Check out Our Educator Guide With
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Amtrak's Rights and Relationships with Host Railroads
Amtrak’s Rights and Relationships with Host Railroads September 21, 2017 Jim Blair –Director Host Railroads Today’s Amtrak System 2| Amtrak Amtrak’s Services • Northeast Corridor (NEC) • 457 miles • Washington‐New York‐Boston Northeast Corridor • 11.9 million riders in FY16 • Long Distance (LD) services • 15 routes • Up to 2,438 miles in length Long • 4.65 million riders in FY16 Distance • State‐supported trains • 29 routes • 19 partner states • Up to 750 miles in length State- • 14.7 million riders in FY16 supported3| Amtrak Amtrak’s Host Railroads Amtrak Route System Track Ownership Excluding Terminal Railroads VANCOUVER SEATTLE Spokane ! MONTREAL PORTLAND ST. PAUL / MINNEAPOLIS Operated ! St. Albans by VIA Rail NECR MDOT TORONTO VTR Rutland ! Port Huron Niagara Falls ! Brunswick Grand Rapids ! ! ! Pan Am MILWAUKEE ! Pontiac Hoffmans Metra Albany ! BOSTON ! CHICAGO ! Springfield Conrail Metro- ! CLEVELAND MBTA SALT LAKE CITY North PITTSBURGH ! ! NEW YORK ! INDIANAPOLIS Harrisburg ! KANSAS CITY ! PHILADELPHIA DENVER ! ! BALTIMORE SACRAMENTO Charlottesville WASHINGTON ST. LOUIS ! Richmond OAKLAND ! Petersburg ! Buckingham ! Newport News Norfolk NMRX Branch ! Oklahoma City ! Bakersfield ! MEMPHIS SCRRA ALBUQUERQUE ! ! LOS ANGELES ATLANTA SCRRA / BNSF / SDN DALLAS ! FT. WORTH SAN DIEGO HOUSTON ! JACKSONVILLE ! NEW ORLEANS SAN ANTONIO Railroads TAMPA! Amtrak (incl. Leased) Norfolk Southern FDOT ! MIAMI Union Pacific Canadian Pacific BNSF Canadian National CSXT Other Railroads 4| Amtrak Amtrak’s Host Railroads ! MONTREAL Amtrak NEC Route System -
RAIL OPERATORS' REPORTING MARKS February 24, 2010 a AA
RAIL OPERATORS' REPORTING MARKS February 24, 2010 A AA ANN ARBOR AAM ASHTOLA AND ALLEGHENY MOUNTAIN AB ATLANTIC AND BIRMINGHAM RAILWAY ABA ATLANTA, BIRMINGHAM AND ATLANTIC ABB AKRON AND BARBERTON BELT RAILROAD ABC ATLANTA, BIRMINGHAM AND COAST ABL ALLEYTON AND BIG LAKE ABLC ABERNETHY-LOUGHEED LOGGING COMPANY ABMR ALBION MINES RAILWAY ABR ARCADIA AND BETSEY RIVER ABS ABILENE AND SOUTHERN ABSO ABBEVILLE SOUTHERN RAILWAY ABYP ALABAMA BY-PRODUCTS CORP. AC ALGOMA CENTRAL ACAL ATLANTA AND CHARLOTTE AIR LINE ACC ALABAMA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ACE AMERICAN COAL ENTERPRISES ACHB ALGOMA CENTRAL AND HUDSON BAY ACL ATLANTIC COAST LINE ACLC ANGELINA COUNTY LUMBER COMPANY ACM ANACONDA COPPER MINING ACR ATLANTIC CITY RAILROAD ACRR ASTORIA AND COLUMBIA RIVER ACRY AMES AND COLLEGE RAILWAY ACTY AUSTIN CITY RAILROAD ACY AKRON, CANTON AND YOUNGSTOWN ADIR ADIRONDACK RAILWAY ADPA ADDISON AND PENNSYLVANIA RAILWAY AE ALTON AND EASTERN AEC ATLANTIC AND EAST CAROLINA AER ANNAPOLIS AND ELK RIDGE RAILROAD AF AMERICAN FORK RAILROAD AG ATLANTIC AND GULF RAILROAD AGR ALDER GULCH RAILROAD AGP ARGENTINE AND GRAY'S PEAK AGS ALABAMA GREAT SOUTHERN AGW ATLANTIC AND GREAT WESTERN AHR ALASKA HOME RAILROAD AHUK AHUKINI TERMINAL RAILWAY AICO ASHLAND IRON COMPANY AJ ARTEMUS-JELLICO RAILROAD AK ALLEGHENY AND KINZUA RAILROAD AKC ALASKA CENTRAL AKN ALASKA NORTHERN AL ALMANOR ALBL ALAMEDA BELT LINE ALBP ALBERNI PACIFIC ALBR ALBION RIVER RAILROAD ALC ALLEN LUMBER COMPANY ALCR ALBION LUMBER COMPANY RAILROAD ALGC ALLEGHANY CENTRAL (MD) ALLC ALLEGANY CENTRAL (NY) ALM ARKANSAS AND LOUISIANA -
Table 3.3.2 List of Prioritized Route / Section
The Preparatory Study on The Dhaka Mass Rapid Transit Development Project (Line 1) Final Report (Summary) Table 3.3.2 List of Prioritized Route / Section Route Section Length (km) Kamalapur – Bashundhara ( Main Line) MRT Line 1 28.2 Future Park - Purbachal Terminal (Purbachal Line) MRT Line 5 Hemayetpur- Vatara 22.4 MRT Line 6 Kamalapur – Uttara 20.4 BRT Line 3 Airport – Joydepur 20.4 Source:JICA Study Team Note: The length is based on RSTP. Source: JICA Study Team Figure 3.3.9 Prioritized Route / Section 2) LOS and Fare Setting of Mass Transit LOS and fare setting assumed in this demand forecast model is shown in Table 3.3.3. Table 3.3.3 List and Fare Setting of Mass Transit Mode 2025/2028 2035 Headway (min) 3.5 Capacity (000 pax/day/ direction) 200 MRT Speed (km/h) 35 Fare (Tk) 22.6+2.8 /km 30.6+3.8 /km Headway (min) 3.0 Capacity (000 pax/day/ direction) 64 BRT Speed (km/h) 23 Fare (Tk) 9.9+4.5/km 13.4+6.1 /km Headway (min) 60 Capacity (000 pax/day/ direction) 64 BR Speed (km/h) 15 Fare (Tk) 0.7 / km 1.0 / km Source: JICA Study Team 3-38 The Preparatory Study on The Dhaka Mass Rapid Transit Development Project (Line 1) Final Report (Summary) Daily Passenger Demand Result Table 3.3.4 shows the estimated railway performance indicators of MRT Line 1. PPHPD (Passenger Per Hour Per Direction) will be 26,500 pax in 20251, 48,000 in 2035 and 58,500 in 2055. -
Transportation on the Minneapolis Riverfront
RAPIDS, REINS, RAILS: TRANSPORTATION ON THE MINNEAPOLIS RIVERFRONT Mississippi River near Stone Arch Bridge, July 1, 1925 Minnesota Historical Society Collections Prepared by Prepared for The Saint Anthony Falls Marjorie Pearson, Ph.D. Heritage Board Principal Investigator Minnesota Historical Society Penny A. Petersen 704 South Second Street Researcher Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Hess, Roise and Company 100 North First Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 May 2009 612-338-1987 Table of Contents PROJECT BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................. 1 RAPID, REINS, RAILS: A SUMMARY OF RIVERFRONT TRANSPORTATION ......................................... 3 THE RAPIDS: WATER TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS .............................................. 8 THE REINS: ANIMAL-POWERED TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ............................ 25 THE RAILS: RAILROADS BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ..................................................................... 42 The Early Period of Railroads—1850 to 1880 ......................................................................... 42 The First Railroad: the Saint Paul and Pacific ...................................................................... 44 Minnesota Central, later the Chicago, Milwaukee and Saint Paul Railroad (CM and StP), also called The Milwaukee Road .......................................................................................... 55 Minneapolis and Saint Louis Railway ................................................................................. -
Chungkai Hospital Camp | Part One: Mid-October 1942 to Mid-May 1944 " Sears Eldredge Macalester College
Macalester College DigitalCommons@Macalester College Book Chapters Captive Audiences/Captive Performers 2014 Chapter 6a. "Chungkai Showcase": Chungkai Hospital Camp | Part One: Mid-October 1942 to Mid-May 1944 " Sears Eldredge Macalester College Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/thdabooks Recommended Citation Eldredge, Sears, "Chapter 6a. "Chungkai Showcase": Chungkai Hospital Camp | Part One: Mid-October 1942 to Mid-May 1944 "" (2014). Book Chapters. Book 16. http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/thdabooks/16 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Captive Audiences/Captive Performers at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Book Chapters by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 184 Chapter 6: “Chungkai Showcase” Chungkai Hospital Camp Part One: Mid-October 1942 to to Mid-May 1944 FIGURE 6.1. CHUNGKAI THEATRE LOGO. HUIB VAN LAAR. IMAGE COPYRIGHT MUSEON, THE HAGUE, NETHERLANDS. Though POWs in other camps in Thailand produced amazing musical and theatrical offerings for their audiences, it was the performers in Chungkai who, arguably, produced the most diverse, elaborate, and astonishing entertainment on the Thailand-Burma railway. Between Christmas 1943 and May 1945 they presented over sixty-five musical or theatrical productions. As there is more detailed information about the administration, production, and reception of the entertainment at Chungkai than at any other camp on the railway, the focus in this chapter will be on those productions and personalities that stand out in some significant way artistically, technically, or politically. To cover this material adequately, the chapter will be divided into two parts: Part One will cover the period from mid-October 1942 to mid-May 1944; Part Two, from mid-May 1944 to July 1945. -
Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the National Archives
REFERENCE INFORMATION PAPER 116 Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the national archives 1 Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the National Archives REFERENCE INFORMATION PAPER 116 National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC Compiled by Peter F. Brauer 2010 United States. National Archives and Records Administration. Records relating to railroads in the cartographic section of the National Archives / compiled by Peter F. Brauer.— Washington, DC : National Archives and Records Administration, 2010. p. ; cm.— (Reference information paper ; no 116) includes index. 1. United States. National Archives and Records Administration. Cartographic and Architectural Branch — Catalogs. 2. Railroads — United States — Armed Forces — History —Sources. 3. United States — Maps — Bibliography — Catalogs. I. Brauer, Peter F. II. Title. Cover: A section of a topographic quadrangle map produced by the U.S. Geological Survey showing the Union Pacific Railroad’s Bailey Yard in North Platte, Nebraska, 1983. The Bailey Yard is the largest railroad classification yard in the world. Maps like this one are useful in identifying the locations and names of railroads throughout the United States from the late 19th into the 21st century. (Topographic Quadrangle Maps—1:24,000, NE-North Platte West, 1983, Record Group 57) table of contents Preface vii PART I INTRODUCTION ix Origins of Railroad Records ix Selection Criteria xii Using This Guide xiii Researching the Records xiii Guides to Records xiv Related -
Pullman Car Services - Archive
Pullman Car Services - Archive Pullman & CIWL News “The quality of service is remembered long after the price is forgotten” September & October 2017 Edition No.38. Pullman & La Compagnie Internationale des Wagons -Lits et des Grand Express Européens News Edition No.38 - September & October 2017 - Page 1 of 72 COVER PHOTOGRAPH: Paul Blowfield - Communications & Marketing Officer, MNLPS - www.clan-line.org July 5th, 2017, marking 50 years to the day that the last steam hauled ‘Bournemouth Belle’ ran. The Merchant Navy Locomotive Preservation Society No.35028 Clan Line with ‘The Bournemouth Belle’ (Belmond British Pullman Cars) passing through Weybridge Station on the ‘Down’ main line. From the Coupé. Welcome aboard your bi-monthly newsletter. I take this opportunity to thank those readers who have kindly taken time to forward contributions in the form of articles and photographs for this edition. I remain dependent on contributions of news, articles (Word) and photographs (jpg) formats in all aspects of Pullman and CIWL operations both past, present, future and related aspects within model railways. All I ask of you for the time I spend in producing your newsletter, is for you to forward on by either E-mail or printing a copy, to any one you believe would be interested in reading your newsletter. Publication of the newsletter being scheduled on or about the 1st of January, March, May, July, September and November. The next edition editorial deadline date of Saturday October 28th, with the scheduled publication date of Wednesday November 1st, 2017. The views and articles within this publication are not necessarily those of the editor. -
TRI-STATE TOLLWAY Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Bridge
TRI-STATE TOLLWAY Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Bridge Project PROJECT OVERVIEW PURPOSE The Illinois Tollway is reconstructing the Burlington Northern The $96 million BNSF Railroad Bridge Project is part of the $4 Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway Bridge, which carries the triple-track billion Central Tri-State Project. Reconstruction of the BNSF railroad over the Tri-State Tollway (I-294) between Hinsdale Railway Bridge will allow for increased traffic capacity on I- and Western Springs, to accommodate the widening of the 294 and improve the overall driving experience through one Central Tri-State Tollway (I-294). of the busiest section of the Tollway. In 2021, the Tollway will begin building the new, longer BNSF As the bridge is expected to last for decades to come, the Railway Bridge after completing a bypass bridge in 2020 that bridge is being designed to accommodate foreseeable future is providing for uninterrupted freight and commuter rail needs to the greatest extent possible. operations during bridge reconstruction. On average, approximately 104 Metra and Amtrak trains Work on the BNSF Railway Bridge is scheduled to continue cross this bridge daily, as well as 52 daily freight trains. through 2022. The project is being coordinated with the Illinois Department of Transportation, Metra, Burlington Northern Santa Fe PROJECT SUMMARY (BNSF) Railway and Cook County, along with the villages of The Illinois Tollway is removing the existing three-track BNSF Hinsdale, Western Springs and Western Springs Park Distrcit, Railway Bridge and replacing it with a longer, wider two-span as well as police and fire departments. steel beam structure that will accommodate four tracks and WORK ZONE SAFETY will allow for reconstruction and widening of the Tollway The Illinois Tollway is committed to ensuring that the Central underneath. -
Union Depot Tower Interlocking Plant
Union Depot Tower Union Depot Tower (U.D. Tower) was completed in 1914 as part of a municipal project to improve rail transportation through Joliet, which included track elevation of all four railroad lines that went through downtown Joliet and the construction of a new passenger station to consolidate the four existing passenger stations into one. A result of this overall project was the above-grade intersection of 4 north-south lines with 4 east-west lines. The crossing of these rail lines required sixteen track diamonds. A diamond is a fixed intersection between two tracks. The purpose of UD Tower was to ensure and coordinate the safe and timely movement of trains through this critical intersection of east-west and north-south rail travel. UD Tower housed the mechanisms for controlling the various rail switches at the intersection, also known as an interlocking plant. Interlocking Plant Interlocking plants consisted of the signaling appliances and tracks at the intersections of major rail lines that required a method of control to prevent collisions and provide for the efficient movement of trains. Most interlocking plants had elevated structures that housed mechanisms for controlling the various rail switches at the intersection. Union Depot Tower is such an elevated structure. Source: Museum of the American Railroad Frisco Texas CSX Train 1513 moves east through the interlocking. July 25, 1997. Photo courtesy of Tim Frey Ownership of Union Depot Tower Upon the completion of Union Depot Tower in 1914, U.D. Tower was owned and operated by the four rail companies with lines that came through downtown Joliet. -
The Myth of the Standard Gauge
The Myth of the Standard Guage: Rail Guage Choice in Australia, 1850-1901 Author Mills, John Ayres Published 2007 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School Griffith Business School DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/426 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/366364 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au THE MYTH OF THE STANDARD GAUGE: RAIL GAUGE CHOICE IN AUSTRALIA, 1850 – 1901 JOHN AYRES MILLS B.A.(Syd.), M.Prof.Econ. (U.Qld.) DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING, FINANCE & ECONOMICS GRIFFITH BUSINESS SCHOOL GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2006 ii ABSTRACT This thesis describes the rail gauge decision-making processes of the Australian colonies in the period 1850 – 1901. Federation in 1901 delivered a national system of railways to Australia but not a national railway system. Thus the so-called “standard” gauge of 4ft. 8½in. had not become the standard in Australia at Federation in 1901, and has still not. It was found that previous studies did not examine cause and effect in the making of rail gauge choices. This study has done so, and found that rail gauge choice decisions in the period 1850 to 1901 were not merely one-off events. Rather, those choices were part of a search over fifty years by government representatives seeking colonial identity/autonomy and/or platforms for election/re-election. Consistent with this interpretation of the history of rail gauge choice in the Australian colonies, no case was found where rail gauge choice was a function of the disciplined search for the best value-for-money option. -
Law Department
RG3761.AM Union Pacific Railroad SG12 Law Department Series 1 Incoming Correspondence Box 407-408 Bartlett 1875-1884 folder inventory Box 409 Poppleton 1877-1878 folder inventory Series 2 Outgoing Correspondence Box 410 December 6, 1890-November 10, 1891 Vols. 1-5 1876-1899 brief inventories for vols. 1-3 Series 3 Miscellany Vol. 1 Drafts of briefs of John F. Dillon list of cases Series 4 Legal Case Files Boxes 411-453 Oversize Volumes RG3761.AM: Union Pacific Railroad, SG12 - Law Department RG3761.AM Union Pacific Railroad SG12 Law Department (Bartlett) Series 1 Incoming Correspondence Box 407 Correspondence, 1875-84 Abbett & Fuller; Attorneys, NY see Post, Simeon vs. UPRR Allen, Charles; U.S. Attorney, MA see UPRR vs. U.S. (Trans); U.S. vs. UPRR (MA-5%) Alley, John Bassett; Ames-Davis Contract Trustee see Gould, Jay American Bridge Co. (L. B. Boomer), Chicago see Pose vs. UPRR Ames, Frederick Lothrop; Trustee, see Colorado Central RR; UPRR vs. C.M.A. in equity (MA); UPRR-Land Department Ames, Oliver; Director UPRR 1863-77; Chairman, Trustees; letters to see Missouri River Bridge (1876); U.S. vs. UPRR et al (1875); regarding estate see Wyoming Coal & Mining Co. U.S. vs. Oliver Ames et al (Income suits, MA) see Bristol, L.H. Ames, Oakes – Contract see UPRR vs. C.M.A. in equity (MA) Ames, Oliver 2 nd see Gould, Jay Ashton, Joseph Hubley; U.S. Attorney, Washington, D.C. see UPRR vs. C.M.A. in equity (MA) Baker, Ezra Henry vs. Durant et al see Durant, Thomas Clark see UPRR vs. -
Educator Guide with Pre- & Post-Visit Lesson Plans 4Th Grade Learning
Educator Guide with Pre- & Post-Visit Lesson Plans th 4 Grade Learning Level Thank you for your interest in Magoffin Home State Historic Site, home of early El Paso pioneer Joseph Magoffin and his family. In this guide, you will find TEKS-aligned classroom lessons and extension activities that will prepare your students for a visit to the Magoffin Home. You may reproduce all images within this Educators’ Guide for your classroom use. For admission prices and hours of operation, please visit us online at http://visitmagoffinhome.com. To schedule a site visit field trip for your students, please call 915-533-5147. For your VISIT, we recommend that you: • Complete the included pre-visit lesson(s) or your own introductory lesson in advance. • Divide your students into three small groups, each with a chaperone prepared to facilitate their group’s work throughout the visit. • Equip each of your students with a sharpened pencil (no pens or markers allowed in museum exhibits). • Equip each of your group chaperones with a camera or phone with camera for group work documentation. We welcome your suggestions and feedback on the enclosed materials. You may find our complete contact information below. We look forward to seeing you and your students at Magoffin Home State Historic Site. Contact Us 1120 Magoffin Ave. El Paso, TX 79901 915-533-5147 [email protected] Pre-Visit Lesson 1 At Home with the Magoffins Objectives In preparation for their visit to Magoffin Home, students will learn about Joseph Magoffin, his family, and their part in building early El Paso.