DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix to Taxonomic Revision of Leopold and Rudolf Blaschkas' Glass Models of Invertebrates 1888 Catalogue, with Correction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

http://www.natsca.org

Journal of Natural Science Collections

Title: Appendix to Taxonomic revision of Leopold and Rudolf Blaschkas’ Glass Models of Invertebrates 1888 Catalogue, with correction of authorities

Author(s): Callaghan, E., Egger, B., Doyle, H., & E. G. Reynaud Source: Callaghan, E., Egger, B., Doyle, H., & E. G. Reynaud. (2020). Appendix to Taxonomic revision of Leopold and Rudolf Blaschkas’ Glass Models of Invertebrates 1888 Catalogue, with correction of

authorities. Journal of Natural Science Collections, Volume 7, .

URL: http://www.natsca.org/article/2587

NatSCA supports open access publication as part of its mission is to promote and support natural science collections. NatSCA uses the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ for all works we publish. Under CCAL authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles in NatSCA publications, so long as the original authors and source are cited.

TABLE 3 – Callaghan et al.

WARD

AUTHORITY

(Ward Catalogue 1888)
TAXONOMY
N°

  • ORIGINAL SPECIES NAME
  • REVISED SPECIES NAME
  • REVISED AUTHORITY

Coelenterata
Anthozoa

  • Alcyonaria
  • 1

2

Alcyonium digitatum

Linnaeus, 1758 Pallas, 1766

Alcyonium palmatum

34

Alcyonium stellatum Anthelia glauca

Milne-Edwards Savigny

[?] Sarcophyton stellatum

Kükenthal, 1910 Lamarck, 1816 Linnaeus, 1758

5

Corallium rubrum

Lamarck

6

Gorgonia verrucosa Kophobelemon (Umbellularia) stelliferum Paralcyonium elegans Pennatula phosphorea Pennatula rubra

Pallas, 1766 Müller, 1766 EdwardsandHaime Ellis

[?] Eunicella verrucosa

78

Paralcyonium spinulosum

Delle Chiaje, 1822 Linnaeus, 1758

910 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Ellis, 1761

Pteroeides griseum

  • Bohadsch
  • Linnaeus, 1767

Renilla violacea

Quoy and Gaimard Lesson, 1834 Ehrenberg, 1834 Ehrenberg

ND ND

Spongodes celIiosa Sympodium caeruleum Sympodium purpurascens Tubipora Hemprichii Veretillium cynomoium Virgularia mirabilis

Ehrenberg, 1834 Pallas, 1766 Müller, 1766

Coelenterata
Anthozoa

  • Zoantharia
  • 19

20 21 22 23 24

Xenia umbellata

  • Savigny
  • Lamarck, 1816

Actinaria Hemprichii

Ehrenberg, 1834 Risso

Megalactis hemprichii

  • [?] Actinia cari
  • Actinia concentrica

Delle Chiaje, 1822 Linnaeus, 1758 [Tugwell, 1856] [Rapp, 1829]

Actinia mesembrianthemum var rubra Actinia mesembrianthemum var fragacea Actinia diaphana

Forbes, 1758 Gosse, 1829 Rapp

Actinia equina Actinia fragracea Aiptasia diaphana

1

TABLE 3 – Callaghan et al.

25 26 27 28 29

Actinia chromatodera

Schmarda Heller

Paranthus chromatoderus Paranemonia cinerea

[Schmarda, 1852] Contarini, 1844 Linnaeus, 1767 Linnaeus, 1767

Actinia Contarinii Actinoloba Dianth Ellis var rubida Actinoloba Dianthus Ellis var brunnea Actinoloba Dianthus Ellis var sindonea

Gosse

Synonym for Metridium senile Synonym for Metridium senile Synonym for Metridium senile

Gosse

  • Gosse
  • Linnaeus, 1767

Hemprich and Ehrenberg in Ehrenberg 1834

30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44

Actinoloba Paumotensis Actinoloba reticulata

(Couthouy) Dana (Couthouy) Dana (Drayton) Dana 1847 Johnston Gosse

[?] Synonym for Heteractis crispa Antholoba achates

Drayton in Dana, 1846

  • Actinoloba achates
  • Antholoba achates

Adamsia palliata

Fabricius, 1779 Gravenhorst, 1831 Pennant, 1777 Forsskål, 1775 Pennant, 1777

  • Aiptasia Couchii
  • Aiptasia mutabilis

Anemonia sulcata Anemonia viridis Anemonia sulcata
Anthea Cereus, Johnst. var amaragdina Anthea Cereus var maxima Anthea Cereus var alabastrina Arachnactis albida

Gosse Gosse Gosse Sars, 1846 Gosse

  • Aureliana Augusta
  • Ambiguous synonym for A. heterocera

Capnea sanguinea

Forbes, 1841 Forbes, 1841 Gosse, 1860 Johnston, 1832 Cocks, 1851

Aureliana heterocera

Gosse

Bolocera Eques

Gosse

Synonym for Urticina felina
Bolocera Tuediae

(Johnston) Gosse Gosse

Bunodes Ballii, Cocks, var. rosea Bunodes Ballii, Cocks, var. dealbata
Anthopleura ballii Anthopleura ballii

  • Gosse
  • Cocks, 1851

Hemprich and Ehrenberg in Ehrenberg, 1834

45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54

Bunodes crispa

Ehrenberg

Synonym for Heteractis crispa Parantheopsis cruentata Hormathia coronata Aulactinia verrucosa Aulactinia verrucosa Anthopleura thallia
Bunodes cruentata Bunodes coronata Bunodes gemmacea Bunodes gemmacea var Bunodes thallia

(Couthouy) Dana, 1846 Gosse, 1858

  • (Ellis) Gosse
  • Pennant, 1777

  • Pennant, 1778
  • Sowerby, Gosse

Gosse, 1854

Calliactis decorata Capnea sanguinea Cerianthus Lloydii Cerianthus membranaceus

(Couthouy) Dana, 1846 Johnston

Calliactis polypus

Forbes, 1841
Gosse, 1859

  • Haime
  • Spallanzanii, 1784

2

TABLE 3 – Callaghan et al.

55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84

Corynactis clavigera Corynactis quadricoloor Corynactis viridis

Drayton

Staurachis clavigera

[Drayton in Dana, 1846]

  • Ruppell and Leukart, 1828
  • Leuckart and Rüppell

Allman 1846 Gosse

Entacmaea quadricolor
Edwardsia (Milnea) callimorpha Edwardsia (Milnea) carnea Edwardsia vestita
Edwardsia claparedi Edwardsiella carnea

ND

Panceri, 1869
Gosse, 1856 Forbes

Evactis artemisia

Drayton

Anthopleura artemisia

Drayton in Dana, 1846 Peach in Johnston, 1847 Muller, 1776

Gregoria fenestrata Halcampa chrysanthellum Heterodactyla Hemprichii Hormanthia Margaritae Ilyanthus Mitchelli Ilyanthus scoticus

Gosse, 1860 Gosse Ehrenberg 1834 Gosse

Hormathia digitata

Gosse

Mesacmaea mitchelli

Forbes 1840 Drayton

Nemactis primula

[Drayton in Dana,1846]

Palythoa auricula

Lesueur, 1817 Ehrenberg Ehrenberg Ehrenberg

Gosse

Species inquirenda ND

Paractis adhaerens Paractis erythrosoma Paractis olivacea
[?] Synonym for Entacmaea quadricolor

ND

Ruppell and Leukart, 1828

  • Peachia hastata
  • Peachia boeckii

Peachia boeckii Peachia boeckii Cataphellia brodricii

Danielssen Koren, 1856 Danielssen and Koren, 1856 Danielssen and Koren, 1856

Peachia triphylla

Gosse

Peachia undata

Gosse

Phellia Brodrichii

Gosse, 1859 Gosse, 1858 Gosse, 1858 Gosse

Phellia gausapata Phellia murocincta

  • Phellia picta
  • Sagartiogeton laceratus

Phymactis clematis

Dalyell, 1848

Phyllactis praetexta Phymactis florida

Couthouy in Dana 1846 (Drayton) Dana Drayton
Drayton in Dana, 1846 Drayton in Dana, 1846 Couthouy in Dana, 1846 Drayton in Dana, 1846

Phymactis clematis Phymactis pustulata Phymactis diadema

Couthouy Drayton

Bunodosoma diadema

3

TABLE 3 – Callaghan et al.

Hemprich and Ehrenberg in Ehrenberg,

85

Phymanthus loligo

Ehrenberg

1834 Hemprich and Ehrenberg in Ehrenberg,

86 87

Rhodactis rhodostoma Saccanthus purpurascens Sagartia bellis E, var tyriensis Sagartia bellis E, var punctata Sagartia fuegiensis

Ehrenberg Milne-Edwards, 1857 Gosse

1834

Cerianthus membranaceus

Cereus pedunculatus Cereus pedunculatus Antholoba achates

[Gmelin, 1791]

88

Pennant, 1777

89

Schmarda (Couthouy) Dana (Drayton) Dana Gosse
Pennant, 1777

90

Drayton in Dana, 1846 [Couthouy in Dana, 1846] Cocks in Johnston, 1847 Dalyell, 1848

91

  • Sagartia impatiens
  • Choriactis impatiens

Chrysoela chrysoplenium Sagartiogeton laceratus

92

Sagartia chrysosplenium Sagartia coccinea

93

Gosse

94

Sagartia ichthyostoma Sagartia miniata

Gosse, 1858 Gosse

95

Synonym for Sagartia elegans Sagartia elegans

Dalyell, 1848

96

Sagartia nivea

  • Gosse
  • Dalyell, 1848

97

Sagartia pallida

Gosse

Metridium senile

Linnaeus, 1761 [Couch, 1842] Dalyell, 1848

98

Sagartia parasitica

Gosse

Calliactis parasitica [?] Sagartia elegans [?] Nemactis rubas Actinothoe sphyrodeta Sagartia aurora

99

Sagartia rosea

Gosse

100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114

Sagartia rubus

Drayton Gosse, 1858 Gosse, 1853 Gosse
[Drayton in Dana, 1846]

Sagartia sphyrodeta Sagartia troglodytes var aurora Sagartia troglodytes var melanoleuca Sagartia ornata
Sagartia troglodytes

Price in Johnston, 1847
Holdsworth, 1855 Gosse

  • Sagartia venusta
  • Sagartia elegans

Dalyell, 1848

Sagartia viduata var aleurops Sagartia viduata var anguicoma Stomphia Churchiae

Gosse

Sagartiogeton viduatus Sagartiogeton viduatus Urticina felina

Müller, 1776

  • Price
  • Müller, 1776

  • Gosse
  • Linnaeus, 1767

Müller, 1776

Tealia crassicornis var purpurea Tealia crassicornis var meloides Tealia crassicornis var rubrocincta Tealia gemma

Gosse

Urticina crassicornis Urticina crassicornis Urticina crassicornis [?] Actinia gemma Hormathia digitata Phymanthea pluvia

  • Gosse
  • Müller, 1776

  • Gosse
  • Müller, 1776

Drayton Gosse
[Drayton in Dana, 1846] [Müller, 1776] [Drayton in Dana, 1846]

Tealia digitata Tealia pluvia

Drayton

4

TABLE 3 – Callaghan et al.

115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125

Thalassianthus aster Ulactis muscosa

Klunzinger (Drayton) Dana, 1846 Gosse
Rüppell and Leuckart, 1828 [Johnston in Couch, 1844]

Oulactis mucosa

  • Zoanthus Couchii
  • Epizoanthus couchii

Zoanthus SolanderI

Lesueur, 1817 Pallas, 1766 Michelin

Astroides calycularis Balanophyllia italica Balanophyllia regia
[?] Balanophyllia europaea

Risso, 1826
Gosse, 1853 Gosse

Caryophyllia Smithii var clara Caryophyllia Smithii var castanea Cladocora cespitosa Dendrophyllia ramea
Caryophyllia Smithii Caryophyllia Smithii

Stokes and Broderip, 1828 Stokes and Broderip, 1829 Linnaeus, 1767
Gosse Lamarck

  • Blainville
  • Linnaeus, 1758

Coelenterata
Anthozoa

  • Calycozoa
  • 126

127 128

Lucernaria auricula

[Fabricius, 1780] Lamouroux, 1815 Müller 1776
Manania auricula [alternate representation]

Lucernaria campanulata Lucernaria quadricornis

Leucernariopsis campanulata [alternate representation]

Coelenterata Hydromedusae

  • Hydroidea
  • 129

130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140

Aegina citrea

Eschscholtz, 1829 Eschscholtz

  • Aegina rosea
  • Aegina citrea

Eschscholtz, 1829 Blainville, 1834

Aegineta sol maris

Gegenbaur, 1856 Peron and Lesueur Agassiz, 1862 (Peron) Forbes Milne-Edwards Allman

Aequorea cyanea

ND

Aequorea albida Aequorea Forskalea Aequorea violacea

Péron and Lesueur, 1810 [Pallas, 1776]

[?] Distichopona violacea
Bougainvillia fruiticosa Bougainvillia superciliaris Carmarina hastata (male) Carmarina hastata (female) Carmarina hastata (development stages)
Bougainvillia muscus

Allman, 1776
Agassiz, 1849 Haeckel

Geryonia proboscidalis Geryonia proboscidalis Geryonia proboscidalis

Forsskål, 1775 Forsskål, 1775 Forsskål, 1775
Haeckel Haeckel

5

TABLE 3 – Callaghan et al.

141 141a 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169

Cladonema radiatum (development stages) Cladonema radiatum (adult medusa) Clava squamata

Dujardin, 1843 Dujardin, 1843 (Müller) Allman (Hincks) Allman Agassiz

Clava multicornis

Forsskål, 1775

Clavatella prolifera Clytia poterium
Eleutheria dichotoma Orthopyxis integra [?] Phialella quadrata

De Quatrefages, 1842 MacGillivray, 1842

Clytia aeronautica

Forbes, 1848 Sars 1835

Corymorpha nutans Crematostoma flava Cunina campanulata Cunina vitrea

Agassiz

Aequorea victoria

Murbach andShearer, 1902 Péron and Lesueur, 1809
Eschscholtz Gegenbaur, 1856 Eschscholtz Linnaeus, 1758 Wright, 1859 Haeckel

ND

Eirene viridula Eudendrium ramosum Garveia nutans Glossocodon eurybia Gossea Corynetes
Liriope tetraphylla Dicoryne conybearii

Chamisso and Eysenhardt, 1821

  • Gosse, 1853
  • Agassiz

Heterocordyle Conybearei Hydractinia echinata Lafoea calcarata

[Allman, 1864] Fleming, 1828 Agassiz

Laodicea undulata Earleria cellularia

Forbes and Goodsir, 1853

Laodicea cellularia Laomedea amphora Liriope appendiculata Liriope tetraphylla

[Agassiz, 1862] Agassiz, 1862 Forbes

ND

  • Chamisso
  • Chamisso and Eysenhardt, 1821

Lizzia blondina

Forbes, 1848 Gegenbaur Forbes

  • Lizzia Koellikerii
  • Koellikerina fasciculata

Rathkea octopunctata Melicertum octocostatum Modeeria rotunda

Péron and Lesueur, 1810 [Sars, 1835]

Lizzia octopunctata Melicertum campanula Modeeria formosa Obelia dichotoma

Eschscholtz Forbes
M. Sars, 1835 Quoy and Gaimard, 1827
Linnaeus, 1758 Peron

Obelia sphaerulina Oceania phosphorica

ND

(Peron) Agassiz

[?] Olindias phosphorica

[Delle Chiaje, 1848]

6

TABLE 3 – Callaghan et al.

170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 191a 192 193 194 195 196 197

Pandea flavidula

Peron and Lesueur Forbes, 1848 Allman

Aurelia aurita

Linnaeus, 1758 Fleming, 1823

Recommended publications
  • Diversity and Community Structure of Pelagic Cnidarians in the Celebes and Sulu Seas, Southeast Asian Tropical Marginal Seas

    Diversity and Community Structure of Pelagic Cnidarians in the Celebes and Sulu Seas, Southeast Asian Tropical Marginal Seas

    Deep-Sea Research I 100 (2015) 54–63 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Deep-Sea Research I journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/dsri Diversity and community structure of pelagic cnidarians in the Celebes and Sulu Seas, southeast Asian tropical marginal seas Mary M. Grossmann a,n, Jun Nishikawa b, Dhugal J. Lindsay c a Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (OIST), Tancha 1919-1, Onna-son, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan b Tokai University, 3-20-1, Orido, Shimizu, Shizuoka 424-8610, Japan c Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokosuka 237-0061, Japan article info abstract Article history: The Sulu Sea is a semi-isolated, marginal basin surrounded by high sills that greatly reduce water inflow Received 13 September 2014 at mesopelagic depths. For this reason, the entire water column below 400 m is stable and homogeneous Received in revised form with respect to salinity (ca. 34.00) and temperature (ca. 10 1C). The neighbouring Celebes Sea is more 19 January 2015 open, and highly influenced by Pacific waters at comparable depths. The abundance, diversity, and Accepted 1 February 2015 community structure of pelagic cnidarians was investigated in both seas in February 2000. Cnidarian Available online 19 February 2015 abundance was similar in both sampling locations, but species diversity was lower in the Sulu Sea, Keywords: especially at mesopelagic depths. At the surface, the cnidarian community was similar in both Tropical marginal seas, but, at depth, community structure was dependent first on sampling location Marginal sea and then on depth within each Sea. Cnidarians showed different patterns of dominance at the two Sill sampling locations, with Sulu Sea communities often dominated by species that are rare elsewhere in Pelagic cnidarians fi Community structure the Indo-Paci c.
  • Frontiers in Zoology Biomed Central

    Frontiers in Zoology Biomed Central

    Frontiers in Zoology BioMed Central Research Open Access Functional chloroplasts in metazoan cells - a unique evolutionary strategy in animal life Katharina Händeler*1, Yvonne P Grzymbowski1, Patrick J Krug2 and Heike Wägele1 Address: 1Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany and 2Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Los Angeles, California, 90032-8201, USA Email: Katharina Händeler* - [email protected]; Yvonne P Grzymbowski - [email protected]; Patrick J Krug - [email protected]; Heike Wägele - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 1 December 2009 Received: 26 June 2009 Accepted: 1 December 2009 Frontiers in Zoology 2009, 6:28 doi:10.1186/1742-9994-6-28 This article is available from: http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/6/1/28 © 2009 Händeler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: Among metazoans, retention of functional diet-derived chloroplasts (kleptoplasty) is known only from the sea slug taxon Sacoglossa (Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia). Intracellular maintenance of plastids in the slug's digestive epithelium has long attracted interest given its implications for understanding the evolution of endosymbiosis. However, photosynthetic ability varies widely among sacoglossans; some species have no plastid retention while others survive for months solely on photosynthesis. We present a molecular phylogenetic hypothesis for the Sacoglossa and a survey of kleptoplasty from representatives of all major clades. We sought to quantify variation in photosynthetic ability among lineages, identify phylogenetic origins of plastid retention, and assess whether kleptoplasty was a key character in the radiation of the Sacoglossa.
  • Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission

    Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission

    CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY OF THE BUREAU OF FISHERIES AT WOODS HOLE, ~ASS. THE MEDUSA: OF THE WOODS HOLE REGION. By CHARLES V\T. HARGITT, Professor ofZoolo;ry, Syracuse University. 21 Blank page retained for pagination CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY OP THE BUREAU OP P\SHERIES AT WOODS HOLE, MASSACHUSETTS. -THE MEDUSA3 OF THE WOODS HOLE REGION. By CHARLES W. HARGITT, Professor 0./Zoology, Syracuse Unioersity, INTRODUCTION. The present report forms one of ~ series projected by the director of the biological laboratory of the United States Bureau of Fisheries, the primary object being' to afford such a biological survey of the region as will bring within easy reach of students and working naturalists a synopsis of the character and distribution of its fauna. The work whieh forms the basis of this paper was carried on during the summers of 1£101 and 1902, including also a brief collecting reconnaissance during the early spring of the latter year, thus enabling me to complete a record of observations upon the medusoid fauna during every month of the year, with daily records during most of the time. For parts of these records during late fall and winter I am chiefly indebted to Mr. Vinal N. Fdwurds, which it is a pleasure hereby to acknowledge. It is also a pleasure to acknowledge the cordial cooperation of the Commissioner, Hon. George M. Bowers, and of Dr. H. M. Smith, director of 'the laboratory ill HI01 and 1902. Most of the drawings have been made directly from life by the writer or under hili personal direction.
  • Champions of the Gods

    Champions of the Gods

    Champions of the Gods Champions of the Gods by Warren Merrifield 1 Champions of the Gods Copyright ©2006 Warren Merrifield. This is an entry into the Iron Game Chef ‘06 competition. It uses the ingredients Ancient, Committee and Emotion, and is designed to be played in four two–hour sessions. Typeset in Garamond and Copperplate. Created with Apple Pages software on a G5 iMac. Contact me at [email protected] 2 Champions of the Gods Map of the Ancient Greek World 3 Champions of the Gods Introduction This is my Iron Game Chef ‘06 Entry. It uses the ingredients Ancient, Committee and Emotion, and is designed to be run in four two–hour sessions with between three and five participants. There is no Gamesmaster. I am no authority on Ancient Greece and its myths, so please indulge me any inaccuracies that I may have presented here. Background The Ancient Greek World, during the Age of Gods and Men: Zeus, father of all the Gods has decided that he wants a new religious festival for the Mortals to honour him. He has declared that it will be known as the “Olympics” and shall be held in the most worthy city–state in all of the Greek World — anywhere from Iberia to the Black Sea. But there are more city–states than Zeus can be bothered to remember, so to discover which is most worthy, he has chosen a number of his Godly offspring to do it for him. They will be known as the “Mount Olympus Committee”, and will report back in four mortal years, or Zeus shall rip all of Creation asunder.
  • The Evolution of Siphonophore Tentilla for Specialized Prey Capture in the Open Ocean

    The Evolution of Siphonophore Tentilla for Specialized Prey Capture in the Open Ocean

    The evolution of siphonophore tentilla for specialized prey capture in the open ocean Alejandro Damian-Serranoa,1, Steven H. D. Haddockb,c, and Casey W. Dunna aDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520; bResearch Division, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, CA 95039; and cEcology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 Edited by Jeremy B. C. Jackson, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, and approved December 11, 2020 (received for review April 7, 2020) Predator specialization has often been considered an evolutionary makes them an ideal system to study the relationships between “dead end” due to the constraints associated with the evolution of functional traits and prey specialization. Like a head of coral, a si- morphological and functional optimizations throughout the organ- phonophore is a colony bearing many feeding polyps (Fig. 1). Each ism. However, in some predators, these changes are localized in sep- feeding polyp has a single tentacle, which branches into a series of arate structures dedicated to prey capture. One of the most extreme tentilla. Like other cnidarians, siphonophores capture prey with cases of this modularity can be observed in siphonophores, a clade of nematocysts, harpoon-like stinging capsules borne within special- pelagic colonial cnidarians that use tentilla (tentacle side branches ized cells known as cnidocytes. Unlike the prey-capture apparatus of armed with nematocysts) exclusively for prey capture. Here we study most other cnidarians, siphonophore tentacles carry their cnidocytes how siphonophore specialists and generalists evolve, and what mor- in extremely complex and organized batteries (3), which are located phological changes are associated with these transitions.
  • A Radical Solution: the Phylogeny of the Nudibranch Family Fionidae

    A Radical Solution: the Phylogeny of the Nudibranch Family Fionidae

    RESEARCH ARTICLE A Radical Solution: The Phylogeny of the Nudibranch Family Fionidae Kristen Cella1, Leila Carmona2*, Irina Ekimova3,4, Anton Chichvarkhin3,5, Dimitry Schepetov6, Terrence M. Gosliner1 1 Department of Invertebrate Zoology, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California, United States of America, 2 Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden, 3 Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia, 4 Biological Faculty, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, 5 A.V. Zhirmunsky Instutute of Marine Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia, 6 National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia a11111 * [email protected] Abstract Tergipedidae represents a diverse and successful group of aeolid nudibranchs, with approx- imately 200 species distributed throughout most marine ecosystems and spanning all bio- OPEN ACCESS geographical regions of the oceans. However, the systematics of this family remains poorly Citation: Cella K, Carmona L, Ekimova I, understood since no modern phylogenetic study has been undertaken to support any of the Chichvarkhin A, Schepetov D, Gosliner TM (2016) A Radical Solution: The Phylogeny of the proposed classifications. The present study is the first molecular phylogeny of Tergipedidae Nudibranch Family Fionidae. PLoS ONE 11(12): based on partial sequences of two mitochondrial (COI and 16S) genes and one nuclear e0167800. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167800 gene (H3). Maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony and Bayesian analysis were con- Editor: Geerat J. Vermeij, University of California, ducted in order to elucidate the systematics of this family. Our results do not recover the tra- UNITED STATES ditional Tergipedidae as monophyletic, since it belongs to a larger clade that includes the Received: July 7, 2016 families Eubranchidae, Fionidae and Calmidae.
  • Genetic Identification of Octopodidae Species in Southern California Seafood Markets: Species Diversity and Resource Implications

    Genetic Identification of Octopodidae Species in Southern California Seafood Markets: Species Diversity and Resource Implications

    Genetic Identification of Octopodidae Species in Southern California Seafood Markets: Species Diversity and Resource Implications Chase Martin Center for Marine Biodiversity and Conservation Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California San Diego Abstract Various species of Octopodidae are commonly found in seafood markets throughout Southern California. Most of the octopus available for purchase is imported, with the majority of imports coming from various Asian nations. Despite the diversity of global octopus species, products are most commonly labeled as simply “octopus,” with some distinctions being made in size, e.g., “baby” or “little octopus.” In efforts to characterize species diversity, this study genetically tested 59 octopus samples from a variety of seafood markets in Los Angeles, Orange, and San Diego Counties. Universal 16S rRNA primers (ref) and CO1 primers developed by Folmer et al. (1994) were used for PCR amplification and sequencing of mtDNA. In all, 105 sequences were acquired. Seven species were identified with some confidence. Amphioctopus aegina was the most prevalent species, while two additional species were undetermined. Little available data exists pertaining to octopus fisheries of the countries of production of the samples. Most available information on octopus fisheries pertains to those of Mediterranean and North African nations, and identifies the Octopus vulgaris as the fished species. Characterizing octopus diversity in Southern California seafood markets and assessing labeling and countries of production provides the necessary first step for assessing the possible management implications of these fisheries and seafood supply chain logistics for this group of cephalopods. Introduction Octopuses are exclusively marine cephalopod mollusks that form the order Octopoda.
  • Nudibranchia: Flabellinidae) from the Red and Arabian Seas

    Nudibranchia: Flabellinidae) from the Red and Arabian Seas

    Ruthenica, 2020, vol. 30, No. 4: 183-194. © Ruthenica, 2020 Published online October 1, 2020. http: ruthenica.net Molecular data and updated morphological description of Flabellina rubrolineata (Nudibranchia: Flabellinidae) from the Red and Arabian seas Irina A. EKIMOVA1,5, Tatiana I. ANTOKHINA2, Dimitry M. SCHEPETOV1,3,4 1Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory 1-12, 119234 Moscow, RUSSIA; 2A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Leninskiy prosp. 33, 119071 Moscow, RUSSIA; 3N.K. Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology RAS, Vavilov str. 26, 119334 Moscow, RUSSIA; 4Moscow Power Engineering Institute (MPEI, National Research University), 111250 Krasnokazarmennaya 14, Moscow, RUSSIA. 5Corresponding author; E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Flabellina rubrolineata was believed to have a wide distribution range, being reported from the Mediterranean Sea (non-native), the Red Sea, the Indian Ocean and adjacent seas, and the Indo-West Pacific and from Australia to Hawaii. In the present paper, we provide a redescription of Flabellina rubrolineata, based on specimens collected near the type locality of this species in the Red Sea. The morphology of this species was studied using anatomical dissections and scanning electron microscopy. To place this species in the phylogenetic framework and test the identity of other specimens of F. rubrolineata from the Indo-West Pacific we sequenced COI, H3, 16S and 28S gene fragments and obtained phylogenetic trees based on Bayesian and Maximum likelihood inferences. Our morphological and molecular results show a clear separation of F. rubrolineata from the Red Sea from its relatives in the Indo-West Pacific. We suggest that F. rubrolineata is restricted to only the Red Sea, the Arabian Sea and the Mediterranean Sea and to West Indian Ocean, while specimens from other regions belong to a complex of pseudocryptic species.
  • Phidiana Lynceus Berghia Coerulescens Doto Koenneckeri

    Phidiana Lynceus Berghia Coerulescens Doto Koenneckeri

    Cuthona abronia Cuthona divae Austraeolis stearnsi Flabellina exoptata Flabellina fusca Calma glaucoides Hermosita hakunamatata Learchis poica Anteaeolidiella oliviae Aeolidiopsis ransoni Phidiana militaris Baeolidia moebii Facelina annulicornis Protaeolidiella juliae Moridilla brockii Noumeaella isa Cerberilla sp. 3 Cerberilla bernadettae Aeolidia sp. A Aeolidia sp. B Baeolidia sp. A Baeolidia sp. B Cerberilla sp. A Cerberilla sp. B Cerberilla sp. C Facelina sp. C Noumeaella sp. A Noumeaella sp. B Facelina sp. A Marionia blainvillea Aeolidia papillosa Hermissenda crassicornis Flabellina babai Dirona albolineata Doto sp. 15 Marionia sp. 10 Marionia sp. 5 Tritonia sp. 4 Lomanotus sp. E Piseinotecus sp. Dendronotus regius Favorinus elenalexiarum Janolus mirabilis Marionia levis Phyllodesmium horridum Tritonia pickensi Babakina indopacifica Marionia sp. B Godiva banyulensis Caloria elegans Favorinus brachialis Flabellina baetica 1 Facelinidae sp. A Godiva quadricolor 0.99 Limenandra fusiformis Limenandra sp. C 0.71 Limenandra sp. B 0.91 Limenandra sp. A Baeolidia nodosa 0.99 Crosslandia daedali Scyllaea pelagica Notobryon panamica Notobryon thompsoni 0.98 Notobryon sp. B Notobryon sp. C Notobryon sp. D Notobryon wardi 0.97 Tritonia sp. 3 Marionia arborescens 0.96 Hancockia cf. uncinata Hancockia californica 0.94 Spurilla chromosoma Pteraeolidia ianthina 0.92 Noumeaella sp. 3 Noumeaella rehderi 0.92 Nanuca sebastiani 0.97 Dondice occidentalis Dondice parguerensis 0.92 Pruvotfolia longicirrha Pruvotfolia pselliotes 0.88 Marionia sp. 14 Tritonia sp. G 0.87 Bonisa nakaza 0.87 Janolus sp. 2 0.82 Janolus sp. 1 Janolus sp. 7 Armina sp. 3 0.83 Armina neapolitana 0.58 Armina sp. 9 0.78 Dermatobranchus sp. 16 0.52 Dermatobranchus sp. 21 0.86 Dermatobranchus sp.
  • STONEFLY NAMES from CLASSICAL TIMES W. E. Ricker

    STONEFLY NAMES from CLASSICAL TIMES W. E. Ricker

    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Perla Jahr/Year: 1996 Band/Volume: 14 Autor(en)/Author(s): Ricker William E. Artikel/Article: Stonefly names from classical times 37-43 STONEFLY NAMES FROM CLASSICAL TIMES W. E. Ricker Recently I amused myself by checking the stonefly names that seem to be based on the names of real or mythological persons or localities of ancient Greece and Rome. I had copies of Bulfinch’s "Age of Fable," Graves; "Greek Myths," and an "Atlas of the Ancient World," all of which have excellent indexes; also Brown’s "Composition of Scientific Words," And I have had assistance from several colleagues. It turned out that among the stonefly names in lilies’ 1966 Katalog there are not very many that appear to be classical, although I may have failed to recognize a few. There were only 25 in all, and to get even that many I had to fudge a bit. Eleven of the names had been proposed by Edward Newman, an English student of neuropteroids who published around 1840. What follows is a list of these names and associated events or legends, giving them an entomological slant whenever possible. Greek names are given in the latinized form used by Graves, for example Lycus rather than Lykos. I have not listed descriptive words like Phasganophora (sword-bearer) unless they are also proper names. Also omitted are geographical names, no matter how ancient, if they are easily recognizable today — for example caucasica or helenica. alexanderi Hanson 1941, Leuctra.
  • The Form and Function of the Hypertrophied Tentacle of Deep-Sea Jelly Atolla Spp

    The Form and Function of the Hypertrophied Tentacle of Deep-Sea Jelly Atolla Spp

    The Form and Function of the Hypertrophied Tentacle of Deep-Sea Jelly Atolla spp. Alexis Walker, University of California Santa Cruz Mentors: Bruce Robison, Rob Sherlock, Kristine Walz, and Henk-Jan Hoving, George Matsumoto Summer 2011 Keywords: Atolla, tentacle, histology, SEM, hypertrophied ABSTRACT In situ observations and species collection via remotely operated vehicle, laboratory observations, and structural microscopy were used with the objective to shed light on the form and subsequently the function of the hypertrophied tentacle exhibited by some Atolla species. Based upon the density of nematocysts, length, movement, and ultrastructure of the hypertrophied tentacle, the function of the tentacle is likely reproductive, sensory, and/or utilized in food acquisition. INTRODUCTION The meso- and bathypelagic habitats are of the largest and least known on the planet. They are extreme environments, characterized by high atmospheric pressure, zero to low light levels, scarcity of food sources, and cold water that is low in oxygen content. Animals that live and even thrive in these habitats exhibit unique characteristics enabling them to survive in such seemingly inhospitable conditions. One such organism, the deep- sea medusa of the genus Atolla, trails a singular elongated tentacle, morphologically 1 distinct from the marginal tentacles. This structure, often referred to as a trailing or hypertrophied tentacle, is unique within the cnidarian phylum. Ernst Haeckel described the first species of this deep pelagic jelly, Atolla wyvillei, during the 1872-1876 HMS Challenger Expedition. In the subsequent 135 years, the genus Atolla has expanded to several species not yet genetically established, which have been observed in all of the worlds oceans (Russell 1970).
  • A Case Study with the Monospecific Genus Aegina

    A Case Study with the Monospecific Genus Aegina

    MARINE BIOLOGY RESEARCH, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000.2016.1268261 ORIGINAL ARTICLE The perils of online biogeographic databases: a case study with the ‘monospecific’ genus Aegina (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa, Narcomedusae) Dhugal John Lindsaya,b, Mary Matilda Grossmannc, Bastian Bentlaged,e, Allen Gilbert Collinsd, Ryo Minemizuf, Russell Ross Hopcroftg, Hiroshi Miyakeb, Mitsuko Hidaka-Umetsua,b and Jun Nishikawah aEnvironmental Impact Assessment Research Group, Research and Development Center for Submarine Resources, Japan Agency for Marine- Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokosuka, Japan; bLaboratory of Aquatic Ecology, School of Marine Bioscience, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Japan; cMarine Biophysics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology (OIST), Onna, Japan; dDepartment of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA; eMarine Laboratory, University of Guam, Mangilao, USA; fRyo Minemizu Photo Office, Shimizu, Japan; gInstitute of Marine Science, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Alaska, USA; hDepartment of Marine Biology, Tokai University, Shizuoka, Japan ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Online biogeographic databases are increasingly being used as data sources for scientific papers Received 23 May 2016 and reports, for example, to characterize global patterns and predictors of marine biodiversity and Accepted 28 November 2016 to identify areas of ecological significance in the open oceans and deep seas. However, the utility RESPONSIBLE EDITOR of such databases is entirely dependent on the quality of the data they contain. We present a case Stefania Puce study that evaluated online biogeographic information available for a hydrozoan narcomedusan jellyfish, Aegina citrea. This medusa is considered one of the easiest to identify because it is one of KEYWORDS very few species with only four large tentacles protruding from midway up the exumbrella and it Biogeography databases; is the only recognized species in its genus.