DOCSLIB.ORG

Insecta, Lepidoptera, Macroheterocera) В Большехехцирском Заповеднике (Хабаровский Край) В

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Insecta, Lepidoptera, Macroheterocera) В Большехехцирском Заповеднике (Хабаровский Край) В Амурский зоологический журнал, 2020, т. XII, № 3 Amurian Zoological Journal, 2020, vol. XII, no. 3 www.azjournal.ru УДК 595.787 DOI: 10.33910/2686-9519-2020-12-3-330-338 http://zoobank.org/References/FAD8E006-6590-4A51-B2B1-0BC45CC4773B ДОПОЛНЕНИЯ К ФАУНЕ НОЧНЫХ МАКРОЧЕШУЕКРЫЛЫХ (INSECTA, LEPIDOPTERA, MACROHETEROCERA) В БОЛЬШЕХЕХЦИРСКОМ ЗАПОВЕДНИКЕ (ХАБАРОВСКИЙ КРАЙ) В. В. Дубатолов1, 2 1 Институт систематики и экологии животных СО РАН, ул. Фрунзе, д. 11, 630091, г. Новосибирск, Россия 2 ФГБУ «Заповедное Приамурье», ул. Юбилейная, д. 8, Хабаровский край, 680502, пос. Бычиха, Россия Сведения об авторе Аннотация. Обсуждаются причины исчезновения в Приамурье Дубатолов Владимир Викторович павлиноглазок рода Eriogyna, отмечавшихся неоднократно более 100 лет E-mail: [email protected] назад; эти материалы были переопределены В. В. Золотухиным как SPIN-код: 6703-7948 E. koreanis (Brechlin, 2009). Высказывается предположение, что бабочек Scopus Author ID: 14035403600 выращивали китайцы на сопредельной территории для производства ReseacherID: N-1168-2018 рыбной лески; с появлением искуственной лески выращивание Eriogyna прекратилось. Бабочки этого рода хорошо летают и могли перелетать на российскую территорию из Китая с ферм. Также приводится 9 видов семейств Nolidae, Erebidae и Noctuidae, собранных в Большехехцирском заповеднике и его окрестностях в 2018–2019 гг. Negritothripa hampsoni Wil., Athetis lapidea Wil., Euplexia koreaeplexia Bryk и Actebia squalida Guen. впервые найдены в Приамурье. Nola confusalis H.-S., Autographa Права: © Автор (2020). Опубликова- но Российским государственным urupina Bryk, Nonagria puengeleri Schaw. и Lacanobia oleracea L. (Noctuidae) педагогическим университетом им. впервые обнаружены на территории Большехехцирского заповедника. А. И. Герцена. Открытый доступ на Ключевые слова: Macroheterocera, Eriogyna koreanis, Nolidae, Erebidae, условиях лицензии CC BY-NC 4.0. Noctuidae, Большехехцирский заповедник, Хехцир, Хабаровск. ADDITIONS TO THE MACROMOTH FAUNA (INSECTA, LEPIDOPTERA, MACROHETEROCERA) OF BOLSHEKHEKHTSYRSKY NATURE RESERVE (KHABAROVSKY KRAI) V. V. Dubatolov1, 2 1 Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 11 Frunze Str., 630091, Novosibirsk, Russia 2 Federal State Budgetary Institution ‘‘Zapovednoe Priamurye’’, 8 Yubileinaya Str., Khabarovsky Region, Khabarovsky Krai 680502, Bychikha Village, Russia Author Abstract. Thepaper discusses the cause for the disappearance of Saturniidae Vladimir V. Dubatolov of the genus Eriogyna from the territory of Bolshekhekhtsyrsky (Great Khekhtsyr) E-mail: [email protected] Nature Reserve, where the species were repeatedly reported over a century SPIN: 6703-7948 ago. These specimens were re-identified by V.V. Zolotuhin asE. koreanis Scopus Author ID: 14035403600 (Brechlin, 2009). The author suggests that these moths were bred in the ReseacherID: N-1168-2018 neighbouring Chinese territory for the silk used in fishing line production. The breeding of Eriogyna later ceased after the synthetic fishing line invention. These moths are good flyers, and, consequently, they could reach the Russian territory from the Chinese breeding farms. In addition, 9 species from Nolidae, Erebidae, and Noctuidae, were cited from Bolshekhekhtsyrsky Nature Reserve and its environs in 2018-2019. Negritothripa hampsoni Wil., Athetis lapidea Wil., Euplexia koreaeplexia Bryk and Actebia squalida Guen. were collected in the Amur basin for the first time. Nola confusalis H.-S., Autographa urupina Copyright: © The Author (2020). Bryk, Nonagria puengeleri Schaw. and Lacanobia oleracea L. (Noctuidae) were Published by Herzen State Pedagogical recorded from Bolshekhekhtsyrsky Nature Reserve for the first time. University of Russia. Open access under Keywords: Macroheterocera, Eriogyna koreanis, Nolidae, Erebidae, Noctuidae, CC BY-NC License 4.0. Bolshekhekhtsyrsky Nature Reserve, Khekhtsyr, Khabarovsk. 330 В. В. Дубатолов ВВЕДЕНИЕ Виды, впервые собранные на террито- рии Приамурья в целом, отмечены двумя Чешуекрылые Большехехцирского за- звездочками (**), для Большехехцирского поведника изучаются нами уже на протя- заповедника — одной звездочкой (*). жении 15 лет. Тем не менее даже после тако- го продолжительного периода на этой терри- ДОПОЛНЕНИЯ ПО ВЫСШИМ тории выявляются виды, новые не только для РАЗНОУСЫМ ЧЕШУЕКРЫЛЫМ заповедника, но и для Приамурья в целом. (MACROHETEROCERA) Собранные ранее, в 2005–2017 гг., данные БОЛЬШЕХЕХЦИРСКОГО ЗАПОВЕДНИКА по ночным макрочешуекрылым опубли- кованы в серии статей (Дубатолов, Долгих Семейство Saturniidae — сатурнии, 2007; 2009а; 2009b; 2010; 2011; Беляев и др. или павлиноглазки 2010; Василенко, Беляев 2011; Дубатолов и Eriogyna koreanis (Brechlin, 2009) — рас- др. 2012; 2013; 2014; Василенко и др. 2014; пространен на востоке Азии в Корее, Се- Volynkin, Dubatolov 2015; Дубатолов 2015a; веро-Восточном и Северном Китае (Зо- 2015b; 2016; 2018; 2019). лотухин 2017). По личному сообщению В настоящей работе приводятся наход- В. В. Золотухина, минимум пара самцов ки новых для заповедника чешуекрылых, этого вида (рис. 1), снабженные этикет- полученные в 2018–2019 гг. Материалы со- ками “Amur Chabarowsk” (Хабаровск) и браны в следующих местах: “Kassakewitschevo (Usurigebiet)” (Казакеви- 1) Бычиха (48°18ʹ с. ш., 134°49ʹ в. д.), по- чево) (Золотухин 2017) хранится в коллек- сёлок, сбор на свет на стене конторы за- ции Зоологического исследовательского поведника; в осеннее время производился музея Александра Кёнига (Das Zoologische также отлов чешуекрылых, прилетающих Forschungsmuseum Alexander König), при- на пахучие приманки; чём эти экземпляры были собраны более 2) кордон Чирки, дубовый лес (48°16ʹ 100 лет назад. Сохранившийся в западно- с. ш., 134°46ʹ в. д., 100 м над уровнем моря) европейских музеях коллекционный мате- в многопородном хвойно-широколиствен- риал по роду Eriogyna Jordan с территории ном лесу в 300 м выше трассы на правом России был переопределен В. В. Золотухи- берегу ручья Соснинский; ным (2017) как E. koreanis Brechlin. Так как 3) Казакевичево (48°16ʹ с. ш., 134°44ʹ в настоящее время этот вид на террито- в. д.), посёлок у впадения реки Уссури в рии России не отмечается, можно сделать реку Амур, вероятно, сборы местных жи- предположение, что в то время существо- телей в конце XIX — начале XX века. вал какой-то фактор, в результате которо- 4) ручей Соснинский (48°16ʹ с. ш., го этот вид мог попадаться на территории 134°46ʹ в. д., 100 м над уровнем моря) в России; в настоящее же время этот фактор многопородном хвойно-широколиствен- действовать перестал. Существует давно ном лесу в 300 м выше трассы на правом опубликованная информация, что вплоть берегу ручья Соснинский; до первых десятилетий XX века очень гру- 5) кордон Соснинский (48°14ʹ с. ш., бый и прочный шелк павлиноглазок рода 134°47ʹ в. д., 450 м над уровнем моря), рас- Eriogyna Jordan, 1911 (приписываемых в то положен в широколиственно-хвойном лесу время к E. pyretorum Westwood, 1847) ис- в верхней части долины ручья Соснинский; пользовался китайцами в производстве 6) вершина Большого Хехцира (48°13ʹ рыбной лески, причем производство такой с. ш., 134°47ʹ в. д., 940 м над уровнем моря) лески местами достигало нескольких тонн на водоразделе Большого Хехцира у север- (Jordan 1911). К концу XIX века китайцы- ного подножья вершинного останца в раз- ханьцы (а не только маньчжуры и близкие реженном крупнотравном елово-пихтово- к ним народности) уже имели возможность каменноберёзовом лесу. селиться на южном берегу реки Амур и, по 331 Дополнения к фауне ночных макрочешуекрылых (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Macroheterocera)... всей видимости, могли завозить грену этих Примечание. Транспалеаркт. На юге Даль- павлиноглазок из более южных районов Ки- него Востока России отмечен повсеместно, тая, а также выращивать гусениц Eriogyna в как на материке, так и на Сахалине и Юж- домашних условиях для производства рыб- ных Курилах (Kononenko 2010). На Хехци- ной лески. Отдельные бабочки с домашних ре отмечен только в верхней части хребта ферм, расположенных на южном берегу среди хвойного леса. Гусеницы — полифа- реки Амур, могли улетать и отлавливаться ги на древесно-кустарниковых листопад- уже на российской территории Приамурья. ных породах, а также некоторых губоцвет- К примеру, на Тайвань Eriogyna pyretorum ных (мята) (Матов, Кононенко 2012). Wstw. была интродуцирована в начале XX **Negritothripa hampsoni (Wileman, 1911) века именно для производства рыбной ле- (рис. 3) ски (“Saturnia pyretorum Westwood, 1847” Материал: Бычиха, на свет, 7–8.07.2019 — 1♂. 2020). После начала производства рыбной Примечание. Ранее был известен из Сред- лески на основе искусственных полиме- него Приамурья (вероятно, с территории ров производство шелка Eriogyna Wstw. Еврейской АО (Kononenko 2010, map 444)), должно было стать нерентабельным и пре- Приморья, Китая, Кореи и Японии (там же), кратилось, поэтому бабочки перестали по- но в 2016 г. был обнаружен в Хабаровском падаться также и на территории России. крае на территории Ботчинского заповед- Предположение В. В. Золотухина (2017), ника (Дубатолов 2017). В связи с тем, что что имело место естественное периодиче- этот вид ни разу не отмечался на Хехцире ское изменение северной границы ареала в течение последних 14 лет, несмотря на Eriogyna koreanis Brechlin, не согласуется с постоянные сборы, можно предположить, отсутствием вида в настоящее время даже что это изменение северной границы аре- на юге Приморского края в условиях явно- ала вида недавнее и связано с глобальным го потепления климата и неоднократного потеплением климата. Гусеницы
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 Years Later: Changes and Additions
    ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (August 2000) 31 (1/2):327-367< Würzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 "Fauna lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 years later: changes and additions. Part 5. Noctuidae (Insecto, Lepidoptera) by Vasily V. A n ik in , Sergey A. Sachkov , Va d im V. Z o lo t u h in & A n drey V. Sv ir id o v received 24.II.2000 Summary: 630 species of the Noctuidae are listed for the modern Volgo-Ural fauna. 2 species [Mesapamea hedeni Graeser and Amphidrina amurensis Staudinger ) are noted from Europe for the first time and one more— Nycteola siculana Fuchs —from Russia. 3 species ( Catocala optata Godart , Helicoverpa obsoleta Fabricius , Pseudohadena minuta Pungeler ) are deleted from the list. Supposedly they were either erroneously determinated or incorrect noted from the region under consideration since Eversmann 's work. 289 species are recorded from the re­ gion in addition to Eversmann 's list. This paper is the fifth in a series of publications1 dealing with the composition of the pres­ ent-day fauna of noctuid-moths in the Middle Volga and the south-western Cisurals. This re­ gion comprises the administrative divisions of the Astrakhan, Volgograd, Saratov, Samara, Uljanovsk, Orenburg, Uralsk and Atyraus (= Gurjev) Districts, together with Tataria and Bash­ kiria. As was accepted in the first part of this series, only material reliably labelled, and cover­ ing the last 20 years was used for this study. The main collections are those of the authors: V. A n i k i n (Saratov and Volgograd Districts), S.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods and Work Profile
    REVIEW OF THE KNOWN AND POTENTIAL BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS OF PHYTOPHTHORA AND THE LIKELY IMPACT ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES JANUARY 2011 Simon Conyers Kate Somerwill Carmel Ramwell John Hughes Ruth Laybourn Naomi Jones Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 15 2. Review of the potential impacts on species of higher trophic groups .................... 16 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Results ............................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 44 3. Review of the potential impacts on ecosystem services .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Bucking the trend The diversity of Anthropocene 'winners' among British moths Boyes, Douglas H.; Fox, Richard; Shortall, Chris R.; Whittaker, Robert J. Published in: Frontiers of Biogeography DOI: 10.21425/F5FBG43862 Publication date: 2019 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Boyes, D. H., Fox, R., Shortall, C. R., & Whittaker, R. J. (2019). Bucking the trend: The diversity of Anthropocene 'winners' among British moths. Frontiers of Biogeography, 11(3), 1-15. [3862]. https://doi.org/10.21425/F5FBG43862 Download date: 28. sep.. 2021 UC Merced Frontiers of Biogeography Title Bucking the trend: the diversity of Anthropocene ‘winners’ among British moths Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6hz0x33v Journal Frontiers of Biogeography, 11(3) Authors Boyes, Douglas H. Fox, Richard Shortall, Chris R. et al. Publication Date 2019 DOI 10.21425/F5FBG43862 Supplemental Material https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6hz0x33v#supplemental License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California a Frontiers of Biogeography 2019, 11.3, e43862 Frontiers of Biogeography RESEARCH ARTICLE the scientific journal of the International Biogeography Society Bucking the trend: the diversity of Anthropocene ‘winners’ among British moths Douglas H. Boyes1,*, Richard Fox2, Chris R. Shortall3 and Robert J. Whittaker1,4 1 School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK; 2 Butterfly Conservation, Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Dorset, BH20 5QP, UK; 3 Rothamsted Insect Survey, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, UK and 4 Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoogeography of the Holarctic Species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): Importance of the Bering Ian Refuge
    © Entomologica Fennica. 8.XI.l991 Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Bering ian refuge Kauri Mikkola, J, D. Lafontaine & V. S. Kononenko Mikkola, K., Lafontaine, J.D. & Kononenko, V. S. 1991 : Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Beringian refuge. - En to mol. Fennica 2: 157- 173. As a result of published and unpublished revisionary work, literature compi­ lation and expeditions to the Beringian area, 98 species of the Noctuidae are listed as Holarctic and grouped according to their taxonomic and distributional history. Of the 44 species considered to be "naturall y" Holarctic before this study, 27 (61 %) are confirmed as Holarctic; 16 species are added on account of range extensions and 29 because of changes in their taxonomic status; 17 taxa are deleted from the Holarctic list. This brings the total of the group to 72 species. Thirteen species are considered to be introduced by man from Europe, a further eight to have been transported by man in the subtropical areas, and five migrant species, three of them of Neotropical origin, may have been assisted by man. The m~jority of the "naturally" Holarctic species are associated with tundra habitats. The species of dry tundra are frequently endemic to Beringia. In the taiga zone, most Holarctic connections consist of Palaearctic/ Nearctic species pairs. The proportion ofHolarctic species decreases from 100 % in the High Arctic to between 40 and 75 % in Beringia and the northern taiga zone, and from between 10 and 20 % in Newfoundland and Finland to between 2 and 4 % in southern Ontario, Central Europe, Spain and Primorye.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Merced Frontiers of Biogeography
    UC Merced Frontiers of Biogeography Title Bucking the trend: the diversity of Anthropocene ‘winners’ among British moths Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6hz0x33v Journal Frontiers of Biogeography, 11(3) Authors Boyes, Douglas H. Fox, Richard Shortall, Chris R. et al. Publication Date 2019 DOI 10.21425/F5FBG43862 Supplemental Material https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6hz0x33v#supplemental License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California a Frontiers of Biogeography 2019, 11.3, e43862 Frontiers of Biogeography RESEARCH ARTICLE the scientific journal of the International Biogeography Society Bucking the trend: the diversity of Anthropocene ‘winners’ among British moths Douglas H. Boyes1,*, Richard Fox2, Chris R. Shortall3 and Robert J. Whittaker1,4 1 School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK; 2 Butterfly Conservation, Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Dorset, BH20 5QP, UK; 3 Rothamsted Insect Survey, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, UK and 4 Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. *Correspondence: Douglas H. Boyes, Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK. E-mail: [email protected]. Abstract Highlights An appreciation of how some species are becoming more • Trends in abundance and occurrence are described common despite unprecedented anthropogenic pressures for 51 British macro-moths that have become more could offer key insights for mitigating the global biodiversity common, using data from two long-term recording crisis. Research to date has largely focused on declining schemes species, while species that are becoming more common have received relatively little attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List of Noctuid Moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae And
    Бiологiчний вiсник МДПУ імені Богдана Хмельницького 6 (2), стор. 87–97, 2016 Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 6 (2), pp. 87–97, 2016 ARTICLE UDC 595.786 CHECK LIST OF NOCTUID MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE AND EREBIDAE EXCLUDING LYMANTRIINAE AND ARCTIINAE) FROM THE SAUR MOUNTAINS (EAST KAZAKHSTAN AND NORTH-EAST CHINA) A.V. Volynkin1, 2, S.V. Titov3, M. Černila4 1 Altai State University, South Siberian Botanical Garden, Lenina pr. 61, Barnaul, 656049, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Tomsk State University, Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecology, Lenina pr. 36, 634050, Tomsk, Russia 3 The Research Centre for Environmental ‘Monitoring’, S. Toraighyrov Pavlodar State University, Lomova str. 64, KZ-140008, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan. E-mail: [email protected] 4 The Slovenian Museum of Natural History, Prešernova 20, SI-1001, Ljubljana, Slovenia. E-mail: [email protected] The paper contains data on the fauna of the Lepidoptera families Erebidae (excluding subfamilies Lymantriinae and Arctiinae) and Noctuidae of the Saur Mountains (East Kazakhstan). The check list includes 216 species. The map of collecting localities is presented. Key words: Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Erebidae, Asia, Kazakhstan, Saur, fauna. INTRODUCTION The fauna of noctuoid moths (the families Erebidae and Noctuidae) of Kazakhstan is still poorly studied. Only the fauna of West Kazakhstan has been studied satisfactorily (Gorbunov 2011). On the faunas of other parts of the country, only fragmentary data are published (Lederer, 1853; 1855; Aibasov & Zhdanko 1982; Hacker & Peks 1990; Lehmann et al. 1998; Benedek & Bálint 2009; 2013; Korb 2013). In contrast to the West Kazakhstan, the fauna of noctuid moths of East Kazakhstan was studied inadequately.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of the Moth Fauna (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) of a Wetland Forest: a Case Study from Motovun Forest, Istria, Croatia
    PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM UDC 57:61 VOL. 117, No 3, 399–414, 2015 CODEN PDBIAD DOI: 10.18054/pb.2015.117.3.2945 ISSN 0031-5362 original research article Diversity of the moth fauna (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) of a wetland forest: A case study from Motovun forest, Istria, Croatia Abstract TONI KOREN1 KAJA VUKOTIĆ2 Background and Purpose: The Motovun forest located in the Mirna MITJA ČRNE3 river valley, central Istria, Croatia is one of the last lowland floodplain 1 Croatian Herpetological Society – Hyla, forests remaining in the Mediterranean area. Lipovac I. n. 7, 10000 Zagreb Materials and Methods: Between 2011 and 2014 lepidopterological 2 Biodiva – Conservation Biologist Society, research was carried out on 14 sampling sites in the area of Motovun forest. Kettejeva 1, 6000 Koper, Slovenia The moth fauna was surveyed using standard light traps tents. 3 Biodiva – Conservation Biologist Society, Results and Conclusions: Altogether 403 moth species were recorded Kettejeva 1, 6000 Koper, Slovenia in the area, of which 65 can be considered at least partially hygrophilous. These results list the Motovun forest as one of the best surveyed regions in Correspondence: Toni Koren Croatia in respect of the moth fauna. The current study is the first of its kind [email protected] for the area and an important contribution to the knowledge of moth fauna of the Istria region, and also for Croatia in general. Key words: floodplain forest, wetland moth species INTRODUCTION uring the past 150 years, over 300 papers concerning the moths Dand butterflies of Croatia have been published (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8).
    [Show full text]
  • Y Nycteola Columbana (Turner, 1925), Nolidae (Lepidoptera: Noctuoidea) Nuevos Para La Fauna De Asturias (España)
    Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa (S.E.A.), nº 59 (31/12/2016): 281–282. ISSN: 1134-9064 NOTAS CIENTÍFICAS Nola confusalis (Herrich-Schäffer, 1847), Pseudoips prasinana (Linnaeus, 1758) y Nycteola columbana (Turner, 1925), Nolidae (Lepidoptera: Noctuoidea) nuevos para la fauna de Asturias (España) Juan José Guerrero, Rosa María Rubio, Manuel Garre & Antonio S. Ortiz Departamento de Zoología y Antropología Física. Área de Biología Animal. Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia. Cam- pus de Espinardo. 30071 Murcia (España). [email protected] Resumen: Se aportan al catálogo lepidopterológico de Asturias datos sobre cuatro especies de la familia Nolidae (Noctuoidea). Los taxones que se citan por primera vez en el área de estudio son Nola confusalis (Herrich-Schäffer, 1847), Pseudoips prasinana (Linnaeus, 1758) y Nycteola columbana (Turner, 1925), además de confirmar la presencia de Bena bicolorana (Fuessly, 1775). Palabras clave: Insecta, Lepidoptera, Nolidae, nuevas citas, España, Asturias. Nola confusalis (Herrich-Schäffer, 1847), Pseudoips prasinana (Linnaeus, 1758) y Nycteola columbana (Turner, 1925), Nolidae (Lepidoptera: Noctuoidea) new records for Lepidopteran checklist of Asturias (España) Abstract: Nola confusalis (Herrich-Schäffer, 1847), Pseudoips prasinana (Linnaeus, 1758) and Nycteola columbana (Turner, 1925) species belonging to the family Nolidae are reported to the Lepidopteran checklist of Asturias while Bena bicolorana (Fuessly, 1775) is confirmed in the study area. Key words: Insecta, Lepidoptera, Nolidae, new records, Spain, Asturias. Introducción Material y métodos La familia Nolidae Meyrick, 1862 se encuentra representada en la Las capturas se realizaron en el Parque Nacional de Picos de Europa Península Ibérica por 27 especies, de las que once pertenecen al y en el Parque Natural de Somiedo, con trampas de luz negra y actí- género Nola Leach, 1815, y el resto se reparten entre los géneros nica de 15 vatios (tipo Heath), como parte de los muestreos realizados Meganola, Bena, Pseudoips, Nycteola, Garella y Earias (Vives, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • South-Central England Regional Action Plan
    Butterfly Conservation South-Central England Regional Action Plan This action plan was produced in response to the Action for Butterflies project funded by WWF, EN, SNH and CCW by Dr Andy Barker, Mike Fuller & Bill Shreeves August 2000 Registered Office of Butterfly Conservation: Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Wareham, Dorset, BH20 5QP. Registered in England No. 2206468 Registered Charity No. 254937. Executive Summary This document sets out the 'Action Plan' for butterflies, moths and their habitats in South- Central England (Dorset, Hampshire, Isle of Wight & Wiltshire), for the period 2000- 2010. It has been produced by the three Branches of Butterfly Conservation within the region, in consultation with various other governmental and non-governmental organisations. Some of the aims and objectives will undoubtedly be achieved during this period, but some of the more fundamental challenges may well take much longer, and will probably continue for several decades. The main conservation priorities identified for the region are as follows: a) Species Protection ! To arrest the decline of all butterfly and moth species in South-Central region, with special emphasis on the 15 high priority and 6 medium priority butterfly species and the 37 high priority and 96 medium priority macro-moths. ! To seek opportunities to extend breeding areas, and connectivity of breeding areas, of high and medium priority butterflies and moths. b) Surveys, Monitoring & Research ! To undertake ecological research on those species for which existing knowledge is inadequate. Aim to publish findings of research. ! To continue the high level of butterfly transect monitoring, and to develop a programme of survey work and monitoring for the high and medium priority moths.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Modern Threats to the Lepidoptera Fauna in The
    MODERN THREATS TO THE LEPIDOPTERA FAUNA IN THE FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM By THOMSON PARIS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011 1 2011 Thomson Paris 2 To my mother and father who helped foster my love for butterflies 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I thank my family who have provided advice, support, and encouragement throughout this project. I especially thank my sister and brother for helping to feed and label larvae throughout the summer. Second, I thank Hillary Burgess and Fairchild Tropical Gardens, Dr. Jonathan Crane and the University of Florida Tropical Research and Education center Homestead, FL, Elizabeth Golden and Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park, Leroy Rogers and South Florida Water Management, Marshall and Keith at Mack’s Fish Camp, Susan Casey and Casey’s Corner Nursery, and Michael and EWM Realtors Inc. for giving me access to collect larvae on their land and for their advice and assistance. Third, I thank Ryan Fessendon and Lary Reeves for helping to locate sites to collect larvae and for assisting me to collect larvae. I thank Dr. Marc Minno, Dr. Roxanne Connely, Dr. Charles Covell, Dr. Jaret Daniels for sharing their knowledge, advice, and ideas concerning this project. Fourth, I thank my committee, which included Drs. Thomas Emmel and James Nation, who provided guidance and encouragement throughout my project. Finally, I am grateful to the Chair of my committee and my major advisor, Dr. Andrei Sourakov, for his invaluable counsel, and for serving as a model of excellence of what it means to be a scientist.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpretation Manual of European Union Habitats - EUR27 Is a Scientific Reference Document
    INTERPRETATION MANUAL OF EUROPEAN UNION HABITATS EUR 27 July 2007 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG ENVIRONMENT Nature and biodiversity The Interpretation Manual of European Union Habitats - EUR27 is a scientific reference document. It is based on the version for EUR15, which was adopted by the Habitats Committee on 4. October 1999 and consolidated with the new and amended habitat types for the 10 accession countries as adopted by the Habitats Committee on 14 March 2002 with additional changes for the accession of Bulgaria and Romania as adopted by the Habitats Committee on 13 April 2007 and for marine habitats to follow the descriptions given in “Guidelines for the establishment of the Natura 2000 network in the marine environment. Application of the Habitats and Birds Directives” published in May 2007 by the Commission services. A small amendment to Habitat type 91D0 was adopted by the Habitats Committee in its meeting on 14th October 2003. TABLE OF CONTENTS WHY THIS MANUAL? 3 HISTORICAL REVIEW 3 THE MANUAL 4 THE EUR15 VERSION 5 THE EUR25 VERSION 5 THE EUR27 VERSION 6 EXPLANATORY NOTES 7 COASTAL AND HALOPHYTIC HABITATS 8 OPEN SEA AND TIDAL AREAS 8 SEA CLIFFS AND SHINGLE OR STONY BEACHES 17 ATLANTIC AND CONTINENTAL SALT MARSHES AND SALT MEADOWS 20 MEDITERRANEAN AND THERMO-ATLANTIC SALTMARSHES AND SALT MEADOWS 22 SALT AND GYPSUM INLAND STEPPES 24 BOREAL BALTIC ARCHIPELAGO, COASTAL AND LANDUPHEAVAL AREAS 26 COASTAL SAND DUNES AND INLAND DUNES 29 SEA DUNES OF THE ATLANTIC, NORTH SEA AND BALTIC COASTS 29 SEA DUNES OF THE MEDITERRANEAN COAST 35 INLAND
    [Show full text]
  • Moth Moniioring Scheme
    MOTH MONIIORING SCHEME A handbook for field work and data reporting Environment Data Centre 1/1/1/ National Boord of Waters and the Environment Nordic Council of Ministers /////// Helsinki 1 994 Environmental Report 8 MOTH MONITORING SCHEME A handbook for field work and data reporting Environment Data Centre National Board of Waters and the Environment Helsinki 1994 Published by Environment Data Centre (EDC) National Board of Waters and the Environment P.O.BOX 250 FIN—001 01 Helsinki FINLAND Tel. +358—0—73 14 4211 Fax. +358—0—7314 4280 Internet address: [email protected] Edited by Guy Söderman, EDC Technical editng by Päivi Tahvanainen, EDC This handbook has been circulated for comments to the members of the project group for moth monitoring in the Nordic countries under the auspices of the Monitoring and Data Group of the Nordic Council of Ministers. Cover photo © Tarla Söderman Checking of installation of light trap at Vilsandi National Park in Estonia. Printed by Painotalo MIKTOR Ky, Helsinki 1 994 ISBN 951—47—9982—8 ISSN 0788—3765 CONTENTS .4 INTRODUCTION 5 PART 1: OBJECTIVES 7 1 Short term objectives 7 2 Medium-long term objectives 8 3 Additional objectives 8 4 Specific goals 9 5 Network design 9 5.1 Geographical coverage 9 5.2 Biotopes coverage 10 PART II: METRODOLOGY 11 1 Technical equipments and use 11 1.1 Structure of Iight traps 11 1.2 Field installation 13 1.3 Structure ofbait trap 14 1.4 Documentation of sites 15 1.5 Timing the light traps 15 1.6 Sampling procedures 15 2 Sample handling 16 2.1 Prestoring 16 2.2 Posting 16
    [Show full text]