DOCSLIB.ORG

Prostate Biopsy in the Staging of Prostate Cancer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prostate Biopsy in the Staging of Prostate Cancer Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (1997) 1, 54±58 ß 1997 Stockton Press All rights reserved 1365±7852/97 $12.00 Review Prostate Biopsy in the staging of prostate cancer L Salomon, M Colombel, J-J Patard, D Gasman, D Chopin & C-C Abbou Service d'Urologie, CHU, Henri Mondor, CreÂteil, France The use of prostate biopsies was developed in parallel with progress in our knowledge of prostate cancer and the use of prostate-speci®c antigen (PSA). Prostate biopsies were initially indicated for the diagnosis of cancer, by the perineal approach under general anesthesia. Nowadays prostate biopsies are not only for diagnostic purposes but also to determine the prognosis, particularly before radical prostatectomy. They are performed in patients with elevated PSA levels, by the endorectal approach, sometimes under local anesthesia.(1±3) The gold standard is the sextant biopsy technique described by Hodge4,5, which is best to diagnose prostate cancer, particularly in case of T1c disease (patients with serum PSA elevation).6±13 Patients with a strong suspicion of prostate cancer from a negative series of biopsies can undergo a second series14;15 with transition zone biopsy16,17 or lateral biopsy.18,19 Karakiewicz et al 20 and Uzzo et al 21 proposed that the number of prostate biopsies should depend on prostate volume to improve the positivity rate. After the diagnosis of prostate cancer, initial therapy will depend on several prognostic factors. In the case of radical prostatectomy, the results of sextant biopsy provide a wealth of information.22,23 The aim of this report is to present the information given by prostate biopsy in the staging of prostate cancer. Keywords: prostate neoplasm; biopsy; prostatectomy; staging Histological results cases, we found a correlation between the Gleason score on biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens in 38.8% Gleason score of cases, an underestimation in 43.8% of cases, and an overestimation in 17% of cases. As regards cellular 24 The Gleason et al score is considered an important grades, the results were respectively 58.3%, 25% and 25 prognostic factor in prostate cancer. Gleason suggested 16.6% (biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens that prostate tumors had relatively stable degrees of were studied by the same pathologist). Fernandes et al 30 malignancy and growth rates, rather than a steady showed that a well-differentiated tumor in the biopsy increase in malignancy with time. However, while small core is a poor predictor of a well-differentiated neoplasm prostate tumors are often composed of a single grade or organ-con®ned disease after surgical treatment, and (usually Gleason grade 2 or 3), most palpable cancers that a high Gleason score in the biopsy is usually asso- contain multiple grades which are arranged in heteroge- ciated with disease outside the prostate and a poorly neous and unpredictable regions, as shown by Atara et differentiated tumor in the prostatectomy specimen. 26 al. The highest tumor grade is not usually found within The use of an 18-gauge biopsy needle rather than a 14- the core of the tumor. The Gleason score at biopsy gauge needle does not affect these results, even if the corresponds to the score at radical prostatectomy in 30± grade accuracy falls in case of low-grade and small 70% of cases, while the Gleason score at prostatectomy is tumors.27 Parker31 preferred to use a 14-gauge biopsy 27±29 underestimated at 33±45% of cases. In a series of 180 needle because the correlation was better, but Spires et al 32 con®rmed that the use of an 18-gauge needle was suf®cient. Kojima et al 33 proposed to adjust the Gleason score according to PSA and PSAD. Parker31 suggested Correspondence: Dr L Salomon, Service d'Urologie, CHU Henri Mondor, 56 Avenue du MareÂchal de Lattre de Tassigny, CreÂteil 94010, that the number of prostate biopsies should depend on 34 France. prostate volume but Thickman et al found that the Received May 1997; revised August 1997; accepted October 1997 situation was not improved by increasing the number of Prostate biopsy in the staging of prostate cancer L Salomon et al core biopsies beyond 6. Gleason35 considered that this evident if carcinomatous material is present in the peri- 55 situation in which relationship appears to be inconsistent prostatic tissue. Biopsies conducted according to Ravery or false are, in fact, correct and true, while Catalona et al 36 et al 50,51 have a positive predictive value of 94% for and Kramer et al 37 reported that, although prostate needle extracapsular involvement. It has been suggested that biopsies are associated with signi®cant errors in grading, the inability of prostate cancer to invade the perineural they provide valuable information on the predominant space could indicate a less aggressive pro®le.52 histologic pattern, which re¯ects the biological potential Bostwick et al 53 demonstrated that perineural invasion of the tumor. correlated with capsular perforation and seminal vesicle Combining the Gleason score with other variables such invasion but, like Ravery et al,51 he showed that it was not as the serum PSA level and clinical stage could have the best predictive factor relative to serum PSA and the substantial predictive value for the pathological stage Gleason score on biopsies. Bastacky et al 54 restricted the before radical prostatectomy.38±40 Narayan et al 41 trans- de®nition of perineural invasion to cases with more than formed clinical staging into biopsy-based staging: one involved nerve or nerve involvement of a diameter of patients were classi®ed as having T2a-b disease if 0.1 mm or more. In this way the speci®city for capsular biopsy of one lobe was positive and T2c disease if perforation increased to 99%, but the sensitivity fell to 9%. biopsies of both lobes were positive. This classi®cation In combination with a high histologic tumor grade (Glea- was superior to clinical staging in predicting the ®nal son score > 7) it could help to identify capsular penetra- pathological stage. Combination of the Gleason score tion and to decide whether to sacri®ce or preserve all or with the PSA level could also eliminate the need for part of the neurovascular bundle on the side of the needle bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy.42±44 Patients with biopsy. PSA levels below 10 ng=ml and Gleason scores below 7 had a false-negative rate for lymph node metastases of only 1% with 95% con®dence limits of less than 3%:44 this Prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia approach is particularly interesting in case of perineal radical prostatectomy. Prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia represents the precan- cerous end of the morphological continuum of cell pro- liferation within the prostatic ducts, ductules and acini. Prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia has been divided into Seminal vesicle biopsies low-grade and high-grade forms. The presence of high- Seminal vesicle invasion by prostatic carcinoma carries a grade prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia on needle biopsy 55±57 poor prognosis, even in the absence of lymph node is strongly predictive of carcinoma: in 445 patients metastasis. The detection of seminal vesicle invasion has with prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia, 19 out of 115 been proposed as a contraindication to radical prostatect- with low-grade PIN (20%) had prostatic carcinoma and 58,59 omy. Vallencien et al 45 used ultrasound-guided seminal 147 out of 232 (45.5%) had prostatic carcinoma. Ellis 60 61 vesicle biopsies in prostate cancer staging and found that et al and Zlotta et al recommended repeating biopsies when seminal vesicle biopsies were positive, capsule in case of high-grade PIN whatever the PSA, and in penetration was present in 100% of cases and lymph case of low-grade PIN if the PSA is above 10 ng=ml node metastases were present in 50% of cases. Hodge et (N < 4 ng=ml). al 4 and Terris et al 46 found it dif®cult to obtain only seminal vesicle biopsies without transversing the prostate gland. Allepuz Losa et al 47 recommended additional seminal biopsies in patients with stage T2b or more Morphological results advanced disease, and also in those with a lower clinical stage but a PSA level of 20 ng=ml or more and a Gleason Tumor volume 48 score of 7 or more. Stone et al proposed these biopsies Stamey62 suggested that tumors with a volume of less for patients with a Gleason score of more than 4, a PSA than 0.5 ml were probably too small to be treated (non level of more than 10 ng=ml or a clinical stage of T2b or signi®cant tumors), and that tumor volume was predic- more, and suggested that patients with positive seminal tive of pathological stage. Different techniques are used to vesicle biopsies should undergo pelvic lymph node dis- 49 calculate tumor volume from PSA, the Gleason score and section. Guillonneau et al proposed these biopsies when prostate ultrasound volume or the extent of positive the two basal sextant biopsies were positive because, in biopsies.63,64 Studies have been performed to analyse this case, 70% of patients had seminal vesicle invasion the relationship between tumor volume and the length and no other discriminatory preoperative parameters and percentage of cancer cells in positive biopsies and the (clinical stage, number of positive biopsies and PSA). number of positive biopsies. Visualisation of the prostate capsule Length of cancer positive biopsies and perineural invasion Prostate tumors are `signi®cant' if there is more than The prostate capsule can be visualized by biopsy. Biopsies 3 mm of tumor on one or two sextant biopsies: when can be performed tangentially to the peripheral area or one biopsy is positive along more than 3 mm, and the needle may be inserted 1 or 2 mm outside the echo- when the tumor volume is more than 0.5 ml.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Is There Anything New in Prostate Cancer Screening?
    IS THERE ANYTHING NEW IN PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING? ANDREW M.D. WOLF, MD, FACP ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF MEDICINE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE No financial disclosures Case Presentation 62 yo white man without significant past medical history presents for annual preventive visit. He has no family history of prostate cancer. He has mild urinary hesitancy and his prostate is mildly enlarged without induration or nodules. His PSA has been gradually rising: - 2011: 2.35 - 2013: 2.17 - 2017: 3.75 - 2019: 4.51 Where do we go from here? What’s New in Prostate Cancer Screening? Key Questions • Do we have any new evidence for or against screening? • Do we have anything better than the PSA? • What about the good old digital rectal exam? • Are we doing any better identifying who needs to be treated? • What do the experts recommend? Prostate Cancer Incidence & Mortality Over the Decades Source: Seer 9 areas & US Mortality Files (National Center for Health Statistics, CDC, Feb 2018 CA Cancer J Clin 2019;69:7-34. Do we have any new evidence for or against prostate cancer screening? Is Prostate Screening Still Controversial? ERSPC Results • Prostate cancer death rate 27% lower in screened group (p = 0.0001) at 13 yrs • Number needed to screen to save 1 life: 781 • NNS to prevent 1 case of metastatic cancer: ~350 • Number needed to diagnose to save 1 life: 27 • Major issue of over-diagnosis & over-treatment Schroder FH, et al. Lancet 2014;384: 2027–2035 • Controlled for differences in study design • Adjusted for lead-time • Both studies led to a ~ 25-32% reduction in prostate cancer mortality with screening compared with no screening Ann Intern Med 2017;167:449-455 • 415,000 British men 50-69 randomized to a single offer to screen vs usual care (info sheet on request) • One-time screen & then followed for 10 yrs • Men dx’d with prostate cancer randomized to treatment vs active surveillance JAMA 2018;319(9):883-895.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiling Prostate Cancer Therapeutic Resistance
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Profiling Prostate Cancer Therapeutic Resistance Cameron A. Wade 1 and Natasha Kyprianou 1,2,3,* 1 Departments of Urology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, KY 40536, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, KY 40536, USA 3 Department of Toxicology & Cancer Biology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, KY 40536, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-859-323-9812; Fax: +1-859-323-1944 Received: 1 March 2018; Accepted: 16 March 2018; Published: 19 March 2018 Abstract: The major challenge in the treatment of patients with advanced lethal prostate cancer is therapeutic resistance to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and chemotherapy. Overriding this resistance requires understanding of the driving mechanisms of the tumor microenvironment, not just the androgen receptor (AR)-signaling cascade, that facilitate therapeutic resistance in order to identify new drug targets. The tumor microenvironment enables key signaling pathways promoting cancer cell survival and invasion via resistance to anoikis. In particular, the process of epithelial-mesenchymal-transition (EMT), directed by transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), confers stem cell properties and acquisition of a migratory and invasive phenotype via resistance to anoikis. Our lead agent DZ-50 may have a potentially high efficacy in advanced metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) by eliciting an anoikis-driven therapeutic response. The plasticity of differentiated prostate tumor gland epithelium allows cells to de-differentiate into mesenchymal cells via EMT and re-differentiate via reversal to mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET) during tumor progression.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroendocrine Differentiation of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma
    J Lab Med 2019; 43(2): 123–126 Laboratory Case Report Cátia Iracema Morais*, João Lobo, João P. Barreto, Cláudia Lobo and Nuno D. Gonçalves Neuroendocrine differentiation of prostatic adenocarcinoma – an important cause for castration-resistant disease recurrence https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2018-0190 awareness of this entity is crucial due to its underdiagno- Received December 3, 2018; accepted December 12, 2018; previously sis and adverse prognosis. published online February 15, 2019 Keywords: carcinoma; castration-resistant (D064129); cell Abstract transformation; neoplastic (D002471); neuroendocrine (D018278); prostate (D011467); prostatic neoplasms. Background: Neuroendocrine differentiation of prostatic carcinoma is a rare entity associated with metastatic castration-resistant disease. Among useful biomarkers of neuroendocrine differentiation, chromogranin A, sero- Introduction tonin, synaptophysin and neuron-specific enolase stand out, while total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels are Neuroendocrine prostatic carcinoma is a rare and often low or undetectable. underdiagnosed histologic subtype. Despite the low Case presentation: We report a case of prostatic adenocar- incidence rate of primary neuroendocrine prostatic cinoma recurrence after a 6-year disease-free follow-up, in carcinoma (which represents under 1% of all prostate which increased serum chromogranin A levels and unde- cancers at diagnosis), 30–40% of patients who develop tectable total PSA provided a prompt indication of neu- metastasized castration-resistant
    [Show full text]
  • Review Committee News—Urology
    Review Committee News—Urology • Definitions of Board Pass Rates This is a reminder that programs will be cited for poor performance on the American Board of Urology examination if they average more than two standard deviations above the mean in failure rates over a five-year period. The RRC will only look at first-time test takers on Part One of the Board’s Qualifying Examination. The application of this standard began with programs reviewed after July 1, 2010. • Logging Ultrasound Procedures To define the current resident experience in performing urologic ultrasound procedures and to track this experience over time, the Urology Review Committee would like residents to log these cases starting July 1, 2012. Ultrasound cases include commonly performed procedures such as transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) with prostate biopsy, and non-TRUS biopsy procedures such as renal, pelvic, scrotal and penile ultrasound cases. The Review Committee is particularly interested in tracking resident involvement in non-TRUS biopsy ultrasound procedures. While TRUS-prostate biopsy will remain an index case with a minimum number required (25), there will be no minimum number of cases required for non- prostate ultrasound procedures. We ask that residents use one of the following CPT codes when logging these procedures: Category CPT code Scrotal 76870 Renal Retroperitoneal, limited (kidney only) 76775 Retroperitoneal, complete (both kidney and bladder) 76770 Transplant kidney ultrasound 76776 US guidance, intraoperative (e.g. during partial nephrectomy) 76998 US
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Summary: Screening for Prostate Cancer
    Clinical Summary: Screening for Prostate Cancer Population Men aged 55 to 69 y Men 70 y and older The decision to be screened for prostate cancer should be Recommendation Do not screen for prostate cancer. an individual one. Grade: D Grade: C Before deciding whether to be screened, men aged 55 to 69 years should have an opportunity to discuss the potential benefits and harms of screening with their clinician and to incorporate their values and preferences in the decision. Screening offers a small potential benefit of reducing the chance of death from prostate cancer in some men. However, many men will experience potential harms of screening, including false-positive results that require additional testing and possible prostate biopsy; overdiagnosis and Informed Decision overtreatment; and treatment complications, such as incontinence and erectile dysfunction. Harms are greater for men 70 years Making and older. In determining whether this service is appropriate in individual cases, patients and clinicians should consider the balance of benefits and harms on the basis of family history, race/ethnicity, comorbid medical conditions, patient values about the benefits and harms of screening and treatment-specific outcomes, and other health needs. Clinicians should not screen men who do not express a preference for screening and should not routinely screen men 70 years and older. Risk Assessment Older age, African American race, and family history of prostate cancer are the most important risk factors for prostate cancer. Screening for prostate cancer begins with a test that measures the amount of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) protein in the blood. An elevated PSA level may be caused by prostate cancer but can also be caused by other conditions, including an enlarged Screening Tests prostate (benign prostatic hyperplasia) and inflammation of the prostate (prostatitis).
    [Show full text]
  • Quality of Life Outcomes After Brachytherapy for Early Prostate Cancer
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (1999) 2 Suppl 3, S19±S20 ß 1999 Stockton Press All rights reserved 1365±7852/99 $15.00 http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/pcan Quality of life outcomes after brachytherapy for early prostate cancer MS Litwin1, JM Brandeis1, CM Burnison1 and E Reiter1 1UCLA Departments of Urology, Health Services, and Radiation Oncology, UCLA, California, USA Despite the absence of empirical evidence, there is a XRT. Sildena®l appeared to have little effect in the radical popular perception that brachytherapy results in less prostatectomy patients. However, brachytherapy patients impairment of health-related quality of life. This study not receiving hormonal ablation or XRT who took silde- compared general and disease-speci®c health-related na®l had better sexual function and bother scores than quality of life in men who had undergone either brachy- those patients who did not. therapy (with and without pre-treatment XRT) or radical prostatectomy, and in healthy age-matched controls. Method Conclusion We surveyed all patients with clinical T2 or less prostate General health-related quality of life did not differ greatly cancer who had undergone interstitial seed brachyther- between the three groups, but there were variations in apy at UCLA during the previous 3±17 months. Each was disease-speci®c (urinary, bowel and sexual) health-related paired with two randomly selected, temporally matched quality of life. Radical prostatectomy patients had the radical prostatectomy patients. Healthy, age-matched worst urinary function (leakage), but brachytherapy controls were drawn from the literature. Surgery and patients were also signi®cantly worse than the controls.
    [Show full text]
  • ICD-9-CM C&M March 2011 Diagnosis Agenda
    ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance Committee Meeting March 19-20, 2014 Diagnosis Agenda Welcome and announcements Donna Pickett, MPH, RHIA Co-Chair, ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance Committee Diagnosis Topics: Contents Opioid Induced Constipation ............................................................................................. 9 Severity of coronary calcification ................................................................................... 10 Sesamoid Fractures .......................................................................................................... 11 Familial Hypercholesterolemia ....................................................................................... 12 Bacteriuria ....................................................................................................................... 14 Mast Cell Activation Syndromes .................................................................................... 15 Necrotizing Enterocolitis ................................................................................................. 17 Hypertensive Crisis, Urgency and Emergency ................................................................ 18 Abnormal level of advanced glycation end products in tissues ...................................... 20 Cryopyrin-Associated Periodic Syndromes and Other Autoinflammatory Syndromes .. 22 Pulsatile Tinnitus ............................................................................................................. 26 In-Stent Restenosis of Coronary
    [Show full text]
  • Prostate Cancer Screening NATIONAL GUIDELINE SUMMARY the Guideline Was Developed Using an Evidence-Based Methodology
    Prostate Cancer Screening NATIONAL GUIDELINE SUMMARY The guideline was developed using an evidence-based methodology. This guideline summary is intended to guide health care professionals with prostate cancer screening in asymptomatic adult men. It does not apply to men who have signs or symptoms of prostate disease, or in whom a diagnosis has already been made. PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING AND Men with an elevated PSA have approximately a 70% chance of having a prostate biopsy that is negative for SHARED DECISION-MAKING cancer. • For average risk men, offer prostate cancer screening If a cancer is detected, it may or may not ever become with prostate-specifi c antigen (PSA) testing and digital clinically signifi cant3 in a man’s lifetime. rectal examination (DRE) in the context of a shared If diagnosed, the grade and stage of the cancer determines decision-making approach starting at age 50. the likely effectiveness of treatment. Potential benefi ts • For higher risk men (i.e., black/African-American of prostate cancer treatments may include increased life descent, family history of at least one fi rst degree span, and reduction in morbidity from locally advanced and relative with prostate cancer), offer prostate cancer metastatic disease. Prostate cancer treatments may also screening with PSA and DRE in the context of a shared have potential complications. Some men with prostate decision-making approach starting at age 40. cancer may elect not to be treated after discussion with their urologist. • Prostate cancer screening is not recommended for men age 75 or older. IF SCREENING IS REQUESTED • In the shared decision-making approach, include • For men who elect to participate in prostate cancer information regarding the potential benefi ts and risks screening: of undergoing screening for prostate cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • Pattern of Prostate Cancer Presentation Among the Egyptian Population
    351 Central European Journal of Urology O R I G I N A L P A P E R UROLOGICAL ONCOLOGY Pattern of prostate cancer presentation among the Egyptian population: A study in a single tertiary care center Ahmed Elabbady, Ahmed Eid, Ahmed Fahmy, Ahmed Fouad Kotb University of Alexandria, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Alexandria, Egypt Article history Introduction Prostate cancer is a common health problem that in the majority of cases starts to develop Submitted: April 22, 2014 at the age of 50 years, reaching its peak at 60–70 years of age. A variation in its incidence and prevalence Accepted: June 23, 2014 exists between western, Asian and Arabic populations. The aim of our work was to report the pattern of prostate cancer presentation in Alexandria University that as a tertiary referral center provides care for uro–oncology cases. Correspondence Ahmed Fouad Kotb Material and methods Data collection for all patients diagnosed with prostate cancer at Alexandria Uni- University of Alexandria versity in Egypt through the year 2012 was done. Faculty of Medicine Results The mean age of the patients was 67. Mean serum total PSA, prostate volume and PSAd were Department of Urology 149 ng/ml, 63 grams and 3.1 ng/ml/gm respectively. 25% of patients were asymptomatic diagnosed ac- El–Khartoum square, cidentally during screening for prostate cancer. The remaining group was presenting with LUTS, including Azarita Alexandria, Egypt 23 patients who presented initially with back pain. phone: +2 0120 302 1316 Conclusions Egyptian men with prostate cancer have a markedly high PSA density and Gleason grade [email protected] at diagnosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Prostate Cancer Early Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging Finding Prostate Cancer Early
    cancer.org | 1.800.227.2345 Prostate Cancer Early Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging Finding Prostate Cancer Early Catching cancer early often allows for more treatment options. Some early cancers may have signs and symptoms that can be noticed, but that is not always the case. ● Can Prostate Cancer Be Found Early? ● Screening Tests for Prostate Cancer ● American Cancer Society Recommendations for Prostate Cancer Early Detection ● Insurance Coverage for Prostate Cancer Screening Diagnosis and Planning Treatment After a cancer diagnosis, staging provides important information about the extent of cancer in the body and anticipated response to treatment. ● Signs and Symptoms of Prostate Cancer ● Tests to Diagnose and Stage Prostate Cancer ● Prostate Pathology ● Prostate Cancer Stages and Other Ways to Assess Risk ● Survival Rates for Prostate Cancer ● Questions To Ask About Prostate Cancer 1 ____________________________________________________________________________________American Cancer Society cancer.org | 1.800.227.2345 Can Prostate Cancer Be Found Early? Screening is testing to find cancer in people before they have symptoms. For some types of cancer, screening can help find cancers at an early stage, when they are likely to be easier to treat. Prostate cancer can often be found early by testing for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in a man’s blood. Another way to find prostate cancer is the digital rectal exam (DRE). For a DRE, the doctor puts a gloved, lubricated finger into the rectum to feel the prostate gland. These tests and the actual process of screening are described in more detail in Screening Tests for Prostate Cancer. If the results of either of these tests is abnormal, further testing (such as a prostate biopsy) is often done to see if a man has cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens David J Grignon
    Modern Pathology (2018) 31, S96–S109 S96 © 2018 USCAP, Inc All rights reserved 0893-3952/18 $32.00 Prostate cancer reporting and staging: needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens David J Grignon Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, IUH Pathology Laboratory, Indianapolis, IN, USA Prostatic adenocarcinoma remains the most common cancer affecting men. A substantial majority of patients have the diagnosis made on thin needle biopsies, most often in the absence of a palpable abnormality. Treatment choices ranging from surveillance to radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy are largely driven by the pathologic findings in the biopsy specimen. The first part of this review focuses on important morphologic parameters in needle biopsy specimens that are not covered in the accompanying articles. This includes tumor quantification as well as other parameters such a extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, perineural invasion, and lymphovascular invasion. For those men who undergo radical prostatectomy, pathologic stage and other parameters are critical in prognostication and in determining the appropriateness of adjuvant therapy. Staging parameters, including extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and lymph node status are discussed here. Surgical margin status is also an important parameter and definitions and reporting of this feature are detailed. Throughout the article the current reporting guidelines published by the College of American Pathologists and the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting are highlighted. Modern Pathology (2018) 31, S96–S109; doi:10.1038/modpathol.2017.167 The morphologic aspects of prostatic adenocarcinoma hormonal therapy.4,5 For needle biopsy specimens the have a critical role in the management and prognos- data described below are largely based on standard tication of patients with prostatic adenocarcinoma.
    [Show full text]
  • Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in a Patient with a Preexisting Three-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis
    www.kjurology.org DOI:10.4111/kju.2010.51.1.70 Case Report Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in a Patient with a Preexisting Three-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Kyung Hwa Choi, Seung Hwan Lee, Won Sug Jung1, Byung Ha Chung Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 1National Health Insurance Corporation Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea We report a rare case of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) in Article History: a patient with a preexisting penile prosthesis. In this case, we completed RARP without received 27 August, 2009 14 October, 2009 removing the reservoir by using a deflation-inflation technique, and there were no com- accepted plications related to the prosthesis. The patient had a negative surgical margin. The Corresponding Author: preserved three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis continued to function properly in 1 Byung Ha Chung month. Reservoir-preserving RARP is technically feasible and safe. However, it is im- Department of Urology, Yonsei portant to be aware of device-related complications. Long-term studies on the mechan- University Health System, Gangnam Severance Hospital, 712, Eonju-ro, ical survival rate and patient satisfaction should be also performed. Dogok-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul Key Words: Robotics, Prostatectomy, Penile prosthesis, Prostatic neoplasms 135-720, Korea TEL: +82-2-2019-3474 FAX: +82-2-3462-8887 E-mail: [email protected] Prostate cancer has been reported to occur most frequently CASE REPORT in men over 40 years of age. In organ-confined cases, radical prostatectomy is the treatment of choice. After the in- 1. Patient troduction of the da VinciⓇ surgical system (Intuitive The patient was a 64-year-old male diagnosed with aci- Surgical, Sunnyvale, USA), robot-assisted laparoscopic nar-type prostate adenocarcinoma with a Gleason score of radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become a mainstay of 6 (3＋3) by prostate biopsy.
    [Show full text]