DOCSLIB.ORG

Searchlites Vol

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Searchlites Vol SearchLites Vol. 22 No. 3, Summer 2016 The Quarterly Newsletter of The SETI League, Inc. Offices: 433 Liberty Street Special METI Issue Little Ferry NJ 07643 USA The emerging science of METI (Messaging to Extraterrestrial Intel- Phone: ligence, also known as Active SETI) has in recent years emerged as a (201) 641-1770 Facsimile: subject of major controversy within the SETI community. At present, (201) 641-1771 Email: The SETI League is not directly involved in experiments involving info@setileague.org transmissions into space, and we have as yet adopted no official policy Web: www.setileague.org on the matter. Several of our members have voiced support of pursu- President ing active messaging from Earth, while many others believe such a Richard Factor pursuit to be fraught with dangers. This issue of SearchLites is de- Registered Agent: voted to several Guest Editorials, which espouse opinions on both Anthony Agnello sides of the METI issue. Secretary/Treasurer: A. Heather Wood The stated goal of SETI science (as well as its companion activity Executive Director Emeritus: of METI) is to stimulate contact between the inhabitants of Earth and H. Paul Shuch, Ph.D. our cosmic companions. Disagreement as to the wisdom of actively Trustee: soliciting dialog centers on perceived inherent risks, as well as differ- Martin Schreiber, CPA ing opinions as to the risk/reward ratio. In contemplating the diversity Advisory Board: of opinions expressed by the various authors whose works appear in Anthony Agnello this newsletter, we urge our members to remember that not all trans- Greg Bear Paul Davies, Ph.D. missions into space are created equal. Both risk and reward are a func- Robert S. Dixon, Ph.D. tion of several calculable variables, as well as numerous incalculable Frank D. Drake, Ph.D. Claudio Maccone, Ph.D. ones. These include transmitter power, directionality, detectability, and Clifford Stoll, Ph.D. duration, as well as information content, coding methodology, and the values and perceptions of the recipient of such messages in a bottle. SearchLites , ISSN 1096-5599, is the Quarterly Newsletter of The SETI League, Inc ., a membership-supported, non- While there are no easy answers to the METI debate, we make a profit [501(c)(3)], educational sharp distinction between three specific types of METI activities: sci- and scientific corporation, dedi- cated to the electromagnetic entific experiments, commercial pursuits, and publicity stunts. All Search for Extra-Terrestrial three classes of transmission have occurred in recent decades, and Intelligence. SETI League, Dr. SETI, and the above logo are all many more have been proposed. The SETI League opposes blanket registered service marks of The policies that would either inhibit science, or encourage pseudo-science. SETI League, Inc. Entire con- tents copyright © 2016 by The Rather, we would hope that each METI proposal to come before the SETI League, Inc. Permission SETI community be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. In the final is hereby granted for re- production in whole or in part, analysis, those who propose and oppose METI activity must come to provided credit is given. All opinions expressed are those an agreement as to how best to pursue meaningful science, without ex- of the individual contributors. posing humanity to irreversible risk. Page 1 Search Lites Volume 22, Number 3 -- Summer 2016 Guest Editorial: lesser ones. It’s not typically great for the less advanced soci- ety whose culture tends to get run over, even if intentions are Is Active SETI Really Dangerous? good on the part of those making contact. We have plenty of by John Traphagan data to support this scenario from our own history. In general, when we think about scientific inquiry, much Put another way, if ET is so advanced, shouldn’t they of its power rests in the idea that everything is open to ques- have something equivalent to Star Trek’s Prime Directive in tion. Turning a scientific gaze upon the world enlightens us which they make every effort to avoid meddling in the devel- and opens our potential to understand more deeply, while of- opment of less advanced civilizations? Perhaps the very fact ten challenging us to reconsider previously held beliefs and that they sent the message indicates nefarious intentions, or ideas. But science is not an unambiguously moral good. just plain stupidity, on the part of aliens who didn’t give much Einstein questioned the ethics of building the atomic thought to how sending might negatively influence the civili- bomb. We know that research like the Tuskegee study of zation at the receiving end, whose culture they knew nothing about when they sent the message. syphilis in African Americans has deep moral problems re- lated to racism and informed consent. More recently, Stephen Now, we need to turn this around to ourselves. Many sci- Hawking and others have raised ethical questions about entists in the SETI community argue against METI on the whether or not we should engage in sending messages to the grounds that it is dangerous. We should simply wait and listen stars — the risks of letting ET know we’re here may outweigh until we are sufficiently advanced to deal with contact. We the benefits of making contact if ET happens to be in a par- should hold off until we mature from our cultural and techno- ticularly foul mood when they answer our interstellar phone logical adolescence, whatever that means, to adulthood. call. However, if we really think about it, the activity likely to Those opposing Active SETI or METI (messaging extra- be more dangerous to humans is receipt of a signal rather than terrestrial intelligence) have a point. There could be some risk sending a message. The way in which people will react on our involved with alerting ET to our presence in the universe, al- socially fragile world is quite unpredictable. Awareness of the though if ET has knowledge of physics allowing them to visit existence of another likely more technologically advanced our corner of the galaxy, hiding probably won’t do us much civilization might propel our world into political chaos or it good anyway. If the extraterrestrials want to vaporize us, might have little influence. And we are left with the problem they’ll go ahead and do it. More likely the extreme distances of what to think about an extraterrestrial civilization that sent a between Earth and possible other civilizations will mitigate message without giving much thought to what it might do at against any real threat — if we send a message out to a star in the other end. Those aliens may be malicious at worst or naïve the Orion constellation today, it will take over 1,000 years to at best. Neither possibility is terribly good from our perspec- get there... tive. Perhaps a more important question is not about the risks The alternative, of course, is to roll up in a ball and hide. of transmitting, but the dangers in receiving. Many in the This seems rather pointless, since the genie is already out of SETI community have shown commitment to the belief that a the bottle, given the wide array of transmissions we constantly technologically advanced civilization will be altruistic, despite send from our planet. A society with technology 1,000 or the lack of evidence supporting that assumption. Therefore it 10,000 years beyond ours may well be able to pick up even the is assumed there are no significant risks with listening quietly. faint signals we are leaking out to the galaxy. Maybe they’re right. But even so, contact may prove quite Instead of hiding, we should give a great deal of thought dangerous to humans. to the kind of message we might send and to what the possible Why? Because of the potential to destabilize our civiliza- consequences are of sending. By consequences here, I do not tion. How will humans react? Will there be panic, infighting, mean self-centered worries about ET blasting us, but other- conflict? Imagine if the Chinese intercept the first message centered concerns about how sending a message might influ- ence or harm the recipient. from aliens and want to keep the information they gain to themselves. How will the American and other governments Perhaps the silence we have experienced to date is a respond if they think the Chinese might have information from product of more advanced civilizations saying, “don’t send ET about physics that would allow them to build super weap- anything that way; those beings are primitive and we might ons? How will religious zealots, who are suddenly confronted ruin their development.” If that’s the case, then our only shot with the idea that humans may not be so special after all, cope at contact will be METI as a way of alerting extraterrestrials with news that we are not alone? Imagine if ET sends us an that we are ready for contact. encyclopedia of information about themselves in which we If SETI scientists are right and ET is likely to be much learn that they are a civilization of card-carrying atheists. older and wiser than humans, the real question is not the dan- And, perhaps, the most important question is what does gers of sending a message, but the risks of receiving one. It sending a message say about them? One way to interpret this seems much less likely that messaging to more advanced is to assume it means they want contact. But if they are sig- extraterrestrials will have a significant impact on their society, nificantly more advanced than we are morally (and there’s no while receipt of a message from advanced extraterrestrials guarantee), perhaps they are also aware of what normally hap- might have a very significant impact on ours.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Project Cyclops : a Design Study of a System for Detecting
    ^^^^m•i.j . --f'v.i^ "^y^-!^ A Design Study of a System for Detecting Extraterrestrial Intelligent Life '• >..-, i,C%' PREPARED UNDER STANFORD /NASA /AMES RESEARCH CENTER >J^1t> 1971 SUMMER FACULTY FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS DESIGr CR 114445 (Revised Edition 7/73) Available to the public rB' ^ A Design Study of a System for Detecting Extraterrestrial Intelligent Life PREPARED UNDER STANFORD/ NASA/AMES RESEARCH CENTER 1971 SUMMER FACULTY FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS DESIGN Further copies of this report may be obtained by writing to Dr. John Billingham NASA/ Ames Research Center, Code LT Moffett Field, California 94035 weixesunr colligc LWRART CYCLOPS PEOPLE Co-Directors: Bernard M. Oliver Stanford University (Summer appointment) John Billingham Ames Research Center, NASA System Design and Advisory Group: James Adams Stanford University Edwin L. Duckworth San Francisco City College Charles L. Seeger New Mexico State University George Swenson University of Illinois Antenna Structures Group: Lawrence S. Hill California State College L.A. John Minor New Mexico State University Ronald L. Sack University of Idaho Harvey B. Sharfstein San Jose State College Pennsylvania Alan 1. Soler University of Receiver Group: Washington Ward J. Helms University of William Hord Southern Illinois University Pierce Johnson University of Missouri C. ReedPredmore Rice University Transmission and Control Group: Marvin Siegel Michigan State University Jon A. Soper Michigan Technological University Henry J. Stalzer, Jr. Cooper Union Signal Processing Group: Jonnie B. Bednar University of Tulsa Douglas B. Brumm Michigan Technological University James H. Cook Cleveland State University Robert S. Dixon Ohio State University Johnson Luh Purdue University Francis Yu Wayne State University /./ la J C, /o ) •»• < .
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Astronomy
    Edition of 2013 HANDBOOK ON RADIO ASTRONOMY International Telecommunication Union Sales and Marketing Division Place des Nations *38650* CH-1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland Fax: +41 22 730 5194 Printed in Switzerland Tel.: +41 22 730 6141 Geneva, 2013 E-mail: sales@itu.int ISBN: 978-92-61-14481-4 Edition of 2013 Web: www.itu.int/publications Photo credit: ATCA David Smyth HANDBOOK ON RADIO ASTRONOMY Radiocommunication Bureau Handbook on Radio Astronomy Third Edition EDITION OF 2013 RADIOCOMMUNICATION BUREAU Cover photo: Six identical 22-m antennas make up CSIRO's Australia Telescope Compact Array, an earth-rotation synthesis telescope located at the Paul Wild Observatory. Credit: David Smyth. ITU 2013 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. - iii - Introduction to the third edition by the Chairman of ITU-R Working Party 7D (Radio Astronomy) It is an honour and privilege to present the third edition of the Handbook – Radio Astronomy, and I do so with great pleasure. The Handbook is not intended as a source book on radio astronomy, but is concerned principally with those aspects of radio astronomy that are relevant to frequency coordination, that is, the management of radio spectrum usage in order to minimize interference between radiocommunication services. Radio astronomy does not involve the transmission of radiowaves in the frequency bands allocated for its operation, and cannot cause harmful interference to other services. On the other hand, the received cosmic signals are usually extremely weak, and transmissions of other services can interfere with such signals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins and Development of the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, 1959-1971 Sierra E
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Masters Theses The Graduate School Spring 2012 "A cosmic Rorschach test": The origins and development of the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, 1959-1971 Sierra E. Smith James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019 Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Smith, Sierra E., ""A cosmic Rorschach test": The origins and development of the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, 1959-1971" (2012). Masters Theses. 334. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019/334 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact dc_admin@jmu.edu. “A Cosmic Rorschach Test”: The Origins and Development of the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, 1959-1971 Sierra E. Smith A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts History May 2012 Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my thesis committee who has gone above and beyond the call of duty to guide me through this process. Despite being dragged into the twentieth century, Dr. Alison Sandman, my thesis director, helped articulate the ideas for my project far better than I could have alone. Thought-provoking conversations with Dr. Kevin Borg ensured that I thought broadly and deeply about both my project and my future plans. Dr. Steven Guerrier’s open door and enthusiasm for my project has been a constant throughout my graduate experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) - the Next Steps (34Th Symposium) (IAA.1.1) (A4.) SETI I - Technical Aspects (1.)
    56th International Astronautical Congress 2005 Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) - The Next Steps (34th Symposium) (IAA.1.1) (A4.) SETI I - Technical Aspects (1.) Author Dr. Douglas A. Vakoch The SETI Institute, United States, dvakoch@seti.org ADVANTAGES OF ACTIVE SETI Abstract This paper will examine the potential benefits of Active SETI, a prospect raised in the Project Cyclops report, which noted “if our first search of the nearest 1000 target stars produced negative results we might wish to transmit beacons to these stars for a year or more before carrying the search deeper into space” (p. 153). Renewed discussion of that possibility is particularly timely in light of the recent completion of Project Phoenix, which surveyed nearly 1000 nearby stars. It has often been argued that the young age of human civilization, when compared to the older age of any extraterrestrial civilization we may contact, justifies our reliance on passive SETI as opposed to transmitting. Because transmission is more costly and requires longer timescales to succeed, the argument goes, we should be expected to take the easier role. However, this reasoning presupposes that the motivations of extraterrestrial civilizations are sufficiently benevolent that they will transmit de novo rather than only in reciprocation, and that they choose to make contact even prior to learning that we desire contact. This paper examines an alternative scenario, in which entry into the Galactic Club requires initiative on the part of the applicant, rather than passively waiting for an invitation. It proposes a solution to the troubling possibility that many civilizations are listening but none is transmitting.
    [Show full text]
  • Ames in the 1970S and 1980S
    Atmosphere of Freedom Sixty Years at the NASA Ames Research Center Wheat in crop growth chamber under red LED lights and low pressure sodium lamps. 98 Diverse Challenges Explored with Unified Spirit Chapter 3: Ames in the 1970s and 1980s Two events make 1969 the year to mark the next era in Ames history. First, Apollo 11 returned safely from its landing on the Moon, signalling the beginning of the end of the lunar landing mission that drove NASA almost from its start. NASA had yet to decide what to do for its second act, and its flurry of strategic planning took place against an uncertain political backdrop. Much of the American public— including both political conservatives concerned with rampant inflation and political liberals concerned with technocratic government—began to doubt the value of NASA’s big plans. NASA had downplayed the excitement of interplanetary exploration as it focused on the Moon. Congress and the American aerospace industry, under pressure from a resurgent European aerospace industry, began to doubt if NASA really wanted the aeronautics part of its name. NASA had to justify its budget with quicker results, better science, and relevance to earthly problems. The second major event of 1969 was the arrival of Hans Mark as Ames’ director. Mark, himself, displayed a force of personality, a breadth of Michael McGreevy holding a intellect, and an aggressive management style. More significantly, Mark arrived as rumors televised rock in his virtual hand circulated that Ames would be shut down. Thus, Ames people gave him a good amount of using the Ames EXOS Dexterous room to reshape their institution.
    [Show full text]
  • "The Search for Extra-Terrestrial Life"
    Portland State University PDXScholar Special Collections: Oregon Public Speakers Special Collections and University Archives 10-2-1975 "The Search for Extra-Terrestrial Life" Donald L. DeVincenzi Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/orspeakers Part of the The Sun and the Solar System Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation DeVincenzi, Donald L., ""The Search for Extra-Terrestrial Life"" (1975). Special Collections: Oregon Public Speakers. 91. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/orspeakers/91 This Article is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Special Collections: Oregon Public Speakers by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: pdxscholar@pdx.edu. “The Search for Extra-Terrestrial Life,” Donald L. DeVincenzi Portland State University October 2, 1975 PSU Library Special Collections and University Archives Oregon Public Speakers Collection https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/orspeakers/91/ Transcribed by Kincaid Davis, April 10, 2020 Audited by Carolee Harrison, June 2020 PSU Library Special Collections and University Archives presents these recordings as part of the historical record. They reflect the recollections and opinions of the individual speakers and are not intended to be representative of the views of Portland State University. They may contain language, ideas, or stereotypes that are offensive to others. CARL DITTMER: On behalf of Portland State University, the College of Science, the Auxiliary Academic Activities Committee, the Environmental Sciences Seminar Committee, and the Division of Continuing Education, I welcome you to this lecture. It is a privilege to be able to present a speaker who will talk on a subject so vital to us as the one tonight.
    [Show full text]
  • Astrobiology Math
    National Aeronautics andSpace Administration Aeronautics National Astrobiology Math This collection of activities is based on a weekly series of space science problems intended for students looking for additional challenges in the math and physical science curriculum in grades 6 through 12. The problems were created to be authentic glimpses of modern science and engineering issues, often involving actual research data. The problems were designed to be one-pagers with a Teacher’s Guide and Answer Key as a second page. This compact form was deemed very popular by participating teachers. Astrobiology Math Mathematical Problems Featuring Astrobiology Applications Dr. Sten Odenwald NASA / ADNET Corp. Sten.F.Odenwald@nasa.gov Astrobiology Math i http://spacemath.gsfc.nasa.gov Acknowledgments: We would like to thank Ms. Daniella Scalice for her boundless enthusiasm in the review and editing of this resource. Ms. Scalice is the Education and Public Outreach Coordinator for the NASA Astrobiology Institute (NAI) at the Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California. We would also like to thank the team of educators and scientists at NAI who graciously read through the first draft of this book and made numerous suggestions for improving it and making it more generally useful to the astrobiology education community: Dr. Harold Geller (George Mason University), Dr. James Kratzer (Georgia Institute of Technology; Doyle Laboratory) and Ms. Suzi Taylor (Montana State University), For more weekly classroom activities about astronomy and space visit the Space Math@ NASA website, http://spacemath.gsfc.nasa.gov Image Credits: Front Cover: Collage created by Julie Fletcher (NAI), molecule image created by Jenny Mottar, NASA HQ.
    [Show full text]
  • Allen Telescope Array
    Remaining schedule Previous Thursday Nov. 20: (nearly) finished up “Intelligence” material. Sec. 6.5, 12.2 in textbook. Today: Begin (and complete?) SETI searches: strategies, programs Textbook Chapter 12.3 Partial review sheet will be available over Thanksgiving break. Thursday: Thanksgiving break. Full review sheet online Monday, Dec. 1. Tuesday Dec. 2: Complete SETI material. Star Travel + Fermi paradox (ch.[13.1],13. 2, 13.3 in text) + review Thursday Dec. 4: Last day of class -- Exam 5. SETI web sites (“links” at course web site) SETI at Space.com http://www.space.com/searchforlife/index.html SpaceRef.com http://www.spaceref.com/Directory/Astrobiology_and_Life_Science/seti/ Ongoing SETI searches: SETI Institute/Allen Telescope Array http://www.seti.org/ Project SERENDIP, UC Berkeley http://seti.ssl.berkeley.edu/serendip/serendip.html SETI@home http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/ Sourthern SERENDIP, Univ. Western Syndey http://seti.uws.edu.au/ SETI Italia http://www.seti-italia.cnr.it/ Optical SETI at Berkeley http://seti.ssl.berkeley.edu/opticalseti/ Harvard http://seti.harvard.edu/oseti/ Amateur SETI: Project BAMBI http://www.bambi.net/ SETI League http://www.setileague.org/ Project ARGUS http://www.setileague.org/argus/index.html STRATEGIES FOR COMMUNICATION WITH EXTRATERRESTRIAL CIVILIZATIONS SETI is concerned with searches for signals from extraterrestrial civilizations, not spectral “biomarkers” we discussed earlier in course, or actual travel to other star systems (Ch.13). Except for 1974 signal to globular cluster M13 (thousands of light years away), we only try for reception, no transmission. (“What if they are all listening?”) “Signals” could be intentional (they are trying for contact) or nonintentional (we eavesdrop, one way or another).
    [Show full text]
  • Searchlites Vol
    SearchLites Vol. 22 No. 4, Autumn 2016 The Quarterly Newsletter of The SETI League, Inc. Offices: 433 Liberty Street Don't Stop the Presses Little Ferry NJ By H. Paul Shuch, Executive Director Emeritus 07643 USA Phone: Every decade or so, the SETI community is treated to a tantalizing (201) 641-1770 (though inconclusive) hint that the existence proof we seek may indeed Facsimile: (201) 641-1771 be within our grasp. Invariably, the popular press seizes upon incom- Email: plete information to increase circulation by prematurely announcing info@setileague.org Web: our success. In the 1960s, the discovery at CalTech of quasar CTA- www.setileague.org 102 was heralded as proof of extraterrestrial intelligence, until cooler President heads prevailed and the true nature of the source was uncovered. In Richard Factor the 1970s, the Ohio State University “Wow!” signal was similarly ex- Registered Agent: aggerated. In The SETI League’s early days, the EQ Pegasi hoax (fol- Anthony Agnello lowed shortly by the Pearl Harbor Hoax) achieved their fifteen minutes Secretary/Treasurer: A. Heather Wood of fame. Now, we’re at it again with wild speculations about a single presumed detection associated with the star HD 164595. Executive Director Emeritus: H. Paul Shuch, Ph.D. The facts as I understand them are fairly straightforward. About a Trustee: year and a half ago, our Russian colleagues used the RATAN-600 tran- Martin Schreiber, CPA sit radio telescope to conduct a routine RF survey of the regions of the sky surrounding promising Kepler exoplanet locations. Using an ex- Advisory Board: Anthony Agnello tremely broadband receiver at a wavelength of 2.7 cm, their data re- Greg Bear vealed an extremely brief RF peak somewhere between 10.6 and 11.6 Paul Davies, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Decryption of Messages from Extraterrestrial Intelligence Using the Power of Social Media – the SETI Decrypt Challenge
    submitted: 19 October 2017 International Journal of Astrobiology accepted: 11 December 2017 doi:10.1017/S1473550417000568 Decryption of Messages from Extraterrestrial Intelligence Using the Power of Social Media – The SETI Decrypt Challenge René Heller Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany; heller@mps.mpg.de Abstract With the advent of modern astronomy, humans might now have acquired the technological and intellectual requirements to communicate with other intelligent beings beyond the solar system, if they exist. Radio signals have been identified as a means for interstellar communication about 60 years ago. And the Square Kilometer Array will be capable of detecting extrasolar radio sources analogous to terrestrial high-power radars out to several tens of light years. The ultimate question is: will we be able to understand the message or, vice versa, if we submit a message to extraterrestrial intelligence first, how can we make sure that they will understand us? Here I report on the largest blind experiment of a pretend radio message received on Earth from beyond the solar system. I posted a sequence of about two million binary digits (‘0’ and ‘1’) to the social media that encoded a configuration frame, two slides with mathematical content, and four images along with spatial and temporal information about their contents. Six questions were asked that would need to be answered to document the successful decryption of the message. Within a month after the posting, over 300 replies were received in total, including comments and requests for hints, 66 of which contained the correct solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • SETI) the Drake Equation
    AST 309 part 2: Extraterrestrial Life The Search For Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) The Drake Equation: N = N* fpl nhab fL fC fT L/T Stars? Planets? Habitable Origin Complex Intelligence, Lifeme planets? of life? life? technology? of civilizaon Another way to see what the Drake equation represents: What is the likelihood or probability that the sequence of events shown to the right will occur, ending up with the peculiar group of phenomena listed at the bottom branching? And are there many other possible branchings that we haven’t thought of, or are incapable (for, say, biological reasons) of imagining? Intelligence, technology Intelligence—If we want to communicate with aliens, they must have something like what we usually call “intelligence.” What does this mean? Are there different “types”? What about other animals? Other cultures? Especially oral tradition cultures. Why did humans evolve such big brains? Why think that extraterrestrials would share our forms of cognition? Factor in Drake equation: What is probability that life elsewhere develops “intelligence”? Call it fI . Communication, technology—If we want signals, the aliens must have some kind of system of representation, like a language. How likely? Other forms? Musical? Unimaginable? And no matter what kind of language they have, they have to be technological civilizations if they are to send signals across the Galaxy. We could enter these topics as two more probabilities, fC fT . N(planets with life that also developed intelligence and technology) = N* fpl nhab fL fC fT Lifetime of the communicating phase We left out one crucial factor: The fraction of the Galaxy’s age T that a civilization is in the technologically communicating phase.
    [Show full text]
  • Audit of SETI Institute (IG-19-011)
    NASA Office of Inspector General National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Audits AUDIT OF SETI INSTITUTE March 6, 2019 Report No. IG-19-011 Office of Inspector General To report, fraud, waste, abuse, or mismanagement, contact the NASA OIG Hotline at 800-424-9183 or 800-535-8134 (TDD) or visit https://oig.nasa.gov/hotline.html. You can also write to NASA Inspector General, P.O. Box 23089, L’Enfant Plaza Station, Washington, D.C. 20026. The identity of each writer and caller can be kept confidential, upon request, to the extent permitted by law. To suggest ideas for or to request future audits contact the Assistant Inspector General for Audits at https://oig.nasa.gov/aboutAll.html. RESULTS IN BRIEF Audit of SETI Institute NASA Office of Inspector General Office of Audits March 6, 2019 IG-19-011 (A-18-010-00) WHY WE PERFORMED THIS AUDIT Supporting scientific and technological research to reveal the unknown about Earth, its Sun and solar system, and the universe for the benefit of humankind is an important part of NASA’s mission. In 2017, NASA spent approximately $600 million on this type of research largely through grants and cooperative agreements. Among these recipients is the SETI Institute, a private, nonprofit organization established in 1984 to advance understanding of the universe through research into technosignatures, which includes the direct search for evidence of intelligent extraterrestrial civilizations using radio and optical telescopes. However, since that time the Institute’s work has expanded beyond technosignatures research to include astronomy and astrophysics, exoplanets, astrobiology, climate and geoscience, and planetary exploration.
    [Show full text]