DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 1: Priority Conservation Species of South Carolina

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AP 1: Priority Species List SC CWCS APPENDIX 1: PRIORITY CONSERVATION SPECIES OF SOUTH CAROLINA Common Name Scientific Name Priority Legal Status G Rank S Rank Mammals Black Bear Ursus americanus Highest Of Concern, State G5 S3? Federal and State Florida Manatee Trichechus manatus Highest G2 S1S2 Endangerd Northern Yellow Bat Lasiurus intermedius Highest Of Concern, State G4G5 S? Appalachian Cottontail Sylvilagus obscurus High G4 S3 Federal and State Atlantic Right Whale Eubaleana glacialis High G1 SA Endangerd Bottlenose Dolphin Tursiops truncates High Of Concern, State G5 S4 Carolina Red-backed Vole Clethrionomys gapperi High Of Concern, State G5 S3 Dwarf Sperm Whale Kogia sima High Of Concern, State G4 S? Eastern Small-footed Myotis Myotis leibii High State Threatened G3 S1 Hairy-tailed Mole Parascalops breweri High Of Concern, State G5 S? Federal and State Humpback Whale Megaptera novaeangliae High G3 S1 Endangerd Masked Shrew Sorex cinereus High Of Concern, State G5 S? Meadow Vole Microtus pennsylvanicus High Of Concern, State G5 S? Mink Mustela vison High G5 S? Pygmy Sperm Whale Kogia breviceps High Of Concern, State G4 SA Rafinesque’s Big-eared Bat Corynorhinus rafinesquii High State Endangered G3G4 S2? Southeastern Bat Myotis austroriparius High Of Concern, State G3G4 S1 Star-nosed Mole Condylura cristata High Of Concern, State G5 S3? Swamp Rabbit Sylvilagus aquaticus High Of Concern, State G5 S2S3 Eastern Fox Squirrel Sciurus niger Moderate Of Concern, State G5 S4 Eastern Spotted Skunk Spilogale putorius Moderate Of Concern, State G5 S4 Eastern Woodrat Neotoma floridana Moderate Of Concern, State G5 S3S4 Southern Pygmy Shrew Sorex hoyi Moderate G5 S3 Woodland Jumping Mouse Napaeozapus insignis Moderate Of Concern, State G5 S4? AP 1-1 AP 1: Priority Species List SC CWCS Common Name Scientific Name Priority Legal Status G Rank S Rank Birds American Avocet Recurvirostra americana Highest G5 S? American Bittern Botaurus lentiginosus Highest Of Concern, State G4 S? American Coot Fulica americana Highest G5 SHB,SNRN American Golden Plover Pluvialis dominica Highest G5 SNA American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus Highest G5 SNR American Oystercatcher Haematopus palliates Highest Of Concern, State G5 S? Bachman’s Sparrow Aimophila aestivalis Highest Of Concern, State G3 S3 Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax Highest G5 SNRB,SNRN Black Duck Anas rubripes Highest G5 SNRN Black Rail Laterallus jamaicensis Highest Of Concern, State G4 S? Black Skimmer Rynchops niger Highest Of Concern, State G5 S2 Black-throated Green Warbler Dendroica virens wayneii Highest G5 S4 Brown-headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla Highest G5 S4 Buff-breasted Sandpiper Tryngites subruficollis Highest G4 SNA Common Ground-dove Columbina passerine Highest State Threatened G5 S? Common Tern Sterna hirundo Highest Dunlin Calidris alpina Highest G5 SNR Eastern Brown Pelican Pelicanus occidentalis carolinensis Highest G4 SNR Eastern Meadowlark Sturnella magna Highest G5 SNR Eastern Wood Peewee Contopus virens Highest G5 S5B Field Sparrow Spizella pusilla Highest G5 S5? Glossy Ibis Plegadis falcinellus Highest Of Concern, State G5 S? Grasshopper Sparrow Ammodramus savannarum Highest G5 SNRB,SNRN Gull-billed Tern Sterna nilotica Highest Of Concern, State G5 S? Henslow’s Sparrow Ammodramus henslowii Highest Of Concern, State G4 SZN Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus Highest G5 S4B King Rail Rallus elegans Highest G4 SNR Least Bittern Ixobrychus exilis Highest G5 SNRB,SNRN Least Sandpiper Calidris minutilla Highest G5 SNRN Least Tern Sterna antillarum Highest State Threatened G4 S3 Lesser Scaup Aythya affinis Highest G5 SNRN AP 1-2 AP 1: Priority Species List SC CWCS Common Name Scientific Name Priority Legal Status G Rank S Rank Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes Highest G5 SNRN Little Blue Heron Egretta caerulea Highest Of Concern, State G5 S? Loggerhead Shrike Lanius ludovicianus Highest Of Concern, State G4 S3 Long-billed Curlew Numenius americanus Highest G5 SNA Mallard Anas platyrhynchos Highest G5 SNRB,SNRN Marbled Godwit Limosa fedoa Highest G5 SNRN Northern Bobwhite Colinus virginianus Highest G5 S4 Northern Pintail Anas acuta Highest G5 SNRN Painted Bunting Passerina ciris Highest G5 SNRB Pied-billed Grebe Podilymbus podiceps Highest G5 SNRB,SNRN Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Highest G5 SRB Purple Gallinule Porphyrio martinica Highest Of Concern, State G5 S4 Federal and State Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Highest Endangerd G3 S2 Red Knot Calidris canutus Highest G5 SNRN Royal Tern Sterna maxima Highest G5 SNRB,SNRN Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Highest G4 SNRN Sanderling Calidris alba Highest G5 SNRN Sandwich Tern Sterna sandvicensis Highest G5 SNRB Seaside Sparrow Ammospiza maritime Highest Semipalmated Sandpiper Calidris pusilla Highest G5 SNA Short-billed Dowitcher Limnodromus griseus Highest G5 SNRN Snowy Egret Egretta thula Highest G5 SNRB,SNRN Solitary Sandpiper Tringa solitaria Highest G5 SNA Stilt Sandpiper Calidris himantopus Highest G5 SNA Swaison’s Warbler Limnothlypis swainsonii Highest Of Concern, State G4 S4 Swallow-tailed Kite Elanoides forficatus Highest G5 S2 Tricolor Heron Egretta tricolor Highest G5 SNRB,SNRN Western Sandpiper Calidris mauri Highest G5 SNRN Whimbrel Numenius phaeopus Highest G5 SNRN White Ibis Eudocimus albus Highest G5 Willet Catoptrophorus semipalmatus Highest G5 SNR Wilson’s Plover Charadrius wilsonia Highest State Threatened G5 S3? AP 1-3 AP 1: Priority Species List SC CWCS Common Name Scientific Name Priority Legal Status G Rank S Rank Wilson’s Snipe Gallinago gallinagodelicata Highest Federal and State Wood Stork Mycteria americana Highest Endangerd G4 S1S2 Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Highest G5 S3?B Worm-eating Warbler Helmitheros vermivorus Highest G5 S4B Upland Sandpiper Bartramia longicauda Highest G5 SNA Yellow-crowned Night Heron Nyctanassa violacea Highest G5 SNRB,SNRN Yellow Rail Coturnicops noveboracensis Highest G4 Acadian Flycatcher Empidonax virescens High G5 S4B Federal Threatened/ State Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus High Endangered G4 S2 Barn Owl Tyto alba High Of Concern, State G5 S4 Black-bellied Plover Pluvialis squatarola High G5 SNRN Black Scoter Melanitta nigra High G5 SNRN Black-throated Blue Warbler Dendroica caerulescens High G5 S4B Blue-winged Teal Anas discors High G5 SNRB,SNRN Canvasback Aythya valisineria High G5 S4 Forster’s Tern Sterna forsteri High G5 SNRN Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus High G4 SHB,SNRN Redhead Aythya Americana High G5 SNRN Semipalmated Plover Charadrius semipalmatus High G5 SNRN Spotted Sandpiper Actitis macularia High G5 SNA White-winged Scoter Melanitta deglandi High G5 SNRN American Woodcock Scolopax minor Moderate G5 S4 Bewick’s Wren Thryomanes bewickii Moderate State Endangered G5 S1? Chestnut-sided Warbler Dendroica pensylvanica Moderate G5 SNRB Common Loon Gavia immer Moderate G5 SNRN Common Raven Corvus corax Moderate G5 S4 Dark-eyed Junco Junco hyemalis Moderate G5 SNRB,SNRN Golden-crowned Kinglet Regulus satrapa Moderate G5 S4 Gray Kingbird Tyrannus dominicensis Moderate G5 SNRB,SNRN Great Blue Heron Ardea herodias Moderate G5 SNRB,SNRN Great Egret Ardea alba Moderate G5 SNRB,SNRN Greater Scaup Aythya marila Moderate G5 SNRN AP 1-4 AP 1: Priority Species List SC CWCS Common Name Scientific Name Priority Legal Status G Rank S Rank Greater Yellowlegs Tringa melanoleuca Moderate G5 SNRN Green Heron Butorides virescens Moderate G5 SNRB,SNRN Horned Grebe Podiceps auritus Moderate G5 SNRN,SNRM Long-billed Dowitcher Limnodromus scolopaceus Moderate G5 SNRN Louisiana Waterthrush Seiurus motacilla Moderate G5 S4B Top of Form Mottled Duck Anas fulvigula Moderate G4 S? Pectoral Sandpiper Calidris melanotos Moderate G5 SNA Purple Sandpiper Calidris maritima Moderate G5 Red-breasted Nuthatch Sitta Canadensis Moderate G5 S4B Red Crossbill Loxia curvirostra Moderate G5 S4 Ringneck Aythya collaris Moderate G5 SNRN Ruffed Grouse Bonasa umbellus Moderate G5 S4 Scarlet Tanager Piranga olivacea Moderate G5 SNRB Tundra Swan Cygnus columbianus Moderate G5 SNRN White-rumped Sandpiper Calidris fuscicollis Moderate G5 SNA Wood Duck Aix sponsa Moderate G5 SNRB,SNRN,SNRM Herpetofauna Federal and State Bog Turtle Glyptemys muhlenbergii Highest Threatened G3 S1 Broad-striped Dwarf Siren Pseudobranchus striatus striatus Highest G5 S2 Federal Threatened/ State Carolina Gopher Frog Rana capito capito Highest Endangered G3/G4 S1 Chamberlain’s Dwarf Salamander Eurycea chamberlainii Highest Coal Skink Eumeces anthracinus Highest State Threatened G5 S1 Coral Snake Micrurus fulvius Highest Of Concern, State G5 S2 Eastern Milk Snake Lampropeltis triangulum Highest Of Concern, State G5 S2 Federal Threatened/ State Flatwoods Salamander Ambystoma cingulatum Highest Endangered G2G3 S1 Florida Green Watersnake Nerodia floridana Highest Of Concern, State G5 S2 Florida Pine Snake Pituophis melanoleucus mugitus Highest Of Concern, State G4T3? S2 Green Salamander Aneides aeneus Highest Of Concern, State G3G4 S1 Federal and State Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas Highest Endangered G3 SNR Gopher Tortoise Gopherus polyphemus Highest State Endangered G3 S1 AP 1-5 AP 1: Priority Species List SC CWCS Common Name Scientific Name Priority Legal Status G Rank S Rank Federal and State Hawksbill Sea Turtle Eretmochelys imbricata Highest Endangered G3 SNR Island Glass Lizard Ophisaurus compressus Highest Of Concern, State G3G4 S1S2 Federal and State Leatherback Sea Turle Demochelys coriacea Highest Endangered G2 S? Federal and State Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta Caretta
Recommended publications
  • Appendix to Taxonomic Revision of Leopold and Rudolf Blaschkas' Glass Models of Invertebrates 1888 Catalogue, with Correction

    Appendix to Taxonomic Revision of Leopold and Rudolf Blaschkas' Glass Models of Invertebrates 1888 Catalogue, with Correction

    http://www.natsca.org Journal of Natural Science Collections Title: Appendix to Taxonomic revision of Leopold and Rudolf Blaschkas’ Glass Models of Invertebrates 1888 Catalogue, with correction of authorities Author(s): Callaghan, E., Egger, B., Doyle, H., & E. G. Reynaud Source: Callaghan, E., Egger, B., Doyle, H., & E. G. Reynaud. (2020). Appendix to Taxonomic revision of Leopold and Rudolf Blaschkas’ Glass Models of Invertebrates 1888 Catalogue, with correction of authorities. Journal of Natural Science Collections, Volume 7, . URL: http://www.natsca.org/article/2587 NatSCA supports open access publication as part of its mission is to promote and support natural science collections. NatSCA uses the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ for all works we publish. Under CCAL authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles in NatSCA publications, so long as the original authors and source are cited. TABLE 3 – Callaghan et al. WARD AUTHORITY TAXONOMY ORIGINAL SPECIES NAME REVISED SPECIES NAME REVISED AUTHORITY N° (Ward Catalogue 1888) Coelenterata Anthozoa Alcyonaria 1 Alcyonium digitatum Linnaeus, 1758 2 Alcyonium palmatum Pallas, 1766 3 Alcyonium stellatum Milne-Edwards [?] Sarcophyton stellatum Kükenthal, 1910 4 Anthelia glauca Savigny Lamarck, 1816 5 Corallium rubrum Lamarck Linnaeus, 1758 6 Gorgonia verrucosa Pallas, 1766 [?] Eunicella verrucosa 7 Kophobelemon (Umbellularia) stelliferum
  • 15 Sea Turtle Epibiosis

    15 Sea Turtle Epibiosis

    15 Sea Turtle Epibiosis Michael G. Frick and joseph B. Pfaller CONTENTS 15. I Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 399 15.2 Common Forms .................................................................................................................... 401 15.2.1 Sessile Forms ............................................................................................................ 401 15.2.2 Sedentary Forms ....................................................................................................... 401 15.2.3 Motile Forms ............................................................................................................ 401 15.3 Communities and Community Dynamics ............................................................................ 402 15.3.1 Pelagic/Oceanic Communities .................................................................................. 402 15.3.2 Benthic/Neritic Communities ................................................................................... 402 15.3.3 Obligate Communities .............................................................................................. 403 15.3.4 Community Distribution ........................................................................................... 403 15.3.5 Community Succession ............................................................................................ 404 15.4 Ecological Interactions ........................................................................................................
  • Benthic Invertebrate Community Monitoring and Indicator Development for Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary

    Benthic Invertebrate Community Monitoring and Indicator Development for Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary

    July 15, 2013 Final Report Project SR12-002: Benthic Invertebrate Community Monitoring and Indicator Development for Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary Gary L. Taghon, Rutgers University, Project Manager [email protected] Judith P. Grassle, Rutgers University, Co-Manager [email protected] Charlotte M. Fuller, Rutgers University, Co-Manager [email protected] Rosemarie F. Petrecca, Rutgers University, Co-Manager and Quality Assurance Officer [email protected] Patricia Ramey, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Frankfurt Germany, Co-Manager [email protected] Thomas Belton, NJDEP Project Manager and NJDEP Research Coordinator [email protected] Marc Ferko, NJDEP Quality Assurance Officer [email protected] Bob Schuster, NJDEP Bureau of Marine Water Monitoring [email protected] Introduction The Barnegat Bay ecosystem is potentially under stress from human impacts, which have increased over the past several decades. Benthic macroinvertebrates are commonly included in studies to monitor the effects of human and natural stresses on marine and estuarine ecosystems. There are several reasons for this. Macroinvertebrates (here defined as animals retained on a 0.5-mm mesh sieve) are abundant in most coastal and estuarine sediments, typically on the order of 103 to 104 per meter squared. Benthic communities are typically composed of many taxa from different phyla, and quantitative measures of community diversity (e.g., Rosenberg et al. 2004) and the relative abundance of animals with different feeding behaviors (e.g., Weisberg et al. 1997, Pelletier et al. 2010), can be used to evaluate ecosystem health. Because most benthic invertebrates are sedentary as adults, they function as integrators, over periods of months to years, of the properties of their environment.
  • Jacksonville, Florida 1998 Odmds Benthic Community Assessment

    Jacksonville, Florida 1998 Odmds Benthic Community Assessment

    JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 1998 ODMDS BENTHIC COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT Submitted to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 61 Forsyth St. Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Prepared by Barry A. Vittor & Associates, Inc. 8060 Cottage Hill Rd. Mobile, Alabama 36695 (334) 633-6100 November 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ………………………………………….……………………………3 LIST OF FIGURES ……………………..………………………………………………..4 1.0 INTRODUCTION ………..…………………………………………………………..5 2.0 METHODS ………..…………………………………………………………………..5 2.1 Sample Collection And Handling ………………………………………………5 2.2 Macroinfaunal Sample Analysis ……………………………………………….6 3.0 DATA ANALYSIS METHODS ……..………………………………………………6 3.1 Assemblage Analyses ..…………………………………………………………6 3.2 Faunal Similarities ……………………………………………………….…….8 4.0 HABITAT CHARACTERISTICS ……………………………………………….…8 5.0 BENTHIC COMMUNITY CHARACTERIZATION ……………………………..9 5.1 Faunal Composition, Abundance, And Community Structure …………………9 5.2 Numerical Classification Analysis …………………………………………….10 5.3 Taxa Assemblages …………………………………………………………….11 6.0 1995 vs 1998 COMPARISONS ……………………………………………………..11 7.0 SUMMARY ………………………………………………………………………….13 8.0 LITERATURE CITED ……………………………………………………………..16 2 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Station locations for the Jacksonville, Florida ODMDS, June 1998. Table 2. Sediment data for the Jacksonville, Florida ODMDS, June 1998. Table 3. Summary of abundance of major taxonomic groups for the Jacksonville, Florida ODMDS, June 1998. Table 4. Abundance and distribution of major taxonomic groups at each station for the Jacksonville, Florida ODMDS, June 1998. Table 5. Abundance and distribution of taxa for the Jacksonville, Florida ODMDS, June 1998. Table 6. Percent abundance of dominant taxa (> 5% of the total assemblage) for the Jacksonville, Florida ODMDS, June 1998. Table 7. Summary of assemblage parameters for the Jacksonville, Florida ODMDS stations, June 1998. Table 8. Analysis of variance table for density differences between stations for the Jacksonville, Florida ODMDS stations, June 1998.
  • Skates and Rays Diversity, Exploration and Conservation – Case-Study of the Thornback Ray, Raja Clavata

    Skates and Rays Diversity, Exploration and Conservation – Case-Study of the Thornback Ray, Raja Clavata

    UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGIA ANIMAL SKATES AND RAYS DIVERSITY, EXPLORATION AND CONSERVATION – CASE-STUDY OF THE THORNBACK RAY, RAJA CLAVATA Bárbara Marques Serra Pereira Doutoramento em Ciências do Mar 2010 UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGIA ANIMAL SKATES AND RAYS DIVERSITY, EXPLORATION AND CONSERVATION – CASE-STUDY OF THE THORNBACK RAY, RAJA CLAVATA Bárbara Marques Serra Pereira Tese orientada por Professor Auxiliar com Agregação Leonel Serrano Gordo e Investigadora Auxiliar Ivone Figueiredo Doutoramento em Ciências do Mar 2010 The research reported in this thesis was carried out at the Instituto de Investigação das Pescas e do Mar (IPIMAR - INRB), Unidade de Recursos Marinhos e Sustentabilidade. This research was funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) through a PhD grant (SFRH/BD/23777/2005) and the research project EU Data Collection/DCR (PNAB). Skates and rays diversity, exploration and conservation | Table of Contents Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. v List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................................. viii Agradecimentos ........................................................................................................................
  • Tampa Bay Benthic Monitoring Program: Status of Middle Tampa Bay: 1993-1998

    Tampa Bay Benthic Monitoring Program: Status of Middle Tampa Bay: 1993-1998

    Tampa Bay Benthic Monitoring Program: Status of Middle Tampa Bay: 1993-1998 Stephen A. Grabe Environmental Supervisor David J. Karlen Environmental Scientist II Christina M. Holden Environmental Scientist I Barbara Goetting Environmental Specialist I Thomas Dix Environmental Scientist II MARCH 2003 1 Environmental Protection Commission of Hillsborough County Richard Garrity, Ph.D. Executive Director Gerold Morrison, Ph.D. Director, Environmental Resources Management Division 2 INTRODUCTION The Environmental Protection Commission of Hillsborough County (EPCHC) has been collecting samples in Middle Tampa Bay 1993 as part of the bay-wide benthic monitoring program developed to (Tampa Bay National Estuary Program 1996). The original objectives of this program were to discern the ―health‖—or ―status‖-- of the bay’s sediments by developing a Benthic Index for Tampa Bay as well as evaluating sediment quality by means of Sediment Quality Assessment Guidelines (SQAGs). The Tampa Bay Estuary Program provided partial support for this monitoring. This report summarizes data collected during 1993-1998 from the Middle Tampa Bay segment of Tampa Bay. 3 METHODS Field Collection and Laboratory Procedures: A total of 127 stations (20 to 24 per year) were sampled during late summer/early fall ―Index Period‖ 1993-1998 (Appendix A). Sample locations were randomly selected from computer- generated coordinates. Benthic samples were collected using a Young grab sampler following the field protocols outlined in Courtney et al. (1993). Laboratory procedures followed the protocols set forth in Courtney et al. (1995). Data Analysis: Species richness, Shannon-Wiener diversity, and Evenness were calculated using PISCES Conservation Ltd.’s (2001) ―Species Diversity and Richness II‖ software.
  • Larval Development of Shallow Water Barnacles of the Carolinas (Cirripedia

    Larval Development of Shallow Water Barnacles of the Carolinas (Cirripedia

    421 NOAA Technical Report Circular 421 OF <•*>" *o, Larval Development of / Shallow Water Barnacles of the Carolinas (Cirripedia: Sr V/ *TES O* Thoracica) With Keys to Naupliar Stages William H. Lang February 1979 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA TECHNICAL REPORTS National Marine Fisheries Service, Circulars The major responsibilities of the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) are to monitor and assess the abundance and geographic distribution of fishery resources, to understand and predict fluctuations in the quantity and distribution of these resources, and to establish levels for optimum use of the resources. NMFS is also charged with the development and implementation of policies for managing national fishing grounds, development and enforcement of domestic fisheries regulations, surveillance of foreign fishing off United States coastal waters, and the development and enforcement of international fishery agreements and policies. NMFS also assists the fishing industry through marketing service and economic analysis programs, and mortgage insurance and vessel construction subsidies. It collects, analyzes, and publishes statistics on various phases of the industry. The NOAA Technical Report NMFS Circular series continues a series that has been in existence since 1941. The Circulars are technical publications of general interest intended to aid conservation and management. Publications that review in considerable detail and at a high technical level certain broad areas of research appear in this series. Technical papers originating in economics studies and from management in- vestigations appear in the Circular series. NOAA Technical Report NMFS Circulars are available free in limited numbers to governmental agencies, both Federal and State.
  • Os Nomes Galegos Dos Moluscos

    Os Nomes Galegos Dos Moluscos

    A Chave Os nomes galegos dos moluscos 2017 Citación recomendada / Recommended citation: A Chave (2017): Nomes galegos dos moluscos recomendados pola Chave. http://www.achave.gal/wp-content/uploads/achave_osnomesgalegosdos_moluscos.pdf 1 Notas introdutorias O que contén este documento Neste documento fornécense denominacións para as especies de moluscos galegos (e) ou europeos, e tamén para algunhas das especies exóticas máis coñecidas (xeralmente no ámbito divulgativo, por causa do seu interese científico ou económico, ou por seren moi comúns noutras áreas xeográficas). En total, achéganse nomes galegos para 534 especies de moluscos. A estrutura En primeiro lugar preséntase unha clasificación taxonómica que considera as clases, ordes, superfamilias e familias de moluscos. Aquí apúntase, de maneira xeral, os nomes dos moluscos que hai en cada familia. A seguir vén o corpo do documento, onde se indica, especie por especie, alén do nome científico, os nomes galegos e ingleses de cada molusco (nalgún caso, tamén, o nome xenérico para un grupo deles). Ao final inclúese unha listaxe de referencias bibliográficas que foron utilizadas para a elaboración do presente documento. Nalgunhas desas referencias recolléronse ou propuxéronse nomes galegos para os moluscos, quer xenéricos quer específicos. Outras referencias achegan nomes para os moluscos noutras linguas, que tamén foron tidos en conta. Alén diso, inclúense algunhas fontes básicas a respecto da metodoloxía e dos criterios terminolóxicos empregados. 2 Tratamento terminolóxico De modo moi resumido, traballouse nas seguintes liñas e cos seguintes criterios: En primeiro lugar, aprofundouse no acervo lingüístico galego. A respecto dos nomes dos moluscos, a lingua galega é riquísima e dispomos dunha chea de nomes, tanto específicos (que designan un único animal) como xenéricos (que designan varios animais parecidos).
  • Oxygen Equilibrium Properties of Coelomic Hemoglobin in the Polychaete Glycera Dibranchiata

    Oxygen Equilibrium Properties of Coelomic Hemoglobin in the Polychaete Glycera Dibranchiata

    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1972 Oxygen Equilibrium Properties of Coelomic Hemoglobin in the Polychaete Glycera dibranchiata Judy Ann Carhart College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Physiology Commons Recommended Citation Carhart, Judy Ann, "Oxygen Equilibrium Properties of Coelomic Hemoglobin in the Polychaete Glycera dibranchiata" (1972). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539624765. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-sptx-je26 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OXYGEN EQUILIBRIUM PROPERTIES OF COELOMIC HEMOGLOBIN IN THE POLYCHAETE GLYCERA DIRRAN C HIAT A A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Biology The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Judy Ann Ca.rhart 1972 APPROVAL SHEET -This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Author Approved, December 1972 fyjtuhA ft' Charlotte P* Mangum ^ £ - £ MJc Robert E. L. Black Martin C. Mathes TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . .................. ' . i v LIST OF TABLES . ... .... v LIST OF FIGURES . ..... vi ABSTRACT . ’ . ...... v j L i INTRODUCTION ................. .V . 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS ..................... 4 RESULTS . 10 DISCUSSION . ............... ... ................................16 REFERENCES . 22 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The writer wishes to express deepest appreciation to Dr, Charlotte P.
  • Atlantic Cod (Gadus Morhua) Off Newfoundland and Labrador Determined from Genetic Variation

    Atlantic Cod (Gadus Morhua) Off Newfoundland and Labrador Determined from Genetic Variation

    COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on the Atlantic Cod Gadus morhua Newfoundland and Labrador population Laurentian North population Maritimes population Arctic population in Canada Newfoundland and Labrador population - Endangered Laurentian North population - Threatened Maritimes population - Special Concern Arctic population - Special Concern 2003 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2003. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Atlantic cod Gadus morhua in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xi + 76 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Jeffrey A. Hutchings for writing the update status report on the Atlantic cod Gadus morhua, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Rapport du COSEPAC sur la situation de la morue franche (Gadus morhua) au Canada Cover illustration: Atlantic Cod — Line drawing of Atlantic cod Gadus morhua by H.L. Todd. Image reproduced with permission from the Smithsonian Institution, NMNH, Division of Fishes. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2003 Catalogue No.CW69-14/311-2003-IN ISBN 0-662-34309-3 Recycled paper COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment summary — May 2003 Common name Atlantic cod (Newfoundland and Labrador population) Scientific name Gadus morhua Status Endangered Reason for designation Cod in the inshore and offshore waters of Labrador and northeastern Newfoundland, including Grand Bank, having declined 97% since the early 1970s and more than 99% since the early 1960s, are now at historically low levels.
  • Lesson (PDF 76

    Lesson (PDF 76

    Common Life in the Marine Biome Instructions: Scientists use dichotomous keys to organize and identify specimens. Dichotomous means dividing into two parts – a dichotomous key provides two choices in each step. For example: to divide a package of multi-coloured pens into two groups, you might decide to divide the pens by “has blue ink” and “does not have blue ink”. Work together at each station and use the available tools and key information to identify the different specimens. Record your answers on your results page. Station 1 – Echinoderms 1. a. Specimen has arms…………………………………………………………………….………..go to 2 b. Specimen does not have arms………………………………………………..………….go to 4 2. a. Specimen usually has 5 arms………………………..……………………………..…...go to 3 b. Specimen usually has more than 5 arms (when intact)………………………………………………………………………………………Common sun star 3. a. Specimen has a central, armoured disc with long, thin arms…………………………………………………………………………………………...Daisy brittle star b. Specimen does not armoured disc, and has large, thicker arms………………………………………………………………………………………………………….Sea star There are different species of sea star in Nova Scotian waters. Often, the easiest identification relates to colour. For example, the northern sea star and Forbes’ sea star can both have colorful bodies (purple, tan, red, etc.), however the northern sea star has a pale yellow madreporite and the Forbes’ sea star has a bright orange madreporite. 4. a. Specimen is round and flat with short, fuzz-like spines (live) or smooth without spines (dead)…..………………………………………………………………....Sand dollar b. Specimen has a dome shape with long, thicker spines (live) or lacks spines (dead).…………………………………………………………………………..Green sea urchin Common Life in the Marine Biome Page 2 of 4 Station 2 – Gastropods 1.
  • South Carolina Department of Natural Resources

    South Carolina Department of Natural Resources

    FOREWORD Abundant fish and wildlife, unbroken coastal vistas, miles of scenic rivers, swamps and mountains open to exploration, and well-tended forests and fields…these resources enhance the quality of life that makes South Carolina a place people want to call home. We know our state’s natural resources are a primary reason that individuals and businesses choose to locate here. They are drawn to the high quality natural resources that South Carolinians love and appreciate. The quality of our state’s natural resources is no accident. It is the result of hard work and sound stewardship on the part of many citizens and agencies. The 20th century brought many changes to South Carolina; some of these changes had devastating results to the land. However, people rose to the challenge of restoring our resources. Over the past several decades, deer, wood duck and wild turkey populations have been restored, striped bass populations have recovered, the bald eagle has returned and more than half a million acres of wildlife habitat has been conserved. We in South Carolina are particularly proud of our accomplishments as we prepare to celebrate, in 2006, the 100th anniversary of game and fish law enforcement and management by the state of South Carolina. Since its inception, the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR) has undergone several reorganizations and name changes; however, more has changed in this state than the department’s name. According to the US Census Bureau, the South Carolina’s population has almost doubled since 1950 and the majority of our citizens now live in urban areas.