Shepard's Batch Delivery Time of Request

Home , King Videocable

118V7K

Print Request: Shepard's Batch Delivery

Time of Request: Monday, July 31, 2006 15:42:31 EST

Number of Lines: 20222 Print Number: 1842:111129490

Client ID/Project Name:

Note:

Research Information:

Shepard's

Send to: LAWRENCE, 118V7K LAWRENCE LAW LIBRARY 2 APPLETON ST LAWRENCE, MA 01840-1573 Page 1

Shepard's Batch Delivery Request Report

Shepard's Citation: 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2607 --FULL References: 2788 Restricted: No FOCUS Terms: No Deliver Shepard's Report: Yes --Completed Deliver Text of Shepardized Cite: Yes --Completed Selected Citing Documents: None Selected Date of Request: 07/31/2006

Citing Full Reference Citations Text Number Request

Key: Completed--Full--text retrieved and delivered below. Table Case--Multiple documents found for this citation; insufﬁcient information to choose one. Error --Full--text could not be retrieved and/or delivered.

LexisNexis is a trademark, and LEXSEE and LEXSTAT and Shepard's are registered trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties, Inc., used under license. ALR is a registered trademark of West Licensing Corp. Copyright **** LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 2

Caterpillar, Inc. v. Williams, 482 U.S. 386, 107 S. Ct. 2425, 96 L. Ed. 2d 318, 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2607, 55 U.S.L.W. 4804, 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 193, 125 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2521, 106 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P12342 (1987)

SHEPARD'S Signal: Caution: Possible negative treatment Restrictions: Unrestricted FOCUS(TM) Terms: No FOCUS terms Print Format: FULL Citing Ref. Signal Legend: {Warning} ----negative treatment indicated {Questioned} ----validity questioned by citing refs. {Caution} ----possible negative treatment {Positive} ----positive treatment indicated {Analysis} ----cited and neutral analysis indicated {Cited} ----citation information available SHEPARD'S SUMMARY

Unrestricted Shepard's Summary No subsequent appellate history. Prior history available. Citing References: Cautionary Analyses: Criticized (1), Distinguished (41) Positive Analyses: Followed (159) Neutral Analyses: Concurring Opinion (7), Conﬂict.Authority (1), Dissenting Op. (30), Explained (20), Harmonized (1), Quest. Precedent (2) Other Sources: Law Reviews (152), Statutes (4), Treatises (61), American Law Rpts/Lawyers' Edition Annos (4)

LexisNexis Headnotes: HN1 (5), HN2 (1684), HN3 (77), HN4 (408), HN5 (340), HN6 (1424), HN7 (344), HN8 (118), HN9 (562), HN10 (443), HN11 (2), HN12 (105), HN13 (1214)

PRIOR HISTORY ( 6 citing references )

1. Williams v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., 786 F.2d 928, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 23750, 1 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1223, 122 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2590, 104 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11888 (9th Cir. Cal. 1986){Caution}

2. Writ of certiorari granted: Caterpillar, Inc. v. Williams, 479 U.S. 960, 107 S. Ct. 455, 93 L. Ed. 2d 401, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 4749, 55 U.S.L.W. 3357 (1986){Analysis}

3. Not followed by: Machinists Automotive Trades Dist. Lodge No. 190 v. Peterbilt Motors Co., 666 F. Supp. 1352, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7121, 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 884, 126 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2107, 109 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10713 (N.D. Cal. 1987) {Analysis} Page 3 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Afﬁrmed by (CITATION YOU ENTERED): Caterpillar, Inc. v. Williams, 482 U.S. 386, 107 S. Ct. 2425, 96 L. Ed. 2d 318, 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2607, 55 U.S.L.W. 4804, 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 193, 125 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2521, 106 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P12342 (1987){Caution}

4. Criticized by: Newberry v. Paciﬁc Racing Asso., 854 F.2d 1142, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 11028, 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 959, 129 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2047, 109 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10676 (9th Cir. Cal. 1988){Caution}

5. Criticized by: Ethridge v. Harbor House Restaurant, 861 F.2d 1389, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 15348, 130 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2001, 110 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10862 (9th Cir. Cal. 1988) {Caution}

6. Williams v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33057, 105 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P12043 (9th Cir. Cal. June 12, 1986){Caution}

CITING DECISIONS ( 2561 citing decisions ) U.S. SUPREME COURT

7. Distinguished by, Cited by: Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila, 542 U.S. 200, 124 S. Ct. 2488, 159 L. Ed. 2d 312, 2004 U.S. LEXIS 4571, 72 U.S.L.W. 4516, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 415, 32 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2569 (2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN9 , HN10, HN13{Caution}

Distinguished by: 542 U.S. 200 p.213 124 S. Ct. 2488 p.2498 159 L. Ed. 2d 312 p.330 Cited by: 542 U.S. 200 p.212 124 S. Ct. 2488 p.2497 159 L. Ed. 2d 312 p.329

8. Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by: Ben. Nat'l Bank v. Anderson, 539 U.S. 1, 123 S. Ct. 2058, 156 L. Ed. 2d 1, 2003 U.S. LEXIS 4277, 71 U.S.L.W. 4409, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 325, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4550, 2003 D.A.R. 5793 (2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6, HN13{Caution}

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: Page 4 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

539 U.S. 1 p.12 123 S. Ct. 2058 p.2065 156 L. Ed. 2d 1 p.11 Cited by: 539 U.S. 1 p.9 123 S. Ct. 2058 p.2064 156 L. Ed. 2d 1 p.9

9. Cited by: Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Sys., 535 U.S. 826, 122 S. Ct. 1889, 153 L. Ed. 2d 13, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 4022, 70 U.S.L.W. 4489, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 325, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4781, 2002 D.A.R. 6073, 62 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1801 (2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

535 U.S. 826 p.831 122 S. Ct. 1889 p.1893 153 L. Ed. 2d 13 p.20

10. Cited by: El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Neztsosie, 526 U.S. 473, 119 S. Ct. 1430, 143 L. Ed. 2d 635, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 3004, 67 U.S.L.W. 4286, 12 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 209, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3165, 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2493, 99 D.A.R. 4120, 29 Envtl. L. Rep. 21099 (1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN13 {Caution}

526 U.S. 473 p.484 119 S. Ct. 1430 p.1437 143 L. Ed. 2d 635 p.645

11. Cited by: Rivet v. Regions Bank, 522 U.S. 470, 118 S. Ct. 921, 139 L. Ed. 2d 912, 1998 U.S. LEXIS 1434, 66 U.S.L.W. 4132, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 329, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Service 1313, 1998 Colo. J. C.A.R. 884, 98 D.A.R. 1793, 11 Fla. L. Weekly S 329, 32 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 187, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P77633 (1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN9, HN13{Caution}

522 U.S. 470 p.475 522 U.S. 470 p.476 118 S. Ct. 921 p.925 139 L. Ed. 2d 912 p.918 139 L. Ed. 2d 912 p.919

12. Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by: City of Chicago v. International College of Surgeons, 522 U.S. 156, 118 S. Ct. 523, 139 L. Ed. 2d 525, 1997 U.S. LEXIS 7502, 66 U.S.L.W. 4041, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 271, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Service 9348, 1997 Colo. J. C.A.R. 3342, 97 D.A.R. 15041, 28 Envtl. L. Rep. 20612 (1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN9, HN13{Caution}

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: 522 U.S. 156 p.177 118 S. Ct. 523 p.535 Page 5 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

139 L. Ed. 2d 525 p.543 Cited by: 522 U.S. 156 p.163 118 S. Ct. 523 p.529 139 L. Ed. 2d 525 p.534

13. Cited by: Livadas v. Bradshaw, 512 U.S. 107, 114 S. Ct. 2068, 129 L. Ed. 2d 93, 1994 U.S. LEXIS 4444, 62 U.S.L.W. 4495, 8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 219, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4355, 94 D.A.R. 8036, 146 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2513, 128 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11104A, 2 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 33 (1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN10, HN13 {Caution}

512 U.S. 107 p.124 114 S. Ct. 2068 p.2078 129 L. Ed. 2d 93 p.110

14. Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: Schacht v. Caterpillar, Inc., 503 U.S. 926, 112 S. Ct. 1306, 117 L. Ed. 2d 527, 1992 U.S. LEXIS 1537, 60 U.S.L.W. 3614, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Service 2029, 92 D.A.R. 3078, 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 449, 139 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2609 (1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13{Analysis}

503 U.S. 926 p.926 112 S. Ct. 1306 p.1306 117 L. Ed. 2d 527 p.528

15. Cited by: Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 492 U.S. 490, 109 S. Ct. 3040, 106 L. Ed. 2d 410, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 3290, 57 U.S.L.W. 5023 (1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Questioned}

492 U.S. 490 p.512 109 S. Ct. 3040 p.3053 106 L. Ed. 2d 410 p.432

16. Followed by, Cited by: Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Graham, 489 U.S. 838, 109 S. Ct. 1519, 103 L. Ed. 2d 924, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 1669, 57 U.S.L.W. 4400 (1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN13{Caution}

Followed by: 489 U.S. 838 p.840 109 S. Ct. 1519 p.1521 103 L. Ed. 2d 924 p.928 Cited by: 109 S. Ct. 1519 p.1520

17. Cited by: Page 6 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp., 486 U.S. 800, 108 S. Ct. 2166, 100 L. Ed. 2d 811, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 2733, 56 U.S.L.W. 4625, 11 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 452, 1988--1Trade Cas. (CCH) P68081, 7 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1109 (1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN9, HN13{Caution}

108 S. Ct. 2166 p.2181 100 L. Ed. 2d 811 p.834

18. Followed by, Cited by: Lingle v. Norge Div. of Magic Chef, 486 U.S. 399, 108 S. Ct. 1877, 100 L. Ed. 2d 410, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 2491, 56 U.S.L.W. 4512, 46 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1553, 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 481, 128 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2521 (1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN7, HN9{Caution}

Followed by: 486 U.S. 399 p.410 108 S. Ct. 1877 p.1883 100 L. Ed. 2d 410 p.421 Cited by: 486 U.S. 399 p.406 108 S. Ct. 1877 p.1881 100 L. Ed. 2d 410 p.419

19. Followed by: Oklahoma Tax Com. v. Graham, 484 U.S. 973, 108 S. Ct. 481, 98 L. Ed. 2d 480, 1987 U.S. LEXIS 5045, 56 U.S.L.W. 3399 (1987){Warning}

484 U.S. 973 p.973 108 S. Ct. 481 p.481 98 L. Ed. 2d 480 p.480 1ST CIRCUIT --COURT OF APPEALS

20. Cited by: Rossello--Gonzalezv. Calderon--Serra, 398 F.3d 1, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 26422 (1st Cir. P.R. 2004){Analysis}

398 F.3d 1 p.11

21. Cited by: Local Union No. 12004, USW v. Massachusetts, 377 F.3d 64, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 15777, 175 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2385, 150 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10376 (1st Cir. Mass. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN6, HN7{Positive}

377 F.3d 64 p.73

22. Cited by: Ortega v. Star--KistFoods, Inc., 370 F.3d 124, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 10714, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P17013 (1st Cir. P.R. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7 {Warning}

370 F.3d 124 p.138 Page 7 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

23. Cited by: Britell v. United States, 318 F.3d 70, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 1343 (1st Cir. Mass. 2003) {Caution}

318 F.3d 70 p.75

24. Cited by: Vargas v. Geologistics Ams., 284 F.3d 232, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 5365, 169 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2859, 146 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10019 (1st Cir. P.R. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution}

284 F.3d 232 p.234

25. Cited by: Danca v. Private Health Care Sys., 185 F.3d 1, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 18043, 23 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1505 (1st Cir. Mass. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Caution}

185 F.3d 1 p.4

26. Cited by: BIW Deceived v. Local S6, Indus. Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers, 132 F.3d 824, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 36795, 157 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2148, 134 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10099 (1st Cir. Me. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN9{Caution}

132 F.3d 824 p.831

27. Cited by: Martin v. Shaw's Supermarkets, 105 F.3d 40, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 1350, 154 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2257 (1st Cir. Mass. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9, HN13 {Caution}

105 F.3d 40 p.41

28. Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: Chaulk Servs. v. Massachusetts Comm'n Against Discrimination, 70 F.3d 1361, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 33253, 69 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 473, 150 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2961 (1st Cir. Mass. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN12{Caution}

70 F.3d 1361 p.1374

29. Cited by: Smith v. WGBH Educ. Found., 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 24697, 144 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2520 (1st Cir. Mass. Sept. 27, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN10, HN13 {Caution}

30. Cited by: Ching v. Mitre Corp., 921 F.2d 11, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 21287, 55 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P40422, 54 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 941 (1st Cir. Mass. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Caution} Page 8 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

921 F.2d 11 p.14

31. Cited by: Magerer v. John Sexton & Co., 912 F.2d 525, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 15273, 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1260, 135 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2261, 116 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10282 (1st Cir. Mass. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10 , HN12, HN13{Caution}

912 F.2d 525 p.528 912 F.2d 525 p.529 1ST CIRCUIT --U.S. DISTRICT COURTS

32. Cited by: LaBrecque v. Sch. Admin. Dist. No. 57, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25719 (D. Me. May 2, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25719

33. Cited by: Beniquez v. Pﬁzer Corp., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23604 (D.P.R. Mar. 21, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23604

34. Cited by: Able Sales Co. v. Mead Johnson P.R., Inc., 420 F. Supp. 2d 1, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12216 (D.P.R. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9 {Positive}

420 F. Supp. 2d 1 p.9

35. Cited by: Ortiz--Enriquezv. Nat'l Healthcare Afﬁliates, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35362 (D.P.R. Oct. 18, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35362

36. Cited by: Borgese v. Am. Lung Ass'n, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24169, 36 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1485, 96 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1181 (D. Me. Oct. 17, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN7, HN13{Positive}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24169

37. Cited by: Betancourt v. Bear Stearns & Co., 392 F. Supp. 2d 187, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22599 (D.P.R. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

392 F. Supp. 2d 187 p.189

38. Cited by: Page 9 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Broad. Networks of P.R., Inc. v. Communs. Counsel Group, Inc., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39170 (D.P.R. Aug. 17, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9 , HN13{Cited}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39170

39. Cited by: Warner v. Atkinson Freight Lines Corp., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16911, 36 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1838, 178 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2083, 11 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 95 (D. Me. Aug. 11, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7{Caution}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16911

40. Cited by: Asociacion de Detallistas de Gasolina de P.R., Inc. v. Shell Chem. Yabucoa Inc., 380 F. Supp. 2d 40, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15930, 2005--2Trade Cas. (CCH) P74917 (D.P.R. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

380 F. Supp. 2d 40 p.42

41. Cited by: Sovereign Bank v. Bowditch Boat Holdings, LLC, 376 F. Supp. 2d 3, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11758 (D. Mass. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Cited}

376 F. Supp. 2d 3 p.5

42. Cited by: Children's Hosp. Corp. v. Kindercare Learning Ctrs., Inc., 360 F. Supp. 2d 202, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3384, 34 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2575 (D. Mass. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN10, HN13{Positive}

360 F. Supp. 2d 202 p.206

43. Cited by: Ponce Super Ctr., Inc. v. Glenwood Holdings, Inc., 359 F. Supp. 2d 27, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6983 (D.P.R. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

359 F. Supp. 2d 27 p.29

44. Cited by: Scotiabank De P.R. v. Residential Partners S.E., 350 F. Supp. 2d 334, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26493 (D.P.R. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9 , HN13{Cited}

350 F. Supp. 2d 334 p.337

45. Cited by: Page 10 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Warner v. Atkinson Freight Lines Corp., 350 F. Supp. 2d 108, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25220, 34 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2598, 176 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2363, 10 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 355 (D. Me. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9 , HN13{Caution}

350 F. Supp. 2d 108 p.114

46. Cited by: RBM Techs., Inc. v. Lash, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15963, Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P28865 (D. Mass. Aug. 13, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN13 {Caution}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15963

47. Cited by: Alshraﬁ v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 321 F. Supp. 2d 150, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10331 (D. Mass. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Cited}

321 F. Supp. 2d 150 p.156

48. Cited by: Livingstone v. Adler, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3700 (D. Mass. Mar. 10, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6{Caution}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3700

49. Cited by: Mangual--Saezv. Brilliant Globe Logistics, Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27003 (D.P.R. Jan. 27, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27003

50. Cited by: Russell's Garden Ctr., Inc. v. Nextel Communs. of the Mid--Atlantic,Inc., 296 F. Supp. 2d 13, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22552 (D. Mass. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4 , HN5{Positive}

296 F. Supp. 2d 13 p.17

51. Cited by: Gattegno v. Sprint Corp., 297 F. Supp. 2d 372, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22537 (D. Mass. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

297 F. Supp. 2d 372 p.374

52. Cited by: Casey v. Goulian, 273 F. Supp. 2d 136, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12937 (D. Mass. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Cited}

273 F. Supp. 2d 136 p.138 Page 11 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

53. Cited by: Wiener v. Wampanoag Aquinnah Shellﬁsh Hatchery Corp., 223 F. Supp. 2d 346, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18900 (D. Mass. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Caution}

223 F. Supp. 2d 346 p.353

54. Cited by: Russell v. Allied Textile Cos., PLC (In re Carleton Woolen Mills, Inc.), 281 B.R. 409, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13090, 29 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1183 (D. Me. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Analysis}

281 B.R. 409 p.418

55. Cited by: Mack v. Massachusetts, 204 F. Supp. 2d 163, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9566 (D. Mass. 2002){Positive}

204 F. Supp. 2d 163 p.167

56. Cited by: Concilio Evangelico de Puerto Rico v. Negron, 178 F. Supp. 2d 49, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23335 (D.P.R. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9{Cited}

178 F. Supp. 2d 49 p.51

57. Cited by: Barbara Brawn & Ameriklean, Inc. v. Donald Coleman & Seiu, 167 F. Supp. 2d 145, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13515, 168 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2166 (D. Mass. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13{Cited}

167 F. Supp. 2d 145 p.149 167 F. Supp. 2d 145 p.152

58. Cited by: Ferrer v. Banco Cent. Hispano--PuertoRico, Inc., 142 F. Supp. 2d 190, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5979 (D.P.R. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

142 F. Supp. 2d 190 p.196

59. Cited by: FERRER v. BANCO CENT. HISPANO--PUERTO RICO, INC., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8060 (D.P.R. Apr. 27, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6

60. Followed by: Guglielmo v. WorldCom, Inc., 2000 DNH 169, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10923 (D.N.H. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Positive}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10923 Page 12 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

61. Cited by: Diaz v. General Sec. Servs. Corp., 93 F. Supp. 2d 129, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6461, 141 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P59030, 7 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 1772 (D. Mass. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Cited}

93 F. Supp. 2d 129 p.137

62. Cited by: Varela--Fernandez v. Burgos, 81 F. Supp. 2d 297, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20746 (D.P.R. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

81 F. Supp. 2d 297 p.299

63. Cited by: Bishop v. Bell Atl. Corp., 81 F. Supp. 2d 84, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18389, 162 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2994, 140 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10674 (D. Me. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7 , HN13{Warning}

81 F. Supp. 2d 84 p.91

64. Cited by: Servia--Mendozav. Burgos, 31 F. Supp. 2d 35, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20203 (D.P.R. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

31 F. Supp. 2d 35 p.38

65. Cited by: Williams v. Local Union 911, USW, 31 F. Supp. 2d 40, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19441, 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2034 (D.R.I. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

31 F. Supp. 2d 40 p.43

66. Cited by: Hernandez v. State Elections Comm'n, 30 F. Supp. 2d 178, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19444 (D.P.R. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Analysis}

30 F. Supp. 2d 178 p.180

67. Cited by: Hernandez--Lopezv. Puerto Rico State Elections Comm'n, 27 F. Supp. 2d 302, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18746 (D.P.R. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 {Analysis}

27 F. Supp. 2d 302 p.307

68. Cited by: Nogueras--Cartagena v. Rossello--Gonzalez, 182 F.R.D. 380, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16237 (D.P.R. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

182 F.R.D. 380 p.382 Page 13 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

69. Cited by: Varela--Fernandez v. Burgos, 15 F. Supp. 2d 183, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12344 (D.P.R. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6{Positive}

15 F. Supp. 2d 183 p.186

70. Cited by: Massachusetts Laborers' Health & Welfare Fund, by and Through its Trustees v. Philip Morris, Inc., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22501 (D. Mass. June 19, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6{Analysis}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22501

71. Cited by: Acciavatti v. Professional Servs. Group, 982 F. Supp. 69, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17409 (D. Mass. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN13{Positive}

982 F. Supp. 69 p.73

72. Cited by: Comeau v. Heller, 945 F. Supp. 7, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19817, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P14827 (D. Mass. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

945 F. Supp. 7 p.9

73. Cited by: Delta Dental v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 942 F. Supp. 740, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14413 (D.R.I. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

942 F. Supp. 740 p.747

74. Cited by: Cellilli v. Cellilli, 939 F. Supp. 72, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12647 (D. Mass. 1996) {Analysis}

939 F. Supp. 72 p.79

75. Cited by: Cellilli v. Cellilli, 939 F. Supp. 72, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12667 (D. Mass. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

76. Cited by: Massachusetts v. Philip Morris Inc., 942 F. Supp. 690, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6859 (D. Mass. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Positive}

942 F. Supp. 690 p.694

77. Cited by: Sopena v. Colejon Corp., 920 F. Supp. 259, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4476, 132 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P33401, 3 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 552 (D.P.R. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN9{Caution} Page 14 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

920 F. Supp. 259 p.266

78. Cited by: Sopena v. Colejon Corp., 131 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P33401 (D.P.R. Mar. 6, 1996) {Caution}

131 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P33401

79. Cited by: Turpin v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 824, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P14619 (D. Mass. Jan. 3, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6{Cited}

80. Cited by: Fisher v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 823, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P14618 (D. Mass. Jan. 3, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6{Cited}

81. Cited by: Shumaker v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 822, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P14617 (D. Mass. Jan. 3, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6{Cited}

82. Cited by: Transport Auditing v. Sea--LandServ., 897 F. Supp. 34, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13982 (D.P.R. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Positive}

897 F. Supp. 34 p.35 897 F. Supp. 34 p.36 897 F. Supp. 34 p.37

83. Cited by: Sirois v. Business Express, 906 F. Supp. 722, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11159, 130 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P57977, 131 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11592 (D.N.H. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4 , HN6, HN13{Analysis}

906 F. Supp. 722 p.726

84. Cited by: Sirois v. Business Express, 131 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11592 (D.N.H. July 26, 1995){Analysis}

131 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11592

85. Cited by: Hood v. City of Boston, 891 F. Supp. 51, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9438 (D. Mass. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN9{Positive}

891 F. Supp. 51 p.57

86. Cited by: Nuzzo v. Northwest Airlines, 887 F. Supp. 28, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7816 (D. Mass. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8{Cited} Page 15 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

887 F. Supp. 28 p.31

87. Cited by: D'Allesandro v. Johnson & Wales Univ., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1039 (D.N.H. Jan. 23, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

88. Cited by: Macomber v. Digital Equip. Corp., 865 F. Supp. 65, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13600 (D.N.H. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Caution}

865 F. Supp. 65 p.71

89. Cited by: Kelly v. American Tel. & Tel. Co., 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5639 (D. Me. Mar. 31, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN8, HN10, HN13

90. Cited by: Smith v. WGBH Educ. Found., 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19924, 144 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2447 (D. Mass. Feb. 16, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13{Positive}

144 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2447 p.2448

91. Cited by: Barzelay v. Ares--Serono, S.A., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12035 (D. Mass. Aug. 11, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN13

92. Followed by: Faloon v. W.S. Libby Co., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9337, 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 794, 140 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2345 (D. Me. Apr. 27, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN10, HN13{Cited}

7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 794 p.795 140 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2345 p.2347

93. Cited by: Crespo v. Candela Laser Corp., 780 F. Supp. 866, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 481 (D. Mass. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN12{Caution}

780 F. Supp. 866 p.874

94. Cited by: East Coast Steel Erectors, Inc. v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural &Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 7, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7452, 117 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10384 (D. Mass. June 15, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9 , HN10, HN12, HN13{Positive}

95. Followed by, Explained by, Cited by: Page 16 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Magerer v. John Sexton & Co., 727 F. Supp. 744, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13, 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 850, 134 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2305, 115 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10033 (D. Mass. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN10, HN12, HN13 {Caution}

Followed by: 727 F. Supp. 744 p.747 Explained by: 727 F. Supp. 744 p.746 Cited by: 727 F. Supp. 744 p.749

96. Cited by: Magerer v. John Sexton & Co., 118 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P56625 (D. Mass. Jan. 2, 1990){Caution}

118 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P56625

97. Cited by: Cuoco v. Nynex, Inc., 722 F. Supp. 884, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11772 (D. Mass. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

722 F. Supp. 884 p.887

98. Cited by: Santa Rosa Medical Center, Inc. v. Converse of Puerto Rico, Inc., 706 F. Supp. 111, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15561, 113 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11628 (D.P.R. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN10{Cited}

706 F. Supp. 111 p.112

99. Cited by: Jackson v. Liquid Carbonic Corp., 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10065 (D. Mass. Oct. 30, 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2ND CIRCUIT --COURT OF APPEALS

100. Cited by: DaPonte v. Manfredi Motors Inc., 157 Fed. Appx. 328, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 19948, 35 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2589 (2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7 {Analysis}

157 Fed. Appx. 328 p.331

101. Cited by: Sullivan v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 424 F.3d 267, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 19714, 177 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3349, 151 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10539 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN3, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN13{Caution}

424 F.3d 267 p.271

102. Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by: Page 17 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Empire Healthchoice Assur., Inc. v. McVeigh, 396 F.3d 136, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 751, 34 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1490 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN13{Caution}

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: 396 F.3d 136 p.152 Cited by: 396 F.3d 136 p.140

103. Cited by: Briarpatch Ltd., L.P. v. Phoenix Pictures, Inc., 373 F.3d 296, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 12847 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

373 F.3d 296 p.304

104. Cited by: Vera v. Saks & Co., 335 F.3d 109, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 14535, 172 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3050 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

335 F.3d 109 p.113

105. Cited by: Spielman v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 332 F.3d 116, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11719, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P92437 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN12, HN13{Caution}

332 F.3d 116 p.124

106. Cited by: KyTEL Int'l Group, Inc. v. Rent--A--Center, Inc., 43 Fed. Appx. 420, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15861 (2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13 {Caution}

43 Fed. Appx. 420 p.422

107. Cited by: Wynn v. AC Rochester, 273 F.3d 153, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 24922, 168 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2853 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9 {Caution}

273 F.3d 153 p.157

108. Cited by: D'Alessio v. N.Y. Stock Exch., Inc., 258 F.3d 93, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 16012, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P91523 (2d Cir. N.Y. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN8, HN13{Caution}

258 F.3d 93 p.100 258 F.3d 93 p.103

109. Cited by: Page 18 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Panczykowski v. Laborers' Int'l Union, 2 Fed. Appx. 157, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 1282 (2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN10{Positive}

2 Fed. Appx. 157 p.160

110. Cited by: Freeman v. Burlington Broadcasters, Inc., 204 F.3d 311, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 2672, 19 Comm. Reg. (P & F) 587 (2d Cir. Vt. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 , HN13{Caution}

204 F.3d 311 p.317

111. Cited by: Fleet Bank, N.A. v. Burke, 160 F.3d 883, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 28218 (2d Cir. Conn. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN13{Caution}

160 F.3d 883 p.886

112. Cited by: Sadowski v. Technical Career Insts., 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 22594 (2d Cir. N.Y. Mar. 12, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN10, HN13{Analysis}

1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 22594

113. Cited by: Fax Telecommunicaciones, Inc. v. AT&T, 138 F.3d 479, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 4113 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN9, HN13 {Caution}

138 F.3d 479 p.486

114. Cited by: Marcus v. AT&T Corp., 138 F.3d 46, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 3648, 11 Comm. Reg. (P & F) 921 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN10 , HN13{Caution}

138 F.3d 46 p.52 138 F.3d 46 p.53

115. Cited by: Foy v. Pratt & Whitney Group, 127 F.3d 229, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 27617, 156 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2418 (2d Cir. Conn. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5 , HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13{Caution}

127 F.3d 229 p.232

116. Cited by: Concerned Citizens v. New York State Dep't of Envtl. Conservation, 127 F.3d 201, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 25766, 28 Envtl. L. Rep. 20039 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1997) {Caution} Page 19 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

127 F.3d 201 p.204 127 F.3d 201 p.206

117. Cited by: Concerned Citizens v. New York State Dep't of Envtl. Conservation, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 36155 (2d Cir. N.Y. Sept. 2, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN7, HN12, HN13{Analysis}

118. Cited by: Hernandez v. Conriv Realty Assocs., 155 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2408 (2d Cir. N.Y. May 23, 1997){Analysis}

155 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2408 p.2409

119. Cited by: Hernandez v. Conriv Realty Assocs., 116 F.3d 35, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 10828, 155 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2195, 133 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11820 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13{Warning}

116 F.3d 35 p.38

120. Cited by: Shaﬁi v. British Airways, PLC, 83 F.3d 566, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 10484, 152 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2263, 131 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11578 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN12{Questioned}

83 F.3d 566 p.569

121. Cited by: In re "Agent Orange" Prod. Liab. Litig., 996 F.2d 1425, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 15365 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Warning}

996 F.2d 1425 p.1430

122. Cited by: Albradco, Inc. v. Bevona, 982 F.2d 82, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 33436, 16 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1279, 142 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2282, 124 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10498 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN10{Caution}

982 F.2d 82 p.87

123. Cited by: Smith v. Dunham--Bush,Inc., 959 F.2d 6, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 2925, 28 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1085 (2d Cir. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

959 F.2d 6 p.8

124. Cited by: Page 20 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Derrico v. Sheehan Emergency Hospital, 844 F.2d 22, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 4385, 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 161, 127 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3201, 108 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10438 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10 {Caution}

844 F.2d 22 p.25 844 F.2d 22 p.26 844 F.2d 22 p.27 2ND CIRCUIT --U.S. DISTRICT COURTS

125. Cited by: Spidella v. Donnelly, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50483 (E.D.N.Y. July 24, 2006)

126. Cited by: Fuchs v. Cristal Concrete Corp., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48767 (E.D.N.Y. July 18, 2006)

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48767

127. Cited by: Paru v. Mut. of Am. Life Ins. Co., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28125 (S.D.N.Y. May 10, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28125

128. Cited by: In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Prods. Liab. Litig., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20575 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 17, 2006){Analysis}

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20575

129. Cited by: Salamea v. Macy's East, Inc., 426 F. Supp. 2d 149, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16464 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

426 F. Supp. 2d 149 p.153

130. Cited by: Singh v. N. Am. Airlines, 426 F. Supp. 2d 38, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19745 (E.D.N.Y. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN5

426 F. Supp. 2d 38 p.41

131. Cited by: Vera v. Saks & Co., 424 F. Supp. 2d 694, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15782 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13{Analysis}

424 F. Supp. 2d 694 p.700

132. Cited by: Page 21 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Banco de Santander Cent. Hispano, S.A. v. Consalvi Int'l, Inc., 425 F. Supp. 2d 421, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14961 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN13

425 F. Supp. 2d 421 p.424

133. Cited by: Atanasio v. Bhd. of Locomotive Eng'Rs & Trainmen, 424 F. Supp. 2d 476, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24343 (E.D.N.Y. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6 , HN13{Cited}

424 F. Supp. 2d 476 p.480

134. Cited by: Berg v. Yellow Transp., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18852 (N.D.N.Y Mar. 3, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18852

135. Cited by: Korthas v. Northeast Foods, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18846 (N.D.N.Y Feb. 27, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Analysis}

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18846

136. Cited by: Blacher v. Ridge, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7837 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 23, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Analysis}

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7837

137. Cited by: Borden v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 418 F. Supp. 2d 266, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8705, 37 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1518 (W.D.N.Y. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6

418 F. Supp. 2d 266 p.271

138. Cited by: Jing Sung v. Wasserstein, 415 F. Supp. 2d 393, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6393, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P93713 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13 {Cited}

415 F. Supp. 2d 393 p.396

139. Followed by, Cited by: Aetna Health v. Kirshner, 415 F. Supp. 2d 109, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6416, 37 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1220 (D. Conn. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN7, HN13 Page 22 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Followed by: 415 F. Supp. 2d 109 p.114 Cited by: 415 F. Supp. 2d 109 p.112

140. Cited by: Mraz v. Lufthansa German Airlines, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3961 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3961

141. Cited by: Elmira Teachers' Ass'n v. Elmira City Sch. Dist., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3893 (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 27, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3893

142. Cited by: Zerafa v. Monteﬁore Hosp. Hous. Co., 403 F. Supp. 2d 320, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32139 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN4{Cited}

403 F. Supp. 2d 320 p.324

143. Cited by: Klein v. Vision Lab Telecomms., Inc., 399 F. Supp. 2d 528, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29541 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

399 F. Supp. 2d 528 p.532

144. Cited by: Quick v. Shell Oil Co. (In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) Prods. Liab. Litig.) , 399 F. Supp. 2d 356, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22994 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) {Caution}

399 F. Supp. 2d 356 p.362

145. Cited by: In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Prods. Liab. Litig., 399 F. Supp. 2d 340, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20296 (S.D.N.Y. 2005){Caution}

399 F. Supp. 2d 340 p.345

146. Cited by: Ass'n of Holocaust Victims for Restitution of Artwork & Masterpieces v. Bank Aus. Creditanstalt AG, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17411 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 19, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4{Analysis}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17411

147. Cited by: Page 23 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Q Mktg. Group, Ltd. v. P3 Int'l Corp., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15968, 2005--2Trade Cas. (CCH) P74696 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 3, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15968

148. Cited by: Wyly v. Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman, LLP, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13666 (S.D.N.Y. July 7, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13666

149. Cited by: Glatzer v. Bear, Stearns & Co., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13340 (S.D.N.Y. July 5, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN4, HN9, HN13{Analysis}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13340

150. Cited by: Meier v. Premier Wine & Spirits, Inc., 371 F. Supp. 2d 239, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10134 (E.D.N.Y. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Caution}

371 F. Supp. 2d 239 p.244

151. Cited by: Barbanti v. MTA Metro N. Commuter R.R., 387 F. Supp. 2d 333, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19951, 178 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2115 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3 {Cited}

387 F. Supp. 2d 333 p.336

152. Cited by: Villano v. Kohl's Dep't Stores, Inc., 362 F. Supp. 2d 418, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4710 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

362 F. Supp. 2d 418 p.420

153. Cited by: Town of Haverstraw v. Barreras, 361 F. Supp. 2d 317, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4689 (S.D.N.Y. 2005){Analysis}

361 F. Supp. 2d 317 p.319

154. Cited by: Carrion v. Local 32B--32JSEIU, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4417 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 21, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN13{Positive}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4417

155. Cited by: Page 24 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Ehrenspeck v. Spear, Leeds & Kellogg, 389 F. Supp. 2d 485, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3812, 35 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1568 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN7, HN13{Cited}

389 F. Supp. 2d 485 p.488

156. Cited by: Studebaker--Worthington Leasing Corp. v. Michael Rachlin & Co., 357 F. Supp. 2d 529, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2521 (E.D.N.Y. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6{Positive}

357 F. Supp. 2d 529 p.533

157. Cited by: H--Quotient,Inc. v. Knight Trading Group, Inc., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1924, 2005--1Trade Cas. (CCH) P74722 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 7, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN3, HN4, HN6, HN13

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1924

158. Cited by: NYU Hosps. Center--Tisch v. Local 348 Health & Welfare Fund, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 256, 34 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2339 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 6, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN5, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 256

159. Cited by: New York v. Grasso, 350 F. Supp. 2d 498, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25044, 34 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2842 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Caution}

350 F. Supp. 2d 498 p.500

160. Cited by: Crowley v. First Step, Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24582, 176 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2946 (D. Conn. Dec. 6, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Cited}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24582

161. Cited by: Fin. & Trading, Ltd. v. Rhodia S.A., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24148, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P93046 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 29, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Positive}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24148

162. Cited by: Port Auth. v. Am. Warehousing of N.Y., Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23121 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 10, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 Page 25 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23121

163. Cited by: Orange County Water Dist. v. Unocal Corp. (In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ( "MTBE") Prods. Liab. Litig.), 364 F. Supp. 2d 329, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22100, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P17197 (S.D.N.Y. 2004){Caution}

364 F. Supp. 2d 329 p.332

164. Cited by: Lawton v. UPS, 338 F. Supp. 2d 347, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19644, 175 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3367, 150 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P59903 (D. Conn. 2004){Caution}

338 F. Supp. 2d 347 p.348

165. Cited by: Alcantara v. Allied Props., LLC, 334 F. Supp. 2d 336, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18152 (E.D.N.Y. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN8, HN10, HN12, HN13 {Positive}

334 F. Supp. 2d 336 p.340

166. Cited by: City of Park City v. Alon USA Energy Inc. (In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Prods. Liab. Litig.) , 341 F. Supp. 2d 386, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17723, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P17129, 59 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1520 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN13 {Caution}

341 F. Supp. 2d 386 p.396

167. Cited by: Nuzzo v. Verizon N.Y., Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16585, 33 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2116 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 19, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13 {Positive}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16585

168. Cited by: Lyons Realty Corp. v. San James Realty Corp., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14917 (S.D.N.Y. July 30, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14917

169. Cited by: Galison v. Greenberg, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14915 (S.D.N.Y. July 30, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14915

170. Cited by: Dolan v. Roth, 325 F. Supp. 2d 122, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12959 (N.D.N.Y 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Warning} Page 26 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

325 F. Supp. 2d 122 p.130

171. Cited by: Liberty Mut. Ins. v. Lone Star Indus., 313 B.R. 9, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14409 (D. Conn. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

313 B.R. 9 p.16

172. Distinguished by, Cited by: Williams v. Comcast Cablevision of New Haven, Inc., 322 F. Supp. 2d 177, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11392, 175 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2289, 150 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10390 (D. Conn. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10 , HN13{Positive}

Distinguished by: 322 F. Supp. 2d 177 p.183 Cited by: 322 F. Supp. 2d 177 p.181

173. Cited by: Campbell v. Kane, Kessler, P.C., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10059, 175 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2095 (S.D.N.Y. May 28, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Positive}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10059

174. Cited by: 1199 Hous. Corp. v. White, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8917 (S.D.N.Y. May 18, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8917

175. Cited by: Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Dev. Co., LLC v. Roskow, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5401 (D. Conn. Mar. 31, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Cited}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5401

176. Cited by: Xpedior Creditor Trust v. Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc., 341 F. Supp. 2d 258, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3703, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P92705 (S.D.N.Y. 2004){Caution}

341 F. Supp. 2d 258 p.266

177. Cited by: Silvester + Tafuro, Inc. v. Daniel Cline & Assocs., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2684, Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P28756 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 18, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2684 Page 27 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

178. Cited by: Isaacson v. Dow Chem. Co. (In re Agent Orange Prod. Liab. Litig.), 304 F. Supp. 2d 442, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1626, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P16911 (E.D.N.Y. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Caution}

304 F. Supp. 2d 442 p.446

179. Cited by: Virgilio v. Motorola, Inc., 307 F. Supp. 2d 504, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1194 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Positive}

307 F. Supp. 2d 504 p.511

180. Cited by: Hom v. Brennan, 304 F. Supp. 2d 374, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1163 (E.D.N.Y. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

304 F. Supp. 2d 374 p.377

181. Cited by: JK&E P'ship v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 587 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 16, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Cited}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 587

182. Cited by: Chaney v. Connecticut, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21925 (D. Conn. Dec. 5, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21925

183. Cited by: Cayuga Indian Nation v. Vill. of Union Springs, 293 F. Supp. 2d 183, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21578 (N.D.N.Y 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6 , HN9, HN13{Warning}

293 F. Supp. 2d 183 p.188

184. Cited by: Metro. Ins. & Annuity Co. v. Barclay, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19077 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19077

185. Cited by: Winne v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc'y of the United States, 315 F. Supp. 2d 404, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19073, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P92607 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

315 F. Supp. 2d 404 p.409 Page 28 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

186. Cited by: Kings Choice Neckwear, Inc. v. DHL Airways, Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17507 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 1, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17507

187. Cited by: Panizza v. Mattel, Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17228, 68 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1469 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN4, HN6, HN13 {Positive}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17228

188. Cited by: Heyer v. Morris Okun, Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14495, 173 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2330 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 19, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN8, HN9, HN10 , HN13{Cited}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14495

189. Followed by: Shamoun v. Peerless Imps., Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13376 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 1, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN10, HN12, HN13{Cited}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13376

190. Cited by: New York v. Shinnecock Indian Nation, 274 F. Supp. 2d 268, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13562 (E.D.N.Y. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Caution}

274 F. Supp. 2d 268 p.270

191. Cited by: Berisic v. Winckelman, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12759 (S.D.N.Y. July 23, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12759

192. Cited by: Pierre--Louisv. Cent. Parking Sys., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12287 (S.D.N.Y. July 14, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12287

193. Cited by: Couloute v. Hunt, Leibert, Chester & Jacobson, LLC, 295 B.R. 689, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12880 (D. Conn. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Analysis}

295 B.R. 689 p.691

194. Followed by, Cited by: Page 29 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Hickey v. City of New York (In re World Trade Ctr. Disaster Site Litig.) , 270 F. Supp. 2d 357, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10397 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN9{Caution}

Followed by: 270 F. Supp. 2d 357 p.372 Cited by: 270 F. Supp. 2d 357 p.367

195. Cited by: Duane Reade, Inc. v. Local 338 Retail, Wholesale, Dep't Store Union, 265 F. Supp. 2d 264, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8829, 172 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2990 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Cited}

265 F. Supp. 2d 264 p.266

196. Cited by: Wilds v. UPS, Inc., 262 F. Supp. 2d 163, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7582, 172 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2565 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN8 , HN9, HN10, HN13{Positive}

262 F. Supp. 2d 163 p.171 262 F. Supp. 2d 163 p.172

197. Cited by: Heredia Mendez v. American Airlines, Inc. (In re Air Crash at Belle Harbor, N.Y.) , 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7540 (S.D.N.Y. May 5, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Analysis}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7540

198. Cited by: Atlantis Health Plan, Inc. v. Local 713, I.B.O.T.U., 258 F. Supp. 2d 284, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6378, 30 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1719 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

258 F. Supp. 2d 284 p.289

199. Cited by: Jam. Buses, Inc. v. Transp. Workers' Union, Local 100, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6209 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 26, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Cited}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6209

200. Cited by: Wilds v. UPS, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8518 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 19, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Warning}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8518

201. Cited by: Page 30 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Lechleiter v. Clairol Inc., 245 F. Supp. 2d 432, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2575, 30 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1830 (D. Conn. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Positive}

245 F. Supp. 2d 432 p.435

202. Cited by: Ryan v. Ajami, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24689 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 30, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24689

203. Cited by: Tannenbaum v. Corbis Sygma, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23928, Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P28539 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 12, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23928

204. Cited by: N. County Communs. Corp. v. Verizon N.Y., Inc., 233 F. Supp. 2d 381, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22788, 2002--2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P73896 (N.D.N.Y 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN9, HN13{Analysis}

233 F. Supp. 2d 381 p.384 233 F. Supp. 2d 381 p.387

205. Cited by: New York v. Justin, 237 F. Supp. 2d 368, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24702 (W.D.N.Y. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Analysis}

237 F. Supp. 2d 368 p.371 237 F. Supp. 2d 368 p.375

206. Cited by: Spagnuolo v. Port Auth., 245 F. Supp. 2d 518, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19989 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9{Caution}

245 F. Supp. 2d 518 p.521

207. Cited by: DeGeorge v. Am. Airlines, Inc. (In re Air Crash at Belle Harbor), 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19836 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 17, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 , HN9{Analysis}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19836

208. Cited by: Yonkers Elec. Contr. Corp. v. Local Union No. 3, IBEW, 220 F. Supp. 2d 254, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17181, 147 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10146 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) {Cited} Page 31 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

220 F. Supp. 2d 254 p.258

209. Cited by: In re Tamoxifen Citrate Antitrust Litig., 222 F. Supp. 2d 326, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17211 (E.D.N.Y. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6 {Positive}

210. Cited by: In re Tamoxifen Citrate Antitrust Litig., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16503, 2002--2Trade Cas. (CCH) P73875 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 20, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6{Positive}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16503

211. Cited by: Aquilina C. Lim MD PC v. Saftchick, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14477 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14477

212. Cited by: United Mut. Houses, L.P. v. Andujar, 230 F. Supp. 2d 349, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12312 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Positive}

230 F. Supp. 2d 349 p.350

213. Cited by: Levine v. Hartford Life Ins. Co., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13605, 28 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2038 (D. Conn. June 28, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Positive}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13605

214. Cited by: Singh v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., Inc., 200 F. Supp. 2d 193, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8438 (E.D.N.Y. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

200 F. Supp. 2d 193 p.198

215. Cited by: Property Clerk, N.Y. City Police Dep't v. Fyfe, 197 F. Supp. 2d 39, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7756 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9 , HN13{Cited}

197 F. Supp. 2d 39 p.41

216. Cited by: Funeral Fin. Sys. v. Solex Express, Inc., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6829 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 11, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Cited}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6829 Page 32 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

217. Cited by: Briarpatch Ltd. L.P. v. Geisler Roberdeau, Inc., 194 F. Supp. 2d 246, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4974 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13 {Warning}

194 F. Supp. 2d 246 p.254

218. Cited by: Sorrentino v. Allied Van Lines, Inc., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26116 (D. Conn. Mar. 22, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26116

219. Cited by: Brown v. NFL, 219 F. Supp. 2d 372, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4399, 169 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2972 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN9{Cited}

219 F. Supp. 2d 372 p.377 219 F. Supp. 2d 372 p.378

220. Cited by: Buote v. Verizon New Eng., 190 F. Supp. 2d 693, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4541, 27 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2184 (D. Vt. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7 {Caution}

190 F. Supp. 2d 693 p.701

221. Cited by: Greco Bros. Readi--MixConcrete Co. v. Local 282 Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4685 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 7, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13{Positive}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4685

222. Cited by: Tasini v. New York Times Co., 184 F. Supp. 2d 350, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1141, 30 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1407, 61 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1832 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN13{Analysis}

184 F. Supp. 2d 350 p.358

223. Cited by: Macro v. Indep. Health Ass'n, Inc., 180 F. Supp. 2d 427, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21156 (W.D.N.Y. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Cited}

180 F. Supp. 2d 427 p.432

224. Cited by: Page 33 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

In re Ciproﬂoxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litig., 166 F. Supp. 2d 740, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15386, 2001-- 2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P73465 (E.D.N.Y. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

166 F. Supp. 2d 740 p.747

225. Cited by: Cahoon v. IBEW Local 261, 175 F. Supp. 2d 220, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19892, 145 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11220 (D. Conn. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 , HN9, HN13{Cited}

175 F. Supp. 2d 220 p.224

226. Cited by: McClelland v. Longhitano, 140 F. Supp. 2d 201, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4879 (N.D.N.Y 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Positive}

140 F. Supp. 2d 201 p.203

227. Cited by: In re Rosenkranz, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4892 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 16, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5{Analysis}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4892

228. Cited by: Bengis v. NY Power Auth. (In re Nuclear Generation Emples. Ass'n), 145 F. Supp. 2d 291, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4409 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN9{Cited}

145 F. Supp. 2d 291 p.297

229. Cited by: Elec. Contrs., Inc. v. Conn. DOT, 139 F. Supp. 2d 265, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5278 (D. Conn. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

139 F. Supp. 2d 265 p.267

230. Cited by: Towne v. Nat'l Life of Vt., Inc., 130 F. Supp. 2d 604, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19858, 25 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2805 (D. Vt. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6, HN13{Positive}

130 F. Supp. 2d 604 p.607 130 F. Supp. 2d 604 p.608

231. Cited by: Bellido--Sullivanv. American Int'l Group, 123 F. Supp. 2d 161, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16970, 142 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P59092 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Positive} Page 34 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

123 F. Supp. 2d 161 p.164

232. Cited by: Carrabus v. Schneider, 119 F. Supp. 2d 221, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15845 (E.D.N.Y. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Positive}

119 F. Supp. 2d 221 p.228

233. Cited by: Monastra v. NYNEX Corp., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13142, 165 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2500, 141 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10818 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 8, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN7, HN10, HN13{Cited}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13142

234. Cited by: Frontier Ins. Co. v. MTN Owner Trust, 111 F. Supp. 2d 376, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13118 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Caution}

111 F. Supp. 2d 376 p.378

235. Cited by: Al--Jundi v. Mancusi, 113 F. Supp. 2d 441, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16006, 164 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2028 (W.D.N.Y. 2000){Analysis}

164 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2028 p.2031

236. Cited by: Soto v. Apple Towing, 111 F. Supp. 2d 222, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12597 (E.D.N.Y. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

111 F. Supp. 2d 222 p.224

237. Followed by: Carrabus v. Schneider, 111 F. Supp. 2d 204, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11883, 79 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P40242 (E.D.N.Y. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Positive}

111 F. Supp. 2d 204 p.207

238. Cited by: Donovan v. Rothman, 106 F. Supp. 2d 513, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10065 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN9{Caution}

106 F. Supp. 2d 513 p.515 106 F. Supp. 2d 513 p.516

239. Cited by: Arrey v. Beaux Arts II, LLC, 101 F. Supp. 2d 225, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8606 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited} Page 35 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

101 F. Supp. 2d 225 p.227

240. Cited by: Monumental Blunders, Inc. v. CBS Corp., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8323, 165 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2373, 141 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10757 (S.D.N.Y. June 14, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8323

241. Cited by: Zanghi v. Laborers' Int'l Union, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7926 (W.D.N.Y. June 5, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Cited}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7926

242. Cited by: Payano v. Garage Mgmt. Corp., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2194 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 28, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2194

243. Cited by: Beckman v. United States Postal Serv., 79 F. Supp. 2d 394, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155, 163 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2614, 163 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2615 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Positive}

79 F. Supp. 2d 394 p.408

244. Cited by: Haggerty by Haggerty v. Wyeth Ayerst Pharms., 79 F. Supp. 2d 182, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117 (E.D.N.Y. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

79 F. Supp. 2d 182 p.185

245. Cited by: Donkor v. British Airways, Corp., 62 F. Supp. 2d 963, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12503 (E.D.N.Y. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9{Positive}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12503

246. Cited by: Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc. v. KLLM, Inc., 58 F. Supp. 2d 315, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11114 (D. Vt. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13 {Caution}

58 F. Supp. 2d 315 p.317

247. Cited by: Rand v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc'y of the U.S., 49 F. Supp. 2d 111, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6842 (E.D.N.Y. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Positive} Page 36 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

49 F. Supp. 2d 111 p.115

248. Cited by: Aetna U.S. Healthcare Inc. v. Maltz, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6708 (S.D.N.Y. May 4, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9{Caution}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6708

249. Cited by: TKO Fleet Enters. v. District 15, Int'l Ass'n of Machinists and Aero. Workers, 72 F. Supp. 2d 83, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20515, 140 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10642 (E.D.N.Y. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN12, HN13{Positive}

72 F. Supp. 2d 83 p.85 72 F. Supp. 2d 83 p.86 72 F. Supp. 2d 83 p.87

250. Cited by: Dobkowski v. Hitachi Koki USA, Ltd., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5573 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 23, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5573

251. Cited by: Niezbecki v. Eisner & Hubbard, P.C., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2970 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 15, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Positive}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2970

252. Cited by: Greenidge v. Mundo Shipping Corp., 41 F. Supp. 2d 354, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2539 (E.D.N.Y. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Analysis}

41 F. Supp. 2d 354 p.358

253. Cited by: Ell v. S.E.T. Landscape Design, Inc., 34 F. Supp. 2d 188, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 608 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Positive}

34 F. Supp. 2d 188 p.190

254. Cited by: County of Suffolk v. CBS Lines, 28 F. Supp. 2d 101, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18713 (E.D.N.Y. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Cited}

28 F. Supp. 2d 101 p.103

255. Cited by: Village of Alden v. Cablevision Indus., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20339 (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 26, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited} Page 37 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20339

256. Cited by: Moscovitch v. Danbury Hosp., 25 F. Supp. 2d 74, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17609 (D. Conn. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

25 F. Supp. 2d 74 p.82

257. Cited by: Cecere v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15100, 1998--2Trade Cas. (CCH) P72363 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 27, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Caution}

258. Cited by: Eastern States Health & Welfare Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc., 11 F. Supp. 2d 384, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9716 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6{Caution}

11 F. Supp. 2d 384 p.389

259. Cited by: Lucas v. Planning Bd., 7 F. Supp. 2d 310, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7538 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Caution}

7 F. Supp. 2d 310 p.318

260. Cited by: Panczykowski v. Laborers Int'l Union, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23269, 166 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2110 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Positive}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23269

261. Cited by: Caci v. Laborers' Int'l Union, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23127, 166 L.R.R.M.(BNA) 2039 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Analysis}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23127

262. Cited by: Capitano v. Laborers Int'l Union, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23110, 165 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3042 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Analysis}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23110

263. Cited by: Page 38 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

New York State Laborers PAC v. Mason Tenders Dist. Council, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3839, 158 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2080 (N.D.N.Y Mar. 23, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN10, HN13{Cited}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3839 158 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2080 p.2082

264. Cited by: Ash v. Artpack Int'l, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3520 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 20, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3520

265. Cited by: Yankee Gas Servs. Co. v. Connecticut Light & Power Co., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15978 (D. Conn. Mar. 16, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15978

266. Cited by: Northup v. Connecticut Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3111 (D. Conn. Feb. 2, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13 {Positive}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3111

267. Followed by, Cited by: Schepis v. Local Union No. 17, United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners, 989 F. Supp. 511, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139, 157 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2871 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Caution}

Followed by: 989 F. Supp. 511 p.514 Cited by: 989 F. Supp. 511 p.517

268. Cited by: New York v. Phillip Morris, Inc., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 5, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4

269. Cited by: Richstone v. Chubb Colonial Life Ins., 988 F. Supp. 401, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20642 (S.D.N.Y. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

988 F. Supp. 401 p.404

270. Cited by: Page 39 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Brannon v. Tarlov, 986 F. Supp. 146, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19742, 162 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2906 (E.D.N.Y. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Positive}

986 F. Supp. 146 p.149 986 F. Supp. 146 p.150

271. Cited by: New York City Sch. Constr. Auth. v. Bedell Assocs., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15597 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 12, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

272. Cited by: Amalgamated Local Union No. 55 v. Fibron Prods., 976 F. Supp. 192, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13640 (W.D.N.Y. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9 , HN10, HN13{Positive}

976 F. Supp. 192 p.196 976 F. Supp. 192 p.197

273. Followed by: Amalgamated Lithographers, Local One v. Armen Graphics (In re Armen Digital Graphics) , 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11938, 157 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2301 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 8, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

157 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2301 p.2306

274. Cited by: Jemzura v. PSC, 971 F. Supp. 702, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22381 (N.D.N.Y 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

971 F. Supp. 702 p.706

275. Cited by: Buffalo Enter. Dev. Corp. v. Elia, 996 F. Supp. 243, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22128 (W.D.N.Y. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13

996 F. Supp. 243 p.245

276. Cited by: Essential Freight Sys. v. Popular Club Plan, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7087 (S.D.N.Y. May 20, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

277. Cited by: Viens v. Wal--MartStores, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24029 (D. Conn. Mar. 3, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN7{Cited}

1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24029

278. Cited by: Page 40 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

New York v. Lutheran Ctr. for the Aging, 957 F. Supp. 393, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2125 (E.D.N.Y. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN13{Positive}

957 F. Supp. 393 p.397

279. Cited by: Gateway 2000 v. Cyrix Corp., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12465 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 27, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

280. Cited by: Seaver v. Yellow Freight Sys., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15915 (W.D.N.Y. Aug. 22, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Caution}

281. Cited by: Marcus v. AT&T Corp., 938 F. Supp. 1158, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12313 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Caution}

938 F. Supp. 1158 p.1165

282. Cited by: Counter v. United Van Lines, 935 F. Supp. 505, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12459 (D. Vt. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN13{Caution}

935 F. Supp. 505 p.506 935 F. Supp. 505 p.507

283. Cited by: Borek v. Weinreb Mgmt., 933 F. Supp. 357, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10449 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13{Cited}

933 F. Supp. 357 p.361

284. Cited by: Tisdale v. A.G. Edwards & Sons (In re NASDAQ Market--Makers Antitrust Litig.) , 929 F. Supp. 174, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8923, 1996--2Trade Cas. (CCH) P71491 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Caution}

929 F. Supp. 174 p.178

285. Cited by: Enhanced Computer Solutions v. Rose, 927 F. Supp. 738, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8145, Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P27609 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 , HN9, HN13{Cited}

927 F. Supp. 738 p.739 927 F. Supp. 738 p.740

286. Cited by: Petrucelli v. Cytec Indus., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22498 (D. Conn. May 21, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN9{Positive} Page 41 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

287. Cited by: Concerned Citizens v. Town of Avoca Planning Bd., 919 F. Supp. 643, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3691 (W.D.N.Y. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 {Caution}

919 F. Supp. 643 p.647 919 F. Supp. 643 p.648

288. Cited by: Foschi by Foschi v. United States Swimming, 916 F. Supp. 232, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2468 (E.D.N.Y. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN13 {Cited}

916 F. Supp. 232 p.238

289. Followed by, Cited by: Vermont v. Oncor Communs., 166 F.R.D. 313, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1641 (D. Vt. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Positive}

Followed by: 166 F.R.D. 313 p.318 Cited by: 166 F.R.D. 313 p.317

290. Cited by: Wilhelm v. Sunrise Northeast, 923 F. Supp. 330, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20982, 151 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2655 (D. Conn. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9, HN10 , HN13{Caution}

923 F. Supp. 330 p.335

291. Cited by: Wilhelm v. Sunrise Northeast, 923 F. Supp. 330, 151 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2655 (D. Conn. 1995){Analysis}

151 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2655 p.2659

292. Cited by: Patrick v. Francis, 887 F. Supp. 481, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6815 (W.D.N.Y. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

887 F. Supp. 481 p.485

293. Cited by: Morris v. Local 819, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6390 (S.D.N.Y. May 10, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Caution}

294. Cited by: Meyerson v. Wickes Cos. (In re Boesky Sec. Litig.), 882 F. Supp. 1371, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5410, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P98731, RICO Bus. Disp. Guide P8817 (S.D.N.Y. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Analysis} Page 42 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

882 F. Supp. 1371 p.1376

295. Cited by: Frys v. General Motors Corp., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7155 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Cited}

296. Cited by: Silver v. The Orioles, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2283, 148 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2826 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 28, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

148 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2826 p.2827

297. Cited by: Reed v. Cohen, 876 F. Supp. 25, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2335 (E.D.N.Y. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Analysis}

876 F. Supp. 25 p.27

298. Cited by: Box Tree S. v. Bitterman, 873 F. Supp. 833, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 515, 149 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2176 (S.D.N.Y. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7 , HN8, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13{Positive}

873 F. Supp. 833 p.837 873 F. Supp. 833 p.839 873 F. Supp. 833 p.840 873 F. Supp. 833 p.843

299. Cited by: Sadowski v. Technical Career Insts., 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15590 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 2, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Positive}

300. Cited by: Stuart v. Adelphi Univ., 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15499, 68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 192, 149 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2956 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 28, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13 {Analysis}

68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 192 p.193 149 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2956 p.2957

301. Cited by: D'Amore v. Stangle & Denigris, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20691 (D. Conn. Oct. 18, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Analysis}

302. Cited by: Hess v. B & B Plastics Div. of Metal Cladding, 862 F. Supp. 31, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12743 (W.D.N.Y. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

862 F. Supp. 31 p.32 Page 43 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

303. Cited by: Satahoo v. Tabard Copley Graphics, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9929 (S.D.N.Y. July 20, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13

304. Cited by: Satahoo v. Tabard Copley Graphics, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9840 (S.D.N.Y. July 20, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13

305. Cited by: Lopez v. Time Inc., 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2802, 147 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2247 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 11, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Cited}

147 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2247 p.2249

306. Cited by: Old Country Iron Works v. Iron Workers Locals 40, 361, & 417, 842 F. Supp. 75, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17030, 147 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3085 (S.D.N.Y. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10 {Cited}

842 F. Supp. 75 p.77

307. Distinguished by, Cited by: Ellis v. Lloyd, 838 F. Supp. 704, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17327, 145 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2478, 127 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10974 (D. Conn. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8 , HN10, HN13{Positive}

Distinguished by: 838 F. Supp. 704 p.709 Cited by: 838 F. Supp. 704 p.707

308. Cited by: Giles v. General Motors Corp., 825 F. Supp. 638, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10251, 126 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10806 (S.D.N.Y. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN10 , HN13{Cited}

825 F. Supp. 638 p.640

309. Cited by: Golden Hill Paugussett Tribe of Indians v. Weicker, 839 F. Supp. 130, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19342 (D. Conn. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Caution}

839 F. Supp. 130 p.136

310. Cited by: Hade v. Kott, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2714 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 5, 1993){Analysis} Page 44 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

311. Cited by: Browning Ave. Realty Corp. v. Rubin, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2429 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 25, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Analysis}

312. Cited by: Herben v. Public Service Com., 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2144 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 25, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

313. Cited by: Rabinowitz v. Benson, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15481 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 8, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

314. Cited by: Ismail v. Barad, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10927 (S.D.N.Y. July 23, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Cited}

315. Cited by: Albradco, Inc. v. Bevona, 788 F. Supp. 786, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4025, 142 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2276, 123 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10477 (S.D.N.Y. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9 , HN10, HN12{Positive}

788 F. Supp. 786 p.793

316. Cited by: Amon v. Nelson, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 280 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4 {Cited}

317. Cited by: Cuisinarts Corp. v. Appliance Science Corp., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21021, Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P26885, 21 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1318 (D. Conn. Oct. 30, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

318. Cited by: Newmark & Lewis, Inc. v. Local 814, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 776 F. Supp. 102, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19053, 120 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11080 (E.D.N.Y. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Caution}

776 F. Supp. 102 p.105

319. Cited by: Fidgeon v. Trataros Constr., Inc., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3750 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 22, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

320. Cited by: Wood v. Vermont Ins. Management, Inc., 749 F. Supp. 558, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15045, 54 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 510, 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1662 (D. Vt. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited} Page 45 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

749 F. Supp. 558 p.559 749 F. Supp. 558 p.560

321. Cited by: Hardmond v. John Hancock Co., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6602, 134 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2928 (E.D.N.Y. May 31, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9

134 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2928 p.2929

322. Cited by: Brown v. American Arbitration Asso., 717 F. Supp. 195, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7766, 136 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2970, 113 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11806 (S.D.N.Y. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN13{Analysis}

717 F. Supp. 195 p.199

323. Cited by: Gaedeke v. Ferrani Fashions, Inc., 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6979 (S.D.N.Y. June 16, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

324. Cited by: International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, Local Lodge No. 967 v. General Electric Co., 713 F. Supp. 547, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5808, 54 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P40112, 52 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 99, 133 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2642, 115 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10022 (N.D.N.Y 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution}

713 F. Supp. 547 p.551 713 F. Supp. 547 p.553

325. Cited by: Fisher v. White, 715 F. Supp. 37, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6886 (E.D.N.Y. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

715 F. Supp. 37 p.39

326. Cited by: Underwood v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 710 F. Supp. 78, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3518, 51 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P39297, 49 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1725, 131 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2551, 112 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11238, 1989--1Trade Cas. (CCH) P68511 (S.D.N.Y. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

710 F. Supp. 78 p.82

327. Cited by: Spencer v. St. John's University, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3421, 112 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11359 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 28, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Cited}

328. Cited by: Page 46 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Dragone v. M.J. Raynes, Inc., 695 F. Supp. 720, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10987, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 347, 130 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2635, 113 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11740 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Caution}

695 F. Supp. 720 p.723

329. Cited by: Paradis v. United Technologies, Pratt & Whitney Div., 672 F. Supp. 67, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10064, 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1221, 126 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3343, 113 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11751 (D. Conn. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 , HN13{Caution}

672 F. Supp. 67 p.68 2ND CIRCUIT --U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURTS

330. Cited by: In re Enron Corp., 328 B.R. 75, 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 1463, 45 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 38 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

328 B.R. 75 p.79

331. Cited by: In re Enron Corp., 327 B.R. 526, 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 1065, 44 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 249 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

327 B.R. 526 p.530

332. Cited by: ML Media Partners, LP v. Century/ML Cable Venture (In re Adelphia Communs. Corp.) , 285 B.R. 127, 2002 Bankr. LEXIS 1326, 40 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 112 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9{Caution}

285 B.R. 127 p.139

333. Cited by: In re Olympia & York Maiden Lane Co. Llc & Olympia & York Maiden Lane Fin. Corp., 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 91 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Jan. 25, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Positive}

1999 Bankr. LEXIS 91 3RD CIRCUIT --COURT OF APPEALS

334. Cited by: In re Cmty. Bank of N. Va. & Guar. Nat'l Bank of Tallahassee Second Mortg. Loan Litig., 418 F.3d 277, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 17471 (3d Cir. Pa. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN13{Caution}

418 F.3d 277 p.293 Page 47 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

335. Cited by: Epic Educ. Projects & Info. Consultant Ctr. Inc. v. Dwelling House S&L Ass'n , 139 Fed. Appx. 388, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 14277 (2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Cited}

139 Fed. Appx. 388 p.390

336. Cited by: Pascack Valley Hosp., Inc. v. Local 464A UFCW Welfare Reimbursement Plan, 388 F.3d 393, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 22632, 33 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2575, 65 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (CBC) 859 (3d Cir. N.J. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10 , HN12{Caution}

388 F.3d 393 p.402

337. Cited by: Kline v. Sec. Guards, Inc., 386 F.3d 246, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20963, 21 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1589, 175 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3038 (3d Cir. Pa. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN3, HN4, HN6, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13{Positive}

386 F.3d 246 p.251 386 F.3d 246 p.253

338. Cited by: Carino v. Stefan, 376 F.3d 156, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 14844, 175 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2257, 150 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10368 (3d Cir. N.J. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Cited}

376 F.3d 156 p.162

339. Cited by: Berne Corp. v. Virgin Islands, 105 Fed. Appx. 324, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 13241 (2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Analysis}

105 Fed. Appx. 324 p.328

340. Cited by: Briones v. Bon Secours Health Sys., 69 Fed. Appx. 530, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12997 (2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN7, HN12{Positive}

69 Fed. Appx. 530 p.534

341. Cited by: Bracken v. Matgouranis, 296 F.3d 160, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 14189 (3d Cir. Pa. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Caution}

296 F.3d 160 p.162 296 F.3d 160 p.163

342. Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: Page 48 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

U.S. Express Lines, LTD. v. Higgins, 281 F.3d 383, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 2416, 2002 A.M.C. 823 (3d Cir. Pa. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

281 F.3d 383 p.396

343. Cited by: Club Comanche, Inc. v. Gov't of the V.I., 278 F.3d 250, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 569 (3d Cir. V.I. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

278 F.3d 250 p.259

344. Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by: Wood v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 207 F.3d 674, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 5186, 24 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2868 (3d Cir. N.J. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN9, HN12{Caution}

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: 207 F.3d 674 p.682 Cited by: 207 F.3d 674 p.678

345. Distinguished by, Cited by: Beidleman v. Stroh Brewery Co., 182 F.3d 225, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 14606, 161 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2656, 138 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10471 (3d Cir. Pa. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN7, HN10, HN12{Positive}

Distinguished by: 182 F.3d 225 p.230 Cited by: 182 F.3d 225 p.231 182 F.3d 225 p.237

346. Followed by: Voilas v. GMC, 170 F.3d 367, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3339, 22 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2781, 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2641, 137 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58597 (3d Cir. N.J. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN8{Caution}

170 F.3d 367 p.373

347. Cited by: Krell v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. (In re Prudential Ins. Co. Am. Sales Practice Litig. Agent Actions) , 148 F.3d 283, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 17057, 41 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 596 (3d Cir. N.J. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Warning}

148 F.3d 283 p.301

348. Cited by: Antol v. Esposto, 100 F.3d 1111, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 30188, 153 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2841, 133 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11762, 3 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 1003 (3d Cir. Pa. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN10, HN13 {Caution} Page 49 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

100 F.3d 1111 p.1116 100 F.3d 1111 p.1117

349. Cited by: Mints v. Educational Testing Serv., 99 F.3d 1253, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 29500 (3d Cir. N.J. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Positive}

99 F.3d 1253 p.1256

350. Cited by: Pennsylvania Nurses Ass'n v. Pennsylvania State Educ. Ass'n, 90 F.3d 797, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 18310, 152 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2901 (3d Cir. Pa. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13 {Caution}

90 F.3d 797 p.807 90 F.3d 797 p.808

351. Cited by: Dukes v. U.S. Healthcare, 57 F.3d 350, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 15034, 19 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1473 (3d Cir. Pa. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6{Caution}

57 F.3d 350 p.354

352. Cited by: Trans Penn Wax Corp. v. McCandless, 50 F.3d 217, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 3884, 148 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2673, 129 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11294 (3d Cir. Pa. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN8, HN10, HN12, HN13{Caution}

50 F.3d 217 p.228 50 F.3d 217 p.229 50 F.3d 217 p.231

353. Cited by: Goepel v. National Postal Mail Handlers Union, 36 F.3d 306, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26970, 18 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2046 (3d Cir. N.J. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN13{Questioned}

36 F.3d 306 p.309 36 F.3d 306 p.310

354. Distinguished by: Angst v. Mack Trucks, Inc., 969 F.2d 1530, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 16543, 15 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2253, 140 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2835, 122 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10300 (3d Cir. Pa. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

969 F.2d 1530 p.1537

355. Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by: Smith v. Industrial Valley Title Ins. Co., 957 F.2d 90, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 2322 (3d Cir. Pa. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Caution} Page 50 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: 957 F.2d 90 p.96 Cited by: 957 F.2d 90 p.92

356. Cited by: Krashna v. Oliver Realty, Inc., 895 F.2d 111, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 1243, 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 111, 133 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2532, 114 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11886 (3d Cir. Pa. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN12, HN13 {Caution}

895 F.2d 111 p.113 895 F.2d 111 p.114

357. Followed by: Berda v. CBS, Inc., 881 F.2d 20, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 10298, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 904, 131 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3073, 112 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11341 (3d Cir. Pa. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13{Caution}

881 F.2d 20 p.23

358. Cited by: Allstate Ins. Co. v. 65 Sec. Plan, 879 F.2d 90, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 10180, 11 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1289 (3d Cir. Pa. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6, HN13{Questioned}

879 F.2d 90 p.93

359. Cited by: Railway Labor Executives Asso. v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co., 858 F.2d 936, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14058, 129 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2673, 110 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10822 (3d Cir. Pa. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Questioned}

858 F.2d 936 p.939 858 F.2d 936 p.941 858 F.2d 936 p.942 3RD CIRCUIT --U.S. DISTRICT COURTS

360. Cited by: Fosnocht v. Demko, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48635 (E.D. Pa. July 17, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48635

361. Cited by: Hutchinson Group, Ltd. v. Am. Int'l Specialty Lines Ins. Co., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36349 (W.D. Pa. June 5, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36349

362. Cited by: Page 51 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Cardello v. CRC Indus., Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35031 (W.D. Pa. May 31, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35031

363. Cited by: Opacity v. Aramark Corp., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24066 (D.N.J. Apr. 28, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24066

364. Followed by: Armstrong v. United States Steel Corp., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22204, 179 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2697 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 12, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN10

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22204

365. Cited by: Abrams v. KPMG, LLP, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11090, 97 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1272 (D.N.J. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11090

366. Cited by: Therien v. Trs. of the Univ. of Pa., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 746 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 10, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 746

367. Cited by: Bergen Reg'l Med. Ctr., L.P. v. Health Prof'l & Allied Emples. Union, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30194 (D.N.J. Nov. 28, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Cited}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30194

368. Cited by: Ahmad v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20164 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 14, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN13

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20164

369. Cited by: Brown v. Catholic Cmty. Servs., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18159 (D.N.J. Aug. 15, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Cited}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18159

370. Cited by: Page 52 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Smith v. Team Dodge--Kia, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11556 (E.D. Pa. June 14, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11556

371. Cited by: N. Penn Water Auth. v. BAE Sys., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10210, 60 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1594 (E.D. Pa. May 25, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10210

372. Cited by: Milkis Enters. v. Ret. Plan Consultants, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6678, 34 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2318 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 19, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Cited}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6678

373. Cited by: Ratmansky v. Plymouth House Nursing Home, Inc., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5713 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 5, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN4, HN13{Cited}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5713

374. Cited by: Jamal v. WMC Mortg. Corp., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5076 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 28, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5076

375. Cited by: City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25151 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 13, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25151

376. Cited by: Thibodeau v. Comcast Corp., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20999 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 21, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Positive}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20999

377. Cited by: Mersmann v. Cont'l Airlines, 335 F. Supp. 2d 544, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19064, 150 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P59932 (D.N.J. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6 , HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13

335 F. Supp. 2d 544 p.546

378. Distinguished by, Followed by: Page 53 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Local Union No. 98, IBEW v. Morris, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13156, 33 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1519 (E.D. Pa. July 9, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Analysis}

Distinguished by: 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13156 Followed by: 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13156

379. Cited by: Stephens v. High Voltage Maint. Co., 323 F. Supp. 2d 650, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12666 (E.D. Pa. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

323 F. Supp. 2d 650 p.652

380. Cited by: Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Poling, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12222 (E.D. Pa. June 10, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN4{Analysis}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12222

381. Cited by: City of Philadelphia v. Greater Canaan Church of God in Christ, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5407 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 27, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6 , HN13{Caution}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5407

382. Cited by: Nott v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare, Inc., 303 F. Supp. 2d 565, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1130 (E.D. Pa. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN9, HN12, HN13{Positive}

303 F. Supp. 2d 565 p.568

383. Cited by: Wright v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 285 F. Supp. 2d 515, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16986 (D.N.J. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

285 F. Supp. 2d 515 p.522

384. Cited by: Hilltown Crossings, L.P. v. Clemens Mkts. Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18055 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 28, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18055

385. Cited by: Naulty v. Kraft Foods, Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15677 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 12, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15677 Page 54 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

386. Cited by: Universal Health Servs. v. Aetna, Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15664 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 4, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN7{Analysis}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15664

387. Cited by: Crawford v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15649 (E.D. Pa. July 22, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15649

388. Cited by: Universal Health Servs. v. Aetna, Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12186 (E.D. Pa. June 25, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN7{Analysis}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12186

389. Cited by: Grabowski v. J.J. White, Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7596 (D. Del. May 2, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7596

390. Cited by: Guckin v. Nagle, 259 F. Supp. 2d 406, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7665 (E.D. Pa. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN9{Positive}

259 F. Supp. 2d 406 p.409

391. Cited by: Carleton v. Physician's Health Plan of Md., Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6714 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 17, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6714

392. Cited by: DML Assocs. v. Mattel, Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5618 (D. Del. Apr. 7, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN13

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5618

393. Cited by: Aronson v. IDT Corp., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6659 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 3, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6659

394. Cited by: Page 55 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Shadie v. Aventis Pasteur, Inc., 254 F. Supp. 2d 509, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4954 (M.D. Pa. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9{Positive}

254 F. Supp. 2d 509 p.516 254 F. Supp. 2d 509 p.517

395. Cited by: Carrick v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 252 F. Supp. 2d 116, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4167 (M.D. Pa. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

252 F. Supp. 2d 116 p.119

396. Cited by: Cleary v. City of Philadelphia, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4705 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 7, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4705

397. Cited by: Alessi v. Beracha, 244 F. Supp. 2d 354, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 986, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P92409 (D. Del. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

244 F. Supp. 2d 354 p.356

398. Cited by: Wietschner v. Gilmartin, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18997 (D.N.J. Jan. 13, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Caution}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18997

399. Cited by: Lancaster County Ofﬁce of Aging v. Schoener, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1342 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 8, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Cited}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1342

400. Cited by: Gaul v. Neurocare Diagnostic, Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 546 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 3, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13{Positive}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 546

401. Cited by: Spada v. Fleming Cos., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21551 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 5, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Cited}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21551

402. Cited by: Murray v. Gemplus Int'l, S.A., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22272 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 29, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution} Page 56 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22272

403. Cited by: County of Del. v. Gov't Sys., 230 F. Supp. 2d 592, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18770 (E.D. Pa. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Positive}

230 F. Supp. 2d 592 p.596 230 F. Supp. 2d 592 p.597

404. Cited by: MCS Servs. v. Johnsen, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16910 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 13, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16910

405. Cited by: Solter v. Health Partners of Phila., Inc., 215 F. Supp. 2d 533, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15074 (E.D. Pa. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Positive}

215 F. Supp. 2d 533 p.536

406. Cited by: Gerow v. Kleinerman, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13268 (D.N.J. July 2, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN9, HN13{Caution}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13268

407. Cited by: State Farm Indem. Co. v. Fornaro, 227 F. Supp. 2d 229, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17591 (D.N.J. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

227 F. Supp. 2d 229 p.237

408. Cited by: Earley v. Innovex (N. Am.) Inc., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10383 (E.D. Pa. June 10, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10383

409. Cited by: Zoren v. Genesis Energy, L.P., 195 F. Supp. 2d 598, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5955, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P91760 (D. Del. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 , HN13{Caution}

195 F. Supp. 2d 598 p.602

410. Cited by: Dianese, Inc. v. Pennsylvania, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3310 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 27, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Analysis}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3310 Page 57 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

411. Cited by: Dianese, Inc. v. Pennsylvania, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3306 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 27, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Caution}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3306

412. Cited by: Dianese, Inc. v. Pennsylvania, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3305 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 27, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Caution}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3305

413. Cited by: City of Philadelphia v. Women's Health, Inc., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12171 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 25, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12171

414. Cited by: Burgo v. Volkswagen of Am., 183 F. Supp. 2d 683, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22456 (D.N.J. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13{Positive}

183 F. Supp. 2d 683 p.686

415. Cited by: Swift Elec. Supply Co. v. Twp. of Lakewood, 168 F. Supp. 2d 298, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16366, 26 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2485, 168 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2826 (D.N.J. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN7

168 F. Supp. 2d 298 p.303

416. Followed by, Cited by: Indeck Me. Energy, L.L.C. v. ISO New Eng. Inc., 167 F. Supp. 2d 675, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16439 (D. Del. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6 , HN13{Analysis}

Followed by: 167 F. Supp. 2d 675 p.684 Cited by: 167 F. Supp. 2d 675 p.683

417. Cited by: Sangmeister v. Airborne Express, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13466, 18 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 699, 145 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11181 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 30, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6{Cited}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13466

418. Cited by: Page 58 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

SANGMEISTER v. AIRBORNE EXPRESS, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15753 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 28, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

419. Cited by: McComb v. Neumann Med. Ctr., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10178 (E.D. Pa. July 18, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10178

420. Cited by: Lemon v. MTS, Inc., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11013 (E.D. Pa. June 29, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9{Cited}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11013

421. Cited by: Longo v. City of Philadelphia, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11506 (E.D. Pa. June 11, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11506

422. Cited by: Dawson v. Ciba--GeigyCorp., USA, 145 F. Supp. 2d 565, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6869 (D.N.J. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13{Caution}

145 F. Supp. 2d 565 p.568

423. Cited by: Caldwell Trucking PRP Group v. Caldwell Trucking Co., 154 F. Supp. 2d 870 (D.N.J. 2001){Cited}

154 F. Supp. 2d 870 p.875

424. Cited by: Caldwell Trucking PRP Group v. Caldwell Trucking Co., 154 F. Supp. 2d 870, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17915 (D.N.J. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN9, HN13 {Caution}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17915

425. Cited by: Orlick v. J.D. Carton & Son, Inc., 144 F. Supp. 2d 337, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5724 (D.N.J. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

144 F. Supp. 2d 337 p.343

426. Cited by: Phillips v. Selig, 157 F. Supp. 2d 419, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3612, 167L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2182 (E.D. Pa. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5 {Caution} Page 59 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

157 F. Supp. 2d 419 p.425

427. Cited by: Nolan v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2585 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 14, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN13

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2585

428. Cited by: Cronin v. United States Prof'l Consultants, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2581 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 13, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2581

429. Followed by: Stafford v. Hess Oil V.I. Corp., 133 F. Supp. 2d 384, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3540, 166 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2816 (D.V.I. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN10, HN13 {Positive}

133 F. Supp. 2d 384 p.388

430. Cited by: Fumo v. Gallas, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1140 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 6, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Positive}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1140

431. Cited by: Talalai v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3577 (D.N.J. Jan. 5, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN13{Positive}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3577

432. Cited by: Dorian v. Bridgestone/Firestone Inc., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15407 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 19, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15407

433. Cited by: Beatty v. Bridgestone/Firestone Inc., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15406 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 19, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15406

434. Cited by: Lennon v. Bridgestone/Firestone Inc., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15405 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 19, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15405 Page 60 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

435. Followed by: Miller v. Bridgestone/Firestone Inc., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15292 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 19, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15292

436. Cited by: Wilbur v. H & R Block, Inc., 170 F. Supp. 2d 480, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21560 (M.D. Pa. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

170 F. Supp. 2d 480 p.481

437. Cited by: Intelnet Int'l Corp. v. Worldcom Technologies, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15828 (D.N.J. Apr. 10, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15828

438. Cited by: Morton v. Mylan Pharm., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4047, 24 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2373 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 22, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4047

439. Cited by: United States ex rel. McCollum v. Dawnco Constr., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3090 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 16, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3090

440. Cited by: Zimnoch v. ITT Hartford, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2846 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 16, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Questioned}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2846

441. Cited by: Marine Midland Bank v. Bravo, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1342 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 11, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Cited}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1342

442. Cited by: City of Camden v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp., 81 F. Supp. 2d 541, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 674, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P15762 (D.N.J. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6 , HN9, HN13{Positive}

81 F. Supp. 2d 541 p.545

443. Cited by: Page 61 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Espinosa v. Continental Airlines, 80 F. Supp. 2d 297, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2640, 163 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2266, 140 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10662, 140 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10663 (D.N.J. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN9, HN13{Caution}

80 F. Supp. 2d 297 p.300

444. Cited by: Aronson v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P., 90 F. Supp. 2d 662, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6742 (W.D. Pa. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN13{Positive}

90 F. Supp. 2d 662 p.665

445. Cited by: XF Enters. v. BASF Corp., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16834, 1999--2Trade Cas. (CCH) P72699 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 2, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13 {Cited}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16834

446. Cited by: Gul v. Pamrapo Sav. Bank, 64 F. Supp. 2d 370, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14449, 162 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2765, 139 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10603 (D.N.J. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN7, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13{Cited}

64 F. Supp. 2d 370 p.372

447. Cited by: Valley Nat'l Bank v. Lavecchia, 59 F. Supp. 2d 432, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14777 (D.N.J. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6{Cited}

59 F. Supp. 2d 432 p.434

448. Cited by: Luthe v. City of Cape May, 49 F. Supp. 2d 380, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13841 (D.N.J. 1999){Questioned}

49 F. Supp. 2d 380 p.384

449. Cited by: Snow v. Burden, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6932 (E.D. Pa. May 6, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Cited}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6932

450. Cited by: Huss v. Green Spring Health Servs., Inc., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5101 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 13, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Caution}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5101

451. Cited by: Page 62 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Cipriano v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2761 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 12, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2761

452. Cited by: Monmouth--OceanCollection Serv., Inc. v. Klor, 46 F. Supp. 2d 385, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5269 (D.N.J. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 {Caution}

46 F. Supp. 2d 385 p.388

453. Cited by: New Jersey v. City of Wildwood, 22 F. Supp. 2d 395, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23557 (D.N.J. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6{Caution}

22 F. Supp. 2d 395 p.400

454. Cited by: Visconti by Visconti v. United States Healthcare, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15691 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 28, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15691

455. Cited by: Lawson v. CONRAIL, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14814 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 22, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14814

456. Cited by: Porzilli v. CBS, Inc., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10689 (D.N.J. July 13, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9{Positive}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10689

457. Cited by: Marcone v. Philadelphia Marine Trade Ctr., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9189 (E.D. Pa. June 22, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9189

458. Cited by: Miller v. Riddle Mem. Hosp., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7752 (E.D. Pa. May 28, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Caution}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7752

459. Cited by: Beidleman v. Stroh Brewery Co., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5967 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 17, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Caution} Page 63 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5967

460. Cited by: Eaccarino v. Canlas, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4904 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 1, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Cited}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4904

461. Cited by: Grays Ferry Cogeneration Pshp. v. Peco Energy Co., 998 F. Supp. 542, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3420 (E.D. Pa. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6 , HN9, HN13{Positive}

998 F. Supp. 542 p.549

462. Followed by: Henderson v. Merck & Co., 998 F. Supp. 532, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3419, 158 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2230 (E.D. Pa. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6 , HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution}

998 F. Supp. 532 p.536

463. Cited by: Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Stella, 994 F. Supp. 308, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1346 (E.D. Pa. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution}

994 F. Supp. 308 p.315

464. Cited by: Hoose v. Jefferson Home Health Care, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1369 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 6, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

465. Cited by: Independent Mach. Co. v. International Tray Pads & Packaging, 991 F. Supp. 687, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 843 (D.N.J. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13 {Positive}

991 F. Supp. 687 p.693

466. Cited by: Atlantic Coast Demolition & Recycling v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 988 F. Supp. 486, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20129, 28 Envtl. L. Rep. 21004 (D.N.J. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN13{Analysis}

988 F. Supp. 486 p.495

467. Cited by: Bauchelle v. AT&T Corp., 989 F. Supp. 636, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20703 (D.N.J. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6{Positive} Page 64 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

989 F. Supp. 636 p.640 989 F. Supp. 636 p.643

468. Cited by: Connors v. Malik, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17342 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN13{Cited}

469. Cited by: Thomas v. Hanley, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13587 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 2, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN9, HN10{Positive}

470. Cited by: Freeman v. Tache, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12807 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 15, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN7, HN13

471. Cited by: Berman v. Abington Radiology Assocs., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12322 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 14, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7{Positive}

472. Cited by: Eisenman v. Continental Airlines, 974 F. Supp. 425, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17682 (D.N.J. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN9{Caution}

974 F. Supp. 425 p.429

473. Cited by: Petron Oil Corp. v. Seitel Gas & Energy, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10394 (E.D. Pa. July 16, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

474. Cited by: Peek v. Philadelphia Coca--ColaBottling Co., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10138, 162 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2537 (E.D. Pa. July 8, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Cited}

1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10138 162 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2537 p.2539

475. Cited by: Kapka v. Hornstein, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9191 (E.D. Pa. June 25, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Cited}

476. Cited by: Hickman v. Caterpillar, Inc., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22174 (M.D. Pa. June 20, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN12{Cited}

477. Cited by: Page 65 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Township of Whitehall v. Allentown Auto Auction, 966 F. Supp. 385, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8705 (E.D. Pa. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN13 {Positive}

966 F. Supp. 385 p.386

478. Cited by: Gardner v. Beasley FM Acquisition Corp., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8218 (E.D. Pa. June 6, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Cited}

479. Cited by: Sanderson, Thompson, Ratledge & Zimny v. AWACS, Inc., 958 F. Supp. 947, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4189 (D. Del. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7 , HN12, HN13{Caution}

958 F. Supp. 947 p.953 958 F. Supp. 947 p.958

480. Cited by: Lamonica v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1988 (D.N.J. Feb. 20, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN7{Cited}

481. Cited by: Violas v. GMC, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16247 (D.N.J. Jan. 29, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN7, HN10, HN12{Positive}

482. Cited by: Conway v. Peco Energy Co., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 747 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 28, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9{Positive}

483. Cited by: In re Comcast Cellular Telcoms. Litig., 949 F. Supp. 1193, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18179(E.D. Pa. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Caution}

949 F. Supp. 1193 p.1198 949 F. Supp. 1193 p.1199 949 F. Supp. 1193 p.1202 949 F. Supp. 1193 p.1204

484. Cited by: Delaware County Solid Waste Auth. v. Hinkson Container Serv., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18374 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 5, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

485. Cited by: Gateway 2000 v. Cyrix Corp., 942 F. Supp. 985, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16011 (D.N.J. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13 {Positive} Page 66 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

942 F. Supp. 985 p.989 942 F. Supp. 985 p.990

486. Cited by: Falcone v. Baxter Healthcare Corp., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12349, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P14736 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 23, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6{Cited}

487. Cited by: In re Orthopedic Bone Screw Prods. Liab. Litig., 939 F. Supp. 398, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11504 (E.D. Pa. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6 , HN9, HN13{Warning}

939 F. Supp. 398 p.399

488. Cited by: DeCastro v. AWACS, Inc., 935 F. Supp. 541, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12344 (D.N.J. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN12{Caution}

935 F. Supp. 541 p.548 935 F. Supp. 541 p.555

489. Cited by: Gonoude v. Baxter Healthcare Corps., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10311, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P14694 (E.D. Pa. July 17, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

490. Cited by: Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. USW, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9396, 157 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2317 (E.D. Pa. July 1, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13

491. Cited by: Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. United Steelworkers of Am., 157 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2317 (E.D. Pa. July 1, 1996)

157 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2317 p.2318

492. Cited by: Eisenman v. Continental Airlines, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21690 (D.N.J. June 25, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13{Warning}

493. Cited by: Mitchell v. Village Super Mkt., 926 F. Supp. 476, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6986, 71 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 24, 152 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2695 (D.N.J. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Positive}

926 F. Supp. 476 p.478

494. Cited by: Page 67 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Mitchell v. Village Super Mkt., Inc., 71 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 24, 152 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2695 (D.N.J. May 20, 1996)

71 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 24 p.26 152 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2695 p.2697

495. Cited by: Shapiro v. Middlesex County Mun. Joint Ins. Fund, 930 F. Supp. 1028, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8516, 1996--2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P71523 (D.N.J. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN13{Cited}

930 F. Supp. 1028 p.1032

496. Cited by: Kozar v. AT & T, 923 F. Supp. 67, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8243 (D.N.J. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN7{Cited}

923 F. Supp. 67 p.69 923 F. Supp. 67 p.70 923 F. Supp. 67 p.72

497. Distinguished by, Cited by: Collins v. Baxter Healthcare Corp., 949 F. Supp. 1143, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20665, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P14706 (D.N.J. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6 , HN9, HN13{Caution}

Distinguished by: 949 F. Supp. 1143 p.1151 Cited by: 949 F. Supp. 1143 p.1147 949 F. Supp. 1143 p.1150

498. Followed by, Cited by: In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. Sales Practices Litig., 924 F. Supp. 627, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5630 (D.N.J. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7 , HN9, HN10, HN13{Warning}

Followed by: 924 F. Supp. 627 p.645 Cited by: 924 F. Supp. 627 p.644

499. Followed by, Cited by: Weinberg v. Sprint Corp., 165 F.R.D. 431, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4661 (D.N.J. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6{Caution}

Followed by: 165 F.R.D. 431 p.436 Cited by: 165 F.R.D. 431 p.437

500. Cited by: Page 68 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Muller v. Maron, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15048 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 12, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

501. Cited by: Howard v. Sasson, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14373, 19 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2091 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 3, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13 {Positive}

19 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2091 p.2092

502. Cited by: McKiernan v. Smith--Edwards--DunlapCo., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6822, 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P43686, 130 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P33296, 3 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 272 (E.D. Pa. May 17, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Caution}

503. Cited by: McKiernan v. Smith--Edwards--DunlapCo., 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P43686, 130 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P33296, 3 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 272 (E.D. Pa. May 17, 1995){Positive}

66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P43686 130 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P33296 3 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 272 p.276

504. Cited by: Rauscher v. Ryan, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6607, 130 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11402 (E.D. Pa. May 15, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9{Analysis}

130 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11402

505. Cited by: Russo v. Abington Mem. Hosp., 881 F. Supp. 177, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4037 (E.D. Pa. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN13 {Warning}

881 F. Supp. 177 p.179

506. Cited by: Teamster, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local 764 v. Greenawalt, 880 F. Supp. 1076, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3725, 148 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2948 (M.D. Pa. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Caution}

880 F. Supp. 1076 p.1082

507. Cited by: Shrader v. Legg Mason Wood Walker, 880 F. Supp. 366, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2911 (E.D. Pa. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

880 F. Supp. 366 p.369 Page 69 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

508. Cited by: In re Estate of Tabas, 879 F. Supp. 464, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2718, RICO Bus. Disp. Guide P8758 (E.D. Pa. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

879 F. Supp. 464 p.466 879 F. Supp. 464 p.467

509. Cited by: Sweigart v. Delmotte, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18735, 148 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2413 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 29, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN13{Positive}

148 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2413 p.2415

510. Cited by: Puckett v. General Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union 249, 150 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2565 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 16, 1994){Warning}

150 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2565 p.2567

511. Cited by: Chase v. Auerbach, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15283 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 26, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Cited}

512. Cited by: Furillo v. Dana Corp. Parish Div., 866 F. Supp. 842, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15072, 150 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2785 (E.D. Pa. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 {Caution}

866 F. Supp. 842 p.852

513. Cited by: Hunter v. H.L. Yoh Co., 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16298 (D.N.J. Oct. 21, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Warning}

514. Cited by: Schulze v. Legg Mason Wood Walker, Inc., 865 F. Supp. 277, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14943 (W.D. Pa. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13 {Caution}

865 F. Supp. 277 p.279 865 F. Supp. 277 p.280 865 F. Supp. 277 p.281

515. Cited by: Holland v. N.J. Dep't of Corr., 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13239 (D.N.J. Sept. 14, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Analysis}

516. Cited by: Page 70 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Aristide v. United Dominion Constructors, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9634, 30 V.I. 224 (1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN12{Cited}

517. Cited by: Thomas v. Gregg Sec., 146 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2763 (W.D. Pa. May 20, 1994){Cited}

146 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2763 p.2764

518. Cited by: Baron v. National--Standard Co., 850 F. Supp. 320, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5769, 146 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2438, 2 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 12 (E.D. Pa. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13{Analysis}

850 F. Supp. 320 p.323 850 F. Supp. 320 p.325

519. Distinguished by, Cited by: Rauscher v. Ryan, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4331, 147 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2430 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 7, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN6, HN10{Caution}

Distinguished by: 147 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2430 p.2434 Cited by: 147 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2430 p.2432

520. Cited by: Estate of Bearoff v. Demedio, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4046 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 6, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

521. Cited by: Robco of Am. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 845 F. Supp. 1112, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2914 (W.D. Pa. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Cited}

845 F. Supp. 1112 p.1115

522. Cited by: Charter Fairmount Inst. v. Alta Health Strategies, 835 F. Supp. 233, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13501 (E.D. Pa. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

835 F. Supp. 233 p.234

523. Followed by: Institute of Pa. Hosp. v. Travelers Ins. Co., 825 F. Supp. 727, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8726 (E.D. Pa. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

825 F. Supp. 727 p.730

524. Cited by: Cannon v. Sheller, 825 F. Supp. 722, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8733 (E.D. Pa. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9{Positive} Page 71 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

825 F. Supp. 722 p.724

525. Cited by: Jacob v. Smithkline Beecham, 824 F. Supp. 552, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8335 (E.D. Pa. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

824 F. Supp. 552 p.554 824 F. Supp. 552 p.558

526. Cited by: Goehl v. Mellon Bank(DE), 825 F. Supp. 1239, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5123 (E.D. Pa. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6{Caution}

825 F. Supp. 1239 p.1240 825 F. Supp. 1239 p.1241

527. Distinguished by, Cited by: Shepherd v. Kingsbury, Inc., 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2944, 143 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2567 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 8, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Caution}

Distinguished by: 143 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2567 p.2568 Cited by: 143 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2567 p.2567

528. Cited by: Ament v. PNC Nat'l Bank, 825 F. Supp. 1243, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21855 (W.D. Pa. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN10, HN13{Warning}

825 F. Supp. 1243 p.1245 825 F. Supp. 1243 p.1247 825 F. Supp. 1243 p.1248

529. Cited by: Armstrong v. Ford Consumer Finance Co., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19286 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 16, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

530. Cited by: Palma v. Chavis, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19692 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 8, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

531. Cited by: Hunter v. Greenwood Trust Co., 856 F. Supp. 207, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22183 (D.N.J. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN7, HN13{Caution}

856 F. Supp. 207 p.211 856 F. Supp. 207 p.212 856 F. Supp. 207 p.214

532. Distinguished by: Page 72 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Leonardis v. Burns Int'l Sec. Services, Inc., 808 F. Supp. 1165, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19357 (D.N.J. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9, HN10 {Positive}

808 F. Supp. 1165 p.1174 808 F. Supp. 1165 p.1175

533. Cited by: Park Plaza Condominium Ass'n v. Armstrong, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17461 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 10, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

534. Cited by: Franks v. O'Connor Corp., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16167, 141 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2559, 125 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10647, RICO Bus. Disp. Guide P8171, 1 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 108, 1 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 109 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 16, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution}

535. Followed by: Franks v. O'Conner Corp., 141 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2559, 125 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10647, 1 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 108 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 16, 1992){Analysis}

125 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10647 141 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2559 p.2562 1 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 108 p.111

536. Cited by: Riccio v. Prudential Ins. Co., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15434 (D.N.J. Sept. 21, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7{Cited}

537. Followed by, Cited by: Bobik v. Thepitt Mfg. Co., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21136, 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1532, 141 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2267 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 10, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6, HN10, HN13{Cited}

Followed by: 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1532 p.1533 141 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2267 p.2269 Cited by: 141 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2267 p.2268

538. Cited by: Blum v. Seiler Corp., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10377 (E.D. Pa. July 16, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

539. Explained by: Weir v. Northwestern Nat'l Life Ins. Co., 796 F. Supp. 846, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9653 (E.D. Pa. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Cited}

796 F. Supp. 846 p.849 Page 73 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

540. Cited by: Morrison v. Albert Einstein Medical Center, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9257 (E.D. Pa. June 29, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9{Cited}

541. Cited by: Horsham Clinic, Inc. v. Principal Mut. Life Ins. Co., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8284 (E.D. Pa. June 10, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

542. Cited by: Coardes v. Chrysler Corp., 785 F. Supp. 480, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2888 (D. Del. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

785 F. Supp. 480 p.482

543. Cited by: Springﬁeld v. Golf View Estates Golf View, Inc., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 7, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

544. Cited by: Wurtenberger v. Liberty Life Assurance Co., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16610 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 13, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN7, HN13 {Cited}

545. Cited by: Johnson v. Police Ofﬁcers Does 1--3, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13990 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 30, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

546. Cited by: Brown v. Wiener, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21855 (E.D. Pa. June 6, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6, HN13{Caution}

1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21855

547. Cited by: Wuerl v. International Life Science Church, 758 F. Supp. 1084, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8500 (W.D. Pa. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Analysis}

758 F. Supp. 1084 p.1086

548. Cited by: Wesler v. Wesler, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17572 (D.N.J. Dec. 14, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Analysis}

549. Cited by: Page 74 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Vail v. Pan Am Corp., 752 F. Supp. 648, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16870 (D.N.J. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9{Cited}

752 F. Supp. 648 p.655

550. Cited by: Smith v. Industrial Valley Title Ins. Co., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10213 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 2, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6{Warning}

551. Cited by: Isaac v. Wm. H. Pﬂaumer & Sons, Inc., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8892 (E.D. Pa. July 16, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

552. Distinguished by, Cited by: Milione v. Hahnemann University, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6407, 8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 172, 141 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2814 (E.D. Pa. May 29, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10 {Caution}

Distinguished by: 8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 172 p.175 141 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2814 p.2817 Cited by: 141 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2814 p.2816

553. Cited by: Hamilton v. Vimco Mfg. Co., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6011 (E.D. Pa. May 16, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN10{Cited}

554. Cited by: Cicchetti v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2740 (D.N.J. Mar. 13, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

555. Cited by: Baucom--Brown v. Philadelphia, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 558 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 19, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

556. Cited by: Albert Einstein Medical Center v. National Ben. Fund for Hosp. & Health Care Employees, 740 F. Supp. 343, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15191 (E.D. Pa. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN7{Caution}

740 F. Supp. 343 p.348

557. Cited by: Shaw v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12732 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 27, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN10{Caution} Page 75 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

558. Cited by: Lorenzo v. Prudential Ins. Co., 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16544 (D.N.J. Apr. 28, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

559. Cited by: Hughes v. Fidelity Bank, 709 F. Supp. 639, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3729 (E.D. Pa. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

709 F. Supp. 639 p.640

560. Cited by: Glass Molders, etc. v. Wickes Cos., 707 F. Supp. 174, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1937, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P95312, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1718, 132 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2617, 114 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11877 (D.N.J. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 , HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution}

707 F. Supp. 174 p.177 707 F. Supp. 174 p.178

561. Followed by: Tomlin v. Carson Helicopters, Inc., 700 F. Supp. 248, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12793, 1989 A.M.C. 1216 (E.D. Pa. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7 {Positive}

700 F. Supp. 248 p.249 700 F. Supp. 248 p.250 700 F. Supp. 248 p.251

562. Cited by: Tener v. Hoag, 697 F. Supp. 196, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11640, 10 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1550, 115 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P56233, 28 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1580 (W.D. Pa. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN13{Caution}

697 F. Supp. 196 p.198 697 F. Supp. 196 p.199

563. Cited by: Rolen v. Drexel University, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6604 (E.D. Pa. June 28, 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10

564. Cited by: Prevost v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp., 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1927, 23 V.I. 395, 128 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2483 (1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN1 {Analysis}

565. Cited by: Zemp v. Boeing Vertol Co., 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6840 (E.D. Pa. July 28, 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

3RD CIRCUIT --U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURTS Page 76 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

566. Cited by: First Nat'l Bank v. Columbia Gas Sys. (In re Columbia Gas Sys.), 164 B.R. 883, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 424 (Bankr. D. Del. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Positive}

164 B.R. 883 p.888 4TH CIRCUIT --COURT OF APPEALS

567. Cited by: Lontz v. Tharp, 413 F.3d 435, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 13138, 177 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2715, 151 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P60017 (4th Cir. W. Va. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5 , HN6, HN12{Caution}

413 F.3d 435 p.439

568. Cited by: Pinney v. Nokia, Inc., 402 F.3d 430, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 4327 (4th Cir. Md. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

402 F.3d 430 p.442

569. Cited by: Harless v. CSX Hotels, Inc., 389 F.3d 444, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 23897, 175 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3338, 150 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10410 (4th Cir. W. Va. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Positive}

389 F.3d 444 p.450

570. Distinguished by: Freeman v. Duke Power Co., 114 Fed. Appx. 526, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20452, 176 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2576 (2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9{Analysis}

114 Fed. Appx. 526 p.531

571. Cited by: Verizon Md., Inc. v. Global Naps, 377 F.3d 355, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 15849 (4th Cir. Md. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9{Caution}

377 F.3d 355 p.363

572. Cited in Concurring Opinion at: Dixon v. Coburg Dairy, Inc., 369 F.3d 811, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 10233, 85 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P41659, 149 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P59859 (4th Cir. S.C. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

369 F.3d 811 p.822

573. Cited in Concurring Opinion at: Dixon v. Coburg Dairy, Inc., 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 13783 (4th Cir. S.C. May 25, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Analysis} Page 77 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 13783

574. Cited by: Forrest v. Transit Mgmt., 93 Fed. Appx. 577, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 6687 (2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

93 Fed. Appx. 577 p.578

575. Cited by: Spicer v. Local Union 1900, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 19054 (4th Cir. Md. Aug. 9, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8{Analysis}

2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 19054

576. Cited by: Owen v. Carpenters' Dist. Council, 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P45817, 139 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10535 (4th Cir. Md. Jan. 13, 1999){Analysis}

75 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P45817 139 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10535

577. Cited by: Owen v. Carpenters' Dist. Council, 161 F.3d 767, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 30446, 78 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 669, 14 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1116, 159 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2897, 137 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58526 (4th Cir. Md. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN5, HN6, HN7{Caution}

161 F.3d 767 p.772

578. Followed by: Price v. Goals Coal Co., 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 18769 (4th Cir. W. Va. Aug. 13, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN13{Analysis}

1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 18769

579. Cited by: Warren v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 31793, 21 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2089 (4th Cir. S.C. Nov. 12, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Analysis}

21 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2089 p.2090

580. Cited by: Davis v. Bell Atlantic--West Va., 110 F.3d 245, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 6238, 154 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2943, 133 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11792 (4th Cir. W. Va. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution}

110 F.3d 245 p.247

581. Cited by: Custer v. Sweeney, 89 F.3d 1156, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17852, 20 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1569 (4th Cir. Va. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution} Page 78 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

89 F.3d 1156 p.1165

582. Cited by: Davis v. North Carolina Dep't of Corrections, 48 F.3d 134, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4122, 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P43471, 67 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 258 (4th Cir. N.C. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Caution}

48 F.3d 134 p.138

583. Cited by: Rosciszewski v. Arete Assocs., 1 F.3d 225, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 19511, Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P27127, 27 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1678 (4th Cir. Va. 1993){Caution}

1 F.3d 225 p.231

584. Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: Lorenz v. CSX Transp. Inc., 8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 177, 141 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2921, 123 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10461, 125 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10773 (4th Cir. N.C. Jan. 5, 1993){Warning}

8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 177 p.182 125 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10773 123 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10461 141 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2921 p.2926

585. Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: Lorenz v. CSX Transp., 980 F.2d 263, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 30973, 8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 177, 8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1470, 141 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2921, 143 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2635, 123 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10461 (4th Cir. Md. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8 , HN9, HN10, HN13{Warning}

980 F.2d 263 p.271

586. Explained by, Cited by: White v. National Steel Corp., 938 F.2d 474, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 15114, 137 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2916, 119 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10800 (4th Cir. W. Va. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN11, HN12, HN13{Caution}

Explained by: 938 F.2d 474 p.482 938 F.2d 474 p.485 Cited by: 938 F.2d 474 p.484

587. Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by: McCormick v. AT&T Technologies, 934 F.2d 531, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 11237, 6 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 915, 137 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2453, 119 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10752, 119 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10852 (4th Cir. Va. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5 , HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13{Caution}

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: 934 F.2d 531 p.539 Page 79 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Cited by: 934 F.2d 531 p.534

588. Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, McCormick v. AT&T Technologies, 119 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10852 (4th Cir. Va. May 28, 1991){Caution}

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: 119 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10852 : 119 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10852

589. Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by: Childers v. Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co., 881 F.2d 1259, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 10980, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1069, 131 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3217, 112 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11370 (4th Cir. Md. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13 {Caution}

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: 881 F.2d 1259 p.1268 Cited by: 881 F.2d 1259 p.1261

590. Cited by: Rayner v. Smirl, 873 F.2d 60, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5364, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 426 (4th Cir. Md. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

873 F.2d 60 p.63

591. Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by: Washington v. Union Carbide Corp., 870 F.2d 957, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3796, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 373, 130 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3150, 131 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2009, 111 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11048 (4th Cir. W. Va. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Caution}

Followed by: 870 F.2d 957 p.961 Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: 870 F.2d 957 p.965 Cited by: 870 F.2d 957 p.960 4TH CIRCUIT --U.S. DISTRICT COURTS

592. Followed by: Chandler v. Cheesecake Factory Rests., Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45649 (M.D.N.C. July 5, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45649

593. Followed by: Blankenship v. Wynne, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26901 (D.S.C. May 3, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN13 Page 80 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26901

594. Cited by: Kutsmeda v. Informed Escrow, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25329 (E.D. Va. May 2, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25329

595. Cited by: Hardesty v. Logan Reg'l Med. Ctr., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22220 (S.D. W. Va. Apr. 21, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22220

596. Cited by: Adkins v. M&G Polymers USA, LLC, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14679 (S.D. W. Va. Mar. 13, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN6, HN7

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14679

597. Followed by: San Jose Constr. Group, Inc. v. Metro. Wash. Airports Auth., 415 F. Supp. 2d 643, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5804 (E.D. Va. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN9{Cited}

415 F. Supp. 2d 643 p.645

598. Cited by: NuVox Communs., Inc. v. N.C. Utils. Comm'n, 409 F. Supp. 2d 660, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2999 (E.D.N.C. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

409 F. Supp. 2d 660 p.663

599. Cited by: Brown v. AGY Holding Corp., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4480 (D.S.C. Jan. 19, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN10, HN13

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4480

600. Cited by: Discover Bank v. Vaden, 409 F. Supp. 2d 632, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1532 (D. Md. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9{Analysis}

409 F. Supp. 2d 632 p.635

601. Followed by, Cited by: Burbage v. Richburg, 417 F. Supp. 2d 746, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2979 (D.S.C. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN9, HN13

Followed by: 417 F. Supp. 2d 746 p.749 Page 81 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Cited by: 417 F. Supp. 2d 746 p.747

602. Cited by: Seeger v. Superior Diesel, Inc., 409 F. Supp. 2d 669, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38344 (D.S.C. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3

409 F. Supp. 2d 669 p.670

603. Cited by: Abreo v. N.C. Growers' Ass'n, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30535 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 25, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30535

604. Cited by: McPhatter v. Sweitzer, 401 F. Supp. 2d 468, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29840 (M.D.N.C. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

401 F. Supp. 2d 468 p.477

605. Cited by: Lilly v. Town of Clendenin, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34069 (S.D. W. Va. Sept. 6, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34069

606. Cited by: Lewis v. Charter Communs. VI LLC, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35156 (S.D. W. Va. Aug. 26, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35156

607. Cited by: Nordan v. Blackwater Sec. Consulting, LLC, 382 F. Supp. 2d 801, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24131 (E.D.N.C. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9 {Cited}

382 F. Supp. 2d 801 p.807

608. Cited by: M.Q. v. Balt. County Pub. Schs, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16690 (D. Md. Aug. 8, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16690

609. Cited by: Ashton Med. Assocs., Inc. v. Aetna Health Mgmt., Inc., 395 F. Supp. 2d 415, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26606, 35 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2751 (S.D. W. Va. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution} Page 82 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

395 F. Supp. 2d 415 p.418

610. Distinguished by, Cited by: Radcliff v. El Paso Corp., 377 F. Supp. 2d 558, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14607, 36 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1285 (S.D. W. Va. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13{Cited}

Distinguished by: 377 F. Supp. 2d 558 p.565 Cited by: 377 F. Supp. 2d 558 p.561

611. Cited by: Georgetown Condos. Homeowners' Ass'n v. Cmty. Apts. Corp., 387 F. Supp. 2d 512, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26277 (M.D.N.C. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

387 F. Supp. 2d 512 p.514

612. Cited by: Harmon v. Am. Elec. Power Serv. Corp., 371 F. Supp. 2d 804, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10720, 177 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2971 (S.D. W. Va. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 , HN10{Cited}

371 F. Supp. 2d 804 p.809

613. Cited by: Hagan v. Feld Entm't, Inc., 365 F. Supp. 2d 700, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6544, 177 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2014 (E.D. Va. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4 {Cited}

365 F. Supp. 2d 700 p.706

614. Cited by: Smith v. Logan, 363 F. Supp. 2d 804, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27433, 34 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1207 (E.D. Va. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution}

363 F. Supp. 2d 804 p.808

615. Cited by: Payman v. Lee County Cmty. Hosp., 338 F. Supp. 2d 679, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19998 (W.D. Va. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

338 F. Supp. 2d 679 p.684

616. Cited by: Murray v. Motorola, Inc. (In re Wireless Tel. Radio Frequency Emissions Prods. Liab. Litig.) , 327 F. Supp. 2d 554, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13954, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P17071 (D. Md. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Positive}

327 F. Supp. 2d 554 p.561 Page 83 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

617. Cited by: Cross Country Bank v. McGraw, 321 F. Supp. 2d 816, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11010 (S.D. W. Va. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9{Positive}

321 F. Supp. 2d 816 p.821

618. Cited by: Besse v. GMC, 317 F. Supp. 2d 646, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13647 (D.S.C. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Cited}

317 F. Supp. 2d 646 p.652

619. Cited by: Martin v. Lagualt, 315 F. Supp. 2d 811, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7428 (E.D. Va. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

315 F. Supp. 2d 811 p.813

620. Cited by: Deleston v. N. Charleston Police Dep't, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22462 (D.S.C. Mar. 23, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN9{Analysis}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22462

621. Cited by: PeopleTree Stafﬁng Solutions, Inc. v. People, Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4481 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4481

622. Cited by: Virden v. Altria Group, Inc., 304 F. Supp. 2d 832, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1541 (N.D. W. Va. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

304 F. Supp. 2d 832 p.837

623. Cited by: McKenzie v. Ocwen Fed. Bank FSB, 306 F. Supp. 2d 543, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3078 (D. Md. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Analysis}

306 F. Supp. 2d 543 p.546

624. Cited by: McPhatter v. Sweitzer, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15878 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 2003) {Caution}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15878

625. Cited by: Freeman v. Duke Power Co., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14432, 174 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2468 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 15, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited} Page 84 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14432

626. Cited by: Jenkins v. PBG, Inc., 268 F. Supp. 2d 593, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11016 (D. Md. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

268 F. Supp. 2d 593 p.596

627. Followed by: Hannibal v. Fed. Express Corp., 266 F. Supp. 2d 466, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10399 (E.D. Va. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

266 F. Supp. 2d 466 p.469

628. Cited by: Healthtek Solutions, Inc. v. Fortis Bens. Ins. Co., 274 F. Supp. 2d 767, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13238 (E.D. Va. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Positive}

274 F. Supp. 2d 767 p.773

629. Cited by: Payman v. Bishop, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7200 (W.D. Va. Apr. 30, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7200

630. Cited by: Graham v. W. Va. Div. of Highways, 245 F. Supp. 2d 836, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1735 (S.D. W. Va. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13{Cited}

245 F. Supp. 2d 836 p.838 245 F. Supp. 2d 836 p.839

631. Cited by: Bryan v. Bellsouth Telcoms., Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1704 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 6, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6{Warning}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1704

632. Cited by: Arlia v. Blankenship, 234 F. Supp. 2d 606, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24287, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P92252 (S.D. W. Va. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN9{Cited}

234 F. Supp. 2d 606 p.612

633. Cited by: Fullen v. Philips Elecs. N. Am. Corp., 266 F. Supp. 2d 471, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26405 (N.D. W. Va. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Cited} Page 85 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

266 F. Supp. 2d 471 p.474

634. Cited by: Sanford v. Premier Millwork & Lumber Co., 234 F. Supp. 2d 569, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23961, 29 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2744 (E.D. Va. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13 {Caution}

234 F. Supp. 2d 569 p.571

635. Cited by: Advanced Sterilizer Dev. & Design, Inc. v. Roadway Express, Inc., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24380 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 21, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 , HN13{Cited}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24380

636. Cited by: Pinney v. Nokia (In re Wireless Tel. Radio Frequency Emissions Prods. Liab. Litig.) , 216 F. Supp. 2d 474, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11144 (D. Md. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN13{Warning}

216 F. Supp. 2d 474 p.479 216 F. Supp. 2d 474 p.480

637. Cited by: Momin v. Maggiemoo's Int'l, L.L.C., 205 F. Supp. 2d 506, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10644 (D. Md. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Cited}

205 F. Supp. 2d 506 p.508

638. Followed by: Green v. Walker, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19501 (M.D.N.C. June 5, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Cited}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19501

639. Cited by: Gold Leaf Land Trust v. Bd. of Supervisors, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8588 (W.D. Va. May 14, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8588

640. Distinguished by: Birch v. Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc., 207 F. Supp. 2d 376, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8374, 170 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2004 (D. Md. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Cited}

207 F. Supp. 2d 376 p.389

641. Cited by: Page 86 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

St. Mary's Hosp. v. Careﬁrst of Md., Inc., 192 F. Supp. 2d 384, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6103, 27 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2724 (D. Md. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Caution}

192 F. Supp. 2d 384 p.387

642. Cited by: Stephenson v. Bartlett, 180 F. Supp. 2d 779, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23697 (E.D.N.C. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Positive}

180 F. Supp. 2d 779 p.786

643. Cited by: Brown v. Ace Cash Express, Inc., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25847 (D. Md. Nov. 14, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25847

644. Cited by: Hilliard v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan of the Mid--AtlanticStates, 169 F. Supp. 2d 416, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17844 (D. Md. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4 , HN13{Cited}

169 F. Supp. 2d 416 p.419

645. Cited by: Durgin v. Giant Food, Inc., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5783 (D. Md. May 7, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8, HN9, HN10

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5783

646. Cited by: West Virginia ex rel. McGraw v. Parrish Auto. Training Co., 147 F. Supp. 2d 470, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8207 (N.D. W. Va. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4{Positive}

147 F. Supp. 2d 470 p.472

647. Cited by: Namovicz v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 225 F. Supp. 2d 582, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24770 (D. Md. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Caution}

225 F. Supp. 2d 582 p.583 225 F. Supp. 2d 582 p.584

648. Cited by: In re Microsoft Corp. Antitrust Litig., 127 F. Supp. 2d 702, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 305, 2000--2Trade Cas. (CCH) P73140, 2001--1Trade Cas. (CCH) P73140 (D. Md. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Warning}

127 F. Supp. 2d 702 p.721 Page 87 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

649. Followed by: United Sheet Metal, Inc. v. Pugh, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 412, 166 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2574 (D. Md. Jan. 12, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN8 , HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 412

650. Cited by: Link Telecomms., Inc. v. Sapperstein, 119 F. Supp. 2d 536, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18582 (D. Md. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

119 F. Supp. 2d 536 p.539

651. Cited by: Brown v. Washington/Baltimore Cellular, Inc., 109 F. Supp. 2d 421, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14954 (D. Md. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7 {Positive}

109 F. Supp. 2d 421 p.423

652. Followed by: Anderson v. National Treasury Emples. Union, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8765 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 2, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN11, HN13

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8765

653. Cited by: McCutcheon v. Valley Rich Dairy, 81 F. Supp. 2d 657, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 732 (S.D. W. Va. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Cited}

81 F. Supp. 2d 657 p.659

654. Followed by, Cited by: Kelley v. Norfolk & Southern Ry., 80 F. Supp. 2d 587, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20037, 163 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2279, 140 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10664 (S.D. W. Va. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Caution}

Followed by: 80 F. Supp. 2d 587 p.589 Cited by: 80 F. Supp. 2d 587 p.590

655. Cited by: Pendergraph v. Crown Honda--Volvo LLC, 104 F. Supp. 2d 586, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22005 (M.D.N.C. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9{Analysis}

104 F. Supp. 2d 586 p.588 104 F. Supp. 2d 586 p.589

656. Cited by: Page 88 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Salmons v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 48 F. Supp. 2d 620, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6438, 161 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2273 (S.D. W. Va. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 {Cited}

48 F. Supp. 2d 620 p.623

657. Cited by: Wilhelm v. Smithﬁeld Packing, Co., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9733 (E.D.N.C. May 3, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13{Analysis}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9733

658. Cited by: Findlay v. PHE, Inc., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9761 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 16, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9761

659. Cited by: Metheney v. Monarch Rubber Co., 43 F. Supp. 2d 588, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5362, 161 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2377, 161 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2378 (S.D. W. Va. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN12{Cited}

43 F. Supp. 2d 588 p.589

660. Cited by: Rule v. Ford Receivables, Inc., 36 F. Supp. 2d 335, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1723 (S.D. W. Va. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6{Positive}

36 F. Supp. 2d 335 p.337

661. Cited by: Dantzler v. Nationwide Credit, Inc., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6726 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 17, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Cited}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6726

662. Cited by: Commissioner of Labor v. Teamsters Local No. 71, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3701 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 5, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3701

663. Followed by: Kight v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan, 34 F. Supp. 2d 334, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 712 (E.D. Va. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN13{Caution}

34 F. Supp. 2d 334 p.337

664. Cited by: Page 89 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Galen--Med,Inc. v. Owens, 41 F. Supp. 2d 611, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1401 (W.D. Va. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN13{Positive}

41 F. Supp. 2d 611 p.613

665. Cited by: Swecker v. Trans Union Corp., 31 F. Supp. 2d 536, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20362 (E.D. Va. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN9, HN13{Positive}

31 F. Supp. 2d 536 p.538

666. Cited by: Matthews v. Consolidated Group Claims, Inc., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21528 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 18, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN9{Cited}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21528

667. Cited by: Casino Ventures v. Stewart, 23 F. Supp. 2d 647, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17742 (D.S.C. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Warning}

23 F. Supp. 2d 647 p.650

668. Cited by: Hamby v. Ryobi Motor Prods. Corp., 17 F. Supp. 2d 507, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15383 (D.S.C. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN13{Caution}

17 F. Supp. 2d 507 p.509

669. Cited by: Carraway v. Mayﬂower Transit, Inc., 36 F. Supp. 2d 262, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21083 (E.D.N.C. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Caution}

36 F. Supp. 2d 262 p.263

670. Followed by: Mixer v. M.K.--Ferguson Co., 17 F. Supp. 2d 569, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12801, 139 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10553 (S.D. W. Va. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5 , HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13{Positive}

17 F. Supp. 2d 569 p.571

671. Followed by: Circuit City Stores v. EEOC, 12 F. Supp. 2d 519, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11261, 77 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1101 (E.D. Va. 1998){Warning}

12 F. Supp. 2d 519 p.524

672. Cited by: Page 90 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Huskey v. Cox Communs. Hampton Rds., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11367, 159 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2397 (E.D. Va. June 12, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN12

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11367 159 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2397 p.2399

673. Followed by: Lanham v. Grifﬁn, 7 F. Supp. 2d 644, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8379 (D. Md. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

7 F. Supp. 2d 644 p.645

674. Cited by: Donald v. Virginia Elec. & Power Co., 7 F. Supp. 2d 694, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8721, 77 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1831 (E.D.N.C. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5 {Positive}

7 F. Supp. 2d 694 p.695

675. Cited by: West Virginia--OhioValley Area I.B.E.W. Welfare Fund v. American Tobacco Co., 29 F. Supp. 2d 733, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15017 (S.D. W. Va. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5 {Analysis}

29 F. Supp. 2d 733 p.735

676. Cited by: Person v. Bell Atlantic--Virginia, 993 F. Supp. 958, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2341, 158 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2238 (E.D. Va. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5 , HN6, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13{Caution}

993 F. Supp. 958 p.960 993 F. Supp. 958 p.961

677. Cited by: HHC v. York Ins. Co., 994 F. Supp. 717, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1833 (E.D. Va. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Questioned}

994 F. Supp. 717 p.722

678. Cited by: United Food & Commer. Workers Union Local 204 v. Dockery, 994 F. Supp. 691, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1996 (M.D.N.C. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN6 {Positive}

994 F. Supp. 691 p.692

679. Cited by: Semtek Int'l v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 988 F. Supp. 913, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20937 (D. Md. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13{Warning} Page 91 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

988 F. Supp. 913 p.914

680. Cited by: Lane v. Mitchell, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20853 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 1, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13

681. Cited by: Peele v. Enterprise Leasing Co., 979 F. Supp. 1069, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17152 (E.D. Va. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

979 F. Supp. 1069 p.1072

682. Cited by: Becker v. Department of the Army, 981 F. Supp. 905, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16419 (D. Md. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Positive}

981 F. Supp. 905 p.908

683. Cited by: Lancaster by Lancaster v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan, 958 F. Supp. 1137, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4602, 21 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2107 (E.D. Va. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13{Caution}

958 F. Supp. 1137 p.1142 958 F. Supp. 1137 p.1143

684. Cited by: Dykema v. King, 959 F. Supp. 736, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4523 (D.S.C. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Positive}

959 F. Supp. 736 p.739

685. Followed by, Cited by: Trexler v. Norfolk S. Ry., 957 F. Supp. 772, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2462 (M.D.N.C. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN8, HN13{Analysis}

Followed by: 957 F. Supp. 772 p.776 Cited by: 957 F. Supp. 772 p.777

686. Cited by: Blair v. Schott Sci. Glass Co., 945 F. Supp. 123, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16901, 154 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2329 (S.D. W. Va. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 , HN13{Positive}

945 F. Supp. 123 p.125

687. Cited by: Time Warner Entertainment v. Foster Mgmt., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14587 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 19, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13 Page 92 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

688. Cited by: Santitoro v. Evans, 935 F. Supp. 733, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12654 (E.D.N.C. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN13{Positive}

935 F. Supp. 733 p.735

689. Cited by: Maryland v. Phillip Morris Inc., 934 F. Supp. 173, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11440 (D. Md. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

934 F. Supp. 173 p.176 934 F. Supp. 173 p.177

690. Cited by: Granville United Bank v. Rain & Hail Ins. Servs., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12912 (E.D.N.C. July 30, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7

691. Cited by: Virginia Transfer & Storage Co. v. Mayﬂower Transit, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15445 (E.D. Va. July 29, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

692. Cited by: Thaxton v. International Bhd. of Painters, 933 F. Supp. 560, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10866 (S.D. W. Va. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

933 F. Supp. 560 p.562

693. Cited by: Freeman v. Bechtel, 936 F. Supp. 320, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10094 (M.D.N.C. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Caution}

936 F. Supp. 320 p.324

694. Cited by: Gray v. Petoseed Co., 985 F. Supp. 625, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21736 (D.S.C. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Analysis}

695. Cited by: J.H.W. Sr., Inc. v. Exxon Co., 921 F. Supp. 1436, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7690 (D. Md. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

921 F. Supp. 1436 p.1438

696. Cited by: Gray v. Petoseed Co., 985 F. Supp. 625, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21737 (D.S.C. 1996){Caution}

985 F. Supp. 625 p.631 Page 93 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

697. Cited by: Prihoda v. Shpritz, 914 F. Supp. 113, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1247, 19 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2650 (D. Md. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

914 F. Supp. 113 p.117

698. Cited by: Mills v. Norfolk & W. Ry., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17261 (E.D. Va. Jan. 24, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN13

699. Cited by: Morales v. Showell Farms, 910 F. Supp. 244, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19282, 3 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 85 (M.D.N.C. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5 , HN6, HN9, HN13{Positive}

910 F. Supp. 244 p.246 910 F. Supp. 244 p.247

700. Cited by: Morales v. Showell Farms Inc., 3 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 85 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 1995)

3 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 85 p.87

701. Cited by: Hunter by Conyer v. Estate of Baecher, 905 F. Supp. 341, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17711 (E.D. Va. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

905 F. Supp. 341 p.345

702. Cited by: Childress v. Charles L. Burks & Co., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16142 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 25, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13

703. Cited by: Spaulding v. Mingo County Bd. of Educ., 897 F. Supp. 284, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12564, 12 Am. Disabilities Dec. 163 (S.D. W. Va. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Cited}

897 F. Supp. 284 p.287

704. Cited by: Gilman v. Wheat, First Sec., 896 F. Supp. 507, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11085 (D. Md. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN12, HN13{Caution}

896 F. Supp. 507 p.512

705. Cited by: Thomas v. North Carolina Dep't of Human Resources, 898 F. Supp. 315, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13837 (M.D.N.C. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Caution} Page 94 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

898 F. Supp. 315 p.319

706. Cited by: Edmonds v. Norfolk & W. Ry., 883 F. Supp. 89, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4988 (S.D. W. Va. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

883 F. Supp. 89 p.93

707. Cited by: O'Neal v. CIGNA Property & Casualty Ins. Co., 878 F. Supp. 848, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3504 (D.S.C. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Caution}

878 F. Supp. 848 p.850

708. Cited by: Employers Resource Management Co. v. Shannon, 869 F. Supp. 398, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17699 (E.D. Va. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13 {Positive}

869 F. Supp. 398 p.403 869 F. Supp. 398 p.404

709. Cited by: Broadnax Mills, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 867 F. Supp. 398, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16090 (E.D. Va. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN12 , HN13{Analysis}

867 F. Supp. 398 p.401

710. Cited by: Scott v. Greiner, 858 F. Supp. 607, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10082 (S.D. W. Va. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Caution}

858 F. Supp. 607 p.609

711. Cited by: Bailey v. Norfolk & W. Ry., 842 F. Supp. 218, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4550, 64 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 987, 146 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2365 (S.D. W. Va. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13{Caution}

842 F. Supp. 218 p.221 842 F. Supp. 218 p.222

712. Cited by: Curran v. Price, 150 F.R.D. 85, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11603 (D. Md. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Positive}

150 F.R.D. 85 p.86

713. Cited by: Page 95 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Sanford v. Moving Picture Mach. Operators' Protective Union, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22568, 123 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10354 (E.D. Va. Aug. 5, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

714. Followed by: Sanford v. Moving Picture Mach. Operators' Protective Union, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22200, 145 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2509 (E.D. Va. Aug. 5, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6, HN13{Positive}

145 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2509 p.2511

715. Cited by: Sanford v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees & Moving Picture Mach. Operators, 123 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10354 (E.D. Va. July 28, 1992){Analysis}

123 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10354

716. Cited by: Richmond v. American Systems Corp., 792 F. Supp. 449, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6663, 15 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1423 (E.D. Va. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Questioned}

792 F. Supp. 449 p.453 792 F. Supp. 449 p.456

717. Cited by: Great Coastal Express, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 782 F. Supp. 302, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1794 (E.D. Va. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13 {Cited}

782 F. Supp. 302 p.304

718. Cited by: Porcaro v. Colonial Life Ins. Co., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15800 (W.D. Va. Feb. 21, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

719. Cited by: Beale v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19825 (E.D. Va. Oct. 17, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

720. Followed by: Chesapeake v. Sutton Enterprises, Inc., 138 F.R.D. 468, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19459 (E.D. Va. 1990){Caution}

138 F.R.D. 468 p.476

721. Cited by: Chesapeake v. Sutton Enterprises, Inc., 138 F.R.D. 468, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19460 (E.D. Va. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Caution} Page 96 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

722. Cited by: Barbe v. Great Atlantic & Paciﬁc Tea Co., 722 F. Supp. 1257, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11617, 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1693, 139 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2159, 115 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10011 (D. Md. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9 , HN10, HN13{Positive}

722 F. Supp. 1257 p.1259

723. Cited by: White v. National Steel Corp., 742 F. Supp. 312, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16966, 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1227, 135 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2014, 117 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10432 (N.D. W. Va. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8, HN10, HN12, HN13{Warning}

742 F. Supp. 312 p.319

724. Cited by: Barton v. Creasey Co. of Clarksburg, 718 F. Supp. 1284, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10258, 135 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3101, 117 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10527, 29 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1529 (N.D. W. Va. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN13{Caution}

718 F. Supp. 1284 p.1287

725. Cited by: Binkley v. Loughran, 714 F. Supp. 776, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5955, 139 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2786, 113 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11774 (M.D.N.C. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Analysis}

714 F. Supp. 776 p.778

726. Cited by: Ridenour v. Andrews Federal Credit Union, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14812 (D. Md. July 28, 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN13{Warning}

727. Cited by: West Virginia v. Anchor Hocking Corp., 681 F. Supp. 1175, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13221 (N.D. W. Va. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Questioned}

681 F. Supp. 1175 p.1176

728. Explained by: Childers v. Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co., 670 F. Supp. 624, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9090, 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 107, 127 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2723 (D. Md. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13{Positive}

670 F. Supp. 624 p.626

729. Followed by: Miller v. Fairchild Indus., Inc., 668 F. Supp. 461, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7663 (D. Md. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Caution} Page 97 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

668 F. Supp. 461 p.465 668 F. Supp. 461 p.467 4TH CIRCUIT --U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURTS

730. Cited by: Allnutt v. Associates Leasing (In re Allnutt), 220 B.R. 871, 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 391, 10 4th Cir. & D.C. Bankr. Ct. Rep. 267 (Bankr. D. Md. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN9, HN13{Warning}

220 B.R. 871 p.887

731. Cited by: Poplar Run Five Ltd. Ptnr. v. Virginia Elec. & Power Co. (In re Poplar Run Five Ltd. Ptnr.) , 192 B.R. 848, 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 1425, 8 4th Cir. & D.C. Bankr. Ct. Rep. 284, 27 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 1194, 34 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 725 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

192 B.R. 848 p.856 5TH CIRCUIT --COURT OF APPEALS

732. Cited by: Scott v. Pﬁzer, Inc., 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 12741 (5th Cir. Tex. May 23, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Cited}

2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 12741

733. Cited by: Premiere Network Servs. v. SBC Communs., Inc., 440 F.3d 683, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 3757 (5th Cir. Tex. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6

440 F.3d 683 p.690

734. Cited by: Guillory v. PPG Indus., 434 F.3d 303, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 28077 (5th Cir. La. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

434 F.3d 303 p.310

735. Cited by: PCI Transp. Inc. v. Fort Worth & W. R.R. Co., 418 F.3d 535, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 15251 (5th Cir. Tex. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

418 F.3d 535 p.543

736. Cited by: City of McComb v. Myers, 122 Fed. Appx. 698, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 25015 (2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN4, HN13{Analysis}

122 Fed. Appx. 698 p.699 Page 98 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

737. Cited by: New Process Steel Corp. v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 91 Fed. Appx. 895, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 22962 (2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

91 Fed. Appx. 895 p.897

738. Cited by: Hoskins v. Bekins Van Lines, 343 F.3d 769, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18759, 199 A.L.R. Fed. 743 (5th Cir. Tex. 2003){Caution}

343 F.3d 769 p.772

739. Cited by: MSOF Corp. v. Exxon Corp., 295 F.3d 485, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 12203, 55 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1699, 32 Envtl. L. Rep. 20757 (5th Cir. La. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN9, HN13{Analysis}

295 F.3d 485 p.490

740. Cited by: Terrebonne Homecare, Inc. v. SMA Health Plan, Inc., 271 F.3d 186, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22410, 2001--2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P73447 (5th Cir. La. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6{Caution}

271 F.3d 186 p.188

741. Cited by: Watson v. Texas, 261 F.3d 436, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 17436 (5th Cir. Tex. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Caution}

261 F.3d 436 p.444

742. Cited by: Waste Control Specialists, LLC v. Envirocare of Texas, Inc., 199 F.3d 781, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 603, 2000-- 1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P72768, 2000--01Trade Cas. (CCH) P72768 (5th Cir. Tex. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Questioned}

199 F.3d 781 p.783

743. Cited by: Hart v. Bayer Corp., 199 F.3d 239, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 94, 30 Envtl. L. Rep. 20256 (5th Cir. Miss. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Positive}

199 F.3d 239 p.244

744. Cited by: Branson v. Greyhound Lines, 126 F.3d 747, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 29922, 21 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2078, 156 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2847 (5th Cir. Tex. 1997) {Caution}

126 F.3d 747 p.753 Page 99 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

745. Cited by: Branson v. Greyhound Lines, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 33989 (5th Cir. Tex. Oct. 30, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13{Analysis}

1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 33989

746. Cited by: Sam L. Majors Jewelers v. ABX, Inc., 117 F.3d 922, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 19504 (5th Cir. Tex. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5{Caution}

117 F.3d 922 p.924 117 F.3d 922 p.925

747. Cited by: Rivet v. Regions Bank, 108 F.3d 576, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 12775, 11 Tex. Bankr. Ct. Rep. 150 (5th Cir. La. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Questioned}

108 F.3d 576 p.583

748. Cited by: Kramer v. Smith Barney, 80 F.3d 1080, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8861 (5th Cir. Tex. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Caution}

80 F.3d 1080 p.1082

749. Cited by: De Aguilar v. Boeing Co., 47 F.3d 1404, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4550 (5th Cir. Tex. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

47 F.3d 1404 p.1412

750. Cited by: Carpenter v. Wichita Falls Indep. Sch. Dist., 44 F.3d 362, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 2905 (5th Cir. Tex. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9{Questioned}

44 F.3d 362 p.367 44 F.3d 362 p.369

751. Cited by: Baker v. Farmers Elec. Coop., 34 F.3d 274, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26834, 10 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1556, 147 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2415, 129 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11191 (5th Cir. Tex. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13{Caution}

34 F.3d 274 p.278 34 F.3d 274 p.280

752. Cited by: Anderson v. American Airlines, 2 F.3d 590, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 24523, 144 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2297, 126 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10874 (5th Cir. Tex. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6, HN13{Caution} Page 100 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2 F.3d 590 p.593 2 F.3d 590 p.594

753. Cited by: Diaz v. McAllen State Bank, 975 F.2d 1145, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 27188, 24 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 269 (5th Cir. Tex. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Caution}

975 F.2d 1145 p.1149

754. Cited by: In re Meyerland Co., 960 F.2d 512, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 10210 (5th Cir. Tex. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Warning}

960 F.2d 512 p.519

755. Cited by: Kidd v. Southwest Airlines, Co., 891 F.2d 540, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 104, 117 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P56455 (5th Cir. Tex. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution}

891 F.2d 540 p.544

756. Cited by: Wells v. General Motors Corp., 881 F.2d 166, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12574, 11 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2375, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1392, 132 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2241, 113 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11524 (5th Cir. Miss. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8 , HN10, HN13{Caution}

881 F.2d 166 p.173

757. Cited by: Aaron v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., 876 F.2d 1157, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 9995, 1990 A.M.C. 2351, 14 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 830 (5th Cir. La. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Caution}

876 F.2d 1157 p.1160

758. Cited by: Lubrizol Corp. v. Exxon Corp., 871 F.2d 1279, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6168 (5th Cir. Tex. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Questioned}

871 F.2d 1279 p.1283

759. Cited by: Richardson v. United Steelworkers of America, 864 F.2d 1162, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 1141, 13 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 138, 130 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2571, 110 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10939 (5th Cir. Tex. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN12, HN13 {Caution}

864 F.2d 1162 p.1168 Page 101 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

864 F.2d 1162 p.1169

760. Cited by: Texas Employers' Ins. Asso. v. Jackson, 862 F.2d 491, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 17750 (5th Cir. Tex. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Questioned}

862 F.2d 491 p.497

761. Cited by: Willy v. Coastal Corp., 855 F.2d 1160, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 13602, 12 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 305, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 819 (5th Cir. Tex. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13{Caution}

855 F.2d 1160 p.1165 855 F.2d 1160 p.1166 855 F.2d 1160 p.1167

762. Cited by: Chuska Energy Co. v. Mobil Exploration & Producing, Inc., 854 F.2d 727, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 12287, 108 Oil & Gas Rep. 540 (5th Cir. Tex. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Positive}

854 F.2d 727 p.731

763. Cited by: Beers v. N. Am. Van Lines, Inc., 836 F.2d 910, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 1391 (5th Cir. Miss. 1988){Questioned}

836 F.2d 910 p.912 836 F.2d 910 p.913

764. Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: Texas Employers' Ins. Asso. v. Jackson, 820 F.2d 1406, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 9585, 1988 A.M.C. 1202 (5th Cir. Tex. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9 , HN13{Questioned}

820 F.2d 1406 p.1423 5TH CIRCUIT --U.S. DISTRICT COURTS

765. Cited by: Notley v. Sterling Bank, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49513 (N.D. Tex. July 19, 2006)

766. Cited by: Kilduff v. First Health Beneﬁts Adm'rs Corp., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50338 (N.D. Tex. July 10, 2006)

767. Cited by: McCarthy v. Smith, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47022 (S.D. Miss. June 30, 2006)

768. Cited by: Page 102 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Woolever v. Taylor, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42694 (N.D. Miss. June 23, 2006)

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42694

769. Cited by: Madison v. Citicorp Inv. Servs., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49368 (S.D. Miss. June 14, 2006)

770. Cited by: Ambulatory Infusion Therapy Specialists, Inc. v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39268 (S.D. Tex. June 13, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39268

771. Cited by: Mem'l Hermann Hosp. Sys. v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43967 (S.D. Tex. June 12, 2006)

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43967

772. Cited by: Hammond v. Cappaert Manufactured Hous., Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38606 (W.D. La. June 12, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38606

773. Cited by: St. Luke's Episcopal Hosp. v. Acordia Nat'l, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37781 (S.D. Tex. June 8, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37781

774. Cited by: Sandoz v. Cingular Wireless, LLC., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41529 (W.D. La. June 7, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41529

775. Followed by: Hodge v. Nat'l Auction Group, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36139 (N.D. Miss. June 1, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36139

776. Cited by: Beard v. Aurora Loan Servs., LLC, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33485 (S.D. Tex. May 17, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33485

777. Cited by: Page 103 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Zea v. Avis Rent a Car Sys., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31981 (S.D. Tex. May 17, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3, HN4{Analysis}

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31981

778. Cited by: Quality Infusion Care, Inc. v. Aetna Health, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28413 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 27, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28413

779. Cited by: Hammond v. Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28022 (S.D. Miss. Apr. 26, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28022

780. Cited by: RCI Entm't(San Antonio), Inc. v. City of San Antonio, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45063 (W.D. Tex. Apr. 14, 2006)

781. Cited by: Hinojosa v. Guidant Corp., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28793 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 7, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6{Analysis}

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28793

782. Cited by: Tuca v. Ocean Freighters, Ltd., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16174 (E.D. La. Apr. 4, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16174

783. Cited by: Haley v. Ford Motor Co., 417 F. Supp. 2d 811, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11712 (S.D. Miss. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

417 F. Supp. 2d 811 p.813

784. Cited by: Evans v. Courtesy Chevrolet II, LP, 423 F. Supp. 2d 669, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20182 (S.D. Tex. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

423 F. Supp. 2d 669 p.670

785. Cited by: Loyola Univ. New Orleans v. McMeans, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4292 (E.D. La. Feb. 3, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4292 Page 104 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

786. Cited by: Snook v. Deutsche Bank AG, 410 F. Supp. 2d 519, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3707 (S.D. Tex. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

410 F. Supp. 2d 519 p.521

787. Cited by: Cooper v. E. Sav. Bank, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3916 (S.D. Miss. Jan. 17, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3916

788. Cited by: Cisneros v. Sanchez, 403 F. Supp. 2d 588, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37724, 34 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1097 (S.D. Tex. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5 {Cited}

403 F. Supp. 2d 588 p.589

789. Cited by: Texas ex rel. Ven--A--Care of the Fla. Keys, Inc. v. Abbott Labs. Inc., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42434 (W.D. Tex. Dec. 5, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Cited}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42434

790. Cited by: Ra Inv. I, LLC v. Smith & Frank Group Servs., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36208 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 2, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36208

791. Cited by: Ling v. Deutsche Bank AG, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31734 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 23, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31734

792. Cited by: Impressive Printing, Inc. v. Lanier Worldwide, Inc., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36883 (E.D. La. Nov. 9, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36883

793. Cited by: Avis Rent a Car Sys. v. Zea, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29191 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 31, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN4, HN7{Analysis}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29191

794. Cited by: Page 105 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Mims v. Renal Care Group, Inc., 399 F. Supp. 2d 740, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41099 (S.D. Miss. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

399 F. Supp. 2d 740 p.742

795. Cited by: Leggette v. Wash. Mut. Bank, FA, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24405 (N.D. Tex. Oct. 19, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24405

796. Cited by: Haley v. Ford Motor Co., 398 F. Supp. 2d 522, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27042 (S.D. Miss. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

398 F. Supp. 2d 522 p.525

797. Cited by: Saxton v. Capital One Bank, 392 F. Supp. 2d 772, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29021 (S.D. Miss. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

392 F. Supp. 2d 772 p.778

798. Cited by: Cantwell v. Deutsche Bank Sec., Inc., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20597 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 21, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20597

799. Cited by: Hardin v. Guidant Corp., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41194 (S.D. Tex. Sept. 20, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41194

800. Cited by: Austin v. Provident Bank, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37113 (N.D. Miss. July 26, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37113

801. Cited by: Mem'l Herman Hosp. Sys. v. Great--West Life & Annuity Ins. Co., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40585 (S.D. Tex. June 30, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 , HN9, HN10, HN13{Cited}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40585

802. Cited by: Lexington Ins. Co. v. Daybreak Express, 391 F. Supp. 2d 538, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34762 (S.D. Tex. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6{Cited} Page 106 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

391 F. Supp. 2d 538 p.540

803. Cited by: Edwards v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9981 (N.D. Tex. May 25, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9981

804. Cited by: Malesovas v. Sanders, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42344 (S.D. Tex. May 16, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42344

805. Cited by: Lee v. Tyco Elecs. Power Sys., 393 F. Supp. 2d 429, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7328 (N.D. Tex. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13{Positive}

393 F. Supp. 2d 429 p.433

806. Cited by: Weinrich v. Levi Strauss & Co., 366 F. Supp. 2d 439, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6617 (S.D. Miss. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

366 F. Supp. 2d 439 p.443

807. Cited by: Goss v. Firestone Polymers, L.L.C., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32755 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 13, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN9, HN10{Analysis}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32755

808. Cited by: McSperitt v. Hartford Life Ins. Co., 393 F. Supp. 2d 418, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37030 (N.D. Tex. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

393 F. Supp. 2d 418 p.424

809. Cited by: Radiology Assocs. of San Antonio, P.A. v. Aetna Health, Inc., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3749, 34 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2702 (W.D. Tex. Mar. 2, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3749

810. Cited by: Blanchard v. Wal--MartStores Tex., LP, 368 F. Supp. 2d 621, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8332 (E.D. Tex. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3{Cited}

368 F. Supp. 2d 621 p.623 Page 107 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

811. Cited by: Newby v. Enron Corp. (In re Enron Corp. Secs., Derivative & ERISA Litig.) , 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4494 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 16, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6{Caution}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4494

812. Cited by: Hammann v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 662, 34 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1619 (W.D. Tex. Jan. 14, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Analysis}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 662

813. Cited by: Eller v. Merck & Co., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41530 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 7, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41530

814. Cited by: Tex. First Nat'l Bank v. Wu, 347 F. Supp. 2d 389, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26983 (S.D. Tex. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

347 F. Supp. 2d 389 p.394

815. Cited by: Campbell v. Cottage Grove Nursing Home, L.P., 350 F. Supp. 2d 735, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26284 (S.D. Miss. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9 , HN13{Cited}

350 F. Supp. 2d 735 p.737

816. Cited by: Williamson v. Fleetwood Homes of Miss., Inc., 346 F. Supp. 2d 851, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26766 (N.D. Miss. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Caution}

346 F. Supp. 2d 851 p.852

817. Cited by: Team Indus. Servs. v. Am. Safety Indem. Co., 347 F. Supp. 2d 366, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24725 (S.D. Tex. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3{Cited}

347 F. Supp. 2d 366 p.368

818. Followed by: Crim. Dist. Court Judicial Expense Fund v. Hunter, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20676 (E.D. La. Oct. 7, 2004)

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20676 Page 108 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

819. Cited by: Jones v. Belhaven College, 334 F. Supp. 2d 916, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27442 (S.D. Miss. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Analysis}

334 F. Supp. 2d 916 p.918

820. Cited by: Mayﬂower Transit v. Troutt, 332 F. Supp. 2d 971, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25670 (W.D. Tex. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

332 F. Supp. 2d 971 p.976

821. Cited by: Baylor Univ. Med. Ctr. v. Epoch Group, L.C., 340 F. Supp. 2d 749, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16381, 33 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2603 (N.D. Tex. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

340 F. Supp. 2d 749 p.756

822. Cited by: Jackson v. Adcock, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16526 (E.D. La. Aug. 17, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4{Caution}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16526

823. Cited by: Crane v. New Orleans Real Estate Investors Ass'n, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12936, 15 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1598 (E.D. La. July 8, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Cited}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12936

824. Cited by: Summerlin v. Scott Petroleum Corp., 324 F. Supp. 2d 810, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12858 (S.D. Miss. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

324 F. Supp. 2d 810 p.812

825. Cited by: Ervin v. Stagecoach Moving & Storage, Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10403 (N.D. Tex. June 8, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10403

826. Cited by: Smith v. Bank One Corp., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10591 (E.D. La. June 7, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9{Cited}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10591

827. Cited by: Page 109 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Erlandson v. Liberty Life Assur. Co., 320 F. Supp. 2d 501, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10139, 33 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2466 (N.D. Tex. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Cited}

320 F. Supp. 2d 501 p.505

828. Cited by: Ham v. Synod of the Sun Presbyterian Church, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9311 (N.D. Tex. May 24, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9311

829. Cited by: Marks v. Suddath Relocation Sys., 319 F. Supp. 2d 746, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14350 (S.D. Tex. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN7, HN13{Cited}

319 F. Supp. 2d 746 p.750

830. Cited by: Southeast Tex. Envtl., L.L.C. v. BP Amoco Chem. Co., 329 F. Supp. 2d 853, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15436 (S.D. Tex. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3 , HN4{Cited}

329 F. Supp. 2d 853 p.858

831. Cited by: Scott v. Primedia, Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10687 (N.D. Tex. May 7, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10687

832. Cited by: Jones v. Nastech Pharm., 319 F. Supp. 2d 720, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9780 (S.D. Miss. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

319 F. Supp. 2d 720 p.724

833. Cited by: Giauque v. Clean Harbors Plaquemine, L.L.C., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29797 (M.D. La. Mar. 25, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Analysis}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29797

834. Cited by: Shaffer v. Palm Harbor Homes, Inc., 328 F. Supp. 2d 633, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23658 (N.D. Miss. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

328 F. Supp. 2d 633 p.635

835. Followed by: Page 110 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Arceneaux v. Amstar Corp., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4671, 174 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2974 (E.D. La. Mar. 22, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8, HN10, HN13 {Cited}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4671

836. Cited by: Balboa v. Turismo Americanos, L.L.C., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4430 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 19, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN7

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4430

837. Cited by: Adams v. GMAC, 307 F. Supp. 2d 812, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10470 (N.D. Miss. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

307 F. Supp. 2d 812 p.816

838. Cited by: Massaad v. Lear Corp., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4554 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2004)

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4554

839. Cited by: Willis v. Waste Mgmt. Nat'l Servs., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2050, 175 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2110 (E.D. La. Feb. 12, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN10, HN13 {Cited}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2050

840. Cited by: Davila v. Am. Home Prods. Corp., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4370 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 3, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN6, HN7, HN13{Caution}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4370

841. Cited by: Hurt v. Del Papa Distrib. Co., L.P., 425 F. Supp. 2d 853, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29366 (S.D. Tex. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN13{Caution}

425 F. Supp. 2d 853 p.855

842. Cited by: Baylor Univ. Med. Ctr. v. Ark. Blue Cross Blue Shield, 331 F. Supp. 2d 502, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 278, 32 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2546 (N.D. Tex. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9{Positive}

331 F. Supp. 2d 502 p.505

843. Cited by: Page 111 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Amos v. Ford Motor Credit Corp., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25763 (N.D. Miss. Dec. 29, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25763

844. Cited by: Metoyer v. Am. Int'l Life Assur. Co., 296 F. Supp. 2d 745, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23040, 32 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1376 (S.D. Tex. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN3, HN4, HN13{Caution}

296 F. Supp. 2d 745 p.747

845. Cited by: Dorsey v. Money Mack Music, Inc., 304 F. Supp. 2d 858, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21652 (E.D. La. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

304 F. Supp. 2d 858 p.863

846. Cited by: Arnoult v. GE Capital Corp., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20587 (E.D. La. Nov. 13, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Analysis}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20587

847. Cited by: N. Natural Gas Co. v. Sheerin, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20049 (W.D. Tex. Oct. 20, 2003){Cited}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20049

848. Cited by: Goins v. Hitchcock Indep. Sch. Dist., 424 F. Supp. 2d 902, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27027 (S.D. Tex. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN13{Analysis}

424 F. Supp. 2d 902 p.905

849. Cited by: Fathergill v. Rouleau, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18310 (N.D. Tex. Oct. 14, 2003) {Analysis}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18310

850. Cited by: Tittle v. Enron Corp. (In re Enron Corp. Sec. Derivative & ERISA Litig.) , 284 F. Supp. 2d 511, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17492, 31 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2281 (S.D. Tex. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

284 F. Supp. 2d 511 p.625

851. Cited by: Landry v. Cross Country Bank, 431 F. Supp. 2d 682, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27033 (S.D. Tex. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited} Page 112 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27033

852. Cited by: Petty v. Gulf Guar. Ins. Co., 303 F. Supp. 2d 815, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25292 (N.D. Miss. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

303 F. Supp. 2d 815 p.817

853. Cited by: Young ex rel. Blockbuster, Inc. v. Antioco, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13786 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 6, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13786

854. Cited by: Health Care Serv. Corp. v. Tap Pharm. Prods., 274 F. Supp. 2d 807, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13556, 30 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2891 (E.D. Tex. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Cited}

274 F. Supp. 2d 807 p.811

855. Cited by: Williams v. Cimarron Mortg. Co., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25160 (N.D. Miss. July 30, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25160

856. Cited by: Goode v. Comal Indep. Sch. Dist., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15798 (W.D. Tex. July 24, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15798

857. Cited by: Gardon v. City of El Paso, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14254 (W.D. Tex. July 17, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14254

858. Cited by: Hammann v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16775 (W.D. Tex. July 15, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6{Caution}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16775

859. Cited by: Applied Nutrition Strategies, LCC v. Phytoceutical Formulations, LCC, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11461 (E.D. La. June 20, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Cited}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11461 Page 113 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

860. Cited by: Dubose v. Merchs. & Farmers Bank, 318 F. Supp. 2d 419, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25568 (S.D. Miss. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Analysis}

318 F. Supp. 2d 419 p.424

861. Cited by: Ortiz v. Brownsville Indep. Sch. Dist., 257 F. Supp. 2d 885, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19358 (S.D. Tex. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Cited}

257 F. Supp. 2d 885 p.886

862. Cited by: Southwest Bank v. Mgmt. Counsel for Emple. Beneﬁts, Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1953 (N.D. Tex. Feb. 10, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1953

863. Cited by: Jamison v. Purdue Pharma Co., 251 F. Supp. 2d 1315, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4439 (S.D. Miss. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

251 F. Supp. 2d 1315 p.1324

864. Cited by: Carson v. H & R Block, Inc., 250 F. Supp. 2d 669, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9331 (S.D. Miss. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

250 F. Supp. 2d 669 p.671

865. Cited by: Green v. Cleary Water, Sewer & Fire Dist., 239 F. Supp. 2d 608, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 680 (S.D. Miss. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Cited}

239 F. Supp. 2d 608 p.611

866. Cited by: Maguire v. Telcom Global Solutions, Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 397 (N.D. Tex. Jan. 10, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 397

867. Cited by: Williams v. Pan Am. Life Ins. Co., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24890 (E.D. La. Dec. 19, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6{Cited}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24890

868. Cited by: Page 114 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Allred v. Bauhaus USA, Inc., 243 F. Supp. 2d 583, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26237 (N.D. Miss. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

243 F. Supp. 2d 583 p.585

869. Cited by: Johnson v. Tuff--N--RumbleMgmt., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24257 (E.D. La. Dec. 4, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24257

870. Cited by: Shields v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 232 F. Supp. 2d 715, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24056 (E.D. Tex. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN9, HN13{Cited}

232 F. Supp. 2d 715 p.720

871. Cited by: Rodriguez v. Conagra Foods, Inc., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21894 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 12, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21894

872. Cited by: Riley v. Ala. Great Southern R.R., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18645 (E.D. La. Sept. 27, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9{Cited}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18645

873. Cited by: Manzella v. UPS, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17262, 170 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3288 (E.D. La. Sept. 10, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN10, HN13 {Caution}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17262

874. Cited by: Newby v. Enron Corp. (In re Enron Corp. Sec.), 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27594 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 9, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Warning}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27594

875. Cited by: Threadgill v. Cingular Wireless, L.L.C., 223 F. Supp. 2d 786, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18210 (E.D. Tex. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

223 F. Supp. 2d 786 p.787

876. Cited by: Wells v. Shelter Gen. Ins. Co., 217 F. Supp. 2d 744, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14931 (S.D. Miss. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Positive} Page 115 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

217 F. Supp. 2d 744 p.748

877. Cited by: Caldwell v. Am. Home Prods. Corp., 210 F. Supp. 2d 809, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13220 (S.D. Miss. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Cited}

210 F. Supp. 2d 809 p.811

878. Cited by: Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Balinas, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10830 (E.D. La. June 7, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10830

879. Cited by: Gallaty v. UPS, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10425 (E.D. La. June 5, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10 , HN13{Positive}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10425

880. Followed by: Kimmel v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co, 210 F. Supp. 2d 850, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13646 (S.D. Tex. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

210 F. Supp. 2d 850 p.853

881. Cited by: Total Marine Servs. of Jefferson, Inc. v. W. Jefferson Levee Dist., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8245 (E.D. La. Apr. 29, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 , HN13

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8245

882. Cited by: Perkins v. Alamo Heights Indep. Sch. Dist., 204 F. Supp. 2d 991, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9626 (W.D. Tex. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN13 {Positive}

204 F. Supp. 2d 991 p.995

883. Cited by: Maitra v. Mitsubishi Heavy Indus., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25900 (W.D. Tex. Mar. 29, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Positive}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25900

884. Cited by: Crouch v. GMC, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3414 (N.D. Tex. Feb. 28, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3414 Page 116 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

885. Cited by: Jones v. Hibernia Corp., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3197 (E.D. La. Feb. 20, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3197

886. Cited by: Collins v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3171 (E.D. La. Feb. 15, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3171

887. Cited by: Ohler v. Purdue Pharma, L.P., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2368 (E.D. La. Jan. 22, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2368

888. Cited by: Walker v. Atwood Chevrolet--Olds,Inc., 189 F. Supp. 2d 594, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23198 (S.D. Miss. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN13{Cited}

189 F. Supp. 2d 594 p.599

889. Cited by: Breathwit v. City of Terrell Civ. Serv. Comm'n, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20111, 82 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P40891, 145 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P34420 (N.D. Tex. Dec. 5, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20111

890. Cited by: Holcomb v. Brience, Inc., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18960 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 20, 2001){Positive}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18960

891. Cited by: Clulee v. Bayou Fleet P'ship, Ltd., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19659 (E.D. La. Nov. 16, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19659

892. Cited by: Rogers v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 192 F. Supp. 2d 661, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17541 (N.D. Tex. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

192 F. Supp. 2d 661 p.664

893. Cited by: Namer v. Huey, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18049 (E.D. La. Oct. 18, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 Page 117 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18049

894. Cited by: Williams v. Corbett, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16789 (N.D. Tex. Oct. 16, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16789

895. Cited by: St. Luke's Episcopal Hosp. Corp. v. Stevens Transp., Inc., 172 F. Supp. 2d 837, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19813 (S.D. Tex. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Positive}

172 F. Supp. 2d 837 p.841

896. Cited by: Warner v. Whitney Corp., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15185 (E.D. La. Sept. 14, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Caution}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15185

897. Cited by: Brown v. Vickers Emples. Credit Union, 162 F. Supp. 2d 528, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14724 (S.D. Miss. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Cited}

162 F. Supp. 2d 528 p.531

898. Cited by: Foley v. Southwest Tex. HMO, Inc., 193 F. Supp. 2d 903, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23314 (E.D. Tex. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13{Caution}

193 F. Supp. 2d 903 p.905

899. Cited by: Magallon--Laffey v. Sun Life Assur. Co. of Can., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13252 (N.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13252

900. Cited by: Khalid v. Signature Leasing & Mgmt., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13300 (N.D. Tex. July 13, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Caution}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13300

901. Cited by: Matthews v. Stewart, 207 F. Supp. 2d 496, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24127 (M.D. La. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN13{Positive}

207 F. Supp. 2d 496 p.497 Page 118 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

902. Cited by: Virgil v. Reorganized M.W. Co., 156 F. Supp. 2d 624, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11714 (S.D. Miss. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

156 F. Supp. 2d 624 p.629

903. Followed by: Collins v. Am. Home Prods. Corp., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25982 (S.D. Miss. June 21, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Warning}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25982

904. Cited by: Owens v. Catholic Diocese of Jackson, 169 F. Supp. 2d 588, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18130 (S.D. Miss. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

169 F. Supp. 2d 588 p.591

905. Cited by: Shaw v. AT&T Wireless Servs., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6589 (N.D. Tex. May 18, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Analysis}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6589

906. Cited by: Galveston Linehandlers, Inc. v. Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local No. 20 , 140 F. Supp. 2d 741, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6553, 167 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2231 (S.D. Tex. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9

140 F. Supp. 2d 741 p.744

907. Cited by: Jones v. City of Burkburnett, 173 F. Supp. 2d 583, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5028 (N.D. Tex. 2001){Cited}

173 F. Supp. 2d 583 p.587

908. Cited by: Brock v. Provident Am. Ins. Co., 144 F. Supp. 2d 652, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4852 (N.D. Tex. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN13{Positive}

144 F. Supp. 2d 652 p.656

909. Cited by: McLaren v. RailAmerica, Inc., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3703 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 21, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3703

910. Cited by: Frost v. Harper, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25094, 171 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2792 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 20, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13{Analysis} Page 119 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25094 171 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2792 p.2795

911. Cited by: Weber v. Lockheed Martin Corp. , 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3488, 169 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2748 (E.D. La. Mar. 20, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6 {Positive}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3488

912. Cited by: River Parishes,Inc. v. Aetna U. S. Healthcare, Inc., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3481 (E.D. La. Mar. 20, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13 {Positive}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3481

913. Cited by: Jones v. Allied Waste Servs., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2892 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 14, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2892

914. Cited by: Smith v. Baker Hughes Int'l Branches, Inc., 131 F. Supp. 2d 920, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2252, 25 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2182 (S.D. Tex. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN7{Cited}

131 F. Supp. 2d 920 p.922

915. Cited by: Alfaro v. Leather Ctr., Inc., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2082 (N.D. Tex. Feb. 20, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2082

916. Cited by: Navarro v. Bell Helicopter Servs., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 707, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P16003 (N.D. Tex. Jan. 25, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 707

917. Cited by: Barton v. Southern Farm Bureau Life Ins. Co., 128 F. Supp. 2d 982, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 820, 25 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2505 (S.D. Miss. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Positive}

128 F. Supp. 2d 982 p.985

918. Cited by: Page 120 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Halfmann v. USAG Ins. Servs., 118 F. Supp. 2d 714, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15670 (N.D. Tex. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13{Positive}

118 F. Supp. 2d 714 p.717

919. Cited by: Asunto v. Shoup, 132 F. Supp. 2d 445, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15597 (E.D. La. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

132 F. Supp. 2d 445 p.450

920. Cited by: Value Recovery Group, Inc. v. Hourani, 115 F. Supp. 2d 761, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14993 (S.D. Tex. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

115 F. Supp. 2d 761 p.765

921. Cited by: Grifﬁn v. Bank One Corp., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16694 (N.D. Miss. Aug. 21, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16694

922. Cited by: Foster v. CIGNA Group Ins., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16671 (N.D. Miss. Aug. 1, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16671

923. Cited by: Caringal v. Karteria Shipping, Ltd., 108 F. Supp. 2d 651, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16518, 2001 A.M.C. 190 (E.D. La. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

108 F. Supp. 2d 651 p.653

924. Cited by: Richard v. Spicuzza, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9365 (E.D. La. June 26, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9365

925. Cited by: Greer v. MAJR Fin. Corp., 105 F. Supp. 2d 583, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10474 (S.D. Miss. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

105 F. Supp. 2d 583 p.586

926. Cited by: Hall v. City of Alexandria, 111 F. Supp. 2d 785, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12569 (W.D. La. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Caution} Page 121 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

111 F. Supp. 2d 785 p.787

927. Cited by: Drawhorn v. Qwest Communs. Int'l, 121 F. Supp. 2d 554, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17074 (E.D. Tex. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

121 F. Supp. 2d 554 p.559

928. Cited by: Richardson v. American Nonwovens Corp., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8515 (N.D. Miss. May 18, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8515

929. Followed by: Robertson v. Hessler, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6669 (E.D. La. May 4, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6669

930. Cited by: Wingrave v. Hebert, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4336 (E.D. La. Mar. 30, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN9, HN13

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4336

931. Cited by: Moham v. Jones, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere & Denegre, L.L.P., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4348 (E.D. La. Mar. 28, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13 {Caution}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4348

932. Followed by: Crooks v. Certiﬁed Computer Consultants, Inc., 92 F. Supp. 2d 582, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4672 (W.D. La. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6 , HN7, HN9, HN13{Caution}

92 F. Supp. 2d 582 p.585

933. Cited by: Dixon v. Alcatel USA, Inc., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1675 (N.D. Tex. Feb. 16, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1675

934. Cited by: Schappel v. UICI, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19444 (N.D. Tex. Dec. 3, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Positive}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19444 Page 122 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

935. Cited by: In re Fraser, 75 F. Supp. 2d 572, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20823 (E.D. Tex. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

75 F. Supp. 2d 572 p.578

936. Cited by: Chavez v. McDonald's Corp., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15978 (N.D. Tex. Oct. 8, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15978

937. Cited by: Brooks v. Southern Univ. & Agric. & Mech. College, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12693 (E.D. La. Aug. 16, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12693

938. Cited by: Caravanas v. Hall, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12741, 80 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1069 (E.D. La. Aug. 10, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN7{Caution}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12741 80 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1069 p.1070

939. Cited by: Mid South Constructors v. Malone Mortg. Co. Am., Ltd., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11187 (N.D. Tex. July 15, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11187

940. Cited by: Walker v. Gulf Guar. Ins. Co., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21873 (S.D. Miss. July 1, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21873

941. Cited by: Kelly v. Advantage Health, Inc., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6903 (E.D. La. May 11, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6{Positive}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6903

942. Cited by: Duerrmeyer v. Alamo Moving & Storage One, Corp., 49 F. Supp. 2d 934, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7546 (W.D. Tex. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Caution}

49 F. Supp. 2d 934 p.935 Page 123 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

943. Cited by: Plocica v. Nylcare, Inc., 43 F. Supp. 2d 658, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3596 (N.D. Tex. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13{Analysis}

43 F. Supp. 2d 658 p.661 43 F. Supp. 2d 658 p.662

944. Cited by: Dardeau v. West Orange--Grove Consol. Indep. Sch. Dist., 43 F. Supp. 2d 722, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4392 (E.D. Tex. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13 {Positive}

43 F. Supp. 2d 722 p.731

945. Cited by: IMT, Inc. v. Haynes & Boone, L.L.P., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1083 (N.D. Tex. Feb. 1, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1083

946. Cited by: Cowboy Mouth L.L.C. v. Monkey Hill Prods., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18777 (E.D. La. Nov. 24, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18777

947. Cited by: Washington v. Fitzgeralds South, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18230 (N.D. Miss. Nov. 10, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18230

948. Cited by: Chatman v. Lawson, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13532 (N.D. Miss. Aug. 19, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13532

949. Cited by: Little v. New England Mut. Life Ins. Co., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12070 (N.D. Miss. July 27, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Analysis}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12070

950. Cited by: Cyr v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan, 12 F. Supp. 2d 556, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11286 (N.D. Tex. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13 {Questioned}

12 F. Supp. 2d 556 p.566 Page 124 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

951. Cited by: McCool v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12064 (N.D. Miss. July 16, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Cited}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12064

952. Cited by: Allen v. City Fin. Co., 224 B.R. 347, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10684 (S.D. Miss. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

224 B.R. 347 p.350

953. Cited by: Saffold v. Fortenberry, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12065 (N.D. Miss. July 13, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12065

954. Cited by: Karydas v. Houston Grinding & Mfg. Co., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21321 (S.D. Tex. June 21, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21321

955. Cited by: Mayo v. Benthall, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11480 (N.D. Miss. June 12, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11480

956. Cited by: Sunrise Shipping Agency v. Universal Maritime Servs., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6426 (E.D. La. Apr. 28, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6426

957. Cited by: Baron v. Strassner, 7 F. Supp. 2d 871, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6116, Blue Sky L. Rep. (CCH) P74159 (S.D. Tex. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

7 F. Supp. 2d 871 p.873 7 F. Supp. 2d 871 p.874

958. Distinguished by: Dearing v. Sigma Chem. Co., 1 F. Supp. 2d 660, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4826 (S.D. Tex. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN10{Positive}

1 F. Supp. 2d 660 p.663

959. Cited by: Page 125 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Tavormina v. Evening Star Prods., 10 F. Supp. 2d 729, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9870, Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P27910 (S.D. Tex. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 {Cited}

10 F. Supp. 2d 729 p.732

960. Cited by: Isbell v. Stewart & Stevenson, Ltd., 9 F. Supp. 2d 731, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9861 (S.D. Tex. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

9 F. Supp. 2d 731 p.732

961. Cited by: Gassie v. SMH Swiss Corp. for Microelectric & Watchmaking Indus., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2003 (E.D. La. Feb. 17, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9 {Caution}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2003

962. Cited by: Ketchum v. Shaw, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2650 (N.D. Miss. Feb. 12, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2650

963. Cited by: Delchamps, Inc. v. Continental Cas. Co., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1944 (E.D. La. Feb. 11, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1944

964. Cited by: City of Fort Worth v. City of Dallas, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1132 (N.D. Tex. Jan. 20, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1132

965. Cited by: Crum v. Mississippi Mun. Serv. Co., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1297 (N.D. Miss. Jan. 12, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1297

966. Cited by: Thompson v. BellSouth Telcoms., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21108, 157 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2823 (E.D. La. Dec. 31, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN10 , HN13{Cited}

157 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2823 p.2824

967. Cited by: Page 126 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Schaper Co. v. C.A.R. Transp. Brokerage Co., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22238 (N.D. Miss. Dec. 30, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN13 {Positive}

968. Cited by: Louisiana Health Serv. & Indem. Co. v. Matherne, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20377 (E.D. La. Dec. 18, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

969. Cited by: Young v. Matagorda County Hosp. Dist., 986 F. Supp. 1064, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20415 (S.D. Tex. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Cited}

986 F. Supp. 1064 p.1065

970. Followed by: Bullard v. Southwest Crop Ins. Agency, 984 F. Supp. 531, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19283 (E.D. Tex. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

984 F. Supp. 531 p.534

971. Followed by: Oney v. Kansas City S. Ry., 3 F. Supp. 2d 729, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22409, 163 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2027 (E.D. Tex. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN9 {Positive}

3 F. Supp. 2d 729 p.735

972. Cited by: Cartegena v. Continental Airlines, 10 F. Supp. 2d 677, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22679 (S.D. Tex. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

10 F. Supp. 2d 677 p.678

973. Followed by: Sherron v. Private Issue by Discover, 977 F. Supp. 804, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14590 (N.D. Miss. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN13{Positive}

977 F. Supp. 804 p.806

974. Cited by: Moorer v. United States, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23813 (N.D. Tex. May 21, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9{Cited}

975. Cited by: Jenkins v. Sandoz Pharms. Corp., 965 F. Supp. 861, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9880 (N.D. Miss. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN13{Questioned}

965 F. Supp. 861 p.863 Page 127 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

976. Cited by: Arnold by & Through Arnold v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 973 F. Supp. 726, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16953 (S.D. Tex. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5 , HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13{Warning}

973 F. Supp. 726 p.730 973 F. Supp. 726 p.732 973 F. Supp. 726 p.734

977. Cited by: Rogers v. Modern Woodmen of Am., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9963 (N.D. Miss. Apr. 8, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Positive}

978. Cited by: George v. Borden Chems. & Plastics Operating Ltd. Pshp., 960 F. Supp. 92, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5011 (M.D. La. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4 {Cited}

960 F. Supp. 92 p.94

979. Cited by: Wright v. Combined Ins. Co. of Am., 959 F. Supp. 356, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3456 (N.D. Miss. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6{Caution}

959 F. Supp. 356 p.362

980. Cited by: Prude v. State Farm Lloyds, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9861 (N.D. Miss. Feb. 3, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN13

981. Cited by: Moorer v. United States, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24004 (N.D. Tex. Jan. 3, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9{Cited}

1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24004

982. Cited by: Taylor v. Carter, 948 F. Supp. 1290, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20633 (W.D. Tex. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Caution}

948 F. Supp. 1290 p.1292

983. Cited by: Rougeau v. Bellsouth Telcoms., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18560 (E.D. La. Dec. 11, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN10, HN13{Caution}

984. Cited by: Cinquemano v. Ciba--GeigyCorp., 962 F. Supp. 862, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20946 (M.D. La. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited} Page 128 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

962 F. Supp. 862 p.864

985. Cited by: Robertson v. Western Heritage Ins. Co., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22631 (N.D. Tex. Dec. 5, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

986. Cited by: Collins v. Bradley, 962 F. Supp. 854, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20937 (M.D. La. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

962 F. Supp. 854 p.855

987. Cited by: Alomang v. Freeport--McMoRanInc., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15908 (E.D. La. Oct. 17, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

988. Cited by: Martinez v. Dow Chem. Co., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13180 (E.D. La. Sept. 4, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

989. Cited by: Gabner v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 938 F. Supp. 1295, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13206 (E.D. Tex. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

938 F. Supp. 1295 p.1301

990. Cited by: Davis v. North Am. Van Lines, 934 F. Supp. 245, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11807 (S.D. Tex. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13{Caution}

934 F. Supp. 245 p.248 934 F. Supp. 245 p.249

991. Cited by: Kenner Servs. v. Star Enter., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10163 (E.D. La. July 15, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN13{Caution}

992. Cited by: Brown v. Inter--CityFed. Bank, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21455, 72 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 318 (N.D. Miss. June 11, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN13{Caution}

993. Cited by: Brown v. Inter--CityFed. Bank for Sav., 72 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 318 (N.D. Miss. June 11, 1996)

72 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 318 p.319

994. Cited by: Page 129 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1st Nat'l Reserve v. Vaughan, 931 F. Supp. 463, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9349 (E.D. Tex. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Caution}

931 F. Supp. 463 p.467

995. Cited by: Mora v. Pazo, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6787 (E.D. La. May 13, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN7{Cited}

996. Cited by: Corley v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 924 F. Supp. 782, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9402 (E.D. Tex. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Questioned}

924 F. Supp. 782 p.787

997. Cited by: Dancy v. Fina Oil & Chem. Co., 921 F. Supp. 1532, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4713, 155 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2621 (E.D. Tex. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN13 {Caution}

921 F. Supp. 1532 p.1534 921 F. Supp. 1532 p.1535

998. Cited by: Umphrey v. Fina Oil & Chem. Co., 921 F. Supp. 434, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4712, 155 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2187 (E.D. Tex. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN13 {Cited}

921 F. Supp. 434 p.436

999. Cited by: Gannett River States Publ. Corp. v. Mississippi State Univ., 945 F. Supp. 128, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17325 (S.D. Miss. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13 {Cited}

945 F. Supp. 128 p.131

1000 Cited by: . Bartley v. Borden, Inc., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3755 (E.D. La. Feb. 13, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13

1001 Cited by: . Simmons v. UPS, 924 F. Supp. 65, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8513 (W.D. Tex. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7{Caution}

924 F. Supp. 65 p.67 Page 130 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1002 Cited by: . Chertkov v. TPLC, Inc., 916 F. Supp. 608, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2446, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P14516 (N.D. Tex. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN13{Questioned}

916 F. Supp. 608 p.611 916 F. Supp. 608 p.612

1003 Cited by: . Lamb v. Laird, 907 F. Supp. 1033, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19126, 69 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1262 (S.D. Tex. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN9{Cited}

907 F. Supp. 1033 p.1035

1004 Cited by: . Thompson v. Nashua Corp., 907 F. Supp. 247, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18618, 1996--1Trade Cas. (CCH) P71356 (W.D. Tex. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN13{Cited}

907 F. Supp. 247 p.248

1005 Cited by: . McClelland v. Gronwaldt, 909 F. Supp. 457, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18575 (E.D. Tex. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5{Warning}

909 F. Supp. 457 p.460

1006 Cited by: . Flowerette v. Heartland Healthcare Ctr., 903 F. Supp. 1042, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19554, 2 Accom. Disabilities Dec. (CCH) P2--180(N.D. Tex. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Caution}

903 F. Supp. 1042 p.1044

1007 Cited by: . Quagliano Tobacco & Candy Co. v. Mitchell, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16795 (E.D. La. Nov. 1, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

1008 Cited by: . Sattar v. Royal Sonesta, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16277 (E.D. La. Nov. 1, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13

1009 Cited by: . Page 131 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Amoco Chem. Co. v. Tex Tin Corp., 902 F. Supp. 730, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15937 (S.D. Tex. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Caution}

902 F. Supp. 730 p.734

1010 Cited by: . Nelson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 897 F. Supp. 328, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12591 (S.D. Tex. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

897 F. Supp. 328 p.330

1011 Cited by: . Feist v. District No. 1 --Paciﬁc Coast Dist., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12000 (E.D. La. Aug. 15, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Analysis}

1012 Cited by: . Martin v. Ford Motor Co., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21529 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 14, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Caution}

1013 Cited by: . Louisiana v. Sprint Communications Co., 892 F. Supp. 145, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9995 (M.D. La. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Positive}

892 F. Supp. 145 p.149

1014 Cited by: . City of New Orleans v. Kernan, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9200 (E.D. La. June 26, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

1015 Cited by: . Morris v. Administrators of the Tulane Educ. Fund, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8642, 68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 800 (E.D. La. June 20, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 800 p.800

1016 Cited by: . Coleman v. Alcolac, Inc., 888 F. Supp. 1388, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8095 (S.D. Tex. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Warning}

888 F. Supp. 1388 p.1396 Page 132 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1017 Cited by: . Feist v. District No. 1----Paciﬁc Coast Dist., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12723 (E.D. La. June 6, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9{Positive}

1018 Cited by: . Geissert v. Republic Ins. Co., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7601 (E.D. La. May 31, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

1019 Cited by: . Carway v. Progressive County Mut. Ins. Co., 183 B.R. 769, 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 8676 (S.D. Tex. 1995){Cited}

183 B.R. 769 p.772

1020 Cited by: . Carway v. Progressive County Mut. Ins. Co., 183 B.R. 769, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8676 (N.D. Tex. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN13{Cited}

1021 Cited by: . Merkel v. Federal Express Corp., 886 F. Supp. 561, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6443 (N.D. Miss. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN13{Positive}

886 F. Supp. 561 p.564 886 F. Supp. 561 p.565 886 F. Supp. 561 p.566 886 F. Supp. 561 p.567

1022 Cited by: . Locke v. Purdon, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21577 (N.D. Miss. Apr. 20, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN9{Cited}

1023 Cited by: . Iwag v. Geisel Compania Maritima, S.A., 882 F. Supp. 597, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4828 (N.D. Tex. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN13{Caution}

882 F. Supp. 597 p.603

1024 Cited by: . Umphrey v. Fina Oil & Chem. Co., 882 F. Supp. 585, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5486 (E.D. Tex. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN13{Caution}

882 F. Supp. 585 p.587 Page 133 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1025 Cited by: . Barringer v. Parker Bros. Employee Retirement Fund, 877 F. Supp. 358, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1708 (N.D. Tex. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Cited}

877 F. Supp. 358 p.361

1026 Cited by: . Gantar v. Hibernia Nat'l Bank, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1268 (E.D. La. Jan. 27, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

1027 Cited by: . KVHP TV Partners v. Channel 12, Inc., 874 F. Supp. 756, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 704 (E.D. Tex. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9{Caution}

874 F. Supp. 756 p.759 874 F. Supp. 756 p.760

1028 Cited by: . L.P. Commercial Corp. v. Caudill, 870 F. Supp. 743, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17849 (S.D. Tex. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

870 F. Supp. 743 p.746

1029 Cited by: . Smith v. Morrison Ins. Agency, 864 F. Supp. 22, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14166 (S.D. Tex. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Cited}

864 F. Supp. 22 p.24

1030 Cited by: . Richardson v. Advanced Cardiovascular Sys., 865 F. Supp. 1210, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13093 (E.D. La. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Caution}

865 F. Supp. 1210 p.1213

1031 Cited by: . Gray v. Murphy Oil USA, 874 F. Supp. 748, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18934 (S.D. Miss. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

874 F. Supp. 748 p.753 Page 134 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1032 Cited by: . City of New Orleans by & Through New Orleans Aviation Bd. v. Portion of Square 205 , 866 F. Supp. 969, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13092 (E.D. La. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN13{Cited}

866 F. Supp. 969 p.974

1033 Cited by: . Amos v. Tulane Univ., 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10332, 65 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1020 (E.D. La. July 27, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

1034 Cited by: . Zamanian v. Christian Health Ministry, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10350 (E.D. La. July 21, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

1035 Cited by: . Williamson v. Haynes Best Western, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8421 (E.D. La. June 20, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9{Positive}

1036 Cited by: . Luna v. Compania Panamena De Aviacion, S.A., 851 F. Supp. 826, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10935 (S.D. Tex. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13 {Caution}

851 F. Supp. 826 p.831

1037 Cited by: . Murphy Exploration & Prod. Co. v. Davis, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3502 (E.D. La. Mar. 23, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13

1038 Cited by: . Strauss v. Martzell, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3122 (E.D. La. Mar. 11, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4

1039 Cited by: . Martin v. District No. 1 ----Marine Eng'rs Beneﬁcial Ass'n/Nat'l Maritime Union, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1068, 67 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1198, 149 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2558 (E.D. La. Feb. 2, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

67 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1198 p.1200 149 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2558 p.2560 Page 135 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1040 Cited by: . Merchant v. Communication Workers, 145 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2627 (E.D. La. Jan. 26, 1994){Analysis}

145 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2627 p.2629

1041 Cited by: . Beaumont v. Exxon Corp., 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50, 2 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1865, 4 Am. Disabilities Dec. 684 (E.D. La. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Cited}

2 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1865 p.1866

1042 Cited by: . Lawson v. Louisiana Eye Ctr., P.C., 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16991 (E.D. La. Nov. 24, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

1043 Cited by: . Merchant v. Communications Workers of Am., 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16085 (E.D. La. Nov. 3, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

1044 Cited by: . Houston Int'l Hosp. v. Jefferson Pilot Life Ins. Co., 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19097 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 31, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6

1045 Cited by: . Cook--Fort Worth Children's Medical Ctr. v. Wal--MartAssocs. Group Health Plan, 823 F. Supp. 418, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8189 (N.D. Tex. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6, HN9{Cited}

823 F. Supp. 418 p.419

1046 Cited by: . In re Taxable Mun. Bonds Litig., 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6890 (E.D. La. May 10, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

1047 Cited by: . Rodriguez v. Shell Oil Co., 818 F. Supp. 1013, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5665, 23 Envtl. L. Rep. 21271 (S.D. Tex. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13 {Caution} Page 136 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

818 F. Supp. 1013 p.1015

1048 Cited by: . Bossier v. Creed, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3705 (E.D. La. Mar. 23, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5

1049 Cited by: . Grynberg Prod. Corp. v. British Gas, P.L.C., 817 F. Supp. 1338, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3649 (E.D. Tex. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Caution}

817 F. Supp. 1338 p.1353

1050 Cited by: . Edwards v. Nestle Beverage Co., 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3719, 61 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1479, 144 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2483 (E.D. La. Mar. 18, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution}

61 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1479 p.1479 144 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2483 p.2483

1051 Cited by: . Johnson v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 819 F. Supp. 578, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8691 (E.D. Tex. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13{Positive}

819 F. Supp. 578 p.583

1052 Explained by: . Messina v. Tri--Gas,Inc., 816 F. Supp. 1163, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3539 (S.D. Tex. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

816 F. Supp. 1163 p.1165 816 F. Supp. 1163 p.1166

1053 Cited by: . Brown v. Crop Hail Management, Inc., 813 F. Supp. 519, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1688 (S.D. Tex. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution}

813 F. Supp. 519 p.522 813 F. Supp. 519 p.523

1054 Cited by: . Lawal v. British Airways, PLC, 812 F. Supp. 713, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21224 (S.D. Tex. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Caution} Page 137 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

812 F. Supp. 713 p.720

1055 Cited by: . Anderson v. Transamerica Specialty Ins. Co., 804 F. Supp. 903, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16298 (S.D. Tex. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13 {Caution}

804 F. Supp. 903 p.905

1056 Cited by: . South Louisiana Bank v. Dardar, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13974 (E.D. La. Sept. 17, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

1057 Cited by: . Rodriguez v. Texas Health Enterprises, Inc., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14788, 15 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2819 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 2, 1992)

15 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2819 p.2820

1058 Cited by: . Pointer v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., 791 F. Supp. 164, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7674, 58 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1652 (S.D. Tex. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6{Cited}

791 F. Supp. 164 p.166

1059 Cited by: . Jefferson Parish Hosp. Dist. #2 v. Harvey, 788 F. Supp. 282, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2503 (E.D. La. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Caution}

788 F. Supp. 282 p.283

1060 Cited by: . Eddy v. Inland Bay Drilling & Workover, Inc., 784 F. Supp. 370, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1679 (S.D. Tex. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN13 {Cited}

784 F. Supp. 370 p.372

1061 Cited by: . Howard v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 793 F. Supp. 129, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20705 (S.D. Tex. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Caution}

793 F. Supp. 129 p.132 Page 138 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1062 Cited by: . Stewart v. American Airlines, Inc., 776 F. Supp. 1194, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15678 (S.D. Tex. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

776 F. Supp. 1194 p.1195 776 F. Supp. 1194 p.1196

1063 Cited by: . Cox v. Tulane University, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13454 (E.D. La. Sept. 5, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13

1064 Cited by: . Chube v. Exxon Chemical Americas, 760 F. Supp. 557, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4864 (M.D. La. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13{Caution}

760 F. Supp. 557 p.560

1065 Cited by: . Bilal v. Burns Sec. Services, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19780 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 18, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN6, HN7, HN12, HN13

1066 Cited by: . Jackson v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15628 (E.D. La. Nov. 16, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Caution}

1067 Cited by: . Ford v. Murphy Oil U.S.A., Inc., 750 F. Supp. 766, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15412 (E.D. La. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Warning}

750 F. Supp. 766 p.772 750 F. Supp. 766 p.773

1068 Cited by: . White v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2801 (E.D. La. Mar. 13, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

1069 Cited by: . Pitre v. Ofﬁce of Clerk of Court of Parish of Jefferson, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10577 (E.D. La. Sept. 6, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Cited} Page 139 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1070 Cited by: . Owens v. First City Nat'l Bank, 714 F. Supp. 227, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6487 (E.D. Tex. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

714 F. Supp. 227 p.229 714 F. Supp. 227 p.231

1071 Cited by: . Wallace v. Ryan--Walsh Stevedoring Co., 708 F. Supp. 144, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2422 (E.D. Tex. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN9, HN13{Caution}

708 F. Supp. 144 p.150 708 F. Supp. 144 p.151

1072 Distinguished by: . Hobgood v. Parish of East Baton Rouge, 703 F. Supp. 1243, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15473 (M.D. La. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6{Cited}

703 F. Supp. 1243 p.1244

1073 Cited by: . Boone v. Du Bose, 718 F. Supp. 479, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16653, 30 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1574 (M.D. La. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN10 {Caution}

718 F. Supp. 479 p.483 718 F. Supp. 479 p.486

1074 Cited by: . Texas v. Insurance Services Ofﬁce, Inc., 699 F. Supp. 601, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13123, 1988--2Trade Cas. (CCH) P68314 (W.D. Tex. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN7, HN13{Cited}

699 F. Supp. 601 p.604 699 F. Supp. 601 p.605

1075 Cited by: . Gemcraft Homes, Inc. v. Sumurdy, 688 F. Supp. 289, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9504, Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P26337, 8 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1514 (E.D. Tex. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN9, HN13{Positive}

688 F. Supp. 289 p.291 688 F. Supp. 289 p.292 688 F. Supp. 289 p.294 6TH CIRCUIT --COURT OF APPEALS Page 140 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1076 Cited by: . Eastman v. Marine Mech. Corp., 438 F.3d 544, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 3530, 2006 FED App. 64P (6th Cir.), 87 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P42293, 24 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1, 152 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P60139 (6th Cir. Ohio 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6{Positive}

438 F.3d 544 p.550

1077 Cited by: . Mikulski v. Centerior Energy Corp., 435 F.3d 666, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 1849, 2006 FED App. 39P (6th Cir.), 97 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 712 (6th Cir. Ohio 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN9, HN13{Warning}

435 F.3d 666 p.671

1078 Cited by: . Palkow v. CSX Transp., Inc., 431 F.3d 543, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 24839, 2005 FED App. 447P (6th Cir.), 87 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P42163, 96 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1740 (6th Cir. Ohio 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7{Positive}

431 F.3d 543 p.553

1079 Cited by: . Husvar v. Rapoport, 430 F.3d 777, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 21381, 2005 FED App. 404A (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Ohio 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13 {Positive}

430 F.3d 777 p.781

1080 Distinguished by: . Beck v. Gannett Satellite Informational Network, Inc., 124 Fed. Appx. 311, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 1580 (2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Cited}

124 Fed. Appx. 311 p.322

1081 Cited by: . Roddy v. Grand Trunk W. R.R., 395 F.3d 318, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 740, 2005 FED App. 25P (6th Cir.), 176 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2482, 150 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P59939 (6th Cir. Mich. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN5, HN6, HN9 {Positive}

395 F.3d 318 p.322 395 F.3d 318 p.323 Page 141 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1082 Followed by: . Thurman v. DaimlerChrysler, Inc., 397 F.3d 352, 116 Fed. Appx. 638, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 24306, 2005 FED App. 32P (6th Cir.), 2005 FED App. 0032P (6th Cir.) (2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Caution}

397 F.3d 352 p.356 116 Fed. Appx. 638 p.642

1083 Followed by: . Alongi v. Ford Motor Co., 386 F.3d 716, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 21276, 175 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3025, 150 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10399 (6th Cir. Mich. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN7, HN13{Caution}

386 F.3d 716 p.725

1084 Cited by: . Pearson v. Int'l Union, United Auto., Aero. & Agric. Implement Workers of Am., 99 Fed. Appx. 46, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8594 (2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7 , HN9{Analysis}

99 Fed. Appx. 46 p.52

1085 Followed by: . Adams v. Apogee Coal Co., 99 Fed. Appx. 566, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 1361 (2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13{Analysis}

99 Fed. Appx. 566 p.568

1086 Cited by: . Loftis v. UPS, 342 F.3d 509, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 17744, 2003 FED App. 306P (6th Cir.), 173 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2079, 148 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P59776 (6th Cir. Tenn. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5{Positive}

342 F.3d 509 p.514 342 F.3d 509 p.515

1087 Cited by: . Husvar v. Rapoport, 337 F.3d 603, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 14661, 2003 FED App. 242P (6th Cir.), 30 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2525 (6th Cir. Ohio 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN13{Caution}

337 F.3d 603 p.607

1088 Cited by: . Page 142 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

XL Sports, Ltd. v. Lawler, 49 Fed. Appx. 13, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 21168 (2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Positive}

49 Fed. Appx. 13 p.18

1089 Cited by: . Mich. S. R.R. Co. v. Branch & St. Joseph Counties Rail Users Ass'n, 287 F.3d 568, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 7474, 2002 FED App. 141P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Mich. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN9{Positive}

287 F.3d 568 p.573

1090 Cited by: . Peters v. Lincoln Elec. Co., 285 F.3d 456, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 4463, 2002 FED App. 97P (6th Cir.), 83 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P41134, 27 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2044, 88 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 639 (6th Cir. Ohio 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN7{Caution}

285 F.3d 456 p.468

1091 Cited by: . Ivery v. Chrysler Corp., 31 Fed. Appx. 841, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3230 (2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9

31 Fed. Appx. 841 p.843

1092 Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: . Moore v. City of Harriman, 272 F.3d 769, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 24056, 2001 FED App. 393P (6th Cir.), 51 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 641 (6th Cir. Tenn. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Caution}

272 F.3d 769 p.793

1093 Cited by: . Melvin v. Knoll, Inc., 21 Fed. Appx. 305, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 18588 (2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13

21 Fed. Appx. 305 p.307

1094 Cited by: . NGS Am., Inc. v. Jefferson, 218 F.3d 519, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15521, 2000 FED App. 0216P (6th Cir.), 2000 FED App. 216P (6th Cir.), 24 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1971 (6th Cir. Mich. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

218 F.3d 519 p.530 Page 143 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1095 Cited by: . Youseff v. Ford Motor Co., 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 14080 (6th Cir. Ohio June 6, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13{Analysis}

2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 14080

1096 Cited by: . Beckwith v. Diesel Tech. Co., 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 14074 (6th Cir. Mich. May 31, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13{Questioned}

2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 14074

1097 Cited in Concurring Opinion at: . Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Yeary, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 4175 (6th Cir. Ohio Mar. 14, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Analysis}

2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 4175

1098 Cited by: . Long v. Bando Mfg. of Am., Inc., 201 F.3d 754, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 432, 2000 FED App. 0018P (6th Cir.), 2000 FED App. 18P (6th Cir.), 15 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1658, 140 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58824 (6th Cir. Ky. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4{Positive}

201 F.3d 754 p.758

1099 Cited by: . Wright v. BellSouth Telecomms., Inc., 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 34509 (6th Cir. Tenn. Dec. 28, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13{Analysis}

1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 34509

1100 Distinguished by: . Lion's Volunteer Blind Indus. v. Automated Group Admin., Inc., 195 F.3d 803, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 28397, 1999 FED App. 376P (6th Cir.), 1999 FED App. 0376P (6th Cir.), 23 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2113 (6th Cir. Tenn. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4 , HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13{Positive}

195 F.3d 803 p.808

1101 Cited by: . Profﬁtt v. International Paper Co., 165 F.3d 28, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 23773, 162 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2704 (6th Cir. Ohio 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7 , HN9, HN13{Analysis} Page 144 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 23773

1102 Cited by: . Lattin v. Kurdziel, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 10769 (6th Cir. Mich. May 26, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN12, HN13{Analysis}

1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 10769

1103 Cited by: . Ahearn v. Charter Twp., 100 F.3d 451, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 29336, 1996 FED App. 358P (6th Cir.), 1996 FED App. 0358P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Mich. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN13{Caution}

100 F.3d 451 p.456

1104 Cited by: . Collins v. Blue Cross Blue Shield, 103 F.3d 35, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33110, 1996 FED App. 392P (6th Cir.), 1996 FED App. 0392P (6th Cir.), 3 Accom. Disabilities Dec. (CCH) P3--149,6 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 227, 19 Am. Disabilities Dec. 1187 (6th Cir. Mich. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Caution}

103 F.3d 35 p.36

1105 Cited by: . Board of Green Twp. Trustees v. Kleve, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 22549 (6th Cir. Aug. 21, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

1106 Cited by: . Clarkston v. Hubbard, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 19141 (6th Cir. Ohio July 3, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

1107 Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by: . Strong v. Telectronics Pacing Sys., 78 F.3d 256, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4500, 1996 FED App. 91P (6th Cir.), 1996 FED App. 0091P (6th Cir.), CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P14532 (6th Cir. Mich. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13 {Positive}

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: 78 F.3d 256 p.261 Cited by: 78 F.3d 256 p.259

1108 Cited by: . Page 145 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Mink v. General Motors Corp., 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 37027 (6th Cir. Dec. 6, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Analysis}

1109 Cited by: . Bullitt County Fiscal Court v. Newsome, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18085 (6th Cir. Ky. June 21, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN13{Analysis}

1110 Cited by: . Zuniga v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 52 F.3d 1395, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 9845, 1995 FED App. 136P (6th Cir.), 1995 FED App. 0136P (6th Cir.), 19 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1273 (6th Cir. Mich. 1995){Caution}

52 F.3d 1395 p.1399

1111 Cited by: . Rebel v. Ford New Holland, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4218 (6th Cir. Mich. Mar. 1, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Analysis}

1112 Followed by, Cited by: . Warner v. Ford Motor Co., 46 F.3d 531, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 2181, 1995 FED App. 0045P (6th Cir.), 1995 FED App. 45P (6th Cir.), 18 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2847, 66 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1680 (6th Cir. Mich. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6, HN12, HN13{Caution}

Followed by: 46 F.3d 531 p.534 Cited by: 46 F.3d 531 p.533

1113 Followed by, Cited by: . Tisdale v. United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipeﬁtting Indus. Local 704 , 25 F.3d 1308, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 13868, 1994 FED App. 198P (6th Cir.), 1994 FED App. 0198P (6th Cir.), 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P43278, 64 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1785, 146 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2615, 128 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11165 (6th Cir. Mich. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13{Positive}

Followed by: 25 F.3d 1308 p.1308 25 F.3d 1308 p.1309 Cited by: 25 F.3d 1308 p.1313

1114 Cited by: . Page 146 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

In re General Motors Corp., 3 F.3d 980, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 22312, 17 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1001, 8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1373, 144 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2145, 126 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10841 (6th Cir. Mich. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

3 F.3d 980 p.984

1115 Cited by: . Gafford v. General Elec. Co., 997 F.2d 150, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 14766, 62 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P42451, 62 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 205 (6th Cir. Ky. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

997 F.2d 150 p.157

1116 Cited by: . Van Camp v. AT&T Info. Sys., 963 F.2d 119, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 8523, 58 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P41445, 15 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1366, 58 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1124 (6th Cir. Mich. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Warning}

963 F.2d 119 p.122

1117 Distinguished by, Cited by: . Adkins v. General Motors Corp., 946 F.2d 1201, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 24449, 138 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2609, 120 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10988 (6th Cir. Ohio 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13{Caution}

Distinguished by: 946 F.2d 1201 p.1204 946 F.2d 1201 p.1205 Cited by: 946 F.2d 1201 p.1208

1118 Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by: . Cromwell v. Equicor--EquitableHCA Corp., 944 F.2d 1272, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 21334, 14 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1235 (6th Cir. Ohio 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6{Caution}

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: 944 F.2d 1272 p.1286 Cited by: 944 F.2d 1272 p.1276

1119 Cited by: . Robinson v. Michigan Consol. Gas Co., 918 F.2d 579, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 19164, 20 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 1971, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P73720, 24 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 49, 17 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1145 (6th Cir. Mich. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN5, HN6{Caution} Page 147 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

918 F.2d 579 p.584 918 F.2d 579 p.585

1120 Cited by: . Fox v. Parker Hanniﬁn Corp., 914 F.2d 795, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 16542, 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1329, 135 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2527, 116 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10303 (6th Cir. Ohio 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8, HN12, HN13{Caution}

914 F.2d 795 p.799 914 F.2d 795 p.801

1121 Cited by: . Welch v. GMC, Buick Motor Div., 922 F.2d 287, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 15550, 3 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 553, 55 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P40467, 146 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2609 (6th Cir. Mich. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7 , HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13{Caution}

922 F.2d 287 p.290 922 F.2d 287 p.291

1122 Cited by: . Beard v. Carrollton R., 893 F.2d 117, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 19472, 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 100, 133 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2220, 113 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11795 (6th Cir. Ky. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13{Questioned}

893 F.2d 117 p.120

1123 Cited by: . Terwilliger v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 882 F.2d 1033, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 11852, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1063, 132 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2001, 112 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11393 (6th Cir. Mich. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13{Caution}

882 F.2d 1033 p.1036 882 F.2d 1033 p.1038

1124 Cited by: . Higgins v. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Intern. Union, 879 F.2d 864, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 10251 (6th Cir. Tenn. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9 , HN10, HN13

1125 Cited by: . Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 9963, 50 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P39139, 56 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1848, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 976, 131 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3022 (6th Cir. Mich. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13{Caution} Page 148 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

879 F.2d 1326 p.1329 879 F.2d 1326 p.1330 879 F.2d 1326 p.1332 879 F.2d 1326 p.1333

1126 Followed by, Cited by: . Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Province of Ontario v. Detroit, 874 F.2d 332, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5877, 29 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1864, 19 Envtl. L. Rep. 20888 (6th Cir. Mich. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Caution}

Followed by: 874 F.2d 332 p.338 874 F.2d 332 p.339 Cited by: 874 F.2d 332 p.342

1127 Cited by: . Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 858 F.2d 1165, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 13500, 47 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P38329, 47 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1777, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 280, 129 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2754, 110 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10759 (6th Cir. Mich. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13{Warning}

858 F.2d 1165 p.1167

1128 Cited by: . Laczay v. Ross Adhesives, Div. of Conros Corp., 855 F.2d 351, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 11669, 11 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1362, 129 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2243, 109 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10673 (6th Cir. Mich. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7 {Analysis}

855 F.2d 351 p.352

1129 Cited by: . Gabriel v. Chevrolet Motor Div. of General Motors Corp., 848 F.2d 190, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 7699 (6th Cir. Mich. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN10

1130 Followed by, Cited by: . Miller v. Norfolk & W. R. Co., 834 F.2d 556, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15490, 126 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3241, 108 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10267 (6th Cir. Ohio 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution}

Followed by: 834 F.2d 556 p.564 834 F.2d 556 p.565 Cited by: 834 F.2d 556 p.566 Page 149 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

834 F.2d 556 p.567 6TH CIRCUIT --U.S. DISTRICT COURTS

1131 Cited by: . State Treasurer v. Bedwell, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51470 ( E.D. Mich. July 27, 2006)

1132 Cited by: . Wells Fargo Home Mortg. v. Bramlage, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47866 ( E.D. Mich. July 14, 2006)

1133 Cited by: . State Treasurer v. Sprague, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47862 ( E.D. Mich. July 14, 2006)

1134 Cited by: . Baraga Tel. Co. v. Am. Cellular Corp., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46983 (W.D. Mich. July 12, 2006)

1135 Cited by: . Burns v. Prudential Secs., Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46329 (N.D. Ohio July 10, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46329

1136 Cited by: . McGhee v. United States Postal Serv., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46962 ( E.D. Mich. June 29, 2006)

1137 Cited by: . GMC v. Trattner, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41211 ( E.D. Mich. June 21, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN13

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41211

1138 Cited by: . Steadman v. Dalton, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38353 (S.D. Ohio June 8, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38353

1139 Cited by: . Page 150 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Smith v. Corum, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36955 (E.D. Ky. June 2, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36955

1140 Cited by: . Riley v. City of Cleveland, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36127 (N.D. Ohio June 2, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36127

1141 Cited by: . Powers v. NWA, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33131 (W.D. Tenn. May 15, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33131

1142 Cited by: . Stanford v. Caesars Entm't, Inc., 430 F. Supp. 2d 749, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26959 (W.D. Tenn. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6

430 F. Supp. 2d 749 p.753

1143 Cited by: . Rush v. UPS, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19940 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 14, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN7

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19940

1144 Cited by: . Stapelton v. Alcoa, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16506 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 5, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN7

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16506

1145 Cited by: . Steadman v. Dalton, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41976 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 3, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41976

1146 Cited by: . Reid v. MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13489 (E.D. Ky. Mar. 27, 2006) Page 151 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13489

1147 Cited by: . Conn v. Markwest Hydrocarbon, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13461 (E.D. Ky. Mar. 27, 2006)

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13461

1148 Cited by: . B&B Enters., LLC v. City of Leb., 422 F. Supp. 2d 903, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16692 (M.D. Tenn. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13

422 F. Supp. 2d 903 p.905

1149 Cited by: . Rackley v. City of Cincinnati, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12831 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 8, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12831

1150 Cited by: . Home Loan Ctr. v. Thompkins, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17058 ( E.D. Mich. Feb. 14, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN9, HN13{Analysis}

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17058

1151 Cited by: . Queen v. Dobson Power Line Const. Co., 414 F. Supp. 2d 676, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4540 (E.D. Ky. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

414 F. Supp. 2d 676 p.678

1152 Cited by: . Leisure Kraft Pontunes, Inc. v. Moeller Marine Prods., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2019, Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P29136 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 9, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2019

1153 Cited by: . Harvey v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am., 404 F. Supp. 2d 969, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32880, 36 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2662 (E.D. Ky. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5 , HN6, HN9, HN13

404 F. Supp. 2d 969 p.973 Page 152 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1154 Cited by: . Medlen v. Estate of Meyers, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33546, 178 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3134 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 6, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13 {Positive}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33546

1155 Cited by: . Pettis v. Econ. Linen & Towel Serv., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28903 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 10, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN13

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28903

1156 Cited by: . Citizens Bank v. First Trust & Sav. Bank, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26560 (E.D. Ky. Nov. 2, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26560

1157 Cited by: . Brown v. Am. Axle & Mfg., 396 F. Supp. 2d 810, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25915, 96 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1566, 178 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2470, 152 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P61117 ( E.D. Mich. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN7, HN10, HN13 {Cited}

396 F. Supp. 2d 810 p.812

1158 Cited by: . Griev. Adm'r v. Fieger, 409 F. Supp. 2d 858, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25890 ( E.D. Mich. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6{Cited}

409 F. Supp. 2d 858 p.865

1159 Cited by: . Profﬁtt v. Owensboro Med. Health Sys., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22659 (W.D. Ky. Oct. 3, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN13

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22659

1160 Cited by: . Taylor v. Currie, 386 F. Supp. 2d 929, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20257 ( E.D. Mich. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

386 F. Supp. 2d 929 p.933 Page 153 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1161 Cited by: . Borset v. Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panels, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33474 ( E.D. Mich. Sept. 2, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Positive}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33474

1162 Followed by: . Lewis v. Laborers Int'l Union of N. Am., 387 F. Supp. 2d 715, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18952, 178 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2126 (W.D. Ky. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Caution}

387 F. Supp. 2d 715 p.715

1163 Cited by: . Sheridan v. New Vista, L.L.C., 406 F. Supp. 2d 789, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22637, 2005--2U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P50572 (W.D. Mich. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN9, HN13{Positive}

406 F. Supp. 2d 789 p.792

1164 Followed by: . Commonwealth v. China Tobacco Anyang Cigarette Factory, 383 F. Supp. 2d 917, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16606 (E.D. Ky. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5 , HN13{Cited}

383 F. Supp. 2d 917 p.919

1165 Cited by: . Phillips v. S. Graphic Sys., 380 F. Supp. 2d 827, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15951, 178 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2587 (W.D. Ky. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6 , HN13{Cited}

380 F. Supp. 2d 827 p.828

1166 Followed by: . Adamasu v. Gifford, Krass, Groh, Sprinkle, Anderson & Citkowski, P.C., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37769 ( E.D. Mich. July 25, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Analysis}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37769

1167 Cited by: . Confalone v. W. & S. Life Ins. Co., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33551 (N.D. Ohio July 7, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 Page 154 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33551

1168 Cited by: . Adamasu v. Gifford, Krass, Groh, Sprinkle, Anderson & Citkowski, P.C., 409 F. Supp. 2d 788, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13310 ( E.D. Mich. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Warning}

409 F. Supp. 2d 788 p.792

1169 Cited by: . Ohio Civ. Rights Comm'n v. SH--91L.P., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13430 (N.D. Ohio July 5, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13430

1170 Followed by: . Stoyer v. Cmty. Hous. Network, Inc., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13009 (S.D. Ohio June 30, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13009

1171 Cited by: . Gregg v. SBC/Ameritech, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12577 (S.D. Ohio June 24, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN10{Cited}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12577

1172 Cited by: . Belperio v. Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11012 (S.D. Ohio June 7, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11012

1173 Cited by: . Malone v. Addison Ins. Mktg., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9907 (W.D. Ky. May 23, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN13{Analysis}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9907

1174 Cited by: . Morris v. Fid. & Deposit Co. of Md., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9425 (N.D. Ohio May 16, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9425 Page 155 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1175 Cited by: . Hughes v. May Dep't Stores Co., 368 F. Supp. 2d 793, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12908 ( E.D. Mich. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3{Analysis}

368 F. Supp. 2d 793 p.796

1176 Cited by: . Williams v. Cawley, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35598 ( E.D. Mich. Mar. 30, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Caution}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35598

1177 Cited by: . Denzik v. Reg'l Airport Auth., 361 F. Supp. 2d 659, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4665 (W.D. Ky. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN4, HN5{Cited}

361 F. Supp. 2d 659 p.661

1178 Cited by: . West v. Visteon Corp., 367 F. Supp. 2d 1160, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7529 (N.D. Ohio 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

367 F. Supp. 2d 1160 p.1162

1179 Cited by: . Johnson v. Micron Tech., Inc., 354 F. Supp. 2d 736, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1832 ( E.D. Mich. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3, HN4{Caution}

354 F. Supp. 2d 736 p.738

1180 Cited by: . Santos v. Knight--Ridder, Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26795 (W.D. Ky. Dec. 15, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26795

1181 Cited by: . Walker v. City of Collegedale, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27698 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 8, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN9, HN13

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27698 Page 156 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1182 Cited by: . Bhandari v. Unison Behavioral Health Group, Inc., 338 F. Supp. 2d 818, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21575, 34 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1535 (N.D. Ohio 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13{Caution}

338 F. Supp. 2d 818 p.820

1183 Cited by: . Palkow v. CSX Transp., Inc., 331 F. Supp. 2d 594, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16865 (N.D. Ohio 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Warning}

331 F. Supp. 2d 594 p.597

1184 Cited by: . Williams v. Del Monte Fresh Produce Co., 325 F. Supp. 2d 855, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13331, 2005--1Trade Cas. (CCH) P74770 (M.D. Tenn. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN13{Analysis}

325 F. Supp. 2d 855 p.857

1185 Explained by: . Firestone Fin. Corp. v. Syal, 327 F. Supp. 2d 809, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15114 (N.D. Ohio 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

327 F. Supp. 2d 809 p.811

1186 Cited by: . Cent. Laborers' Pension Fund v. Chellgren, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6066, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P92830 (E.D. Ky. Mar. 29, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Positive}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6066

1187 Cited by: . JSJ Corp. v. AT&T Corp., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2349 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 9, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2349

1188 Cited by: . Carlisle Twp. Bd. of Trs. v. Hynolds LLC, 303 F. Supp. 2d 873, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2032 (N.D. Ohio 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13 {Cited}

303 F. Supp. 2d 873 p.875 Page 157 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1189 Followed by: . Mich. Rehab. Clinic, P.C. v. City of Detroit, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1549 ( E.D. Mich. Jan. 5, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN4, HN13 {Analysis}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1549

1190 Cited by: . Tangwall v. Robb, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27128 ( E.D. Mich. Dec. 23, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9{Analysis}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27128

1191 Cited by: . Obeid v. Meridian Auto. Sys., 296 F. Supp. 2d 751, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22854 ( E.D. Mich. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

296 F. Supp. 2d 751 p.752

1192 Cited by: . Adell v. v. Whall (In re Adell's Petition to Authorize the Issuance of Subpoenas for Depositions Relating to a Foreign Proceeding) , 294 F. Supp. 2d 917, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21770 ( E.D. Mich. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6{Cited}

294 F. Supp. 2d 917 p.920

1193 Cited by: . Hudgins Moving & Storage Co. v. Am. Express Co., 292 F. Supp. 2d 991, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21005, 2004--1Trade Cas. (CCH) P74302 (M.D. Tenn. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN4, HN6{Positive}

292 F. Supp. 2d 991 p.995

1194 Cited by: . Levy v. Chandler, 287 F. Supp. 2d 831, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20423 (E.D. Tenn. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5{Analysis}

287 F. Supp. 2d 831 p.833

1195 Cited by: . Levy v. Chandler, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18454, 31 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1941 (E.D. Tenn. Oct. 15, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5{Analysis} Page 158 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18454

1196 Cited by: . Garbaccio v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp., 289 F. Supp. 2d 903, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19957 (N.D. Ohio 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Cited}

289 F. Supp. 2d 903 p.905

1197 Cited by: . Tangwall v. Robb, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27139 ( E.D. Mich. Aug. 27, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9{Positive}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27139

1198 Cited by: . Solomon v. Sprint Spectrum L.P., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26068 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 27, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26068

1199 Cited by: . Hancock v. Bank of Am., 272 F. Supp. 2d 608, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12036 (W.D. Ky. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN13{Positive}

272 F. Supp. 2d 608 p.610

1200 Cited by: . Bourke v. Carnahan, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13399 (S.D. Ohio July 1, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13399

1201 Cited by: . Hohne v. Nextel W. Corp., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26181 (N.D. Ohio June 5, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN4, HN6{Cited}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26181

1202 Cited by: . Gaines v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich., 261 F. Supp. 2d 900, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7545 ( E.D. Mich. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7{Cited}

261 F. Supp. 2d 900 p.902 Page 159 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1203 Cited by: . First Tenn. Bank v. Dale, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26076 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 31, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Warning}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26076

1204 Cited by: . Johnson v. Delphi Corp., 261 F. Supp. 2d 955, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6660 (S.D. Ohio 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13{Cited}

261 F. Supp. 2d 955 p.960 261 F. Supp. 2d 955 p.965

1205 Cited by: . Fillmore v. Brush Wellman, 243 F. Supp. 2d 758, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1888 (N.D. Ohio 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

243 F. Supp. 2d 758 p.760

1206 Cited by: . Weir v. Palmer, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1737 (W.D. Tenn. Jan. 27, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN9

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1737

1207 Cited by: . Egan v. Premier Scales & Sys., 237 F. Supp. 2d 774, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24986, 90 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1199 (W.D. Ky. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Caution}

237 F. Supp. 2d 774 p.775

1208 Cited by: . Benincasa v. Flight Sys. Auto. Group, L.L.C., 242 F. Supp. 2d 529, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25348 (N.D. Ohio 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Analysis}

242 F. Supp. 2d 529 p.535

1209 Cited by: . McSharry v. UNUMProvident Corp., 237 F. Supp. 2d 875, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24519, 29 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2305 (E.D. Tenn. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN13{Caution}

237 F. Supp. 2d 875 p.879 Page 160 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1210 Cited by: . Zerod v. Caprathe, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23619 ( E.D. Mich. Nov. 25, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9{Positive}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23619

1211 Cited by: . Glagola v. Glagola, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25495 ( E.D. Mich. Oct. 31, 2002) {Positive}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25495

1212 Cited by: . Strong v. Print U.S.A., Ltd., 230 F. Supp. 2d 798, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22654, 90 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 909 (N.D. Ohio 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN9, HN13{Positive}

230 F. Supp. 2d 798 p.799

1213 Cited by: . Groesbeck Invs., Inc. v. Smith, 224 F. Supp. 2d 1144, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18913, 90 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6968 ( E.D. Mich. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Positive}

224 F. Supp. 2d 1144 p.1149

1214 Cited by: . Little v. Purdue Pharma, L.P., 227 F. Supp. 2d 838, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20048 (S.D. Ohio 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

227 F. Supp. 2d 838 p.856

1215 Cited by: . Marshall v. Ormet Corp., 228 F. Supp. 2d 811, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21139 (S.D. Ohio 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

228 F. Supp. 2d 811 p.814

1216 Cited by: . Fields v. Louisville Cmty. Dev. Bank, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15481 (W.D. Ky. Aug. 13, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15481 Page 161 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1217 Cited by: . Henderson v. City of Chattanooga, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26339, 31 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2163 (E.D. Tenn. June 11, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9{Cited}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26339

1218 Cited by: . Sylvester v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17989 (N.D. Ohio May 30, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Positive}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17989

1219 Followed by: . Culik v. Univ. of Detroit Mercy, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6573 ( E.D. Mich. Apr. 4, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6573

1220 Cited by: . Gobble v. Hellman, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26833 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 26, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9, HN13{Caution}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26833

1221 Cited by: . Stratoti v. Kroger Co., 184 F. Supp. 2d 718, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5175, 146 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10033 (S.D. Ohio 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7 , HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13{Cited}

184 F. Supp. 2d 718 p.720

1222 Cited by: . Mich. Dep't of Treasury v. Michalec, 181 F. Supp. 2d 731, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1190, 27 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2003 ( E.D. Mich. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6{Positive}

181 F. Supp. 2d 731 p.734 181 F. Supp. 2d 731 p.735

1223 Cited by: . City of Tipp City v. City of Dayton, 204 F.R.D. 388, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23016 (S.D. Ohio 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

204 F.R.D. 388 p.395 Page 162 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1224 Followed by: . Loftis v. UPS, Inc., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25300 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 23, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Positive}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25300

1225 Cited by: . Sweeney v. City of Steubenville, 147 F. Supp. 2d 872, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8109 (S.D. Ohio 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

147 F. Supp. 2d 872 p.875

1226 Cited by: . Went v. Lafarge Corp., 136 F. Supp. 2d 741, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7276 (N.D. Ohio 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Cited}

136 F. Supp. 2d 741 p.742

1227 Cited by: . McIntire v. Ford Motor Co., 142 F. Supp. 2d 911, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5628 (S.D. Ohio 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

142 F. Supp. 2d 911 p.922

1228 Followed by: . Krystyan v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4985 ( E.D. Mich. Jan. 22, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4985

1229 Cited by: . Bryan v. Michigan Funeral Dir. Ass'n, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 580 (W.D. Mich. Jan. 16, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 580

1230 Followed by, Cited by: . Crump v. WorldCom, Inc., 128 F. Supp. 2d 549, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145 (W.D. Tenn. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN12, HN13 {Positive}

Followed by: 128 F. Supp. 2d 549 p.554 Cited by: Page 163 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

128 F. Supp. 2d 549 p.553

1231 Cited by: . Enoch v. Cont'l Gen. Tire, Inc., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21795 (W.D. Ky. Dec. 26, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN8, HN13

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21795

1232 Cited by: . Perry v. Powell County, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22633 (E.D. Ky. Dec. 11, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Cited}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22633

1233 Cited by: . Southeastern Mich. Rooﬁng Contrs. Ass'n, Inc. v. C. Davis Rooﬁng, Inc., 123 F. Supp. 2d 402, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17994, 142 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10856 ( E.D. Mich. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN9, HN10, HN13

123 F. Supp. 2d 402 p.406

1234 Cited by: . Harris v. Michigan Consol. Gas Co., 117 F. Supp. 2d 642, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16344, 25 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1798, 25 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1799 ( E.D. Mich. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

117 F. Supp. 2d 642 p.645

1235 Cited by: . Jones v. Woodmen Accident & Life Co., 112 F. Supp. 2d 676, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13181 (N.D. Ohio 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

112 F. Supp. 2d 676 p.678

1236 Cited by: . Litchﬁeld v. UPS, 136 F. Supp. 2d 756, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20257 (S.D. Ohio 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

136 F. Supp. 2d 756 p.758

1237 Cited by: . Technical Rubber Co. v. Buckeye Egg Farm, L.P., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8602 (S.D. Ohio June 16, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13 {Positive} Page 164 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8602

1238 Cited by: . Burns v. Prudential Sec., 116 F. Supp. 2d 917, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13204 (N.D. Ohio 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7{Caution}

116 F. Supp. 2d 917 p.919

1239 Cited by: . Johnson v. Health Mgmt. Sys. of Am., 96 F. Supp. 2d 711, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9187, 141 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10778 ( E.D. Mich. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN8 , HN9, HN10, HN13{Cited}

96 F. Supp. 2d 711 p.713

1240 Cited by: . Simmons v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4943 ( E.D. Mich. Mar. 13, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4943

1241 Cited by: . Cotter v. DaimlerChrysler, 87 F. Supp. 2d 746, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2518, 164 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2111, 140 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10698 ( E.D. Mich. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10 {Cited}

87 F. Supp. 2d 746 p.752

1242 Cited by: . Nelson v. Associates Fin. Servs. Co., 79 F. Supp. 2d 813, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 676 (W.D. Mich. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

79 F. Supp. 2d 813 p.816

1243 Cited by: . Nelson v. Associates Fin. Servs. Co., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 680 (W.D. Mich. Jan. 25, 2000)

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 680

1244 Cited by: . Richmond v. Daimler--Chrysler, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 583 ( E.D. Mich. Jan. 13, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN13

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 583 Page 165 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1245 Followed by: . Alexander v. UDV N. Am., Inc., 78 F. Supp. 2d 614, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19908, 163 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2606, 140 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10652 ( E.D. Mich. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13{Positive}

78 F. Supp. 2d 614 p.618

1246 Cited by: . McKinney v. City of Grosse Pointe Park, 72 F. Supp. 2d 788, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20998 ( E.D. Mich. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Caution}

72 F. Supp. 2d 788 p.790

1247 Cited by: . Kendrick v. CNA Ins. Cos., 71 F. Supp. 2d 815, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16727 (S.D. Ohio 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN7, HN13{Cited}

71 F. Supp. 2d 815 p.817

1248 Cited by: . McNamara v. Arms Tech., Inc., 71 F. Supp. 2d 720, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16764 ( E.D. Mich. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Positive}

71 F. Supp. 2d 720 p.722

1249 Cited by: . In re Cardizem CD Antitrust Litig., 90 F. Supp. 2d 819, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20698 ( E.D. Mich. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

90 F. Supp. 2d 819 p.836 90 F. Supp. 2d 819 p.837

1250 Cited by: . Reynolds v. Ferguson, 73 F. Supp. 2d 841, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17163, 163 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2813 (W.D. Mich. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Cited}

73 F. Supp. 2d 841 p.844

1251 Followed by: . Archer v. Arms Tech., Inc., 72 F. Supp. 2d 784, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16725 ( E.D. Mich. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

72 F. Supp. 2d 784 p.786 Page 166 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

72 F. Supp. 2d 784 p.787

1252 Cited by: . Rievley v. Blue Cross Blue Shield, 69 F. Supp. 2d 1028, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15566 (E.D. Tenn. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13{Caution}

69 F. Supp. 2d 1028 p.1031 69 F. Supp. 2d 1028 p.1032

1253 Followed by, Cited by: . Shaw v. TCI/TKR of N. Ky., Inc., 67 F. Supp. 2d 712, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20724 (W.D. Ky. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Cited}

Followed by: 67 F. Supp. 2d 712 p.715 Cited by: 67 F. Supp. 2d 712 p.714

1254 Cited by: . Sungold Gaming (U.S.A.) Inc. v. United Nation of Chippewa, Ottawa, and Pottawatomi Indians, Inc., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8891 (W.D. Mich. June 7, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6{Cited}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8891

1255 Cited by: . Neighbors Concerned About Yacht Club Expansion v. Grosse Pointe Yacht Club, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8646 ( E.D. Mich. May 26, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6{Cited}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8646

1256 Cited by: . VanDenBroeck v. ContiMortgage Corp., 53 F. Supp. 2d 965, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9104 (W.D. Mich. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Positive}

53 F. Supp. 2d 965 p.967 53 F. Supp. 2d 965 p.968

1257 Followed by: . Messick v. Toyota Motor Mfg., Inc., 45 F. Supp. 2d 578, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13325, 44 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 229 (E.D. Ky. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN13{Caution}

45 F. Supp. 2d 578 p.580 Page 167 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1258 Cited by: . Greer v. Chrysler Corp., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19379, 161 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2557 ( E.D. Mich. Dec. 3, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN12

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19379 161 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2557 p.2559

1259 Cited by: . Gotlib v. Paul Revere Life Ins. Co., 26 F. Supp. 2d 989, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18483 ( E.D. Mich. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Cited}

26 F. Supp. 2d 989 p.992

1260 Cited by: . Wheeling--Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Mitsui & Co., 26 F. Supp. 2d 1022, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18235 (S.D. Ohio 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Caution}

26 F. Supp. 2d 1022 p.1025

1261 Cited by: . Hanks v. GMC, 26 F. Supp. 2d 977, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18095, 22 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2154, 22 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 72155 ( E.D. Mich. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9{Cited}

26 F. Supp. 2d 977 p.979

1262 Cited by: . Norvell v. 20th Century Heating & Cooling, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15035 ( E.D. Mich. Aug. 11, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN9, HN13

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15035

1263 Cited by: . Portage County Bd. of Comm'rs v. City of Akron, 12 F. Supp. 2d 693, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11781 (N.D. Ohio 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 {Cited}

12 F. Supp. 2d 693 p.697

1264 Followed by: . Reedy v. Philips Elecs., NV, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22982 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 18, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis} Page 168 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22982

1265 Cited by: . C.C. Mid West v. McDougall, 990 F. Supp. 914, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 473, 21 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2590 ( E.D. Mich. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN9, HN13{Positive}

990 F. Supp. 914 p.917

1266 Cited by: . Dobberowsky v. Cryogenic Transp., Inc., 989 F. Supp. 848, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21145, 137 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58536 ( E.D. Mich. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5 , HN6, HN13{Cited}

989 F. Supp. 848 p.850

1267 Cited by: . Wright v. Canteen Servs., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21295 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 19, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN10, HN13

1268 Cited by: . Hoffman v. Stump, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15740 (W.D. Mich. Sept. 22, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13

1269 Cited by: . Switzer v. Hayes Wheels Int'l, 976 F. Supp. 692, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14020 ( E.D. Mich. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Analysis}

976 F. Supp. 692 p.694

1270 Explained by, Cited by: . Tyree v. Burlington N. R.R., 973 F. Supp. 786, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17797 (W.D. Tenn. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9{Cited}

Explained by: 973 F. Supp. 786 p.791 Cited by: 973 F. Supp. 786 p.789 973 F. Supp. 786 p.790

1271 Cited by: . Brune v. Toyota Tech. Ctr. U.S.A., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6908 ( E.D. Mich. Mar. 28, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13 Page 169 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1272 Cited by: . Haber v. Chrysler Corp., 958 F. Supp. 321, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4176, 163 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2600 ( E.D. Mich. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9 {Questioned}

958 F. Supp. 321 p.327

1273 Cited by: . Greater Lansing Ambulatory Surgery Ctr. Co., L.L.C. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 952 F. Supp. 516, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 570, 20 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2717, 154 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3073 ( E.D. Mich. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Cited}

952 F. Supp. 516 p.518

1274 Cited by: . Profﬁtt v. International Paper Co., 154 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2882 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 11, 1996){Positive}

154 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2882 p.2884

1275 Cited by: . Profﬁtt v. International Paper Co., 953 F. Supp. 207, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20234, 154 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2882 (S.D. Ohio 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9 {Positive}

953 F. Supp. 207 p.210

1276 Cited by: . Ouellette v. Christ Hosp., 942 F. Supp. 1160, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16096, 20 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2116 (S.D. Ohio 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6{Positive}

942 F. Supp. 1160 p.1162

1277 Cited by: . Payne v. Saperstein Assocs. Corp., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15535 ( E.D. Mich. Sept. 10, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6

1278 Cited by: . Wright v. Bond--Air, Ltd., 930 F. Supp. 300, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9935 ( E.D. Mich. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Positive}

930 F. Supp. 300 p.302 Page 170 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1279 Cited by: . Agniﬁli v. KFC Corp., 924 F. Supp. 78, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5994 (W.D. Ky. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN13{Positive}

924 F. Supp. 78 p.79 924 F. Supp. 78 p.80

1280 Cited by: . Spedowski v. Lear Seigler Plastic Corp., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5817 (W.D. Mich. Apr. 15, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9

1281 Cited by: . Weatherholt v. Meijer Inc., 922 F. Supp. 1227, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4648, 153 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2132, 132 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11697 ( E.D. Mich. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8 , HN9, HN10, HN13{Positive}

922 F. Supp. 1227 p.1230

1282 Followed by, Cited by: . Baldwin v. Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp., 927 F. Supp. 1046, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7520 (M.D. Tenn. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13 {Caution}

Followed by: 927 F. Supp. 1046 p.1052 Cited by: 927 F. Supp. 1046 p.1050 927 F. Supp. 1046 p.1051

1283 Cited by: . Moll v. International Union, United Auto., Aerospace & Agric. Implement Workers, 911 F. Supp. 269, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 616 ( E.D. Mich. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7 , HN9{Cited}

911 F. Supp. 269 p.271

1284 Followed by, Cited by: . Willett v. General Motors Corp., 904 F. Supp. 612, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17668, 69 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 928, 151 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2409 ( E.D. Mich. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13{Cited}

Followed by: 904 F. Supp. 612 p.613 904 F. Supp. 612 p.615 Cited by: Page 171 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

904 F. Supp. 612 p.614

1285 Cited by: . Mother Waddles Perpetual Mission v. Frazier, 904 F. Supp. 603, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16302, 37 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1184 ( E.D. Mich. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6{Caution}

904 F. Supp. 603 p.606 904 F. Supp. 603 p.608

1286 Cited by: . Berlin Charter Township v. Proud, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16887 ( E.D. Mich. Sept. 13, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13

1287 Cited by: . Hyzer v. Cigna Property Casualty Ins. Co., 884 F. Supp. 1146, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6716 ( E.D. Mich. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN10, HN13 {Caution}

884 F. Supp. 1146 p.1148 884 F. Supp. 1146 p.1149

1288 Cited by: . Sears v. Chrysler Corp., 884 F. Supp. 1125, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5919, 131 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58020 ( E.D. Mich. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 , HN9, HN13{Cited}

884 F. Supp. 1125 p.1128

1289 Cited by: . Mallory v. Electronic Data Sys., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10386 ( E.D. Mich. Apr. 24, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

1290 Cited by: . Harper v. TRW, Inc., 881 F. Supp. 294, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4275 ( E.D. Mich. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7{Caution}

881 F. Supp. 294 p.296 881 F. Supp. 294 p.300

1291 Cited by: . Hamburger v. Desoutter, Inc., 886 F. Supp. 616, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6961 ( E.D. Mich. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited} Page 172 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

886 F. Supp. 616 p.618

1292 Cited by: . Passalacqua Corp. v. Restaurant Management II, 885 F. Supp. 154, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6970 ( E.D. Mich. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN13 {Cited}

885 F. Supp. 154 p.156 885 F. Supp. 154 p.158

1293 Cited by: . Blanchard v. Simpson Plainwell Paper Co., 925 F. Supp. 510, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5830 (W.D. Mich. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Cited}

925 F. Supp. 510 p.518

1294 Cited by: . Hayes v. Kroger, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17654 ( E.D. Mich. Oct. 20, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13

1295 Cited by: . Sheets v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17650, 67 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1051, 149 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2111 ( E.D. Mich. Sept. 30, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7 , HN9, HN10, HN13{Positive}

67 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1051 p.1053 149 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2111 p.2113

1296 Cited by: . Flores v. Midwest Waterblasting Co., 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17704 ( E.D. Mich. Sept. 26, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13{Positive}

1297 Cited by: . Cox v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 869 F. Supp. 501, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19806 ( E.D. Mich. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

869 F. Supp. 501 p.503

1298 Cited by: . Zimmer v. AT&T, 947 F. Supp. 302, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21018, 153 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2725 ( E.D. Mich. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Positive}

947 F. Supp. 302 p.307 Page 173 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1299 Cited by: . Porter v. General Motors Corp., 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13529 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 10, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN13

1300 Cited by: . Jolliffe v. Enterprise Rent--a--Car, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12428, 130 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P57908 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 10, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN7

130 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P57908

1301 Cited by: . Sweeney v. City of Dayton, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21515 (S.D. Ohio July 29, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN6{Cited}

1302 Cited by: . Artie Fields Prods. v. Channel 7, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16814, 32 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1539 ( E.D. Mich. July 19, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 {Analysis}

1303 Cited by: . Artic Fields Prod. Inc. v. Channel 7 of Detroit Inc., 32 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA)1541 ( E.D. Mich. July 19, 1994)

32 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1541 p.1541

1304 Cited by: . Artie Fields Prods. v. Channel 7, 32 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1539 ( E.D. Mich. July 19, 1994){Caution}

32 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1539 p.1541

1305 Cited by: . Watkins v. Shared Hosp. Servs. Corp., 852 F. Supp. 640, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6881, 1 Accom. Disabilities Dec. (CCH) P1--143,3 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 464 (M.D. Tenn. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Positive}

852 F. Supp. 640 p.645

1306 Cited by: . Schell v. Baker Furniture Co., 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10183 (W.D. Mich. May 12, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10 Page 174 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1307 Cited by: . Porter v. Paramount Fabricating, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10184 ( E.D. Mich. Apr. 13, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13{Cited}

1308 Cited by: . Halliday v. NSK Corp., Bearing Div., 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10190 ( E.D.Mich. Apr. 7, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10

1309 Cited by: . Rebel v. Ford New Holland, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19260 ( E.D. Mich. Dec. 14, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7{Warning}

1310 Cited by: . Ray v. General Motors, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19850, 145 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2687 (W.D. Mich. Sept. 30, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8, HN10, HN13 {Positive}

1311 Cited by: . Ray v. GMC, 145 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2687 (W.D. Mich. Sept. 30, 1993){Positive}

145 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2687 p.2693

1312 Cited by: . Kuipers v. Heinz USA, Div. of H.J. Heinz Co., 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13939 (W.D. Mich. Sept. 9, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN10, HN12, HN13 {Analysis}

1313 Cited by: . Jergovich v. CF Motor Freight, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15040 ( E.D. Mich. Aug. 11, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Analysis}

1314 Cited by: . Tolton v. American Biodyne, 854 F. Supp. 505, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20347 (N.D. Ohio 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

854 F. Supp. 505 p.510 Page 175 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1315 Cited by: . In re Air Disaster, 819 F. Supp. 1352, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4613 ( E.D. Mich. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7{Caution}

819 F. Supp. 1352 p.1355 819 F. Supp. 1352 p.1356

1316 Cited by: . Crawford v. TRW, Inc., 815 F. Supp. 1028, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3131, 143 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2034, 126 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10872 ( E.D. Mich. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN7{Caution}

815 F. Supp. 1028 p.1032

1317 Explained by: . McClure v. International Union United Automobile, Aerospace, etc., 124 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10508 (W.D. Mich. July 31, 1992)

124 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10508

1318 Explained by: . Kopczynski v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund, 782 F. Supp. 350, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1299 ( E.D. Mich. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Cited}

782 F. Supp. 350 p.356

1319 Cited by: . In Defense of Animals v. Cleveland Metroparks Zoo, 785 F. Supp. 100, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19745 (N.D. Ohio 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Positive}

785 F. Supp. 100 p.102

1320 Cited by: . Brussow v. Lansing Community College, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19691 (W.D. Mich. Oct. 11, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13

1321 Cited by: . Cady v. Meijer, Inc., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19585, 121 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P56889 ( E.D. Mich. Aug. 1, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13

121 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P56889 Page 176 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1322 Cited by: . McDaniel v. General Motors Corp., 765 F. Supp. 407, 124 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P57218 (W.D. Mich. 1991){Analysis}

124 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P57218

1323 Cited by: . Edwards v. National Post Ofﬁce, etc., Local 304, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20990, 142 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2575 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 30, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13{Positive}

142 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2575 p.2577 142 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2575 p.2578

1324 Cited by: . Gemmell v. Conrail, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7107 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 12, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

1325 Cited by: . Tazelaar v. Integrated Metal Technology, Inc., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5022, 120 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11122 (W.D. Mich. Apr. 12, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7 , HN10{Cited}

120 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11122

1326 Cited by: . Beeching v. Showboat Hotel, Casino, etc., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4165 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 31, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

1327 Cited by: . Kanalos v. Graham, 759 F. Supp. 374, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3687 ( E.D. Mich. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

759 F. Supp. 374 p.375

1328 Cited by: . Tippett v. Old Kent Bank, 134 F.R.D. 159, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1781 (W.D. Mich. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

134 F.R.D. 159 p.160

1329 Cited by: . Page 177 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Commercial Sales Network v. Sadler--Cisar, Inc., 755 F. Supp. 756, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1314 (N.D. Ohio 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Analysis}

755 F. Supp. 756 p.759

1330 Cited by: . Schafer v. Banc One Corp., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18452, 54 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1440 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 20, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6{Cited}

54 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1440 p.1441

1331 Cited by: . Briggs v. General Motors Corp., 754 F. Supp. 107, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17150, 119 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10778 (W.D. Mich. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN13 {Caution}

754 F. Supp. 107 p.109

1332 Followed by, Cited by: . Ackison v. Detroit Edison Co., 751 F. Supp. 1245, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18354 ( E.D. Mich. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

Followed by: 751 F. Supp. 1245 p.1246 Cited by: 751 F. Supp. 1245 p.1247

1333 Followed by: . Roy v. Ford Motor Co., 748 F. Supp. 492, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14112 ( E.D. Mich. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN8, HN10, HN12, HN13 {Cited}

748 F. Supp. 492 p.494 748 F. Supp. 492 p.496

1334 Cited by: . Baker v. General Motors Corp., 745 F. Supp. 1275, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14330, 134 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3226, 118 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10535 (N.D. Ohio 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN8, HN10, HN13

745 F. Supp. 1275 p.1278

1335 Followed by, Cited by: . Page 178 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

McDaniel v. General Motors Corp., 765 F. Supp. 407, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7408, 118 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10690, 124 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P57218 (W.D. Mich. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Caution}

Followed by: 765 F. Supp. 407 p.411 Cited by: 765 F. Supp. 407 p.409 765 F. Supp. 407 p.410

1336 Followed by: . McDaniel v. General Motors Corp., 118 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10690 (W.D. Mich. June 20, 1990)

118 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10690

1337 Cited by: . Wolverine Mut. Ins. Co. v. Rospatch Corp. Employee Ben. Plan, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2996 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 14, 1990)

1338 Cited by: . Shivers v. Saginaw Transit System, 719 F. Supp. 599, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10594, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1691, 133 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2608, 113 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P56128 ( E.D. Mich. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN12{Cited}

719 F. Supp. 599 p.601

1339 Cited by: . Complete Auto Transit v. Howe, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18092 ( E.D. Mich. Sept. 5, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9

1340 Cited by: . Brown v. General Motors Corp., 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17776 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 18, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13

1341 Cited by: . State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Mich. Glass & Glazing Indus. Welfare Fund, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19163 ( E.D. Mich. Jan. 19, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN3, HN4, HN6

1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19163 Page 179 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1342 Cited by: . Bonnell v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17628, 112 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P56076 ( E.D. Mich. Jan. 13, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6

1343 Cited by: . Mangiapane v. Sheet Metal Workers, Local 292, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17731, 112 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11220 ( E.D. Mich. Nov. 30, 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6

1344 Cited by: . Strickland v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17885, 112 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11470 ( E.D. Mich. Oct. 27, 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6 {Cited}

1345 Cited by: . Clemence v. Meijer, Inc., 716 F. Supp. 298, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16624, 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 122, 133 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2071, 111 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11181 (W.D. Mich. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13 {Cited}

716 F. Supp. 298 p.299

1346 Followed by: . Adkins v. General Motors Corp., 713 F. Supp. 1043, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16265, 116 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10223 (S.D. Ohio 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN10 {Warning}

713 F. Supp. 1043 p.1048 713 F. Supp. 1043 p.1049

1347 Cited by: . Phillips v. Ford Motor Co., 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11978, 46 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P38092 ( E.D. Mich. Apr. 22, 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6 {Analysis}

1348 Cited by: . Noyes v. Ford Motor Co., 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15383, 47 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1843 ( E.D. Mich. Feb. 10, 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN10, HN13 {Cited} Page 180 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1349 Cited by: . Grifﬁth v. Columbus Area Chapter of American Red Cross, 678 F. Supp. 182, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 997 (S.D. Ohio 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 {Caution}

678 F. Supp. 182 p.184

1350 Cited by: . Gilbert v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15556 ( E.D. Mich. Dec. 3, 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN10, HN13

1351 Cited by: . Brown v. United Auto., Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local 892 , 682 F. Supp. 901, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13271, 126 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3027, 114 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11972 ( E.D. Mich. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 {Cited}

682 F. Supp. 901 p.903

1352 Cited by: . Wechsler v. General Motors Corp., 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15776 ( E.D. Mich. July 16, 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN8, HN13

1353 Followed by, Cited by: . Hollenbeck v. Burroughs Corp., 664 F. Supp. 280, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6437, 44 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 467 ( E.D. Mich. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN7, HN9, HN13{Caution}

Followed by: 664 F. Supp. 280 p.282 Cited by: 664 F. Supp. 280 p.281 6TH CIRCUIT --U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURTS

1354 Cited by: . In re Federated Dep't Stores, Inc., 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 998 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio May 11, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9, HN13

7TH CIRCUIT --COURT OF APPEALS

1355 Cited by: . Page 181 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Nelson v. Stewart, 422 F.3d 463, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 18583, 45 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 68, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P80355, 36 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1036, 177 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3217, 151 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10531 (7th Cir. Ind. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10{Analysis}

422 F.3d 463 p.466

1356 Cited by: . Disher v. Citigroup Global Mkts., Inc., 419 F.3d 649, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 17334, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P93335 (7th Cir. Ill. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN3, HN4{Warning}

419 F.3d 649 p.653

1357 Cited by: . Tifft v. Commonwealth Edison Co., 366 F.3d 513, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8241, 174 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2938, 149 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10341 (7th Cir. Ill. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13{Positive}

366 F.3d 513 p.516

1358 Followed by: . Hart v. Wal--MartStores, Inc., 360 F.3d 674, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 3892, 32 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1426 (7th Cir. Ill. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN13{Positive}

360 F.3d 674 p.678

1359 Cited by: . Baker v. IBP, Inc., 357 F.3d 685, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 1659, 174 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2230, 149 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P34813 (7th Cir. Ill. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN12{Caution}

357 F.3d 685 p.688

1360 Cited by: . Vorhees v. Naper Aero Club, Inc., 272 F.3d 398, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 24203 (7th Cir. Ill. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Positive}

272 F.3d 398 p.403

1361 Cited by: . Neuma, Inc. v. AMP, Inc., 259 F.3d 864, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 17615, 26 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2289 (7th Cir. Ill. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

259 F.3d 864 p.880 Page 182 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1362 Cited by: . Faehnrich v. Bentz Metal Prods. Co. (In re Bentz Metal Prods. Co.), 253 F.3d 283, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 11847, 37 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 277, 37 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 1088, 167 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2344, 143 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11015 (7th Cir. Ind. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN10{Caution}

253 F.3d 283 p.286

1363 Cited by: . Henderson v. Bolanda, 253 F.3d 928, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 9321, 49 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 624 (7th Cir. Ill. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13 {Analysis}

253 F.3d 928 p.932

1364 Cited by: . Faehnrich v. Bentz Metal Prods. Co. (In re Bentz Metal Prods.), 231 F.3d 1029, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 27775, 165 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2775, 142 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10843 (7th Cir. Ind. 2000){Warning}

231 F.3d 1029 p.1033

1365 Cited by: . Lehmann v. Brown, 230 F.3d 916, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 25687, 25 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1042 (7th Cir. Wis. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN13{Positive}

230 F.3d 916 p.919

1366 Cited by: . Fornalik v. Perryman, 223 F.3d 523, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18995 (7th Cir. Ill. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Positive}

223 F.3d 523 p.531

1367 Cited by: . Kimbro v. Pepsico, Inc., 215 F.3d 723, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 12096, 164 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2449 (7th Cir. Ill. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9, HN13 {Caution}

215 F.3d 723 p.724

1368 Cited by: . Garbie v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 211 F.3d 407, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 8537 (7th Cir. Ill. 2000){Caution} Page 183 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

211 F.3d 407 p.410

1369 Cited by: . Bastien v. AT&T Wireless Servs., 205 F.3d 983, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 3385, 19 Comm. Reg. (P & F) 1185 (7th Cir. Ill. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Questioned}

205 F.3d 983 p.986

1370 Cited by: . In re Bluffton Casting Corp., 186 F.3d 857, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 20188, 34 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 1136, 15 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 786, 162 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2096, 139 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10515 (7th Cir. Ind. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10 {Warning}

186 F.3d 857 p.862

1371 Cited by: . More v. Roadway Express, Inc., 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4214 (7th Cir. Ill. Mar. 11, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9{Analysis}

1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4214

1372 Cited by: . Speciale v. Seybold, 147 F.3d 612, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 13232, 22 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1321 (7th Cir. Ill. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

147 F.3d 612 p.614

1373 Cited by: . United States v. Palumbo Bros., 145 F.3d 850, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 9285, 22 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1591, 158 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2263 (7th Cir. Ill. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Positive}

145 F.3d 850 p.863

1374 Cited by: . In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litig., 123 F.3d 599, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 22267, 1997--2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P71904 (7th Cir. Ill. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN6, HN9, HN13{Warning}

123 F.3d 599 p.611

1375 Cited by: . Page 184 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Kaucky v. Southwest Airlines Co., 109 F.3d 349, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 5301, 79 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1536, 97-- 1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P70072 (7th Cir. Ill. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13{Caution}

109 F.3d 349 p.351

1376 Cited by: . Davis v. Rodriguez, 106 F.3d 206, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 1832 (7th Cir. Ill. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13{Positive}

106 F.3d 206 p.208

1377 Cited by: . Atchley v. Heritage Cable Vision Assocs., 101 F.3d 495, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 30749, 153 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2908, 132 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11711, 3 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 1112 (7th Cir. Ind. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN7 , HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution}

101 F.3d 495 p.498

1378 Cited by: . In re County Collector (Appeal of O'Brien), 96 F.3d 890, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 24306 (7th Cir. Ill. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Positive}

96 F.3d 890 p.895

1379 Cited by: . International College of Surgeons v. City of Chicago, 91 F.3d 981, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 18988 (7th Cir. Ill. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4 {Warning}

91 F.3d 981 p.987

1380 Followed by, Cited by: . Loewen Group Int'l v. Haberichter, 65 F.3d 1417, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 26338, 10 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1723, 150 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2326, 130 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11412 (7th Cir. Ill. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Warning}

Followed by: 65 F.3d 1417 p.1421 65 F.3d 1417 p.1423 Cited by: 65 F.3d 1417 p.1426

1381 Cited by: . Page 185 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Rice v. Panchal, 65 F.3d 637, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25813, 19 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1841 (7th Cir. Ill. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13 {Caution}

65 F.3d 637 p.639 65 F.3d 637 p.640 65 F.3d 637 p.645

1382 Cited by: . Glisson v. United States Forest Serv., 55 F.3d 1325, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 13512, 41 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1283, 25 Envtl. L. Rep. 21246 (7th Cir. Ill. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9{Analysis}

55 F.3d 1325 p.1328

1383 Cited by: . Burns v. Burns, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 2530 (7th Cir. Ill. Feb. 10, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4 {Analysis}

1384 Cited by: . Seinfeld v. Austen, 39 F.3d 761, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30993, 1994 Trade Cas. (CCH) P70778 (7th Cir. Ill. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Warning}

39 F.3d 761 p.763

1385 Cited by: . Fish v. Reliance Elec. Co., 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 11545 (7th Cir. May 18, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN10{Analysis}

1386 Cited by: . Brazinski v. Amoco Petroleum Additives Co., 6 F.3d 1176, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23186, 144 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2153, 126 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10857 (7th Cir. Ill. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN10, HN13{Caution}

6 F.3d 1176 p.1180

1387 Cited by: . Doe v. Allied--Signal,Inc., 985 F.2d 908, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 2025 (7th Cir. Ind. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Questioned}

985 F.2d 908 p.911

1388 Cited by: . Page 186 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Hicks v. Resolution Trust Corp., 970 F.2d 378, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 18172, 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1199, 123 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P57100 (7th Cir. Ill. 1992) {Caution}

123 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P57100

1389 Cited by: . Burda v. M. Ecker Co., 954 F.2d 434, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 650, 21 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 879, 92--1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P50071 (7th Cir. Ill. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13{Caution}

954 F.2d 434 p.438 954 F.2d 434 p.440

1390 Distinguished by: . United States v. Quinones--Sandoval, 943 F.2d 771, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 21994 (7th Cir. Ill. 1991){Positive}

943 F.2d 771 p.771

1391 Distinguished by: . Smith v. Colgate--Palmolive Co., 943 F.2d 764, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 21962, 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 449, 138 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2481, 120 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10982 (7th Cir. Ind. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Caution}

943 F.2d 764 p.769

1392 Distinguished by: . Smith v. Colgate--Palmolive Co., 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 449 (7th Cir. Ind. Sept. 18, 1991){Analysis}

7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 449 p.453 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 449 p.454

1393 Cited by: . Hood v. Foster, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 5592 (7th Cir. Mar. 27, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6{Analysis}

1394 Cited by: . Sluder v. United Mine Workers, etc., 892 F.2d 549, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 19484, 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 187, 133 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2121, 113 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11712 (7th Cir. Ill. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN13{Positive}

892 F.2d 549 p.556 Page 187 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1395 Cited by: . Lister v. Stark, 890 F.2d 941, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 18121, 11 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2362 (7th Cir. Ill. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

890 F.2d 941 p.946

1396 Cited by: . Marzuki v. AT & T Technologies, Inc., 878 F.2d 203, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 8939, 131 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2941, 112 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11264 (7th Cir. Ill. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN10, HN13{Positive}

878 F.2d 203 p.206 878 F.2d 203 p.207

1397 Cited by: . Nelson v. Central Illinois Light Co., 878 F.2d 198, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 8915, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1052, 131 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2935, 113 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P56111 (7th Cir. Ill. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN10, HN13{Positive}

878 F.2d 198 p.200 878 F.2d 198 p.202 878 F.2d 198 p.203

1398 Cited by: . Bettis v. Oscar Mayer Foods Corp., 878 F.2d 192, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 8907, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 858, 131 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2853, 112 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11263 (7th Cir. Ill. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Positive}

878 F.2d 192 p.197

1399 Cited by: . Douglas v. American Information Technologies Corp., 877 F.2d 565, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 9006, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 851, 131 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2846, 112 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11259 (7th Cir. Ill. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN10 {Caution}

877 F.2d 565 p.568 877 F.2d 565 p.569

1400 Cited by: . LaBuhn v. Bulkmatic Transport Co., 865 F.2d 119, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 18027, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 540, 130 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2301, 110 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10884 (7th Cir. Ill. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN10, HN13{Caution}

865 F.2d 119 p.120 Page 188 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1401 Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: . Marozsan v. United States, 852 F.2d 1469, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10702 (7th Cir. Ind. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9, HN13{Caution}

852 F.2d 1469 p.1491

1402 Distinguished by: . Evans v. Einhorn, 855 F.2d 1245, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 12112, 129 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2094, 109 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10659, 28 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1311 (7th Cir. Ill. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10{Caution}

855 F.2d 1245 p.1251

1403 Cited by: . Hickey v. Duffy, 827 F.2d 234, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11301, 8 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 974 (7th Cir. Ill. 1987){Positive}

827 F.2d 234 p.239

1404 Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by: . Lingle v. Norge Div. of Magic Chef, 823 F.2d 1031, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 8080, 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 353, 125 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2855, 106 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P12447 (7th Cir. Ill. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10 , HN12, HN13{Warning}

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: 823 F.2d 1031 p.1053 Cited by: 823 F.2d 1031 p.1037 823 F.2d 1031 p.1044 7TH CIRCUIT --U.S. DISTRICT COURTS

1405 Cited by: . City of Fairview Heights v. Orbitz, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47085 (S.D. Ill. July 12, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47085

1406 Cited by: . Adams v. Ind. Newspapers, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47800 (S.D. Ind. July 7, 2006)

1407 Cited by: . Pullen--Walker v. Roosevelt Univ., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19596 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 3, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13 Page 189 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19596

1408 Cited by: . GH, L.L.C. v. Curtin, 422 F. Supp. 2d 994, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15365, Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P29163 (N.D. Ind. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

422 F. Supp. 2d 994 p.996

1409 Cited by: . Thiel v. Nelson, 422 F. Supp. 2d 1024, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13493 (W.D. Wis. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

422 F. Supp. 2d 1024 p.1028

1410 Cited by: . Forness v. Cross Country Bank, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3423 (S.D. Ill. Jan. 13, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3423

1411 Cited by: . Ray v. Laidlaw Med. Transp., Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1198 (N.D. Ind. Jan. 13, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN4, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1198

1412 Cited by: . Waldock v. M.J. Select Global, Ltd., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38001, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P93624 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 27, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Analysis}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38001

1413 Cited by: . Highland Supply Co. v. Klerk's Flexible Packaging, B.V., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38013 (S.D. Ill. Dec. 21, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3, HN4{Analysis}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38013

1414 Cited by: . Fiore v. First Am. Title Ins. Co., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34348 (S.D. Ill. Dec. 13, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3, HN4{Cited}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34348 Page 190 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1415 Cited by: . Higginbotham v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31701 (N.D. Ind. Dec. 7, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31701

1416 Cited by: . Phillips v. Ford Motor Co., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24486 (S.D. Ill. Oct. 17, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3, HN4{Positive}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24486

1417 Distinguished by: . Kaden v. First Commonwealth Ins. Co., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24147 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 14, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN12 {Analysis}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24147

1418 Cited by: . Komeshak v. Concentra, Inc., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23231 (S.D. Ill. Oct. 7, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3, HN4{Caution}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23231

1419 Cited by: . Lawrence v. Biotronik, Inc., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20911 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 20, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20911

1420 Cited by: . King v. Retailers Nat'l Bank, 388 F. Supp. 2d 913, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20455 (N.D. Ill. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9{Cited}

388 F. Supp. 2d 913 p.915

1421 Cited by: . Holmstrom v. Harad, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16694 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 11, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3{Caution}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16694 Page 191 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1422 Followed by: . Ducham v. Reebie Allied Moving & Storage, Inc., 372 F. Supp. 2d 1076, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11080 (N.D. Ill. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6 {Cited}

372 F. Supp. 2d 1076 p.1078

1423 Cited by: . Gordon v. Buntrock, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 3, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN3{Positive}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57

1424 Cited by: . Lefebvre v. Duff & Phelps Inv. Mgmt. Co., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21704, 34 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1593 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 27, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN3{Cited}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21704

1425 Cited by: . Leto v. RCA Corp., 355 F. Supp. 2d 921, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21614, Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P28893, 32 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2629, 72 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1823 (N.D. Ill. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN13{Analysis}

355 F. Supp. 2d 921 p.923

1426 Cited by: . Leto v. RCA Corp., 341 F. Supp. 2d 1001, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27682 (N.D. Ill. 2004){Analysis}

341 F. Supp. 2d 1001 p.1008

1427 Cited by: . Kresge v. Jackson, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20850 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 14, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3{Cited}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20850

1428 Cited by: . McCoy v. Unicare Life & Health Ins. Co., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20798, 34 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2047 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 14, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN3, HN6, HN7{Cited}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20798 Page 192 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1429 Cited by: . Shales v. Asphalt Maint., Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19394, 176 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2250, 10 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 1130 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 28, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN10, HN13{Cited}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19394

1430 Cited by: . Leto v. RCA Corp., 341 F. Supp. 2d 1001, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19296, 32 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2626, 72 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1819 (N.D. Ill. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Analysis}

341 F. Supp. 2d 1001 p.1005

1431 Cited by: . Murphy v. Reliance Std. Life Ins. Co., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19428, 34 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1925 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 24, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19428

1432 Cited by: . Lawrence v. Biotronik, Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16513, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P17091 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 18, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN5, HN6, HN7 {Analysis}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16513

1433 Cited by: . Ladegaard v. Hard Rock Concrete Cutters, Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16288, 150 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P34880, 9 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 1550 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 17, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN10, HN13{Positive}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16288

1434 Cited by: . SEIU, Local 4 v. EMI Enters., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16063, 175 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2728 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 12, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13 {Cited}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16063

1435 Cited by: . City of New Albany v. New Albany DVD, LLC, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14240 (S.D. Ind. July 22, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution} Page 193 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14240

1436 Cited by: . Paldrmic v. Altria Corporate Servs., 327 F. Supp. 2d 959, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14727 (E.D. Wis. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Caution}

327 F. Supp. 2d 959 p.963

1437 Cited by: . Sadorf v. Valdez, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11076 (N.D. Ill. June 16, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN13

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11076

1438 Cited by: . Great Am. Ins. Co. v. K & R Transp., Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8695 (N.D. Ill. May 14, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3{Analysis}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8695

1439 Cited by: . Dixon v. Borgwarner Diversiﬁed Transmission Prods., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6278 (S.D. Ind. Mar. 29, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Caution}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6278

1440 Cited by: . C.D.A.N.A. v. Culligan Int'l Co., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5102 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 26, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Analysis}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5102

1441 Cited by: . O'Brien v. Encotech Constr., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4696, 9 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 1628 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 22, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13 {Caution}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4696

1442 Cited by: . Richardson v. Cambridge Manor, L.L.C., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3180, 33 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1123 (S.D. Ind. Feb. 18, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN13 {Cited} Page 194 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3180

1443 Cited by: . Vogeler v. Columbia Acorn Trust, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9182 (S.D. Ill. Feb. 12, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN4, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9182

1444 Cited by: . Potter v. Janus Inv. Fund, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9181 (S.D. Ill. Feb. 9, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN4, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9181

1445 Cited by: . Parthasarthy v. T. Rowe Price Int'l Funds, Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29804 (S.D. Ill. Jan. 30, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29804

1446 Cited by: . Kircher v. Putnam Funds Trust, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10327 (S.D. Ill. Jan. 27, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN4, HN6, HN13{Warning}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10327

1447 Cited by: . Franczyk v. Cingular Wireless, L.L.C., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 643 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 20, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Caution}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 643

1448 Cited by: . Gonzalez v. Farmington Foods, Inc., 296 F. Supp. 2d 912, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23047, 9 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 769 (N.D. Ill. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10 , HN13{Positive}

296 F. Supp. 2d 912 p.934

1449 Cited by: . Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Ill. v. Cruz, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20629, 32 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1283 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 14, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4 {Warning} Page 195 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20629

1450 Cited by: . Ting v. Chi. Mercantile Exch., Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15099 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 27, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15099

1451 Cited by: . Rubel v. Pﬁzer Inc., 276 F. Supp. 2d 904, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14315 (N.D. Ill. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

276 F. Supp. 2d 904 p.907

1452 Cited by: . Integra Bank, N.A. v. Greer, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11580 (S.D. Ind. June 26, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN7, HN13{Cited}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11580

1453 Cited by: . Barnes v. Ford Motor Co., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9268 (S.D. Ind. May 30, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN9, HN13{Cited}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9268

1454 Cited by: . Keesling v. Richman, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6756 (S.D. Ind. Apr. 18, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6756

1455 Cited by: . Tires Prods. Liab. Litig. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. (In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.), 256 F. Supp. 2d 884, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6225 (S.D. Ind. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5 , HN6, HN9{Caution}

256 F. Supp. 2d 884 p.899

1456 Cited by: . Lopez v. Smurﬁt--StoneContainer Corp., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2180, 171 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3170, 148 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10208 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 10, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13{Caution} Page 196 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2180

1457 Cited by: . Boone County Utils., LLC v. Boone County Bd. of Comm'Rs, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1351 (S.D. Ind. Jan. 28, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Cited}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1351

1458 Followed by: . Tifft v. Commonwealth Edison, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1131, 171 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3106 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 24, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN10{Positive}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1131

1459 Cited by: . Krygowski v. AT&T Corp., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 895 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 22, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 895

1460 Cited by: . Verotix Sys. v. Follett Library Res., 235 F. Supp. 2d 851, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24328 (N.D. Ill. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN13{Caution}

235 F. Supp. 2d 851 p.852

1461 Cited by: . Flanders Diamond USA, Inc. v. Nat'l Diamond Syndicate, Inc., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23129, 68 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1056 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 27, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23129

1462 Cited by: . Smith v. United Airlines, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19241 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 3, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19241

1463 Cited by: . Coughlin v. Health Care Serv. Corp., 244 F. Supp. 2d 883, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18808, 29 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1411 (N.D. Ill. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN9, HN13{Caution} Page 197 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

244 F. Supp. 2d 883 p.885

1464 Cited by: . Dorazio v. UAL Corp., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18809 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 1, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13{Positive}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18809

1465 Cited by: . Hudson v. ACE Cash Express, Inc., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11226, RICO Bus. Disp. Guide P10285 (S.D. Ind. May 30, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11226

1466 Cited by: . Fournier v. Lufthansa German Airlines, 191 F. Supp. 2d 996, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2137 (N.D. Ill. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

191 F. Supp. 2d 996 p.1002

1467 Cited by: . Wilcher v. The Kroger Co., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2687, 170 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2263 (S.D. Ind. Feb. 6, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8, HN10, HN13 {Cited}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2687

1468 Cited by: . Gilmore v. Southwestern Bell Mobile Sys., 210 F.R.D. 212, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19850 (N.D. Ill. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Positive}

210 F.R.D. 212 p.223

1469 Cited by: . Varco v. Lapsis, 172 F. Supp. 2d 985, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18818, 27 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1150 (N.D. Ill. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Positive}

172 F. Supp. 2d 985 p.988

1470 Cited by: . In re AT&T Fiber Optic Cable Installation Litig., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24290 (S.D. Ind. Nov. 5, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24290 Page 198 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1471 Cited by: . All AT&T Corp Fiber Optic Plaintiffs v. All AT&T Corp Fiber Optic Defendants, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20026 (S.D. Ind. Nov. 5, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Caution}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20026

1472 Cited by: . Ampere Auto. Corp. v. Fullen, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17367 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 17, 2001){Positive}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17367

1473 Cited by: . Gilmore v. Southwestern Bell Mobile Sys., 156 F. Supp. 2d 916, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11679 (N.D. Ill. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13 {Caution}

156 F. Supp. 2d 916 p.919

1474 Cited by: . Snyder--Stulginskisv. United Air Lines, Inc, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11665 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 7, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN9 {Cited}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11665

1475 Cited by: . Doyle v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Ill., 149 F. Supp. 2d 427, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7160, 26 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2114 (N.D. Ill. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN13{Caution}

149 F. Supp. 2d 427 p.430

1476 Cited by: . Sercye--McCollumv. Ravenswood Hosp. Med. Ctr., 140 F. Supp. 2d 944, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8584 (N.D. Ill. 2001){Cited}

140 F. Supp. 2d 944 p.947

1477 Followed by: . Bezy v. Floyd County Plan Comm'n, 199 F.R.D. 308, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2538 (S.D. Ind. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

199 F.R.D. 308 p.311 Page 199 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1478 Followed by: . Bebble v. National Air Trafﬁc Controllers' Ass'n, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1236, 166 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2633 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 7, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1236

1479 Explained by: . Niese v. GE, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5352, 167 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2037, 6 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 1578 (S.D. Ind. Jan. 31, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7 , HN8, HN10{Caution}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5352

1480 Cited by: . Allen v. Citgo Petroleum Corp., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17972 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 7, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN10, HN13{Cited}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17972

1481 Cited by: . Niese v. GE, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16099, 8 Accom. Disabilities Dec. (CCH) P8--132,79 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P40290, 165 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2812, 142 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P34167, 6 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 846 (S.D. Ind. Oct. 26, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN9, HN12{Warning}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16099

1482 Cited by: . Melton v. Cummins Engine Co., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14199 (S.D. Ind. Sept. 20, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14199

1483 Cited by: . Kaiser v. Cigna Corp., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22660 (S.D. Ill. Sept. 13, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22660

1484 Cited by: . Kiest v. Kiest, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13556 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 7, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4{Cited} Page 200 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13556

1485 Cited by: . Fain v. FSC Sec. Corp., 111 F. Supp. 2d 1039, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12716 (N.D. Ind. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

111 F. Supp. 2d 1039 p.1041

1486 Cited by: . Colgren v. County Line Cartage, Inc., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11740 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 11, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13{Analysis}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11740

1487 Cited by: . Duerr v. 3M, 101 F. Supp. 2d 1057, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9015, 141 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10781 (N.D. Ill. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9{Cited}

101 F. Supp. 2d 1057 p.1060

1488 Cited by: . Panayi v. Northern Ind. Pub. Serv. Co., 109 F. Supp. 2d 1012, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12714, 165 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2125 (N.D. Ind. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Cited}

109 F. Supp. 2d 1012 p.1015

1489 Cited by: . Analytical Surveys, Inc. v. Intercare Health Plans, Inc., 101 F. Supp. 2d 727, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7664 (S.D. Ind. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Positive}

101 F. Supp. 2d 727 p.731

1490 Cited by: . Schumann v. CITGO Petroleum Corp., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5800, 140 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10718 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 20, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6 , HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13{Cited}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5800 140 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10718

1491 Cited by: . Page 201 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

City of Gary v. Smith & Wesson Corp., 94 F. Supp. 2d 947, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5077 (N.D. Ind. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Warning}

94 F. Supp. 2d 947 p.948

1492 Cited by: . Hanson v. DrugScan, Inc., 95 F. Supp. 2d 868, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5877, 165 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2317, 141 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58990 (N.D. Ill. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10 , HN13{Cited}

95 F. Supp. 2d 868 p.872

1493 Followed by, Cited by: . Kittle v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 102 F. Supp. 2d 1029, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6570, 165 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2039, 142 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P59135 (S.D. Ind. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6, HN10, HN13{Cited}

Followed by: 102 F. Supp. 2d 1029 p.1033 Cited by: 102 F. Supp. 2d 1029 p.1032

1494 Cited by: . Associates Home Equity Servs. v. Kay, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19926 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 21, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19926

1495 Cited by: . Board of Educ. v. Rainbow/Push Coalition, 75 F. Supp. 2d 916, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18853 (C.D. Ill. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Cited}

75 F. Supp. 2d 916 p.918

1496 Cited by: . Illinois ex rel. Ryan v. Northbrook Sports Club, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18632 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 24, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18632

1497 Cited by: . Gallagher & Henry v. Chicago & Northeast Ill. Dist. Council of Carpenters, 73 F. Supp. 2d 954, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17284, 163 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3020 (N.D. Ill. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN9{Cited}

73 F. Supp. 2d 954 p.956 Page 202 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1498 Cited by: . Tokio Marine & Fire Ins. Co. v. American President Lines, Ltd., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8320 (N.D. Ill. May 21, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 {Analysis}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8320

1499 Cited by: . O'Reilly v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3930 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 2, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Analysis}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3930

1500 Cited by: . Mahon v. Cyganiak Planning, Inc., 41 F. Supp. 2d 910, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 999, 22 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2409 (E.D. Wis. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

41 F. Supp. 2d 910 p.914

1501 Cited by: . Central Laborers Welfare Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc., 85 F. Supp. 2d 875, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19574 (S.D. Ill. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13 {Positive}

85 F. Supp. 2d 875 p.885

1502 Cited by: . Adamczyk v. Lever Bros. Co., 33 F. Supp. 2d 679, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17532, 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2477 (N.D. Ill. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8, HN9, HN10 , HN13{Caution}

33 F. Supp. 2d 679 p.684

1503 Cited by: . Micheaux v. Duraco, Inc., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16203 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 8, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16203

1504 Cited by: . Coleman v. Sterling Castings Corp. (In re Bluffton Castings Corp.), 224 B.R. 85, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13331 (N.D. Ind. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN10{Warning} Page 203 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

224 B.R. 85 p.88

1505 Cited by: . Chirico v. Ceramic Tile Layers Union, Local 67, 13 F. Supp. 2d 798, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12260, 162 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2696 (N.D. Ill. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4 {Positive}

13 F. Supp. 2d 798 p.799

1506 Cited by: . Brown v. Local 701 of the IBEW, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11355 (N.D. Ill. July 17, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Caution}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11355

1507 Cited by: . Gianopolous v. Interstate Brand Corp., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4906 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 1, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN12{Cited}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4906

1508 Cited by: . R.L. Sohol Carpenter Contrs. v. Perinar, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4018 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 25, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Cited}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4018

1509 Cited by: . Stutler v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 998 F. Supp. 968, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4242 (S.D. Ind. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

998 F. Supp. 968 p.969

1510 Cited by: . Vandenbergh v. Swedishamerican Health Sys., 177 F.R.D. 432, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 638 (N.D. Ill. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

177 F.R.D. 432 p.434

1511 Cited by: . Diamond v. United Food & Commer. Workers Union, Local 881, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16795, 157 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2882 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 20, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution} Page 204 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

157 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2882 p.2884

1512 Cited by: . Kluza v. Dominick's Finer Foods, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14848 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 23, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10

1513 Cited by: . Magic v. GE, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13261 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 26, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN9, HN10, HN13{Analysis}

1514 Cited by: . United States v. Palumbo Bros., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12998 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 15, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN12{Warning}

1515 Cited by: . Carroll v. Commonwealth Edison Co., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10962 (N.D. Ill. July 23, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Analysis}

1516 Cited by: . Bielicki v. City of Chicago, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6880 (N.D. Ill. May 5, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8, HN10, HN13{Cited}

1517 Cited by: . Guardian Nat'l Acceptance Corp. v. Swartzlander Motors, 962 F. Supp. 1137, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6277 (N.D. Ind. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13 {Caution}

962 F. Supp. 1137 p.1142

1518 Cited by: . Commonwealth Edison Co. v. IBEW, Local Union No. 15, 961 F. Supp. 1169, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1972 (N.D. Ill. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8 , HN10, HN13{Analysis}

961 F. Supp. 1169 p.1174

1519 Cited by: . Commonwealth Edison Co. v. IBEW, Local Union No. 15, 961 F. Supp. 1154, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19589 (N.D. Ill. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5 , HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution} Page 205 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

961 F. Supp. 1154 p.1160 961 F. Supp. 1154 p.1161

1520 Cited by: . In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litig., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14529 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 1, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

1521 Cited by: . Buckeridge Door Co. v. Chicago & Northeast Ill. Dist. Council of Carpenters, 940 F. Supp. 1287, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14490, 154 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2476 (N.D. Ill. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN10, HN13{Cited}

940 F. Supp. 1287 p.1289

1522 Followed by, Cited by: . Pauley v. Ford Elecs. & Refrigeration Corp., 941 F. Supp. 794, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14696 (S.D. Ind. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6 , HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution}

Followed by: 941 F. Supp. 794 p.803 Cited by: 941 F. Supp. 794 p.798 941 F. Supp. 794 p.800

1523 Cited by: . England v. Thermo Prods., 956 F. Supp. 1446, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21060, 154 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2241 (N.D. Ind. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7 , HN9, HN10, HN13{Cited}

956 F. Supp. 1446 p.1449 956 F. Supp. 1446 p.1450

1524 Cited by: . Castellanos v. U.S. Long Distance Corp., 928 F. Supp. 753, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8483 (N.D. Ill. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN13{Caution}

928 F. Supp. 753 p.755

1525 Cited by: . Ready Transp. v. Best Foam Fabricators, 919 F. Supp. 310, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3018 (N.D. Ill. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Caution}

919 F. Supp. 310 p.312 919 F. Supp. 310 p.315 Page 206 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1526 Cited by: . Ashley v. Archer Daniels Midland Co. (In re Amino Acid Lysine Antitrust Litig.) , 918 F. Supp. 1181, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2402, 1996--1Trade Cas. (CCH) P71431 (N.D. Ill. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13 {Caution}

918 F. Supp. 1181 p.1184

1527 Cited by: . Bristol Oaks, L.P. v. Chapman, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1804 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 15, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

1528 Cited by: . Mein v. Carus Corp., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1538 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 5, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

1529 Cited by: . Sebring Homes Corp. v. T.R. Arnold & Assocs., 927 F. Supp. 1098, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20914 (N.D. Ind. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN4, HN13 {Positive}

927 F. Supp. 1098 p.1101 927 F. Supp. 1098 p.1103

1530 Cited by: . Atchley v. Heritage Cable Vision Assocs., 904 F. Supp. 870, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16458, 150 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2930, 2 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 1684 (N.D. Ind. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution}

904 F. Supp. 870 p.873 904 F. Supp. 870 p.874

1531 Cited by: . Atchley v. Heritage Cable Vision Assocs., 150 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2930, 2 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 1684 (N.D. Ind. Oct. 10, 1995)

150 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2930 p.2932 2 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 1684 p.1686

1532 Cited by: . Royal Components v. LID, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13180, 150 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2946 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 8, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9 , HN10, HN13{Positive} Page 207 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

150 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2946 p.2948

1533 Criticized by, Cited by: . McQuerry v. American Medical Sys., 899 F. Supp. 366, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12028, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P14375 (N.D. Ill. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 , HN7, HN9, HN13{Positive}

Criticized by: 899 F. Supp. 366 p.369 Cited by: 899 F. Supp. 366 p.368 899 F. Supp. 366 p.370 899 F. Supp. 366 p.371

1534 Cited by: . Ramsay v. Steeltech Mfg., 895 F. Supp. 225, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12386, 131 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58027 (E.D. Wis. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7 , HN9{Positive}

895 F. Supp. 225 p.227

1535 Cited by: . Bosaw v. National Treasury Employees Union, 887 F. Supp. 1199, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11269 (S.D. Ind. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Caution}

887 F. Supp. 1199 p.1205

1536 Cited by: . Goldstein v. W.L. Gore & Assocs., 887 F. Supp. 168, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6935 (N.D. Ill. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9 {Positive}

887 F. Supp. 168 p.170 887 F. Supp. 168 p.171

1537 Cited by: . Evans v. Keystone Consol. Indus., 884 F. Supp. 1209, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6348, 154 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2901 (C.D. Ill. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 {Caution}

884 F. Supp. 1209 p.1213

1538 Cited by: . Rice v. Mayﬂower Transit, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5509 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 25, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Analysis} Page 208 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1539 Distinguished by, Cited by: . McCarty v. Reynolds Metals Co., 883 F. Supp. 356, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5107 (S.D. Ind. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Positive}

Distinguished by: 883 F. Supp. 356 p.362 Cited by: 883 F. Supp. 356 p.359 883 F. Supp. 356 p.360 883 F. Supp. 356 p.361

1540 Cited by: . John B. by Helga B. v. Board of Educ., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3651, 9 Am. Disabilities Dec. 1211 (N.D. Ill. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6

1541 Cited by: . Kaminski v. Roadway Express, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2475 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 1, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Cited}

1542 Cited by: . Ventre v. Datronic Rental Corp., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 723 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 17, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

1543 Cited by: . Hammond v. Kunard, 889 F. Supp. 1084, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20627 (C.D. Ill. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN7, HN13{Caution}

889 F. Supp. 1084 p.1089 889 F. Supp. 1084 p.1090

1544 Cited by: . Pratt, Bradford & Tobin, P.C. v. Terminal R.R. Ass'n, 876 F. Supp. 1034, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19676 (S.D. Ill. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13 {Cited}

876 F. Supp. 1034 p.1037

1545 Cited by: . Gorrell v. Hartigan, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16590 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 30, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13 Page 209 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1546 Cited by: . People ex rel. Burris v. Comcast Cable, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12802 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 9, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Cited}

1547 Cited by: . Loewen Group Int'l v. Haberichter, 863 F. Supp. 629, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11881 (N.D. Ill. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13{Warning}

863 F. Supp. 629 p.632 863 F. Supp. 629 p.633

1548 Cited by: . Empress River Casino Corp. v. Local Unions No. 9 & 176, Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7822 (N.D. Ill. June 9, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13{Analysis}

1549 Cited by: . Pratt v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co., 885 F. Supp. 1126, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20662 (S.D. Ill. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN13{Positive}

885 F. Supp. 1126 p.1129

1550 Cited by: . Weiser v. United Food & Commercial Workers Unions, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 499 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 19, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN7, HN13

1551 Cited by: . Nill v. Essex Group, 844 F. Supp. 1313, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2314 (N.D. Ind. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13{Positive}

844 F. Supp. 1313 p.1317 844 F. Supp. 1313 p.1318

1552 Cited by: . State Oil Co. v. Khan, 839 F. Supp. 543, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17344 (N.D. Ill. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN7, HN13{Caution}

839 F. Supp. 543 p.545

1553 Cited by: . Page 210 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Evans v. City of Chicago, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9787, 63 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1079, 145 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2347 (N.D. Ill. July 16, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10 {Cited}

63 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1079 p.1084 145 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2347 p.2352

1554 Among conﬂicting authorities noted in: . Dobiecki v. Chicago Osteopathic Hosps. & Medical Ctrs., 829 F. Supp. 229, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9566 (N.D. Ill. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 , HN7, HN10, HN13{Cited}

1555 Cited by: . Pitchford v. Aladdin Steel, 828 F. Supp. 610, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18320, 129 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P57823 (S.D. Ill. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 , HN7, HN10, HN13{Cited}

828 F. Supp. 610 p.612 828 F. Supp. 610 p.613

1556 Cited by: . Forest County Potawatomi Community v. Doyle, 828 F. Supp. 1401, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9936 (W.D. Wis. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Caution}

828 F. Supp. 1401 p.1411

1557 Cited by: . Donaldson v. Bradley Printing Co., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18084 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 24, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13{Cited}

1558 Cited by: . Hogan v. Transamerica Commercial Finance Corp., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13557 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 4, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13{Cited}

1559 Cited by: . Forest County Potawatomi Community v. Doyle, 803 F. Supp. 1526, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14066 (W.D. Wis. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Caution}

803 F. Supp. 1526 p.1533 Page 211 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1560 Cited by: . Corporate Travel Consultants, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc., 799 F. Supp. 58, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13063, 1992--2Trade Cas. (CCH) P70074 (N.D. Ill. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13{Positive}

799 F. Supp. 58 p.60

1561 Cited by: . Gegenhuber v. Hystopolis Productions, Inc., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10156 (N.D. Ill. July 10, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Cited}

1562 Cited by: . Illinois Psychiatric Hosp. Co. v. Health Care Serv. Corp., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9607 (N.D. Ill. July 8, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

1563 Cited by: . Holder v. New Horizon, Inc., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5717 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 7, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

1564 Followed by: . American Inmate Phone Systems, Inc. v. US Sprint Communications Co., 787 F. Supp. 852, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5452, 70 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 1387 (N.D. Ill. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7{Caution}

787 F. Supp. 852 p.858

1565 Cited by: . Leher v. Consolidated Papers, Inc., 786 F. Supp. 1480, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3448, 58 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P41527, 58 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1145, 140 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2277, 121 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10078 (W.D. Wis. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9{Positive}

786 F. Supp. 1480 p.1483

1566 Cited by: . Medical College of Wisconsin Faculty Physicians & Surgeons v. Pitsch, 776 F. Supp. 437, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15585 (E.D. Wis. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6{Cited}

776 F. Supp. 437 p.439 776 F. Supp. 437 p.440 Page 212 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1567 Cited by: . Commissioner of Indiana Dep't of Environmental Management v. Terre Haute, B. & E. R., Inc., 761 F. Supp. 631, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11702 (S.D. Ind. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN7

761 F. Supp. 631 p.632

1568 Cited by: . Calvert v. Certiﬁed Grocers Midwest, Inc., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 804 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 24, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9

1569 Cited by: . Montgomery v. Franklin, 737 F. Supp. 57, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6488, 117 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10382 (N.D. Ill. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Cited}

737 F. Supp. 57 p.58

1570 Cited by: . Kennedy v. Commercial Carriers, 739 F. Supp. 406, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7241, 118 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10704 (N.D. Ill. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 , HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution}

739 F. Supp. 406 p.408 739 F. Supp. 406 p.410 739 F. Supp. 406 p.411

1571 Cited by: . Cox v. Aurora Fast Freight, Inc., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3528 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 29, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13

1572 Cited by: . Elliott v. Conrail, 732 F. Supp. 954, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3233, 115 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10103 (N.D. Ind. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN13{Cited}

732 F. Supp. 954 p.956

1573 Cited by: . Burda v. M. Ecker Co., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1195, 71A A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 3515, 90--1U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P50176 (N.D. Ill. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Caution}

71A A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 3515 p.3518 Page 213 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1574 Cited by: . Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Health & Welfare Fund v. Borden, Inc., 736 F. Supp. 788, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5297 (N.D. Ill. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13{Cited}

736 F. Supp. 788 p.791

1575 Followed by: . Meyer v. Employers Health Ins. Co., 722 F. Supp. 547, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11222 (E.D. Wis. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13{Positive}

722 F. Supp. 547 p.550

1576 Cited by: . Lockport Well & Pump, Inc. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150 , 708 F. Supp. 178, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2096, 112 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11374 (N.D. Ill. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN10{Cited}

708 F. Supp. 178 p.179

1577 Cited by: . Lowe Excavating Co. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 150 , 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5786 (N.D. Ill. June 10, 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN7, HN12, HN13{Positive}

1578 Cited by: . Local 921, of Chicago & Cent. States Joint Bd., etc. v. Estate of Schmidt, 684 F. Supp. 601, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3570, 111 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11027 (W.D. Wis. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

684 F. Supp. 601 p.604

1579 Cited by: . Fisher v. Hertrich, 680 F. Supp. 1250, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2031, 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1340, 128 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2347, 110 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10810 (N.D. Ill. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

680 F. Supp. 1250 p.1252

1580 Cited by: . Brown v. Keystone Consol. Industries, Inc., 680 F. Supp. 1212, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 968, 46 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 98, 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 26, 127 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2934, 110 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10800 (N.D. Ill. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution} Page 214 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

680 F. Supp. 1212 p.1217

1581 Cited by: . Evans v. Chicago Football Franchise Ltd. Partnership, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9446 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 8, 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Positive}

1582 Cited by: . Brown v. Keystone Consol. Industries, Inc., 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9429 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 6, 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution}

1583 Cited by: . Williams v. Hitachi Zosen Clearing, Inc., 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8654 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 23, 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13{Cited}

1584 Cited by: . Valparaiso v. Iron Workers Local Union #395, 669 F. Supp. 912, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13961 (N.D. Ind. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9 {Caution}

669 F. Supp. 912 p.913 669 F. Supp. 912 p.914 7TH CIRCUIT --U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURTS

1585 Cited by: . Hilbert v. Conseco, Inc. (In re Conseco, Inc.), 2004 Bankr. LEXIS 2370 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Dec. 22, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

2004 Bankr. LEXIS 2370 p.8

1586 Cited by: . Conseco, Inc. v. Adams (In re Conseco, Inc.), 318 B.R. 425, 2004 Bankr. LEXIS 1974, 44 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 20 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Positive}

318 B.R. 425 p.429

1587 Cited by: . Coleman v. Bluffton Castings Corp. (In re Bluffton Castings Corp.), 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 1312 (Bankr. N.D. Ind. Feb. 20, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN10{Analysis} Page 215 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1998 Bankr. LEXIS 1312 8TH CIRCUIT --COURT OF APPEALS

1588 Cited by: . Trs. of the Twin City Bricklayers Fringe Beneﬁt Funds v. Superior Waterprooﬁng, Inc., 450 F.3d 324, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 13933, 179 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2947 (8th Cir. Minn. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7{Analysis}

450 F.3d 324 p.329

1589 Cited by: . Lundeen v. Canadian Pac. Ry. Co., 447 F.3d 606, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 12032 (8th Cir. Minn. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6{Caution}

447 F.3d 606 p.611

1590 Cited by: . Carlson v. Arrowhead Concrete Works, Inc., 445 F.3d 1046, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 9727, 179 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2513, 152 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10653 (8th Cir. Minn. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

445 F.3d 1046 p.1050

1591 Cited by: . Estes v. Fed. Express Corp., 417 F.3d 870, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 16427 (8th Cir. Mo. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Positive}

417 F.3d 870 p.873

1592 Cited by: . Phipps v. FDIC, 417 F.3d 1006, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 15432 (8th Cir. Mo. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

417 F.3d 1006 p.1010

1593 Cited by: . Chapman v. LabOne, 390 F.3d 620, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 24664, 22 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1084, 150 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10417 (8th Cir. Iowa 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN9, HN13{Caution}

390 F.3d 620 p.625

1594 Cited by: . Page 216 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Wells Fargo Bank West, N.A. v. Burns, 100 Fed. Appx. 599, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 11305 (2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Cited}

100 Fed. Appx. 599 p.599

1595 Followed by: . Williams v. George P. Reintjes Co., 361 F.3d 1073, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 5391, 149 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10329 (8th Cir. Mo. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8 , HN9, HN10, HN13{Cited}

361 F.3d 1073 p.1074

1596 Cited by: . Dudek v. Prudential Secs., Inc., 295 F.3d 875, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 14275 (8th Cir. Iowa 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

295 F.3d 875 p.879

1597 Cited by: . Green v. Ameritrade, Inc., 279 F.3d 590, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 1546, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P91679 (8th Cir. Neb. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN13{Caution}

279 F.3d 590 p.595

1598 Cited by: . Lyons v. Philip Morris, Inc., 225 F.3d 909, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 22377, 24 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2781, 2000--02Trade Cas. (CCH) P73017, 2000--2Trade Cas. (CCH) P73017 (8th Cir. Minn. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 {Caution}

225 F.3d 909 p.912

1599 Cited by: . Graham v. Contract Transp., Inc., 220 F.3d 910, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 19188, 164 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3096, 141 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58998 (8th Cir. Iowa 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7{Caution}

220 F.3d 910 p.913

1600 Cited by: . Krispin v. May Dep't Stores Co., 218 F.3d 919, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18192 (8th Cir. Mo. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

218 F.3d 919 p.922 Page 217 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1601 Cited by: . Gore v. TWA, 210 F.3d 944, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 8450, 164 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2065 (8th Cir. Mo. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13 {Caution}

210 F.3d 944 p.948

1602 Cited by: . Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Nixon, 210 F.3d 814, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 7345, 77 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P46355, 52 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1080, 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1080 (8th Cir. Mo. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Warning}

210 F.3d 814 p.816

1603 Cited by: . Clark v. Kellogg Co., 205 F.3d 1079, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 3521, 16 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 79, 140 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58906 (8th Cir. Neb. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN9{Analysis}

205 F.3d 1079 p.1082

1604 Cited by: . Vincent v. Dakota, Minn. & E. R.R. Corp., 200 F.3d 580, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 756, 140 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58907 (8th Cir. S.D. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6{Positive}

200 F.3d 580 p.582

1605 Cited by: . Husmann v. TWA, 169 F.3d 1151, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3587 (8th Cir. Mo. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

169 F.3d 1151 p.1152

1606 Cited by: . Husmann v. TWA, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 388 (8th Cir. Mo. Jan. 14, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Analysis}

1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 388

1607 Cited by: . Missouri ex rel. Nixon v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe, 164 F.3d 1102, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 62, 42 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1127 (8th Cir. Mo. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Caution} Page 218 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

164 F.3d 1102 p.1108

1608 Followed by: . Meyer v. Schnucks Mkts., Inc., 163 F.3d 1048, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 31853, 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2136, 139 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10536 (8th Cir. Mo. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5 {Caution}

163 F.3d 1048 p.1051

1609 Cited by: . Johnson v. AGCO Corp., 159 F.3d 1114, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 26779, 159 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2513 (8th Cir. Mo. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13{Cited}

159 F.3d 1114 p.1116

1610 Cited by: . Schuver v. MidAmerican Energy Co., 154 F.3d 795, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 20286, 159 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2001, 135 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10223 (8th Cir. Iowa 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution}

154 F.3d 795 p.798

1611 Cited by: . Williams v. Ragnone, 147 F.3d 700, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 12605 (8th Cir. S.D. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Caution}

147 F.3d 700 p.702

1612 Cited by: . St. John v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aero. Workers, Local # 1010 , 139 F.3d 1214, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 6467, 157 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2927, 135 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58372 (8th Cir. Iowa 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7 {Positive}

139 F.3d 1214 p.1216

1613 Cited by: . Magee v. Exxon Corp., 135 F.3d 599, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 1804 (8th Cir. Ark. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

135 F.3d 599 p.601

1614 Cited by: . Page 219 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Berger Levee Dist. v. United States, 128 F.3d 679, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 29928 (8th Cir. Mo. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Caution}

128 F.3d 679 p.681

1615 Cited by: . County of St. Charles v. Missouri Family Health Council, 107 F.3d 682, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 3476 (8th Cir. Mo. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Positive}

107 F.3d 682 p.684

1616 Cited by: . Gaming Corp. of Am. v. Dorsey & Whitney, 88 F.3d 536, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 15326 (8th Cir. Minn. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10 , HN13{Caution}

88 F.3d 536 p.542 88 F.3d 536 p.543 88 F.3d 536 p.547

1617 Cited by: . Luecke v. Schnucks Mkts., 85 F.3d 356, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13217, 152 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2389, 132 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58129 (8th Cir. Mo. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN10, HN13{Caution}

85 F.3d 356 p.358

1618 Cited by: . United Paperworkers Int'l Union, Local 274 v. Champion Int'l Corp., 81 F.3d 798, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8479, 152 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2095, 131 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11551 (8th Cir. Minn. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN9{Positive}

81 F.3d 798 p.802

1619 Cited by: . Peters v. Union Pac. R.R., 80 F.3d 257, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 6051 (8th Cir. Mo. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

80 F.3d 257 p.260

1620 Harmonized by, Cited by: . Humphrey v. Sequentia, Inc., 58 F.3d 1238, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 15900, 149 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2732 (8th Cir. Mo. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7 , HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution} Page 220 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Harmonized by: 58 F.3d 1238 p.1247 Cited by: 58 F.3d 1238 p.1242 58 F.3d 1238 p.1244

1621 Cited by: . Maxwell v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 20239 (8th Cir. Ark. Aug. 28, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN10{Analysis}

1622 Cited by: . M. Nahas & Co. v. First Nat'l Bank, 930 F.2d 608, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 5871 (8th Cir. Ark. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13{Caution}

930 F.2d 608 p.611

1623 Cited by: . DeSantiago v. Laborers Int'l Union, Local No. 1140, 914 F.2d 125, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 15841, 135 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2419, 116 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10287 (8th Cir. Iowa 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Caution}

914 F.2d 125 p.127 914 F.2d 125 p.128

1624 Explained by: . Deford v. Soo Line R. Co., 867 F.2d 1080, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 1384, 131 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2625, 110 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10928 (8th Cir. Minn. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Caution}

867 F.2d 1080 p.1084

1625 Followed by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: . Int'l Asso. of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, Dist. Lodge No. 19 v. Soo L. R. Co., 850 F.2d 368, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8598, 128 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2826, 109 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10563 (8th Cir. Minn. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN12{Positive}

Followed by: 850 F.2d 368 p.375 Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: 850 F.2d 368 p.387

1626 Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: . Page 221 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

International Asso. of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, Dist. Lodge No. 19 v. Soo L. R. Co., 833 F.2d 730, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15011, 126 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3061, 127 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2485 (8th Cir. Minn. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10 {Warning}

833 F.2d 730 p.738 8TH CIRCUIT --U.S. DISTRICT COURTS

1627 Cited by: . Jackson v. Walgreen Co., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50697 (E.D. Mo. July 25, 2006)

1628 Cited by: . Van Natta v. Sara Lee Corp., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44606 (N.D. Iowa June 29, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44606

1629 Cited by: . Regions Bank v. Crawford, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41041 (E.D. Mo. June 20, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41041

1630 Cited by: . Osia v. Mid--CenturyIns. Company/Farmers Ins. Group, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34869 (E.D. Mo. May 30, 2006)

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34869

1631 Cited by: . City of Lincoln v. Lincoln Lumber Co., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34287 (D. Neb. May 23, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34287

1632 Cited by: . State ex rel. Nixon v. Mylan Labs., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32570 (E.D. Mo. May 23, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32570

1633 Cited by: . Page 222 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Webb v. Wash. Univ. Sch. of Med., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31693 (E.D. Mo. May 19, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31693

1634 Cited by: . Redinger v. McCorkle, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27873 (W.D. Mo. Apr. 28, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27873

1635 Cited by: . Tucker v. Wal--MartStores, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27477 (E.D. Mo. Apr. 26, 2006)

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27477

1636 Cited by: . Missouri ex rel. Nixon v. Gaddy, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30695 (W.D. Mo. Apr. 24, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30695

1637 Cited by: . Emplr. Trs. of the Graphic Communs. Int'l Union v. Union Trs. of the Graphic Communs. Int'l Union, Local 1--BHealth & Welfare Fund, 428 F. Supp. 2d 997, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20158 (D. Minn. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

428 F. Supp. 2d 997 p.1001

1638 Cited by: . Local 447 of the Int'l Union of Painters & Allied Trades v. Five Seasons Paint & Drywall, Inc., 426 F. Supp. 2d 982, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16163, 179 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2593 (S.D. Iowa 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN10, HN13

426 F. Supp. 2d 982 p.998

1639 Cited by: . CPG Fin. I, L.L.C. v. Shopro, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26228 (W.D. Mo. Mar. 21, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26228

1640 Cited by: . Pagel v. Kmart Corp., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9354 (E.D. Mo. Mar. 9, 2006) Page 223 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9354

1641 Cited by: . Curry v. Aervoe Indus., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11736 (W.D. Ark. Mar. 3, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11736

1642 Followed by: . Glorvigen v. Cirrus Design Corp., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8741, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P17399 (D. Minn. Feb. 16, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8741

1643 Cited by: . City of Beatrice v. Aquila, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20772 (D. Neb. Jan. 25, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20772

1644 Cited by: . Guinn v. U.S. Xpress, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1340 (E.D. Mo. Jan. 5, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1340

1645 Cited by: . Reid v. USF Holland, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86 (E.D. Mo. Jan. 4, 2006) {Caution}

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86

1646 Cited by: . Clark v. Ameritas Inv. Corp., 408 F. Supp. 2d 819, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39441, 36 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2252 (D. Neb. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6{Caution}

408 F. Supp. 2d 819 p.825

1647 Cited by: . Lauder v. Bekins Van Lines Co., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31825 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 7, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31825

1648 Cited by: . Page 224 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Hayes v. Ford Motor Co., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26653 (E.D. Mo. Nov. 4, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26653

1649 Cited by: . Neb. Turk. Growers Coop. Ass'n v. ATS Logistics Servs., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42421 (D. Neb. Oct. 13, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN9, HN13{Warning}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42421

1650 Cited by: . Jeffrey Lake Dev., Inc. v. Cent. Neb. Pub. Power & Irrigation Dist., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30028 (D. Neb. Oct. 11, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13 {Caution}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30028

1651 Cited by: . Sarantino v. Am. Airlines, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43009 (E.D. Mo. Sept. 29, 2005)

1652 Cited by: . Wandel v. Am. Airlines, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43007 (E.D. Mo. Sept. 28, 2005)

1653 Cited by: . Shearer v. Ill. Nat'l Ins., Co., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33421 (E.D. Mo. Sept. 12, 2005)

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33421

1654 Cited by: . Jackson v. City of Grant City, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36632 (W.D. Mo. Aug. 29, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36632

1655 Cited by: . Reaves v. Wal--MartStores, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33489 (E.D. Mo. Aug. 23, 2005)

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33489

1656 Cited by: . Page 225 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Uncommon USA, Inc. v. Wiese, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17594 (D. Minn. Aug. 19, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17594

1657 Cited by: . Qwest Dex, Inc. v. Hearthside Rest., Inc., 376 F. Supp. 2d 931, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14435 (D. Minn. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6 {Cited}

376 F. Supp. 2d 931 p.933

1658 Followed by: . Carlson v. Arrowhead Concrete Works, Inc., 375 F. Supp. 2d 835, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12458, 177 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3016, 151 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10515 (D. Minn. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6{Analysis}

375 F. Supp. 2d 835 p.839

1659 Cited by: . Gaul v. Hughes Pharm. Servs., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42151 (N.D. Iowa June 23, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42151

1660 Cited by: . Valley Tissue Culture, Inc. v. Furuseth, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9099 (D. Minn. May 10, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9099

1661 Cited by: . Sullivan v. City of Dexter, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3916 (S.D. Iowa Mar. 11, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3916

1662 Cited by: . Sackett v. Hansen, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2057 (S.D. Iowa Feb. 10, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2057

1663 Cited by: . Page 226 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Huckshold v. HSSI, L.L.C., 344 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23294 (E.D. Mo. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

344 F. Supp. 2d 1203 p.1205

1664 Cited by: . Lundeen v. Canadian Pac. Ry. Co., 342 F. Supp. 2d 826, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21630 (D. Minn. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN4, HN6, HN7, HN13 {Warning}

342 F. Supp. 2d 826 p.829

1665 Cited by: . In re Wireless Tel. Fed. Cost Recovery Fees Litig., 343 F. Supp. 2d 838, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23077 (W.D. Mo. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4 , HN7, HN13{Analysis}

343 F. Supp. 2d 838 p.845

1666 Cited by: . Robinson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17368, 175 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3305 (D. Minn. Aug. 30, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Cited}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17368

1667 Cited by: . Illig v. Union Elec. Co., 334 F. Supp. 2d 1151, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18007 (E.D. Mo. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Cited}

334 F. Supp. 2d 1151 p.1154

1668 Cited by: . Phillips v. AT&T Wireless, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14544 (S.D. Iowa July 29, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN6, HN9, HN13{Positive}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14544

1669 Cited by: . Howell v. Grant Holding, Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9400 (D. Minn. May 12, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9400

1670 Cited by: . Page 227 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Adams v. Bank of Am., N.A., 317 F. Supp. 2d 935, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8033 (S.D. Iowa 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

317 F. Supp. 2d 935 p.940

1671 Cited by: . Arnold v. First Greensboro Home Equity, Inc., 327 F. Supp. 2d 1022, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15020 (E.D. Mo. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9 , HN13{Cited}

327 F. Supp. 2d 1022 p.1025

1672 Cited by: . Brady v. Hallmark Dev. Co., L.C., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4649 (S.D. Iowa Mar. 19, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4649

1673 Cited by: . Estes Card Shops, Inc. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3819 (D. Minn. Mar. 11, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3819

1674 Followed by: . Allende v. Soo Line R.R. Co., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26918 (D. Minn. Jan. 29, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13{Questioned}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26918

1675 Cited by: . McNerny v. Neb. Pub. Power Dist., 309 F. Supp. 2d 1109, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4642 (D. Neb. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

309 F. Supp. 2d 1109 p.1116

1676 Cited by: . Watson v. Philip Morris Cos., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24512 (E.D. Ark. Dec. 12, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13{Caution}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24512

1677 Cited by: . Page 228 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Pickens v. Gardner, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21828 (S.D. Iowa Dec. 3, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21828

1678 Cited by: . Thompson v. United Transp. Union, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21717, 173 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3083 (N.D. Iowa Dec. 3, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Cited}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21717

1679 Cited by: . Whitney v. Alltel Communs., Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26066 (W.D. Mo. Oct. 16, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN13{Cited}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26066

1680 Cited by: . Phipps v. Guar. Nat'l Bank of Tallahassee, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16984 (W.D. Mo. Sept. 17, 2003){Cited}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16984

1681 Cited by: . Moriconi v. AT&T Wireless PCS, LLC, 280 F. Supp. 2d 867, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15792 (E.D. Ark. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

280 F. Supp. 2d 867 p.871

1682 Cited by: . South Dakota v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Ry., 2003 DSD 12, 280 F. Supp. 2d 919, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14791 (D.S.D. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5 , HN6{Caution}

280 F. Supp. 2d 919 p.925

1683 Cited by: . Berreth v. Keystone Elec. Mfg. Co., 269 F. Supp. 2d 1084, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11280, 172 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3303 (S.D. Iowa 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 {Cited}

269 F. Supp. 2d 1084 p.1086

1684 Cited by: . Page 229 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Boyles v. Metso Minerals Indus., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3632, 30 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1988 (N.D. Iowa Mar. 5, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Cited}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3632

1685 Cited by: . Moline Mach., Ltd. v. Pillsbury Co., 259 F. Supp. 2d 892, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7358 (D. Minn. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

259 F. Supp. 2d 892 p.896

1686 Cited by: . Sothmann v. Quad Cities Surgical Assocs., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1736, 30 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1159, 8 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 897 (S.D. Iowa Feb. 5, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Cited}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1736

1687 Cited by: . State ex rel. Nixon v. Nextel West Corp., 248 F. Supp. 2d 885, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3612 (E.D. Mo. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Positive}

248 F. Supp. 2d 885 p.888 248 F. Supp. 2d 885 p.889

1688 Cited by: . Bullinger v. Trebas, 245 F. Supp. 2d 1060, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1581 (D.N.D. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

245 F. Supp. 2d 1060 p.1065

1689 Cited by: . Junker v. Amana Co., L.P., 240 F. Supp. 2d 894, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 604, 148 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P34686 (N.D. Iowa 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN9 , HN10{Cited}

240 F. Supp. 2d 894 p.899

1690 Cited by: . Hipke v. Kilcoin, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26704 (D. Neb. Nov. 19, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Analysis}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26704 Page 230 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1691 Cited by: . Allison v. Wellmark, Inc., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24168 (N.D. Iowa Oct. 15, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24168

1692 Followed by, Cited by: . Howell v. Lab One, Inc., 225 F. Supp. 2d 1168, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21053 (D. Neb. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Questioned}

Followed by: 225 F. Supp. 2d 1168 p.1173 Cited by: 225 F. Supp. 2d 1168 p.1172

1693 Cited by: . City of Univ. City v. AT&T Wireless Servs., 229 F. Supp. 2d 927, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21091 (E.D. Mo. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

229 F. Supp. 2d 927 p.929

1694 Cited by: . Agre v. Rain & Hail LLC, 196 F. Supp. 2d 905, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6903, 187 A.L.R. Fed. 529, 187 A.L.R.5th 529 (D. Minn. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN7, HN13{Caution}

196 F. Supp. 2d 905 p.910

1695 Cited by: . Metro Ass'n of Plumbing--Heating--CoolingContrs. v. Minn. Mech. Contrs. Ass'n , 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4753 (D. Minn. Mar. 18, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6, HN7

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4753

1696 Cited by: . Estate of Haag v. Hartford Life Ins. & Accident Ins. Co., 188 F. Supp. 2d 1135, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15126 (D. Minn. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Positive}

188 F. Supp. 2d 1135 p.1137

1697 Cited by: . Tanous v. United Behavioral Health, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23260 (D. Neb. Sept. 17, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution} Page 231 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23260

1698 Cited by: . Metrobank, N.A. v. Foster, 178 F. Supp. 2d 987, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21169 (S.D. Iowa 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

178 F. Supp. 2d 987 p.993

1699 Cited by: . Beaver v. Earthgrains Baking Cos., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12618 (N.D. Iowa Aug. 21, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Caution}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12618

1700 Followed by: . Reimers v. Farm Credit Servs. AgCountry, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8388 (D.N.D. June 22, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8388

1701 Cited by: . Tabor v. Willey, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10445 (N.D. Iowa May 3, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10445

1702 Cited by: . Duckson, Carlson, Bassinger, LLC v. Lake Bank, N.A., 139 F. Supp. 2d 1117, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6156 (D. Minn. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13 {Cited}

139 F. Supp. 2d 1117 p.1118

1703 Cited by: . Stewart v. Pershing Health Sys., 182 F. Supp. 2d 856, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3148, 26 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1379 (E.D. Mo. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Cited}

182 F. Supp. 2d 856 p.859

1704 Cited by: . Minnesota v. Worldcom, Inc., 125 F. Supp. 2d 365, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20218 (D. Minn. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Positive}

125 F. Supp. 2d 365 p.369 Page 232 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1705 Cited by: . Green v. Ameritrade, Inc., 120 F. Supp. 2d 795, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16860, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P91267 (D. Neb. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN6 {Caution}

120 F. Supp. 2d 795 p.799

1706 Followed by: . American Academy of Estate Planning Attys., Inc. v. Goodwin, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16129 (D. Neb. Oct. 30, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN13{Analysis}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16129

1707 Cited by: . Cedar Rapids Cellular Tel., L.P. v. Miller, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22624 (N.D. Iowa Sept. 15, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Positive}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22624

1708 Cited by: . American Acad. of Estate Planning Attys. v. Goodwin, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20401 (D. Neb. Sept. 7, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20401

1709 Cited by: . Iowa v. United States Cellular Corp., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21656 (S.D. Iowa Aug. 7, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21656

1710 Cited by: . Blaylock v. Hynes, 104 F. Supp. 2d 1184, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8904, 25 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1567 (D. Minn. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN13{Positive}

104 F. Supp. 2d 1184 p.1187

1711 Cited by: . Shepard v. Courtoise, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20647, 163 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2638 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 3, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20647 163 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2638 p.2639 Page 233 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1712 Cited by: . Harris v. Deaconess Health Servs. Corp., 61 F. Supp. 2d 889, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12813 (E.D. Mo. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

61 F. Supp. 2d 889 p.892 61 F. Supp. 2d 889 p.893

1713 Cited by: . Al--CastMold & Pattern, Inc. v. Perception, Inc., 52 F. Supp. 2d 1081, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9628 (D. Minn. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

52 F. Supp. 2d 1081 p.1083

1714 Cited by: . Matheis v. May Dep't Stores Co., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21917 (E.D. Mo. May 21, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Warning}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21917

1715 Cited by: . Moubry v. Kreb, 58 F. Supp. 2d 1041, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11719 (D. Minn. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN13{Positive}

58 F. Supp. 2d 1041 p.1044

1716 Cited by: . Aetna/US Healthcare v. Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12952 (D. Minn. Mar. 24, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5{Caution}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12952

1717 Cited by: . Gramc v. Millar Elevator Company/Schindler Enters., 3 F. Supp. 2d 1082, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6920 (E.D. Mo. 1998){Positive}

3 F. Supp. 2d 1082 p.1083

1718 Cited by: . Stephens v. Cowles Media Co., 995 F. Supp. 974, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22045 (D. Minn. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN13{Analysis}

1719 Cited by: . Page 234 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Stephens v. Cowles Media Co., 995 F. Supp. 974, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10338 (D. Minn. 1998){Analysis}

995 F. Supp. 974 p.977

1720 Cited by: . Missouri ex rel. Nixon v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14980 (W.D. Mo. Sept. 29, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Warning}

1721 Cited by: . North Cent. F.S. v. Brown, 951 F. Supp. 1383, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19836, Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) P27031 (N.D. Iowa 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6, HN13{Caution}

951 F. Supp. 1383 p.1393

1722 Cited by: . Farmers Coop. Elevator v. Abels, 950 F. Supp. 931, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18605 (N.D. Iowa 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

950 F. Supp. 931 p.935

1723 Cited by: . Hanson v. Blue Cross Blue Shield, 953 F. Supp. 270, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20277 (N.D. Iowa 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

953 F. Supp. 270 p.273

1724 Cited by: . Woods v. Unigroup, Inc., 945 F. Supp. 1255, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17220 (E.D. Mo. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

945 F. Supp. 1255 p.1255

1725 Cited by: . Farmers Co--op.Elevator v. Doden, 946 F. Supp. 718, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16343 (N.D. Iowa 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Positive}

946 F. Supp. 718 p.727 946 F. Supp. 718 p.732

1726 Cited by: . Calloway v. Union Pac. R.R., 929 F. Supp. 1280, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12693 (E.D. Mo. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution} Page 235 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

929 F. Supp. 1280 p.1282

1727 Cited by: . Blair v. Source One Mortg. Servs. Corp., 925 F. Supp. 617, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6281 (D. Minn. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13{Positive}

925 F. Supp. 617 p.620

1728 Cited by: . Neal v. Wilson, 920 F. Supp. 976, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4742 (E.D. Ark. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Caution}

920 F. Supp. 976 p.984

1729 Cited by: . Duffel v. Union Pac. R.R., 937 F. Supp. 842, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21214 (E.D. Mo. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

937 F. Supp. 842 p.844

1730 Cited by: . Prescott v. Little Six, Inc., 897 F. Supp. 1217, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17735 (D. Minn. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

897 F. Supp. 1217 p.1223

1731 Cited by: . Iowa Comprehensive Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Fund Bd. 990C80656 v. Amoco Oil Co., 883 F. Supp. 403, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6098 (N.D. Iowa 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

883 F. Supp. 403 p.408

1732 Cited by: . Owen v. Crop Hail Mgmt., 841 F. Supp. 297, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 463 (W.D. Mo. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN10, HN13{Caution}

841 F. Supp. 297 p.298

1733 Cited by: . United States ex rel. God's Helping Hands v. Alexander, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15925 (D. Minn. Oct. 15, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4 Page 236 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1734 Cited by: . Bennett v. Hallmark Cards, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11689, 1 Accom. Disabilities Dec. (CCH) P1--149,2 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1133, 2 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1137, 64 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P42936 (W.D. Mo. Aug. 17, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Cited}

1 Accom. Disabilities Dec. (CCH) P1--149 2 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1137 p.1138 64 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P42936

1735 Cited by: . Hrabko v. Chemsico, Inc., 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11920 (E.D. Mo. July 19, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

1736 Cited by: . Mousel v. Knutson Mortgage Corp., 823 F. Supp. 658, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8252 (D. Minn. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Cited}

823 F. Supp. 658 p.662

1737 Cited by: . Rosen v. Transx, Ltd., 816 F. Supp. 1364, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3954, 8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 890, 143 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2142, 126 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10868 (D. Minn. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN7, HN13{Caution}

816 F. Supp. 1364 p.1368 816 F. Supp. 1364 p.1369

1738 Cited by: . Hill v. Chemical Bank, 799 F. Supp. 948, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11821 (D. Minn. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

799 F. Supp. 948 p.950

1739 Cited by: . Nelson v. Citibank N.A., 794 F. Supp. 312, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7848 (D. Minn. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN13{Caution}

794 F. Supp. 312 p.314

1740 Cited by: . South Dakota State Cement Plant Com. v. Wausau Underwriters Ins. Co., 778 F. Supp. 1515, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19992 (D.S.D. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Analysis} Page 237 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

778 F. Supp. 1515 p.1516

1741 Cited by: . Coalition for Safe Transit, Inc. v. Bi--StateDev. Agency, 778 F. Supp. 464, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17182 (E.D. Mo. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 , HN9, HN13{Analysis}

778 F. Supp. 464 p.466

1742 Followed by: . Norwood v. Slammons, 788 F. Supp. 1020, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20574 (W.D. Ark. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Caution}

788 F. Supp. 1020 p.1025

1743 Explained by: . Amrhein v. Quaker Oats Co., 752 F. Supp. 894, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17354 (E.D. Mo. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN9{Positive}

752 F. Supp. 894 p.895

1744 Cited by: . Stephan v. Arkansas, 747 F. Supp. 1327, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13835 (E.D. Ark. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

747 F. Supp. 1327 p.1328

1745 Cited by: . M. Nahas Co. v. First Nat'l Bank, 739 F. Supp. 1338, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7623 (W.D. Ark. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

739 F. Supp. 1338 p.1339

1746 Cited by: . Wieland v. Savetz, 734 F. Supp. 409, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3729 (E.D. Mo. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Positive}

734 F. Supp. 409 p.410

1747 Cited by: . In re Trust Created by Hill, 728 F. Supp. 564, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 807 (D. Minn. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Positive}

728 F. Supp. 564 p.567 Page 238 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1748 Cited by: . Brown v. Holiday Stationstores, Inc., 115 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10012 (D. Minn. Dec. 13, 1989)

115 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10012

1749 Explained by: . Brown v. Holiday Stationstores, Inc., 723 F. Supp. 396, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12481, 2 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 755, 52 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P39557 (D. Minn. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN13{Cited}

723 F. Supp. 396 p.398 723 F. Supp. 396 p.403

1750 Cited by: . Draper v. Castle Home Sales, Inc., 711 F. Supp. 1501, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5368 (E.D. Ark. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Positive}

1751 Cited by: . Detillier v. Kansas City Power & Light Co., 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2413 (W.D. Mo. Mar. 2, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6

9TH CIRCUIT --COURT OF APPEALS

1752 Cited by: . Miles v. Okun (In re Miles), 430 F.3d 1083, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 27085, 45 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 202, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P80418 (9th Cir. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN9{Cited}

430 F.3d 1083 p.1088

1753 Cited by: . Codda v. Codda, 150 Fed. Appx. 614, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 19971 (2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4{Cited}

150 Fed. Appx. 614 p.615

1754 Cited by: . Valles v. Ivy Hill Corp., 410 F.3d 1071, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 10408, 177 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2475, 151 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P60009, 10 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 1088 (9th Cir. Cal. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

410 F.3d 1071 p.1075 Page 239 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1755 Cited by: . Opera Plaza Residential Parcel Homeowners Ass'n v. Hoang, 376 F.3d 831, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 14238 (9th Cir. Cal. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Positive}

376 F.3d 831 p.838

1756 Cited by: . Calif. ex rel. Lockyer v. Dynegy, Inc., 375 F.3d 831, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 13813 (9th Cir. Cal. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Caution}

375 F.3d 831 p.838

1757 Cited by: . Cal. ex rel. Lockyer v. Dynegy, Inc., 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 22531 (9th Cir. Cal. July 6, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Analysis}

2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 22531

1758 Cited by: . Schrader v. Noll Mfg. Co., 91 Fed. Appx. 553, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 3745 (2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3, HN6, HN9{Cited}

91 Fed. Appx. 553 p.555

1759 Cited by: . Harris v. Verizon Communs., Inc., 84 Fed. Appx. 958, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 26502 (2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5

84 Fed. Appx. 958 p.959

1760 Cited by: . Hoirup v. Alaska Airlines, Inc., 77 Fed. Appx. 408, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 20141 (2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8

77 Fed. Appx. 408 p.409

1761 Cited by: . Ansley v. Ameriquest Mortg. Co., 340 F.3d 858, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 17043, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Service 7493, 2003 D.A.R. 9410 (9th Cir. Cal. 2003) {Positive}

340 F.3d 858 p.861 Page 240 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1762 Cited by: . Lopez v. FOX TV Animation, Inc., 76 Fed. Appx. 769, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 16387 (2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9

76 Fed. Appx. 769 p.771

1763 Cited by: . Fitzgerald v. Celergy Networks, Inc., 67 Fed. Appx. 390, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 8626 (2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

67 Fed. Appx. 390 p.391

1764 Cited by: . United States v. Figueroa--Diaz, 61 Fed. Appx. 448, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 7340 (2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN4{Cited}

61 Fed. Appx. 448 p.449

1765 Cited by: . Gradilla v. Ruskin Mfg., 320 F.3d 951, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2733, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Service 1372, 2003 D.A.R. 1789, 83 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P41335, 147 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P34659, 8 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 813 (9th Cir. Cal. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN9, HN10, HN13{Warning}

320 F.3d 951 p.959

1766 Cited by: . Dahl v. Rosenfeld, 316 F.3d 1074, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 1005, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Service 702, 2003 D.A.R. 881, 171 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2841, 147 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10170 (9th Cir. Cal. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN13{Cited}

316 F.3d 1074 p.1077

1767 Cited by: . Abada v. Charles Schwab & Co., 300 F.3d 1112, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 17180, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Service 7616, 2002 D.A.R. 9585, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P91959 (9th Cir. Cal. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN13 {Caution}

300 F.3d 1112 p.1118

1768 Cited by: . King County v. Rasmussen, 299 F.3d 1077, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 16044, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Service 7242, 2002 D.A.R. 9108 (9th Cir. Wash. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN13{Positive} Page 241 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

299 F.3d 1077 p.1082

1769 Cited by: . Whigham v. Arizona, 43 Fed. Appx. 111, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 16090 (2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

43 Fed. Appx. 111 p.111

1770 Followed by, Cited by: . Hoﬂer v. Aetna US Healthcare of Cal., Inc., 296 F.3d 764, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 13827, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Service 6127, 2002 D.A.R. 7685 (9th Cir. Cal. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN13{Warning}

Followed by: 296 F.3d 764 p.768 Cited by: 296 F.3d 764 p.767

1771 Cited by: . Wayne v. DHL Worldwide Express, 294 F.3d 1179, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 12716, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Service 5810, 2002 D.A.R. 7433 (9th Cir. Cal. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

294 F.3d 1179 p.1183

1772 Cited by: . Bender v. Fred Meyer Stores, Inc., 36 Fed. Appx. 920, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 10326 (2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13

36 Fed. Appx. 920 p.921

1773 Cited by: . Lim v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 36 Fed. Appx. 267, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 9634 (2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Cited}

36 Fed. Appx. 267 p.270

1774 Cited by: . Patenaude v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc'y of the United States, 290 F.3d 1020, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 9124, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4119, 2002 D.A.R. 5239, 28 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1578, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P91909 (9th Cir. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6{Positive}

290 F.3d 1020 p.1023 Page 242 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1775 Cited by: . Republican Party of Guam v. Gutierrez, 277 F.3d 1086, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 604, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Service 389, 2002 D.A.R. 513 (9th Cir. Guam 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN9{Caution}

277 F.3d 1086 p.1089

1776 Cited by: . Broce v. ARCO Pipe Line Co., 28 Fed. Appx. 653, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 152 (2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

28 Fed. Appx. 653 p.654

1777 Followed by: . Sangster v. Sverdrup Civ., Inc., 24 Fed. Appx. 765, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 26635 (2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN1

24 Fed. Appx. 765 p.767

1778 Cited by: . Sprewell v. Golden State Warriors, 266 F.3d 979, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 20434, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Service 8123, 2001 D.A.R. 10021, 86 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1121, 87 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1844, 168 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2225, 144 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11115 (9th Cir. Cal. 2001){Caution}

266 F.3d 979 p.990

1779 Cited by: . Guinan v. Dean Foods of Cal., Inc., 16 Fed. Appx. 627, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 13943 (2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN10

16 Fed. Appx. 627 p.629

1780 Cited by: . Cramer v. Consol. Freightways, Inc., 255 F.3d 683, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19157, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Service 9199, 2001 D.A.R. 9199, 145 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P59475 (9th Cir. Cal. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Caution}

255 F.3d 683 p.689

1781 Cited by: . Cramer v. Consol. Freightways, Inc., 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 13385, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4945, 2001 D.A.R. 6107, 167 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2353, 143 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11025 (9th Cir. Cal. June 15, 2001){Caution} Page 243 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 13385

1782 Cited by: . Gritchen v. Collier, 254 F.3d 807, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 12869, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4855, 2001 D.A.R. 5955 (9th Cir. Cal. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13 {Caution}

254 F.3d 807 p.812

1783 Cited by: . Larranaga v. Northwest Defenders Ass'n, 4 Fed. Appx. 391, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2605 (2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN10, HN13{Analysis}

4 Fed. Appx. 391 p.393

1784 Distinguished by, Cited by: . Aguilera v. Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp., 223 F.3d 1010, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 22620, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Service 7485, 2000 D.A.R. 9949, 165 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2203, 141 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10792 (9th Cir. Cal. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9 , HN10, HN13{Caution}

Distinguished by: 223 F.3d 1010 p.1015 Cited by: 223 F.3d 1010 p.1014

1785 Cited by: . Firestone v. S. Cal. Gas Co., 219 F.3d 1063, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 17257, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Service 5987, 2000 D.A.R. 7941, 164 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2897, 141 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10764, 6 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 371 (9th Cir. Cal. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13{Caution}

219 F.3d 1063 p.1065

1786 Cited by: . ARCO Envtl. Remediation, L.L.C. v. Department of Health & Envtl. Quality, 213 F.3d 1108, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 11453, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4063, 2000 D.A.R. 5455, 51 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1146, 30 Envtl. L. Rep. 20574 (9th Cir. Mont. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

213 F.3d 1108 p.1113

1787 Cited by: . Page 244 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Cramer v. Consol. Freightways, Inc., 209 F.3d 1122, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 7759, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3184, 2000 D.A.R. 4327, 16 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 321, 164 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2129 (9th Cir. Cal. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10 {Caution}

209 F.3d 1122 p.1128

1788 Cited by: . Vers v. Holmes, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 8258 (9th Cir. Cal. Apr. 24, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Analysis}

2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 8258

1789 Cited by: . Balcorta v. Twentieth Century--Fox Film Corp., 208 F.3d 1102, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6229, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Service 2673, 2000 D.A.R. 3623, 164 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2071, 5 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 1835 (9th Cir. Cal. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Caution}

208 F.3d 1102 p.1106

1790 Cited by: . Rutledge v. Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson, 201 F.3d 1212, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 307, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Service 310, 2000 D.A.R. 437, 24 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1149 (9th Cir. Cal. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Caution}

201 F.3d 1212 p.1216

1791 Cited by: . Audette v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, Local 24 , 195 F.3d 1107, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 28103, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Service 8750, 99 D.A.R. 11199, 2000 A.M.C. 912, 162 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2705, 139 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10569 (9th Cir. Wash. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13 {Caution}

195 F.3d 1107 p.1111

1792 Cited by: . Bogovich v. Sandoval, 189 F.3d 999, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 20675, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Service 7074, 99 D.A.R. 9045, 9 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1204 (9th Cir. Cal. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9 {Caution}

189 F.3d 999 p.1001

1793 Cited by: . Page 245 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Interstate Brands Corp. v. United States Dist. Court, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 11074 (9th Cir. Cal. May 27, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Analysis}

1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 11074

1794 Cited by: . Niehaus v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 173 F.3d 1207, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 6913, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Service 2654, 99 D.A.R. 3480, 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2995, 138 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58627 (9th Cir. Nev. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8 , HN10, HN13{Caution}

173 F.3d 1207 p.1211

1795 Cited by: . Grant v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 163 F.3d 1136, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 32576, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Service 9386, 98 D.A.R. 13103, 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2139, 138 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10434 (9th Cir. Cal. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10 {Positive}

163 F.3d 1136 p.1137

1796 Distinguished by: . Sparta Surgical Corp. v. NASD, 159 F.3d 1209, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 28167, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Service 8274, 98 D.A.R. 11493, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P90318 (9th Cir. Cal. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN8, HN10, HN13 {Caution}

159 F.3d 1209 p.1213

1797 Cited by: . Anderson v. Anheuser--Busch Cos., 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 17487, 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2256 (9th Cir. Cal. July 27, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13 {Analysis}

1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 17487

1798 Cited by: . Ritchey v. Upjohn Drug Co., 139 F.3d 1313, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 6627, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Service 2449, 98 D.A.R. 3401 (9th Cir. Cal. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6, HN13{Questioned}

139 F.3d 1313 p.1319

1799 Cited by: . Page 246 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Campbell v. Aerospace Corp., 123 F.3d 1308, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 23026, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Service 7095, 97 D.A.R. 11453, 21 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1666, 13 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 348, 135 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58366 (9th Cir. Cal. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Positive}

123 F.3d 1308 p.1315

1800 Cited by: . Easton v. Crossland Mortg. Corp., 114 F.3d 979, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 13606, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4354, 97 D.A.R. 7297, 70 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P44771, 73 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1885 (9th Cir. Cal. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Positive}

114 F.3d 979 p.982

1801 Distinguished by: . Beals v. Kiewit Pac. Co., 114 F.3d 892, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 13009, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4191, 97 D.A.R. 7062, 155 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2461, 135 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58380 (9th Cir. Haw. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13{Caution}

114 F.3d 892 p.894

1802 Cited by: . Associated Builders v. Local 302 IBEW, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 10780, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3528, 97 D.A.R. 6065 (9th Cir. Cal. May 12, 1997){Analysis}

1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 10780

1803 Cited by: . Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Local 302, IBEW, 155 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2199 (9th Cir. Cal. May 12, 1997){Analysis}

155 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2199 p.2201

1804 Cited by: . Associated Builders & Contrs. v. Local 302 IBEW, 109 F.3d 1353, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 5655, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Service 2213, 97 D.A.R. 4067, 154 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2871, 155 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2199, 135 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58317 (9th Cir. Cal. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Caution}

109 F.3d 1353 p.1356

1805 Cited by: . Attorneys Trust v. Videotape Computer Prods., 93 F.3d 593, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 20900, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Service 6178, 96 D.A.R. 10118 (9th Cir. Cal. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13 {Caution} Page 247 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

93 F.3d 593 p.599

1806 Cited by: . Montag v. Aerospace Corp., 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 20339 (9th Cir. Cal. Aug. 12, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN12{Analysis}

1807 Cited by: . Rains v. Criterion Sys., 80 F.3d 339, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 5409, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Service 2009, 96 D.A.R. 3405, 68 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P44008, 70 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 635, 11 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 936 (9th Cir. Cal. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Caution}

80 F.3d 339 p.344

1808 Cited by: . Duncan v. Stuetzle, 76 F.3d 1480, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 2584, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Service 1125, 96 D.A.R. 1921, 37 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1758 (9th Cir. Cal. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Caution}

76 F.3d 1480 p.1485

1809 Cited by: . MSR Exploration v. Meridian Oil, 74 F.3d 910, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 748, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Service 419, 96 D.A.R. 693, 28 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 608, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P76761, 35 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 287 (9th Cir. Mont. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

74 F.3d 910 p.912

1810 Cited by: . Contract Servs. Network v. Aubry, 62 F.3d 294, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 20259, 60 Cal. Comp. Cas. (MB) 725, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Service 5996, 95 D.A.R. 10325, 149 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3058, 130 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P57964 (9th Cir. Cal. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Caution}

62 F.3d 294 p.299 60 Cal. Comp. Cas. (MB) 725 p.729

1811 Cited by: . Monfore v. United States, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 3365 (9th Cir. Cal. Feb. 16, 1995){Analysis}

1812 Cited by: . Page 248 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Roberts v. Motion Picture Pension Plan, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 2690 (9th Cir. Cal. Feb. 1, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

1813 Cited by: . Berg v. Leason, 32 F.3d 422, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20753, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Service 6070, 94 D.A.R. 11111, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P98353 (9th Cir. Cal. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN13{Caution}

32 F.3d 422 p.426

1814 Cited by: . Harris v. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co., 26 F.3d 930, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 13406, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4154, 94 D.A.R. 7738, 18 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1567 (9th Cir. Or. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

26 F.3d 930 p.934

1815 Cited by: . Carpenters Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Tri Capital Corp., 25 F.3d 849, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 13087, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4028, 94 D.A.R. 7556, 18 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1838 (9th Cir. Cal. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10 {Warning}

25 F.3d 849 p.858

1816 Cited by: . Coker v. Culinary Hotel & Motel Serv. Workers' Union, Local 226, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 24122 (9th Cir. Nev. Sept. 17, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Analysis}

1817 Cited by: . Thompson v. Johnson Group, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23064 (9th Cir. Sept. 2, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

1818 Cited by: . Ellis v. Gelson's Mkts., 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 20195 (9th Cir. Cal. July 29, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13{Analysis}

1819 Cited by: . Page 249 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Ramirez v. Fox Television Station, 998 F.2d 743, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 17387, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Service 5337, 93 D.A.R. 9045, 62 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P42449, 62 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 489, 26 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1158, 143 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2834, 125 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10768 (9th Cir. Cal. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Caution}

998 F.2d 743 p.747

1820 Cited by: . Holman v. Laulo--RoweAgency, 994 F.2d 666, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 11937, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3781, 93 D.A.R. 6474 (9th Cir. Mont. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN9{Caution}

994 F.2d 666 p.668

1821 Explained by, Cited by: . Karambelas v. Hughes Aircraft Co., 992 F.2d 971, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10402, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3346, 93 D.A.R. 5793, 16 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2565, 8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 944, 125 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P57349 (9th Cir. Cal. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN10, HN13{Positive}

Explained by: 992 F.2d 971 p.974 Cited by: 992 F.2d 971 p.973

1822 Followed by: . Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Newman & Holtzinger, P.C., 992 F.2d 932, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10156, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3247 (9th Cir. Cal. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN8, HN10, HN12, HN13{Caution}

992 F.2d 932 p.934 992 F.2d 932 p.936

1823 Cited by: . Kwang--Wei Han v. General American Life Ins. Co., 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 28298 (9th Cir. Oct. 28, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

1824 Cited by: . Wolfe v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 18770 (9th Cir. Aug. 6, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN10, HN13{Analysis}

1825 Cited by: . Page 250 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Sieu Mei Tu v. Southern Paciﬁc Transp. Co., 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 13348 (9th Cir. June 1, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN10, HN13 {Analysis}

1826 Cited by: . Milne Employees Ass'n v. Sun Carriers, Inc., 960 F.2d 1401, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 9174, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3808, 92 D.A.R. 6007, 143 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2663, 120 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11016 (9th Cir. Cal. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution}

960 F.2d 1401 p.1406

1827 Cited by: . Baker v. KGMB, 961 F.2d 216, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 9535 (9th Cir. Haw. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN10, HN13

1828 Cited by: . Adkins v. United States, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 9549 (9th Cir. Cal. Apr. 24, 1992)

1829 Followed by: . Lopez v. Continental Can Co., 961 F.2d 147, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6155, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Service 2937, 92 D.A.R. 4655, 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 734, 140 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2246, 121 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10096 (9th Cir. Cal. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13{Positive}

961 F.2d 147 p.149

1830 Cited by: . Streater v. Hemet Valley Hospital/Medical Center & Dist., 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 3678 (9th Cir. Mar. 4, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Analysis}

1831 Cited by: . Tingey v. Pixley--Richards West, Inc., 953 F.2d 1124, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 102, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Service 310, 92 D.A.R. 392, 14 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2445 (9th Cir. Ariz. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN7 {Caution}

953 F.2d 1124 p.1129

1832 Cited by: . Yorn v. Union Oil Co., 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 150 (9th Cir. Jan. 7, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN13{Analysis} Page 251 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1833 Followed by: . Hayden v. Reickerd, 957 F.2d 1506, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 30570, 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1841, 139 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2769, 121 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10173 (9th Cir. Cal. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8, HN10, HN13{Caution}

957 F.2d 1506 p.1509

1834 Followed by: . Hayden v. Reickerd, 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1841, 139 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2769 (9th Cir. Cal. Dec. 19, 1991){Cited}

7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1841 p.1843 139 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2769 p.2772

1835 Cited by: . Milne Employees Ass'n v. Sun Carriers, Inc., 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 27786, 91 D.A.R. 14209, 143 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2663, 120 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11016 (9th Cir. Cal. Nov. 20, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Caution}

120 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11016

1836 Cited by: . Felton v. Unisource Corp., 940 F.2d 503, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 17084, 91 Cal. Daily Op. Service 6176, 91 D.A.R. 9293, 56 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P40905, 57 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 209 (9th Cir. Ariz. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5 {Caution}

940 F.2d 503 p.507

1837 Cited by: . Hintze v. Pershing Direct Brokerage Servs., 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 17519 (9th Cir. Ariz. July 25, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Cited}

1838 Cited by: . Schlacter--Jones v. General Tel., 936 F.2d 435, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 12197, 91 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4752, 91 D.A.R. 7105, 6 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 897, 137 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2641, 119 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10795 (9th Cir. Cal. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13{Warning}

936 F.2d 435 p.442

1839 Cited by: . Page 252 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Galvez v. Kuhn, 933 F.2d 773, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 10154, 91 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3653, 91 D.A.R. 5899, 137 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2521, 119 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10834 (9th Cir. Cal. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Caution}

933 F.2d 773 p.775 933 F.2d 773 p.781

1840 Cited by: . Harris v. Radio Ofﬁcers Union, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 5869 (9th Cir. Apr. 1, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13{Analysis}

1841 Cited by: . Hubbard v. United Airlines, Inc., 927 F.2d 1094, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 3573, 91 Cal. Daily Op. Service 1725, 91 D.A.R. 2773, 136 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2750, 118 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10601 (9th Cir. Haw. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN10, HN13{Warning}

927 F.2d 1094 p.1097

1842 Cited by: . Hendy v. Losse, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 2141 (9th Cir. Cal. Feb. 12, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN10, HN13{Analysis}

1843 Cited by: . Eldridge v. Felec Services, Inc., 920 F.2d 1434, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 20622, 90 Cal. Daily Op. Service 8613, 6 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 32, 135 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3202, 117 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10429 (9th Cir. Alaska 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9 , HN10{Caution}

920 F.2d 1434 p.1436

1844 Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: . Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. Wilson, 915 F.2d 535, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 17265, 6 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1774, 135 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3057, 116 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10338 (9th Cir. Cal. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN9{Caution}

915 F.2d 535 p.541

1845 Distinguished by, Cited by: . Stikes v. Chevron USA, Inc., 914 F.2d 1265, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 16316, 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1311, 135 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2414, 116 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10302 (9th Cir. Cal. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Warning}

Distinguished by: Page 253 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

914 F.2d 1265 p.1270 Cited by: 914 F.2d 1265 p.1267 914 F.2d 1265 p.1268

1846 Cited by: . Cook v. Lindsay Olive Growers, 911 F.2d 233, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 13669, 54 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P40179, 58 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 930, 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1767, 140 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2020, 116 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10280 (9th Cir. Cal. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Questioned}

911 F.2d 233 p.238

1847 Explained by: . Lea v. Republic Airlines, Inc., 903 F.2d 624, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 6874, 12 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1469, 134 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2165, 115 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10051 (9th Cir. Nev. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9{Caution}

903 F.2d 624 p.632

1848 Cited by: . Gulden v. Crown Zellerbach Corp., 890 F.2d 195, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 17523, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1761, 132 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3022, 113 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11798, 14 O.S.H. Cas. (BNA) 1353 (9th Cir. Or. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8 , HN10, HN13{Caution}

890 F.2d 195 p.198

1849 Cited by: . Whitman v. Raley's Inc., 886 F.2d 1177, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14964, 11 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1999, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1559, 132 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2731, 113 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11637 (9th Cir. Cal. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Caution}

886 F.2d 1177 p.1180

1850 Cited by: . Jackson v. Southern California Gas Co., 881 F.2d 638, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 11014, 50 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P39204, 52 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P39470, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1092, 131 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3238, 112 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11390 (9th Cir. Cal. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Questioned}

881 F.2d 638 p.641 881 F.2d 638 p.642 881 F.2d 638 p.643 Page 254 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1851 Cited by: . Chmiel v. Beverly Wilshire Hotel Co., 873 F.2d 1283, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6037, 50 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P39181, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 957, 131 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2371, 111 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11131 (9th Cir. Cal. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10 , HN12{Caution}

873 F.2d 1283 p.1286

1852 Cited by: . Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5231, 13 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1455 (9th Cir. Cal. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Caution}

872 F.2d 1416 p.1421

1853 Cited by: . California v. Chevron Corp., 872 F.2d 1410, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5021, 107 Oil & Gas Rep. 237, 1989--1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P68544 (9th Cir. Cal. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Analysis}

872 F.2d 1410 p.1415

1854 Followed by: . Holcomb v. Bingham Toyota, 871 F.2d 109, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 4256, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 499, 131 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2043, 111 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P56054 (9th Cir. Cal. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

871 F.2d 109 p.110 871 F.2d 109 p.111

1855 Cited by: . De Lapp v. Continental Can Co., 868 F.2d 1073, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2180, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 330, 130 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2900, 111 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10964 (9th Cir. Wash. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Cited}

868 F.2d 1073 p.1076

1856 Followed by, Cited by: . Ethridge v. Harbor House Restaurant, 861 F.2d 1389, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 15348, 130 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2001, 110 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10862 (9th Cir. Cal. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN10, HN12, HN13{Caution}

Followed by: 861 F.2d 1389 p.1393 Cited by: 861 F.2d 1389 p.1394 Page 255 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

861 F.2d 1389 p.1395 861 F.2d 1389 p.1396 861 F.2d 1389 p.1399 861 F.2d 1389 p.1400 861 F.2d 1389 p.1403

1857 Cited by: . Ackerman v. Western Electric Co., 860 F.2d 1514, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14890, 1 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1389, 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P38427, 56 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1806, 129 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2929, 110 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10858 (9th Cir. Cal. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10 , HN13{Caution}

860 F.2d 1514 p.1517

1858 Cited by: . Newberry v. Paciﬁc Racing Asso., 854 F.2d 1142, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 11028, 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 959, 129 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2047, 109 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10676 (9th Cir. Cal. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9{Caution}

854 F.2d 1142 p.1146

1859 Distinguished by: . Laws v. Calmat, 852 F.2d 430, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9307, 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 785, 128 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3066, 109 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10602 (9th Cir. Cal. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN10{Warning}

852 F.2d 430 p.433

1860 Cited by: . Miller v. AT & T Network Sys., 850 F.2d 543, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8637, 46 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P38076, 54 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1734, 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 966, 128 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2987, 109 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10582 (9th Cir. Or. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8, HN10, HN12, HN13 {Caution}

850 F.2d 543 p.546

1861 Cited by: . Hyles v. Mensing, 849 F.2d 1213, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8302, 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 840, 128 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2746, 129 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2336, 109 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10568 (9th Cir. Cal. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN9, HN10 , HN13{Caution}

849 F.2d 1213 p.1215 849 F.2d 1213 p.1216 Page 256 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1862 Cited by: . Miller v. AT&T Network Sys., 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 7726, 46 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P38029, 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 562, 128 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2702, 109 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10521 (9th Cir. Or. June 7, 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN10, HN12, HN13 {Warning}

1863 Cited by: . Utility Workers of America, Local No. 246 v. Southern California Edison Co., 852 F.2d 1083, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 5864, 46 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P37945, 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1068, 129 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2077, 108 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10470 (9th Cir. Cal. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Warning}

852 F.2d 1083 p.1085

1864 Cited by: . Utility Workers of America, Local No. 246 v. Southern California Edison Co., 46 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P37945, 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 367, 128 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2317, 13 O.S.H. Cas. (BNA) 1736 (9th Cir. Cal. May 4, 1988) {Warning}

13 O.S.H. Cas. (BNA) 1736

1865 Cited by: . Lou v. Belzberg, 834 F.2d 730, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15006 (9th Cir. Cal. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

834 F.2d 730 p.734

1866 Cited by: . Young v. Anthony's Fish Grottos, Inc., 830 F.2d 993, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13820, 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1086, 126 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2798, 107 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10196 (9th Cir. Cal. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13 {Questioned}

830 F.2d 993 p.996 830 F.2d 993 p.998

1867 Cited by: . Ghebreselassie v. Coleman Sec. Service, 829 F.2d 892, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13262, 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1399, 126 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2717, 107 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10222 (9th Cir. Cal. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN10, HN13{Caution}

829 F.2d 892 p.895 Page 257 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1868 Followed by: . Price v. PSA, Inc., 829 F.2d 871, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13207, 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1357, 126 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2805, 107 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10158 (9th Cir. Cal. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7{Caution}

829 F.2d 871 p.875

1869 Cited by: . United Food & Commercial Workers Local Union Numbers 137, 324, 770, 899, 905, 1167, 1222, 1428, & 1442 v. Food Employers Council, Inc., 827 F.2d 519, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11880, 126 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2223, 107 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10114, 1987--2Trade Cas. (CCH) P67694 (9th Cir. Cal. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7 , HN10{Caution}

827 F.2d 519 p.523

1870 Followed by: . Paige v. Henry J. Kaiser Co., 826 F.2d 857, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11423, 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 705, 126 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2145, 107 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10194, 13 O.S.H. Cas. (BNA) 1467, O.S.H. Dec. (CCH) P28176, 1988 O.S.H. Dec. (CCH) P28176 (9th Cir. Cal. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN10, HN12, HN13 {Caution}

826 F.2d 857 p.860 9TH CIRCUIT --U.S. DISTRICT COURTS

1871 Cited by: . Fazekas v. Longnecker, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44928 (D. Haw. June 30, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44928

1872 Cited by: . Fant v. Residential Servs. Validated Publs, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47074 (N.D. Cal. June 29, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47074

1873 Cited by: . Alaska Dental Soc'y v. Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44263 (D. Alaska June 28, 2006)

1874 Cited by: . Moore v. Medtronic, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44198 (D. Nev. June 26, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4 Page 258 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44198

1875 Cited by: . Smith v. Hearst Communs., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22546 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22546

1876 Cited by: . Merrill v. Kiewit Pac. Co., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22385 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22385

1877 Cited by: . Chase Bank USA, N.A. v. Duran, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20154 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20154

1878 Cited by: . Zuniga v. Chugach Maint. Servs., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25068 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25068

1879 Cited by: . Stmicroelectronics, Inc. v. Harari, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25162 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25162

1880 Cited by: . Punla v. Terminal Maint. Co., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15755 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15755

1881 Cited by: . Ruelas v. Eagle Mt. Casino, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11978 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11978 Page 259 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1882 Cited by: . Tan v. Dolby Labs., Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10111 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10111

1883 Cited by: . Stoker v. Medeiros, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8562 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN6

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8562

1884 Cited by: . Armknecht v. WebMD Practice Servs., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4184 (D. Ariz. Jan. 30, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Caution}

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4184

1885 Cited by: . Lepree v. Cathedral Hill Assocs., L.P., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3766 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3766

1886 Cited by: . McIntyre v. Carpenters Health & Sec. Trust of W. Wash., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3759, 37 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2037 (W.D. Wash. Jan. 13, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3759

1887 Cited by: . Cal. Dep't of Water Res. v. Powerex Corp., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3737 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3737

1888 Cited by: . Alvarez v. ANC Rental Corp., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41810 (D. Nev. Dec. 29, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41810 Page 260 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1889 Cited by: . Liming v. Checkfree Servs. Corp., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39155 (D. Ariz. Dec. 16, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39155

1890 Cited by: . Arvizu v. AFSCME Local Union 2384, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33059 (D. Ariz. Dec. 13, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33059

1891 Cited by: . Chas Roberts Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Sheet Metal Workers Int'l Ass'n, Local Union 359, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32512 (D. Ariz. Dec. 9, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Analysis}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32512

1892 Cited by: . Intransit, Inc. v. Excel N. Am. Rd. Transp., 426 F. Supp. 2d 1136, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41185 (D. Or. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN4 {Caution}

426 F. Supp. 2d 1136 p.1143

1893 Cited by: . Richina v. Maytag Corp., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25294 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25294

1894 Cited by: . Hobby v. Mulhern, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24979 (D. Ariz. Oct. 21, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6{Cited}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24979

1895 Cited by: . City of Livingston v. Dow Chem. Co., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42387 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42387 Page 261 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1896 Cited by: . Letch v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34304 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 12, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34304

1897 Cited by: . Swords v. Kemp, 423 F. Supp. 2d 1031, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41285 (N.D. Cal. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

423 F. Supp. 2d 1031 p.1033

1898 Cited by: . Sutter Health v. Unite Here, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20892, 177 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3176 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN10, HN13 {Caution}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20892

1899 Cited by: . In re Textainer P'ship Sec. Litig., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26711 (N.D. Cal. July 27, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26711

1900 Cited by: . Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. Shoemaker, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36171 (W.D. Wash. July 15, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36171

1901 Cited by: . Little v. RMC Pac. Materials, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14338 (N.D. Cal. July 11, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9{Cited}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14338

1902 Cited by: . Purcell v. Merck & Co., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41239 (S.D. Cal. June 3, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3{Positive}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41239 Page 262 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1903 Cited by: . Busey v. P.W. Supermarkets, Inc., 368 F. Supp. 2d 1045, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12334 (N.D. Cal. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

368 F. Supp. 2d 1045 p.1048

1904 Cited by: . Evergreen Sch. Dist. v. N.F., 393 F. Supp. 2d 1070, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37420 (W.D. Wash. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

393 F. Supp. 2d 1070 p.1074

1905 Cited by: . Mattel, Inc. v. Bryant, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3568 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3568

1906 Followed by, Cited by: . Bonilla v. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc., 407 F. Supp. 2d 1107, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38524 (C.D. Cal. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 , HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13{Cited}

Followed by: 407 F. Supp. 2d 1107 p.1111 Cited by: 407 F. Supp. 2d 1107 p.1110

1907 Cited by: . Lester v. Silk, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2609 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2609

1908 Cited by: . McMaster v. Coca--ColaBottling Co., 392 F. Supp. 2d 1107, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5978 (N.D. Cal. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN13{Cited}

392 F. Supp. 2d 1107 p.1110

1909 Cited by: . Powell v. L.A. Police Dep't, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 288 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 288 Page 263 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1910 Cited by: . Patel v. Sugen, Inc., 354 F. Supp. 2d 1098, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5036, 34 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2723 (N.D. Cal. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6{Cited}

354 F. Supp. 2d 1098 p.1111

1911 Followed by, Cited by: . Davidson v. Arch Chems. Specialty Prods., 347 F. Supp. 2d 938, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27006 (D. Or. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6{Positive}

Followed by: 347 F. Supp. 2d 938 p.943 Cited by: 347 F. Supp. 2d 938 p.941

1912 Followed by: . W. States Wholesale Natural Gas Antitrust Litig. v. Reliant Energy, Inc., 346 F. Supp. 2d 1123, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23839 (D. Nev. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN13{Caution}

346 F. Supp. 2d 1123 p.1129

1913 Cited by: . Torres v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21332 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21332

1914 Cited by: . Hudson v. Pinkerton Sec. Servs., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19491 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 13, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19491

1915 Cited by: . Gamboa v. UPS, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18231 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN9, HN10, HN13

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18231

1916 Cited by: . Lehman Bros., Inc. v. City of Lodi, 333 F. Supp. 2d 895, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17209 (E.D. Cal. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN13{Analysis} Page 264 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

333 F. Supp. 2d 895 p.900

1917 Cited by: . Phillips v. Horton, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16150 (D. Or. Aug. 10, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN3{Positive}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16150

1918 Cited by: . Deleo v. Rudin, 328 F. Supp. 2d 1106, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15449 (D. Nev. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

328 F. Supp. 2d 1106 p.1111

1919 Cited by: . Nat'l Credit Reporting Ass'n v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17303, 2004--2Trade Cas. (CCH) P74567 (N.D. Cal. July 21, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Caution}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17303

1920 Cited by: . Doran v. Purdue Pharma Co., 324 F. Supp. 2d 1147, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13322 (D. Nev. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

324 F. Supp. 2d 1147 p.1150

1921 Cited by: . Wagner v. Amor 17 Corp., 321 F. Supp. 2d 1195, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11506, 159 Oil & Gas Rep. 320 (D. Nev. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 {Cited}

321 F. Supp. 2d 1195 p.1202

1922 Followed by: . Cross--CountyBank v. Klussman, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7835 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN6{Caution}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7835

1923 Cited by: . Pressman v. Meridian Mortg. Co., 334 F. Supp. 2d 1236, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17874 (D. Haw. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive} Page 265 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

334 F. Supp. 2d 1236 p.1240

1924 Cited by: . Jain v. Clarendon Am. Co., 304 F. Supp. 2d 1263, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6785 (W.D. Wash. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Cited}

304 F. Supp. 2d 1263 p.1265

1925 Cited by: . United States v. S. Cal. Edison Co., 300 F. Supp. 2d 964, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4545 (E.D. Cal. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Warning}

300 F. Supp. 2d 964 p.972

1926 Followed by: . Able Bldg. Maint. Co. v. Bd. of Trs. of Gen. Emples. Trust Fund, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20816 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 , HN10, HN13{Caution}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20816

1927 Cited by: . Feitelberg v. Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19116 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3{Positive}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19116

1928 Cited by: . Goldstein v. Haw. Med. Serv. Ass'n, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24506 (D. Haw. Sept. 9, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Positive}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24506

1929 Cited by: . Pearson v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24508 (D. Or. Aug. 8, 2003){Caution}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24508

1930 Cited by: . Gregory v. Sprint Spectrum L.P., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10943 (S.D. Cal. June 13, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10943 Page 266 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1931 Cited by: . T&E Pastorino Nursery v. Duke Energy Trading & Mktg., L.L.C., 268 F. Supp. 2d 1240, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10234 (S.D. Cal. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN9, HN13{Caution}

268 F. Supp. 2d 1240 p.1245

1932 Cited by: . Gatton v. T--MobileUSA, Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25922 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Analysis}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25922

1933 Cited by: . Herman v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc., 266 F. Supp. 2d 1208, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7221, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P92486 (S.D. Cal. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Caution}

266 F. Supp. 2d 1208 p.1211

1934 Cited by: . Pac. Mar. Ass'n v. Mead, 246 F. Supp. 2d 1087, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2757 (N.D. Cal. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN9, HN10, HN13{Cited}

246 F. Supp. 2d 1087 p.1090

1935 Followed by, Cited by: . Schuster v. Gardner, 319 F. Supp. 2d 1159, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25400 (S.D. Cal. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN9{Cited}

Followed by: 319 F. Supp. 2d 1159 p.1164 Cited by: 319 F. Supp. 2d 1159 p.1162

1936 Cited by: . Young v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Ry., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24818 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24818

1937 Cited by: . Malcolm v. City & County of San Francisco, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21671 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 Page 267 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21671

1938 Cited by: . Feitelberg v. Merrill Lynch & Co., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25714 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 9, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Analysis}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25714

1939 Cited by: . Feitelberg v. Merrill Lynch & Co., 234 F. Supp. 2d 1043, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19875, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P92012 (N.D. Cal. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6{Caution}

234 F. Supp. 2d 1043 p.1045

1940 Cited by: . Bertrand v. Aventis Pasteur Labs., Inc., 226 F. Supp. 2d 1206, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18746 (D. Ariz. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Positive}

226 F. Supp. 2d 1206 p.1210 226 F. Supp. 2d 1206 p.1211

1941 Cited by: . TPS Utilicom Servs. v. AT&T Corp., 223 F. Supp. 2d 1089, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17042 (C.D. Cal. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Analysis}

223 F. Supp. 2d 1089 p.1096

1942 Cited by: . Cal. ex rel. Lockyer v. Mirant Corp., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15733 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN13{Caution}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15733

1943 Cited by: . Coykendall v. Kaplan, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22483, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P92224 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22483

1944 Followed by: . Page 268 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Opera Plaza Residential Parcel Homeowners Ass'n v. Hoang, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14240 (N.D. Cal. July 22, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13 {Positive}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14240

1945 Cited by: . Newens v. Orna Servs., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10685 (N.D. Cal. June 10, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10685

1946 Cited by: . Precision Pay Phones v. Qwest Communs. Corp., 210 F. Supp. 2d 1106, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11855 (N.D. Cal. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Caution}

210 F. Supp. 2d 1106 p.1111 210 F. Supp. 2d 1106 p.1116

1947 Cited by: . Doherty v. Pasteur, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9596 (N.D. Cal. May 15, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN7, HN9{Positive}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9596

1948 Cited by: . Klussman v. Cross--CountryBank, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9387 (N.D. Cal. May 10, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13{Warning}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9387

1949 Cited by: . Garcia v. Aventis Pasteur, Inc., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15122 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 22, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13{Positive}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15122

1950 Cited by: . Gordon v. San Francisco Newspaper Agency, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6372 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6372 Page 269 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1951 Cited by: . Johnson v. Am. Online, Inc., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26937 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN4, HN13{Caution}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26937

1952 Cited by: . G.B. v. Archdiocese of Portland in Or., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7033 (D. Or. Feb. 11, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Caution}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7033

1953 Cited by: . Littel v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 259 F. Supp. 2d 1016, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26519 (C.D. Cal. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

259 F. Supp. 2d 1016 p.1021

1954 Cited by: . King v. Aventis Pasteur, Inc., 210 F. Supp. 2d 1201, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12822 (D. Or. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Caution}

210 F. Supp. 2d 1201 p.1212

1955 Cited by: . Mead v. Aventis Pasteur, Inc., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25645 (D. Or. Jan. 7, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Caution}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25645

1956 Cited by: . C.B. v. Grammond, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23621 (D. Or. Dec. 19, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4{Caution}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23621

1957 Cited by: . JC2 v. Grammond, 232 F. Supp. 2d 1166, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23626 (D. Or. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Caution}

232 F. Supp. 2d 1166 p.1167

1958 Cited by: . Page 270 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

M.K. v. Archdiocese of Portland, 228 F. Supp. 2d 1168, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23625 (D. Or. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Caution}

228 F. Supp. 2d 1168 p.1169

1959 Cited by: . WB v. Grammond, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23627 (D. Or. Dec. 13, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4{Caution}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23627

1960 Cited by: . Chesler/Perlmutter Prods. v. Fireworks Entm't, Inc., 177 F. Supp. 2d 1050, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21281 (C.D. Cal. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5 , HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13{Positive}

177 F. Supp. 2d 1050 p.1055

1961 Cited by: . Teamsters Local 117 v. Davis Wire Corp., 187 F. Supp. 2d 1279, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1279 (W.D. Wash. 2001)

187 F. Supp. 2d 1279 p.1281

1962 Cited by: . Teamsters Local 117 v. Davis Wire Corp., 187 F. Supp. 2d 1279, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23724 (W.D. Wash. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9, HN10 {Cited}

1963 Cited by: . Von Heeder v. Safeway, Inc., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19681, 169 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2121 (D. Or. Nov. 11, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19681

1964 Cited by: . Precision Pay Phones v. Global Crossing Telecomms., Inc., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18776 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN9{Analysis}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18776

1965 Cited by: . Del Real v. HealthSouth Corp., 171 F. Supp. 2d 1041, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22634 (D. Ariz. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited} Page 271 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

171 F. Supp. 2d 1041 p.1042

1966 Cited by: . Continental Forge v. S. Cal. Gas Co. (In re Cal. Retail Natural Gas & Elec. Antitrust Litig.) , 170 F. Supp. 2d 1052, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18321, 2001--1Trade Cas. (CCH) P73502, 2001--2Trade Cas. (CCH) P73502 (D. Nev. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN9, HN13{Caution}

170 F. Supp. 2d 1052 p.1056

1967 Cited by: . Quayle v. MCI Worldcom, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17450 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17450

1968 Followed by: . Kizziee v. Health Care Workers Local 250, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13764 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 4, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN10, HN13

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13764

1969 Cited by: . Haller v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan of the Northwest, 184 F. Supp. 2d 1040, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22146 (D. Or. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7 {Caution}

184 F. Supp. 2d 1040 p.1045

1970 Cited by: . Hendricks v. Dynegy Power Mktg., Inc., 160 F. Supp. 2d 1155, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21697, 2002--1Trade Cas. (CCH) P73544 (S.D. Cal. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN10, HN13{Caution}

160 F. Supp. 2d 1155 p.1157 160 F. Supp. 2d 1155 p.1162

1971 Cited by: . Firoozye v. Earthlink Network, 153 F. Supp. 2d 1115, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15934 (N.D. Cal. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Positive}

153 F. Supp. 2d 1115 p.1119 153 F. Supp. 2d 1115 p.1120 Page 272 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1972 Cited by: . Asante Techs. v. Pmc--Sierra, Inc., 164 F. Supp. 2d 1142, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16000 (N.D. Cal. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN13{Caution}

164 F. Supp. 2d 1142 p.1146

1973 Cited by: . Davis v. Am. Bldg. Maint. Co., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9474 (N.D. Cal. June 21, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN10, HN13

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9474

1974 Cited by: . Olson v. Fort James Operating Co., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9890, 144 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11110 (D. Or. May 24, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN10, HN13

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9890

1975 Cited by: . Shaev v. Claﬂin, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6677, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P91452 (N.D. Cal. May 16, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6677

1976 Cited by: . Fardella v. Downey S&L Ass'n, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6037 (N.D. Cal. May 8, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN13{Cited}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6037

1977 Cited by: . Hill Physicians Med. Group, Inc. v. PaciﬁCare of Cal., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6051 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 23, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13 {Positive}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6051

1978 Cited by: . Macque--Garcia v. Dominican Santa Cruz Hosp., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4866 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4866 Page 273 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

1979 Cited by: . Roskind v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 165 F. Supp. 2d 1059, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4528, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P91411 (N.D. Cal. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Caution}

165 F. Supp. 2d 1059 p.1064

1980 Cited by: . Braco v. MCI Worldcom Communs., Inc., 138 F. Supp. 2d 1260, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5461 (C.D. Cal. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13 {Positive}

138 F. Supp. 2d 1260 p.1264

1981 Cited by: . Simon v. Internet Wire, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4086, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P91408 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN13 {Positive}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4086

1982 Cited by: . Allen v. Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean, LLP, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1838 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1838

1983 Cited by: . Fucci v. Paciﬁc Bell Tel. Co., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1841 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1841

1984 Followed by, Cited by: . Shaw v. Charles Schwab & Co., 128 F. Supp. 2d 1270, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3494 (C.D. Cal. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

Followed by: 128 F. Supp. 2d 1270 p.1272 Cited by: 128 F. Supp. 2d 1270 p.1271

1985 Cited by: . Castro v. Providian Nat'l Bank, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19062 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Positive} Page 274 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19062

1986 Cited by: . Wayne v. DHL Worldwide Express, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19654 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Warning}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19654

1987 Cited by: . In re World War II Era Japanese Forced Labor Litig., 114 F. Supp. 2d 939, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13984 (N.D. Cal. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4 {Caution}

114 F. Supp. 2d 939 p.943

1988 Cited by: . IBEW, Local Union 640 v. Dueck, 148 F. Supp. 2d 955, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21298, 145 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11167 (D. Ariz. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 , HN13{Positive}

148 F. Supp. 2d 955 p.959

1989 Cited by: . Valero v. Peninsula Auto. Machinists Local 1414, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11322 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN13

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11322

1990 Cited by: . Germann v. Vulcan Materials Co., 106 F. Supp. 2d 1010, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13093, 142 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P59063 (S.D. Cal. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Positive}

106 F. Supp. 2d 1010 p.1016

1991 Cited by: . Jordan v. Creative Iron, Inc., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10838 (N.D. Cal. July 17, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10838

1992 Cited by: . Flores v. Transamerica Homeﬁrst, Inc., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7584 (N.D. Cal. May 19, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution} Page 275 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7584

1993 Cited by: . Jae Won Jeong v. Onoda Cement Co., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7985 (C.D. Cal. May 17, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN13{Caution}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7985

1994 Cited by: . Swanson v. Liquid Sugars, Inc., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3569 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3569

1995 Cited by: . Madison v. Motion Picture Set Painters & Sign Writers Local 729, 132 F. Supp. 2d 1244, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20979 (C.D. Cal. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN9{Positive}

132 F. Supp. 2d 1244 p.1250

1996 Cited by: . Johnson v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., 71 F. Supp. 2d 1026, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16040 (N.D. Cal. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Cited}

71 F. Supp. 2d 1026 p.1028

1997 Cited by: . Peterson v. Spaich Farms, Inc., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22545 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 28, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7{Positive}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22545

1998 Cited by: . Abada v. Charles Schwab & Co., 68 F. Supp. 2d 1160, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20219, Blue Sky L. Rep. (CCH) P74195, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P90663 (S.D. Cal. 1999) {Warning}

68 F. Supp. 2d 1160 p.1162 68 F. Supp. 2d 1160 p.1163

1999 Cited by: . Nasca v. Peoplesoft, Inc. (In re Nasca), 87 F. Supp. 2d 967, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13140 (N.D. Cal. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN12, HN13{Analysis} Page 276 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

87 F. Supp. 2d 967 p.970

2000 Cited by: . Klein v. Southwest Gas Corp., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22979 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Positive}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22979

2001 Cited by: . Albright v. Kaiser Permanente Med. Group, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12337 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12337

2002 Cited by: . Paciﬁc Bell v. Covad Communs. Co., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8846 (N.D. Cal. June 7, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6{Positive}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8846

2003 Cited by: . Howell v. Todd Pac. Shipyards Corp., 45 F. Supp. 2d 1067, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6868, 161 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2383 (W.D. Wash. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9 , HN10, HN13

45 F. Supp. 2d 1067 p.1069

2004 Cited by: . Needles v. Berkeley Farms, Inc., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5964 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN1, HN2, HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Positive}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5964

2005 Cited by: . Washington v. Municipal Court, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2993 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2993

2006 Cited by: . Dead Kennedys v. Biafra, 37 F. Supp. 2d 1151, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7914, Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P27994 (N.D. Cal. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Caution} Page 277 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

37 F. Supp. 2d 1151 p.1153

2007 Cited by: . Oraha v. BCI Coca--ColaBottling Co., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1388, 138 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58634 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1388 138 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58634

2008 Cited by: . Galvan v. Hyatt Regency S.F. Airport, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19366 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19366

2009 Cited by: . California v. Roman, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17093 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17093

2010 Cited by: . Martinez v. Lucky Stores, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14740 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 17, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14740

2011 Cited by: . Brown v. Allstate Ins. Co., 17 F. Supp. 2d 1134, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11759, 98 D.A.R. 10203 (S.D. Cal. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN1{Caution}

17 F. Supp. 2d 1134 p.1138

2012 Cited by: . Joe Boxer Corp. v. Fritz Transp. Int'l, 33 F. Supp. 2d 851, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21689, 1998 A.M.C. 2576 (C.D. Cal. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6 , HN7{Caution}

33 F. Supp. 2d 851 p.853

2013 Followed by: . Chase v. California, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6474 (N.D. Cal. May 6, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4{Cited}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6474 Page 278 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2014 Cited by: . Moreno v. Health Partners Health Plan, 4 F. Supp. 2d 888, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6456 (D. Ariz. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

4 F. Supp. 2d 888 p.889

2015 Cited by: . Petrie v. Paciﬁc Stock Exch., 982 F. Supp. 1390, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17072, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P99575 (N.D. Cal. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

982 F. Supp. 1390 p.1394

2016 Cited by: . Worth v. Universal Pictures, 5 F. Supp. 2d 816, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22905 (C.D. Cal. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

5 F. Supp. 2d 816 p.821

2017 Cited by: . California v. Acme Fill Corp., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16847 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Positive}

2018 Cited by: . Tortola Restaurants, L.P. v. Kimberly--ClarkCorp., 987 F. Supp. 1186, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16883, 1997--2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P71940 (N.D. Cal. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Positive}

987 F. Supp. 1186 p.1188

2019 Cited by: . Kirton v. Summit Med. Ctr., 982 F. Supp. 1381, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18806 (N.D. Cal. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN10, HN13{Cited}

982 F. Supp. 1381 p.1385

2020 Cited by: . Preuc v. Continental Micronesia, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22354 (D. Guam Aug. 29, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

2021 Cited by: . Page 279 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Reed v. Oregon Iron Works, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10669 (D. Or. July 8, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6{Analysis}

2022 Cited by: . Clancy v. Bay Area Bank, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4914 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 7, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Positive}

2023 Cited by: . Bowman v. U.S. West, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3015 (D. Or. Mar. 10, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Analysis}

2024 Cited by: . Schrader v. Hamilton, 959 F. Supp. 1205, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5132 (C.D. Cal. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Caution}

959 F. Supp. 1205 p.1207

2025 Cited by: . Moreno v. Los Angeles Child Care & Dev. Council, 963 F. Supp. 876, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13337, 154 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2850 (C.D. Cal. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN8{Positive}

963 F. Supp. 876 p.880

2026 Cited by: . Lattie v. Murdach, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3558, 42 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1240 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

42 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1240 p.1242

2027 Cited by: . Lavadenz De Estenssoro v. American Jet, S.A., 944 F. Supp. 813, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20455, 96 D.A.R. 14507 (C.D. Cal. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6{Caution}

944 F. Supp. 813 p.814

2028 Cited by: . Zinn v. American Jet, S.A., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16331, 96 D.A.R. 14511 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 10, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Analysis} Page 280 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2029 Cited by: . Pena v. Downey S&L, Ass'n, 929 F. Supp. 1308, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8969, 96 D.A.R. 13461, 133 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58219 (C.D. Cal. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN5, HN6, HN13{Cited}

929 F. Supp. 1308 p.1312

2030 Cited by: . Pena v. Downey Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 133 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58219 (C.D. Cal. June 25, 1996)

133 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58219

2031 Cited by: . Matherly v. Las Vegas Valley Water Dist., 926 F. Supp. 990, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7825 (D. Nev. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

926 F. Supp. 990 p.992

2032 Cited by: . Butts v. Lane, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4810 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9

2033 Cited by: . In re Citric Acid Antitrust Litig., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3149 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN13{Caution}

2034 Cited by: . Graphic Communs. Int'l Union, Local 501--Mv. Tongg Printing Co., Inc., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22874 (D. Haw. Jan. 26, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8 , HN10, HN13

1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22874

2035 Cited by: . Dielsi v. Falk, 916 F. Supp. 985, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4953 (C.D. Cal. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

916 F. Supp. 985 p.993

2036 Cited by: . Rawson v. Tosco Ref. Co., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1006 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13 Page 281 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2037 Cited by: . Heichman v. AT&T, 943 F. Supp. 1212, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21291 (C.D. Cal. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13{Positive}

943 F. Supp. 1212 p.1218

2038 Cited by: . Atchison, T & S.F. Ry. v. Chiuppi, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19362 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

2039 Followed by: . Joy v. International Union of Operating Eng'rs, Local 701, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11750, 151 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2287 (D. Or. Aug. 2, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4 , HN6, HN13{Cited}

151 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2287 p.2288

2040 Cited by: . Maydak v. Bonded Credit Co., 892 F. Supp. 1304, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14261 (D. Or. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

892 F. Supp. 1304 p.1309

2041 Cited by: . Lerigo v. Novato Cable Co., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5119 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5

2042 Cited by: . In re Pozsga, 158 F.R.D. 435, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16433 (D. Ariz. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

158 F.R.D. 435 p.438

2043 Cited by: . Hotaling v. Paciﬁc Inst. for Research & Evaluation, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14740 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN12, HN13

2044 Cited by: . Pantazis v. Fior D'Italia, Inc., 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13622 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 20, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN10, HN13{Cited} Page 282 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2045 Cited by: . Trenton v. Inﬁnity Broadcasting Corp., 865 F. Supp. 1416, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19191, Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P27406, 33 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1161 (C.D. Cal. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Caution}

865 F. Supp. 1416 p.1421

2046 Cited by: . Trenton v. Inﬁnity Broad. Corp., 33 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1161 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 1994){Cited}

33 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1161 p.1165

2047 Cited by: . Hollinquest v. St. Francis Medical Ctr., 872 F. Supp. 723, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19902 (C.D. Cal. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Cited}

872 F. Supp. 723 p.727

2048 Cited by: . Fitzwater v. Namco Am., 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19505, 130 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P33233 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

2049 Cited by: . Fritzwater v. Namco Am. Inc., 130 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P33233 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 1994)

130 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P33233

2050 Cited by: . Clendenin v. RMC Lonestar, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9017 (N.D. Cal. June 28, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10

2051 Cited by: . Koutney v. Exxon Corp., 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6702 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

2052 Cited by: . Rail--Transport Employees Ass'n v. Union Pac. Motor Freight, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1746 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis} Page 283 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2053 Cited by: . Foster v. Richardson, 843 F. Supp. 625, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1343, 129 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P57781 (D. Haw. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN10 {Caution}

843 F. Supp. 625 p.628

2054 Cited by: . City of Ellensburg v. King Videocable Co., 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20979 (E.D. Wash. Dec. 17, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

2055 Followed by, Cited by: . Donald v. Golden 1 Credit Union, 839 F. Supp. 1394, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17764, 94 D.A.R. 1699 (E.D. Cal. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10 , HN12, HN13{Analysis}

Followed by: 839 F. Supp. 1394 p.1396 Cited by: 839 F. Supp. 1394 p.1403

2056 Cited by: . Batiste v. Redevelopment Agency, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17848 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4

2057 Cited by: . Watson v. First Union Nat'l Bank, 837 F. Supp. 146, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19288, 72 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5769 (S.D. Cal. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Caution}

837 F. Supp. 146 p.148

2058 Cited by: . Alternative Sys. v. Connors, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15255 (N.D. Cal. July 27, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2059 Cited by: . Burnette v. Godshall, 828 F. Supp. 1439, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15276, 27 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 125, RICO Bus. Disp. Guide P8446 (N.D. Cal. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN13{Caution}

828 F. Supp. 1439 p.1445 828 F. Supp. 1439 p.1449 Page 284 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2060 Cited by: . Lyster v. First Nationwide Bank Fin. Corp., 829 F. Supp. 1163, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11958, 93 D.A.R. 11506 (N.D. Cal. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13{Caution}

829 F. Supp. 1163 p.1167

2061 Cited by: . Jack v. Trans World Airlines, 820 F. Supp. 1218, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6592, 93 D.A.R. 6604 (N.D. Cal. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Caution}

820 F. Supp. 1218 p.1219 820 F. Supp. 1218 p.1220

2062 Cited by: . Shanks v. Northern Cal. Cement Masons Joint Apprenticeship Training Comm., 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6331 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Caution}

2063 Cited by: . Asyali v. Sheraton Palace Hotel, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5603 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN12{Cited}

2064 Cited by: . Salgadoe v. San Francisco Hilton & Towers Hotel, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4639 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10

2065 Cited by: . Barker v. Pick N Pull Auto Dismantlers, Inc., 819 F. Supp. 889, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5276 (E.D. Cal. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9{Positive}

819 F. Supp. 889 p.890

2066 Cited by: . Levin v. Regent Int'l, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15108 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 25, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2067 Cited by: . Tarter v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18865 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 14, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 Page 285 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2068 Cited by: . Forfang v. Chevron USA, Inc., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10408 (N.D. Cal. June 19, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6

2069 Cited by: . Adeola v. New United Motor Mfg., Inc., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8554 (N.D. Cal. May 5, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8, HN10

2070 Cited by: . Rail--Transport Employees Ass'n v. Union Pac. Motor Freight, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8605(N.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

2071 Cited by: . Mason v. Crescent Jewelers, Inc., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4577 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13

2072 Cited by: . Robinson v. U--HaulCo., 785 F. Supp. 1378, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2107 (D. Alaska 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

785 F. Supp. 1378 p.1381

2073 Cited by: . Walton v. UTV of San Francisco, Inc., 776 F. Supp. 1399, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16369, 57 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 609, 121 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P56890 (N.D. Cal. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7{Positive}

776 F. Supp. 1399 p.1402

2074 Cited by: . Puget Sound Elec. Workers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Leaf Corp., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21103 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 31, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13{Warning}

2075 Cited by: . Engleman v. Knudsen Corp., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21743, 121 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10176 (D. Haw. Oct. 30, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN10, HN13 {Analysis} Page 286 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2076 Cited by: . Engleman v. Knudsen Corp., 121 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10176 (D. Haw. Oct. 30, 1991)

121 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10176

2077 Cited by: . International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 125 v. Portland General Electric Co., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10870 (D. Or. July 30, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2078 Cited by: . Munar v. National Homecare Systems, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8274 (N.D. Cal. June 6, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN6, HN7, HN10, HN13{Caution}

2079 Cited by: . Romero v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9729, 6 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1097, 137 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2647, 123 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10373 (D. Haw. June 3, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8, HN10, HN13

6 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1097 p.1099 137 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2647 p.2649

2080 Cited by: . Romero v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 123 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10373 (D. Haw. June 3, 1991)

123 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10373

2081 Cited by: . Fillmore v. Bank of America, N.T. & S.A., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6640 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 1991){Cited}

2082 Followed by: . Boyle v. MTV Networks, Inc., 766 F. Supp. 809, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8680, 91 D.A.R. 7942 (N.D. Cal. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN9 , HN13{Positive}

766 F. Supp. 809 p.813 766 F. Supp. 809 p.815

2083 Cited by: . Page 287 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

O'Conner v. Hilton Hawaiian Village, 763 F. Supp. 1544, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18838, 136 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2891, 118 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10607 (D. Haw. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13{Cited}

763 F. Supp. 1544 p.1546 763 F. Supp. 1544 p.1547

2084 Cited by: . United Food & Commercial Workers Local 1179 v. S & K Toyota, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14462 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13

2085 Cited by: . Livadas v. Aubry, 749 F. Supp. 1526, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14240, 135 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2954, 117 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10404, 30 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 7 (N.D. Cal. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13 {Warning}

749 F. Supp. 1526 p.1537

2086 Cited by: . Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen, Local Union No. 3 v. Masonry & Tile Contractors Ass'n , 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18520, 136 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2319, 118 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10744 (D. Nev. July 2, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN10{Cited}

118 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10744 136 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2319 p.2324

2087 Cited by: . Akau v. Tel--A--ComHawaii, Inc., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4647, 12 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1378, 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 488 (D. Haw. Apr. 17, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Warning}

12 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1378 p.1380

2088 Cited by: . Deller v. Portland General Electric Co., 734 F. Supp. 916, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3994, 12 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1488 (D. Or. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Positive}

734 F. Supp. 916 p.918

2089 Cited by: . Bloom v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 734 F. Supp. 1553, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9955, 118 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10717 (C.D. Cal. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN10 , HN13{Positive} Page 288 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

734 F. Supp. 1553 p.1558

2090 Cited by: . California v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 726 F. Supp. 785, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16121 (S.D. Cal. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9, HN13{Analysis}

726 F. Supp. 785 p.786

2091 Cited by: . Lawpaugh v. Press Specialties Mfg. Co., 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11158, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1883, 133 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2328 (D. Or. Sept. 21, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10 , HN12, HN13

2092 Cited by: . California v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 720 F. Supp. 826, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16177 (S.D. Cal. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13{Caution}

720 F. Supp. 826 p.829

2093 Cited by: . Maynard v. Mare--Bear, Inc., 712 F. Supp. 795, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5725, 113 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11556 (D. Nev. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN9 , HN12, HN13{Cited}

712 F. Supp. 795 p.797

2094 Followed by, Explained by, Cited by: . Milne Employees Ass'n v. Sun Carriers, Inc., 714 F. Supp. 1028, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7039, 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1802, 131 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2116, 114 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11825 (N.D. Cal. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6 , HN10, HN13{Caution}

Followed by: 714 F. Supp. 1028 p.1030 Explained by: 714 F. Supp. 1028 p.1030 714 F. Supp. 1028 p.1033 Cited by: 714 F. Supp. 1028 p.1031 714 F. Supp. 1028 p.1035

2095 Followed by: . Milne Employees Ass'n v. Sun Carriers, Inc., 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1802 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 1989)

5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1802 p.1803 Page 289 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2096 Distinguished by: . Sewell v. Genstar Gypsum Products Co., Div. of Domtar Gypsum, Inc., 699 F. Supp. 1443, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13346, 130 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2563, 112 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11455 (D. Nev. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Cited}

699 F. Supp. 1443 p.1448

2097 Followed by: . Citizens Alliance to Save Southline v. Montana Rail Link, Inc., 672 F. Supp. 1576, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10764 (D. Mont. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 , HN13{Analysis}

672 F. Supp. 1576 p.1578

2098 Cited by: . Bergkamp v. New York Guardian Mortgagee Corp., 667 F. Supp. 719, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8260 (D. Mont. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Positive}

667 F. Supp. 719 p.722 9TH CIRCUIT --U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURTS

2099 Cited by: . Miles v. Okun (In re Miles), 294 B.R. 756, 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 456, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4248, 2003 D.A.R. 5421, 41 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 92, 50 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 235 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

294 B.R. 756 p.762

2100 Cited by: . Ansley v. Ameriquest Mortg. Co., 194 F. Supp. 2d 1062, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6208 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13 {Positive}

194 F. Supp. 2d 1062 p.1064 194 F. Supp. 2d 1062 p.1065 10TH CIRCUIT --COURT OF APPEALS

2101 Cited by: . Turgeau v. Admin. Review Bd., 446 F.3d 1052, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 10476, 24 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 818 (10th Cir. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9, HN13 {Cited}

446 F.3d 1052 p.1060 Page 290 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2102 Cited by: . Nicodemus v. Union Pac. Corp., 440 F.3d 1227, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 6121 (10th Cir. Wyo. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Analysis}

440 F.3d 1227 p.1232

2103 Cited by: . Hunt v. Lamb, 427 F.3d 725, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22199 (10th Cir. Kan. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN4{Caution}

427 F.3d 725 p.726

2104 Cited by: . Baby C v. Price, 138 Fed. Appx. 81, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 11026 (2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Cited}

138 Fed. Appx. 81 p.83

2105 Cited by: . Topeka Hous. Auth. v. Johnson, 404 F.3d 1245, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6537 (10th Cir. Kan. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Positive}

404 F.3d 1245 p.1247

2106 Followed by, Cited by: . Felix v. Lucent Techs., Inc., 387 F.3d 1146, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 22270, 33 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2473, 175 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3146, 150 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10397 (10th Cir. Okla. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10 , HN12, HN13{Positive}

Followed by: 387 F.3d 1146 p.1154 387 F.3d 1146 p.1166 Cited by: 387 F.3d 1146 p.1163

2107 Cited by: . Qwest Corp. v. City of Santa Fe, 380 F.3d 1258, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 17974 (10th Cir. N.M. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Caution}

380 F.3d 1258 p.1264

2108 Cited by: . Von Loh v. Synthes, Inc., 106 Fed. Appx. 665, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 15964, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P17085 (2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 Page 291 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

106 Fed. Appx. 665 p.667

2109 Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by: . Karnes v. Boeing Co., 335 F.3d 1189, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 14327, 20 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 305, 148 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10234 (10th Cir. Okla. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN12, HN13{Positive}

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: 335 F.3d 1189 p.1197 Cited by: 335 F.3d 1189 p.1193

2110 Cited by: . Garley v. Sandia Corp., 236 F.3d 1200, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 54, 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 336, 17 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 224, 142 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10874 (10th Cir. N.M. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN13{Caution}

236 F.3d 1200 p.1207 236 F.3d 1200 p.1210

2111 Cited by: . Cisneros v. ABC Rail Corp., 217 F.3d 1299, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15703, 78 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P40174, 83 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 321, 164 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2780, 142 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10834 (10th Cir. Colo. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13{Caution}

217 F.3d 1299 p.1302

2112 Cited by: . Hernandez v. Denver Post, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 17901, 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4540, 138 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58677 (10th Cir. Colo. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10 , HN13{Analysis}

1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 17901 138 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58677

2113 Explained by, Cited by: . Schmeling v. NORDAM, 97 F.3d 1336, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 26214, 12 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 207, 132 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58162 (10th Cir. Okla. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13{Positive}

Explained by: 97 F.3d 1336 p.1341 Cited by: 97 F.3d 1336 p.1339 Page 292 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2114 Distinguished by: . Fry v. Airline Pilots Ass'n, 88 F.3d 831, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 15738, 152 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2754, 132 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11625 (10th Cir. Colo. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Caution}

88 F.3d 831 p.837

2115 Explained by: . Albertson's, Inc. v. Carrigan, 982 F.2d 1478, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 51, 8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 208, 142 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2220, 124 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10509, 93--2U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P50536 (10th Cir. Colo. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13 {Caution}

982 F.2d 1478 p.1481

2116 Cited by: . State ex rel. Okla. Tax Comm'n v. Wyandotte Tribe, 919 F.2d 1449, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 20612 (10th Cir. Okla. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Analysis}

919 F.2d 1449 p.1450

2117 Distinguished by, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: . Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Graham, 846 F.2d 1258, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9080 (10th Cir. Okla. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7 , HN10, HN13{Warning}

Distinguished by: 846 F.2d 1258 p.1259 846 F.2d 1258 p.1260 Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: 846 F.2d 1258 p.1261

2118 Followed by, Cited by: . United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Indus., Local No. 57 v. Bechtel Power Corp., 834 F.2d 884, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15897, 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1555, 127 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2342, 108 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10313 (10th Cir. Utah 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13{Caution}

Followed by: 834 F.2d 884 p.889 834 F.2d 884 p.890 Cited by: 834 F.2d 884 p.888 10TH CIRCUIT --U.S. DISTRICT COURTS Page 293 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2119 Cited by: . Shakur v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44946 (W.D. Okla. June 29, 2006){Analysis}

2120 Cited by: . Mavrovich v. Vanderpool, 427 F. Supp. 2d 1084, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19275 (D. Kan. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN9{Analysis}

427 F. Supp. 2d 1084 p.1091

2121 Cited by: . Cormier v. City of Topeka, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9799 (D. Kan. Mar. 10, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Analysis}

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9799

2122 Cited by: . Cormier v. City of Topeka, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11556 (D. Kan. Mar. 9, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11556

2123 Cited by: . Feil v. MBNA Am. Bank, N.A., 417 F. Supp. 2d 1214, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8531 (D. Kan. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Analysis}

417 F. Supp. 2d 1214 p.1216

2124 Cited by: . Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp. v. Framatome ANP, Inc., 416 F. Supp. 2d 1081, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7775 (D. Kan. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Cited}

416 F. Supp. 2d 1081 p.1085

2125 Cited by: . Varela v. Public Serv. Co., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22694 (D.N.M. Jan. 13, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN9

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22694

2126 Cited by: . Page 294 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Vetro, Inc. v. Active Plumbing & Heating, Inc., 403 F. Supp. 2d 1033, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34722 (D. Colo. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4 {Cited}

403 F. Supp. 2d 1033 p.1035

2127 Followed by: . Brewer v. UPS, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36402 (W.D. Okla. Dec. 2, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN9, HN13

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36402

2128 Cited by: . Cendant Mortg. Corp. v. Clemmer, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22931 (D. Kan. Oct. 5, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN13

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22931

2129 Cited by: . Bar J Sand & Gravel v. W. Mobile N.M., Inc., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39142 (D.N.M. Sept. 29, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN9, HN13 {Analysis}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39142

2130 Cited by: . King v. Knoll, 399 F. Supp. 2d 1169, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28590 (D. Kan. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Analysis}

399 F. Supp. 2d 1169 p.1172

2131 Cited by: . Consumer Crusade v. Sci. Research Group, Inc., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42905 (D. Colo. Aug. 23, 2005)

2132 Cited by: . Roybal v. Los Alamos Nat'l Bank, 375 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13800 (D.N.M. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Positive}

375 F. Supp. 2d 1324 p.1328

2133 Cited by: . Frederick v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32351 (D. Kan. May 12, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3, HN4{Analysis} Page 295 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32351

2134 Cited by: . In re Estate of Masters, 361 F. Supp. 2d 1303, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9632 (E.D. Okla. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

361 F. Supp. 2d 1303 p.1306

2135 Cited by: . Cox v. Beneﬁcial Kan., Inc., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4168 (D. Kan. Mar. 9, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Caution}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4168

2136 Cited by: . King v. Ziegler, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26255 (D. Kan. Dec. 16, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4 {Positive}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26255

2137 Cited by: . Lafayette v. Cobb, 385 F. Supp. 2d 1152, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28779 (D.N.M. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN4, HN5, HN6{Analysis}

385 F. Supp. 2d 1152 p.1159

2138 Followed by: . Topeka Hous. Auth. v. Johnson, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21649 (D. Kan. Sept. 2, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN13{Positive}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21649

2139 Cited by: . In re Baby C, 323 F. Supp. 2d 1082, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12564 (D. Kan. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN13{Analysis}

323 F. Supp. 2d 1082 p.1085

2140 Cited by: . Schecher v. Purdue Pharma L.P., 317 F. Supp. 2d 1253, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8571, 2004--1Trade Cas. (CCH) P74431 (D. Kan. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4 , HN6, HN9, HN13{Positive}

317 F. Supp. 2d 1253 p.1257 Page 296 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2141 Followed by: . AG Servs. of Am. v. Metsker, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8563 (D. Kan. Apr. 21, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN13{Caution}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8563

2142 Cited by: . Olsen v. Quality Continuum Hospice, Inc., 380 F. Supp. 2d 1225, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28551 (D.N.M. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Cited}

380 F. Supp. 2d 1225 p.1232

2143 Cited by: . Flowers v. EZPawn Okla., Inc., 307 F. Supp. 2d 1191, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24876 (N.D. Okla. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Caution}

307 F. Supp. 2d 1191 p.1201

2144 Cited by: . Russell v. Sprint Corp., 264 F. Supp. 2d 955, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8852 (D. Kan. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13{Positive}

264 F. Supp. 2d 955 p.959

2145 Cited by: . Firstar Bank, N.A. v. West--Anderson, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9649 (D. Kan. Apr. 22, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9649

2146 Cited by: . Fielden v. Wal--MartStores, Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5443 (D. Kan. Mar. 27, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3, HN4, HN6{Analysis}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5443

2147 Cited by: . McPhail v. Wal--MartStores, Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5442 (D. Kan. Mar. 27, 2003){Analysis}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5442

2148 Cited by: . Page 297 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Bolden v. City of Topeka, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1706 (D. Kan. Feb. 4, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Warning}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1706

2149 Cited by: . Tenney v. Iowa Tribe of Kan. & Neb. Gaming Comm'n, 243 F. Supp. 2d 1196, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1705, 91 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 215 (D. Kan. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

243 F. Supp. 2d 1196 p.1198

2150 Cited by: . In re Universal Serv. Fund Tel. Billing Practices Litig., 247 F. Supp. 2d 1215, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25071 (D. Kan. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6, HN13{Caution}

247 F. Supp. 2d 1215 p.1223

2151 Cited by: . Stephenson v. Wheaton Van Lines, Inc., 240 F. Supp. 2d 1161, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24913 (D. Kan. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6{Positive}

240 F. Supp. 2d 1161 p.1163 240 F. Supp. 2d 1161 p.1164

2152 Cited by: . First Nat'l Bank of Med. Lodge v. Mighty KC Bat Co., Inc., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13127 (D. Kan. June 26, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13127

2153 Cited by: . State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Saunders, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10923 (D. Kan. June 17, 2002){Cited}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10923

2154 Cited by: . Hoover v. Allied Van Lines, Inc., 205 F. Supp. 2d 1232, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11394 (D. Kan. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN9, HN13{Positive}

205 F. Supp. 2d 1232 p.1235 205 F. Supp. 2d 1232 p.1236 Page 298 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2155 Cited by: . Uniﬁed Sch. Dist. No. 497 v. Long--Palcher, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10335 (D. Kan. May 30, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9, HN13

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10335

2156 Cited by: . Bushue Trust v. Wyandotte County, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8200 (D. Kan. Apr. 24, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9, HN13

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8200

2157 Cited by: . First Union Nat'l Bank v. Lewis, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7012 (D. Kan. Apr. 17, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7012

2158 Cited by: . Quested v. Mortgage Plus, Inc., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7489 (D. Kan. Apr. 16, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN7, HN13{Cited}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7489

2159 Cited by: . Browning v. MCI Worldcom Network Servs., Inc., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5591 (D. Kan. Mar. 28, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN13{Cited}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5591

2160 Cited by: . Colorado ex rel. Salazar v. ACE Cash Express, Inc., 188 F. Supp. 2d 1282, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1523 (D. Colo. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9 , HN13{Caution}

188 F. Supp. 2d 1282 p.1284

2161 Cited by: . Adkins v. U.S. West Communs., Inc., 181 F. Supp. 2d 1189, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22007, 27 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1739 (D. Colo. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN7, HN9, HN10{Cited}

181 F. Supp. 2d 1189 p.1199 Page 299 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2162 Cited by: . Lawser v. Poudre Sch. Dist. R--1, 171 F. Supp. 2d 1155, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18681 (D. Colo. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

171 F. Supp. 2d 1155 p.1157

2163 Cited by: . O'Donnell v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Wyo., 173 F. Supp. 2d 1176, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18785 (D. Wyo. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6 {Positive}

173 F. Supp. 2d 1176 p.1178 173 F. Supp. 2d 1176 p.1183

2164 Cited by: . McGrew v. Schering--PloughCorp., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12205 (D. Kan. Aug. 6, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12205

2165 Cited by: . Sandoval v. N.M. Tech. Group LLC, 174 F. Supp. 2d 1224, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18488 (D.N.M. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN7{Positive}

174 F. Supp. 2d 1224 p.1228

2166 Cited by: . Paper, Allied, Chem. & Energy Workers Int'l Union, Local 5--508v. Slurry Explosive Corp., 107 F. Supp. 2d 1311, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11074, 165 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2223, 141 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10776 (D. Kan. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7 {Positive}

107 F. Supp. 2d 1311 p.1325

2167 Cited by: . Redd v. Pearson, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8038 (D. Kan. May 23, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8038

2168 Cited by: . Thermal Components Co. v. Grifﬁth, 98 F. Supp. 2d 1224, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8035 (D. Kan. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Positive}

98 F. Supp. 2d 1224 p.1231 Page 300 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2169 Cited by: . Environmental Remediation Holding Corp. v. Talisman Capital Opportunity Fund, L.P. , 106 F. Supp. 2d 1088, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13617 (D. Colo. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Analysis}

106 F. Supp. 2d 1088 p.1092

2170 Cited by: . Havens Protected "C" Clamps v. Pilkington PLC, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4905 (D. Kan. Mar. 27, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN13{Caution}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4905

2171 Cited by: . Doll v. U.S. West Communs., Inc., 85 F. Supp. 2d 1038, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2930, 140 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10701, 5 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 1870 (D. Colo. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN10, HN12{Positive}

85 F. Supp. 2d 1038 p.1043 85 F. Supp. 2d 1038 p.1044

2172 Cited by: . Friesner v. N. Am. Co. for Life & Health Ins., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21241 (D.N.M. Mar. 8, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21241

2173 Cited by: . Cadigan v. Transamerica Occidental Life Ins. Co., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21233 (D.N.M. Feb. 24, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN13{Positive}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21233

2174 Cited by: . Oneok, Inc. v. Kansas Pipeline Co., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18355 (D. Kan. Oct. 27,1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN7

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18355

2175 Cited by: . Thurkill v. Menninger Clinic, Inc., 72 F. Supp. 2d 1232, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13897 (D. Kan. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

72 F. Supp. 2d 1232 p.1234 Page 301 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2176 Cited by: . Aetna U.S. Healthcare, Inc. v. Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft, Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., 54 F. Supp. 2d 1042, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10125 (D. Kan. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4{Caution}

54 F. Supp. 2d 1042 p.1052

2177 Cited by: . Herrera v. Lovelace Health Sys., 35 F. Supp. 2d 1327, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1475 (D.N.M. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Cited}

35 F. Supp. 2d 1327 p.1329

2178 Cited by: . Kansas Dep't of Soc. & Rehabilitation Servs. v. Calderon, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1921 (D. Kan. Jan. 11, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Analysis}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1921

2179 Cited by: . Leader Mortg. Co. v. Earel, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17697 (D. Kan. Nov. 4, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17697

2180 Cited by: . Kansas ex rel. Mitchell v. Marion County Landﬁll, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17329 (D. Kan. Oct. 13, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17329

2181 Cited by: . Crisp v. Rappe, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16032 (D. Kan. Sept. 3, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4 {Analysis}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16032

2182 Cited by: . Kansas ex rel. Stovall v. Home Cable Inc., 35 F. Supp. 2d 783, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21173 (D. Kan. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6 {Positive}

35 F. Supp. 2d 783 p.786 Page 302 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2183 Cited by: . City of Hays v. Big Creek Improvement, 5 F. Supp. 2d 1228, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8214 (D. Kan. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Cited}

5 F. Supp. 2d 1228 p.1229

2184 Cited by: . George v. Board of County Comm'rs, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6395 (D. Kan. Apr. 16, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6395

2185 Cited by: . Dillon Cos. v. Teamsters Union Local No. 795, 3 F. Supp. 2d 1193, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6615, 158 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2444 (D. Kan. 1998){Cited}

3 F. Supp. 2d 1193 p.1198

2186 Cited by: . Watts v. Yellow Tech. Servs., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19481 (D. Kan. Nov. 21, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

2187 Cited by: . City of Park City v. Rural Water Dist. No. 2, 960 F. Supp. 255, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5422 (D. Kan. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN13 {Cited}

960 F. Supp. 255 p.257

2188 Explained by, Cited by: . Roux v. Lovelace Health Sys., 947 F. Supp. 1534, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18218 (D.N.M. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN13{Cited}

Explained by: 947 F. Supp. 1534 p.1543 Cited by: 947 F. Supp. 1534 p.1538

2189 Cited by: . Heckelmann v. Piping Cos., 904 F. Supp. 1257, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16999 (N.D. Okla. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

904 F. Supp. 1257 p.1260 Page 303 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2190 Cited by: . De Young v. Lorentz, 887 F. Supp. 254, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7895 (D. Kan. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Positive}

887 F. Supp. 254 p.257

2191 Cited by: . Tabron v. Colgate--Palmolive Co., 881 F. Supp. 512, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4416 (D. Kan. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

881 F. Supp. 512 p.514

2192 Cited by: . Henkel v. ITT Bowest Corp., 872 F. Supp. 872, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19118 (D. Kan. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Caution}

872 F. Supp. 872 p.875

2193 Cited by: . Kansas v. Gorsline, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18925 (D. Kan. Dec. 5, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4

2194 Cited by: . Oltremari by McDaniel v. Kansas Social & Rehabilitative Serv., 871 F. Supp. 1331, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17428 (D. Kan. 1994){Caution}

871 F. Supp. 1331 p.1342

2195 Cited by: . Oltremari by McDaniel v. Kansas Social & Rehabilitative Serv., 871 F. Supp. 1331, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18674 (D. Kan. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3, HN4 {Positive}

2196 Cited by: . St. David's Episcopal Church v. Westboro Baptist Church, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11263 (D. Kan. July 13, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6{Cited}

2197 Cited by: . Booth Theatre Found. v. McKiernan, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4173 (D. Kan. Mar. 11, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Cited} Page 304 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2198 Cited by: . Leroy Cattle Co. v. Fina Oil & Chem. Co., 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4802 (D. Kan. Mar. 2, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13 {Positive}

2199 Cited by: . Drake v. Cheyenne Newspapers, 842 F. Supp. 1403, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1243 (D. Wyo. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9{Analysis}

842 F. Supp. 1403 p.1410

2200 Cited by: . Smith ex rel. a Class Composed of All Oil & Gas Royalty Owners etc. v. Amoco Prod. Co., 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2434 (D. Kan. Feb. 2, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN13{Positive}

2201 Cited by: . Howard v. Hibbard Brown & Co., 835 F. Supp. 1331, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15509 (D. Kan. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

835 F. Supp. 1331 p.1332 835 F. Supp. 1331 p.1333

2202 Cited by: . Widmer v. Hibbard Brown & Co., 835 F. Supp. 1327, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15525 (D. Kan. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

835 F. Supp. 1327 p.1328

2203 Cited by: . Wickman v. Canandaigua Wine Co., 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14071 (D. Kan. Sept. 10, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN9, HN13{Cited}

2204 Cited by: . Zibell v. Brull, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8087 (D. Kan. May 20, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2205 Cited by: . State ex rel. Stephan v. Finney, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8260 (D. Kan. May 12, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13{Cited} Page 305 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2206 Cited by: . Copeland v. MBNA Am., N.A., 820 F. Supp. 537, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6364 (D. Colo. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9{Caution}

820 F. Supp. 537 p.539 820 F. Supp. 537 p.541

2207 Cited by: . Van Hoove v. Mid--AmericaBldg. Maintenance, 811 F. Supp. 609, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1055 (D. Kan. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Positive}

811 F. Supp. 609 p.611

2208 Cited by: . Brasﬁeld v. Brasﬁeld, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18752 (D. Kan. Nov. 19, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Warning}

2209 Cited by: . Nipper v. Garage Door Group, Inc., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17298 (D. Kan. Oct. 19, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13{Cited}

2210 Cited by: . McIntosh v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13900 (D. Kan. Aug. 14, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN1, HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Cited}

2211 Cited by: . Alford v. MESA Petroleum Co., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17569 (D. Kan. Sept. 24, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

2212 Cited by: . Farrar v. Mobil Oil Corp., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13296 (D. Kan. Sept. 18, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

2213 Cited by: . OXY USA, Inc. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., 771 F. Supp. 337, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12084 (D. Kan. 1991){Cited}

771 F. Supp. 337 p.337 Page 306 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2214 Cited by: . Lemon v. Anadarko Prod. Co., 771 F. Supp. 335, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11772, 115 Oil & Gas Rep. 497 (D. Kan. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 {Positive}

771 F. Supp. 335 p.337

2215 Cited by: . Flanagan v. Volume Shoe Corp., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11151 (D. Kan. July 25, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13

2216 Cited by: . Peoples Nat'l Bank v. Darling, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4230 (D. Kan. Apr. 1, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2217 Cited by: . National Mills, Inc. v. Consolidated Freightways Corp., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2870 (D. Kan. Feb. 12, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2218 Cited by: . Davis v. John Alden Life Ins. Co., 746 F. Supp. 44, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12130 (D. Kan. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Cited}

746 F. Supp. 44 p.46

2219 Cited by: . Carter v. Amax Coal Corp., 748 F. Supp. 812, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13923, 12 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2370 (D. Utah 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Cited}

748 F. Supp. 812 p.814

2220 Cited by: . Christian v. College Boulevard Nat'l Bank, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8690 (D. Kan. June 25, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

2221 Cited by: . Gonzalez v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8294 (D. Kan. June 18, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13 Page 307 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2222 Cited by: . Romero v. Mason & Hanger--SilasMason Co., 739 F. Supp. 1472, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7713, 55 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P40362, 6 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 255, 135 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2930, 118 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P56609 (D.N.M. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13{Cited}

739 F. Supp. 1472 p.1474 739 F. Supp. 1472 p.1475 739 F. Supp. 1472 p.1477

2223 Cited by: . Stewart v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, Inc., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3793 (D. Kan. Mar. 29, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

2224 Cited by: . Smith v. Hill's Pet Products, Inc., 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3805 (D. Kan. Mar. 20, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13

2225 Cited by: . Kansas ex rel. Stephan v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 730 F. Supp. 366, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1343 (D. Kan. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Questioned}

730 F. Supp. 366 p.367

2226 Cited by: . Frontier Airlines, Inc. v. United Air Lines, Inc., 758 F. Supp. 1399, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17334, 1991--1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P69365 (D. Colo. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN13{Caution}

758 F. Supp. 1399 p.1406

2227 Cited by: . Maierhofer v. Crown Realty Co., 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18184 (D. Colo. Apr. 11, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

11TH CIRCUIT --COURT OF APPEALS

2228 Cited by: . Page 308 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Dunlap v. G&L Holding Group, Inc., 381 F.3d 1285, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 18258, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 971, Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P28856, 21 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1257, 72 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1365 (11th Cir. Fla. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Caution}

381 F.3d 1285 p.1290

2229 Cited by: . Stern v. IBM, 326 F.3d 1367, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 7070, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 501, 30 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1520 (11th Cir. Fla. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN13{Positive}

326 F.3d 1367 p.1370

2230 Cited by: . Geddes v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 321 F.3d 1349, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3281, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 335, 171 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3121, 148 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P59709 (11th Cir. Fla. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN13 {Caution}

321 F.3d 1349 p.1352

2231 Cited by: . Behlen v. Merrill Lynch, 311 F.3d 1087, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 23253, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 13 (11th Cir. Ala. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6{Caution}

311 F.3d 1087 p.1090

2232 Cited by: . Anderson v. H & R Block, Inc., 287 F.3d 1038, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 5978, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 433 (11th Cir. Ala. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6, HN13{Warning}

287 F.3d 1038 p.1042

2233 Cited by: . Henson v. Ciba--GeigyCorp., 261 F.3d 1065, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 18344, 14 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1094 (11th Cir. Fla. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4 {Caution}

261 F.3d 1065 p.1070

2234 Cited by: . Smith v. GTE Corp., 236 F.3d 1292, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 59, 14 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 303 (11th Cir. Ala. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6{Caution} Page 309 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

236 F.3d 1292 p.1310

2235 Cited by: . Blab T.V., Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communs., Inc., 182 F.3d 851, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 17939, 12 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1118, 17 Comm. Reg. (P & F) 180 (11th Cir. Ala. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Caution}

182 F.3d 851 p.854

2236 Cited by: . De Perez v. AT&T Co., 139 F.3d 1368, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 8241, 11 Fla. L. Weekly C 1267 (11th Cir. Ga. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Warning}

139 F.3d 1368 p.1373 139 F.3d 1368 p.1373 139 F.3d 1368 p.1373 139 F.3d 1368 p.1373

2237 Cited by: . Hall v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield, 134 F.3d 1063, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 1789, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1013 (11th Cir. Ala. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6{Caution}

134 F.3d 1063 p.1065 134 F.3d 1063 p.1065

2238 Cited by: . Franklin v. QHG of Gadsden, 127 F.3d 1024, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 30467, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 729 (11th Cir. Ala. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Caution}

127 F.3d 1024 p.1028

2239 Cited by: . Diaz v. Sheppard, 85 F.3d 1502, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 15246, 10 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 32 (11th Cir. Fla. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9{Caution}

85 F.3d 1502 p.1504

2240 Cited by: . Burns v. Windsor Ins. Co., 31 F.3d 1092, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25241 (11th Cir. Ala. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

31 F.3d 1092 p.1095 Page 310 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2241 Cited by: . Tamiami Partners, Ltd. v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, 999 F.2d 503, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 20716, 7 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 756 (11th Cir. Fla. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Caution}

999 F.2d 503 p.507

2242 Distinguished by: . Darden v. United States Steel Corp., 830 F.2d 1116, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 14133, 126 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2906, 107 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10185 (11th Cir. Ala. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7{Caution}

830 F.2d 1116 p.1119 11TH CIRCUIT --U.S. DISTRICT COURTS

2243 Cited by: . Houser v. Medtronic United States, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49933 (M.D. Fla. July 20, 2006)

2244 Cited by: . Horowitz v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49643 (M.D. Fla. July 17, 2006)

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49643

2245 Followed by: . Ferree v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48239 (N.D. Ga. July 17, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN13{Analysis}

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48239

2246 Cited by: . Callahan v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42860 (N.D. Fla. June 26, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42860

2247 Cited by: . Marzella v. Sprint--Florida,Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33877 (M.D. Fla. May 26, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33877 Page 311 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2248 Cited by: . Commercial Diving Servs. v. U.S. Envtl. Servs., L.L.C., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28362 (S.D. Ala. May 2, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28362

2249 Cited by: . Dimension D, LLC v. True, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23924 (M.D. Ala. Apr. 21, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23924

2250 Cited by: . King v. Provident Bank, 428 F. Supp. 2d 1226, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17877 (M.D. Ala. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9

428 F. Supp. 2d 1226 p.1230

2251 Cited by: . Deel v. Metromedia Rest. Servs., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10174, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 409 (N.D. Fla. Feb. 27, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10174

2252 Cited by: . Smith v. Am. Int'l Group, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8560 (M.D. Ala. Feb. 10, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Positive}

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8560

2253 Cited by: . AT&T Corp. v. Austal, USA, L.L.C., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7447 (S.D. Ala. Feb. 7, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7447

2254 Cited by: . Regency Hosp. Co. of S. Atlanta, L.L.C. v. United Healthcare of Ga., Inc., 403 F. Supp. 2d 1221, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30011, 37 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1232 (N.D. Ga. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13

403 F. Supp. 2d 1221 p.1224 Page 312 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2255 Cited by: . Fiﬁe v. Cooksey, 403 F. Supp. 2d 1131, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35950 (M.D. Fla. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

403 F. Supp. 2d 1131 p.1133

2256 Cited by: . Vowells v. New Eng. Life Ins. Co., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28288 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 19, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN3

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28288

2257 Cited by: . Capece v. Depository Trust & Clearing Corp., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42039 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 11, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42039

2258 Cited by: . Bayer CropScience, LP v. Booth, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19411 (M.D. Ga. Aug. 31, 2005){Analysis}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19411

2259 Cited by: . Booth v. Bd. of Regents, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19337 (M.D. Ga. Aug. 30, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Analysis}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19337

2260 Cited by: . Moll v. Allstate Floridian Ins. Co., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24609, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 895 (N.D. Fla. Aug. 16, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3{Cited}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24609

2261 Distinguished by: . Lockette v. City of Albany, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17080 (M.D. Ga. Aug. 11, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17080

2262 Cited by: . Page 313 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Bensman v. Citicorp Trust, N.A., 354 F. Supp. 2d 1330, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5631, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 487, 55 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (CBC) 956 (S.D. Fla. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

354 F. Supp. 2d 1330 p.1331

2263 Followed by: . Jones v. LMR Int'l, 351 F. Supp. 2d 1308, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 516, 34 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1896 (M.D. Ala. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN5, HN13{Analysis}

351 F. Supp. 2d 1308 p.1311

2264 Cited by: . Nichols v. CitiGroup Global Mkts., 364 F. Supp. 2d 1330, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28034 (N.D. Ala. 2004){Positive}

364 F. Supp. 2d 1330 p.1334

2265 Cited by: . Bolton v. McWane Cast Iron & Pipe Co., 328 F. Supp. 2d 1229, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13802 (N.D. Ala. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

328 F. Supp. 2d 1229 p.1231

2266 Cited by: . Florida, Dep't of Agric. & Consumer Servs. v. Sports Auth. Fla., Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29646 (M.D. Fla. June 4, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN5, HN6, HN13

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29646

2267 Cited by: . Transouth Fin. Corp. v. Murry, 311 B.R. 99, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11413 (M.D. Ala. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13{Positive}

311 B.R. 99 p.104

2268 Cited by: . Braden v. Wyeth, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28734 (N.D. Ala. Apr. 5, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5 {Analysis}

2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28734 Page 314 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2269 Cited by: . York v. Ramsay Youth Servs., 313 F. Supp. 2d 1275, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6055, 33 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1229 (M.D. Ala. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13{Positive}

313 F. Supp. 2d 1275 p.1281

2270 Cited by: . White v. Bombardier Corp., 313 F. Supp. 2d 1295, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5976, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 499 (N.D. Fla. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3 {Caution}

313 F. Supp. 2d 1295 p.1298

2271 Cited by: . United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. v. Yellow Freight Sys., 296 F. Supp. 2d 1322, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22979 (S.D. Ala. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Cited}

296 F. Supp. 2d 1322 p.1337

2272 Cited by: . Stern v. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co., 295 F. Supp. 2d 1321, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23183, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 175 (M.D. Fla. 2003) {Cited}

295 F. Supp. 2d 1321 p.1324

2273 Cited by: . In re Managed Care Litig., 298 F. Supp. 2d 1259, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22066, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 292 (S.D. Fla. 2003){Caution}

298 F. Supp. 2d 1259 p.1287

2274 Cited by: . Adair v. Johnston, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25232 (M.D. Ala. Oct. 24, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Caution}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25232

2275 Cited by: . Jenkins v. First Am. Cash Advance of Ga., LLC, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25154 (S.D. Ga. Sept. 5, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Warning}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25154 Page 315 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2276 Cited by: . Lewis v. Nextel Communs., Inc., 281 F. Supp. 2d 1302, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16060 (N.D. Ala. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13{Cited}

281 F. Supp. 2d 1302 p.1303

2277 Cited by: . Audio Sys. of Fla., Inc. v. Simplexgrinnell LP, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23360, 68 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1681 (M.D. Fla. July 11, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN3, HN4, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13{Caution}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23360

2278 Cited by: . Jackson v. Purdue Pharma Co., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6998 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 10, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6998

2279 Followed by: . Greaves v. McAuley, 264 F. Supp. 2d 1078, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2319, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P92414 (N.D. Ga. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5{Caution}

264 F. Supp. 2d 1078 p.1087

2280 Cited by: . Microdecisions, Inc. v. Skinner, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14846 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 5, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14846

2281 Cited by: . McGettigan v. Ford Motor Co., 265 F. Supp. 2d 1291, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8886, 2003--1Trade Cas. (CCH) P74044 (S.D. Ala. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6{Analysis}

265 F. Supp. 2d 1291 p.1297

2282 Cited by: . Smartt v. First Union Nat'l Bank, 245 F. Supp. 2d 1229, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7481 (M.D. Fla. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Analysis}

245 F. Supp. 2d 1229 p.1233 Page 316 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2283 Cited by: . Hill v. Bellsouth Telcoms., Inc., 244 F. Supp. 2d 1323, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6555 (N.D. Ga. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6{Warning}

244 F. Supp. 2d 1323 p.1324

2284 Cited by: . Coker v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 220 F. Supp. 2d 1367, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17407 (N.D. Ga. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Positive}

220 F. Supp. 2d 1367 p.1369

2285 Cited by: . Herndon v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc'y of the United States, 253 F. Supp. 2d 1364, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26001 (S.D. Ga. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6{Positive}

253 F. Supp. 2d 1364 p.1366 253 F. Supp. 2d 1364 p.1367

2286 Cited by: . Sapp v. AT&T Corp., 215 F. Supp. 2d 1273, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16008 (M.D. Ala. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

215 F. Supp. 2d 1273 p.1274

2287 Cited by: . Thomas v. Admin. Comm. of the Wal--MartStores, Inc., 210 F. Supp. 2d 1296, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10209, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 374, 28 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1458 (M.D. Fla. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

210 F. Supp. 2d 1296 p.1298 210 F. Supp. 2d 1296 p.1299

2288 Cited by: . Household Bank v. JFS Group, 191 F. Supp. 2d 1292, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4547 (M.D. Ala. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Warning}

191 F. Supp. 2d 1292 p.1303

2289 Cited by: . Rollin v. Kimberly Clark Tissue Co., 211 F.R.D. 670, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24867, 2002 A.M.C. 898 (S.D. Ala. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Cited} Page 317 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

211 F.R.D. 670 p.679

2290 Cited by: . Novastar Mortg., Inc. v. Bennett, 173 F. Supp. 2d 1358, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20911 (N.D. Ga. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

173 F. Supp. 2d 1358 p.1361

2291 Cited by: . Samples v. Conoco, Inc., 165 F. Supp. 2d 1303, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12872 (N.D. Fla. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Positive}

165 F. Supp. 2d 1303 p.1308

2292 Cited by: . Nat'l Ass'n of Prof'l Athletes, Inc. v. UPS, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23615 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 1, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23615

2293 Cited by: . Harrelson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Ala., 150 F. Supp. 2d 1290, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10790, 26 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2039 (M.D. Ala. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN7{Positive}

150 F. Supp. 2d 1290 p.1293

2294 Cited by: . Hooper v. Albany Int'l Corp., 149 F. Supp. 2d 1315, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10782 (M.D. Ala. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN13{Cited}

149 F. Supp. 2d 1315 p.1320

2295 Cited by: . Rosenthal v. United Van Lines, LLC, 174 F. Supp. 2d 1331, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23560 (N.D. Ga. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13{Warning}

174 F. Supp. 2d 1331 p.1334

2296 Cited by: . Krasny v. Waser, 147 F. Supp. 2d 1300, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8772 (M.D. Fla. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

147 F. Supp. 2d 1300 p.1304 Page 318 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2297 Cited by: . Lucia v. Teledyne Cont'l Motors, 173 F. Supp. 2d 1253, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19825 (S.D. Ala. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13 {Cited}

173 F. Supp. 2d 1253 p.1258 173 F. Supp. 2d 1253 p.1263 173 F. Supp. 2d 1253 p.1267

2298 Followed by: . Long v. Ace Cash Express, Inc., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24617 (M.D. Fla. June 15, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24617

2299 Cited by: . Letner v. Unum Life Ins. Co., 203 F. Supp. 2d 1291, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24638 (N.D. Fla. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

203 F. Supp. 2d 1291 p.1296

2300 Cited by: . Lamm v. Bekins Van Lines Co., 139 F. Supp. 2d 1300, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5017 (M.D. Ala. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9{Caution}

139 F. Supp. 2d 1300 p.1303

2301 Cited by: . Cadiz v. IRS, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7400, 87 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2336 (M.D. Fla. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Analysis}

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7400

2302 Cited by: . Oskars, Inc. v. Bennett & Co., 132 F. Supp. 2d 1333, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2990 (M.D. Ala. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN13{Cited}

132 F. Supp. 2d 1333 p.1336

2303 Cited by: . Andrews v. Hotel Reed Nursing Home, 167 F. Supp. 2d 1333, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5577 (S.D. Ala. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Caution}

167 F. Supp. 2d 1333 p.1339 Page 319 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2304 Cited by: . Hines v. Reed, 170 F. Supp. 2d 1200, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5229 (S.D. Ala. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Positive}

170 F. Supp. 2d 1200 p.1203

2305 Cited by: . Bridges v. Principal Life Ins. Co., 132 F. Supp. 2d 1325, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2988, 26 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1317 (M.D. Ala. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN13{Analysis}

132 F. Supp. 2d 1325 p.1327

2306 Cited by: . Shaner v. Fleet Bank, 132 F. Supp. 2d 953, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2973 (M.D. Ala. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN13{Cited}

132 F. Supp. 2d 953 p.955

2307 Cited by: . Reed v. O'Neal, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3379, 87 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1536 (M.D. Fla. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3379

2308 Cited by: . Bear MGC Cutlery Co. v. Estes Express Lines, Inc., 132 F. Supp. 2d 937, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6314 (N.D. Ala. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 , HN7, HN12{Caution}

132 F. Supp. 2d 937 p.940

2309 Cited by: . Dickerson v. Alexander Hamilton Life Ins. Co. of Am., 130 F. Supp. 2d 1271, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2930 (N.D. Ala. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Positive}

130 F. Supp. 2d 1271 p.1273

2310 Cited by: . Anderson v. H&R Block, Inc., 132 F. Supp. 2d 948, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19431 (M.D. Ala. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5{Warning}

132 F. Supp. 2d 948 p.950 Page 320 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2311 Cited by: . Harris v. Florida Elections Canvassing Comm'n, 122 F. Supp. 2d 1317, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17875, 14 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 78 (N.D. Fla. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Positive}

2312 Cited by: . Stark v. Health Partners S.E., Inc., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18249 (S.D. Ala. Nov. 20, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Cited}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18249

2313 Cited by: . Love v. Fortis Beneﬁts Ins. Co., 120 F. Supp. 2d 997, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17059 (M.D. Ala. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN13{Positive}

120 F. Supp. 2d 997 p.1001

2314 Cited by: . Watkins v. Trans Union,L.L.C., 118 F. Supp. 2d 1217, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16339, 28 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2557 (N.D. Ala. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 , HN13{Positive}

118 F. Supp. 2d 1217 p.1219

2315 Cited by: . Ramirez v. Humana, Inc., 119 F. Supp. 2d 1307, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16348 (M.D. Fla. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13{Caution}

119 F. Supp. 2d 1307 p.1309

2316 Cited by: . Carden v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21367 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 17, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21367

2317 Cited by: . Hardy v. Welch, 135 F. Supp. 2d 1171, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20704 (M.D. Ala. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Positive}

135 F. Supp. 2d 1171 p.1177 Page 321 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2318 Cited by: . Hardy v. Welch, 128 F. Supp. 2d 1331, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19540 (M.D. Ala. 2000){Warning}

128 F. Supp. 2d 1331 p.1336

2319 Cited by: . Bishop v. Alabama Dep't of Envtl. Mgmt., 108 F. Supp. 2d 1323, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12316 (M.D. Ala. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Cited}

108 F. Supp. 2d 1323 p.1325 108 F. Supp. 2d 1323 p.1328

2320 Cited by: . Peters v. Harper Group, Inc., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20763 (M.D. Ala. Mar. 10, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Cited}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20763

2321 Followed by: . First Guar. Bank & Trust Co. v. Reeves, 86 F. Supp. 2d 1147, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2878 (M.D. Fla. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Cited}

86 F. Supp. 2d 1147 p.1154

2322 Cited by: . Cacciatore v. Liberty Life Assur. Co., 85 F. Supp. 2d 1282, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1162, 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 166, 24 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2661 (M.D. Fla. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7{Cited}

85 F. Supp. 2d 1282 p.1284

2323 Cited by: . World Access USA Corp. v. AT&T Corp., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2373, 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 141, 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 0141 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 2, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN9{Caution}

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2373

2324 Cited by: . Carpenter v. Communications Workers, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6114, 163 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3023, 140 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10716 (N.D. Ga. Jan. 28, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13

2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6114 Page 322 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

140 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10716 163 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3023 p.3023

2325 Cited by: . Circle Redmont, Inc. v. Mercer Transp. Co., 78 F. Supp. 2d 1316, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21126 (M.D. Fla. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

78 F. Supp. 2d 1316 p.1318

2326 Cited by: . Nicholson v. National Accounts, Inc., 105 F. Supp. 2d 1290, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22227 (S.D. Ala. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

105 F. Supp. 2d 1290 p.1293

2327 Cited by: . Reeves v. Mayﬂower Transit, 87 F. Supp. 2d 1251, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21275 (M.D. Ala. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Caution}

87 F. Supp. 2d 1251 p.1253

2328 Cited by: . Cowan v. Combined Ins. Co. of Am., 67 F. Supp. 2d 1312, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14715 (M.D. Ala. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN13{Cited}

67 F. Supp. 2d 1312 p.1318

2329 Cited by: . Droessler v. Wyeth--Ayerst Lab., 64 F. Supp. 2d 1265, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15062 (S.D. Fla. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Positive}

64 F. Supp. 2d 1265 p.1269

2330 Cited by: . Estate of Ayres v. Beaver, 48 F. Supp. 2d 1335, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7626, 12 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 400 (M.D. Fla. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4 , HN6{Positive}

48 F. Supp. 2d 1335 p.1338

2331 Cited by: . Wynn ex rel. Alabama v. Philip Morris, Inc., 51 F. Supp. 2d 1232, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8419 (N.D. Ala. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9 {Caution} Page 323 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

51 F. Supp. 2d 1232 p.1238

2332 Cited by: . Garrison v. Northeast Ga. Med. Ctr., Inc., 66 F. Supp. 2d 1336, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10608 (N.D. Ga. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5{Positive}

66 F. Supp. 2d 1336 p.1340

2333 Followed by, Cited by: . Key Bank U.S.A., N.A. v. First Union Nat'l Bank, 234 B.R. 827, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6102, 12 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 331 (M.D. Fla. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6, HN13{Cited}

Followed by: 234 B.R. 827 p.831 Cited by: 234 B.R. 827 p.830

2334 Cited by: . Weathington v. United Behavioral Health, 41 F. Supp. 2d 1315, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2643 (M.D. Ala. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN13 {Questioned}

41 F. Supp. 2d 1315 p.1319

2335 Cited by: . Mason v. Fidelity Fed. Bank, 40 F. Supp. 2d 1340, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2622 (M.D. Ala. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5{Caution}

40 F. Supp. 2d 1340 p.1342

2336 Followed by: . Anderson v. Chrysler Corp., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23107 (N.D. Ala. Dec. 21, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23107

2337 Cited by: . Mehaffey v. Boston Mut. Life Ins. Co., 31 F. Supp. 2d 1329, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19582 (M.D. Ala. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN13{Caution}

31 F. Supp. 2d 1329 p.1332

2338 Cited by: . Page 324 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Case v. Webb, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21679 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 7, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4{Positive}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21679

2339 Followed by: . Carter v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, Inc., 61 F. Supp. 2d 1237, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22584 (N.D. Fla. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6 {Caution}

61 F. Supp. 2d 1237 p.1239

2340 Cited by: . Stoudemire v. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co., 24 F. Supp. 2d 1252, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15202 (M.D. Ala. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN13 {Caution}

24 F. Supp. 2d 1252 p.1254

2341 Cited by: . Campbell v. GMC, 19 F. Supp. 2d 1260, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14575 (N.D. Ala. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Caution}

19 F. Supp. 2d 1260 p.1271

2342 Cited by: . Tetley v. Knollwood Park Hosp., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16473 (S.D. Ala. Sept. 3, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16473

2343 Cited by: . Gray v. H.A.S., 18 F. Supp. 2d 1320, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13803 (M.D. Ala. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

18 F. Supp. 2d 1320 p.1323

2344 Cited by: . Simmer v. North Am. Van Lines, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23140 (M.D. Ala. July 31, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13{Positive}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23140

2345 Cited by: . Page 325 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Greater Jacksonville Transp. Co. v. Jacksonville Port Auth., 12 F. Supp. 2d 1311, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10667 (M.D. Fla. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Cited}

12 F. Supp. 2d 1311 p.1313

2346 Cited by: . First Bank v. C & J Sapp Publ'g. Co., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22105 (M.D. Fla. July 2, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22105

2347 Cited by: . Parra v. John Alden Life Ins. Co., 22 F. Supp. 2d 1360, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12875 (S.D. Fla. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Cited}

22 F. Supp. 2d 1360 p.1362

2348 Cited by: . Construction Servs. v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22818 (N.D. Ala. May 5, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN13{Cited}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22818

2349 Cited by: . Stabler v. Contel Cellular, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20194 (S.D. Ala. Nov. 17, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6

2350 Cited by: . Patterman v. Travelers, Inc., 11 F. Supp. 2d 1382, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22775 (S.D. Ga. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9{Caution}

11 F. Supp. 2d 1382 p.1385

2351 Cited by: . Brand v. Robins Fed. Credit Union, 969 F. Supp. 778, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10352 (M.D. Ga. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Analysis}

969 F. Supp. 778 p.779

2352 Cited by: . Butterworth v. Chances Casino Cruises, Inc., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23561 (M.D. Fla. July 14, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN7, HN13 {Positive} Page 326 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2353 Cited by: . Levett v. American Heritage Life Ins. Co., 971 F. Supp. 1399, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12074 (M.D. Ala. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Analysis}

971 F. Supp. 1399 p.1401

2354 Cited by: . Hutto v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Ala., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16386 (M.D. Ala. June 9, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6

1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16386

2355 Cited by: . Barnett v. Winn--DixieStores, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12521 (S.D. Ala. June 2, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN7{Caution}

2356 Cited by: . Means v. Independent Life & Accident Ins. Co., 963 F. Supp. 1131, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7202 (M.D. Ala. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN13 {Positive}

963 F. Supp. 1131 p.1133

2357 Cited by: . Crook v. Credit Acceptance Corp. (In re Crook), 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8105 (S.D. Ala. May 13, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Analysis}

1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8105

2358 Cited by: . Rodgers v. Independent Life & Accident Ins. Co., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23584 (N.D. Ala. Apr. 30, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9{Positive}

2359 Cited by: . Frankenberg v. Superior Distribs., 961 F. Supp. 1560, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11354 (S.D. Ala. 1997){Analysis}

961 F. Supp. 1560 p.1565

2360 Cited by: . Page 327 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Lovelace v. Amerada Hess Corp., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6614 (S.D. Ala. Apr. 1, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

2361 Cited by: . Crowne Invs. v. United Food & Commer. Workers, Local No. 1657, 959 F. Supp. 1473, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4147, 155 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2042, 137 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10313 (M.D. Ala. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Cited}

959 F. Supp. 1473 p.1476

2362 Cited by: . Lewis v. Bice, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21597 (M.D. Ala. Mar. 19, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN13{Caution}

2363 Cited by: . Estate of Olmstead by & Through Olmstead v. Beverly Enterprises--Florida, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4059, 10 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 652 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 17, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Cited}

2364 Cited by: . Frankenberg v. Superior Distribs., 961 F. Supp. 1560, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11362 (S.D. Ala. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

2365 Cited by: . Murray v. Omaha Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12843 (S.D. Ala. Feb. 27, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN13 {Caution}

1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12843

2366 Cited by: . Monday v. Coast to Coast Wireless Cable, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2970 (M.D. Ala. Feb. 19, 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9 , HN10, HN13{Caution}

2367 Cited by: . Smith v. Beneﬁcial Nat'l Bank USA, 971 F. Supp. 513, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12162 (M.D. Ala. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6, HN7, HN13{Positive}

971 F. Supp. 513 p.515 971 F. Supp. 513 p.516 Page 328 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2368 Cited by: . Howard v. Globe Life Ins. Co., 973 F. Supp. 1412, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21354 (N.D. Fla. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Questioned}

973 F. Supp. 1412 p.1414

2369 Cited by: . Partin v. Cableview, Inc., 948 F. Supp. 1046, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20406 (S.D. Ala. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN13{Positive}

948 F. Supp. 1046 p.1049

2370 Cited by: . Engelhardt v. Paul Revere Life Ins. Co., 951 F. Supp. 1003, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20207 (M.D. Ala. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Warning}

951 F. Supp. 1003 p.1007

2371 Cited by: . Sanderson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 954 F. Supp. 237, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20066 (M.D. Ala. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Analysis}

954 F. Supp. 237 p.240

2372 Cited by: . Hunter v. Beneﬁcial Nat'l Bank USA, 947 F. Supp. 446, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17715 (M.D. Ala. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Positive}

947 F. Supp. 446 p.449

2373 Cited by: . Giddens v. Hometown Fin. Servs., 938 F. Supp. 801, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14203 (M.D. Ala. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13 {Caution}

938 F. Supp. 801 p.804

2374 Cited by: . Standridge v. Wal--MartStores, Inc., 945 F. Supp. 252, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20186 (N.D. Ga. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

945 F. Supp. 252 p.257 Page 329 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2375 Cited by: . Kenney v. Farmers Nat'l Bank, 938 F. Supp. 789, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13608 (M.D. Ala. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

938 F. Supp. 789 p.791

2376 Cited by: . Carlson v. WPLG/TV--10, 956 F. Supp. 994, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21355, 72 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 646 (S.D. Fla. 1996){Analysis}

956 F. Supp. 994 p.1005

2377 Cited by: . Jackson v. Bank One, 952 F. Supp. 734, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20135 (M.D. Ala. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13{Positive}

952 F. Supp. 734 p.736

2378 Cited by: . Hayduk v. UPS, 930 F. Supp. 584, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9019, 10 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 32, 152 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2728 (S.D. Fla. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN13 {Caution}

930 F. Supp. 584 p.596

2379 Cited by: . Hayduk v. UPS, 152 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2728 (S.D. Fla. Apr. 25, 1996)

152 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2728 p.2735

2380 Cited by: . Carlson v. WPLG/TV--10, 956 F. Supp. 994, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12612, 72 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 646 (S.D. Fla. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10 {Analysis}

72 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 646 p.656

2381 Cited by: . Sexton v. Principal Fin. Group, 920 F. Supp. 169, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3289 (M.D. Ala. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9{Cited}

920 F. Supp. 169 p.172 Page 330 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2382 Cited by: . Grace v. Interstate Life & Accident Ins. Co., 916 F. Supp. 1185, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2037 (M.D. Ala. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9 {Caution}

916 F. Supp. 1185 p.1191

2383 Cited by: . Carlson v. WPLT/TV--10, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7686, 70 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1596 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 7, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Caution}

70 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1596 p.1603

2384 Cited by: . Walker v. Commercial Credit Corp., 192 B.R. 260, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1289 (M.D. Ala. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN13{Positive}

192 B.R. 260 p.264 192 B.R. 260 p.265

2385 Followed by: . Glenn v. Fidelity Fin. Servs., 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1835 (S.D. Ala. Feb. 1, 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Cited}

1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1835

2386 Cited by: . Constantine v. Minis, 910 F. Supp. 657, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19546 (S.D. Ga. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN12{Caution}

910 F. Supp. 657 p.661

2387 Cited by: . Traylor v. First Family Fin. Servs. (In re Traylor), 192 B.R. 255, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20296 (M.D. Ala. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 {Positive}

192 B.R. 255 p.260

2388 Cited by: . Horn v. Rural Community Ins. Servs., 903 F. Supp. 1502, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16305 (M.D. Ala. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN13{Caution}

903 F. Supp. 1502 p.1504 Page 331 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2389 Cited by: . Moss v. Southtrust Mobile Servs., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21770 (N.D. Ala. Sept. 22, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

2390 Cited by: . Austin v. American Gen. Fin., 900 F. Supp. 396, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14258 (M.D. Ala. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13 {Cited}

900 F. Supp. 396 p.398 900 F. Supp. 396 p.399 900 F. Supp. 396 p.400

2391 Cited by: . Hunter v. Rich's Dep't Stores, 945 F. Supp. 1500, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21391 (N.D. Ala. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN13{Caution}

945 F. Supp. 1500 p.1504

2392 Cited by: . Anderson v. Household Fin. Corp., 900 F. Supp. 386, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14243 (M.D. Ala. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN13{Positive}

900 F. Supp. 386 p.388 900 F. Supp. 386 p.389

2393 Cited by: . Four Way Plant Farm v. NCCI, 894 F. Supp. 1538, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10988, 1995--2Trade Cas. (CCH) P71152 (M.D. Ala. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN7, HN13{Cited}

894 F. Supp. 1538 p.1542 894 F. Supp. 1538 p.1543

2394 Cited by: . McCrae v. Commercial Credit Corp., 892 F. Supp. 1385, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10909 (M.D. Ala. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13 {Cited}

892 F. Supp. 1385 p.1386 892 F. Supp. 1385 p.1387

2395 Cited by: . Page 332 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Harmony Homes v. United States, 890 F. Supp. 1032, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9389, 9 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 139 (M.D. Fla. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Warning}

890 F. Supp. 1032 p.1034

2396 Cited by: . Lambert v. Mail Handlers Beneﬁt Plan, 886 F. Supp. 830, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6765 (M.D. Ala. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13{Questioned}

886 F. Supp. 830 p.834

2397 Cited by: . Burke v. Humana Ins. Co., 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20744 (M.D. Ala. May 11, 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Caution}

2398 Cited by: . Agee v. Huggins, 888 F. Supp. 1573, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8688, 149 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3005 (N.D. Ga. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

888 F. Supp. 1573 p.1578 888 F. Supp. 1573 p.1582

2399 Followed by: . Publix Supermarkets v. United Food & Commercial Workers Int'l Union, 900 F. Supp. 419, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15433, 9 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 394, 131 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58046 (M.D. Fla. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN13 {Caution}

900 F. Supp. 419 p.421

2400 Cited by: . Autrey v. United Cos. Lending Corp., 872 F. Supp. 925, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 305 (S.D. Ala. 1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN13{Analysis}

872 F. Supp. 925 p.927 872 F. Supp. 925 p.928

2401 Cited by: . Campos v. Sociedad Aeronautica de Medellin Consolidada, S.A., 882 F. Supp. 1056, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20140, 8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 742 (S.D. Fla. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

882 F. Supp. 1056 p.1057 Page 333 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2402 Cited by: . Cook v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 174 B.R. 321, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16388 (M.D. Ala. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

174 B.R. 321 p.324 174 B.R. 321 p.326

2403 Cited by: . Condon v. United Airlines, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20023, 147 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2986 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 30, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN10, HN13 {Positive}

2404 Cited by: . Condon v. United Airlines, 147 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2985 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 30, 1994)

147 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2985 p.2987

2405 Cited by: . Union Iberoamericana v. American Airlines, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10483, 8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 308 (S.D. Fla. July 19, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Cited}

2406 Cited by: . Pierre v. Alabama Power Co., 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9680 (S.D. Ala. June 30, 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN10, HN13

2407 Cited by: . Goff v. Michelin Tire Corp., 837 F. Supp. 1143, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19551 (M.D. Ala. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

837 F. Supp. 1143 p.1144

2408 Cited by: . Baptist Hosp. v. Timke, 832 F. Supp. 338, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13588, 7 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 446 (S.D. Fla. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Questioned}

832 F. Supp. 338 p.340

2409 Cited by: . Page 334 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Mathews v. Anderson, 826 F. Supp. 479, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9585, 62 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 862, 8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1188 (M.D. Ga. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4 , HN6{Cited}

826 F. Supp. 479 p.480

2410 Cited by: . Courtney v. Champion Int'l Corp., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17284 (S.D. Ala. Oct. 14, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN10

2411 Followed by: . Horne v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 793 F. Supp. 315, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11373, 6 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 277, 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 984, 140 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2727, 140 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2728, 124 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10496 (S.D. Fla. 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN9, HN10, HN13{Positive}

793 F. Supp. 315 p.316

2412 Followed by: . Wilkinson v. Georgia Power Co., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12704, 2 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1015, 140 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2735, 123 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10475 (M.D. Ga. May 28, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13{Cited}

2 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1015 p.1017 123 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10475 140 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2735 p.2736

2413 Cited by: . Morganstern v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, Inc., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2584 (S.D. Ga. Jan. 2, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4

2414 Cited by: . Dickinson v. Cosmos Broadcasting Co., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21659 (M.D. Ala. Apr. 1, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Positive}

2415 Cited by: . King Provision Corp. v. Burger King Corp., 750 F. Supp. 501, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15264, 1991--1Trade Cas. (CCH) P69324 (M.D. Fla. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6, HN13{Cited}

750 F. Supp. 501 p.503 Page 335 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2416 Cited by: . Hudson Ins. Co. v. American Elec. Corp., 748 F. Supp. 837, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13519, 32 Env't Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1278, 21 Envtl. L. Rep. 20456 (M.D. Fla. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN9, HN13{Positive}

748 F. Supp. 837 p.839

2417 Cited by: . Auto Finance Corp. v. Landy, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13639 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 28, 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7

2418 Cited by: . Charter Medical Corp. v. Friese, 732 F. Supp. 1160, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16464 (N.D. Ga. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN6{Questioned}

732 F. Supp. 1160 p.1162

2419 Cited by: . Scherer v. Laborers' Int'l Union, 746 F. Supp. 73, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17290, 134 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2962 (N.D. Fla. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN10 , HN13{Caution}

746 F. Supp. 73 p.78

2420 Cited by: . Ward v. Savannah Maritime Asso., 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5575, 129 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3061 (S.D. Ga. May 23, 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Cited}

D.C. CIRCUIT --COURT OF APPEALS

2421 Cited in Concurring Opinion at: . Republic of Venez. v. Philip Morris, Inc., 351 U.S. App. D.C. 108, 287 F.3d 192, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 7685 (2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

287 F.3d 192 p.200 351 U.S. App. D.C. 108 p.116 D.C. CIRCUIT --U.S. DISTRICT COURT

2422 Cited by: . Your Girl Friday, LLC v. MGF Holdings, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20665 (D.D.C. Apr. 18, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4

2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20665 Page 336 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2423 Cited by: . Greene v. AFGE, AFL--CIO,Local 2607, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19983 (D.D.C. Sept. 7, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3{Analysis}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19983

2424 Cited by: . Lilley v. Stout, 384 F. Supp. 2d 83, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14313, 75 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1843 (D.D.C. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Cited}

384 F. Supp. 2d 83 p.88

2425 Cited by: . District of Columbia v. 109,205.5 Square Feet of Land, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7990 (D.D.C. Apr. 25, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3{Cited}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7990

2426 Followed by, Cited by: . Int'l Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers v. Ins. Co. of the West, 366 F. Supp. 2d 33, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4949, 176 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3271 (D.D.C. 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Positive}

Followed by: 366 F. Supp. 2d 33 p.40 Cited by: 366 F. Supp. 2d 33 p.36

2427 Cited by: . Adolph Coors Co. v. Truck Ins. Exch., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3588 (D.D.C. Feb. 28, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3{Analysis}

2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3588

2428 Cited by: . Strategic Lien Acquisitions LLC v. Republic of Zaire, 344 F. Supp. 2d 145, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22307 (D.D.C. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9 , HN13{Cited}

344 F. Supp. 2d 145 p.148

2429 Cited by: . Page 337 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Kopff v. World Research Group, LLC, 298 F. Supp. 2d 50, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23641 (D.D.C. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Caution}

298 F. Supp. 2d 50 p.53

2430 Cited by: . Julien v. CCA of Tenn., 268 F. Supp. 2d 19, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10505 (D.D.C. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3{Cited}

268 F. Supp. 2d 19 p.21

2431 Cited by: . Bush v. Clark Constr. & Concrete Corp., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10067 (D.D.C. June 6, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN10, HN13{Analysis}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10067

2432 Cited by: . Bush v. Clark Constr. & Concrete Corp., 267 F. Supp. 2d 43, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9392 (D.D.C. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN7, HN10, HN13{Positive}

267 F. Supp. 2d 43 p.45

2433 Cited by: . Williams v. Purdue Pharma Co., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19268 (D.D.C. Feb. 27, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Cited}

2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19268

2434 Cited by: . Herero People's Reparations Corp. v. Deutsche Bank AG, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27982 (D.D.C. May 29, 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Positive}

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27982

2435 Cited by: . In re Tobacco/Governmental Health Care Costs Litig., 100 F. Supp. 2d 31, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8341 (D.D.C. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13 {Warning}

100 F. Supp. 2d 31 p.35

2436 Cited by: . Page 338 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Lowe v. Nasd Regulation, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19489 (D.D.C. Dec. 14, 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4{Cited}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19489

2437 Cited by: . Ruf v. ABC, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1092 (D.D.C. Jan. 29, 1999){Cited}

1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1092

2438 Cited by: . Ajemba v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan, Inc., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22297 (D.D.C. July 13, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN13{Cited}

1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22297

2439 Cited by: . Van Allen v. Bell Atlantic--Washington, D.C., 921 F. Supp. 830, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4586 (D.D.C. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN10, HN13 {Cited}

921 F. Supp. 830 p.832

2440 Cited by: . International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffeurs, etc. v. Association of Flight Attendants, 663 F. Supp. 847, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5680, 126 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2325, 111 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11030 (D.D.C. 1986) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN13 {Warning}

663 F. Supp. 847 p.851 FEDERAL CIRCUIT --COURT OF APPEALS

2441 Cited by: . Uroplasty, Inc. v. Advanced Uroscience, 239 F.3d 1277, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 1862, 57 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1726 (Fed. Cir. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 {Analysis}

239 F.3d 1277 p.1279

2442 Cited by: . Jim Arnold Corp. v. Hydrotech Sys., 109 F.3d 1567, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 5467, 42 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1119 (Fed. Cir. 1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4 {Caution}

109 F.3d 1567 p.1571 Page 339 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2443 Cited by: . Duncan v. Stuetzle, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 33011 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 13, 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Analysis}

FEDERAL CLAIMS COURT

2444 Cited by: . Trek Leasing, Inc. v. United States, 62 Fed. Cl. 673, 2004 U.S. Claims LEXIS 287 (2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2{Caution}

62 Fed. Cl. 673 p.679 U.S. COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

2445 Cited by: . Tak Fat Trading Co. v. United States, 24 Ct. Int'l Trade 1376, 2000 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 160, Ct. Int'l Trade No. 2000--161,SLIP OP. 2000--161,22 Int'l Trade Rep. (BNA) 2404 (2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN4{Warning}

2000 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 160 p.2 Ct. Int'l Trade No. 2000--161 24 Ct. Int'l Trade 1376 p.1377

2446 Cited by: . Neenah Foundry Co. v. United States, 24 Ct. Int'l Trade 202, 2000 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 36, Ct. Int'l Trade No. 2000--33,SLIP OP. 2000--33,22 Int'l Trade Rep. (BNA) 1190 (2000){Caution}

2000 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 36 p.2 Ct. Int'l Trade No. 2000--33 24 Ct. Int'l Trade 202 p.203 OTHER FEDERAL DECISIONS

2447 Followed by: . Her Majesty v. Detroit, 19 Envtl. L. Rep. 20888 (1989){Cited}

19 Envtl. L. Rep. 20888 p.20892

2448 Cited by: . Ct. App. 9th Dkt. No. 89--15837

Ct. App. 9th Dkt. No. 89--15837

2449 Cited by: . Page 340 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 488, 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 488{Warning}

5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 488 p.489

2450 Cited by: . 135 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2083, 135 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2083{Caution}

135 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2083 p.2085

2451 Followed by: . 117 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10384, 117 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10384

117 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10384

2452 Distinguished by: . 116 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P56365, 116 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P56365

116 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P56365

2453 Cited by: . 114 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11816, 114 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11816

114 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11816 ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

2454 Cited by: . Aldridge v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 809 So. 2d 785, 2001 Ala. LEXIS 113, 143 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P59273 (Ala. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9, HN10 , HN13{Analysis}

809 So. 2d 785 p.791

2455 Cited by: . Reynolds Metals Co. v. Mays, 547 So. 2d 518, 1989 Ala. LEXIS 392, 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1820, 134 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2217 (Ala. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN10, HN13{Caution}

547 So. 2d 518 p.521 ALASKA SUPREME COURT

2456 Cited by: . Schaub v. K&L Distribs., 115 P.3d 555, 2005 Alas. LEXIS 86, 151 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10551 (Alaska 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN13{Cited} Page 341 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

115 P.3d 555 p.560

2457 Cited by: . Norcon, Inc. v. Kotowski, 971 P.2d 158, 1999 Alas. LEXIS 25, 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2616, 137 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58588 (Alaska 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN8, HN10{Caution}

971 P.2d 158 p.164 ALASKA

2458 Cited by: . Alaska Dkt. No. S--6390

Alaska Dkt. No. S--6390 CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT

2459 Cited by: . Boisclair v. Superior Court, 51 Cal. 3d 1140, 276 Cal. Rptr. 62, 801 P.2d 305, 1990 Cal. LEXIS 5481, 90 Cal. Daily Op. Service 9128, 90 D.A.R. 14282 (1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

51 Cal. 3d 1140 p.1156 276 Cal. Rptr. 62 p.72 801 P.2d 305 p.315 CALIFORNIA COURTS OF APPEAL

2460 Cited in questionable precedent at: . Prachasaisoradej v. Ralphs Grocery Co., Inc., 122 Cal. App. 4th 29, 18 Cal. Rptr. 3d 514, 2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1481, 69 Cal. Comp. Cas. (MB) 1408, 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Service 8289, 175 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2778 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN8, HN10{Warning}

122 Cal. App. 4th 29 p.44 18 Cal. Rptr. 3d 514 p.525

2461 Distinguished by, Cited by: . Levy v. Skywalker Sound, 108 Cal. App. 4th 753, 134 Cal. Rptr. 2d 138, 2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 716, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4065, 172 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2625, 148 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P59757 (Cal. App. 1st Dist. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN10, HN13{Analysis}

Distinguished by: 108 Cal. App. 4th 753 p.764 134 Cal. Rptr. 2d 138 p.145 Cited by: 108 Cal. App. 4th 753 p.763 Page 342 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2462 Cited by: . Department of Fair Employment & Housing v. Verizon California, Inc., 108 Cal. App. 4th 160, 133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 258, 2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 623, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3634, 2003 D.A.R. 4623, 172 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2651, 8 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 1181 (Cal. App. 4th Dist. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN10, HN13{Analysis}

108 Cal. App. 4th 160 p.165 133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 258 p.262

2463 Cited by: . American Vantage Companies v. Table Mountain Rancheria, 103 Cal. App. 4th 590, 126 Cal. Rptr. 2d 849, 2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4936, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Service 11036, 2002 D.A.R. 12787 (Cal. App. 5th Dist. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6 {Positive}

103 Cal. App. 4th 590 p.595 126 Cal. Rptr. 2d 849 p.852

2464 Cited in questionable precedent at: . American Vantage Companies v. Table Mountain Rancheria, 102 Cal. App. 4th 954, 125 Cal. Rptr. 2d 879, 2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4771, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Service 10232, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Service 10302, 2002 D.A.R. 11753, 2002 D.A.R. 11842 (Cal. App. 5th Dist. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Warning}

102 Cal. App. 4th 954 p.958 125 Cal. Rptr. 2d 879 p.881

2465 Cited by: . Lujan v. Southern Cal. Gas Co., 96 Cal. App. 4th 1200, 117 Cal. Rptr. 2d 828, 2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 2889, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Service 2460, 2002 D.A.R. 2979, 169 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2910, 146 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P59532, 7 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 1270 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9 , HN10, HN13{Caution}

96 Cal. App. 4th 1200 p.1206 117 Cal. Rptr. 2d 828 p.832

2466 Distinguished by, Cited by: . Durgom v. Janowiak, 74 Cal. App. 4th 178, 87 Cal. Rptr. 2d 619, 1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 748, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Service 6552, 99 D.A.R. 8349 (Cal. App. 4th Dist. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

Distinguished by: 74 Cal. App. 4th 178 p.186 87 Cal. Rptr. 2d 619 p.625 Cited by: Page 343 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

74 Cal. App. 4th 178 p.183 87 Cal. Rptr. 2d 619 p.623

2467 Cited by: . Warehouse, Processing Etc. Union v. Hugo Neu Proler Co., 65 Cal. App. 4th 732, 76 Cal. Rptr. 2d 814, 1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 639, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Service 5703, 98 D.A.R. 7913, 158 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2935, 135 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10210 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13{Cited}

65 Cal. App. 4th 732 p.737 76 Cal. Rptr. 2d 814 p.817

2468 Cited by: . Seaview Industries, Inc. v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners etc., 215 Cal. App. 3d 497, 263 Cal. Rptr. 724, 1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 1139, 114 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P56192 (Cal. App. 1st Dist. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7 , HN10, HN13{Warning}

263 Cal. Rptr. 724 p.727 263 Cal. Rptr. 724 p.728

2469 Cited by: . Aragon v. Pappy, Kaplon, Vogel & Phillips, 214 Cal. App. 3d 451, 262 Cal. Rptr. 646, 1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 983, 114 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11878 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN13{Positive}

214 Cal. App. 3d 451 p.457 262 Cal. Rptr. 646 p.649

2470 Cited by: . Moreau v. San Diego Transit Corp., 210 Cal. App. 3d 614, 258 Cal. Rptr. 647, 1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 476, 114 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11816 (Cal. App. 4th Dist. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN13{Caution}

210 Cal. App. 3d 614 p.621 258 Cal. Rptr. 647 p.650

2471 Cited by: . Abreu v. Svenhard's Swedish Bakery, 208 Cal. App. 3d 1446, 257 Cal. Rptr. 26, 1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 279, 116 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P56365 (Cal. App. 1st Dist. 1989) {Analysis}

208 Cal. App. 3d 1446 p.1453 257 Cal. Rptr. 26 p.29

2472 Cited by: . Page 344 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Rodriguez v. Yellow Cab Cooperative, Inc., 206 Cal. App. 3d 668, 253 Cal. Rptr. 779, 1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 1164, 112 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11469 (Cal. App. 1st Dist. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Positive}

206 Cal. App. 3d 668 p.679 253 Cal. Rptr. 779 p.785 UNPUBLISHED CALIFORNIA APPELLATE DECISIONS

2473 Cited by: . Matusek v. Murad, 2006 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 5947 (2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10 {Warning}

2474 Cited by: . HANSON AGGREGATES MID--PACIFIC v. DEPARTMENT OF INDUS. RELS., 2004 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 11374 (2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN9{Warning}

2475 Cited by: . McDOWELL v. CALIFORNIA DAIRIES, INC., 2004 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 11235 (2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13{Warning}

2476 Cited by: . ORMOND v. SUPERSHUTTLE ORANGE COUNTY, INC., 2003 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 7282 (2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN12{Warning}

2477 Cited by: . HARUKO KIMURA v. COLUMBIA GOOD SAMARITAN HOSP., 2003 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1491 (2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13{Warning}

2478 Cited by: . CARLITO LIM v. TELEDYNE RYAN AERONAUTICAL, 2001 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 2505 (2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13{Warning}

2479 Cited by: . WARD v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, 2001 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 191 (2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN7, HN10{Warning}

COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS

2480 Cited by: . Page 345 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Houdek v. Mobil Oil Corp., 879 P.2d 417, 1994 Colo. App. LEXIS 11, 18 Brief Times Rptr. 102 (Colo. Ct. App. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

879 P.2d 417 p.421

2481 Cited by: . Cronk v. Intermountain Rural Electric Ass'n, 1992 Colo. App. LEXIS 228, 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 545, 140 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2149 (Colo. Ct. App. Apr. 2, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13{Analysis}

7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 545 p.549 140 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2149 p.2152 CONNECTICUT SUPREME COURT

2482 Distinguished by, Followed by, Cited by: . Barbieri v. United Techs. Corp., 255 Conn. 708, 771 A.2d 915, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 117, 167 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2250, 143 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10992, 110 A.L.R.5th 647 (2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13{Caution}

Distinguished by: 255 Conn. 708 p.746 771 A.2d 915 p.939 Followed by: 255 Conn. 708 p.724 771 A.2d 915 p.927 Cited by: 255 Conn. 708 p.722 771 A.2d 915 p.926 OTHER CONNECTICUT DECISIONS

2483 Cited by: . Hosp. of St. Raphael v. Teamsters Local 443, 2005 Conn. Super. LEXIS 1698 (Conn. Super. Ct. May 24, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10 , HN13

2484 Cited by: . Green v. Toburen, 2000 Conn. Super. LEXIS 1592 (Conn. Super. Ct. June 20, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN9, HN13{Cited}

DELAWARE SUPREME COURT

2485 Followed by: . Rossdeutscher v. Viacom, Inc., 768 A.2d 8, 2001 Del. LEXIS 100 (Del. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Caution}

768 A.2d 8 p.19 Page 346 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

DELAWARE COURT OF CHANCERY

2486 Cited by: . Davis Int'l v. New Start Group Corp., 2005 Del. Ch. LEXIS 169 (Del. Ch. Oct. 27, 2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN3{Analysis}

2005 Del. Ch. LEXIS 169

2487 Cited by: . Breakaway Solutions, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., 2004 Del. Ch. LEXIS 125 (Del. Ch. Aug. 27, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6{Positive}

2004 Del. Ch. LEXIS 125 FLORIDA DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

2488 Cited by: . Acevedo v. Caribbean Transp., 673 So. 2d 170, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4759, 21 Fla. L. Weekly D 1147 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 3d Dist. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9 , HN10, HN13{Caution}

673 So. 2d 170 p.172

2489 Cited by: . Southwest Gulfcoast, Inc. v. Allan, 513 So. 2d 219, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12212, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2316 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1st Dist. 1987){Warning}

513 So. 2d 219 p.225 HAWAI'I SUPREME COURT

2490 Cited by: . Casumpang v. ILWU, Local 142, 94 Haw. 330, 13 P.3d 1235, 2000 Haw. LEXIS 456, 168 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3073, 143 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P59208 (Haw. 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9 {Positive}

94 Haw. 330 p.343 13 P.3d 1235 p.1248 ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT

2491 Cited by: . Gendron v. Chicago & North Western Transp. Co., 139 Ill. 2d 422, 564 N.E.2d 1207, 1990 Ill. LEXIS 148, 151 Ill. Dec. 545, 136 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2413, 117 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10449 (1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN12 {Caution} Page 347 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

139 Ill. 2d 422 p.426 564 N.E.2d 1207 p.1209

2492 Cited by: . Krasinski v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 115 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10108 (Ill. Dec. 14, 1988)

115 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10108

2493 Cited by: . Krasinski v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 124 Ill. 2d 483, 530 N.E.2d 468, 1988 Ill. LEXIS 150, 125 Ill. Dec. 310, 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1674, 129 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2939 (1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8, HN10, HN13{Caution}

124 Ill. 2d 483 p.491 530 N.E.2d 468 p.472

2494 Cited by: . Ryherd v. General Cable Co., 124 Ill. 2d 418, 530 N.E.2d 431, 1988 Ill. LEXIS 151, 125 Ill. Dec. 273, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 596, 131 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2238, 121 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P56826 (1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN12{Caution}

124 Ill. 2d 418 p.426 530 N.E.2d 431 p.435 ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT

2495 Cited by: . Kennedy v. Commercial Carriers, 258 Ill. App. 3d 939, 630 N.E.2d 1059, 1994 Ill. App. LEXIS 203, 196 Ill. Dec. 894 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8 , HN10, HN13{Caution}

258 Ill. App. 3d 939 p.948 630 N.E.2d 1059 p.1065 196 Ill. Dec. 894 p.900

2496 Cited by: . Jones v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., 241 Ill. App. 3d 129, 607 N.E.2d 1348, 1993 Ill. App. LEXIS 118, 180 Ill. Dec. 835 (Ill. App. Ct. 4th Dist. 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4, HN5, HN6, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13 {Analysis}

241 Ill. App. 3d 129 p.132 607 N.E.2d 1348 p.1350 180 Ill. Dec. 835 p.837

2497 Cited by: . Page 348 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Schacht v. Caterpillar, Inc., 213 Ill. App. 3d 169, 571 N.E.2d 1215, 1991 Ill. App. LEXIS 859, 157 Ill. Dec. 196, 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 446, 138 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2757, 121 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P56871, 123 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10425 (Ill. App. Ct. 3d Dist. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13 {Positive}

571 N.E.2d 1215 p.1217

2498 Distinguished by: . Schacht v. Caterpillar, Inc., 123 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10425 (Ill. App. Ct. May 20, 1991)

123 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10425

2499 Cited by: . Brazinski v. Transport Serv. Co., 159 Ill. App. 3d 1061, 513 N.E.2d 76, 1987 Ill. App. LEXIS 3059, 111 Ill. Dec. 830, 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1095, 126 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3069, 28 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 526 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1987) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Positive}

159 Ill. App. 3d 1061 p.1064 513 N.E.2d 76 p.79 INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS

2500 Cited by: . Green v. Hendrickson Publrs., 751 N.E.2d 815, 2001 Ind. App. LEXIS 1228 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN13{Warning}

751 N.E.2d 815 p.820 IOWA SUPREME COURT

2501 Followed by, Cited by: . Grimm v. US West Communs., Inc., 644 N.W.2d 8, 2002 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 95, 18 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1071, 169 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3239 (Iowa 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7 , HN8, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13{Positive}

Followed by: 644 N.W.2d 8 p.14 Cited by: 644 N.W.2d 8 p.13

2502 Cited by: . Barske v. Rockwell Int'l Corp., 514 N.W.2d 917, 1994 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 87, 9 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 816, 146 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2332 (Iowa 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10 {Caution}

514 N.W.2d 917 p.921 Page 349 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

OTHER MAINE DECISIONS

2503 Cited by: . WASSON v. B. K. MGMT. GROUP & MSM ENTERPRISES, 1989 Me. Super. LEXIS 6 (Me. Super. Ct. Jan. 9, 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN8, HN10, HN12, HN13

MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT

2504 Cited by: . Betty v. Brooks & Perkins, 446 Mich. 270, 521 N.W.2d 518, 1994 Mich. LEXIS 2043, 69 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1455, 147 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2157 (1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Positive}

446 Mich. 270 p.279 521 N.W.2d 518 p.522 MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

2505 Cited by: . MASSENGALE v. MOTOR CITY CASINO, 2006 Mich. App. LEXIS 1440 (Mich. Ct. App. Apr. 25, 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8, HN10, HN13

2506 Cited by: . SLAWICK v. DETROIT NEWSPAPER AGENCY, 2001 Mich. App. LEXIS 474 (Mich. Ct. App. May 18, 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13

2507 Cited by: . CLEMENTS v. WOLVERINE TRACTOR & EQUIP. CO., 1998 Mich. App. LEXIS 1007 (Mich. Ct. App. Oct. 2, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN10, HN13

MINNESOTA COURT OF APPEALS

2508 Cited by: . Jara v. Buckbee--Mears Co., 469 N.W.2d 727, 1991 Minn. App. LEXIS 506, 121 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10168 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10 {Positive}

469 N.W.2d 727 p.730

2509 Cited by: . Houghton v. Hibbing Taconite Co., Div. of Pickands Mather & Co., 1991 Minn. App. LEXIS 337 (Minn. Ct. App. Mar. 28, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN13{Cited} Page 350 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2510 Cited by: . Whipple v. Independent School Dist., 424 N.W.2d 559, 1988 Minn. App. LEXIS 463 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Analysis}

424 N.W.2d 559 p.564 MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

2511 Cited by: . Claude v. Ceccarini, 110 S.W.3d 843, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1102, 172 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3241 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8{Cited}

110 S.W.3d 843 p.848 OTHER MONTANA DECISIONS

2512 Cited by: . Murray v. Xanterra Parks & Resorts, Inc., 2003 Mont. Dist. LEXIS 2227, 2003 ML 1185 (2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN10

2513 Cited by: . Murray v. Xanterra Parks & Resorts, Inc., 2003 Mont. Dist. LEXIS 1453, 2003 ML 1185 (2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN10

2514 Cited by: . Zerbst v. Ravalli County, 2000 Mont. Dist. LEXIS 2102, 2000 ML 4160 (2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10

2515 Cited by: . Sanders v. Lake County, 1995 Mont. Dist. LEXIS 832 (1995) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10

NEBRASKA SUPREME COURT

2516 Followed by: . Foreman v. AS Mid--America,Inc., 255 Neb. 323, 586 N.W.2d 290, 1998 Neb. LEXIS 211, 159 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2434, 136 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10258 (1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10 {Positive}

255 Neb. 323 p.342 586 N.W.2d 290 p.304 NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT Page 351 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2517 Cited by: . Troy v. Rutgers, 168 N.J. 354, 774 A.2d 476, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 776, 17 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1863, 168 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2045, 144 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P59363 (2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN12{Positive}

168 N.J. 354 p.374 774 A.2d 476 p.488 NEW JERSEY SUPERIOR COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION

2518 Cited by: . Feit v. Horizon Blue Cross & Blue Shield of N.J., 385 N.J. Super. 470, 897 A.2d 1075, 2006 N.J. Super. LEXIS 148 (App.Div. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5, HN6

385 N.J. Super. 470 p.483 897 A.2d 1075 p.1083

2519 Cited by: . Dzwonar v. McDevitt, 348 N.J. Super. 164, 791 A.2d 1020, 2002 N.J. Super. LEXIS 185, 169 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2584 (App.Div. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7 {Positive}

348 N.J. Super. 164 p.174 791 A.2d 1020 p.1026

2520 Cited by: . Maher v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., 239 N.J. Super. 213, 570 A.2d 1289, 1990 N.J. Super. LEXIS 71, 56 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P40790, 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 585, 134 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2235 (App.Div. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Warning}

239 N.J. Super. 213 p.220 570 A.2d 1289 p.1292 NEW MEXICO SUPREME COURT

2521 Followed by, Cited by: . Self v. UPS, 1998 NMSC 46, 126 N.M. 396, 970 P.2d 582, 1998 N.M. LEXIS 442, 38 N.M. B. Bull. 2, 38 N.M. B. Bull. No. 2 17, 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2888, 137 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58521, 5 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 81 (1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN4, HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13{Caution}

Followed by: 1998 NMSC 46 126 N.M. 396 p.400 970 P.2d 582 p.587 38 N.M. B. Bull. No. 2 17 p.18 Cited by: Page 352 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

126 N.M. 396 p.399 970 P.2d 582 p.585 38 N.M. B. Bull. No. 2 17 p.17

2522 Cited by: . Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. Board of County Comm'rs, 118 N.M. 550, 883 P.2d 136, 1994 N.M. LEXIS 396, 33 N.M. B. Bull. 1408 (1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN13{Analysis}

118 N.M. 550 p.557 883 P.2d 136 p.143 NEW MEXICO COURT OF APPEALS

2523 Distinguished by, Cited by: . Kerschion v. Public Serv. Co., 2002 NMCA 45, 132 N.M. 119, 45 P.3d 59, 2002 N.M. App. LEXIS 24, 41 N.M. B. Bull. 13, 41 N.M. B. Bull. No. 18 13, 170 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3142 (2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN7, HN10{Positive}

Distinguished by: 132 N.M. 119 p.123 45 P.3d 59 p.63 Cited by: 132 N.M. 119 p.121 45 P.3d 59 p.61 NEW YORK SUPREME COURT APP. DIV.

2524 Cited by: . Navarro v. Federal Paper Bd. Co., 185 A.D.2d 590, 586 N.Y.S.2d 381, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9111, 8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 118, 140 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3035 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN12{Cited}

185 A.D.2d 590 p.593 586 N.Y.S.2d 381 p.384 OTHER NEW YORK DECISIONS

2525 Cited by: . Niezbecki v. Eisner & Hubbard, P.C., 186 Misc. 2d 191, 717 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1999 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 664 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 {Analysis}

186 Misc. 2d 191 p.195 717 N.Y.S.2d 815 p.820

2526 Cited by: . Page 353 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Allegis Corp., 144 Misc. 2d 983, 545 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1989 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 550, 135 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2083 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN13{Cited}

144 Misc. 2d 983 p.988 545 N.Y.S.2d 638 p.642 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS

2527 Cited by: . Walton v. Carolina Tel. & Tel. Co., 93 N.C. App. 368, 378 S.E.2d 427, 1989 N.C. App. LEXIS 219, 115 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P56215, 116 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10306 (1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Positive}

93 N.C. App. 368 p.372 378 S.E.2d 427 p.430

2528 Followed by: . Walton v. Carolina Tel. & Tel. Co., 116 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10306 (N.C. Ct. App. Apr. 18, 1989){Positive}

116 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10306 OHIO COURT OF APPEALS

2529 Cited by: . Fillmore v. Brush Wellman, Inc., 2004 Ohio 3448, 2004 Ohio App. LEXIS 3098, 33 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1423 (Ohio Ct. App., Ottawa County June 30, 2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Analysis}

2004 Ohio 3448

2530 Cited by: . Cunningham v. Aultcare Corp., 2003 Ohio 3085, 2003 Ohio App. LEXIS 2765, 30 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 2546 (Ohio Ct. App., Stark County June 9, 2003) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9{Cited}

2003 Ohio 3085

2531 Cited by: . Bennett v. Bank of Am., N.A., 2003 Ohio 654, 2003 Ohio App. LEXIS 635, 30 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1491 (Ohio Ct. App., Cuyahoga County Feb. 13, 2003){Cited}

2003 Ohio App. LEXIS 635 p.7

2532 Cited by: . Page 354 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Tewarson v. Simon, 141 Ohio App. 3d 103, 750 N.E.2d 176, 2001 Ohio App. LEXIS 1 (Ohio Ct. App., Lorain County 2001) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN4 {Caution}

141 Ohio App. 3d 103 p.111 750 N.E.2d 176 p.182

2533 Cited by: . Darovich v. GMC, 2000 Ohio App. LEXIS 663, 169 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2027 (Ohio Ct. App., Cuyahoga County Feb. 24, 2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN12 , HN13{Analysis}

2000 Ohio App. LEXIS 663 p.3

2534 Cited by: . Merkel v. Compass Steel, Inc., 1991 Ohio App. LEXIS 132 (Ohio Ct. App., Hamilton County Jan. 16, 1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13{Cited}

OKLAHOMA SUPREME COURT

2535 Cited by: . Reeds v. Walker, 2006 OK 43, 2006 Okla. LEXIS 41 (Okla. 2006) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN9

2006 OK 43 OREGON SUPREME COURT

2536 Followed by: . Smoldt v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc., 334 Ore. 507, 53 P.3d 443, 2002 Ore. LEXIS 609, 171 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2213, 147 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P59620 (2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8 , HN9{Analysis}

334 Ore. 507 p.512 53 P.3d 443 p.446 OREGON COURT OF APPEALS

2537 Cited by: . Cramblit v. Diamond B Constructors, 197 Ore. App. 358, 105 P.3d 906, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 102 (2005) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN7, HN9, HN10 {Cited}

197 Ore. App. 358 p.366 105 P.3d 906 p.911

2538 Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by: . Page 355 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

Smoldt v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc., 168 Ore. App. 657, 7 P.3d 638, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 1097, 165 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2431, 6 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 564 (2000) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN7, HN9{Warning}

Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: 168 Ore. App. 657 p.670 7 P.3d 638 p.644 Cited by: 168 Ore. App. 657 p.663 7 P.3d 638 p.641 PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR COURT

2539 Cited by: . Werner v. Plater--Zyberk, 2002 PA Super 42, 799 A.2d 776, 2002 Pa. Super. LEXIS 185 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN6, HN9, HN13{Positive}

2002 PA Super 42 p.30 799 A.2d 776 p.790

2540 Cited by: . Adam v. Benjamin, 426 Pa. Super. 543, 627 A.2d 1186, 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2140, 147 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2479, 2 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 595 (1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN9, HN10{Caution}

627 A.2d 1186 p.1190 426 Pa. Super. 543 p.550 SOUTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS

2541 Cited by: . Lewis v. Local 382, IBEW, 324 S.C. 412, 481 S.E.2d 135, 1996 S.C. App. LEXIS 151, 154 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2313 (S.C. Ct. App. 1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13 {Warning}

324 S.C. 412 p.421 481 S.E.2d 135 p.139 SOUTH DAKOTA SUPREME COURT

2542 Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited by: . Dirks v. Sioux Valley Empire Elec. Ass'n, 450 N.W.2d 426, 1990 S.D. LEXIS 5, 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 273, 133 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2885, 114 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11883 (S.D. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13{Cited}

Cited in Concurring Opinion at: 450 N.W.2d 426 p.431 Cited by: 450 N.W.2d 426 p.429 TENNESSEE COURT OF APPEALS Page 356 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2543 Followed by: . Baldwin v. Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp., 3 S.W.3d 1, 1999 Tenn. App. LEXIS 106, 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2541, 137 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10409 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN8, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13{Caution}

3 S.W.3d 1 p.5 TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS

2544 Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: . In the Interest of B.A.C., 144 S.W.3d 8, 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 6586 (Tex. App. Waco 2004){Analysis}

144 S.W.3d 8 p.8

2545 Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: . In re Clark, 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 6587 (Tex. App. Waco July 21, 2004){Analysis}

2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 6587

2546 Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: . Kiefer v. Continental Airlines, 882 S.W.2d 496, 1994 Tex. App. LEXIS 2026 (Tex. App. Houston 1st Dist. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9{Caution}

882 S.W.2d 496 p.507

2547 Cited by: . Sanchez v. Johnson & Johnson Medical, 860 S.W.2d 503, 1993 Tex. App. LEXIS 1821 (Tex. App. El Paso 1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN5, HN6, HN9, HN10, HN13 {Warning}

860 S.W.2d 503 p.512

2548 Cited by: . Day & Zimmermann, Inc. v. Hatridge, 1992 Tex. App. LEXIS 927 (Tex. App. Texarkana Mar. 24, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Warning}

2549 Cited by: . Kyle v. West Gulf Maritime Ass'n, 792 S.W.2d 805, 1990 Tex. App. LEXIS 1440, 118 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10686 (Tex. App. Houston 14th Dist. 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10 {Cited}

792 S.W.2d 805 p.809 Page 357 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2550 Cited by: . Hatridge v. Day & Zimmermann, Inc., 789 S.W.2d 654, 1990 Tex. App. LEXIS 951, 116 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10359 (Tex. App. Texarkana 1990) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN7, HN9, HN10, HN12, HN13{Warning}

789 S.W.2d 654 p.655 UTAH SUPREME COURT

2551 Cited by: . Retherford v. AT&T Communications, 844 P.2d 949, 1992 Utah LEXIS 120, 201 Utah Adv. 21, 8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 405, 142 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2668 (Utah 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN10{Caution}

844 P.2d 949 p.968

2552 Explained by: . Retherford v. AT&T Communications, 1992 Utah LEXIS 93, 200 Utah Adv. 22, 60 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P41915, 124 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P57203 (Utah Nov. 24, 1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN10{Caution}

60 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P41915 124 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P57203 UTAH COURT OF APPEALS

2553 Cited by: . Park City Educ. Ass'n v. Board of Educ., 879 P.2d 267, 1994 Utah App. LEXIS 114, 244 Utah Adv. 39 (Utah Ct. App. 1994) LexisNexis Headnotes HN12{Caution}

879 P.2d 267 p.273 WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT

2554 Cited by: . Commodore v. University Mechanical Contractors, Inc., 120 Wn.2d 120, 839 P.2d 314, 1992 Wash. LEXIS 258, 61 U.S.L.W. 2308, 8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 761, 141 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2990 (1992) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6{Caution}

120 Wn.2d 120 p.139 839 P.2d 314 p.323

2555 Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited in Dissenting Opinion at, Cited by: . Beaman v. Yakima Valley Disposal, Inc., 116 Wn.2d 697, 807 P.2d 849, 1991 Wash. LEXIS 142, 6 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1697, 137 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2034, 123 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10414 (1991) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Positive}

Cited in Concurring Opinion at: Page 358 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

116 Wn.2d 697 p.713 Cited in Dissenting Opinion at: 807 P.2d 849 p.858 Cited by: 116 Wn.2d 697 p.707 807 P.2d 849 p.854 WASHINGTON COURT OF APPEALS

2556 Cited by: . Brundridge v. Fluor Fed. Servs., 109 Wn. App. 347, 35 P.3d 389, 2001 Wash. App. LEXIS 2635, 168 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2963 (2001){Caution}

109 Wn. App. 347 p.357 35 P.3d 389 p.395

2557 Cited by: . Wilson v. City of Monroe, 88 Wn. App. 113, 943 P.2d 1134, 1997 Wash. App. LEXIS 1570, 157 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2365 (1997){Caution}

88 Wn. App. 113 p.118 943 P.2d 1134 p.1136

2558 Cited by: . United Food & Commer. Workers Union Local 1001 v. Mutual Beneﬁt Life Ins. Co., 84 Wn. App. 47, 925 P.2d 212, 1996 Wash. App. LEXIS 593, 153 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2827, 3 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 986 (1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN9, HN10 , HN13{Caution}

84 Wn. App. 47 p.53 925 P.2d 212 p.215

2559 Cited by: . Swinford v. Russ Dunmire Oldsmobile, 82 Wn. App. 401, 918 P.2d 186, 1996 Wash. App. LEXIS 243, 8 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 419, 158 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2500 (1996) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6, HN9{Positive}

82 Wn. App. 401 p.410 918 P.2d 186 p.191 WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME CT. OF APPEALS

2560 Cited by: . GMC v. Smith, 216 W. Va. 78, 602 S.E.2d 520, 2004 W. Va. LEXIS 129, 15 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1255, 33 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1414, 176 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2759 (2004) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2, HN7, HN9, HN10, HN13{Analysis}

216 W. Va. 78 p.85 Page 359 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

602 S.E.2d 520 p.528

2561 Cited by: . State ex rel. Orlofske v. City of Wheeling, 212 W. Va. 538, 575 S.E.2d 148, 2002 W. Va. LEXIS 190, 29 Employee Beneﬁts Cas. (BNA) 1656 (2002) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN5{Cited}

212 W. Va. 538 p.543 575 S.E.2d 148 p.153

2562 Cited by: . Bailey v. Norfolk & Western Ry., 206 W. Va. 654, 527 S.E.2d 516, 1999 W. Va. LEXIS 193, 164 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2010 (1999) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10, HN13{Analysis}

206 W. Va. 654 p.664 527 S.E.2d 516 p.526

2563 Cited by: . Greenﬁeld v. Schmidt Baking Co., 199 W. Va. 447, 485 S.E.2d 391, 1997 W. Va. LEXIS 42, 156 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2717, 135 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P58332 (1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN2 , HN6, HN7, HN9, HN13{Positive}

199 W. Va. 447 p.453 485 S.E.2d 391 p.397

2564 Cited by: . Satterﬁeld v. Claypole, 190 W. Va. 384, 438 S.E.2d 564, 1993 W. Va. LEXIS 188, 145 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2758 (1993) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Cited}

190 W. Va. 384 p.389 438 S.E.2d 564 p.569 WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT

2565 Cited in Concurring Opinion at, Cited by: . International Asso. of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, IAM Local 437 v. United States Can Co., 150 Wis. 2d 479, 441 N.W.2d 710, 1989 Wisc. LEXIS 89, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1081, 132 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2043, 114 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11917 (Wis. 1989) LexisNexis Headnotes HN6 , HN8, HN9, HN10, HN13{Positive}

Cited in Concurring Opinion at: 150 Wis. 2d 479 p.505 441 N.W.2d 710 p.722 Cited by: 150 Wis. 2d 479 p.490 441 N.W.2d 710 p.715 PUERTO RICO SUPREME COURT Page 360 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2566 Cited by: . BONAFONT v. AMERICAN EAGLE, 143 P.R. Dec. 374, 1997 PR Sup. LEXIS 497, 1997 Juris P.R. No. 86 (1997) LexisNexis Headnotes HN5, HN6, HN7{Positive}

VIRGIN ISLANDS TERRITORIAL COURT

2567 Cited by: . Stafford v. Hess Oil V.I. Corp., 1998 V.I. LEXIS 10 (V.I. Terr. Ct. May 12, 1998) LexisNexis Headnotes HN10{Positive}

ANNOTATED STATUTES ( 4 Citing Statutes )

2568 28 USCS @ 1441 .

2569 29 USCS @ 151 .

2570 29 USCS @ 185 .

2571 Cal Lab Code @ 2750 .

LAW REVIEWS AND PERIODICALS ( 152 Citing References )

2572 ARTICLE: The States, Congress, or the Courts: Who Will Be First To Reform ERISA Remedies? , 7 Ann. . Health L. 73 (1998)

2573 15--4ABIJ 4 (May 1, 1996) .

2574 NOTE: Not Just Old Wine in New Bottles: Kentucky Ass'n of Health Plans, Inc. v. Miller n1 Bottles a New . Test for State Regulation of Insurance, 38 Akron L. Rev. 253 (2005)

38 Akron L. Rev. 253 p.253

2575 ARTICLE: Syngenta, Stephenson and the Federal Judicial Injunctive Power, 37 Akron L. Rev. 605 (2004) .

37 Akron L. Rev. 605 p.605 Page 361 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2576 ARTICLE: Preemption Under the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act: If It Looks Like a Securities . Fraud Claim and Acts Like a Securities Fraud Claim, Is It a Securities Fraud Claim? , 56 Ala. L. Rev. 325 (2004)

56 Ala. L. Rev. 325 p.325

2577 ARTICLE: ERISA Preemption and Regulation of Managed Health Care:The Case for Managed Federalism, . 23 Am. J. L. and Med. 251 (1997)

2578 NOTE & COMMENT: GAMING CORP. v. DORSEY & WHITNEY: Does IGRA Completely Preempt State . Regulation of Gaming on Indian Land? , 29 Ariz. St. L.J. 323 (1997)

2579 NOTE: HOLMES GROUP, INC. V. VORNADO AIR CIRCULATION SYSTEMS, INC.: NECROMANCY, . JUDICIAL ACTIVISM, AND THE WELL--PLEADEDCOMPLAINT RULE, 84 B.U.L. Rev. 1103 (2004)

84 B.U.L. Rev. 1103 p.1103

2580 ARTICLE: THE DISCORD BETWEEN COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AND INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYMENT . RIGHTS: THEORETICAL ORIGINS AND A PROPOSED RECONCILIATION, 77 B.U.L. Rev. 687 (1997)

77 B.U.L. Rev. 687 p.687

2581 ARTICLE: PREEMPTION PATHOLOGIES AND CIVIC REPUBLICAN VALUES., 71 B.U.L. Rev. 687 (1991) .

71 B.U.L. Rev. 687 p.687

2582 COMMENT: THE FIFTH CIRCUIT PROVIDES A REPRODUCIBLE FRAMEWORK FOR THE . APPLICATION OF THE COMPLETE PREEMPTION DOCTRINE, 50 Baylor L. Rev. 205 (1998)

2583 ARTICLE: Managing Complex Litigation: Class Actions and Mass Torts *, 48 Baylor L. Rev. 1001 (1996) .

2584 ARTICLE: Religious Accommodation and the National Labor Relations Act, 17 Berkeley J. Emp. & Lab. L. . 185 (1996)

2585 ARTICLE: Preserving Unionized Employees' Individual Employment Rights: An Argument Against Section . 301 Preemption, 17 Berkeley J. Emp. & Lab. L. 1 (1996)

2586 ARTICLE: Title VII Arbitration, 16 Berkeley J. Emp. & Lab. L. 209 (1995) .

2587 ARTICLE: Struggling Through the Thicket: Section 301 and the Washington Supreme Court, 15 Berkeley J. . Emp. & Lab. L. 106 (1994) Page 362 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2588 I. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: B. PATENT: 2. FEDERAL CIRCUIT JURISDICTION: Holmes Group, Inc. . v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc., 18 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 141 (2003)

2589 ERISA PREEMPTION: A MOVE TOWARDS DEFEDERALIZING CLAIMS FOR PATIENTS' RIGHTS, 42 . Brandeis L.J. 529 (2004)

2590 COMMENT: Complete Preemption --Removing the Mystery from Removal, 86 Cal. L. Rev. 363 (1998) .

2591 Comment: Interpreting a Rent--a--Womb Contract: How California Courts Should Proceed When Gestational . Surrogacy Arrangements Go Sour, 42 Cal. W. L. Rev. 321 (2006)

42 Cal. W. L. Rev. 321 p.321

2592 NOTE: LINGLE V. NORGE DIVISION OF MAGIC CHEF, INC.: REVOLUTIONIZING THE APPLICATION . OF SUBSTANTIVE STATE LABOR LAW TO UNIONIZED EMPLOYEES., 38 Cath. U.L. Rev. 769 (1989)

2593 COLUMN: RICO REPORT, 22 Champion 44 (1998) .

2594 EMPLOYEE CAUCUS: A KEY INSTITUTION IN THE EMERGING SYSTEM OF EMPLOYMENT LAW,69 . Chi.--Kent. L. Rev. 149 (1993)

69 Chi.--Kent. L. Rev. 149 p.149

2595 SYMPOSIUM ON LABOR ARBITRATION THIRTY YEARS AFTER THE STEELWORKERS TRILOGY: . LIMITING SECTION 301 PREEMPTION: THREE CHEERS FOR THE TRILOGY, ONLY ONE FOR LINGLE AND LUECK ,66 Chi.--Kent. L. Rev. 685 (1990)

2596 ARTICLE: UNDER THE LAW OF FEDERAL JURISDICTION: ALLOCATING CASES BETWEEN . FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS,104 Colum. L. Rev. 1211 (2004)

104 Colum. L. Rev. 1211 p.1211

2597 NOTE: WEEDING RICO OUT OF GARDEN VARIETY LABOR DISPUTES. *, 92 Colum. L. Rev. 103 (1992) .

2598 COMMENT: Section 332 of the Communications Act: A Federalist Approach to Regulating Wireless . Telecommunications Services, 8 CommLaw Conspectus 113 (2000)

2599 ARTICLE: "Embedded Contract Unionism" in Play----Examiningthe Intersection of Individual and Collective . Contracting in the National Basketball Association, 35 Conn. L. Rev. 1 (2002) Page 363 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

35 Conn. L. Rev. 1 p.1

2600 COMMENT: LIABILITY OF MANAGED CARE ORGANIZATIONS AFTER DUKES V. U.S. HEALTHCARE: . AN ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS, 27 Cumb. L. Rev. 681 (1996)

2601 ARTICLE: The Integration of State Private Law in Federalized Fields of Law: The Case for Federal Common . Law, 74 Denv. U.L. Rev. 207 (1996)

2602 ARTICLE: Labor/Employment Law: Mandatory Arbitration of Individual Employment Rights: The Yellow . Dog Contract of the 1990s , 73 Denv. U.L. Rev. 1017 (1996)

2603 ARTICLE: RATIONALIZING COMPLETE PREEMPTION AFTER BENEFICIAL NATIONAL BANK V. . ANDERSON: A NEW RULE, A NEW JUSTIFICATION, 54 Drake L. Rev. 371 (2006)

54 Drake L. Rev. 371 p.371

2604 ARTICLE: A THEORY OF LEGAL STRATEGY, 49 Duke L.J. 1405 (2000) .

2605 ARTICLE: Crossed Signals in a Wireless World: The Seventh Circuit's Misapplication of the Complete . Preemption Doctrine, 2004 Duke L. & Tech. Rev. 14 (2004)

2606 ARTICLE: KISSING COUSINS?: THE FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT AND MODERN LABOR . ARBITRATION* , 55 Emory L.J. 609 (2006)

55 Emory L.J. 609 p.609

2607 ARTICLE: EXPLORING PATHS TO RECOVERY FOR OSHA WHISTLEBLOWERS: SECTION 11(C) OF . THE OSHAct AND THE PUBLIC POLICY TORT, 6 Empl. Rts. & Employ. Pol'y J. 329 (2002)

2608 COLUMNS: APPELLATE PRACTICE AND ADVOCACY: REMAND ORDERS IN ERISA CASES: WHEN . ARE THEY REVIEWABLE IN THE 11TH CIRCUIT?, 77 Fla. Bar J. 88 (2003)

2609 NOTE: THE PRECLUSIVE EFFECT OF STATE COURT ADJUDICATION OF PATENT ISSUES AND THE . FEDERAL COURTS' CHOICE OF PRECLUSION LAWS, 69 Fordham L. Rev. 707 (2000)

69 Fordham L. Rev. 707 p.707

2610 ARTICLE: THE SISTER SOVEREIGN STATES: PREEMPTION AND THE SECOND TWENTIETH . CENTURY REVOLUTION IN THE LAW OF THE AMERICAN WORKPLACE., 62 Fordham L. Rev. 469 (1993) Page 364 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2611 SYMPOSIUM ARTICLE: Thanks for Not Suing: The Prospects for State Court Class Action Litigation over . Tobacco Injuries, 33 Ga. L. Rev. 979 (1999)

2612 ARTICLE: Adrift on a Sea of Uncertainty: Preserving Uniformity in Patent Law Post--Vornado Through . Deference to the Federal Circuit, 92 Geo. L.J. 523 (2004)

92 Geo. L.J. 523 p.523

2613 COMMENT: THE $ 75,000.01 QUESTION: WHAT IS THE VALUE OF INJUNCTIVE RELIEF? , 6 Geo. . Mason L. Rev. 1013 (1998)

2614 ARTICLE: THE ROAD TO THE TRIBUNAL AND BEYOND: INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL . ARBITRATION AND UNITED STATES COURTS, 34 Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. 17 (2002)

2615 ARTICLE: Unattainable Justice: The Form of Complex Litigation and the Limits of Judicial Power., 60 Geo. . Wash. L. Rev. 1683 (1992)

2616 ARTICLE: The Phoenix Precedents: The Unexpected Rebirth of Regional Circuit Jurisdiction Over Patent . Appeals and the Need for a Considered Congressional Response, 16 Harv. J. Law and Tec 411 (2003)

2617 NOTE: FORUM SHOPPING RECONSIDERED., 103 Harv. L. Rev. 1677 (1990) .

103 Harv. L. Rev. 1677 p.1677

2618 ARTICLE: Reconsidering the Artful Pleading Doctrine., 44 Hastings L.J. 273 (1993) .

2619 ARTICLE: COUNTERCLAIMS, THE WELL--PLEADEDCOMPLAINT, AND FEDERAL JURISDICTION, 33 . Hofstra L. Rev. 1 (2004)

33 Hofstra L. Rev. 1 p.1

2620 ARTICLE: JURISDICTIONALITY, TIME, AND THE LEGAL IMAGINATION, 23 Hofstra L. Rev. 1 (1994) .

23 Hofstra L. Rev. 1 p.1

2621 ARTICLE: Innovations in Collective Bargaining: Nummi----Drivento Excellence, 13 Hofstra Lab. L.J. 433 . (1996)

2622 CONVOCATION INAUGURATING THE SAMUEL M. KAYNARD DISTINGUISHED VISITING . PROFESSORSHIP IN LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW* ARTICLE PUTTING GILMER WHERE IT BELONGS: THE FAA'S LABOR EXEMPTION, 18 Hofstra Lab. & Emp. L.J. 253 (2000) Page 365 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2623 CONVOCATION INAUGURATING THE SAMUEL M. KAYNARD DISTINGUISHED VISITING . PROFESSORSHIP IN LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW* ARTICLE STRIKING BARGAINS: THE AT-- WILL EMPLOYMENT OF PERMANENT STRIKE REPLACEMENTS , 18 Hofstra Lab. & Emp. L.J. 167 (2000)

2624 ARTICLE: A MANAGED CARE ORGANIZATION'S MEDICAL MALPRACTICE LIABILITY FOR DENIAL . OF CARE: THE LOST WORLD, 35 Hous. L. Rev. 715 (1998)

2625 COMMENT: AVOIDING NONJUDICIOUS NONSUITS: HEARING THE DEFENDANT ON RULE 41(A)(2) . MOTIONS *, 32 Hous. L. Rev. 159 (1995)

2626 NOTE: Removal and Waiver of the Eleventh Amendment, 74 Ind. L.J. 1019 (1999) .

74 Ind. L.J. 1019 p.1019

2627 ARTICLE: VECTORS TO FEDERAL COURT: UNIQUE APPROACHES TO SUBJECT MATTER . JURISDICTION IN AVIATION CASES, 62 J. Air L. & Com. 959 (1997)

2628 CASE NOTE: HAWAIIAN AIRLINES, INC. V. NORRIS: RAILWAY LABOR ACT PREEMPTION OF STATE-- . LAW CLAIMS, 61 J. Air L. & Com. 757 (1996)

2629 RECENT CASES AND DEVELOPMENTS IN AVIATION LAW, 60 J. Air L. & Com. 3 (1994) .

2630 Article: It's Just Water: Toward the Normalization of Admiralty, 35 J. Mar. L. & Com. 469 (2004) .

2631 ARTICLE: JURISDICTIONAL GERRYMANDERING? RESPONDING TO HOLMES GROUP v. VORNADO . AIR CIRCULATION SYSTEMS, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2002)

36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 p.1

2632 ARTICLE: Deferential Review of an Administrative Agency's Decision in Federal District Court: . International College of Surgeons v. City of Chicago, 18 J. NAALJ 113 (1998)

2633 M.D. or M.B.A. ----Who Decides?: The Need to Put Quality of Care Ahead of Proﬁt, 6 Kan. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y . 139 (1997)

2634 COMMENT: ERISA Preemption, HMOs, and Denial of Beneﬁt Claims, 59 La. L. Rev. 961 (1999) .

59 La. L. Rev. 961 p.961 Page 366 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2635 ARTICLE: Machinists Preemption Under the NLRA: A Powerful Tool to Protect an Employer's Freedom to . Bargain, 58 La. L. Rev. 1065 (1998)

58 La. L. Rev. 1065 p.1065

2636 45 Lab. L.J. 565 .

45 Lab. L.J. 565 p.577

2637 43 Lab. L.J. 663 .

43 Lab. L.J. 663 p.670

2638 42 Lab. L.J. 398 .

42 Lab. L.J. 398 p.399

2639 41 Lab. L.J. 337 .

41 Lab. L.J. 337 p.337

2640 DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW: FEDERAL JURISDICTION AND FORUM SELECTION*: FEDERAL . QUESTION JURISDICTION, 37 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1443 (2004)

37 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1443 p.1443

2641 COMMENT: All True Histories Contain Instruction: Why HMOs Cannot Avoid Malpractice Liability . Through Independent Contracting With Physicians, 29 McGeorge L. Rev. 323 (1998)

2642 THE MARYLAND SURVEY: 1996--1997: Recent Decisions: The United States Court of Appeals for the . Fourth Circuit, 57 Md. L. Rev. 1178 (1998)

2643 ANNUAL ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SURVEY SURVEY ARTICLES: Trial Practice and Procedure, 51 Mercer L. . Rev. 1291 (2000)

2644 NOTE: No Longer Safe at Home: Preventing the Misuse of Federal Common Law of Foreign Relations as a . Defense Tactic in Private Transnational Litigation, 100 Mich. L. Rev. 2408 (2002)

100 Mich. L. Rev. 2408 p.2408

2645 NOTES: Removal and the Eleventh Amendment: The Case for District Court Remand Discretion To Avoid a . Bifurcated Suit, 92 Mich. L. Rev. 683 (1993) Page 367 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

92 Mich. L. Rev. 683 p.683

2646 ARTICLE: "ARISING UNDER" JURISDICTION AND UNIFORMITY IN PATENT LAW, 9 Mich. Telecomm. . Tech. L. Rev. 253 (2003)

2647 Note: Federalizing Foreign Relations: The Case for Expansive Federal Jurisdiction in Private International . Litigation, 89 Minn. L. Rev. 1464 (2005)

89 Minn. L. Rev. 1464 p.1464

2648 SYMPOSIUM: THE INTERFACE BETWEEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW AND ANTITRUST LAW: . Comment: Holmes and the Erosion of Exclusive Federal Jurisdiction over Patent Claims, 87 Minn. L. Rev. 2133 (2003)

87 Minn. L. Rev. 2133 p.2133

2649 Comment: Loosening ERISA's Preemptive Grip on HMO Medical Malpractice Claims: A Response to . PaciﬁCare of Oklahoma v. Burrage, 80 Minn. L. Rev. 1545 (1996)

80 Minn. L. Rev. 1545 p.1545

2650 ARTICLE: Building Solidarity Through Expansion of NLRA Coverage: A Blueprint for Worker . Empowerment, 74 Minn. L. Rev. 953 (1990)

74 Minn. L. Rev. 953 p.1018

2651 CASENOTE: The Clean Air Act and the Federal Removal Statute: Do They Fit Together or Are We Missing a . Piece of the Puzzle? , 8 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 85 (2001)

2652 ARTICLE: Removal of Diversity Actions When the Amount in Controversy Cannot be Determined from the . Face of Plaintiff's Complaint: The Need for Judicial and Statutory Reform to Preserve Defendant 's Equal Access to Federal Courts, 62 Mo. L. Rev. 681 (1997)

2653 COMMENT: The Ever--ExpandingComplete Preemption Doctrine and the Copyright Act: Is This What . Congress Really Wanted? , 7 N.C. J.L. & Tech. 205 (2005)

2654 SURVEY OF DEVELOPMENTS IN NORTH CAROLINA LAW; V. EMPLOYMENT LAW: McCormick v. A T & . T Technologies, Inc. and Section 301 Preemption: The Fourth Circuit Makes a Federal Case Out of Workplace Torts. , 70 N.C. L. Rev. 2073 (1992)

2655 CONTENT: FEDERAL COURTS, STATE POWER, AND INDIAN TRIBES: CONFRONTING THE WELL-- . PLEADED COMPLAINT RULE, 35 N.M. L. Rev. 1 (2005)

35 N.M. L. Rev. 1 p.1 Page 368 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2656 44 N.Y. U. Annual Conf. on Labor 9 .

44 N.Y. U. Annual Conf. on Labor 9 p.20

2657 43 N.Y. U. Annual Conf. on Labor 449 .

43 N.Y. U. Annual Conf. on Labor 449 p.471

2658 NOTE: IN DEFENSE OF HOLMES V. VORNADO: ADDRESSING THE UNWARRANTED CRITICISM, 79 . N.Y.U. L. Rev. 452 (2004)

79 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 452 p.452

2659 NOTE: UNDERSTANDING PREEMPTION REMOVAL UNDER ERISA 502, 72 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 578 (1997) .

72 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 578 p.585 72 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 578 p.597

2660 NOTE: UP IN SMOKE: HOW THE PROXIMATE CAUSE BATTLE EXTINGUISHED THE TOBACCO WAR, . 76 Notre Dame L. Rev. 257 (2000)

76 Notre Dame L. Rev. 257 p.257

2661 ARTICLE AND ESSAY: RECENT TRENDS IN THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT: REMOVAL JURISDICTION . AND PROCEDURES IN EMPLOYMENT LAW LITIGATION, 28 Nova L. Rev. 351 (2004)

2662 Article: A THEORY OF FEDERAL COMMON LAW, 100 Nw. U.L. Rev. 585 (2006) .

100 Nw. U.L. Rev. 585 p.585

2663 ARTICLE: Prerogative Lost: The Trouble with Statutory Federal Question Doctrine After Merrell Dow, 52 . Ohio St. L.J. 1477 (1991)

2664 ARTICLE: Federalism in Labor Relations ----The Last Decade., 50 Ohio St. L.J. 487 (1989) .

2665 ARTICLE: THE ROLE OF CLASS COUNSEL, 46 Orange County Lawyer 33 (2004) .

2666 ARTICLE: MANAGED CARE LIABILITY AND ERISA PREEMPTION, 69 Pa. B.A.Q. 93 (1998) . Page 369 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2667 ARTICLE: Quantity Versus Quality: The Medical Malpractice Exception to ERISA Preemption, 5 Quinnipiac . Health L.J. 153 (2002)

2668 ARTICLE: After Smyrna: Rights and Powers of Unions that Represent less than a Majority, 45 Rutgers L. . Rev. 637 (1993)

2669 ARTICLE: BASIC REMOVAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE, 6 S. Carolina Lawyer 25 (1995) .

2670 ARTICLE: Preemption in the Rehnquist Court: A Preliminary Empirical Assessment, 14 S. Ct. Econ. Rev. 43 . (2006)

2671 ARTICLE: The Safest Care is to Deny Care: Implications of Corporate Health Insurance, Inc. v. Texas . Department of Insurance on HMO Liability in Texas, 41 S. Tex. L. Rev. 621 (2000)

41 S. Tex. L. Rev. 621 p.621

2672 ARTICLE: ERISA: THE SAVINGS CLAUSE, 502 IMPLIED PREEMPTION, COMPLETE PREEMPTION, . AND STATE LAW REMEDIES,42 Santa Clara L. Rev. 105 (2001)

42 Santa Clara L. Rev. 105 p.105

2673 ARTICLE: Judicial Abstinence: Ninth Circuit Jurisdictional Celibacy for Claims Brought Under the Federal . Declaratory Judgment Act, 27 Seattle Univ. L. R. 751 (2004)

2674 ARTICLE: Attention Shoppers: The Federal Circuit's Failure to Preempt Contractual Provisions Prohibiting . Reverse Engineering May Create a Blue Light Special on Jurisdictional Forums, 57 SMU L. Rev. 63 (2004)

57 SMU L. Rev. 63 p.63

2675 ARTICLE: HIPAA IMPLICATIONS FOR ATTORNEY--CLIENTPRIVILEGE, 35 St. Mary's L. J. 871 (2004) .

35 St. Mary's L. J. 871 p.871

2676 ARTICLE: Foreign Environmental and Human Rights Suits Against U.S. Corporations in U.S. Courts, 18 . Stan. Envtl. L.J. 145 (1999)

2677 NOTE: ERISA PREEMPTION MEETS THE AGE OF MANAGED CARE: TOWARD A COMPREHENSIVE . SOCIAL POLICY, 47 Syracuse L. Rev. 191 (1996)

47 Syracuse L. Rev. 191 p.191

2678 NOTE: Vornado Hits the Midwest: Federal Circuit Jurisdiction in Patent and Antitrust Cases After Holmes v. . Vornado* , 82 Tex. L. Rev. 1091 (2004) Page 370 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

82 Tex. L. Rev. 1091 p.1091

2679 ARTICLE: The Continuing Assault on the Right to Strike, 79 Tex. L. Rev. 703 (2001) .

79 Tex. L. Rev. 703 p.703

2680 FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE SYMPOSIUM HONORING CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT: Artful . Pleading: A Doctrine in Search of Deﬁnition, 76 Tex. L. Rev. 1781 (1998)

76 Tex. L. Rev. 1781 p.1783

2681 SYMPOSIUM ----FEDERAL CONFLICTS LAW: ARTICLE: The Federal--StateConﬂict of Laws: "Actual " . Conﬂicts., 70 Tex. L. Rev. 1743 (1992)

70 Tex. L. Rev. 1743 p.1763

2682 FIFTH CIRCUIT SURVEY, JUNE 2001--MAY 2002: SURVEY ARTICLE: Civil Procedure, 34 Tex. Tech L. . Rev. 571 (2003)

34 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 571 p.571

2683 FIFTH CIRCUIT SURVEY, JUNE 2001--MAY 2002: SURVEY ARTICLE: Recent Developments in Fifth . Circuit Business Torts Jurisprudence, 34 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 513 (2003)

34 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 513 p.513

2684 SYMPOSIUM: CLASS ACTIONS IN THE GULF SOUTH AND BEYOND: A Primer on the Class Action . Fairness Act of 2005 , 80 Tul. L. Rev. 1617 (2006)

80 Tul. L. Rev. 1617 p.1617

2685 RECENT DEVELOPMENT: Smith v. Houston Oilers, Incorporated: State--LawClaims Intercepted in the . End Zone, 71 Tul. L. Rev. 1359 (1997)

71 Tul. L. Rev. 1359 p.1359

2686 NOTE: THE AVCO EXCEPTION TO THE WELL PLEADED COMPLAINT DOCTRINE AS APPLIED TO . THE LHWCA: AARON V. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. CO., 16 Tul. Mar. L. J. 235 (1991)

2687 ARTICLE: REMOVABILITY OF HIGH SEAS DEATH CLAIMS FILED IN STATE COURT AFTER . TALLENTIRE., 12 Tul. Mar. L. J. 317 (1988)

2688 COMMENT: Appellate Review of SLUSA Remands after CAFA, 73 U. Chi. L. Rev. 321 (2006) .

73 U. Chi. L. Rev. 321 p.321 Page 371 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2689 ARTICLE: The Legacy of Industrial Pluralism: The Tension Between Individual Employment Rights and the . New Deal Collective Bargaining System., 59 U. Chi. L. Rev. 575 (1992)

59 U. Chi. L. Rev. 575 p.598

2690 EDITORIAL NOTE: FEDERAL LABOR LAW PREEMPTION OF STATE WRONGFUL DISCHARGE . CLAIMS, 58 U. Cin. L. Rev. 491 (1989)

2691 NOTE: SLICING THROUGH THE GORDIAN KNOT: "EMPLOYERS," STANDING, AND REMOVAL . UNDER ERISA, 2005 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1257 (2005)

2005 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1257 p.1257

2692 ARTICLE: COMPENSATION FOR MASS PRIVATE DELICTS: EVOLVING ROLES OF ADMINISTRATIVE, . CRIMINAL, AND TORT LAW, 2001 U. Ill. L. Rev. 947 (2001)

2001 U. Ill. L. Rev. 947 p.947

2693 ARTICLE: The Sixth Circuit Year in Review----LeadingCases of 1995, 26 U. Mem. L. Rev. 399 (1996) .

2694 ARTICLE: Class Action Fairness Act of 2005: The Eight--Year Saga Is Finally Over, 59 U. Miami L. Rev. . 385 (2005)

59 U. Miami L. Rev. 385 p.385

2695 COMMENT: New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans, et al. v. Travelers Insurance . Company, et al.: Medical Malpractice and Enabling Regulation In States Again, 51 U. Miami L. Rev. 131 (1996)

2696 ARTICLE: PUBLIC GOODS, PRIVATE CONTRACT AND PUBLIC POLICY: FEDERAL PREEMPTION OF . SOFTWARE LICENSE PROHIBITIONS AGAINST REVERSE ENGINEERING, 53 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 543 (1992)

2697 ARTICLE: The New Psychological Contract: Implications of the Changing Workplace for Labor and . Employment Law, 48 UCLA L. Rev. 519 (2001)

48 UCLA L. Rev. 519 p.519

2698 ARTICLE: An Intermediate Solution to State Sovereign Immunity: Federal Appellate Court Review of State-- . Court Judgments After Seminole Tribe, 46 UCLA L. Rev. 161 (1998)

2699 ARTICLE: The Trojan Horse: How the Declaratory Judgment Act Created a Cause of Action and Expanded . Federal Jurisdiction While the Supreme Court Wasn't Looking, 36 UCLA L. Rev. 529 (1989)

36 UCLA L. Rev. 529 p.588 Page 372 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2700 COMMENT: ARTFUL PLEADING AND REMOVAL JURISDICTION: FERRETING OUT THE TRUE . NATURE OF A CLAIM., 35 UCLA L. Rev. 315 (1987)

2701 NOTE: THE BREADTH OF COMPLETE PREEMPTION: LIMITING THE DOCTRINE TO ITS ROOTS, 76 . Va. L. Rev. 1601 (1990)

2702 ARTICLE: RHETORIC AND ITS DENIAL IN LEGAL DISCOURSE, 76 Va. L. Rev. 1545 (1990) .

76 Va. L. Rev. 1545 p.1602

2703 NOTE: Avoiding Impotence: Rethinking the Standards for Applying State Antitrust Laws to Interstate . Commerce, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 1705 (2001)

54 Vand. L. Rev. 1705 p.1705

2704 NOTE: Efﬁciency, Fairness, and Common Sense: The Case for One Action as to Percentage of Fault in . Comparative Negligence Jurisdictions That Have Abolished or Modiﬁed Joint and Several Liability, 48 Vand. L. Rev. 739 (1995)

2705 ARTICLE: Removal, Remand, and Review in Pendent Claim and Pendent Party Cases., 41 Vand. L. Rev. 923 . (1988)

2706 Casenotes: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY V. OHIO & THE FEDERAL FACILITY . COMPLIANCE ACT OF 1992: THE SUPREME COURT FORCES A HAZARDOUS COMPROMISE IN CWA AND RCRA ENFORCEMENT AGAINSTFEDERAL AGENCIES , 4 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 363 (1993)

2707 NOTE: HOW CAN IT BE WRONG WHEN IT FEELS SO RIGHT? APPELLATE REVIEW OF REMAND . ORDERS UNDER THE SECURITIES LITIGATION UNIFORM STANDARDS ACT, 50 Vill. L. Rev. 305 (2005)

50 Vill. L. Rev. 305 p.305

2708 ISSUES IN THE THIRD CIRCUIT: CASEBRIEF: LABOR LAW----ANTOL V. ESPOSTO: THE THIRD . CIRCUIT EXPANDS PREEMPTION UNDER THE LABOR MANAGEMENT RELATIONS ACT, 42 Vill. L. Rev. 1995 (1997)

2709 ARTICLE: A LOOK AT TITLE VII'S REGULATORY REGIME, 16 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 219 (1994) .

2710 ARTICLE: Principles of Forum Selection, 103 W. Va. L. Rev. 167 (2000) .

103 W. Va. L. Rev. 167 p.167 Page 373 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2711 ARTICLE: THE COMPLETE PREEMPTION DILEMMA: A LEGAL PROCESS PERSPECTIVE, 31 Wake . Forest L. Rev. 927 (1996)

2712 NOTE: Are Rules Just Meant To Be Broken? The One--Year Two--Stepin Tedford v. Warner--LambertCo., 62 . Wash & Lee L. Rev. 1315 (2005)

62 Wash & Lee L. Rev. 1315 p.1315

2713 NOTE: AUTOMATIC FOR REMOVAL?: THE USE OF POST--PETITIONEVIDENCE TO ESTABLISH THE . AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY FOR DIVERSITY JURISDICTION, 80 Wash. U. L. Q. 299 (2002)

80 Wash. U. L. Q. 299 p.299

2714 ANNUAL SURVEY OF MICHIGAN LAW+ JUNE 1, 1998 --MAY 31, 1999: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 46 . Wayne L. Rev. 563 (2000)

2715 NOTE: AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. v. WOLENS: THE SUPREME COURT'S REREGULATION OF THE . AIRLINE INDUSTRY, 5 Widener J. Pub. L. 405 (1996)

2716 COMMENT: THE GENERAL AVIATION REVITALIZATION ACT OF 1994: A TEN--YEAR . RETROSPECTIVE, 2004 Wis. L. Rev. 945 (2004)

2004 Wis. L. Rev. 945 p.945

2717 3 Wis. L. Rev. 945 .

3 Wis. L. Rev. 945 p.945

2718 ARTICLE: Reconceptualizing Federal Preemption of Tort Claims as The Government Standards Defense, 37 . Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 903 (1996)

2719 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN HEALTH CARE LAW: AETNA v. DAVILA/CIGNA v. CALAD: A MISSED . OPPORTUNITY, 31 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 843 (2005)

31 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 843 p.843

2720 ARTICLE: Travelers Insurance: New Support for the Argument to Restrain ERISA Pre--emption , 13 Yale J. . On Reg. 255 (1996)

2721 ARTICLE: Patient Injury Incentives in Law, 17 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 1 (1998) .

2722 Article: The Unjustiﬁed Absence of Federal Fraud Protection in the Labor Market, 107 Yale L.J. 715 (1997) . Page 374 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

107 Yale L.J. 715 p.759

2723 NOTE: The Need for a New Approach to Federal Preemption of Union Members' State Law Claims., 99 Yale . L.J. 209 (1989)

ALR ANNOTATIONS ( 4 Citing Annotations )

2724 Supreme Court's views as to scope of "arising under" clause of Article III sec. 2, clause 1 of Federal . Constitution, 76 L. Ed. 2d 831, supp secs. 3, 11

2725 Constitutionality and construction of sec. 301(a) of Labor Management Relations Act (29 USC sec. 185(a)) . conferring jurisdiction on Federal District Courts in actions for violation of contract between employer and labor organization----federal cases, 16 L. Ed. 2d 1143, supp secs. 4, 9

2726 Preemption of State--LawWrongful Discharge Claim, Not Arising From Whistleblowing, by sec. 301(a) of . Labor--Management Act of 1947 (29 U.S.C.A. sec. 185(a)), 184 A.L.R. Fed. 241, secs. 2(a), 2(b)

2727 Federal pre--emptionof whistleblower's state--lawaction for wrongful retaliation, 99 A.L.R. Fed. 775, sec. 7 .

TREATISE CITATIONS ( 61 Citing Sources )

2728 5--45Administrative Law @ 45.03 .

2729 L1--6Business Law Monographs @ 6.01 .

2730 15--212Business Organizations with Tax Planning @ 212.05 .

2731 1--11California Class Actions Practice and Procedure @ 11.01 .

2732 1--3California Employment Law @ 3.02 .

2733 4--60California Employment Law @ 60.09 .

2734 4--61California Employment Law @ 61.03 . Page 375 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2735 21--249California Forms of Pleading and Practice----Annotated@ 249.50 .

2736 22--265California Forms of Pleading and Practice----Annotated@ 265.33 .

2737 22--265California Forms of Pleading and Practice----Annotated@ 265.37 .

2738 22--265California Forms of Pleading and Practice----Annotated@ 265.64 .

2739 7A--71California Points & Authorities @ 71.61 .

2740 3--40ACalifornia Torts @ 40A.30 .

2741 5--71California Torts @ 71.22 .

2742 8--21Chisum on Patents Supp. to @ 21.02 .

2743 16 Chisum on Patents @ 8000 .

2744 4--65Collier Bankruptcy Practice Guide P 65.12 .

2745 5--63Dorsaneo, Texas Litigation Guide @ 63.02 .

2746 13--202Dorsaneo, Texas Litigation Guide @ 202.01 .

2747 13--203Dorsaneo, Texas Litigation Guide @ 203.203 . Page 376 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2748 13--203Dorsaneo, Texas Litigation Guide @ 203.10 .

2749 10--138Dunlap--HannaPennsylvania Forms @ 138.02 .

2750 10--138Dunlap--HannaPennsylvania Forms @ 138.03 .

2751 3--7EDUCATION LAW @ 7.07 .

2752 2--7Employee Rights Litigation: Pleading and Practice @ 7.04 .

2753 6--144Energy Law and Transactions @ 144.01 .

2754 6--144Energy Law and Transactions @ 144.05 .

2755 1--4Federal Litigation Guide: New York and Connecticut @ 4.04 .

2756 2--9Insurance Coverage for Environmental Claims @ 9.02 .

2757 4--59Intellectual Property Counseling & Litigation @ 59.02 .

2758 2--36Labor and Employment Law @ 36.01 .

2759 2--36Labor and Employment Law @ 36.06 .

2760 1--5LN Practice Guide: FL Civil Motion Practice @ 5.07 .

2761 Manual of Federal Practice 5th @ 1.63 . Page 377 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2762 Manual of Federal Practice 5th @ 1.153 .

2763 1--17MB Practice Guide: CA Pretrial Civil Procedure @ 17.09 .

2764 1--2MB Practice Guide: Fed Pretrial Civ Proc in CA @ 2.07 .

2765 1--3MB Practice Guide: Fed Pretrial Civ Proc in CA @ 3.09 .

2766 2--15BMedical Malpractice P 15B.06 .

2767 15--103Moore's Federal Practice --Civil @ 103.41 .

2768 15--103Moore's Federal Practice --Civil @ 103.45 .

2769 16--107Moore's Federal Practice --Civil @ 107.04 .

2770 16--107Moore's Federal Practice --Civil @ 107.14 .

2771 16--107Moore's Federal Practice --Civil Current Developments in @ 107.14 .

2772 1--5Moore's Manual----Federal Practice and Procedure @ 5.13 .

2773 1--8Moore's Manual----Federal Practice and Procedure @ 8.21 .

2774 4--36National Labor Relations Act: Law & Practice @ 36.01 . Page 378 SHEPARD'S® - 482 U.S. 386 - 2788 Citing References

2775 4--36National Labor Relations Act: Law & Practice @ 36.06 .

2776 3--12Nimmer on Copyright @ 12.01 .

2777 1--16North Carolina Unfair Business Practice @ 16.06 .

2778 3--14Occupational Safety And Health Act @ 14.04 .

2779 1--1PATENT LAW DIGEST 8100 .

2780 19--94Personal Injury----Actions,Defenses, Damages @ 7 .

2781 1--8Regulatory Takings @ 8--6 .

2782 Rhode Island Civil Practice and Procedure @ 811 .

2783 2--9Goods in Transit @ 9.00 .

2784 3--45Texas Torts and Remedies @ 45.10 .

2785 1--9Unjust Dismissal @ 9.03 .

2786 Illinois Jurisprudence, Health Law @ 15:48 .

2787 Illinois Jurisprudence, Labor and Employment @ 11:27 .

2788 1--6Business Law Monographs: Litigation @ 6.01 . Page 379

LEXSEE 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2607

CATERPILLAR INC. ET AL. v. WILLIAMS ET AL.

No. 86--526

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

482 U.S. 386; 107 S. Ct. 2425; 96 L. Ed. 2d 318; 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2607; 55 U.S.L.W. 4804; 106 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P12,342; 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 193; 125 L.R.R.M. 2521

April 21, 1987, Argued June 9, 1987

PRIOR HISTORY: accordingly found that respondents' claim rested solely upon state law and was not removable to federal court. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. OUTCOME: The Court afﬁrmed the appellate court's decision and found that respondents' claims did not arise DISPOSITION: under a federal labor law statute and therefore could not 786 F.2d 928, afﬁrmed. be removed to federal court.

CASE SUMMARY: CORE TERMS: collective--bargaining, pre--empted, removal, state law, federal law, state--law, collective agreement, well--pleaded, pre--emption, federal question, fed- PROCEDURAL POSTURE: Petitioners sought review eral claim, weekly, cause of action, federal jurisdiction, of a decision from the United States Court of Appeals for employment contract, superseded, removable, unionized, the Ninth Circuit, which reversed a trial court decision pre--empt,bargaining unit, breached, assured, state cause that would have allowed petitioners to remove respon- of action, unfair labor practice, eliminated, subsumed, dents' state law breach of contract employment action to federal cause of action, collective bargaining, federal-- federal court. The court ruled that petitioners could not question, pre--existing remove the claim because it did not arise under § 301 of the Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.S. § 185. LexisNexis(R) Headnotes OVERVIEW: Petitioner equipment manufacturer hired respondents to work at one of its facilities. Initially, re- Contracts Law > Types of Contracts > Implied--in--Fact spondents were in positions covered by a collective bar- Contracts gaining agreement. Each eventually rose to management Contracts Law > Types of Contracts > Implied--in--Law positions not covered by the collective bargaining agree- Contracts ment and alleged that petitioner represented that they Labor & Employment Law > Employment Relationships could enjoy indeﬁnite employment. Respondents were > General Overview later downgraded into positions covered by the collective [HN1] Under California law, an implied contract of em- bargaining agreement and then laid off. Respondents sued ployment may arise from a combination of factors, includ- petitioners, the manufacturer and others, for breach of an ing longevity of service, commendations and promotions, employment agreement. Petitioners removed the case to oral and written assurances of stable and continuous em- federal court. Respondents sought to have the action re- ployment, and an employer's personnel practices. manded to state court. The trial court denied remand but the appellate court reversed. Petitioners sought review. Civil Procedure > Jurisdiction > Diversity Jurisdiction The Court afﬁrmed the appellate court. The Court found > General Overview that the case had been improperly removed and that re- Civil Procedure > Jurisdiction > Subject Matter spondents' claims did not arise under the collective bar- Jurisdiction > General Overview gaining agreement and therefore did not arise under § 301 Civil Procedure > Removal > Basis > Diversity of of the Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.S. § 185. The Court Citizenship Page 380 482 U.S. 386, *; 107 S. Ct. 2425, **; 96 L. Ed. 2d 318, ***; 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2607

[HN2] Only state--courtactions that originally could have ing claims pre--emptedby § 301 of the Labor Management been ﬁled in federal court may be removed to federal court Act, 29 U.S.C.S. § 185. That section provides that suits by the defendant. Absent diversity of citizenship, federal-- for violation of contracts between an employer and a la- question jurisdiction is required. The presence or absence bor organization representing employees in an industry of federal--question jurisdiction is governed by the well-- affecting commerce as deﬁned in this chapter, or between pleaded complaint rule, which provides that federal juris- any such labor organizations, may be brought in any dis- diction exists only when a federal question is presented trict court of the United States having jurisdiction of the on the face of the plaintiff's properly pleaded complaint. parties, without respect of the amount in controversy or The rule makes the plaintiff the master of the claim; he or without regard to the citizenship of the parties. she may avoid federal jurisdiction by exclusive reliance on state law. Labor & Employment Law > Collective Bargaining & Labor Relations > Enforcement Civil Procedure > Removal > Basis > General Overview [HN8] State law does not exist as an independent source [HN3] See 28 U.S.C.S. § 1441. of private rights to enforce collective bargaining contracts.

Civil Procedure > Jurisdiction > Jurisdictional Sources Labor & Employment Law > Collective Bargaining & > Constitutional Sources Labor Relations > Federal Preemption Civil Procedure > Jurisdiction > Subject Matter Labor & Employment Law > Employment Relationships Jurisdiction > Federal Questions > General Overview > General Overview [HN4] Under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1331, federal district courts [HN9] The pre--emptive force of § 301 of the Labor have original jurisdiction over all civil actions arising un- Management Act, 29 U.S.C.S. § 185, is so powerful as der the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States. to displace entirely any state cause of action for violation of contracts between an employer and a labor organiza- Civil Procedure > Removal > Basis > General Overview tion. Any such suit is purely a creature of federal law, [HN5] A case may not be removed to federal court on the notwithstanding the fact that state law would provide a basis of a federal defense, including the defense of pre-- cause of action in the absence of § 301. emption, even if the defense is anticipated in the plaintiff's complaint, and even if both parties concede that the Labor & Employment Law > Collective Bargaining & federal defense is the only question truly at issue. Labor Relations > Enforcement Labor & Employment Law > Employment Relationships Civil Procedure > Jurisdiction > Subject Matter > Employment Contracts > Breach Jurisdiction > Federal Questions > General Overview [HN10] Section 301 of the Labor Management Act, 29 Constitutional Law > Supremacy Clause > General U.S.C.S. § 185, governs claims founded directly on rights Overview created by collective--bargaining agreements, and also [HN6] There is an independent corollary to the well-- claims substantially dependent on analysis of a collec- pleaded complaint rule for the purposes of determining tive--bargaining agreement. whether federal jurisdiction exists, which is known as the "complete pre--emption"doctrine, and it applies where the Labor & Employment Law > Collective Bargaining & pre--emptive force of a statute is so extraordinary that it Labor Relations > Unfair Labor Practices > General converts an ordinary state common law complaint into one Overview stating a federal claim for purposes of the well--pleaded Labor & Employment Law > Employment Relationships complaint rule. Once an area of state law has been com- > Employment Contracts > General Overview pletely pre--empted, any claim purportedly based on that [HN11] Individual contracts cannot subtract from collec- pre--empted state law is considered, from its inception, a tive ones, and whether under some circumstances they federal claim, and therefore arises under federal law. may add to them in matters covered by the collective bargain, the court leaves to be determined by appropriate Labor & Employment Law > Collective Bargaining & forums under the law of contracts applicable, and to the Labor Relations > Federal Preemption Labor Board if they constitute unfair labor practices. Labor & Employment Law > Collective Bargaining & Labor Relations > Right to Organize Labor & Employment Law > Collective Bargaining & Transportation Law > Interstate Commerce > Definition Labor Relations > Federal Preemption of Commerce Labor & Employment Law > Employment Relationships [HN7] The complete pre--emption corollary to the well-- > Employment Contracts > General Overview pleaded complaint rule is applied primarily in cases rais- [HN12] If an employer wishes to dispute the continued Page 381 482 U.S. 386, *; 107 S. Ct. 2425, **; 96 L. Ed. 2d 318, ***; 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2607 legality or viability of a pre--existing individual employ- company, and that if the facility at which they were em- ment contract because an employee has taken a position ployed ever closed, employment opportunities would be covered by a collective agreement, it may raise this ques- provided for them at other facilities. Subsequently, the tion in state court. The employer may argue that the in- tractor company downgraded the employees' employment dividual employment contract has been pre--empted due status to positions covered by the collective bargaining to the principle of exclusive representation in § 9(a) of agreement, but allegedly assured them that the down- the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), 29 U.S.C.S. § grades were temporary. Thereafter, the employees were 159(a). notified that the plant at which they worked would close and that they would be laid off. The employees filed an Civil Procedure > Removal > Basis > Federal Questions action against the tractor company in a California state Civil Procedure > Judicial Officers > General Overview court based totally on state law, and contended that the Contracts Law > Contract Interpretation > General tractor company breached their individual employment Overview contracts. The tractor company removed the action to the [HN13] It is true that when a defense to a state claim is United States District Court for the Northern District of based on the terms of a collective--bargaining agreement, California, and argued that removal was proper because the state court will have to interpret that agreement to any individual employment contracts made by the em- decide whether the state claim survives. But the presence ployees were, as a matter of federal substantive labor law, of a federal question, even a question under § 301 of the merged into and superseded by the collective bargaining Labor Management Act, 29 U.S.C.S. § 185, in a defen- agreement. The District Court held that removal to federal sive argument does not overcome the paramount policies court was proper and dismissed the case when the employ- embodied in the well--pleaded complaint rule ----that the ees refused to amend their complaint to attempt to state plaintiff is the master of the complaint, that a federal a claim under 301 of the Labor Management Relations question must appear on the face of the complaint, and Act (LMRA) (29 USCS 185). The United States Court that the plaintiff may, by eschewing claims based on fed- of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed and held that eral law, choose to have the cause heard in state court. (1) the case was not removable to federal court because When a plaintiff invokes a right created by a collective-- the employees' state--law claims were not grounded upon bargaining agreement, the plaintiff has chosen to plead rights or liabilities created by the collective bargaining what the Court has held must be regarded as a federal agreement, and (2) the tractor company's claim that its claim, and removal is at the defendant's option. But a de- collective bargaining agreement with the union super- fendant cannot, merely by injecting a federal question into seded all previous individual employment contracts was an action that asserts what is plainly a state--law claim, irrelevant and a "defensive allegation" (786 F2d 928). transform the action into one arising under federal law, On certiorari, the United States Supreme Court af- thereby selecting the forum in which the claim shall be firmed the Court of Appeals. In an opinion by Brennan, litigated. If a defendant could do so, the plaintiff would be J., expressing the unanimous view of the court, it was master of nothing. Congress has long since decided that held that a complaint which alleges only state common-- federal defenses do not provide a basis for removal. law claims of breach of individual employment contracts is not removable to federal court under 301 of the LMRA, DECISION: although the claims are asserted by employees who also State--law claim of breach of individual employ- possess substantial rights under a collective bargaining ment contract held not completely pre--empted by 301 agreement, because 301 does not convert a state common-- of LMRA (29 USCS 185) and not removable to federal law complaint into one stating a federal claim for purposes court. of the "complete pre--emption" corollary to the "well-- pleaded complaint" rule, where the employees' complaint SUMMARY: (1) does not seek to enforce the collective bargaining agreement, (2) is not substantially dependent upon inter- Employees, initially hired by a tractor company to fill pretation of the collective bargaining agreement, (3) does positions covered by a collective bargaining agreement, not rely upon the collective bargaining agreement, and (4) eventually assumed managerial or salaried positions out- does not address the relationship between the individual side the coverage of the collective bargaining agreement. contracts and the collective agreement. While the employees were in the managerial and salaried positions, the tractor company allegedly created implied LAWYERS' EDITION HEADNOTES: individual employment contracts with the employees by allegedly making repeated representations to the employ- [***LEdHN1] ees that they would have indefinite employment with the Page 382 482 U.S. 386, *; 107 S. Ct. 2425, **; 96 L. Ed. 2d 318, ***LEdHN1; 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2607

CAUSES §67 only where original federal jurisdiction exists. POSSESSIONS §38 STATUTES §91 [***LEdHN4] employment contracts ---- state--law claims ---- "well-- CAUSES §27 pleaded complaint" rule----"complete pre--emption"corol- diversity of citizenship ----federal question ---- lary ---- Headnote:[4] Headnote:[1A][1B][1C][1D] Absent diversity of citizenship, federal--questionjurisdic- A complaint alleging only state common--law claims of tion is required for the removal of cases from state into breach of individual employment contracts, although the federal courts. claims are asserted by employees who also possess substantial rights under a collective bargaining agreement, is [***LEdHN5] not removable to federal court under 301 of the Labor COURTS §255 Management Relations Act (29 USCS 185)----which con- --528,712 jurisdiction----"well--pleadedcomplaint" rule---- fers jurisdiction on Federal District Courts to decide law- state law ---- suits alleging violations of collective--bargaining agree- Headnote:[5] ments----because 301 does not convert a state common-- The presence or absence of federal--question jurisdic- law complaint into one stating a federal claim for pur- tion is governed by the "well--pleaded complaint" rule, poses of the "complete pre--emption" corollary to the which provides that federal jurisdiction exists only when "well--pleaded complaint" rule----under which corollary a a federal question is presented on the face of a properly-- court may conclude that the pre--emptive force of a federal pleaded complaint; the rule makes the plaintiff the mas- statute is so extraordinary that it converts a state common-- ter of the claim and enables the plaintiff to avoid federal law complaint into one stating a cause of action arising jurisdiction by exclusive reliance on state law. under federal law----where the employees' complaint (1) does not seek to enforce the collective bargaining agree- [***LEdHN6] ment, (2) is not substantially dependent upon interpreta- CAUSES §67 tion of the collective bargaining agreement, (3) does not federal defenses ---- rely upon the collective bargaining agreement, and (4) Headnote:[6] does not address the relationship between the individual contracts and the collective agreement; it would be incon- A case may not be removed from state court to federal sistent with congressional intent under 301 to pre--empt court on the basis of a federal defense, including the de- state rules that proscribe conduct, or establish rights and fense of pre--emption,even if the defense is anticipated in obligations, independent of a labor contract. the plaintiff's complaint, and even if both parties concede that the federal defense is the only question truly at issue. [***LEdHN2] CAUSES §67 [***LEdHN7] action arising under federal law ---- COURTS §257 Headnote:[2A][2B] federal cause of action ---- Headnote:[7] An action under 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (29 USCS 185), which confers jurisdiction on Federal Once an area of state law has been completely pre--empted District Courts to decide lawsuits alleging violations of by federal law, any cause of action purportedly based on collective bargaining agreements, is properly removed to that pre--empted state law is considered, from its incep- federal court, although, at the time, the relief sought by tion, a federal cause of action, and therefore arises under the plaintiff may be obtained only in state court----the na- federal law, so as to provide the basis for federal jurisdic- ture of the relief available after jurisdiction attaches being tion. different from the question whether there is jurisdiction to adjudicate the controversy. [***LEdHN8] LABOR §46 [***LEdHN3] enforcement of collective bargaining agreement ---- CAUSES §6 Headnote:[8] original federal jurisdiction ---- Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (29 Headnote:[3A][3B] USCS 185), which confers jurisdiction on Federal District Removal of causes from state to federal court is authorized Courts to decide lawsuits alleging violations of collective Page 383 482 U.S. 386, *; 107 S. Ct. 2425, **; 96 L. Ed. 2d 318, ***LEdHN8; 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2607 bargaining agreements, governs not only claims founded Labor Relations Act (29 USCS 151 et seq.) does not directly on rights created by collective bargaining agree- establish that they are removable to federal court as an ments, but also claims substantially dependent on analysis action arising under federal law. of a collective bargaining agreement. [***LEdHN13] [***LEdHN9] APPEAL §1331.5 LABOR §40 COURTS §712 contracts ---- individual employment contracts ----state claims ---- Headnote:[9] Headnote:[13A][13B] Individual employment contracts are not inevitably super- Where the United States Supreme Court affirms a judg- seded by any subsequent collective bargaining agreement ment holding that laid off employees' state common--law covering an individual employee; an employee covered by claims of breach of individual employment contracts were a collective bargaining agreement is permitted to assert not removable to federal court, the Supreme Court will contract rights independent of that agreement, including intimate no view on the merits of an employer's con- state--law contract rights, as long as the contract relied tentions (1) that 301 of the National Labor Relations Act upon is not the collective bargaining agreement. (29 USCS 185) pre--empts a state--law claim even when the employer raises only a defense that requires a court to [***LEdHN10] interpret or apply a collective bargaining agreement, and COURTS §278.5 (2) that in the employer's collective bargaining agreement, POSSESSIONS §38 its unionized employees waived any pre--existing individ- collective bargaining agreements ---- enforcement of ual employment contract rights; these are questions that rights ----pre--emption---- must be addressed in the first instance by the state court Headnote:[10A][10B] in which the laid off employees filed their claims. Section 301 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 SYLLABUS: USCS 185), which confers jurisdiction on Federal District Courts to decide lawsuits alleging violations of collective Caterpillar Tractor Co. (Caterpillar) hired respon- bargaining agreements, does not require that all employ- dents to work at its San Leandro, California, facility ment--related matters involving unionized employees be in positions covered by its collective--bargaining agree- resolved through collective bargaining, and thus be gov- ment with a union. Respondents eventually assumed erned by a federal common law created by 301; claims management and other positions outside the bargaining bearing no relationship to a collective bargaining agree- unit, and allegedly were repeatedly assured by Caterpillar ment beyond the fact that they are asserted by an individ- that, if the San Leandro facility ever closed, Caterpillar ual covered by such an agreement are not pre--emptedby would employ them at other facilities. Subsequently, 301 or by other provisions of the federal labor law. they were downgraded to unionized positions, but allegedly assured that the downgrades were temporary. [***LEdHN11] However, Caterpillar later notified them that its San COURTS §173 Leandro plant would close and that they would be laid off. state jurisdiction ---- Respondents then filed this action, based solely on state Headnote:[11] law, in a California state court, alleging that Caterpillar thereby breached their individual employment contracts. If an employer wishes to dispute the continued legality Caterpillar removed the action to Federal District Court, or viability of a pre--existing individual employment con- arguing that removal was proper because any individual tract because an employee has taken a position covered employment contracts made with respondents were, as by a collective bargaining agreement, the employer may a matter of federal substantive labor law, merged into raise this question in state court. and superseded by the collective--bargaining agreement. Respondents denied that they alleged any federal claim [***LEdHN12] and sought remand of the action to the state court. The CAUSES §67 Federal District Court held that removal was proper, and action arising under federal law ---- dismissed the case when respondents refused to amend the Headnote:[12] complaint to attempt to state a claim under § 301 of the The fact that a defendant might ultimately prove that Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, which confers a plaintiff's state--law claims of breach of an individual federal jurisdiction as to suits for violations of collective-- employment contract are pre--empted under the National bargaining agreements. The Court of Appeals reversed, Page 384 482 U.S. 386, *; 107 S. Ct. 2425, **; 96 L. Ed. 2d 318, ***LEdHN13; 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2607 holding that the case was improperly removed. individual employment contract rights. The presence of a federal question, even a § 301 question, in a defen- Held: Respondents' state--law complaint for breach of sive argument does not overcome the paramount policies the individual employment contracts is not removable to embodied in the well--pleaded complaint rule. Pp. 398-- Federal District Court. Pp. 391--399. 399. (a) The presence or absence of federal--question jurisdiction that will support removal is governed by the COUNSEL: "well--pleadedcomplaint rule," under which federal juris- Gerald D. Skoning argued the cause for petition- diction exists only when a federal question is presented on ers. With him on the briefs were Charles C. Jackson, the face of the properly pleaded complaint. Ordinarily, a J. Stephen Poor, Theodore R. Johnson, and Nancy L. case may not be removed on the basis of a federal defense, Snowden. including the defense of pre--emption,even if the defense is anticipated in the complaint, and even if both parties Fritz Wollett argued the cause and filed a brief for concede that the federal defense is the only question truly respondents. * at issue. However, under the "complete pre--emptiondoc- trine," which is a corollary to the well--pleadedcomplaint * Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were rule, once an area of state law has been completely pre-- filed for the Chamber of Commerce of the United empted, any claim purportedly based on that pre--empted States by James C. Paras, Kingsley R. Browne, state law is considered, from its inception, a federal claim, and Stephen A. Bokat; for the Equal Employment and therefore arises under federal law. Pp. 391--394. Advisory Council by Robert E. Williams, Douglas S. McDowell, and Garen E. Dodge; for the (b) Respondents' state--law contract claims are not Merchants and Manufacturers Association et al. by "completely pre--empted"§ 301 claims. Section 301 gov- Charles G. Bakaly, Jr.; and for the Union Pacific erns claims founded directly on rights created by col- Railroad Co. by I. Michael Greenberger and Mark lective--bargaining agreements and claims substantially B. Goodwin. dependent on analysis of such agreements. However, respondents alleged that Caterpillar breached individual Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were employment contracts with them, and § 301 says nothing filed for the American Federation of Labor and about the content or validity of such contracts. Although Congress of Industrial Organizations by Marsha respondents, as bargaining unit employees at the time Berzon, David M. Silberman, and Laurence Gold; of the plant closing, could have brought suit under the for the Employment Law Center of the San collective agreement, they, as masters of the complaint, Francisco Legal Aid Society by Joan M. Graff, chose not to do so. Moreover, their complaint is not sub- Robert Barnes, and John M. True; and for the stantially dependent upon interpretation of the collective-- Plaintiff Employment Lawyers Association by Paul bargaining agreement. Pp. 394--395. H. Tobias. (c) J. I. Case Co. v. NLRB, 321 U.S. 332, does not JUDGES: support Caterpillar's contention that when respondents returned to the collective--bargaining unit, their individual Brennan, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous employment contracts were subsumed into, or eliminated Court. by, the collective--bargaining agreement so as to be pre-- empted by § 301. That decision does not stand for the OPINIONBY: general proposition that all individual employment con- BRENNAN tracts are inevitably superseded by a subsequent collective agreement. The fact that an employer may raise such OPINION: a question in state court and might ultimately prove that the employee's claims are pre--empted does not establish [***324] [*388] [**2427] JUSTICE BRENNAN that they are removable. Pp. 395--398. delivered the opinion of the Court. (d) There is no merit to Caterpillar's argument that § [***LEdHR1A] [1A]The question for decision is 301 pre--emptsa state--law claim when the employer raises whether respondents' state--law complaint for breach only a defense that requires a court to interpret or apply of individual employment contracts is completely pre-- a collective--bargaining agreement, such as Caterpillar's empted by § 301 of the Labor Management Relations defense claiming that, in its collective--bargaining agree- Act, 1947 (LMRA), 61 Stat. 156, 29 U. S. C. § 185, and ment, its unionized employees waived any pre--existing therefore removable to Federal District Court. Page 385 482 U.S. 386, *388; 107 S. Ct. 2425, **2427; 96 L. Ed. 2d 318, ***LEdHR1A; 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2607

I n2 [HN1] Under California law, an implied contract of employment may arise from a com- At various times between 1956 and 1968, Caterpillar bination of factors, including longevity of service, Tractor Company (Caterpillar) hired respondents to work commendations and promotions, oral and written at its San Leandro, California, facility. Complaint paras. assurances of stable and continuous employment, 10--26, App. to Pet. for Cert. (App.) A--40--A--42. and an employer's personnel practices. See Pugh Initially, each respondent filled a position covered by v. See's Candies, Inc., 116 Cal. App. 3d 311, 327-- the collective--bargaining agreement between Caterpillar 329 (1981); Cleary v. American Airlines, Inc., 111 and Local Lodge No. 284, International Association of Cal. App. 3d 443, 455--456(1980). Machinists (Union). Each eventually became either a managerial or a weekly salaried employee, positions outside the coverage of the collective--bargaining agreement. Between May 1980 and January 1984, Caterpillar Respondents held the [***325] latter positions for peri- downgraded respondents from managerial and weekly ods ranging from 3 to 15 years; all but two respondents salaried positions to hourly positions covered by the col- served 8 years or more. App. A--97--A--98. lective--bargaining agreement. Respondents allege that, at the time they were downgraded to unionized positions, Respondents allege that, "during the course of [their] Caterpillar supervisors orally assured them that the down- employment, as management or weekly salaried employ- grades were temporary. Id. para. 27F, App. A--48. On ees," Caterpillar made oral and written representations December 15, 1983, Caterpillar notified respondents that that "they could look forward to indefinite and lasting em- its San Leandro plant would close and that they would be ployment with the corporation and that they could count laid off. on the corporation to take care of them." Complaint paras. 27A, 27D, App. A--43. [*389] More specifically, respon- [*390] On December 17, 1984, respondents filed dents claim that, "while serving Caterpillar as managers or an action based solely on state law in California state weekly salaried employees, [they] were assured that if the court, contending that Caterpillar "breached [its] employ- San Leandro facility of Caterpillar ever closed, Caterpillar ment agreement by notifying [respondents] that the San would provide employment opportunities for [them] at Leandro plant would be closed and subsequently advis- other facilities of Caterpillar, its subsidiaries, divisions, ing [respondents] that they would be terminated" without or related companies." [**2428] Id. para. 27F, App. A-- regard to the individual employment contracts. Id. para. 48. n1 Respondents maintain that these "promises were 32, App. A--49. n3 Caterpillar then removed the action continually and repeatedly made," and that they created to federal court, arguing that removal was proper be- "a total employment agreement wholly independent of cause [***326] any individual employment contracts the collective--bargaining agreement pertaining to hourly made with respondents "were, as a matter of federal sub- employees." Id. para. 29, App. A--49. n2 In reliance on stantive labor law, merged into and superseded by the . . . these promises, respondents assert, they "continued to collective bargaining agreements." Petition for Removal, remain in Caterpillar's employ rather than seeking other App. A--36. Respondents denied that they alleged any employment." Id. para. 31, App. A--49. federal claim and immediately sought remand of the action to the state court. In an oral opinion, the District n1 The complaint also avers that Caterpillar Court held that removal to federal court was proper, and "made clear . . . its intention to employ [respon- dismissed the case when respondents refused to amend dents] indefinitely by promoting them from en- their complaint to attempt to state a claim under § 301 of try level hourly positions to mid--level technical the LMRA. App. A--4. or weekly positions and to management positions," and by giving respondents "favorable performance n3 Respondents also brought state--law causes evaluations," "payment increases and bonuses," of action for breach of a covenant of good faith and "training . . . to provide additional job se- and fair dealing, intentional infliction of mental curity." Complaint paras. 27A, 27B, 27C, App. distress, and fraud. See Complaint paras. 36--55, A--43. Written representations with respect to App. A--51----A--55. Petitioners principally rely on job security were allegedly contained in employ- the breach--of--contractclaim to support removal to ment memoranda, manuals, brochures, handbooks, federal court. and in Caterpillar's "Code of Worldwide Business Conduct and Operating Principles." Id. para. 27E, App. A--43----A--48. [***LEdHR2A] [2A]The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Page 386 482 U.S. 386, *390; 107 S. Ct. 2425, **2428; 96 L. Ed. 2d 318, ***LEdHR2A; 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2607

Circuit reversed, holding that the case was improperly re- Southern Cal., 463 U.S. 1, 23 (1983) ("The Court moved. 786 F.2d 928 (1986). The court determined that of Appeals held, [in Avco,] and we affirmed, . . . that respondents' state--law claims were not grounded, either the petitioner's action 'arose under' § 301, and thus directly or indirectly, upon rights or liabilities created by could be removed to federal court, although the pe- the collective--bargaining agreement. Caterpillar's claim titioner had undoubtedly pleaded an adequate claim that its collective--bargaining agreement with the Union for relief under the state law of contracts and had superseded and extinguished all previous individual em- sought a remedy available only under state law") ployment contracts alleged by respondents was deemed (emphasis in original; citation omitted). irrelevant. The court labeled this argument a "defensive allegation," "raised to defeat the [respondents'] claims We granted certiorari, 479 U.S. 960 (1986), and now grounded in those independent contracts." Id., at 936. affirm. Since respondents' cause of action did not require interpretation or application of the collective--bargaining II agreement, [*391] the court concluded that the com- A plaint did not arise under [**2429] § 301 and was not removable to federal court. n4 The Court recently set forth in some detail "the century--old jurisdictional [***327] framework governing [***LEdHR2B] [2B] removal of federal [*392] question cases from state into federal courts," Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Taylor, n4 The Court of Appeals also appears to have held 481 U.S. 58, 63 (1987) (citing Franchise Tax Board of that a case may not be removed to federal court on Cal. v. Construction Laborers VacationTrust for Southern the ground that it is completelypre--empted unless Cal., 463 U.S. 1 (1983)), and we sketch only its outline the federal cause of action relied upon provides the here. plaintiff with a remedy. For example, the court stated: [***LEdHR3A] [3A] [***LEdHR4] [4] "[A] state law cause of action has been 'com- [***LEdHR5] [5][HN2] Only state--court actions that pletely pre--empted' when federal law both dis- originally could have been filed in federal court may be places and supplements the state law ---- that is, removed to federal court by the defendant. n5 Absent when federal law provides both a superseding rem- diversity of citizenship, federal--question jurisdiction is edy replacing the state cause of action and preempts required. n6 The presence or absence of federal--question that state law cause of action. These are two distinct jurisdiction is governed by the "well--pleaded complaint inquiries, both of which must be satisfied to permit rule," which provides that federal jurisdiction exists only removal of an action to federal court." 786 F.2d, at when a federal question is presented on the face of the 932 (emphasis in original; citations omitted). plaintiff's properly pleaded complaint. See Gully v. First National Bank, 299 U.S. 109, 112--113 (1936). The rule This analysis is squarely contradicted by our makes the plaintiff the master of the claim; he or she decision in Avco Corp. v. Machinists, 390 U.S. 557 may avoid federal jurisdiction by exclusive reliance on (1968). We there held that a § 301 claim was prop- state law. n7 erly removed to federal court although, at the time, the relief sought by the plaintiff could be obtained n5 Title 28 U. S. C. § 1441 provides: only in state court. We reasoned as follows: [HN3] "(a) Except as otherwise expressly pro- "The nature of the relief available after juris- vided by Act of Congress, any civil action brought diction attaches is, of course, different from the in a State court of which the district courts of the question whether there is jurisdiction to adjudicate United States have original jurisdiction, may be re- the controversy. . . . The breadth or narrowness of moved by the defendant or the defendants, to the the relief which may be granted under federal law district court of the United States for the district and in § 301 cases is a distinct question from whether division embracing the place where such action is the court has jurisdiction over the parties and the pending." subject matter." Id., at 561. Thus, although we affirm the Court of Appeals' n6 [HN4] Federal district courts have original judgment, we reject its reasoning insofar as it is jurisdiction over "all civil actions arising under the inconsistent with Avco. See also Franchise Tax Bd. Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States." of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for 28 U. S. C. § 1331. Page 387 482 U.S. 386, *392; 107 S. Ct. 2425, **2429; 96 L. Ed. 2d 318, ***LEdHR5; 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2607

n7 See The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co., County of Oneida, 414 U.S. 661, 675 (1974) (state-- 228 U.S. 22, 25 (1913) ("Of course, the party who law complaint that alleges a present right to pos- brings a suit is master to decide what law he will session of Indian tribal lands necessarily "asserts rely upon") (Holmes, J.); see also Merrell Dow a present right to possession under federal law," Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Thompson, 478 U.S. 804, and is thus completely pre--empted and arises un- 809, n. 6 (1986) ("Jurisdiction may not be sustained der federal law); Avco, supra (discussed infra). on a theory that the plaintiff has not advanced"); Great North R. Co. v. Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, [HN7] 282 (1918) ("The plaintiff may by the allegations of his complaint determine the status with respect The complete pre--emption corollary to the well-- to removability of a case"). pleaded complaint rule is applied primarily in cases rais- ing claims pre--empted by § 301 of the LMRA. Section 301 provides: [**2430] [*394] "Suits for violation of contracts between an [***LEdHR3B] [3B] [***LEdHR6] [6]Ordinarily fed- employer and a labor organization representing employ- eral pre--emption is raised as a defense to the allegations ees in an industry affecting commerce as deﬁned in this in a plaintiff's complaint. Before 1887, a federal defense chapter, or between any such labor organizations, may be such as pre--emption could provide a basis for removal, brought in any district court of the United States having but, in that year, Congress amended the removal [*393] jurisdiction of the parties, without respect of the amount statute. We interpret that amendment to authorize re- in controversy or without regard to the citizenship of the moval only where original federal jurisdiction exists. See parties." 29 U. S. C. § 185(a). Act of Mar. 3, 1887, ch. 373, 24 Stat. 552, as amended by Act of Aug. 13, 1888, ch. 866, 25 Stat. 433. Thus, it is In Avco Corp. v. Machinists, the Court of Appeals decided now settled law that [HN5] a case may not be removed to that [HN8] "state law does not exist as an independent federal court on the basis of a federal defense, including source of private rights to enforce collective bargaining the defense of pre--emption, even if the defense is antici- contracts." 376 F.2d 337, 340 (CA6 1967), aff'd, 390 U.S. pated in the plaintiff's complaint, and even if both parties 557 (1968). In afﬁrming, we held that, when "the heart of concede that the federal defense is the only question truly the [state--law] complaint [is] a . . . clause in the collective at issue. See Franchise Tax Board, 463 U.S., at 12. bargaining agreement," id., at 558, that complaint arises under federal law: [***LEdHR1B] [1B] [***LEdHR7] [7][HN6] There [HN9] "The pre--emptive force of § 301 is so power- does exist, however, an "independent corollary" to the ful as to displace entirely any state cause of action 'for well--pleaded complaint rule, id., at 22, known as the violation of contracts between an employer and a labor "complete pre--emption"doctrine. On occasion, the Court organization.' Any such suit is purely a creature of federal has concluded that the pre--emptive force of a statute is law, notwithstanding the fact that state law would provide so "extraordinary" that it "converts an ordinary state com- a cause of action in the absence of § 301." Franchise Tax monlaw complaint into one stating a federal claim for pur- Board, supra, at 23. poses of the well--pleaded complaint rule." Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., supra, at 65. n8 [***328] Once an B area of state law has been completely pre--empted, any claim purportedly based on that pre--empted state law is [***LEdHR1C] [1C] [***LEdHR8] [8]Caterpillar considered, from its inception, a federal claim, and there- asserts that respondents' state--law contract claims are in fore arises under federal law. See Franchise Tax Board, reality completely pre--empted§ 301 claims, which there- supra, at 24 ("If a federal cause of action completely pre-- fore arise under federal law. [**2431] We disagree. empts a state cause of action any complaint that comes [HN10] Section 301 governs claims founded directly on within the scope of the federal cause of action necessarily rights created by collective--bargaining agreements, and 'arises under' federal law"). also claims "substantially dependent on analysis of a collective--bargaining agreement." Electrical Workers v. n8 See, e. g., Metropolitan Life Insurance Hechler, 481 U.S. 851, 859, n. 3 (1987); see also Allis-- Co. v. Taylor (state contract and tort claims com- Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck, 471 U.S. 202, 220 (1985). pletely pre--empted by §§ 502(a)(1)(B) and 502(f) Respondents allege that Caterpillar has entered into and of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act breached individual employment contracts with them. of 1974, 88 Stat. 891, 892); Oneida Indian Nation v. Section 301 [***329] says nothing about the content or Page 388 482 U.S. 386, *394; 107 S. Ct. 2425, **2431; 96 L. Ed. 2d 318, ***329; 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2607 validity of individual employment contracts. It is [*395] spondents' claims under their individual contracts actu- true that respondents, bargaining unit members at the time ally are claims under the collective agreement and pre-- of the plant closing, possessed substantial rights under the empted by § 301. collective agreement, and could have brought suit under § 301. As masters of the complaint, however, they chose [***LEdHR9] [9] [***LEdHR10A] [10A]Caterpillar not to do so. is mistaken. First, J. I. Case does not stand for the proposition that all individual employment contracts are sub- Moreover, contrary to Caterpillar's assertion, see sumed into, or eliminated by, the collective--bargaining Reply Brief for Petitioner 10, respondents' complaint is agreement. In fact, the Court there held: not substantially dependent upon interpretation of the collective--bargaining agreement. It does not rely upon the collective agreement indirectly, nor does it address the relationship between the individual contracts and the col- [HN11] "Individual contracts cannot subtract from collective agreement. n9 As the Court has stated, "it would lective ones, and whether under some circumstances they be inconsistent with congressional intent under [§ 301] to may add to them in matters covered by the collective pre--empt state rules that proscribe conduct, or establish bargain, we leave to be determined by appropriate fo- rights and obligations, independent of a labor contract." rums under the law of contracts applicable, and to the Allis--ChalmersCorp., supra, at 212. Labor Board if they constitute unfair labor practices." 321 U.S., at 339.Thus, individual employment contracts are n9 Caterpillar contends for example, that, un- not inevitably superseded by any subsequent collective der California law governing implied contracts of agreement covering an individual employee, and claims employment, the state court will have to exam- based upon them may arise under state law. Caterpillar's ine the collective--bargaining agreement as part of [***330] basic error is its failure to recognize that a its evaluation of the "totality of the parties' re- plaintiff covered by a collective--bargaining agreement is lationship." Brief for Petitioners 35, n. 24. But permitted to assert legal rights independent of that agree- respondents rely on contractual agreements made ment, including state--law contract rights, so long as the while they were in managerial or weekly salaried contract relied upon is not a collective--bargaining agree- positions ---- agreements in which the collective-- ment. See Allis--Chalmers [**2432] Corp., supra. n10 bargaining agreement played no part. The irrel- Caterpillar impermissibly [*397] attempts to create the evance of the collective--bargaining agreement to prerequisites to removal by ignoring the set of facts (i. these individual employment contracts is illustrated e., the individual employment contracts) presented by re- by the District Court's disposition of the claim of spondents, along with their legal characterization of those Mr. Chambers, who was not in the bargaining unit facts, and arguing that there are different facts respondents at the time he was laid off. His claim was deemed might have alleged that would have constituted a federal solely a matter of state law (and, by implication, not claim. In sum, Caterpillar does not seek to point out that intertwined with the collective--bargaining agree- the contract relied upon by respondents is in fact a col- ment), and thus was remanded to state court. See lective agreement; rather it attempts to justify removal on App. A--22. Moreover, it is unclear whether an ex- the basis of facts not alleged in the complaint. The "artful amination of the collective--bargaining agreement pleading" doctrine cannot be invoked in such circum- is truly required by California law. See Youngman stances. n11 v. Nevada Irrigation Dist., 70 Cal. 2d 240, 246--247, 449 P. 2d 462, 466 (1969) ("In pleading a cause of [***LEdHR10B] [10B] action on an agreement implied from conduct, only n10 Section 301 does not, as Caterpillar suggests, the facts from which the promise is implied must be require that all"employment--related matters in- alleged"); 2 J. Chadbourn, H. Grossman, & A. Van volving unionized employees" be resolved through Alstyne, California Pleading § 1011, p. 159 (1961) collective bargaining and thus be governed by a (same). federal common law created by § 301. Brief for Petitioners 26. The Court has stated that "not ev- Caterpillar next relies on this Court's decision in J. ery dispute concerning employment, or tangentially I. Case Co. v. NLRB, 321 U.S. 332 (1944), arguing that involving a provision of a collective--bargaining when respondents returned to the collective--bargaining agreement, is pre--empted by § 301 or other pro- unit, their [*396] individual employment agreements visions of the federal labor law." Allis--Chalmers were subsumed into, or eliminated by, the collective-- Corp. v. Lueck, 471 U.S. 202, 211 (1985). Claims bargaining agreement. Thus, Caterpillar contends, re- bearing no relationship to a collective--bargaining Page 389 482 U.S. 386, *397; 107 S. Ct. 2425, **2432; 96 L. Ed. 2d 318, ***LEdHR10B; 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2607

agreement beyond the fact that they are asserted agreement would violate § 9(a) of the NLRA, 49 by an individual covered by such an agreement Stat. 453, 29 U. S. C. § 159(a), because, with ex- are simply not pre--empted by § 301. See also ceptions not here relevant, it is an unfair labor prac- Franchise Tax Board, 463 U.S., at 25, n. 28 ("Even tice "for the employer to disregard the bargaining under § 301 we have never intimated that any action representative by negotiating with individual em- merely relating to a contract within the coverage of ployees, whether a majority or a minority, with § 301 arises exclusively under that section. For respect to wages, hours, and working conditions." instance, a state battery suit growing out of a vi- Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. NLRB, 321 U.S. 678, olent strike would not arise under § 301 simply 684 (1944). Even if these individual employment because the strike may have been a violation of an contracts were negotiated with respondents while employer--unioncontract"). the latter were covered by a collective agreement (which is disputed), this fact is irrelevant to the removal question. For reasons similar to those stated n11 Cf. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. in text, see supra, at 394--397, and this page, re- Moitie, 452 U.S. 394, 410, n. 6 (1981) (BRENNAN, spondents' state--law claims might be pre--empted J., dissenting) (Although "occasionally the removal by the NLRA, but they would not be transformed court will seek to determine whether the real nature into claims arising under federal law. of the claim is federal, regardless of plaintiff's characterization, . . . most of them correctly confine this practice to areas of the law pre--empted by federal substantive law") (internal quotations omitted). [***LEdHR13A] [13A]Finally, Caterpillar argues that § 301 pre--emptsa state--law claim even [**2433] when the employer raises only a defense that requires a court to interpret or apply a collective--bargaining agreement. [***LEdHR11] [11] [***LEdHR12] [12]Second, Caterpillar asserts such a defense claiming that, in its col- [HN12] if an employer wishes to dispute the continued le- lective--bargaining agreement, its unionized employees gality or viability of a pre--existing individual employment waived any pre--existing individual employment contract contract because an employee has taken a position cov- rights. n13 ered by a collective agreement, it may raise this question in state court. The employer may argue that the individual [***LEdHR13B] [13B] employment contract has been pre--empteddue to the prin- n13 We intimate no view on the merits of this or ciple of exclusive representation in § 9(a) of the National any of thepre--emptionarguments discussed above. Labor Relations Act (NLRA), 29 U. S. C. § 159(a). See These are questions that must be addressed in the Machinists v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Comm'n, first instance by the state court in which respondents 427 U.S. 132, 146 (1976) (quoting Teamsters v. Morton, filed their claims. 377 U.S. 252, 260 (1964)) (NLRA pre--empts state law that "'upset[s] the balance of power between labor and management expressed in our national labor policy'"). [HN13] It is true that when a defense to a state claim is Or the employer may contend that enforcement of the in- based on the terms of a collective--bargaining agreement, dividual employment contract arguably would constitute the state court will have to interpret that agreement to an unfair labor practice under the NLRA, and is there- decide whether the state claim survives. But the presence fore pre--empted.See San Diego Building [*398] Trades of a federal question, even a § 301 question, in a defen- Council v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236 (1959) (state law that sive argument does not overcome the paramount policies infringes upon the National Labor Relations Board's pri- embodied in the well--pleaded complaint rule ----that the mary jurisdiction over unfair labor practice charges is pre-- plaintiff is the master of the [*399] complaint, that a fed- empted). The fact that a defendant might ultimately prove eral question must appear on the face of the complaint, that a plaintiff's claims are pre--empted under the NLRA and that the plaintiff may, by eschewing claims based on does not [***331] establish that they are removable to federal law, choose to have the cause heard in state court. federal court. n12 When a plaintiff invokes a right created by a collective-- bargaining agreement, the plaintiff has chosen to plead n12 Caterpillar also contends that enforcement what we have held must be regarded as a federal claim, of individual employment contracts negotiated with and removal is at the defendant's option. But a defen- employees covered by the collective--bargaining dant cannot, merely by injecting a federal question into Page 390 482 U.S. 386, *399; 107 S. Ct. 2425, **2433; 96 L. Ed. 2d 318, ***LEdHR13B; 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2607 an action that asserts what is plainly a state--law claim, 2420; 48A Am Jur 2d, Labor and Labor Relations 1959 transform the action into one arising under federal law, thereby selecting the forum in which the claim shall be lit- 23 Federal Procedure, L Ed, Labor and Labor Relations igated. n14 If a defendant could do so, the plaintiff would 52:2053; 29 Federal Procedure, L Ed, Removal of Actions be master of nothing. Congress has long since decided 69:1--69:16 that federal defenses do not provide a basis for removal. See supra, at 392, and n. 5, 392--393.n15 14 Federal Procedural Forms, L Ed, Removal of Actions 58:1--58:60 n14 See, e. g., Cook v. Georgetown Steel Corp., 770 F.2d1272 (CA4 1985); Medlin v. Boeing Vertol 11 Am Jur Pl & Pr Forms (Rev), Federal Practice and Co., 620 F.2d 957 (CA3 1980). Procedure, Forms 43, 152

3 Am Jur Trials 553, Selecting the Forum----Plaintiff's n15 Caterpillar contends that the Court of Position; 3 Am Jur Trials 611, Selecting the Forum---- Appeals' decision offends the paramount national Defendant's Position; 3 Am Jur Trials 681, Tactics and labor policy of referring disputes to arbitration, Strategy of Pleading since its collective--bargaining agreement with the Union contains an arbitration cause. Brief for 29 USCS 185 Petitioners 36. This argument presumes that respondents' claims are arbitrable, when, in fact, they RIA Employment Coordinator LR--46,601 are alleged to grow out of individual employment contracts to which the grievance--arbitrationproce- US L Ed Digest, Removal of Causes 67, 97; States, dures in the collective--bargaining agreement have Territories, and Possessions 38; Statutes 91 no application. Index to Annotations ,Jurisdiction; Labor and Employment ;Removal of Actions III Annotation References: [***LEdHR1D] [1D]Respondents' claims do not arise under federal law and therefore may not be removed to Supreme Court's views as to scope of "arising un- federal court. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is der" clause of Article III, 2, clause 1 of the Federal Constitution. 76 L Ed 2d 831. Afﬁrmed. Constitutionality and construction of 301(a) of Labor REFERENCES: Return To Full Text Opinion Management Relations Act (29 USCS 185(a)) conferring Go to Oral Argument Transcript jurisdiction on Federal District Courts in actions for violation of contract between employer and labor organiza- 32B Am Jur 2d, Federal Practice and Procedure 2406 -- tions. 99 L Ed 529, 7 L Ed 2d 959, 16 L Ed 2d 1143. 118V7K

********** Print Completed **********

Time of Request: Monday, July 31, 2006 15:42:31 EST

Print Number: 1842:111129490 Number of Lines: 20222 Number of Pages: 390

Send To: LAWRENCE, 118V7K LAWRENCE LAW LIBRARY 2 APPLETON ST LAWRENCE, MA 01840-1573