DOCSLIB.ORG

Hydro News Some

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hydro News Some SSoommee DDaamm –– HHyyddrroo NNeewwss and Other Stuff i 11/03/2006 Quote of the Day: It is inaccurate to say I hate everything. I am strongly in favor of common sense, common honesty, and common decency. This H. L. Mencken makes me forever ineligible for any public office. -- for any public office. H. L. Mencken Dams Army Corps to inspect dams for quake damage The Honolulu Advertiser, October 27, 2006 HILO, Hawai'i — The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is deploying a team of eight dam safety specialists to survey dams in the wake of the Oct. 15 earthquakes. The Army Corps will work with the Federal Emergency Management Agency and state Department of Land and Natural Resources to inspect 84 high-hazard dams starting Oct. 29, with the inspections conducted over two weeks. "This work will be done under a FEMA Technical Assistance Mission," said Derek Chow, Honolulu District's project manager for the Dam Safety Inspection Mission. "We (the Corps) are coordinating with state officials on the scope, timing and other requirements." Initial inspections on the Big Island and Maui have been completed by non-Corps resources. However, Big Island dams will be re-inspected by the Corps. The federal Bureau of Reclamation will complete Maui dam inspections Oct. 28, and no further inspections of Maui dams will be conducted by the Corps. Five Corps geotechnical engineers will inspect Kauai dams, while three Corps geotechnical engineers will survey the Big Island dams and then the Oahu dams. 1 Copy obtained from the National Performance of Dams Program: http://npdp.stanford.edu The inspections will be conducted in accordance with the "Hawaii Dam Safety Guidelines: Seismic Analysis & Post-Earthquake Inspections," which can viewed on the state DLNR website under Dam Safety Program at: http://www.hawaii.gov/dlnr/ (You have to read the last paragraph to understand what this is really about!) Ceremony celebrates removal of dam $1.7 million project to improve Cuyahoga By Bob Downing, Beacon Journal, Akron, OH, 10/28/06 MUNROE FALLS - Summit County, Munroe Falls and the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency on Friday celebrated the completion of a $1.7 million dam removal on the Cuyahoga River. Under rainy skies, 22 members of the Stow-Munroe Falls High School marching band performed in a new riverside amphitheater made of stones from the old dam. A ribbon was cut, speeches were delivered and an oak tree was planted at Brust Park next to the free-flowing river. ``Do you believe how beautiful that is?'' asked Elaine Marsh of the Friends of the Crooked River, an Akron- based group devoted to the Cuyahoga River. The dam -- 144 feet wide and 11 ½ feet high -- was largely gone by late 2005. The stagnant pool behind the dam disappeared. The narrow river now tumbles over a rocky ledge. Trees and grass are growing on the banks. Munroe Falls would like to see a restaurant and a bike rental plus park development next to the Cuyahoga River along North Main Street (state Route 91), said Mayor Frank Larson. The city envisions Brust Park hosting arts and crafts shows, concerts and car shows along with bicycling, canoeing and kayaking, he said. Removing the Munroe Falls dam and modifying the dam in Kent are expected to improve the Cuyahoga's water quality. The EPA wanted the two dams changed to reduce stagnant pools, improve water flow and increase dissolved oxygen and fish and insect populations. The Kent dam was modified in 2004 so the river can flow around it. That change has already had a major impact on fish and insect populations, to the point that the river meets EPA standards, said William Skowronski, Ohio EPA district director. The river at Munroe Falls is expected to attract more fish and aquatic insects very soon, he said. Summit County and Kent are the biggest beneficiaries of the dam projects. That's because their sewage plants discharge into the Cuyahoga River. They would have faced costly bills for sewer plant improvements if the dams had not been removed. 2 Copy obtained from the National Performance of Dams Program: http://npdp.stanford.edu (Sometimes fixing a dam is a perplexing problem. No one wants to take responsibility!) Dams have Middlesex residents upset One failed; another has forced the closing of the road atop it BY LAWRENCE LATANE III, Richmond, VA TIMES-DISPATCH, 10/30/06 SALUDA Fall colors reflecting off the surfaces of Middlesex County millponds hide longstanding predicaments in the rural, Middle Peninsula county. At Hilliard Pond, homeowners have been urging state government since September 2004 to replace the dam they say failed because of lack of state oversight. At Healys Pond, more than a dozen miles away, state Route 629 is closed to through traffic because engineers are afraid the dam the road crosses has been rendered unstable by leaks. The Virginia Department of Transportation closed the road in February and has no plans to fix it because it does not own the dam. Both situations are fraying the patience of local leaders who are anxious to have the problems fixed. A drain on the county State Route 629 was one of the county's busiest secondary roads, channeling 880 vehicles a day through a lush landscape of farm fields and dense forests. Hilliard Millpond has cost the county financially. The Board of Supervisors took $40,000 from its road fund in 2003 to help residents around the pond build a dam to replace one that had broken. Now, with the dam breached once more and Hilliard Millpond reduced to a puddle surrounded by acres of mudflats, county finances are being affected again. Commissioner of the Revenue Mary Lou Stephenson said her office cut the values of the 22 parcels surrounding the pond by a total of $260,000 because they can no longer be considered valuable waterfront property. The reductions cost the county $1,352 in lost tax revenue this year. "We're quite upset," said County Administrator Charlie Culley as he reflected on problems that appear to have no easy solutions. Waters have been impounded at the two millpond sites for hundreds of years in keeping with the Middle Peninsula's role as a grain-growing region. Numerous tributaries of the Rappahannock and Piankatank rivers yielded natural sites for ponds in the 18th and 19th centuries to power stone grist mills for making flour. Problems began in 2002 Hilliard Millpond's problems began in April 2002 when the dam broke days after a VDOT contractor used jackhammers to install stone rip-rap along state Route 602 near the dam. VDOT never accepted blame for the dam breach, but, because it improved the dam in the 1960s and owned a right of way across it, it allowed the county to allocate $40,000 from its road fund toward the dam's repair. The 22 landowners around the pond created the Hilliard Mill Pond Dam Association and raised another $40,000. Association president Joe Longton said the group then met with members of the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation and its Department of Dam Safety to plan rebuilding. 3 Copy obtained from the National Performance of Dams Program: http://npdp.stanford.edu The association hired a contractor recommended by the department to replace a portion of the dam. It paid $80,000 to Watershed Services of Mechanicsville to build a new dam that tied to an existing earthen wall. The company completed the work in July 2003. Then a section of the pre-existing wall ruptured in September 2004 and the association paid Watershed $18,500 to repair the damage. That work kept the pond intact until July 2005 when the wall broke for good, causing the millpond to drain. So far, the dam association has not repaired the damage because it is at loggerheads with the Department of Conservation over who is responsible for new construction. At odds on responsibility Scott Cahill, director of Watershed Services, said Longton forced him to stop work on new repairs that should have prevented the wall from failing again. "We've worked on hundreds of dams all over the eastern U.S. and never had a problem like this," Cahill said of the dam and his company's frosty relationship with Longton. Longton maintains that the state should pay to rebuild the dam because he had been assured by state employees that the dam was being built to state specifications. When it broke, he discovered that the department had little record of the project and was unwilling to finance new repairs. "I was working with the Department of Dam Safety and trusting it for direction," Longton said recently as he stood on his deck overlooking a narrow stream flowing across a mudflat once covered by lake water. To further complicate matters, none of the state employees involved in the original dam construction project still work for the Department of Conservation and Recreation or its Department of Dam Safety, said Del. Harvey B. Morgan, R-Middlesex.. "The department has a new engineer and a new director, neither of whom knows anything about this situation because no one left any records." Morgan has considered filing a bill to make the state pay for the dam replacement, but faces his own obstacle: "The committee wouldn't consider it unless [Longton] has exhausted all other possibilities, including court action." Longton said the $58,500 association members spent to replace the dam in 2003 has exhausted the finances of the group, leaving none for launching a civil suit against the contractor. Association members, he said, "barely scratched together the dollars the first time and the state squandered it by not seeing [the dam] was done right." The county feels the same way.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Some Dam – Hydro News
    SSoommee DDaamm –– HHyyddrroo NNeewwss and Other Stuff i 5/01/2009 Quote of Note: Thoughts on the economy: “If you’re in a traffic jam quit whining, it means you have a job” - - Paula Smith “If you have a job it’s a recession, if you’re laid off it’s a depression” - - Common “No nation was ever drunk when wine was cheap.” - - Thomas Jefferson Ron’s wine pick of the week: Maipe Bonarda Mendoza, Argentina 2008 OOtthheerr SSttuuffffff::: (Oops, a funny thing happened on the way to the office, they forgot about or don’t know about pumped storage hydro, the ideal backup solution. They got it right on the other points though.) Getting real on wind and solar By James Schlesinger and Robert L. Hirsch, Washington Post, 04/24/2009 Why are we ignoring things we know? We know that the sun doesn't always shine and that the wind doesn't always blow. That means that solar cells and wind energy systems don't always provide electric power. Nevertheless, solar and wind energy seem to have captured the public's support as potentially being the primary or total answer to our electric power needs. Solar cells and wind turbines are appealing because they are "renewables" with promising implications and because they emit no carbon dioxide during operation, which is certainly a plus. But because both are intermittent electric power generators, they cannot produce electricity "on demand," something that the public requires. We expect the lights to go on when we flip a switch, and we do not expect our computers to shut down as nature dictates.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Chelan Basin Overview View ‘Up-Lake’ of 90 Km (50 Mile) Long, 453 M (1486 Ft.) Deep Lake Chelan
    J. Riedel Contributions to the 2018 Pacific Northwest Friends of the Pleistocene Field Conference Stop 1.2: Lake Chelan Basin Overview View ‘up-lake’ of 90 km (50 mile) long, 453 m (1486 ft.) deep Lake Chelan. There are three basins comprising Lake Chelan separated by bedrock sills: Stehekin, Lucerne, and Wapato (Figure 2). The Lucerne Basin is the deepest and longest, with relief of > 3200 m (10,660 000 ft.) from the bedrock floor of the valley to the summit of Bonanza Peak (2900 m) on its west valley wall (Figure 2). The shallower Wapato Basin is in part dammed by glacial drift south of Chelan (Stop 1.4; Runner 1921). Figure 1. Location of Lake Chelan in north-central Washington. Blue arrows at top indicate Fisher and Rainy passes, where Cordilleran Ice Sheet entered Chelan watershed. Waitt (2017) noted the ice sheet was 760 m thick over Rainy Pass. Figure 2. Longitudinal profile of the bottom of Lake Chelan (top) and seismic profiling of sub-bottom (UW and NPS unpublished). The Lucerne and Stehekin basins are superimposed on resistant Skagit Gneiss and Tertiary igneous bedrock. The upper part of the valley is cut into resistant gneiss, which allows the canyon walls to stand near vertically along the upper lake. The deepest part of Lake Chelan occurs in the Lucerne Basin in The Straits near Falls Creek, where the bedrock changes from gneiss to erodible volcanic rocks and schist. The lower two basins are separated at the Narrows, an accumulation of landslide debris from Slide Ridge on the south shore, and bedrock on the north shore (Whetten, 1967).
    [Show full text]
  • Relicensing Update in This Issue: Settlement Discussions for Rocky Reach Relicensing
    August 2005 Chelan County PUD RELICENSING UPDATE IN THIS ISSUE: Settlement discussions for Rocky Reach relicensing ..........1 Lake Chelan Dam still awaits biological opinion..............4 Lake Chelan Rocky Reach Hydroelectric Project Hydroelectric Project Settlement discussions for Rocky Reach relicensing flow into summer The Federal Energy project operations or make Regulatory Commission recommendations about (FERC) is currently preparing how Chelan County PUD a draft environmental should protect, mitigate or assessment of the license enhance resources affected application Chelan County by the project. Tribal PUD submitted in June, representatives, local agencies, 2004. In the meantime, the the City of Entiat and local utility continues to meet interested parties are also with a “Settlement Group” active Settlement Group of stakeholders who hope members. to propose a comprehensive The purpose of the settlement agreement to settlement process is to FERC before the end of this more effectively address year. issues which otherwise may During relicensing, a project result in legal challenge. Chelan PUD biologists Jeff Osborn (left) and Steve Hays is evaluated by FERC on the Resolving issues directly with (right) discuss the Bull Trout Management Plan with U.S. basis of how power and non- stakeholders allows local Fish and Wildlife Service biologist Steve Lewis (center). power uses of the affected solutions to prevail, rather water resource (i.e. the Rocky than awaiting decisions PMEs will be used by (for details on water quality Reach Reservoir) will be from Washington, D.C. FERC to develop license issues, see the March, 2005 managed for the next 30-50 Ultimately, a comprehensive articles, which will become Relicensing Update on years.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Chelan Recertification Review Report 2018
    REVIEW OF APPLICATION FOR RE-CERTIFICATION BY THE LOW IMPACT HYDROPOWER INSTITUTE OF THE LAKE CHELAN HYDROELECTRIC FACILITY Prepared by Patricia McIlvaine December 26, 2018; links added January 21, 2019 I. INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the review of the application submitted by the Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan County (Chelan PUD or Applicant) to the Low Impact Hydropower Institute (LIHI) for re-certification of the Lake Chelan Hydroelectric Project FERC P-637 (Lake Chelan or Project). The Project was initially certified by LIHI as Low Impact in 2008 and re-certified in December 2012 as LIHI Certificate No. 30. The expiration date of the Certificate has been extended to allow for this review. This current re-certification review was conducted in compliance with LIHI’s Handbook, 2nd Edition, dated March 7, 2016. The December 2012 Recertification Report can be accessed via the link below. https://lowimpacthydro.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Recommendation-Memo-Lake-Chelan- 2012.pdf The Project’s December 2012 re-certification had no conditions. II. RECERTIFICATION PROCESS AND INITIAL ASSESSMENT Under the 2016 LIHI Handbook, reviews are a two-phase process starting with a limited review of a completed LIHI application, focused on three questions: (1) Is there any missing information from the application? (2) Has there been a material change in the operation of the certified facility since the previous certificate term? (3) Has there been a change in LIHI criteria since the Certificate was issued? In accordance with the Recertification Standards, if the only issue is that there is some missing information, the applicant will have the opportunity to provide the missing information, and this may or may not trigger a Stage II review.
    [Show full text]
  • RELICENSING UPDATE in This Issue: Lake Chelan Project Study Updates
    July 2000 Chelan County PUD RELICENSING UPDATE In this issue: Lake Chelan project Study updates ........................................................ Page 1 Rocky Reach project Study updates ........................................................ Page 2 Kayak photos A look at the gorge ................................................... Page 3 Get to know the PUD relicensing team Lake Chelan Rocky Reach Steve Hays, natural sciences consultant ....................... Page 4 Hydroelectric Project Hydroelectric Project License expires 2004 License expires 2006 LAKE CHELAN HYDRO PROJECT Kayakers make it through Chelan Gorge at three flows The flow of water in the gorge was controlled by opening Tracy Clapp of Sultan, Wash., a single gate at the Lake Chelan Dam upstream. Flows were finds his kayak 273 cubic feet per second the first day, 391 cfs the second pointing skyward day and 475 cfs the third day. Flows during spring runoff as he fights his way are more typically in the 1,000 to 2,000 cfs range, but they through whitewater can get above 12,000 cfs. in the gorge. Kayakers said they thought the middle flow was closest to what most visiting kayakers would like to see. But they also said the higher flow offered some extra challenges that visiting boaters would find enjoyable. More kayak The PUD must now wait for the final report from the photos, Page 3 kayaking study team evaluating the test. Then it will discuss the issue with other parties in the relicensing process to Six highly experienced kayakers made three successful determine whether kayaking will become part of the terms trips through the Chelan River Gorge July 8-10, demon- and conditions for a new license.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Impact Hydropower Institute Re-Certification Application Lake
    Low Impact Hydropower Institute Re-certification Application Lake Chelan Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 637) Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan County August 30, 2018 1 Contents Part 1. Facility Description ............................................................................................................. 3 The Lake Chelan Hydroelectric Project, FERC Project No. 637. .................................................. 3 Part 2. Standards Matrices ............................................................................................................ 15 2.1 Zone of Effect 1 – Lake Chelan .......................................................................................... 15 Table 1 – Zone of Effect 1 ..................................................................................................... 15 2.2 Zone of Effect 2 – Reaches 1, 2, and 3 of the Chelan River ............................................... 28 Table 2 – Zone of Effect 2 ..................................................................................................... 28 2.3 Zone of Effect 3 – Reach 4 of the Chelan River ................................................................. 39 Table 3 – Zone of Effect 3 ..................................................................................................... 39 2.4 Zone of Effect 4 – Lake Chelan Project Tailrace ................................................................ 51 Table 4 – Zone of Effect 4 ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Chelan, Chelan River, Washington
    Hydropower Reform Coalition Success Story LAKE CHELAN, CHELAN RIVER, WASHINGTON BALANCE IN LAKE CHELAN LEVELS Lake level management will protect against erosion at Stehekin Flats, control woody debris and riparian vegetation while maintaining local photo courtesy of recreation and tourism Chelan PUD industries NEW FLOWS IN THE CHELAN RIVER Minimum fl ows for fi sh habitat and special whitewater releases in the Chelan River photo courtesy of USGS A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR LAKE CHELAN FISHERIES Watershed-wide improvements to Lake Chelan’s fi shery, including the removal of alluvium barriers in lake photo courtesy of tributaries and habitat National Park enhancements Service FERC PROJECT NUMBER: P-637 PROJECT OWNER: Chelan County PUD LAKE CHELAN PROJECT GENERATING CAPACITY: 59.2 MW PROJECT FIRST LICENSED: May 8, 1926 Chelan River, Washington SETTLEMENT ACHIEVED: October 8, 2003 CURRENT LICENSE ISSUED: November 6, 2006 LICENSE EXPIRATION DATE: October 31, 2056 Lake Chelan is a freshwater ord, a lake carved by ancient glaciers. At 1,500 feet deep and FEDERAL LANDS INUNDATED BY THE PROJECT: 361.4 55 miles long, it is the third deepest lake in the United States, and the longest and deepest acres (Wenatchee National Forest) and 104.1 acres lake in the state of Washington. The Chelan River, the lake’s outlet, fl ows four miles into the (Lake Chelan National Recreation Area of North Cascades National Park) Columbia River. Over a century ago, the Chelan River’s fl ows varied by a factor of ten: from 640 cfs in the winter to 6,400 cfs in late spring freshets. KEY SETTLEMENT SIGNATORIES AND SUPPORTERS: • Chelan County PUD (dam owner) Beginning in 1892, companies began to build dams at the outlet to raise and control Lake • Federal agencies: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chelan Wildlife Area Management Plan Acknowledgements Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff
    August 2018 Chelan Wildlife Area Management Plan Acknowledgements Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Planning Team Members Plan Leadership and Content Development Ron Fox, Wildlife Area Manager Ron Fox, Chelan Wildlife Area Manager Rich Finger, Region Two Lands Operation Manager Lauri Vigue, Lead Lands Planner Graham Simon, Habitat Biologist Melinda Posner, Wildlife Area Planning, David Volsen, District Wildlife Biologist Recreation and Outreach Section Manager Travis Maitland, Fish District Biologist Cynthia Wilkerson, Lands Division Manager Eric Oswald, Enforcement Document Production Dan Klump, Enforcement Peggy Ushakoff, Public Affairs Mark Teske, Environmental Planner Michelle Dunlop, Public Affairs Rod Pfeifle, Forester Matthew Trenda, Wildlife Program Administration Mapping Support John Talmadge, GIS Shelly Snyder, GIS Chelan Wildlife Area Advisory Committee Roster Name Organization City Bill Stegeman Wenatchee Sportsmen’s Association Wenatchee Sam Lain Upland Bird Hunter Chelan Graham Grant Washington Wild Sheep Foundation Wenatchee Jason Lundgren Cascade Columbia Fisheries Enhancement Group Wenatchee Dan Smith North Cascades Washington Audubon Chelan Von Pope Chelan Public Utilities District Wenatchee Erik Ellis Bureau of Land Management Wenatchee Ana Cerro-Timpone Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest Entiat Paul Willard Lake Chelan Trails Alliance/Evergreen Bike Alliance Mason Cover Photos: Chelan Butte Unit by Justin Haug, bighorn sheep rams by Beau Patterson, Beebe Springs western meadowlark by Alan Bauer and Bighorns in the Swakane by Justin Haug 2 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Chelan Wildlife Area Kelly Susewind, Director, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Chelan Wildlife Area Management Plan August 2018 Chelan Wildlife Area Management Plan 3 Table of Contents Table of Contents . 4 List of Acronyms & Abbreviations . 6 Part 1 - Wildlife Area Planning Overview .
    [Show full text]
  • Population Structure, Status and Life Histories of Upper Columbia
    Population Structure, Status and Life Histories of Upper Columbia Steelhead, Spring and Summer/fall Chinook, Sockeye, Coho Salmon, Bull Trout, Westslope Cutthroat Trout, Non-migratory Rainbow Trout, Pacific Lamprey, and Sturgeon February, 2003 Chuck Peven PEVEN CONSULTING, INC. 3617 Burchvale Rd. Wenatchee, WA 98801 (509) 662-1839 [email protected] 1 Acknowledgments I would like to thank the wise and timely input from the following individuals that made this work a better product: Bob Rose, Keith Wolf, Kate Terrell, Phil Archibald, Ken MacDonald, R.D. Nelle, Barb Kelly-Ringold, Judy DeLavergne, Kim Hyatt, Stuart Hammond, Shane Bickford, and Rick Klinge. 2 Introduction This report defines the population structure, current and historic status, and life histories of “focal” fish species that inhabit the Columbia Cascade Province (CCP). Focal fish species are species of interest within the CCP that would benefit from restoration and conservation actions through the Subbasin Planning process. 1. Definition of species/populations Species can be defined as a group of interbreeding populations that are reproductively isolated from other such groups. These populations exhibit various traits, such as the ability to produce viable, fertile offspring, have similar morphological characteristics, and genetic exchange is generally isolated from other populations. The term population can be defined various ways, but in the evolutionary context, Ridley (1996) defines it as, a group of organisms, usually a group of sexual organisms that interbreed and share a gene pool. The ESA (1973, amended in 1978) defined “species” to include, “any subspecies of fish or wildlife or plants and any distinct population segment of any species of vertebrate fish or wildlife, which interbreeds when mature.” Waples (1991), further defined the term distinct population segment, a vertebrate population will be considered distinct (and hence a “species”) for the purposes of conservation under the Act if the population represents an evolutionary significant unit (ESU) of the biological species.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Chelan Watershed DDT and PCB Total Maximum Daily Load ______
    Lake Chelan Watershed DDT and PCB Total Maximum Daily Load __________________________ Water Quality Improvement Report June 2006 Publication No. 06-10-022 Lake Chelan Watershed DDT and PCB Total Maximum Daily Load __________________________ Water Quality Improvement Report Prepared by: David Schneider and Randy Coots Washington State Department of Ecology Water Quality Program June 2006 Publication Number 06-10-022 You can print or download this document from our Web site at: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/0610022.html For more information contact: Department of Ecology Water Quality Program Central Regional Office 15 W Yakima Avenue, Suite 200 Yakima, WA 98902 Telephone: (509) 454-7894 Headquarters (Lacey) 360-407-6000 Regional Whatcom Pend San Juan Office Oreille location Skagit Okanogan Stevens Island Northwest Central Ferry 425-649-7000 Clallam Snohomish 509-575-2490 Chelan Jefferson Spokane K Douglas i Bellevue Lincoln ts Spokane a Grays p King Eastern Harbor Mason Kittitas Grant 509-329-3400 Pierce Adams Lacey Whitman Thurston Southwest Pacific Lewis 360-407-6300 Yakima Franklin Garfield Wahkiakum Yakima Columbia Walla Cowlitz Benton Asotin Skamania Walla Klickitat Clark Persons with a hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341. If you need this publication in an alternate format, please call the Water Quality Program at 509-454-7888. Persons with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341 Table of
    [Show full text]
  • Chelan River Project Monthly Report
    P U B L I C U T I L I T Y D I S T R I C T N O. 1 o f C H E L A N C O U N T Y P.O. Box 1231, Wenatchee, WA 98807-1231 • 327 N. Wenatchee Ave., Wenatchee, WA 98801 (509) 663-8121 • Toll free 1-888-663-8121 • www.chelanpud.org July 15, 2009 P-637-WA NATDAM-WA00004 Mr. Patrick Regan, P.E., Regional Engineer Portland Regional Office Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 805 SW Broadway, Suite 550 Portland, OR 97205 Re: Chelan River Project Monthly Report Dear Mr. Regan: In accordance with your letter of June 19, 2008, enclosed herewith are an original and two copies of the thirteenth monthly report for the Chelan River Project. In addition, copies of this letter and the report will be sent to Mr. Jon Merz and Ms. Pat Irle of Washington Department of Ecology. If you would like to discuss this work or if additional information would be helpful, please call me at the number listed below, or call Michelle Smith, Licensing & Compliance Manager, at (509) 661-4180. Sincerely, Engineering Services M. Gene Yow, P.E. Dam Safety Manager (509) 661-4305 [email protected] Enclosures: Original and two copies cc: Jon Merz, WaDOE Pat Irle, WaDOE COMMISSIONERS: Carnan Bergren, Dennis S. Bolz, Ann Congdon, Norm Gutzwiler, Randy Smith GENERAL MANAGER: Richard Riazzi Chelan River Project – Monthly Report Lake Chelan Hydroelectric Project – FERC No. 637 Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan County July 15th, 2009 1.
    [Show full text]
  • EPA Approval) • NPDES Permitting of Point Source Discharges (EPA Delegated Authority) • 401 Water Quality Certification (Independent State Authority)
    EPA Region 10 States Meeting Hydropower, Compliance Schedules, and Upcoming UAA’s Chad Brown Water Quality Program Washington Department of Ecology What is the Ecology’s regulatory role in relation to hydropower facilities? Implementing Clean Water Act- Water Quality Program • Adoption of Water Quality Standards (EPA approval) • NPDES permitting of point source discharges (EPA delegated authority) • 401 Water Quality Certification (independent state authority) Water Rights - Water Resources Program • Issuing non-consumptive water rights • Setting Instream flows – habitat protection Coastal Zone Management (CZM) – Shorelands and Environmental Assistance (SEA) • Certification of federal consistency What is the Ecology’s regulatory role in relation to hydropower facilities? Implementing Clean Water Act- Water Quality Program • Adoption of Water Quality Standards (EPA approval) • NPDES permitting of point source discharges (EPA delegated authority) • 401 Water Quality Certification (independent state authority) Water Rights - Water Resources Program • Issuing non-consumptive water rights • Setting Instream flows – habitat protection Coastal Zone Management (CZM) – Shorelands and Environmental Assistance (SEA) • Certification of federal consistency A Look Back… 401 Water Quality Certifications issued in the last 20 years • 22 Hydropower project 401s issued • Majority were issued between 2008-2012 • Most all were multi-year processes • 2003 - Ecology adopted the ‘Compliance Schedules for Dams’ process into the water quality standards. • Necessary
    [Show full text]