How to Realign Our Rhetorical Judgments for the Post-Postmodern, Digital Media Age

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How to Realign Our Rhetorical Judgments for the Post-Postmodern, Digital Media Age Fear and Loathing in the New Media Era: How to Realign Our Rhetorical Judgments for the Post-Postmodern, Digital Media Age DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Aaron McKain Graduate Program in English The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: James Phelan, Advisor Cynthia Selfe Wendy Hesford Copyright by Aaron McKain 2012 Abstract This dissertation begins with a question that sits – obstinately – at the crossroads of 21st century American politics and 21st century scholarship in rhetoric and composition: How do we make judgments about rhetoric when new media (social-networking, web 2.0, ease of audio/visual production) have rendered our long-standing public norms of ethos untenable? This is the dilemma lurking behind the daily parade of new media acts that we, as citizens, are expected to judge: From co-workers caught mid-kegstand on Facebook to politicians trapped in the YouTube minefield of decontextualized and mashed-up gaffes. But ethos points to a larger concern as well: At the precise moment where technology has given us, as a citizens, unparalleled power to act as rhetorical critics -- when anyone with a laptop and dial-up connection can effortlessly remediate, remix, and repurpose rhetorical acts from one context to another – we are uncertain about what the new rules of rhetoric are? How do we rethink ethos – in terms of character -- for a heavily surveilled, socially-networked age, where the distinctions between public and private are nebulous and all of our previous public performances are always only a Google search away? Concerned that our current, mass media age, standards for judging ethos as character (e.g., as authenticity, as the search for the “real” person) are both deadlocking our politics and providing no vocabulary of resistance to the new media era’s twin industries of information- gathering and surveillance, this dissertation proceeds in three stages in order to present a solution. First, using U.S. presidential campaigns in the new media era as a canonical political and pop cultural text, it zeroes in on two particular crises of ethos: the impossibility of maintaining a ii coherent public persona (e.g. Gov. Mitt Romney versus the internet archive) and the erosion of the line between what is public and what is private (e.g., Sen. John McCain). Second, it turns to an underexplored area of American politics – aesthetics – to consider how the continued embrace of now forty year old, postmodern political aesthetics (e.g., metafiction, the New Journalism) prevents us from updating and re-conceptualizing our notions of political ethos. Finally, drawing on these observations, Fear and Loathing in the New Media Era proposes a heuristic to rethink our judgments of ethos: A critical updating of the “Chicago School” narrative model of communication. Arguing for this narrative model academically (via debates within the digital humanities on the issue of posthumanism), politically (using Stephen Colbert as a test case of ethos and new media era American politics ), and pedagogically (as a method of teaching ethos in rhetoric and composition classrooms), this project lobbies for a rethinking of our judgments of ethos that (1) better navigates the complexities of our new rhetorical landscapes; (2) is more in sync with the post-postmodern aesthetics of the digital media age; and (3) triangulates, as a pedagogy of resistance for citizens and students, the legal, political, and ethical values of ethos that new media – through our judgments of even its most mundane acts – invite us to acquiesce to. iii To Jim, Cindy, and Danielle for, well, everything. iv Acknowledgments Wendy and Nan, Scott and Michael, John and Joy, David and Brian (and Paul), Gordon and Kate, Jan and Teemu, Jill, Bartley, and Karl: Ten years is a very long time. I owe you all more than you will ever know. v Vita 1998 ..................................................................... B.A. English, B.A. Political Science, University of Nebraska 2004 ..................................................................... M.A. English, Ohio State University 2011 ..................................................................... Assistant Professor of English, Hamline University Publications “Rhetoric.” In Peter Logan, Ed. Blackwell Encyclopedia of the Novel. Malden, MA: Wiley- Blackwell, 2011. “The Rhetoric of Narrative: What the Law as Narrative Movement Can Teach the Rest of the Narrative Turn.” In Deborah Journet, Ed. Narrative Action/Narrative Knowledge. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2010. “New Media, New English.” In Cheryl E. Ball and James Kalmbach, Eds. Reading and Writing New Media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2009. With Jason Palmeri, Cormac Slevin, and Scott Lloyd DeWitt. Commonplace: A Citizen’s Guide to Persuasion (for an Age that Desperately Needs One). New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008. With Michael Harker and Scott Lloyd DeWitt. “Re-Learning How to Argue.” In Cynthia L. Selfe, Ed. Multimodal Composition: Resources for Teachers. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2007. “Made Actual Through Pain: A Literacy Documentary.” In Cynthia L Selfe, Ed. vi Multimodal Composition: Resources for Teachers. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2007. With Michael Harker and Cormac Slevin. “Not Necessarily Not the News: Gatekeeping, Remediation, and The Daily Show.” Journal of American Culture 28, no. 4 (2005): 415-430. Fields of Study Major Field: English vii Table of Contents Abstract……………………………………………………………………………............ii Dedication………………………………………………………………………………................iv Acknowledgement………………………………………………………………………................v Vita………………………………………………………………………………………………...vi List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………………..ix Introduction: Welcome to the New Media Era…………………………………………………….1 Chapter 1 (Exhibit B): Mitt Romney: Grey Flannel Martyr for the New Media Ethos?……........39 Chapter 2 (Theory Interlude): A Cyborg, Wayne Booth, and a Dissertation Walk Into a Bar.......63 Chapter 3 (Exhibit C): Losing to Win: Interpretive Restraint, McCain and Colbert……………105 Conclusion: Commonplace: Character, Community, and Agency in the Classroom…………...159 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………………….178 viii List of Figures Figure 1. Narrative Model of Communication…………………………………………………...81 Figure 2. Ethos as Producer/Produced…………………………………………………………....85 Figure 3. Narrative Model Redux………………………………………………………………...91 Figure 4. Narrative Model With Audiences……………………………………………………..135 Figure 5. Experiential Axis: Character………………………………………………………….139 Figure 6. Experiential Axis: Agency and Community…………………………………………..157 ix INTRODUCTION: WELCOME TO THE NEW MEDIA ERA “Lester stared at me for a moment, then shrugged. “God damn!” he said. “What a bummer. Why would anybody want to get hung up on a pile of shit like Politics?” – H.S. Thompson, Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail, ‘721 We, the People, are really we, the rhetorical critics. This doesn’t sound like the familiar slogan of high school civics teachers and junior Congressmen, but it is true: American politics, at its best and worst, is the constellation of millions of rhetorical judgments. We are asked to decide whether to get angry when Rev. Jeremiah Wright rallies his congregation with “God Damn America,” or whether to get angry at our fellow Americans who got angry about it. We cry or cringe or cheer or hiss when we hear Sen. Obama tell 80,000 at Mile High Stadium that we are “the hope we’ve been waiting for,” or listen to Sen. McCain reveal, to another 45,00 in Minneapolis, the story of his captivity and torture and most private, in extremis moments. We laugh and groan and stare in slack-jawed disbelief when Chuck Norris endorses Mike Huckabee, or at Will.i.am’s YouTube oh-so-earnest- it-might-be-sickening celebrity sing-along. We nod or yell at the biases of Fox News and MSNBC and The Huffington Post, and screech or scratch our heads at the ideological clowning of Rush Limbaugh and Jon Stewart. At protests and rallies and town hall meetings, we fear the collapse of civil civic discourse, except when we are heartened by the resurrection of civic activism. And, at some point during the proceedings, we all feel proud and stupid and dumbstruck and awed all at once for having ever watched or participated in (or participated in by watching) a single second of the scary magnificent banal spectacle in the first place. 1 Hunter S. Thompson, Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail, ’72 (New York: Grand Central Publishing, 1985), 31. 1 These are the moments – silly, powerful, stupid, momentous, and insignificant – that, for better or worse, comprise our political rhetoric, and, in particular, collated into the presidential campaign of 2008 (and we are watching it again, reanimated and with a different cast of characters – like a TV spinoff – in 2012). And Campaign 2008, for better or worse, is a fair measure of what constitutes and symbolizes political life in our representative democracy – a democracy in which we have (as commentators from Chomsky to Agamben to Glenn Beck take pains to point out) a fairly circumscribed and attenuated role. As citizens, we are typically neither asked nor expected to weigh in on the intricacies of micro-finance or the IMF, nor to lend a hand in unraveling the mysteries of municipal water lines or credit-default swaps. Rather, our assigned role – blueprinted in the Federalist Papers and, once upon a time not so long ago, perhaps an inevitable consequence
Recommended publications
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 153 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 2007 No. 22 House of Representatives The House met at 10:30 a.m. and was become true. It is Orwellian double- committee of initial referral has a called to order by the Speaker pro tem- think, an amazing concept. statement that the proposition con- pore (Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia). They believe that if you simply just tains no congressional earmarks. So f say you are lowering drug prices, poof, the chairman of the Appropriations it’s done, ignoring the reality that Committee, Mr. OBEY, conveniently DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO prices really won’t be lowered and submitted to the record on January 29 TEMPORE fewer drugs will be made available to that prior to the omnibus bill being The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- our seniors. considered, quote, ‘‘does not contain fore the House the following commu- They believe that if you just say you any congressional earmarks, limited nication from the Speaker: are implementing all of the 9/11 Com- tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits.’’ WASHINGTON, DC, mission’s recommendations, it changes But, in fact, Mr. Speaker, this omnibus February 6, 2007. the fact that the bill that was passed spending bill that the Democrats I hereby appoint the Honorable HENRY C. here on the floor doesn’t reflect the to- passed last week contained hundreds of ‘‘HANK’’ JOHNSON, Jr. to act as Speaker pro tality of those recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2018 June 3Rd, 2018 19 Men and 6 Women NBC's Meet the Press
    June 2018 June 3rd, 2018 19 men and 6 women NBC's Meet the Press with Chuck Todd: 5 men and 1 woman Frm. Mayor Rudy Giuliani (M) PM Justin Trudeau (M) Joshua Johnson (M) Peggy Noonan (W) Rich Lowry (M) Ben Rhodes (M) CBS's Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan: 5 men and 2 women Gov. John Kasich (M) Rep. Will Hurd (M) Frm. Amb. Robert Gallucci (M) Dr. Jung Pak (W) David Nakamura (M) Susan Page (W) Michael Crowley (M) ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos: 5 men and 2 women Frm. Mayor Rudy Giuliani (M) Frm. Amb. Bill Richardson (M) Tom Bossert (M) Sue Mi Terry (W) Frm. Speaker Newt Gingrich (M) Karen Finney (W) Patrick Gaspard (M) CNN's State of the Union with Jake Tapper: *With Guest Host Dana Bash 1 man and 1 woman Rep. Kevin McCarthy (M) Minister Chrystia Freeland (W) Fox News' Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace: 3 men and 0 women Corey Lewandowski (M) Guy Benson (M) Larry Kudlow (M) June 10th, 2018 13 men and 6 women NBC's Meet the Press with Chuck Todd: No Data Available CBS's Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan: 4 men and 4 women Frm. Amb. Susan Rice (W) Dir. Larry Kudlow (M) Sen. Edward Markey (M) Evan Osnos (M) Seung Min Kim (W) Selena Zito (W) Molly Ball (W) Kenneth Starr (M) ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos: 1 man and 0 women Jonathan Cheng (M) CNN's State of the Union with Jake Tapper: 1 man and 2 women Dir.
    [Show full text]
  • House Section
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 151 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, JUNE 21, 2005 No. 83 House of Representatives The House met at 9 a.m. and was I would like to read an e-mail that there has never been a worse time for called to order by the Speaker pro tem- one of my staffers received at the end Congress to be part of a campaign pore (Miss MCMORRIS). of last week from a friend of hers cur- against public broadcasting. We formed f rently serving in Iraq. The soldier says: the Public Broadcasting Caucus 5 years ‘‘I know there are growing doubts, ago here on Capitol Hill to help pro- DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO questions and concerns by many re- mote the exchange of ideas sur- TEMPORE garding our presence here and how long rounding public broadcasting, to help The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- we should stay. For what it is worth, equip staff and Members of Congress to fore the House the following commu- the attachment hopefully tells you deal with the issues that surround that nication from the Speaker: why we are trying to make a positive important service. difference in this country’s future.’’ There are complexities in areas of le- WASHINGTON, DC, This is the attachment, Madam June 21, 2005. gitimate disagreement and technical I hereby appoint the Honorable CATHY Speaker, and a picture truly is worth matters, make no mistake about it, MCMORRIS to act as Speaker pro tempore on 1,000 words.
    [Show full text]
  • Quotes from Co-Signers of Garrett's Iran Letter to President
    QUOTES FROM CO-SIGNERS OF GARRETT’S IRAN LETTER TO PRESIDENT BUSH Walter Jones ● Authored A Letter With Democrat Rep. Keith Ellison Encouraging Negotiations With Iran In 2012, Jones Signed A Letter With Democrat Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) Encouraging Negotiations With Iran. “We strongly encourage your Administration to pursue bilateral and multilateral engagement with Iran. While we acknowledge that progress will be difficult, we believe that robust, sustained diplomacy is the best option to resolve our serious concerns about Iran's nuclear program, and to prevent a costly war that would be devastating for the United States and our allies in the region.” (Walter B. Jones and Keith Ellison, Letter, 3/2/12) ● Extreme Minority Of House Members To Vote Against Additional Sanctions On Iran In 2012, The House Passed Additional Sanctions Against Iran's Energy, Shipping, and Insurance Sectors. “Both houses of Congress approved legislation on Wednesday that would significantly tighten sanctions against Iran's energy, shipping and insurance sectors. The bill is the latest attempt by Congress to starve Iran of the hard currency it needs to fund what most members agree is Iran's ongoing attempt to develop a nuclear weapons program.” (Pete Kasperowicz, “House, Senate Approve Tougher Sanctions Against Iran, Syria,” The Hill's Floor Action, 8/1/12) One Of Only Six House Members To Vote Against The 2012 Sanctions Bill. “The sanctions bill was approved in the form of a resolution making changes to prior legislation, H.R. 1905, on which the House and Senate agreed — it passed in an 421-6 vote, and was opposed by just five Republicans and one Democrat.
    [Show full text]
  • Giuliani, 9/11 and the 2008 Race
    ABC NEWS/WASHINGTON POST POLL: ‘08 ELECTION UPDATE EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE AFTER 11:35 p.m. Tuesday, Sept. 11, 2007 Giuliani, 9/11 and the 2008 Race Six years after the terrorist attacks that vaulted him to national prominence, it’s unclear whether 9/11 will lift Rudy Giuliani all the way to the presidency: He remains hamstrung in the Republican base, and his overall support for his party’s nomination has slipped in the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll. Giuliani does better with Republicans who are concerned about another major terrorist attack in this country, a legacy of his 9/11 performance. But among those less focused on terrorism, he’s in a dead heat against newcomer Fred Thompson. Thompson also challenges Giuliani among conservatives and evangelical white Protestants – base groups in the Republican constituency – while John McCain has stabilized after a decline in support. Giuliani still leads, but his support is down by nine points in this poll from his level in July. Indeed this is the first ABC/Post poll this cycle in which Giuliani had less than a double- digit lead over all his competitors: He now leads Thompson by nine points (and McCain by 10). Among Republicans and Republican-leaning independents, 28 percent support Giuliani, 19 percent Thompson, 18 percent McCain and 10 percent Mitt Romney. Other candidates remain in the low single digits. (There’s no significant difference among registered voters – and plenty of time to register.) ’08 Republican primary preferences Now July June April Feb Giuliani 28% 37 34 35 53 Thompson 19 15 13 10 NA McCain 18 16 20 22 23 Romney 10 8 10 10 5 The Democratic race, meanwhile, remains exceedingly stable; Hillary Clinton has led Barack Obama by 14 to 16 points in each ABC/Post poll since February, and still does.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Primary Preview: Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina CLINTON PRESSED in IOWA, but HOLDS WIDE LEADS ELSEWHERE
    NEWS Release 1615 L Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20036 Tel (202) 419-4350 Fax (202) 419-4399 FOR RELEASE: MONDAY, DECEMBER 3, 2007 10:00AM Democratic Primary Preview: Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina CLINTON PRESSED IN IOWA, BUT HOLDS WIDE LEADS ELSEWHERE A Survey Conducted in Association with The Associated Press Also inside… Iraq, health care top issues Clinton by far the most electable But electability matters less than in ‘04 Clinton, Obama split black vote in South Carolina FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Kohut, Director Scott Keeter, Director of Survey Research Carroll Doherty and Michael Dimock, Associate Directors Pew Research Center for the People & the Press 202/419-4350 http://www.people-press.org Democratic Primary Preview: Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina CLINTON PRESSED IN IOWA, BUT HOLDS WIDE LEADS ELSEWHERE Democrats enter the presidential primary campaign upbeat about their candidates and united in their views on major issues. Sen. Hillary Clinton is the clear frontrunner in New Hampshire and South Carolina, where she holds 19-point and 14-point leads, respectively. However in Iowa she is in a statistical tie with Barack Obama. Clinton has a clear advantage on the key issue of Democratic Horse Race health care, and leads among Democratic women voters in Based on Likely Voters* all three states – where women constitute majorities of the Natl IA NH SC likely caucus and primary electorates. Her lead is also % % % % Clinton 48 31 38 45 particularly wide among older voters – voters over age 50 in Obama 22 26 19 31 all three states favor her over Obama by more than two-to- Edwards 11 19 15 10 Richardson 3 10 10 1 one.
    [Show full text]
  • PBS Newshour Length: 60 Minutes Airdate: 4/8/2011 6:00:00 PM O.B
    PBS: 2nd Quarterly Program Topic Report 2011(April -June): KRWG airdates and times: Tavis Smiley: Weeknight: Monday-Friday at 10:30pm, PBS time: 11pm/HD01 eastern, Newshour: Weeknights at 5:30pm, PBS time: 6pm/ eastern Nightly Business Report: Weeknights at 5pm, PBS time: 6:30pm/SD06 Charlie Rose: Weeknights at 10pm PBS time 11:30pm, repeats next weekday at 12pm, except, Mondays, 5/2 & 5/9, Tuesdays 5/3, 6/7, 6/21 & 6/28; Wednesdays 6/22aired at 10:30pm; Did not air on 5/10, 6/1 but did repeat next day Washington Week: Fridays at 7pm, PBS time 8pm eastern, repeats Sundays at 9am except Sunday 6/5 and 6/12 24/7 schedule: Newshour repeats at midnight and 5am. Primetime: 7pm to 11pm airs from 1am to 5am A Place of our Own records Mondays at noon, repeats 11 days later, Fridays at 2pm(4/1 #6060, 4/8 #6065, 4/15 #5005, 4/22 #5010, 4/29 #5015, 5/6 #5095, 5/13 #5100, 5/20 # 5105, 5/27 #6005, 6/3 # 6010, 6/10 #6015, 6/17 #6020, 6/24 #6025 A Place of our Own records Tuesdays at noon, repeats 10days later, Fridays at 2:30pm(4/1 #6060, 4/8 #6065, 4/15 #5005, 4/22 #5010, 4/29 #5015, 5/6 #5095, 5/13 #5100, 5/20 # 5105, 5/27 #6005, 6/3 # 6010, 6/10 #6015, 6/17 #6020, 6/24 #6025 Need to Know airs Fridays at 8pm, repeats Sundays at 8am, except 6/5 and 6/12 Frontline repeats Fridays at 9pm , except 6/3 and 6/10 Quarterly Program Topic Report April 1-15, 2011 Category: Abortion NOLA: MLNH 010002 Series Title: PBS NewsHour Length: 60 minutes Airdate: 4/8/2011 6:00:00 PM O.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Ittqvo W]\ Wn Tw^M Q\P 7Jiui
    V16, N5 Thursday, Sept. 9, 2010 Falling out of love with Obama Blue Hoosier state turns on president as economy sputters By BRIAN A. HOWEY STORY, Ind. - There was a barn sale in the bucolic hills of Brown County on Sunday and as people milled around the tables of used tools and clothes the talk turned to politics and, ultimately, President Obama. “He’s the worst president ever,” a woman said. Why would you say that? “He’s against capitalism,” she responded. This is not an isolated dynam- ic in the Hoosier State where Barack Obama carried with 51 percent of the vote in 2008. Whether it was The NRCC is running the TV ad (above) tying a speech before the Rotary Club in U.S. Rep. Joe Donnelly to President Obama Wabash, at a pub in Fremont, or at a and Speaker Pelosi. At right, President Obama funeral service in Mexico, Ind., when went on the offensive in Parma, Ohio on the topic turned to the president, Wednesday, answering in a speech charges there was open contempt, disgust made by House Minority Leader John Boehner. Continued on page 4 Obama at low ebb By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS - Obama wept. No, this isn’t news media fawning. It really hap- pened at the American Legion Mall in Indianapolis on the UA look around the American night of May 5, 2008. Some 21,000 Hoosiers gathered at the park to listen to Stevie Wonder and economy suggests itXs time to !"#$%"#&'%&%[$&)%*'#+*',-&'.%*,!/"%0'1-% Sen. Barack Obama in his race against break out the brandy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Portrayal of Gender and a Description of Gender Roles in Selected American Modern and Postmodern Plays
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2002 A Portrayal of Gender and a Description of Gender Roles in Selected American Modern and Postmodern Plays. Bonny Ball Copenhaver East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the English Language and Literature Commons, and the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons Recommended Citation Copenhaver, Bonny Ball, "A Portrayal of Gender and a Description of Gender Roles in Selected American Modern and Postmodern Plays." (2002). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 632. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/632 This Dissertation - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Portrayal of Gender and a Description of Gender Roles in Selected American Modern and Postmodern Plays A dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Education in Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis by Bonny Ball Copenhaver May 2002 Dr. W. Hal Knight, Chair Dr. Jack Branscomb Dr. Nancy Dishner Dr. Russell West Keywords: Gender Roles, Feminism, Modernism, Postmodernism, American Theatre, Robbins, Glaspell, O'Neill, Miller, Williams, Hansbury, Kennedy, Wasserstein, Shange, Wilson, Mamet, Vogel ABSTRACT The Portrayal of Gender and a Description of Gender Roles in Selected American Modern and Postmodern Plays by Bonny Ball Copenhaver The purpose of this study was to describe how gender was portrayed and to determine how gender roles were depicted and defined in a selection of Modern and Postmodern American plays.
    [Show full text]
  • The End of the Tour
    THE END OF THE TOUR Screenplay by Donald Margulies Directed by James Ponsoldt Based on "Although Of Course You End Up Becoming Yourself: A Road Trip With David Foster Wallace" by David Lipsky © 2014 EOT Film Productions, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No Portion of this script may be performed, published, reproduced, sold or distributed by any means, or quoted or published in any medium, including on any website without prior written consent of EOT Film Productions, LLC. This material is the property of EOT Film Productions LLC and is intended and restricted for use solely for EOT Film Productions, LLC personnel. Distribution of disclosure of this material to unauthorized persons is prohibited. Disposal of this script copy does alter any restrictions previously set forth. FADE IN: 1 INT. LIPSKY’S WEST END AVE APT/LIVING ROOM/OFFICE - NYC - 1 2008 - NIGHT A bright, unpretentious two-bedroom in a pre-war building, cluttered with books and papers, reflecting its owner’s lively mind. The decor is that of a perennial grad student’s digs, the bachelor pad of a New York intellectual. A dog curled up on the sofa beside him, DAVID LIPSKY, a boyishly handsome forty-three, quick-witted, tightly-wound, smokes and types speedily from scraps of handwritten notes, surrounded by books on his current journalistic subject, climate change. A stack of copies of his recent publishing success - Absolutely American - looms nearby. His iPhone vibrates. He gets up and answers the call. LIPSKY Hey, Bob, what’s up? BOB’S VOICE (over phone) Listen: According to this unconfirmed report..
    [Show full text]
  • New Museum Announces Fran Lebowitz, Essayist and Cultural Satirist, As the 2016 Stuart Regen Visionaries Series Speaker
    MEDIA CONTACTS Gabriel Einsohn, Senior Communications Director Allison Underwood, Press & Social Media Manager 212.219.1222 x209 [email protected] New Museum Announces Fran Lebowitz, Essayist and Cultural Satirist, as the 2016 Stuart Regen Visionaries Series Speaker Lebowitz to Appear in Conversation with Legendary Filmmaker Martin Scorsese Tuesday September 27, 2016, at 7 PM in the New Museum Theater Photo by Brigitte Lacombe New York, NY…The New Museum is pleased to announce that raconteur, essayist, and critic Fran Lebowitz will be featured as this year’s Visionary speaker. The Stuart Regen Visionaries Series at the New Museum honors forward-thinking front-runners in the fields of art, architecture, design, film, and related disciplines of contemporary culture. Now in its eighth season, the annual series spotlights innovators who shape intellectual life and the future of culture. On Tuesday, September 27, Lebowitz will appear in conversation with legendary filmmaker Martin Scorsese. Lebowitz is one of New York City’s most distinctive voices. Often inseparable from her sensibilities as a New Yorker, her wit and extraordinary command of language provide her with a deep reservoir of acerbic inspiration. Unapologetically opinionated and boasting the bravado of a taxi driver, she is best known for her unconventional worldview and unique take on modern life. Lebowitz is the author of two bestselling collections of essays, Metropolitan Life (1978) and Social Studies (1981)—which were later compiled in The Fran Lebowitz Reader (1994)—as well as the children’s book Mr. Chas & Lisa Sue Meet the Pandas (1994). In 2010, Martin Scorsese directed Public Speaking, a feature-length documentary chronicling Lebowitz’s razor- sharp wit and sartorial style.
    [Show full text]
  • Lights, Camera, Action! Gerald R. Ford International Airport Serves As Location for Filming of “The End of the Tour.”
    Gerald R. Ford International Airport AIRPORT BOARD KENT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF AERONAUTICS ROGER MORGAN, Chairman BRIAN D. RYKS, A.A.E. Executive Director RICHARD A. VANDER MOLEN, Vice Chairman PHILLIP E. JOHNSON, A.A.E. Deputy Executive Director STEVEN R. HEACOCK ROBERT W. BENSTEIN, A.A.E. Public Safety & Ops Director BIRGIT KLOHS BRIAN PICARDAT, A.A.E. Finance & Admin. Director DAVID A. SLIKKERS THOMAS R. ECKLUND, P.E. Facilities Director THEODORE J. VONK TARA M. HERNANDEZ Mktg. & Communications Mgr. FLOYD WILSON, JR. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 21, 2014 Contact: Tara M. Hernandez, Marketing & Communications Mgr. 616-233-6053 or [email protected] Lights, Camera, Action! Gerald R. Ford International Airport Serves as Location for Filming of “The End of the Tour.” Grand Rapids, MI. – The Gerald R. Ford International Airport had hundreds of extra visitors last week as the James Ponsoldt movie, “The End of the Tour,” was filmed on location. Due to security and contract regulations, the announcement was reserved until after filming commenced. A crew of over 100 people worked for over fourteen hours at GFIA, and filmed in various locations throughout the airport. Locations included the economy parking lot, the parking ramp, the airfield, the Concourse B hallway as well as two vacant ticket counter areas. Grand Rapids was standing in as both the Minneapolis-St. Paul and Chicago O’Hare airports with two different scenes created among the location. The Gerald R. Ford International Airport staff and security worked with the cast and crew for several weeks leading up to the filming to scout out locations, times for filming and acclimate “The End of the Tour” crew with strict security rules and regulations.
    [Show full text]