6.4 Biological Resources

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

6.4 Biological Resources 6.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 6.4.1 OVERVIEW AND SUMMARY The primary plant community occupying the project site is orchard. Eucalyptus tree windrows, ornamental landscaping, and disturbed/ruderal areas comprise the remaining areas. No federally or state-listed, or other special- status plant or wildlife species were observed on the project site during several site the surveys. Based on the suitability of the habitat on the site, the site’s proximity to suitable habitat, and historic occurrences in the region, six special-status wildlife species have the potential to occur on the site. However, due to the disturbed nature of the site, the majority of these species would be expected to occur only as transients. It is possible that native bird species may utilize the trees, landscaping, or other areas on the site to nest during the breeding season, which generally occurs March through August. If construction were to take place during breeding season, impacts to these nesting birds, their eggs, or young could be considered significant. Nighttime light can disturb breeding and foraging behavior of nocturnal birds, mammals, and invertebrates, which may be considered a significant impact. A total of four coast live oak trees, considered a sensitive resource by the City of Camarillo, occur within the project site. If these trees were removed during the course of construction on the project site, it may be considered a significant impact. 6.4.2 LITERATURE AND DATA REVIEW Project-Related Studies The following project-related studies were utilized in the preparation of this section: • Glenn Lukos Associates, Jurisdictional Impact Analysis of the Camarillo Hills Project located in the City of Camarillo, Ventura County, California. February 23, 2017. • Glenn Lukos Associates, Jurisdictional Delineation of the Camarillo Hills Project located in the City of Camarillo, Ventura County, California. September 27, 2016. • Impact Sciences, Inc. 2016 Focused Special Status Plant Survey Report St. John’s Seminary Specific Plan City of Camarillo, California. July 2016. • E. Read and Associates. Addendum to Jurisdictional Delineation for the Camarillo Seminary Property. January 27, 2016. • Impact Sciences, Inc. Summary of Evaluation of Habitat Associated with Notified Protocol California Gnatcatcher Surveys; St. John’s Seminary, California. August 7, 2015. Impact Sciences, Inc. 6.4-1 St. John’s Seminary Residential Community EIR 0037.030 June 2017 6.4 Biological Resources • E. Read and Associates. Assessment of Federal and State Jurisdictional Waters and Wetlands. Camarillo Seminary Property, Camarillo, Ventura County, California. December 30, 2015. • L. Newman Design Group, Shea Homes St. John’s Parcel Tree Inventory, September 2007. Other Data Sources The following data sources were consulted: • California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB).1 • California Native Plant Society (CNPS), Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California.2 6.4.3 METHODOLOGY Impact Sciences’ biologists conducted reconnaissance-level surveys of the 88.45-acre project site in 2008, 2013, 2014, and 2016. The intent of these surveys was to document general site characteristics, such as quality and extent of natural and manufactured habitats, and to assess the need for further study of biological resources, including focused species surveys and jurisdictional waters determinations. The entire site was driven via paved and unpaved roads, while areas dominated by native plants or otherwise potentially suitable to special-status species were walked via meandering transects as allowed by vegetation density and terrain. Focused surveys were conducted for California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica) in August 20153 and special status plants in 2016.4 Jurisdictional delineations and impact assessments were completed in 2015, 2016, and 2017.5 The determination of the potential for special-status species to occur on the project site is 1 California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2016. Natural Diversity Database. 2 California Native Plant Society. 2016. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants Sacramento, CA. www.cnps.org/inventory. 3 Impact Sciences, Inc. August 17, 2015. Letter to Chris Dellith at USFWS: Summary of Evaluation of Habitat Associated with Notified Protocol California Gnatcatcher Surveys, St. John’s Seminary, Camarillo, CA. Prepared by Dave Crawford. 4 Impact Sciences, Inc. 2016 Focused Special Status Plant Survey Report St. John’s Seminary Specific Plan City of Camarillo, California. July 2016. 5 Read, Edith, Ph.D., December 30, 2015. Assessment of Federal and State Jurisdictional Waters and Wetlands, Camarillo Seminary Property, Camarillo, Ventura County, California. Prepared for Impact Sciences, Inc. Addendum to Jurisdictional for the Camarillo Seminary Property; January 27, 2016. Addendum to Jurisdictional Delineation for the Camarillo Seminary Property; Glenn Lukos Associates, Jurisdictional Impact Analysis of the Camarillo Hills Project located in the City of Camarillo, Ventura County, California. February 23, 2017; Glenn Lukos Associates, Jurisdictional Delineation of the Camarillo Hills Project located in the City of Camarillo, Ventura County, California. September 27, 2016. Impact Sciences, Inc. 6.4-2 St. John’s Seminary Residential Community EIR 0037.030 June 2017 6.4 Biological Resources based on the proximity of the project site to previously recorded occurrences in the CNDDB and CNPS databases, on-site vegetation and habitat quality, topography, elevation, soils, surrounding land uses, habitat preferences, and geographic ranges of special-status plant and wildlife species recorded to occur in the region. A detailed discussion of the potential for the presence of special-status species is provided in the Special- Status Resources subsection, below. 6.4.4 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Federal Regulations Federal Endangered Species Act The Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA), Section 9(a)(1)(B),6 prohibits the “take” of federally listed Threatened and Endangered Species. FESA (Section 3(19)) defines “take” as any action that would harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect any Threatened or Endangered species. If a proposed project may result in take of a listed species, and there is no nexus with any other federal agency, an Incidental Take Permit under Section 10(a)(1)(B) of FESA is required. If there is a nexus with a federal agency action, incidental take may be authorized pursuant to Section 7 consultation conducted under FESA. Federal Clean Water Act Wetlands and permanent and intermittent drainages, creeks, and streams are generally subject to the jurisdiction of the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) under Section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act.7 By USACE definition, all aquatic or riverine habitats between the “ordinary high water mark” of rivers, creeks, and streams are potentially considered “waters of the United States (US)” and may fall under USACE jurisdiction. Any deposit of fill into waters of the US, including wetlands, requires the acquisition of a permit from the USACE pursuant to Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act. 6 US Code, Title 16, Endangered Species Act, (1973 as amended), Section 9. 7 US Code, Title, 33, Section 404, Clean Water Act, Navigation and Navigable Waters, Chapter 26 Water Pollution Prevention and Controls, Subchapter IV Permits and Licenses, Section 1344 Permits for dredged or fill material (1977, as amended 1994). Impact Sciences, Inc. 6.4-3 St. John’s Seminary Residential Community EIR 0037.030 June 2017 6.4 Biological Resources Migratory Bird Treaty Reform Act of 1918 The Migratory Bird Treaty Reform Act (MBTRA) protects all migratory birds native to the United States and their nests. The act makes it unlawful to take any migratory bird and their active nests. State Regulations California Endangered Species Act Section 2080 of the California Endangered Species Act (CESA)8 prohibits the take of state-listed Threatened and Endangered species. CESA is found within Division 3, Chapter 1.5, Article 3 of California Fish and Game Code. California Fish and Game Code defines “take” in Section 86 (found within Division 0.5, Chapter 1, General Definitions) as any action that would hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill, or attempt to hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill any Threatened or Endangered species. If a proposed project may result in take of a listed species, a permit pursuant to Section 2081 of CESA is required from the CDFW. California Fish and Game Code Streambeds are potentially subject to regulation by the CDFW under Sections 1600 through 1603 of the California Fish and Game Code.9 Streambeds are defined in the California Code of Regulations10 as a body of water that flows at least periodically or intermittently through a bed or channel having banks and that supports fish or other aquatic life. This definition includes watercourses having surface or subsurface flow that supports or has supported riparian vegetation. CDFW generally asserts jurisdiction to the edge of the riparian vegetation canopy associated with any stream. Any work within a bed, bank or channel or the removal of associated riparian vegetation requires the acquisition of a Streambed Alteration Agreement from the CDFW. The proposed project would also be subject to the requirements of Sections 3503 and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code.11 These regulations protect all native birds and their nests by making it unlawful to take any migratory
Recommended publications
  • Piedra Blanca Trail Middle Sespe Creek/Pine Mountain Ridge, Ventura County, California by David L
    Vascular Plants of the Piedra Blanca Trail Middle Sespe Creek/Pine Mountain Ridge, Ventura County, California By David L. Magney Botanical Name Common Name Habit Family Acer macrophyllum Bigleaf Maple T Sapindaceae Acmispon ? Lotus AH Fabaceae Acmispon glaber var. glaber Deerweed S Fabaceae Acmispon strigosus var. strigosus Strigose Lotus AH Fabaceae Acourtia microcephala Sacapellote PH Asteraceae Adenostoma fasciculatum Chamise S Rosaceae Agoseris ? Mountain Dandelion PH Asteraceae Alnus rhombifolia White Alder T Betulaceae Amorpha californica False Indigo S Fabaceae Antirrhinum multiflorum Sticky Snapdragon S Veronicaceae Aquilegia formosa Columbine PH Ranunculaceae Arctostaphylos glauca Bigberry Manzanita S Ericaceae Artemisia douglasiana Mugwort S Asteraceae Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata Great Basin Sagebrush S Asteraceae Asclepias eriocarpa Woolly Milkweed AH Apocynaceae Astragalus ? Milkvetch AH Fabaceae Avena barbata* Slender Wild Oat AG Poaceae Baccharis salicifolia Mulefat S Asteraceae Boechera arcuata Few-flowered Rock Cress PH Brassicaceae Brickellia californica California Brickellbush S Asteraceae Bromus ? Brome PG Poaceae Bromus madritensis ssp. rubens* Red Brome AG Poaceae Bromus tectorum var. tectorum* Downy Brome AG Poaceae Calocedrus decurrens Incense-cedar T Cupressaceae Calyptridium monandrum Common Calyptridium AH Montiaceae Calystegia malacophylla ssp. cf pedicellata Sierra Morning-glory PH Convolvulaceae Camissonia boothii ssp. decorticans Shreading Evening Primrose AH Onagraceae Camissonia campestris ssp. campestris? Mojave Sun-cup AH Onagraceae Camissoniopsis micrantha Tiny Primrose AH Onagraceae Camissoniopsis pallida ssp. pallida Pale Primrose AH Onagraceae Carex ? Sedge PG Cyperaceae Carex senta Rough Sedge PG Cyperaceae Castilleja ? Indian Paintbrush PH Orobanchaceae Castilleja affinis ssp. affinis Lay-and-Collie's Indian Paintbrush PH Orobanchaceae Castilleja foliolosa Woolly Indian Paintbrush PH Orobanchaceae Castilleja subinclusa ssp. subinclusa Long-leaved Indian Paintbrush PH Orobanchaceae Caulanthus coulteri var.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Text Here Watershed 2011 Accomplishments
    Alluvial Scrub Native Plants for the Upper Santa Ana River Title text here Watershed 2011 Accomplishments This project was initiated to develop science-based plant lists and local plant materials for restoration of alluvial scrub habitats within the Santa Ana River Watershed. This project is a collaborative effort between the U.S. Forest Service’s Pacific Southwest Region, NRCS Area Resource Conservation Agencies, a local organic farm, and the California Native Plant Society (CNPS). During April 2011, a second training workshop for volunteers in relevé and rapid assessment sampling techniques was hosted by Irvine Ranch Conservancy and the Riverside-Corona Resource Conservation District (R- CRCD) and CNPS. The CNPS completed data analysis of 49 plots from this project and legacy data from other alluvial sage scrub sites. Plots were classified into 14 associations and 12 alliances. Potential plant lists for restoration sites and species suitable for seed production will be identified from the analysis results. Seed collection for grow-out trials is now in progress (Figure 1). Figure 2. The workshop on farm production of native seeds drew A two-day training workshop about farm production of 85 participants to the historic Mitten Building in Redlands, California native seeds for use in southern California ecoregions was during September 2011. held in September 2011. Dr. Arlee Montalvo, R-CRCD scientist, was the workshop’s lead organizer. Participants learned about standards for collection of wild seeds for Year Awarded: FY2011 initiating fields, seed certification, field planting and cultivation techniques, harvesting techniques, seed Project completion: FY2013 processing, seed storage and more (Figure 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura County Plant Species of Local Concern
    Checklist of Ventura County Rare Plants (Twenty-second Edition) CNPS, Rare Plant Program David L. Magney Checklist of Ventura County Rare Plants1 By David L. Magney California Native Plant Society, Rare Plant Program, Locally Rare Project Updated 4 January 2017 Ventura County is located in southern California, USA, along the east edge of the Pacific Ocean. The coastal portion occurs along the south and southwestern quarter of the County. Ventura County is bounded by Santa Barbara County on the west, Kern County on the north, Los Angeles County on the east, and the Pacific Ocean generally on the south (Figure 1, General Location Map of Ventura County). Ventura County extends north to 34.9014ºN latitude at the northwest corner of the County. The County extends westward at Rincon Creek to 119.47991ºW longitude, and eastward to 118.63233ºW longitude at the west end of the San Fernando Valley just north of Chatsworth Reservoir. The mainland portion of the County reaches southward to 34.04567ºN latitude between Solromar and Sequit Point west of Malibu. When including Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands, the southernmost extent of the County occurs at 33.21ºN latitude and the westernmost extent at 119.58ºW longitude, on the south side and west sides of San Nicolas Island, respectively. Ventura County occupies 480,996 hectares [ha] (1,188,562 acres [ac]) or 4,810 square kilometers [sq. km] (1,857 sq. miles [mi]), which includes Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands. The mainland portion of the county is 474,852 ha (1,173,380 ac), or 4,748 sq.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Taxon Common Lifeform Status ADOXACEAE Sambucus Nigra Ssp. Caerulea Blue Elderberry Shrub Native AGAVACEAE Chlorogalum Sp
    family taxon common lifeform status ADOXACEAE Sambucus nigra ssp. caerulea Blue elderberry Shrub native AGAVACEAE Chlorogalum sp soaproot Perennial herb native AGAVACEAE Hesperoyucca whipplei Chaparral yucca Shrub native AIZOACEAE Drosanthemum sp. Dewflower, iceplant Perennial herb non-native ANACARDIACEAE Malosma laurina Laurel sumac Tree, Shrub native ANACARDIACEAE Toxicodendron diversilobum Poison oak Vine, Shrub native APIACEAE Apiastrum angustifolium Wild celery Annual herb native APIACEAE Conium maculatum Poison hemlock Perennial herb invasive non-native APIACEAE Daucus pusillus Wild carrot Annual herb native APIACEAE Foeniculum vulgare Fennel Perennial herb invasive non-native APIACEAE Sanicula arguta Sharp toothed snakeroot Perennial herb native APOCYNACEAE Nerium oleander Oleander Shrub non-native ARECACEAE Washingtonia robusta Washington fan palm Tree invasive non-native ASTERACEAE Ambrosia psilostachya Ragweed Perennial herb native ASTERACEAE Artemisia californica Coastal sage brush Shrub native ASTERACEAE Artemisia douglasiana California mugwort Perennial herb native ASTERACEAE Artemisia palmeri San diego sagewort Shrub native ASTERACEAE Baccharis pilularis Coyote brush Shrub native ASTERACEAE Baccharis salicifolia ssp. salicifolia Mule fat Shrub native ASTERACEAE Brickellia californica California brickellia Perennial herb native Carduus pycnocephalus ssp. ASTERACEAE pycnocephalus Italian thistle Annual herb non-native ASTERACEAE Centaurea melitensis Tocalote Annual herb invasive non-native ASTERACEAE Chaenactis artemisiifolia
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Flora of the Liebre Mountains, Western Transverse Ranges, California Steve Boyd Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 18 | Issue 2 Article 15 1999 Vascular flora of the Liebre Mountains, western Transverse Ranges, California Steve Boyd Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Boyd, Steve (1999) "Vascular flora of the Liebre Mountains, western Transverse Ranges, California," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 18: Iss. 2, Article 15. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol18/iss2/15 Aliso, 18(2), pp. 93-139 © 1999, by The Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, CA 91711-3157 VASCULAR FLORA OF THE LIEBRE MOUNTAINS, WESTERN TRANSVERSE RANGES, CALIFORNIA STEVE BOYD Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden 1500 N. College Avenue Claremont, Calif. 91711 ABSTRACT The Liebre Mountains form a discrete unit of the Transverse Ranges of southern California. Geo­ graphically, the range is transitional to the San Gabriel Mountains, Inner Coast Ranges, Tehachapi Mountains, and Mojave Desert. A total of 1010 vascular plant taxa was recorded from the range, representing 104 families and 400 genera. The ratio of native vs. nonnative elements of the flora is 4:1, similar to that documented in other areas of cismontane southern California. The range is note­ worthy for the diversity of Quercus and oak-dominated vegetation. A total of 32 sensitive plant taxa (rare, threatened or endangered) was recorded from the range. Key words: Liebre Mountains, Transverse Ranges, southern California, flora, sensitive plants. INTRODUCTION belt and Peirson's (1935) handbook of trees and shrubs. Published documentation of the San Bernar­ The Transverse Ranges are one of southern Califor­ dino Mountains is little better, limited to Parish's nia's most prominent physiographic features.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant Species with Documented Or Recorded Occurrence in Placer County
    A PPENDIX II Vascular Plant Species with Documented or Reported Occurrence in Placer County APPENDIX II. Vascular Plant Species with Documented or Reported Occurrence in Placer County Family Scientific Name Common Name FERN AND FERN ALLIES Azollaceae Mosquito fern family Azolla filiculoides Pacific mosquito fern Dennstaedtiaceae Bracken family Pteridium aquilinum var.pubescens Bracken fern Dryopteridaceae Wood fern family Athyrium alpestre var. americanum Alpine lady fern Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosorum Lady fern Cystopteris fragilis Fragile fern Polystichum imbricans ssp. curtum Cliff sword fern Polystichum imbricans ssp. imbricans Imbricate sword fern Polystichum kruckebergii Kruckeberg’s hollyfern Polystichum lonchitis Northern hollyfern Polystichum munitum Sword fern Equisetaceae Horsetail family Equisetum arvense Common horsetail Equisetum hyemale ssp. affine Scouring rush Equisetum laevigatum Smooth horsetail Isoetaceae Quillwort family Isoetes bolanderi Bolander’s quillwort Isoetes howellii Howell’s quillwort Isoetes orcuttii Orcutt’s quillwort Lycopodiaceae Club-moss family Lycopodiella inundata Bog club-moss Marsileaceae Marsilea family Marsilea vestita ssp. vestita Water clover Pilularia americana American pillwort Ophioglossaceae Adder’s-tongue family Botrychium multifidum Leathery grapefern Polypodiaceae Polypody family Polypodium hesperium Western polypody Pteridaceae Brake family Adiantum aleuticum Five-finger maidenhair Adiantum jordanii Common maidenhair fern Aspidotis densa Indian’s dream Cheilanthes cooperae Cooper’s
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura County Planning Division DRAFT 2018 Locally Important Plant List
    Ventura County Planning Division DRAFT 2018 Locally Important Plant List Number of Scientific Name Common Name Habit Family Federal/State Status Occurrences in Source Ventura County Abronia turbinata Torr. ex S. Consortium of California Turbinate Sand-verbena A/PH Nyctaginaceae 2 Watson Herbaria Acanthoscyphus parishii var. abramsii (E.A. McGregor) Consortium of California Abrams' Oxytheca AH Polygonaceae CRPR 1B.2 4-5 Reveal [synonym: Oxytheca Herbaria parishii var. abramsii] Acanthoscyphus parishii Consortium of California Parish Oxytheca AH Polygonaceae CRPR 4.2 1 (Parry) Small var. parishii Herbaria Rancho Santa Ana Acmispon glaber var. Botanic Garden brevialatus (Ottley) Brouillet Short Deerweed PH Fabaceae 1 Herbarium Acmispon heermannii Heermann Lotus or Consortium of California (Durand & Hilg.) Brouillet var. PH Fabaceae 4 Hosackia Herbaria heermannii Acmispon heermannii var. Roundleaf Heermann Consortium of California PH Fabaceae 1 orbicularis (A. Gray) Brouillet Lotus or Hosackia Herbaria Acmispon junceus (Bentham) Consortium of California Rush Hosackia AH Fabaceae 2 Brouillet var. junceus Herbaria 1 Number of Scientific Name Common Name Habit Family Federal/State Status Occurrences in Source Ventura County Acmispon micranthus (Torrey Consortium of California Grab Hosackia or Lotus AH Fabaceae 3 & A. Gray) Brouillet Herbaria Acmispon parviflorus Consortium of California Tiny Lotus AH Fabaceae 2 (Bentham) D.D. Sokoloff Herbaria Consortium of California Agrostis hallii Vasey Hall's Bentgrass PG Poaceae 1 Herbaria Common or Broadleaf Consortium of California Alisma plantago-aquaticum L. PH Alismataceae 4 Water-plantain Herbaria Consortium of California Allium amplectens Torrey Narrowleaf Onion PG Alliaceae 1 Herbaria Allium denticulatum (Traub) Consortium of California Dentate Fringed Onion PG Alliaceae 1 D. McNeal Herbaria Allium lacunosum S.
    [Show full text]
  • Developmental Origins of Structural Diversity in Pollen Walls of Compositae
    Plant Syst Evol (2010) 284:17–32 DOI 10.1007/s00606-009-0232-2 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Developmental origins of structural diversity in pollen walls of Compositae Stephen Blackmore • Alexandra H. Wortley • John J. Skvarla • Nina I. Gabarayeva • John R. Rowley Received: 5 June 2008 / Accepted: 21 September 2009 / Published online: 15 October 2009 Ó Springer-Verlag 2009 Abstract Compositae exhibit some of the most complex Keywords Compositae Á Exine dissolution Á and diverse pollen grains in flowering plants. This paper Exine ultrastructure Á Palynology Á Pollen development Á reviews the evolutionary and developmental origins of this Self-assembly diversity in pollen structure using recent models based on the behaviour of colloids and formation of micelles in the differentiating microspore glycocalyx and primexine. The Introduction developmental model is consistent with observations of structures recovered by pollen wall dissolution. Pollen wall Compositae is not only the largest family of flowering diversity in Compositae is inferred to result from small plants (Funk et al. 2005), but is also remarkable for the changes in the glycocalyx, for example ionic concentration, great diversity of internal and external forms encountered which trigger the self-assembly of highly diverse struc- in its pollen grains (Figs. 1, 2). Many investigators have tures. Whilst the fine details of exine substructure are, made observations on Compositae pollen, ever since the therefore, not under direct genetic control, it is likely that invention of microscopy (for a comprehensive bibliography genes establish differences in the glycocalyx which define see Wortley et al. 2009) but the details were first docu- the conditions for self-assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Alluvial Scrub Vegetation of Southern California, a Focus on the Santa Ana River Watershed in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, California
    Alluvial Scrub Vegetation of Southern California, A Focus on the Santa Ana River Watershed In Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, California By Jennifer Buck-Diaz and Julie M. Evens California Native Plant Society, Vegetation Program 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 In cooperation with Arlee Montalvo Riverside-Corona Resource Conservation District (RCRCD) 4500 Glenwood Drive, Bldg. A Riverside, CA 92501 September 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Background and Standards .......................................................................................................... 1 Table 1. Classification of Vegetation: Example Hierarchy .................................................... 2 Methods ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Study Area ................................................................................................................................3 Field Sampling ..........................................................................................................................3 Figure 1. Study area map illustrating new alluvial scrub surveys.......................................... 4 Figure 2. Study area map of both new and compiled alluvial scrub surveys. ....................... 5 Table 2. Environmental Variables ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cottonwood Pass Checklist 09Jun2019
    Checklist1 of Vascular Flora of Cottonwood Pass2 San Luis Obispo County, California (09 June 2019) David J. Keil Robert F. Hoover Herbarium Biological Sciences Department California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, California Scientific Name Common Name Family Rare n ❀ Achillea millefolium yarrow ASTERACEAE v n ❀ Achyrachaena mollis blow wives ASTERACEAE v n Acmispon brachycarpus shortpod deervetch FABACEAE v n Acmispon wrangelianus California deervetch FABACEAE o n Allium crispum crinkled onion ALLIACEAE v n Allium howellii var. howellii Howell's onion ALLIACEAE 1B.3 v n Allophyllum gilioides subsp. gilioides blue false-gilia POLEMONIACEAE v 1 Please notify the author of additions or corrections to this list ([email protected]). ❀ — See Wildflowers of San Luis Obispo, California, second edition (2018) for photograph. Most are illustrated in the first edition as well; old names for some species in square brackets. n — California native i — exotic species, introduced to California, naturalized or waif. v — documented by one or more specimens (Consortium of California Herbaria record; specimen in OBI; or collection that has not yet been accessioned) o — observed during field surveys; no voucher specimen known Rare—California Rare Plant Rank 2 Southern Diablo Range along Highway 41 corridor, northeastern corner of San Luis Obispo County. Scientific Name Common Name Family Rare n Amsinckia intermedia common fiddleneck BORAGINACEAE o n Amsinckia lycopsoides bugloss fiddleneck BORAGINACEAE v n Amsinckia tessellata var. gloriosa Carrizo fiddleneck BORAGINACEAE v n Amsinckia tessellata var. tessellata desert fiddleneck BORAGINACEAE o n Ancistrocarphus filagineus woolly fishhooks ASTERACEAE o n Androsace elongata subsp. acuta California rock-primrose PRIMULACEAE 4.2 v n Antirrhinum ovatum oval-leaved snapdragon PLANTAGINACEAE 4.2 v n Aphyllon californicum subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MEGACHILINE BEES of CALIFORNIA (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)
    BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY VOLUME 3 THE MEGACHILINE BEES OF CALIFORNIA (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) BY PAUL D. HURD, JR. (Department of Entomology and Parasitology, University of California, Berkeley) AND CHARLES D. MICHENER (Department of Entomology, University of Kansas, Lawrence) UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES 1955 BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY Editors: E. G. Linsley, E. 0. Essie, S. B. Freeborn, R. L. Usinger Volume 3, pp. 1-248 Submitted by Editors, May 14, 1954 Issued May 31, 1955 Price $3.50 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON, ENGLAND PRINTED BY OFFSET IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Contents Introduction ....................... 1 Bionomics ...................... 1 Floral relationships ................... 2 Distribution ..................... 2 Acknowledgments .................... 3 Systematics ....................... 6 Family Megachilidae ............ ....... 6 Phyletic relationships within the Megachilini ............. 8 Key to the Genera of Megachilini found in the Western Hemisphere .......10 Heriades .............. .......11 Chelos toma .................... 24 Chelostomopsis ................... 37 Hoplitis .............. .......44 Anthocopa ............. .......94 Proteriades ............. Ashmeadiella ..................... 153 Diceratosmia ............. .215 Osmia ...................... 217 Megachile .............. .......217 Coelioxys .............. .......222 Literature Cited ...................... 223 Index
    [Show full text]
  • Parallel Ecological Speciation in Plants?
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation International Journal of Ecology Volume 2012, Article ID 939862, 17 pages doi:10.1155/2012/939862 Review Article Parallel Ecological Speciation in Plants? Katherine L. Ostevik,1 Brook T. Moyers,1 Gregory L. Owens,1 and Loren H. Rieseberg1, 2 1 Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, 3529-6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 2 Biology Department, Indiana University, 1001 E Third Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Katherine L. Ostevik, [email protected] Received 3 August 2011; Revised 14 October 2011; Accepted 18 November 2011 Academic Editor: Andrew Hendry Copyright © 2012 Katherine L. Ostevik et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Populations that have independently evolved reproductive isolation from their ancestors while remaining reproductively cohesive have undergone parallel speciation. A specific type of parallel speciation, known as parallel ecological speciation, is one of several forms of evidence for ecology’s role in speciation. In this paper we search the literature for candidate examples of parallel ecological speciation in plants. We use four explicit criteria (independence, isolation, compatibility, and selection) to judge the strength of evidence for each potential case. We find that evidence for parallel ecological speciation in plants is unexpectedly scarce, especially relative to the many well-characterized systems in animals. This does not imply that ecological speciation is uncommon in plants. It only implies that evidence from parallel ecological speciation is rare.
    [Show full text]