PUBLIC NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 12Th STREET, S.W

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PUBLIC NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 12Th STREET, S.W PUBLIC NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 12th STREET, S.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 DA 02-733 News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov MEDIA BUREAU ACTION March 29, 2002 AT&T CORP. AND COMCAST CORP. SEEK FCC CONSENT FOR A PROPOSED TRANSFER OF CONTROL MB DOCKET NO. 02-70 Petitions/Comments due: April 29, 2002 Oppositions/Responses due: May 14, 2002 Beginning on February 28, 2002,1 the Commission received applications requesting consent to transfer to AT&T Comcast Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation (“AT&T Comcast”), control of (1) licenses and authorizations held by the subsidiaries and affiliates of Comcast Corporation (“Comcast”) and (2) certain licenses and authorizations held by the subsidiaries and affiliates of AT&T Corp. (“AT&T,” and collectively with Comcast, the “Applicants”) associated with AT&T’s broadband division. These applications were filed pursuant to Sections 214 and 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. The proposed transfer of control will result from the spin-off of AT&T Broadband Corp. (“AT&T Broadband”), a holding company for AT&T’s broadband division, to AT&T’s shareholders, and the subsequent merger of AT&T Broadband and Comcast into wholly-owned subsidiaries of AT&T Comcast. After the merger is consummated, existing AT&T shareholders will hold 53 percent of the economic interest and between 54 and 58 percent of the voting interest of AT&T Comcast; existing Comcast shareholders will hold 41 percent of the economic interest and between 3 and 7 percent of the voting interest of AT&T Comcast; and Brian L. Roberts will directly or indirectly hold 1 percent of the economic interest and 33 percent of the voting interest of AT&T Comcast. AT&T Broadband is a major provider of cable television service, serving 13.44 million customers through cable systems in which AT&T Broadband holds more than a 50 percent interest. AT&T Broadband also holds a 50 percent or less interest in cable systems serving in the aggregate 16,585,000 additional customers. The latter group includes AT&T Broadband’s 25.51 percent limited partnership 1 On February 28, 2002, the Applicants filed a Public Interest Statement and associated applications for consent to the transfer of control of certain licenses and authorizations. On various subsequent dates, up to and including March 26, 2002, the Applicants filed additional, related transfer of control applications, re-filed certain applications, and filed supplemental information or amendments to the applications to make them acceptable for filing. 1 interest in Time Warner Entertainment, which serves 12.8 million cable subscribers on systems that it owns or manages. AT&T Broadband also provides cable modem services and cable telephony services and holds attributable interests in certain national and regional video programming services. Comcast also is a major provider of cable television service, serving 8,481,500 million subscribers through cable systems in which it holds an attributable interest. Additionally, it holds a general partnership interest in high-speed Internet access service, electronic commerce, video programming and other services. Comcast offers a number of services that it characterizes as “interactive TV services,” provides telephone service to over 40,000 customers, and offers integrated broadband communications services to over 4,000 business and governmental customers. Additionally, Comcast holds attributable interests in several regional and national video programming networks, and owns various sports teams and arenas. The Applicants assert that the proposed transaction will accelerate the deployment of facilities- based broadband and cable telephony services, as well as digital video services. The Applicants submit that this will occur because the greater scale and scope economies, cost savings, and financial standing that the combined company would better enable it to make new investments in these technologies and services. The Applicants also assert that the combined company would be in a better position to leverage AT&T Broadband’s expertise in providing cable telephony on the Comcast cable systems. Interested parties may file comments or petitions to deny the applications no later than April 29, 2002. Oppositions or responses to these comments and petitions may be filed no later than May 14, 2002. Given recent changes in the mail delivery process, we strongly urge commenters and petitioners to use the Commission’s Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). Procedures for filing through ECFS are described below in the “General Information” section. For administrative convenience, the various applications listed in the Attachment below have been consolidated into one general docket. All filings regarding any aspect of the proposed merger should reference the docket assigned to this proceeding, MB Docket No. 02-70. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Because this proceeding involves broad public policy issues, the proceeding will be treated as “permit but disclose” for purposes of the Commission’s ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200- 1.1216. Should circumstances warrant, this proceeding or any related proceeding may be designated as restricted. Under “permit but disclose” procedures, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission’s rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings.2 Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission’s statement re- emphasizing the public’s responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation’s substance and not merely list the 2 An ex parte presentation is any communication (spoken or written) directed to the merits or outcome of a proceeding made to a Commissioner, a Commissioner’s assistant, or other decision-making staff member, that, if written, is not served on other parties to the proceeding or, if oral, is made without an opportunity for all parties to be present. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1201. 2 subjects discussed.3 More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206 (b) as well. We urge parties to use ECFS to file ex parte submissions. See “General Information” section below. TRANSFER OF CONTROL APPLICATIONS AT&T and Comcast’s consolidated application includes the Commission authorizations and licenses listed in the Attachment below. They are separated by the type of authorization or license, and, within each category, listed by licensee name, application or ULS file number, call sign or lead call sign (for ULS filings), and/or other service-specific information, as appropriate. Interested parties should refer to the transfer of control applications for a more detailed listing of the authorizations or licenses. Each of the Applicants’ subsidiaries or affiliates may hold multiple authorizations or licenses of a particular type. Parties should be aware that additional applications may have to be filed to identify any additional authorizations involved in this transaction. AT&T and Comcast have requested that, given the ongoing regulatory activity of both AT&T and Comcast, including the need for these parties to file applications with the Commission during the period in which this transfer of control will remain pending, “the Commission’s grant of its consent to the transfer of control of these licensees and authorizations include the authorization for AT&T Comcast to acquire control of: (1) any authorizations issued to Comcast or any subsidiaries or affiliates, or to AT&T or any of its affiliates to the extent such authorizations are related to AT&T Broadband’s business, during the Commission’s consideration of the transfer of control applications and the period required for the consummation of the transaction following approval; (2) construction permits held by licensees involved in this transfer of control that mature into licenses after closing and that may have been omitted from the transfer of control applications; and (3) applications that will have been filed by such licensees and that are pending at the time of consummation of the proposed transfer of control.” The applicants contend that this action would be consistent with prior decisions of the Commission. GENERAL INFORMATION The applications for transfer of control of the licenses and authorizations referenced herein have, upon initial review, been accepted for filing. (Note: the applications referenced herein do not necessarily match those listed in Appendix 2 of the applicants’ Public Interest statement.) The Commission reserves the right to return any applications if, upon further examination, they are determined to be defective and not in conformance with the Commission’s rules, regulations, or policies. Final action will not be taken on the applications earlier than 31 days following the date of this Notice. Interested parties may file pleadings as indicated above regarding the applications. Parties are encouraged to file comments using ECFS. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to <http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html>. Generally, only one copy of an electronic submission must be filed. In completing the transmittal screen, commenters should include their full name, Postal Service mailing address, and the applicable docket or rulemaking number. Parties may also submit an electronic comment by Internet e-mail. To receive filing instructions for e-mail comments, commenters should send an e-mail to [email protected], and should include the following words in the body of the message, “get form <your e-mail address>.” A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. 3 See Commission Emphasizes the Public’s Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, FCC 00-358, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000).
Recommended publications
  • Executive Intelligence Review, Volume 23, Number 26, June 21
    Selected works in new English translations. The writings of Friedrich Schiller, the great 19th-century poet, playwright, historian and philosopher, have inspired patriots and world citizens for 200 years. VOLUME I VOLUME II VOLUME III Don Carlos, Infante of Spain Wilhelm Tell The Virgin of Orleans Letters on Don Carlos What Is, and To What End Do Philosophical Letters Theater Considered as a Moral We Study Universal History? On the Pathetic Institution The Legislation of Ly curgus and On the Sublime Solon On the Aesthetical Education of On Naive and Sentimental Poetry Man On Grace and Dignity Poetry and Ballads The Ghost Seer Poetry, including The Song of the $15.00 Poetry and Epigrams Bell $9.95 $15.00 '" SPECIAL OFFER: Buy the three-volume set for only $34.50. Make check or mon�y order payable to: Shipping and handling: Add $4 for the first book and $.50 for each additional book in the order. Ben Franklin Booksellers Virginia residents add 4.5% sales tax. 107 South King St. Leesburg, Va. 22075 1-800-453-4108 or 1-703-777-3661 We accept Mastercard, Visa, American Express, and Discover. Founder and Contributing Editor: Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. Editorial Board: Melvin Klenetsky, Antony From theAssociate Editor Papen, Gerald Rose, Dennis Small, Edward Spannaus, Nancy Spannaus, Jeffrey Steinberg, Webster Tarpley, Carol White, Christopher White Senior Editor: Nora Hamerman If any among our readers think that Lyndon LaRouche's campaign Associate Editor: Susan Welsh Managing Editors: John Sigerson, is "pretty much over," with the end of the primary season, they don't Ronald Kokinda know Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • New Copyright Act & Cable Television: a Signal of Change
    digitalcommons.nyls.edu Faculty Scholarship Articles & Chapters 1977 New Copyright Act & Cable Television: A Signal of Change Michael Botein New York Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/fac_articles_chapters Part of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, Communications Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation 24 Bull. Copyright Soc'y U.S.A. 1 (1976-1977) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles & Chapters by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@NYLS. Botein. Copyright and Cable Television PART I ARTICLES 1. THE NEW COPYRIGHT ACT AND CABLE TELEVISION-A SIGNAL OF CHANGE By MICHAEL BOTEIN* Cable television has existed for more than a generation, but only now has the cable copyright issue reached a final and legislative reso­ lution. 1 There are at least several reasons for the delay in defining the cable-copyright interface. First, until the last decade, cable-or "com­ munity antenna television" (CA TV)-was a literally low-visibility medium; it merely relayed four or five otherwise unavailable broad­ cast television signals to a few hundred thousand subscribers in otherwise unserved or "white" areas, and had no program origination capability.2 Second, when cable eventually did become an issue, the only available forum was the Federal Communications Commission. Reasonably enough, the Commission then viewed, and to a- great ex­ tent still views, cable mainly in terms of its potential impact on broad­ cast television's advertising revenues, rather than in terms of compen­ sation to copyright holders.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Court of Appeals of the State of Washington
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON JEFFREY T. PARSONS, MATTHEW ) BALKMAN, GARY DAVID BIESHEIM, ) No. 62152-1-I NEYSA BLACKWELL, THOMAS P. ) CARMODY, KARREN and DANIEL ) DIVISION ONE CAWLFIELD, SCOTT and JULIE ) FOWLER, ROMAN G. GILLULY, ) PUBLISHED OPINION GEORGE GILLULY, JOHN G. and ) SUSAN B. HANSEN, JOHN A. and ) JOYCELYN A. KEEFE, ROBERT E. ) KELLUM, EDWARD MAY, ALLISON S. ) MAY, MARK V. MARTINEZ, TYLER P. ) MICKEY, FARID and SOHEILA ) MOHARJERJASBI, THOMAS C. ) MULLINS, JANE and JEFFREY ) PINNEO, RYAN SCHARNHORST, ) MELODY SCHERTING, SHERI M. ) SLEETH, DEBORAH SMITH, ) DOUGLAS and AMANDA STROMBOM, ) DIANE ZULAS and all others similarly ) situated, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) ) COMCAST of California/Colorado/ ) Washington I, Inc.; COMCAST of ) Washington IV, Inc.; and JOHN DOES ) FILED: June 8, 2009 I-XV, ) Respondents. ) GROSSE, J.—Subject to a few narrow exceptions, the Cable Act expressly preempts state or local action that amounts to rate regulation of basic cable television services, such is the purview of the Federal Communications No. 62152-1-I / 2 Commission (FCC) and local franchising authorities alone. Individual subscribers or groups may only challenge the rates charged to them by a cable service provider before the FCC or before the local franchising authority. Because the plaintiffs here sought relief that necessarily required rate regulation, conduct explicitly proscribed by the Cable Act, summary dismissal of plaintiffs’ state law claims under CR 12(b)(6) was proper. We affirm. FACTS The plaintiffs (collectively Parsons) are Comcast cable television subscribers living in King County’s Greenwood Point and South Cove (annexation area). Following a popular vote, the city of Issaquah annexed those areas effective March 2, 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Telecommunication Economics: Selected Results of the COST Action IS0605
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Stiller, Burkhard (Ed.); Hadjiantonis, Antonis M. (Ed.) Book — Published Version Telecommunication Economics: Selected Results of the COST Action IS0605 Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No. 7216 Provided in Cooperation with: SpringerOpen Suggested Citation: Stiller, Burkhard (Ed.); Hadjiantonis, Antonis M. (Ed.) (2012) : Telecommunication Economics: Selected Results of the COST Action IS0605, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No. 7216, ISBN 978-3-642-30382-1, Springer, Heidelberg, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30382-1 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/182345 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an
    [Show full text]
  • Broadband Reference Guide
    Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc. Broadband Reference Guide Airports Casinos Fitness Centers Retail Stores Houses of Worship Hotels Assisted Living Stadiums & Arenas Offices Broadcast Studios Schools & Universities Government Headends Hospitals MDUs Correctional Facilites Next Generation - “Broadband Reference Guide” Select the desired channel or frequency by touching the respective blue arrow. At the bottom of the The full range of channels is listed screen, select the icon for to the right, select your range, the channel application. and then choose the appropriate number to the left. Click at the top left menu to return to your channel info. Thank you for requesting our Broadband Reference Guide. We hope you find this latest update helpful as we strive to provide technical information for the broadband industry in a convenient pocket size book. Remember to look for previous versions of the reference guide on the Blonder Tongue website. We welcome any suggestion for further improvement, simply e-mail: [email protected]. Bob Pallé President One Jake Brown Road, Old Bridge, NJ 08857 Phone: 732-679-4000 • Fax: 732-679-4353 www.blondertongue.com ©2014 Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc. All rights reserved. Specifications are subject to change without notice. Trademarks are the property of their respective owner. 1 SAFETY System Planning ............................................................4 Cable Substitution Chart ................................................5 Current Ratings for Electronic Cables .............................6
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/010719Website.Ppt (Visited Aug
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-310 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the matter of ) ) Applications for Consent to the Transfer of ) Control of Licenses from Comcast Corporation ) MB Docket No. 02-70 and AT&T Corp., Transferors, to AT&T Comcast ) Corporation, Transferee ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: November 13, 2002 Released: November 14, 2002 By the Commission: Chairman Powell issuing a statement; Commissioner Copps dissenting and issuing a statement. Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 II. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................... 11 A. The Applicants...................................................................................................................... 11 1. AT&T. ..................................................................................................................... 11 2. Comcast. .................................................................................................................. 17 B. The Merger Transaction and the Application to Transfer Licenses...................................... 24 III. STANDARD OF REVIEW AND PUBLIC INTEREST FRAMEWORK........................................ 26 IV. POTENTIAL PUBLIC INTEREST HARMS ................................................................................... 29 A. Video
    [Show full text]
  • “It's a Poor Sort of Memory That Only Works Backwards.”
    1 “It’s a poor sort of memory that only works backwards.” 2 3 On his way to the store Gauri Banerjee, 64 years old and blind, knocked his head against a door and could see again after 20 years. But in the same moment he lost his hearing. Wolverhampton Express & Star (17 May 1995). 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Hugh Williams was the only survivor of a vessel that sank in the Straits of Dover on 5 December 1660. One hundred and twenty-one years later to the day, another shipping disaster in the same waters claimed the lives of all on board, except a man with the seemingly charmed name of Hugh Williams. On 5 August 1820, when a picnic boat capsized on the Thames, all drowned with the exception of a five-year-old boy—Hugh Williams. Again about one hundred and twenty years later, on 10 July 1940, a British trawler was destroyed by a German mine. Only two men survived, an uncle and nephew, both named Hugh Williams. Plimmer, M. & King, B., Beyond Coincidence: Amazing Stories of Conincidence and the Mystery Behind Them (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2007), 192. 12 13 Subject: killed by book On 10 Mar 2007, at 1:33 PM, Tom McCarthy wrote: Date: Monday, March 12, 2007 12:19 PM From: Tom McCarthy How bizarre, given that I’d just written to you about your “encyclopaedic” knowledge of Hitchcock in relation to his mother’s death. How did it happen? “Absalom, Absalom!” Is such a good book to die with—or rather break a leg.
    [Show full text]
  • January 6, 2013, Special and Regular Meetings 1 B. Acknowledge Minutes of Boards and Commissions (I) Landmarks & Design Commission - December 17, 2013 8 C
    CITY OF ELLENSBURG COUNCIL AGENDA Council Chambers 501 North Anderson Street January 21, 2014 7:00 p.m. Pledge of Allegiance I. Call to Order & Roll Call 2. Proclamations 3. Awards and Recognitions 4. Approval of Agenda 5. CONSENT AGENDA Items listed below have been distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and will be enacted by one motion. If separate discussion is desired on an item, that item may be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed on the Regular Agenda at the request of a Councilmember or at the request of a member of the public with concurrence of a Councilmember. Requests to remove items should be made under Item 4 Approval of Agenda. A. Approve Minutes - January 6, 2013, Special and Regular Meetings 1 B. Acknowledge Minutes of Boards and Commissions (I) Landmarks & Design Commission - December 17, 2013 8 C. Approve Noise Waiver Application for Central Washington University at 2400 North Alder Street on May 15, 2014 from 4:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. 9 D. Accept Small Works Quote 2013-30, Doorway Installation Work As Complete 10 E. Accept Small Works 2013-31, Mechanical Assist Filing System As Complete 11 F. Authorize the Director of Energy Services to Accept the License for a Fiber Optic Line Across Railroad Property 12 G. Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Kittitas County Conservation Rebate Agreement 29 H. Authorize the Director of Energy Services to Accept a Professional Services Agreement with Green Rubino for a Natural Gas Utility Marketing Plan at a cost not to exceed $31,500.00 including applicable taxes 36 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission DA 00-1534 Before the Federal
    Federal Communications Commission DA 00-1534 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of: ) ) Costa de Oro Television, Inc. ) For Modification of Market of ) Station KJLA, Ventura, California ) Petition for Reconsideration ) CSR-5096-A ) Century Cable of Southern California, Century ) Southwest Cable Television, Inc. and Multivision, ) Marcus Cable, MediaOne of Los Angeles, Inc., ) American Cablesystems of South Central Los ) Angeles, Inc. dba MediaOne, King Videocable ) Company dba MediaOne, and TCI Cablevision of ) California, dba TCI of East San Fernando Valley. ) For Modification of Market of ) Station KJLA, Ventura, California ) Petition for Reconsideration ) ) Costa de Oro Television, Inc. v. Cox ) Communications, Inc. ) CSR-5515-M Request for Carriage ) ) Costa de Oro Television, Inc. v. Time Warner ) Cable ) CSR-5520-M Request for Carriage ) ) CoxCom, Inc. ) For Modification of Market of ) CSR-5537-A Station KJLA, Ventura, California ) ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: July 7, 2000 Released: July 10, 2000 By the Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. The Bureau has before it several matters that pertain to the cable television carriage rights of broadcast television station KJLA, Ventura, California. These matters include petitions for reconsideration, mandatory carriage, and modification of the station’s market. For administrative convenience, the Bureau is consolidating the petitions into one proceeding. Costa de Oro Television, Inc., licensee
    [Show full text]
  • A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS of CABLE TELEV'slon ITS IMPACT on Michlgan with ALTERNATIVES for LEGISLAHOH
    A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF CABLE TELEV'SlON ITS IMPACT ON MICHlGAN WITH ALTERNATIVES FOR LEGISLAHOH Thesis for the Degree of M. A. M‘CHIGAN STATE UNWERSITY LAWRENCE D. THOMPSON 1974 ABSTRACT A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF CABLE TELEVISION, ITS IMPACT ON MICHIGAN WITH ALTERNATIVES FOR LEGISLATION BY Lawrence D. Thompson Cable television began some 20 years ago with the simple purpose of providing broadcast signals, but today's cable system has evolved into a highly complex entity. The new unit, the.modern cable and broadband communication system, can carry thirty to fifty television channels, fifty audio signals and hundreds of digital data channels for computers, teletypes, or alarm signals. It is apparent that the enormous two-way and interactive capacity of the cable communication system is just beginning exploration. Cable can thusly become an increasingly significant factor in our lives. It will significantly affect the social, economic, cultural, educational and recreational aspects of our environment. But there are great risks in ~cable development--of technological obsolescence, financial insolvency, consumer disinterest. A general background of cable television in Chapter I and the current state of cable in Michigan in Chapter II provides a basis for the remainder of the report. Lawrence D. Thompson Chapter III attempts to convey a sense of the tremendous possibilities of the medium. Chapter IV discusses the very great financial and political uncertainties and problems for cable's future in Michigan. Chapter V outlines govern— mental framework for cable systems in the states and dis— cusses a number of alternatives toward cable. The report concentrates particularly on cable teler vision systems in Michigan-*the pioneer comprehensive report on cable communications for the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Shepard's Batch Delivery Time of Request
    118V7K Print Request: Shepard's Batch Delivery Time of Request: Monday, July 31, 2006 15:42:31 EST Number of Lines: 20222 Print Number: 1842:111129490 Client ID/Project Name: Note: Research Information: Shepard's Send to: LAWRENCE, 118V7K LAWRENCE LAW LIBRARY 2 APPLETON ST LAWRENCE, MA 01840-1573 Page 1 Shepard's Batch Delivery Request Report Shepard's Citation: 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2607 --FULL References: 2788 Restricted: No FOCUS Terms: No Deliver Shepard's Report: Yes --Completed Deliver Text of Shepardized Cite: Yes --Completed Selected Citing Documents: None Selected Date of Request: 07/31/2006 Citing Full Reference Citations Text Number Request Key: Completed--Full--text retrieved and delivered below. Table Case--Multiple documents found for this citation; insufficient information to choose one. Error --Full--text could not be retrieved and/or delivered. LexisNexis is a trademark, and LEXSEE and LEXSTAT and Shepard's are registered trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties, Inc., used under license. ALR is a registered trademark of West Licensing Corp. Copyright **** LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved. Page 2 Copyright 2006 SHEPARD'S(R) --2788 Citing references Caterpillar, Inc. v. Williams, 482 U.S. 386, 107 S. Ct. 2425, 96 L. Ed. 2d 318, 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2607, 55 U.S.L.W. 4804, 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 193, 125 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2521, 106 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P12342 (1987) SHEPARD'S Signal: Caution: Possible negative treatment Restrictions: Unrestricted FOCUS(TM) Terms: No FOCUS terms Print Format: FULL Citing Ref. Signal Legend: {Warning} ----negative treatment indicated {Questioned} ----validity questioned by citing refs.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 1
    Introduction 1 Congratulations on choosing to buy a Tevion® product. By doing so you now have the assurance and peace of mind that comes with purchasing a product made by one of Europe’s leading manufacturers. All products brought to you by Tevion® are manufactured to the highest standards of performance and safety, and, as part of our philosophy of customer service and satisfaction, are backed by our comprehensive 3 Year Warranty. Please fill in and return the Warranty Card to the address provided. We hope you will enjoy using your purchase for many years to come. Helpline No. UK/ North Ireland 0871 37 61 020 Rep. Ireland 1-800-992 508 Web Support www.medion.co.uk Model Number: MD 30275 3 Overview 2 Front 1. Screen 2. Infra-red sensor: receiving area for infra-red signals from the remote control 3. On/off light: the red light will come on when the device is in stand-by mode. It will turn blue when the device is switched on. 4. Loudspeakers Helpline No. UK/ North Ireland 0871 37 61 020 Rep. Ireland 1-800-992 508 Web Support www.medion.co.uk Model Number: MD 30275 4 Sides 1. VOL+/–: you can regulate the volume of your equipment with these keys. 2. CH: you can switch TV channel using these keys. 3. MENU: with this key you can display the screen menu to make adjustments to your equipment. 4. INPUT: to select the input signal: DTV, TV (antennae), AV, S- Video, YPbPr, SCART, HDMI, VGA. 5. STANDBY: to switch the LCD-TV off temporarily.
    [Show full text]