DOCSLIB.ORG

C/O Spire View Cotts Lane Tilney All Saints King's Lynn Norfolk PE34

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

c/o Spire View Cotts Lane Tilney All Saints King’s Lynn Norfolk PE34 4SL Dear Recipient, An Open Letter re Hillsborough, police corruption, an Establishment cover-up and me I do apologise for the use of the word ‘recipient’. It is not out of a lack of respect but rather because of the ‘Open’ status I have accorded to this letter. In compiling this document, I specifically refer to the House of Lords discussion on the inquest verdicts at Hillsborough and a similar discussion in the House of Commons on 27 April 2016. It is my intention in this document to provide a brief analysis of the modus operandi of the “Establishment cover-up” (as described by Joanna Cherry QC, MP and Lord Paddick, former Assistant Commissioner of Scotland Yard) and then to link it to the same Establishment involved in a “…cover-up of child abuse in Lambeth Council…” (retired DCI Clive Driscoll, Scotland Yard) and the substantial human rights abuses of me and my innocent family members. It is also my intention to secure a result similar to that achieved by the Hillsborough families: (i) vindication of any wrong-doing on my part; (ii) criminal convictions of corrupt State officials; (iii) redress for my significant losses. Article 3 Official Complaint It is necessary for the sake of full transparency and because it has a tremendous bearing on this case, for me to inform the Reader that on 31 December 2013 I issued an Official Complaint against HM Government under Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) for having been subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment and punishment meted out to me by various agencies of State including – but not limited to: (i) Lambeth Council; (ii) The Metropolitan Police Service (“the MPS”); (iii) Essex Constabulary; (iv) Norfolk Constabulary; (v) Bexley Council; (vi) Off Centre Counselling in Hackney; (vii) the Probation Service; (viii) the Prison Service; (ix) et al. Naturally I reserve all of my Rights – and my family’s Rights – against all of those agencies of State mentioned above, together with other organisations or individuals. As most readers of this Open Letter will be aware of, there are no possible derogations from Article 3, not even in war-time. Page 1 of 71 However, whilst Prime Minister David Cameron’s office acknowledged receipt of my Official Complaint (copied to HM the Queen and others), the Government’s response was not positive as it is meant to be under the rule of law, but decidedly negative. Its course of conduct amounted to not only “harassment and persecution” (retired DCI Clive Driscoll1) but also to automatic breaches of Article 3 and other European Convention Rights, including, but not limited to, breaches of Article 5 (the Right to Liberty), Article 6 (the Right to a Fair Trial), Article 8 (the Right to Privacy and Family Life), Article 10 (the Right to Freedom of Expression), Article 11 (the Right to Free Association), Article 13 (the Right to an Effective Remedy), Protocol 1 Article 1 (the Right to peaceful enjoyment of property). Some of the negative responses include – but are not limited to – the following: (i) further unwarranted defamation; (ii) the bringing of three further criminal cases; (iii) illegal imprisonment (including 10 prisons in 12 weeks in 2014); (iv) illegal imprisonment for 24 months in 2015 for an alleged breach of a Restraining Order unlawfully issued on 01 November 2011; (v) being made homeless; (vi) refusal to quash obviously “unsafe” convictions: a. alleged incitement of a 14-year-old female who never existed; b. alleged harassment of my daughter by sending her a letter about police corruption and my granddaughter by sending her a birthday card; c. and others including “Impersonating a Barrister” (when I have never spoken on another person’s behalf in Court), “criminal damage” against a car when I was not informed of a trial date; “threats against the person” (added at the trial for criminal damage); breaches of a Sexual Offences Prevention Order (when I am not a sex offender) et al; (vii) banned from the entire London Borough of Bexley; (viii) the imposition of two further gagging orders; (ix) refusal to allow me to travel abroad for a holiday; (x) 3 unwarranted stop and searches by the Police in the 4 weeks following my release from illegal incarceration; (xi) unwarranted visits from the Public Protection Unit (who never bring any documentation with them or ever take notes – refer to Appendices: draft witness statement from Philippa Bensley, former landlady); (xii) being given two separate prison numbers; (xiii) unlawful police national computer (PNC) records being created against me (including a false record containing a list of rapes and other sexual offences against underage females when I have never been arrested, charged, Indicted, sentenced for these – so why did Scotland Yard create this false record?); (xiv) as far away from achieving justice for me and family as ever. Hillsborough As a Liverpool FC fan, I attended the match on 15 April 1989. In 1986 I had had my first book published: Liverpool: A Complete Record 1892-1986 and that book had taken me 20 years to research. 1 09 March 2015 in a meeting with Brian Pead (William Brian Freeman) and Michael Bird, co-authors of the banned book from Hillsborough to Lambeth. The meeting took place at the Port Jackson public house in Bishop’s Stortford, Essex. Minutes were recorded and shared. Page 2 of 71 I witnessed the horror of Hillsborough and closely followed the Establishment’s handling of the aftermath. It was obvious to me – and to so many others – that various agencies of State were culpable of ‘wrong-doing’ and criminal activity. Indeed, Professor Phil Scraton2 of the University of Belfast, draws attention to the ‘failings’ by the ambulance service and that the Home Office always knew the Truth about Hillsborough but, for politically expedient reasons, deliberately caused obfuscation and emotional pain by disseminating disinformation. Lies: Hillsborough David Conn3 (The Guardian) referred to “…vile lies perpetrated by the police about innocent people’s behaviour…”4 He said that there was a demonstrable “…cover-up by the police…” and that they created a false narrative to deflect public attention away from wrong-doing by South Yorkshire Police and Sheffield Council and other agencies of State. Lies: Brian Pead Just as in Hillsborough, the police (the Metropolitan Police Service, Essex Constabulary and Norfolk Constabulary) perpetuated – and continue to perpetuate – lies about me in order to create a false narrative which included, but is not limited to: (i) labelling me a sex offender; (ii) lying to my family; (iii) lying to my work colleagues; (iv) promulgating disinformation about me via the internet and traditional press; (v) defaming me; (vi) attempting to denigrate my research; (vii) banning my book entitled from Hillsborough to Lambeth; (viii) creating further spurious charges against me; (ix) et al. Raison d’être for Hillsborough It is now established that various agencies of State created a false narrative about Hillsborough in order to cover up its own wrong-doing and Professor Scraton refers to “…systemic failures beyond the police … going right to the heart of government …to the Home Office…” Lord Falconer of Thoroton5 stated in the House of Lords6 that “…the media colluded with the police in 2 Phil Scraton is Professor of Criminology in the Institute of Criminology and Criminal Justice, School of Law, Queen's University, Belfast, where he is Director of the Childhood, Transition and Social Justice Initiative. He has held recent visiting scholarships at Monash University, Melbourne and Sydney Law School, University of Sydney. Source: < http://hillsborough.independent.gov.uk/the-independent-panel/phil-scraton/> 3 David Conn is a sports writer for the Guardian. He writes predominantly on football. 4 Hillsborough: The Truth, Radio5Live, 27 April 2016, 7pm 5 The Rt Hon. the Lord Falconer of Thoroton was born Charles Falconer on 19 November 1951 , and is a Labour Life peer sitting in the House of Lords since 14 May 1997. Lord Falconer of Thoroton is currently Shadow Lord Chancellor and Shadow Secretary of State for Justice, an opposition position he has held since May 2015. In the past, Lord Falconer of Thoroton has held the position of Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice (2007 to 2007), Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs and Lord Chancellor (2003 to 2007), Minister of State (Home Office) (Criminal Justice System) (2002 to 2003), Minister of State (Department of Transport, Local Government and Regions) (Housing & Planning) (2001 to 2002) in government. Source: < http://myparliament.info/Member/2758> 6 Hansard, Volume 771, 27 April 2016 Page 3 of 71 smearing the families…”, while Lord Alton of Liverpool7 referred to the “…subversion of the justice system…” and “…a denial of criminal responsibility…” Indeed, it worth reading Lord Alton’s speech in its entirety as published in Hansard: “…My Lords, during the 27 years that have elapsed since the Hillsborough disaster, the double spectre of loss and injustice has hung over the people of Liverpool. Among the 96 who died were former constituents of mine, including a child. Those deaths of loved ones were compounded by the denial of criminal negligence, callous indifference, the subversion of our justice system, collective character assassination and demonisation. If the Minister has had a chance to read the material I sent him this morning, including the letter I sent before the game was played at Hillsborough which questioned the safety of the ground, he will realise that there are still many unanswered questions. I would be grateful if he told us more about the timetabling of the continuing inquiry, which is being held with great diligence and meticulousness at Warrington; I have had a chance to visit it and talk to the people about the way they are going about their work.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Court of Appeal Found No Love for Topshop Tank

    1 Court of Appeal Found No Love for Topshop Tank

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CLoK Court of Appeal found no love for Topshop tank: theimage right that dare not speak its name Susan Fletcher Senior Lecturer in Law, University of Central Lancashire Justine Mitchell Associate Lecturer in Law, University of Central Lancashire Subject:Passing Off. Other related subjects: Torts. Image rights.Personalityrights.Publicityrights.Passing off. Tradeconnections.Intellectual property. Keywords:passing off, image rights, personality rights, publicity rights, trade marks, goodwill, misrepresentation, merchandising, endorsements, English law, comparative law, unfair competition, freeriding, unjust enrichment, dilution, monopoly, social media, photograph, Rihanna, Topshop, Fenty, Arcadia Abstract:This article contains an analysis of the first instance and appeal decisions of the “Rihanna case”.In particular, the authors consider the substantive law of passing off in the context of the unauthorised use of a celebrity's image on a Topshop tank vest top. This is followed by a discussionof the consequences of the caseforcelebrities, consumers and stakeholders in theentertainmentand fashion industries. Every time you see me it's a different colour, a different shape, a different style. ....because it really...I/we just go off of instinct. Whatever we feel that very moment, we just go for it. Creatively, fashion is another world for me to get my creativity out.12 1Rihanna quote from the Talk That Talk music video available at www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVTKxwO2UnU
  • Fickle Justice: Judicial Idiosyncrasy in UK Privacy Cases

    Fickle Justice: Judicial Idiosyncrasy in UK Privacy Cases

    Fickle Justice: Judicial Idiosyncrasy in UK Privacy Cases PAUL WRAGGt I. INTRODUCTION In 1990, the Federal Court of Australia rejected counsel's submission that English authorities on the "public interest" defense in breach of confidence claims ought to be adopted. The court dismissively described those authorities as "not so much a rule of law as an invitation to judicial idiosyncrasy."' The same comment seems equally applicable today. As is well-established in British common law, when deciding claims for misuse of private information (which replaces breach of confidence),2 the court must decide whether the claimant's reasonable expectation of privacy is outweighed by the contribution to a debate of public interest that the publication makes.3 As the case law shows, this is usually a delicate balance that may involve fine distinctions. Yet despite judicial recognition that the "applicable principles [should] be stated with reasonable clarity ' 4 so as to avoid accusations of judicial idiosyncrasy, the approach taken to determining the question of "public interest" remains an invitation to such, especially where celebrities' private lives are involved. Recent developments suggest broad diversity in the methodology of evaluating the worth of privacy-invading expression in which both skeptical and generous approaches are evident. These idiosyncratic factors are the subject of discussion in this Article.5 By examining the recent case law, it will be argued that since the public interest test pervades a range of measures relating to the misuse of private information tort, the issue of judicial idiosyncrasy must be addressed by an appellate court. The adoption of the skeptical approach as tLecturer in Law, School of Law, University of Leeds, UK.
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard

    Whole Day Download the Hansard

    Monday Volume 679 7 September 2020 No. 95 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 7 September 2020 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2020 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 345 7 SEPTEMBER 2020 346 Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi (Slough) (Lab): What House of Commons steps the Government is taking to support universities accepting higher numbers of domestic students as a result of the change in policy on predicted A-level Monday 7 September 2020 grades. [905503] The House met at half-past Two o’clock Holly Mumby-Croft (Scunthorpe) (Con): What steps his Department is taking to help universities increase PRAYERS the number of places available to students in 2020-21. [905512] [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] The Minister for Universities (Michelle Donelan): We Virtual participation in proceedings commenced (Order, are working across government and closely with the 2 September). higher education sector, utilising the higher education [NB: [V] denotes a Member participating virtually.] taskforce I have created, to ensure that the vast majority of students who want to go to university this year can do so at the university their grades unlock. Oral Answers to Questions Mr Sharma [V]: Universities need financial support to expand physical buildings and facilities and to fund the expansion of wellbeing and support services and EDUCATION other important areas of university life. Will the Secretary of State confirm that this additional support will be granted to ensure that his algorithm does not cost The Secretary of State was asked— thousands of students their futures, and when will he Free Speech: Universities do this? Felicity Buchan (Kensington) (Con): What steps his Michelle Donelan: Last week in fact, we announced a Department is taking to help ensure free speech in £10 million capital fund to cover capital as well as universities.
  • Challenging the Harms of the 'Muslim Grooming Gangs' Narrative

    Challenging the Harms of the 'Muslim Grooming Gangs' Narrative

    RAC0010.1177/0306396819895727Race & ClassCockbain and Tufail 895727research-article2020 SAGE Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, Melbourne Failing victims, fuelling hate: challenging the harms of the ‘Muslim grooming gangs’ narrative ELLA COCKBAIN and WAQAS TUFAIL Abstract: ‘Muslim grooming gangs’ have become a defining feature of media, political and public debate around child sexual exploitation in the UK. The dominant narrative that has emerged to explain a series of horrific cases is misleading, sensationalist and has in itself promoted a number of harms. This article examines how racist framings of ‘Muslim grooming gangs’ exist not only in extremist, far-right fringes but in mainstream, liberal discourses too. The involvement of supposedly feminist and liberal actors and the promotion of pseudoscientific ‘research’ have lent a veneer of legitimacy to essentialist, Ella Cockbain is an associate professor at University College London in the Department of Security and Crime Science and a visiting research fellow at Leiden University. Her research focuses on human trafficking, child sexual exploitation and labour exploitation. In seeking evidence- informed responses to complex issues, she has worked closely with organisations across the public, private and third sectors. Her book Offender and Victim Networks in Human Trafficking was published by Routledge in 2018. Waqas Tufail is a senior lecturer in Criminology at Leeds Beckett University. His research interests concern the policing, racialisation and criminalisation of marginalised and minority communities and the lived experiences of Muslim minorities. He is a board member of the International Sociological Association Research Committee on Racism, Nationalism, Indigeneity and Ethnicity, serves on the editorial board of Sociology of Race and Ethnicity and is co-editor of Media, Crime, Racism (Palgrave Macmillan, 2018).
  • This Is an Author Accepted Manuscript, Not the Published Article. Accepted for Publication by Security Dialogue (Published by Sage) on 12Th June 2018

    This Is an Author Accepted Manuscript, Not the Published Article. Accepted for Publication by Security Dialogue (Published by Sage) on 12Th June 2018

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by De Montfort University Open Research Archive This is an author accepted manuscript, not the published article. Accepted for publication by Security Dialogue (published by Sage) on 12th June 2018. The published version will differ from this pre-print. Please cite the published version Authors: Dr Nadya Ali, Lecturer in International Relations, University of Sussex Dr Ben Whitham, Lecturer in International Relations, De Montfort University Corresponding author: Dr Ben Whitham ([email protected]), Lecturer in International Relations, Department of Politics, People and Place, De Montfort University, Leicester. 1 The Unbearable Anxiety of Being: Ideological Fantasies of British Muslims beyond the Politics of Security Abstract Since the advent of the 'War on Terror' British Muslims have been designated as a source of anxiety by politicians, journalists and publics alike. Fears that began over terrorism have extended to the opening of Islamic faith schools, the meaning of clothing and halal slaughter. Critical scholarship that engages with these developments in the fields of politics and international relations tends to view them through paradigms of (in)security. Whilst these contributions have been helpful in understanding the construction of a Muslim 'problem', this article demonstrates how the array of issues incorporated by this problem exceeds the politics of security. The article develops an original conceptual and analytic framework, drawing upon Slavoj Žižek's Lacanian theory of ideology, to argue that political and media ‘scandals’ about what an imagined 'Muslim community' gets up to are best understood as ideological fantasies.
  • International Passenger Survey, 2008

    International Passenger Survey, 2008

    UK Data Archive Study Number 5993 - International Passenger Survey, 2008 Airline code Airline name Code 2L 2L Helvetic Airways 26099 2M 2M Moldavian Airlines (Dump 31999 2R 2R Star Airlines (Dump) 07099 2T 2T Canada 3000 Airln (Dump) 80099 3D 3D Denim Air (Dump) 11099 3M 3M Gulf Stream Interntnal (Dump) 81099 3W 3W Euro Manx 01699 4L 4L Air Astana 31599 4P 4P Polonia 30699 4R 4R Hamburg International 08099 4U 4U German Wings 08011 5A 5A Air Atlanta 01099 5D 5D Vbird 11099 5E 5E Base Airlines (Dump) 11099 5G 5G Skyservice Airlines 80099 5P 5P SkyEurope Airlines Hungary 30599 5Q 5Q EuroCeltic Airways 01099 5R 5R Karthago Airlines 35499 5W 5W Astraeus 01062 6B 6B Britannia Airways 20099 6H 6H Israir (Airlines and Tourism ltd) 57099 6N 6N Trans Travel Airlines (Dump) 11099 6Q 6Q Slovak Airlines 30499 6U 6U Air Ukraine 32201 7B 7B Kras Air (Dump) 30999 7G 7G MK Airlines (Dump) 01099 7L 7L Sun d'Or International 57099 7W 7W Air Sask 80099 7Y 7Y EAE European Air Express 08099 8A 8A Atlas Blue 35299 8F 8F Fischer Air 30399 8L 8L Newair (Dump) 12099 8Q 8Q Onur Air (Dump) 16099 8U 8U Afriqiyah Airways 35199 9C 9C Gill Aviation (Dump) 01099 9G 9G Galaxy Airways (Dump) 22099 9L 9L Colgan Air (Dump) 81099 9P 9P Pelangi Air (Dump) 60599 9R 9R Phuket Airlines 66499 9S 9S Blue Panorama Airlines 10099 9U 9U Air Moldova (Dump) 31999 9W 9W Jet Airways (Dump) 61099 9Y 9Y Air Kazakstan (Dump) 31599 A3 A3 Aegean Airlines 22099 A7 A7 Air Plus Comet 25099 AA AA American Airlines 81028 AAA1 AAA Ansett Air Australia (Dump) 50099 AAA2 AAA Ansett New Zealand (Dump)
  • Feet on the Ground a Blog by “Xavier”

    Feet on the Ground a Blog by “Xavier”

    Feet On The Ground a blog by “Xavier” being the journal of a mega-millions lottery winner fotg the fifth Produced by HTSP Editorial Division, 10/SK6 4EG, G.B. © “Xavier” MM17-18 F&F BOOKS www.FarragoBooks.co.uk Feet On The Ground : “Xavier 5” 1 Don’t even think it 1st August 2017 An Arab who stabbed three people in Hamburg on the last Friday in July, killing one of them, is being dismissed as a random nutter rather than as organized Islamist terrorist. He also injured three other people during his rampage. No surprise that the Merkel regime doesn’t think locking up obviously crazy failed asylum seekers until they can be deported is a good idea. No great surprise 1st August 2017 You do kind of expect to hear that the head of student equality at Cambridge university has ended up in trouble for making lots of nasty, racialist posts on anti-social meeja. That sort of character always feels that the rulz don’t apply to it. What are schools really for? 1st August 2017 The nation’s child health experts are advocating breast- feeding lessons for 11-year-old girls and boys, who should be getting to grips with reading, writing and sums at that age. This suggests that the experts are planning as their next move to encourage girls to get pregnant at 12, while there’s a chance they might still remember the lessons – possibly as part of a scheme to let women take care of breeding in their teens so that they don’t have an interrupted working life? This process will be helped, of course, by a greater focus on sex and relationship education at the expense of academic subjects.
  • Tugendhat and Christie: the Law of Privacy and the Media Online

    Tugendhat and Christie: the Law of Privacy and the Media Online

    DFwnN (Free pdf) Tugendhat and Christie: The Law of Privacy and The Media Online [DFwnN.ebook] Tugendhat and Christie: The Law of Privacy and The Media Pdf Free From Oxford University Press *Download PDF | ePub | DOC | audiobook | ebooks Download Now Free Download Here Download eBook #6465806 in Books 2016-03-14Original language:EnglishPDF # 1 7.00 x 2.20 x 9.80l, .0 #File Name: 01996857461010 pages | File size: 26.Mb From Oxford University Press : Tugendhat and Christie: The Law of Privacy and The Media before purchasing it in order to gage whether or not it would be worth my time, and all praised Tugendhat and Christie: The Law of Privacy and The Media: 0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. lsquo;THE FOGGY BOUNDARIES BETWEEN PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF EXPRESSIONrsquo;By Phillip Taylor MBElsquo;THE FOGGY BOUNDARIES BETWEEN PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF EXPRESSIONrsquo;ARE EXAMINED IN THIS DEFINITIVE WORK OF REFERENCE-- NOW IN A NEW THIRD EDITIONAn appreciation by Phillip Taylor MBE and Elizabeth Taylor of Richmond Green ChambersThis book, says co-editor Sir Mark Warby is lsquo;not an academic treatise, but a practitionerrsquo;s textbookrsquo; adding that lsquo;the practitionerrsquo;s insight is an enormously important part of this workrsquo;, newly published by the Oxford University Press.Now in its third edition, this long established and authoritative work of reference is an absolute boon to practitioners in this difficult field where, more often than not, controversies rage. Within its almost 900 pages, the book contains the insightful -- and not altogether non- controversial -- commentary of some twenty-nine erudite contributors, including the two editors and interestingly, nine foreign law contributors from as many jurisdictions ndash; a useful feature here, for comparative lawyers.The wealth of new material and commentary in this edition reflects the significant developments in this area of law that have emerged since the previous edition of 2011.
  • Anglian Water 2015 Water Resource Management Plan

    Anglian Water 2015 Water Resource Management Plan

    Anglian Water 2015 Water Resource Management Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment: Task 1 & 2 December 2013 Error! No text of specified style in document. Anglian Water 2015 Water Resources Management Plan 313903 EVT EES 003 C http://pims01/pims/llisapi.dll/properties/1547572395 04 December 2013 Habitats Regulations Assessment: Task 1 & 2 Anglian Water 2014 Water Resources Management Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment: Task 1 & 2 December 2013 Mott MacDonald, Demeter House, Station Road, Cambridge CB1 2RS, United Kingdom T +44 (0)1223 463500 F +44 (0)1223 461007 W www.mottmac.com Anglian Water 2015 Water Resource Management Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment: Task 1 & 2 Issue and revision record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description Standard A 16 October 2013 Tristan Folland Zoe Trent N Levy Draft for comments Roisin Ni Celia Figueira Mhathuna B 27 November 2013 Tristan Folland Laura N Levy Final draft for comments Celia Figueira Henderson C 04 December 2013 Tristan Folland Laura N Levy Final for Submission Celia Figueira Henderson This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned project document being relied upon by any other party, or being used only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission any other purpose. which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it.
  • High Court Judgment Template

    High Court Judgment Template

    Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWHC 3525 (QB) Case No: HQ16D01543 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION MEDIA & COMMUNICATIONS LIST Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 19 December 2018 Before : THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE NICKLIN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : Zahir Monir Claimant - and – Steve Wood Defendant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Julian Santos (instructed by Penningtons Manches LLP) for the Claimant David Hirst (instructed by Humphreys & Co) for the Defendant Hearing dates: 16-20 April and 3-5 July 2018 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Judgment Approved The Honourable Mr Justice Nicklin : 1. On 7 May 2015, there was a general election in the United Kingdom. One of the parties fielding candidates for election was the United Kingdom Independence Party (“UKIP”). Like most political parties, UKIP had local branches. One of those branches was Bristol UKIP. It had a Twitter account - @BristolUKIP – which was used for campaigning. At 20.42 on 4 May 2015, a Tweet was posted on the Bristol UKIP Twitter account (“the 4 May Tweet”). It consisted of a photograph of Sarah Champion, the Labour member of Parliament for Rotherham, together with two men. One of those men was Zahir Monir, the Claimant in this action. The text of the 4 May Tweet, obviously referring to the photograph, was: Sarah champion labour candidate for THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE NICKLIN Monir -v- Wood Approved Judgment Rotherham stood with 2 suspended child grooming taxi drivers DO NOT VOTE LABOUR (Throughout this judgment, I set out various Tweets exactly as they appeared, so what may appear to be errors of spelling, grammar or punctuation appear in the original text.) 2.
  • Open Justice and Privacy.Pdf

    Open Justice and Privacy.Pdf

    This is a repository copy of Open Justice and Privacy. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/120650/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Wragg, PM orcid.org/0000-0003-3869-408X (2017) Open Justice and Privacy. Communications Law, 22 (3). pp. 90-98. ISSN 1746-7616 © 2017, Bloomsbury Publishing Limited. This is an author produced version of a paper published in Communications Law. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ OPEN JUSTICE AND PRIVACY PAUL WRAGG* 1. INTRODUCTION How is the law to react when a claimant wishes to conceal the fact of his arrest for fear that damage to his private and family life and/or reputation would occur if it was known? It is a well-established legal principle that legal proceedings should be heard in public and freely reported.
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard

    Whole Day Download the Hansard

    Tuesday Volume 699 20 July 2021 No. 37 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 20 July 2021 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2021 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 789 20 JULY 2021 790 journalists are rounded up, pro-democracy protesters House of Commons are arrested and 1 million Uyghurs are incarcerated in detention camps. In October, before he was overruled Tuesday 20 July 2021 by the Chancellor and the Prime Minister, he said that there comes a point where sport and politics cannot be The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock separated. When is that point? Dominic Raab: The hon. Lady knows that the PRAYERS participation of any national team in the Olympics is a matter for the British Olympic Association, which is [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] required, as a matter of law under the International Virtual participation in proceedings commenced (Orders, Olympic Committee regulations, to take those decisions 4 June and 30 December 2020). independently. We have led the international response [NB: [V] denotes a Member participating virtually.] on Xinjiang, and also on Hong Kong. Of course, as we have said, we will consider the level of Government representation at the winter Olympics in due course. Oral Answers to Questions Lisa Nandy: While the Foreign Secretary continues to duck the question, the Chinese Government have raised the stakes.Yesterday,he admitted that China was responsible FOREIGN, COMMONWEALTH AND for the Microsoft Exchange hack, which saw businesses’ DEVELOPMENT OFFICE data stolen and hackers demanding millions of pounds in ransom.