Version PREVIEW – Exam 1 – JOHNSON – (53140) 1 This Print

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Version PREVIEW – Exam 1 – JOHNSON – (53140) 1 This Print VersionPREVIEW–Exam1–JOHNSON–(53140) 1 This print-out should have 30 questions. ·· Multiple-choice questions may continue on ·Cl· the next column or page – find all choices ··· ··· before answering. ·Cl·· C Cl·· · · · LDE Identifying Bonds 005 ·Cl·· · 001 10.0 points The molecule has tetrahedral electronic and Rank the labeled bonds in the molecule molecular geometry. The C−Cl bond is polar, below from least to most polar. but becuase of the symmetry of the molecule, b b b H O b the individual dipole moments cancel. The a b molecule is therefore nonpolar. b c b H C N e ChemPrin3e T03 39 d b b b b S S H 003 10.0 points b b b b Which of the following is NOT polar? 1. c < e < b < a < c 1. COCl2 2. c < d < e < a < b 2. ClF3 3. d < c < e < b < a correct − 3. BrO3 4. c < d < e < b < a + 4. CH3 correct 5. d < c < b < e < a 5. O3 Explanation: Bonds a, b, c, d, and e have a ∆EN of 1.4, 1.0, 0.5, 0.0, and 0.9, respectively. Explanation: COCl2 (the central atom is C) is polar be- Brodbelt 013 322 cause there are two different bonds: C=O 002 10.0 points and C-Cl which have different sized dipoles Which of the following statements about po- so their effects do not cancel. The other in- larity is false? correct choices have either 3, 4 or 5 RHED: one or more of these are lone pairs on the 1. Linear molecules can be polar. central atom which causes the polar bonds to be placed in positions where the dipole of at least one bond is not opposing another, caus- 2. Polar molecules must have a net dipole + ing the species to be polar. In CH3 there are moment. ◦ no lone pairs; the C-H bonds are at 120 so 3. Lone (unshared) pairs of electrons on the their effects cancel and the ion is nonpolar. central atom play an important role in influ- encing polarity. ChemPrin3e T03 22 004 10.0 points Which of the following has bond angles 4. CCl4 is a polar molecule. correct ◦ slightly less than 109 ? 5. Dipole moments can “cancel”, giving a + net non-polar molecule. 1. NH4 − Explanation: 2. BrO3 correct The Lewis Dot structure for CCl4 is VersionPREVIEW–Exam1–JOHNSON–(53140) 2 − 3. ClO4 5. 2; 6 − 4. BH4 6. 4; 2 3− 5. PO4 7. 3; 4 Explanation: 8. 3; 6 While all structures have four regions of electron density around the central atom, only − 9. 3; 2 BrO3 also has one of these regions as a lone pair. Since the lone pair requires more room, Explanation: the other bonds are repelled away from it slightly, folding them up rather like an um- N =8 × 3=25 brella and resulting in angles slightly less than ◦ × 109.5 . A =5+(7 2)+1=20 S = 24 − 20=4 Brodbelt 013 320 First, draw the molecule. The number of 005 10.0 points 3 regions of HED equals the number of bonds The sp hybridization has what percent s and the number of lone pairs. There are 4 character and what percent p character? shared, or bonded electrons, giving 2 regions of HED. The 2 F atoms have an octet. This 1. 50%; 50% means that 16 of the 20 available electrons are accounted for, leaving 4 electrons to be placed 2. 33%; 67% on the N atom as 2 lone pairs. Since there are 2 lone pairs, 2 bonds, that gives a total of 4 3. 67%; 33% regions of HED. 4. 75%; 25% Brodbelt 08 02 007 10.0 points 5. 25%; 75% correct Which molecular geometries can stem from Explanation: tetrahedral electronic geometry? 1 s = = 25% 1. tetrahedral, trigonal pyramidal, angular 4 correct 3 p = = 75% 4 2. trigonal pyramidal, seesaw Brodbelt 013 308 3. tetrahedral, T-shaped, linear 006 10.0 points − NF has (2, 3, 4) regions of high electron 2 4. only tetrahedral density and (2, 4, 6) bonded electrons. 5. tetrahedral, trigonal bipyramidal, linear, 1. 2; 2 angular, seesaw 2. 4; 4 correct Explanation: Tetrahedral, trigonal pyramidal and angu- 3. 2; 4 lar are three molecular geometries that can stem from tetrahedral electronic geometry. 4. 4; 6 Benzene Sigma Pi Bonds VersionPREVIEW–Exam1–JOHNSON–(53140) 3 008 10.0 points correct How many σ and π bonds, respectively, are found in benzene (C6H6)? 5. Antibonding orbitals are made from the overlap of sigma and pi orbitals. 1. 6; 6 Explanation: Antibonding orbitals are higher in energy 2. 12; 6 than their corresponding bonding orbitals. Molecules can exist with electrons in anti- 3. 12; 12 bonding orbitals, as long as the molecule does not place as many electrons in antibonding 4. correct 12; 3 orbitals as there are in bonding orbitals. 5. 3; 3 Msci 02 1186 Explanation: 011 10.0 points C2 is calculated to have a bond order of two Bonds in C2H2 according to MO theory. Pick the true state- 009 10.0 points ment. Which of the following bonds is not found in 1. acetylene (C2H2)? The molecule has exactly two pairs of bonding electrons and no more. 1. All of these bonds are found in C2H2. correct 2. The molecule is held together by two pi bonds. correct 2. π2p−2p 3. The molecule is held together by two sigma bonds. 3. σsp−sp 4. The molecule is paramagnetic. 4. σ1s−sp Explanation: 5. The molecule contains one sigma and one pi bond. Msci 02 1239 Explanation: 010 10.0 points The MO energy diagram will fill with 8 Which of the following is TRUE about anti- total electrons (4 from each C). 4 electrons fill bonding orbitals of the molecular orbital the- the σ2s and σ2s⋆ MO’s. The order of the MO’s ory? made with the overlapping 2p’s of the two C’s is 1. Unshared electrons are placed in anti- bonding orbitals. π2p,π2p <σ2p <π2p⋆ ,π2p⋆ <σ2p⋆ 2. The strongest bonds between atoms have So the 2 π2p’s fill first meaning C2 is held no electrons in antibonding orbitals. together with 2 π bonds and no σ’s. 3. Although antibonding orbitals may ac- LDE Bond Order 007 cept electrons, the electrons never remain for 012 10.0 points long. All of the species below have the same bond order except for one of them. Which is it? 4. Antibonding orbitals are higher in energy − than their corresponding bonding orbitals. 1. H2 VersionPREVIEW–Exam1–JOHNSON–(53140) 4 Msci 09 0604 − 2. B2 correct 015 10.0 points Which of the following substances has a delo- + 3. Ne2 calized bond? − 4. F2 1. CO + 2− 5. H2 2. CO3 correct Explanation: 3. CO2 All of the species have a bond order of 0.5 − except for B2 , which has a bond order of 1.5. − 4. ClO3 LDE Paramagnetism 005 5. NH3 013 10.0 points Which of the following species is paramag- Explanation: netic? Delocalized bonds occur whenever reso- nance occurs. In a molecule that exhibits 1. He2 resonance, the bond has partial double and partial single bond character. This means 2. N2 that electrons are delocalized around the res- 2− 2− onance bond. CO3 is the only compound 3. Be2 correct that exhibits resonance and therefore delocal- 2− ization. 4. C2 Explanation: Mlib 04 1137 2− 016 The species Be2 will have two unpaired 10.0 points electrons in degenerate π bonding orbitals. The volume of a gas varies directly with its Kelvin temperature, at constant pressure. LDE Bond Order 008 This is a statement of 014 10.0 points Rank the following species in terms of increas- 1. Boyle’s Law. − + 2− ing bond length: N2, O2 , Ne2 ,H2,B2 . 2. Dalton’s Law of partial pressure. + − 2− 1. Ne2 < H2 < O2 < N2 < B2 3. Henry’s Law. 2− − + 2. N2 < B2 < O2 < H2 < Ne2 correct 4. Charles’ Law. correct 3. − + 2− N2 < O2 < H2 < Ne2 < B2 Explanation: + 2− − Charles’ Law relates the volume and tem- 4. Ne < H2 < B < O < N2 2 2 2 perature of a fixed (definite) mass of gas at − 2− + constant pressure. The direct proportionality 5. N2 < O < B < Ne < H2 2 2 2 applies only if the temperature is expressed Explanation: on the absolute (Kelvin) scale. − + 2− The species N2, O2 , Ne2 ,H2 and B2 have bond orders of 3, 1.5, 0.5, 1 and 2, respec- LDE Ideal Gas Calculation 006 tively. Bond length is inversely proportional 017 10.0 points to bond strength. If a gaseous system initially at 789 torr and ◦ 215 C occupies a volume of 22.80 cm3, what VersionPREVIEW–Exam1–JOHNSON–(53140) 5 volume will it occupy if the pressure is reduced The ideal gas law is to 456 torr and the temperature is increased ◦ to 430 C? P V = n R T n P = 1. 9.14 cm3 V R T with unit of measure mol/L on each side. 2. Not enough information. Multiplying each by molar mass (MM) gives 3 n P 3. 5.86 cm · MM = · MM = ρ, V R T 3 4. 88.73 cm with units of g/L. 5. 56.83 cm3 correct ρ R T MM = Explanation: P It is not necessary to use L and atm for (8 g/L)(0.08206 L · atm/mol/K) = this problem because the relationship can be 1 atm ◦ written so that the units cancel ( C must be × (273.15 K) converted to K, though, because it is not an = 179.318 g/mol absolute measure): P1V1 P2V2 = Brad C12 006 T1 T2 019 10.0 points P1V1T2 If sufficient acid is used to react completely = V2 T1P2 with 21.0 grams of Mg 3 ◦ (789 torr)(22.80 cm )(703 C) 3 = 56.83 cm Mg(s) + 2HCl(aq) → MgCl2(aq)+ H2(g) (488 ◦C)(456 torr) what volume of hydrogen at STP would be ChemPrin3e T04 25 produced? 018 10.0 points If 250 mL of a gas at STP weighs 2 g, what is 1.
Recommended publications
  • Molecular Orbital Theory to Predict Bond Order • to Apply Molecular Orbital Theory to the Diatomic Homonuclear Molecule from the Elements in the Second Period
    Skills to Develop • To use molecular orbital theory to predict bond order • To apply Molecular Orbital Theory to the diatomic homonuclear molecule from the elements in the second period. None of the approaches we have described so far can adequately explain why some compounds are colored and others are not, why some substances with unpaired electrons are stable, and why others are effective semiconductors. These approaches also cannot describe the nature of resonance. Such limitations led to the development of a new approach to bonding in which electrons are not viewed as being localized between the nuclei of bonded atoms but are instead delocalized throughout the entire molecule. Just as with the valence bond theory, the approach we are about to discuss is based on a quantum mechanical model. Previously, we described the electrons in isolated atoms as having certain spatial distributions, called orbitals, each with a particular orbital energy. Just as the positions and energies of electrons in atoms can be described in terms of atomic orbitals (AOs), the positions and energies of electrons in molecules can be described in terms of molecular orbitals (MOs) A particular spatial distribution of electrons in a molecule that is associated with a particular orbital energy.—a spatial distribution of electrons in a molecule that is associated with a particular orbital energy. As the name suggests, molecular orbitals are not localized on a single atom but extend over the entire molecule. Consequently, the molecular orbital approach, called molecular orbital theory is a delocalized approach to bonding. Although the molecular orbital theory is computationally demanding, the principles on which it is based are similar to those we used to determine electron configurations for atoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Valence Bond Theory
    Valence Bond Theory • A bond is a result of overlapping atomic orbitals from two atoms. The overlap holds a pair of electrons. • Normally each atomic orbital is bringing one electron to this bond. But in a “coordinate covalent bond”, both electrons come from the same atom • In this model, we are not creating a new orbital by the overlap. We are simply referring to the overlap between atomic orbitals (which may or may not be hybrid) from two atoms as a “bond”. Valence Bond Theory Sigma (σ) Bond • Skeletal bonds are called “sigma” bonds. • Sigma bonds are formed by orbitals approaching and overlapping each other head-on . Two hybrid orbitals, or a hybrid orbital and an s-orbital, or two s- orbitals • The resulting bond is like an elongated egg, and has cylindrical symmetry. Acts like an axle • That means the bond shows no resistance to rotation around a line that lies along its length. Pi (π) Bond Valence Bond Theory • The “leftover” p-orbitals that are not used in forming hybrid orbitals are used in making the “extra” bonds we saw in Lewis structures. The 2 nd bond in a double bond nd rd The 2 and 3 bonds in a triple bond /~harding/IGOC/P/pi_bond.html • Those extra bonds form only after the atoms are brought together by the formation of the skeletal bonds made by www.chem.ucla.edu hybrid orbitals. • The “extra” π bonds are always associated with a skeletal bond around which they form. • They don’t form without a skeletal bond to bring the p- orbitals together and “support” them.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 the Covalent Bond 1
    Chapter 5 The Covalent Bond 1. What two opposing forces dictate the bond length? (Why do bonds form and what keeps the bonds from getting any shorter?) The bond length is the distance at which the repulsion of the two nuclei equals the attraction of the valence electrons on one atom and the nucleus of the other. 3. List the following bonds in order of increasing bond length: H-Cl, H-Br, H-O. H-O < H-Cl < H-Br. The order of increasing atom size. 5. Use electronegativities to describe the nature (purely covalent, mostly covalent, polar covalent, or ionic) of the following bonds. a) P-Cl Δχ = 3.0 – 2.1 = 0.9 polar covalent b) K-O Δχ = 3.5 – 0.8 = 2.7 ionic c) N-H Δχ = 3.0 – 2.1 = 0.9 polar covalent d) Tl-Br Δχ = 2.8 – 1.7 = 1.1 polar covalent 7. Name the following compounds: a) S2Cl2 disulfur dichloride b) CCl4 carbon tetrachloride c) PCl5 phosphorus pentachloride d) HCl hydrogen chloride 9. Write formulas for each of the following compounds: a) dinitrogen tetroxide N2O4 b) nitrogen monoxide NO c) dinitrogen pentoxide N2O5 11. Consider the U-V, W-X, and Y-Z bonds. The valence orbital diagrams for the orbitals involved in the bonds are shown in the margin. Use an arrow to show the direction of the bond dipole in the polar bonds or indicate “not polar” for the nonpolar bond(s). Rank the bonds in order of increasing polarity. The bond dipole points toward the more electronegative atom in the bond, which is the atom with the lower energy orbital.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Carbon Spsp Hybrids : Acetylene and the : Acetylene And
    CarbonCarbon spsp hybridshybrids:: AcetyleneAcetylene andand thethe TripleTriple bondbond CC2HH2 isis HH--CCCC--HH FormForm spsp onon eacheach CC leavingleaving 2p2px,, 2p2py “unused”“unused” H - sp C sp + +-+ sp C sp H PredictsPredicts linearlinear structure.structure. AboveAbove areare allall σσ bondsbonds H-C-C-H Uses up 2 valence e- for each C in sp (and 2 from 1s H). Leaves 2 valence e - for each C unused. 2py 2py Put last valence 2px e- into ππ orbitals sp formed from H C C H 2px, 2py 2px - - 2 e in πx 2 e in πy Gives two π bonds connecting carbon atoms. π bonds are at right angles to each other. Total C-C bonds are now 3, one σσ, 2 π Short Comparison of Bond Order, Bond Length, Bond Energy C-C C-C C-C Molecule Bond Order Bond Length Bond E, kcal/mole σσ Ethane, C2H6 1 (1 ) 1.54Å 83 σσ Ethylene, C2H4 2 (1 , 1π) 1.35Å 125 σσ Acetylene, C2H2 3 (1 , 2π) 1.21Å 230 ConjugationConjugation andand DelocalizationDelocalization ofof ElectronsElectrons andand BondsBonds Although energy of π* in ethylene < σ*, conjugated polylenes have even lower energy π* levels. These absorb light at longer wavelength- sometimes even in visible (human eye’s light perception). Conjugated polyenes: C=C-C-C=C-C 2 essentially independent double bonds. C=C-C=C-C=C polyene DoubleDouble bondsbonds ALTERNATE!ALTERNATE! Could draw ππ bonds between any 2 C’s ππ* bonds C C C C C C drawn are not unique! ψψ This gives delocalized structure MO = (Const)[2py(1) + 2py(2) + 2py(3) + 2py(4) +2py(5) + 2py(6) +………].
    [Show full text]
  • Bond Orders of the Diatomic Molecules†
    RSC Advances PAPER View Article Online View Journal | View Issue Bond orders of the diatomic molecules† Cite this: RSC Adv.,2019,9,17072 Taoyi Chen and Thomas A. Manz * Bond order quantifies the number of electrons dressed-exchanged between two atoms in a material and is important for understanding many chemical properties. Diatomic molecules are the smallest molecules possessing chemical bonds and play key roles in atmospheric chemistry, biochemistry, lab chemistry, and chemical manufacturing. Here we quantum-mechanically calculate bond orders for 288 diatomic molecules and ions. For homodiatomics, we show bond orders correlate to bond energies for elements within the same chemical group. We quantify and discuss how semicore electrons weaken bond orders for elements having diffuse semicore electrons. Lots of chemistry is effected by this. We introduce a first-principles method to represent orbital-independent bond order as a sum of orbital-dependent bond order components. This bond order component analysis (BOCA) applies to any spin-orbitals that are unitary transformations of the natural spin-orbitals, with or without periodic boundary conditions, and to non-magnetic and (collinear or non-collinear) magnetic materials. We use this BOCA to study all À Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. period 2 homodiatomics plus Mo2,Cr2, ClO, ClO , and Mo2(acetate)4. Using Manz's bond order equation with DDEC6 partitioning, the Mo–Mo bond order was 4.12 in Mo2 and 1.46 in Mo2(acetate)4 with a sum of bond orders for each Mo atom of 4. Our study informs both chemistry research and education. As Received 5th February 2019 a learning aid, we introduce an analogy between bond orders in materials and message transmission in Accepted 10th May 2019 computer networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Aromaticity on Excited State Structure, Reactivity and Properties
    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 1679 Influence of Aromaticity on Excited State Structure, Reactivity and Properties KJELL JORNER ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6214 ISBN 978-91-513-0354-3 UPPSALA urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-349229 2018 Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in room 80101, Ångströmlaboratoriet, Lägerhyddsvägen 1, Uppsala, Thursday, 14 June 2018 at 13:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: Prof. Dr. Rainer Herges (Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Otto-Diels- Institut für Organische Chemie). Abstract Jorner, K. 2018. Influence of Aromaticity on Excited State Structure, Reactivity and Properties. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 1679. 55 pp. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. ISBN 978-91-513-0354-3. This thesis describes work that could help development of new photochemical reactions and light-absorbing materials. Focus is on the chemical concept "aromaticity" which is a proven conceptual tool in developing thermal chemical reactions. It is here shown that aromaticity is also valuable for photochemistry. The influence of aromaticity is discussed in terms of structure, reactivity and properties. With regard to structure, it is found that photoexcited molecules change their structure to attain aromatic stabilization (planarize, allow through-space conjugation) or avoid antiaromatic destabilization (pucker). As for reactivity, it is found that stabilization/destabilization of reactants decrease/increase photoreactivity, in accordance with the Bell-Evans-Polanyi relationship. Two photoreactions based on excited state antiaromatic destabilization of the substrates are reported.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Orbital Theory
    Prof. Manik Shit, SACT, Department of Chemistry, Narajole Raj College, Narajole. Molecular Orbital Theory Introduction to Molecular Orbital Theory Valence Bond Theory fails to answer certain questions like Why He2 molecule does not exist and why O2 is paramagnetic? Therefore in 1932 F. Hood and RS. Mulliken came up with theory known as Molecular Orbital Theory to explain questions like above. According to Molecular Orbital Theory individual atoms combine to form molecular orbitals, as the electrons of an atom are present in various atomic orbitals and are associated with several nuclei. Fig. No. 1 Molecular Orbital Theory Electrons may be considered either of particle or of wave nature. Therefore, an electron in an atom may be described as occupying an atomic orbital, or by a wave function Ψ, which are solution to the Schrodinger wave equation. Electrons in a molecule are said to occupy molecular orbitals. The wave function of a molecular orbital may be obtained by one of two method: 1. Linear Combination of Atomic Orbitals (LCAO). 2. United Atom Method. PAPER: C6T (Inorganic Chemistry - II) TOPIC : Chemical Bonding (Part -1) Prof. Manik Shit, SACT, Department of Chemistry, Narajole Raj College, Narajole. Linear Combination of Atomic Orbitals (LCAO) As per this method the formation of orbitals is because of Linear Combination (addition or subtraction) of atomic orbitals which combine to form molecule. Consider two atoms A and B which have atomic orbitals described by the wave functions ΨA and ΨB .If electron cloud of these two atoms overlap, then the wave function for the molecule can be obtained by a linear combination of the atomic orbitals ΨA and ΨB i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Formal Charge-Bond Order
    Formal Charge and Bond Order The concept of formal charge is useful because it can help us to distinguish between competing Lewis structures. Formal charge can be used to decide which Lewis (electron dot) structure is preferred from several. Formal charge is an accounting procedure, it is a fictitious charge assigned to each atom in a Lewis structure. It allows chemists to determine the location of charge in a molecule as well as compare how good a Lewis structure might be. Formal charge of an atom in a Lewis structure is the charge an atom would have if all bonding electrons were shared equally between the bonded atoms, i.e. formal charge is the calculated charge if we completely ignore the effects of electronegativity. The Lewis (electron dot) structure with the atoms having the formal charge values closest to zero is preferred. Smaller formal charge on individual atoms is better than larger ones on the most electronegative atom. Because energy is required to separate + and – charges, the structure without the formal charges is probably lower in energy than the structure with formal charges. It takes energy to get a separation of charge in the molecule (as indicated by the formal charge) so the structure with the least formal charge should be lower in energy and thereby be the better Lewis structure. Negative formal charge should reside on the most electronegative atom in a Lewis structure. If the atom in a molecule has more electrons than the isolated atom, it has a negative formal charge, if it has less electrons, it has a positive formal charge The sum of the formal charges in molecules or ions must equal the overall charge of the molecule or the ion.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Study of Scn
    Revised: 2/12/15 A COMPUTATIONAL STUDY OF SCN- REPORT INSTRUCTIONS Create a computational study page in the Week 5’s folder. All Spartan files and tables for this experiment must be attached to or in the ELN. No formal lab report sections are needed. INTRODUCTION Lewis structures are created by summing the valence electrons of all the atom’s of a chemical species and then arranging those electrons so each atom typically has an octet of electrons. For - example, the Lewis structure of NO2 has a total of 18 valence electrons – 6 from both oxygen atoms, 5 from the nitrogen atom, and 1 extra because of the negative charge. - O N O When the Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion (VSEPR) theory is applied, the shape of the chemical species can be determined. The lone pair of electrons on the nitrogen atom will result in a bent molecule. - N O O The placement of the double bond between the nitrogen atom and the oxygen on the right is arbitrary. - N O O When two or more Lewis structures differ only by the placement of double or triple bonds, they are referred to as resonance structures. An imbalance of the number of lone and bonding pairs around a particular atom can potentially create a charge localized on that atom. The charge on that atom is referred to as formal charge and is calculated by the following equation: Formal Charge = # of valence e-s – (# of lone pair e-s + ½ # of bonding pair e-s) For the oxygen atom singly bound to the nitrogen atom above, the formal charge is calculated as follows: Formal Charge = 6 – (6 + ½ (2)) = -1 - So, a more accurate representation of NO2 places the negative charge on the oxygen atom singly bound to the nitrogen atom and shows both resonance structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Multicenter Bond Indices As a New Means for the Quantitative Characterization of Homoaromaticity
    6606 J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 6606-6609 Multicenter Bond Indices As a New Means for the Quantitative Characterization of Homoaromaticity Robert Ponec* Institute of Chemical Process Fundamentals, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 6, Suchdol 2, RozVojoVa´ 135, 165 02, Czech Republic Patrick Bultinck Department of Inorganic and Physical Chemistry, Ghent UniVersity, Krijgslaan 281 (S3), B-9000 Gent, Belgium Ana Gallegos Saliner European Chemicals Bureau, Institute for Health & Consumer Protection, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, 21020 Ispra, Italy ReceiVed: April 27, 2005; In Final Form: May 31, 2005 This study reports the use of multicenter bond indices as a new tool for the quantitative characterization of homoaromaticity. The approach was applied to the series bicyclic systems whose homoaromaticity was recently discussed in terms of traditional aromaticity index, namely, NICS. In this study we found that the multicenter bond indices are indeed able to quantify the degree of homoaromaticity of the studied systems as reflected in the classification of these molecules into classes of homoaromatic, non-homoaromatic, and anti-homoaromatic systems suggested on the basis of NICS values. Introduction CHART 1 The concept of homoaromaticity was introduced by Winstein et al.1 to denote the fact, first observed by Applequist and Roberts,2 that the insertion of short insulating chains into the cyclic array of orbitals responsible for the specific properties of aromatic systems does not completely destroy the conjugative interactions between the separated subunits so that the corre- sponding molecules still display, albeit to a reduced extent, the properties typical for the aromatic systems. Because of its importance, the phenomenon of homoaromaticity has been the subject of a wealth of experimental and theoretical studies aiming both at the evaluation of various manifestations of this phenomenon3-17 and, also, to the design of new tools and procedures allowing estimating the extent of the effects respon- sible for its existence.
    [Show full text]
  • Bond Order Potentials for Covalent Elements
    Bond order potentials for covalent elements. This chapter will be dedicated to a short history of the so called \bond order" potentials [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] (BOPs), that represent an interesting class of the rather scattered family of analytic potentials. Analytic interatomic potentials (sometimes referred to as empirical, semi-empirical or clas- sical potentials) are used for a variety of purposes, ranging from the estimation of minimum energy structures for surface reconstruction, grain boundaries or related defects, to the descrip- tion of the liquid structure. All analytic potentials are de¯ned through a functional form of the interatomic interactions, whose parameters are ¯tted to a selected database. According to Brenner [8], an analytic potential needs to be: ² Flexible: the function should be flexible enough to accommodate the inclusion of a relatively wide range of structures in a ¯tting database. ² Accurate: the potential function must be able to accurately reproduce quantities such energies, bond lengths, elastic constant, and related properties entering a ¯tting database. ² Transferable: the functional form of the potential should be able to reproduce related prop- erties that are not included in the ¯tting database. In practise the potential should be able to give a good description of the energy landscape for any possible realistic con¯guration characterized by the set of atomic positions frig. ² Computationally e±cient: the function should be of such a form that it is tractable for a desired calculation, given the available computing resources. We note that one of the paradigms that has led science through its development, i.e. the Occam razor (\Entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity"), is not mentioned here.
    [Show full text]
  • Aromaticity and Conditions. Neutral and Charged Homo- and Hetero Aromatic Systems
    Aromaticity and Conditions. Neutral and charged homo- and hetero aromatic systems. Electrophilic aromatic substitution reaction its mechanism and basic cases. Substituent effects in electrophilic substitution reactions to the rate (reactivity), directing rules (regioselectivity). Electrophilic substitution reactions of five- and six-membered heteoaromatic compounds. Addition reactions. Reaction of aromatic hydrocarbons containing alkyl side chain, the benzyl type reactive intermediates. Some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Aromatic compounds and their classification Formally, cyclic compounds containing conjugated double bonds (and non-bonding electron pairs) - BUT itself is not a sufficient condition for aromaticity Aromatic compounds - characteristic chemical properties (in spite of unsaturation no addition reaction, BUT substitution reactions) + Anomalous NMR spectroscopy behaviour Classification 1. Homo aromatic compounds - carbocyclic (carbon atoms only!) 1.1. Monocyclic homo aromatic compounds - substituted benzene derivatives Mostly trivial or semi-trivial names (BUT the suffix is often misleading) benzene toluene xylene styrene phenol anisole aniline xylidine (o-, m-, p-) (o-, m-, p-) Some important groups 1.2. Polycyclic homo aromatic compounds 1 1.2.1. Isolated polycycles Ar-(C)n-Ar n = 0 Biphenyl and its derivatives E conjugation interaction between electron system of the two rings: coplanar nature? No! In gas and liquid phases decreasing overlap due to the van der Waals repulsion 90o 180o 270o o 360 between o, o'-hydrogens n ≥ 1 Aryl-substituted alkanes Consequence: Atrop isomerism Trityl cation (radical, anion) very stable. Reason: electron delocalization on 19 C Resonance structures of trityl cation 1.2.1. PAH: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Condensed polycyclic - rings connected through two points (anellation points) Linearly condensed Angularly condensed naphthalene anthracene phenanthrene coronene Trivial names: special numbering: reason: highlighted position with different reactivity 2.
    [Show full text]