Cascadia Subductionzone
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
9780295744117.Pdf (3.082Mb)
Feminist Technosciences Rebecca Herzig and Banu Subramaniam, Series Editors 1r.Roy, Molecular Feminisms.indd 1 1/28/19 1:10 PM 1r.Roy, Molecular Feminisms.indd 2 1/28/19 1:10 PM Molecular Feminisms BIOLOGY, BECOMINGS, AND LIFE IN THE LAB DEBOLEENA ROY University of Washington Press Seattle 1r.Roy, Molecular Feminisms.indd 3 1/28/19 1:10 PM Publication of this open monograph was the result of Emory University’s participa- tion in TOME (Toward an Open Monograph Ecosystem), a collaboration of the Association of American Universities, the Association of University Presses, and the Association of Research Libraries. TOME aims to expand the reach of long-form humanities and social science scholarship including digital scholarship. Additionally, the program looks to ensure the sustainability of university press monograph pub- lishing by supporting the highest quality scholarship and promoting a new ecology of scholarly publishing in which authors’ institutions bear the publication costs. Funding from Emory University and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation made it possible to open this publication to the world. www.openmonographs.org Copyright © 2018 by Deboleena Roy Printed and bound in the United States of America Interior design by Thomas Eykemans Composed in Chaparral, typeface designed by Carol Twombly Cover design by Katrina Noble Cover photograph by Kheyal Roy-Meighoo and Koan Roy-Meighoo 22 21 20 19 5 4 3 2 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. -
Key Principles and Implications for Research Design, Analysis, and Interpretation
REVIEW ARTICLE published: 28 August 2014 HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00650 Recommendations for sex/gender neuroimaging research: key principles and implications for research design, analysis, and interpretation Gina Rippon 1*, Rebecca Jordan-Young 2, Anelis Kaiser 3 and Cordelia Fine 4 1 Aston Brain Centre, School of Life and Health Sciences (Psychology), Aston University, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK 2 Department of Women’s, Gender and Sexuality Studies, Barnard College, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, NY, USA 3 Department of Social Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland 4 Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, Melbourne Business School, and Centre for Ethical Leadership, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia Edited by: Neuroimaging (NI) technologies are having increasing impact in the study of complex Sven Braeutigam, University of cognitive and social processes. In this emerging field of social cognitive neuroscience, Oxford, UK a central goal should be to increase the understanding of the interaction between the Reviewed by: Sören Krach, Philipps-University neurobiology of the individual and the environment in which humans develop and function. Marburg, Germany The study of sex/gender is often a focus for NI research, and may be motivated by a Jennifer Blanche Swettenham, desire to better understand general developmental principles, mental health problems that University of Oxford, UK show female-male disparities, and gendered differences in society. In order to ensure the Ana Susac, University of Zagreb, Croatia maximum possible contribution of NI research to these goals, we draw attention to four key *Correspondence: principles—overlap, mosaicism, contingency and entanglement—that have emerged from Gina Rippon, Aston Brain Centre, sex/gender research and that should inform NI research design, analysis and interpretation. -
Thesis (Complete)
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) The politics of plasticity: Sex and gender in the 21st century brain Kleinherenbrink, A.V. Publication date 2016 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Kleinherenbrink, A. V. (2016). The politics of plasticity: Sex and gender in the 21st century brain. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:24 Sep 2021 T HE t the beginning of this century, the idea that the brain is plastic—that its P Astructure and function can change in response to stimulation or injury— OLITICS began to replace the belief that adult brains are fixed. The claim that sex differences are hardwired into the brain, however, is still frequently endorsed. -
Biblical Theology of Human Sexuality Report
Dear Reader: This report from the Committee to Articulate a Foundation-laying Biblical Theology of Human Sexuality is made available to the CRC congregations and classes for discussion and careful review. Due to the cancellation of Synod 2021, the deadline for responses to this report, in the form of an Overture or Communication, has been extended to be considered by Synod 2022. Such documents must be processed through a church council and then through classis and then be received by the Synodical Services Office by March 15, 2022, in order to be included on synod’s agenda in 2022. If you have any questions regarding proper procedures, please refer to the Rules for Synodical Procedure (pp. 9-11) available at crcna.org/SynodResources, or you may contact the Synodical Services Office or the executive director of the CRCNA. Thank you! Mr. Colin P. Watson, Sr. Executive Director of the CRCNA 1700 28th Street SE Grand Rapids, MI 49508-1407 Phone: 616-224-0744 or 800-272-5125 Email: [email protected] Committee to Articulate a Foundation-laying Biblical Theology of Human Sexuality Report Outline I. Introduction II. Preamble A. Good sex B. Current context C. The church’s response III. A biblical theology of human sexuality A. Introduction: Matthew 19 B. Creation: Genesis 1-2 C. Fall: Genesis 3 D. Redemption: The Old Testament E. Redemption: The New Testament IV. Note on science and general revelation V. Pornography: Cultural Context A. Current context B. Effects of pornography VI. Pornography: Scripture A. Violence B. Exploitation of the poor C. Racism D. -
Recommendations for Sex/Gender Neuroimaging Research: Key Principles and Implications for Research Design, Analysis, and Interpretation
REVIEW ARTICLE published: 28 August 2014 HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00650 Recommendations for sex/gender neuroimaging research: key principles and implications for research design, analysis, and interpretation Gina Rippon 1*, Rebecca Jordan-Young 2, Anelis Kaiser 3 and Cordelia Fine 4 1 Aston Brain Centre, School of Life and Health Sciences (Psychology), Aston University, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK 2 Department of Women’s, Gender and Sexuality Studies, Barnard College, Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, NY, USA 3 Department of Social Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland 4 Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, Melbourne Business School, and Centre for Ethical Leadership, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia Edited by: Neuroimaging (NI) technologies are having increasing impact in the study of complex Sven Braeutigam, University of cognitive and social processes. In this emerging field of social cognitive neuroscience, Oxford, UK a central goal should be to increase the understanding of the interaction between the Reviewed by: Sören Krach, Philipps-University neurobiology of the individual and the environment in which humans develop and function. Marburg, Germany The study of sex/gender is often a focus for NI research, and may be motivated by a Jennifer Blanche Swettenham, desire to better understand general developmental principles, mental health problems that University of Oxford, UK show female-male disparities, and gendered differences in society. In order to ensure the Ana Susac, University of Zagreb, Croatia maximum possible contribution of NI research to these goals, we draw attention to four key *Correspondence: principles—overlap, mosaicism, contingency and entanglement—that have emerged from Gina Rippon, Aston Brain Centre, sex/gender research and that should inform NI research design, analysis and interpretation. -
Neurocientistas Feministas E O Debate Sobre O “Sexo Cerebral”: Um Estudo Sobre Ciência E Sexo/Gênero
DOI: 10.12957/emconstrucao.2019.37439 www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/emconstrucao Neurocientistas feministas e o debate sobre o “sexo cerebral”: um estudo sobre ciência e sexo/gênero Feminist neuroscientists and the debate on the “brain sex”: a study of science and sex/gender Marina Nucci Resumo pós-doutoranda do Instituto Neste trabalho, refletimos sobre a relação entre sexo/gênero, feminismo e ciência, de Medicina Social da UERJ, a partir da análise da rede NeuroGenderings, grupo internacional interdisciplinar bolsista Faperj Nota 10 que reúne pesquisadoras que se descrevem como “neurofeministas”. Críticas Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000- ao determinismo biológico, elas procuram realizar uma neurociência situada, 0003-3465-9201 assumidamente feminista, que não deixe de lado a materialidade dos corpos. [email protected] Exploramos neste trabalho estratégias da rede para tentar sair do que chamam de “becos sem saída” impostos pelo modo dualista de se pensar natureza/cultura, sexo/gênero, ciências humanas/biológicas. Recebido em: 23/09/2018 Palavras-chave: Feminismo; Ciência; Sexo; Gênero; Cérebro; Aceito em:29/03/2019 Abstract In this work, we reflect on the relationship between sex/gender, feminism and science, based on the analysis of NeuroGenderings network, an interdisciplinary international group that brings together researchers who describe themselves as “neurofeminists”. Critical to biological determinism, they seek to make a situaded neuroscience, openly feminist, that doesn’t leave aside the materiality of bodies. We explore, in this work, the network strategies to try to get out of what they call the “dead ends” imposed by dualistic way of thinking nature/ culture, sex/gender, human/biological sciences. -
Sex-Based Brain Differences and Emotional Harm
Duke Law Journal Online VOLUME 70 OCTOBER 2020 SEX-BASED BRAIN DIFFERENCES AND EMOTIONAL HARM BETSY J. GREY† ABSTRACT Technological advances have allowed neuroscientists to identify brain differences between women and men, which may lead to explanations for sex-biased population differences in behavior and brain-based disorders. Although the research is at its early stages, this is an appropriate time to examine some of the potential legal implications of these findings. This Article examines that question in the context of tort law, especially how scientific findings may affect the use of the reasonable person standard in emotional injury claims. Specifically, studies suggest that there may be distinct sex-based mechanisms involved in reactions to extreme stress, raising the question of whether women experience and process stress and trauma differently than men. This Article argues that these studies may eventually inform the use of the reasonableness standard for freestanding emotional harm claims. As science further develops, courts may either apply a reasonable woman standard in limited contexts or at least allow jurors to consider evidence of sex-based differences in applying a reasonable person standard. Recognizing these differences, courts have already begun to apply the reasonable woman standard to hostile workplace environment claims, and science may support broader use of that standard, especially for negligent and intentional infliction of emotional harm claims. INTRODUCTION The last decades of legal development rightfully have broken down artificial sex-based distinctions over a range of fronts—from † Jack E. Brown Chair in Law at Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law. -
'A Large and Longstanding Body'
‘A Large and Longstanding Body’ Historical Authority in the Science of Sex Jeffrey W. Lockhart Preprint Suggested citation: Lockhart, Jeffrey W. 2020. “‘A Large and Long Standing Body’: Historical Authority in the Science of Sex.” In Far Right Revisionism and the End of History: Alt/Histories, edited by Louie Dean Valencia-García, 359–86. New York: Routledge. This is an Accepted Manuscript of a book chapter published by Routledge in Far Right Revisionism and the End of History: Alt/Histories on 8 April, 2020, available online: https://www.routledge.com/Far-Right-Revisionism-and-the-End-of-History-Alt-Histories/Valencia- Garcia/p/book/9780367460082 Lockhart | 2 ‘A Large and Longstanding Body’ Historical Authority in the Science of Sex1 Jeffrey W. Lockhart Scientists’ testimonies are used to endorse everything from toothpaste to nuclear power and weapons, but they are also used to challenge the very same things. And this is where the knife goes in because at present “scientific” support can be elicited on all sides of every question, so the “lay” public is constantly forced to decide which scientists to believe. Where then is the vaunted objectivity of science? People are realizing that they must… develop criteria on which to make these decisions.2 Notions of essential, biological sex differences play a major role in contemporary social and policy debates, ranging across the under-representation of women in science, government, and corporate leadership; the division of household labor and childcare; the access and rights of trans and intersex people to use appropriate facilities or to exist at all; and the best way to educate boys and girls. -
Universidade Do Estado Do Rio De Janeiro Centro
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Centro Biomédico Instituto de Medicina Social Marina Fisher Nucci “Não chore, pesquise!”: Reflexões sobre sexo, gênero e ciência a partir do neurofeminismo Rio de Janeiro 2015 Marina Fisher Nucci “Não chore, pesquise!”: Reflexões sobre sexo, gênero e ciência a partir do neurofeminismo Tese apresentada, como requisito parcial para obtenção do título de Doutor, ao Programa de Pós- Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Orientadora: Prof.a Dra. Jane Araújo Russo Rio de Janeiro 2015 CATALOGAÇÃO NA FONTE UERJ/ REDE SIRIUS/ CB/C C962 Nucci, Marina Fisher “Não chore, pesquise!” : reflexões sobre sexo, gênero e ciências a partir do neurofeminismo / Marina Fisher Nucci. – 2015. 222 f. Orientadora: Jane Araújo Russo. Tese (doutorado) – Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Medicina Social. 1. Sexo - Teses. 2. Gênero - Teses. 3. Feminismo – Teses. 4. Neurociências – Teses. I. Russo, Jane. II. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Medicina Social. III. Título. CDU 616.8:159.922.1 Autorizo, apenas para fins acadêmicos e científicos, a reprodução total ou parcial desta tese, desde que citada a fonte. ________________________________ ______________________________ Assinatura Data Marina Fisher Nucci “Não chore, pesquise!”: Reflexões sobre sexo, gênero e ciência a partir do neurofeminismo Tese apresentada, como requisito parcial para obtenção do título de Doutor, ao Programa de Pós- Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Aprovada em 04 de setembro de 2015. Orientadora: Profa. Dra. Jane Araújo Russo Instituto de Medicina Social - UERJ Banca Examinadora: ________________________________________________________ Prof.ª Dra. -
Dismantling the Transgender Brain Eric Llaveria Caselles
Dismantling the Transgender Brain Eric Llaveria Caselles ABSTRACT: In this paper, I analyze in detail a neuroscientific research paper that investigates the structural connectome of transmen and transwomen in relation to cismen and ciswomen. Situated within the frame of Feminist Science Studies and from an outsider-within perspective, my analysis meets three objectives. First, it provides an understanding of the research presented in the paper: what is the research question, which methods are they using, which paradigms do they fol- low? Second, it problematizes the findings of the research paper and the inter- pretation thereof by focusing on different conceptualizations of sex/gender within neuroscience; the limits of neuroimaging technologies and the privileging of par- ticular lines of interpretations. Finally, it reflects upon the challenges of this exer- cise by asking about the role of ignorance and learning in interdisciplinary work; the impact of epistemic hierarchies and the political and ethical dimensions of the research paper. My conclusion is that the lack of engagement of the neurosci- entists with perspectives from gender studies and with the voices of trans people constitutes a severe neglect of the social and political responsibility of researchers and reinforces the oppression of the trans community. KEYWORDS: neuroscience, transgender, hardwiring paradigm, sex/gender binary, research ethics. AUTHOR NOTE: Eric Llaveria Caselles was born in Valencia, Spain and named Ma- ria after her grandmother. At the age of 17 s/he moved to Berlin and got involved in feminist and queer networks. He is currently finishing his MA Gender Studies at the Humboldt University. Interested in feminist and decolonizing approaches to knowledge production, he works at the intersection of epistemic injustice, so- cial studies of science, history of science and trans studies.