Resin Identification Code - Wikipedia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Types of Plastic and Their Recycle Codes | Quality Logo Products®
7/24/2018 Types of Plastic and Their Recycle Codes | Quality Logo Products® Product Search Your privacy will be protected by redirecting your search to Search Encrypt. Learn More X ALL ABOUT MATERIALS Types of Plastic and Their Recycle Codes Other Lessons in This Course Types of Plastic Plastic is an essential component of many items, including water bottles, combs, and beverage containers. Knowing the difference, as well as the SPI codes, will help you make more informed decisions about recycling. The seven types of plastic include: Polyethylene Terephthalate (PETE or PET) High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Miscellaneous plastics (includes: polycarbonate, polylactide, acrylic, acrylonitrile butadiene, styrene, fiberglass, and nylon) When it comes to promotional giveaways, and even items we use around the house, there is no material more important than plastic. The same can be said for the items we use at the office. Most of our supplies contain at least a little bit of this material. In fact, humans have thus far produced 9.1 billion tons of plastic! For the sake of the environment, it’s important to know the different types of plastic and their uses, as well as the resin identification codes found on each for the sake of recycling. Recycling Codes for Plastic Understanding the different types of plastic can help consumers like you make more informed decisions related to your health and the environment. It’s important to become familiar with an item’s SPI (Society of the Plastics Industry) code, which is also known as a resin identification number and is used to classify the different types of plastic. -
Primary Microplastics in the Oceans: a Global Evaluation of Sources Authors: Julien Boucher, Damien Friot
Primary Microplastics in the Oceans: a Global Evaluation of Sources Authors: Julien Boucher, Damien Friot INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE Primary Microplastics in the Oceans: a Global Evaluation of Sources Authors: Julien Boucher, Damien Friot The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland Copyright: © 2017 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Boucher, J. and Friot D. (2017). Primary Microplastics in the Oceans: A Global Evaluation of Sources. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. 43pp. ISBN: 978-2-8317-1827-9 DOI: dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2017.01.en Authors: Julien Boucher EA – Shaping Environmental Action & University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland // HES-SO, HEIG-VD, Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland Damien Friot EA – Shaping Environmental Action www.shaping-ea.com [email protected] Editor: Carl Gustaf Lundin and João Matos de Sousa External reviewers: Francis Vorhies (Earthmind, http://earthmind.org) François Galgani (IFREMER, Laboratoire LER/PAC) Mathieu Pernice (University of Technology, Sydney) Doug Woodring (www.oceanrecov.org) Designed by: Imre Sebestyén jr. -
The Facts About Plastic Bags: Recyclable, Affordable, and Convenient
THE FACTS ABOUT PLASTIC BAGS: RECYCLABLE, AFFORDABLE, AND CONVENIENT Plastic bags are 100% recyclable, reusable, made from natural gas, not oil, and a sustainable choice for consumers, communities and businesses. What’s more, the plastic bag manufacturing and recycling industry is a uniquely American industry that employs more than 30,000 Americans in 349 plants across the country, including more than 1,000 people in Washington state. Bans and taxes on plastic bags are misguided policies that don’t make sense. They don’t help the environment, force less sustainable options, threaten local manufacturing jobs and raise grocery costs for consumers. Instead of banning a reusable, 100% recyclable, American-made product, recycling solutions can help reduce litter, give consumers a choice, and protect American jobs. Plastic grocery bags are the best checkout option for our environment On a per bag basis, plastic bags are more resource efficient, reduce landfill waste and generate fewer greenhouse gas emissions. o They take up a lot less space in a landfill: 1,000 plastic bags weigh 13 pounds; 1,000 paper bags weigh 114 pounds.i o They generate 80 % less waste than paper bags.ii American plastic bags are made from natural gas, NOT oil. In the U.S., 85 percent of the raw material used to make plastic bags is produced from natural gas.iii Recycled plastic bags are used to make new plastic bags and building products, such as backyard decks, playground equipment, and fences. Bans haven’t worked in other places, and don’t protect the environment A ban would make no difference in litter reduction since plastic bags only make up a tiny fraction (less than 0.5 %) of the U.S. -
Work Catalog
Your Partner In Safety -Since 1979- • Illness Prevention Signage BACK TO WORK • Disposable Clothing • Respiratory CATALOG Protection What you need to get back to work safely • Eye Protection • Disinfectants Back To Work Novel Coronavirus (nCoV) Infection Overview The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and World Health Organization (WHO) are closely monitoring an outbreak caused by a novel (new) coronavirus first identified in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. Chinese authorities iden- tified the new coronavirus, which has resulted in hundreds of confirmed cases in China, including cases outside Wuhan, with additional cases being identified in a growing number of countries internationally. These numbers will likely grow given the high amount of travel associated with the Lunar New Year holiday. It has been confirmed that the virus can spread from human to human although specific routes of transmission (i.e. airborne, direct contact, ingestion, etc.) have yet to be definitively determined. Common symptoms include runny nose, headache, cough, sore throat, fever, and a general feeling of being unwell. The CDC is providing the following precautions for health care providers: “Healthcare providers should obtain a detailed travel history for patients with fever and respiratory symptoms. For pa- tients who traveled to Wuhan on or after December 1, 2019 and had onset of illness within 2 weeks of leaving, consider the novel coronavirus outbreak in China when evaluating a patient with these symptoms and notify infection control per- sonnel and your local health department immediately. Although routes of transmission have yet to be definitively determined, CDC recommends a cautious approach to inter- acting with patients under investigation. -
Improving Plastics Management: Trends, Policy Responses, and the Role of International Co-Operation and Trade
Improving Plastics Management: Trends, policy responses, and the role of international co-operation and trade POLICY PERSPECTIVES OECD ENVIRONMENT POLICY PAPER NO. 12 OECD . 3 This Policy Paper comprises the Background Report prepared by the OECD for the G7 Environment, Energy and Oceans Ministers. It provides an overview of current plastics production and use, the environmental impacts that this is generating and identifies the reasons for currently low plastics recycling rates, as well as what can be done about it. Disclaimers This paper is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and the arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. For Israel, change is measured between 1997-99 and 2009-11. The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law. Copyright You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgment of OECD as source and copyright owner is given. -
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,702,110 B1
USOO670211 OB1 (12) UnitedO States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,702,110 B1 Flores, Jr. et al. (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 9, 2004 (54) DISC STORAGE CONTAINER 5,573,120 A 11/1996 Kaufman et al. ........... 206/755 5,574,716 A 11/1996 Uchida ....................... 369/291 w 5,584,391 A 12/1996 Weisburn (75) Inventors: Victor' E. SER 5,590,768 A 1/1997 Hilton et al. ............ 206/308.1 erdes, CA (US); Victorio M. Flores, 5,597,068 A 1/1997 Weisburn et al. ........ 206/308.1 III, San Pedro, CA (US); Ernst C. 5,615,779 A 4/1997 Marsilio et al. .............. 211/40 Benjamins, Covina, CA (US) 5,682,991. A 11/1997 Lammerant et al. ..... 206/308.1 5,690,218 A 11/1997 McCamy et al. ........... 206/303 (73) ASSignee: Ace Packaging, Inc., Lake Forest, CA D387,217 S 12/1997 Lakoski et al. .............. D6/407 (US) 5,713,463 A 2/1998 Lakoski et al. .......... 206/308.1 5,762,187 A 6/1998 Belden, Jr. et al. ...... 206/3O8.2 - - - - 5,779,038 A 7/1998 Herr et al. ............... 206/3O8.2 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 5,782,350 A 7/1998 Weisburn et al. ........ 206/3O8.2 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 5,788,068 A 8/1998 Fraser et al. ................ 206/310 U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. 5,794,796 A 8/1998 Weisburn ..................... 211/40 5,816,394 A 10/1998 O’Brien et al. .......... 206/308.1 5,829,582 A 11/1998 Ippolito et al. -
Brands Talk Sustainability: Exclusive M&S and Coca-Cola Interviews
VOLUME 13.1 – 2018 BRANDS TALK SUSTAINABILITY: EXCLUSIVE M&S AND COCA-COLA INTERVIEWS WHAT ARE THE DEFINING TRENDS OF 2018? SERIALISATION PERSPECTIVES MINIMALIST DESIGN: THE POWER OF SILENCE INTRODUCING THE DIGITAL NOMAD Cover image © Mehmet Gözetlik Head of Content Senior Account VOLUME 13.1 – 2018 Tim Sykes Managers Kevin Gambrill Editors Jesse Roberts Elisabeth Skoda Libby White Account Manager Dominic Kurkowski Head of Studio Gareth Harrey Executive Assistant Amber Dawson Art Editor Paul Holden-Abbott IT Support Syed Hassan Advertising Coordinator Kayleigh Harvey Data Manager 3 Editorial Tim Sykes Andrew Wood 5 M&S Interview Are we looking at a one-polymer future? 7 2018 Predictions This year’s defining trends in CPG and retail packaging 14 Smart Manufacturing Automation perspectives 17 Innovation Spotlight Pont brings twist to cap design Packaging Europe Ltd 18 Coca-Cola Interview Inside the new sustainability plan Part of the Rapid News Communications Group 20 Pharmapack The future is now Alkmaar House, Alkmaar Way, Norwich, Norfolk, NR6 6BF, UK 23 Bostik What if hotmelt adhesives could bring comfort and safety in your plant? Registered Office: Carlton House, Sandpiper Way, 25 Smurfit Kappa On-shelf differentiation in advance Chester Business Park, Chester, CH4 9QE. 28 Bioplastics EUBP Conference review Company No: 10531302. 31 ADF/PCD Paris Counting down to the next edition Registered in England. VAT Registration No. GB 265 4148 96 33 Prosweets Sweet solution 35 Ipack-Ima Ipack-Ima returns with new vision Telephone: +44 (0)1603 -
Plastic Industry Awareness of the Ocean Plastics Problem
Fueling Plastics Plastic Industry Awareness of the Ocean Plastics Problem • Scientists became aware of the ocean plastics problem in the 1950s, and understanding of the nature and severity of the problem grew over the next decades. • The major chemical and petroleum companies and industry groups were aware of the ocean plastics problem no later than the 1970s. • Plastics producers have often taken the position that they are only responsible for plastic waste in the form of resin pellets, and that other forms of plastic waste are out of their control. The use of plastics in consumer resins and the fossil fuel companies the twentieth century. Early observ- goods has been expanding exponen- supplying them with chemical feed- ers concerned about marine plas- tially since the late 1940s. Within stocks — have known about this tics were specifically worried about years of that expansion beginning, problem and for how long. The re- marine animals becoming entan- observers began to document plas- mainder of this document presents a gled in discarded fishing gear and tic pollution in the environment, brief overview of the history of pub- other plastic wastes. As noted by including in the world’s oceans. lic and industry awareness of marine the United States’ National Oce- Plastic is a pollutant of unique con- plastic pollution. Although this his- anic and Atmospheric Administra- cern because it is durable over long torical account is detailed, it is far tion (NOAA), “[p]rior to the 1950s periods of time and its effects accu- from comprehensive, and additional much of the fishing gear and land- mulate as more of it is produced and research is forthcoming. -
Food Packaging Technology
FOOD PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY Edited by RICHARD COLES Consultant in Food Packaging, London DEREK MCDOWELL Head of Supply and Packaging Division Loughry College, Northern Ireland and MARK J. KIRWAN Consultant in Packaging Technology London Blackwell Publishing © 2003 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered Editorial Offices: trademarks, and are used only for identification 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ and explanation, without intent to infringe. Tel: +44 (0) 1865 776868 108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK First published 2003 Tel: +44 (0) 1865 791100 Blackwell Munksgaard, 1 Rosenørns Allè, Library of Congress Cataloging in P.O. Box 227, DK-1502 Copenhagen V, Publication Data Denmark A catalog record for this title is available Tel: +45 77 33 33 33 from the Library of Congress Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd, 550 Swanston Street, Carlton South, British Library Cataloguing in Victoria 3053, Australia Publication Data Tel: +61 (0)3 9347 0300 A catalogue record for this title is available Blackwell Publishing, 10 rue Casimir from the British Library Delavigne, 75006 Paris, France ISBN 1–84127–221–3 Tel: +33 1 53 10 33 10 Originated as Sheffield Academic Press Published in the USA and Canada (only) by Set in 10.5/12pt Times CRC Press LLC by Integra Software Services Pvt Ltd, 2000 Corporate Blvd., N.W. Pondicherry, India Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA Printed and bound in Great Britain, Orders from the USA and Canada (only) to using acid-free paper by CRC Press LLC MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin, Cornwall USA and Canada only: For further information on ISBN 0–8493–9788–X Blackwell Publishing, visit our website: The right of the Author to be identified as the www.blackwellpublishing.com Author of this Work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. -
North American Recycled Plastic Processing Capacity Increases Published January 17, 2020
NERC‐NEWMOA REGIONAL RECYCLING MARKETS COMMITTEE North American Recycled Plastic Processing Capacity Increases Published January 17, 2020 INTRODUCTION The following is a list of increases in North American capacity to process recyclable plastics into products such as plastic lumber, pellets or resins for end‐markets. These increases were announced or completed in 2017 or later. The list covers facilities that have been publicly identified in either the trade or local press. Details of these new plastic processing facilities tend to have less information than similar announcements of expanded recycled end‐market capacity in the paper industry. For instance, announcements of projected opening dates have not, in many cases, been accompanied by press releases or news stories confirming the opening. In addition, few of the facilities are taking mixed plastics. Instead, they are relying on MRFs or other processors to do the initial resin sorting. Each facility listing includes: Name and whether new or expanded facility location projected processing capacity (input) and/or production capacity (output) in tons per year (TPY) 1 product projected opening date This list will be updated as new capacity is announced or new information received. If you have information about capacity expansions not listed here or corrections to the information on this list, please contact Chaz Miller, Chair, NERC‐NEWMOA Regional Recycling Markets Committee, [email protected], 301‐346‐6507. List of acronyms ABS = acrylonitrile butadiene styrene PET = polyethylene terephthalate EPS = expanded polystyrene PP = polypropylene HDPE = high density polyethylene PVC = poly vinyl chloride LDPE = low density polyethylene RPET = recycled PET LLDPE = linear low‐density polyethylene TPM = tons per month PC = polycarbonate TPY = tons per year 1 Some facilities reported in metric tonnes per year. -
Bio-Based and Biodegradable Plastics – Facts and Figures Focus on Food Packaging in the Netherlands
Bio-based and biodegradable plastics – Facts and Figures Focus on food packaging in the Netherlands Martien van den Oever, Karin Molenveld, Maarten van der Zee, Harriëtte Bos Rapport nr. 1722 Bio-based and biodegradable plastics - Facts and Figures Focus on food packaging in the Netherlands Martien van den Oever, Karin Molenveld, Maarten van der Zee, Harriëtte Bos Report 1722 Colophon Title Bio-based and biodegradable plastics - Facts and Figures Author(s) Martien van den Oever, Karin Molenveld, Maarten van der Zee, Harriëtte Bos Number Wageningen Food & Biobased Research number 1722 ISBN-number 978-94-6343-121-7 DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.18174/408350 Date of publication April 2017 Version Concept Confidentiality No/yes+date of expiration OPD code OPD code Approved by Christiaan Bolck Review Intern Name reviewer Christaan Bolck Sponsor RVO.nl + Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs Client RVO.nl + Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs Wageningen Food & Biobased Research P.O. Box 17 NL-6700 AA Wageningen Tel: +31 (0)317 480 084 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.wur.nl/foodandbiobased-research © Wageningen Food & Biobased Research, institute within the legal entity Stichting Wageningen Research All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system of any nature, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. The publisher does not accept any liability for inaccuracies in this report. 2 © Wageningen Food & Biobased Research, institute within the legal entity Stichting Wageningen Research Preface For over 25 years Wageningen Food & Biobased Research (WFBR) is involved in research and development of bio-based materials and products. -
Plastic Recycling March 2020
Shenandoah County NEWS RELEASE Office of the County Administrator 600 N. Main Street, Suite 102 Woodstock, VA 22664 540-459-6165 FAX 540-459-6168 www.shenandoahcountyva.us For Immediate Release March 4, 2020 Media Contact: Patrick Felling, Director of Public Services 540-325-8982 [email protected] Shenandoah County Announces Changes to Recycling Program. (Woodstock, VA) — In response to ever changing recycling market conditions, Shenandoah County announced effective immediately they will only accept bottles and jugs for plastic recycling. According to Evan Vass, County Administrator, the County was informed in mid-February that their plastics recycling vendor would no longer accept most plastic types; only plastic numbers 1 and 2 in bottle or jug form are being accepted. “The Solid Waste program attempted to locate another vendor to recycle other types of plastic, but no viable alternatives could be located,” said Vass. The modification in Shenandoah County’s program follows that of changes affecting localities throughout the state and nation. Neighboring counties and cities, including Rockingham, Harrisonburg, Frederick and Winchester, have already restricted their recycling to plastic types 1 and 2. “We estimate that less than half of the plastic currently collected at County sites are bottles and jugs,” said Patrick Felling, County Director of Public Services. “Our staff will now spend hours every day sorting and separating the material that cannot be shipped out. We ask that those citizens using our recycling centers deposit only #1 and #2 bottles and jugs,” said Felling. Those plastics that cannot be recycled will be landfilled. Vass emphasized, “Our other recycling programs will continue, including cardboard, paper, glass, aluminum, and other scrap metals.” ### Page 1 of 1 .