DOCSLIB.ORG

The Expedition 364 Scientists, 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Expedition 364 Scientists, 2017 Vrije Universiteit Brussel Expedition 364 preliminary report: Chicxulub: drilling the K-Pg impact crater. Morgan, Joanna; Gulick, Sean P.; Mellett, Claire; Claeys, Philippe; IODP-ICDP Expedition 364 Science Party Published in: International Ocean Discovery Program Publications DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14379/iodp.pr.364.2017 Publication date: 2017 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Morgan, J., Gulick, S. P., Mellett, C., Claeys, P., & IODP-ICDP Expedition 364 Science Party (2017). Expedition 364 preliminary report: Chicxulub: drilling the K-Pg impact crater. In S. Gulick, & J. Morgan (Eds.), International Ocean Discovery Program Publications (pp. 1-38). (International Ocean Discovery Program Expedition 364 Preliminary Report). ECORD European Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling Science Operator. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14379/iodp.pr.364.2017 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 14. Jan. 2018 International Ocean Discovery Program Expedition 364 Preliminary Report Chicxulub: drilling the K-Pg impact crater In collaboration with the International Continental Scientific Drilling Program Platform operations 5 April–31 May 2016 Onshore Science Party 21 September–15 October 2016 Sean Gulick, Joanna Morgan, Claire L. Mellett, and the Expedition 364 Scientists Publisher’s notes Core samples and the wider set of data from the science program covered in this report are under moratorium and accessible only to Science Party members until 15 October 2017. This publication was prepared by the European Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling (ECORD) Science Operator (ESO) and Texas A&M University (TAMU) as an account of work performed under the International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP). Funding for IODP is provided by the following international partners: National Science Foundation (NSF), United States Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan European Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling (ECORD) Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), People’s Republic of China Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM) Australia-New Zealand IODP Consortium (ANZIC) Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES), India Coordination for Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), Brazil Portions of this work may have been published in whole or in part in other IODP documents or publications. Disclaimer Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the participating agencies or TAMU. Copyright Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US). Unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction are permitted, provided the original author and source are credited. Citation Gulick, S., Morgan, J., Mellett, C.L., and the Expedition 364 Scientists, 2017. Expedition 364 Preliminary Report: Chicxulub: Drilling the K-Pg Impact Crater. International Ocean Discovery Program. http://dx.doi.org/10.14379/iodp.pr.364.2017 ISSN World Wide Web: 2372-9562 February 2017 S. Gulick et al. Expedition 364 Preliminary Report Expedition 364 participants Expedition 364 Science Party Joanna Morgan* Philippe Claeys Co-Chief Scientist/Geophysicist Impact Petrologist Department of Earth Science and Engineering Analytical, Environmental and Geo-Chemistry Imperial College London Vrije Universiteit Brussel London SW7 2AZ Pleinlaan 2 United Kingdom 1050 Brussels [email protected] Belgium [email protected] Sean Gulick* Co-Chief Scientist/Geophysicist Charles Cockell* Institute for Geophysics Microbiologist Jackson School of Geosciences Centre for Astrobiology University of Texas at Austin School of Physics and Astronomy Austin Texas 78758-4445 University of Edinburgh USA Edinburgh EH9 3FD [email protected] United Kingdom [email protected] Claire Mellett* Expedition Project Manager Marco Coolen* ECORD Science Operator Organic Geochemist/Microbiologist British Geological Survey Department of Chemistry The Lyell Centre Curtin University Research Avenue South Bentley WA 6102 Edinburgh EH14 4AP Australia United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] Ludovic Ferrière Johanna Lofi* Impact Petrologist Petrophysics Staff Scientist Natural History Museum ECORD Science Operator Burgring 7 Géosciences Montpellier 1010 Vienna Université de Montpellier Austria 34095 Montpellier Cedex 05 [email protected] France Catalina Gebhardt [email protected] Physical Properties Specialist Elise Chenot Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre of Polar and Marine Inorganic Geochemist Research Biogéosciences Laboratory 27568 Bremerhaven UMR 6282 CNRS Germany Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté [email protected] 21000 Dijon Kazuhisa Goto France Sedimentologist [email protected] Tohoku University Gail Christeson* International Research Institute of Disaster Science Geophysicist Aoba 468-1 E303 Institute for Geophysics Sendai 980-0845 Jackson School of Geosciences Japan University of Texas at Austin [email protected] Austin Texas 78758-4445 USA [email protected] 3 S. Gulick et al. Expedition 364 Preliminary Report Heather Jones Auriol Rae* Paleontologist Geophysicist/Impact Petrologist The Pennsylvania State University Department of Earth Science and Engineering 336 Deike Building Imperial College London University Park PA 16802 London SW7 2AZ USA United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] David Kring Cornelia Rasmussen Impact Petrologist Sedimentologist Lunar and Planetary Institute University of Utah 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Department of Geology and Geophysics Houston TX 77058 115 South 1460 East (FASB) USA Salt Lake City UT 84112 [email protected] USA [email protected] Christopher Lowery* Paleontologist Mario Rebolledo-Vieyra Institute for Geophysics Physical Properties Specialist Jackson School of Geosciences Unidad de Ciencias del Agua University of Texas at Austin Centro de Investigación Austin Texas 78758-4445 Científica de Yucatán, A.C. USA 77500 Cancún QROO [email protected] México [email protected] Rubén Ocampo-Torres Organic Geochemist Ulrich Riller Groupe de Physico-Chimie de l’Atmosphère Structural Geologist ICPEES Institut für Geologie UMR 7515 Université de Strasbourg/CNRS Universität Hamburg 1 Rue Blessig Bundesstrasse 55 67000 Strasbourg 20146 Hamburg France Germany [email protected] [email protected] Ligia Perez-Cruz* Honami Sato Geochemist Inorganic Geochemist Instituto de Geofísica Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology Universidad Nacional Autónoma De México 2-15 Natsushima-cho Coyoacán Yokosuka-city Ciudad de México CP 04510 Kanagawa 237-0061 México Japan [email protected] [email protected] Annemarie E. Pickersgill Jan Smit Inorganic Geochemist Paleontologist School of Geographical & Earth Sciences Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam University of Glasgow Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences FALW Gregory Building, Lilybank Gardens de Boelelaan 1085 Glasgow G12 8QQ 1018HV Amsterdam United Kingdom Netherlands [email protected] [email protected] Michael Poelchau* Sonia Tikoo Structural Geologist Paleomagnetist University of Freiburg Rutgers University New Brunswick Geology Earth and Planetary Sciences Albertstraße 23b Piscataway Township NJ 08854 79104 Freiburg USA Germany [email protected] [email protected] 4 S. Gulick et al. Expedition 364 Preliminary Report Naotaka Tomioka Kosei Yamagachi Impact Petrologist Inorganic Geochemist Kochi Institute for Core Sample Research Department of Chemistry Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology Toho University 200 Monobe Otsu Ota-ku Funabashi Nankoku Chiba 274-8510 Kochi 783-8502 Japan Japan [email protected] [email protected] Long Xiao Michael Whalen Metamorphic Petrologist Sedimentologist China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) University of Alaska Fairbanks School of Earth Sciences Geosciences Planetary Science Institute 900 Yukon Drive 388 Lumo Road Hongshan District Fairbanks AK 99775 China USA [email protected] [email protected] William Zylberman Axel Wittmann* Paleomagnetist Inorganic Geochemist Aix Marseille University Arizona State University CNRS IRD Coll France LeRoy Eyring Center for Solid State Science CEREGE Physical Sciences 13626 Aix-en-Provence Tempe AZ 85287-1704 France USA [email protected] [email protected] Additional participants Jaime Urrutia Fucugauchi Tim Bralower† Mexican Scientific Coordinator Paleontologist Institute of Geophysics The Pennsylvania State University UNAM Board of Governors 535 Deike Building National
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geological Survey Research 1961 Synopsis of Geologic and Hydrologic Results
    Geological Survey Research 1961 Synopsis of Geologic and Hydrologic Results GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 424-A Geological Survey Research 1961 THOMAS B. NOLAN, Director GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 424 A synopsis ofgeologic and hydrologic results, accompanied by short papers in the geologic and hydrologic sciences. Published separately as chapters A, B, C, and D UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1961 FOEEWOED The Geological Survey is engaged in many different kinds of investigations in the fields of geology and hydrology. These investigations may be grouped into several broad, inter­ related categories as follows: (a) Economic geology, including engineering geology (b) Eegional geologic mapping, including detailed mapping and stratigraphic studies (c) Eesource and topical studies (d) Ground-water studies (e) Surface-water studies (f) Quality-of-water studies (g) Field and laboratory research on geologic and hydrologic processes and principles. The Geological Survey also carries on investigations in its fields of competence for other Fed­ eral agencies that do not have the required specialized staffs or scientific facilities. Nearly all the Geological Survey's activities yield new data and principles of value in the development or application of the geologic and hydrologic sciences. The purpose of this report, which consists of 4 chapters, is to present as promptly as possible findings that have come to the fore during the fiscal year 1961 the 12 months ending June 30, 1961. The present volume, chapter A, is a synopsis of the highlights of recent findings of scientific and economic interest. Some of these findings have been published or placed on open file during the year; some are presented in chapters B, C, and D ; still others have not been pub­ lished previously.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tennessee Meteorite Impact Sites and Changing Perspectives on Impact Cratering
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND THE TENNESSEE METEORITE IMPACT SITES AND CHANGING PERSPECTIVES ON IMPACT CRATERING A dissertation submitted by Janaruth Harling Ford B.A. Cum Laude (Vanderbilt University), M. Astron. (University of Western Sydney) For the award of Doctor of Philosophy 2015 ABSTRACT Terrestrial impact structures offer astronomers and geologists opportunities to study the impact cratering process. Tennessee has four structures of interest. Information gained over the last century and a half concerning these sites is scattered throughout astronomical, geological and other specialized scientific journals, books, and literature, some of which are elusive. Gathering and compiling this widely- spread information into one historical document benefits the scientific community in general. The Wells Creek Structure is a proven impact site, and has been referred to as the ‘syntype’ cryptoexplosion structure for the United State. It was the first impact structure in the United States in which shatter cones were identified and was probably the subject of the first detailed geological report on a cryptoexplosive structure in the United States. The Wells Creek Structure displays bilateral symmetry, and three smaller ‘craters’ lie to the north of the main Wells Creek structure along its axis of symmetry. The question remains as to whether or not these structures have a common origin with the Wells Creek structure. The Flynn Creek Structure, another proven impact site, was first mentioned as a site of disturbance in Safford’s 1869 report on the geology of Tennessee. It has been noted as the terrestrial feature that bears the closest resemblance to a typical lunar crater, even though it is the probable result of a shallow marine impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Recovery of Ejecta Material from Confirmed, Probable
    Appendix A Recovery of Ejecta Material from Confirmed, Probable, or Possible Distal Ejecta Layers A.1 Introduction In this appendix we discuss the methods that we have used to recover and study ejecta found in various types of sediment and rock. The processes used to recover ejecta material vary with the degree of lithification. We thus discuss sample processing for unconsolidated, semiconsolidated, and consolidated material separately. The type of sediment or rock is also important as, for example, carbonate sediment or rock is processed differently from siliciclastic sediment or rock. The methods used to take and process samples will also vary according to the objectives of the study and the background of the investigator. We summarize below the methods that we have found useful in our studies of distal impact ejecta layers for those who are just beginning such studies. One of the authors (BPG) was trained as a marine geologist and the other (BMS) as a hard rock geologist. Our approaches to processing and studying impact ejecta differ accordingly. The methods used to recover ejecta from unconsolidated sediments have been successfully employed by BPG for more than 40 years. A.2 Taking and Handling Samples A.2.1 Introduction The size, number, and type of samples will depend on the objective of the study and nature of the sediment/rock, but there a few guidelines that should be followed regardless of the objective or rock type. All outcrops, especially those near industrialized areas or transportation routes (e.g., highways, train tracks) need to be cleaned off (i.e., the surface layer removed) prior to sampling.
    [Show full text]
  • New Developments Regarding the KT Event and Other Catastrophes in Earth History
    NASA-CR-195169 ///_/- _/_ " C-'_/#_'/ NEW OEVELOPMENTS N94-28294 EVENT AND OTHER --THRU-- EARTH HISTORY N94-28314 150 p Unclas G3/46 0208810 ...o_ep]F1)_'F" PAPERS PRESENTED TO New Developments Regarding the KT Event and Other Catastrophes in Earth History FEBRUARY 9-12, 1994 • HOUSTON, TEXAS PAPERS PRESENTED TO NEW DEVELOPMENTS REGARDING THE KT EVENT AND OTHER CATASTROPHES IN EARTH HISTORY February 9-12, 1994 Houston, Texas Sponsored by Lunar and Planetary Institute University of Houston-Clear Lake L P I _/ear L__'_ LPI Contribution No. 825 Compiled in 1994 by LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE The Institute is operated by the University Space Research Association under Contract No. NASW-4574 with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Material in this volume may be copied without restraint for library, abstract service, education, or personal research purposes; however, republication of any paper or portion thereof requires the written permission of the authors as well as the appropriate acknowledgment of this publication. This report may be cited as Author A. B. (1994) Title of abstract. In New Developments Regarding the KT Event and Other Catastrophes in Earth History. LPI Contribution No. 825, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston. 138 pp. This report is distributed by ORDER DEPARTMENT Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 Mail order requestors will be invoiced for the cost of shipping and handling. LPI Contribution No. 825 iii Preface This volume contains papers that have been accepted for presentation at the conference on New Developments Regarding the KT Event and Other Catastrophes in Earth History, February 9-12, 1994, in Houston, Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Survey Research 1962
    Geological Survey Research 1962 Synopsis of Geologic, Hydrologic, and Topographic Results GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 450-A Geological Survey Research 1962 THOMAS B. NOLAN, Director GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 450 Asynopsis of results ofgeologic, hydro logic, and topo­ graphic investigations for fiscalyear 1962, accom­ panied by short papers in the fields of geology, hydrology, topography, and allied sciences. Pub­ lished separately as Chapters A, B, C, D, and E UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1962 FOREWORD The reception accorded the 1960 and 1961 Annual Reviews of Geological Survey research has encouraged us to prepare this volume, "Geological Survey Research, 1962," in a con­ tinuing effort to publish more quickly the significant results of our current investigations. We continue to consider these reports as experimental and have again this year modified the content, format, and frequency of release of chapters in an attempt to serve better the interests of the users of the reports. The comments and suggestions of these users are here solicited and will be considered carefully as future volumes are planned. The current Annual Review consists of five chapters (Chapters A through E) of Pro­ fessional Paper 450. As in the preceding two Annual Reviews, Chapter A is a synopsis of recent findings in the many and varied lines of study pursued by Survey personnel. Chap­ ters, B, C, D, and E of this volume are collections of short articles in geology, hydrology, topography, and allied fields. These articles are numbered as follows: Prof. Paper 450-B Articles 1-59 Prof. Paper 450-C Articles 60-119 Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Ore Bin / Oregon Geology Magazine / Journal
    The ORE BIN Volume 27, No.1 January, 1965 OREGON'S MINERAL INDUSTRY IN 1964 By Ralph S. Mason* Oregon mines and metallurgical plants continued to pump large quan­ tities of primary wealth into the state's economy in 1964. Indications are that the value produced during the past year wi II probably equal that of the record-shatteri ng total turned in for 1963. Soari ng metal prices on world markets, particularly for mercury, saw the reopening of six cinnabar mines and activity at several antimony properties which have been idle for many years. Production of aggregate, which ac­ counts for approximately two-thirds of the total value of all minerals produced in the state, was close to that of last year, in spite of a lessened demand by large federal construction projects. The disas­ trous Christmas-week floods across the state temporari Iy paralyzed nearly all of the sand and gravel producers, who suffered high Josses to stocks and equipment. The need for aggregate and stone of all types for the coming year will probably set new records as the state rebuilds its highways, jetties, dikes, plants, homes, and bridges. Offshore oi I and gas leases for federal and state lands lying off the Oregon coast were granted to major oi I companies last fall. The action marks an important milestone in the state's long search for petroleum. Metals Mercury A continuing imbalance in the international mercury supply and demand forced prices up to all-time highs in 1964. As a direct result, interest in several Oregon mercury properties developed and at year's end activitywas reported at six mines.
    [Show full text]
  • International Ocean Discovery Program Expedition 364
    International Ocean Discovery Program Expedition 364 Preliminary Report Chicxulub: drilling the K-Pg impact crater In collaboration with the International Continental Scientific Drilling Program Platform operations 5 April–31 May 2016 Onshore Science Party 21 September–15 October 2016 Sean Gulick, Joanna Morgan, Claire L. Mellett, and the Expedition 364 Scientists Publisher’s notes Core samples and the wider set of data from the science program covered in this report are under moratorium and accessible only to Science Party members until 15 October 2017. This publication was prepared by the European Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling (ECORD) Science Operator (ESO) and Texas A&M University (TAMU) as an account of work performed under the International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP). Funding for IODP is provided by the following international partners: National Science Foundation (NSF), United States Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan European Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling (ECORD) Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), People’s Republic of China Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM) Australia-New Zealand IODP Consortium (ANZIC) Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES), India Coordination for Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), Brazil Portions of this work may have been published in whole or in part in other IODP documents or publications. Disclaimer Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the participating agencies or TAMU. Copyright Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US).
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Geophysics Graduate Symposium
    Department of Earth Sciences November 24, 2012 Graduate 9580/9680 BGS Rm 1056 Geology and Geophysics Graduate Symposium Time Speaker Title 9:00 am Annemarie Pickersgill Shatter cones: A diagnostic feature of hypervelocity impact. 9:12 am Tanya Harrison Geologic activity on Enceladus. 9:24 am Anna Nuhn Martian, Lunar, and terrestrial cave entrances: A comparative geological analysis. 9:36 am Eric Pilles The mantle plume paradigm. 9:48 am Mahadia Ibrahim Asteroid mining: Possibilities and challenges. 10:00 am Cassandra Marion Volcanism on Io. 10:12 am Patrick Shepherd Common causes of colour in natural diamonds: Dislocations, impurities, and vacancies. 10:24 am Renata Smoke Formational models of Au-rich volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits. 10:36 am ------------------------------------- Coffee Break ---------------------------------------------------- 10:48 am Yonghua Cao Convergent margin-related orogenic belts and metallogenesis. 11:00 am Randy Campbell Carbonatites: A classification and evolutionary review. 11:12 am Gloria Eboremen Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soils: Land farming approach. 11:24 am David Olutusin Formation of black shales: Deep versus shallow water interpretation. 11:36 am Colin Terry Determining igneous structures and geomagnetic field history from induced and remnant magnetic fields. 11:48 am Tola Ogunniyi Resource potential of the Barnett Shale, Fort Worth Basin, Texas. 12:00 noon Wesley Greig The precession of the perihelion of Mercury. 12:12 pm Mansour Al-hashim Stromatolites: Utility, application, and challenges. 12:24 pm ------------------------------------- Lunch Break ----------------------------------------------------- 1:24 pm Roderick Tom-Ying Microfossils and the origins of life on Earth. 1:36 pm Kathryn Lapenskie Affects of Early to Middle Ordovician climate, paleogeography, and environment on faunal radiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Author's Personal Copy
    Author's personal copy J Archaeol Method Theory (2014) 21:134–211 DOI 10.1007/s10816-012-9149-0 The Archaeology of Cosmic Impact: Lessons from Two Mid-Holocene Argentine Case Studies Gustavo Barrientos & W. Bruce Masse Published online: 15 September 2012 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012 Abstract Cosmic impact is a category of natural catastrophe neglected or misunderstood by most archaeologists in reconstructions of past human population dynamics. We discuss the nature of impact by asteroids and comets and what is known and theorized about the Quaternary Period impact record. As case studies for our exploration of how archaeolog- ical method and theory can be productively applied to the study of cosmic impact, we focus on two confirmed Holocene asteroid impacts in central and northeastern Argentina, Rio Cuarto and Campo del Cielo, both likely dating between 6 and 3 cal ky BP. We model and assess the potential destructive effects of these impacts on contemporary hunting and gathering populations using several lines of evidence. The search for Quaternary Period cosmic impacts, along with the documentation of the effects of confirmed cosmic impacts on human populations, particularly of those organized in small-scale social groups, represents a challenge and key opportunity for future archaeological research. Keywords Extraterrestrial object collisions . Quaternary Period . Archaeological evidence and judgment criteria . Campo del Cielo and Río Cuarto impact events Introduction “Impact cratering is the most fundamental geologic process in the Solar System” (Melosh 2011:222). G. Barrientos Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional del La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n, B1900FWA, La Plata, Argentina e-mail: [email protected] G.
    [Show full text]
  • Accuracy in Genesis From
    Accuracy in Genesis from http://www.accuracyingenesis.com April 2010 Editor H. Daily CONTENTS Section One: New Perspectives on Genesis 1. The Days of Genesis 1 2. The Heavens 5 3. After their Kind 9 4. In Our Image 11 5. Adam Named 22 6. Surely Die 23 7. The Curse 25 8. Farming 28 9. Herbs 37 10. Rain 39 11. Ararat 41 12. The Flood 46 13. How much is All ? 55 14. Noah's Ark 57 15. Chronology 62 16. Babel 66 17. Sodom and Gomorrah 71 18. Dragons 75 19. Biblical Archaeology 76 20. Happy 82 21. The Long Day 84 Section Two: New Perspective Translations 1. Genesis 1, In the Beginning God 87 2. Genesis 2, Adam and Eve 89 3. Genesis 3, the Sin of Adam and Eve 90 4. Genesis 4, Cain and Abel 91 5. Genesis 5, the Genealogy of the Sons of 93 Adam 95 6. Genesis 6, Noah and the Ark 96 7. Genesis 7, The Flood 97 8. Genesis 8, the Flood Ends 98 9. Genesis 9, God's Covenant 100 10. Genesis 10, the Genealogy of the Sons of 101 Noah 11. Genesis 11, the Genealogy of the Sons of Shem Section Three: Old Earth vs. Young Earth 1. Volcanoes 103 2. Varves 113 3. Atmospheric Argon 116 4. Missing Isotopes 117 5. Caves and Caverns 119 6. Impact Craters 125 7. The Dead Sea 142 8. Bible Land Rivers 158 9. Natufians 164 Section One: New Perspectives on Genesis Chapter One, The Days of Genesis "And the evening and the morning were the ____ day." Needless to say much has been written on the subject of the creation days of Genesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Meteorite Mysteries a Teacher’S Guide with Activities for Earth and Space Sciences EG-1997-08-104-HQ National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    Educational Product National Aeronautics and Teachers Grades 5-12 Space Administration Exploring Meteorite Mysteries A Teachers Guide with Activities for Earth and Space Sciences EG-1997-08-104-HQ National Aeronautics and Space Administration Exploring Meteorite Mysteries A Teachers Guide with Activities for Earth and Space Sciences Office of Space Science Solar System Exploration Division Office of Human Resources and Education Education Division August 1997 This publication is in the Public Domain and is not copyrighted. Permission is not required for duplication. Acknowledgements This teacher’s guide was developed in a partnership between scientists in the Planetary Materials Office, at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas, and teachers from local school districts. NASA and Contractor Staff Teachers On the Cover— Marilyn Lindstrom JoAnne Burch Project Coordinator and Meteorite Curator Pearland ISD, Several aspects of a meteorite NASA Johnson Space Center Elementary fall are depicted on the cover. Houston, Texas Pearland, Texas The background is a painting created by an eyewitness of Karen Crowell Jaclyn Allen the Sikhote-Alin fireball. At Scientist and Science Education Specialist Pasadena ISD, Lockheed Martin Engineering & Sciences Co. Elementary the top is the asteroid Ida, a Houston, Texas Pasadena, Texas possible source of meteorites. At the bottom is Meteor Allan Treiman* and Carl Allen Roy Luksch Crater in Arizona—the first Alvin ISD, Planetary Scientists identified meteorite impact Lockheed Martin Engineering & Sciences Co. High School Houston, Texas Alvin, Texas crater. Anita Dodson Karen Stocco Graphic Designer Pasadena ISD, Lockheed Martin Engineering & Sciences Co. High School Houston, Texas Pasadena, Texas Bobbie Swaby Pasadena ISD, Middle School National Aeronautics and Pasadena, Texas Space Administration Lyndon B.
    [Show full text]
  • International Ocean Discovery Program Expedition 364 Scientific
    International Ocean Discovery Program Expedition 364 Scientific Prospectus Chicxulub: drilling the K-Pg impact crater In collaboration with the International Continental Scientific Drilling Program Sean Gulick Joanna Morgan Co-Chief Scientist Co-Chief Scientist Institute for Geophysics Department of Earth Science and J.J. Pickle Research Campus, Building 196 Engineering 10100 Burnet Road (R2200) Imperial College London Austin TX 78758-4445 South Kensington Campus USA London SW7 2AZ [email protected] United Kingdom [email protected] Claire L. Mellett Jaime Urrutia Fucugauchi ESO Expedition Project Manager Mexican Scientific Coordinator British Geological Survey Institute of Geophysics Murchison House UNAM Board of Governors West Mains Road National University of Mexico Edinburgh EH9 3LA Coyoacan 04510 Mexico City United Kingdom Mexico [email protected] [email protected] Publisher’s notes This publication was prepared by the European Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling (ECORD) Science Operator (ESO) and Texas A&M University as an account of work performed under the International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP). Funding for the program is provided by the fol- lowing implementing organizations and international partners: National Science Foundation (NSF), United States Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan European Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling (ECORD) Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), People’s Republic of China Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM) Australian-New Zealand IODP Consortium (ANZIC) Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES), India Coordination for Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, Brazil (CAPES) Portions of this work may have been published in whole or in part in other International Ocean Discovery Program documents or publications.
    [Show full text]