Environment Impact Assessment Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environment Impact Assessment Report Client ST HELENA DEVELOPMENTS LTD Project ESTABLISHMENT OF TRADE WINDS OCEAN VILLAGE ON PARCEL NO 186, BLOCK 1, THOMPSONS HILL, ST HELENA ISLAND Date FEBRUARY 2021 ST HELENA DEVELOPMENTS LTD ESTABLISHMENT OF TRADE WINDS OCEAN VILLAGE ON PARCEL NO 186, BLOCK 1, THOMPSONS HILL, ST HELENA ISLAND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT _________________________ Lourens de Villiers Managing Director and Environmental Assessment Practitioner Plot 24 Haakdoornboom AH Soutpan Road (M35) Pretoria North Cell: 082 789 6525 Labesh (Pty) Ltd. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................................. 6 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................................................... 6 APPENDICES ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................................................... 7 DEFINITIONS ..................................................................................................................................................................... 9 ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................................................ 13 NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... 14 ST HELENA ISLAND - LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CONTROL (ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT) REGULATIONS, 2013 ........................................................................................................................... 23 DESCRIPTION OF THE EIA PROCESS................................................................................................................................ 23 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 24 1.1 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................................................... 24 1.2 TERMS OF REFERENCE ............................................................................................................................................. 25 1.2.1 Applicant Details ........................................................................................................................................ 25 1.2.2 Environmental Assessment Practitioner Details ........................................................................................ 25 2. SCHEME DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................................................ 26 2.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTIVITIES TO BE UNDERTAKEN ............................................................................................... 26 2.2 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................................. 30 2.3 MOTIVATION FOR THE NEED AND DESIRABILITY OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ..................................................... 31 2.3.1 Development Need and Objectives ........................................................................................................... 31 3. PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................................................... 32 3.1 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED .................................................................................................................................... 32 3.1.1 Location ..................................................................................................................................................... 33 3.1.2 Design and Layout .................................................................................................................................... 33 3.1.3 Technological ............................................................................................................................................ 33 3.1.4 Input .......................................................................................................................................................... 34 3.1.5 Scale and Magnitude ................................................................................................................................. 34 3.1.6 “No-Go Option” .......................................................................................................................................... 34 4 APPROACH TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT.............................................................................. 35 4.1 OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROCESS ............................................................................... 35 4.2 PROCESS FOLLOWED FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROCESS.................................................. 36 4.2.1 Screening and Scoping Checklist .............................................................................................................. 36 4.2.2 Public Participation .................................................................................................................................... 41 4.2.2.1 Public Review of Scoping Report ......................................................................................................... 41 4.2.2.2 Summary of Issues Raised by Interested and Affected Parties (I&AP) ................................................ 41 4.3 SCOPING REPORT ................................................................................................................................................ 41 4.4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT ................................................................................................... 42 5 POLICY CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................. 43 5.1 ST HELENA ISLAND LEGISLATION ........................................................................................................................... 43 5.1.1 Constitution of St Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cuncha, 2009 ......................................................... 43 5.1.2 Agriculture and Livestock Improvement Ordinance, 1940 ......................................................................... 43 5.1.3 Animal Trespass Ordinance, 1982 ............................................................................................................ 43 5.1.4 Animal Diseases Ordinance, 1944 ............................................................................................................ 43 5.1.5 Bees Ordinance, 1995 ............................................................................................................................... 43 5.1.6 Birds Protection Ordinance, 1996.............................................................................................................. 43 5.1.7 Building Control Ordinance, 2013.............................................................................................................. 43 Labesh (Pty) Ltd. 3 5.1.8 Electricity Ordinance, 1961 ....................................................................................................................... 44 5.1.9 Environmental Protection Ordinance, 2016 ............................................................................................... 44 5.1.10 Health and Safety Ordinance, 1977 ...................................................................................................... 44 5.1.11 Land Planning and Development Control Ordinance, 2013.................................................................. 44 5.1.12 Plants Protection Ordinance, 1938 ....................................................................................................... 44 5.1.13 Protection of Animals Ordinance, 1969 ................................................................................................ 44 5.1.14 Water Ordinance, 1978 ........................................................................................................................ 44 6 LAND USE & ACCESS ........................................................................................................................................... 45 6.1 LAND USE ................................................................................................................................................................ 45 6.1.1 Current Land Use ........................................................................................................................................... 45 6.1.2 Proposed Land Use ........................................................................................................................................ 45 6.1.3 Surrounding Land Uses .................................................................................................................................. 46 6.2 ACCESS ..................................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Download Document
    African countries and neighbouring islands covered by the Synopsis. S T R E L I T Z I A 23 Synopsis of the Lycopodiophyta and Pteridophyta of Africa, Madagascar and neighbouring islands by J.P. Roux Pretoria 2009 S T R E L I T Z I A This series has replaced Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa and Annals of the Kirstenbosch Botanic Gardens which SANBI inherited from its predecessor organisations. The plant genus Strelitzia occurs naturally in the eastern parts of southern Africa. It comprises three arborescent species, known as wild bananas, and two acaulescent species, known as crane flowers or bird-of-paradise flowers. The logo of the South African National Biodiversity Institute is based on the striking inflorescence of Strelitzia reginae, a native of the Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal that has become a garden favourite worldwide. It sym- bolises the commitment of the Institute to champion the exploration, conservation, sustain- able use, appreciation and enjoyment of South Africa’s exceptionally rich biodiversity for all people. J.P. Roux South African National Biodiversity Institute, Compton Herbarium, Cape Town SCIENTIFIC EDITOR: Gerrit Germishuizen TECHNICAL EDITOR: Emsie du Plessis DESIGN & LAYOUT: Elizma Fouché COVER DESIGN: Elizma Fouché, incorporating Blechnum palmiforme on Gough Island PHOTOGRAPHS J.P. Roux Citing this publication ROUX, J.P. 2009. Synopsis of the Lycopodiophyta and Pteridophyta of Africa, Madagascar and neighbouring islands. Strelitzia 23. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria. ISBN: 978-1-919976-48-8 © Published by: South African National Biodiversity Institute. Obtainable from: SANBI Bookshop, Private Bag X101, Pretoria, 0001 South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Island Biology Island Biology
    IIssllaanndd bbiioollooggyy Allan Sørensen Allan Timmermann, Ana Maria Martín González Camilla Hansen Camille Kruch Dorte Jensen Eva Grøndahl, Franziska Petra Popko, Grete Fogtmann Jensen, Gudny Asgeirsdottir, Hubertus Heinicke, Jan Nikkelborg, Janne Thirstrup, Karin T. Clausen, Karina Mikkelsen, Katrine Meisner, Kent Olsen, Kristina Boros, Linn Kathrin Øverland, Lucía de la Guardia, Marie S. Hoelgaard, Melissa Wetter Mikkel Sørensen, Morten Ravn Knudsen, Pedro Finamore, Petr Klimes, Rasmus Højer Jensen, Tenna Boye Tine Biedenweg AARHUS UNIVERSITY 2005/ESSAYS IN EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY Teachers: Bodil K. Ehlers, Tanja Ingversen, Dave Parker, MIchael Warrer Larsen, Yoko L. Dupont & Jens M. Olesen 1 C o n t e n t s Atlantic Ocean Islands Faroe Islands Kent Olsen 4 Shetland Islands Janne Thirstrup 10 Svalbard Linn Kathrin Øverland 14 Greenland Eva Grøndahl 18 Azores Tenna Boye 22 St. Helena Pedro Finamore 25 Falkland Islands Kristina Boros 29 Cape Verde Islands Allan Sørensen 32 Tristan da Cunha Rasmus Højer Jensen 36 Mediterranean Islands Corsica Camille Kruch 39 Cyprus Tine Biedenweg 42 Indian Ocean Islands Socotra Mikkel Sørensen 47 Zanzibar Karina Mikkelsen 50 Maldives Allan Timmermann 54 Krakatau Camilla Hansen 57 Bali and Lombok Grete Fogtmann Jensen 61 Pacific Islands New Guinea Lucía de la Guardia 66 2 Solomon Islands Karin T. Clausen 70 New Caledonia Franziska Petra Popko 74 Samoa Morten Ravn Knudsen 77 Tasmania Jan Nikkelborg 81 Fiji Melissa Wetter 84 New Zealand Marie S. Hoelgaard 87 Pitcairn Katrine Meisner 91 Juan Fernandéz Islands Gudny Asgeirsdottir 95 Hawaiian Islands Petr Klimes 97 Galápagos Islands Dorthe Jensen 102 Caribbean Islands Cuba Hubertus Heinicke 107 Dominica Ana Maria Martin Gonzalez 110 Essay localities 3 The Faroe Islands Kent Olsen Introduction The Faroe Islands is a treeless archipelago situated in the heart of the warm North Atlantic Current on the Wyville Thompson Ridge between 61°20’ and 62°24’ N and between 6°15’ and 7°41’ W.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Biology of the Endangered St. Helena Plover Charadrius Sanctaehelenae
    Conservation biology of the endangered St. Helena Plover Charadrius sanctaehelenae Volume 1 of 1 Fiona Ewing Burns A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Bath Department of Biology and Biochemistry June 2011 COPYRIGHT Attention is drawn to the fact that copyright of this thesis rests with its author. A copy of this thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and they must not copy it or use material from it except as permitted by law or with the consent of the author This thesis may be made available for consultation within the University Library and may be photocopied or lent to other libraries for the purposes of consultation. 1 Contents Acknowledgements...........................................................................................................3 Abstract .............................................................................................................................5 Introduction.......................................................................................................................6 Chapter 1: Leg flags versus colour rings: a comparison of marking methods using a small shorebird, the St Helena Plover.............................................................................20 Chapter 2: The impact of introduced predators on an island endemic, the St. Helena Plover Charadrius sanctaehelenae .................................................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Anatomy of the Endemic Woodyasteraceae of St Helena I
    Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society (2001), 13.7: 197—210. With 27 figures doi:10.1006/bojl.2001.0483, available online at httpV/www.idealibrary.com on IDE Wood anatomy of the endemic woody Asteraceae of St Helena I: phyletic and ecological aspects SHERWIN CARLQUIST FLS Santa Barbara Botanic Garden, 1212 Mission Canyon Road, Santa Barbara, California 93105, USA Received January 2001; accepted for publication June 2001 Quantitative and qualitative data are given for samples of mature wood of all eight species of woody Asteraceae, representing three tribes, of St Helena I. The quantitative features of all except one species are clearly mesomorphic, corresponding to their mesic central ridge habitats. Corn midendrum rugosum has more xeromorphic wood features and occurs in dry lowland sites. Commidendrum species are alike in their small vessel pits and abundant axial parenchyma. Melanodendrum agrees with Corn inidendrum in having fibre dimorphism and homogeneous type II rays. The short fibres in both genera are storied and transitional to axial parenchyma. Elongate crystals occur in ray cells of only two species of Corn midendrum, suggesting that they are closely related. Wood of Commidendrum and Melanodendrum is similar to that of the shrubby genus Felicia, thought closely related to Commidendrum on molecular bases. Corn midendrum and Melanodendrum have probably increased in woodiness on St Helena, but are derived from shrubby ancestors like today’s species of Felicia. Petrobiurn wood is paedomorphic and indistinguishable from that of Bidens, from which Petrobium is likely derived. The two senecionid species (Senecio leucadendron = Pladaroxylon leucadendron; and Senecio redivivus =Lachanodes arborea, formerly Lachanodes prenanthiflora) also show paedomorphic wood.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Phylogeny of Diplostephium (Asteraceae): Speciation Rate and Character Evolution
    NUMBER 15 VARGAS AND MADRIN˜ A´ N: SPECIATION AND CHARACTER EVOLUTION OF DIPLOSTEPHIUM 1 PRELIMINARY PHYLOGENY OF DIPLOSTEPHIUM (ASTERACEAE): SPECIATION RATE AND CHARACTER EVOLUTION Oscar M. Vargas1,2 and Santiago Madrin˜a´n2 1Section of Integrative Biology and the Plant Resources Center, The University of Texas, 205 W 24th St., Stop CO930, Austin, Texas 78712 U.S.A., email: [email protected] 2Laboratorio de Bota´nica y Sistema´tica Universidad de los Andes, Apartado Ae´reo 4976, Bogota´, D. C., Colombia Abstract: Diplostephium comprises 111 neotropical species that live in high elevation habitats from Costa Rica to Chile. Primarily Andean, the genus seems to have undergone an adaptive radiation indicated by its high number of species, broad morphological variation, and diversification primarily in an ecosystem (pa´ramo) that formed within the last 2–5 my. Internal transcriber spacer (ITS) sequences and several chloroplast markers, rpoB, rpoC1, and psbA-trnH were sequenced in order to infer a preliminary phylogeny of the genus. The chloroplast regions showed no significant variation within the genus. New ITS data were therefore analyzed together with published sequences for generating a topology. Results suggest that Diplostephium and other South American genera comprise a polytomy within which a previously described North American clade is nested. Monophyly of Diplostephium was neither supported nor rejected, but the formation of a main crown clade using different methods of analysis suggests that at least a good portion of the genus is monophyletic. A Shimodaira-Hasegawa test comparing the topology obtained and a constrained one forcing Diplostephium to be monophyletic showed no significant difference between them.
    [Show full text]
  • Article (Refereed) - Postprint
    Article (refereed) - postprint Gray, Alan; Perry, Annika; Cavers, Stephen; Eastwood, Antonia; Biermann, Michelle; Darlow, Andrew; Thomas, Vanessa; Lambdon, Phil. 2017. Hybrid plants preserve unique genetic variation in the St Helena endemic trees Commidendrum rotundifolium DC Roxb. and C. spurium (G.Forst.) DC. Conservation Genetics, 18 (1). 241-246. 10.1007/s10592-016-0884-8 © 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 This version available http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/514663/ NERC has developed NORA to enable users to access research outputs wholly or partially funded by NERC. Copyright and other rights for material on this site are retained by the rights owners. Users should read the terms and conditions of use of this material at http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/policies.html#access This document is the author’s final manuscript version of the journal article, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer review process. There may be differences between this and the publisher’s version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from this article. The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10592-016-0884-8 Contact CEH NORA team at [email protected] The NERC and CEH trademarks and logos (‘the Trademarks’) are registered trademarks of NERC in the UK and other countries, and may not be used without the prior written consent of the Trademark owner. 1 Title: Hybrid plants preserve unique genetic variation in the St Helena endemic trees 2 Commidendrum rotundifolium (Roxb.) DC and C. spurium (G.Forst.) DC. 3 Alan Gray1, Annika Perry1, Stephen Cavers1, Antonia Eastwood2, Michelle Biermann1, Andrew 4 Darlow3, Vanessa Thomas3, and Phil Lambdon4 5 1 NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Edinburgh EH26 0QB, 6 UK 7 2 The James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, Scotland, UK 8 3 Environmental Management Division, Environment and Natural Resources Directorate, St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carbon Sequestration Potential of Commidendrum Robustum Roxb
    The carbon sequestration potential of Commidendrum robustum Roxb. (DC.) within the Millennium Forest restoration site, St Helena Island. Shayla J M Ellick MSc by Research University of York Environment June 2015 Abstract The drastic increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) (particularly carbon dioxide CO2) into the atmosphere is causing climate change around the world. Tropical forests are considered to be significant sinks of carbon, but are subject to widespread degradation and deforestation. Restoring and conserving tropical forests as a form of climate change mitigation, through the creation of off-setting schemes, can increase rates of carbon sequestration. Islands are particularly vulnerable to climate change, though they contribute relatively little to the world’s GHG emissions. St Helena Island, a UK Territory with a high rate of endemism in the South Atlantic Ocean, produces an estimated 11,000 tonnes of CO2 annually. St Helena’s native forests were decimated following the island’s discovery in 1502 and only fragments remain. A restoration project, ‘the Millennium Forest’, restoring endemic Commidendrum robustum Roxb. (DC.) woodland to the degraded Crown Wastes area is managed by the St Helena National Trust (SHNT). SHNT hope to use the site as the basis for a carbon off-setting scheme to mitigate CO2 emissions from the island’s new airport (expected to open in early 2016). This study found that C. robustum biomass and its associated carbon pools increased carbon stocks within the Crown Wastes area by approximately 52.5 ± 12.20 tonnes over 15 years. pH was found to be highly correlated with the carbon estimates.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Reconstruction of Climatic and Elevation Preferences and the Evolution of Cloud Forest-Adapted Tree Ferns in Mesoamerica
    Historical reconstruction of climatic and elevation preferences and the evolution of cloud forest-adapted tree ferns in Mesoamerica Victoria Sosa1, Juan Francisco Ornelas1,*, Santiago Ramírez-Barahona1,* and Etelvina Gándara1,2,* 1 Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecología AC, Carretera antigua a Coatepec, El Haya, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico 2 Instituto de Ciencias/Herbario y Jardín Botánico, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, Mexico * These authors contributed equally to this work. ABSTRACT Background. Cloud forests, characterized by a persistent, frequent or seasonal low- level cloud cover and fragmented distribution, are one of the most threatened habitats, especially in the Neotropics. Tree ferns are among the most conspicuous elements in these forests, and ferns are restricted to regions in which minimum temperatures rarely drop below freezing and rainfall is high and evenly distributed around the year. Current phylogeographic data suggest that some of the cloud forest-adapted species remained in situ or expanded to the lowlands during glacial cycles and contracted allopatrically during the interglacials. Although the observed genetic signals of population size changes of cloud forest-adapted species including tree ferns correspond to predicted changes by Pleistocene climate change dynamics, the observed patterns of intraspecific lineage divergence showed temporal incongruence. Methods. Here we combined phylogenetic analyses, ancestral area reconstruction, and divergence time estimates with climatic and altitudinal data (environmental space) for phenotypic traits of tree fern species to make inferences about evolutionary processes Submitted 29 May 2016 in deep time. We used phylogenetic Bayesian inference and geographic and altitudinal Accepted 18 October 2016 distribution of tree ferns to investigate ancestral area and elevation and environmental Published 16 November 2016 preferences of Mesoamerican tree ferns.
    [Show full text]
  • BEST Ecosystem Profile of the South Atlantic Region
    EUROPEAN OVERSEAS REGIONAL ECOSYSTEM PROFILE South Atlantic Ascension Island Saint Helena Tristan da Cunha Falkland Islands (Malvinas) This document has been developed as part of the project ‘Measures towards Sustaining the BEST Preparatory Action to promote the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity and ecosystem services in EU Outermost EU Outermost Regions and Overseas Countries and Territories’. The document does not represent an official, formal position of the European Commission. JUNE2016 2016 Service contract 07.0307.2013/666363/SER/B2 Prepared by: South Atlantic Environmental Research Institute (SAERI) And with the technical support of: IUCN CEPF Drafted by the BEST team of the South Atlantic hub: Maria Taylor Under the coordination of: Dr Paul Brickle and Tara Pelembe Assisted by individual experts and contributors from the following institutions: Ascension Island: Ascension Island Government Conservation Department Dr Sam Weber Dr Judith Brown Dr Andy Richardson Dr Nicola Weber Emma Nolan Kate Downes University of Exeter Dr Annette Broderick Dr Brendon Godley St Helena: St Helena Government Isabel Peters Samantha Cherrett Annalea Beard Elizabeth Clingham Derek Henry Mike Jervois Lourens Malan Dr Jill Keys Ross Towers Paul Cherrett St Helena National Trust Jeremy Harris Rebecca Cairn-Wicks David Pryce Dennis Leo Acting Governor Sean Burns Independent Dr Andre Aptroot Dr Phil Lambdon Ben Sansom Tristan da Cunha: Tristan da Cunha Government Trevor Glass James Glass Katrine Herian Falkland Islands: Falkland Island Government
    [Show full text]
  • Universidade Federal Do Paraná Vinícius Bednarczuk De Oliveira Estudo Morfoanatômico, Fitoquímico E Biológico Das Frondes D
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ VINÍCIUS BEDNARCZUK DE OLIVEIRA ESTUDO MORFOANATÔMICO, FITOQUÍMICO E BIOLÓGICO DAS FRONDES DA ESPÉCIE VEGETAL Dicksonia sellowiana (Presl.) Hook. (DICKSONIACEAE) CURITIBA 2016 VINÍCIUS BEDNARCZUK DE OLIVEIRA ESTUDO MORFOANATÔMICO, FITOQUIMICO E BIOLÓGICO DAS FRONDES DA ESPÉCIE VEGETAL Dicksonia sellowiana (Presl.) Hook. (DICKSONIACEAE) Tese apresentada ao Programa de Pós Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Setor de Ciências da Saúde da Universidade Federal do Paraná, como requisito parcial para a obtenção do título de Doutor em Ciências Farmacêuticas. Orientador: Dr. Obdulio Gomes Miguel Coorientadora: Drª. Marilis Dallarmi Miguel CURITIBA 2016 Oliveira, Vinícius Bednarczuk de Estudo morfoanatômico, fitoquímico e biológico das frondes da espécie vegetal Dicksonia sellowiana (Presl.) Hook. (Dicksoniaceae) / Vinícius Bednarczuk de Oliveira – Curitiba, 2016. 171 f. : il. (algumas color.) ; 30 cm Orientador: Professor Dr. Obdulio Gomes Miguel Coorientadora: Professora Dra. Marilis Dallarmi Miguel Tese (doutorado) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Setor de Ciências da Saúde. Universidade Federal do Paraná. 2016. Inclui bibliografia 1. Dicksonia sellowiana. 2. Dicksoniaceae. 3. Analítica. 4. Ácido gálico. 5. Atividades biológicas. I. Miguel, Obdulio Gomes. II. Miguel, Marilis Dallarmi. III. Universidade Federal do Paraná. IV. Título. CDD 615.321 AGRADECIMENTOS Desafio tão grande quanto escrever esta tese é conseguir agradecer todas às pessoas que direta ou indiretamente fizeram parte da construção deste trabalho, pois sozinhos não construímos nada. Primeiramente gostaria de agradecer a DEUS pelo dom da vida e que nas horas mais difíceis me deu forças, serenidade e sabedoria para continuar. A meus pais, minha esposa e familiares, pela compreensão nas horas que estive ausente, pelos incentivos e apoio nas horas que precisei.
    [Show full text]
  • Timm Karisch Lepidoptera Report 2018
    Darwin-Plus Project DPLUS040 Securing the future for St Helena’s endemic invertebrates Report Lepidoptera The endemic plume moth Agdistis marionae, feeding nectar on flower of Scrubwood; Man and Horse cliff (09.IV.2018, photo: A.-J. DUTTON) Timm Karisch Museum für Naturkunde und Vorgeschichte Dessau Dessau, 31.08.2018 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Knowledge on Lepidoptera of St Helena 3 1.2 The project 4 2 Material 5 2.1 Methods 5 2.2 Studied areas 6 2.3 Presentation of the results 7 3 Results 8 3.1 Moths and butterflies of the main habitats of the island 8 3.1.1 Habitats formed by indigenous or endemic plants 8 3.1.1.1 Cloud forest 8 3.1.1.2 Gumwood-woodlands 13 3.1.1.3 Scrubwood-shrubland 17 3.1.1.4 Samphire semi-deserts 20 3.1.2 Non-indigenous habitats 25 3.1.2.1 Forests 25 3.1.2.2 Shrubland 30 3.1.2.3 Opuntia- and Aloe-Vegetation 36 3.1.2.4 Meadows and pastures 38 3.1.3 rural areas 39 3.2 Habitat-linked moths 41 3.3 Lepidoptera species 42 4 Recommendations of habitat management 61 4.1 Introduction 61 4.2 Cloud forest zone 61 4.3 Gumwood-woodland 61 4.4 Scrubwood shrubland 62 4.5 Forests 62 4.6 Non-indigenous, open shrub vegetation 62 4.7 Semi-deserts 63 5 Outstanding works 64 6 Summary 66 7 Acknowlegements 67 8 References 68 2 1 Introduction 1.1 Knowledge on Lepidoptera of St Helena Allthough there are probably more than 50 endemic species occuring nowhere else than on the island, the Lepidoptera have not attained much attention during the last centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Endemic Plants of St. Helena: Potential for Rescue, Inherent Variation Within Species, and the Future of Babies’ Toes and the Lowland Desert Habitat
    Endemic Plants of St. Helena: Potential for Rescue, Inherent Variation within Species, and the Future of Babies’ Toes and the Lowland Desert Habitat https://sthelenaisland.info/flora/scrubwood/ Melissa Starkey August 2020 Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the MSc in the Biodiversity and Taxonomy of Plants. Acknowledgements Special thanks to my supervisor, Dr. Alan Gray, for his guidance, support, expertise, and good discussions. His enthusiasm about St. Helena was contagious from the start. Thanks also to my co-supervisor, Dr. Greg Kenicer for helpful comments and feedback on my project. I am indebted to Gerrie, Scott, and Kay, for their unwavering support both at home and from afar. i Abstract St. Helena is a remote volcanic island in the South Atlantic Ocean with a diverse topology and a rich endemic flora. Due to anthropogenic factors, many plant species have been reduced to small, severely fragmented populations, resulting in genetic erosion and a more limited ability to adapt to environmental pressures. This thesis addresses conservation of St. Helena’s endemic flora relating to themes of genetic variation and climate change. Chapter one introduces the island and its flora. Chapter two reviews the literature on genetic rescue in plants and shows that it can be beneficial for small, fragmented populations, though additional research is needed. Chapter three conceptually applies the genetic rescue approach to St. Helena’s critically endangered endemic plants, many of which are promising candidates for the strategy and are predicted to be heading rapidly towards extinction. Chapter four assesses historical levels of variation through morphometric analysis using herbarium specimens of three endemic St.
    [Show full text]