DOCSLIB.ORG

Interaction of Ozone and Hydrogen Peroxide in Water Implications For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interaction of Ozone and Hydrogen Peroxide in Water Implications For UC Irvine Faculty Publications Title Interaction of ozone and hydrogen peroxide in water: Implications for analysis of H 2 O 2 in air Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7j7454z7 Journal Geophysical Research Letters, 9(3) ISSN 00948276 Authors Zika, R. G Saltzman, E. S Publication Date 1982-03-01 DOI 10.1029/GL009i003p00231 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California GEOPHYSICLARESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 9, NO. 3, PAGES231-234 , MARCH1982 INTERACTION OF OZONE AND HYDROGEN PEROXIDE IN WATER: IMPLICATIONSFORANALYSIS oFH20 2 IN AIR R.G. Zika and E.S. Saltzman Division of Marine and Atmospheric Chemistry, University of Miami, Miami, Florida 331#9 Abstract. We have attempted to measure gaseous Analytical Methods H202 in air usingan aqueoustrapping method. With continuousbubbling, H 20 2 levels in the traps reacheda a. Hydrogen Peroxide. Hydrogen peroxide in aqueous plateau, indicating that a state of dynamic equilibrium solution was measured using a modified fluorescence involving H202 destrbction was established. We decay technique [Perschke and Broda, 1976; Zika and attribute this behavior to the interaction of ozone and its Zelmer, 1982]. The method involved the addition of a decompositionproducts (OH, O[) withH 20 2 inacld:•ous known amot•at of scopoletin (6-methyl-7-hydroxyl-i,2- solution. This hypothesis was investigated by replacing benzopyrone)to a pH 7.0 phosphatebuffered. sample. the air stream with a mixture of N2, 02 and 0 3. The The sample was prepared bY diluting an aliquot of the results Of this experiment show that H O was both reaction solution to 20 mls with low contaminant producedand destroyedin the traps. Theseresults have distilledwater. Thesize of the reactionsolution aliqu0t led us to question the validity of techniques which wassuch that the concentr.•tion of H202 in the20 ml employaqueous traps to measureH 20 2 in air. samplewas less than 2x 10- M. Additionøf horseradish peroxidase(HRP) phenol mixture catalyzed oxidation of Introduction the scopoletin by H202 resulting in a decrease in fluorescence of the sample. Fluorescence measurements Theoccurrence of H202 in theatmosphere has. been were madeon a TurnerDesigns Model 10 fluorometer explained exclusively through photochemical gas phase With excitationand emissionwaveler•gths centered at reaction mechanismS. Model calculations suggest that 36.• and #90 nm, respectively. the lower troposphericconcentration of H20 2 produi:ed Calibration curves were prepared by .analyzing a via these processes Should be of the order 1-#.ppbv series of solutions Of known peroxide concentrations [Levy, 1973]. Measurementsof gas phase 1'1202 preparedby dilutionof a I x 10-2 M H202 stock concentrationsgive valuesO f 2-180 ppbv [Bufalini et al., solution. By varying the amount of scopoletin added, 1972• Kok et al., 1978 ]. The higher values in this range peroxideconcentrations of 2 x 10-9 M to .• x 10-7 could have been recorded for polluted atmospheric be accuratelydetermined with a precisionof + 2%. environments and the lower levels are probably more Low contaminant distilled water was t•ed for all typical of ambient concentrations•andwould therefore be reagents preparations, dilutions.and in. the traps. It was in agreement with the model predicted values. prepared by slow distillation from a neutral The data basefor environmentalH 20 2 measurements permanganate-Milli-Qwater solution. The water Was is limited and little information exists for true ambient distilled througha 55 cm packedcolumn .and collected in background values. The Complete lack of such a reservoir which was isolated from the atmosphere by measurements for the southeastern United States and our means of an activated carbon filter. Water prepared in current interest in determining the atmospheric input of thisway was found to below in organic,transition metal H202 tO the oceansled usto make H202 measurements (i.e., Cu• Fe andMn), and residual oxidant COntaminants. in ground level air in South Flori•da and the Bahamas. b. OzOne.Ozone in the gasstream was determined The air measurements appeared to be in good agreement bY plac!nga 296neutral KI solutionin the first fritted with those determined elsewhere by other analytical gas washing trap. After sampling a known volume of the methods [Kok et al., 1978 ] which, like this study, equilibrated gas stream the absorbance of the trapping employ aqueous trapping of gas phase H20 2. Further solution was measured at 362 rim. At neutral pH the evaluation of our experimental procedure indicated that reaction, the validity of the air measurements was in question because of the anomalous behavior of H202 in the 03+3I +H20+I 3 +O2+2OH aqueoustraps. It is possiblethat the observedanomalies are the resultof aqueousreac•:ions of mixturesof H2 O2 yieldsone mole of I• f.oreach m0ie of ozoneconsumed and ozone. Although the chemistry of aqueousozone is [Schechter,1973 ]. The absorbancesof standard!3_- not usually recognized in the atmospheric literature, solutionswere Usedto calibratethe method, The 13 there are numerous studies on its reactivity in water in solution was standardized by titration with standard the chemical literature [ Hoigne and Bader, 197.5;Peleg, thiosulfate solution. 1976; Weinstein and Bielstd, 1979]. Although much of While I• does react with H202, the kinetics are this information is inconsistent, it is proposedthat ozone much slower than those of reaction with Ozone. Based on decaysto produceH 202 [Hoigne and Bader, 1976] via this criteria there was no evidence for the occurrence of the following pathway: H 202 in the KI trap solutions. Experimental Procedures 203+OH-+OH+O 2 +202 (1) a. H202 in Air. The apparatus used to measure (2) H202 in air consists of two .500 ml fritted gas washing 202 +2H++H202+O 2 traps, each containing .500ml Of water, a vacuum pump, and a flowmeter (Figure 1). Teflon tubing was used to Copyright 1982 by the American Geophysical Union. connect the various components, and to draw air into the Paper number 1L1876. 231 0094-8276/82/001L-1876501.00 232 Zika andSaltzman: Interaction of Ozoneand H202 in Water Ozonizer . increase was again observed as was the plateau. Figure 2 showsa casewhere the secondtrap plateauoccurred at a lower concentration ot• H20 2 than the first. In some Washing cases there was virtually no difference between the measured plateau H20 2 Concentrations in the two traps. In view of H202's low vapor pressure and infinite solubility in water, the first trap should have removed all of the H20 2 from the air stream. This is contrary to what was found by Pilz and Johann [1974] who reported O3 that H 202 is very difficult to quantitatively extract outflow fromair withwater traps. Thispossibility was tested by outside(• replacing the air in the scrubbing experiments with a air I'" ....' .....J mixture of oxidantfree 99.999%N2 and H 202 (g). This Meter experiment conclusively demonstrated that the first trap was > 99% efficient in extracting H 202 and that the Flow concentrationincreased linearly with gas volumeover a Fritted Gas Vacuum rangeof < 10-8Mto > 10-aM. It is likelythat Pilz and • WashingTraps Pump johann observedthe same phenomenonthat we did in our air sampling methods. Fig.1. Schematicdiagram of the apparatusused to The only plausible explanation we have for these collect peroxide from air, and for ozone experiments. results is that some partially soluble and reactive component(s)in air is generatingH20 2 in the second trap. Since the dual trap experiments gave similar laUratoryapparatus from the outside.The traps were results on the open ocean as in the laboratory, the filled with distilledwater and air was drawnthrough component(s)is not restricted to near shore or city air. them at a controlled flow rate. At various intervals the The H202 precursor must be present in substantial flow was briefly interrupted, and samples were concentrations to generate the peroxide levels observed Withdrawnfrom the traps for H2 02 analysis. The in the two traps. The only possible candidate known to VOlumeof sampleremoved was replacedwith distilled us is ozone. During the experiment, shown in Figure 2, water; this caused only a small dilution effect of the the O3 concentration in the air at the experimental site large volumein the traps. Prior to analysis,samples on Virginia Key varied between 35 and 45 ppb as were degassealwith high purity helium to remove any monitored by Dade Environmental Resources ozonethat mayhave been present. Management. The efficiency of this system for the extraction of In dual trapping experiments with outside air, we H202from air was tested by passing a controlled stream observedan inductionperiod for the formationof H2 02 of nitrogen over 30% H 202 and then through the traps. The first trap wasfound to be in excessof 99% efficient 10.0 ......... in removingH202 fromthe gasstream and for the range of H202 concentrationstested, 10-Uto 10-3 molar,no }---analyticalerror H 20 2 carry over could be detected in the secondtrap. b. AqueousOzone Reactions. The effect of aqueous ozone chemistry on the H202 levels in the collection o o traps was investigated by replacing the air used in the 8.0 Previous experiment with a gas stream of N2, 02 and O3. The collectors were again filled with water and the H20 2 concentrations were measured at various intervals during the experiment. Ozone was introduced into the N2 stream by flowing 02 through a Supelco micro 6.0 o ozOnizer. The gas stream was bubbledthrough two in- o line wash traps, the first containing .1 molar HCIO• and the second, water to remove any H202 that may have been produced in the ozonizer. These wash traps were equilibrated with the ozone mixture prior to the start of the experiment. The N2 flow was 250 ml/min and the O2 flow was 25 ml/min. After 30 minutes the 02 flow was reduced to 5 ml/min.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ozonedisinfection.Pdf
    ETI - Environmental Technology Initiative Project funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Assistance Agreement No. CX824652 What is disinfection? Human exposure to wastewater discharged into the environment has increased in the last 15 to 20 years with the rise in population and the greater demand for water resources for recreation and other purposes. Disinfection of wastewater is done to prevent infectious diseases from being spread and to ensure that water is safe for human contact and the environment. There is no perfect disinfectant. However, there are certain characteristics to look for when choosing the most suitable disinfectant: • Ability to penetrate and destroy infectious agents under normal operating conditions; • Lack of characteristics that could be harmful to people and the environment; • Safe and easy handling, shipping, and storage; • Absence of toxic residuals, such as cancer-causing compounds, after disinfection; and • Affordable capital and operation and maintenance (O&M) costs. What is ozone disinfection? One common method of disinfecting wastewater is ozonation (also known as ozone disinfection). Ozone is an unstable gas that can destroy bacteria and viruses. It is formed when oxygen molecules (O2) collide with oxygen atoms to produce ozone (O3). Ozone is generated by an electrical discharge through dry air or pure oxygen and is generated onsite because it decomposes to elemental oxygen in a short amount of time. After generation, ozone is fed into a down-flow contact chamber containing the wastewater to be disinfected. From the bottom of the contact chamber, ozone is diffused into fine bubbles that mix with the downward flowing wastewater. See Figure 1 on page 2 for a schematic of the ozonation process.
    [Show full text]
  • The Decomposition Kinetics of Peracetic Acid and Hydrogen Peroxide in Municipal Wastewaters
    Disinfection Forum No 10, October 2015 The Decomposition Kinetics of Peracetic Acid and Hydrogen Peroxide in Municipal Wastewaters INTRODUCTION Efficient control of microbial populations in municipal wastewater using peracetic acid (PAA) requires an understanding of the PAA decomposition kinetics. This knowledge is critical to ensure the proper dosing of PAA needed to achieve an adequate concentration within the contact time of the disinfection chamber. In addition, the impact of PAA on the environment, post-discharge into the receiving water body, also is dependent upon the longevity of the PAA in the environment, before decomposing to acetic acid, oxygen and water. As a result, the decomposition kinetics of PAA may have a significant impact on aquatic and environmental toxicity. PAA is not manufactured as a pure compound. The solution exists as an equilibrium mixture of PAA, hydrogen peroxide, acetic acid, and water: ↔ + + Acetic Acid Hydrogen Peroxide Peracetic Acid Water PeroxyChem’s VigorOx® WWT II Wastewater Disinfection Technology contains 15% peracetic acid by weight and 23% hydrogen peroxide as delivered. Although hydrogen peroxide is present in the formulation, peracetic acid is considered to be the active component for disinfection1 in wastewater. There have been several published studies investigating the decomposition kinetics of PAA in different water matrices, including municipal wastewater2-7. Yuan7 states that PAA may be consumed in the following three competitive reactions: 1. Spontaneous decomposition 2 CH3CO3H à 2 CH3CO2H + O2 Eq (1) 2. Hydrolysis CH3CO3H + H2O à CH3CO2H + H2O2 Eq (2) 3. Transition metal catalyzed decomposition + CH3CO3H + M à CH3CO2H + O2 + other products Eq (3) At neutral pH’s, both peracetic acid and hydrogen peroxide can be rapidly consumed by these reactions7 (hydrogen peroxide will decompose to water and oxygen via 2H2O2 à 2H2O + O2).
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen Discovery of a Eugenol Oxidase From
    University of Groningen Discovery of a eugenol oxidase from Rhodococcus sp strain RHA1 Jin, J.F.; Mazon, H.; van den Heuvel, R.H.H.; Janssen, D.B.; Fraaije, M.W. Published in: Febs Journal DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05767.x IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2007 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Jin, J. F., Mazon, H., van den Heuvel, R. H. H., Janssen, D. B., & Fraaije, M. W. (2007). Discovery of a eugenol oxidase from Rhodococcus sp strain RHA1. Febs Journal, 274(9), 2311 - 2321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05767.x Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 23-09-2021 Discovery of a eugenol oxidase from Rhodococcus sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Algorithmic Analysis of Chemical Dynamics of the Autoignition of NH3–H2O2/Air Mixtures
    energies Article Algorithmic Analysis of Chemical Dynamics of the Autoignition of NH3–H2O2/Air Mixtures Ahmed T. Khalil 1,2, Dimitris M. Manias 3, Efstathios-Al. Tingas 4, Dimitrios C. Kyritsis 1,2,* and Dimitris A. Goussis 1,2 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi 127788, UAE; [email protected] (A.T.K.); [email protected] (D.A.G.) 2 Research and Innovation Center on CO2 and H2 (RICH), Khalifa University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 127788, Abu Dhabi, UAE 3 Department of Mechanics, School of Applied Mathematics and Physical Sciences, National Technical University of Athens, 157 73 Athens, Greece; [email protected] 4 Perth College, University of the Highlands and Islands, (UHI), Perth PH1 2NX, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 8 September 2019; Accepted: 7 October 2019; Published: 21 November 2019 Abstract: The dynamics of a homogeneous adiabatic autoignition of an ammonia/air mixture at constant volume was studied, using the algorithmic tools of Computational Singular Perturbation. Since ammonia combustion is characterized by both unrealistically long ignition delays and elevated NOx emissions, the time frame of action of the modes that are responsible for ignition was analyzed by calculating the developing time scales throughout the process and by studying their possible relation to NOx emissions. The reactions that support or oppose the explosive time scale were identified, along with the variables that are related the most to the dynamics that drive the system to an explosion.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethanol Purification with Ozonation, Activated Carbon Adsorption, and Gas Stripping Shinnosuke Onuki Iowa State University
    Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Publications 9-4-2015 Ethanol purification with ozonation, activated carbon adsorption, and gas stripping Shinnosuke Onuki Iowa State University Jacek A. Koziel Iowa State University, [email protected] William S. Jenks Iowa State University, [email protected] Lingshuang Cai Iowa State University Somchai Rice Iowa State University SeFoe nelloxtw pa thige fors aaddndition addal aitutionhorsal works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/abe_eng_pubs Part of the Agriculture Commons, Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering Commons, and the Organic Chemistry Commons The ompc lete bibliographic information for this item can be found at https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ abe_eng_pubs/909. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ethanol purification with ozonation, activated carbon adsorption, and gas stripping Abstract Fermentation of sugar to produce ethanol also produces volatile byproducts. This study was aimed at purifying corn-based ethanol for industrial and pharmaceutical use. The er search was on treatment for 10 impurities removal after distillation. The the anol headspace was sampled with solid-phase microextraction and analyzed with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. A 40 mg/L ozone treatment resulted in >56% and >36% removal of styrene and 2-pentylfuran, respectively, without significant generation of byproducts.
    [Show full text]
  • Publication No. 17: Ozone Treatment of Private Drinking Water Systems
    PRIVATE DRINKING WATER IN CONNECTICUT Publication Date: April 2009 Publication No. 17: Ozone Treatment of Private Drinking Water Systems Effective Against: Pathogenic (disease-causing) organisms including bacteria and viruses, phenols (aromatic organic compounds), some color, taste and odor problems, iron, manganese, and turbidity. Not Effective Against: Large cysts and some other large organisms resulting from possible or probable sewage contamination, inorganic chemicals, and heavy metals. How Ozone (O3) Treatment Works Ozone is a chemical form of pure oxygen. Like chlorine, ozone is a strong oxidizing agent and is used in much the same way to kill disease-causing bacteria and viruses. It is effective against most amoebic cysts, and destroys bacteria and some aromatic organic compounds (such as phenols). Ozone may not kill large cysts and some other large organisms, so these should be eliminated by filtration or other procedures prior to ozone treatment. Ozone is effective in eliminating or controlling color, taste, and odor problems. It also oxidizes iron and manganese. Ozone treatment units are installed as point-of-use treatment systems. Raw water enters one opening and treated water emerges from another. Inside the treatment unit, ozone is produced by an electrical corona discharge or ultraviolet irradiation of dry air or oxygen. The ozone is mixed with the water whenever the water pump is running. Ozone generation units require a system to clean and remove the humidity from the air. For proper disinfection the water to be treated must have negligible color and turbidity levels. The system requires routine maintenance and an ozone treatment system can be very energy consumptive.
    [Show full text]
  • Ozone: Good up High, Bad Nearby
    actions you can take High-Altitude “Good” Ozone Ground-Level “Bad” Ozone •Protect yourself against sunburn. When the UV Index is •Check the air quality forecast in your area. At times when the Air “high” or “very high”: Limit outdoor activities between 10 Quality Index (AQI) is forecast to be unhealthy, limit physical exertion am and 4 pm, when the sun is most intense. Twenty minutes outdoors. In many places, ozone peaks in mid-afternoon to early before going outside, liberally apply a broad-spectrum evening. Change the time of day of strenuous outdoor activity to avoid sunscreen with a Sun Protection Factor (SPF) of at least 15. these hours, or reduce the intensity of the activity. For AQI forecasts, Reapply every two hours or after swimming or sweating. For check your local media reports or visit: www.epa.gov/airnow UV Index forecasts, check local media reports or visit: www.epa.gov/sunwise/uvindex.html •Help your local electric utilities reduce ozone air pollution by conserving energy at home and the office. Consider setting your •Use approved refrigerants in air conditioning and thermostat a little higher in the summer. Participate in your local refrigeration equipment. Make sure technicians that work on utilities’ load-sharing and energy conservation programs. your car or home air conditioners or refrigerator are certified to recover the refrigerant. Repair leaky air conditioning units •Reduce air pollution from cars, trucks, gas-powered lawn and garden before refilling them. equipment, boats and other engines by keeping equipment properly tuned and maintained. During the summer, fill your gas tank during the cooler evening hours and be careful not to spill gasoline.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicological Profile for Acetone Draft for Public Comment
    ACETONE 1 Toxicological Profile for Acetone Draft for Public Comment July 2021 ***DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT*** ACETONE ii DISCLAIMER Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, the Public Health Service, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre dissemination public comment under applicable information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or policy. ***DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT*** ACETONE iii FOREWORD This toxicological profile is prepared in accordance with guidelines developed by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The original guidelines were published in the Federal Register on April 17, 1987. Each profile will be revised and republished as necessary. The ATSDR toxicological profile succinctly characterizes the toxicologic and adverse health effects information for these toxic substances described therein. Each peer-reviewed profile identifies and reviews the key literature that describes a substance's toxicologic properties. Other pertinent literature is also presented, but is described in less detail than the key studies. The profile is not intended to be an exhaustive document; however, more comprehensive sources of specialty information are referenced. The focus of the profiles is on health and toxicologic information; therefore, each toxicological profile begins with a relevance to public health discussion which would allow a public health professional to make a real-time determination of whether the presence of a particular substance in the environment poses a potential threat to human health.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen Peroxide Cas #7722-84-1
    HYDROGEN PEROXIDE CAS #7722-84-1 Division of Toxicology ToxFAQsTM April 2002 This fact sheet answers the most frequently asked health questions (FAQs) about hydrogen peroxicde. For more information, call the ATSDR Information Center at 1-888-422-8737. This fact sheet is one in a series of summaries about hazardous substances and their health effects. It is important you understand this information because this substance may harm you. The effects of exposure to any hazardous substance depend on the dose, the duration, how you are exposed, personal traits and habits, and whether other chemicals are present. HIGHLIGHTS: Hydrogen peroxide is a manufactured chemical, although small amounts of hydrogen peroxide gas may occur naturally in the air. Low exposure may occur from use at home; higher exposures may occur from industrial use. Exposure to hydrogen peroxide can cause irritation of the eyes, throat, respiratory airway, and skin. Drinking concentrated liquid can cause mild to severe gastrointestinal effects. This substance has been found in at least 18 of the 1,585 National Priorities List sites identified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). What is hydrogen peroxide? ‘ If released to soil, hydrogen peroxide will be broken down Hydrogen peroxide is a colorless liquid at room temperature by reacting with other compounds. with a bitter taste. Small amounts of gaseous hydrogen peroxide occur naturally in the air. Hydrogen peroxide is ‘ Hydrogen peroxide does not accumulate in the food chain. unstable, decomposing readily to oxygen and water with release of heat. Although nonflammable, it is a powerful How might I be exposed to hydrogen peroxide? oxidizing agent that can cause spontaneous combustion when it comes in contact with organic material.
    [Show full text]
  • Production of Hydrogen Peroxide from Carbon Monoxide, Water and Oxygen Over Alumina-Supported Ni Catalysts
    _______________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 210 (2004) 157–163 Production of hydrogen peroxide from carbon monoxide, water and oxygen over alumina-supported Ni catalysts Zhong-Long Ma, Rong-Li Jia, Chang-Jun Liu∗ Key Laboratory of Green Synthesis and Transformation of Ministry of Education, School of Chemical Engineering and Technologies, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, PR China Received 23 April 2003; accepted 11 September 2003 Abstract Novel amorphous Ni–B catalysts supported on alumina have been developed for the production of hydrogen peroxide from carbon monoxide, water and oxygen. The experimental investigation confirmed that the promoter/Ni ratio and the preparation conditions have a significant effect on the activity and lifetime of the catalyst. Among all the catalysts tested, the Ni–La–B/␥-Al2O3 catalyst with a 1:15 atomic ratio of La/Ni, dried at 120 ◦C, shows the best activity and lifetime for the production of hydrogen peroxide. The deactivation of the alumina-supported Ni–B amorphous catalyst was also studied. According to the characterizations of the fresh and used catalysts by SEM, XRD and XPS, no sintering of the active component and crystallization of the amorphous species were observed. However, it is water poisoning that leads to the deactivation of the catalyst. The catalyst characterization demonstrated that the active component had changed (i.e., amorphous NiO to amorphous Ni(OH)2) and then salt was formed in the reaction conditions. Water promoted the deactivation because the surface transformation of the active Ni species was accelerated by forming Ni(OH)2 in the presence of water.
    [Show full text]
  • Focus on Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)
    The information presented here reflects EPA's modeling of the Clear Skies Act of 2002. The Agency is in the process of updating this information to reflect modifications included in the Clear Skies Act of 2003. The revised information will be posted on the Agency's Clear Skies Web site (www.epa.gov/clearskies) as soon as possible. Overview of the Human Health and Environmental Effects of Power Generation: Focus on Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) and Mercury (Hg) June 2002 Contents The Clear Skies Initiative is intended to reduce the health and environmental impacts of power generation. This document briefly summarizes the health and environmental effects of power generation, specifically those associated with sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOX), and mercury (Hg). This document does not address the specific impacts of the Clear Skies Initiative. • Overview -- Emissions and transport • Fine Particles • Ozone (Smog) • Visibility • Acid Rain • Nitrogen Deposition • Mercury Photo Credits: 1: USDA; EPA; EPA; VTWeb.com 2: NADP 6: EPA 7: ?? 10: EPA 2 Electric Power Generation: Major Source of Emissions 2000 Sulfur Dioxide 2000 Nitrogen Oxides 1999 Mercury Fuel Combustion- Industrial Processing electric utilities Transportation Other stationary combustion * Miscellaneous * Other stationary combustion includes residential and commercial sources. • Power generation continues to be an important source of these major pollutants. • Power generation contributes 63% of SO2, 22% of NOX, and 37% of man-made mercury to the environment. 3 Overview of SO2, NOX, and Mercury Emissions, Transport, and Transformation • When emitted into the atmosphere, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and mercury undergo chemical reactions to form compounds that can travel long distances.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen Peroxide Oxidation of Aromatic Hydrocarbons by Immobilized Iron(III)
    Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 217 (2004) 161–164 Hydrogen peroxide oxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons by immobilized iron(III) Hassan Hosseini Monfared∗, Zahra Amouei Department of Chemistry, School of Sciences, Zanjan University, Zanjan 45195-313, Iran Received 30 October 2003; received in revised form 16 March 2004; accepted 16 March 2004 Available online 27 April 2004 Abstract Supported iron(III) ions on neutral ␥-alumina are an efficient catalyst for the oxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons with hydrogen peroxide in acetonitrile at 60 ◦C. The catalyst is active in the low temperatue liquid phase oxidation of benzene, toluene, chlorobenzene, p-xylene, mesitylene, benzaldehyde with hydrogen peroxide. Conversions of 31–88% with respect to starting substrate were obtained within 6 h. Oxidation on both the side chain and the aromatic ring of hydrocarbons occurred. © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Aromatic hydrocarbons; Hydrogen peroxide; Heterogeneous catalyst; Oxidation 1. Introduction ions on silica [4] or alumina [5], considerably retards the non-productive decomposition of H2O2. Here, we report that The selective catalytic oxidation of organic molecules supported iron ions on ␥-alumina show remarkable catalytic continues to be a very important method for the prepara- properties in activation of H2O2 for aromatic hydrocarbons tion of primary and specialty chemicals in the chemical oxidation. industry worldwide. Catalytic oxidation reactions using metal complexes are valuable for facilitation the devel- opment
    [Show full text]