DOCSLIB.ORG

Statement of Work for the Main Terminal Baggage Handling Systems Operation and Maintenance Services at Washington Dulles International Airport

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

STATEMENT OF WORK FOR THE MAIN TERMINAL BAGGAGE HANDLING SYSTEMS OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES AT WASHINGTON DULLES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT November 2010 PREPARED BY: For: Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (MWAA) Washington Dulles International Airport Engineering and Maintenance Department (MA-220) Maintenance Engineering Division (MA-226) Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority 1-11-C012 SECTION I - TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I - TABLE OF CONTENTS I-1 SECTION II - INTRODUCTION II-1 SECTION III - DEFINITIONS III-1 SECTION IV - BASE SERVICES IV-1 SECTION V - SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES V-1 SECTION VI - CONTRACT START UP VI-1 SECTION VII - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS VII-1 SECTION VIII - SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS VIII-1 SECTION IX - DOCUMENTATION AND REPORTING IX-1 SECTION X - PERSONNEL X-1 SECTION XI - DELIVERABLES XI-1 SECTION XII - AIRPORTS AUTHORITY FURNISHED RESOURCES XII-1 SECTION XIII - METHOD OF PAYMENT XIII-1 SECTION XIV - CONTRACT PHASE OUT XIV-1 SECTION XV - APPENDICES XV-1 APPENDICES A. SITE PLAN B. WASHINGTON DULLES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BHS DESCRIPTIONS 1. BAGGAGE HANDLING SYSTEM DESCRIPTIONS 2. BAGGAGE HANDLING SYSTEM DRAWINGS 3. MAIN TERMINAL AND MIDFIELD CONCOURSE C/D BHS EQUIPMENT INVENTORY 4. BHS EQUIPMENT CRITICAL PARTS LIST C. CONTRACT SERVICES CALL ORDER FORM D. DORMANT AND OUT-OF-SCOPE BHS EQUIPMENT E. PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR DORMANT BHS EQUIPMENT F. BHS/CBIS CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PLAN G. BHS/CBIS CONTINGENCY PLAN H. CONCOURSE D – COLD SORT BAGGAGE TRANSER FLAT PLATE MAKE-UP DEVICE Statement of Work Section I-1 Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority 1-11-C012 SECTION II - INTRODUCTION 01 INTRODUCTION The Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (the Airports Authority) is responsible for the operation, maintenance and repair of the Baggage Handling Systems (BHS) at Washington Dulles International Airport. The areas of the Main Terminal and the layout of the related BHS is illustrated in Appendix “B” of this document. The Inbound and Outbound Baggage Handling Systems (BHS) at Washington Dulles International Airport are categorized between four (4) separate areas of the Main Terminal and two (2) areas of the C/D Midfield Concourse, as follows: A. At the Main Terminal: 1. Ticketing Kiosk 1 and West Baggage Basement (WBB), which encompasses all of the outbound BHS for Ticketing Kiosk 1 (i.e., Ticket counter and curbside check-in conveyors with associated direct fed baggage make-up devices) and two inbound subsystems for domestic terminating (i.e., claim devices CD13 and CD14 with associated remote feeds). 2. Ticketing Kiosks 2/3 and South Baggage Basement (SBB), which encompasses all of the outbound BHS for Ticketing Kiosks 2 and 3 (i.e., Ticket counter and curbside check-in conveyors with associated automated sort system and baggage make-up devices) and six inbound subsystems for domestic terminating (i.e., claim devices CD5 through CD7 and CD10 through CD12 with associated remote feeds). 3. Ticketing Kiosk 4 and East Baggage Basement (EBB), which encompasses all of the outbound BHS for Ticketing Kiosk 4 (i.e., Ticket counter and curbside check-in conveyors with associated primary Tilt-Tray sort system and baggage make-up chutes, and the secondary sort system consisting of stacked sort piers with pusher divirters) and four inbound subsystems for domestic terminating (i.e., claim devices CD1 through CD4 with associated remote feeds) 4. International Arrivals Building (IAB), which encompasses all of the international terminating (i.e., six claim devices and associated remote feeds) and the subsystems for international to domestic baggage transfers (i.e., Recheck input conveyor lines and baggage make-up). B. At the C/D Midfield Concourse: 1. Concourse C, which encompasses the FIS International to Domestic re-claim and recheck/re- accommodation subsystems and a stacked sort pier system with pusher diverters. 2. Concourse D, which encompasses a single flat plate carousel used for cold-sort transfer baggage handling. C. The base services under this Statement of Work (SOW) require the operation, maintenance and repair of the following inbound and outbound baggage handling systems, including all associated dormant conveyor lines that are not in operational use, which are located within the above referenced four areas of the Main Terminal: 1. Outbound BHS for Ticketing Kiosk 1 and West Baggage Basement 2. Outbound BHS for Ticketing Kiosks 2/3 and South Baggage Basement 3. Domestic Terminating (i.e., inbound subsystems for Claim Devices CD1 – CD7 and CD10 – CD14) 4. International Terminating (i.e., inbound subsystems for Claim Devices ICD1 – ICD6) Statement of Work Section II-1 Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority 1-11-C012 5. International to Domestic Baggage Transfer (i.e., Recheck input conveyor lines and baggage make-up). D. United Airlines (UAL) currently operates and maintains the outbound BHS related to Ticketing Kiosk 4 and the East Baggage Basement, which also includes a secondary automated sortation system and baggage make-up area that is referred to as the temporary building or UAL’s MU2 Bag room. The operation, maintenance and repair of the Ticketing Kiosk 4 outbound BHS is an optional add-on scope to this SOW. E. United Airlines (UAL) currently also operates and maintains the above referenced BHS equipment in the Concourse C Federal Inspection Service facility and the Concourse D cold sort transfer area. The operation, maintenance and repair of these systems is also an optional add-on scope to this SOW. F. This SOW and accompanying appendices are intended to generally outline the Main Terminal baggage handling systems, their related configurations and associated functions. G. The above referenced Main Terminal baggage handling systems at Washington Dulles International Airport are currently under construction or scheduled for modification during the period covered by this SOW, therefore the equipment and overall BHS configuration that is covered under this SOW will vary as systems or subsystems are taken out service for construction and modified systems are completed and placed back under the care of the Airports Authority. H. It is the responsibility of the O&M Contractor to become familiar with the existing systems and proposed reconfigurations to provide the specified operation, maintenance and repair services on the existing and proposed planned systems. The enclosed drawings are intended to illustrate the BHS areas within the different levels of the Main Terminal and C/D Midfield Concourse, and generally outline the conveyor system configuration; the referenced conveyor line right-of-ways are presented as approximations for reference purposes. 02 SUMMARY OF WORK A. This SOW requires 24 hours a day, 7 days a week operation, corrective and preventive maintenance services, with associated operational and maintenance reporting services for the above referenced Main Terminal Baggage Handling Systems at Washington Dulles International Airport, which are described in detail within Appendix “B” of this document, that shall be provided in accordance industry standards, best commercial practices and assure a safe, efficient and practical operations and maintenance program, consistent with the intended design and usage of the respective BHS as acceptable to the Airports Authority. B. The Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Contractor shall provide all labor, materials, tools, parts, supplies, lubricants, equipment, transportation and supervision required for implementing the O&M services that are defined by this SOW, including but not limited to all required testing and trouble- shooting of system equipment/components to determine and correct any fault conditions. C. The inventory of system spare parts shall be replenished as used by the O&M Contractor. The Airports Authority will reimburse the actual cost of the parts. D. The requirements of this SOW are a combination of minimum operational and technical requirements and performance requirements. E. The terms of these requirements are intended to consist of one (1) two-year base period with the option to extend for three (3) additional one-year periods. Statement of Work Section II-2 Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority 1-11-C012 03 DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEMS The information in this section provides a summary-level description of the pertaining baggage handling systems (BHS) that are directly related to the Washington Dulles International Airport Main Terminal and shall be covered under the base services of this operation and maintenance contract. Additional details of these systems are provided in Appendices “B” and “C”. A. Main Terminal Outbound BHS for Ticketing Kiosk 1 and West Baggage Basement (WBB) This system consists of five (5) ticket counter and two (2) curbside check-in lines, which are directly connected to the four (4) inclined-plate baggage make-up devices in the West Baggage Basement. An Odd Size Conveyor line is also part of the Ticketing Kiosk 1 and WBB outbound operation for the processing of oversize items. An automated in-line Checked Baggage Inspection System (CBIS) is currently under design development for this “direct-fed” outbound BHS, which will reconfigure the overall system to include four (4) automated inline Explosives Detection System (EDS) machines, with remote TSA On-screen resolution and a Checked Baggage Resolution Area (CBRA), an automated sortation system with baggage tag readers and manual encode stations. The baggage make-up carousels are not affected by this CBIS project and will remain
Recommended publications
  • Wayfinding at Airports

    Wayfinding at Airports

    WAYFINDING AT AIRPORTS – a LAirA Project Report - LAirA is financially supported by the European Union’s Interreg Central Europe programme, which is a European cohesion policy programme that encourages cooperation beyond borders. LAirA is a 30-months project (2017-2019), with a total budget of €2.3 million. LAirA PROJECT 2019 © All images courtesy of Transporting Cities Ltd. Printed on recycled paper Print and layout: Airport Regions Conference airportregions.org info@ airportregions.org TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 INTRODUCTION 5 LAirA Project in a nutshell 5 Executive summary 7 PART 1: WHAT IS WAYFINDING AT AIRPORTS 7 1.1 Airport passenger types 7 1.2 The context of wayfinding at airports 10 1.3 Wayfinding access to public transport around the world 10 1.4 Wayfinding to deliver an exemplary journey through the airport 11 1.4.1 First step: Orientating the passenger 11 1.4.2 Promoting public transport and introducing the iconography 12 1.4.3 Making the association to the transport destination 13 1.4.4 Avoiding the moment of doubt when emerging into the public area 13 1.4.5 Using icons to lead the way through the terminal 15 1.4.6 Providing reassurance along the way 15 1.4.7 Identifying the transport destination 16 1.4.8 Draw a picture for complicated transport connections 17 PART 2: PRINCIPLES OF WAYFINDING 17 2.1 The ideal journey to public transport 17 2.2 Identifying the principles of wayfinding 20 PART 3: WAYFINDING IN LAIRA REGIONS OR FUNCTIONAL URBAN AREAS 20 3.1 LAirA partners and the principles of wayfinding 20 3.2 Partner questionnaire 20 3.3 Analysis of questionnaire responses 22 PART 4: CONCLUSION 22 4.1 Capitalising on transport investment 22 4.2 Wayfinding and access to airports 23 4.3 Conclusion and recommendation INTRODUCTION LAirA project in a nutshell Executive summary LAirA (Landside Airport Accessibility) addresses the This report considers the theme of wayfinding at specific and significant challenge of the multimodal, airports.
  • Baggage Report 2011

    Baggage Report 2011

    Baggage Report 2011 Specialists in air transport communications and IT solutions Baggage Report 2011 2 SITA Baggage Report 2011 Baggage Report 2011 Preface It has been a difficult year for all those Nonetheless, the air transport industry related to the cost of getting it back to involved in the air transport industry’s responded remarkably well. It is clear its owner. SITA, as the global operator response to the great logistical that improvements in technology, the of the tracking and tracing service for challenge of making sure that over two increasing deployment of baggage lost baggage continues to play its part, billion passengers’ bags get on the sortation systems and IATA’s Baggage innovating and bringing new improved right planes and are delivered to the Improvement Program are having an baggage management solutions to the right carousels in reasonable time for impact on keeping down the numbers market like BagSmart which we have collection by their owners. of bags mishandled. While there was already tested successfully at London a rise in the absolute number of bags Heathrow with the Star Alliance. It will Airlines, airports and ground handlers mishandled, this had to be expected be widely available in 2011 and is the respond to this task with the minimum in the circumstances. However, the first web-based application in the air of fuss but all were put to a severe test long-term trend shows the industry is transport industry that can warn of last year as passenger volumes rose for driving down overall mishandling rates potential baggage mishandlings the first time in two years and nature as it brings knowledge, experience and before they occur.
  • Easy-Peasy Self-Service Bag Tagging About 14 Million Easyjet Passengers Flying in and out of Gatwick Airport Choose to Use the Self-Service Bag-Drop System

    Easy-Peasy Self-Service Bag Tagging About 14 Million Easyjet Passengers Flying in and out of Gatwick Airport Choose to Use the Self-Service Bag-Drop System

    Company insight > Routes Company insight > Routes Easy-peasy self-service bag tagging About 14 million easyJet passengers flying in and out of Gatwick Airport choose to use the self-service bag-drop system. Considering that the airline introduced it just two and a half years ago, the uptake has been swift. Thomas Doogan, ground-operations customer experience manager at easyJet, speaks about the shift in passenger behaviour and the role eezeetags is playing in the airline’s innovation. client convenience, intends to raise that to 45% by the end of 2017, and to 70% by the end of 2018. There have been major benefits, not least in efficiency, says Doogan. “The perception of our friendliness by customers has increased by 10% and that is in the top two boxes – people who are ‘very satisfied’ and ‘extremely satisfied’.” As airports seek to streamline passenger flow, self-service facilities offer smoother, stress-free operations for travellers. The customers’ praise is attributable to the ground crew’s new-found freedom. Previously, the crew had to training on how to effectively use. These were comparatively “By really understanding each customer, we found the dedicate time and energy to tagging baggage in addition to complex and, therefore, left to the airline staff to apply. best solution for everyone and, therefore, the best overall interacting with customers. Now, its sole focus is greeting “We cannot expect passengers using a modern bag-drop solution for all travellers.” self-service passengers and being on hand to assist those system to apply a bag tag that was designed 40 years ago and While easyJet can lay claim to the title of kick-starter of in need of help to navigate the new system, which doesn’t meant to be applied by a trained agent,” stresses Vrieling.
  • AIRLINE REQUIREMENTS for DESIGN TENANT DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES Copyright ©2015 by Denver International Airport

    AIRLINE REQUIREMENTS for DESIGN TENANT DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES Copyright ©2015 by Denver International Airport

    AIRLINE REQUIREMENTS FOR DESIGN TENANT DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES Copyright ©2015 by Denver International Airport All rights reserved No part of this manual may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without the permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America 2 Table of Contents The Jeppesen Terminal .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Terminal East and West Sides ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Levels of the Terminal ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Door Numbers ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Hotel and Transit Center ................................................................................................................................................................................................................
  • Employee Travel Center in Atlanta

    Employee Travel Center in Atlanta

    Delta’s Employee Travel Center in Atlanta Delta has several initiatives underway in Atlanta intended to improve customer service by adding choice, convenience, and efficiency. This includes physical changes to the Delta facilities at Atlanta’s Hartsfield- Jackson airport, designed to improve our customers’ experience, and include: • An Employee Travel Center (ETC) for Positive Space and non-rev travel which will result in more lobby space in the Atlanta airport for our customers’ use. • A redesigned portion of Delta’s international lobby area to better serve our customers. • Additional kiosks to facilitate a fast and efficient customer check-in. • Enhanced kiosks capabilities to include international check-in supporting international growth. • Additional check-in positions both inside and outside for fast and efficient check-in from wherever the customer chooses. • Additional baggage positions for added customer convenience • Programmable ‘over the counter’ signage to facilitate customer communications. This communication brief deals specifically with the Employee Travel Center in Atlanta. Details Employees will be required to use the ETC in Atlanta for all of their travel – both Positive Space and non- rev, and for all Buddy Pass travel in order to make the lobby area and lobby kiosks available to revenue passengers. The Employee Travel Center (ETC) will be located directly across from Baggage Carousel #1. The Employee Travel Center will equipped with four work stations for TravelNet access, four kiosks and a bag tag printer. This will allow NRSA travelers to list passengers, change reservations, activate stand-by and check baggage, all in one dedicated location. The center will be staffed with Delta agents for those who need further assistance.
  • RFID for Baggage Handling and Tracking

    RFID for Baggage Handling and Tracking

    RFID for Baggage Handling and Tracking Whitepaper Author Kristine P. Koldkjær, Lyngsoe Systems EXECUTIVE SUMMARY With potential savings of 20 cents for every 10 cents4 spent on implementing RFID for baggage handling and tracking, now is the time to realize the benefits and close the gap in baggage performance. RFID technology is expected to reduce mishandling rates for baggage by 25%4, which means large savings for airlines, and just as importantly, a better passenger experience. Barcode read rates on transfer bags are still found to be at 60-70%, so a large share of bags need to be handled twice and take up capacity. Due to the expected increase in doubling passenger numbers within the next 15 years1, new technology is required to support the industry with their baggage handling solutions. RFID has proven read rates of 99.9% in baggage handling and is the most reliable and cost-effective technology to increase capacity and improve the baggage handling process. Delta Airlines was the first airline to take the step into full RFID implementation for baggage handling in the airline industry, and it is no longer a matter of whether to go for RFID, but a matter of when. Airlines waiting too long will fall behind in the race to provide increased passenger services, better baggage handling, improved security and lower operational costs. 2 | RFID for Baggage Handling and Tracking WHY RFID TECHNOLOGY FOR BAGGAGE HANDLING AND TRACKING? TRACK MY BAG With the rapid development of technologies such as mobile apps, customers now require more information from companies with which they have dealings.
  • DCS Customer Management Course Guide

    DCS Customer Management Course Guide

    DCS Customer Management Course Guide Table of Contents Before You Start ...................................................................................... 1 What's New in this Course Guide .......................................................... 2 Chapter 1 Getting Started......................................................................................... 3 What Is Customer Management? .......................................................... 3 Security Restrictions .............................................................................. 5 How to Sign In to Customer Management............................................. 6 How to Set Advanced Sign-in Parameters ............................................ 7 How to Sign Out and Close Customer Management........................... 10 How to Open an Application ................................................................ 10 How to Close an Application................................................................ 11 How to Set the Default Carrier............................................................. 12 How to Use the Customer Management GUI: Title Bar and Resize Controls ............................................................................................... 13 How to Use the Customer Management GUI: Menus ......................... 14 How to Use the Customer Management GUI: Screen Features ......... 17 How to Use the Customer Management GUI: Navigation and Shortcuts ............................................................................................................
  • Elimination Or Reduction of Baggage Recheck for Arriving International Passengers TRB

    Elimination Or Reduction of Baggage Recheck for Arriving International Passengers TRB

    96+ pages; Perfect Bind with SPINE COPY or 65–95 pages; Perfect Bind (NO SPINE COPY) REQUESTED ADDRESS SERVICE Washington, DC 20001 500 Fifth Street, NW BOARD TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH ACRP Report 61 AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH Elimination or Reduction of Baggage Recheck for Arriving International Passengers ACRP PROGRAM REPORT 61 Sponsored by the Federal Aviation Administration Elimination or Reduction of Baggage Recheck for Arriving International Passengers Washington, DC Permit No. 8970 ISBN 978-0-309-21395-0 Non-profit Org. U.S. Postage 9 0 0 0 0 PAID TRB 9 780309 213950 ACRP OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE* TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2012 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* Abbreviations and acronyms used without definitions in TRB publications: CHAIR OFFICERS AAAE American Association of Airport Executives James Wilding CHAIR: Sandra Rosenbloom, Professor of Planning, University of Arizona, Tucson AASHO American Association of State Highway Officials Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority VICE CHAIR: Deborah H. Butler, Executive Vice President, Planning, and CIO, Norfolk Southern AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (retired) Corporation, Norfolk, VA ACI–NA Airports Council International–North America EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board ACRP Airport Cooperative Research Program VICE CHAIR ADA Americans with Disabilities Act Jeff Hamiel MEMBERS APTA American Public Transportation Association Minneapolis–St. Paul J. Barry Barker, Executive Director, Transit Authority of River City, Louisville, KY ASCE American Society of Civil Engineers Metropolitan Airports Commission ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers William A.V. Clark, Professor of Geography and Professor of Statistics, Department of Geography, ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials MEMBERS University of California, Los Angeles ATA Air Transport Association James Crites Eugene A.
  • THE Baggage Report

    THE Baggage Report

    2013 AIR TRANSPORT INDUSTRY INSIGHTS THE Baggage report In association with PREFACE SITA’s ninth annual Baggage Report shows a continued There is already a strong momentum to reduce mishandling improvement in the baggage mishandling rates of the further. As an industry, we are collaboratively addressing the industry. The headline figure has now dropped to 8.83 issues and developing the solutions. IATA’s InBag program mishandled bags per 1,000 passengers, down from 8.99 has set a target to reduce the global baggage mishandling in 2011 and represents a drop of 44.5% in the number of rate to 4.5 mishandled bags per thousand passengers. It is mishandled bags in the last six years. Remarkably, given a figure that is nearly half of where we are today, so there is the nearly three billion passengers using the air transport still much work to do. While it is challenging, SITA is working system last year, it means that for every hundred passengers with its industry partners, including IATA and the ACI, to make traveling fewer than one bag was reported as mishandled. it happen. For the industry it translates into an annual cost saving of US$2.1 billion for 2012. We are now seeing the rewards of a concerted collaborative effort to improve the baggage handling operations of the industry and in so doing reducing a major cause of passenger Francesco Violante dissatisfaction. Delayed baggage, which was responsible for Chief Executive Officer, SITA 82.9% of mishandling, fell 2.4% in 2012 to 5.67 per thousand passengers.
  • Cincinnati International Airport Delta Airlines Cvg Automated Baggage System

    Cincinnati International Airport Delta Airlines Cvg Automated Baggage System

    CINCINNATI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT DELTA AIRLINES CVG AUTOMATED BAGGAGE SYSTEM OWNER The Delta Airlines installation in Cincinnati is one of the most successful baggage DELTA AIRLINES handling system applications in the world. Quite a claim, but this installation combines proven high speed technologies to enhance passenger service levels and minimize OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE labor costs. Development risk was never a concern since all of the equipment utilized MR. JAMES W. GREENE, DL has been used in other installations. Equipment cost was justified by decreased operating costs. This system was commissioned in 1995 and, although the start-up BNP PROJECT MANAGER was not without difficulties, it’s performance has since proven itself. The first phase of JIMMY MENOSCAL the CVG master plan consisted of a major redevelopment of Delta’s facilities at this major hub, an expansion of airside capabilities from 25 gates to 50-plus gates. LOCATION Construction activities included a major new Federal Inspections Services Facility, a CINCINNATI, OHIO, USA new remote concourse providing superior transfer passenger handling, concessions and inspiring architecture, a new landside terminal providing interfaces to the local CONTRACT PERIOD Cincinnati passengers, an expansion of the Concourse A facility and a new 50-plus 1991 - 1993 gate commuter aircraft passenger terminal. Interconnecting these facilities was a new state-of-the-art people mover system. In combination, the CVG project represents one PROJECT AMOUNT the best origin/destination and transfer terminals in the world. The Delta Air Lines US $40 MILLION Automated Baggage System (ABS) is designed to process originating, terminating, and “hot” transfer baggage. The originating baggage handling system is somewhat REFERENCE unique for a United States carrier in that individual feeder conveyors are provided at DELTA AIRLINES each ticketing position.
  • MCO International Arrivals Brochure

    MCO International Arrivals Brochure

    MCO International Arrival Wayfinding Map N SIDE Gates 1-29 Level 1 Gates 100-129 Ground Transportation & Baggage Claim (8A) Level 2 Baggage Claim Gates 10-19 Gates Ticketing Locations 20-29 Gates 100-111 A-1 A-2 Level 3 A-3 A-4 2 1 Gates Gates 1-9 112-129 Hyatt Regency - Lvl.4 Regency Hyatt Security Checkpoint To Gates 70-129 Gates To Food Court To Gates 1-59 Gates To Security Checkpoint Gates 70-79 Gates 50-59 To Parking “C” Gates 3 90-99 4 B-1 B-2 Level 3 B-3 B-4 Gates Gates 30-39 Ticketing Locations Gates 80-89 40-49 Gates 70-99 Level 2 Gates 30-59 Baggage Claim Level 1 Ground Transportation & Baggage Claim (28B) SIDE C Check-in and baggage claim locations subject to change. Please check signage on arrival. *Map not to scale Find it ALL in One Place Download the Orlando MCO App Welcome to Orlando Available for International Airport (MCO) OrlandoAirports.net /flymco @MCO @flymco International Flight Arrival Guide 05/19 After clearing customs and Upon arrival on Level 3 of Welcome to Take the escalator or stairs immigration, claim your baggage the main terminal, look for Orlando International up one level and board the from the baggage carousel then 3 5 the large illuminated letters proceed to the exit. Automated People Mover 7 indicating the A and B sides Airport (MCO) (APM) to the of the terminal. main terminal. Upon exiting the aircraft you will 1 be required to clear U.S.
  • Reno – Stead Airport

    Reno – Stead Airport

    Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority FY 2017-18 ANNUAL BUDGET Table of Contents SECTION 1 – Introduction and Summary Airport System Overview. ......................................................................................... 1-2 National and Regional Economic Outlook. ............................................................. 2-13 Air Service Market Update. ................................................................................... 13-17 Air Cargo Update. .................................................................................................. 17-19 Operating Environment. ........................................................................................ 19-29 Budget Process. ..................................................................................................... 29-30 Revenue Bond Resolution .......................................................................................... 30 Planning for the Future .......................................................................................... 30-32 Budget Document Structure ....................................................................................... 32 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 32-33 Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................... 33 Distinguished Budget Presentation Award ................................................................. 34 SECTION 2 – Executive Summary