DOCSLIB.ORG

Optimizing Mobile Display Brightness by Leveraging Human Visual Perception

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Optimizing Mobile Display Brightness by Leveraging Human Visual Perception Optimizing Mobile Display Brightness by Leveraging Human Visual Perception Matthew Schuchhardt Susmit Jha Northwestern University Intel Corporation [email protected] [email protected] Raid Ayoub Michael Kishinevsky Gokhan Memik Intel Corporation Intel Corporation Northwestern University [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT that after two Samsung display design iterations, normalized Modern smart phones and tablets are battery-constrained full-brightness per-pixel power efficiency only improves by by their mobility; this constraint is heavily factored into 5.7%; this is reduced even further when the current trend any design decision made on the device. Furthermore, the toward increasingly larger screens is considered. Furthermore, display is one of the most power-consuming subsystems. they find that the most significant contributor to power Adaptive display brightness systems attempt to address this consumption is the size of the screen itself. With larger high display power consumption by setting the brightness devices, although the battery tends to be bigger, the screen is depending on the surrounding ambient light levels. also larger, and considering the lack of significantgenerational In this work, we run a series of user studies aimed at improvements in power consumption, there is no reason to gauging the accuracy of these adaptive brightness models. expect that display power will not continue to be a significant These studies compare subjective satisfaction and readability consumer of power in mobile devices. metrics on a common smartphone display and find that the Because the display consumes a significant amount of adaptive brightness system isn't well-tuned to user prefer­ power, adaptive brightness systems are one way that dis­ ences. We also find that subjective ratings and readability play manufacturers attempt to reduce the display's power are closely correlated with one another across different dis­ envelope while improving user satisfaction with the display's play brightness levels, which can be used to give a better brightness. Adaptive brightness systems control a display's understanding of how screen brightness levels impact users. brightness via ambient light sensors which give an indication Additionally, we note that operating systems need to re­ of incident environmental light on the screen. These adap­ duce the power envelope of the device for a variety of reasons. tive brightness systems can significantly reduce the power This is done without understanding the impact of these deci­ usage compared to a display which is constantly set to a high sions on user satisfaction, and can significantly degrade user brightness level. Also, adaptive brightness systems have the experience. In this work, we propose a user-aware method advantage of causing less eye strain by avoiding setting the of reducing display power consumption, which allows display brightness too high when in a dim lighting environment [12]. power to be throttled while understanding the resulting im­ In this work, we wish to gauge how effective these adaptive pact on the user. By considering this impact on the user, brightness systems actually are at satisfying users' brightness we devise an optimal dimming scheme which can reduce requirements. To do this, we design a user study which the time-weighted readability degradation by upwards of allows us to gather subjective display brightness satisfaction 21.5%. ratings and readability data for a series of users at a selection of ambient light and screen brightness levels. From these results, we find that the default automatic brightness system 1. INTRODUCTION that comes shipped with the device isn't well-tailored to the In modern mobile devices, the touchscreen display has group of users we studied. taken front and center as the most important interface that Furthermore, we find that subjective user ratings are users interact with. Not only does the touchscreen display closely correlated with an objective readability metric, espe­ act as the primary means of output to the user, but with the cially in brighter lighting environments. This strong, direct absence of hardware keyboards and buttons on many mobile correlation is interesting because it suggests that by using devices, it is now the primary means of input as well. With this relationship, it's possible to understand how much of an this elevated station that touchscreen displays have come impact selecting a given brightness level will have on a user, to enjoy in smartphones and tablets, more and more focus without needing to directly gather subjective ratings from is being placed on the design and features of the display. the user. The trend of mobile displays is increasingly toward larger, We also study the impact that various brightness throttling brighter, higher-resolution displays [10], and this trend is schemes have on users. System power may need to be reduced undoubtedly a sight for sore eyes everywhere. below the standard power envelope for many reasons. For However, this trend toward larger and brighter displays example, one common reason for reducing display brightness does not come without cost; although many manufacturers is low-battery situations. When the battery falls under a tote the energy efficiency of their displays, Chen et al. [3] find critical threshold, many smartphones reduce the display's that generational improvements in OLED displays account brightness to help extend the device's remaining on-screen for minor improvements in power consumption. They find 978-1-4673-8320-2/15/$3l.00 ©20 15 IEEE 11 time. Additionally, there are systems such as system-level Luminance is defined as the intensity of light per unit area, dynamic thermal management [9], which reduce system power and is colloquially referred to as brightness in the context consumption in an attempt to reduce the system's total heat of mobile displays. Contrast ratio is related to luminance; levels. Any OS subsystem can cause power throttling events, generically defined, contrast ratio compares the luminance but the underlying issue with these systems is that they do of the colors black and white (Lblack and Lwhite) as they ap­ not consider the impact that these power savings decisions pear on the display. Lblack is never exactly zero on an LCD have on the user. display; there is always some amount of light which leaks To explore this further, we conduct another study which through the liquid crystal matrix, even on an image which collects data on what lighting environments are commonly is intended to be fully black. Similarly, LWhite is limited encountered throughout the day by a typical user. Using by how bright the LCD's backlight is. The contrast ratio these results along with the previous readability and ratings describes the relative difference between these luminances. data, we directly analyze how much power can be saved with However, there is not a single well-defined metric which de­ a specified degradation in readability. We also compare a scribes contrast ratio, and there are a number of different user-agnostic system which degrades the display by a con­ equations which can represent this. One common formula stant brightness level or constant brightness percentage, to for a display's contrast ratio is described in Equation (1): our proposed user-aware system which degrades the display's brightness more in brighter environments. Any backlight Lwhite - Lblack C = (1) dimming power savings decision will impact users to some Lwhite degree, but by considering how these decisions affectthe user, There are some complexities as to how this is measured it's possible to reduce the average impact over a period of and reported in consumer devices (such as dynamic contrast time. Using our user-aware brightness throttling scheme can ratio, static contrast ratio, etc.), but as far as light perception achieve an 8% average system power reduction while only is considered, this definition is sufficient. It is important to degrading average readability by 3.2%; this is 21.5% less of a note, and are not entirely self-contained to the degradation than the next best user-agnostic method. Even Lblack Lwhite display itself; the device's ambient light can have a signifi­ more importantly, this method allows us to directly under­ cant impact on these values. For instance, in a completely stand how the power decisions will affect users, which makes darkened room, the contrast ratio is precisely defined as these power decisions more well-informed than arbitrarily in Equation (1). However, consider a lighting environment throttling system power. which involves a significant amount of ambient light. Since In summary, we make the following primary contributions: the display's optical characteristics necessarily don't absorb 100% of incoming ambient light, some of that light is reflected • We find a correlation between subjective user ratings and an objective readability metric back at the viewer. This reflected light reduces the resulting contrast ratio, as evidenced in Equation (2), with E repre­ - We run user studies which gather subjective ratings senting the environmental illuminance and p representing the and visual discernment task data across multiple light­ display's reflective coefficient. Contrast ratio has a significant ing environments impact on discerning visual detail, and this relationship of - We present analysis which shows a strong correlation contrast ratio with ambient light explains why it is easier to between objective visual discernment and subjective read backlit displays in darker ambient environments. This is ratings also the basis for the inclusion of adaptive brightness systems - We perform the first analysis on the impact of adap­ in mobile devices. Adaptive brightness systems use ambient tive screen brightness mechanisms on readability light sensors to help control the display's brightness: in dim • We create a model for screen brightness which maximizes environments, the display reduces the display's brightness, time-averaged screen readability and in brighter environments, the display is set to higher - We compare existing adaptive brightness systems to brightness levels.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Illumination and Distance
    PHYS 1400: Physical Science Laboratory Manual ILLUMINATION AND DISTANCE INTRODUCTION How bright is that light? You know, from experience, that a 100W light bulb is brighter than a 60W bulb. The wattage measures the energy used by the bulb, which depends on the bulb, not on where the person observing it is located. But you also know that how bright the light looks does depend on how far away it is. That 100W bulb is still emitting the same amount of energy every second, but if you are farther away from it, the energy is spread out over a greater area. You receive less energy, and perceive the light as less bright. But because the light energy is spread out over an area, it’s not a linear relationship. When you double the distance, the energy is spread out over four times as much area. If you triple the distance, the area is nine Twice the distance, ¼ as bright. Triple the distance? 11% as bright. times as great, meaning that you receive only 1/9 (or 11%) as much energy from the light source. To quantify the amount of light, we will use units called lux. The idea is simple: energy emitted per second (Watts), spread out over an area (square meters). However, a lux is not a W/m2! A lux is a lumen per m2. So, what is a lumen? Technically, it’s one candela emitted uniformly across a solid angle of 1 steradian. That’s not helping, is it? Examine the figure above. The source emits light (energy) in all directions simultaneously.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunlight Readability and Luminance Characteristics of Light
    SUNLIGHT READABILITY AND LUMINANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF LIGHT- EMITTING DIODE PUSH BUTTON SWITCHES Robert J. Fitch, B.S.E.E., M.B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2004 APPROVED: Albert B. Grubbs, Jr., Major Professor and Chair of the Department of Engineering Technology Don W. Guthrie, Committee Member Michael R. Kozak, Committee Member Roman Stemprok, Committee Member Vijay Vaidyanathan, Committee Member Oscar N. Garcia, Dean of the College of Engineering Sandra L. Terrell, Interim Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Fitch, Robert J., Sunlight readability and luminance characteristics of light- emitting diode push button switches. Master of Science (Engineering Technology), May 2004, 69 pp., 7 tables, 9 illustrations, references, 22 titles. Lighted push button switches and indicators serve many purposes in cockpits, shipboard applications and military ground vehicles. The quality of lighting produced by switches is vital to operators’ understanding of the information displayed. Utilizing LED technology in lighted switches has challenges that can adversely affect lighting quality. Incomplete data exists to educate consumers about potential differences in LED switch performance between different manufacturers. LED switches from four different manufacturers were tested for six attributes of lighting quality: average luminance and power consumption at full voltage, sunlight readable contrast, luminance contrast under ambient sunlight, legend uniformity, and dual-color uniformity. Three of the four manufacturers have not developed LED push button switches that meet lighting quality standards established with incandescent technology. Copyright 2004 by Robert J. Fitch ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank Don Guthrie and John Dillow at Aerospace Optics, Fort Worth, Texas, for providing the test samples, lending the use of their laboratories, and providing tremendous support for this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Color-Proposal.Pdf
    Colors in Snap! -bh proposal, draft, do not distribute Your computer monitor can display millions of colors, but you probably can’t distinguish that many. For example, here’s red 57, green 180, blue 200: And here’s red 57, green 182, blue 200: You might be able to tell them apart if you see them side by side: … but maybe not even then. Color space—the collection of all possible colors—is three-dimensional, but there are many ways to choose the dimensions. RGB (red-green-blue), the one most commonly used, matches the way TVs and displays produce color. Behind every dot on the screen are three tiny lights: a red one, a green one, and a blue one. But if you want to print colors on paper, your printer probably uses a different set of three colors: CMY (cyan-magenta-yellow). You may have seen the abbreviation CMYK, which represents the common technique of adding black ink to the collection. (Mixing cyan, magenta, and yellow in equal amounts is supposed to result in black ink, but typically it comes out a not-very-intense gray instead.) Other systems that try to mimic human perception are HSL (hue-saturation-lightness) and HSV (hue-saturation-value). If you are a color professional—a printer, a web designer, a graphic designer, an artist—then you need to understand all this. It can also be interesting to learn about. For example, there are colors that you can see but your computer display can’t generate. If that intrigues you, look up color theory in Wikipedia.
    [Show full text]
  • Color Appearance Models Second Edition
    Color Appearance Models Second Edition Mark D. Fairchild Munsell Color Science Laboratory Rochester Institute of Technology, USA Color Appearance Models Wiley–IS&T Series in Imaging Science and Technology Series Editor: Michael A. Kriss Formerly of the Eastman Kodak Research Laboratories and the University of Rochester The Reproduction of Colour (6th Edition) R. W. G. Hunt Color Appearance Models (2nd Edition) Mark D. Fairchild Published in Association with the Society for Imaging Science and Technology Color Appearance Models Second Edition Mark D. Fairchild Munsell Color Science Laboratory Rochester Institute of Technology, USA Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England Telephone (+44) 1243 779777 This book was previously publisher by Pearson Education, Inc Email (for orders and customer service enquiries): [email protected] Visit our Home Page on www.wileyeurope.com or www.wiley.com All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except under the terms of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP, UK, without the permission in writing of the Publisher. Requests to the Publisher should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England, or emailed to [email protected], or faxed to (+44) 1243 770571. This publication is designed to offer Authors the opportunity to publish accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Measure and Characterize LED Lighting Fixtures
    How to Measure and Characterize LED Lighting Fixtures. Explanation of Photometric Quantities and Measurement Instruments Requirements According to CIE Standards and Other International Norms by Mikolaj Przybyla, Brand Director About GL Optic : GL Optic is the brand name of JUST Normlicht GmbH Germany the world's leading supplier of the standardized light solutions for printing and graphic arts industries. For more than 30 years Just has been developing the innovative solutions which are of the highest quality in standard-light viewing conditions. About GL Optic : The spectral light measurement project was created at the end of 2009 by Michael Gall the owner and CEO of Just Normlicht in cooperation with Jan Lalek, a Polish physicist who had been involved in the creation of the innovative LED tunable standard lighting systems. They also developed together the light quality assurance instruments installed at Just spectral measurements laboratory. How to measure LEDs When designing an LED lighting fixtures, we instantly had to deal with parameters and issues such as Flux and Colour shift with temperature and current, accurate current control and heat management are just a few of them. Therefore the accurate light measurement system is crucial for the development of these LED products. This presentation will cover basic information on light measurement procedures, international standards as well as the presentation of available instrumentation for very different measurement tasks from luminous flux measurement with integrating spheres to luminance
    [Show full text]
  • EL Light Output Definition.Pdf
    GWENT GROUP ADVANCED MATERIAL SYSTEMS Luminance The candela per square metre (cd/m²) is the SI unit of luminance; nit is a non-SI name also used for this unit. It is often used to quote the brightness of computer displays, which typically have luminance’s of 50 to 300 nits (the sRGB spec for monitor’s targets 80 nits). Modern flat-panel (LCD and plasma) displays often exceed 300 cd/m² or 300 nits. The term is believed to come from the Latin "nitere" = to shine. Candela per square metre 1 Kilocandela per square metre 10-3 Candela per square centimetre 10-4 Candela per square foot 0,09 Foot-lambert 0,29 Lambert 3,14×10-4 Nit 1 Stilb 10-4 Luminance is a photometric measure of the density of luminous intensity in a given direction. It describes the amount of light that passes through or is emitted from a particular area, and falls within a given solid angle. The SI unit for luminance is candela per square metre (cd/m2). The CGS unit of luminance is the stilb, which is equal to one candela per square centimetre or 10 kcd/m2 Illuminance The lux (symbol: lx) is the SI unit of illuminance and luminous emittance. It is used in photometry as a measure of the intensity of light, with wavelengths weighted according to the luminosity function, a standardized model of human brightness perception. In English, "lux" is used in both singular and plural. Microlux 1000000 Millilux 1000 Lux 1 Kilolux 10-3 Lumen per square metre 1 Lumen per square centimetre 10-4 Foot-candle 0,09 Phot 10-4 Nox 1000 In photometry, illuminance is the total luminous flux incident on a surface, per unit area.
    [Show full text]
  • Application Note
    How Light Meters Can Fool Us A primer on why bluer white light looks brighter to us and how it can help save the planet Imagine two identical rooms artificially illuminated with exactly the same amount of white light. A light meter confirms that the two rooms have equal light levels. In fact, everything about the rooms is the same except for one important detail: The light in one room has a little more blue in it than the other room. Why, then, does the room with the bluer light seem so much brighter? (See Fig. 1.) For decades this effect has created more than a little controversy among vision scientists, with many dismissing it as nothing more than an illusion. But recent advances in vision science now support the view that this is a real effect. The room with the bluer light does appear brighter to the human eye — a fact that can help reduce lighting costs by as much as 40% or more. To understand why, we need to know a little more about the history of why light meters are calibrated the way they are and how our eyes react to light. Figure 1: The shopping center above was initially lighted by fluorescent lamps having a color temperature of 4100K (left photo). The fluorescents were replaced by LEDs with a color temperature of 6000K (right photo). Even though the LED lamps use less electricity, the area still looks brighter because LED lighting is more efficient, but also because the higher color temperature creates a bluer white light that looks brighter to us.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical and Luminous Units of Light Intensity
    Physical and Luminous Units of Light Intensity Energy vs Brightness Paul Avery Dept. of Physics University of Florida PHY 3400 Light, Color and Holography http://www.phys.ufl.edu/~avery/course/phy3400_f99/ Paul Avery (PHY 3400) 1 Physical and Luminous Units Physical ⇒ energy flow • Measured by instruments ⇒ radiant flux • Basic unit: watt = joule/sec Luminous ⇒ subjective brightness • Measured by observer ⇒ luminous flux • Same energy flow at different wavelengths gives different visual response and thus different brightness • Basic unit: lumen Paul Avery (PHY 3400) 2 Physical and Luminous Units Visual Sensitivity vs Wavelength 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 Relative Sensitivity 0.2 0.1 0.0 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 Wavelength in nm Relative Sensitivity of Eye vs. Wavelength Peak at λ = 555 nm Paul Avery (PHY 3400) 3 Physical and Luminous Units Define “Luminous efficiency” luminous flux in lumens LE= radiant flux in watts • LE is maximum for a light source emitting at λ = 555 nm. • To achieve desired lumens for lowest $ ⇒ maximize LE • Projectors, indoor/outdoor lighting, displays, floodlights Paul Avery (PHY 3400) 4 Physical and Luminous Units Luminous efficiencies for different sources Light Source LE (lumens/watt) Candle 0.1 Kerosene lamp 0.3 Tungsten-filament lamp (100-watt) 15 High-intensity tungsten-filament lamp 30 “Photoflood” lamp 36 Mercury-vapor lamp, low pressure 25–40 Mercury-vapor lamp, high pressure 40–65 Sodium-vapor lamp 50 LEDs 10–20 Fluorescent lamp 60–75 Metal halide lamps 65–90 http://www.phoenixlamps.com/mhl.html
    [Show full text]
  • Illuminating Terms & Graphics
    Illuminating Terms & Graphics Candela ~ the basic SI unit of luminous intensity; the luminous intensity in a given direction of a source that emits monochromatic radiation Golden Ratio in design ~ an ideal based on Fibonacci. In this case the number 8, which is 3 + 5. Lumen (unit) ~ The lumen (symbol: lm) is the SI derived unit of luminous flux, a measure of the total quantity of visible light emitted by a source. Illuminance ~ the lighting up of a surface area. It is a measure of the amount of light falling onto (illuminating) and spreading over the given surface area. It correlates with how humans perceive brightness of an illuminated area. Illuminance is often called brightness, which leads to confusion, as brightness can be used to also describe luminance. Brightness is a reference to physiological sensations and perceptions of light; it is not to be used for quantitative purposes. The SI unit for illuminance is lux (lx). Sometimes people use the term foot-candle; foot-candle is a non SI unit of illuminance widely used in the United States. The term “foot-candle” means “the illuminance on a surface by a candela source one foot away”. One foot-candle is equivalent to one lumen per square foot which is approximately 10.764 lux. Luminance ~ the measure of the amount of light passing through, emitting or reflected from a particular surface traveling at a solid angle; it indicates how much luminous power can be perceived by a human eye. Thus luminance indicates the brightness of emitted or reflected surface. Luminance is used in the display industry to quantify the brightness of displays.
    [Show full text]
  • COLOR APPEARANCE MODELS, 2Nd Ed. Table of Contents
    COLOR APPEARANCE MODELS, 2nd Ed. Mark D. Fairchild Table of Contents Dedication Table of Contents Preface Introduction Chapter 1 Human Color Vision 1.1 Optics of the Eye 1.2 The Retina 1.3 Visual Signal Processing 1.4 Mechanisms of Color Vision 1.5 Spatial and Temporal Properties of Color Vision 1.6 Color Vision Deficiencies 1.7 Key Features for Color Appearance Modeling Chapter 2 Psychophysics 2.1 Definition of Psychophysics 2.2 Historical Context 2.3 Hierarchy of Scales 2.4 Threshold Techniques 2.5 Matching Techniques 2.6 One-Dimensional Scaling 2.7 Multidimensional Scaling 2.8 Design of Psychophysical Experiments 2.9 Importance in Color Appearance Modeling Chapter 3 Colorimetry 3.1 Basic and Advanced Colorimetry 3.2 Why is Color? 3.3 Light Sources and Illuminants 3.4 Colored Materials 3.5 The Visual Response 3.6 Tristimulus Values and Color-Matching Functions 3.7 Chromaticity Diagrams 3.8 CIE Color Spaces 3.9 Color-Difference Specification 3.10 The Next Step Chapter 4 Color Appearance Models: Table of Contents Page 1 Color-Appearance Terminology 4.1 Importance of Definitions 4.2 Color 4.3 Hue 4.4 Brightness and Lightness 4.5 Colorfulness and Chroma 4.6 Saturation 4.7 Unrelated and Related Colors 4.8 Definitions in Equations 4.9 Brightness-Colorfulness vs. Lightness-Chroma Chapter 5 Color Order Systems 5.1 Overview and Requirements 5.2 The Munsell Book of Color 5.3 The Swedish Natural Color System (NCS) 5.4 The Colorcurve System 5.5 Other Color Order Systems 5.6 Uses of Color Order Systems 5.7 Color Naming Systems Chapter 6 Color-Appearance
    [Show full text]
  • A Luminous Efficiency Function, V*(1), for Daylight Adaptation
    Journal of Vision (2005) 5, 948–968 http://journalofvision.org/5/11/3/ 948 A luminous efficiency function, V *(1), for daylight adaptation Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, Lindsay T. Sharpe London, United Kingdom Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, Andrew Stockman London, United Kingdom Forschungstelle fu¨r Experimentelle Ophthalmologie, Wolfgang Jagla Universita¨ts-Augenklinik, Tu¨bingen, Germany Forschungstelle fu¨r Experimentelle Ophthalmologie, Herbert Ja¨gle Universita¨ts-Augenklinik, Tu¨bingen, Germany We propose a new luminosity function, V Ãð1Þ, that improves upon the original CIE 1924 Vð1Þ function and its modification by D. B. Judd (1951) and J. J. Vos (1978), while being consistent with a linear combination of the A. Stockman & L. T. Sharpe (2000) long-wavelength-sensitive (L) and middle-wavelength-sensitive (M) cone fundamentals. It is based on experimentally determined 25 Hz, 2- diameter, heterochromatic (minimum) flicker photometric data obtained from 40 observers (35 males, 5 females) of known genotype, 22 with the serine variant L(ser180), 16 with the alanine L(ala180) variant, and 2 with both variants of the L-cone photopigment. The matches, from 425 to 675 nm in 5-nm steps, were made on a 3 log troland xenon white (correlated color temperature of 5586 K but tritanopically metameric with CIE D65 standard daylight for the Stockman and Sharpe L- and M-cone fundamentals in quantal units) adapting field of 16- angular subtense, relative to a 560-nm standard. Both the reference standard and test lights were kept near flicker threshold so that, in the region of the targets, the total retinal illuminance averaged 3.19 log trolands.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inverse Square Law of Light the Relationship Between Distance and Brightness, and How Astronomers Measure Distances to Far Away Objects
    The Inverse Square Law of Light The relationship between distance and brightness, and how astronomers measure distances to far away objects Image Credit: Splung.com Overview: We all know that a light, such as a candle or a streetlight, looks dimmer the farther away from it we get. This activity gives an easy way for students to measure the relationship between distance and brightness. Once students discover the relationship, they can begin to understand how astronomers use this knowledge to determine the distances to stars and far away galaxies. Grade Level: This lesson is intended for grades 5-12. (See standards correlation in Appendix A.) Objectives: Students will be able to: • demonstrate that the brightness of a source of light is a function of the inverse square of its distance. • understand how the brightness of light could be used to measure distances, even to stars and far away galaxies. Time: Prep Time: For each shade box, 15 minutes if using a MiniMaglite™, 30 minutes or less if you make the light source Part I: 45- 60 minutes Part II: 45-60 minutes 1 Acknowledgments: Nancy Alima Ali, Dr. Bryan Mendez and Kyle Fricke developed and produced these lessons using funding from the Education and Public Outreach program of the NASA Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer Mission while at the Center for Science Education at the Space Sciences Laboratory (CSE@SSL) at the University of California in Berkeley. Karin Hauck, Darlene Yan and Leitha Thrall assisted with the testing of the lesson. We would also like to thank the Astrophysics Educator Ambassadors and teachers attending the “Cool Astronomy” workshop at the American Museum of Natural History for their feedback on the lesson.
    [Show full text]