic relationships within the national economy. Unfortunately
data are generally collected by political unit and it is not al
ways easy to aggregate or disaggregate the data into meaningful func*~ tional units.
As elsewhere, data are collected by political unit in Austria at
the provincial, district (county), and "Gemeinde" (community or munic-
^ ipality) levels. There are 9 provinces, 97.districts, and (in 1976)
about 2500 municipalities. The municipal data would be very useful
64 65
in constructing functional units, but not all data are available at this.level and the sheer number of observations makes data handling cumbersome. The problem is made all the more intractable by chang ing municipal borders which make data comparability from one census to another a very difficult problem.
Fortunately data collected at the distirct level does generally reflect functional economic units. This results from the fact that district "seats" are generally the highest order central places in the districts. And, the district often includes an area which is in tegrated economically and socially owing to the concentration of eco nomic activities and public services at or on the district seat. A map of districts in Austria is not radically different from a map of functional central place regions (Bobek, 1961). Many of the dis crepancies occur because several towns and cities have been given separate district status from their hinterland. In order to re solve this problem the data were generally aggregated into 82 dis tricts in order to produce a truer economic unit. This has been done throughout the analysis but has not been employed for all of the maps.
Maps 11 and 12 employ all 97 districts so that the rural-urban nature of net migration can be shown most vividly. Another exception is that although Wien Umgebung (suburban Vienna) and Moedling are joined with
Vienna for purposes of analysis, they are always mapped separately in order to show some detail in the socio-economic patterns around
Austria*s most important metropolis.
When district data were not available, data were collected at the provincial level. Again, these units in most cases form reasonably
good functional units and are not inordinately large; they have pop
ulations ranging from 275,000 to 1,600,000. An indication of the func
tional nature of provincial units is the fact that with the exception
of Lower Austria, Burgenland, and Vienna, all provinces have the great
est migratory interaction with their respective provincial capital.
This is not true for Lower Austria and Burgenland which are oriented
toward Vienna. This results from the fact that Lower Austria has no
capital (its provincial offices are in Vienna) and Burgenland's cap
ital is a very small town near Vienna.
In many respects these latter two provinces are part of a large
economic region in eastern Austria dominated by Vienna. However, there
are some significant differences in levels of socio-economic well-being within this region and an aggregation of these three provinces would
hide the variations between Vienna, the wealthiest, and Burgenland, the
poorest province. And, in at least one sense some parts of Burgenland
and Lower Austria only belong to the Viennese economic region by default.
Parts of both provinces ij o w have little or no contact across the eastern borders into Hungary and Czechoslovakia, something which has resulted
from the Cold War and has seriously disrupted the economic units of Cen
tral Europe. For example, parts of Lower Austria might now be oriented
to Brno and Bratislava, Czechoslovakia and Budapest were it not for the unsettled political relationships in Central Europe. Similarly, parts
of Burgenland would probably be somewhat oriented to Budapest, Sopron,
and Szombathely in Hungary and less toward Vienna. It is in this sense,
then, that parts of Lower Austria and Burgenland belong to the Viennese 67
region by "default"; these regions are at the "tails" of Vienna1s met
ropolitan influence. Some parts of eastern Austria, thus, should not
be Included in a functional unit with Vienna. Unfortunately, the t boundaries of the functional units in eastern Austria do not run along
provincial borders. However, in order to resolve the latter problem and
to alleviate the related problem of aggregation noted earlier, analysis
at the provincial level has been carried out using the 9 provinces as
observations; Vienna, Burgenland, and Lower Austria are, thus, all con
sidered seperately.
A second consideration in the choice of regional units relates to the
effect of scale upon the results of any analysis. Thus, for example and
as noted earlier, functional economic units are needed here to properly
evaluate the impact of Austrian regional planning upon the changing
socio-economic structures in the nation. The most interesting investi
gation of this impact would be at lower level functional units, i.e.
districts, but the unavailability of the necessary policy data at that
scale make such a study impossible. The use of provinces for this in
vestigation results in a rather small, though satisfactory, data base.
On the other hand, a good Investigation of migration must be carried out using smaller scale units and that has been possible here.
The regional units employed for the analyses, then, are provinces and districts. The choice of these units was in some cases dictated t by data availability, but in all cases the units are adequate for the investigations of the relationship between regional policy and chang ing regional structures in Austria. 68
Data Sources
Data for Austrian regions are generally satisfactory. For this
investigation they are derived most frequently from the censuses of
1951, 1961, and 1971. A great many other data sources were, however, sought out and some of these data proved useful in the investigation.
The two greatest weaknesses in data availability are in the areas of income and investment statistics. The latter data are collected but remain confidential, creating a considerable handicap for re search. However, the data are available to the Oesterreichisches
Institut fuer Wirtschaftsforschung (Austrian Institute for Economic
Research), which then publishes useful indices of income. These in dices include gross and net domestic product. Gross domestic pro duct data are available by province for intermittent dates between
1952 and 1964 and then, at the time of this writing, for 1964-1972.
Net domestic product is available by district for 1961 and 1971. The latter data are also reported per employed person, one indication of
Income levels. However, income per capita is also useful, since it helps to account for variations in dependency ratios among regions.
The analyses were conducted using both per capita and per worker data in order to provide two views of income variation and change in Austria.
Not too surprisingly, the results from both sets of data were quite similar.
Investment data are especially difficult to collect for Austria.
Estimations by province for industrial investment are available from the Economic Research Institute and from the Oesterreichesche Sta-
tistische Zentralamt (Austrian C e n t r a l Statistical Office, hereafter 69
O.St.Z) beginning with the mid-1960's. Data on investment in infra structure is, however, even more difficult to obtain but is available
for some time periods from the accounts of the provinces and munic ipalities by way of the O.St.Z. Federal infrastructural investment data are not available.
One other data set which requires some comment is the migration data set. The migration data utilized in this investigation are in direct data derived from demographic statistics. A region's net mi gration rate is calculated by using known values of population size and birth and death rates for the time period being considered. These data can be assumed to be quite accurate for Austria, where demographic
data are carefully collected.
Methodology
Several quantitative techniques have been used in the analyses, some of which require some clarification at this point. First, in order to measure regional inequalities two different aggregated meas ures of inequality were employed. Each has distinctive characteristics which both encourage and discourage its use. It was ffelt that the use of hath would provide the most information and best opportunity
for thoroughly investigating changing regional inequalities in Austria.
One measure is the coefficient of variation shown below.
I P Regional Inequality^ r-1 r(Ir-T)
I i-'
70
where, ?r - population, in region r
lr « income per capita in region r
I « national income per capita
This measure has been employed by many researchers, notably Williamson
(1965), and has the added benefit of producing inequality values
ranging . 0.0 to 1.0. However, the method squares deviations from
the mean, which tends to exaggerate extreme values vis-a-vis .near aver
age values. A second measure using information statistics avoids this
problem by using logarithms. An example of this statistic for the pro
vincial level is shown below (Semple, n.d.):
I zr Regional Inequality = r=l (GDPr) (log2 _____) Y
where, GDPr - % o f gross domestic product accounted for by region r
Ir and I are as above .
This statistic has the additional advantage of being completely in
sensitive to changes in regional income differentials caused by in
flation (assuming inflation rates are equal everywhere). However,
this statistic has not been as widely used as the coefficient of
variation and does not have a constant range of inequality values.
Using both measures, then, seemed to be a reasonably good strategy,
and it was anticipated that*, in any event, strong forces toward in-
*' ■ come divergence or convergence should be reflected in the values of
both. This proved to be true and adds reliability to the results. 71
It should be noted, though, that these results derive from aggregated
statistics; they measure inequality at one specific scale and as
applied here do not reflect inequalities that exist within the par -
ticular units being studied.
The use of sets of simultaneous equations in the analysis-also
requires some comment. The procedure was adopted in order to model
complex interrelationships existing between sets of variables, such
as the interrelationsips existing among variables used to explain mi
gration flows. The method is designed to remove the simultaneous bias
from interdependent variables used in a regression analysis by pro
ducing estimates of the independent (regressor) variables which are
uncorrelated to the error terms. This is necessary to fulfill the
assumptions of regression and to obtain unbiased estimates. The bias that must be removed is the extent to which the dependent variable
influences the independent variables. The problem is resolved by
estimating the independent variables using exogenous variables which
are uncorrelated with the error terms (Willis, 1974, pp. 121-132). i 1 . This estimation procedure, however, may create identification
problems for the regression equations. Willis provides the follow
ing explanation of identification:
To be identified, an equation in a model of G linear equations must exclude at .least G-l of the variables that appear in the model. This is a necessary order condition. The rank condition for identification also exists. An equation in a linear model of G equations is identified if, and only if, at least one non-zero determinant of G-l rows and columns is contained in the array of coefficients formed as follows: starting with the row and column array of coefficients in the 72
model, omit all columns not having a prescribed zero In the equation in question, and omit the row coeffi cients of that equation. ^ (Willis, 1974, p. 133)
The problem referred to earlier arises, however, when there are more independent variables in the equation than are required to estimate
the parameters. This is referred to as overidentification and results from the fact that the order condition is more than satisfied
(Christ, 1966, pp. 323-327).
The problem can be resolved by using two-stage least squares
(Willis,' 1974, p. 134). Two stage least squares replaces indepen dent varialbes with estimates which derive from a first-stage esti mation of the independent variable so that this variable is not cor related with the error terras resulting from its regression upon the dependent variable (which is the second-stage) (Johnston, 1972). In its application here, the two-stage least squares technique has been employed to.estimate variables which are themselves determined within the simultaneous equatios system (i.e. endogenous variables).
Since they are determined within the system, the direct use of these endogenous variables would result in biased estimations owing to correlations between themselves and the error terms from re gression. Their estimated can be utilized, since the estimation procedure makes use of variables which are good predictors of the endogenous variables but are not highly correlated with other var iables in the equations system. The variables utilized as predictors can either be variables within the equation already or other variables being estimated. In this study the former procedure has been used. 73
A point also must be made here concerning the use of t-scores
In the presentation of regression results. These scores are pro
vided not in order to test significance levels but in order to
assess the reliability of relationships among variables derived
from the Austrian data set. This data set is considered to be a
population and means, standard deviations, and regression coef
ficients derived in the analyses are assumed to represent popu
lation statistics and not estimates. However, when regression co- efficeints have low t-scores their standard errors of the estimates are large. Even for a population this would suggest that there is considerable error in the regressor1s estimation of the dependent variable (see: Draper and Smith, 1966, p. 16). In such a situa tion there would be less confidence in the regression coefficient as an indicator of the nature of the relationship between two var iables. Thus, in order to provide some indication of the reliabil ity of regression coefficients, t-scores will be reported with all regression results.
Finally, some comment is also needed regarding the use of path analysis in this paper. Good reviews of the technique are presented in Fararo (1973) and Van de Geer (1971). Path analysis is disigned to disaggregate correlations between variables into direct and indirect components. Indirect components derive from the relationship between two varlalbes via a third, intermediate variable. The relationships between variables can be identified by-using correlation, partial correlation, or regression coeffi cients (See: Van de Geer, 1971, pp. 112-127). The technique is especially useful in situations where an entire equations system is 74 under investigation. In such a case the net impact of, for example, a policy measure can be broken into direct and indirect effects in order to ascertain the measure's diverse impact upon a nation's socio-economic structure. This is one of the technique's applica tions in this study.
In order to calculate the direct and indirect effects of one variable on another, a diagram is constructed which graphically portrays the interrelationships among the entire set of variables, as postulated by the researcher. The "paths" between variable are given values which derive from correlation or regression analysis,
These values are then referred to as path coefficients. To cal culate the effect of a variable X on a variable Y, one "walks" along all possible paths from X to Y, multiplying path coefficients which are met along the way and summing over all paths (Van de Geer,
1971, p. 124). This provides a total or net effect; the product of any set of paths between X and Y provides an individual indirect effect.
Unfortunately, the application of the technique is not as sim ple as has been suggested thus far. There are a number of problems which are encountered in any: real world application. First', the multicollinearlty inherent in any Interrelated system can result in
Inaccurately estimated regression coefficients, which in turn cause problems in the calculation of direct and indirect effects utilizing the path (or regression ) coefficients. This problem can only be avoided 75
by eliminating the problems of multicollinearity in the original
regression equations. However, multicollinearity can be minimized
by utilizing factor analysis to extract minimally correlated factors
which can be introduced into the regression analysis. This, though,
results in an obliteration of the original variables, which in this
case are policy insturments and essential to the analysis. A sec
ond method to minimize multicollinearity is to remove variables
from the analysis which are most highly correlated with other var
iables in the regression format. This, of course, detracts from
the optimal theoretical structure of the equation system but was
an acceptable option in its application in this study and has, thus,
been employed.
Second, there is a problem of verifying the results from path
analysis. Fararo (1971) and Spady and Greenwood (n.d.) maintain
that the net effects produced by the model should correspond to
the simple correlations between variables in the model. However,
this writer is not convinced that it is necessary to satisfy this
condition. Differences between the results from path analysis
and the results of correlation analysis may, indeed, be caused by
an imcomplete specification of the model but not necessarily in
validate results from the path analysis. It is possible that the
path analysis results may produce lower levels of explanation
than correlation analysis due to the absence of important explan
atory variables which are correlated to both dependent and inde pendent variables in the analysis. However, such variables might 76
also be absent from analyses where path and correlation analysis
results are similar. In this case the absent variables might, In
fact, be the true explanors while Independent variables Included
In. the analysis closely co-vary with dependent variables due to
complex Interrelationships in the data set. For example, this is
fhe case where there is a high degree of correlation between levels
of aid provided by the Kommunalkredit A.G. and by redistributed
taxes from the F.A.G. The relationship is not causal but, rather,
coincident, and placing a "path" between the two variables might
produce misleading results.
In any event, it would not seem wise to depend upon a com
parison of the results from path and correlation analyses to de
termine the adequacy of the model as specified by the researcher.
Rather, the model must be constructed upon a firm theoretical base
derived from a knowledge of the relevant literature. Then the
results from path analysis may indicate ways to improve the model by 1 ) failing to substantiate hypothesized relationships and/or by 2) indicating where intermediate variables are missing. In such cases the path analysis model may still help identify par tial relationships which can serve as a base for a subsequent improved model.
The path analyses used in the investigation which follow will, then, not be evaluated according to their ability to duplicate results from correlation analysis. The results from these analyses 77
will instead be interpreted as results stemming from a partial
systems analysis. They will thus not be immediately accepted
as indications of causality since causality cannot be determined ‘ by path analysis; it can only be inferred from theoretically sound
and complete equations systems, a condition which is not satisfied here. Chapter 5
REGIONAL CHANGE AND REGIONAL INEQUALITY IN AUSTRIA
The changing structure of Austrian regions and internal levels of inequality must first be set in the perspective of m o d e m day Austria.
The nation must now cope with problems stemming from its location in
Europe, problems which arose with the dissolution of the Austro-
Hungarian Empire and which create disadvantages for Austria in its new role as a neutral, border state.
First, Austria is disadvantaged by "its unfavourable geographical location on the periphery of the Western European economic area" (OECD,
1974, p. 12). This disadvantage is further exacerbated by lingering
Cold War tensions and subsequent impediments to economic co-operation between Austria and its East European neighbors. Vienna, the capital,
Is, after all, located well east of Prague on a potentially Important but little used, navigable river, the Danube. Thus, as the result of natural features (mountain chains) and Europe's political divisiveness,
Austria suffers from poor accessibility to real and potential sources of economic stimulation.
Austria has also been forced to adjust to the end of its imperial era, during which the nation was an important Europena power and the economic center of parts of Central and Southeastern Europe. Austria, a small mountain state thrust deeply into socialist controlled Europe, now must deal with..regional problems common to other nations, yet problems which are made more difficult by Austria's location in Europe.
78. 79
Despite claims .that Austria suffers from ''massive regional ine
qualities” (OECD, 1974, p. 1), these inequalities are not as great as
those in many other European nations (Wiener Institut fuer Wirtschaft-
sforschung, 1959, p. 12). Austria also has no major urban problem area
in comparison to France or Britain. Austria's problem regions, de
scribed previously, are mainly rural border areas in the eastern part
of the country. These areas suffer from sectorial imbalance, from the
disintegration of Austro-Hungary, and from the failure of a restora tion of pre-World War I economic relations in central and eastern Eur
ope.
At the end of World War I Austria was reduced to 1/8 of its pre - vious size as the result of the dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian
Empire into several succession states (Pachucki, 1967, p. 8 ). The
empire's demise resulted in serious economic problems for many regions which have not all overcome the disadvantage. Lower Austria's north
ern border region, the Waldviertel, lost contact with Important textile
activities in Bohemia. The eastern Alps lost tourists, something which
further worsened after World War II. Wiener Neustadt lost the imperial
defense industry, and its resumption under German auspices lead to heavy
destruction during the Second World War (OIR, 1966, p. 26). Burgen—
land, part of western Hungary until after World War I, emerged as an
Austrian province, but a poor one owing to Its earlier association with less progressive Hungarian rule and to its severance from the rest of its former province and major city, Sopron. This region has also been hindered by its historical role as an oft devastated, oft 80
Ignored borderland.(Burghardt, 1962, pp. 236, 278). The dissolution
of the empire also resulted in a severe loss in.accessibility for
Carinthla owing to the loss of the port of Trieste (Proksch, 1962,
p. 30). Carinthla, in fact all of southern Austria, continues to
suffer from poor access to the European market. .
During the inter-War period Austria struggled to cope with eco
nomic realignment, and difficulties in that sphere helped generate
political problems as well. The period, of course, culminated in in
corporation into the Third Reich. Austria emerged from this exper
ience with a greater sense of national identity as well as an impor
tant new heavy industrial region at Linz. The War, however, took a
heavy economic toll on Austria by way of Soviet reparations and oc
cupation and by way of the depletion of the working age groups, which
has resulted in periodic labor shortages. Eastern Austria, occupied
by the Soviets, was especially disadvantaged because of the lack of
incentives for private investment and because of poorer opportunities
for trade (Streit et. al., 1967, p. 2; OKKAG, n.d., pp. 4-5). The
legacy of occupation and effects of the Cold War continue to depress
living standards in many eastern regions. The relative economic
opportunities available to the East are considerably less than those
available to the West as is well illustrated by the trade flow data
presented in Map 1.
However, the post-War era has been one of economic and political
success for Austria. It reachieved complete independence in 1955 and has enjoyed stable political conditions and steady economic growth 81
ever since. All of Austria has benefitted from this growth, although
Styrla has lagged'behind somewhat. (This related to the steel
crisis of the early 1960’s and lingering structural problems in the
Styrian economic structure (Jeglitsch, 1975, p. 29) ). Regional
inequalities are less than in other European nations and these ine
qualities have declined in recent years.
Income Inequality
The best and perhaps most important example of declining regional
inequality in Austria is provided by the examination of income data.
Regional income inequalities declined during the 1960's and early
1970!s at both the provincial and district level. These declines can be largely related to the lessening of industrial concentration, par
ticularly benefitting lesser industrialized areas of the East, and to
the rapid increase of tourism and related tertiary acitvities In the
West (Butschek, n.d.; p. 32).
In 1971, 26.4% of Austria’s gross domestic product derived from
industry, about 6% from agriculture, 23.8% from commerce and trade,
10*1% from construction, 6% from transport, and the remaining 27.7%
from various service industries and activities. Map 2 displays
regions which are heavily dominated by either industrial or agricul tural activities In Austria. Th® major industrial axis extends from
Vienna to northern Styria. There is also a lesser Linz-Salzburg axis.
The eastern border regions are predominantly agricultural. The re maining districts have either more sectoral diversity or large ter- I tiary sectors (Jeglitsch, 1967). i Data source: O.StZ German Federal Rep. Federal German Map 1. Austrian trade with Central Europe. 100 100 Km represents 10 million represents schilling Austrian
Jo Total Trade with Neighboring Nations in 1970 Sectoral Shares of Gross Domestic Product by District, 1971
ISSS >40% in industry
>20% in agriculture diversifid or large share in service sector
oo 100 Km <-o Data aourca: Jaglltach, 1076
Map 2. Sectoral structure of the economies of Austrian districts. 84
This regional economic structure has an important impact on re
gional income levelsi The only available regional income statistic
at the district level is net domestic product/worker, and Map 3 dis
plays districts where incomes differ considerably from the median. A
comparison of Map 2 and Map 3 reveals that there is a strong relation ship between industrialization and income. Map 3 illustrates the
fact that large urban and important tourist centers also enjoy rela
tively high, income levels.
However, industrial deconcentration and increased tourism during the 1960*8 has, as noted previously, caused declines in regional in come inequalities. This is illustrated by Map 4, which depicts the districts where income grew most rapidly during 1961-1971 and by Map
5 depicting districts with above average industrial employment growth.
A comparison of Maps 3 and 5 reveals the fact that industrial growth has been greatest in heretofore agriculturally dominated districts.
A comparison of Maps 4 and 5 illustrates the point that this sectoral diversification has often led to marked improvement in income levels.
In 1971 the distribution of income by province favored Vienna and the West. The data presented in Table 1 verify this. The rank order for both, income measures is quite similar, and it- can be rea-
. j sonably assumed.that the data adequately represent relative income equalities. Absolute income inequalities may be somewhat less, how ever, since there is considerable commuting from some of the lower income to higher income provinces. These data do not reflect that in come flow, because both, measures only account for income generated at the production site. Net Domestic Product/Worker, 1971
(000's Austrian schilling)
m >ioo
Q U <100, >75
E V j < 75
100 Km a Data sourca: Jeglitsch, 1976 j
Map 3. Net domestic product/worker, 1971. Percentage Change in Net Domestic Product/Worker, 1961—1971
Data, eourca: Jaglttach, 1976
Map 4. Change in net domestic product/worker.1961—1971. Change In Industrial Employment as a
Percentage of Total Employment
>5% growth
<5% growth
(midlon=3.3%)
oo 100 Km Data aourca: O.StZ.
Map 5. Change in Industrial employment, 1961—1971. 88 Regional income inequalities showed declines during the 1960's at both the provincial and district levels. Table 2 presents the results of investigations of provincial income inequality using two measures of income and two measures of income inequality. Although the results vary somewhat, there is a clear tendency toward declining
Income inequality during the time period investigated.
Table 1
Provincial Income 1971 (Austrian Schillings)
GDP/capita NDP/worker
Vienna 75,033 Vienna 126,400
Salzburg 63,517 Vorarlberg 113,000
Vorarlberg 61,258 Salzburg 107,100
Tirol 57,004 Tirol 104,800
AUSTRIA 55,405 AUSTRIA 101,600
Upper Austria 54,631 Upper Austria 96,900
Lower Austria 47,113 Carinthla 91,100
Carinthla 46,507 Lower Austria 87,100
Styria 44,174 Styria 85,900
Burgenland 30,906 Burgenland 66,500 sources: Jeglitsch, 1975; Jeglitsch, 1976 . Table 2
Provincial Income Inequality
GDP/capita NDP/worker Annual Annual 1964 1972 Ave. change 1961 1971 Ave. change
Coefficients of .2276 .2079 —1.08% 1718 .1663 -0.32% Variation information .03634 .03099 -1.84% 02257 .01996 -1.16% statistic
Data on GDP/capita were available for each year from 1964 to 1972, and
in this case the period 1964-1968 showed a slight increase in inequal
ity and then, during 1968-1972, a more rapid inequality decline. There
is also some evidence that income inequality increased during the 4 period 1952-1964, so that there appear to be emerging tendencies to
ward and forces creating provincial income convergence.
Income inequality also declined among the political districts. m In this case only net domestic product data were available for compar
ison for 1961 and 1971. Table 3 presents results which again indicate
income convergence. 90 Table 3
' District Income Inequality
NDP/worker
1961 1971 Ave. Annual change coefficient of variation .2620 .2155 -1.77%
Information statistic .06570 .04158 -3.67%
This tendency toward income convergence is also pronounced among
districts within any given province. The decline is greatest in the
higher income provinces, but this result is probably somewhat related
to the fact that most of these provinces have a small number of dis
tricts. Income increase In any one district has a larger relative im
pact on the provincial inequality than would be true of such an In
crease In the larger, lower income provinces. Results of an investi
gation of intra-provincial income inequalities are presented in Table 91
Table 4
Intra-Provincial Income Inequality
NDP/worker (coefficient of variation)
1961 1971 Ave. Annual <
Vorarlberg .0763 .0267 -6.50%
Tirol .1703 .0747 -5.61%
Upper Austria .3012 .1962 -3.49%
Salzburg .1630 .1146 -2.97%
Styria .3371 .2380 -2.94%
Burgenland .2496 .1767 -2.92%
Lower Austria .2301 .2113 -0.82%
Carinthia .0951 .1031 +0.84%
Data source: Jeglitsch, 1976
Unemployment
Like income, unemployment changes in Austria indicate declining
regional inequality. Unemployment data by province are available be
ginning with 1954 and Table 5 presents these data for 1954 and 1973. Table 5
Average Annual Provincial Unemployment'(Province of Residence)
Absolute change 1954 1973 1954-:
Vorarlberg 2 . 2 0 . 8 -1.4%
Vienna 7.9 1 . 0 -6.9%
Salzburg 3.8 1 . 2 -2 .6%
Styria 7.0 1.5 -5.5%
Upper Austria 6.6 1 . 6 -5.8%
AUSTRIA 7.6 1 . 6 -6 .0 %
Tirol 6.5 1. 8 -4.7%
Lower Austria 917 1.9 -7.8%
Carlnthia 8.4 3.1 -5.3%
Burgenland 20.3 4.2 -15.9%
source: Bundesralnisterlum fuer sozlale Verwaltung
As might be expected, the lower Income provinces generally ex- perlence higher rates of unemployment, however these provinces have
shown large declines, especially Burgenland. Styria has fared some what better than the other lower Income provinces, but it is also threatened with the loss of many jobs in the future with the potential closure of large mining operations. Unfortunately the lower income provJnces also suffer the greatest fluctuations in employment levels, the higher income provinces the least. For example, in 1973 Vorarl— bergfs monthly unemployment pealc (1 .2 %) was only 0.4% above the 93
annual average, but In Burgenland the.peak C12.2%) was 8.0% above
the average (Bundesministerium fuer soziale Verwaltung). Thus, ‘job
security, measured by seasonal unemployment, as well as employment
opportunities are poorer in lower income provinces, although there has
been consistent and marked improvement in both respects since these
statistics have been collected.
Unemployment changes at the district level were also large during
the period 1961-1971. Maps 6 and 7 present these data, clearly illus
trating the unemployment problems of the agricultural districts along
Austria's eastern borders. By 1971 the situation had improved consid
erably due to out-migration, out-commuting* Increased industrial em
ployment, and a changing population age structure. Some of these
forces have contributed to greater economic opportunity and security
for many rural regions, but in particular the border regions.
Other Indications of Changing Regional Inequality
One fairly sensitive indicator of social inequality is infant mortality. Austrian infant mortality is now fairly low, although there
are some regional variations. These variations do not, however, al ways conform to variations in income levels. This is apparent from a comparison of Maps 3 and 8 . And, unlike unemployment, fluctuations
in the infant mortality rate do not appear to be greatest in lower in
come regions. Several “inor Epidemics caused infant mortality increases
in many political districts•during the period 1970-1973 in comparison with the 1965-1969 average. The districts experiencing such increases
/ Unemployment, 1961
annual avt. >5%, ptak month >10%
Y/X\ annual avt. >5%
| | annual avt. < 5%
100 Km VO Data sourca: Bundaamlnlaterlum fuar sozlala Varwattung
Map 6. Unemployment, 1961. Unemployment, 1971
annual ava. 5 >%, paak month 10 > %
^ / X A annual avo. 5 >% ^
| 1 annual ava. 5 <% ) '
Data aourca: Bundaamlnlstarlum fuar aozlala Varwattung
Map 7. Unemployment, 1971. Infant Mortality, 1970-1973
r a >30.0
<30.0, >22.0
IV.l <22.0
(m«an=25.6)
Data aourco: O.StZ.
Map 8. Infant mortality, 1970—1973. 97
are identified in Hap 9. No clear spatial pattern emerges and there
is, again, no clear relationship with income level. This seems to
indicate that infant health care has improved enough in poorer regions
so that the threat of periodic fluctuation is no greater than in high
er income regions.
The most significant evidence for the reduction of regional ine
qualities in Austria is demonstrated by the results from a factor
analysis investigating changes in factors derived from nine socio
economic variables at the provincial level. These variables include
the three variables noted thus far plus six others. The factor load
ings are reported in Table 6 and the factor scores in Table 7. The
factor scores present a good summary of existing regional inequality
and changes in this since 1957. Factor 1 identifies some of the basic
characteristics of provincial socio-economic structures. Factor 2,
on the other hand, is a composite of several variables which reflect
consumption patterns in Austria. The two factors explain 83.4% of the
variance in the raw data and have a factor correlation equal to -.435.
Using the coefficient of variation, factor 1 changed -14% and factor
' 2 -16% during the period 1957-1971.
These results and several other indications point to the fact
that regional Inequalities are declining at both the provincial and
district levels in Austria. This is true for basic economic consid
erations like income and employment opportunities, for social indi
cators like infant mortality, and for measures of consumption like
auto and television ownership. These trends are completely consistent Increases in Infant Mortality
m m
100 Km Data aourca: O.StX.
Map 9. Infant mortality increases for 1970—1973 in comparison to 1965—1969. 99
Table 6
‘ Factor Loadings:
Variable Factor 1 Factor :
Income/capita 0.986 0.077 hospital beds/capita 0.972 0.209 % population non-agrlcultural 0.789 -0.250 monthly unemployment peak -0.837 0.188 annual unemployment average -0.761 0.261 % apartments electrified 0.172 -0.755 TV sets/capita -0.052 -0.912 autos/capita -0.008 -0.946 infant mortality -0.005 0.913
Data source: Jeglitsch, 1976; 0. St. Z., 1975a, 1957-73 1955 -72, 1955-73, 1963, 1953; Seidl et. al., 1966.
Table 7
Oblique Factor Analysis: Factor Scores
1957: Factor 1971: Factor
1 2 1 1
Vienna 1.57 1.19 1.40 -1.74
Salzburg 0.34 1.26 0.70 -1.51
Vorarlberg 0.84 0.89 0.56 -1.30
Tirol -0.10 0.97 0.44 -1.14
Upper Austria -0.18 1.20 0.24 -1.24
Styria -0.11 1.77 0.08 —1.00
Lower Austria -0.59 1.54 -Q.Q7 -1.18
Carinthia -0.61 1.86 -Q.Q9 -0.91
Burgenland -3.07 2.67 -1.47 -1.Q3
Data source: see Table 6 100
with regional policy goals. The nature of the causal relationship
will, however, be considered in the next chapter.
Net Migration
Changes in the pattern of net migration are an Important cause
and effect of other regional changes and are particularly relevant
to regional planning in Austria. It is, as noted earlier, Austrian
policy to inhibit the depopulation of many rural regions. This policy was developed in response to net migration patterns which have existed
in some cases since the late 19th century, but in particular in re
sponse to immediate post-war experiences. Net migration losses have
limited population growth in many regions but In some these losses have
resulted in absolute population decline over a considerable period of
time. Map 10 depicts regions which tjave experienced consistent popu
lation decline during the last century. Again, it is the eastern border regions which are identified. These regions are characterized by "old” population structures, often the result of long periods of selective out-migration. Out-migration has resulted from poor eco nomic opportunity, related to the absence of significant Industrial ization as well as the lack of commercial ties.across the eastern boundaries. Even Vienna has experienced long-term population decline, in spite of consistent net in-migration. Age selective suburbaniza tion (the suburbanization of the younger part of the populace), a gen eral aging of the city's population (both causing fertility delclnes la the city), and Vienna's sharply reduced political role in central
Europe have resulted in population declines for the city proper for Population Decline during the Period:
BS53 1890-1961
Map 10. Population decline In Austrian districts. 102 some time. The metropolitan area has, however, maintained population stability.
An. interesting aspect of the net migration pattern in Austria is the close coincidence of nodal net migrant regions with provincial boundaries. Examining 1961-1971 data, it was found that with very few exceptions political districts had their largest net migration losses to the respective provincial capital. Lower Austria, with its government seat in Vienna, and Burgenland, with its old capital now in
Hungary and present capital a small town, are both oriented to Vienna.
Styria is oriented to Graz, Carinthia to Klagenfurt Cor, in some cases,
Villach), Tirol to Innsbruck, and Vorarlberg to Feldkirch and Bregenz.
The only real exception to this adherence to provincial boundaries is the orientation of two western Upper Austrian districts to Salzburg.
All of Salzburg province is oriented to Salzburg and the greatest part of Upper Austira to Linz.
The migration of Austrians to these major cities is also an in dication of a more general tendency of rural to urban migration. This tendency is noticeable in migration data for the period 1951-1961 and 1961-1971, presented in Maps 11 and 12. These maps also document the fact that many regions have suffered and, in many cases, continue to suffer from heavy net out-migration. This is particularly true for the eastern border regions and poorly accessible regions of south central Austria. The tendency, for migration away from the eastern borderlands and toward western Austria is clearly observable from results of a study , of the asymmetric portion of total migratory flow Population Change Resulting from Net Migration, 1951—1961
pop, growth >5% f CZH c h a r ,. <5%
l*.*.1 pop. dtclin# >5%
Q S'
0> & 103 100 Km Data sourca: O.StZ.
Map 11. Net migration, 1951—1961. I Population Change Resulting from Net Migration, 1961—1971
m pop. growth >5% 4
I . * . * ] pop- dtdint >5% 104 100 Km Data aourca: O.StZ.
Map 12. Net migration, 1961—1971. 105 in Austria (MacKinnan and Skarke, 1975; Tobler, 1975). The "wind vectors" of Map 13 originate from the centroids of all political districts and represent the intensity and direction of migration move ments which, are not counterbalanced by movements in the opposite direction.
However, perhaps the most important conclusion which can be de rived from recent Austrian net migration is that there has been a decided decline in population loss resulting from out-migration in many parts of Austria. The eastern border districts have especially experienced lessened net out-migration, although the net figure is still negative. The most spectacular decline has, however, been in a five district region west of Linz where migration resulted in the net departure of 30,038 people during the period 1951-1961 but only 1,471 during 1961-1971.
These trends in migration in Austria, as well as clear indica tions of the convergence of incomes (and living standards in general) leave no doubt that regional inequalities, including variations in social and economic levels of well-being, are declining in Austria at both the provincial and district level. These trends are coincident with Austrian planning goals. However, the results presented above do not necessarily- imply that a causal relationship exists between the achievement of these goals and regional-planning efforts. The fpllowing chapter will investigate the causal factors involved in the trends observed here and attempt to evaluate the impact of the planning ef fort. If a positive relationship between planning and regional change Wind'Vector 106 100 Km Source: MacKinnon and Skarke, 1975
Map 13. “Wind" vectors in Austria. is established, the effectiveness of the Asutrian planning strategy will have been established. Chapter 6
EVALUATION OF AUSTRIAN REGIONAL PLANNING
Introduction
An evaluation of Austrian regional planning efforts is presented here in two sections. First, there is a consideration of goal con flicts, which exist both between the goals themselves and between the goals' of various regions. Second, there is a two part analysis of the impact of planning upon the achievement of planning goals. This includes an analysis of the importance of policy measures relative to provincial investment levels and a causal analysis of the achieve ment of the planning goals in Austria. The latter investigation is pursued at both the provincial and district levels utilizing a simul taneous equations format and path analysis.
Goal Conflicts in Austrian Regional Planning
Goal conflicts in Austrian regional policy exist in three differ ent forms. First, there is a potential conflict between at least 2 of the 3 major planning goals, specifically between income convergence and the lessening of net out-migration from ruralregions. Second, there are potential impediments to the achievement of the planning goals at both the national and provincial levels. For example,
108 109
national Income convergence might be best achieved by a continuing
decline In the relative income levels in Vienna. Clearly, however,
it is very unlikely that Viennese city administration would be will
ing to support any national policy which embodied such an implication.
Third, and finally, the provinces themselves espouse provincial goals
which are not always consistent with the planning goals of neighbor
ing provinces.
1. Potential Conflicts Between Planning Goals
The. most notable conflict between planning goals in Austria is the
issue concerning income convergence and the lessening of net out
migration from rural regions. The controversy concerning the effects
of net out-migration upon a region was outlined in Chapter II. As
noted earlier there are many researchers who favor out-migration in
situations where regions do not have or cannot attract the other re
quisite factors of production needed to assure long-term employment 9 growth and stability. This argument is based on notions of national
economic efficiency and attempts to emphasize "people" as opposed to
"place prosperity". However, there are also many researchers who em
phasize the economic problems caused by selective out-migration, which may result in downward spiralling local economies and population densities below levels required for tourism or national defense (see literature review).
Authorities implementing regional planning in Austria have thus far been most convinced by arguments emphasizing the problems created by out-migration. However, the national goal to lessen net out-uiigra- tion from many rural regions creates several potential problems, some 110
which are special to Austria. One of these problems relates to
migration movements in western Austria, where there is much concern
about the loss of Austrian labor to Bavaria. Specifically, there
has been concern that Linz has lost influence upon its traditional
migration field in Upper Austria due to influences from the German
Federal Republic (OIR, 1973c, p.143). It is possible that regional
policy is lessening the "pull" of Austrian metropolitan areas upon
the rural populace while the influence from German metropolitan
regions remains unimpeded In cases where people are considering migrating to urban centers for social rather than economic reasons
(i.e. the attractiveness of the urban life style), a German metropolis may seem to be more attractive than an Austrian city. Thus, regional policies to strengthen local economies may have an impact on economic
causes of migration but may not provide alternatives for those po
tential migrants who are more concerned with the social benefits of urban life. Such a policy impasse would most likely not exist in a situation where regional policy emphasized growth in large or medium-sized cities, as would be the case with the use of a growth center strategy.
Another special problem created by a policy to inhibit migration in Austria relates to subsidies to mountain farmers. These farmers have poorer possibilities to mechanize production, a shorter growing season, and usually smaller farms than farmers elsewhere. As a result, net productivity per man hour in mountain agriculture is 25% to
40% below productivity on the plains. Social amenities and infra structure are also often lacking in the mountain communities and Ill provision of these services Is more expensive In the mountains than elsewhere. It Is no surprise, then, that people are leaving mountain agriculture for places where they will have greater economic and social opportunities. This out-migration concerns Austrian officials who argue that depopulation in the mountains hurts tourism and is a "hardship to individuals". They feel that a "purely passive attitude
toward this migratory movement) would be irresponsible" (OECD,
1974, p.29). In order to remedy the situation the government recom mends improving social and economic opportunities in the mountains so that they are roughly equal to those in the non-mountainous region (OECD, 1974, p.29-32).
Direct and indirect subsidies to mountain farmers are now in existence at both the national and provincial levels, but the con tinuation or expansion of these would require serious contemplation.
It would seem to be very inconsistent with attempts to reduce in come inequalities and potentially very expensive to seek to improve economic and social conditions in regions which are as disadvantaged as the mountain farm communities. Out-migration is this case ap pears to be in response to real differences in efficiency and not as a result of efficiency differences caused by the distortions in investment patterns noted by Friedmann. Austrian efforts to impede out-migration from poorer mountain regions, if successful, certainly mean either lessened regional income convergence or slower national growth resulting from the large income transfers that would be necessary to achieve this particular goal. A reasonable and potentially effective compromise on this issue might be the 112
selection of a few mountain communities for a concentration of aid
which is now distributed over all mountain regions, so that the
goal to inhibit out-migration might be achieved in areas which,
for example, are most influential on tourism (e.g. the Inn Valley,
Krimml, and Kltzbuehl regions, portions of the Salzkammergut, etc.).
In addition to the Income convergence-migration issue, Austrian
regional policy also must face another potentially contradictory sit
uation. As outlined previously, national and provincial authorties
are concerned about economic problems on Austria's borders. This
includes the problems of economic stagnation in the east and the prob
lems related to the flow of labor across borders In the west. A
seeming contradiction is the contention that the problems in the east are partly the result of closed borders while, quite clearly, problems in the west are the result of open borders. Steps to close
the borders in the west might well result in the kind of problems existing in the east, and an improvement of political and economic relations with Eastern Europe might well result in the outflow of east Austrian labor to cities like Prague, Brno, Bratislava, Sopron, and Budapest - cities in nations, which, like the German Federal
Republic, are short of labor. In short, there is no guarantee that Austria would experience only positive effects as the result of increased international economic Integration. More likely, the net effect would be positive and the nation would have to accept the Inevitable negative economic effects related to inter national competition. 113
Austrian authorities have taken and are considering action to
alleviate the impact of these adverse economic effects of inter
national economic integration. Thus, for example, one of the motiv
ations for subsidies to industries locating in rural Lower Austria
is to combat the attraction of Bavaria for Austrian labor (OROK,
1974, pp.44-45). Another example is the unwillingness of Austria
to always consider more general European accessibility in its
autobahn location decisions in Vorarlberg and Tirol (Meingast,
1965, pp.110, 123). At the same time, however, Austria is con
cerned with German regional aid in southern Bavaria and the po
tential for counterproductive regional policy competition in the
Swiss - German - Austrian border regions (OECD, 1974, p. 1).
In fact, this issue is a fairly complex political and economic
problem that faces Western Europe in general. Again, the problem
revolves around "place" and "people" prosperity. Efforts by
individual nations to achieve all domestic goals may well result
in poorer international economic efficiency, which in turn adversely affects the economies of all of the nations. The nations of
Western Europe, Austria included, are in the position of having
to make difficult political decisions concerning the prospective economic benefits of relinquishing some domestic political control over their respective national economies. The problem for Austria, is, perhaps, especially difficult, since Austria straddles the gulf between the economic systems of Eastern and Western Europe, 114
and since Austria borders on no less than seven other nations.
2. Goal Conflicts between Regions in Austria
Goal conflicts between regions in Austria exist among all three levels of governmental authority - national, provincial, and municipal. However, the conflicts are most visible with respect to the goals of' the federal and provincial governments. These conflicts pose a considerable problem for the implementation of national policy, especially because of the limited authority of the Bund to oversee all aspects of regional planning. Cer tainly the situation in Austria does not meet Friedmann's con ditions that "A national policy of regional development must be designed to deal with the diverse problems of development re gions as a comprehensive system of interdependencies" (Friedmann,
1966, p.45). In fact, a prominent Austrian researcher feels that
"Regionalpolitik 1st die Politik des Regionalegoismus" (Marzner,
1975), which is at least partially true in Austria.
This regional egotism or egocentrism is only another mani festation of the problems discussed earlier with regard to inter national co-operation. Here the only difference is one of scale.
In thLs case the provinces, protecting their own interests as they see them, take actions which are incongruous with action at the national level. For example, when requested to rank order priority regions for a ministry involved in regional planning, the provinces responded by delimiting such regions but not rank ordering them 115
for priority of action (OIR, 1973b', p.l). This response was,
no doubt, the result of provincial politics and the desire to
make the elimination of aid for any particular region more dif
ficult, and to place any such responsibility on national and not
provincial authorities.
The provinces also attempt to retain as much control as pos
sible over the allocation of development funds, which frustrates more integrated national planning (Streit, et. al., 1967, pp. 16,23).
This has had a very great impact upon the selection of a planning strategy. The choice of decentralized concentration as a planning strategy reflects the power of provincial and local political interests. However, given the level of decentralization, there is some question whether subsidized regional development will sig nificantly further national development. There is, as noted by a prominent Austrian economist, the danger of the encouragement of low-wage industries and the creation of one-company towns in the rural hinterland (Nowotny, n.d. p.53).
Again, the problem of incorporating optimal national development into a system characterized by fragmented political authority neces sitates difficult political decisions. The spirit of political compromise and accomodation in Austria which has brought stability to a society with many cleavages (Steiner, 1972, p.284) provides an appropriate context, but perhaps results in too much accomodation, for local interests. An active planner in Austria, Rudolf Wurzer, has correctly assessed the situation. He argues that there is no 116
sense In pursuing politically unrealistic development plans but that
Austria must rather view itself as an entity greater than the sum of its provinces (Wurzer, 1969, p.54).
Unfortunately, the provinces not only jealously protect their powers vis-a-vis the Bund, but also exercise those powers in a way which contradicts the efforts of other provinces. Goal conflicts among provinces is greatest in eastern Austria, where each province is particularly concerned with satisfying the demands of an expanding economy with sufficient labor resources. Thus, Lower Austria and
Burgenland are very concerned about the out-migration and out-commuting of labor from those respective provinces, in spite of the fact that this factor flow may be best for the larger economic region (OIR, 1965, p.43). Lower Austria is not only concerned with labor movement to
Vienna but to Linz as well (OIR, 1972; Lower Austrian section p.8) and, yet, continues to develop a provincial development policy which fails to enhance alternative urban growth centers within the province.
The resolution of goal conflicts among provinces must evolve from the same political dialogue which is necessary to resolve problems at the national and international level. The problem is one of agree ment upon a course of action which Is deemed optimal for all levels of government and all regions taken as a sum, and upon a course of action which recognizes that it is impossible for progress without a change in the status quo. Clearly, change will cause adverse influences upon most, if not all regions. However, a direction must be chosen which minimizes these influences and maximizes growth and development for the larger politlcal-grographlcal entity. 117
Policy Impact Analysis
The preceding chapters have described regional goals, regional
policy, and trends in regional inequality in Austria. It has been
made clear that the major planning goals have been at least partially
achieved, i.e. out-migration from many regions has declined and there
has been a convergence in standards of living within Austria. These
trends have coincided with the initiation and In some cases contin
uation of several regional policy measures which were designed to
assist in the achievement of these goals. However, there are other
forces at work in Austria which could also potentially be responsible
for the achievement of the planning goals. Thus, It is necessary to
investigate the impact of regional policy in order to assess policy's
role, if any, in affecting the observed trends in Austria.
There are two important ways In which regional policy should be
analyzed. Policy should be scrutinized for both equity and effec-*
tlveness In its application. The Austrians, of course, believe that
their particular planning strategy satisfies both important criteria.
That is, they believe that the most effective policy Is one which
disperses the aid to the places where people are now unemployed
.and/or have low incomes. These are, of course, also the places from
which people are out-migrating in the largest numbers. Thus equity,
as defined by the Asutrian goal structure itself, means the dispersal
of the largest share of regional development aid to lowest income
regions. This section will, then, first investigate the distribution
of regional aid in order to see if the greatest amount of aid has, 118
Indeed, been directed toward the poorest regions. If this has been
true, the distribution can be considered equitable, although not
necessarily effedtive.
To date there is only circumstantial evidence suggesting that
regional aid has, in fact, been effective. Therefore, analyses to
follow will attempt to ascertain the causal relationships, if any,
which exist between 1) declining regional income inequalities and
lessening out-migrating from many regions and 2) regional policy
measures. If such relationships exist and they are positive, it
will suggest that policy has been effective in achieving the plan
ning goals. The causal analysis will, however, not answer all ques
tions related to effectiveness. Even if policy measures can be proven
to positively affect goal achievement, there is still the possibility
that an alternative planning strategy may have been more effective.
1. The Importance of Policy Measures Relative to Provincial Investment Levels
The absolute importance of regional levels of aid vis-a-vis
regional levels of Investment Is one necessary aspect of an inves
tigation of regional policy measures. This is especially true here
in order to put in perspective the Impact of regional policy upon
the provincial economies. This type of analysis is also important within, the Austrian context in order to see If regional aid has been
distributed in favor of poorer regions, regardless of the actual
impact of that aid upon these areas. In order to be distributed 119 equitably, aid in Austria must favor poorer regions, since the plan ning goals are to raise incomes of these areas without redistributing their populations. This clearly implies the investment of funds in the provinces in which problem regions are Ideated.
In order to assess the effects of policy measures on investment levels, data concerning 1) regional aid as a percentage of total in vestment and 2) regional aid per capita will be presented. This will be done for both industrial and infrastructural investment.
a. Regional Policy Measures and Industrial Investment
Table 8 presents data concerning the absolute inportance of regional policy measures and industrial investment in Austrian pro vinces. The data show that, in general, a fairly equal proportion of total industrial investment is subsidized in each of the pro vinces. However, one of the most Industrialized provinces, Upper
Austria, receives somewhat less than average and Burgenland, the least industrialized and poorest province, receives by far the largest pro portionate share. The distribution, however, varies according to the type of aid. The E.R.P. has a slight bias toward higher income pro vincas; the K.K.A.G. and transport tax have a fairly strong bias toward lower income regions. The pattern for provincial aid is somewhat mixed, but Lower Austria and Burgenland receive the largest shares from their provincial governments. This is very likely the result of the * • fact that these two provinces also receive the largest shares of re distributed taxed from the Bund. 120
Table 8
Aid as % of Total Provincial Industrial Investment - 1966-1970
K.K.A.G. and ERP Provincial Transport Total
Vienna 6.7 0.9 0.7 8.3
Salzburg 5.8 1.2 0.1 7.1
Vorarlberg 5.7 0.4 0.0 6.1
Tirol 6.3 1.5 0.7 8.5
Upper Austria 3.7 0.7 0.2 4.6
Styria 4.9 1.0 1.3 7.2
Lower Austria 5.1 2.5 0.8 8.4
Carinthia 3.7 0.4 3.5 7.6
Burgenland 16.7 9.2 16.2 42.1
K.K.A.G. = loans from KommunalKredit A.G. and transport tax reductions
Provincial = aid to industry and commerce from provinces
ERP * loans from the E.R.P.
Data sources: OIR, 1973a; O.St. Z.; Bundesministerium fuer Finanzen 121
Table 9 shows ..regional aid per Industrial worker, which has a
somewhat different pattern owing to variation in levels of industrial
investment per industrial worker. The highest lewis of E.R.P. aid
go to Lower Austria and Burgenland, two of the poorest provinces,
although another poorer province, Carinthla, receives the least of
all provinces. In general, though, the data support statements that
the E.R.P. has been especially concerned with encouraging investment
in eastern Austria. And, the highest levels of provincial aid by far are
distributed by Lower Austria and. Burgenland, which again corresponds well to the amount of federal taxes which are redistributed to pro vinces. Finally, there is a fairly good inverse relationship between
K.K.A.G. and transport tax benefits and level of development. Thus,
there is a tendency for poorer provinces to receive more industrial aid than wealthier provinces.
One way of more precisely evaluating this tendency is to use a simple technique suggested by Ruehmann. He constructs an index of national income weighted by levels of regional aid in order to see If national governments are, in fact, helping the poorest regions. Ap plying Ruehmann*s ideas, the following index was constructed:
E * ^( A i/A^ GDPi/GDPn
where,
E * index of equality of aid distribution « regional aid/capita in region 1 Ajj « average level of national aid/capita GDP^ « gross domestic product.accounted for by region i GDPn ** gross domestic product 122
Table 9
Aid/industrial worker (Austrian Schillings)
1966-70 1961-65
KKAG Provincial ERP KKAG Provincial ERP
Vienna 152 228 1492 46 42 1098
Salzburg 37 472 2505 19 200 1576
Vorarlberg 18 137 2476 0 141 1266
Tirol 242 460 2257 0 308 1531
Upper Austria 200 405 2309 128 268 1237
Styria 542 385 1993 280 247 1647
Lower Austria 478 1409 3038 557 814 2217
Carinthia 1145 134 1183 512 127 717
Burgenland 2813 1265 2890 1848 610 1111
Data sources; see Table 8 123
If E is greater than 1.0, aid is distributed In favor of wealthier
regions; if E is less than 1.0 the distribution favors poorer regions.
For Belguim in the 1960's Ruehmann*s data produced a value of E = 0.962
at the provincial level (Ruehmann, 1968). F°r Austria, considering the
types of regional aid represented in Table 2 plus the federal aid to
development regions, E = 0.967 for 1962-1964 and E = 0.904 for 1971—
1973. This, agian, suggests that there has been some realization of
the goal to equitably distribute industrial aid and that this tendency
has strengthened through time.
b. Regional Policy Measures and Infrastructural Investment
There are many policy measures which serve to improve the capa
bility of provinces and municipalities to invest in needed infrastruc
ture. The most Important of these are laws which redistribute federally
collected taxes to provincial and local governments. The F.A.G. and
Kopfquotenausglelch are the two most important of these legislative
actions. The F.A.G. disperses nationally collected taxes to provinces
largely according to population. This benefits poorer provinces where
lower than.„average tax revenues are generated. However, some of the
money redistributed through the F.A.G. is actually generated by taxes
from corporations which have branch plants in several different pro vinces but pay their taxes to the province where headquarters is
located, Vienna for example.
Still, there is no question that the F.A.G. is an important
policy tool. One way to assess the impact of the tax laws which bene
fit poorer provinces is to compare the amount of taxes collected by 124
the Bund with the amount it returns to each .respective province.
Thus, for example, in 1970 the Bund returned 57.53% of all of the
‘ tabces it collected to the provinces according to the provisions of the
F.A.G. However, Vienna received only 35.05% of all of the taxes col
lected there while Burgenland actually received more than it paid.
Burgenland thus gained the difference between the average return, 57.53%,
and its actual return, 153.53%, a benefit of about $24 million (Verbin-
dungsstelle der Bundeslaender, 1972). A provincial official estimates
that perhaps one-half of this benefit is real, i.e. not the result of
simply returning taxes paid by, for example, corporations operating in
Burgenland but paying taxes in Vienna (Szorger, 1975). For the purposes
of this investigation the estimate was made even more conservative so
as not to bias results. Henceforth only one-third of all gains via re
distributed taxes will be utilized for the purpose of analysis.
A second important source of revenue for provinces is the Kopf-
quotenausgleich, which returns federally collected taxes to provinces with below average per capita tax revenues. These monies are actually direct subsidies to poorer provinces. This is also true of money given
to provinces for regions in need of development. The latter measure, however, is a much smaller source of assistance than the F.A.G. and
Kopfquotenausgleich.
The Importance of gains from tax redistribution upon provincial
and municipal budgets is made clear by the data in Table 10. For ex ample, Burgenland1s $24 million gain in 1970, even when lowered to
$8 million to compensate for centralized tax collections, still rep resents nearly 9% of the money in the provincial and municipal budgets. 125
Total tax redistribution, and development region money represent nearly
13% of all monies used to run government in Burgenland. The data, in
general, show that the poorer provinces' receive considerable and im
portant gains from redistriubted taxes. These gains are in a sense the
losses of the wealthier provinces showing no gain in Table 10.
Another important consideration is the relationship between gains
from redistributed taxes and investment in infrastructure. In Table
1 1 there is an attempt to show the potential importance of these gains
relative to such investment. Although money gained by tax redistribu
tion is not automatically invested in infrastructure, this money would
make more investment possible. Here again there is clear evidence that
policies in Austria benefit poorer regions. In fact, there is no doubt
that the tax redistribution system in Austria has been an important
contributor to the lessening of regional inequalities and quite possib
ly to the lessening of out-migration from poorer regions. However,
this argument is supported here only by Implication. The coincidence
of 1 ) declines in regional inequalities and 2 ) levels of industrial and
infrastructural aid to the provinces only verifies that the greatest
amount of aid is received by poorer provinces. It does not represent
a real test of the causal relationship existing between levels of regional aid and changes in lining standards and rates of migration.
Analyses designed to test , such a relationship now follow.
2 , The Achievement of Planning Goalss A Causal Analysis
An investigation of the relationship between regional planning 1 2 6
Table 10
Gains from Redistributed Taxes as a Percentage of Municipal
‘ and Provincial Budgets, 1970
F.A.G. Kopf Dev. Regions Total
Vienna - - 0 . 0 0 . 0
Salzburg - — 0 . 0 0 . 0
Vorarlberg - - 0 . 0 0 . 0
Tirol 0.3 - 0 . 0 0.3
Upper Austria 1.9 0.4 0 . 1 ' 2.4
Styria 4.0 1.0 0 . 1 5.1
Lower Austria 5.8 1 . 0 0 . 1 6.9
Carinthia 3.3 0 . 8 0 . 1 4.2
Burgenland 8.9 3.8 0 . 2 12.9
F.A.G. = positive gains from redistributed taxes governed by the F.A.G.
Kopf ■ monies distributed under the Kopfquotenausgleich
Dev. Regions ** monies distributed to provinces for investment in "regions in need of development"
Data source: Verbindungsstelle der Bundeslaender, 1972.
r 127
Table 11
Gains from Redistributed Taxes as a Percentage of Municipal
and Provincial Investment in Construction, 1970
F.A.G. Kopf Dev. Region Total
Vienna - - 0 . 0 0 . 0
Salzburg -- 0 . 2 0 . 2
Vorarlberg - - 0 . 1 0 . 1
Tirol 1.2 — 0 . 1 1.3
Upper Austria 11.5 2.6 0.4 14.5
Styria 29.7 7.5 0.5 37.7
Lower Austria 40.9 7.0 0 . 6 48.5
Carinthia 2 1 . 6 5.5 0.5 27.6
Burgenland 43.0 18.4 1 . 1 62.5
F.A.G., Kopf, Dev. Region - see Table 10
Data sources: Verblndungsstelle der Bundeslaender, 1972; O.St. Z. 128
policies and the achievement of planning goals Is presented in this
section. Due to the fact that the best policy data are available at
the provincial level, the first analysis investigates the relation
ship between policy and goal achievement using the nine provinces as
observations. At this scale the most appropriate investigations are
of the impact of policy upon the achievement of the goals relating to
the decline of living standard and unemployment differentials. The
impact of population movements (commuting and migration) upon regional
socio-economic changes will also be included in the analysis. However,
the importance of tflese movements are best observed at the district lev-
.el, since the Austrians are concerned with depopulation of particular
regions in each province. Thus, a second analysis is presented for data collected at the district level.
a. Provincial Analysis
The purpose of the analysis presented here is to assess the effects of regional policy initiatives upon the socio-economic structure of
Austrian provinces. The hypotheses of this analysis all relate to the
Impact of particular policy measures upon the change in living standards in Austrian provinces during the periods 1961-1966 and 1966-1971. The
"change in living standards" was measured by using the factor analysis results presented in chapter 5. A composite factor score was calculated for each province for 1961, 1966, and 1971 from the factor scores from those respective years? "Change" was defined as the difference between . 129 the values .for 1961 and 1966 and for 1966 and 1971. Thus, there 6 were two observations for each province and 18 observations in all.
The hypothesized relationships are as follows:
la. It is hypothesized that low cost industrial loans from
the Kommunalkredit A.G. and transport tax reductions from the Bund
are positively related to changes in living standards.
lb. It is hypothesized that economic aid (excluding aid to
agriculture and tourism) from the provincial governments is positively
related to changes in living standards.
lc. It Is hypothesized that industrial and commercial aid from
the European Recovery Program (E.R.P.) Is positively related to changes
in living standards.
Id. It is hypothesized that gains from redistributed taxes are positively related to changes in living standards. It is anticipated that the indirect effects of this variable upon such changes may be more important than direct effects due to the positive effect of im proved infrastructure upon the economic structure (measured in this case via industrial employment).
2. It is hypothesized that greater labor mobility decreases the rate of improvement in living standards. (This is in keeping with the predominant Austrian view that labor movements from poorer to wealthier areas are detrimental to the economies of the former regions.)
Thus, it is further hypothesized that (a) increases in commuter mobil ity are negatively related to changes in living standards and that (b) levels of net migration are positively related to changes in living standards. The testing procedure involved the use of both second stage
least square estimates In a simultaneous equations format and path
analysis. The path coefficients were the standardized partial re
gression coefficients derived from the simultaneous equations analysis
The equations system was comprised of six exogenous and three
endogenous variables:
' DEMP± = f(ERPi, ISUB^ PSUB^, TAX±)
DUEM^ = f(DCOMM±, NMIG^, ERP^, ISUBj., PSUB.^ DEMP±)
DLIVj; *= f (DEMP^, DUEM^, TAXt> ERP±, ISUB^ P S U B ^ DCOMM^, NMIG^)
where,
DLIV^ *= change in living standards in region i
DEMP^ *= change in industrial workers per 1 0 0 0 population
DUEM^ = change in average annual unemployment rate
TAX^ = gains from redistributed taxes per inhabitant
ERP^ = E.R.P. industrial and commercial investment funds loaned per industrial worker
PSUB - provincial industrial and commercial loans and subsidies per industrial worker
ISUB^ « loans from the Kommunalkredit A.G. and benefits from transport tax reductions per industrial worker
DCOMM^ « changes in commuter mobility
NMXG^ ~ level, of net migration^
The order condition for the identification of a simultaneous equation was not fulfilled for the change in living standards (DLIV) equation as originally formulated. That is, too few exogenous vari ables were excluded from the equation. Thus, successive runs were 131
performed, excluding the minimum number of exogenous variables until
it was ascertained which of the exogenous variables should be finally
excluded from this equation. Preliminary analysis of the other two
equations also resulted in the elimination of a number of variables
owing to low t-scores. The resultant equations system, shown below, was, however, overidentified and the equations were, solved utilizing
the two-stage least squares regression technique.
DEMPj. - c± + ERP± + ISUBi + PSUB± A DUEM± = c2 + DCOMM± + NMIG^. + ISUB± + DEMP^ A DLIVj = c, + TAX. + ISUB. + DCOMM. + DUEM. i 3 i i i ± where,
cl* c2 * an<* c 3 are constants' and A represents an estimate.
The most important endogenous variable was change in living stand ards (DLIV), derived from the factor analysis. The two other endogen ous variables were change in industrial employment (DEMP) and change in unemployment (DUEM). These variables were assumed to play an inter mediate role between many of the exogenous variables and DLIV. That is, it was assumed that the policy measures indirectly affected DLIV by increasing local industrial employment and decreasing unemployment.
It was further assumed .that higher incomes from the latter effects would positively influence provincial tax bases and cause economic multiplier effects which would be in addition to the effects of the policy meas ures upon the labor market. These tax and multiplier effects were estimated by including the policy variables directly in the determination 132 of DLIV. The presumption was that the effects of the policy variables
upon changes in living standards which were not accounted for by changes
in industrial employment and changes in unemployment could be attributed
to "other", i.e. tax and multiplier, effects. Preliminary analysis
showed, however, that only the inclusion of K.K.A.G. aid and transport
tax reductions (ISUB) was warranted, due to its explanatory power in
the DLIV equation. Similarly, it was assumed that redistributed taxes
(TAX) had both direct and indirect effects upon DLIV. It was antici
pated that the indirect effect would be large, since the presumption
was that these tax receipts would be utilized to improve infrastructure,
which in turn would promote greater economic growth. Finally, in keep
ing with Austrian concerns relating to migration and commuting, the
impact of net migration levels and changes in commuting mobilities
were included in the analysis.
The estimation of parameters from this equations system encountered
a serious methodological problem - multicollinearity. The severity of
the problem makes the interpretation of the regression coefficients
more difficult, particularly because of the hypothesized direct and
indirect effects of several of the variables.. However, the estimation
problems did not seem entirely intractable. The.,equations system was
solved several times, successively eliminating variables which proved
consistently unimportant. This reduced the multicollinearity problem
considerably. However, at one point all variables except TAX in the
DEMP equation appeared to be insignificant, largely due to high levels
of multicollinearity. The equation was estimated without the TAX 133
variable and more reasonable results were obtained. It was then decided
to utilize the simple correlation coefficient between TAX and DEMP
Q C709) to estimate the path coefficient.
The final two-stage regression results are presented In Table 12.
Results from the first equation suggest that the relationship between
industrial employment changes and the policy measures is not strong.
In fact, E.R.P. aid is actually negatively related to employment change.
This suggests that the E.R.P. has not contributed to the above average
rates of industrialization in, for example, Burgenland. The most effec
tive policy measures appear to be.aid from the Kommunalkredit A.G. and
transport tax reductions, which have a positive relationship to changes
in industrial employment. These measures also show a. strong negative
relationship to changes in unemployment, a result which is consistent with hypothesized expectations. This Is also true of changes In In
dustrial employment, suggesting that efforts to increase such employ ment do indeed have strong effects on unemployment decline. Finally,
the variable measuring commuter mobility suggests that increases in
that mobility may actually slow unemployment declines. This is pre-. sumably the result of the loss of the employment multiplier effects related to locally based economic activities. The other variable measuring labor mobility, net migration, is clearly unimportant.
The results of equation 3A show the anticipated negative relation ship between living standards and unemployment changes and the hypothe sized positive relationship between changes in living standards and aid from the K.K.A.G. and transport tax reductions. However, in this 134
TABLE 12
Simultaneous Equation. Regression Results
Equation Dependent Independent Regression Number Variable Variable Coeff. t-score d.f.
1 DEMP I SUB .321 1.041 14 .262 ERP -.360 -0.978 PSUB .353 0.801 TAX (.709)a
2 DUEM I SUB -.657 -2.924 13 .694 DEMP -.744 -1.959 DCOMM .482 1.342 NMIG .022 0.092
3A DLIV DCOMM .402 2.173 13 9.14 DUEM -.407 -2.047 ISUB .381 1.774 TAX -.084 -0.368
3B DLIV DUEM -.694 -5.777 14 .902 DCOMM .234 1.426 TAX .174 0.966
assumption 135
equation, the results suggest that greater commuter mobility increases
living standards, a.result which is contrary to the indirect effect of ¥ increased commuter mibility on changes' in living standards Cby way of
unemployment changes — equation 2 ).
Table 13 presents the results of the path analysis which assesses
both the direct and indirect effects of all variables on changes in
.living standards. Although these results do not prove causality, they
do provide important information about the nature of the interrelation
ships among the variables.
The surprisingly large total effect of ISUB led to the conclusion
that perhaps the direct effect of ISUB and DLIV reported in equation
3A was more coincidental than causal. Thus, another equation 3B was
run, eliminating ISUB. The final result with respect to ISUB, however,
was much the same as evidenced by the path analysis results presented
in Table 14. Thus, the evidence supports hypothesis la; there does
appear to be a positive relationship between loans from the Kommunal—
kredit A.G. and transport tax reductions and changes in regional levels
of standard of living.
The results, however, do not support hypotheses lb and lc. Reg
ional policy measures taken by the E.R.P. are negatively related to
changes in the living standard and actions by provincial authorities
show no great Impact, although the impact is in the hypothesized direc tion.
The results generally support hypothesis Id. The effects of gains
from tax redistribution upon changes in living standards are positive 136
Table 13
Direct and Indirect Effects upon Changes In Living Standards
(DLIV) from Path Analysis
Using Equations 1, 2, and 3A
Variable Direct Effect Indirect Effects Total
ISUB .381 .365 .746
DEMP .303 .303
DCOMM .402 -.196 .206
TAX -.084 (.215)a .131
PSUB .107 .107
NMIG
ERP -.109 -.109
DUEM -.407 .000 -.407
indicates an assumption that path = .000
%y assumption Table 14
Direct and Indirect Effects upon Changes la Living Standards
(DLIV) from Path Analysis
Using Equations 1, 2, and 3B
Variable Direct Effect Indirect Effect Total
■ ISUB - .622 .622
TAX .174 (.366)a .540
DEMP - .516 .516
PSUB - .182 .182
NMIG
DCOMM .234 -.335 -.101
ERP - .186 -.186 t
DUEM -.694 .000 -<694
‘(-^Indicates an assumption that path = .000
assumption 138
no matter which form of equation 3 is.accepted. The results are
most promising, however, when equation 3B is used. And as anticipated,
the indirect effects of redistributed taxes are larger in either the
case of equation 3A or 3B.
Hypothesis 2 is not supported by the results. There is little
evidence that lessened labor mobility creates increases in living stan -
dards. Levels of net migration were not found to be important to changes
either in unemployment or living standards. Changes in levels of com
muting mobility shows a more complex pattern. Using either equation
3A or 3B, changes in commuting had a negative effect on changes in liv
ing standards but a positive direct effect. The total net effect is
positive using equation 3A, negative using equation 3B. The results
are, thus, indeterminate. However, the lack of support for hypothesis
2 may also be due to 1 ) the fact that the raw commuter and migration
data were interpolated for this analysis and/or 2 ) the fact that the
hypothesized results may be more observable at the sub-provincial
level. ,
Given a small population size and methodological problems in the
estimation of parameters, it would not be wise to attempt a rigorous
statistical test of the hypotheses. However, the results presented
above do give some indications of the impact of regional policy at the
provincial levell They indicate that some types of regional policy
measures are apparently important causal factors in the achievement
.of lessened regional inequalities. They also indicate, however, that,
at least at the provincial level, attempts to restrict the mobility of 139
of labor may not result in the effects desired by the Austrian government.
This, then, suggests that Austria*s potential goal conflicts may, in
fact, be real.
Finally, the results also make it possible to disaggregate the
net effect of policy into direct and indirect effects. Figure 2
graphically summarizes these effects, derived from Tables 13 and 1 4 .
The indirect effects, some of which have already been discussed,
can be very interesting. For example, referring to Figure 2, it is
possible to trace and evaluate all indirect effects of aid from the
K.K.A.G. and transport tax reductions upon changes in living stan
dards. Thus, the path from K.K.A.G. aid to industrial employment
changes to unemployment changes to changes in living standards
(ISUB-DEMP-DUEM-DLIV) results in the multiplication of coefficients with signs (+)(-)(-), resulting in a positive indirect effect.
Similarly, the path from K.K.A.G. aid to unemployment changes to
changes in living standards (ISUB-DUEM-DLIV) means multiplication
of signs (-)(-), resulting in another positive indirect effect.
These results are also all consistent with the hypotheses. Conversely,
the indirect effect of changes in commuter mobility on changes in
living standards (DCOMM-DUEM-DLIV) results in a negative effect, while the direct effect is positive. In general, the technique
employed here helps identify more precisely the complex nature of*
.relationships among several interdependent variables. In doing so
it permits a closer scrutiny of the impact of policy upon socio economic trends in Austria. 140
E.R.P. Investment redistributed taxes
(-.360) +.890 provincial subsidies (+.353) change in ■►industrial 084 employment (+.321)
Kommunalkredit investment and +.381 change in ▼ transportation tax gains ► living standards
-.657 net migration |change in inemployment +.022 +.402
+.482 change in commuting mobility
Figure 2
Summary Results of Regression Analysisa
••These results derive from a simultaneous equations system solved by use of second stage least squares estimations. The data are for the 9 Austrian provinces for the periods 1961-1966 and 1966-1971.
^By assumption 141
Thus, the same approach was applied to the Investigation of the changes in such trends at the district level, an analysis that now follows.
b. District Analysis
The purpose of the district analysis is to Investigate the causes of important socio-economic changes in Austria during the period 1961-1971. The investigation Includes an analysis of the causes for reduced unemployment In and net out—migration from many districts, as well as the causes of the decline in regional living standard inequalities. The analysis includes the testing of several hypotheses which are related to the regional planning strategy adopted In Austria. The analysis investigates the Austrian conten tion that labor mobility, migration or commuting, is counter productive to the reduction of interregional inequalities. The in vestigation also includes an analysis of residuals from regression in attempts to Isolate important regional variations which are not explained by national trends. The causes of these regional varia tions may, of course, be related to regional policy and/or to important differences in regional economic structures. The iden tification of either type of relationship would provide useful In formation about the achievement of the regional planning goals, notably the desire for lessened out-migration and reductions in regional income inequalities. 142
Analyzing the relationship between regional policy and changes
In .incomes and net migration levels at the district level is made
difficult by the lack of good regional policy and other data for
districts. However, this problem is resolved below by the use of dummy variables to denote regions which are known to receive above average levels of regional development aid (Burgenland in this case) and regions which are distinctive in some other important way. (The importance of these dummy variables was first iden tified by analysis of the regression residuals and subsequently verified by the inclusion of the variables in modified regression formats.)
The data were collected for the period 1961-1971, and ’'change'* was defined as the change between values in 1961 and 1971. For changes in net migration, the level of net migration for 1951-1961 was com pared with the level for 1961-1971.
The analysis includes the following hypothesized relationships:
1. It is hypothesized that greater labor mobility impedes
income growth relative to the national average. It is
further hypothesized that (a) increased levels of com
muting are negatively related to relative income changes
and that (b) levels of net migration and positive changes
in net migration are positively related to relative in
come changes.
2. It is hypothesized that an analysis of regression resid
uals will identify a spatial coincidence of unexplained
Variance with areas receiving the highest levels of re -
gional development aid. 143
The testing procedure involved the use of both second stage least square estimates in a simultaneous equations format and path analysis. The path coefficients were, again, the standarlzed par tial regression coefficients from the simultaneous equations anal ysis.
The equations system was comprised of nine exongenous and three' ’ endogenous variables:
DUNEMP^, = f (NMIG^, DMIG± , DCMMMO± , DCMMCT^, DIKDUS±)
DMIG. - f(DUNEMP , DINDUS , DINC , DCMMCT , DCMMMO ) i i x i i D1NC± » f(DUNEMP±, DMIG^, NMIG^, DCMMCT^, DCMMMO±, AGE±) where,
DUNEMP^ = change in average annual unemployment rate in district i
DMIGj[ = change in the level of net migration
DINC^ = change in the relative income level3
NMIGj, “ net migration during the period 1961-1971
DCMMMO^ = change in the level of commuter mobility**
DCMMCTi = change in the level of commuting to major metropolitan
centers0
a Relative income is defined as (income per worker 1971/nat’l. ave.) — (income per worker 1961/nat'l. ave.) £ Mobility is defined as the percentage of workers who are employed outside the municipality in which they reside.
° Commuting to major cities was defined as the percentage of workers who commute to Vienna, Linz, Graz, Salzburg, Villach, Klagen- furt, and/or Innsbruck. 144
DINDUS^ *= changes' in. the percentage of population employed in
industry
AGE^ *» percentage of the population within the ages 20-50 in .
1961
As in the previous analysis* the hypothesized relationships were
tested with successive runs, excluding variables which were unimportant
to explanation. At this point the residuals were examined and dummy variables entered into the regression format in order to improve expla nation. The final regression format was as follows:
DUNEMP-t = cx + BURG± + NMIG1 + DCMMMO^ + DCMMCT + DINDUSi A A DMIGi = c2 + LINZ1 + DINC^ + EAST^ + DCMMCT± + DINDUS± + DUHSMP^ A A DINC± “ c3 + STYRIA±+ AGE^ + NMIG± + BURG± + DUNEMP^ + DCMMCT± + DMIG± where,
BURG^ = a dummy variable. All districts in Burgenalnd were given
a value = 1 , all others = 0 .
LINZ^ = a dummy variable. Districts experiencing rapid increases
in industrial employment in the Linz region during 1961-
1971 were given a value 85 1, all others = 0.
EAST^ = a dummy variable. Districts north and east of Vienna
were given a value = 1 , all others - 0 .
STYRXA^ « a dummy variable. Districts with structural problems in
industry in northern Styria and adjacent Lower Austria
were given a value « 1 , all others = 0 .
The two most important endogenous variables were change in relative levels of income (DINC) and change in levels of net migration (DMIG). 145
These variables embody the goals of Austrian regional policy, namely
the reduction of net out-migration from many regions and the lessening
of regional inequalities in living standards. Previous analysis has
already confirmed the partial attainment of the goals, and the analysis presented here was conducted to attempt to identify some of the causes of the observed trends. The results of this investigation are presented in Table 15. The results of equations 1A and IB are especially inter esting. In both equations the results indicated that more commuting and net out-migration result in lower rates of' unemployment. These results are not consistent with the Austrian view that labor mobility is undesireable. Clearly, this labor mobility does foster greater equality among people, but it may not foster the population distribution desired by the Austrians. In this case, the results support earlier contentions that goal conflicts do exist in regional planning in Austria.
The results of equation 1A suggest that industrial employment growth is also an important contributor to unemployment decline, which is, of course, consistent with expectations. However, after an analysis of residuals and the inclusion of a dummy variable representing the districts in Burgenalnd (equation IB), the industrial employment variable becomes less important and total explanation improves considerably. The inclu- sion of the dummy variable for Burgenland accoutns for several of the districts showing large unemployment declines, in part related to in dustrial growth. However, Burgenland has, in fact, seen a more general diversification of its economy as well as a markedly increased trend toward out-commuting. Both of these trends are certainly related to the Table 15 146
' R jt R2 F
1A. DUNEMP .330 9.353 NMIG .320 3.144 DCMMMO -.300 -3.002 DINDUS -.172 -1.551 DCMMCT -.070 -0.700
DUNEMP .450 12.267 BURG -.373 -4.053 NMIG .317 3.416 DCMMMO -.225 -2.424 DCMMCT -.088 -0.955 DINDUS -.073 -0.703
DMIG .432 9.373 LINZ .448 4.520 DINC .458 3.598 EAST .255 2.804 DCMMCT .141 1.440 DINDUS .113 1.039 DUNEMP -.109 -0.911
DMIG .418 10.773 LINZ .481 5.110 DINC .474 3.729 EAST .264 2.889 DCMMCT .172 1.823 DUNEMP -.157 -1.403
3A. DINC .292 6.173 AGE -.387 -2 . 8 8 6 DUNEMP -.345 -2.587 DMIG .354 2.253 NMIG .291 1.932 DCMMCT -.092 -0.983
DINC .535 10.352 STYRIA -.487 -5.070 AGE ' -.534 -3.508 NMIG .367 2.198 BURG .218 2 . 0 1 0 DUNEMP -.282 -1.680 DCMMCT - . 1 2 1 -1.248 DMIG -.087 -0.337 147
Important Impact of regional development aid and the cumulative and
self-reinforcing growth effects resulting from it. Infrastructural
aid has probably discouraged migration, encouraged commuting, and en
hanced the industrial potential of Burgenland. The province has also,
of course, been aided by direct industrial assistance by the K.K.A.G.,
the E.R.P., and the province itself. Thus, the results of the first
equation suggest that regional policy has been successful where it has
been pursued most vigorously, I.e. in Burgenland.
The results of the second equation suggest several reasons for
generally lower rates of net out-migration from Austrian districts
during 1961-1971 In comparison to the period 1951-1961. Again, great
er commuting plays an important role. This is evidnet from the positive
sign of the variable measuring increases in commuting to major centers.
Not 'surprisingly, one of the most important factors resulting in les
sened net out-migration is increased relative income levels (DINC).
Also, increased industrial employment retards out-migration. This is
evident not only In the industrial employment variable itself, but
also In the dummy variable for the Linz region, where an apparent
natural growth center has emerged, propelled by increased Industrial
employment generated by the large nationalized steel Industry centered
in Linz.
A similar regional employment effect Is clearly Identifiable for
the districts north and east of Vienna (EAST), which, however, have not been affected by a growth center. The sharp reductions In net out—migration from this region are probably the result of a great many 148
things which are of lesser Importance elsewhere. First, the area
is within the area most affected by Vienna, a city which has become
less attractive to migrants in general in the post-war era. Laobr now also has a greater opportunity to commute to Vienna from these regions, lessening to need to migrate.
Second, this region may have been most affected by what has been termed the "Ruckstaub", the settling of the "dust” after World War XI.
This refers to the possibility that levels of net out-migration during the 1951-1961 period were unusually high in these districts due to
1 ) constraints on internal population movements during the war, result ing in increased mobility thereafter; 2 ) real opportunities for more rapid socio-economic advancement in Vienna vis-a-vis these rural dis tricts; and 3) the potential hazard of living in a border region in a time of European political instability. These effects were probably self-reinforcing during 1951-1961 just as reduced net out-migration has probably created self-reinforcing multiplier effects resulting from improved market possibilities for local Industries and services during
1961-1971. And, third, industrial expansion in this area has benefitted significantly from the labor shortages which appeared in Vienna during the 1960’s, exemplified by Vienna’s importation of over 60,000 foreign workers during 1961-1971 (Oesterrelchisches Institut fuer Wirtschafts- forschung and Oesterrelchisches Statistisches Zentralamt, 1968 and 1971).
These shortages in Vienna led to a considerable movement of industry from Vienna to Lower Austria, where people leaving agriculture were available for industrial empldyment. Finally, the results of the second equation indicate that unem
ployment changes are negatively related to changes in net migration.
This is, of course, the expected relationship. The partial regression
coefficient was more reliable, however, when the industrial employ
ment variable was omitted. This was apparently caused by fairly high
levels of multi-collinearity existing between these two variables.
(In general, however, multi-collinearity did not pose the serious
problem which it created in the provincial analysis.)
•The results of the third equation give some insights into the
nature of income convergence in Austria. The results of equation 3
indicated that unemployment decline is an important contributor to
relative income increases. However, the most interesting relation
ships in equation 3A are those between labor mobility and income change.
In keeping with the Austrian view that migration and commuting are
harmful to local economies, the results of this equation suggest that
districts with net out-migration rates (NMIG) and slower declines in
net out-migration (DMIG) experience lower rates of relative income
change. Further, there is a tendency for districts experiencing growth
in commuting to major centers (DCMMCT) to enjoy lower rates of relative
income change. However, the variable measuring percentage of the pop
ulation in the 20-50 age group has a negative relationship with relative
income change. This result suggests that age specific out-migration is
not necessarily an important impediment to local economic Improvement.
It, thus, suggests that concerns about the long-term effects of selec tive out-migration are perhaps over estimated. On the other hand, this 150
result may also simply reflect the fact that very strong forces of
income convergence (i.e. metropolitan labor shortages, for example)
are, in the short-run overshadowing the long-term negative impact of
selective out-migration.
The results of equation 3B follow from the analysis of the resi
duals from equation 3A and the resultant inclusion of two important
dummy variables. The sizeable increase in explanation and the regres
sion coefficients indicate the Importance of these variables in explain
ing relative income changes in Austria. They are important because-they
represent important free market and regional policy impacts upon chang
ing income levels. One of the variables, STYRIA, represents a struc
turally and locationally disadvantaged industrial region in northern
Styria and western Lower Austria. The disadvantagous economic position
of this region vis-a-^is the rest of Austria is clearly evident from
Its large negative regression coefficient. Importantly, however, an
analysis of the residuals from equation 3B suggest that the situation
in Knittelfeld and Judenburg, two of the seven districts in this region, .
is possibly aided by the special E.R.P. mining project. (Further aid
has also been more recently directed at this area by the Aichfeld-
Muerboden project.) This conclusion is based on the fact that in spite,
of the inclusion of this dummy variable, four of the seven districts
still have predicted relative income changes which are over estimated • by regression; the two above-mentioned districts are among the three .
districts which are under estimated. Thus, although the structural-
deficiencies of the area are apparently not completely accounted for 151
by the dummy variable, relative income change in the portion of the
region which receives the most regional policy attention is not lower
than expected.
Another strong indication of the importance of specific regional
patterns, and regional policy in particular, derives from the inter
pretation of the regression coefficient for the dummy variable rep
resenting Burgenland,s districts (BURG). The positive coefficient
suggests that some socio-economic forces influencing income conver
gence are stronger in Burgenland than elsewhere. These forces probebly include benefits accruing from reduced out-migration (in part related
to increased commuting) and increased sectoral diversification. The
latter trend has resulted from an increase in the industrial and ter tiary sectors. Industry has received considerable benefit from both ' the direct effects of industrial subsidies and the indirect Impacts of improved infrastructure. Expansion in the number of industrial jobs! has helped create the expansion in the tertiary sector. These eco nomic developments in Burgenland, however, have also resulted from more general national trends like the decentralization of industry during the 1960*s, when labor was in short supply.
The other notable difference between equations 3A and 3B is the coefficient for change in levels of net ncLgration (DMIG), which is con siderably altered by the inclusion of the dummy variables. Since ex planation in 3B is greater than in 3A, DMIG is apparently of lesser importance than the results of equation 3A. would Indicate. 152
In fact, the results of the path analysis, reported In Tables
16 and 17, seem to indicate that interpretation 6f the impact of the
mobility variables upon regional change is, in some cases, problemat
ical. The results of these tables were derived from a path analysis
Which utilized the most statistically reliable path coefficients.
(all coefficients with t-scores greater than or equal to 1.300 were
included in the analysis.) These results permit the most critical
evaluation of the hypotheses presented earlier, and, in particular,
do not entirely support the hypothesis that greater labor mobility
impedes relative income growth. The effects of the migratory variables,
listed in the first group of Table 16 , are neither the most important
nor the most consistent among the independent variables. Greater
commuter mobility is not negatively related to relative income change
(hypothesis la), but is rather a weak positive force for income con— '
vergence. And, as noted earlier, the age specific nature of out-nigra.-
tlon has not necessarily had a large adverse impact on relative income
change. On the other hand, net out-migration does appear to have a negative impact on income changes, confirming hypothesis lb. Thus, labor mobility affects both income divergence and convergence, and the results do not entirely confirm or reject the first hypothesis.
The results presented in Table 16 do, however, tend to confirm the' second hypothesis. Perhaps the strongest forces affecting Income con vergence in Austria are forces which are operative in particular regions.
The forces previously mentioned with regard to Burgenland include the impact of regional policy. Similarly, structural problems in Austrian 153
Table 16
EFFECTS OF INDEPENDENT VARIABLES UPON
CHANGING RELATIVE INCOMESa
Indirect direct total effect
% population age 20-50 (AGE) — —.534 —.534 net migration (NMIG) —.109 +.367 +.258 change in commuting +.078 - +.078 mobility (DCMMMO)
Styria (STYRIA) - -.487 -.487
Burgenland (BURG) +.129 +.218 +.347 change In unemployment — — .282 -.282 (DUNEMP) a Results derive from a path analysis of a simultaneous equations system. 154
Table 17
EFFECTS OF INDEPENDENT VARIABLES UPON
CHANGING LEVELS OF NET MIGRATION (DMIG) 3
indirect direct total effect
AGE -.253 - -.253 change In commuting to — +.172 +.172 major centers (DCMMCT)
NMIG +.101 - +.101
DCMMMO +.052 - +.052 region near Linz (LINZ) - +.481 +.481 districts north and east — +.264 +.264 of Vienna (EAST)
STYRIA -.231 - -.231
BURG +.162 - +.162 change in relative - +.474 +.474 incomes (DINC)
DUNEMP -.074 -.157 -.231 a Results derive from a'path analysis of a simultaneous equations system.
* 155
industry are to some extent concentrated in northern Styria, and this
problem has a strong negative relationship to relative income change.
Most of the districts in this area had above average incomes in 1961 but
all were below the 1971 national average. The relative income decline
was again, however, less rapid in some districts which have received
more attention from regional policy makers.
The results presented in Table 17 do not relate directly to the hypotheses posed at the outset of this analysis, but they are very
important to the analysis of the regional planning strategy. The first
group of variables in Table 17 suggest, for example, that there are
several forces at work in reducing out-migration. One of these is the reduction in the percentage of population in younger age groups (AGE), lessening the potential for out-migration. Another is increased commut ing activity (DCMMCT, DCMMMO). However, as in the case of changing relative incomes, specific regional trends are among the most important independent variables. Thus, strong growth impulses in the Linz region and Burgenland have lessened out-migration, while the reverse has been true in the stagnating industrial regions of northern Styria. Importantly, changing relative incomes and unemployment levels have a strong in fluence on changing migration patterns.
A simultaneous evaluation of the results presented in Tables 16 and provides an interesting insight into the regional planning strategy adopted in Austria. First, these results suggest that a complete halt to labor mobility may not help income convergence and, especially
In the case of commuter mobility, would not help decrease levels of net 156
out-migration. These implications are the same as those derived
from the provincial analysis and again emphasize the potential
conflict between the planning goals in Austria. (A potential
alternative strategy, more consistent with the empirical findings and still compatible with the reality of Austrian politics will be proposed in the concluding chapter.)
' A second general conclusion which can be drawn from the analysis is the importance of sub-national forces upon the achievement of the national planning goals. These forces are often important contributors to the achievement of the planning goals. The existence of these r e gional forces underlines the complexity of the causes of regional change and the need for researchers to be familiar with socio-economic trends at the sub-national level. In this particular case some of the regional trends confirm the contention that regional policy has been somewhat ' effective in aiding in the achievement of goals. And, these results are again consistent with findings at the provincial level.
A third important conclusion which derives form the preceeding analysis is that changes in regional economic and social structures are highly interrelated. This is apparent from interrelationships which have been established at both the district and provincial levels.
The existence of these interrelationships confirms the desireability of the investigation of regional changes within a systems framework, such, as is possible with the use of a simultaneous equations format.
A more general evaluation and summary of the regional planning experience in Austria will be presented in the following chapter along 157 with a discussion of some potential modifications of the planning strategy in Austria. Chapter 7
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
The foregoing analysis has established the fact that regional
policy has had a positive impact upon the lessening of regional
Income inequalities and the reduction of out-migration from rural
regions in Austria. These trends represent a partial achievement
of Austrian regional planning goals and suggest that Austria's
planning strategy has been reasonably well devised. Industrial sub
sidies and improved local infrastructures have aided in the industrial
ization of rural regions (see Map 5, Chapter 5). This has, in turn,
lessened unemployment and raised income levels in these areas. Further,
the provision of secure employment opportunities and improved social
services and the improved possibility for commuting (resulting from
better roads and more automobiles) have been important factors in
declining rates of net out-migration in rural, east Austrian regions.
It must again be noted, however, that there are several free
market forces which have probably been most instrumental.in producing
the observed economic and social trends in Austria. First, the wealthiest and most attractive in-migrant province, Vienna, has ex perienced relatively slow economic growth due to its location and to
the age structure of its. population. Two Austrian researchers have shown that Vienna has experienced locational disadvantages during the period 1964-1971, as the result of the city's distance from the core industrial growth region in northwestern Europe. The western provinces
158 159
in Austria have, on the other hand, benefitted from location vis-a-vis
western Europe and have shown sharp income and in-migrant gains (Skarke
and Skarke, 1974, Abbildung 2). A second factor, related to the first,
is that western Austria has benefitted considerably from higher levels
of tourism. This has, again, raised many rural west Austrian income
levels vis-a—vis Vienna and contributed to lessening Income Inequalities
and reduced out-migration. And, third, the evolution of the production'
cycle (see Chapter 2) in Austria has considerably benefitted the poorer
rural regions. The decentralization of labor-intensive industry away
from Vienna, hastened by labor shortages in the capital, has meant more
industrial jobs for rural areas of Austria.
There is, however, some question about how long free market forces will continue to lessen regional income inequalities and rural out migration. This is particularly true with regard to decentralization of industry, a trend which may slow in the future if labor shortages ease. Further, decentralization may not, in any event, prove to be of long term benefit for the rural regions. As noted earlier, the indus tries which are decentraliizing are not generally growth industries and also tend to be somewhat mobile, i.e. they may resettle again if wage rates Increase. Thus, the current trend of industrial decen tralization does not guarantee a viable and vital economic structure for rural regions in the long run. They may well need to again attract, the next "wave" of economic activity that decentralizes from the metro politan regions- 160
Under these circumstances there may be considerable need for
continued regional planning. Planning may either 1) continue to
complement and reinforce free market forces or 2) be the sole agent
fostering the achievement of regional planning goals during an era
when free market forces are no longer favoring growth in poorer and
rural regions. In either case, but especially in the latter, Austrian
regional policy might be more successful if some modifications were
adopted in the planning strategy. These modifications might include:
1) reduced emphasis upon halting out-commuting from rural regions
and more favorable attitudes towards this type of labor mobility as a
subsitute for migration; and 2) greater concentration of regional aid
in larger towns than is now the case in order to take advantage of
economies of scale and agglommeration and to create alternative in- •
migrant and in-commuter centers in closer proximity to the existent
rural population.
The second point, of course, relates well to the first; the crea
tion of alternative in-migrant and in-commuter centers might hasten local
commuting and lessen migration in both the short- and long-term. Thu6,
for example, such smaller centers might impede a common practice of
stepped migration to Vienna - first commuting and then, later, migration
to the capital. The foregoing analyses provide considerable evidence which indicates that such a strategy might be a successful one. First," .
commuting has been found to be a substitute for migration and has con- •
trlhuted to declines in income inequalities in Austria. Second, the
emergence of Linz, a smaller metropolitan region, as a growth center has 161
been, a very strong check on continued out-migration from rural regions
In the vicinity of Linz. Thus, if it were possible to create other
growth centers in Austira, even if only on a smaller scale, the ten
dencies toward income convergence and reduced rural out-migration might
be strengthened. This might be particularly important if free market
forces tending toward economic and demographic concentration re-emerge
in Austira. A system of more dynamic towns and small cities, strength
ened by regional policy, might prevent an erosion of advancements made
thus far toward the achievement of the regional planning goals.
In order to implement these modifications it would, as noted ear
lier, be necessary to concentrate more regional development aid in
larger urban centers. This might be particularly true for aid. to in
dustry, which has been very decentralized in th&_ past. Such aid might
be concentrated in larger towns selected by national and provincial
planners and leaders (e.g. by OROK) as real potential growth centers.
These would necessarily have to be few in number, perhaps only one
or two towns in the smaller provinces. The selection process would not be easy politcially, but smaller localities must be made to real
ize that the free market forces aiding regional convergence may not
continue indefinitely and that renewed forces of economic concentration might quickly issue in a new era of divergence in regional levels of well-being. If the non-urban areas do not avail themselves of the op portunity to now construct a viable, stable economic base in selected
growth,centers, there is the possibility that forces of economic con
centration may only benefit the larger provincial capitals. This 162 would inevitably lead to greater rural out-migration and renewed re gional income idvergence.
Implimentation of a modified policy to encourage growth in selected centers would also necessitate some emphasis on infrastructural invest ment in those centers. However, the investment might also be well spent in improved regional transport facilities in order to create commuting regions centered on the growth center. There would be no special need to create new administrative bodies to co-ordinate such investment if existing administrative agencies were agreeable to the regional planning strategy and made internal investment decisions to support it. The tax redistribution system would also not need major changes, although tax incentives for the growth centers and greater tax returns to them would warrant consideration. Major changes in the tax redistribution system do not seem urgent, since the results of Chapters
5 and 6 suggest that regional inequalities in infrastructure are de clining and that this decline is related to the way in which taxes are presently redistributed.
Other modifications in the present regional planning stragety that might be considered include greater communication among the Institutions implementing policy and a consideration of a wider range of potential policy measures. Co-ordination of planning activities is poor in Austria, but the establishment of the Austrian Regional Planning Commission
COROK) provides some hope for the future. This forum may also provide on-going evaluation of the effectiveness of Austrian regional policy and recommend the incorporation of new types of policy measures into the program. 163
Even without modification the strategy adopted to date in Austria
(decentralized concentration) has proven to be at least partially suc
cessful. It has complemented free market forces which have aided in
the partial achievement of the major planning goals. The strategy has also worked fairly well politically, since the emphasis on decentrali
zation of aid has reduced the incidence and seriousness of conflict between areas competing for regional aid. Thus, decentralized concen tration might be an acceptable regional policy in other national contexts where there are free market forces which are also aiding in the.reduction of regional inequalities and where political realities make the adopt ion of more elegant theoretical planning alternative impossible.
Clearly, further research is needed to analyze the potential im pact of these other planning alternatives and to investigate their applicability in diverse political contexts. Further research is also required in order to better ascertain the nature of the complex socio economic interrelationships which exist in regional and national eco nomic systems and to develop methodologies to handle these interrela tionships. This research is intended to be one. part of such a more comprehensive analysis of regional policy alternatives and one example of a methodological framework for the investigation of these alternatives within a partial systems analysis framework. LIST OF REFERENCES
Alonso, William. "Equity and its Relationship to Efficiency in Urban ization." Essays in Regional Economics. Edited by John F. Kain and John R. Meyer (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971).
Beirat fuer WIrtschafts- und Sozialfragen. Verschlaege zur Regionalen Strukturpolitik. Vienna: Carl Ueberreuter Druck und Verlag, 1972.
Berger, Heinz; Austrian National Railways. Interview conducted in Vienna, March 1975.
Berry, Brian. Growth Centers in the American Urban System. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Pub. Co., 1973.
Berry, Brian. "Hierarchical Diffusion. The Basis of Developmental Filtering and Spread in a System of Growth Centers." Growth Centers in Regional Economic Development. Edited by N. Hansen (1972).
Berry, Brian. "Commuting Patterns: Labor Market Participation and Regional Potential." Growth and Change (October. 1970), 3-10.
Blalock, H.M; -. Jr. Causal Inferences .in Nonexperimental Research. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press-, 1961.
Blumenfeld, H. "The Economic Base of the Metropolis." Journal of American Institute of Planners 21 (Fall, 1955), 114-132.
Bobek, Hans, ed. Atlas der Republic Oesterreich. Vienna: Freytag- Berndt und Artaria, 1961.
Boeventer, Edwin von. "Regional Economic Problems in West Germany." Backward Areas in Advanced Countries. Edited by E.A.G. Robinson, (1969).
Boudeville, J.R. L Tespace et les poles de croissance. Paris: Presses Uniyersltaries de France, 1968.
Boekemann, Dieter. Talk on Infrastructure as a determinant of changing urban hierarchies, in Vienna, May 1975.
Bundeskanzleramt, Buero fuer Raumplanung. Erster Raumordnungsbericht; Bundesbeitrag. Vienna: Bundeskranzleramt, 1975a.
Bundeskanzleramt, Buero fuer Ramplanung. Regionale Entwicklungspol— ' itik in Oesterreich. Raumplanung fuer Oesberreich, 1/75. Vienna: Bundeskanzleramt /Bundespressedienst, 1975b.
164 165
Bundeskanzleramt, Buero fuer Raumplanung. Regional Development Policy In Austria. Vienna: Oesterreichische Raumordnungskonferenz, 1973.
Bundeskanzleramt, Buero fuer Raumplanung.' Raumordnung fuer Oesterreich. Vienna: Bundeskanzleramt, 1969.
Bundesministerium fuer Finanzen. Unpublished data on investment by provinces in infrastructure and tax savings resulting from exemptions from the transport tax. Data gathered in Vienna.
Bundesministerium fuer sozlale Verwaltung. Bericht ueber die soziale Lage. Vienna: Bundesministerium fuer soziale Verwaltung, editions 1966-1972.
Bunesministerium fuer soziale Verwaltung. Unpublished unemployment data; gathered in Vienna.
Bundesministerium fuer Wissenschaft und Forschung. Die Vollendung der Ausbaustufe der Hochschule fuer Bildungswissenschaften in Klagenf urt~ Vienna: Bundesministerium fuer Wissenschaft und Forschung, 1973.
Bundesministerium fuer Wissenschaft und Forschung. Hochschulbericht 1972, Band 2 . Vienna: Bundesministerium fuer Wissenschaft und Forschung, 1972.
Burgenlaendlsche Industrie- und Betriebsansiedlungs Ges. M.B.H. Thr Industrie Standort: Burgenland. Eisenstadt: Burgenlaen- dische Industre- und Betriebsansiedlungs Ges. M.B.H., n.d.
Burghardt, Andrew F. Borderland. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1962
Butschek, Felix. "Regionalpolitische Industriefoerderung. n.p.: Bundesministerium fuer Handel, Uewerbe, und Industrie, n.d.
Bylund, Erik. ’’Industrial Location Policy and the Problems of Sparsely Populated Areas in Sweden." Backward Areas in Advanced Coun- tries. Edited by E.A.G. Robinson (1969).
Christ, Carl F. Econometric Models and Methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1966.
Clark, Colin. "The Economic Fluctuations of a City in Relation to its 51ze.” Econometrica 13 (April 1945), 97-113.
Copes, P. and Steed, G. "Regional Policy and Settlement.Strategy: Constraints and Contradictions in Newfoundland's Experience." Regional Studies 9 (1975), 93-110. Davin, Louis E. "The Structural Crisis of a Regional Economy. A Case Study: The Walloon Area." Backward Areas in Advanced Countries. Edited by E.A.G. Robinson (1969).
' Die Presse. "Flaute ,rettetel Raumordnungsprojekt." April 22, 1975.
Draper, N.R. and Smith, H. Applied Regression Analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1966.
European Free Trade Association. National Settlement Strategies: A Framework for Regional Development. Geneva: Secretariat of E.F.T.A., n.d.
European Recovery Program. Bericht der Geschaeftsfuehrung des ERP Foods. Vienna: European Recovery Program, 1974.
Foerster, Ministerialrat. Interview conducted at the Finanzamt in Vienna, February 1975.
Friedmann, John. "A General Theory of Polarized Growth." Growth Centers in Regional Economic Development. Edited by N.M. Hansen, 1972.
Friedmann, John. Regional Development Policy: A Case Study of Vene zuela. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1966.
Friedmann, John. "Regional Economic Policy for Developing Areas." Papers of the Regional Science Association 11 (1963), 41-62.
Gatscha, Otto. "Die oesterreichisc.he verstaatlichte Industrie und Ihre Rolle im Rahmen der oesterreichischen Regionalpolitik." Regionale Entwicklungspolitik in Oesterreich. Edited by Bundeskanzleramt, Buero fuer Raumplanung, (1975b).
Gauthier, Howard. Lectures in a seminar in regional development presented at The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio in 1976.
Gober-Meyers, Patricia. "Interregional Migration, Per Capita Income Inequality and Regional Attractiveness: A Simultaneous Equa tions Approach." Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University, 1975.
Greenwood, M.J. "Urban Economic Growth and Migration: Their Interaction. Environment and Planning 5 (1973), 91-112.
Froenman, S. "Social Aspects of Backwardness in Developed Countries Backward Areas in Advanced Countries. Edited by E.A.G. Robinson, (1969).
Hadn, Hofrat. Interview in the transport planning department of the Lower Austrian provincial government in Vienna, May 1975. 167
Hansen,* Niles M. Location Preferences, Migration, and Regional Growth: A Study of the South and Southwest U.S. New York: Praeger Pub., 1973.
Hansen, Niles M. "Criteria for a Growth Centre.Policy." Growth Poles and Growth Centres in Regional Planning. Edited by Antoni R. Kuklinski (Paris: Mouton, 1972).
Hansen, Niles M. Intermediate-Size Cities as Growth Centers: Applica tions for Kentucky, the Piedmont Crescent, the Ozarks, and Texas. New York: Praeger Pub., 1971.
Hansen, Niles M. French Regional Planning. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1968.
IFermansen, Tormod. "Development Poles and Development Centres in Na tional and Regional Development: Elements of a Theoretical Framework." Growth Poles and Growth Centres in Regional Planning Edited by Antoni R. Kuklinski (Paris: Mouton, 1972).
Herrick, Bruce. Urban Migration and Economic Development in Chile. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1965.
Hilhorst, Jos G.M. Regional Planning: A System Approach. Rotteram: Rotterdam University Press, 1971.
Hirschman, Albert 0. The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1958.
Holzman, Gustav. "Die Regionale Raumordnung in Oesterreich." From a manuscript of Oesterreichischer Rundfunk telecasts, January 10, 1970 through June 15, 1971.
Hoover, Edgar M. "Some Old and New Issues In Regional Development." Backward Areas in Advanced Countries. Edited by E.A.G. Robinson, (1969) .
Hufbauer, G.L. Synthetic Materials and the Theory of International Trade. London: Duckworth, 1965.
Institut fuer Empirische Sozialforschung. Zuwanderung nach Wien. Vienna; Institut fuer Empirische Sozialforschung, 1970.
Jaeger, Kastner. Gesamtverkehr und Raumplanung. Vienna: Oesterreich- isches Institut fuer Raumplanung, 1973.
Jeffrey, Douglas. "Economic Impulses in an Urban System." Ph.D. dis sertation, The Ohio State University, 1970. 168
Jeglitsch, Helmut. Unpublished income data, estimated by Dr. Jeglitsch at the Oesterreichisches Institut fuer Wirtschaftsforschung, Vienna, 1976.
Jeglitsch, Helmut. "Der Beitrag der Bundeslaender zum Brutto-National- produkt 1961 bis 1972." Monatsberichte 1/1975, Oesterreich isches Institut fuer Wirtschaftsforschung.
Jessl, Albert. Interview conducted at the Oesterreichisches Institut fuer Raumplanung, Vienna, on March 3, 1975.
John * Doktor. Interview at the Bundeskanzleramt, Vienna, on October 29, 1974.
Johnston, J. Econometric Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1960.
Klassen, L.H. and Drewe, P. Migration Policy in Europe. Glasgow: Saxon House, D.C. Heath Ltd., 1973.
Koeszegi, L. "Development Problems of Backward Areas In Hungary." Backward Areas in Advanced Countries. Edited by E.A.G. Robinson, (1969).
Kohlbacher, Alfred. Interview conducted in the Bundeskanzleramt, Vienna, on November 18, 1974.
Lasuen, J.R. "On Growth Poles." Urban Studies 6 (June, 1969) 137-161.
Lentsch, Brigitte. "Raumordnungsprogratran ueber zentrale Orte in Niederoesterreich." Kultur Berichte (Land Niederoesterreich). (Nov. 1973) 8-14.
Loerderer, B.J. and Nowotny, Ewald. Oberoesterreich 1980. Vienna: Europa Verlag, 1969.
MacKinnon, Ross D. and Skarke, Anna Maria. "Exploratory Analyses of the 1966-1971 Austrian Migration Table." Research Report of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Schloss Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 1975.
Maclennan, M.C, and Robertson, D.J. "Regional Policy in the United Kingdom." Backward Areas in Advanced Countries. Edited by E.A.G. Robinson (1969).
Magistrat der Stadt-WIenj Geschaeftsgruppe VI, Plannung. Taetigkeits- bericht. Vienna: Magistrat der Stadt Wien, years 1971, 1972, and 1973. 169
Magistrat der Stadt Wien, Geschaeftsgruppe VI, Plannung. Kulturbericht 1973/3. Vienna: Magistrat der Stadt Wien, 1973a.
l^glstrat der Stadt Wien. "Motive und Einstellung der Zuwanderer nach Wien.” Unpublished paper. Vienna, 1973b.
Malecki, Edward J. "Innovation Diffusion Among Finns: .A Dissertation." Studies in Diffusion of Innovation, No. 27. Columbus: Depart ment of Geography, Ohio State University, 1975.
Mastalier, Volker. Interview conducted at the Wiener Institut fuer Standort Beratung, Vienna, March 1975.
Matzner, E. Talk on the Finanzausgleigh in Vienna, May 1975.
Matzner, Egon. Oeffentliche Investitionen, 1950—1966. Informations- zentrum fuer Kommunale Finanzierung Reihe, No. 5. Vienna: Informationszentrum fuer Kommunale Finanzierung, 1969.
Meingast, Josef. "Landesplanung in Oesterreich." Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Hochschule fuer Welthandel, Vienna, 1965.
Mera, Koichi. "A Multiple Layer Theory of National Urban Systems." Paper presented at the Conference on National Settlement Systems and Strategies, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Schloss Laxenburg, Austria, December 16-19, 1974.
Mueller, Georg. Raumordnung in Bund, Laendem und Gemeinden. Mainz: W. Kohlhammer Verlag und Deutscher Gemeindeverlag, 1965.
Myrdal, Gunnar. Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions. London: Duckworth, 1957.
Niederoesterreich, Landesreglerung, Abteilung R/2, Raumordnung. Untersuchungsergebnisse ueber die Gemeinden des Grenzlandes. Planungs- und Entscheidungsgrundlagen, No. 13. Vienna: Amt der Niederoesterreichischen Landesreglerung, Abteilung R/2, RAumord- nung, 1974a.
Niederoesterreich, Landesreglerung. Grenzland-Raumordnungsprogramm, provincial law 218/74, 1974b.
Niederoesterreich, Landesreglerung. Zentrale-Orte-Raumordnungspro— gramm, provincial law 142/73, 1973.
Niederoesterreich, Landesreglerung. Raumordnungsprogramm zur Verbess- erung der Kommunalstruktur in Niederoesterreich, provincial law 233/71, 1971a.
Niederoesterreich, Landesreglerung. Raumordnungsprogramm zur Schaffung, Verbesserung oder Sicherung geeigneter Standorte fuer Betriebe des gueterproduzierenden fembedarfstaetigen Gewerbes und der Industrie, provincial law 255/71, 1971b. 170
Niederoesterreich, Landesreglerung. Untersuchung ueber Industrieelg- nungszonen In Niederoesterreich. Vienna: Amt der Niederoes- terreichischen Landesreglerung, 1969.
Niederoesterreich, Landesreglerung. Rechnungsabschluss des Landes Niederoesterreich. Vienna: Land Niederoesterreich, volumes 1961-1967.
North, D.C. ''Location Theory and Regional Economic Growth," Journal of Political Economy 63 (no. 3 1955), 243-258.
Nowotny, Ewald. Regionale Probleme der Industriepolitik. n.p.: Bundes— ministeriura fuer Handel, Gewerbe und Industrie, n.d.
Nussbaumer, Adolf. "Raumordnung - Zielsetzung und Verwirklichung." Oberoesterreich: Entwicklung und Aufstieg 1/1969, 7-12.
Oesterreich, Republik. Finanzausgleichgestez J973, federal law Nr.445, 1972
Oesterreich, Republik. Finanausgleichgesetz 1967, federal law Nr. 2, 1967a.
Oesterreich, Republik. Befoerderungssteuergesetz-Novelle 1967, federal law Nr. 51, 1967b.
Oesterreich, Republik. Einkommensteuergesetz 1967, federal law Nr. 268, 1967c.
Oesterreich, Republik. Flnanzausgleichgesetz 1959, federal law Nr. 97, 1959.
Oesterreichische.Kommunalkredit A.G. Geschaeftsbericht der Oester- reichlschen Kommunalkredit A.G. Vienna: Oesterreichische Kommunalkredit A.G., volumes 1962-1963.
Oesterreichische Kommunalkredit A.G. Aufgaben und Ziele der Oester- ■ reichischen Kommunalkredit A.G. zur Aufschliessung von Indus- triegelaende. Vienna: Oesterreichische Kommunalkredit A.G., n.d.
Oesterreichische Raumordnungskonferenz. Erster Raumordnungsbericht. Vienna: Oesterreichische Raumordnungskonferenz, 1975.
Oesterreichische Raumordnungskonferenz. Reglonalpolitik im Grenzebiet gegenueber Bayern. Schriftenreihe der oesterreichishen Raumordnungskonferenz No. 4. Vienna: Oesterreichische Raum ordnungskonferenz, 1974. 171
Oesterreichisches Institut fuer Raumplanung. Das Instrumentarium des Bundes fuer die Regionale Industriepolitik in Oester— reich. Vienna: Bundesministerium fuer Handel, Gewerbe und Industrie, 1973a.
Oesterreichisches Institut fuer Raumplanung. Dringliche Faelle der Regionalen Industriepolitk: Fragebogenauswertung. Vienna: Bundesministerium fuer Handel, Gewerbe und Industrie, 1973b.
Oesterreichisches Institut fuer Raumplanung. Regionalplanung Innviertel Voruntersuchung: Auswtrkungen von Entwicklungen im Bayer- ischen Raum. Ihpublished b o o kprepared at the Oesterreich isches Institut fuer Raumplanung, Vienna, 1973c (mimeographed).
Oesterreichisches Institut fuer Raumplanung. Ziele und Grundsaetze der Regionalen Industriepolitk in den oesterreichischen Bundeslaendem. Unpublished book prepared at the Oester— reichisches Institut fuer Raumplanung, Vienna, 1972 (mimeo graphed) .
Oesterreichisches Institut fuer Raumplanung (under contract from the Styrian provincial government). Reglonalplanung Aichfeld- Murboden. Vienna: Oesterreichisches Institut fuer Raumplanung, 1969.
Oesterreichisches Institut fuer Raumplanung. Landesentwlcklungspro- gramm Burgenland. Vienna: Oesterreichisches Institut fuer Raumplanung, 1968.
Oesterreichisches Institut fuer Raumplanung. Raumordnung in Oester— reich. Vienna: Oesterreichisches Institut fuer Raumplanung, 1966.
Oesterreichisches Institut fuer Raumplanung. Industrie-Entwicklungs- programm Niederoesterreich. Vienna: Oesterreichische Institut fuer Raumplanung, 1965.
Oesterreichisches Institut fuer Wirtschaftsforschung and Oesterreich isches Statistiches Zentralamt. Statistische Uebersichten. 7/68, 7/71, and 7/74 (1968, J.971,- and- 1974).
Oesterreichisches Institut fuer Wirtschaftsforschung. "Die Verteilung des Volkseinkommens nach Bundes laendem." Honatsberichte 1/1973, Oesterreichisches Institut fuer Wirtschaftsforschung.
Oesterreichisches Institut fuer Wirtschaftsforschung. "Die Ver teilung' des Volkseinkommens nach Bundes laendem." Honats berichte 12/1959, Oesterreichisches Institut fuer Wirt schaftsforschung. 172
Oesterreichisches Statistlsche Zentralamt. Statistlsche Uebersichten 1/75. Vienna: Oesterreichische Statlstiche Zentralamt und Oesterrichlsches Institut fuer Wirtschaftforschung, 1975a.
Oesterreichisches Statistlsche Zentralamt. Unpublished Einkommen— und Lohnsteuerstatistk, 1975b.
Oesterreichisches Statistlsche Zentralamt. Bestands-Statistik der Kraftfahrzeugen in Oesterreich. Vienna: Oesterreichisches Statistlsche Zentralamt, volumes 1957-1973.
Oesterreichisches Statistlsche Zentralamt. Ergebnisse der Volkszaeh- lung vom 12. Mai 1971. Vienna: Druck und Kommissionsverlag Carl Ueberreuter, 1973.
Oesterreichisches Statistlsche Zentralamt. Bericht ueber das Gesund- heitwesen Oesterreichs. Vienna: Oesterreichisches Statistlsche Zentralamt, 1955-1973.
Oesterreichisches Statistlsche Zentralamt. Statistisches Handbuch , fuer die Republik Oesterreich. Vienna: Oesterreichische Staatsdruckerei, volumes 1955-1972.
Oesterreichisches Statistlsche Zentralamt. Die Naturliche Bevolker- ungsbewegung im Jahre 1971. Vienna:Oesterreichisches • Statis tisches Zentralamt, 1972.
Oesterreichisches Statistlsche Zentralamt. Ergbriisse der Volkszaeh- lung 1961. Vienna: Oesterreichisches Statistlsche Zentralamt, 1963.
Oesterreichisches Statistisches Zentralamt. Ergebnisse der Volks- zaehlung 1951. Vienna: Oesterreichisches Statistlsche Zentral amt, 1953.
Okun, Bernard and Richardson, R.W. "Regional Income Inequality and Internal Population Migration." Economic Development and Cultural Change IX (January 1961).
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Salient Features of Regional Development Policy in Austria. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and'Development, 1974.
Pachucki, Herbert. Regionalpolitik. Vienna: Verlag fuer Geschichte : und:Politik, 1967. . - ■ - . . ^ .... -
Pachucki, Herbert, "Regionale Wirtschaftspolitk. " Spezielle Auswirk- ungen einzelner •Bestimmungen der Europaeischen Vertraege auf die raeumliche Entwicklung des Bundesgebietes. Unpub lished book available at the Oesterreichisches Institut fuer Raumplanung, Vienna, n.d. 173
Parr, John B. "Outmigration and the Depressed Area Problem." Land Economics II (May 1966), 149-159.
Pedersen, Paul 0. "Innovation Diffusion within and between National Urban Systems." Geographical Analysis (July 1970), 203-254.
Perroux, Francois. "Note sur la Notion de ’pole de Crolssance'".. Economic appliquee 8 (1955), 307-320.-
Perroux, Francois. "Economic Space: Theory and Applications." Quarterly Journal of Economics LXIV (February 1950), 94-97, 1950a.
Perroux, Francois. "Les spaces economiques." Economic appliquee 3 (1950), 225, 1950b.
Petrella, Ricardo. Interview conducted at the European Co-ordination Center for Research and Documentation in Social Sciences in Vienna on April 10, 1975.
Petzmanh, Heinz. Interview conducted at the Oesterreichisches Institut fuer Raumplanung in Vienna on March 3, 1975.
Pred, Allan R. "Diffusion, Organizational Spatial Structure, and City- System Development." Economic Geography 51 (July 1975), 252-268.
Pred, Allan Major Job-Providing Organizations and Systems of Cities. Commission on College Geography, Resource Paper No. 27. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Geographers, 1974.
Proksch, Anton. Vollbeschaeftigung, Entwicklungsgebiete, Dauerarbeit- plaetze. Vienna: Verlag des Oesterreichischen Gewerkschafts- bundes, 1962.
Proraboek. E. Interview conducted in the Department of Economic Planning and Co-ordination for the City of Vienna on March 5, 1975.
Richardson, Harry W. Regional Economics. New York: Praeger Pub lishers. 1969.
Rill, Heinz P. and Schaeffer, Heinz. Die Rechtsnormen fuer die Planungs- koordlnierung seitens der oeffentlichen Hand auf dem Gebiete der Raumordnung. Oesterreichische Raumordnungskonferenz Schrif- tenreihe No. 6. Vienna: Oesterreichische Raumordnungskongerenz, 1975.
Robinson, E.A.G., ed. Backward Areas in Advanced Countries. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1969. 174
Rodgers, Allan. "Migration and Industrial Development: The Southern Italian Experience." Economic Geography 46 (April 1970), 111-135.
Ruehmann, Peter, Die regionale Wirtschaftspolitik Belgiens. Kieler Studien No. 93. Tuebingen: Mohr, 1968.
Schwind, Paul J . Migration and Regional Development in the United States 1950-1960. University of Chicago, Department of Geog raphy. Research Paper No. 133. Chicago: University of Chicago: 1971.
Scitovsky, T. "Two Concepts of External Economies." Journal of Political Economics (April 1954), 143-151.
Schramke, Doktor. Interview conducted at the Oesterreichische Kommunalkredit A.G., Vienna, on October 18, 1974.
Seidel, Hans. "Regionale Strukturpolitik Oesterreichs unter der gegen- waertigen europaeischen Realitaet." Regionalpolitik in der Sechsergemeinschaft und in Oesterreich. Zweite Internationale Studientagung, Europahaus Wien, October 1969. Vienna: Europa- haus, 1969.
Seidel, .Hans; Butschek, Felix; Kausel, Anton. Die Regionale Dynamlk der oesterreichischen Wirtschaft. Vienna: Oesterreichisches Institut fuer Wirtschaftsforschung, 1966.
Semple, Keith. "Geography and Information Theory." Unpublished paper, The Ohio State University, n.d. (mimeographed).
Sinnhuber, Karl A. "Eisenhuettenstadt and Other New Industrial Locations East of Berlin," Wiener Geographische Schriften. (1965), 328-349.
Sjaastad, L.A. "The Costs and Returns of Human Migration." The Journal of Political Economy 70 (October 1962), 80-93.
Skarke, Anna Maria and Skarke, Peter, Wachstumsunterschiede der Oesterreichischen Bundeslander 1964-1971.. Institut fuer Hoehere Studien Forschungsbericht Nr. 87. (Vienna, Institut fuer Hoehere Studien), 1974.
Spady, William G. and Greenwood, Donna. "Instant Path Analysis: An Elementary Cookbook." Unpublished paper, the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, n.d. (mimeographed).
Spector, Aron. "A Description and Review of Path Analysis." Unpublished paper, Department of Geography, Ohio State University, n.d. (mimeographed). 175
Steiermark, Landesreglerung. Landesrechnungsabschluss. Graz: Land Steiermark, .volumes 1960-1968.
Stein, Jerome L. Economic Growth In a Free Market. New York: Columbia University Press, 1964.
Steiner, Kurt. Politics In Austria. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1972.
Stipschitsch, Franz. Interview conducted at the federal Finanzamt, Vienna, on May 7, 1975.
« Stoehr, Walter. "Development Planning for Depressed Areas: A Method ological Approach." Journal of the American Institute of Planners. 30 (May 1964), 123-131.
Streit, Max; Kubinzky, A.; Gordesch, Johannes. Underdeveloped Areas in Industrialized Countries. The Austrian Report to the European Coordination Centre for Research and Documentation in Social Sciences. Graz: Institut fuer Soziologle an der Universitaet Graz, 1967.
Strummer, Franz. "Regionalpolitik in Oesterreich: Aus der Sicht der Land - und Forstwirtschaft." Land- und Forstwirtschaft in Oesterreich: Sozialoekonomische Tatbestaende. Linz: Praesldent- konferenz der Landwirtschaftskammem Oesterreichs, 1969.
Szorger, Hofrat. Interview conducted in the Finanzamt, province of Burgenland, in Eisenstadt on June 2, 1975.
Szorger, Hofrat. "Die Auswirkungen der Gemeindezusammenlegungen auf die Ertragsanteile der burgenlaendischen Gemeinden." Unpub lished paper, n.d. (mimeographed).
Thomas, Morgan. "The Regional Problem, Structural Change and Growth Pole Theory." Growth Poles and Growth Centres in Regional Planning. Edited by Antoni R. Kuklinski (Paris: Mouton, 1972).
Tirol, Landesreglerung. Landwirtschaftsgesetz, provincial law 3/1975.
Tobler, W.R. "Spatial Interaction Patterns." International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Research Memorandum RM-75-26. Schloss Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 1975.
Trauner, Rudolh. "Betriebsgruendung - Wunsch und Realiteat." Oberoesterreich: Entwicklung und Aufstieg. 1/1969, 19-26.
Van de Geer, John. Introduction to Multivariate Analysis for the Social Sciences. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1971. 176
Verbindungsstelle der Bundeslaender. Oesterreichische- Finanzwirtschaft. Vienna: Verbindungsstelle der Bundeslaender, 1972.
Verein .zur Foerderung der Burgenlaendischen Wirtschaft. Neue Betriebe 1956—1971. Eisenstadt: Verein zur Foederung der Burgaenlaen- dischen Wirtschaft, n.d.
Vorarlberg, Landesreglerung. Letter received from the Amt der Vorarl- berger Landesreglerung, Bregenz, Austria; dated June 13, 1975.
Vorarlberg, Landesreglerung. Gesetz ueber die Gewaehrung von Darlehen zum Bau und zur Erhaltung von Krankenanstalten, provincial law 7/1970.
Wagner, Georg. "Regionalprogramra Aichfeld- Murboden." Regionale Entwicklungspolitik in Oesterreich. Edited by the Bundes kanzleramt, Buero fur Raumplanung, 1975a.
Wagner, Georg. Interview conducted in Vienna on June 6, 1975b.
Wiener Institut fuer Standortberatung. Raumwirksamkeit von Foerderungen, Band 1. Vienna: Bundeskanzleramt, Buero fuer Raumplanung, 1975.
Williamson, Jeffrey G. "Regional Inequality and the Process of National Development: A Description of Patterns." Economic Development and Cultural Change XIII No. 4 part II (July 1965), 1-84.
Willis, Kenneth G. Problems in Migration Analysis. Westmead, England: Saxon House/Lexington Books, 1974.
Winlarskl, B. "The Programming and Development Policy of Backward Areas in National Economic Planning." Backward Areas in Advanced Countries. Edited by E.A.G. Robinson (1969).
Winnick, Louis. "Place Prosperity versus People Prosperity: Welfare Considerations in the Geographical Redistribution of Economic Activity." Essays in Urban Land Economics. Edited by S. Grebber. (Los Angeles: University of California, 1966).
Wurzer, Rudolf. "Die Grundprinzipien einer oesterreichischen Raumordnung." Regionalpolitik in der Sechsergemeinschaft und in Oesterreich. Zwelte Internationale Studlentagung, Europahaus Wien, October 1969. Vienna: Europahaus Wien, 1969. FOOTNOTES
This institute also has the best regional planning library in Austria.
^This excludes one district, Dornbrin, for which separate data are not available prior to the 1961 census.
The matrix procedure outlined here by Willis can be illustrated by the use of the equation system used in this study in the provincial analysis section of Chapter 6. That system has 9 variables, 3 endo genous (Y) and 6 exogenous (x). The table below presents that system with variable names above the variable symbols
DEMP DUEM DLIV ERP 1SUB PSUB NMIG DCOMM TAX Equation Y, Y? Y„ x. x-
1 2 2 0 0 2 3 0 x. x6
If we consider equation 1, we eliminate that row of coefficients and "all columns not having a prescribed zero" in that row. Those entries are lined through above and there does exist at least one non-zero determinant of a matrix with G-l rows and columns (here a 2X2 matrix). That matrix is braketed above and the determinant is ((x^) (Xc)-(O) (xij)) , which is clearly non-zero. The same pro cedure applied to the other equations reveals that they also satisfy this rank condition for Identification.
This result derives from the comparison of two data sets for different time periods and by different authors. However, the time periods do overlap and the comparison, thus, seems justified (data from Jeglitsch, 1976; Seldl et. al., 1966).
^The composite scores were produced by combining the factor scores of each province frpm the two factors which were identified. Each respective score was weighted by the proportion of variance explained by the factor in question and the two weighted factor scores were added. The result was a composite score, one for each province and time period. This procedure is similar to a procedure outlined by Rummel (1970, p.441) for producing composite factor estimates.
177 17.8
Thla population size Is adequate for the purposes of regression analysis, but it is not optimal and the estimates from regression must be Interpreted with some caution.
^All data were collected for the periods 1961-1966 and 1966-1971 with the following modifications:
1) Monies for the period 1961-1966 were calculated from the years 1961—1965 and for the period 1966-1971 from the years 1966-1970.
2) DCOMM and NMIG were interpolated values deriving from data for the entire 1961-1971 period.
®This is also actually somewhat smaller than the estimated regression coefficient which was 0.901.