DOCSLIB.ORG

Syria-The Mediterranean Piece by Mary Beaudion

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Syria-The Mediterranean Piece by Mary Beaudion Syria: the Mediterranean Piece By Mary Beaudoin What’s left out when the U.S. talks about Syria is that it is in a key position for exporting natural gas. Adding weapons to the region makes it explosive. We know that the Syrian people have suffered terribly from the violence that has erupted. Undeniably many factors are involved. But are we in the West to believe that the people need to be rescued by us so that they, too, can come to enjoy the democratic rights that U.S. citizens appear to have less and less of every day? Or is something else going on there? What’s Missing from This Picture? When Washington, corporate media, or pundits address Syria, they neglect to mention that Syria is situated on the eastern Mediterranean in a key position with regard to natural gas—and its export to the world. Although NATO as an organization claims not to be interfering in Syria, countries belonging to NATO that were involved in Libya have been intervening in Syria (through proxy and special ops): the U.S., Britain, and France. They are aligned with Turkey, Israel and Jordan, plus the Gulf Council of Arab monarchies. Syria is in a key position in the “New Great Game,” which has extended to the Mediterranean as world powers struggle for natural gas. The coalition is aligned against the official state government of Syria and its allies Iran, Russia, and China. Having energy interests in the Middle East, Russia and China are blocking a “regime change” coup d’état in the UN Security Council. The “New Great Game,” once defined as the quest for natural gas through Central Asia, now extends to the Middle East as world powers struggle for control in the Mediterranean. German/American geopolitical analyst F. William Engdahl says natural gas is not only the “clean energy” of choice in Europe, but also the only way European Union governments “from Germany to France to Italy and Spain will be able to meet EU mandated CO2 reductions by 2020.” Russia is well positioned to assist in the development and transportation of natural gas from Iran and Syria en route for Europe. This is because Russia has maintained a military facility in the Syrian port of Tartus since the Cold War, and it has experience with its own domestic gas industry—it’s vast reserves are currently the biggest supplier to the EU. Rival pipeline routes through which natural gas can be transported from the Persian Gulf are a big part of the issue, according to Dmitry Minin of the Strategic Culture Foundation: “A battle is raging over whether pipelines will go toward Europe from east to west from Iran and Iraq to the Mediterranean coast of Syria, or take a more northbound route from Qatar and Saudi Arabia via Syria and Turkey.” The objective of eliminating the competition can explain why countries allied with the U.S. have been instrumental in funneling arms to Syrian rebels and why they have met fierce resistance. Other energy transit routes are part of the whole picture. So, too, is the discovery of huge reserves of natural gas and oil in the southeastern Mediterranean Sea. In 2010, the World Petroleum Resources Project of the U.S. Geological Survey was tasked with conducting an “Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources of the Levant Basin Province, Eastern Mediterranean.” The area described is off the coast of Israel, Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria, and close to Cyprus. Production in specific fields is large enough to create exports. This close proximity of hyrdrocarbon reserves and their transportation routes is a source of volatility in the region. Israel, which receives $3 billion a year in aid from the U.S., has conducted three bombing raids, engaged in espionage, and used its military in the Golan Heights to aid rebels opposed to the Syrian government. Hezbollah from Lebanon crossed into Syria to fight on the pro-government side. The war in Syria has taken a tragic toll with UN estimates of 93,000 deaths. In June of 2013, the Office of the UN High Commissioner of Refugees counted more than one and a half million externally––and four and a half million internally––displaced people (among them Iraqis who had found refuge in Syria from the destruction of Iraq). Modern infrastructure has been severely damaged. Irreplaceable cultural artifacts have been ruined or looted. As in Iraq, divide-and-conquer tactics manifest in ethnic and sectarian divisions inflamed by kidnappings, killings, and the targeted destruction of sacred mosques in a country that had been largely pluralistic. Anna Macdonald, Oxfam’s Head of Arms Control warned that “sending further arms into Syria would simply fuel the deadly arms race which is unfolding on Syrian soil, and it will be civilians who pay the highest price.” People of good will anywhere feel anguish hearing about the suffering of the Syrian people. But what can citizens of the United States do about it? We can’t really control what other countries do. The only thing we can do is look at the role our own nation is playing and try to do something about that. And Just What Role Has Our Nation Been Playing? Syria and its allies have met head-on with neocon plans laid in previous decades, and not associated in the public mind with the Obama administration. What we’re seeing now was described in a 1996 framework created in a study group led by Richard Perle and entitled, “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.” The plan includes making “tribal alliances with Arab tribes that cross into Syrian territory and are hostile to the Syrian ruling elite” and suggests “striking Syrian military targets in Lebanon and, should that prove insufficient, striking at select targets in Syria proper.” Throughout the document, ways in which the United States can be persuaded to buy in are pointed out. Self-described “Machiavellian” Michael Ledeen wrote an opinion in the Wall Street Journal April 4, 2002, in which he stated, “We do not want stability in Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and even Saudi Arabia…The real issue is not whether, but how to destabilize.” Five years later, Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that there was “a new strategic alignment in the Middle East.” She went on to say that Iran and Syria had chosen to be on “the other side” and that they “have made their choice and their choice is to destabilize.” Of course she hardly meant that they were choosing to destabilize themselves. In the same 2007 New Yorker article about Rice’s testimony, investigative reporter Seymour Hersch wrote: “The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and Syria.” On April 17, 2011, this was confirmed when the Washington Post published an article “U.S. secretly backed Syrian opposition groups,” reporting what was in diplomatic cables exposed by Wikileaks. Vast reserves of natural gas lie in the Pars Fields in the Persian Gulf, an area split between Qatar and Iran. A 2013 report on Syria from the U.S. Energy Information Administration reveals the ultimate result of destabilization: “The continued violence threatens to derail Syria's ambitions of becoming an important energy transit country to its neighbors, the Mediterranean, and Europe.” On March 24, 2013, the New York Times, while generally framing its reports in favor of deposing the Syrian government, reported that “with help from the C.I.A., Arab governments and Turkey have sharply increased their military aid to Syria’s opposition fighters in recent months, expanding a secret airlift of arms and equipment for the uprising against President Bashar al-Assad, according to air traffic data, interviews with officials in several countries, and the accounts of rebel commanders.” By June, the U.S. leadership was openly discussing adding more fuel to the fire. Aside from what it had been doing with its NATO partners and allies, backing the various groups fighting the Syrian state and supporting a new government-in-waiting outside Syria, it sent Patriot missile batteries, F-16 fighter jets, and troops for joint military exercises along the Syrian border in neighboring Jordan. On June 21, the Los Angeles Times reported that since last November, the U.S. Special Op teams had already been training rebels on heavy weaponry. But supporting the “rebels” is problematic for the U.S in a rapidly escalating low- intensity war. Rebel forces include jihadists like Al-Qaeda-related Al Nusra groups, which are on the U.S. terrorist list—which begs the question: weren’t we supposed to be in a war against terrorists, and just who has been instigating and executing these plans for “regime change”? Independent journalists and observers have long been maintaining that Libya’s murderous “rebels” went to Syria and brought weapons with them. On June 23, the New York Times” reported on Al Qaeda-aligned fighters acquiring these weapons. Is the U.S., itself, engaged in what it calls “material support for terrorism”? When the rebels appeared to be defeated in key areas and the violence was subsiding, Secretary of State John Kerry said that the U.S. would be sending more weapons. This action comes at the time we are expecting to hold peace talks in Geneva in August to stabilize the country, calling to mind what Einstein said: “You can’t simultaneously prevent and prepare for war.” And the U.S. knows it. In anticipation of the Geneva II peace conference, if the conference even takes place, the U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Defending Damascus, Betraying Beirut: Hezbollah's Communication
    Defending Damascus, Betraying Beirut: Hezbollah’s Communication Strategies in the Syrian Civil War Research Thesis Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with research distinction in International Studies in the undergraduate colleges of The Ohio State University by Maxwell Scurlock The Ohio State University April 2017 Project Advisor: Professor Jeffrey Lewis, International Studies Table of Contents Part 1 – Background Information and Historical Context Introduction – 1 1. Historical and Contextual Background – 6 a. Shi‘ism in Historical Context – 9 b. French Mandatory Period, 1920-1945 – 10 c. Independence to Black September, 1945-1970 – 14 d. The Early Years of the Lebanese Civil War and the Emergence of Hezbollah, 1970-1982 – 17 e. Hezbollah’s Formation – 21 f. Hezbollah’s Early Ideological Framework – 23 g. Syrian and Israeli Occupations of Lebanon, 1982-2005 – 24 h. Political Turmoil, 2006 Lebanon War, and 2008 Lebanese Political Crisis – 29 i. Hezbollah’s 2009 Manifesto – 31 j. The Syrian Civil War – 32 k. Sunni Islamists in Lebanon and Syria – 34 l. Lebanese Christians – 37 Part 2 – Analysis of Hezbollah’s Communications 2. Theoretical Approach to Hezbollah’s Communications – 40 3. Hezbollah in Syria – 44 a. Hezbollah’s Participation in Syria – April 30th, 2013 – 44 b. The Campaign for al-Qusayr, Part One – May 9th, 2013 – 48 c. The Campaign for al-Qusayr, Part Two – May 25th, 2013 – 50 4. Hezbollah’s Responses to Terrorism – 54 a. An Attack in al-Dahieh – August 16th, 2013 – 54 b. The Bombing of Iran’s Embassy – November 19th, 2013 – 56 5. Further Crises – 62 a. The Assassination of Hezbollah Commander Hassan al-Laqqis – December 3rd, 2013 – 62 b.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorism Research Institute Denying the Link Between Islamist Ideology
    Terrorism Research Institute Denying the Link between Islamist Ideology and Jihadist Terrorism “Political Correctness” and the Undermining of Counterterrorism Author(s): Jeffrey M. Bale Source: Perspectives on Terrorism, Vol. 7, No. 5 (October 2013), pp. 5-46 Published by: Terrorism Research Institute Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/26297006 Accessed: 03-07-2018 14:08 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms This article is licensed under a Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0). To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. Terrorism Research Institute is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Perspectives on Terrorism This content downloaded from 132.229.180.47 on Tue, 03 Jul 2018 14:08:49 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms PERSPECTIVES ON TERRORISM Volume 7, Issue 5 I. Articles Denying the Link between Islamist Ideology and Jihadist Terrorism: “Political Correctness” and the Undermining of Counterterrorism by Jeffrey M. Bale “[I]f your enemy is a terrorist and he professes to be an Islamist, it may be wise to take him at
    [Show full text]
  • 9/11 and Islam: Terrorism, State Violence and Dialogue
    9/11 and Islam: Terrorism, State Violence and Dialogue A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Tapas K. Patra School of Social Science and International Studies Faculty of Arts and Social Science University of New South Wales June 2017 11 PLEASE TYFE THE UNIVERSITY OF NE'v'V SOUTH WALES Thesis/Dissertation Sheet Surname or Family name; Kan First name; Janice Other name/s: Mary Kai-Yee Abbreviation for degree as given in the University calendar: AlD School: Psychology Faculty: Science Trtle: Ghosts of mother's past: Examining the persistent effects of previous maternal stress on the mother and her subsequent infant rat offspring Abstract 350 words maxim um: (PLEASE TYPE) The experiments reported in this thesis exanined the long-term effects of chronk: maternal-separation on the mother and her future offspring. Adult female rats were bred and were then repeatedly separated from their pups (maternal separation; MS) or remained with their pups (standard rearing; SR), After those pups were weaned. females were bred again with all pups from the subsequent litters being standard reared. Hence, these subsequent litter pups had mothers that were either previously separated (MSsue) or not (SRsus} f rom their prior litter. Infant offspring of the subsequent litter and their mothers were the focus of the research reported in this thesis. In the first series of experiments (Chapter 2), those infants were examined for anxiety-like behaviour, as well as w hetherthey use maternal cues to regulate their responses to aversive situations, a process referre:I to as maternal buffering. It was found that MSsus infants did not exhibit more anxiety-like behaviour compared to standard-reared controls.
    [Show full text]
  • By Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya
    suomi français italiano nederlands norsk polski português About the Network How to participate? RSS ﻓﺎرﺳﻰ čeština deutsch ελληνικά english español ﻋﺮﺑﻲ română русский türkçe 中文 Voltaire Network FRONT PAGE SECTIONS DOSSIERS ARCHIVES Newsletter Search MACKINDER’S GEO-STRATEGIC NIGHTMARE Russian Federation The "Great Game" and the Conquest of Eurasia: Towards a World War III Scenario? by Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya Countries and combatant groups which are zigzagging across the international chess board will sooner or later have to position themselves with regard to the big confrontation looming ahead: that which will oppose the United States and China. Two main alliance blocs have already emerged and regardless of the historical bumps along the road (coups, so-called colour revolutions, etc.), the position of all players will inexorably be determined by their strategic interests. The author offers his appraisal of how the two camps will Meeting (Arria) on Crimea come together during the forthcoming international conflict. Vladimir Putin on the russian sanitary and epidemiological situation VOLTAIRE NETWORK | OTTAWA (CANADA) | 10 DECEMBER 2010 New Moscow military cathedral: a fresco too many! Additional Protocol to the Memorandum on Stabilization of the Situation in the Idlib De- Escalation Area continue Low Carb Nutrious Diabec Recipes For Free! Diabecguide by PurpleAds Mahdi Darius People’s Republic of Nazemroaya China Award-winning author, sociologist and geopolitical analyst, Mahdi Darius Nazemroaza is the author of The Globalization of NATO (Clarity Press) and a forthcoming book The War on Libya and the Re- Colonization of Africa. He is Research Associate at the Centre for Research on As relics like this Dong Feng 1 missile sit in the Chinese Globalization (CRG), a military museum in Beijing, China is increasing its military contributor at the Strategic budget by 17.6 percent, part of a two-decade effort to Cultural Foundation (SCF), modernize its forces which may soon unseat the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom on the Net 2019
    Syria Not Free 17 100 A Obstacles to Access 625 B Limits on Content 835 C Violations of User Rights 340 Last Year's Score & Status 17 100 Not Free Overview Internet freedom remained heavily restricted in Syria. While no major internet shutdowns occurred during the coverage period, blocking of numerous websites persisted. Moreover, individuals continued to face a serious risk of violence in reprisal for their online activity. Political rights and civil liberties in Syria are severely compromised by one of the world’s most repressive regimes and by other belligerent forces in an ongoing civil war. The regime prohibits genuine political opposition and harshly suppresses freedoms of speech and assembly. Corruption, enforced disappearances, military trials, and torture are rampant in government-controlled areas. Residents of contested regions or territory held by nonstate actors are subject to additional abuses, including intense and indiscriminate combat, sieges and interruptions of humanitarian aid, and mass displacement. Key Developments June 1, 2018 – May 31, 2019 Unlike in previous years, no major internet shutdowns were reported during the coverage period. However, the regime of President Bashar al-Assad maintains a tight grip on the internet infrastructure in areas under its control ( see A1). State authorities reimposed blocks on the independent websites Enab Baladi and SouriaLi Radio, which had been unblocked in 2017. A variety of other websites, including those of human rights groups and online tools used to circumvent censorship, remained blocked during the coverage period (see B1). A number of progovernment journalists were arrested, including Wissam al- Tayr in December 2018; al-Tayr’s whereabouts remained unknown as of late 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Hezbollah: Challenging International Politics in the Middle East
    Double Bachelor’s Degree in International Relations and Translation and Interpreting Dissertation in International Relations HEZBOLLAH: CHALLENGING INTERNATIONAL POLITICS IN THE MIDDLE EAST Author: Berta Zabaleta Catón Supervisor: Dr. Javier Gil Pérez April 2015 To those who believe the Middle East still matters. We do not want to keep this weapon forever. We do not want to continue to shoulder this responsibility. We will forever be grateful when there is a strong state and a strong army that protect Lebanon, its South, villages and all its towns. (Hassan Nasrallah, leader of Hezbollah, August 2007) Table of Contents 1. Purpose and reasons............................................................................................1 2. The state of play...................................................................................................3 2.1. Hezbollah today: much more than a radical Islamic terrorist group.............3 2.2. Hezbollah and the Syrian crisis......................................................................6 2.3. Theoretical framework................................................................................10 2.3.1. Concept definition: terrorism, insurgency, counterinsurgency, weak state, failed state, Islam, Islamism, Sunnism and Shiism...................10 2.3.2. Hypotheses: Hezbollah has had an impact on the conduct of policy in the Middle East, particularly since 2006/Hezbollah: terrorism and insurgency..........................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Report
    A report of the The Scalabrini Migration Study Centers consist of the Centro de Estudios Migratorios (CEM) in Brazil, the Centro de Estudios Migratorios Latinoamericanos (CEMLA) in Argentina, the Centre d’Information et d’Études sur les Migrations Internationales (CIEMI) in France, the Center for Migration Studies of New York (CMS) in the United States, the Centro Studi Emigrazione Roma (CSER) in Italy, the Scalabrini Institute for Human Mobility in Africa (SIHMA) in South Africa, and the Scalabrini Migration Center (SMC) in the Philippines. This report was edited by J. Kevin Appleby, Senior Director for International Migration Policy for CMS and the Scalabrini International Migration Network (SIMN), and by Donald Kerwin, Executive Director of CMS. The editors would like to thank Fr. Leonir Chiarello, c.s., Executive Director of SIMN, for his strong support during the process. Cover photo credits: Left photo: Shutterstock / Alexyz3d Right photo: UN Photo / Tobin Jones Suggested citation: Appleby, J. Kevin, and Donald Kerwin, eds. 2018. 2018 International Migration Policy Report: Perspectives on the Content and Implementation of the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly, and Regular Migration. New York: Scalabrini Migration Study Centers. https://doi.org/10.14240/ internationalmigrationrpt2018. 2018 International Migration Policy Report Perspectives on the Content and Implementation of the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly, and Regular Migration A report of the Scalabrini Migration Study Centers September 2018 International Migration Policy Report
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the Jewish Question
    Revisiting the Jewish Question Revisiting the Jewish Question Élisabeth Roudinesco Translated by Andrew Brown polity First published in French as Retour sur la question juive © Éditions Albin Michel, 2009 This English edition © Polity Press, 2013 This book is supported by the Institut français (Royaume-Uni) as part of the Burgess programme (www.frenchbooknews.com). Polity Press 65 Bridge Street Cambridge CB2 1UR, UK Polity Press 350 Main Street Malden, MA 02148, USA All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. ISBN-13: 978-0-7456-5219-1 ISBN-13: 978-0-7456-5220-7 (pb) A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Typeset in 10.5 on 12 pt Sabon by Toppan Best-set Premedia Limited Printed and bound in Great Britain by Clays Ltd, St Ives PLC The publisher has used its best endeavours to ensure that the URLs for external websites referred to in this book are correct and active at the time of going to press. However, the publisher has no responsibility for the websites and can make no guarantee that a site will remain live or that the content is or will remain appropriate. Every effort has been made to trace all copyright holders, but if any have been inadvertently overlooked the publisher will be pleased to include any necessary credits in any subsequent reprint or edition.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Security Council
    485 UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL UFRGS Model United Nations I vol. 3 I 2015 486 UFRGSMUN | UFRGS Model United Nations ISSN: 2318-3195 | v.3, 2015| p. 486-538 the situation in ukraine Bruno Palombini Gastal1 Natália Colvero Maraschin2 ABSTRACT In 2013, as a result of the decision to postpone the signing of Ukraine’s Association Agreement with the European Union, thousands of people gath- ered at Maidan, in Kiev, to protest against the central Government. After weeks of confrontation between the militants and the State forces, president Yanukovich was ousted, and new protests emerged, this time by pro-Govern- ment demonstrators who considered the deposition a coup. In this context, Crimea held a referendum declaring itself independent from Ukraine and joined Russia, and the Eastern portion of the country, mostly pro-Russian, also began to demand its independence. A major armed confrontation devel- oped between the Government and pro-Kiev militias, on one side, and the militias of Donetsk and Luhansk, on the other, raising concern among the region. Russia was accused of supporting the separatists and the European Union and the United States were accused of intervening in the internal affairs of Ukraine. Since the beginning of the crisis, several cease-fire accords have been signed; peace, however, did not last, and an increase in offensives in the near future is expected. 1 Bruno is a 2nd year student of International Relations at UFRGS and assistant director at UNSC. 2 Natália is a final year student of International Relations at UFRGS and director at UNSC.
    [Show full text]
  • Stabilizing Eastern Syria After ISIS for More Information on This Publication, Visit
    C O R P O R A T I O N JAMES A. SCHEAR, JEFFREY MARTINI, ERIC ROBINSON, MICHELLE E. MIRO, JAMES DOBBINS Stabilizing Eastern Syria After ISIS For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2541 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0201-1 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover image: Muhammad Hamed / Reuters Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The U.S.-led international coalition to defeat the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) has achieved substantial progress over the past several years.
    [Show full text]
  • Syria Country Report | Freedom on the Net 2018
    Syria Country Report | Freedom on the Net 2018 https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/2018/syria Syria Country Report | Freedom on the Net 2018 Internet Freedom Score 13/25 Most Free (0) Least Free (100) Obstacles to access 20/25 Limits on content 26/35 Violations of users rights 37/40 Key Developments: June 1, 2017 - May 31, 2018 Mobile phone penetration increased and internet access became more affordable across several regions (see Availability and Ease of Access). Numerous regional and Lebanese media websites, Wikipedia, and the WordPress blogging platform were unblocked in 2017. The block on the Israeli domain (.il) was also lifted (see Blocking and Filtering). Self-censorship has increased amid growing threats and violent reprisals for online posts (see Media, Diversity, and Content Manipulation; and Intimidation and Violence). In August 2017, it was confirmed that digital activist Bassel Khartabil Safadi was executed by the regime’s security forces in 2015. He had been detained in 2012 for his democratic activism (see Intimidation and Violence). Law Number 9, passed in March 2018, establishes specialized courts for criminal cases related to communication and technology; critics worry the courts could be used to further suppress freedom of expression online (see Legal Environment). Introduction: Despite heavy restrictions on internet freedom, the cost and availability of internet access improved over the past year. The unexplained unblocking of several websites was offset by heightened self-censorship amid growing threats and violent reprisals for online activities. In a positive development, authorities unblocked a number of regional and Lebanese media websites by the end of 2017, including Al Jazeera, Al Arabiya, Asharq al-Awsat, the Qatari Al-Arab newspaper, and Al-Hayat, in addition to the Syrian websites The New Syrian, Enab Baladi, and Souriali Radio.
    [Show full text]
  • Voltaire - Action by US Authorities in Regards to the Extradition Request
    June 20, 2005 N°4 - ISSN : 1762-5157 UNITED STATES, TERRORIST STATE Available Arab Brain Time The Confessions of INTERNATIONAL OP-ED The International Herald Tribune has resumed discussions about the Luis Posada Carriles role of advertisement in the implementation of the “Great Middle East” Latin America is mobilizing to support the extradition request against Luis Posada policy objectives. The Carriles, currently sheltered in Miami and paper is again giving the protected by the Bush Administration. The floor to two specialists, Cuban-born terrorist has become a symbol Maurice Lévy and John of the US methods of hemispheric M. McNeel. Though they domination and its double standard: on the have both reached one hand, they declare a global war on different conclusions, the terrorism and, on the other, they use it. initial hypothesis of This case is even more outrageous these two authors is the considering that, four years ago, protected same: the Arab States by his impunity, Posada Carriles revealed might be driven to accept any policy all the truth to the New York Times. page 2 provided that it is well sold to them. page 8 JUNE 13, 1971 The Pentagon Papers Daniel Ellsberg, a high U.S. official, who felt indignant at the reality of the Vietnam war, decided to illegally send the documents in his hands to the press. On June 13, 1971, the U.S. East coast reference daily, the New-York Times, started the publication of those Pentagon Papers: 7000 pages of classified defense secrets. Those revelations had the effect of a bomb. Far from what was presented by the official propaganda, they brought out the disastrous political handling of the war as well as countless atrocities.
    [Show full text]