DOCSLIB.ORG

The Economic Feasibility of Forming a California Wheat Grower's Cooperative

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Economic Feasibility of Forming a California Wheat Grower's Cooperative The Economic Feasibility of Forming A California Wheat Cooperative Prepared by Jay E. Noel1 James J. Ahern David J. Schaffner Jill Johnson Kristina Muelrath Kyle Schroeder September 2002 1 Noel, Ahern, and Schaffner are Professors in the Agribusiness Department at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA. Johnson and Muelrath are past graduate students in the Agribusiness Department and Schroeder is a current Master of Business Administration student in the College of Business at California Polytechnic State University. The authors would like to thank Ms. Bonnie Fernandez, Executive Director, California Wheat Commission, Woodland, CA. for her time and information contributions to the study. Funding was provided by matching grants from the California State University Agricultural Research Initiative and the Rural Business Cooperative Service, USDA via the Center for Cooperatives, University of California. The Economic Feasibility of Forming a California Wheat Growers’ Cooperative Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1 Market and Industry Overview ................................................................................2 The Cooperative as a Business Entity .....................................................................6 Grain Cooperative Performance ..............................................................................9 Grain Cooperatives Adding Value.........................................................................11 The 21st Century Alliance ..........................................................................12 Dakota Growers’ Pasta Cooperative..........................................................13 Spring Wheat Bakers .................................................................................13 Value Added Products-Oklahoma .............................................................14 American White Wheat Producers Association.........................................15 IOF Versus Cooperatives as a Business Form.......................................................16 IOF Advantages .........................................................................................16 IOF Disadvantages.....................................................................................16 Advantage to Cooperatives........................................................................17 Disadvantage to Cooperatives....................................................................17 II. WHEAT GROWER INTEREST in a COOPERATIVE .......................................18 Sampling Procedures .............................................................................................18 Grower Survey Results ..........................................................................................20 First Handlers and Grain Buyers................................................................22 Prices Received..........................................................................................22 Secondary Uses..........................................................................................23 Current Coop/Group Involvement .............................................................23 Cooperative Services Desired....................................................................24 Statistical Limitation of Non-Response.....................................................27 Insights from the Grower Survey...........................................................................29 III. ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY of WHEAT MARKETING ....................................31 Wheat Merchandizing............................................................................................31 Price Data for Margins...............................................................................32 Margin Evaluations....................................................................................35 Export Margins ..........................................................................................40 Storage Costs and Capacity ...................................................................................43 Transportation Costs ..............................................................................................49 Transportation Contribution Margin Analysis...........................................51 Economic Feasibility of Wheat Merchandising Markets.......................................57 IV. MILLING COSTS and FLOUR MILL INVESTMENT.......................................60 California Flour Milling.........................................................................................60 Industry Structure ..................................................................................................60 i Structure in California............................................................................................61 Flour Milling Capacities In California...................................................................61 Sources of Wheat for California Flour Mills .........................................................62 Toll Milling Research ............................................................................................64 Extra Costs Associated with Preserving Identity...................................................66 Entry into Flour Milling.........................................................................................68 New Plant Implementation Option: A Model Plant Proforma .................68 V. MAJOR VALUE ADDED PROCESSING ARENAS..........................................70 US Pasta Industry...................................................................................................70 The US Tortilla Sector ..........................................................................................72 Frozen Dough Manufacture ...................................................................................75 Basis For Revenue Calculations ................................................................81 Issue of Market Access.............................................................................. 93 VI. MARKET NICHE OPPORTUNITIES and FOOD PROCESSOR FLOUR.........95 USE Wheat Containing Processed Food Products .........................................................95 Product Opportunity Areas ........................................................................97 Food Processor Survey Results..................................................................97 Data Problems - Survey Research in the Communications Age................99 VII. SUMMARY and CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................101 Grower Interest Survey........................................................................................101 Wheat Merchandizing Opportunities...................................................................102 Manufacturing Opportunities...............................................................................103 Flour Milling and Market Niche’ Products..........................................................104 References Cited ..................................................................................................106 List of Tables Table 1. Grain Cooperative Performance Measures, 1999 –2000....................................10 Table 2. Cal Poly-CWC Grower Sampling Stratification of First Mailing ......................19 (Summer 2001) Table 3. Cal Poly-CWC Grower Sampling Stratification of Second Mailing..................20 (Fall 2001) ii Table 4. Number of Growers Reporting Use of Government Price Support....................23 in the Last FiveYears Table 5. Frequency of Grower Use in the Last Two Years of Marketing and .................24 Pricing Method (n=33) Table 6. Average of Grower Rankings, and Frequency Each Service Was .....................25 Chosen by Growers Table 7. California Wheat Grower Opinions of the Overall Wheat Market.....................26 Table 8. California Wheat Grower Responses to Cooperative Business..........................27 Table 9. Percent of California Farm Wheat Marketed by Month.....................................31 Table 10. Assembly-Marketing Margins for Los Angeles Flourmills..............................37 Table 11. Assembly-Marketing Margins Chino Valley Feed Wheat Market...................39 Table 12. California Wheat Export 1992-02 by Country of Destination..........................41 Table 13. California Hard Red Wheat Exports 1992-3 to 2001-02 ..................................41 Table 14. Export Sales of Desert Durum® Wheat Produced in California and Arizona for Marketing Years of 1998-99 to December 11, 2001.................................42 Table 15. Gulf Export Market Assembly-Margins for California-Arizona......................43 Durum Wheat (Price/Cwt) Table 16. Western United States Storage Capacity and Grain-Soybean Stocks ............... 44 Table 17. On-Farm and Off-Farm Storage (tons) Selected Months .................................45 Table 18. California Grain Elevators Location, Capacity, and Transport Service ...........45 Table 19. California Wheat First Handler Responses on Storage ....................................46 Table 20. Estimated Monthly Storage Costs for California Wheat Short-term................47 Storage Costs Table 21. Storage Construction Cost Per Ton of Capacity ..............................................48 Table 22. Investment Cost per Ton For Wheat Storage Construction..............................49
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Issues and Decision Memo for Final
    A-475-818 A-489-805 Sunset Review - 2018 Public Document AD/CVD Operations VI: DD, SH DATE: November 28, 2018 MEMORANDUM TO: Gary Taverman Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance FROM: James Maeder Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations performing the duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations SUBJECT: Issues and Decision Memorandum for Final Results of the Expedited Fourth Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on Certain Pasta from Italy and Turkey I. Summary We have analyzed the substantive responses of interested parties in the fourth sunset reviews of the antidumping duty (AD) orders1 covering certain pasta (pasta) from Italy and Turkey. We recommend that you approve the positions described in the “Discussion of the Issues” section of this memorandum. Below is the complete list of the issues in these sunset reviews for which we received substantive responses: 1. Likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping; and 2. Magnitude of the margins likely to prevail. II. Background On August 1, 2018, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) published the notice of initiation of the fourth sunset reviews of the Orders, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 1 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order and Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Pasta from Turkey, 61 FR 38545 (July 24, 1996); See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order and Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Pasta from Italy, 61 FR 38547 (July 24, 1996) (collectively, the Orders).
    [Show full text]
  • Certain Pasta from Italy and Turkey
    Certain Pasta From Italy and Turkey Investigation Nos. 701-TA-365-366 and 731-TA-734-735 (Second Review) Publication 3947 September 2007 Washington, DC 20436 U.S. International Trade Commission COMMISSIONERS Daniel R. Pearson, Chairman Shara L. Aranoff, Vice Chairman Deanna Tanner Okun Charlotte R. Lane Irving A. Williamson Dean A. Pinkert Robert A. Rogowsky Director of Operations Staff assigned Michael Szustakowski, Investigator Christopher Cassise, Investigator Mark Simone, Industry Analyst Steven Trost, Economist David Boyland, Accountant Patrick Gallagher, Attorney Lita David-Harris, Statistician Diane Mazur, Supervisor Investigator Address all communications to Secretary to the Commission United States International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 U.S. International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 www.usitc.gov Certain Pasta From Italy and Turkey Investigation Nos. 701-TA-365-366 and 731-TA-734-735 (Second Review) Publication 3947 September 2007 CONTENTS Page Determinations ................................................................. 1 Views of the Commission ......................................................... 3 Part I: Introduction and overview ................................................. I-1 Background .................................................................. I-1 Statutory criteria and organization of the report...................................... I-1 Summary data................................................................ I-3 The original investigations and first five-year reviews................................
    [Show full text]
  • 03Business Model
    BUSINESS03 MODEL DEFINITION OF THE MODEL The Ebro Foods Group is the leading Spanish food group. It is firmly established through its subsidiaries in the rice and pasta markets in Europe and North America and has a growing presence in other countries. The Group decentralises certain management areas of each business, focusing on the business with a light, dynamic structure in which functionality, coherence and knowledge of the market prevail over individuals. The Ebro Foods Group is managed by business segments, grouped by the type of activity they perform and their geographical location. Our two core businesses are: Rice Business: This includes the production and distribution of rice, rice- based products and complementary food products. It engages in industrial and branding activities under a multi- brand model. Its presence spans Europe, the Mediterranean Basin, India and Thailand with the Herba Group companies and covers North America, Central America, the Caribbean and the Middle East through the Riviana Group and its subsidiary American Rice (ARI). Pasta Business: This includes the production and marketing of fresh and dry pasta, sauces, semolina, semolina-based products and complementary food products by the New World Pasta Group in North America, the Panzani Group and Garofalo (rest of the world). Decision-making is controlled by the Board of Directors, which is ultimately responsible for defining the Group’s general strategy and management guidelines. The Board delegates certain tasks to the Executive Committee, including monitoring and oversight of compliance with the strategic and corporate development guidelines, while the Management Committee, on which the heads of the principal business areas are represented, is tasked with monitoring and preparing the decisions made at management level.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 • Ensure the Integrity of Tasmania's GM Moratorium by Changing the Definition of 'Genetically Modified Organism' in Th
    ABN: 67 104 140 918 PO Box 400, Emerald Vic 3782 T: 03 5968 2996 E: [email protected] Tas GM Moratorium Review April 2019 [email protected] Friday May 3, 2019 Re: Inquiry into Tasmania’s Genetically Manipulated (GM) crops moratorium Thanks you for the opportunity to make this submission. If there is an opportunity to appear before the committee please invite us to do so. We recommend that the Tasmanian government: • Permanently maintain its GM-free policies and moratorium on the growing of GM crops, animals and microbes; • Continue to advocate through the Legislative and Governance Forum on Gene Technology (LGFGT) and other forums, that the Office of Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) and Food Standards Australia and New Zealand (FSANZ) continue to assess, regulate and license all new and emerging GM techniques and their products, under the national Gene Technology Scheme and its Regulations. • Ensure the integrity of Tasmania’s GM moratorium by changing the definition of ‘genetically modified organism’ in the Genetically Modified Organisms Control Act 2004, to explicitly include organisms modified using all the new GM processes, including SDN-1 methods. • Lifting the GM crop moratorium would jeopardise an outstanding competitive advantage for the Tasmanian GM-free state brand, within the Health and Wellness marketing sector. • There is a clear competitive advantage for Australia and all its GM-free producers from growing and supplying non-GM canola. But Tasmania’s canola would very likely not comply with market requirements and be rejected, if the oilseed were GM. • The introduction of GM canola varieties into Tasmania may severely impact the input costs and profitability of farmers, with flow on effects to food production costs and food prices.
    [Show full text]
  • Italian Hospitality Seal Italian Restaurants in the World
    ITALIAN HOSPITALITY SEAL ITALIAN RESTAURANTS IN THE WORLD Quality is definitely one of the keywords that better represents Italy all over the world, and warm hospitality is for sure one of the features that label Italian people. "Italian Style" dining is more than merely eating, it’s gathering together, sharing and enjoying the unique taste of ingredients cooked according to the traditional recipes, handed down generation by generation. This cultural experience, that is a national cultural heritage, must not only be protected but also spread and promoted worldwide. The “Italian Hospitality Seal” emphasizes the use of genuine Italian products, the offer of authentic Italian recipes, and the replication of a truly Italian atmosphere in the restaurant. The award aims at spotting and identifying authentic Italian restaurants in 54 countries in the world. The first certification dates back to 1997 and since 2010 it has been promoted in China by the China-Italy Chamber of Commerce (CICC). The project is supported by Unioncamere, together with the National Institute for Tourism Research (IS.NA.R.T), and five Italian Ministries (Foreign Affairs, Cultural Heritage, Economic Development, Tourism and Agriculture). Year after year, following accurate inspections and documents collection, CICC rewards all those restaurants which are an exceptional example of the versatility and quality of both Italian cuisine and hospitality. In 2014, 35 Italian restaurants received the award. During the awarding ceremony, CICC also presented and distributed to all the guests the first edition of the food guide “Authentic Italian Food Quality Experience”, containing information of all the awarded restaurants in 2014. “Where can I eat a real pizza Margherita? Where can I taste the best pasta al dente? Where can I go to make sure that the ingredients are 100% Italians?” The “Italian Hospitality Seal” finally answers all those questions that Italians (and not only) living abroad have always asked to themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Et Gestion Des Activites Commerciales
    MANAGEMENT ET GESTION DES ACTIVITES COMMERCIALES Cas numéro 6 : PANZANI REGIA Alix TALANDIER - Jean-Claude BORDICHINI FORMAPLACE.ORG ÉDITIONS Copyright c 2017 Jean-Claude BORDICHINI EDITÉ PAR FORMAPLACE.ORG EDITIONS WWW.FORMAPLACE.ORG / WWW.FORMAPLACE.EU La loi du 11 mars 1957 interdit les copies ou reproductions destinées à une utilisation collective. Toute représentation ou reproduction intégrale ou partielle faite par quelque procédé que ce soit, sans le consentement de l’auteur, est illicite et constitue une contrefaçon sanctionnée par les articles 425 et suivants du Code pénal. Première édition, septembre 2016 Table des matières I SUJET ET REFERENTIEL 1 REFERENTIEL DE MGAC ................................7 1.1 Finalité et objectifs7 1.2 Contenu7 1.3 Critères d’évaluation8 1.4 Modalités d’évaluation8 1.5 Composition de la commission de correction8 2 CAS "PANZANI REGIA", 2015 ...........................9 2.1 Composition du cas d’entreprise9 2.2 Présentation de PANZANI REGIA9 2.3 DOSSIER 1 Le recours à une force de vente additionnelle 11 2.4 DOSSIER 2 : La mise en place d’une opération promotionnelle 11 2.5 DOSSIER 3 L’organisation de la tournée des vendeurs 12 2.6 DOSSIER 4 La gestion du parc automobile 13 2.7 ANNEXES 14 II CORRIGE ET COURS ASSOCIES AU CAS 2.8 BAREME FORME 31 2.9 BAREME CONTENU 31 Jean-Claude Bordichini –CAS PRATIQUE 3 CORRIGE DE PANZANI REGIA, 2015 .................... 33 3.1 DOSSIER 1 : Le recours à une force de vente additionnelle. 33 3.2 DOSSIER 2 : La mise en place d’une opération promotionnelle. 35 3.3 DOSSIER 3 : L’organisation de la tournée des vendeurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebro 2015 Annual Report
    EBRO 2015 ANNUAL REPORT 1 ANNUAL REPORT CHAIRMAN´S STATEMENT Key Indicators 2015 BUSINESS ECONOMIC HUMAN SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT (Thousand of €) CAPITAL COMMITMENT 23 1.541.725 € companies 2,461.9 5,808 1,146,964 € Expense + Net sales Average total in food donations Investment: 76 workforce countries 314.7 596,795 € 7% EBITDA 72.88 in welfare less significant 45 % men programmes emissions than in plants 144.8 2014 Net Profit 27.12% 60 70 women projects 11% brands 101.5 developed more water recycled Dividends paid 117,717 and reused than in Hours training 51,272 2014 given beneficiaries 5% less energy consumed than in 2014 2 ANNUAL REPORT KEY INDICATORS 2015 1,112 1,008 NET TURN OVER NET TURN OVER Mill€ Mill€ 145 152 EBITDA EBITDA 1,756 1,112 1,008 2,539 NET TURN OVER NET TURN OVER Mill€ AVERAGE HEADCOUNT Mill€ AVERAGE HEADCOUNT EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES Mill€ Mill€ 145 152 28 35 EBITDA 2,539 EBITDA 1,756 Mill€ AVERAGE HEADCOUNT Mill€ AVERAGE HEADCOUNT NO. BRANDS NO. BRANDS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES 28 35 NO. BRANDS NO. BRANDS 1,112 1,008 NET TURN OVER NET TURN OVER Mill€ Mill€ 20 63 143 No. Plants NET TURN OVER NET TURN OVER 145 152 Mill€ Mill€ EBITDA 2,539 EBITDA 1,756 NORTH AMERICA Mill€ AVERAGE HEADCOUNT Mill€ AVERAGE HEADCOUNT EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES 1 12 EBITDA EBITDA 63 143 388 820 NET TURN OVER Mill€ AVERAGE HEADCOUNT Mill€ AVERAGE HEADCOUNT NET TURN OVER EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES 28 Mill€ 35 Mill€ EUROPE NO. BRANDS NO. BRANDS 1 12 EBITDA 388 EBITDA 820 9 Mill€ AVERAGE HEADCOUNT Mill€ AVERAGE HEADCOUNT 14 NO.
    [Show full text]
  • To View Online Click Here
    YOUR O.A.T. ADVENTURE TRAVEL PLANNING GUIDE® Italy’s Western Coast & Islands: A Voyage from Rome to Valletta 2022 Small Groups: 20-25 travelers—guaranteed! (average of 22) Overseas Adventure Travel ® The Leader in Personalized Small Group Adventures on the Road Less Traveled 1 Dear Traveler, At last, the world is opening up again for curious travel lovers like you and me. And the O.A.T. Italy’s Western Coast & Islands: A Voyage from Rome to Valletta itinerary you’ve expressed interest in will be a wonderful way to resume the discoveries that bring us so much joy. You might soon be enjoying standout moments like these: I love to eat in Italy (who doesn’t?) and nothing compares to the fresh ingredients of the Aeolian Islands. You’ll see what I mean when you sit down with the owners of a small-scale caper farm for a farm-fresh lunch. First, you’ll spend A Day in the Life of this farm located on the island of Salina, where you’ll have a chance to get to know your hosts and come to learn the history of their farm. Then, you’ll learn about their organic and traditional farming practices during a stroll through their gardens followed by a savory lunch. After witnessing the beauty of Italy and its people, it saddens me to hear about darker chapters enmeshed in this vibrant culture. You’ll hear them, too, when you meet meet with survivor and advocate Francesco Zanardian to discuss how the Vatican and the Italian authorities have handled the Catholic Church’s sexual abuse scandal.
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT Pag. 1 KEY INDICATORS 2016 Pag. 5 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Pag. 2 Pag. 7 GLOBAL PRESENCE CHAIRMAN´S STATEMENT Pag. 33 BUSINESS MODEL Pag. 46 Pag. 10 BUSINESS AREAS IN 2016 THE COMPANY Pag. 21 GOVERNANCE MODEL ANNUAL REPORT Key indicators 1 Key indicators 2016 BUSINESS ECONOMIC (MILLIONS OF €) 25 Companies 2,459.246 Net sales 80 Countries 344.1 EBITDA 47 Plants 169.7 Net profit 72 Brands 83 Dividends paid SOCIAL COMMITMENT HUMAN CAPITAL 2,107,837 € in food donations Average total workforce: 6,184 597,000€ in welfare programmes 72.07% Men 61 projects developed 27.93% Women 58,749 beneficiaries 130,789 Hours training given Fidelity Prize 2016 granted by FESBAL ENVIRONMENT 3,825,701€ Expense + Investment 1.56 Energy intensity 0.1 Intensity of GHG emissions Paper Values Prize granted by ASPAPEL ANNUAL REPORT Global presence 2 Global presence Key indicators per continent NUMBER OF PLANTS 19 148 EBITDA NET TURNOVER Mill€ Mill€ 7 10 NO. BRANDS 943 AVERAGE HEADCOUNT EMPLOYEES 159 1,174 SPAIN EBITDA NET TURNOVER Mill€ Mill€ 29 2,637 NO. BRANDS AVERAGE HEADCOUNT EMPLOYEES 22 NUMBER OF PLANTS EUROPE 111 NET TURNOVER 13 Mill€ 7 EBITDA 7 NO. BRANDS Mill€ 3 NUMBER OF PLANTS AVERAGE HEADCOUNT EMPLOYEES 381 NUMBER OF PLANTS 1,000 157 NET TURNOVER EBITDA Mill€ Mill€ 2 37 ASIA NO. BRANDS AFRICA NUMBER OF PLANTS 1,839 AVERAGE HEADCOUNT EMPLOYEES 54 NET TURNOVER 2.6 Mill€ EBITDA Mill€ 14 AMERICA NO. BRANDS AVERAGE HEADCOUNT EMPLOYEES 384 ANNUAL REPORT Global presence 3 Global presence key indicators per continent NUMBER OF PLANTS 19 148 EBITDA NET TURNOVER Mill€ Mill€ 7 10 NO.
    [Show full text]
  • CERTAIN PASTA from ) 731-TA-734-735 ITALY and TURKEY ) (Third Review)
    UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION In the Matter of: ) Investigation Nos.: ) 701-TA-365-366 and CERTAIN PASTA FROM ) 731-TA-734-735 ITALY AND TURKEY ) (Third Review) Pages: 1 through 299 Place: Washington, D.C. Date: July 11, 2013 HERITAGE REPORTING CORPORATION Official Reporters 1220 L Street, N.W., Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 628-4888 [email protected] 1 THE UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION In the Matter of: ) Investigation Nos.: ) 701-TA-365-366 and CERTAIN PASTA FROM ) 731-TA-734-735 ITALY AND TURKEY ) (Third Review) Thursday, July 11, 2013 Main Hearing Room U.S. International Trade Commission 500 E Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. The hearing commenced, pursuant to notice, at 9:32 a.m., before the Commissioners of the United States International Trade Commission, the Honorable IRVING A. WILLIAMSON, Chairman, presiding. APPEARANCES: On behalf of the International Trade Commission: Commissioners: IRVING A. WILLIAMSON, CHAIRMAN DANIEL R. PEARSON, COMMISSIONER SHARA L. ARANOFF, COMMISSIONER DEAN A. PINKERT, COMMISSIONER MEREDITH M. BROADBENT, COMMISSIONER Staff: WILLIAM R. BISHOP, SUPERVISORY HEARINGS AND INFORMATION OFFICER SHARON BELLAMY, HEARINGS AND MEETINGS ASSISTANT KEYSHA MARTINEZ, INVESTIGATOR JOHN GIAMALVA, INTERNATIONAL TRADE ANALYST JOHN BENEDETTO, ECONOMIST DAVID BOYLAND, ACCOUNTANT/AUDITOR JOHN HENDERSON, ATTORNEY ELIZABETH HAINES, SUPERVISORY INVESTIGATOR Heritage Reporting Corporation (202) 628-4888 2 APPEARANCES: (Cont'd.) In Support of the Continuation of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders: On behalf of the Domestic Industry: ROBERT VERMYLEN, Vice President, A. Zerega's Sons, Inc. WALT GEORGE, Consultant, American Italian Pasta Company SCOTT MEKUS, Vice President of Finance, American Italian Pasta Company BRIAN FOX, Vice President of Category Management, American Italian Pasta Company JACK HASPER, Vice President of Sales and Marketing, Dakota Growers Pasta Company SHANE FAUCETT, Senior Vice President of Sales and Customer Development, New World Pasta Company GREGORY S.
    [Show full text]
  • Providing the Total Pasta Solution
    The New Balance Providing the Total Pasta Solution AN I RIC TAL E IA M N A PA S NY TA COMPA ANNUAL REPORT 2002 AN I RIC TAL E IA M N A PA S NY TA COMPA MISSION STATEMENT The following AIPC goals are the founding principles of our Company, and incorporate the values that have given us the vision and focus to produce the world’s finest pasta. GROWTH & PROFITS: Achieve short- and long-term growth in sales CUSTOMER OFFERING: Provide inspirational customer service and and profits to maximize value to our shareholders. products of superior quality in a culture that drives toward lowest total delivered cost and continuous improvement in customer satisfaction. AIPC’S PEOPLE: Build a team of quality-minded and results-oriented people and provide an environment that encourages innovation, continu- CORPORATE IDENTITY: To be a customer-driven and quality-minded ous improvement and superior performance, recognizes achievements and Company based on and committed to our guiding principles of integrity, helps our people reach their full potential. fairness, performance and consistency. CODE OF TEAM BEHAVIOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS MISSION STATEMENT 1. Focus on, reward and celebrate results, not effort alone. The primary role of the Board of Directors of American Italian Pasta 2. Work diligently, in the constant pursuit of excellence, Company is to create shareholder value. In this role, the Board provides with a sense of urgency. oversight and counsel to management as follows: 3. Teach, coach and mentor. We want Team Members who • Reviews corporate performance, and critiques and approves global “own” their process and develop others in a way strategic and operating plans to ensure achievement of short- and that achieves and sustains excellence.
    [Show full text]
  • Based on His Travels to Northern Italy, Thomas Jefferson Drew a “Maccaroni” Machine with Instructions for Making Pasta Germa
    Based on his travels to Northern Italy, Thomas 1787 Jefferson drew a “maccaroni” machine with instructions for making pasta French immigrant Antoine Zerega 1848 opened first pasta factory in USA on the Brooklyn waterfront 1867 German immigrant Christian Mueller first sold pasta door-to- door in New Jersey 1892 Atlantic Macaroni Company formed in Queens, New York Bicocchi & Laneri created the 1899 Fort Worth Macaroni Company Felice Maldari started 1901 F.Maldari Manufacturers of Pasta Dies The National Association of Macaroni & Noodle 1904 Manufacturers of America, forerunner of today’s NPA, is formed. Dues are $5. 1910 Anthony Gioia founded Gioia Macaroni Company in Buffalo, New York DeDomenico family delivers pasta around 1912 San Francisco, starting Golden Grain Macaroni Company I. DeFrancisci & Son of Brooklyn, New York (forerunner of DEMACO), 1914 built their first pasta Vincenzo La Rosa founded V. La Rosa & Sons Macaroni Company in Brooklyn, New York machine in the USA Antonio Marano founded Philadelphia Macaroni Company Emanuele Ronzoni 1915 Imports of Italian pasta ended started Ronzoni abruptly during World War I Macaroni Company in creating an enormous demand Queens, New York for domestic production 1916 Pennsylvania Dutch-Megs Company opened in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania The National Macaroni Manufacturers Association gets the government to agree that all products termed as “alimentary paste,” “Macaroni,” “Spaghetti,” “Vermicelli,” 1927 “Noodles,” or “Short Cuts,” to be called under the general term of “Macaroni Products” Ettore Boiardi 1928 launches Chef Boyardee brand 1929 of canned pasta Italian immigrant John Robilio and his Memphis- born wife Jennie founded Ronco Pasta 1935 Macaroni manufacturing industry comprised of approximately 400 factories producing one- half billion pounds of product annually 1937 Kraft introduced Macaroni & Cheese Dinner in the USA Numerous GIs are introduced to pasta as 1942-1945 the War Department feeds over 12 million servicemen and women in World War II Donato Maldari renames D.
    [Show full text]