Equity Research Health Care SEPTEMBER 8, 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Equity Research Health Care SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 Equity Research Health Care \ SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 Multiple vaccines may warrant Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in Q4:20 due to political pressure, but the durable immunity data needed for full approval will be a more difficult hurdle. Market opportunity for vaccines is significant from $3B in FY21 and $4.3B in FY23. Government agreements secured ~3B doses globally. We view PFE/BNTX as most promising. We project GILD's Veklury revenue of $3.6B, $2.1B, $1.4B, $1.0B, and $750MM for 2020-'24. Antibody therapy may have prophylactic and therapeutic roles. Competitive space could reach $2.9B in FY21 and $1.1B in FY24. REGN/RHHBY's cocktail is regimen to beat. Yaron Werber, M.D. 646 562 1415 [email protected] Leo Ai, Ph.D. 646 562 1419 [email protected] Steve Scala, R.Ph., CFA 617 946 3923 [email protected] Phil Nadeau, Ph.D. 646 562 1336 [email protected] Joshua Jennings, M.D. 646 562 1333 [email protected] Boris Peaker, Ph.D., CFA 646 562 1377 [email protected] COWEN EQUITY RESEARCH September 8, 2020 This page left blank intentionally. 2 COWEN.COM EQUITY RESEARCH SECTOR NOTE September 8, 2020 ■ Health Care BREAKING COVID-19 CURVE WITH VACCINES & ANTIBODIES - AHEAD OF THE CURVE SERIES Yaron Werber, M.D. THE COWEN INSIGHT 646 562 1415 One or more vaccines may be approved for emergency use in Q4:20, but access for general [email protected] population is the more relevant economic catalyst and likely to occur in H1/mid-’21. Leo Ai, Ph.D. Antibody therapies will have major role supplementing vaccines. We expect both modalities 646 562 1419 to generate significant revenue in FY21 ($3B and $2.9B, respectively). PFE/BNTX’s vaccine [email protected] and REGN/RHHBY’s cocktail are most promising. Steve Scala, R.Ph., CFA 617 946 3923 Transitioning From the End of the Beginning to the Beginning of the End [email protected] A return to normalcy and its associated economic recovery hinges on successful Phil Nadeau, Ph.D. prophylactic and therapeutic treatments for COVID-19. Though much of the political focus 646 562 1336 [email protected] has been on the potential for regulators to grant Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to one or more vaccine candidate before the presidential election in November, we believe Joshua Jennings, M.D. investors should focus on the timing of full approval and the subsequent rollout to the 646 562 1333 general population. [email protected] Recent reports noted that the four leading COVID-19 vaccine makers will issue a statement Boris Peaker, Ph.D., CFA reaffirming their commitment not to file for EUA until they have sufficient clinical data from 646 562 1377 [email protected] ongoing Phase 3 studies. This could delay the EUA timing to after the election and into year- end. Based on the neutralizing antibody (nAb) and T cell data in the early trials and initial manufacturing capacity, we believe at least one EUA in Q4:20 is likely and will allow vaccination of the most vulnerable patients first (e.g., people with ³2 co-morbid conditions, hospitalized and nursing home patients in regions with high case counts). While this is a positive for society, we do not expect it to be a catalyst for economic activity (though the market is likely to welcome it as a sign that vaccine trials are on track for success). ACIP Sets Stage For Vaccine Rollout – Vote Expected On September 22 Ahead of VRBP Advisory Committee Meeting On October 22 Based on the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) initial recommendation following its public hearing on August 26 about the plan for vaccine rollout, the first phase will offer vaccination to 25-26M people while the second phase will extend that to 45-50% of the U.S. population. Phase 3 will roll out to another 40-45% of the population. A vote on this interim prioritization scheme is expected on September 22 for approval ahead of CBER’s Vaccine & Related Biological Products (VRBP) advisory committee meeting scheduled for October 22 to discuss COVID-19 vaccines. What We Don’t Know Can Hurt Us – Key Question Is Sustainability Of Protection After The Initial Early Period Post Vaccination Data from patients who have recovered from COVID-19 show that nAb levels against the virus peak within 3 months and then decrease. This naturally raises the question of whether developing an effective vaccine is possible. The key question for full approval of COVID-19 vaccines is whether the duration of immunity will be sustainable after the first 3 months. This is critical because when nAb levels fall, there is a risk for vaccine dependent enhancement (VDE) (aka antibody dependent enhancement or ADE). Meaning that the vaccine-generated antibodies become insufficient to confer protection but theoretically can facilitate viral entry into immune cells and lead to increased severity among infected patients compared to placebo by helping the virus infect the person. While we believe that the risk of VDE is relatively low (our base case is that vaccines are generally tolerable and safe), the need to prove safety beyond the initial few months will translate to full FDA approval no sooner than Q1:21. 3 Please see pages 180 to 182 of this report for important disclosures. COWEN.COM COWEN EQUITY RESEARCH September 8, 2020 FDA’s 50% Efficacy Threshold for COVID-19 Vaccines Balances Achievability and Usefulness As outlined in a guidance document in June 2020, the FDA will require vaccine trials to show >50% efficacy above placebo in the primary endpoint, with the lower bound of the confidence interval above 30%. These thresholds were chosen based on the belief that they are high enough for consumers to agree to take a vaccine yet not so onerous that developers would need years to refine their candidates. In comparison, many approved vaccines have demonstrated far higher efficacy, such as measles (97% effective), pertussis (85%), HPV (90%), and polio (99%). But these vaccines took over a decade or more to develop. The flu vaccine, which is 50% effective in a good year (only 29% effective in the 2018-‘19 flu season), provides perhaps a more reasonable benchmark. We Believe Multiple Vaccines Will Clear 50% Efficacy Hurdle for Full FDA Approval in Q1:21 Phase 1 and 2 vaccine studies have consistently generated nAb titers in excess of convalescent sera, including the candidates from Moderna, Pfizer/BioNTech, AstraZeneca/ Oxford and Novavax, among others. We view the FDA efficacy requirement for approval as highly achievable since the common primary endpoint among the ongoing Phase 3 studies is prevention of symptomatic COVID-19 cases. Though the higher bar of prevention of infection (aka full protective immunity) is preferable, prevention of symptomatic cases is sufficient given the urgent societal need. In line with our base case, Dr. Anthony Fauci stated in early August that a vaccine could end up being only 50-60% effective. In addition, Moderna has powered their Phase 3 trial to achieve 60% efficacy over placebo. We believe that 50-60% efficacy, when combined with some persistent protective public health measures (masks are unlikely go away for the time being) and the current level of herd immunity (not fully known but may be in the 10-20% range in several regions), will be sufficient to provide confidence to return to normal activity. One risk to this view is the potential for public distrust of vaccines and low levels of inoculation if the approval process is viewed as too politicized and rushed; this is even more reason for the FDA to wait for at least 6 months of data before issuing an approval. The FDA advisory panel meeting on October 22 to discuss COVID-19 vaccines will be a key event to watch, particularly regarding clarification and/or updates regarding the requirements for full approval. Allocation to the General Population Not Likely Until Q2/Mid-’21 Given Overall Need Post approval, vaccines are expected to be rolled out in phases according to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendations. Based on the expected ACIP framework for allocation, we expect a vaccine to be available for high-risk populations immediately after Q1:21 approval, followed by distribution to the general population in Q2/ mid-’21. Using influenza vaccine penetration as a guide, we estimate peak penetration in increased risk individuals to be ~65%, with peak penetration in the remaining population to be ~30%. Despite Pricing Pressure, We See Vaccines Peaking At $4.3B in FY21 With $20B In Cumulative Sales Over Several Years Vaccines are likely to be significant profit drivers despite low initial pricing based on sizable opportunity and potential for the virus to be a recurring annual threat. Thus far, the U.S. government has secured 800M initial doses (though not all vaccines may succeed) with contracts ranging from $4 to $20 per dose. While it is possible that future pricing will be higher (Moderna has made the case for $32-$37 per dose of its vaccine for “smaller- volume” agreements but just agreed to sell 100M doses for $1.5B excluding another $955M in funding from BARDA), there will be bipartisan pressure to keep prices down, especially for drug makers that have accepted development funding. Our base case scenario assumes a bolus of vaccine sales in FY21-24, generating peak US and EU vaccine revenue of $4.3B in FY21 before declining to $600M in FY26. The total of vaccine sales in FY21-FY33 is estimated to be $20B. 4 COWEN.COM COWEN EQUITY RESEARCH September 8, 2020 Initial Pivotal Vaccine Data Expected Q4:20, We Believe Pfizer/BioNTech Vaccine Is The Most Promising Candidate So Far Moderna, Pfizer/BioNTech, AstraZeneca/Oxford, Inovio, CanSino, Sinovac, and Sinopharm are currently in Phase 2/3 or Phase 3 clinical trials and we expect interim data from each in Q4:20.
Recommended publications
  • Ifs Recommendations for Covid 19 Vaccination Before Art
    16 – 17 JULY 2020 PRAGATI MAIDAN - DELHI INDIAN FERTILITY SOCIETY IFS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR COVID 19 VACCINATION BEFORE ART IFS SECRETARIAT +91 11 40018184 +91 9899308083 indianferlitysociety [email protected] www.indianferlitysociety.org indianferlitysociety 302, 3rd Floor, Kailash Building, ifsdelhi 26, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, C.P. New Delhi - 110001 Cosmo Tech is the Most Important Trade show for the Suppliers to EXPAND Strengthen Increase Multiply Profits New Markets Pan New Market Customer Base India & World Customer Soaring Boost Network Brand Sales Brand Recall Value with the Industry Visibility ORGANIZED BY CALL EMAIL +91 9971811937 [email protected] +91 9999302797 [email protected] +91 9811141938 [email protected] W W W .C O SMO TEC HEXPO IND IA .C O M Dr. Sudha Prasad Dr. Neena Malhotra President Secretary General Indian Fertility Society Indian Fertility Society Director, Matritava Advanced IVF & Professor, ART Centre, Department of Training Cenre, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AIIMS, New Delhi Dr. Sonia Malik Dr. Kuldeep Jain Past President Indian Fertility Society, Past President Indian Fertility Society, Director & Nova Southend Fertility & Director, KJIVF New Delhi IVF Delhi NCR Dr. KU Kunjumoideen Dr. A K Pandey Joint Secretary Indian Fertility Society, Dean Academics &. Co Ordinator Director ARMC IVF Calicut. Molecular Lab. ESI Medical college Faridabad Dr. Charu Jandial Dr. Sumita Aggarwal Member IFS, Consultant, Member IFS, Fellow, Nova Southend Fertility & IVF Delhi NCR Nova Southend Fertility & IVF Delhi NCR Introduction The coronavirus pandemic has wreaked havoc on life In these trying mes, as sociees are gradually trying to and healthcare globally. According to WHO database as return to a state of normalcy, it is also important to on 7th June 2021, there have been 173 million consider sexual and reproducve health of people.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of COVID-19 Vaccine Subtypes, Efficacy and Geographical Distributions Andre Ian Francis ‍ ‍ ,1 Saudah Ghany,1 Tia Gilkes,1 Srikanth Umakanthan2
    Review Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-140654 on 6 August 2021. Downloaded from Review of COVID-19 vaccine subtypes, efficacy and geographical distributions Andre Ian Francis ,1 Saudah Ghany,1 Tia Gilkes,1 Srikanth Umakanthan2 1Department of Clinical Medical ABSTRACT 2021, the Ad26.COV2.S, developed by Janssen Sciences, The Faculty of Medical As of 1 May 2021, there have been 152 661 445 (Johnson & Johnson) and Moderna on 30 April.4 Sciences, The University of the COVAX, coordinated by WHO, Gavi: The West Indies, St. Augustine, Covid-19 cases with 3 202 256 deaths globally. Trinidad and Tobago This pandemic led to the race to discover a vaccine Vaccine Alliance, the Coalition for Epidemic 2Pathology unit, Department to achieve herd immunity and curtail the damaging Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), acts as a of Paraclinical Sciences, The effects of Covid-19. This study aims to discuss the most programme that supports the development of University Of The West Indies, St. COVID-19 vaccine candidates and negotiates their Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago recent WHO-approved Covid-19 vaccine subtypes, their status and geographical scheduled updates as of 4 pricing to ensure low- and- middle- income countries have a fair shot at receiving vaccines.5 Correspondence to May 2021. The keywords “Covid-19, Vaccines, Pfizer, Mr. Andre Ian Francis, The BNT162b2, AstraZeneca, AZD1222, Moderna, mRNA- This article aims at discussing the most recent University of the West Indies, St. 1273, Janssen, Ad26.COV2.S” were typed into PubMed. WHO- approved COVID-19 vaccine subtypes, their Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago; Thirty Two relevant PubMed articles were included in status and geographical scheduled updates as of 4 andre.
    [Show full text]
  • Immunizations
    Medicine Summer 2015 | Volume 14, Number 2 encephalitis tetanus RUBELLA MUMPS meningococus pertussis ENCEPHALITIS MEASLES PERTUSSIS ROTAVIRUS meningococus MUMPS meningococus MEASLES tuberculosis RUBELLA diphtheria CHICKENPOX meningococus CHICKENPOX pneumococus meningococus rotavirus ENCEPHALITIS PNEUMOCOCUS FEVER TETANUS DIPHTHERIA TETANUS hepatitismumps POLIO encephalitis hepatitis measles pneumococus POLIO DIPHTHERIA FEVER CHICKENPOX tuberculosisRUBELLA tuberculosis diphtheria DIPHTHERIA meningococusMUMPS pneumococus encephalitis ENCEPHALITIS polio TETANUS diphtheria pertussis polio hepatitisRUBELLA meningococus ENCEPHALITIS DIPHTHERIA MEASLES YELLOW RUBELLA TETANUS measles Immunizations MEASLESpolio meningococus PERTUSSIS MEASLES RUBELLA measles tetanus rubella YELLOW tuberculosisENCEPHALITIS pneumococus CHICKENPOX RUBELLA measles What physicians rubella pertussis PNEUMOCOCUS need to know encephalitis diphtheria MUMPS meningococustetanus pneumococus measles rubella tetanus measles rotavirus tetanus rubellaPOLIOmeningococus hepatitisHEPATITISFEVER PERTUSSIS RUBELLA FEVER hepatitis FEVER HEPATITIS chickenpox poliorubella encephalitisTETANUSpertussis rubella DIPHTHERIA rotavirus tuberculosis FEVERHEPATITIS POLIO yellow DIPHTHERIAYELLOW polio pneumococus YELLOW polio ENCEPHALITIS chickenpoxrubellaRUBELLA rotavirus ENCEPHALITIS pertussis ROTAVIRUS tetanus chickenpox hepatitisFEVER encephalitis ENCEPHALITIS POLIO rotavirus ROTAVIRUS DIPHTHERIA YELLOW pertussis PNEUMOCOCUS PERTUSSIS RUBELLA polio CHICKENPOX ROTAVIRUS pneumococus CHICKENPOXCHICKENPOX
    [Show full text]
  • Commonly Administered Vaccines
    Commonly Administered Vaccines CPT CVX Vaccine Type Brand Name Manufacturer PhilaVax Display Name Description Code Code Combination Vaccines Diptheria, tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine, Hepati- DTaP-HepB-IPV Pediarix® GlaxoSmithKline 90723 110 DTaP-HepB-IPV tis B and poliovirus vaccine, inactivated Diptheria, tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine and DTaP-Hib TriHIBit® Sanofi Pasteur 90721 50 DTaP-Hib (TriHIBit) Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine Diptheria, tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine, Hae- DTaP-Hib-IPV Pentacel® Sanofi Pasteur 90698 120 DTaP-Hib-IPV mophilus influenzae type b, and poliovirus vaccine, inactivated Diptheria, tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine, and DTaP-IPV Kinrix® GlaxoSmithKline 90696 130 DTaP-IPV (KINRIX) poliovirus vaccine, inactivated HepA-HepB TWINRIX® GlaxoSmithKline 90636 104 HepA/B (TWINRIX) Hepatisis A and Hepatitis B vaccine, adult dosage Hepatitis B and Hemophilus influenza b vaccine, for intramuscular HepB-Hib Comvax® Merck 90748 51 Hib-Hep B (COMVAX) use Haemophilus influenza b and meningococcal sero groups C and Y MeningC/Y-Hib Menhibrix® GlaxoSmithKline 90644 148 Meningococcal-Hib vaccine, 4 dose series Diphtheria, Tetanus and Pertussis DTaP Infanrix® GlaxoSmithKline 90700 20 DTaP (INFANRIX) Diptheria, tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine DTaP, 5 Pertussis Antigens Daptacel® Sanofi Pasteur 90700 106 DTaP (DAPTACEL) Diptheria, tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine Tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccine Hesitancy
    Vaccine Hesitancy Dr Brenda Corcoran National Immunisation Office Presentation Outline An understanding of the following principles: • Overview of immunity • Different types of vaccines and vaccine contents • Vaccine failures • Time intervals between vaccine doses • Vaccine overload • Adverse reactions • Herd immunity Immunity Immunity • The ability of the human body to protect itself from infectious disease The immune system • Cells with a protective function in the – bone marrow – thymus – lymphatic system of ducts and nodes – spleen –blood Types of immunity Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immunological_memory Natural (innate) immunity Non-specific mechanisms – Physical barriers • skin and mucous membranes – Chemical barriers • gastric and digestive enzymes – Cellular and protein secretions • phagocytes, macrophages, complement system ** No “memory” of protection exists afterwards ** Passive immunity – adaptive mechanisms Natural • maternal transfer of antibodies to infant via placenta Artificial • administration of pre- formed substance to provide immediate but short-term protection (antitoxin, antibodies) Protection is temporary and wanes with time (usually few months) Active immunity – adaptive mechanisms Natural • following contact with organism Artificial • administration of agent to stimulate immune response (immunisation) Acquired through contact with an micro-organism Protection produced by individual’s own immune system Protection often life-long but may need boosting How vaccines work • Induce active immunity – Immunity and immunologic memory similar to natural infection but without risk of disease • Immunological memory allows – Rapid recognition and response to pathogen – Prevent or modify effect of disease Live attenuated vaccines Weakened viruses /bacteria – Achieved by growing numerous generations in laboratory – Produces long lasting immune response after one or two doses – Stimulates immune system to react as it does to natural infection – Can cause mild form of the disease (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Different Types of COVID-19 Vaccines
    Pfizer-BioNTech Help stop the pandemic Type of vaccine: Messenger RNA, or mRNA, a genetic Different Types material that tells your body how to make proteins that by getting vaccinated triggers an immune response inside our bodies of COVID-19 Effectiveness: 95% based on clinical trials Even if you are undocumented Common side effects: Pain and/or swelling in the arm and/or don’t have insurance, you and tiredness, headache, muscle pain, chills, fever, or can get the vaccine—for free. Vaccines: nausea in the body that may last two days Recommended Ages: 16 and older (currently testing the vaccine in kids ages 12-15) Understanding How Dosage: Two shots, 21 days apart They Work Visit VaccinateALL58.com Moderna for the newest information about when and where the vaccine Type of vaccine: Messenger RNA, or mRNA, a genetic will be available to you. material that tells your body how to make proteins that triggers an immune response inside our bodies Sign up at myturn.ca.gov or Effectiveness: 94.1% based on clinical trials call 1-833-422-4255 to find out Common side effects: Pain and/or swelling in the arm if it’s your turn to get vaccinated and and tiredness, headache, muscle pain, chills, fever, or schedule vaccination appointments. nausea in the body that may last two days Recommended Ages: 18 years and older (currently testing the vaccine in kids ages 12-17) Dosage: Two shots, 28 days apart Johnson & Johnson Follow us on social media for more COVID-19 tips and information. Type of vaccine: A viral vector, it uses a harmless version of a different
    [Show full text]
  • Adenoviral Vector COVID-19 Vaccines: Process and Cost Analysis
    processes Article Adenoviral Vector COVID-19 Vaccines: Process and Cost Analysis Rafael G. Ferreira 1,* , Neal F. Gordon 2, Rick Stock 2 and Demetri Petrides 3 1 Intelligen Brasil, Sao Paulo 01227-200, Brazil 2 BDO USA, LLP, Boston, MA 02110, USA; [email protected] (N.F.G.); [email protected] (R.S.) 3 Intelligen, Inc., Scotch Plains, NJ 07076, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has motivated the rapid development of numerous vaccines that have proven effective against SARS-CoV-2. Several of these successful vaccines are based on the adenoviral vector platform. The mass manufacturing of these vaccines poses great challenges, especially in the context of a pandemic where extremely large quantities must be produced quickly at an affordable cost. In this work, two baseline processes for the production of a COVID-19 adenoviral vector vaccine, B1 and P1, were designed, simulated and economically evaluated with the aid of the software SuperPro Designer. B1 used a batch cell culture viral production step, with a viral titer of 5 × 1010 viral particles (VP)/mL in both stainless-steel and disposable equipment. P1 used a perfusion cell culture viral production step, with a viral titer of 1 × 1012 VP/mL in exclusively disposable equipment. Both processes were sized to produce 400 M/yr vaccine doses. P1 led to a smaller cost per dose than B1 ($0.15 vs. $0.23) and required a much smaller capital investment ($126 M vs. $299 M). The media and facility-dependent expenses were found to be the main contributors to the operating cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Bill 2015 - Submission to the Senate Enquiry
    Committee Secretary Senate Standing Committees on Community Affairs PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 12/10/2015 Dear Sir/Madam, Re: Social Services Legislation Amendment (No Jab No Pay) Bill 2015 - submission to the Senate enquiry My objections to the No Jab No Pay bill are outlined as follows: 1) 'Motivating' people financially targets the less well off only. The majority of previous conscious objectors are the well educated and higher earning class. It will force women out of the workforce and will not achieve a notable difference in vaccination rates or reduce disease. 2) The 'No Jab No Pay' policy is not targeting those who have forgotten to vaccinate but those who previously would have consciously objected to vaccinating. In a democratic society, it should not be possible to rule in favour of forcing medical procedures onto members of the public, particularly into the children of people who disagree fundamentally with the process. It would be a very sad day for Australia if medical procedures were forced on members of the public who genuinely believe it could harm them. To force not only unavoidably unsafe procedures but future unknown and untested medical procedures in indeterminable amounts on the children whose parents are not convinced of the safety or efficacy of such procedures, puts an end to freedom of choice, an end to human rights for Australians. 3) The science is NOT clear. The government and policy makers may have only been presented with one sided research but I reiterate, the science is NOT clear. Please see the attached list of peer reviewed research that offer information that may not otherwise have been presented to policy makers.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of COVID Vaccine Clinical Trial Results & Some Challenges
    An overview of COVID vaccine clinical trial results & some challenges DCVMN Webinar December 8th, 2020 Access to COVID-19 tools ACCESSACCESS TO TOCOVID-19 COVID-19 TOOLS TOOLS (ACT) (ACT) ACCELERATOR ACCELERATOR (ACT) accelerator A GlobalA GlobalCollaboration Collaboration to Accelerate tothe AccelerateDevelopment, the Production Development, and Equitable Production Access to New and Equitable AccessCOVID-19 to New diagnostics, COVID-19 therapeutics diagnostics, and vaccines therapeutics and vaccines VACCINES DIAGNOSTICS THERAPEUTICS (COVAX) Development & Manufacturing Led by CEPI, with industry Procurement and delivery at scale Led by Gavi Policy and allocation Led by WHO Key players SOURCE: (ACT) ACCELERATOR Commitment and Call to Action 24th April 2020 ACT-A / COVAX governance COVAX COORDINATION MEETING CEPI Board Co-Chair: Jane Halton Co-Chair: Dr. Ngozi Gavi Board Workstream leads + DCVMN and IFPMA-selected Reps As needed – R&D&M Chair; COVAX IPG Chair Development & Manufacturing Procurement and delivery Policy and allocation (COVAX) at scale Led by (with industry) Led by Led by R&D&M Investment Committee COVAX Independent Product Group Technical Review Group Portfolio Group Vaccine Teams SWAT teams RAG 3 COVAX SWAT teams are being set up as a joint platform to accelerate COVID- 19 Vaccine development and manufacturing by addressing common challenges together Timely and targeted Multilateral Knowledge-based Resource-efficient Addresses specific cross- Establishes a dialogue Identifies and collates Coordinates between developer technical and global joint effort most relevant materials different organizations/ challenges as they are across different COVID-19 and insights across the initiatives to limit raised and/or identified vaccines organizations broader COVID-19 duplications and ensure on an ongoing basis (incl.
    [Show full text]
  • Update 50 (15Th of December 2020)
    Update 50 (15th of December 2020) Information about Infection disease COVID-19 (novel coronavirus) Force Health Protection Branch FHPB (former DHSC) NATO MILMED COE in Munich 15th of December 2020 email: [email protected] In December 2019, a novel coronavirus emerged in Wuhan City, China. Since then the virus spread to 65 countries including Europe and America. Since then the virus showed evidence for human-to-human transmission as well as evidence of asymptomatic transmission. At 30th January 2020 WHO declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. The disease was formally named COVID-19 on 11th of February. The virus itself has been named SARS-CoV-2. On 11th of March 2020 WHO characterized the disease as a pandemic. HIGHLIGHTS/NEWS GLOBALLY ↗ • GBR/WHO: A new variant of the virus could be responsible for the renewed high number of cases in the UK, among other things, which 72 879 777 confirmed cases could be "in connection with the faster spread in the south of England". 47 710 950 recovered So far, 1000 cases have been identified. 1 622 200 deaths The WHO emphasized that the new variant would now be examined. EU/EEA and the UK ↘ However, there is no evidence that the strain behaves differently than 21 936 276 existing virus types. "We saw many variants, this virus evolves and confirmed cases changes over time." 10 689 950 recovered • Sputnik V: The developers of the Russian coronavirus vaccine Sputnik 479 566 deaths V explain that it creates 91.4 percent protection against the lung disease USA ↗ Covid-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Criteria for Reviewing Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine
    Draft—3/11/10 Oregon School/Facility Immunization Advisory Committee: Review of Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine Against Twelve Criteria for Children’s Facility Immunization Requirements Oregon Department of Human Services Public Health Division Office of Family Health Immunization Program 800 NE Oregon Street, Suite 370 Portland, Oregon 97232 Phone: 971-673-0300 Fax: 971-673-0278 Web: www.oregon.gov/DHS/ph/imm Page 1–Review of Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine Against Criteria for School Law Immunization Requirements Oregon School/Facility Immunization Advisory Committee: Review of Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine Against Twelve Criteria for School/Facility/College Immunization Requirements Process for Reviewing Antigens for Potential Inclusion in OAR 333-050-0050, 333-050-0130 and 333-050-0140. Request for the inclusion of additional antigens or vaccines can come from the Oregon Immunization Program, IPAT (Immunization Policy Advisory Team), or from the community. Proposed changes to vaccine requirements are discussed with IPAT either in a regularly scheduled meeting or through electronic communication. IPAT will submit their comments and a request for consideration to the Oregon Immunization School Law Advisory Committee. The Oregon School/Facility Immunization Advisory Committee was established as a part of the school law immunization requirements when the original legislation was passed in 1980. This Committee is composed of immunization stakeholders from the fields of public health, school health, school administration, medicine, day care, child advocacy and consumers (parents). Through consensus, the committee determines what vaccines (antigens) should be included in Oregon school immunization requirements. Information about new vaccines and the diseases they prevent, including transmission within schools, burden of disease, cost-effectiveness, effect on schools/counties and vaccine availability is presented at a scheduled meeting for committee consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Immunity and How Vaccines Work
    Immunity and how vaccines work Dr Brenda Corcoran National Immunisation Office Presentation Outline An understanding of the following principles: • Overview of immunity • Different types of vaccines and vaccine contents • Vaccine failures • Time intervals between vaccine doses • Vaccine overload • Adverse reactions • Herd immunity Immunity Immunity • The ability of the human body to protect itself from infectious disease The immune system • Cells with a protective function in the – bone marrow – thymus – lymphatic system of ducts and nodes – spleen –blood Types of immunity Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immunological_memory Natural (innate) immunity Non-specific mechanisms – Physical barriers • skin and mucous membranes – Chemical barriers • gastric and digestive enzymes – Cellular and protein secretions • phagocytes, macrophages, complement system ** No “memory” of protection exists afterwards ** Passive immunity – adaptive mechanisms Natural • maternal transfer of antibodies to infant via placenta Artificial • administration of pre- formed substance to provide immediate but short-term protection (antitoxin, antibodies) Protection is temporary and wanes with time (usually few months) Active immunity – adaptive mechanisms Natural • following contact with organism Artificial • administration of agent to stimulate immune response (immunisation) Acquired through contact with an micro-organism Protection produced by individual’s own immune system Protection often life-long but may need boosting How vaccines work • Induce active immunity – Immunity and immunologic memory similar to natural infection but without risk of disease • Immunological memory allows – Rapid recognition and response to pathogen – Prevent or modify effect of disease Live attenuated vaccines Weakened viruses /bacteria – Achieved by growing numerous generations in laboratory – Produces long lasting immune response after one or two doses – Stimulates immune system to react as it does to natural infection – Can cause mild form of the disease (e.g.
    [Show full text]