DOCSLIB.ORG

Copyright by Brian Kearney Arbour 2007

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Copyright by Brian Kearney Arbour 2007 Copyright by Brian Kearney Arbour 2007 The Dissertation Comm ittee for Brian Kearney Arbour certifies that this is the approved versi on of the following dissertation: Résumé Politics: How Campaigns Use Background Appeals to Win Votes and Elections Committee: Daron Shaw, Supervisor Rod Hart Sharon Jarvis Brian Roberts John Sides Résumé Politics : How Campaigns Use Background Appeals to Win Votes and Elections by Brian Kearney Arbour, B.A.; M. A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doc tor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2007 Dedication To Alice & Peter Arbour, and Carter Long Acknowledgements Like all large academic projects, I have greatly benefited by the support, dedication, effort, and friendship from a large number of people. They have all given generously of their time , energy, and intellect . Each has given more to me than I have to them, and I am eternally grateful for their efforts. My work in graduat e school has been generously supported by several financial sources provided by the Department of Government at the University of Texas at Austin. I twice won a McDonald Fellowship, which provided me financial support in the Summer of 2005 and for the 2006 -2007 academic year. I also received support from the Patterson Travel Fellowship, which allowed me to travel to several academic conferences. The Public Policy Institute at UT, headed by David Leal, provided funding to hire a research assistant to assist with coding advertisement. Yvette Armani was that assistant, and her excellent worked helped me greatly. Also, the experiment in Chapter 5 was part of UT’s module of the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES). Funding for that survey was provided by the Annette Strauss Institute for Civic Participation, the College of Liberal Arts, and the Department of Government. I was aided in the process by an outstanding dissertation committee. Daron Shaw, my chair, does an outstanding job of professionalizin g his new charges, and socializing his students into the expectations and standards of our academic discipline. UT political science Ph.D. have earned more prestigious jobs over the last several years, and Dr. Shaw’s commitment to graduate students is one of the biggest reasons why. On a personal level, he has provided wise counsel and patient guidance to me both in advising me on my research agenda, and the job process. John Sides proved a great asset to my committee. His research on similar subjects provi ded me with both inspiration and v challenge —how to live up to his standard. He was a faithful reader and editor of my work, making a long series of constructive criticisms that improved this final product greatly. Brian Roberts challenged me to think more c learly about the theoretical argument of my dissertation, and how to best test the expectations I developed from that argument. His comments improved this product greatly. Sharon Jarvis provided a different perspective to this political scientist, and one that challenged (and thus strengthened) my first assumptions. Rod Hart aided my through the quality of his own scholarship, and helping me to see the big picture of my argument, a difficult task when you place so much effort into the many small components of a project. Graduate school proved to be the most enjoyable period of my life. I give great credit to David Menefee -Libey, my advisor at Pomona College and my dear friend, for only inspiring me to want to be a political scientist and an academic. Most im portantly, when I told David I wanted to go to grad school, his reaction (“You’ll be great…) provided great confidence that I had chosen the right path for me. Other professors at UT provided help and guidance in this project. I thank Ismail White, Ken Gre en, Sean Theriault, David Leal, Tasha Philpot, and Wendy Hunter for their time and effort. The biggest reason why I have enjoyed my time in graduate school so much is that it allowed me to meet a series of people who shared my interest and passion in polit ics. My friends in academia provided not only emotional support, but also an encouraging environment to discuss the political world and our effort to understand it. My thanks go to Neal Allen, Laura Barberena , Brian Brox, Eunjung Choi, Odysseas Christou, O ya Dursun, Julie George, Joe Giammo, Austin Hart, Patrick Hickey, Scott Garrison, Tao -fang Huang, Julie Lane, Allison Martens, David McCoy, Ernest McGowen, Seth McKee, Mark McKenzie, Adam Myers, Bobby Parks , Ayesha Ray , Laura Seay, Mary Slosar, Natasha Sug iyama, Jeremy Teigen, and Jongseok Woo . My vi friends outside of academic have helped to see the world beyond the ivory tower. I think Ella Kleynerma n, Doris Eichburg, Mandi Boyd , Bill Grandberg, and my oldest (and in many ways closest) friends , Damian and La urie Abreo. Two friends stand out and deserve special commendation here. Few understand me better, as an academic and a person, than Danny Hayes. His combination of intelligence, wit, and care makes his an excellent political scientist, and even better fri end. Mike Unger proved a great friend, generous with his knowledge, his time, his good judgment, his good humor, and even more generous with his cooking talents. I have been blessed with a family that has provided me comfort and guidance in equal measur es. My aunt and uncle, Charlie and Sharon Ford, have always shown me love and generosity beyond what I have been able to return to them. Ford Family Tailgating , which they run, provided me with a welcome respite from the daily grind of graduate school, as well as a way to remain connected to my family. While one of FFT’s mottos is “family isn’t who you’re related to; it’s who you choose to spend time with,” I am proud to not only be part of this definition, but also to note that “if you’re family was as coo l as this one you’d party with ‘em too.” My mother’s mother, Bereniece Ford, or Granny, passed away several years ago, but I still know how special her love is for me, and for my family. My grandmother, Ann Arbour, or Anneé, passed away earlier this year, but her joy, love, and spirit live deep within those whose lives she touched, including my parents, my aunts and uncles, and my cousins. My grandfather, Sidney Arbour Jr., has always provided a moral guide for my life through his dedication to family and c ommunity. My brother Blake has always been one of the warmest, most generous people in my life. His infectious and positive spirit is an always welcome part of my life. My sister Megan is not only my blood relation, but one of my closest friends, and is on e of the first vii people I turn to for advice and support in tough times. Her husband Wes is an outstanding addition to our family. In this dissertation, I argue that information about the past is used to make decisions about the future. In dedicating this di ssertation, I take a similar spirit. My parents, Peter and Alice Arbour, represent information from the past. They have taught me lessons about how to be generous, outgoing, caring, and committed to my values. They have supported me in hundreds of ways, ph ysically, financially, socially, and emotionally. Representing decisions about the future , I include my nephew and godson Carter Long. Carter not only provides me with hope for the possibilities in his future, but he teaches me lessons today about the tru e meaning of joy. More importantly, he is the coolest person I know, just because he is who he is. June 22, 2007 viii Résumé Politics : How Campaigns Use Background Appeals to Win Votes and Elections Brian Kearney Arbour , Ph.D. The University of Texas at Au stin, 2007 Supervisor: Daron R. Shaw The dissertation examines the use of background appeals in campaign messages. I argue that background appeals allow campaigns to meet tw o seemingly conflicting incentives in the same message —the incentive to reduce voters’ uncertainty about their candidate, and the incentive to remain ambiguous in their issue positions. Background appeals allow voters to know more about a candidate and dev elop more certainty about what he will do in office. At the same times, campaigns can achieve this goal while avoiding specific policy commitments, which, on controversial issues, might repel a significant part of the electorate. I test my argument by exa mining how campaigns plan on using candidates’ backgrounds by interviewing a sample of political consultants. The consultants I interviewed make the candidate’s background a top priority in developing a message plan for their clients. They want to show vo ters “who their candidate is” as a means of developing likeability and credibility with voters. ix As expected, campaigns use background appeals frequently, in nearly 80% of advertisements aired by US Senate campaigns in 2000 and 2002. But in these appeals, campaigns avoid specifically connecting their candidate to particular policies. Also, the appeal of ambiguity is so great that campaigns only use more specific background appeals when discussing the opponent’s background. Background appeals can have a posi tive effect on perceptions of a candidate. Using an experimental design, I vary the background of a mock candidate for Congress while holding constant his issue position. Respondents regard the candidate more favorably when they learn about his occupation than when they receive no such information. x Table of Contents Chapter 1: Background on Background ...............................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Conversation with Mark Salter, Author of “The
    A Conversation with Mark Salter, Author of “The Luckiest Man: Life with John McCain” Join Michael Zeldin in his conversation with Mark Salter, Author of The Luckiest Man: Life with John McCain. Salter collaborated with John McCain on all seven of their books, including The Restless Wave, Faith of My Fathers, Worth the Fighting For, Why Courage Matters, Character Is Destiny, Hard Call, and Thirteen Soldiers. He served on Senator McCain’s staff for eighteen years. Guest Mark Salter Author of “The Luckiest Man: Life with John McCain” Mark Salter is an American speechwriter from Davenport, Iowa, known for his collaborations with United States Senator John McCain on several nonfiction books as well as on political speeches. Salter also served as McCain’s chief of staff for a while, although he had left that position by 2008. About the Book More so than almost anyone outside of McCain’s immediate family, Mark Salter had unparalleled access to and served to influence the Senator’s thoughts and actions, cowriting seven books with him and acting as a valued confidant. Now, in The Luckiest Man, Salter draws on the storied facets of McCain’s early biography as well as the later-in-life political philosophy for which the nation knew and loved him, delivering an intimate and comprehensive account of McCain’s life and philosophy. Salter covers all the major events of McCain’s life—his peripatetic childhood, his naval service—but introduces, too, aspects of the man that the public rarely saw and hardly knew. Woven throughout this narrative is also the story of Salter and McCain’s close relationship, including how they met, and why their friendship stood the test of time in a political world known for its fickle personalities and frail bonds.
    [Show full text]
  • Whither America? a Strategy for Repairing America’S Political Culture
    Whither America? A Strategy for Repairing America’s Political Culture John Raidt Foreword by Ellen O. Tauscher Whither America? A Strategy for Repairing America’s Political Culture Atlantic Council Strategy Paper No. 13 © 2017 The Atlantic Council of the United States. All rights reserved. No part of this publi- cation may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the Atlantic Council, except in the case of brief quotations in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. Please direct inquiries to: Atlantic Council 1030 15th Street, NW, 12th Floor Washington, DC 20005 ISBN: 978-1-61977-383-7 Cover art credit: Abraham Lincoln by George Peter Alexander Healy, 1869 This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intel- lectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommenda- tions. The Atlantic Council, its partners, and funders do not determine, nor do they necessari- ly endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s particular conclusions. November 2017 Atlantic Council Strategy Papers Editorial Board Executive Editors Mr. Frederick Kempe Dr. Alexander V. Mirtchev Editor-in-Chief Mr. Barry Pavel Managing Editor Dr. Mathew Burrows Table of Contents FOREWORD ....................................................................................................................i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................2 WHITHER AMERICA? ...............................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • US Department of State-America.Gov
    Barack Obama’s Victory Speech Página 1 de 4 U.S. Department of State America.gov - Updated 8:58 EST - 25 Feb 2008 Telling America's Story You are in: Home > U.S. Politics > 2008 Elections U.S. ELECTIONS | Guide to the 2008 Election 05 November 2008 Barack Obama’s Victory Speech President-elect addresses supporters in Illinois On November 4, Americans elected Illinois Senator Barack Obama as the 44th president of the United States. At the end of a very long Election Day, he addressed supporters at a park in Chicago. (See “Barack Obama Wins Historic Election Victory.”) Following is the transcript of that speech: (begin transcript) President-elect Barack Obama Chicago, Illinois November 4, 2008 Hello, Chicago. If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible, who still wonders if the dream of our founders is alive in our time, who still questions the power of our democracy, tonight is your answer. It's the answer told by lines that stretched around schools and churches in numbers this nation has never seen, by people who waited three hours and four hours, many for the first time in their lives, because they believed that this time must be different, that their voices could be that difference. It's the answer spoken by young and old, rich and poor, Democrat and Republican, black, white, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, gay, straight, disabled and not disabled. Americans who sent a message to the world that we have never been just a collection of individuals or a collection of red states and blue states.
    [Show full text]
  • {PDF EPUB} Why Courage Matters the Way to a Braver Life by John Mccain Why Courage Matters
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Why Courage Matters The Way to a Braver Life by John McCain Why Courage Matters. Why Courage Matters: The Way to a Braver Life is a 2004 book by United States Senator John McCain with his frequent collaborator and aide Mark Salter. Published by Random House, it is mostly mini-biographies and mini-commentaries on others, but contains a small autobiographical element. Contents. See also References External links. The book followed McCain's two memoirs, Faith of My Fathers (1999) and Worth the Fighting For (2002). [1] McCain starts by saying that in contemporary usage people talk too loosely in characterizing acts as being courageous - it should be not only "the capacity for action despite our fears" but also involve a physical self-sacrifice for the benefit of others. [1] He says that during his time as a POW in North Vietnam during the Vietnam War, he relied on his fellow POWs for moral support but "I was not always a match for my enemies." [1] In press interviews for the book, McCain said that courage materializes when "our fear is overcome by our conscience and our beliefs and forces us to act." [2] Most of the book consists of his portraits of people, both leaders and ordinary people, he thinks have shown courage. [3] The book starts with the story of U.S. Special Forces soldier Roy Benavidez, who won the Medal of Honor for his actions during the Vietnam War. [4] Others whose stories are in the book include American civil rights leader John Lewis, American Indian chiefs Manuelito and Barboncito, explorer John Wesley Powell, Jewish resistance fighter Hannah Szenes, Burmese dissident Aung San Suu Kyi, Baltimore anti-drugs-crime mass murder victim Angela Dawson, and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wisdom, Wit and Impact of John Mccain»
    WEEKLY DIGEST AUGUST 31, 2018 THE WISDOM, WIT AND IMPACT OF JOHN MCCAIN » JARRAR REMAINS OFF CAMPUS AS FRESNO STATE CLASSES START » GOV. BROWN SIGNS BILL ENDING BAIL BEFORE TRIAL » JARRARLOCAL REMAINS OFFAs Her FresnoCAMPUS State Classes Start August 27, 2018 | David Taub Controversial Fresno State professor Randa Jarrar has yet hotline number at Arizona State. Following the uproar, and to return to the classroom. threats from the Fresno State community that they would withhold donations because of Jarrar, university president The embattled English department professor is scheduled Joseph Castro announced she would not face discipline. to teach two classes this semester, starting today (Aug. Castro reiterated those remarks last week, as students 27). However, the university confirmed Monday that she returned to class. While he disagreed with Jarrar, Castro remains on leave. “The cited free speech and the fact she uttered her remarks on “The professor is still professor is still scheduled a private social media account as the reason the school scheduled to return to to return to teaching this wouldn’t take action. teaching this fall after fall after having been on having been on approved leave since last spring. approved leave since last Other Opinions Emerge Since this is a personnel spring. Since the April revelation of the Bush tweets, other Jarrar matter, we cannot dis- remarks surfaced, regarding her opinion of Valley farmers. close the date of her return Since this is a personnel “A lot of the farmers now are Trump supporters and just to teaching.” — Patti Waid, matter, we cannot disclose f—ing stupid,” Fox News university spokeswoman reported about her com- “A lot of the farmers now the date of her return to are Trump supporters teaching,” said university spokeswoman Patti Waid.
    [Show full text]
  • Rick Davis Interview John Mccain: for Whom the Bell Tolls Kunhardt Film Foundation
    RICK DAVIS INTERVIEW JOHN MCCAIN: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS KUNHARDT FILM FOUNDATION RICK DAVIS Presidential Campaign Director October 31, 2017 Interviewed by Teddy Kunhardt Total Running Time: 1 Hour 38 Minutes START TC: QT: 01;00;00;00 QT: 01;00;00;00 RICK DAVIS: Ok, RiCk Davis, take one, mark. QT: 01;00;08;14 TITLE The team member that knows MCCain best QT: 01;00;13;02 RICK DAVIS: It’s really Mark Salter, and I just call him whenever I need to know what’s going on with McCain so—[laughs] QT: 01;00;18;16 TITLE Joining MCCain’s Presidential Campaign in ‘98 QT: 01;00;24;00 RICK DAVIS: Well he was looking around after winning re-election in 2009, or no, 2008. So John won re-election to the Senate in 2008 and started thinking about running for President. A lot of PeoPle around him at the time were big suPPorters of his, they’d been a core team for some time but didn’t have muCh national exPerienCe, and so they were looking for somebody who had been around a few Presidential eleCtions and so I started getting Calls from some of the folks on the MCCain team who knew me. I didn’t really know McCain that well. QT: 01;01;02;10 RICK DAVIS: I’m sorry, ’98, yeah. So anyway, in ’98, they started looking around for somebody who had a little bit more Presidential exPerienCe and I’d been on a number of Presidential Campaigns sinCe 1980 with Reagan, and so some of my friends who were Part of the MCCain Core grouP, Greg Stevens for one who was his media Consultant Called me uP, said, “Hey, what do you think of John MCCain running for President?” When I got done laughing, I told him, “I think I’m gonna Probably be hooking uP with somebody else.” At that time, I’d Just Come off of the ’96 Dole Campaign where I’d been dePuty manager and wanted to run my own show and thought that Elizabeth Dole had a shot at being President of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Realign Our Rhetorical Judgments for the Post-Postmodern, Digital Media Age
    Fear and Loathing in the New Media Era: How to Realign Our Rhetorical Judgments for the Post-Postmodern, Digital Media Age DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Aaron McKain Graduate Program in English The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: James Phelan, Advisor Cynthia Selfe Wendy Hesford Copyright by Aaron McKain 2012 Abstract This dissertation begins with a question that sits – obstinately – at the crossroads of 21st century American politics and 21st century scholarship in rhetoric and composition: How do we make judgments about rhetoric when new media (social-networking, web 2.0, ease of audio/visual production) have rendered our long-standing public norms of ethos untenable? This is the dilemma lurking behind the daily parade of new media acts that we, as citizens, are expected to judge: From co-workers caught mid-kegstand on Facebook to politicians trapped in the YouTube minefield of decontextualized and mashed-up gaffes. But ethos points to a larger concern as well: At the precise moment where technology has given us, as a citizens, unparalleled power to act as rhetorical critics -- when anyone with a laptop and dial-up connection can effortlessly remediate, remix, and repurpose rhetorical acts from one context to another – we are uncertain about what the new rules of rhetoric are? How do we rethink ethos – in terms of character -- for a heavily surveilled, socially-networked age, where the distinctions between public and private are nebulous and all of our previous public performances are always only a Google search away? Concerned that our current, mass media age, standards for judging ethos as character (e.g., as authenticity, as the search for the “real” person) are both deadlocking our politics and providing no vocabulary of resistance to the new media era’s twin industries of information- gathering and surveillance, this dissertation proceeds in three stages in order to present a solution.
    [Show full text]
  • New-School Trademark Dilution: Famous Among the Juvenile Consuming Public
    File: Roberts_B.doc Created on: 6/8/2009 2:21:00 PM Last Printed: 6/8/2009 2:30:00 PM 579 NEW-SCHOOL TRADEMARK DILUTION: FAMOUS AMONG THE JUVENILE CONSUMING PUBLIC ALEXANDRA J. ROBERTS* The recently enacted Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 recali- brated the degree of fame necessary to garner protection: the TDRA applies only to a mark “widely recognized by the general consuming public of the Unit- ed States as a designation of source of the goods or services of the mark’s own- er.” By privileging those major players who succeed in turning their brands into household names, the TDRA strengthens incentives for mark-owners to ensure their logos and brand names are well-recognized not only among adult consum- ers, but also among children. This Article examines a set of marketing beha- viors aimed at children that the TDRA’s revised fame standard both reflects and rewards. Deeming fewer marks famous may serve the immediate purpose of creating a higher bar for plaintiffs to successfully bring dilution claims, but that bar should be set at age twenty-one to avoid rewarding firms for making loyal consumers out of teenagers, tweens, kids and even infants. * J.D., Yale Law School. She currently works as an associate in the Intellectual Property group of Ropes & Gray LLP in New York, NY. She would like to thank Paul Roberts and Gabriel Rosenberg for their assistance and Eric Goralnick and Annette Roberts for their pa- tient support. Volume 49—Number 4 File: Roberts_B.doc Created on: 6/8/2009 2:21:00 PM Last Printed: 6/8/2009 2:30:00 PM 580 IDEA—The Intellectual Property Law Review INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Engagement Guide Table of Contents
    ENGAGEMENT GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION > 3 USING THIS GUIDE > 4 LEARNING OBJECTIVES > 5 FILM SUMMARY > 6 KEY PEOPLE > 7 BEFORE SCREENING > 9 INTERACTIVE DISCUSSION > 11 ACTIVITIES > 16 JOHN MCCAIN | 2 INTRODUCTION Legendary six-term US senator and war hero John McCain agreed to participate in this documentary near the end of his life, providing unprecedented access to his daily activities in Washington, DC, and at home in Arizona. This sweeping account combines the senator’s own voice—culled from original interviews, commentary, and speeches—with archival news footage and previously unseen home movies and photographs. The film also features interviews with family, friends, colleagues, and other leading political figures. Senator McCain’s continuing crusade for the causes he believed in, even during his battle with brain cancer, underscores his fighting spirit and resilience. What emerges is a portrait of a maverick with an unerring sense of duty who never forgot the most important American ideals. JOHN MCCAIN | 3 USING THIS GUIDE This discussion guide is designed as a tool for high school classroom teachers and facilitators to incorporate excerpts of the 2018 HBO film John McCain: For Whom the Bell Tolls and over 28 hours of additional interview footage in the Interview Archive on the Kunhardt Film Foundation website. These materials are an informative and inspiring complement to teaching US history, government, and civics. They illustrate the significance of bipartisanship, moral leadership, and ethical decision-making. Through a rich visual retelling of McCain’s causes and alliances, a portrait of a man dedicated to ideas, rather than party, emerges.
    [Show full text]
  • Other Books by Stanley Renshon
    Other Books by Stanley Renshon The Trump Doctrine and the Emerging International System [with Peter Suedfeld]. Barack Obama and the Politics of Redemption. National Security in the Obama Administration: Reassessing the Bush Doctrine. Noncitizen Voting and American Democracy. Understanding the Bush Doctrine: Psychology and Strategy in an Age of Terrorism [with Peter Suedfeld]. The 50% American: Immigration and National Identity in an Age of Terrorism. In his Father’s Shadow: The Transformations of George W. Bush. Good Judgment in Foreign Policy: Theory and Application [with Deborah Larson]. America’s Second Civil War: Dispatches From the Political Center. One America?: Political Leadership, National Identity, and the Dilemmas of Diversity. Political Psychology: Cultural and Cross Cultural Foundations [with John Duckitt]. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive 467 license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 S. Renshon, The Real Psychology of the Trump Presidency, The Evolving American Presidency, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45391-6 468 OTHER BOOKS BY STANLEY RENSHON High Hopes: The Clinton Presidency and the Politics of Ambition. Note: Winner of the American Political Science Association’s Richard E. Neustadt Award for the Best Book Published on the Presidency-1977 and the National Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis’ Gradiva Award for the best published work that advances psychoanalysis-category: biography-1998. The Psychological Assessment of Presidential Candidates. The Clinton Presidency: Campaigning, Governing, and the Psychology of Leadership. The Political Psychology of the Gulf War: Leaders, Publics and the Process of Conflict. Handbook of Political Socialization: Theory and Research. Psychological Needs and Political Behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Delaware National Agenda 2020 We Are the People
    UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE NATIONAL AGENDA 2020 WE ARE THE PEOPLE Howard Gordon, John Mankiewicz, Steve Schmidt, Eric Deggans “Fact vs. Fiction” HOSTED BY University of Delaware – Center for Political Communication PARTICIPANTS Dr. Lindsay Hoffman Director of National Agenda and Associate Director of the Center for Political Communication, University of Delaware Howard Gordon Critically acclaimed tv writer and producer, co- creator of award-winning Homeland, and executive producer of tv series 24, 24: Live Another Day, Tyrant, and 24: Legacy, Gordon is a 25-year industry veteran who won Golden Globes for The X-Files. John Mankiewicz Emmy nominated tv and film producer, screenwriter and co-executive producer of the series House of Cards. Mankiewicz co-created the 2020 true-crime drama series Interrogation; co-executive produced for Bosch and co-created The Street. A former journalist he has written for Esquire, Rolling Stone and the New Yorker. Steve Schmidt Alumnus of University of Delaware and CPC founding senior fellow, Schmidt is one of the premier public affairs and campaign strategists in the country. After formally leaving the GOP he co- founded The Lincoln Project in 2019. He is a regular guest on MSNBC. He has worked on numerous GOP campaigns, notably for John McCain and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, and was an advisor for President George W. Bush. Eric Deggans First full-time TV critic for national Public Radio, Deggans crafts stories and commentaries for NPR shows including: Morning Edition, Here & Now, All Things Considered in addition to writing material for npr.org. He appears on multiple NPR podcasts and is a contributor and media analyst for MSNBC/NBC.
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks from Senator John Mccain
    Remarks from Senator John McCain November 4, 2008 Thank you. Thank you, my friends. Thank you for coming here on this beautiful Arizona evening. My friends, we have -- we have come to the end of a long journey. The American people have spoken, and they have spoken clearly. A little while ago, I had the honor of calling Senator Barack Obama to congratulate him on being elected the next president of the country that we both love. In a contest as long and difficult as this campaign has been, his success alone commands my respect for his ability and perseverance. But that he managed to do so by inspiring the hopes of so many millions of Americans who had once wrongly believed that they had little at stake or little influence in the election of an American president is something I deeply admire and commend him for achieving. This is an historic election, and I recognize the special significance it has for African-Americans and for the special pride that must be theirs tonight. I've always believed that America offers opportunities to all who have the industry and will to seize it. Senator Obama believes that, too. But we both recognize that though we have come a long way from the old injustices that once stained our nation's reputation and denied some Americans the full blessings of American citizenship, the memory of them still had the power to wound. A century ago, President Theodore Roosevelt's invitation of Booker T. Washington to dine at the White House was taken as an outrage in many quarters.
    [Show full text]